Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Knights Templar
View on WikipediaThis article has an unclear citation style. (November 2024) |
| Part of a series on the |
| Knights Templar |
|---|
|
Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon |
| Overview |
| Councils |
| Papal bulls |
|
| Locations |
| Successors |
| Cultural references |
| See also |
|
|
The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, mainly known as the Knights Templar, was a military order of the Catholic faith, and one of the most important military orders in Western Christianity. They were founded in 1118 to defend pilgrims on their way to Jerusalem, with their headquarters located there on the Temple Mount, and existed for nearly two centuries during the Middle Ages.
Officially endorsed by the Catholic Church by such decrees as the papal bull Omne datum optimum of Pope Innocent II, the Templars became a favoured charity throughout Christendom and grew rapidly in membership and power. The Templar knights, in their distinctive white mantles with a red cross, were among the most skilled fighting units of the Crusades. They were prominent in Christian finance; non-combatant members of the order, who made up as much as 90% of their members,[1][2] managed a large economic infrastructure throughout Christendom.[3] They developed innovative financial techniques that were an early form of banking,[4][5] building a network of nearly 1,000 commanderies and fortifications across Europe and the Holy Land.[6]
The Templars were closely tied to the Crusades. As they became unable to secure their holdings in the Holy Land, support for the order faded.[7] In 1307, King Philip IV of France had many of the order's members in France arrested, tortured into giving false confessions, and then burned at the stake.[8] Under pressure from Philip, Pope Clement V disbanded the order in 1312.[9] In spite of its dissolution, however, between 1317–1319, a number of Templar knights, properties and other assets were absorbed within the Portuguese Order of Christ,[10][11][12][13] and the Spanish Order of Montesa;[14] the abrupt disappearance of this major medieval European institution in its original incarnation gave rise to speculation and legends, which have currently kept the "Templar" name alive in self-styled orders and popular culture.[15]
Names
[edit]The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon (Latin: Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique Salomonici and French: Pauvres Chevaliers du Christ et du Temple de Salomon) are also known as the Order of Solomon's Temple, and mainly the Knights Templar (French: Les Chevaliers Templiers), or simply the Templars (French: Les Templiers).
The Temple Mount where they had their headquarters had a mystique because it was above what was believed to be the ruins of the Temple of Solomon.[16]
History
[edit]Rise
[edit]After the Franks in the First Crusade captured Jerusalem from the Fatimid Caliphate in 1099, many Christians made pilgrimages to various sacred sites in the Holy Land. Although the city of Jerusalem was relatively secure under Christian control, the rest of Outremer was not. Bandits and marauding highwaymen preyed upon these Christian pilgrims, who were routinely slaughtered, sometimes by the hundreds, as they attempted to make the journey from the coastline at Jaffa through to the interior of the Holy Land.[17]

In 1119, the French knight Hugues de Payens approached King Baldwin II of Jerusalem and Warmund, Patriarch of Jerusalem, and proposed creating a monastic Catholic religious order for the protection of these pilgrims. King Baldwin and Patriarch Warmund agreed to the request, probably at the Council of Nablus in January 1120, and the king granted the Templars a headquarters in a wing of the royal palace on the Temple Mount in the captured Al-Aqsa Mosque.[20]
The order, with about nine knights including Godfrey de Saint-Omer and André de Montbard, had few financial resources and relied on donations to survive. Their emblem was of two knights riding on a single horse, emphasizing the order's poverty.[21]
The impoverished status of the Templars did not last long. They had a powerful advocate in Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, a leading Church figure, the French abbot primarily responsible for the founding of the Cistercian Order of monks and a nephew of André de Montbard, one of the founding knights. Bernard put his weight behind them and wrote persuasively on their behalf in the letter In Praise of the New Knighthood,[22][23] and in 1129, at the Council of Troyes, he led a group of leading churchmen to officially approve and endorse the order on behalf of the church. With this formal blessing, the Templars became a favoured charity throughout Christendom, receiving money, land, businesses, and noble-born sons from families who were eager to help with the fight in the Holy Land. At the Council of Pisa in 1135, Pope Innocent II initiated the first papal monetary donation to the Order.[24] Another major benefit came in 1139, when Innocent II's papal bull Omne Datum Optimum exempted the order from obedience to local laws. This ruling meant that the Templars could pass freely through all borders, were not required to pay any taxes and were exempt from all authority except that of the pope.[25] However, in practice, they often had to respect the wishes of the European rulers in whose kingdoms they resided, especially in their handling of funds for the local noblility in their banks.[26]
With its clear mission and ample resources, the order grew rapidly. Templars were often the advance shock troops in key battles of the Crusades, as the heavily armoured knights on their warhorses would charge into the enemy lines ahead of the main army. One of their most famous victories was in 1177 during the Battle of Montgisard, where some 500 Templar knights helped several thousand infantry to defeat Saladin's army of more than 26,000 soldiers.[a]
A Templar Knight is truly a fearless knight, and secure on every side, for his soul is protected by the armour of faith, just as his body is protected by the armour of steel. He is thus doubly armed, and need fear neither demons nor men.
Although the primary mission of the order was military, relatively few members were combatants. The majority acted in support positions to assist the knights and manage their financial infrastructure. Although individual members were sworn to poverty, the Templar Order controlled vast wealth even beyond direct donations. A nobleman participating in the Crusades might place all his assets under Templar management during his absence. Accumulating wealth in this manner throughout Christendom and the Outremer, in 1150 the order began to issue letters of credit for pilgrims journeying to the Holy Land: pilgrims deposited their valuables with a local Templar preceptory before embarking, received a document indicating the value of their deposit, then showed that document upon arrival in the Holy Land to claim treasure of equal value to their funds. This innovative arrangement was an early form of banking and may have been the first use of bank cheques; it protected pilgrims from robbery, while augmenting Templar finances.[29]
Based on this mix of donations and business dealings, the Templars established financial networks across the whole of Christendom. They acquired large tracts of land, both in Europe and the Middle East; they bought and managed farms and vineyards; they built massive stone cathedrals and castles; they were involved in manufacturing, import, and export; they owned fleets of ships; and at one point they even owned the entire island of Cyprus. The order arguably qualifies as the world's first multinational corporation.[30][31] By the late 12th century the Templars were also politically powerful in the Holy Land. Secular nobles in the Kingdom of Jerusalem began granting them castles and surrounding lands as a defense against the growing threat of the Zengids in Syria. The Templars were even allowed to negotiate with Muslim rulers independently of the feudal lords. The Templar castles became de facto independent lordships with their own markets, further growing their political authority. During the regency after the death of King Baldwin IV in 1185, the royal castles were placed in the custody of the Templars and Hospitallers: the grand masters of the two orders, along with the patriarch of Jerusalem, each had a key to the crown jewels.[32]
From the mid-12th century, the Templars were recruited (jointly with the Hospitallers) to fight the Muslim kingdoms in the Iberian Peninsula, in addition to their campaigns in the Latin East.[33] In the kingdoms of Castile and León, they obtained some major strongholds (such as Calatrava la Vieja or Coria), but their vulnerability along the border was exposed during the Almohad offensive.[34] In Aragon, the Templars subsumed the Order of Mountjoy in the late 12th century, becoming an important vanguard force on the border, while in Portugal they commanded some castles along the Tagus line.[35] One of these was Tomar, which was unsuccessfully besieged by the Almohad Caliphate in 1190.
Due to the expense of sending a third of their revenues to the East, Templar and Hospitaller activities in the Iberian Peninsula were at a disadvantage to the Hispanic military orders which expended all their resources in the region.[36]
War
[edit]
Accounts of the Order's early military activities in the Levant are vague, though it appears their first battles were defeats, because the Seljuk Turks and other Muslim powers used different tactics than those in Europe at that time. The Templars later adapted to this and became strategic advisors to the leaders of the Crusader states.[37] The first recorded battle involving the Knights Templar was in the town of Teqoa, south of Jerusalem, in 1138. A force of Templars led by their grand master, Robert de Craon (who succeeded Hugues de Payens about a year earlier), was sent to retake the town after it was captured by Muslims. They were initially successful, but the Muslims regrouped outside the town and were able to take it back from the Templars.[38]
The Order's mission developed from protecting pilgrims to taking part in regular military campaigns early on,[37] and this is shown by the fact that the first castle received by the Knights Templar was located four hundred miles north of the pilgrim road from Jaffa to Jerusalem, on the northern frontier of the Principality of Antioch: the castle of Bagras in the Amanus Mountains.[37][39] It may have been as early as 1131, and by 1137 at the latest, that the Templars were given the mountainous region that formed the border of Antioch and Cilician Armenia, which included the castles of Bagras, Darbsak, and Roche de Roissel. The Templars were there when Byzantine emperor John II Komnenos tried to make the Crusader states of Antioch, Tripoli, and Edessa his vassals between 1137 and 1142. Templar knights accompanied Emperor John II with troops from those states during his campaign against Muslim powers in Syria from 1137 to 1138, including at the sieges of Aleppo and Shaizar.[40] In 1143, the Templars also began taking part in the Reconquista in Iberia at the request of the count of Barcelona.[41]
In 1147 a force of French, Spanish, and English Templars[42] left France to join the Second Crusade, led by King Louis VII. At a meeting held in Paris on 27 April 1147 they were given permission by Pope Eugenius III to wear the red cross on their uniforms. They were led by the Templar provincial master in France, Everard des Barres, who was one of the ambassadors King Louis sent to negotiate the passage of the Crusader army through the Byzantine Empire on its way to the Holy Land. During the dangerous journey of the Second Crusade through Anatolia, the Templars provided security to the rest of the army from Turkish raids.[43] After the Crusaders arrived in 1148, the kings Louis VII, Conrad III of Germany, and Baldwin III of Jerusalem made the decision to capture Damascus, but their siege in the summer of that year failed and ended with the defeat of the Christian army.[44][45] In the fall of 1148 some returning Templars took part in the successful siege of Tortosa in Spain, after which one-fifth of that city was given to the Order.[42]
Robert de Craon died in January 1149 and was succeeded as grand master by Everard des Barres, one of the few leaders at the siege of Damascus whose reputation was not damaged by the event.[44] After the Second Crusade, Zengid forces under Nur ad-Din Zengi of Aleppo attacked the Principality of Antioch, and in June 1149 his army defeated the Crusaders at the Battle of Inab, where Prince Raymond of Antioch was killed. King Baldwin III led reinforcements to the principality, which led Nur ad-Din to accept a truce with Antioch and not advance any further.[46] The force with King Baldwin included 120 Templar knights and 1,000 sergeants and squires.[47]
In the winter of 1149 and 1150, King Baldwin III oversaw the reconstruction of the fortress at Gaza City, which had been left in ruins.[48][49] It was part of the ring of castles that were built along the southern border of the Kingdom of Jerusalem to protect it from raids by the Egyptian Fatimid Caliphate, and specifically from the Fatimid troops at the fortress of Ascalon, which by then was the last coastal city in the Levant still under Muslim control.[49][50] Gaza was given to the Knights Templar, becoming the first major Templar castle.[49] In 1152 Everard stepped down as grand master for unknown reasons, and his successor was Bernard de Tremelay.[51] In January of the following year, Bernard led the Templars when King Baldwin III led a Crusader army to besiege Ascalon. Several months of fighting went by until the wall of the city was breached in August 1153, at which point Bernard led forty knights into Ascalon. But the rest of the army did not join them and all of the Templars were killed by the Muslim defenders. Ascalon was captured by the rest of the army several days later,[52][53] and Bernard was eventually succeeded by André de Montbard.[54]
After the fall of Ascalon, the Templars continued operating in that region from their castle at Gaza. In June 1154 they attacked Abbas ibn Abi al-Futuh, the vizier of Egypt, when he tried to flee from Cairo to Damascus after losing a power struggle. Abbas was killed and the Templars captured his son, who they later sent back to the Fatimids.[54] In the late 1150s the Egyptians launched raids against the Crusaders in the areas of Gaza and Ascalon.[55]
Decline
[edit]
In the mid-12th century, the tide began to turn in the Crusades. The Islamic world had become more united under effective leaders such as Saladin, and the reborn Sunni regime in Egypt. Dissension arose among Christian factions in and concerning the Holy Land. The Knights Templar were occasionally at odds with the two other Christian military orders, the Knights Hospitaller and the Teutonic Knights, and decades of internecine feuds weakened Christian positions, both politically and militarily. After the Templars were involved in several unsuccessful campaigns, including the pivotal Battle of Hattin, Jerusalem was recaptured by Muslim forces under Saladin in 1187. The Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II reclaimed the city for Christians in the Sixth Crusade of 1229, without Templar aid, but only held it for a little more than a decade. In 1244, the Ayyubid dynasty together with Khwarezmi mercenaries recaptured Jerusalem, and the city did not return to Western control until 1917 when, during World War I, the British captured it from the Ottoman Empire.[56]
The Templars were forced to relocate their headquarters to other cities in the north, such as the seaport of Acre, which they held for the next century. It was lost in 1291, followed by their last mainland strongholds, Tortosa (Tartus in present-day Syria) and Atlit (in present-day Israel). Their headquarters then moved to Limassol on the island of Cyprus,[57] and they also attempted to maintain a garrison on tiny Arwad Island, just off the coast from Tortosa. In 1300, there was some attempt to engage in coordinated military efforts with the Mongols[58] via a new invasion force at Arwad. In 1302 or 1303, however, the Templars lost the island to the Egyptian Mamluk Sultanate in the siege of Arwad. With the island gone, the Crusaders lost their last foothold in the Holy Land.[59]
With the order's military mission now less important, support for the organization began to dwindle. The situation was complex, however, since during the two hundred years of their existence, the Templars had become a part of daily life throughout Christendom.[60] The organization's Templar Houses, hundreds of which were dotted throughout Europe and the Near East, gave them a widespread presence at the local level.[2] The Templars still managed many businesses, and many Europeans had daily contact with the Templar network, such as by working at a Templar farm or vineyard, or using the order as a bank in which to store personal valuables. The order was still not subject to local government, making it everywhere a "state within a state" – its standing army, although it no longer had a well-defined mission, could pass freely through all borders. This situation heightened tensions with some European nobility, especially as the Templars were indicating an interest in founding their own monastic state, just as the Teutonic Knights had done in Prussia and the Baltic and the Knights Hospitaller were doing in Rhodes.[61]
The Templars were accused of enabling corruption in their ranks which often allowed them to influence the legal systems of Europe to act in their favor and gain influence over local rulers' lands at the expense of the rulers.[26]
Arrests, charges and dissolution
[edit]In 1305, the new Pope Clement V, based in Avignon, France, sent letters to both the Templar Grand Master Jacques de Molay and the Hospitaller Grand Master Fulk de Villaret to discuss the possibility of merging the two orders. Neither was amenable to the idea, but Pope Clement persisted, and in 1306 he invited both grand masters to France to discuss the matter. De Molay arrived first in early 1307, but de Villaret was delayed for several months. While waiting, de Molay and Clement discussed criminal charges that had been made two years earlier by an ousted Templar and were being discussed by King Philip IV of France and his ministers. It was generally agreed that the charges were false, but Clement sent King Philip a written request for assistance in the investigation. According to some historians, Philip, who was already deeply in debt to the Templars from his war against England, decided to seize upon the rumours for his own purposes. He began pressuring the church to take action against the order, as a way of freeing himself from his debts.[62]

At dawn on Friday, 13 October 1307, King Philip IV had de Molay and scores of other French Templars to be simultaneously arrested. The arrest warrant started with the words: "Dieu n'est pas content, nous avons des ennemis de la foi dans le Royaume" ("God is not pleased. We have enemies of the faith in the kingdom.").[64]
Claims were made that during Templar admissions ceremonies, recruits were forced to spit on the Cross, deny Christ, and engage in indecent kissing; brethren were also accused of worshipping idols, and the order was said to have encouraged homosexual practices.[65] Many of these allegations contain tropes that bear similarities to accusations made against other persecuted groups such as Jews, heretics, and accused witches.[66] These allegations, though, were highly politicised without any real evidence.[67] Still, the Templars were charged with numerous other offences such as financial corruption, fraud, and secrecy.[68] Many of the accused confessed to these charges under torture, and their confessions, even though obtained under duress, caused a scandal in Paris. The prisoners were coerced to confess that they had spat on the Cross. One said: "Moi, Raymond de La Fère, 21 ans, reconnais que [j'ai] craché trois fois sur la Croix, mais de bouche et pas de cœur" ("I, Raymond de La Fère, 21 years old, admit that I have spat three times on the Cross, but only from my mouth and not from my heart"). The Templars were accused of idolatry and were charged with worshipping either a figure known as Baphomet or a mummified severed head they recovered, amongst other artefacts, at their original headquarters on the Temple Mount. Some have theorised that this head might have been believed to be that of John the Baptist, among other things.[69]
Relenting to King Phillip's demands, Pope Clement then issued the papal bull Pastoralis praeeminentiae on 22 November 1307, which instructed all Christian monarchs in Europe to arrest all Templars and seize their assets.[70] Clement called for papal hearings to determine the Templars' guilt or innocence, and once freed, many Templars recanted their confessions.
Several Templars are listed as having come from Gisors to defend the Order on 26 February 1310: Henri Zappellans or Chapelain, Anceau de Rocheria, Enard de Valdencia, Guillaume de Roy, Geoffroy de Cera or de La Fere-en-Champagne, Robert Harle or de Hermenonville, and Dreux de Chevru.[71][72][73] Some had sufficient legal experience to defend themselves in the trials, but in 1310, having appointed the archbishop of Sens, Philippe de Marigny, to lead the investigation, Philip blocked this attempt, using the previously forced confessions to have dozens of Templars burned at the stake in Paris.[74][75][76]
With Philip threatening military action unless the pope complied with his wishes, Clement finally agreed to disband the order, citing the public scandal that had been generated by the confessions. At the Council of Vienne in 1312, he issued a series of papal bulls, including Vox in excelso, which officially dissolved the order, and Ad providam, which turned over most Templar assets to the Hospitallers.[77]

As for the leaders of the order, the elderly Grand Master Jacques de Molay, who had confessed under torture, retracted his confession. Geoffroi de Charney, Preceptor of Normandy, also retracted his confession and insisted on his innocence. Both men, under pressure from the king, were declared guilty of being relapsed heretics and sentenced to burn alive at the stake in Paris on 18 March 1314. De Molay reportedly remained defiant to the end, asking to be tied in such a way that he could face the Notre Dame Cathedral and hold his hands together in prayer.[78] According to legend, he called out from the flames that both Pope Clement and King Philip would soon meet him before God. His actual words were recorded on the parchment as follows: "Dieu sait qui a tort et a péché. Il va bientôt arriver malheur à ceux qui nous ont condamnés à mort" ("God knows who is wrong and has sinned. Soon a calamity will occur to those who have condemned us to death").[64] Clement died only a month later, and Philip died while hunting within the same year.[79][80][81]
The remaining Templars around Europe were either arrested and tried under the Papal investigation (with virtually none convicted), absorbed into other Catholic military orders, or pensioned off and allowed to live out their days peacefully. By papal decree, the property of the Templars was transferred to the Knights Hospitaller except in the Kingdoms of Castile, Aragon, and Portugal. Portugal was the first country in Europe where they had settled, occurring only two or three years after the order's foundation in Jerusalem and even having a presence during Portugal's conception.[82]
The Portuguese king, Denis I, refused to pursue and persecute the former knights, as had occurred in some other states under the influence of Philip & the crown. Under his protection, Templar organizations simply changed their name, from "Knights Templar" to the reconstituted Order of Christ and also a parallel Supreme Order of Christ of the Holy See; both are considered successors to the Knights Templar.[83][84][85]
Chinon Parchment
[edit]In September 2001, a document known as the Chinon Parchment dated 17–20 August 1308 was discovered in the Vatican Archives by Barbara Frale, apparently after having been filed in the wrong place in 1628. It is a record of the trial of the Templars and shows that Clement absolved the Templars of all heresies in 1308 before formally disbanding the order in 1312, as did another Chinon Parchment dated 20 August 1308 addressed to Philip IV of France, also mentioning that all Templars that had confessed to heresy were "restored to the Sacraments and to the unity of the Church". This other Chinon Parchment has been well known to historians,[86][87][88] having been published by Étienne Baluze in 1693[89] and by Pierre Dupuy in 1751.[90]
The current position of the Catholic Church is that the persecution of the Knights Templar was unjust, that nothing was inherently wrong with the order or its rule, and that Pope Clement V was pressed into his actions by the magnitude of the public scandal and by the dominating influence of King Philip IV.[91]
Organization
[edit]
The Templars were organised as a monastic order similar to Bernard's Cistercian Order, which was considered the first effective international organization in Europe.[92] The organizational structure had a strong chain of authority. Each country with a major Templar presence (France, Poitou, Anjou, Jerusalem, England, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Tripoli, Antioch, Hungary, and Croatia)[93] had a master of the Order for the Templars in that region.
All of them were subject to the grand master, appointed for life, who oversaw both the order's military efforts in the East and their financial holdings in the West. The grand master exercised his authority via the visitors-general of the order, who were knights specially appointed by the grand master and convent of Jerusalem to visit the different provinces, correct malpractices, introduce new regulations, and resolve important disputes. The visitors-general had the power to remove knights from office and to suspend the master of the province concerned.[94][unreliable source?]
The central headquarters of the Templars had several offices that answered to the grand master. These were held as temporary appointments rather than for life. The second-in-command of the Order was the seneschal. The highest ranking military official was the marshal, while the preceptor (who was also sometimes called the commander) was responsible for the administration and provisions. The draper was responsible for their uniforms, the treasurer was in charge of finance, the turcopolier commanded auxiliary forces, and the prior was the head of the church at the headquarters.[95] The headquarters and its most senior officials were known as the convent[96][97] and its role was to assist and advise the grand master with running the administration of the Order.[98]
No precise numbers exist, but it is estimated that at the order's peak, there were between 15,000 and 20,000 Templars, of whom about a tenth were actual knights.[1][2]
Ranks within the order
[edit]Three main ranks
[edit]There was a threefold division of the ranks of the Templars: the noble knights, the non-noble sergeants, and the chaplains. The knights wear white mantles to symbolise their purity and chastity.[99] The sergeants wore black or brown. All three classes of brothers wore the order's red cross.[100] Before they received their monastic rule in 1129 at the Council of Troyes, the Templars were referred to only as knights (milites in Latin), and after 1129 they were also called brothers of their monastic order. Therefore the three main ranks were eventually known as knight brothers, sergeant brothers, and chaplain brothers. Knights and chaplains were referred to as brothers by 1140, but sergeants were not full members of the Order until the 1160s.[101]
The knights were the most visible division of the order. They were equipped as heavy cavalry, with three or four horses and one or two squires. Squires were generally not members of the order but were instead outsiders who were hired for a set period of time. The Templars did not perform knighting ceremonies, so anyone wishing to become a knight in the Templar had to be a knight already.[102]
Beneath the knights in the order and drawn from non-noble families were the sergeants.[103] They brought vital skills and trades from blacksmiths and builders, including administration of many of the order's European properties. In the Crusader states, they fought alongside the knights as light cavalry with a single horse.[104] Several of the order's most senior positions were reserved for sergeants, including the post of Commander of the Vault of Acre, who also served as the Templar fleet's admiral. But he was subordinated to the Order's preceptor instead of the marshal, indicating that the Templars considered their ships to be mainly for commerce rather than military purposes.[105][106]
From 1139, chaplains constituted a third Templar rank. They were ordained priests who cared for the Templars' spiritual needs.[107] These Templar clerics were also referred to as priest brothers or chaplain brothers.[108]
The Templars also employed lightly armed mercenaries as cavalry in the 12th century that were known as turcopoles (a Greek term for descendants of Turks). Its meaning has been interpreted as either referring to people of a mixed Muslim-Christian heritage who became Christians, or members of the local population in Syria. Sometime in the 13th century, turcopole became a formal rank held by Templar brothers, including Latin Christians.[109]
Grand masters
[edit]Starting with founder Hugues de Payens, the order's highest office was that of grand master, a position which was held for life, though considering the martial nature of the order, this could mean a very short tenure. All but two of the grand masters died in office, and several died during military campaigns. For example, during the Siege of Ascalon in 1153, Grand Master Bernard de Tremelay led a group of 40 Templars through a breach in the city walls. When the rest of the Crusader army did not follow, the Templars, including their grand master, were surrounded and beheaded.[110] Grand master Gérard de Ridefort was beheaded by Saladin in 1189 at the Siege of Acre.
The grand master oversaw all of the operations of the order, including both the military operations in the Holy Land and Eastern Europe and the Templars' financial and business dealings in Western Europe. Some grand masters also served as battlefield commanders, though this was not always wise: several blunders in de Ridefort's combat leadership contributed to the devastating defeat at the Battle of Hattin. The last grand master was Jacques de Molay, burned at the stake in Paris in 1314 by order of King Philip IV.[76]
Conduct, uniform and beards
[edit]
Bernard de Clairvaux and founder Hugues de Payens devised a specific code of conduct for the Templar Order, known to modern historians as the Latin Rule. Its 72 clauses laid down the details of the knights' way of life, including the types of garments they were to wear and how many horses they could have. Knights were to take their meals in silence, eat meat no more than three times per week, and not have physical contact of any kind with women, even members of their own family. A master of the Order was assigned "four horses, and one chaplain-brother, and one clerk with three horses, and one sergeant brother with two horses, and one gentleman valet to carry his shield and lance, with one horse".[112] As the order grew, more guidelines were added, and the original list of 72 clauses was expanded to several hundred in its final form.[113][114]
The daily schedule of the order adhered to the canonical hours in the Rule of Saint Benedict, with communal prayers designated at specific hours throughout the day. Members unable to participate must recite the Lord's Prayer at the same hours.
The knights wore a white surcoat with a red cross, and a white mantle also with a red cross; the sergeants wore a black tunic with a red cross on the front and a black or brown mantle.[115][116] The white mantle was assigned to the Templars at the Council of Troyes in 1129, and the cross was most probably added to their robes at the launch of the Second Crusade in 1147, when Pope Eugenius III, King Louis VII of France, and many other notables attended a meeting of the French Templars at their headquarters near Paris.[117][118][119] Under the Rule, the knights were to wear the white mantle at all times: They were even forbidden to eat or drink unless wearing it.[120]
The red cross that the Templars wore on their robes was a symbol of martyrdom, and to die in combat was considered a great honour that assured a place in heaven.[121] There was a cardinal rule that the warriors of the order should never surrender unless the Templar flag had fallen, and even then they were first to try to regroup with another of the Christian orders, such as that of the Hospitallers. Only after all flags had fallen were they allowed to leave the battlefield.[122] This uncompromising principle, along with their reputation for courage, excellent training, and heavy armament, made the Templars one of the most feared combat forces in medieval times.
Although not prescribed by the Templar Rule, it later became customary for members of the order to wear long and prominent beards. In about 1240, Alberic of Trois-Fontaines described the Templars as an "order of bearded brethren"; while during the interrogations by the papal commissioners in Paris in 1310–1311, out of nearly 230 knights and brothers questioned, 76 are described as wearing a beard, in some cases specified as being "in the style of the Templars", and 133 are said to have shaved off their beards, either in renunciation of the order or because they had hoped to escape detection.[123][124]
Initiation,[125] known as "reception" (receptio) into the order, was a profound commitment and involved a solemn ceremony. Outsiders were discouraged from attending the ceremony, which aroused the suspicions of medieval inquisitors during the later trials. New members had to willingly sign over all of their wealth and goods to the order and vow to "God and Our Lady" (mother of Jesus) poverty, chastity, piety, obedience to the master of the order, and to conquer the Holy Land of Jerusalem.[126] They were then promised "the bread and water and poor clothing of the house and much pain and suffering".[127]
Most brothers joined for life, although some were allowed to join for a set period. Sometimes a married man was allowed to join if he had his wife's permission,[116] but a married brother was not allowed to wear the white mantle.[128]
Legacy
[edit]
With their military mission and extensive financial resources, the Knights Templar funded a large number of building projects around Europe and the Holy Land. Many of these structures are still standing. Many sites also maintain the name "Temple" because of centuries-old association with the Templars.[129] For example, some of the Templars' lands in London were later rented to lawyers, which led to the names of the Temple Bar gateway and the Temple Underground station. Two of the four Inns of Court which may call members to act as barristers are the Inner Temple and Middle Temple – the entire area known as Temple, London.[130]
Distinctive architectural elements of Templar buildings include the use of the image of "two knights on a single horse", representing the Knights' poverty, and round buildings designed to resemble the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem.[131]
Modern organizations
[edit]The Knights Templar were disbanded in 1309. Following the suppression of the Order, a number of Knights Templar joined the newly established Order of Christ, which effectively reabsorbed the Knights Templar and its properties in AD 1319, especially in Portugal.[13][132]
The story of the persecution and sudden dissolution of the Templars has drawn many other groups to use alleged connections with them as a way of enhancing their own image and mystery.[133] Apart from the Order of Christ and Order of Montesa in Spain,[13][132][14] there are no historical connections between the Knights Templar and any other modern organization, the earliest of which emerged publicly in the 18th century.[134][135][136][137]
Order of Christ
[edit]Following the dissolution of the Knights Templar, the Order of Christ was erected in 1319 and absorbed many of the Knights Templar into its ranks, along with Knights Templar properties in Portugal.[13][132] Its headquarters became a castle in Tomar, a former Knights Templar castle.[13]
The Military Order of Christ consider themselves the successors of the former Knights Templar. After the Templars were abolished on 22 March 1312,[138][85] the Order of Christ was founded in 1319[139][84] under the protection of the Portuguese king Denis, who refused to persecute the former knights. Denis revived the Templars of Tomar as the Order of Christ, grateful for their aid during the Reconquista and in the reconstruction of Portugal after the wars. Denis negotiated with Clement's successor John XXII for recognition of the new order and its right to inherit Templar assets and property. This was granted in the papal bull Ad ea ex quibus of 14 March 1319.[12] The Portuguese brought the Order of Christ with them to Kongo and Brazil, where the Order of Christ continues to be awarded; the Vatican additionally has awarded the Supreme Order of Christ.[140][141][142]
Associations of the faithful
[edit]In the Catholic Church, there are certain associations of the Christian faithful that have modeled themselves after the Knights Templar, such as the Militia Templi.[143] Founded by Count Marcello Alberto Cristofani della Magione in 1979, the headquarters of the Militia Templi is located in the Castello della Magione, which originally belonged to the Knights Templar.[143] Those belonging to the Militia Templi include professed religious knights and dames, as well as married couples, all of whom recite the Divine Office daily.[143]
Temperance movement
[edit]Many temperance organizations named themselves after the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, citing the belief that the original Knights Templar "drank sour milk, and also because they were fighting 'a great crusade' against 'this terrible vice' of alcohol".[15] The largest of these, the International Order of Good Templars (IOGT), grew throughout the world after being started in the 19th century and continues to advocate for the abstinence from alcohol and other drugs; other Orders in this tradition include those of the Templars of Honor and Temperance (Tempel Riddare Orden), which has a large presence in Scandinavia.[15][144]
Freemasonry
[edit]Freemasonry has incorporated the symbols and rituals of several medieval military orders in a number of Masonic bodies since at least the 18th century. This can be seen in the "Red Cross of Constantine," inspired by the Military Constantinian Order; the "Order of Malta," inspired by the Knights Hospitaller; and the "Order of the Temple", inspired by the Knights Templar. The Orders of Malta and the Temple feature prominently in the York Rite. Though some have claimed a link between the historical Knights Templar of the 14th century through members who allegedly took refuge in Scotland and aided Robert the Bruce, this theory has been rejected by both Freemasons and historians.[145][146]
Neo-Templarism
[edit]Neo-Templarism is a term used to describe movements that claim to be direct continuations of the original Templars. The Templar degree system in Freemasonry built off an idea that Templars had embedded themselves within Freemasonry; however, some Freemasons believed the Templar degrees were not subordinate to masonry and were their own system. This culminated in 1805, when Bernard-Raymond Fabré-Palaprat, a physician who refused to acknowledge the authority of the Catholic Church, created a revivalist Templar movement, claiming he had discovered a document that revealed an unbroken history of Templar grand masters to the present day. Fabré-Palaprat declared himself the grand master of his revivalist order. This began a long series of revival orders involving various schisms, which Fabré-Palaprat is usually regarded as the originator of; Fabré-Palaprat's organization eventually evolved into the Sovereign Military Order of the Temple of Jerusalem. The idea that these orders have legitimate descent from the Templars has been criticized by scholars of Templar history as dubious and tied to false claims.[147][148]
Modern popular culture
[edit]The Knights Templar have been associated with legends circulated even during their time. Many orders, such as the freemasons, claimed to have received esoteric wisdom from the Templars, or were direct descendants of the order. Masonic writers added their own speculations in the 18th century, and further fictional embellishments have been added in popular novels such as Ivanhoe, Foucault's Pendulum, and The Da Vinci Code;[149] modern movies such as National Treasure, The Last Templar, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade; the television series Knightfall; as well as video games such as Broken Sword, Deus Ex, Assassin's Creed and Dante's Inferno.[150]
The Templars were the subject of many conspiracy theories and legends. A legend is that when Louis XVI was executed, a freemason dipped a cloth in the king's blood and said, "Jacques de Molay, you are avenged.", the idea being that the king of France was responsible for destroying the Knights Templar back then. A theory states that they are still existent and running a secret conspiracy to preserve the bloodline of Jesus.[151]
There have been speculative popular publications surrounding the order's early occupation of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem as well as speculation about what relics the Templars may have found there. The association of the Holy Grail with the Templars has precedents even in 12th-century fiction; Wolfram von Eschenbach's Parzival calls the knights guarding the Grail Kingdom templeisen, apparently a conscious fictionalization of the templarii.[152][153][154]
See also
[edit]- Sovereign Military Order of Malta – Descended from the Knights Hospitaller, another Catholic religious order involved in the Crusades
- Teutonic Order – Another Catholic religious order involved in the Crusades
- Templari Cattolici d'Italia – A private Catholic lay association of the faithful living and promoting the spirituality of the Knights Templar of old
Notes
[edit]References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ a b c Burman 1990, p. 45.
- ^ a b c d Barber 1992, pp. 314–26
By Molay's time the grand master was presiding over at least 970 houses, including commanderies and castles in the east and west, serviced by a membership which is unlikely to have been less than 7,000, excluding employees and dependents, who must have been seven or eight times that number.
- ^ Selwood, Dominic (2002). Knights of the Cloister. Templars and Hospitallers in Central-Southern Occitania 1100–1300. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press. ISBN 978-0-85115-828-0.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 47.
- ^ Nicholson 2001, p. 4.
- ^ Barber 1994.
- ^ Miller, Duane (2017). 'Knights Templar' in War and Religion, Vol. 2. Santa Barbara, California: ABC–CLIO. pp. 462–64. Retrieved 28 May 2017.
- ^ Barber 1993.
- ^ Barber, Malcolm (1995). The new knighthood : a history of the Order of the Temple (Canto ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. xxi–xxii. ISBN 978-0-521-55872-3.
- ^ Enciclopédia dos Lugares Mágicos de Portugal, vol. 11, pp. 79
- ^ Pinho Leal, Augusto Soares d’Azevedo Barbosa de (1875). Portugal Antigo e Moderno - Diccionario - "Mogadouro". [S.l.]: Livraria Editora de Mattos Moreira & Companhia. pp. 355
- ^ a b F. A. Dutra, "Dinis, King of Portugal", in Medieval Iberia: An Encyclopedia (Routledge, 2003), p. 285.
- ^ a b c d e Ralls, Karen (2007). Knights Templar Encyclopedia: The Essential Guide to the People, Places, Events, and Symbols of the Order of the Temple. Red Wheel Weiser Conari. p. 53. ISBN 978-1-56414-926-8.
Founded in Portugal and approved by papal bull in 1319, after the suppression of their Order in 1312, a number of Templars joined the newly established Order of Christ. The knights of this Order became known as the Knights of Christ. They wore a white mantle with a red cross that had a white twist in the middle, which also has been translated as a double cross of red and silver in some medieval documents. Initially, the Order of Christ was located at Castro Marim; later, its headquarters was relocated to Tomar, the location of the castle of the Knights Templar.
- ^ a b Moeller, Charles (1913a). . Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 10.
- ^ a b c Nicholson, Helen (2014). A Brief History of the Knights Templar. Little, Brown. p. 151. ISBN 978-1-4721-1787-8.
- ^ Barber 1994, p. 7.
- ^ Burman 1990, pp. 13, 19.
- ^ Archer, Thomas Andrew; Kingsford, Charles Lethbridge (1894). The Crusades: The Story of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. T. Fisher Unwin. p. 176.
- ^ Burgtorf 2008, pp. 545–546.
- ^ Selwood, Dominic (20 April 2013). "Birth of the Order". Retrieved 20 April 2013.
- ^ Read 2001, p. 91.
- ^ Selwood, Dominic (28 May 2013). "The Knights Templar 4: St Bernard of Clairvaux". Archived from the original on 30 June 2017. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
- ^ Selwood, Dominic (1996). "'Quidam autem dubitaverunt': the Saint, the Sinner and a Possible Chronology". Autour de la Première Croisade. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne. pp. 221–230. ISBN 978-2-85944-308-5.
- ^ Barber 1994, p. 56.
- ^ Burman 1990, p. 40.
- ^ a b Cartwright, Mark (28 August 2018). "Knights Templar". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 19 April 2024.
- ^ Stevenson 1907, p. 218.
- ^ Stephen A. Dafoe. "In Praise of the New Knighthood". TemplarHistory.com. Archived from the original on 26 March 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2007.
- ^ Martin 2005.
- ^ Ralls, Karen (2007). Knights Templar Encyclopedia. Career Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-1-56414-926-8.
- ^ Benson, Michael (2005). Inside Secret Societies. Kensington. p. 90.
- ^ Burman 1990, pp. 63–64.
- ^ Barquero Goñi 2011, pp. 174−175.
- ^ Barquero Goñi, Carlos (2011). "Templarios y Hospitalarios en la Reconquista peninsular" (PDF). Anales de la Universidad de Alicante. Historia Medieval (17). Universidad de Alicante: 175−176.
- ^ Barquero Goñi 2011, pp. 176−177.
- ^ Barquero Goñi 2011, p. 176.
- ^ a b c Burman 1990, pp. 53–54.
- ^ Howarth 1982, p. 97.
- ^ Forey 1995, p. 191.
- ^ Burman 1990, pp. 51–53.
- ^ Forey 1995, p. 187.
- ^ a b Philips & Hoch 2001, p. 145.
- ^ Barber 1994, pp. 66–67.
- ^ a b Barber 1994, pp. 68–70.
- ^ Howarth 1982, pp. 106–107.
- ^ Runciman 1951, pp. 325–328.
- ^ Barber 1994, p. 70.
- ^ Smail 1956, pp. 211–212.
- ^ a b c Barber 1994, p. 73.
- ^ Fulton 2022, p. 25.
- ^ Barber 1994, p. 71.
- ^ Barber 1994, pp. 73–75.
- ^ Nicholson 2001, pp. 74–75.
- ^ a b Barber 1994, p. 75.
- ^ Fulton 2022, p. 26.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 99.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 113.
- ^ Demurger, p. 139. "During four years, Jacques de Molay and his order were totally committed, with other Christian forces of Cyprus and Armenia, to an enterprise of reconquest of the Holy Land, in liaison with the offensives of Ghazan, the Mongol Khan of Persia."
- ^ Nicholson 2001, p. 201
The Templars retained a base on Arwad island (also known as Ruad island, formerly Arados) off Tortosa (Tartus) until October 1302 or 1303, when the island was recaptured by the Mamluks.
- ^ Nicholson 2001, p. 5.
- ^ Nicholson 2001, p. 237.
- ^ Barber 2006.
- ^ "Convent of Christ in Tomar". World Heritage Site. Archived from the original on 31 December 2006. Retrieved 20 March 2007.
- ^ a b "Les derniers jours des Templiers". Science et Avenir: 52–61. July 2010.
- ^ Riley-Smith, Johnathan (1995). The Oxford Illustrated History of the Crusades. Oxford: Oxford Press. p. 213.
- ^ Rice, Joshua (1 June 2022). "Burn in Hell". History Today. 72 (6): 16–18.
- ^ Dodd, Gwilym; Musson, Anthony (2006). The Reign of Edward II: New Perspectives. Boydell & Brewer. p. 51. ISBN 978-1-903153-19-2.
- ^ Barber 1993, p. 178.
- ^ Edgeller, Johnathan (2010). Taking the Templar Habit: Rule, Initiation Ritual, and the Accusations against the Order (PDF). Texas Tech University. pp. 62–66. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 July 2011.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 118.
- ^ Alain Demurger (2019). "Templars". The Persecution of the Knights Templar: Scandal, Torture, Trial. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-64313-089-7. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
Seven of these nine Templars are also on the list of brothers who came from Gisors on 26 February 1310: Henri Zappellans or Chapelain, Anceau de Rocheria, Enard de Valdencia, Guillaume de Roy, Geoffroy de Cera or de La Fere-en-Champagne, Robert Harle or de Hermenonville, and Dreux de Chevru; the two others, Robert de Mortefontaine and Robert de Monts-de-Soissons, perhaps appear under different names. We don't know the reasons why those nine Templars were not taken back to Gisors. They are catalogued as 'non-reconciled': that is, they had not been absolved and reconciled with the Church by a diocesan commission. They attended neither the Council of Sens nor that of Reims in May 1310. They were from different dioceses: Toul, Sens, Chalons-en-Champagne, Treves but also Soissons (Guillaume de Roy), Laon (Geoffroy de La Fere) and Senlis (Robert Harle).
- ^ De Philippe Antoine Grouvelle (1805). "Les Templiers". Mémoires historiques sur les Templiers, ou Éclaircissemens nouveaux sur leur histoire, leur procès, les accusations intentées contr'eux, et les causes secrètes de leur ruine. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
Noms des Frères rassemblés le 28 mars 1310, devant les Commissaires charges par le Pape de l'Enquête sur les griefs imputés à l'Ordre du Temple en général... 184. Guillaume De Roy
- ^ Société académique de Laon (1864). "Bulletin de la Société académique de Laon". Bibliothèque nationale de France. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
Procès des Templiers" "Nicolas de Celles; Gauthier de Villesavoye; Etienne de Compiègne; Robert de Montreuil-aux-Lions, pètre; Guillaume de Roy; Geoffroy de Cère; Eloi de Pavant; Raoul et Pierre de Compiègne, Pierre d'Anizy défendront tous l'Ordre.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 122.
- ^ Sobecki 2006, p. 963.
- ^ a b Barber 1993, p. 3.
- ^ Martin 2005, pp. 123–124.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 125.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 140.
- ^ Malcolm Barber has researched this legend and concluded that it originates from La Chronique métrique attribuée à Geffroi de Paris, ed. A. Divèrres, Strasbourg, 1956, pp. 5711–5742. Geoffrey of Paris was "apparently an eye-witness, who describes de Molay as showing no sign of fear and, significantly, as telling those present that God would avenge their deaths". Barber 2006, p. 357, footnote 110
- ^ In The New Knighthood, Barber referred to a variant of this legend, about how an unspecified Templar had appeared before and denounced Clement V and, when he was about to be executed sometime later, warned that both Pope and King would "within a year and a day be obliged to explain their crimes in the presence of God", found in the work by Ferreto of Vicenza, Historia rerum in Italia gestarum ab anno 1250 ad annum usque 1318 (Barber 1994, pp. 314–315).
- ^ Templários no condado portucalense antes do reconhecimento formal da ordem: O caso de Braga no início do séc. XII – Revista da Faculdade de Letras [Templars in the County of Portucale before the formal recognition of the order: The case of Braga in early 12th century], Ciências e Técnicas do Património, Porto 2013, Volume XII, pp. 231–243. Author: Paula Pinto Costa, FLUP/CEPESE (University of Porto)
- ^ "The Order of Christ and the Papacy". 6 May 2008. Archived from the original on 6 May 2008.
- ^ a b Helen J. Nicholson (2004). The Crusades. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-313-32685-1.
- ^ a b Jochen, Burgtorf; Paul F., Crawford; Helen J., Nicholson (2013). The Debate on the Trial of the Templars (1307–1314). Ashgate. p. 298. ISBN 978-1-4094-8102-7.
- ^ Charles d'Aigrefeuille, Histoire de la ville de Montpellier, Volume 2, p. 193 (Montpellier: J. Martel, 1737–1739).
- ^ Sophia Menache, Clement V, p. 218, 2002 paperback edition ISBN 0-521-59219-4 (Cambridge University Press, originally published in 1998).
- ^ Germain-François Poullain de Saint-Foix, Oeuvres complettes de M. de Saint-Foix, Historiographe des Ordres du Roi, p. 287, Volume 3 (Maestricht: Jean-Edme Dupour & Philippe Roux, Imprimeurs-Libraires, associés, 1778).
- ^ Étienne Baluze, Vitae Paparum Avenionensis, 3 Volumes (Paris, 1693).
- ^ Pierre Dupuy, Histoire de l'Ordre Militaire des Templiers (Foppens, Brusselles, 1751).
- ^ Frale, Barbara (2004). "The Chinon chart – Papal absolution to the last Templar, Master Jacques de Molay". Journal of Medieval History. 30 (2): 109–134. doi:10.1016/j.jmedhist.2004.03.004. S2CID 153985534.
- ^ Burman 1990, p. 28.
- ^ Barber 1993, p. 10.
- ^ International, American. "The Knights Templar and Knights Hospitaller". www.medievalwarfare.info. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
- ^ Burgtorf 2008, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Burgtorf 2008, p. 1.
- ^ Burgtorf 2008, p. 14.
- ^ Burgtorf 2008, pp. 15–16.
- ^ The Rule of the Templars. p. article 17.
- ^ Selwood, Dominic (7 April 2013). "The Knights Templars 2: Sergeants, Women, Chaplains, Affiliates". Archived from the original on 30 June 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2013.
- ^ Burgtorf 2008, pp. 36–37.
- ^ Selwood, Dominic (20 March 2013). "The Knights Templar 1: The Knights". Retrieved 12 April 2013.
- ^ Barber 1994, p. 190.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 54.
- ^ Burgtorf 2008, p. 92.
- ^ Burgtorf 2008, p. 296.
- ^ Moeller 1913.
- ^ Burgtorf 2008, p. 97.
- ^ Burgtorf 2008, pp. 37–38.
- ^ Read 2001, p. 137.
- ^ Hourihane, Colum (2012). "Flags and standards". The Grove Encyclopedia of Medieval Art and Architecture. OUP USA. p. 514. ISBN 978-0-19-539536-5.
the Knights Templar ... carried white shields with red crosses but [their] sacred banner, Beauséant, was white with a black chief
- ^ Burman 1990, p. 43.
- ^ Burman 1990, pp. 30–33.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 32.
- ^ Barber 1994, p. 191.
- ^ a b Burman 1990, p. 44.
- ^ Barber 1994, p. 66
(WT, 12.7, p. 554. James of Vitry, 'Historia Hierosolimatana', ed. J. ars, Gesta Dei per Francos, vol I(ii), Hanover, 1611, p. 1083, interprets this as a sign of martyrdom.)According to William of Tyre it was under Eugenius III that the Templars received the right to wear the characteristic red cross upon their tunics, symbolising their willingness to suffer martyrdom in the defence of the Holy Land.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 43
The Pope conferred on the Templars the right to wear a red cross on their white mantles, which symbolised their willingness to suffer martyrdom in defending the Holy Land against the infidel.
- ^ Read 2001, p. 121
Pope Eugenius gave them the right to wear a scarlet cross over their hearts, so that the sign would serve triumphantly as a shield and they would never turn away in the face of the infidels': the red blood of the martyr was superimposed on the white of the chaste." (Melville, La Vie des Templiers, p. 92.)
- ^ Burman 1990, p. 46.
- ^ Nicholson 2001, p. 141.
- ^ Barber 1994, p. 193.
- ^ Harris, Oliver D. (2013). "Beards: true and false". Church Monuments. 28: 124–132, esp. 124–125.
- ^ Nicholson 2001, pp. 48, 124–127.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 52.
- ^ Nicholson, Helen J., ed. (2021). "Beliefs". The Knights Templar. Amsterdam University Press. pp. 33–42. doi:10.1017/9781641891691.004. ISBN 978-1-64189-169-1. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- ^ Newman, S. (2007). The Real History Behind the Templars. Berkeley Publishing. pp. 304–312.
- ^ Barber 1993, p. 4.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 58.
- ^ Ruggeri, Amanda. "The hidden world of the Knights Templar". Retrieved 11 December 2017.
- ^ Barber 1994, pp. 194–195.
- ^ a b c Gourdin, Theodore S. (1855). Historical Sketch of the Order of Knights Templar. Walker & Evans. p. 22.
Upon the suppression of the Order of Templars in Portugal, their estates were given to this equestrian militia. The name of the Order was changed to that of the Order of Christ. The Templars in Portugal suffered little persecution, and the Order of Christ, since its foundation in 1317, has always been protected by the sovereigns of that country, and also by the Popes of Rome.
- ^ Finlo Rohrer (19 October 2007). "What are the Knights Templar up to now?". BBC News Magazine. Retrieved 13 April 2008.
- ^ The Mythology Of The Secret Societies (London: Secker and Warburg, 1972). ISBN 0-436-42030-9
- ^ Peter Partner, The Murdered Magicians: The Templars And Their Myth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982). ISBN 0-19-215847-3
- ^ John Walliss, Apocalyptic Trajectories: Millenarianism and Violence In The Contemporary World, p. 130 (Bern: Peter Lang AG, European Academic Publishers, 2004). ISBN 3-03910-290-7
- ^ Michael Haag, Templars: History and Myth: From Solomon's Temple To The Freemasons (Profile Books Ltd, 2009). ISBN 978-1-84668-153-0
- ^ Robert Ferguson (2011). The Knights Templar and Scotland. History Press Limited. p. 39. ISBN 978-0-7524-6977-5.
- ^ Matthew Anthony Fitzsimons; Jean Bécarud (1969). The Catholic Church today: Western Europe. University of Notre Dame Press. p. 159.
- ^ Akyeampong, Emmanuel Kwaku; Gates, Henry Louis Gates (2012). Dictionary of African Biography. Oxford University Press. p. 187. ISBN 978-0-19-538207-5.
- ^ Bostoen, Koen; Brinkman, Inge (2018). The Kongo Kingdom: The Origins, Dynamics and Cosmopolitan Culture of an African Polity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 237–238. ISBN 978-1-108-47418-4.
- ^ Ragnau, Edmond Hugues de (1913). The Vatican: The Center of Government of the Catholic World. D. Appleton & Company. p. 38.
- ^ a b c Sonnen, John Paul (21 December 2023). "The Castello della Magione di Poggibonsi: Centre of Resplendent Liturgical Arts". Liturgical Arts Journal. Retrieved 8 October 2025.
- ^ Ammerman, Robert T.; Ott, Peggy J.; Tarter, Ralph E. (1999). Prevention and Societal Impact of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-1-135-67215-7.
- ^ "Freemasonry Today periodical (Issue January 2002)". Grand Lodge Publications Ltd. Archived from the original on 3 March 2011. Retrieved 28 May 2011.
- ^ Miller, Duane (2017). 'Knights Templar' in War and Religion, Vol 2. Santa Barbara, California: ABC–CLIO. p. 464. Retrieved 28 May 2017.
- ^ Introvigne, Massimo (2006). "Ordeal by Fire: The Tragedy of the Solar Temple". In Lewis, James R. (ed.). The Order of the Solar Temple: The Temple of Death. Controversial New Religions. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. pp. 19–23. ISBN 978-0-7546-5285-4.
- ^ Napier, Gordon (2011). A to Z of the Knights Templar: A Guide to Their History and Legacy. History Press. p. 424. ISBN 978-0-7524-7362-8.
- ^ The History Channel, Decoding the Past: The Templar Code, 7 November 2005, video documentary written by Marcy Marzuni.
- ^ Magy Seif El-Nasr; Maha Al-Saati; Simon Niedenthal; David Milam. "Assassin's Creed: A Multi-Cultural Read". pp. 6–7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 November 2009. Retrieved 1 October 2009.
we interviewed Jade Raymond ... Jade says ... Templar Treasure was ripe for exploring. What did the Templars find
- ^ "Templar | History, Battles, Symbols, & Legacy | Britannica". www.britannica.com. 26 March 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 133. Helmut Brackert, Stephan Fuchs (eds.), Titurel, Walter de Gruyter, 2002, p. 189 Archived 1 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine. There is no evidence of any actual connection of the historical Templars with the Grail, nor any claim on the part of any Templar to have discovered such a relic. See Karen Ralls, Knights Templar Encyclopedia: The Essential Guide to the People, Places, Events and Symbols of the Order of the Temple, p. 156 (The Career Press, Inc., 2007). ISBN 978-1-56414-926-8
- ^ Louis Charpentier, Les Mystères de la Cathédrale de Chartres (Paris: Robert Laffont, 1966), translated The Mysteries of Chartres Cathedral (London: Research Into Lost Knowledge Organization, 1972).
- ^ Sanello, Frank (2003). The Knights Templars: God's Warriors, the Devil's Bankers. Taylor Trade Publishing. pp. 207–208. ISBN 978-0-87833-302-8.
Sources
[edit]- Barber, Malcolm (1994). The New Knighthood: A History of the Order of the Temple. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-42041-9.
- Barber, Malcolm (1993). The Trial of the Templars (1st ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-45727-9.
- Barber, Malcolm (2006). The Trial of the Templars (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-67236-8.
- Barber, Malcolm (1992). "Supplying the Crusader States: The Role of the Templars". In Benjamin Z. Kedar (ed.). The Horns of Hattin. Jerusalem and London. pp. 314–326.
- Burgtorf, Jochen (2008). The Central Convent of Hospitallers and Templars: History, Organization, and Personnel (1099/1120–1310). Leiden: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-16660-8.
- Burman, Edward (1990). The Templars: Knights of God. Rochester: Destiny Books. ISBN 978-0-89281-221-9.
- Mario Dal Bello (2013). Gli Ultimi Giorni dei Templari, Città Nuova, ISBN 978-88-311-6451-1
- Forey, Alan (1995). "The Military Orders, 1120–1312". In Riley-Smith, Jonathan (ed.). The Oxford Illustrated History of the Crusades. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-285428-5.
- Fulton, Michael S. (2022). Contest for Egypt: The Collapse of the Fatimid Caliphate, the Ebb of Crusader Influence, and the Rise of Saladin. Leiden: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-51227-6.
- Howarth, Stephen (1982). The Knights Templar. New York: Barnes and Noble. ISBN 0-88029-663-1.
- Martin, Sean (2005). The Knights Templar: The History & Myths of the Legendary Military Order. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press. ISBN 978-1-56025-645-8.
- Moeller, Charles (1913). . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 10. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
- Nicholson, Helen (2001). The Knights Templar: A New History. Stroud: Sutton. ISBN 978-0-7509-2517-4.
- Philips, Jonathan; Hoch, Martin, eds. (2001). The Second Crusade: Scope and Consequences. Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 0-7190-5710-8.
- Read, Piers (2001). The Templars. New York: Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-81071-8 – via archive.org.
- Stevenson, W. B. (1907). The Crusaders in the East: a brief history of the wars of Islam with the Latins in Syria during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Cambridge University Press.
The Latin estimates of Saladin's army are no doubt greatly exaggerated (26,000 in Tyre xxi. 23, 12,000 Turks and 9,000 Arabs in Anon.Rhen. v. 517
- Sobecki, Sebastian (2006). "Marigny, Philippe de". Biographisch-bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon (26th ed.). Bautz: Nordhausen. pp. 963–64.
- Runciman, Steven (1951). A History of the Crusades, Volume II: The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East, 1100–1187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-06162-8.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - Smail, R. C. (1956). Crusading Warfare 1097–1193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 1-56619-769-4.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
Further reading
[edit]- Malcolm Barber, Keith Bate (2002). The Templars: Selected Sources Translated and Annotated by Malcolm Barber and Keith Bate. Manchester University Press ISBN 0-7190-5110-X
- Brighton, Simon (2006). In Search of the Knights Templar: A Guide to the Sites in Britain. London: Orion Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-297-84433-4.
- Jochen Burgtorf, Shlomo Lotan, Enric Mallorquí-Ruscalleda (eds.) (2021). The Templars: The Rise, Fall, and Legacy of a Military Religious Order, Routledge ISBN 978-1-138-65062-6
- Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 26 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Upton-Ward, Judith Mary (1992). The Rule of the Templars: The French Text of the Rule of the Order of the Knights Templar. Ipswich: Boydell Press. ISBN 978-0-85115-315-5.
External links
[edit]Knights Templar
View on GrokipediaFounding and Early Development
Origins and Papal Endorsement
The Knights Templar, formally known as the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, originated around 1119 when French knight Hugues de Payens assembled eight companions to protect Christian pilgrims journeying from Jaffa to Jerusalem. This initiative addressed persistent threats of banditry and Saracen raids on pilgrimage routes, which persisted despite the First Crusade's capture of Jerusalem in 1099 and the establishment of the Latin Kingdom. The group, initially small and resource-poor, received quarters in the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount from King Baldwin II of Jerusalem, who endorsed their protective mission.[6][7][8] As warrior-monks, the founders adopted strict monastic vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience, blending Cistercian spiritual discipline with martial readiness to defend Christendom's frontiers. Their early operations emphasized humility and self-sufficiency, with members forgoing personal wealth and relying on donations to sustain patrols amid the Holy Land's unstable security. This dual religious-military identity distinguished them from secular knights, positioning the order as a dedicated safeguard for pilgrims vulnerable to ambushes in the aftermath of crusader victories.[9][10] Official ecclesiastical recognition arrived at the Council of Troyes in January 1129, convened under papal legate cardinal Matthew of Albania, where the order's rule was formalized. Bernard of Clairvaux, a prominent Cistercian abbot and influential churchman, championed the Templars, drafting or inspiring their Latin Rule—a 68-article code adapting Benedictine and Cistercian principles to permit armed service while enforcing ascetic standards. This endorsement elevated the order from informal fellowship to a legitimate religious institution, enabling recruitment and expansion under church auspices.[11][12] Papal confirmation followed with the bull Omne datum optimum, issued by Pope Innocent II on March 29, 1139, which explicitly approved the Templars' statutes and granted privileges such as exemption from local bishops' jurisdiction and direct accountability to the Holy See. This decree solidified their autonomy, allowing independent management of resources and personnel essential for their protective duties, while affirming their role in bolstering crusader defenses.[13][14]Establishment in the Holy Land
The Knights Templar originated in Jerusalem in 1119, formed by Hugues de Payens and eight companions who pledged to protect Christian pilgrims journeying to holy sites in the aftermath of the First Crusade's conquests. Their initial vows were taken at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre on Christmas Day that year.[15] In January 1120, during the Council of Nablus, King Baldwin II of Jerusalem and Patriarch Warmund of Jerusalem formally endorsed the nascent order, granting them quarters in a wing of the royal palace situated within the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount. The Templars identified this site with the ruins of Solomon's Temple, interpreting the concession as a divine mandate to safeguard the sacred precincts central to Christian devotion.[15][16] This headquarters served as both administrative center and symbolic bastion, enabling patrols along vulnerable pilgrim routes such as those extending to the Jordan River.[16] Commencing with approximately nine members, the order's early sustainability hinged on aristocratic patronage, including support from Fulk, Count of Anjou, who joined as a benefactor in 1120. To bolster recruitment and resources, de Payens journeyed to Western Europe starting in 1127, soliciting donations of cash, livestock, and estates that facilitated the creation of preceptories to manage incoming aid.[15][17] By the 1130s, these European holdings had expanded the order's capacity, allowing for augmented knightly contingents dispatched to Outremer and the acquisition of additional lands from Crusader potentates in the Kingdom of Jerusalem and adjacent principalities.[17] Such grants fostered consolidation without immediate recourse to offensive warfare, embedding the Templars as steadfast auxiliaries to the Latin East's monarchs and lords. Their reliability in escort duties and site security earned reciprocal endowments, including early manor houses repurposed as outposts, which fortified logistical networks across the region.[17] This phase marked a transition from ad hoc vigilance to institutionalized presence, underpinned by transcontinental endowments rather than conquest.[15]Military Engagements and Achievements
Role in the Crusades
The Knights Templar assumed a pivotal strategic role in bolstering Crusader polities during the Second Crusade (1147–1149) and subsequent campaigns, deploying as elite heavy cavalry units to deliver shock assaults and shield advancing columns from ambush.[18] Their participation extended to escorting royal contingents, such as that of King Louis VII of France, where they provided tactical training and frontline protection amid the expedition's logistical strains.[19] Beyond this crusade, Templars integrated into broader defensive operations, coordinating with the Knights Hospitaller to patrol frontiers and reinforce garrisons against coordinated Muslim incursions.[20] This alliance, though occasionally strained by rivalry, ensured mutual support in sustaining pilgrim corridors and countering opportunistic raids, thereby stabilizing Latin outposts through shared reconnaissance and supply chains.[21] In fortress defense, Templars anchored key coastal and inland bastions, exemplified by their prolonged hold on Tortosa (modern Tartus), which they fortified as a bulwark against naval and land assaults from 1148 onward, repelling sieges that could have severed Crusader supply lines to Europe.[22] At Safita (Chastel Blanc), their garrisons employed disciplined rotations and scouting to monitor Ayyubid movements, preventing encirclement and enabling rapid reinforcements that forestalled the fragmentation of inland territories.[23] These efforts relied on rigorous logistics, including pre-positioned depots and knightly relays, which minimized attrition from attrition warfare and sustained operational tempo despite isolation. The Order's doctrinal commitment framed engagements as an unyielding holy war against the expansionist jihad prosecuted by Seljuk Turks and Ayyubid dynasts, who sought to reclaim Levantine territories through sustained holy warfare of their own.[24] Templars accepted disproportionate casualties—often serving as vanguard expendables in rearguard actions—yet replenished ranks via perpetual recruitment, embodying a causal calculus where martial sacrifice directly protracted Crusader viability.[25] This reliability empirically deferred Seljuk consolidation post-1071 and Ayyubid unification under Saladin, as Templar-held redoubts disrupted momentum, confining major reconquests to piecemeal gains until the Mamluk era.Key Battles and Tactical Innovations
One of the most notable Templar victories occurred at the Battle of Montgisard on November 25, 1177, where a small Crusader force including approximately 500 Templar and other knights, supported by infantry, decisively defeated Saladin's army of around 26,000 troops, including Mamluks.[26] The Templars exploited Saladin's overconfidence and dispersed formations by launching a surprise aggressive charge near Ramla, using terrain for concealment and routing the Ayyubid forces, which suffered heavy casualties and fled toward Egypt, marking a rare reversal for Saladin's campaigns.[27] This engagement highlighted Templar shock tactics, emphasizing rapid heavy cavalry assaults to disrupt larger, less cohesive Muslim armies.[28] In contrast, the Battle of Hattin on July 4, 1187, represented a catastrophic defeat for the Templars, who formed a core of the Crusader army under King Guy of Lusignan, comprising about 150 Templar knights among roughly 1,200 total knights.[29] Saladin's forces, numbering over 20,000, employed harassment tactics with archers and incendiaries to exhaust the Crusaders during their march from Sephoria to relieve Tiberias, denying water access and precipitating a collapse into the Horns of Hattin.[30] Despite their renowned discipline—refusing to retreat and fighting in tight formations until encircled—the Templars suffered near annihilation, with most captured knights executed afterward, contributing to the subsequent fall of Jerusalem.[31] During the Third Crusade, Templars played a pivotal role in the Battle of Arsuf on September 7, 1191, as part of Richard I's army of about 20,000 advancing south from Acre toward Jaffa against Saladin's 25,000 harassers.[32] Positioned on the left flank, the Templars maintained formation under constant arrow fire and missile attacks, adhering to Richard's orders to avoid premature charges until the Hospitallers broke ranks, enabling a coordinated heavy cavalry counterassault that shattered Saladin's lines and secured the coastal route.[33] This victory demonstrated Templar tactical restraint, preserving cohesion amid provocation to enable decisive exploitation of enemy fatigue. Templar military adaptations included refined heavy cavalry tactics, such as the "boar's head" wedge formation for penetrating infantry lines, combined with strict no-retreat discipline to maintain unit integrity under pressure.[34] In siege warfare, they innovated by constructing and defending fortified positions like the castles at Tortosa and Safita, integrating water cisterns and layered defenses to withstand prolonged assaults, which prolonged Crusader holdouts in the Levant until the 1291 fall of Acre.[35] For convoy protection, Templars escorted pilgrim and supply trains with screened marching orders—advance guards, flankers, and rearguards—mitigating ambush risks across hostile territories, supported by a network of nearly 1,000 commanderies, many fortified as staging posts.[36] These methods, grounded in empirical adaptations to outnumbered engagements, enhanced Crusader logistical resilience despite ultimate territorial losses.[37]Economic and Logistical Operations
Pioneering Financial Systems
The Knights Templar pioneered an early banking system in the mid-12th century, primarily to support pilgrimage and Crusader logistics by mitigating the dangers of transporting valuables across hostile territories. By approximately 1150, they issued letters of credit allowing depositors in Europe to receive funds or equivalents in the Levant upon presenting authenticated documents, often sealed and coded for verification within the order's network.[38][2] This mechanism reduced robbery risks for pilgrims carrying coinage or bullion, enabling greater mobilization of resources for holy wars without the physical transfer of specie over thousands of miles.[39] The Templars extended credit facilities to secular rulers, providing loans secured by gold reserves, pledged revenues, or movable assets like jewels, while circumventing canonical usury bans through administrative fees rather than interest charges. In 1191, during the Third Crusade, Richard I of England borrowed substantial sums from the order to finance his campaign, pawning crown jewels as collateral at their Acre outpost.[40] Philip II Augustus of France similarly utilized Templar financing for military endeavors, with the order managing aspects of royal fiscal operations by the late 12th century.[41] These arrangements stabilized wartime economies by offering reliable liquidity backed by the Templars' accumulated metallic reserves and international credibility. Their operations relied on a vast infrastructure of nearly 1,000 commanderies across Europe and the Near East, functioning as fortified vaults for deposits, withdrawals, and internal transfers predicated on the order's monastic discipline and papal privileges ensuring trust.[38] By the 1290s, this network handled the French crown's treasury, housed in the Paris Temple, where Templar officials oversaw collections, disbursements, and safekeeping amid royal indebtedness.[42][43] Such systems fostered proto-modern banking principles, including verifiable credit instruments and decentralized yet coordinated fund movement, causal precursors to contemporary correspondent banking without reliance on physical currency transit.[44]Estate Management and Resource Networks
The Knights Templar amassed extensive land holdings across Europe primarily through donations from nobility, monarchs, and pious benefactors seeking spiritual merits or political alliances, with records indicating over 9,000 manors, estates, and properties by the early 14th century.[45] These acquisitions spanned regions from England to the Iberian Peninsula, including rural preceptories like Cressing Temple in Essex, granted in 1137 and expanded to encompass 2,000 acres with mills by 1300.[46] [47] Management of these estates relied on a decentralized yet coordinated system of preceptories, each functioning as an administrative and productive unit supervised by knight brothers but operated largely by lay brothers—known as sergeants—who handled agricultural labor and oversight.[48] These non-combatant members cultivated arable lands for grain and legumes, maintained pastures for sheep and cattle to produce wool and livestock, and bred horses essential for order operations, achieving efficiencies through tenant famuli and specialized roles like ploughmen.[49] [50] Preceptory inventories, such as those from Temple Hirst in Yorkshire, document balanced exploitation of arable, meadow, and woodland resources, emphasizing sustainable yields to support the order's broader needs without overreliance on external markets.[50] To sustain Levant operations, the Templars established logistical networks linking European estates to Mediterranean ports, where preceptories collected surplus provisions like grain, wool, and preserved foods for shipment via owned vessels to Holy Land outposts.[51] Cartulary records and estate accounts demonstrate this system's role in fostering self-sufficiency, minimizing dependence on inconsistent royal or ecclesiastical aid that often faltered during crusade mobilizations.[52] Hubs such as those in Normandy and Provence facilitated bulk transport, with exemptions from tolls—granted by papal bulls like Omne datum optimum in 1139—enabling unimpeded movement of goods across feudal territories.[41] Administrative practices included standardized record-keeping in preceptory cartularies to track yields, tenancies, and resource allocation, reflecting early centralized oversight that optimized land use amid diverse regional conditions.[53] These efficiencies, bolstered by privileges exempting the order from local taxes and jurisdictions, enhanced operational mobility but provoked envy and disputes with feudal lords, who viewed the Templars' autonomy as a threat to customary seigneurial controls.[41]Organizational Framework
Hierarchy and Recruitment
The Knights Templar maintained a stratified hierarchy divided into three distinct classes, reflecting functional specialization within the order. Knight-brothers, required to be of noble birth and trained in warfare, formed the combat elite, clad in white mantles symbolizing purity and equipped for mounted engagements. Sergeant-brothers, typically from non-noble or lower noble origins, supported military and logistical operations as infantry, artisans, or administrators, wearing black or brown mantles to denote their status. Chaplain-brothers, ordained clergy, ensured spiritual welfare by conducting masses, administering sacraments, and upholding doctrinal orthodoxy, insulated from secular command.[54][55] Supreme authority rested with the Grand Master, elected for life by a conclave of thirteen senior members—eight knights, four sergeants, and one chaplain—to balance representation across classes and prioritize competence over hereditary privilege. The Grand Master directed global operations from Jerusalem until its recapture by Saladin in 1187, relocating to Acre in 1191 amid ongoing territorial contractions, and finally to Cyprus following the Mamluk conquest of Acre on May 18, 1291, which ended sustained Templar presence in the Levant.[56][57] Regional governance occurred through provincial masters appointed to oversee territories such as France, England, Aragon, and the Levantine priories of Jerusalem, Antioch, and Tripoli, enabling autonomous decision-making and resource allocation that sustained the order despite battlefield attrition. This decentralized model distributed command responsibilities, mitigating risks from centralized losses as evidenced by continued operations post-1187 defeats.[58] Recruitment demanded stringent criteria to preserve discipline and alignment with monastic-military ideals, with knight aspirants needing legitimate noble birth, freedom from debt or criminal taint, and endorsement by existing members after probationary service. Sergeants faced similar vetting but without noble prerequisites, emphasizing practical skills and loyalty. By the late 12th century, amid Crusader expansions, total membership—including professed brothers, affiliates, and lay associates—peaked at an estimated 15,000 to 20,000, though active knight-brothers numbered only about 10 percent, underscoring reliance on broader networks for sustainability.[1][57][59]Vows, Discipline, and Symbols
The Knights Templar, formally the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, bound members to the three traditional monastic vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience upon admission, as codified in their Latin Rule promulgated at the Council of Troyes in 1129. Poverty entailed communal ownership of all property, with recruits surrendering personal wealth and goods to the order irrevocably, ensuring no individual enrichment and directing resources toward the defense of Christendom. Chastity prohibited marriage, sexual relations, and even undue familiarity with women, while obedience demanded absolute submission to superiors, extending to military commands without question. These vows integrated ascetic renunciation with martial obligation, framing combat not as personal glory but as a causal imperative to safeguard pilgrims and holy sites from verifiable Islamic conquests in the Levant.[60] Discipline under the Rule emphasized rigorous self-denial to cultivate unit cohesion and spiritual focus amid perpetual warfare. Prohibitions included gambling, hunting with hounds or birds, swearing oaths beyond necessity, excessive drinking, gossip, and idle laughter or jesting, with violations punishable by flogging, demotion, or expulsion to preserve moral order. Meat consumption was limited to three days weekly to avoid bodily corruption, and knights were barred from pointed shoes or ostentatious dress that might incite vanity. Warfare, however, received explicit sanction as a divine service, permitting Templars to kill enemies without sin if conducted justly, distinguishing their ethos from pure monasticism by prioritizing empirical defense against territorial threats over pacifism. Trial records from 1307–1314 reveal testimonies affirming this overall rigor, with most knights denying deviations and describing enforced accountability, though isolated admissions under duress suggested occasional lapses in remote outposts due to wartime pressures.[61][62][63] Templar identifiers reinforced their dual identity, with knights adopting white mantles at the 1129 Council of Troyes to symbolize purity and chastity, later augmented by a red cross in 1147 via papal bull from Eugenius III on the eve of the Second Crusade, denoting martyrdom and the blood of Christ shed for faith's defense. Sergeants wore black or brown mantles with the same cross, while all ranks grew beards—unlike clean-shaven secular knights—to signify separation from worldly vanities and enhance brotherhood amid diverse recruits. These symbols, borne into battle, projected unambiguous commitment to vows, deterring internal discord and signaling to allies and foes alike the order's unyielding resolve.[59]Path to Decline
Loss of Crusader Support
The fall of Acre on May 18, 1291, marked the collapse of the last Crusader stronghold on the Levantine mainland, effectively terminating the Templars' primary military mandate to protect pilgrims and defend the Holy Land.[64] Despite their fierce defense of the city's northern walls alongside the Hospitallers, the Mamluk forces overwhelmed the defenders, forcing the surviving Templars to evacuate by sea.[65] This event rendered the order's foundational purpose obsolete, as no viable territorial base remained for sustained operations against Muslim forces in the region.[5] In response, the Templars relocated their eastern headquarters to Cyprus, where they established bases such as Limassol and maintained a fleet for potential reconnaissance and raids.[66] However, papal enthusiasm for new Crusades diminished sharply thereafter, with subsequent calls—such as those by Pope Nicholas IV—yielding minimal mobilization from Western Christendom, which increasingly viewed recovery of the Holy Land as impractical amid competing priorities like the Reconquista in Iberia and defensive needs against eastern steppe nomads.[67] The order's strategic irrelevance grew evident, as Cyprus served more as a staging point than a launchpad for reconquest, prompting internal reflection on their evolving role.[68] This shift exacerbated perceptions of mission drift, with the Templars devoting greater resources to European administrative and financial activities rather than frontline warfare, leading to critiques from contemporaries who saw the order as detached from its warrior origins.[68] Donations, once fueled by the urgency of Holy Land defense, began to dry up as noble and ecclesiastical benefactors redirected support toward local churches or other military orders with clearer regional mandates.[67] By the early 14th century, recruitment stagnated, with the order facing an aging membership and fewer entrants drawn to an institution perceived as triumphant in tactics yet defeated in its core strategic objective.[69] Estimates place the Templars at their 12th-century peak with around 2,000 knights supported by thousands of sergeants and affiliates, but post-1291 losses and disinterest contributed to a marked numerical and influential contraction.[5]Conflicts with Secular Monarchs
The Knights Templar encountered escalating tensions with secular rulers due to their extensive papal privileges, which exempted them from local laws, taxes, and royal oversight, positioning the order as an autonomous entity answerable solely to the pope.[70][69] This structure enabled the Templars to maintain neutrality in monarchs' internal disputes, prioritizing crusading duties over national allegiances, which increasingly irked kings consolidating power in the late 13th and early 14th centuries.[70] In France, King Philip IV's conflicts intensified as he borrowed heavily from the Templars to fund his protracted Flemish wars (1297–1305), including defeats like the Battle of Courtrai in 1302 that strained royal finances through troop levies and logistical costs exceeding 200,000 livres tournois annually.[71] Philip, facing bankruptcy from these campaigns and conflicts over Gascony with England, resented the order's refusal to forgive debts or submit to crown jurisdiction, viewing their vast, untaxed estates—spanning over 900 houses in Europe—and independent tribunals as impediments to fiscal recovery and absolutist control.[71][70] Analogous frictions arose in England, where Edward II inherited Templar loans from his father's campaigns but prioritized political survival over repayment, arresting order members in January 1308 under French and papal influence despite their prior financial support to the crown amid baronial unrest.[72] In Aragon, King James II initially rejected informant accusations against the Templars in 1307, valuing their military contributions and jurisdictional independence, though envy of their cross-border networks—handling royal consignments without seizure—fostered underlying royal unease.[73][71] The order's resistance to absorption into other institutions, such as proposed unions with the Hospitallers discussed in royal and ecclesiastical circles, further highlighted their commitment to sovereignty as a counterweight to monarchical overreach, prioritizing papal oversight and crusader mandate over national integration.[74] This stance, rooted in charters like Pope Innocent II's 1139 bull Omne datum optimum granting perpetual exemptions, exemplified the Templars' role as exemplars of supranational loyalty, which empirically fueled resentment as European crowns sought to dismantle rival power centers.[75]Trials, Suppression, and Dissolution
Arrests and Fabricated Charges
On Friday, October 13, 1307, King Philip IV of France issued secret orders leading to the coordinated arrest of hundreds of Knights Templar across the realm, including Grand Master Jacques de Molay and key officials, on charges of heresy, idolatry (such as worshipping a head called Baphomet), sodomy, denial of Christ, spitting and trampling on the cross during initiation rites, and other moral corruptions.[76][77] Royal agents simultaneously seized Templar preceptories, fortresses, and treasury holdings, transferring assets to the crown before any formal trials, which underscores the operation's aim to secure immediate financial gain amid Philip's mounting debts from wars and lavish spending.[78][79] Interrogations in France relied heavily on torture methods including the rack for stretching limbs, scorching with heated irons on feet and genitals, prolonged starvation, and threats of execution, prompting confessions from figures like de Molay and hundreds of others to the fabricated charges.[77][80] In Paris alone, 138 Templars endured such ordeals, with most admitting to the accusations under duress, though subsequent recantations—often numbering in the majority once physical coercion ended—revealed the unreliability of these statements, as prisoners retracted claims of secret rituals and immorality when facing less pressure.[77][81] The arrests extended to realms like England, Aragon, and the Holy Roman Empire, but outcomes varied sharply by local practices; in England, King Edward II delayed action until papal urging and employed milder questioning without routine torture, yielding minimal confessions and no widespread admissions of deviance, in contrast to France's systematic brutality.[82] This disparity highlights how coercive extraction, rather than inherent guilt, drove French results, as untortured Templars consistently denied the charges.[83] Philip's pattern of targeting affluent groups for fiscal relief—evident in his 1306 expulsion of Jews, seizure of their loans and properties to offset crown debts, and earlier ousting of Lombard bankers—positions the Templar suppression as a continuation of opportunistic asset grabs, not a response to verified wrongdoing.[84][85] Absent any documented complaints or investigations into Templar heresy, sodomy, or idolatry before 1307, the charges lack independent corroboration and align with standard inquisitorial tactics against perceived financial rivals, prioritizing royal solvency over empirical justice.[86][87]Papal Response and Chinon Parchment
In early 1308, Pope Clement V, residing near Avignon under the influence of King Philip IV of France, responded to the Templars' arrests by initiating his own inquiry, separate from the French proceedings, to assess the validity of the charges.[88] Despite Philip's pressure to endorse the accusations, Clement summoned select Templar leaders to Poitiers for examination but conducted a private interrogation at Chinon Castle from August 17 to 20, 1308, involving Cardinals Bérenger Frédol, Étienne de Suisy, and Landolfo Brancacci as witnesses.[89] The resulting Chinon Parchment records confessions from Grand Master Jacques de Molay, preceptor Geoffroi de Charney, and others regarding rituals like denial of Christ and spitting on the cross during initiations, which they attributed to coerced obedience rather than belief, leading Clement to deem the charges unsubstantiated and extend sacramental absolution to them for any errors under duress.[89] [90] This absolution, kept secret amid ongoing French trials, reflected Clement's discernment that empirical evidence pointed to fabricated or exaggerated claims driven by royal debt and envy of Templar wealth, rather than widespread doctrinal heresy.[88] However, Philip's threats and military demonstrations compelled Clement to withhold public vindication, illustrating the papacy's weakened autonomy post-Avignon relocation.[91] By 1311, at the Council of Vienne convened under Regnans in caelis, Clement faced persistent royal lobbying; the council's delegates declined to pronounce the Templars heretical based on reviewed testimonies, yet Clement unilaterally suppressed the order via the bull Vox in excelso on March 22, 1312, framing it as a precautionary dissolution without guilt adjudication, and redirected assets to the Knights Hospitaller per Ad providam.[92] The suppression's political causality over theological judgment was evident in outcomes: only a minority of Templars—fewer than 100 of thousands—persisted in heretical confessions warranting execution, with leaders like Molay burned in Paris on March 18, 1314, specifically for retracting coerced admissions, underscoring that dissolution served French fiscal interests more than papal truth-seeking.[88][92]Aftermath and Asset Redistribution
Following the papal bull Vox in excelso issued by Pope Clement V on March 22, 1312, at the Council of Vienne, the Knights Templar order was officially suppressed, with its members dispersed and properties subject to redistribution under ecclesiastical oversight.[93] The bull Ad providam, promulgated on May 2, 1312, directed the transfer of Templar lands, goods, and financial assets primarily to the Knights Hospitaller, excluding properties in realms where monarchs like Philip IV of France had already seized control or opposed the handover; this aimed to sustain Christian military efforts but required the Hospitallers to compensate affected parties, including a payment of 200,000 livres tournois to the French crown to settle claims.[94][95] In France, where Philip IV had confiscated Templar estates since the arrests of October 13, 1307, much of the wealth—including preceptories, cash reserves, and agricultural holdings—was diverted to royal coffers, bolstering the king's finances amid his debts while delaying full Hospitaller access for years.[96][97] Surviving Templars, numbering in the hundreds after executions like the burning of 54 recalcitrant knights in Paris on May 12, 1310, received varied treatment: many low-ranking members were absolved, granted pensions from order funds, or permitted to join other religious orders or secular pursuits, while lay affiliates and servants obtained modest annuities to avoid destitution.[5] In regions outside France, such as England, former Templars were often integrated into Hospitaller ranks or allowed to retire with portions of estate revenues.[6] Templar archives and charters were systematically destroyed during the suppression, particularly in France, to erase institutional memory, though archaeological evidence from sites like the Paris Temple enclosure—excavated remnants of fortified walls, chapels, and storage vaults beneath modern streets—attests to the order's pre-dissolution operational extent, spanning over 900 preceptories across Europe with integrated economic networks.[98] This dispersal eroded the autonomy of independent military-religious orders, channeling resources toward state-aligned entities and exposing vulnerabilities in decentralized Christian defense mechanisms reliant on papal protection.[97]Controversies and Historical Debates
Validity of Heresy Accusations
The primary accusations of heresy leveled against the Knights Templar included denial of Christ through rituals such as spitting or urinating on the cross during initiation, worship of an idol known as Baphomet, and practices of sodomy among members.[77] These charges emerged primarily from confessions extracted under severe torture, including the rack, fire, and prolonged confinement, applied systematically after the order's arrest on October 13, 1307, by order of King Philip IV of France.[77] In Paris alone, interrogators tortured 138 Templars, with most yielding confessions only after such coercion, though many later recanted when torture ceased or under papal questioning.[77] Testimonies varied widely in details, with no consistent pattern across the hundreds of knights questioned; for instance, descriptions of Baphomet ranged from a bearded head to a cat or goat, lacking any physical artifacts or independent witnesses to substantiate claims of organized idolatry.[24] Canon law at the time, as reiterated in papal bulls like Ad extirpanda (1252), permitted limited torture but deemed confessions obtained through excessive pain unreliable, a principle echoed in the Templar trials where recantations were common once pressure eased.[24] Absent corroborative evidence beyond coerced statements, historians assess these accusations as fabricated, driven by Philip IV's financial desperation—owing vast sums to the Templars—and political ambition to consolidate royal power over independent military orders.[99] The Chinon Parchment, a 1308 document from Pope Clement V's private inquiry, records the absolution of grand master Jacques de Molay and other leaders after they admitted only minor, non-heretical faults under duress, explicitly clearing the order of core charges like apostasy and immorality.[100] Suppressed for centuries, this and related trial records were published by the Vatican in 2007 as Processus Contra Templarios, comprising over 800 pages of Latin transcripts that affirm the pope's view of the Templars' innocence on heresy, attributing confessions to fear rather than truth.[99] [101] Modern scholarship, drawing on these archives, concurs that the order's downfall stemmed from its diminished military utility post the 1291 fall of Acre, not inherent corruption, rejecting narratives of elite decadence as unsubstantiated by the two-century record of Templar fidelity to crusading vows and papal authority.[24] While isolated lapses in discipline—such as occasional initiation secrecy or personal failings—may have occurred, as noted in some non-tortured admissions, no evidence supports systemic heresy or vice pervading the order, whose operational success in banking, fortifications, and warfare for nearly 200 years contradicts portrayals of widespread moral decay.[102] This empirical assessment privileges primary trial documents over later sensationalized accounts, highlighting how geopolitical expediency, rather than doctrinal deviance, precipitated the accusations.[99]Myths of Hidden Knowledge and Treasures
Numerous legends attribute to the Knights Templar the guardianship of esoteric relics and forbidden knowledge, including the Holy Grail, the Ark of the Covenant, and secrets derived from excavations beneath the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. These claims emerged primarily after the order's 1312 suppression, amplified by 19th- and 20th-century esoteric literature and fiction, but lack substantiation in contemporary records or archaeological findings. Despite the Templars' documented access to the Temple Mount from 1119 to 1187 for stabling horses and minor digs, no artifacts matching these descriptions were reported by the order itself or uncovered during King Philip IV's 1307 seizures of Templar properties across France.[103][104][105] Accusations of occult rites, such as the worship of Baphomet—a bearded head idol allegedly spat upon and venerated during initiations—stem from confessions extracted under torture during the 1307–1314 trials, with no corroborating pre-arrest evidence from Templar documents or eyewitnesses unaffiliated with Philip IV's agents. Historians attribute these charges to fabricated heresy to justify asset confiscation, as inventories of seized preceptories revealed administrative ledgers, liturgical items, and modest cash reserves rather than idols or mystical texts; Philip's regime netted real estate and debt forgiveness exceeding 150,000 livres tournois, but no vast gold hoards or arcane libraries. The Templars' rule explicitly prohibited such deviations, mandating strict adherence to Catholic orthodoxy, and papal inquiries, including the 1308 Chinon examination, found no basis for idolatry claims beyond coerced admissions later recanted.[106][107][97] Post-dissolution treasure myths posit that Templar fleets from La Rochelle evaded capture in 1307, spiriting away riches to hidden European sites or beyond, yet naval logs and port records show no such mass exodus, and successor orders like the Templars in Portugal inherited only fragmented estates without legendary caches. Modern elaborations, such as the Priory of Sion as a Templar successor safeguarding Merovingian bloodlines and Grail secrets, originated as a 1956 fraud by Pierre Plantard, a convicted forger who fabricated statutes and genealogies exposed by 1960s investigations revealing planted documents in French archives.[108][109][110] Claims of Templar voyages to America circa 1307–1398, allegedly transporting relics to sites like Oak Island or Newport Tower, rely on 20th-century interpretations of rune stones and maps lacking provenance; 14th-century cog ships lacked the range for transatlantic crossings without resupply, and no pre-Columbian European artifacts or Norse-Templar contacts appear in indigenous oral histories or Viking sagas. These narratives, popularized in works like Holy Blood, Holy Grail (1982), conflate the order's maritime expertise with anachronistic capabilities, ignoring the Templars' focus on Mediterranean and Atlantic pilgrim routes documented in their cartularies. Such romanticizations often reflect anti-clerical sentiments projecting hidden esotericism onto an order whose charters emphasize militant piety over secrecy.[111][112][113]Enduring Legacy
Influence on Successor Institutions
In Portugal, King Denis I negotiated with Pope John XXII to safeguard Templar assets from dissolution, leading to the establishment of the Order of Christ via papal bull Ad ea ex quibus on 14 March 1319, which transferred Portuguese Templar properties, personnel, and traditions to the new order headquartered at Tomar.[114] This continuity preserved the Templars' maritime capabilities, with the order's resources—derived from former Templar estates and revenues—financing naval expeditions during the Age of Discovery; Henry the Navigator, as administrator from 1417, directed these efforts, including voyages that reached the African coast and supported the conquest of Ceuta in 1415.[115] The order's cross, an adaptation of the Templar emblem, symbolized this institutional lineage, enabling sustained Portuguese expansion without the Templars' international entanglements.In the Crown of Aragon, King James II founded the Order of Montesa in 1317, approved by Pope John XXII on 17 June of that year, to absorb Aragon's Templar knights, lands, and commanderies while affiliating with the Cistercian-influenced Order of Calatrava for oversight.[116] This entity focused on Reconquista campaigns in Valencia, utilizing Templar-held castles and agricultural revenues to maintain a localized military-monastic presence until its merger into the Spanish crown in 1587, representing a pragmatic reconfiguration rather than full doctrinal replication.[117] Across most of Europe, the 1312 papal bull Ad providam by Clement V mandated transfer of Templar estates to the Knights Hospitaller to offset crusade debts, a process completed unevenly by 1338 amid legal disputes and encumbrances, bolstering the Hospitallers' resources for their own defenses in Rhodes and later Malta from 1530.[118] While this augmented the Hospitallers' military-monastic framework—shared with the Templars in vows of poverty, chastity, and combat readiness—it constituted asset reallocation under papal fiat rather than unbroken succession, as the orders had competed as rivals during the Crusades.[24] Assertions of Templar survival in Scotland, including alleged refuge for fugitives or continuity through clans like the Sinclairs, rely on 18th-century fabrications without primary documentation; no charters or trials indicate organized persistence there post-1312, and claims of involvement at Bannockburn in 1314 contradict the timeline of arrests beginning in 1307.[111]
