Hubbry Logo
logo
Catholicity
Community hub

Catholicity

logo
0 subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia

Catholicity (from Ancient Greek: καθολικός, romanizedkatholikós, lit.'general', 'universal', via Latin: catholicus)[1] is a concept pertaining to beliefs and practices that are widely accepted by numerous Christian denominations, most notably by those Christian denominations that describe themselves as catholic in accordance with the Four Marks of the Church, as expressed in the Nicene Creed formulated at the First Council of Constantinople in 381: "[I believe] in one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church." The English adjective catholic is derived from the Ancient Greek adjective καθολικός (romanized: katholikos), meaning "general", "universal".[2][3] Thus, "catholic" means that in the Church the wholeness of the Christian faith, full and complete, all-embracing, and with nothing lacking, is proclaimed to all people without excluding any part of the faith or any class or group of people.[4][5][6] An early definition for what is "catholic" was summarized in what is known as the Vincentian Canon in the 5th century Commonitory: "what has been believed everywhere, always, and by all."[7][8]

This is distinct from the capitalized word Catholic, referring specifically to the Catholic Church and often, further, the Roman Catholic Church, used especially in ecumenical contexts and in countries where other churches use the term catholic, to distinguish it from broader meanings of the term.[9][10] Though the community led by the pope in Rome is known as the Catholic Church, the traits of catholicity, and thus the term catholic, are also ascribed[by whom?] to denominations such as the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Church, and the Assyrian Church of the East.[citation needed] It also occurs in the language of churches that decisively split from the Roman Catholic Church, like Lutheranism and Anglicanism, as well as Independent Catholicism, Old Catholicism and other Christian denominations. While traits used to define catholicity, as well as recognition of these traits in other denominations, vary among these groups, such attributes include formal sacraments, an episcopal polity, apostolic succession, highly structured liturgical worship, and other shared Ecclesiology.[citation needed]

Among Protestant and related traditions, catholic is used in the sense of indicating a self-understanding of the universality of the confession and continuity of faith and practice from Early Christianity, encompassing the "whole company of God's redeemed people".[11] Specifically among Moravian,[12] Lutheran,[13] Anglican,[14] Methodist,[15] and Reformed denominations[16] the term "catholic" is used in claiming to be "heirs of the apostolic faith".[14][17] These denominations consider themselves to be part of the catholic (universal) church, teaching that the term "designates the historic, orthodox mainstream of Christianity whose doctrine was defined by the ecumenical councils and creeds" and as such, most Reformers "appealed to this catholic tradition and believed they were in continuity with it." As such, the universality, or catholicity, of the church pertains to the entire body (or assembly) of believers united to Christ.[13]

History

[edit]

Summary of major divisions

[edit]
Timeline of the evolution of the catholic church, beginning with early Christianity

A common belief related to catholicity is institutional continuity with the early Christian church founded by Jesus Christ. Many churches or communions of churches identify singularly or collectively as the authentic church. The following summarizes the major schisms and conflicts within Christianity, particularly within groups that identify as catholic; there are several competing historical interpretations as to which groups entered into schism with the original early church.

According to the theory of Pentarchy, the early undivided church came to be organized under the three patriarchs of Rome, Alexandria and Antioch, to which later were added the patriarchs of Constantinople and Jerusalem. The bishop of Rome was at that time recognized as first among them, as is stated, for instance, in canon 3 of the First Council of Constantinople (381)—many interpret "first" as meaning here first among equals—and doctrinal or procedural disputes were often referred to Rome, as when, on appeal by Athanasius against the decision of the Council of Tyre (335), Pope Julius I, who spoke of such appeals as customary, annulled the action of that council and restored Athanasius and Marcellus of Ancyra to their sees.[18] The bishop of Rome was also considered to have the right to convene ecumenical councils. When the Imperial capital moved to Constantinople, Rome's influence was sometimes challenged. Nonetheless, Rome claimed special authority because of its connection to the Apostles Peter[19][20] and Paul, who, many believe, were martyred and buried in Rome, and because the bishop of Rome saw himself as the successor of Peter. There are sources that suggest that Peter was not the first pope and never went to Rome.[21]

The 431 Council of Ephesus, the third ecumenical council, was chiefly concerned with Nestorianism, which emphasized the distinction between the humanity and divinity of Jesus and taught that, in giving birth to Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary could not be spoken of as giving birth to God. This Council rejected Nestorianism and affirmed that, as humanity and divinity are inseparable in the one person of Jesus Christ, his mother, the Virgin Mary, is thus Theotokos, God-bearer, Mother of God. The first great rupture in the Early Church followed this Council. Those who refused to accept the Council's ruling were largely Persian and are represented today by the Assyrian Church of the East and related churches, which, however, do not now hold a "Nestorian" theology. They are often called Ancient Oriental Churches.

The next major break was after the Council of Chalcedon (451). This Council repudiated Eutychian Monophysitism which stated that the divine nature completely subsumed the human nature in Christ. This Council declared that Christ, though one person, exhibited two natures "without confusion, without change, without division, without separation" and thus is both fully God and fully human. The Alexandrian Church rejected the terms adopted by this Council, and the Christian churches that follow the tradition of non-acceptance of the Council—they are not Monophysite in doctrine—are referred to as Pre-Chalcedonian or Oriental Orthodox Churches.

The next great rift within Christianity was in the 11th century. Longstanding doctrinal disputes, as well as conflicts between methods of church government, and the evolution of separate rites and practices, precipitated a split in 1054 that divided the church, this time between a "West" and an "East". Spain, England, France, the Holy Roman Empire, Poland, Bohemia, Slovakia, Scandinavia, the Baltic states, and Western Europe in general were in the Western camp, and Greece, Romania, Russia and many other Slavic lands, Anatolia, and the Christians in Syria and Egypt who accepted the Council of Chalcedon made up the Eastern camp. This division between the Western Church and the Eastern Church is called the East–West Schism.

In 1438, the Council of Florence convened, which featured a strong dialogue focussed on understanding the theological differences between the East and West, with the hope of reuniting the Catholic and Orthodox churches.[22] Several eastern churches reunited, constituting some of the Eastern Catholic Churches.

Another major division in the church occurred in the 16th century with the Protestant Reformation, after which many parts of the Western Church rejected Papal authority, and some of the teachings of the Western Church at that time, and became known as "Reformed" or "Protestant".

A much less extensive rupture occurred when, after the Catholic Church's First Vatican Council, in which it officially proclaimed the dogma of papal infallibility, small clusters of Catholics in the Netherlands and in German-speaking countries formed the Old-Catholic (Altkatholische) Church.

Beliefs and practices

[edit]

Use of the terms "catholicity" and "catholicism" depends on context. For times preceding the Great Schism, it refers to the Nicene Creed and especially to tenets of Christology, i.e. the rejection of Arianism. For times after the Great Schism, Catholicism (with the capital C) in the sense of the Catholic Church, combines the Latin Church, the Eastern Catholic Churches of Greek tradition, and the other Eastern Catholic Churches. Liturgical and canonical practices vary between all these particular Churches constituting the Roman and Eastern Catholic Churches (or, as Richard McBrien calls them, the "Communion of Catholic Churches").[23] Contrast this with the term Catholicos (but not Catholicism) in reference to the head of a Particular Church in Eastern Christianity. In the Roman Catholic Church, the term "catholic" is understood as to cover those who are baptized and in communion with the Pope.

The weekly observance of the Liturgy of the Eucharist in the church service is considered a trait of catholicity

Other Christians use it in an intermediate sense, neither just those Christians in communion with Rome, but more narrow than all Christians who recite the Creeds. They use it to distinguish their position from a Calvinistic or Puritan form of Protestantism. It is then meaningful to attempt to draw up a list of common characteristic beliefs and practices of this definition of catholicity:

Sacraments or sacred mysteries

[edit]
An Italian priest during the sacrament of Baptism

Churches in the Roman Catholic tradition administer seven sacraments or "sacred mysteries": Baptism, Confirmation or Chrismation, Eucharist, Penance, also known as Reconciliation, Anointing of the Sick, Holy Orders, and Matrimony. For Protestant Christians, only Baptism and Eucharist are considered sacraments.

In churches that consider themselves catholic, a sacrament is considered to be an efficacious visible sign of God's invisible grace. While the word mystery is used not only of these rites, but also with other meanings with reference to revelations of and about God and to God's mystical interaction with creation, the word sacrament (Latin: a solemn pledge), the usual term in the West, refers specifically to these rites.

  • Baptism – the first sacrament of Christian initiation, the basis for all the other sacraments. Churches in the Catholic tradition consider baptism conferred in most Christian denominations "in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit" (cf. Matthew 28:19) to be valid, since the effect is produced through the sacrament, independently of the faith of the minister, though not of the minister's intention. This is not necessarily the case in other churches. As stated in the Nicene Creed, Baptism is "for the forgiveness of sins", not only personal sins, but also of original sin, which it remits even in infants who have committed no actual sins. Expressed positively, forgiveness of sins means bestowal of the sanctifying grace by which the baptized person shares the life of God. The initiate "puts on Christ" (Galatians 3:27), and is "buried with him in baptism ... also raised with him through faith in the working of God" (Colossians 2:12).
  • Confirmation or Chrismation – the second sacrament of Christian initiation, the means by which the gift of the Holy Spirit conferred in baptism is "strengthened and deepened" (see, for example, Catechism of the Catholic Church, §1303) by a sealing. In the Western tradition it is usually a separate rite from baptism, bestowed, following a period of education called catechesis, on those who have at least reached the age of discretion (about 7)[29] and sometimes postponed until an age when the person is considered capable of making a mature independent profession of faith. It is considered to be of a nature distinct from the anointing with chrism (also called myrrh) that is usually part of the rite of baptism and that is not seen as a separate sacrament. In the Eastern tradition it is usually conferred in conjunction with baptism, as its completion, but is sometimes administered separately to converts or those who return to Orthodoxy. Some theologies consider this to be the outward sign of the inner "Baptism of the Holy Spirit", the special gifts (or charismata) of which may remain latent or become manifest over time according to God's will. Its "originating" minister is a validly consecrated bishop; if a priest (a "presbyter") confers the sacrament (as is permitted in some Catholic churches) the link with the higher order is indicated by the use of chrism blessed by a bishop. (In an Eastern Orthodox Church, this is customarily, although not necessarily, done by the primate of the local autocephalous church.)
  • Eucharist – the sacrament (the third of Christian initiation) by which the faithful receive their ultimate "daily bread", or "bread for the journey", by partaking of and in the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ and being participants in Christ's one eternal sacrifice. The bread and wine used in the rite are, according to Catholic faith, in the mystical action of the Holy Spirit, transformed to be Christ's Body and Blood—his Real Presence. This transformation is interpreted by some as transubstantiation or metousiosis, by others as consubstantiation or sacramental union.
  • Penance (also called Confession and Reconciliation) – the first of the two sacraments of healing. It is also called the sacrament of conversion, of forgiveness, and of absolution. It is the sacrament of spiritual healing of a baptized person from the distancing from God involved in actual sins committed. It involves the penitent's contrition for sin (without which the rite does not have its effect), confession (which in highly exceptional circumstances can take the form of a corporate general confession) to a minister who has the faculty to exercise the power to absolve the penitent,[30] and absolution by the minister. In some traditions (such as the Roman Catholic), the rite involves a fourth element – satisfaction – which is defined as signs of repentance imposed by the minister. In early Christian centuries, the fourth element was quite onerous and generally preceded absolution, but now it usually involves a simple task (in some traditions called a "penance") for the penitent to perform, to make some reparation and as a medicinal means of strengthening against further sinning.
  • Anointing of the Sick (or Unction) – the second sacrament of healing. In it those who are suffering an illness are anointed by a priest with oil consecrated by a bishop specifically for that purpose. In past centuries, when such a restrictive interpretation was customary, the sacrament came to be known as "Extreme Unction", i.e. "Final Anointing", as it still is among traditionalist Catholics. It was then conferred only as one of the "Last Rites". The other "Last Rites" are Penance (if the dying person is physically unable to confess, at least absolution, conditional on the existence of contrition, is given), and the Eucharist, which, when administered to the dying, is known as "Viaticum", a word whose original meaning in Latin was "provision for a journey".
  • Holy Orders – the sacrament which integrates someone into the Holy Orders of bishops, priests (presbyters), and deacons, the threefold order of "administrators of the mysteries of God" (1 Corinthians 4:1), giving the person the mission to teach, sanctify, and govern. Only a bishop may administer this sacrament, as only a bishop holds the fullness of the Apostolic Ministry. Ordination as a bishop makes one a member of the body that has succeeded to that of the Apostles. Ordination as a priest configures a person to Christ the Head of the Church and the one essential Priest, empowering that person, as the bishops' assistant and vicar, to preside at the celebration of divine worship, and in particular to confect the sacrament of the Eucharist, acting "in persona Christi" (in the person of Christ). Ordination as a deacon configures the person to Christ the Servant of All, placing the deacon at the service of the Church, especially in the fields of the ministry of the Word, service in divine worship, pastoral guidance and charity. Deacons may later be further ordained to the priesthood, but only if they do not have a wife. In some traditions (such as those of the Roman Catholic Church), while married men may be ordained, ordained men may not marry. In others (such as the Anglican-Catholic Church), clerical marriage is permitted.[note 1] Moreover, some sectors of Anglicanism "in isolation of the whole" have approved the ordination of openly active homosexuals to the priesthood and episcopacy, in spite of the support that Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, spoke for Anglican teaching on homosexuality, which he said the church "could not change simply because of a shift in society's attitude", noting also that those churches blessing same-sex unions and consecrating openingly gay bishops would not be able "to take part as a whole in ecumenical and interfaith dialogue." Thus in ecumenical matters, only if the Roman Catholic as well as Orthodox churches come to an understanding with first tier or primary bishops of the Anglican Communion can those churches (representing 95% of global Catholicism) implement an agreement with second tier or secondary Anglican bishops and their respective Anglican communities.[32][note 2][34][35]
  • Holy Matrimony (or Marriage) – is the sacrament of joining a man and a woman (according to the churches' doctrines) for mutual help and love (the unitive purpose), consecrating them for their particular mission of building up the Church and the world, and providing grace for accomplishing that mission. Western tradition sees the sacrament as conferred by the canonically expressed mutual consent of the partners in marriage; Eastern and some recent Western theologians not in communion with the see of Rome view the blessing by a priest as constituting the sacramental action.

Denominational interpretations

[edit]

Many individual Christians and Christian denominations consider themselves "catholic" on the basis, in particular, of apostolic succession. They may be described as falling into five groups:

  1. The Catholic Church, also known as the Roman Catholic Church, which sees full communion with the Bishop of Rome as an essential element of Catholicism. Its constituent particular churches, Latin Church and the Eastern Catholic Churches, have distinct and separate jurisdictions, while still being "in union with Rome".[36]
  2. Those, like adherents of Eastern Orthodox Church, Oriental Orthodox Church and the Church of the East, that claim unbroken apostolic succession from the early church and identify themselves as the Catholic Church.
  3. Those, such as the Old Catholic, Anglican and some Lutheran and other denominations, that claim unbroken apostolic succession from the early church and see themselves as a constituent part of the church.[note 3]
  4. Those who claim to be spiritual descendants of the Apostles but have no discernible institutional descent from the historic church and normally do not refer to themselves as catholic.
  5. Those who have acknowledged a break in apostolic succession, but have restored it in order to be in full communion with bodies that have maintained the practice. Examples in this category include the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada.

For some confessions listed under category 3, the self-affirmation refers to the belief in the ultimate unity of the universal church under one God and one Savior, rather than in one visibly unified institution (as with category 1, above). In this usage, "catholic" is sometimes written with a lower-case "c". The Western Apostles' Creed and the Nicene Creed, stating "I believe in ... one holy catholic ... church", are recited in worship services. Among some denominations in category 3, "Christian" is substituted for "catholic" in order to denote the doctrine that the Christian Church is, at least ideally, undivided.[38][39][failed verification][40]

Protestant churches each have their own distinctive theological and ecclesiological notions of catholicity.[41][42]

Catholic Church

[edit]

In its Letter on Some Aspects of the Church Understood as Communion, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith stressed the belief that the idea of the universal church as a communion of churches must not be presented as meaning that "every particular Church is a subject complete in itself, and that the universal church is the result of a reciprocal recognition on the part of the particular Churches". It insisted that "the universal Church cannot be conceived as the sum of the particular Churches, or as a federation of particular Churches".[43]

The Catholic Church considers only those in full communion with the Holy See in Rome as Catholics. While recognising the valid episcopates and Eucharist of the Eastern Orthodox Church in most cases, it does not consider Protestant denominations such as Reformed ones to be genuine churches and so uses the term "ecclesial communities" to refer to them. Because the Catholic Church does not consider these denominations to have valid episcopal orders capable of celebrating a valid Eucharist, it does not classify them as churches "in the proper sense".[44][45][46]

The Catholic Church's doctrine of infallibility derives from the belief that the authority Jesus gave Peter as head of the church on earth has been passed on to his successors, the popes. Relevant Bible verses include;[47] "And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven."

Ruins of a gothic Catholic church in Liptovská Mara (Slovakia)

The Latin and Eastern Catholic Churches together form the "Catholic Church",[48] often called the "Roman Catholic Church",[49] the world's largest single religious body and the largest Christian denomination, as well as its largest Catholic church, comprising over half of all Christians (1.27 billion Christians of 2.1 billion) and nearly one-sixth of the world's population.[50][51][52][53] Richard McBrien would put the proportion even higher, extending it to those who are in communion with the Bishop of Rome only in "degrees".[54] It comprises 24 component "particular Churches" (also called "rites" in the Second Vatican Council's Decree on the Eastern Catholic Churches[55] and in the Code of Canon Law),[56] all of which acknowledge a primacy of jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome[57] and are in full communion with the Holy See and each other.

These particular churches or component parts are the Latin Church (which uses a number of different liturgical rites, of which the Roman Rite is by far prevalent) and the 23 Eastern Catholic Churches. Of the latter particular churches, 14 use the Byzantine Rite for their liturgy.[58] Within the universal Church, each "particular church", whether Eastern or Western, is of equal dignity.[59] Finally, in its official documents, the Catholic Church, though made up of several particular churches, "continues to refer to itself as the 'Catholic Church'"[60] or, less frequently but consistently, as the 'Roman Catholic Church', owing to its essential[49] link with the Bishop of Rome.[note 4]

Richard McBrien, in his book Catholicism, disagrees with the synonymous use of "Catholic" and "Roman Catholic":

But is 'Catholic' synonymous with 'Roman Catholic'? And is it accurate to refer to the Roman Catholic Church as simply the 'Roman Church'? The answer to both questions is no. The adjective 'Roman' applies more properly to the diocese, or see, of Rome than to the worldwide Communion of Catholic Churches that is in union with the Bishop of Rome. Indeed, it strikes some Catholics as contradictory to call the Church 'Catholic' and 'Roman' at one and the same time. Eastern-rite Catholics, of whom there are more than twenty million, also find the adjective 'Roman' objectionable. In addition to the Latin, or Roman, tradition, there are seven non-Latin, non-Roman ecclesial traditions: Armenian, Byzantine, Coptic, Ethiopian, East Syriac (Chaldean), West Syriac, and Maronite. Each to the Churches with these non-Latin traditions is as Catholic as the Roman Catholic Church. Thus, not all Catholics are Roman Catholic... [T]o be Catholic—whether Roman or non-Roman—in the ecclesiological sense is to be in full communion with the Bishop of Rome and as such to be an integral part of the Catholic Communion of Churches.[61]

McBrien says that, on an official level, what he calls the "Communion of Catholic Churches" always refers to itself as "The Catholic Church".[62] However, counter examples such as seen above of the term "Roman Catholic Church" being used by popes and departments of the Holy See exist. The Latin Archdiocese of Detroit, for example, lists eight Eastern Catholic churches, each with its own bishop, as having one or more parishes in what is also the territory of the Latin archdiocese, yet each is designated as being in "full communion with the Roman Church".[63][better source needed]

Eastern Orthodox Church

[edit]

The Eastern Orthodox Church maintains the position that it is their communion which actually constitutes the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.[64][65] Eastern Orthodox Christians consider themselves the heirs of the first-millennium patriarchal structure that developed in the Eastern Church into the model of the pentarchy, recognized by Ecumenical Councils, a theory that "continues to hold sway in official Greek circles to the present day".[66]

Since the theological disputes that occurred from the 9th to 11th centuries, culminating in the final split of 1054, the Eastern Orthodox churches have regarded Rome as a schismatic see that has violated the essential catholicity of the Christian faith by introducing innovations of doctrine (see Filioque). On the other hand, the model of the pentarchy was never fully applied in the Western Church, which preferred the theory of the Primacy of the Bishop of Rome, favoring Ultramontanism over Conciliarism.[67][68][69][70] The title "Patriarch of the West" was rarely used by the popes until the 16th and 17th centuries, and was included in the Annuario Pontificio from 1863 to 2005, being dropped in the following year as never very clear, and having become over history "obsolete and practically unusable".[69][70]

Oriental Orthodoxy

[edit]

The Oriental Orthodox churches (Coptic, Syriac, Armenian, Ethiopian, Eritrean, Malankaran) also maintain the position that their communion constitutes the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. In this sense, Oriental Orthodoxy upholds its own ancient ecclesiological traditions of apostolicity (apostolic continuity) and catholicity (universality) of the Church.[71]

Assyrian Church of the East

[edit]

Similar notion of the catholicity was also maintained in the former Church of the East, with its distinctive theological and ecclesiological characteristics and traditions. That notion was inherited by both of its modern secessions: the Chaldean Catholic Church that is part of the Catholic Church, and the Assyrian Church of the East whose full official name is: The Holy Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East,[72] along with its off-shot in turn the Ancient Church of the East whose full official name is: The Holy Apostolic Catholic Ancient Church of the East.[73] These churches are using the term catholic in their names in the sense of traditional catholicity. They are not in communion with the Catholic Church.

Lutheranism

[edit]
Nathan Söderblom is ordained as archbishop of the Church of Sweden, 1914. Although the Swedish Lutherans can boast of an unbroken line of ordinations going back prior to the Reformation, the bishops of Rome today do not recognize such ordinations as a valid due to the fact they occurred without authorization from the Roman See.

The Augsburg Confession found within the Book of Concord, a compendium of belief of the Lutheran Churches, teaches that "the faith as confessed by Luther and his followers is nothing new, but the true catholic faith, and that their churches represent the true catholic or universal church".[74] When the Lutherans presented the Augsburg Confession to Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor in 1530, they believe to have "showed that each article of faith and practice was true first of all to Holy Scripture, and then also to the teaching of the church fathers and the councils".[74]

Following the Reformation, Lutheran Churches, such as the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland and the Church of Sweden, retained apostolic succession, with former Roman Catholic bishops simply becoming Lutheran and continuing to occupy their chairs.[75][76][77] The 20th century movement of High Church Lutheranism championed Evangelical Catholicity, restoring, in some cases, apostolic succession, to Lutheran Churches in Germany where it was lacking.[78]

Anglicanism

[edit]

Introductory works on Anglicanism, such as The Study of Anglicanism, typically refer to the character of the Anglican tradition as "Catholic and Reformed",[79] which is in keeping with the understanding of Anglicanism articulated in the Elizabethan Settlement of 1559 and in the works of the earliest standard Anglican divines such as Richard Hooker and Lancelot Andrewes. Yet different strains in Anglicanism, dating back to the English Reformation, have emphasized either the Reformed, Catholic, or "Reformed Catholic" nature of the tradition.

Anglican theology and ecclesiology has thus come to be typically expressed in three distinct, yet sometimes overlapping manifestations: Anglo-Catholicism (often called "high church"), Evangelical Anglicanism (often called "low church"), and Latitudinarianism ("broad church"), whose beliefs and practices fall somewhere between the two. Though all elements within the Anglican Communion recite the same creeds, Evangelical Anglicans generally regard the word catholic in the ideal sense given above. In contrast, Anglo-Catholics regard the communion as a component of the whole Catholic Church, in spiritual and historical union with the Roman Catholic, Old Catholic and several Eastern churches. Broad Church Anglicans tend to maintain a mediating view, or consider the matter one of adiaphora. These Anglicans, for example, have agreed in the Porvoo Agreement to interchangeable ministries and full eucharistic communion with Lutherans.[80][81]

The Catholic nature or strain of the Anglican tradition is expressed doctrinally, ecumenically (chiefly through organizations such as the Anglican—Roman Catholic International Commission), ecclesiologically (through its episcopal governance and maintenance of the historical episcopate), and in liturgy and piety. The 39 Articles hold that "there are two Sacraments ordained of Christ our Lord in the Gospel, that is to say, Baptism and the Supper of the Lord", and that "those five commonly called Sacraments, that is to say, Confirmation, Penance, Orders, Matrimony, and Extreme Unction, are not to be counted for Sacraments of the Gospel"; some Anglo-Catholics interpret this to mean that there are a total of Seven Sacraments.[82] Many Anglo-Catholics practice Marian devotion, recite the rosary and the angelus, practice eucharistic adoration, and seek the intercession of saints. In terms of liturgy, most Anglicans use candles on the altar or communion table and many churches use incense and bells at the Eucharist, which is amongst the most pronounced Anglo-Catholics referred to by the Latin-derived word "Mass" used in the first prayer book and in the American Prayer Book of 1979. In numerous churches the Eucharist is celebrated facing the altar (often with a tabernacle) by a priest assisted by a deacon and subdeacon. Anglicans believe in the Real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, though Anglo-Catholics interpret this to mean a corporeal presence, rather than a pneumatic presence. Different Eucharistic rites or orders contain different, if not necessarily contradictory, understandings of salvation. For this reason, no single strain or manifestation of Anglicanism can speak for the whole, even in ecumenical statements (as issued, for example, by the Anglican – Roman Catholic International Commission).[83][84][85]

The growth of Anglo-Catholicism is strongly associated with the Oxford Movement of the 19th century. Two of its leading lights, John Henry Newman and Henry Edward Manning, both priests, ended up joining the Roman Catholic Church, becoming cardinals. Others, like John Keble, Edward Bouverie Pusey, and Charles Gore became influential figures in Anglicanism. The previous Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, is a patron of Affirming Catholicism, a more liberal movement within Catholic Anglicanism. Conservative Catholic groups also exist within the tradition, such as Forward in Faith. There are about 80 million Anglicans in the Anglican Communion, comprising 3.6% of global Christianity.[86]

Methodism

[edit]
A Methodist minister wearing a cassock, vested with a surplice and stole, with preaching bands attached to his clerical collar

The 1932 Deed of Union of the Methodist Church of Great Britain teaches that:[87]

The Methodist Church claims and cherishes its place in the Holy Catholic Church which is the Body of Christ. It rejoices in the inheritance of the Apostolic Faith and loyally accepts the fundamental principles of the historic creeds and of the Protestant Reformation. It ever remembers that in the providence of God Methodism was raised up to spread Scriptural Holiness through the land by the proclamation of the Evangelical Faith, and declares its unfaltering resolve to be true to its divinely appointed mission. The doctrines of the Evangelical Faith, which Methodism has held from the beginning and still holds, are based upon the divine revelation recorded in the Holy Scriptures. The Methodist Church acknowledges this revelation as the supreme rule of faith and practice. The Methodist Church recognises two sacraments, namely, Baptism and the Lord's Supper, as of divine appointment and of perpetual obligation, of which it is the privilege and duty of members of the Methodist Church to avail themselves.[87]

The theologian Stanley Hauerwas wrote that Methodism "stands centrally in the Catholic tradition" and that "Methodists indeed are even more Catholic than the Anglicans who gave us birth, since Wesley, of blessed memory, held to the Eastern fathers in a more determinative way than did any of the Western churches—Protestant or Catholic."[88]

Reformed

[edit]

Within Reformed Christianity the word "catholic" is generally taken in the sense of "universal" and in this sense many leading Protestant denominations identify themselves as part of the catholic church. The puritan Westminster Confession of Faith adopted in 1646 (which remains the Confession of the Church of Scotland) states for example that:

The catholic or universal Church, which is invisible, consists of the whole number of the elect, that have been, are, or shall be gathered into one, under Christ the Head thereof; and is the spouse, the body, the fulness of Him that fills all in all.[89]

The London Confession of the Reformed Baptists repeats this with the emendation "which (with respect to the internal work of the Spirit and truth of grace) may be called invisible".[90] The Church of Scotland's Articles Declaratory begin "The Church of Scotland is part of the Holy Catholic or Universal Church".

In Reformed Churches there is a Scoto-Catholic grouping within the Presbyterian Church of Scotland. Such groups point to their churches' continuing adherence to the "Catholic" doctrine of the early Church Councils. The Articles Declaratory of the Constitution of the Church of Scotland of 1921 defines that church legally as "part of the Holy Catholic or Universal Church".[79]

Independent Catholicism

[edit]

The Old Catholics, the Liberal Catholic Church, the Augustana Catholic Church, the American National Catholic Church, the Apostolic Catholic Church (ACC), the Aglipayans (Philippine Independent Church), the African Orthodox Church, the Polish National Catholic Church of America, and many Independent Catholic churches, which emerged directly or indirectly from and have a theology and practices which are largely similar to Latin Catholicism, regard themselves as "Catholic" without full communion with the Bishop of Rome, because they generally reject his claimed status and authority. Some Independent Catholics believe that, among bishops, the Bishop of Rome is primus inter pares, and they also believe that conciliarism is a necessary check against ultramontanism.[citation needed]

The Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association, a division of the People's Republic of China's Religious Affairs Bureau which exercises state supervision of mainland China's Catholics, holds a similar position, while it also attempts, as with Buddhists and Protestants, to indoctrinate them and mobilize them in support of the Communist Party's objectives.[91]

Other views by individual scholars

[edit]

Richard McBrien considers that the term "Catholicism" refers exclusively and specifically to that "Communion of Catholic Churches" in communion with the Bishop of Rome.[92] According to McBrien, Catholicism is distinguished from other forms of Christianity in its particular understanding and commitment to tradition, the sacraments, the mediation between God, communion, and the See of Rome.[93] According to Bishop Kallistos Ware, the Orthodox Church has these things as well, though the primacy of the See of Rome is only honorific, showing non-jurisdictional respect for the Bishop of Rome as the "first among equals" and "Patriarch of the West".[94] Catholicism, according to McBrien's paradigm, includes a monastic life, religious institutes, a religious appreciation of the arts, a communal understanding of sin and redemption, and missionary activity.[note 5]

Henry Mills Alden, in Harper's New Monthly Magazine, writes that:

The various Protestant sects can not constitute one church because they have no intercommunion...each Protestant Church, whether Methodist or Baptist or whatever, is in perfect communion with itself everywhere as the Roman Catholic; and in this respect, consequently, the Roman Catholic has no advantage or superiority, except in the point of numbers. As a further necessary consequence, it is plain that the Roman Church is no more Catholic in any sense than a Methodist or a Baptist.[96]

— Henry Mills Alden, Harper's New Monthly Magazine Volume 37, Issues 217–222

As such, according to this viewpoint, "for those who 'belong to the Church', the term Methodist Catholic, or Presbyterian Catholic, or Baptist Catholic, is as proper as the term Roman Catholic."[97] "It simply means that body of Christian believers over the world who agree in their religious views, and accept the same ecclesiastical forms."[97]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Catholicity is a theological concept in Christianity referring to the universal nature and completeness of the Church, encompassing its mission to all people across time and cultures. Derived from the Greek word katholikos, meaning "universal" or "according to the whole," it is one of the four marks of the Church professed in the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic.[1] This attribute highlights the Church's possession of the fullness of faith, sacraments, and apostolic tradition, as shared across various Christian denominations, though interpreted differently.[2] The foundation of catholicity lies in biblical mandates such as the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19–20), calling the apostles to teach all nations, and the Church's emergence at Pentecost as the Body of Christ, guided by the Holy Spirit to maintain fidelity to apostolic teaching amid diversity.[3] In practice, it manifests in the Church's inclusive structure, where local communities form part of a global body, promoting unity in diversity through liturgical, doctrinal, and missional expressions. While central to Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and other traditions, catholicity also informs Protestant understandings of the Church's worldwide reach and orthodoxy. Detailed denominational perspectives are explored in subsequent sections.[4] Catholicity encourages inculturation, adapting the Gospel to diverse cultures while upholding its universal truth, and fosters ecumenical dialogue by recognizing elements of truth in other Christian communities.[5]

Etymology and Definition

Etymology

The term "catholicity" derives from the Greek adjective katholikos, meaning "universal" or "on the whole," formed by the combination of kata (according to or concerning) and holos (whole).[6] This linguistic root emphasized comprehensiveness in classical Greek usage, predating its Christian adoption.[6] The first recorded application of katholikos to the Christian church appears in the Epistle to the Smyrnaeans by Ignatius of Antioch, circa 110 AD, where he states: "Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church."[7] This usage marked an early shift toward describing the church as a unified, all-encompassing entity.[6] Through early Latin translations, katholikos became catholicus, facilitating its integration into Western Christian texts from the 2nd century onward.[6] This Latin form helped distinguish the universal church from fragmented or "heretical" groups, underscoring wholeness against partial sects in emerging ecclesiastical writings.[6] By the 4th century, the term's meaning had evolved from general universality to denote the specific wholeness and orthodoxy of the Christian church, as reflected in patristic literature.[6] This development is evident in the Nicene Creed of 325 AD, which affirms belief in "one holy catholic and apostolic Church" as a hallmark of doctrinal integrity.[8]

Definition in Christian Theology

In Christian theology, catholicity denotes the essential attribute of the Church as a universal, whole, and orthodox community that encompasses all true believers across time, space, and nations, reflecting the fullness of God's redemptive work in Christ. This concept emphasizes the Church's completeness in doctrine, worship, and life, uniting diverse members under the singular truth of the gospel without partiality or limitation. As articulated by theologian Herman Bavinck, catholicity signifies "the universality or catholicity of the one, holy Christian Church," rooted in the unity of God, Christ, and Scripture, which permeates all aspects of human existence and creation.[9] The term "catholic" (lowercase) in this theological sense must be distinguished from its use as a proper noun referring to the Roman Catholic Church; it instead describes an inherent quality of the true Church shared by all orthodox Christian traditions. In the Apostles' Creed, the phrase "holy catholic church" confesses belief in the Church's wholeness and universality, meaning "throughout the whole" in terms of its global reach and doctrinal integrity, not institutional affiliation. This distinction underscores that catholicity pertains to spiritual and confessional unity rather than hierarchical structures or denominational boundaries.[10][11] Key attributes of catholicity include the fullness of the Christian faith, apostolic continuity in teaching and practice, and sacramental completeness that realizes God's presence among believers. It entails embracing the entire deposit of faith—Scripture, tradition, and creedal formulations—without addition, subtraction, or fragmentation, ensuring orthodoxy as the preservation of revealed truth. Bavinck further describes this as an "inner catholicity" that integrates faith into the totality of life, leavening culture and society while maintaining doctrinal purity. In creeds like the Apostles' and Nicene, catholicity affirms the Church's role as the complete body of Christ, holy and apostolic, embodying unity in diversity across all peoples.[9]

Historical Development

Origins in the Early Church

In the apostolic era, the concept of catholicity emerged implicitly through New Testament writings that emphasized the unity and universality of the Christian community. The Epistle to the Ephesians, for instance, articulates a vision of one body, one Spirit, one hope, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and one God and Father of all, underscoring the indivisible nature of the Church across diverse believers.[12] This foundational call to unity reflected the early Church's mission to transcend ethnic, cultural, and geographic boundaries, laying the groundwork for a global faith community without yet employing the term "catholic." The explicit use of "catholic" to describe the Church first appears in the writings of Ignatius of Antioch around 110 AD, during his journey to martyrdom in Rome. In his Epistle to the Smyrnaeans, Ignatius writes, "Wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church," urging believers to adhere to the bishop, presbyters, and deacons as a means of preserving unity against emerging Gnostic divisions that threatened doctrinal coherence.[7] Ignatius portrayed the Catholic Church as a visible, hierarchical entity embodying wholeness and orthodoxy, countering schismatic tendencies by insisting that valid Eucharist and assembly occur only under episcopal oversight. This marked a pivotal moment in articulating catholicity as a safeguard for the Church's integrity amid internal challenges. By the late second century, Irenaeus of Lyons further developed this concept in his work Against Heresies (c. 180 AD), employing catholicity to affirm the Church's universal rule of faith in opposition to localized Gnostic heresies. He described the Church as "dispersed throughout the whole world, even to the ends of the earth," yet united in preserving the apostolic faith with "one soul and one heart," regardless of language or region—from Germany to Libya.[13] Irenaeus contrasted this global consistency, rooted in Scripture and tradition, with the fragmented, innovative doctrines of heretics, positioning the Catholic Church as the guardian of authentic Christianity against esoteric deviations. The establishment of episcopal structures during the second century reinforced catholicity by institutionalizing mechanisms for maintaining universal orthodoxy. Early texts like 1 Clement (c. 96 AD) appealed to apostolic succession to restore order in Corinth, while Ignatius vigorously promoted the monarchical episcopate as essential for doctrinal purity, equating the bishop's role to divine authority.[14] By mid-century, figures such as Justin Martyr referenced a single presiding bishop in worship, and later, Hippolytus (c. 200 AD) outlined episcopal consecrations by fellow bishops to exclude lay or presbyteral interference, ensuring the transmission of orthodox teaching across communities and countering Gnostic influences. This evolving hierarchy solidified catholicity as both a theological ideal and a practical framework for the Church's worldwide cohesion.

Evolution Through Schisms and Councils

The Council of Nicaea, convened in 325 AD under Emperor Constantine I, played a pivotal role in early Christian unity by addressing Arianism and establishing foundational affirmations of the Church's nature. While the original creed produced at Nicaea focused primarily on Christ's divinity, it laid the groundwork for subsequent ecumenical statements that explicitly described the Church as "one, holy, catholic, and apostolic," a formulation that emphasized its universal and orthodox character across the emerging Christian world.[15] This creed's legacy reinforced catholicity as a mark of the Church's fidelity to apostolic teaching, promoting doctrinal cohesion amid regional variations.[16] Subsequent councils further shaped catholicity through Christological clarifications, notably the Council of Chalcedon in 451 AD, which defined Christ as possessing two natures—divine and human—in one person, rejecting both Nestorianism and Monophysitism. This definition, articulated in the Chalcedonian Definition, aimed to preserve the Church's universal orthodoxy but precipitated separations among non-Chalcedonian communities, leading to the formation of the Oriental Orthodox Churches, which viewed the council's language as compromising Christ's unity.[17] The schism highlighted tensions in interpreting catholicity, as these churches maintained their own claims to apostolic continuity while rejecting Chalcedon's authority, resulting in enduring fractures in Eastern Christianity.[18] The East-West Schism of 1054 marked a profound rupture in the Church's visible unity, culminating in mutual excommunications between Cardinal Humbert, representing Pope Leo IX, and Patriarch Michael I Cerularius of Constantinople. These acts symbolized deeper divergences over papal primacy, liturgical practices, and the Filioque clause, challenging the notion of a single catholic Church and prompting each side to assert exclusive possession of true catholicity—the Eastern Orthodox emphasizing conciliar governance and the Western Church papal supremacy.[19] The schism's impact persisted, fragmenting the universal Church into Latin and Greek traditions and complicating ecumenical expressions of shared faith.[20] In the 16th century, the Protestant Reformation intensified critiques of Roman claims to catholicity, with reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin arguing that the Roman Church had deviated from apostolic purity through practices such as indulgences and clerical abuses, thereby forfeiting its universal authority. Luther's 1520 treatise On the Babylonian Captivity of the Church contended that true catholicity resided in the invisible Church of all believers adhering to Scripture alone, rejecting Rome's hierarchical monopoly on the faith.[21] Calvin, in his Institutes of the Christian Religion, similarly redefined the Church's marks as pure preaching of the Word, right administration of sacraments, and ecclesiastical discipline, positioning Reformed communities as the genuine catholic heirs amid the era's divisions.[21] These challenges led to widespread separations, diversifying Christian interpretations of universality and unity. Modern ecumenical efforts, particularly the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965), sought to reaffirm catholicity in a fragmented landscape by promoting dialogue and mutual recognition among Christian denominations. The council's decree Unitatis Redintegratio emphasized the Church's catholicity as rooted in its fullness in the Roman tradition while acknowledging elements of sanctification and truth in separated communities, fostering reconciliation without compromising doctrinal integrity.[22] Through documents like Lumen Gentium, Vatican II articulated the Church as a pilgrim people called to unity, influencing subsequent dialogues with Orthodox and Protestant bodies and underscoring catholicity's enduring call to visible communion.[23] These efforts continued into the 21st century, notably with global commemorations of the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea in 2025, organized by bodies such as the World Council of Churches and the Catholic Church, which highlighted the Nicene Creed's role in fostering Christian unity and the universal character of the Church across denominations.[24][25]

Theological Foundations

Biblical and Scriptural Basis

The concept of catholicity, denoting the universality of the Church, finds precursors in the Old Testament through God's covenant promises that extend salvation beyond Israel to all nations. In Genesis 12:3, God assures Abraham, "I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you, and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. . . . In you all the families of the earth shall be blessed," signaling a universal blessing through Abraham's lineage that foreshadows the inclusive mission of the Church. Similarly, Isaiah 49:6 declares to the servant of the Lord, "It is too light a thing that you should be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to restore the preserved of Israel; I will give you as a light to the nations, that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth," portraying Israel's role as a beacon for global redemption, which Christian theology interprets as pointing to the Church's worldwide outreach. In the New Testament, explicit references underscore the enduring and universal nature of the Church founded by Christ. Matthew 16:18 records Jesus' words to Peter: "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it," affirming the Church's indestructibility and its mission against all opposition, implying a universal structure that persists across time and space. Acts 2 describes the Pentecost event as the birth of this universal Church, where the Holy Spirit descends on the apostles amid a diverse crowd from "every nation under heaven," enabling them to proclaim the Gospel in multiple languages and drawing converts from varied backgrounds, thus initiating the Church's global expansion.[26] Pauline writings emphasize catholicity through the imagery of unity amid diversity, portraying the Church as a single, mature body reaching its full potential in Christ. In Ephesians 4:13, Paul exhorts believers "until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ," envisioning a unified, universal community growing toward completeness across all members.[12] Likewise, 1 Corinthians 12 develops the metaphor of the body of Christ, stating in verses 12-13, "For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ. For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and all were made to drink of one Spirit," highlighting the Church's catholicity as an interconnected whole embracing diverse peoples in harmonious oneness. The Johannine tradition contributes to this foundation by stressing visible unity as essential to the Church's witness. In John 17:21, Jesus prays, "That they may all be one; even as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that thou hast sent me," interceding for a profound, observable unity among believers that authenticates the Gospel's universal appeal and reflects the Trinitarian communion. These scriptural themes of universality and unity later informed patristic interpretations, as seen in early Church Fathers' exegeses.[27]

Patristic and Conciliar Formulations

In the patristic era, early Church Fathers began to articulate the concept of catholicity as an essential mark of the true Church, emphasizing its visible unity and doctrinal integrity as extensions of scriptural teachings on the universal body of Christ. The earliest explicit reference appears in the writings of Ignatius of Antioch, bishop and martyr (c. 35–107 AD). In his Epistle to the Smyrnaeans (c. 110 AD), Ignatius writes: "Wheresoever the bishop shall appear, there let the people be; as where Jesus Christ is, there is the universal [katholike] Church." This usage distinguishes the true, universal Church from local or heretical gatherings, underscoring its wholeness and extension across the world.[7] Cyprian of Carthage, writing around 250 AD, strongly linked catholicity to the necessity of visible ecclesial unity for salvation. In his Epistle 72 to Jubaianus, he argued that baptism and regeneration occur only within the Church, as heretics lack the authority to confer valid sacraments. In his Treatise I, On the Unity of the Catholic Church, he stated, "He cannot have God for his Father who has not the Church for his mother," and thus "no one can be saved outside the Church" because schism severs one from this catholic whole.[28][29] This formulation underscored catholicity not as an abstract ideal but as the concrete, undivided community preserving apostolic faith against heresies.[29] Augustine of Hippo, in the fourth and fifth centuries, further developed catholicity in his polemics against the Donatists, portraying it as the Church's global extension to all nations in contrast to localized schismatic groups. In works such as On Baptism, Against the Donatists, he contended that the true Church is marked by its worldwide presence and orthodoxy, declaring that the Holy Spirit vivifies only within this catholic body, which spreads "from the rising of the sun unto the going down thereof." Augustine's emphasis highlighted catholicity as a divine mandate for unity amid division, interpreting biblical calls for a universal Church as realized in the visible, expansive institution. The Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed of 381 AD provided a conciliar affirmation of catholicity, expanding the original Nicene formulation to affirm belief "in one holy catholic and apostolic Church" as the guardian of orthodox faith across the world.[30] This creed, promulgated at the First Council of Constantinople, denoted "catholic" as encompassing the fullness of truth held universally by the faithful, countering Arian and other errors by tying ecclesial identity to apostolic tradition disseminated globally.[30] Vincent of Lérins, in the fifth century, offered a methodological criterion for discerning catholic doctrine in his Commonitory, famously defining the rule of faith as "that which has been believed everywhere, always, by all" (quod ubique, quod semper, quod ab omnibus).[31] This triad—universality, antiquity, and consensus—served as a test for orthodoxy, ensuring that catholicity manifests in the Church's enduring, collective adherence to revealed truth against novel innovations.[31]

Core Doctrinal Elements

Universality and Unity

Catholicity encompasses the Church's universality in three primary dimensions: temporal, spatial, and doctrinal. Temporally, it spans across all ages, from the apostolic era to the eschatological fulfillment, as the Church is seen as enduring through history under Christ's perpetual guidance. Spatially, it extends to all peoples and nations, transcending cultural, ethnic, and geographical boundaries to embrace humanity universally. Doctrinally, catholicity signifies the fullness of revealed truth, containing the complete deposit of faith without partiality or deficiency. The unity inherent in catholicity manifests in both visible and invisible aspects, with both essential to its integrity. Visible unity is expressed through institutional structures, such as hierarchical communion and shared sacramental life, fostering a concrete, observable oneness among the faithful. Invisible unity, animated by the Holy Spirit, binds believers spiritually across divisions, ensuring an underlying communion even amid imperfections. Catholicity demands this dual unity, as the Church is one body in Christ, where separation undermines its wholeness.[32] Within the four marks of the Church—one, holy, catholic, and apostolic—catholicity interrelates closely with holiness and apostolicity. It supports holiness by integrating diverse members into Christ's sanctifying grace, promoting spiritual growth across the universal body. Apostolicity reinforces catholicity through the faithful transmission of doctrine and mission, ensuring the Church's unity remains rooted in the apostles' witness. These marks collectively affirm the Church's identity as the enduring, sanctified community sent into the world.[5] In confronting modern pluralism, catholicity counters relativism by upholding the existence of one true Church subsisting in the Catholic Church, where Christ’s unique mediation offers the fullness of salvation. This stance rejects theories positing multiple equivalent paths to God, insisting instead on the Church's necessity for authentic faith and unity, while recognizing elements of truth in other communities as oriented toward this singular reality. Scriptural themes of unity, such as "one body and one spirit," underscore this doctrinal commitment.[33]

Apostolic Succession and Authority

Apostolic succession refers to the uninterrupted transmission of ministerial authority from the apostles to successive generations of bishops through the rite of ordination, typically involving the laying on of hands, which preserves the authenticity of Christian doctrine and sacramental life. This concept posits that only those ordained in this direct lineage can validly exercise the Church's teaching and governing roles, ensuring continuity with the apostolic foundation established by Christ.[34] The historical roots of apostolic succession trace back to the late first century, as evidenced in the First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians, composed around 96 AD by Clement, an early bishop of Rome. In this letter, Clement addresses divisions in the Corinthian church by stressing the apostles' appointment of overseers (episkopoi) and deacons, along with provisions for orderly replacements to prevent disorder: "Our apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be strife for the office of bishop. For this reason... they appointed the aforesaid persons, and afterwards they provided a continuance, that if these should fall asleep, other approved men should succeed to their ministry." This underscores succession as a mechanism for maintaining ecclesiastical stability and fidelity to apostolic teaching.[35] By the third century, the Apostolic Tradition, attributed to Hippolytus of Rome, further formalized these practices, describing detailed ordination ceremonies for bishops, presbyters, and deacons that emphasize the imparting of spiritual authority through imposition of hands, linking the rite explicitly to the apostles' example.[36] In theological doctrine, apostolic succession undergirds catholicity by forging an indelible connection between particular churches and the universal apostolic faith, thereby authenticating the Church's mission, doctrine, and unity across time and space. It serves as a visible sign of the Church's fidelity to Christ's mandate, where bishops act as successors to the apostles in collegiality, guided by the Holy Spirit to interpret Scripture and Tradition without innovation. This structure not only guards against doctrinal deviation but also embodies the Church's enduring catholic character as one, holy, and apostolic body.[34] Critiques of apostolic succession emerged prominently during the Protestant Reformation, where reformers rejected the necessity of an unbroken episcopal lineage in favor of sola scriptura—the principle that Scripture alone suffices as the ultimate authority for faith and practice. Figures like Martin Luther and John Calvin argued that true ministerial validity derives from adherence to biblical teaching rather than historical ordination chains, viewing succession claims as unsubstantiated traditions that elevated human institutions over divine revelation. This perspective maintains that the Church's catholicity is preserved through doctrinal purity drawn directly from the apostolic witness in Scripture, without requiring sacramental transmission of authority.[37]

Practices and Expressions

Role in Sacraments and Liturgy

Catholicity manifests in the sacraments as the universal channels through which divine grace is conferred upon all the faithful, ensuring equitable access to God's saving work regardless of cultural or geographical boundaries. The Catholic Church recognizes seven sacraments—Baptism, Confirmation, Eucharist, Penance, Anointing of the Sick, Holy Orders, and Matrimony—as efficacious signs instituted by Christ to communicate grace, actions of the Holy Spirit that build up the Body of Christ in unity and holiness.[38] These sacraments embody catholicity by extending the fruits of Christ's redemptive mystery to every member of the Church, fostering a shared participation in divine life that transcends local differences.[39] Central to this sacramental expression is the Eucharist, regarded as the source and summit of the Church's life, where catholic unity is most profoundly realized. In the Eucharistic celebration, the faithful from diverse traditions commune in Christ's Body and Blood, which effects a real unity among them as members of one mystical Body. In the Catholic understanding, this occurs through transubstantiation, by which the substance of bread and wine is wholly converted into Christ's Body and Blood, while retaining their appearances.[40][41] This sacrament thus serves as the pinnacle of catholicity, drawing the universal Church into intimate communion with God and one another.[40] Baptism initiates this universal incorporation into the catholic Church, marking the entry of individuals into the community of believers as professed in the Nicene Creed: "I confess one Baptism for the forgiveness of sins." Through this sacrament, the baptized are freed from original sin, reborn as children of God, and indelibly configured to Christ, becoming full members of the Church with a share in her apostolic mission.[42] This foundational rite underscores catholicity by uniting all Christians in a single, visible Body, irrespective of rite or origin, as the gateway to the other sacraments.[8] Liturgical practices further express catholicity through diverse yet unified rites that maintain the fullness of worship across the global Church. The Roman Mass in the Latin rite and the Divine Liturgy in the Byzantine rite, among others, celebrate the same Paschal Mystery, promoting a communion that binds distant communities in common prayer and sacrifice. The Church affirms the equal dignity of all recognized rites—Latin, Byzantine, Alexandrian, Syriac, Armenian, Maronite, and Chaldean—preserving their traditions while ensuring fidelity to the universal faith.[43] These variations enrich the Church's catholicity, allowing inculturation without compromising the essential unity of sacramental grace.[43]

Ecumenical and Missional Dimensions

Catholicity, understood as the universal scope and wholeness of the Church, serves as a fundamental impetus for the ecumenical movement, compelling Christians to pursue visible unity across denominational divides. This outward orientation recognizes that the Church's catholic nature is impaired by schisms, prompting collaborative efforts to restore communion. The World Council of Churches (WCC), established in 1948, exemplifies this drive, uniting over 350 member churches from more than 120 countries in dialogues aimed at fostering cooperation and mutual understanding, though the Roman Catholic Church participates as an observer rather than a full member.[44][45] The missional dimension of catholicity extends this universal impulse toward evangelization, viewing the Church's wholeness as inseparable from its mandate to proclaim the Gospel to all peoples. Central to this is the Great Commission in Matthew 28:19, where Jesus instructs his disciples to "go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." This command underscores catholicity's call to global outreach, emphasizing that the Church's unity and universality are realized through active witness and the incorporation of diverse cultures into the faith, as articulated in Catholic teachings on evangelization.[46] The Second Vatican Council's Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio (1964), further integrates these dimensions by affirming shared catholic elements in separated Christian communities, such as the Word of God, faith, hope, charity, and true sacraments like Baptism, which bind them to the Catholic Church despite deficiencies. The document promotes ecumenical dialogue, prayer, and cooperation as means to recover full unity, recognizing that these elements contribute to salvation and reflect the Church's inherent catholicity. It urges Catholics to engage in spiritual ecumenism, including joint prayer where appropriate, to overcome divisions and manifest the Church's universal mission.[47] Yet, realizing catholicity's ecumenical and missional aims presents challenges in balancing the Church's particular identities—rooted in cultural, liturgical, and theological traditions—with its universal essence in a globalized Christian landscape. Particularities must remain subordinated to catholicity to avoid fragmentation, yet globalization amplifies tensions, such as navigating religious pluralism and secular influences that test the Church's inclusive outreach without diluting doctrinal integrity. Conciliarity, or decision-making through councils, emerges as a key mechanism to address these, ensuring that universality fosters ongoing dialogue among diverse voices rather than imposing uniformity.[48][49]

Denominational Interpretations

Roman Catholic Perspective

In the Roman Catholic understanding, catholicity refers to the universal scope and completeness of the Church founded by Christ, extending to all humanity through its visible structure and mission. The Catechism of the Catholic Church explains that the Church is catholic in the sense of being universal, embracing all people from the beginning, and perfect in her parts due to her union with Christ and the Trinity. Furthermore, she proclaims the entirety of the faith to all nations at all times, serving as its guardian and a light to the world. This catholicity is realized in the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church, which subsists in the Catholic Church under the successor of Peter. The First Vatican Council, in its dogmatic constitution Pastor Aeternus (1870), underscored the role of papal infallibility in safeguarding the catholic truth of the faith. It defined that the Roman Pontiff, when speaking ex cathedra on matters of faith and morals, possesses the same infallibility that Christ willed for the entire Church, ensuring the deposit of faith remains undivided and universally applicable.[50] This doctrine positions the Pope as the perpetual guardian of catholicity, protecting the Church's teaching from error and maintaining its unity across time and space. Central to this perspective is the Petrine primacy, which ensures the visible unity essential to catholicity. The Second Vatican Council's Lumen Gentium (1964) teaches that Christ appointed Peter as the enduring foundation of unity among the apostles, a role inherited by the Bishop of Rome, who holds full, supreme, and universal power over the Church.[5] Bishops exercise their authority only in communion with the Pope, who serves as the visible principle of unity, rejecting any notion of parallel or independent structures that could fragment the Church's catholic wholeness.[5] The Roman Catholic Church explicitly rejects the "branch theory," which posits the existence of multiple co-equal branches of the one Church, affirming instead the unique subsistence of Christ's Church in the Catholic communion. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith's declaration Dominus Iesus (2000) clarifies that the Church of Christ subsists in its fullness only in the Catholic Church, governed by the successor of Peter and the bishops in communion with him, while other Christian communities possess elements of truth but lack full apostolic succession and sacramental integrity.[33] Following the Second Vatican Council, Roman Catholic teaching incorporates an inclusivist approach, recognizing that elements of sanctification and truth exist outside the visible boundaries of the Church, drawing non-Catholics toward full unity. Lumen Gentium states that these elements, as gifts proper to Christ's Church, include baptism and aspects of faith and life found in separated communities, which serve as impulses toward catholic unity without compromising the Church's singular fullness.[5] This perspective maintains the Church's universal mission while acknowledging partial realizations of grace beyond its visible structure.

Eastern Orthodox Perspective

In Eastern Orthodoxy, catholicity is understood as the intrinsic fullness and wholeness of the Church, manifesting the Trinitarian life through eucharistic communion and conciliar fellowship, rather than through a centralized authority. This perspective emphasizes that the Church's universality is not merely geographical but qualitative, embodying the complete truth of Christ in every local assembly where the Eucharist is celebrated. The term "catholic" (from the Greek katholikos, meaning "according to the whole") underscores this integrity, as articulated by early Fathers like St. Cyril of Jerusalem, who described the Church as possessing the fullness of faith, grace, and holiness universally.[51] Central to this view is the concept of sobornost, a Russian theological term denoting conciliarity or spiritual togetherness, which integrates catholicity with synodal governance among autocephalous churches in eucharistic communion. Originating in 19th-century Slavophile thought but rooted in patristic ecclesiology, sobornost reflects the Church's organic unity without subordinating local churches to a universal primate, allowing each to express the fullness of Orthodoxy while maintaining interdependence through councils. This structure ensures that authority resides in the collective witness of bishops in synod, preserving the apostolic faith against individualism or hierarchy. For instance, the Orthodox Church's governance involves autocephalous entities like the Ecumenical Patriarchate and other national churches, united not by jurisdiction but by shared doctrine and liturgy.[52][53] The Eucharist realizes catholic unity in Orthodoxy, as each local celebration constitutes the full Church, embodying the body of Christ without need for external oversight. Theologians like Metropolitan John Zizioulas have developed this eucharistic ecclesiology, arguing that the Church's catholicity emerges from the Trinitarian communion enacted in the Divine Liturgy, where the bishop presides in apostolic succession, fostering equality among local communities. This rejects any universal jurisdiction, viewing it as incompatible with the synodal model affirmed in the early ecumenical councils.[54][55] The Great Schism of 1054 reinforced Orthodoxy's claim to embody the true catholic Church by preserving the undivided apostolic faith against Western innovations like the filioque clause and papal supremacy. From the Orthodox standpoint, the mutual excommunications highlighted Rome's departure from conciliar norms, with the Eastern Church upholding the original creed and canonical equality of sees as essential to catholicity. This preservation continues to define Orthodoxy as the faithful witness to the one Church.[56] In modern times, Orthodox participation in ecumenism, such as through the World Council of Churches, seeks dialogue and witness while steadfastly affirming the exclusive catholicity of the Orthodox Church as the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic body. Official statements emphasize that ecumenical engagement does not compromise this self-understanding but invites others to recognize Orthodoxy's fullness, guided by the principle of oikonomia (merciful accommodation) without relativizing doctrine. For example, the Orthodox Church in America has articulated that its ecumenical efforts are judged solely by fidelity to the revealed faith lived by the saints. Recent initiatives, particularly the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea in 2025, have advanced these efforts, with Pope Leo XIV calling for full visible communion in June 2025.[57][58][59][24]

Oriental Orthodox and Assyrian Views

The Oriental Orthodox Churches, including the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria, the Armenian Apostolic Church, the Syriac Orthodox Church of Antioch, the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, the Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church, and the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, interpret catholicity as the faithful preservation and universal transmission of the apostolic faith as defined by the first three ecumenical councils—Nicaea (325 AD), Constantinople (381 AD), and Ephesus (431 AD).[60] This understanding emphasizes mia physis (one incarnate nature) Christology, rooted in the teachings of St. Cyril of Alexandria, which affirms the full divinity and humanity of Christ united without confusion, change, division, or separation in a single nature of the Word incarnate.[61] They view the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD) as an innovation that deviates from this Cyrilline orthodoxy by introducing a perceived Nestorian division into two natures, thus compromising the unity of Christ's person and undermining the catholic (universal) integrity of the Church's doctrine.[61] For these churches, catholicity manifests in their liturgical and spiritual continuity with the patristic tradition, particularly through the ancient sees of Alexandria and Antioch, which they regard as primary bearers of the undivided Church's universal witness despite historical separations.[60] The Assyrian Church of the East, tracing its origins to the apostolic missions of St. Thomas, St. Addai, and St. Mari in the Persian Empire, understands catholicity through its dyophysite Christology and unwavering adherence to the first two ecumenical councils (Nicaea and Constantinople), predating the divisions at Ephesus and Chalcedon.[62] This tradition confesses Christ as having two distinct natures—divine and human—united in one person without mingling or separation, a formulation it sees as preserving the primitive faith against later innovations.[63] Catholicity for the Assyrian Church is embodied in its ancient East Syriac liturgical rite, which maintains continuity with early Christian worship practices across diverse ethnic and geographic contexts, from Mesopotamia to Asia, underscoring the Church's universal scope beyond Roman imperial boundaries.[64] Like the Oriental Orthodox, it emphasizes apostolic sees such as Antioch and Edessa as foundational centers of this enduring, global faith tradition.[62] Both the Oriental Orthodox and Assyrian traditions share an emphasis on catholicity as rooted in the pre-Chalcedonian heritage of apostolic sees like Alexandria and Antioch, which served as hubs for theological formulation and missionary expansion in the early Church, ensuring the faith's universality amid persecutions and schisms.[60] Recent ecumenical dialogues with the Roman Catholic Church have affirmed mutual elements of catholicity by recognizing shared doctrinal substance. For instance, the 1973 Common Christological Declaration between Pope Paul VI and Coptic Pope Shenouda III stated that both sides profess "our Lord Jesus Christ is perfect God with respect to His Divinity, perfect man with respect to His humanity," using complementary terminologies to express the same orthodox faith.[65] In 1984, Pope John Paul II and Syriac Orthodox Patriarch Ignatius Zakka I Iwas declared that historical schisms "in no way affect or touch the substance of their faith," allowing for reciprocal sacramental recognition.[61] Similarly, the 1994 Common Christological Declaration with Assyrian Catholicos-Patriarch Mar Dinkha IV affirmed unity in confessing "the same faith in the Son of God made man," highlighting shared apostolic roots and liturgical patrimony.[64] These agreements have been extended through ongoing international dialogues, including meetings in the 2020s such as the twentieth session of the Joint International Commission with the Oriental Orthodox Churches in January 2024 and the sixteenth plenary with the Assyrian Church in November 2024, as well as efforts commemorating the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea in 2025.[66][67][24]

Protestant Interpretations

In Protestant theology, catholicity is generally understood as the universal scope of the Christian church, emphasizing spiritual unity among believers rather than institutional hierarchies or visible uniformity. This interpretation arose in the context of the 16th-century Reformation schisms, where reformers sought to reclaim the church's apostolic and scriptural foundations from perceived corruptions. Protestant views prioritize the invisible church—the body of all true believers across time and space—over exclusive claims to visible catholicity, focusing on fidelity to the Gospel, sacraments, and core doctrines. Lutheran theology, as articulated in the Augsburg Confession of 1530, affirms the catholic church as the congregation of saints where the Gospel is purely preached and the sacraments are rightly administered, encompassing all believers regardless of Roman institutional exclusivity. Article VII describes this one holy church as enduring forever through agreement on essential doctrines, rejecting any notion that catholicity is confined to a single visible structure. This understanding underscores an invisible unity grounded in Word and sacrament, accessible to all who confess Christ. Anglican interpretations position the tradition as a via media between Protestant and Catholic elements, with the 19th-century branch theory positing that the one holy catholic and apostolic church persists in three interdependent branches: Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Anglican, each retaining essential elements of faith, order, and sacraments. This view, developed amid the Oxford Movement, sees catholicity as shared apostolic continuity rather than schismatic division, allowing for visible diversity within a unified spiritual reality. Proponents argue that no single branch possesses the fullness of catholicity alone, promoting ecumenical recognition. In Reformed and Calvinist traditions, the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646) defines the catholic or universal church as the invisible assembly of the elect—those redeemed by Christ across all ages—united by the Spirit in true faith and obedience to the Word. Chapter 25 emphasizes this spiritual catholicity as transcending visible denominations, with unity rooted in shared doctrine and the headship of Christ, rather than external governance. Visible churches, while important, are imperfect manifestations of this broader, eternal body. Methodist thought, shaped by John Wesley, interprets catholicity through the lens of universal grace and apostolic preaching, viewing the church as a global fellowship where prevenient grace enables all people to respond to the Gospel. In his sermon "Catholic Spirit" (1750), Wesley advocates for a loving unity among Christians of differing forms—Episcopal, Presbyterian, or Independent—provided they hold the apostolic faith in essentials like justification by faith and the means of grace.[68] This emphasizes catholicity as an inclusive, missional reality, extending salvation's offer universally without institutional barriers.[68] In contemporary scholarship, as of 2025, figures like Gavin Ortlund have argued that Protestantism's emphasis on semper reformanda (always reforming) aligns with catholicity by promoting a biblically grounded, inclusive unity across diverse traditions, countering perceptions of fragmentation.[69]

Other Scholarly and Independent Views

Independent Catholicism represents a strand of ecclesiastical tradition that asserts the possibility of maintaining catholicity apart from Roman primacy. Following the First Vatican Council's declaration of papal infallibility in 1870, groups of Catholics, particularly in Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands, rejected the dogma as an innovation incompatible with the Church's ancient faith. These dissenters formed the Old Catholic Church under the Union of Utrecht in 1889, preserving apostolic succession through episcopal consecrations outside Roman oversight and upholding the validity of the seven ecumenical councils. They claim catholicity through fidelity to the creedal marks of the Church—one, holy, catholic, and apostolic—while emphasizing collegial governance among bishops without a supreme pontiff, viewing their structure as a return to pre-ultramontane ecclesiology.[70] Twentieth-century Catholic theologian Karl Rahner expanded the concept of catholicity by introducing the idea of "anonymous Christians," suggesting that God's universal offer of grace extends salvation to non-Christians who implicitly accept divine truth through their moral lives and transcendental openness to mystery. In Rahner's framework, these individuals participate in the Church's catholicity without explicit knowledge of Christ, as the Church's mission encompasses all humanity under God's salvific will, aligning with Vatican II's affirmation that the Church subsists in a way that includes elements of truth and sanctification beyond its visible boundaries. This view reframes catholicity not merely as institutional membership but as a supernatural reality permeating human existence universally.[71] Ecumenical theologian Yves Congar further developed scholarly understandings of catholicity by portraying it as a dynamic, unfolding process rather than a static possession of any single institution. Congar argued that true catholicity involves the Church's ongoing growth toward fullness through the Holy Spirit's action, including ecumenical dialogue that recognizes partial realizations of catholicity in separated Christian communities. Influenced by his studies of patristic and medieval ecclesiology, he emphasized that catholicity manifests in the Church's ability to integrate diversity while maintaining unity, critiquing overly centralized models and advocating for a pneumatic, relational dimension that evolves historically.[72] Critiques from liberal theology challenge orthodox boundaries of catholicity, proposing a redefinition centered on inclusive pluralism that prioritizes ethical solidarity and diverse spiritual experiences over doctrinal uniformity. Thinkers in this tradition, often drawing from post-Vatican II reflections, contend that catholicity should embrace marginalized voices and interfaith insights, transforming the Church into a forum for prophetic witness amid modern pluralism rather than a guardian of exclusive creeds. This perspective seeks to reconcile catholicity with contemporary values like social justice and religious freedom, viewing orthodoxy as adaptable to ensure the Church's relevance in a globalized world.[73] Recent ecumenical initiatives, particularly around the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea in 2025, have further emphasized shared catholicity across traditions. For instance, Pope Leo XIV's addresses in June and October 2025 reaffirmed commitments to full communion with Eastern Orthodox and Assyrian Churches, while joint commissions with Oriental Orthodox continued dialogues on doctrinal unity as of September 2025.[24][59][74]

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.