Hubbry Logo
Oil refineryOil refineryMain
Open search
Oil refinery
Community hub
Oil refinery
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Oil refinery
Oil refinery
from Wikipedia

Anacortes Refinery, on the north end of March Point southeast of Anacortes, Washington, United States
Grangemouth Refinery, in Scotland
Jamnagar Refinery, the world's largest oil refinery, in Gujarat, India
Oil refinery in Brod, Republika Srpska

An oil refinery or petroleum refinery is an industrial process plant where petroleum (crude oil) is transformed and refined into products such as gasoline (petrol), diesel fuel, asphalt base, fuel oils, heating oil, kerosene, liquefied petroleum gas and petroleum naphtha.[1][2][3] Petrochemical feedstock like ethylene and propylene can also be produced directly by cracking crude oil without the need of using refined products of crude oil such as naphtha.[4][5] The crude oil feedstock has typically been processed by an oil production plant. There is usually an oil depot at or near an oil refinery for the storage of incoming crude oil feedstock as well as bulk liquid products. In 2020, the total capacity of global refineries for crude oil was about 101.2 million barrels per day.[6]

Oil refineries are typically large, sprawling industrial complexes with extensive piping running throughout, carrying streams of fluids between large chemical processing units, such as distillation columns. In many ways, oil refineries use many different technologies and can be thought of as types of chemical plants. Since December 2008, the world's largest oil refinery has been the Jamnagar Refinery owned by Reliance Industries, located in Gujarat, India, with a processing capacity of 1.24 million barrels (197,000 m3) per day.

Oil refineries are an essential part of the petroleum industry's downstream sector.[7]

History

[edit]

The Chinese were among the first civilizations to refine oil.[8] As early as the first century, the Chinese were refining crude oil for use as an energy source.[9][8] Between 512 and 518, in the late Northern Wei dynasty, the Chinese geographer, writer and politician Li Daoyuan introduced the process of refining oil into various lubricants in his famous work Commentary on the Water Classic.[10][9][8]

Crude oil was often distilled by Persian chemists, with clear descriptions given in handbooks such as those of Muhammad ibn Zakarīya Rāzi (c. 865–925).[11] The streets of Baghdad were paved with tar, derived from petroleum that became accessible from natural fields in the region. In the 9th century, oil fields were exploited in the area around modern Baku, Azerbaijan. These fields were described by the Arab geographer Abu al-Hasan 'Alī al-Mas'ūdī in the 10th century, and by Marco Polo in the 13th century, who described the output of those wells as hundreds of shiploads.[12] Arab and Persian chemists also distilled crude oil in order to produce flammable products for military purposes. Through Islamic Spain, distillation became available in Western Europe by the 12th century.[13]

In the Northern Song dynasty (960–1127), a workshop called the "Fierce Oil Workshop", was established in the city of Kaifeng to produce refined oil for the Song military as a weapon. The troops would then fill iron cans with refined oil and throw them toward the enemy troops, causing a fire – effectively the world's first "fire bomb". The workshop was one of the world's earliest oil refining factories where thousands of people worked to produce Chinese oil-powered weaponry.[14]

Prior to the nineteenth century, petroleum was known and utilized in various fashions in Babylon, Egypt, China, Philippines, Rome and Azerbaijan. However, the modern history of the petroleum industry is said to have begun in 1846 when Abraham Gessner of Nova Scotia, Canada devised a process to produce kerosene from coal. Shortly thereafter, in 1854, Ignacy Łukasiewicz began producing kerosene from hand-dug oil wells near the town of Krosno, Poland.

Romania was registered as the first country in world oil production statistics, according to the Academy Of World Records.[15][16]

In North America, the first oil well was drilled in 1858 by James Miller Williams in Oil Springs, Ontario, Canada.[17] In the United States, the petroleum industry began in 1859 when Edwin Drake found oil near Titusville, Pennsylvania.[18] The industry grew slowly in the 1800s, primarily producing kerosene for oil lamps. In the early twentieth century, the introduction of the internal combustion engine and its use in automobiles created a market for gasoline that was the impetus for fairly rapid growth of the petroleum industry. The early finds of petroleum like those in Ontario and Pennsylvania were soon outstripped by large oil "booms" in Oklahoma, Texas and California.[19]

Samuel Kier established America's first oil refinery in Pittsburgh on Seventh Avenue near Grant Street, in 1853.[20] Polish pharmacist and inventor Ignacy Łukasiewicz established an oil refinery in Jasło, then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire (now in Poland) in 1854.

The first large refinery opened at Ploiești, Romania, in 1856–1857.[15] It was in Ploiesti that, 51 years later, in 1908, Lazăr Edeleanu, a Romanian chemist of Jewish origin who got his PhD in 1887 by discovering amphetamine, invented, patented and tested on industrial scale the first modern method of liquid extraction for refining crude oil, the Edeleanu process. This increased the refining efficiency compared to pure fractional distillation and allowed a massive development of the refining plants. Successively, the process was implemented in France, Germany, U.S. and in a few decades became worldwide spread. In 1910 Edeleanu founded "Allgemeine Gesellschaft für Chemische Industrie" in Germany, which, given the success of the name, changed to Edeleanu GmbH, in 1930. During Nazi's time, the company was bought by the Deutsche Erdöl-AG and Edeleanu, being of Jewish origin, moved back to Romania. After the war, the trademark was used by the successor company EDELEANU Gesellschaft mbH Alzenau (RWE) for many petroleum products, while the company was lately integrated as EDL in the Pörner Group. The Ploiești refineries, after being taken over by Nazi Germany, were bombed in the 1943 Operation Tidal Wave by the Allies, during the Oil Campaign of World War II.

Another close contender for the title of hosting the world's oldest oil refinery is Salzbergen in Lower Saxony, Germany. Salzbergen's refinery was opened in 1860.

At one point, the refinery in Ras Tanura, Saudi Arabia owned by Saudi Aramco was claimed to be the largest oil refinery in the world. For most of the 20th century, the largest refinery was the Abadan Refinery in Iran. This refinery suffered extensive damage during the Iran–Iraq War. Since 25 December 2008, the world's largest refinery complex is the Jamnagar Refinery Complex, consisting of two refineries side by side operated by Reliance Industries Limited in Jamnagar, India with a combined production capacity of 1,240,000 barrels per day (197,000 m3/d), and SK Energy's Ulsan in South Korea with 840,000 bbl/d (134,000 m3/d). PDVSA's Paraguaná Refinery Complex in Paraguaná Peninsula, Venezuela, with a theoretical refining capacity of 940,000 bbl/d (149,000 m3/d) could be into the second place, but its effective run rates have been dramatically lower and publicly unaccounted, after Chavismo nationalized Venezuelan oil production, significantly decreasing its productivity.

Prior to World War II in the early 1940s, most petroleum refineries in the United States consisted simply of crude oil distillation units (often referred to as atmospheric crude oil distillation units). Some refineries also had vacuum distillation units as well as thermal cracking units such as visbreakers (viscosity breakers, units to lower the viscosity of the oil). All of the many other refining processes discussed below were developed during the war or within a few years after the war. They became commercially available within 5 to 10 years after the war ended and the worldwide petroleum industry experienced very rapid growth. The driving force for that growth in technology and in the number and size of refineries worldwide was the growing demand for automotive gasoline and aircraft fuel.

In the United States, for various complex economic and political reasons, the construction of new refineries came to a virtual stop in about the 1980s. However, many of the existing refineries in the United States have revamped many of their units and/or constructed add-on units in order to: increase their crude oil processing capacity, increase the octane rating of their product gasoline, lower the sulfur content of their diesel fuel and home heating fuels to comply with environmental regulations and comply with environmental air pollution and water pollution requirements.

Baton Rouge Refinery (the sixth-largest in the United States)[21]

United States

[edit]
Refinery, Bayport Industrial Complex, Harris County, Texas

In the 19th century, refineries in the U.S. processed crude oil primarily to recover the kerosene. There was no market for the more volatile fraction, including gasoline, which was considered waste and was often dumped directly into the nearest river. The invention of the automobile shifted demand to gasoline and diesel, which remain the primary refined products today.[22]

Today, national and state legislation require refineries to meet stringent air and water cleanliness standards. In fact, oil companies in the U.S. perceive obtaining a permit to build a modern refinery to be so difficult and costly that no new refineries were built (though many have been expanded) in the U.S. from 1976 until 2014 when the small Dakota Prairie Refinery in North Dakota began operation.[23] More than half the refineries that existed in 1981 are now closed due to low utilization rates and accelerating mergers.[24] As a result of these closures total US refinery capacity fell between 1981 and 1995, though the operating capacity stayed fairly constant in that time period at around 15,000,000 barrels per day (2,400,000 m3/d).[25] Increases in facility size and improvements in efficiencies have offset much of the lost physical capacity of the industry. In 1982 (the earliest data provided), the United States operated 301 refineries with a combined capacity of 17.9 million barrels (2,850,000 m3) of crude oil each calendar day. In 2010, there were 149 operable U.S. refineries with a combined capacity of 17.6 million barrels (2,800,000 m3) per calendar day.[26] By 2014 the number of refinery had reduced to 140 but the total capacity increased to 18.02 million barrels (2,865,000 m3) per calendar day. Indeed, in order to reduce operating costs and depreciation, refining is operated in fewer sites but of bigger capacity.

In 2009 through 2010, as revenue streams in the oil business dried up and profitability of oil refineries fell due to lower demand for product and high reserves of supply preceding the economic recession, oil companies began to close or sell the less profitable refineries.[27]

Operation

[edit]
Neste Oil refinery in Porvoo, Finland

Raw or unprocessed crude oil is not generally useful in industrial applications, although "light, sweet" (low viscosity, low sulfur) crude oil has been used directly as a burner fuel to produce steam for the propulsion of seagoing vessels. The lighter elements, however, form explosive vapors in the fuel tanks and are therefore hazardous, especially in warships. Instead, the hundreds of different hydrocarbon molecules in crude oil are separated in a refinery into components that can be used as fuels, lubricants, and feedstocks in petrochemical processes that manufacture such products as plastics, detergents, solvents, elastomers, and fibers such as nylon and polyesters.

Petroleum fossil fuels are burned in internal combustion engines to provide power for ships, automobiles, aircraft engines, lawn mowers, dirt bikes, and other machines. Different boiling points allow the hydrocarbons to be separated by distillation. Since the lighter liquid products are in great demand for use in internal combustion engines, a modern refinery will convert heavy hydrocarbons and lighter gaseous elements into these higher-value products.[28]

The oil refinery in Haifa, Israel, is capable of processing about 9 million tons (66 million barrels) of crude oil a year. Its two cooling towers are landmarks of the city's skyline.

Oil can be used in a variety of ways because it contains hydrocarbons of varying molecular masses, forms and lengths such as paraffins, aromatics, naphthenes (or cycloalkanes), alkenes, dienes, and alkynes.[29] While the molecules in crude oil include different atoms such as sulfur and nitrogen, the hydrocarbons are the most common form of molecules, which are molecules of varying lengths and complexity made of hydrogen and carbon atoms, and a small number of oxygen atoms. The differences in the structure of these molecules account for their varying physical and chemical properties, and it is this variety that makes crude oil useful in a broad range of several applications.

Once separated and purified of any contaminants and impurities, the fuel or lubricant can be sold without further processing. Smaller molecules such as isobutane and propylene or butylenes can be recombined to meet specific octane requirements by processes such as alkylation, or more commonly, dimerization. The octane grade of gasoline can also be improved by catalytic reforming, which involves removing hydrogen from hydrocarbons producing compounds with higher octane ratings such as aromatics. Intermediate products such as gasoils can even be reprocessed to break a heavy, long-chained oil into a lighter short-chained one, by various forms of cracking such as fluid catalytic cracking, thermal cracking, and hydrocracking. The final step in gasoline production is the blending of fuels with different octane ratings, vapor pressures, and other properties to meet product specifications. Another method for reprocessing and upgrading these intermediate products (residual oils) uses a devolatilization process to separate usable oil from the waste asphaltene material. Certain cracked streams are particularly suitable to produce petrochemicals includes polypropylene, heavier polymers, and block polymers based on the molecular weight and the characteristics of the olefin specie that is cracked from the source feedstock.[30]

Oil refineries are large-scale plants, processing about a hundred thousand to several hundred thousand barrels of crude oil a day. Because of the high capacity, many of the units operate continuously, as opposed to processing in batches, at steady state or nearly steady state for months to years. The high capacity also makes process optimization and advanced process control very desirable.

Major products

[edit]
Crude oil is separated into fractions by fractional distillation. The fractions at the top of the fractionating column have lower boiling points than the fractions at the bottom. The heavy bottom fractions are often cracked into lighter, more useful products. All of the fractions are processed further in other refining units.
A breakdown of the products made from a typical barrel of US oil[31]

Petroleum products are materials derived from crude oil (petroleum) as it is processed in oil refineries. The majority of petroleum is converted to petroleum products, which includes several classes of fuels.[32]

Oil refineries also produce various intermediate products such as hydrogen, light hydrocarbons, reformate and pyrolysis gasoline. These are not usually transported but instead are blended or processed further on-site. Chemical plants are thus often adjacent to oil refineries or a number of further chemical processes are integrated into it. For example, light hydrocarbons are steam-cracked in an ethylene plant, and the produced ethylene is polymerized to produce polyethene.

To ensure both proper separation and environmental protection, a very low sulfur content is necessary in all but the heaviest products. The crude sulfur contaminant is transformed to hydrogen sulfide via catalytic hydrodesulfurization and removed from the product stream via amine gas treating. Using the Claus process, hydrogen sulfide is afterward transformed to elementary sulfur to be sold to the chemical industry. The rather large heat energy freed by this process is directly used in the other parts of the refinery. Often an electrical power plant is combined into the whole refinery process to take up the excess heat.

According to the composition of the crude oil and depending on the demands of the market, refineries can produce different shares of petroleum products. The largest share of oil products is used as "energy carriers", i.e. various grades of fuel oil and gasoline. These fuels include or can be blended to give gasoline, jet fuel, diesel fuel, heating oil, and heavier fuel oils. Heavier (less volatile) fractions can also be used to produce asphalt, tar, paraffin wax, lubricating and other heavy oils. Refineries also produce other chemicals, some of which are used in chemical processes to produce plastics and other useful materials. Since petroleum often contains a few percent sulfur-containing molecules, elemental sulfur is also often produced as a petroleum product. Carbon, in the form of petroleum coke, and hydrogen may also be produced as petroleum products. The hydrogen produced is often used as an intermediate product for other oil refinery processes such as hydrocracking and hydrodesulfurization.[33]

Petroleum products are usually grouped into four categories: light distillates (LPG, gasoline, naphtha), middle distillates (kerosene, jet fuel, diesel), heavy distillates, and residuum (heavy fuel oil, lubricating oils, wax, asphalt). These require blending various feedstocks, mixing appropriate additives, providing short-term storage, and preparation for bulk loading to trucks, barges, product ships, and railcars. This classification is based on the way crude oil is distilled and separated into fractions.[2]

Over 6,000 items are made from petroleum waste by-products, including fertilizer, floor coverings, perfume, insecticide, petroleum jelly, soap, and vitamin capsules.[34]

Chemical processes

[edit]
Storage tanks and towers at Shell Puget Sound Refinery (Shell Oil Company), Anacortes, Washington
  • Desalter unit washes out salt, and other water soluble contaminants, from the crude oil before it enters the atmospheric distillation unit.[35][36][37]
  • Pre-flash and/or pre-distillation which is found in most atmospheric crude oil units of more than 100,000 bpsd in capacity.[38]
  • Crude oil distillation unit distills the incoming crude oil into various fractions for further processing in other units. See continuous distillation.[39][40][41][42][43]
  • Vacuum distillation further distills the residue oil from the bottom of the crude oil distillation unit. The vacuum distillation is performed at a pressure well below atmospheric pressure.[39][40][41][42][43]
  • Naphtha hydrotreater unit uses hydrogen to desulfurize naphtha from atmospheric distillation. Naphtha must be desulfurized before sending it to a catalytic reformer unit.[1][44]
  • Catalytic reformer converts the desulfurized naphtha molecules into higher-octane molecules to produce reformate (reformer product). The reformate has higher content of aromatics and cyclic hydrocarbons which is a component of the end-product gasoline or petrol. An important byproduct of a reformer is hydrogen released during the catalyst reaction. The hydrogen is used either in the hydrotreaters or the hydrocracker.[45][46]
  • Distillate hydrotreater desulfurizes distillates (such as diesel) after atmospheric distillation. Uses hydrogen to desulfurize the naphtha fraction from the crude oil distillation or other units within the refinery.[1][44] Distillate hydrotreaters that operate above 700 psi are also capable of removing nitrogen contaminants from feedstocks if given adequate liquid hourly space velocity.[47]
  • Fluid catalytic cracker (FCC) upgrades the heavier, higher-boiling fractions from the crude oil distillation by converting them into lighter and lower boiling, more valuable products.[48][3][49]
  • Hydrocracker uses hydrogen to upgrade heavy residual oils from the vacuum distillation unit by thermally cracking them into lighter, more valuable reduced viscosity products.[50][51]
  • Merox desulfurize LPG, kerosene or jet fuel by oxidizing mercaptans to organic disulfides.
  • Alternative processes for removing mercaptans are known, e.g. doctor sweetening process and caustic washing.
  • Coking units (delayed coker, fluid coker, and flexicoker) process very heavy residual oils into gasoline and diesel fuel, leaving petroleum coke as a residual product.
  • Alkylation unit uses sulfuric acid or hydrofluoric acid to produce high-octane components for gasoline blending. The "alky" unit converts light end isobutane and butylenes from the FCC process into alkylate, a very high-octane component of the end-product gasoline or petrol.[52]
  • Dimerization unit converts olefins into higher-octane gasoline blending components. For example, butenes can be dimerized into isooctene which may subsequently be hydrogenated to form isooctane. There are also other uses for dimerization. Gasoline produced through dimerization is highly unsaturated and very reactive. It tends spontaneously to form gums. For this reason, the effluent from the dimerization needs to be blended into the finished gasoline pool immediately or hydrogenated.
  • Isomerization converts linear molecules such as normal pentane to higher-octane branched molecules for blending into gasoline or feed to alkylation units. Also used to convert linear normal butane into isobutane for use in the alkylation unit.
  • Steam reforming converts natural gas into hydrogen for the hydrotreaters and/or the hydrocracker.
  • Liquified gas storage vessels store propane and similar gaseous fuels at pressure sufficient to maintain them in liquid form. These are usually spherical vessels or "bullets" (i.e., horizontal vessels with rounded ends).
  • Amine gas treater, Claus unit, and tail gas treatment convert hydrogen sulfide from hydrodesulfurization into elemental sulfur. The large majority of the 64,000,000 metric tons of sulfur produced worldwide in 2005 was byproduct sulfur from petroleum refining and natural gas processing plants.[53][54]
  • Sour water stripper uses steam to remove hydrogen sulfide gas from various wastewater streams for subsequent conversion into end-product sulfur in the Claus unit.[37]
  • Cooling towers circulate cooling water, boiler plants generates steam for steam generators, and instrument air systems include pneumatically operated control valves and an electrical substation.
  • Wastewater collection and treating systems consist of API separators, dissolved air flotation (DAF) units and further treatment units such as an activated sludge biotreater to make water suitable for reuse or for disposal.[55]
  • Solvent refining uses solvent such as cresol or furfural to remove unwanted, mainly aromatics from lubricating oil stock or diesel stock.
  • Solvent dewaxing removes the heavy waxy constituents petrolatum from vacuum distillation products.
  • Storage tanks for storing crude oil and finished products, usually vertical, cylindrical vessels with some sort of vapor emission control and surrounded by an earthen berm to contain spills.

Flow diagram of typical refinery

[edit]

The image below is a schematic flow diagram of a typical oil refinery that depicts the various unit processes and the flow of intermediate product streams that occurs between the inlet crude oil feedstock and the final end products. The diagram depicts only one of the literally hundreds of different oil refinery configurations. The diagram also does not include any of the usual refinery facilities providing utilities such as steam, cooling water, and electric power as well as storage tanks for crude oil feedstock and for intermediate products and end products.[1][56][57][58]

Schematic flow diagram of a typical oil refinery

There are many process configurations other than that depicted above. For example, the vacuum distillation unit may also produce fractions that can be refined into end products such as spindle oil used in the textile industry, light machine oil, motor oil, and various waxes.

Crude oil distillation unit

[edit]

The crude oil distillation unit (CDU) is the first processing unit in virtually all petroleum refineries. The CDU distills the incoming crude oil into various fractions of different boiling ranges, each of which is then processed further in the other refinery processing units. The CDU is often referred to as the atmospheric distillation unit because it operates at slightly above atmospheric pressure.[1][2][41] Below is a schematic flow diagram of a typical crude oil distillation unit. The incoming crude oil is preheated by exchanging heat with some of the hot, distilled fractions and other streams. It is then desalted to remove inorganic salts (primarily sodium chloride).

Following the desalter, the crude oil is further heated by exchanging heat with some of the hot, distilled fractions and other streams. It is then heated in a fuel-fired furnace (fired heater) to a temperature of about 398 °C and routed into the bottom of the distillation unit.

The cooling and condensing of the distillation tower overhead is provided partially by exchanging heat with the incoming crude oil and partially by either an air-cooled or water-cooled condenser. Additional heat is removed from the distillation column by a pumparound system as shown in the diagram below.

As shown in the flow diagram, the overhead distillate fraction from the distillation column is naphtha. The fractions removed from the side of the distillation column at various points between the column top and bottom are called sidecuts. Each of the sidecuts (i.e., the kerosene, light gas oil, and heavy gas oil) is cooled by exchanging heat with the incoming crude oil. All of the fractions (i.e., the overhead naphtha, the sidecuts, and the bottom residue) are sent to intermediate storage tanks before being processed further.

Schematic flow diagram of a typical crude oil distillation unit as used in petroleum crude oil refineries

Location of refineries

[edit]

A party searching for a site to construct a refinery or a chemical plant needs to consider the following issues:

  • The site has to be reasonably far from residential areas.
  • Infrastructure should be available for the supply of raw materials and shipment of products to markets.
  • Energy to operate the plant should be available.
  • Facilities should be available for waste disposal.

Factors affecting site selection for oil refinery:

  • Availability of land
  • Conditions of traffic and transportation
  • Conditions of utilities – power supply, water supply
  • Availability of labours and resources

Refineries that use a large amount of steam and cooling water need to have an abundant source of water. Oil refineries, therefore, are often located nearby navigable rivers or on a seashore, nearby a port. Such location also gives access to transportation by river or by sea. The advantages of transporting crude oil by pipeline are evident, and oil companies often transport a large volume of fuel to distribution terminals by pipeline. A pipeline may not be practical for products with small output, and railcars, road tankers, and barges are used.

Petrochemical plants and solvent manufacturing (fine fractionating) plants need spaces for further processing of a large volume of refinery products, or to mix chemical additives with a product at source rather than at blending terminals.

Safety and environment

[edit]
Fire-extinguishing operations after the Texas City refinery explosion

The refining process releases a number of different chemicals into the atmosphere (see AP 42 Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors) and a notable odor normally accompanies the presence of a refinery. Aside from air pollution impacts there are also wastewater concerns,[55] risks of industrial accidents such as fire and explosion, and noise health effects due to industrial noise.[59]

Many governments worldwide have mandated restrictions on contaminants that refineries release, and most refineries have installed the equipment needed to comply with the requirements of the pertinent environmental protection regulatory agencies. In the United States, there is strong pressure to prevent the development of new refineries, and no major refinery has been built in the country since Marathon's Garyville, Louisiana facility in 1976. However, many existing refineries have been expanded during that time. Environmental restrictions and pressure to prevent the construction of new refineries may have also contributed to rising fuel prices in the United States.[60] Additionally, many refineries (more than 100 since the 1980s) have closed due to obsolescence and/or merger activity within the industry itself.[61]

Environmental and safety concerns mean that oil refineries are sometimes located some distance away from major urban areas. Nevertheless, there are many instances where refinery operations are close to populated areas and pose health risks.[62][63] In California's Contra Costa County and Solano County, a shoreline necklace of refineries, built in the early 20th century before this area was populated, and associated chemical plants are adjacent to urban areas in Richmond, Martinez, Pacheco, Concord, Pittsburg, Vallejo and Benicia, with occasional accidental events that require "shelter in place" orders to the adjacent populations. A number of refineries are located in Sherwood Park, Alberta, directly adjacent to the City of Edmonton, which has a population of over 1,000,000 residents.[64]

NIOSH criteria for occupational exposure to refined petroleum solvents have been available since 1977.[65]

Worker health

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Modern petroleum refining involves a complicated system of interrelated chemical reactions that produce a wide variety of petroleum-based products.[66][67] Many of these reactions require precise temperature and pressure parameters.[68]  The equipment and monitoring required to ensure the proper progression of these processes is complex, and has evolved through the advancement of the scientific field of petroleum engineering.[69][70]

The wide array of high pressure and/or high temperature reactions, along with the necessary chemical additives or extracted contaminants, produces an astonishing number of potential health hazards to the oil refinery worker.[71][72]  Through the advancement of technical chemical and petroleum engineering, the vast majority of these processes are automated and enclosed, thus greatly reducing the potential health impact to workers.[73]  However, depending on the specific process in which a worker is engaged, as well as the particular method employed by the refinery in which he/she works, significant health hazards remain.[74]

Although occupational injuries in the United States were not routinely tracked and reported at the time, reports of the health impacts of working in an oil refinery can be found as early as the 1800s. For instance, an explosion in a Chicago refinery killed 20 workers in 1890.[75] Since then, numerous fires, explosions, and other significant events have from time to time drawn the public's attention to the health of oil refinery workers.[76] Such events continue in the 21st century, with explosions reported in refineries in Wisconsin and Germany in 2018.[77]

However, there are many less visible hazards that endanger oil refinery workers.

Chemical exposures

[edit]

Given the highly automated and technically advanced nature of modern petroleum refineries, nearly all processes are contained within engineering controls and represent a substantially decreased risk of exposure to workers compared to earlier times.[73] However, certain situations or work tasks may subvert these safety mechanisms, and expose workers to a number of chemical (see table above) or physical (described below) hazards.[78][79] Examples of these scenarios include:

  • System failures (leaks, explosions, etc.).[80][81]
  • Standard inspection, product sampling, process turnaround, or equipment maintenance/cleaning activities.[78][79]

A 2021 systematic review associated working in the petrochemical industry with increased risk of various cancers, such as mesothelioma. It also found reduced risks of other cancers, such as stomach and rectal. The systematic review did mention that several of the associations were not due to factors directly related to the petroleum industry, rather were related to lifestyle factors such as smoking. Evidence for adverse health effects for nearby residents was also weak, with the evidence primarily centering around neighborhoods in developed countries.[82]

BTX stands for benzene, toluene, xylene. This is a group of common volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are found in the oil refinery environment, and serve as a paradigm for more in depth discussion of occupational exposure limits, chemical exposure and surveillance among refinery workers.[83][84]

The most important route of exposure for BTX chemicals is inhalation due to the low boiling point of these chemicals. The majority of the gaseous production of BTX occurs during tank cleaning and fuel transfer, which causes offgassing of these chemicals into the air.[85] Exposure can also occur through ingestion via contaminated water, but this is unlikely in an occupational setting.[86] Dermal exposure and absorption is also possible, but is again less likely in an occupational setting where appropriate personal protective equipment is in place.[86]

In the United States, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) have all established occupational exposure limits (OELs) for many of the chemicals above that workers may be exposed to in petroleum refineries.[87][88][89]

Occupational exposure limits for BTX chemicals
OSHA PEL (8-hour TWA) CalOSHA PEL (8-hour TWA) NIOSH REL (10-hour TWA) ACGIH TLV (8-hour TWA)
Benzene 10 ppm 1 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.5 ppm
Toluene 200 ppm 10 ppm 100 ppm 20 ppm
Xylene 100 ppmx 100 ppm 100 ppm 100 ppm
Sources:[90][91][92][87][93]

Benzene, in particular, has multiple biomarkers that can be measured to determine exposure. Benzene itself can be measured in the breath, blood, and urine, and metabolites such as phenol, t,t-muconic acid (t,tMA) and S-phenylmercapturic acid (sPMA) can be measured in urine.[94] In addition to monitoring the exposure levels via these biomarkers, employers are required by OSHA to perform regular blood tests on workers to test for early signs of some of the feared hematologic outcomes, of which the most widely recognized is leukemia. Required testing includes complete blood count with cell differentials and peripheral blood smear "on a regular basis".[95] The utility of these tests is supported by formal scientific studies.[96]

Potential chemical exposure by process

[edit]
Process Potential chemical exposure[97] Common health concerns[98]
Solvent extraction and dewaxing Phenol[99] Neurologic symptoms, muscle weakness, skin irritation.
Furfural[100] Skin irritation
Glycols Central nervous system depression, weakness, irritation of the eyes, skin, nose, throat.
Methyl ethyl ketone[101] Airway irritation, cough, dyspnea, pulmonary edema.
Thermal cracking Hydrogen sulfide[102] Irritation of the respiratory tract, headache, visual disturbances, eye pain.
Carbon monoxide[103] Electrocardiogram changes, cyanosis, headache, weakness.
Ammonia[104] Respiratory tract irritation, dyspnea, pulmonary edema, skin burns.
Catalytic cracking Hydrogen sulfide[102] Irritation of the respiratory tract, headache, visual disturbances, eye pain.
Carbon monoxide[103] Electrocardiogram changes, cyanosis, headache, weakness.
Phenol[99] Neurologic symptoms, muscle weakness, skin irritation.
Ammonia[104] Respiratory tract irritation, dyspnea, pulmonary edema, skin burns.
Mercaptan[105][106] Cyanosis and narcosis, irritation of the respiratory tract, skin, and eyes.
Nickel carbonyl[107] Headache, teratogen, weakness, chest/abdominal pain, lung and nasal cancer.
Catalytic reforming Hydrogen sulfide[102] Irritation of the respiratory tract, headache, visual disturbances, eye pain.
Benzene[108] Leukemia, nervous system effects, respiratory symptoms.
Isomerization Hydrochloric acid Skin damage, respiratory tract irritation, eye burns.
Hydrogen chloride Respiratory tract irritation, skin irritation, eye burns.
Polymerization Sodium hydroxide[109] Irritation of the mucous membranes, skin, pneumonitis.
Phosphoric acid Skin, eye, respiratory irritation.
Alkylation Sulfuric acid Eye and skin burns, pulmonary edema.
Hydrofluoric acid Bone changes, skin burns, respiratory tract damage.
Sweetening and treating Hydrogen sulfide[102] Irritation of the respiratory tract, headache, visual disturbances, eye pain.
Sodium hydroxide[109] Irritation of the mucous membranes, skin, pneumonitis.
Unsaturated gas recovery Monoethanolamine (MEA) Drowsiness, irritation of the eyes, skin, and respiratory tract.
Diethanolamine (DEA) Corneal necrosis, skin burns, irritation of the eyes, nose, throat.
Amine treatment Monoethanolamine (MEA) Drowsiness, irritation of the eyes, skin, and respiratory tract.
Diethanolamine (DEA) Corneal necrosis, skin burns, irritation of the eyes, nose, throat.
Hydrogen sulfide[102] Irritation of the respiratory tract, headache, visual disturbances, eye pain.
Carbon dioxide Headache, dizziness, paresthesia, malaise, tachycardia.
Saturated gas extraction Hydrogen sulfide[102] Irritation of the respiratory tract, headache, visual disturbances, eye pain.
Carbon dioxide[110] Headache, dizziness, paresthesia, malaise, tachycardia.
Diethanolamine Corneal necrosis, skin burns, irritation of the eyes, nose, throat.
Sodium hydroxide[109] Irritation of the mucous membranes, skin, pneumonitis.
Hydrogen production Carbon monoxide[103] Electrocardiogram changes, cyanosis, headache, weakness.
Carbon dioxide[110] Headache, dizziness, paresthesia, malaise, tachycardia.

Physical hazards

[edit]

Workers are at risk of physical injuries due to a large number of high-powered machines in the relatively close proximity of the oil refinery. The high pressure required for many of the chemical reactions also presents the possibility of localized system failures resulting in blunt or penetrating trauma from exploding system components.[111]

Heat is also a hazard. The temperature required for the proper progression of certain reactions in the refining process can reach 1,600 °F (870 °C).[73] As with chemicals, the operating system is designed to safely contain this hazard without injury to the worker. However, in system failures, this is a potent threat to workers' health. Concerns include both direct injury through a heat illness or injury, as well as the potential for devastating burns should the worker come in contact with super-heated reagents/equipment.[73]

Noise is another hazard. Refineries can be very loud environments, and have previously been shown to be associated with hearing loss among workers.[112] The interior environment of an oil refinery can reach levels in excess of 90 dB.[113][59] In the United States, an average of 90 dB is the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for an 8-hour work-day.[114] Noise exposures that average greater than 85 dB over an 8-hour require a hearing conservation program to regularly evaluate workers' hearing and to promote its protection.[115]  Regular evaluation of workers' auditory capacity and faithful use of properly vetted hearing protection are essential parts of such programs.[116]

While not specific to the industry, oil refinery workers may also be at risk for hazards such as vehicle-related accidents, machinery-associated injuries, work in a confined space, explosions/fires, ergonomic hazards, shift-work related sleep disorders, and falls.[117]

Hazard controls

[edit]

The theory of hierarchy of controls can be applied to petroleum refineries and their efforts to ensure worker safety.

Elimination and substitution are unlikely in petroleum refineries, as many of the raw materials, waste products, and finished products are hazardous in one form or another (e.g. flammable, carcinogenic).[97][118]

Examples of engineering controls include a fire detection/extinguishing system, pressure/chemical sensors to detect/predict loss of structural integrity,[119] and adequate maintenance of piping to prevent hydrocarbon-induced corrosion (leading to structural failure).[80][81][120][121] Other examples employed in petroleum refineries include the post-construction protection of steel components with vermiculite to improve heat/fire resistance.[122] Compartmentalization can help to prevent a fire or other systems failure from spreading to affect other areas of the structure, and may help prevent dangerous reactions by keeping different chemicals separate from one another until they can be safely combined in the proper environment.[119]

Administrative controls include careful planning and oversight of the refinery cleaning, maintenance, and turnaround processes. These occur when many of the engineering controls are shut down or suppressed and may be especially dangerous to workers. Detailed coordination is necessary to ensure that maintenance of one part of the facility will not cause dangerous exposures to those performing the maintenance, or to workers in other areas of the plant. Due to the highly flammable nature of many of the involved chemicals, smoking areas are tightly controlled and carefully placed.[78]

Personal protective equipment (PPE) may be necessary depending on the specific chemical being processed or produced. Particular care is needed during sampling of the partially completed product, tank cleaning, and other high-risk tasks as mentioned above. Such activities may require the use of impervious outerwear, acid hood, disposable coveralls, etc.[78] More generally, all personnel in operating areas should use appropriate hearing and vision protection, avoid clothes made of flammable material (nylon, Dacron, acrylic, or blends), and full-length pants and sleeves.[78]

Regulations

[edit]

United States

[edit]

Worker health and safety in oil refineries is closely monitored at a national level by both the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).[123][124] In addition to federal monitoring, California's CalOSHA has been particularly active in protecting worker health in the industry, and adopted a policy in 2017 that requires petroleum refineries to perform a "Hierarchy of Hazard Controls Analysis" (see above "Hazard controls" section) for each process safety hazard.[125] Safety regulations have resulted in a below-average injury rate for refining industry workers. In a 2018 report by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, they indicate that petroleum refinery workers have a significantly lower rate of occupational injury (0.4 OSHA-recordable cases per 100 full-time workers) than all industries (3.1 cases), oil and gas extraction (0.8 cases), and petroleum manufacturing in general (1.3 cases).[126]

Below is a list of the most common regulations referenced in petroleum refinery safety citations issued by OSHA:[127]

Corrosion

[edit]
Refinery of Slovnaft in Bratislava
Oil refinery in Iran

Corrosion of metallic components is a major factor of inefficiency in the refining process. Because it leads to equipment failure, it is a primary driver for the refinery maintenance schedule. Corrosion-related direct costs in the U.S. petroleum industry as of 1996 were estimated at US$3.7 billion.[121][128]

Corrosion occurs in various forms in the refining process, such as pitting corrosion from water droplets, embrittlement from hydrogen, and stress corrosion cracking from sulfide attack.[129] From a materials standpoint, carbon steel is used for upwards of 80 percent of refinery components, which is beneficial due to its low cost. Carbon steel is resistant to the most common forms of corrosion, particularly from hydrocarbon impurities at temperatures below 205 °C, but other corrosive chemicals and environments prevent its use everywhere. Common replacement materials are low alloy steels containing chromium and molybdenum, with stainless steels containing more chromium dealing with more corrosive environments. More expensive materials commonly used are nickel, titanium, and copper alloys. These are primarily saved for the most problematic areas where extremely high temperatures and/or very corrosive chemicals are present.[130]

Corrosion is fought by a complex system of monitoring, preventative repairs, and careful use of materials. Monitoring methods include both offline checks taken during maintenance and online monitoring. Offline checks measure corrosion after it has occurred, telling the engineer when equipment must be replaced based on the historical information they have collected. This is referred to as preventative management.

Online systems are a more modern development and are revolutionizing the way corrosion is approached. There are several types of online corrosion monitoring technologies such as linear polarization resistance, electrochemical noise and electrical resistance. Online monitoring has generally had slow reporting rates in the past (minutes or hours) and been limited by process conditions and sources of error but newer technologies can report rates up to twice per minute with much higher accuracy (referred to as real-time monitoring). This allows process engineers to treat corrosion as another process variable that can be optimized in the system. Immediate responses to process changes allow the control of corrosion mechanisms, so they can be minimized while also maximizing production output.[120] In an ideal situation having on-line corrosion information that is accurate and real-time will allow conditions that cause high corrosion rates to be identified and reduced. This is known as predictive management.

Materials methods include selecting the proper material for the application. In areas of minimal corrosion, cheap materials are preferable, but when bad corrosion can occur, more expensive but longer-lasting materials should be used. Other materials methods come in the form of protective barriers between corrosive substances and the equipment metals. These can be either a lining of refractory material such as standard Portland cement or other special acid-resistant cement that is shot onto the inner surface of the vessel. Also available are thin overlays of more expensive metals that protect cheaper metal against corrosion without requiring much material.[131]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
An oil refinery is an industrial installation that manufactures finished products from crude oil, unfinished oils, liquids, other hydrocarbons, and such oxygenates as alcohols and ethers through processes including , cracking, reforming, treating, and blending. These facilities convert raw crude oil, a complex mixture of hydrocarbons varying in size and structure, into high-value products essential for transportation fuels, heating, road paving, , and feedstocks. The primary process begins with , separating crude oil into fractions like , , and heavier residues based on boiling points, followed by secondary conversion units that break down heavier molecules into lighter, more versatile ones to meet market demands. Refineries represent a critical node in the global supply chain, processing approximately 100 million barrels of crude oil daily worldwide as of recent estimates, with the alone operating facilities that handle over 17 million barrels per day. This capability has enabled the scalability of modern economies reliant on liquid fuels, though operations involve inherent risks such as fires, explosions, and emissions of pollutants like and volatile organic compounds, prompting ongoing investments in safety technologies and catalytic processes to reduce environmental impacts. Defining characteristics include their complexity, measured by which quantifies the extent of upgrading units relative to simple capacity, with high-complexity refineries yielding more and diesel from a barrel of crude. Despite regulatory pressures and shifts toward , refineries continue to adapt by producing cleaner fuels and co-products like lubricants and asphalt, underscoring their role in causal chains of production and consumption grounded in chemistry.

History

Early Innovations and Commercialization

In the mid-19th century, the development of marked a pivotal innovation in oil refining, enabling the separation of crude into useful fractions like . American chemist Benjamin Silliman Jr. conducted one of the earliest systematic applications of this technique to in 1855, analyzing rock oil and demonstrating its potential for producing illuminating oil through controlled heating and condensation of vapors. Earlier European experiments laid groundwork, with Scottish chemist James Young establishing a in to distill paraffin oil from and boghead deposits, producing commercial quantities of lighting oil by the early 1850s. These processes, rooted in empirical trials, addressed the growing demand for affordable illuminants amid scarce supplies. Commercialization accelerated in the United States following Edwin Drake's successful drilling of the first productive near , on August 27, 1859, which initiated systematic extraction at depths beyond surface seeps. This spurred the construction of rudimentary refineries focused on production via simple stills, with early operations like those of Kier in predating the boom by refining limited crude into lubricants and fuels since the 1850s. Pennsylvania's output exploded from approximately 220,000 barrels in 1860 to over 2 million barrels in 1861, averaging several thousand barrels per day by the mid-1860s and overwhelming initial infrastructure. The derived from rapidly displaced for lighting due to its lower cost—often under $0.50 per gallon by the 1860s compared to 's escalating prices from overharvesting—and cleaner burning properties, contributing to a sharp decline in demand. Standardization emerged through John D. Rockefeller's , founded in 1870, which optimized refining efficiency by consolidating operations, improving still designs, and achieving from wells to distribution by the 1870s, controlling up to 90% of U.S. refining capacity through cost-driven innovations rather than mere scale.

Expansion in the 20th Century

The expansion of oil refining capacity in the 20th century paralleled the proliferation of internal combustion engines in automobiles and aircraft after 1900, as gasoline demand eclipsed kerosene by 1910 and drove the need for higher yields of light distillates from crude oil. Refineries initially relied on atmospheric distillation, which yielded only about 20% gasoline from typical crudes, but process innovations addressed this mismatch between straight-run outputs and market needs. Thermal cracking, pioneered by William Merriam Burton for in 1913, represented the first major breakthrough, operating at 700–750°F and 90 psi to convert heavier gas oils into and double yields relative to distillation alone. This method, implemented at the that same year, boosted light product output and set the stage for further advancements. In , fixed-bed catalytic cracking, developed by Eugene Houdry, employed catalysts to achieve higher-octane at milder conditions than thermal processes. accelerated innovation, with , , , and visbreaking scaled for aviation fuels; Germany's synthetic fuel plants, using and gas , supplied over 70% of its liquid fuels by 1944 amid Allied bombings. These technologies empirically raised light distillate yields beyond 50% in integrated operations. Postwar economic growth, including U.S. and highway expansion, spurred refinery construction to meet surging transportation needs, culminating in a U.S. operable capacity peak of 18 million barrels per day in 1981. The cartel's formation in initially had limited direct refining impacts but, combined with the 1973–1974 and 1979 oil shocks, prompted Western refiners to diversify crude sourcing away from Middle Eastern supplies and adopt conservation-oriented upgrades like improved cracking . These pressures reinforced the shift toward complex refineries capable of processing heavier, sourer crudes while maximizing and diesel outputs.

Modern Era and Geopolitical Influences

The U.S. boom, accelerating after 2008, dramatically increased domestic production of , reaching record levels that outpaced the capacity of many refineries designed for heavier imported crudes. This shift created processing challenges, as approximately 70% of U.S. refining infrastructure operates most efficiently with denser, heavier feedstocks typically sourced from imports, leading to adaptations like increased light oil blending and unit utilization to handle the surplus. Despite these dynamics, U.S. operable refinery capacity has remained largely stable at around 18.4 million barrels per day (bpd) as of January 1, 2025, reflecting minimal net expansions or closures amid steady demand and regulatory constraints. Globally, refinery throughputs have continued to rise, projected by the to average 83.5 million bpd in 2025, driven by recovering post-pandemic demand in and petrochemical feed needs. However, growth has slowed compared to prior decades, with refining margins peaking amid supply disruptions in 2022-2023 before declining significantly—falling up to 70% from those highs by mid-2023—due to oversupply risks, new capacity additions in regions like and , and softening fuel demand growth. This margin compression has pressured operators to optimize existing assets rather than pursue large-scale builds, contributing to capacity stasis in mature markets amid pressures. Geopolitical tensions have underscored refining vulnerabilities, particularly evident in the 2022 , which triggered sanctions on Russian oil exports and subsequent Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian facilities. These attacks, escalating from 2022 onward, have periodically idled up to 17% of Russia's refining capacity—equivalent to about 1.2 million bpd at peak disruption—through damage to key units at sites like and , forcing reliance on imports and highlighting the sector's exposure to and interruptions. Such events have amplified global price volatility and prompted diversified sourcing strategies among importers. To counter these pressures without physical expansions, refiners have invested in digital technologies like AI-driven optimization and digital twins, enabling and process simulations that boost throughput by 5-10% through better yield forecasting and energy efficiency. These tools allow real-time adjustments to operational parameters, reducing downtime and enhancing resilience to feedstock variability from or geopolitical sources.

Refining Processes and Technology

Crude Distillation and Separation

Crude distillation begins with desalting to remove salts and impurities from incoming crude oil, typically by mixing with water and demulsifiers in an electrostatic desalter, achieving salt reductions to below 1-2 pounds per thousand barrels to prevent corrosion in downstream equipment. The desalted crude then enters a preheat train consisting of multiple shell-and-tube heat exchangers that recover heat from hot product streams such as naphtha, kerosene, diesel, and atmospheric residue, preheating the feed to around 250-300°C while minimizing energy consumption, with well-designed systems recovering up to 80-90% of available heat to enhance overall thermal efficiency. From the preheat train, the oil is routed to a fired furnace where it is heated to 350-400°C under controlled conditions to partially vaporize the feed without excessive cracking, ensuring optimal fractionation. The heated crude enters the atmospheric distillation column, a tall vertical tower operating at near-atmospheric pressure, where vapor-liquid equilibrium separates components based on differences: lighter fractions like gases and rise to the top and condense at progressively lower temperatures, while heavier ones like , diesel (or atmospheric gas oil), and residue settle lower. Internal components such as sieve trays, valve trays, or structured packing promote efficient vapor-liquid contact, with streams from overhead condensers enhancing separation purity by countercurrent flow. Fraction yields depend on crude data, which characterize composition via true curves; for light crudes with above 30°, gasoline-range can exceed 40% by volume, whereas heavier crudes yield more residue, often 50% or higher. The bottoms product, atmospheric residue, is further processed in a vacuum distillation unit to handle high-boiling components without ; heated to approximately 400°C in a , it enters a column under reduced (10-50 mmHg) created by ejectors, lowering boiling points and yielding vacuum gas oil (VGO) as the primary distillate for catalytic cracking feedstock, alongside vacuum residue. Vacuum columns often employ packing materials over trays to minimize and entrainment, with yields typically producing 40-50% VGO from atmospheric residue depending on crude type. This staged separation leverages and relative volatilities, prioritizing physical fractionation over chemical alteration to maximize flexibility.

Conversion, Upgrading, and Cracking

Conversion processes in oil refineries break down heavy molecules from residues and vacuum gas oils into lighter fractions, maximizing yields of high-value products like and diesel through thermal, catalytic, and hydrogen-assisted methods. These upgrading techniques address the limitations of straight-run by increasing the proportion of transportation fuels, with modern configurations achieving conversion rates that transform over 70% of heavy feeds into lighter distillates. Thermal cracking, such as visbreaking, applies mild heat (400–450°C) to atmospheric or residues in a furnace, reducing by 75–85% while generating small quantities of , distillates, and gas to facilitate handling and blending. This non-catalytic process, dating to early 20th-century innovations, primarily targets residue fluidity rather than deep conversion, yielding primarily lower- fuel oil with limited light ends (typically under 15% and gas). For more severe bottom-of-the-barrel upgrading, delayed heats residues to thermal cracking temperatures (around 450–500°C) in coke drums, fully converting feeds into gas, light/medium distillates (20–40% yields), and solid as byproduct, which serves industrial uses like . Catalytic methods dominate modern conversion due to higher selectivity and yields. (FCC), first commercialized in 1942 at a , fluidizes a catalyst with heavy feeds at 500–550°C, cracking 40–50% of feed to while producing olefins and light cycle oil. FCC units, evolved over eight decades, now handle diverse feeds and contribute the bulk of global production through optimized catalyst circulation and riser reactors. Hydrocracking complements FCC by reacting heavy vacuum gas oils or residues with (partial pressures of 1200–2300 psi) over bifunctional catalysts at 350–450°C, yielding 70–90% middle distillates like diesel with sulfur levels reduced by over 90% via simultaneous . This process suits low-sulfur specifications and lighter crudes like shale condensates, as hydrogen saturation minimizes coke formation and enables once-through or recycle modes for diesel maximization. Upgrading lighter streams enhances for blending. combines with C3–C4 olefins from cracking (using sulfuric or catalysts at 0–40°C) to form branched iso-paraffins like isooctane, yielding alkylate with research numbers exceeding 90–95. rearranges molecules over platinum-rhenium catalysts at 450–550°C and low , producing reformate with 95–100 via dehydrogenation and , supplying aromatics and for other units. Refinery sophistication, as measured by the (NCI)—calculated by weighting secondary processing capacities relative to crude (NCI=1 for basic topping plants)—correlates with light product yields; facilities with NCI >10 process over 80% of input into fuels via integrated cracking and upgrading.

Treating, Blending, and Quality Control

Hydrotreating, a key purification process in oil refining, employs gas and catalysts such as cobalt-molybdenum or nickel-molybdenum sulfides to remove heteroatoms like and from streams. In (HDS), the dominant form of hydrotreating, organosulfur compounds react with to form (H₂S), which is subsequently stripped from the product, enabling compliance with stringent sulfur limits. This catalytic operates at temperatures of 300–400°C and pressures of 30–130 bar, minimizing cracking while saturating olefins and stabilizing streams. The implementation of ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) standards exemplifies HDS's role, with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requiring highway diesel sulfur content below 15 ppm effective June 1, 2006, to reduce particulate matter and enable advanced emission controls. Similar hydrodenitrogenation removes nitrogen as (NH₃), preventing in downstream units and improving product stability. Refineries adapt HDS severity—via catalyst activity, partial pressure, and reactor design—to handle varying crude sulfur levels, often exceeding 2 wt% in high-sulfur feeds. Blending integrates treated streams with select components and additives to achieve product specifications, such as for density, (>40 for diesel) for ignition quality, and research number (>90 for ) for anti-knock performance. Volume-based blending rules apply to properties like specific gravity, while nonlinear models account for and blending indices derived from empirical data. Additives, including detergents, antioxidants, and corrosion inhibitors, are dosed at parts-per-million levels to enhance stability and meet regional volatility or cold-flow requirements. Quality assurance relies on laboratory assays for detailed composition—via and —and real-time online analyzers for parameters like content and curves. Refineries tailor blends to jurisdiction-specific standards, such as the European Union's Euro VI diesel limit of 10 ppm (effective 2014) versus U.S. Tier 3 averaging 10 ppm (phased in 2017–2025), ensuring with vehicle technologies. Automated feedback loops from near-infrared or process gas chromatographs adjust blending ratios dynamically to maintain consistency. Waste minimization integrates treating with gas recovery; sour water from hydrotreaters, containing H₂S and , undergoes stripping in steam-heated columns at 100–150°C to recover for reuse and direct H₂S to sulfur recovery units. Amine treating circulates aqueous solutions (e.g., monoethanolamine) to absorb H₂S and CO₂ from recycle gases, regenerating the via steam stripping and minimizing emissions through integration. These steps recover over 99% of acid gases, aligning with environmental regulations while optimizing hydrogen efficiency.

Major Products and Byproducts

Transportation Fuels

Transportation fuels, including gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel, represent the largest share of oil refinery output, typically accounting for over 85% of production in major refining regions like the United States. Globally, these fuels support approximately two-thirds of oil consumption dedicated to transportation applications. Refineries optimize yields through processes like cracking and reforming to meet demand, with transportation fuels comprising around 70% of total refined products by volume in typical configurations. Gasoline, often yielding 40-50% of a barrel of crude oil in complex refineries, is blended from components such as reformate, alkylate, and straight-run to achieve desired specifications. Reformate, produced via , contributes high-octane hydrocarbons essential for engine performance, with common blends featuring octane ratings of 87-93 AKI for regular and premium grades. Seasonal adjustments lower (RVP) in summer blends to reduce volatility and evaporative emissions, typically targeting 7.0-9.0 psi depending on regional standards. Diesel fuel and jet fuel derive from middle distillates, with straight-run fractions from atmospheric distillation supplemented by cracked stocks from hydrocracking or fluid catalytic cracking to increase volume and quality. Diesel requires a cetane index or number exceeding 40 for reliable ignition in compression-ignition engines, supporting heavy-duty trucking that consumes a significant portion of global diesel demand. Jet fuel, akin to kerosene distillates, powers aviation, where it accounts for about 8% of transportation energy use worldwide. Byproducts like liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) emerge from cracking processes, while heating oil overlaps with diesel-grade distillates. Refineries increasingly incorporate biofuel blends, such as 10% in U.S. (E10), mandated under renewable fuel standards, though pure hydrocarbons retain higher provides about 33% more energy per than . This blending meets policy requirements but reduces compared to unblended fuels due to 's lower heating value.

Industrial and Consumer Products

Oil refineries produce diverse non-transportation fuel products from crude oil fractions, including feedstocks, lubricants, asphalt, waxes, solvents, and byproducts such as and , demonstrating the process's versatility in generating materials for industrial applications and consumer goods. Petrochemical feedstocks, primarily and liquefied petroleum gases derived from atmospheric and as well as cracking processes, supply steam crackers for olefin production like and , which form the basis for plastics, synthetic fibers, and resins. Typically, up to 10% of refinery output may serve as such feedstocks, with U.S. net production of petrochemical feedstocks averaging around 250,000 barrels per day in recent years. These outputs enable downstream manufacturing critical for , such as fertilizers via synthesis, and enhance overall productivity through durable materials. Lubricants originate from hydrotreated vacuum gas oils and residues, yielding base oils refined via extraction, dewaxing, and hydrocracking to meet and performance standards for engine oils, greases, and hydraulic fluids. Asphalt and road oils, produced by or deasphalting of heavy residua, provide binding materials for pavement and roofing, with U.S. refinery net production approximating 370,000 barrels per day. Waxes, separated from lubricating oil fractions through chilling and dewaxing, find uses in candles, polishes, and . Solvents, including aromatic and aliphatic types from reforming and extraction, serve in paints, cleaners, and extraction processes. Petroleum coke, generated in delayed coking units from heavy residues, acts as a high-carbon and precursor for electrodes in aluminum and , with U.S. production reaching 808,000 barrels per day in 2023; this transforms potential into valuable . Heavy aromatic oils from cracking serve as feedstocks for , used in tires and inks. , recovered during hydrotreating to remove impurities, supports production for fertilizers and chemicals.

Economic and Strategic Role

Contributions to Global and National Economies

The U.S. refining industry generates substantial economic value, contributing $688 billion to GDP in via direct operations, supplier linkages, and induced spending. This sector supports nearly 3 million jobs nationwide, including direct at refineries and indirect roles in supporting industries, while producing $284 billion in labor and $162 billion in federal, state, and local revenues. These impacts stem from 's role in processing domestic and imported crude into marketable products, with high —often exceeding 90%—amplifying output efficiency. Globally, the oil refining market reached approximately $1.8 in value in 2024, reflecting revenues from processing over 100 million barrels per day of crude into fuels and that power transportation, industry, and households. This scale enables cost efficiencies in production, lowering transportation expenses that otherwise burden and ; for instance, stable output has historically correlated with reduced energy costs as a share of freight operations, fostering broader economic . 's multiplier effects extend upstream to crude extraction—where demand for processing incentivizes investments—and downstream to reliant on affordable , diesel, and feedstocks, creating secondary economic activity estimated at 1.5 to 2 times direct impacts in integrated analyses. Post-World War II refining expansions, particularly in the U.S. and , aligned with accelerated GDP growth rates averaging 4-5% annually through the and 1960s, as surging capacity met rising demand for vehicle fuels and aviation that underpinned , exports, and industrial . Despite cyclical margin pressures from crude price volatility, the sector sustains average returns on of about 5%, underscoring its resilience and countering narratives of structural decline amid demand shifts.

Energy Security and Supply Chain Dynamics

Oil refineries enhance by providing processing flexibility that allows adaptation to disrupted crude supplies, converting alternative feedstocks into usable products during geopolitical shocks. In response to Western sanctions following Russia's invasion of , which reduced Russian crude exports to by redirecting volumes to , global refining networks absorbed the shifts without widespread shortages; Indian and Chinese refineries, equipped with high-complexity units like hydrocrackers, processed increased imports of discounted heavy, sour Russian grades, yielding transportation fuels that offset European deficits. U.S. refineries, meanwhile, ramped up exports of diesel and other distillates to Europe, supplying over 1 million barrels per day in peak months of 2022 to fill gaps left by lost Russian volumes, demonstrating how excess regional capacity acts as a buffer against import vulnerabilities. Refinery configurations tailored to specific crude types further bolster , enabling nations to utilize non-traditional sources amid sanctions or conflicts. Facilities in and , optimized for heavy crudes with API gravities below 30 degrees and high content, incorporate extensive and desulfurization units to handle imports from , , or , whereas U.S. Gulf Coast refineries, historically complex for imported heavy oils, adapted post-2010 shale boom to lighter sweet crudes ( above 35 degrees) via simpler yielding higher yields, reducing dependence on volatile foreign heavy supplies. This mismatch resolution prevents stranding incompatible crudes during disruptions; for instance, the U.S. Strategic Reserve (SPR), holding over 700 million barrels of primarily medium-sour crude as of 2023, integrates directly with domestic refineries to release processed products rapidly, as seen in draws totaling 180 million barrels that stabilized markets without overwhelming light-crude-optimized plants. The shift to net exports in the U.S. since 2011, driven by production, has amplified allies' by diversifying away from sanctioned suppliers, contrasting with risks faced by import-reliant economies. Pre-2010s import dependence exposed nations to single-source shocks, but U.S. exports surged to post-2022, replacing Russian diesel flows and mitigating price spikes that could have exceeded 50% absent such alternatives. Refining inherently multiplies crude's utility, transforming low-value raw oil—limited to basic heating or —into high-demand fuels like and , whose per-barrel equivalent value often doubles or triples that of unprocessed crude in volatile markets, averting waste from unrefinable surpluses during rerouting events.

Infrastructure and Siting

Key Factors in Refinery Location

The primary determinant in selecting refinery sites is proximity to crude oil supplies, particularly via seaports or networks, to minimize inbound transportation costs, which constitute a significant portion of operational expenses. In the United States, the Gulf Coast region hosts over 55% of national refining capacity, enabling direct access to imported crude via the and reducing reliance on costlier overland transport. Similarly, major European and Asian hubs like and attract refinery clusters due to their strategic port locations, facilitating efficient crude imports from global sources and break-of-bulk operations where large tanker shipments are processed for regional distribution. Proximity to product markets ranks as a close secondary factor, as outbound shipping of refined fuels like and diesel to consumers incurs comparable logistical expenses; thus, refineries often balance raw material access with demand centers to optimize total economics. considerations, including existing pipelines, rail links, and utilities, further influence siting to lower capital expenditures, while availability of skilled labor pools supports . Land and water resources, essential for cooling and processing, play tertiary roles, as ample industrial sites near transport nodes typically suffice without dominating decisions. Regulatory and permitting challenges have constrained new greenfield refinery construction, with no major facilities built in the U.S. since the refinery in , completed in 1976, due to protracted environmental reviews and local opposition extending timelines to over a decade. This has led operators to favor expansions at existing sites, where sunk and established mitigate risks, reinforcing locational around proven clusters.

Global Capacity and Regional Variations

Global refining capacity reached approximately 102 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2024, with net additions of around 0.7 million bpd expected in 2025, concentrated in and the . The region holds about 36-40% of total capacity, accounting for the majority of recent and projected expansions, including over 3 million bpd of new capacity slated for commissioning through 2030. In contrast, North American capacity, led by the at roughly 18 million bpd, has remained relatively stable, while European capacity has declined amid closures. Regional technological adaptations reflect feedstock availability and export orientations. Middle Eastern refineries, processing locally abundant light sweet crudes, often utilize simpler topping and hydroskimming configurations optimized for high yields of middle distillates like diesel, with capacity expanding from 8 million bpd in 2005 to about 13 million bpd by 2025. Japanese refineries, reliant on imported heavy sour crudes (primarily from the , comprising over 95% of feedstock), feature highly complex Nelson Complexity Indices exceeding 10, incorporating advanced cracking and upgrading units to maximize light product yields from lower-quality imports. International trade in refined products constitutes a significant share of global flows, with exports of items like and diesel supporting regional imbalances; key hubs such as Fujairah in the UAE, hosting the Middle East's largest commercial storage for refined products (over 10 million barrels), facilitate strategic stockpiling and blending to circumvent chokepoints like the . Capacity shifts underscore divergent trajectories: experienced closures totaling nearly 1.8 million bpd from 2009 to 2020, equivalent to over 20 refineries shuttered due to elevated fuel taxes, import competition, and softening domestic demand, contrasting with Asia's ongoing buildout of integrated mega-complexes.

Safety Protocols and Risk Management

Engineering and Operational Safeguards

Oil refineries incorporate principles during design to minimize hazards from high temperatures and pressures, such as substituting hazardous materials where feasible, minimizing inventory of flammables, and simplifying layouts to reduce failure points. systems, including ultrasonic and sensors, enable early identification of releases, while automated shutdown mechanisms, triggered by programmable logic controllers (PLCs), isolate sections to prevent escalation. Blast-resistant modules, constructed with reinforced and designed to withstand overpressures up to 5 psi, protect control rooms and personnel shelters in facilities. Distributed control systems (DCS) and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) provide real-time monitoring of process variables like pressure, temperature, and flow rates across refinery units, allowing operators to detect deviations and adjust controls instantaneously. These systems integrate with predictive maintenance algorithms leveraging (AI) to analyze sensor data for anomalies, forecasting equipment failures such as pump vibrations or valve leaks before they occur, thereby reducing unplanned downtime by up to 50% in some implementations. Pressure relief systems adhere to (API) standards, with API 520 specifying sizing, selection, and installation of relief valves based on flow rates and scenarios, and API 521 guiding depressurizing systems to mitigate and explosion risks in refineries. systems, essential for safe disposal of excess gases, incorporate minimization strategies like gas recovery units and optimized steam injection to achieve combustion efficiencies exceeding 96%, enhancing operational efficiency while complying with safety protocols. Operator training programs utilize high-fidelity simulators and (VR) environments to replicate upset conditions, training personnel to respond to scenarios like surges without risking live operations, as contributes to approximately 80% of incidents. These simulations foster for emergency procedures, improving response times and reducing error rates in high-stakes environments. The implementation of OSHA's standard since 1992, building on earlier API guidelines, has supported these safeguards, correlating with declining lost-time incident rates in U.S. refineries from 1.5 per 200,000 work hours in the 1980s to under 0.5 today.

Historical Incidents and Resulting Improvements

On March 23, 2005, an explosion at the America refinery in , during startup of an unit resulted in 15 worker fatalities and 180 injuries, primarily from a vapor cloud ignition after overfilling the raffinate splitter tower exceeded its liquid capacity, leading to pressurized hydrocarbon release and ignition near temporary trailers housing contractors. The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) identified root causes including inadequate safety instrumentation, deficient operator training, and organizational failures in , such as prioritizing cost-cutting over maintenance. This incident prompted the (OSHA) to issue its largest-ever penalty of over $21 million to for 300 willful violations, alongside enhanced (PSM) enforcement, mandating third-party audits and root-cause analyses for high-risk facilities. In August 2012, a fire at Chevron's refinery released flammable hydrocarbons from corroded carbon-steel piping in a crude unit, affected by sulfidation due to insufficient silicon content and inadequate inspections, injuring 19 workers and prompting over 15,000 local residents to seek medical treatment for respiratory issues from smoke exposure. The CSB investigation highlighted failures in applying inherently safer design principles and proactive piping upgrades, leading to regulatory pushes for improved monitoring and mechanical integrity programs under PSM standards. These events underscored causal factors like equipment degradation and procedural lapses, driving industry-wide adoption of Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies for systematic deviation analysis in and operations. Post-incident reforms, including rigorous HAZOP implementations and independent audits, correlated with quantifiable safety gains; U.S. refinery capital expenditures on maintenance and safety doubled from levels by the 2000s, countering narratives of chronic underinvestment. data reflect a broader decline in lost-workday injury rates by about 20% from 1990 to 1996, with oil refining following suit through PSM enhancements, while recent federal records show U.S. refineries averaging fewer than two fatalities annually across 153 facilities from 2017-2023, yielding rates below 1 per 100,000 workers—safer than many sectors. Globally, refinery operations maintain low fatality rates under 1 per 100,000, attributable to causal interventions like automated safeguards and cultural shifts toward proactive risk identification rather than reactive compliance.

Environmental Considerations and Regulations

Empirical Data on Emissions and Impacts

Emissions of sulfur oxides (SOx) and from U.S. petroleum refineries have shown marked declines since 1990, with national emissions inventory data reflecting reductions exceeding 70% for and over 90% for SO2 by 2013, attributable to widespread adoption of processes and technologies that remove from fuels and gases prior to . Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), often managed through flaring of waste gases, constitute less than 1% of refinery throughput in efficient operations, as high-temperature achieves destruction efficiencies of 98% or higher, minimizing unburned releases. These empirical reductions contrast with earlier modeled projections that anticipated slower progress absent targeted controls, highlighting the causal role of in curbing criteria pollutant outputs. Petroleum refining contributes approximately 3-5% to global CO2 emissions, with 2021 estimates placing refinery-related releases at around 1 GtCO2 annually amid total anthropogenic emissions of 37 GtCO2, primarily from process heaters, , and units. On a per-unit basis, exhibits lower CO2 intensity than alternatives like coal-to-liquids synthesis or certain pathways, as U.S. refineries have improved energy efficiency by 20-40% since the 1990s through advanced integration and complexity upgrades, yielding 0.05-0.08 tons CO2 per barrel of product versus higher figures for less integrated systems. Localized air quality monitoring near U.S. refinery sites corroborates these trends, with EPA records showing ambient concentrations of criteria pollutants falling in line with national averages despite proximity to operations. Water usage in refining generates volumes equivalent to 0.5-7 liters per liter of crude processed, but many facilities pursue near-zero discharge via and treatment, with direct spills representing under 0.1% of annual throughput based on decade-long U.S. sector averages. from such incidents remains episodic and contained, with empirical spill data indicating median volumes below 1,000 gallons per event and rapid remediation limiting persistence. assessments near established refineries yield mixed but often neutral long-term outcomes in industrialized zones, where baseline predominates over refinery-specific effects, as evidenced by stable invertebrate and avian metrics in monitored coastal sites absent acute spills. impose fundamental limits on emission-free processing, as complete carbon oxidation is inherent to fuel conversion, though pilots at select refineries demonstrate mitigation potentials of 50-90% for point-source CO2.

Regulatory Evolution and Economic Trade-offs

The Clean Air Act of 1970 established the foundational framework for regulating emissions from stationary sources, including oil refineries, by requiring states to develop implementation plans to meet and imposing new source performance standards (NSPS) for pollutants like and particulates. Subsequent amendments in 1977 introduced prevention of significant deterioration provisions, restricting expansions in cleaner air areas, while the 1990 revisions mandated maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards for hazardous air pollutants, targeting refinery processes such as units and sulfur recovery plants. These measures compelled refineries to install , flares, and low-sulfur fuel production capabilities, progressively tightening product specifications like reducing sulfur to 30 ppm by 2006 under Tier 2 standards. In the European Union, the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive of 1996/61/EC shifted toward integrated environmental permitting, requiring refineries to apply best available techniques (BAT) to minimize emissions across air, water, and soil, with sector-specific reference documents updated periodically. This evolved into the Industrial Emissions Directive (2010/75/EU), which enforces BAT-associated emission levels for refinery streams, including limits on nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds, often necessitating costly upgrades like selective catalytic reduction systems. Globally, the International Maritime Organization's MARPOL Annex VI, revised in 2008 and enforced via the 2020 sulfur cap reducing bunker fuel limits from 3.5% to 0.5% mass sulfur, indirectly pressures refineries to produce compliant marine fuels, spurring hydrodesulfurization investments but straining low-sulfur feedstock availability. Compliance with these regulations imposes substantial capital expenditures on U.S. refineries, estimated at $7-10 billion annually in the early 2000s for Clean Air Act mandates alone, covering desulfurization and pollution control retrofits that enable cleaner products like ultra-low diesel but defer or cancel expansion projects due to permitting delays and costs exceeding $1 billion per major upgrade. Such investments yield health benefits through reduced particulate and ozone exposure, with EPA analyses of 1990 Amendments rules showing benefit-cost ratios exceeding 3:1 by monetizing avoided premature deaths and respiratory illnesses at $7.4 million per statistical life in 2020 dollars. However, these ratios often exclude non-monetized factors like diminished energy reliability from stalled capacity growth; U.S. operable refinery capacity stagnated post-2010 after expansions in the 2000s, with no new grassroots facilities permitted since the amid layered environmental reviews under the , heightening reliance on imports during disruptions. These trade-offs reflect causal tensions between emission reductions and supply resilience: while regulations have curbed sulfur emissions by over 90% since 1990, correlating with fewer new builds and a 15% drop in operable count from to despite modest capacity gains from debottlenecking, critics argue that benefit estimates overstate marginal gains by assuming static baselines and undervalue premiums in volatile . Empirical reviews indicate that while health-focused BCRs surpass unity, holistic assessments incorporating expansion barriers suggest net economic drags, as compliance diverts funds from efficiency innovations, potentially inflating fuel prices by 5-10 cents per during .

Occupational Health and Workforce Issues

Identified Hazards and Exposure Risks

Oil refinery workers face exposure to hazardous chemicals, including , a known human associated with through prolonged occupational contact. Historical exposures to in refining operations exceeded 1 ppm prior to stricter regulations in the , but current permissible exposure limits set by OSHA at 1 ppm have reduced average levels below this threshold in monitored settings. (H2S), another prevalent chemical, poses risks, with concentrations above 500 ppm capable of causing sudden or via respiratory , while levels around 10 ppm induce eye irritation and damage. Physical hazards include the potential for fires and explosions due to ignition of flammable hydrocarbons and vapors present throughout processing units. levels from machinery and operations often exceed safe thresholds, contributing to hearing impairment risks, while heat stress arises from high-temperature environments in operational areas, exacerbating fatigue and physiological strain. Ergonomic demands from maintenance tasks and equipment handling further compound potentials. Occupational reveals limited evidence of elevated cancer rates among refinery workers compared to the general , with studies indicating no consistent excess for most sites beyond historical and associations. Instances of and have shown historical declines correlating with improved and ventilation practices, though respiratory irritants can still provoke acute symptoms. , common in 24-hour operations, disrupts circadian rhythms, elevating risks for sleep disturbances, , and metabolic disorders through chronobiologic misalignment.

Monitoring, Controls, and Long-term Outcomes

Occupational health monitoring in oil refineries includes (PPE) such as respirators and chemical-resistant clothing, alongside like local exhaust ventilation systems to minimize airborne exposures. assesses internal doses through urine analysis for metabolites, including trans,trans-muconic acid (t,t-MA) and S-phenylmercapturic acid (S-PMA), enabling detection of low-level exposures even below air sampling thresholds. The U.S. (OSHA) enforces a (PEL) of 1 part per million (ppm) as an 8-hour time-weighted average, with a 5 ppm , through mandatory compliance programs that integrate these controls. Health surveillance programs in refineries track worker cohorts via periodic medical examinations, exposure registries, and morbidity reporting to identify trends in occupational illnesses. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies as a based on high-dose epidemiological evidence, but dose-response analyses in low-exposure settings, such as modern refineries with median levels around 0.14 ppm, demonstrate negligible excess risk, with observed-to-expected ratios near unity. These programs leverage empirical data to confirm that contemporary exposure reductions—achieved via process enclosures and substitution—yield risks aligned with background rates rather than historical peaks. Longitudinal cohort studies of refinery workers report standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for all causes and major diseases comparable to or below population averages, with no evidence of shortened attributable to occupational factors in post-1940 hires. Post-2000 data from surveillance indicate absence of chronic disease spikes, such as or , beyond baseline incidences, corroborating low modern risks from controlled exposures. Economically, health-related remains low, with hazard-linked days off constituting a minor fraction of total productivity losses—often outweighed by factors like —supporting sustained in compliant facilities.

Controversies and Public Debates

Environmental Alarmism vs. Verifiable Data

Claims of elevated cancer incidence forming "clusters" in communities adjacent to oil refineries have been advanced by environmental advocacy groups and certain media reports, positing direct causation from emissions such as and other volatile organic compounds. However, peer-reviewed meta-analyses of residential proximity to facilities reveal inconsistent and often non-significant associations for adult cancers, with pooled relative risks for at 1.07 (95% CI: 0.91–1.26) and at 0.97 (95% CI: 0.87–1.09), alongside a decreased for (RR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.63–0.85). These findings highlight limitations in and the influence of confounders like and , which epidemiological data confirm independently elevate cancer rates in lower socioeconomic areas by factors exceeding 1.5 for tobacco-related malignancies. Specific investigations into alleged clusters, such as those by the CDC in refinery-heavy regions like , have shown reported cancer cases aligning with statewide expectations when adjusted for demographics, without establishing causal ties to refinery operations beyond baseline confounders. While some observational studies report proximity-based associations across cancer types (e.g., >1 within 10 miles), these ecological designs fail to isolate refinery effects from correlated variables like industrial density or lifestyle factors, underscoring the challenges in attributing incremental s empirically. A heightened for near facilities (RR=1.90, 95% CI: 1.34–2.70) persists in meta-analyses, yet represents a rare outcome with absolute incidence remaining low relative to dominant causes like genetic predispositions. Ambient monitoring of key air toxics like near refineries typically registers annual averages below the EPA's fenceline action level of 9 μg/m³ at over half of U.S. facilities, with concentrations dropping further in surrounding communities to levels posing lifetime cancer risks below 1 in 100,000 per EPA risk assessments. Exceedances, reported at 12 of 118 refineries in , trigger remediation, and national trends indicate declining emissions due to technological controls, stabilizing local health metrics without disproportionate elevations in respiratory or oncogenic outcomes. "Not-in-my-backyard" opposition often cites perceived perils leading to value declines, yet hedonic analyses document only transient reductions—typically 1-5% short-term—followed by recovery as economic benefits materialize, with buffered zones sometimes correlating to net higher valuations from job access (e.g., thousands of direct employments per facility) and tax revenues supporting . Community-scale evaluations affirm that these fiscal inflows, averaging millions annually per , offset localized disamenities for residents, contrasting alarmist narratives that overlook such trade-offs in favor of unadjusted risk perceptions.

Policy Interventions and Market Distortions

Government policies imposing carbon pricing mechanisms, such as the European Union's Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), have elevated operational costs for oil refineries by requiring purchases of emissions allowances, with estimates indicating increases of 0.6% to 5% in average operating expenses at carbon prices between €10 and €30 per . These costs disproportionately burden energy-intensive refining processes, reducing competitiveness against unsubsidized imports and prompting capacity reductions, as refineries face margins eroded by compliance rather than market fundamentals. Proponents argue such systems internalize environmental externalities, yet empirical analyses reveal limited emission reductions in early phases—around 6% in the first trading period—while amplifying price volatility for refined products. In the United States, state-level mandates in have accelerated refinery closures, including the facility set to cease fuel production by the end of 2025 and Valero's planned shutdowns, potentially slashing in-state refining capacity by 17% and exposing consumers to shortages. Unplanned outages and phaseouts contributed to price spikes in 2022 and 2023, with analysts projecting averages up to $8.43 per gallon by 2026 absent compensatory imports, which themselves incur higher transportation costs and supply risks. Such interventions, framed as advancing low-carbon transitions, overlook the causal reality that refined products remain essential for transportation and , where alternatives like electric vehicles impose grid strains—potentially increasing peak loads by orders of magnitude on originally designed for fossil-based generation—without equivalent dispatchable reliability. Subsidies directed toward intermittent renewables, which official U.S. data show exceed fossil fuel supports by a factor of 30 in tax credits and incentives, distort investment away from refining capacity essential for energy security, favoring sources that require fossil backups for intermittency and yield higher system-level costs when accounting for storage and transmission upgrades. Geopolitical measures, including 2025 U.S. sanctions on Russian entities like Rosneft and Lukoil, have constricted global refining access to discounted crudes, spiking Brent prices by up to 6% in a single day and amplifying market volatility as refiners scramble for alternatives. While intended to deter aggression, these actions ignore substitution barriers, such as the persistent reliance on refined derivatives for non-electrifiable sectors, where net energy delivery from renewables remains costlier in integrated systems due to capacity factors below 30% versus fossil fuels' consistent output.

Future Developments

Global refining capacity is projected to contract by 10% to 30% over the next , with the extent varying by region and most pronounced declines in areas facing stagnant demand and high closure risks. This trend stems from plateauing oil demand in countries, forecasted to stabilize around 105.5 million barrels per day (mb/d) by 2030 amid slower growth rates averaging below 0.5 mb/d annually post-2024. While non- regions may see modest expansions to meet rising needs, structural closures in and —such as OECD 's ongoing capacity reductions—will offset these, leading to net underutilization and margin pressures. Technological adaptations focus on partial decarbonization through process electrification and hydrogen integration, though capital expenditures exceed $1 billion per major unit upgrade, limiting widespread adoption. targets high-emission processes like heating and compression, potentially cutting CO2 by replacing with electric alternatives, but requires grid-scale renewable power that constrains. , traditionally used in hydrocracking, is shifting toward low-carbon variants to decarbonize crackers and desulfurization, with refiners integrating blue or to comply with emissions mandates; however, production costs remain 2-3 times higher than reforming without subsidies. Efficiency enhancements via modular retrofits and digital tools offer incremental gains without full rebuilds, achieving 5% improvements in energy use through targeted heat recovery and process optimization. Digitalization, including AI-driven , reduces unplanned downtime by up to 20% by analyzing sensor data for real-time adjustments, enhancing throughput in existing facilities amid capacity constraints. Refineries are adapting to variable feedstocks by co-processing waste oils and biofuels, enabling up to 10-20% renewable blending in hydrotreaters while maintaining output quality, though is limited by feedstock availability and without alleviating intermittency issues from direct integration. These shifts prioritize operational resilience over rapid transformation, as high upfront costs and uncertain returns deter greenfield investments in a demand-constrained environment.

Adaptation to Demand Changes and Alternatives

Global oil demand is projected to increase by approximately 2.6 million barrels per day from 2023 to 2030 before peaking around that year, according to the International Energy Agency's Stated Policies Scenario, with refining capacity adjustments tracking these trends as excess capacity in fuels is reallocated. This peak reflects slower growth in advanced economies offset by rising consumption in developing regions, where transportation and industrial needs sustain demand. While electric vehicles are displacing gasoline demand—potentially reducing it by over 20 million barrels per day globally by 2040 in aggressive transition scenarios—diesel fuel for heavy-duty trucks, shipping, and aviation faces fewer immediate substitutes due to battery limitations in weight-sensitive and long-haul applications. Alternatives to refined petroleum products remain constrained in scale and viability. Liquid biofuels currently constitute less than 5% of global transport fuel supply, with production dominated by first-generation feedstocks like , which offer low (EROI) ratios around 1-3:1, compared to conventional oil refining's EROI of approximately 10:1 or higher for integrated processes. , primarily derived from (over 70% of production), accounts for a negligible share of transport , with green electrolytic at under 0.2% globally and facing scalability barriers from high costs and intermittent renewable inputs. No comprehensive substitute portfolio has demonstrated capacity to replace refined fuels at current volumes (over 100 million barrels per day) within the next decade, as efficiency gains and primarily erode light-duty rather than heavier fractions. Refineries have adapted by pivoting toward production, where for and other feedstocks is expected to grow, offsetting fuel declines and raising ' share of total consumption from 15.8% in 2024 to 17.4% by 2030. This shift leverages existing infrastructure for plastics, chemicals, and materials essential to modern economies, with projected to drive 40% of growth through 2028 despite transport fuel plateaus. Such resilience underscores refining's role in high-EROI delivery, contrasting with lower-return alternatives that require substantial subsidies and land/resource inputs without equivalent net yields. Hasty policy-driven transitions have exposed vulnerabilities, as seen in Europe's post-2022 following the curtailment of Russian gas supplies without adequate baseload replacements, leading to price spikes exceeding 10 times pre-crisis levels, industrial curtailments, and heightened blackout risks from grid imbalances. Germany's premature nuclear phase-out, completed in April 2023, exacerbated reliance on variable renewables and imported LNG, contributing to affecting millions through elevated household costs—up 50-100% in some nations—and deferred on . These outcomes highlight causal risks of accelerating divestment from refining and dispatchable fuels before scalable, dispatchable alternatives mature, prioritizing empirical over optimistic substitution timelines.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.