Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Electric heating
View on Wikipedia

Electric heating is a process in which electrical energy is converted directly to heat energy. Common applications include space heating, cooking, water heating and industrial processes. An electric heater is an electrical device that converts an electric current into heat.[1] The heating element inside every electric heater is an electrical resistor, and works on the principle of Joule heating: an electric current passing through a resistor will convert that electrical energy into heat energy. Most modern electric heating devices use nichrome wire as the active element; the heating element, depicted on the right, uses nichrome wire supported by ceramic insulators.
Alternatively, a heat pump can achieve around 150% – 600% efficiency for heating, or COP 1.5 - 6.0 Coefficient of performance, because it uses electric power only for transferring existing thermal energy. The heat pump uses an electric motor to drive a reversed refrigeration cycle, that draws heat energy from an external source such as the ground or outside air (or the interior of a refrigerator) and directs that heat into the space to be warmed (in case of a fridge, the kitchen). This makes much better use of electric energy than direct electric heating, but requires much more expensive equipment, plus plumbing. Some heating systems can be operated in reverse for air conditioning so that the interior space is cooled and even hotter air or water is discharged outside or into the ground.
Space heating
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (May 2021) |
Space heating is used to warm the interiors of buildings. Space heaters are useful in places where air-handling is difficult, such as in laboratories. Several methods of electric space heating are used.
Infrared radiant heaters
[edit]
Electric infrared radiant heating uses heating elements that reach a high temperature. The element is usually packaged inside a glass envelope resembling a light bulb and with a reflector to direct the energy output away from the body of the heater. The element emits infrared radiation that travels through air or space until it hits an absorbing surface, where it is partially converted to heat and partially reflected. This heat directly warms people and objects in the room, rather than warming the air. This style of heater is particularly useful in areas through which unheated air flows. They are also ideal for basements and garages where spot heating is desired. More generally, they are an excellent choice for task-specific heating.
Radiant heaters operate silently and present the greatest potential danger of ignition of nearby furnishings due to the focused intensity of their output and lack of overheat protection. In the United Kingdom, these appliances are sometimes called electric fires, because they were originally used to replace open fires.
The active medium of the heater depicted in this section is a coil of nichrome resistance wire inside a fused silica tube, open to the atmosphere at the ends, although models exist where the fused silica is sealed at the ends and the resistance alloy is not nichrome.
Convection heaters
[edit]Natural convection
[edit]
In a convection heater, the heating element heats the air in contact with it by thermal conduction. Hot air is less dense than cool air, so it rises due to buoyancy, allowing more cool air to flow in to take its place. This sets up a convection current of hot air that rises from the heater, heats up the surrounding space, cools and then repeats the cycle. These heaters are sometimes filled with oil or thermal fluid. They are ideally suited for heating a closed space. They operate silently and have a lower risk of ignition hazard if they make unintended contact with furnishings compared to radiant electric heaters.
Forced convection
[edit]A fan heater, also called a forced convection heater, is a kind of convection heater that includes an electric fan to speed up the airflow. They operate with considerable noise caused by the fan. They have a moderate risk of ignition hazard if they make unintended contact with furnishings. Their advantage is that they are more compact than heaters that use natural convection and are also cost-efficient for portable and small room heating systems.

Storage heating
[edit]A storage heating system takes advantage of cheaper electricity prices, sold during low demand periods such as overnight. In the United Kingdom, this is branded as Economy 7. The storage heater stores heat in clay bricks, then releases it during the day when required. Newer storage heaters are able to be used with various tariffs. Whilst they can still be used with economy 7, they can be used with day-time tariffs. This is due to the modern design features that are added during manufacturing. Alongside new designs the use of a thermostat or sensor has improved the efficiency of the storage heater. A thermostat or sensor is able to read the temperature of the room, and change the output of the heater accordingly.
Water can also be used as a heat-storage medium.
Domestic electrical underfloor heating
[edit]An electric underfloor heating system has heating cables embedded in the floor. Current flows through a conductive heating material, supplied either directly from the line voltage (120 or 240 volts) or at low voltage from a transformer. The heated cables warm the flooring by direct conduction and will switch off once it reaches the temperature set by the floor thermostat. A warmer floor surface radiates heat to colder surrounding surfaces (ceiling, walls, furniture.) which absorb heat and reflects all non absorbed heat to yet other still cooler surfaces. The cycle of radiation, absorption and reflection starts slowly and slows down slowly nearing set point temperatures and ceases to take place once equilibrium is reached all-round. A floor thermostat or a room thermostat or combination controls the floor on/off. In the process of radiant heating a thin layer of air which is in touch with the warmed surfaces also absorbs some heat and this creates a little convection (air circulation). Contrary to belief people are not heated by this warmed circulating air or convection (convection has a cooling effect) but are heated by the direct radiation of the source and reflection of its surrounds. Comfort is reached at lower air temperature due to eliminating circulating air. Radiant heating experiences highest comfort levels as people's own energy (± 70 Watt for an adult) (must radiate out in heating season) is in balance with its surrounds. Compared to convection heating system based on academic research the air temperatures may be lowered by up to 3 degrees. One variation is using tubes filled with circulating hot water as heat source for warming the floor. The heating principle remains the same. Both old style electric and warm water (hydronic) underfloor heating systems embedded in the floor construction are slow and cannot respond to external weather changes or internal demand/lifestyle requirements. The latest variant places specialized electric heating systems and blankets directly under the floor-decor and on top of additional insulation all placed on top of construction floors. Construction floors stay cold. The principle change of heat source positioning allows it to respond within minutes to changing weather and internal demand requirements such as life style being in/out, at work, rest, sleep, more people present/cooking, etc.
Lighting system
[edit]In large office towers, the lighting system is integrated along with the heating and ventilation system. Waste heat from fluorescent lamps is captured in the return air of the heating system; in large buildings a substantial part of the annual heating energy is supplied by the lighting system. However, this waste heat becomes a liability when using air conditioning. Such expenses can be avoided by integrating an energy efficient lighting system that also creates an electric heat source.[2]
Heat pumps
[edit]A heat pump uses an electrically driven compressor to operate a refrigeration cycle that extracts heat energy from outdoor air, the ground or ground water, and moves that heat to the space to be warmed. A liquid contained within the evaporator section of the heat pump boils at low pressure, absorbing heat energy from the outdoor air or the ground. The vapor is then compressed by a compressor and piped into a condenser coil within the building to be heated. The heat from the hot dense gas is absorbed by the air in the building (and sometimes also used for domestic hot water) causing the hot working fluid to condense back into a liquid. From there the high pressure fluid is passed back to the evaporator section where it expands through an orifice and into the evaporator section, completing the cycle. In the summer months, the cycle can be reversed to move heat out of the conditioned space and to the outside air.
Heat pumps may obtain low-grade heat from the outdoor air in mild climates. In areas with average winter temperatures well below freezing, ground source heat pumps are more efficient than air source heat pumps because they can extract residual solar heat stored in the ground at warmer temperatures than is available from cold air.[3] According to the US EPA, geothermal heat pumps can reduce energy consumption up to 44% compared with air source heat pumps and up to 72% compared with electric resistance heating.[4] The high purchase price of a heat pump vs resistance heaters may be offset when air conditioning is also needed.
Liquid heating
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (May 2021) |
Immersion heater
[edit]
An immersion heater has an electrical resistance heating element encased in a tube, placed in the water (or other fluid) to be heated. The heating element might be inserted directly into the liquid, or installed inside a metal pipe to protect against corrosion and facilitate maintenance. Portable immersion heaters may not have a control thermostat, since they are intended to be used only briefly and under control of an operator.
For domestic hot water supply, or industrial process hot water, permanently installed heating elements in an insulated hot water tank may be used, controlled by a thermostat to regulate temperature. Household units may be rated only a few kilowatts. Industrial water heaters may reach 2000 kilowatts. Where off-peak electric power rates are available, hot water may be stored to use when required.
Minerals present in the water supply may precipitate out of solution and form a hard scale on the heating element surface, or may fall to the bottom of the tank and clog water flow. Maintenance of water heating equipment may require periodic removal of accumulated scale and sediment. Where water supplies are known to be highly mineralized, scale production can be reduced by using low-watt-density heating elements.[5]
Electric shower
[edit]
An electric shower or electric shower head are self-heating shower heads that use an immersion heater which is turned on with the flow of water. A group of separate electric heating elements can be switched to offer different heating levels. They are specialized point-of-use tankless water heaters and are widely used in some countries.
Invented in Brazil by Francisco Canhos in the 1930s due to a lack of central gas distribution and used frequently since the 1940s, the electric shower is a home appliance often seen in South and Central American countries due to the higher costs of gas distribution, combined with households that in most cases do not support conventional water heaters. Earlier models were made of chromed copper or brass, which were expensive, but since 1970, units made of injected plastics are popular due to low prices similar to that of a hair dryer.
Electric showers have a simple electric system, working like a coffee maker, but with a larger water flow. A flow switch turns on the device when water flows through it. Once the water is stopped, the device turns off automatically. An ordinary electric shower often but not always has three heat settings: high (5.5 kW), low (2.5 kW), or cold (0 W) to use when a central heater system is available or in hot seasons. Higher power (up to 7.5 KW) and lower power (up to 3.2 KW) versions are also made, as well as versions with 4 heat settings or a variable heat setting.Electric water boiler
[edit]
Circulation heaters
[edit]Circulation heaters or "direct electric heat exchangers" (DEHE) use heating elements inserted into a "shell side" medium directly to provide the heating effect. All of the heat generated by the electric circulation heater is transferred into the medium, thus an electric heater is 100 percent efficient. Direct electric heat exchangers or "circulation heaters" are used to heat liquids and gases in industrial processes.[10][11]
Electrode heater
[edit]With an electrode heater, there is no wire-wound resistance and the liquid itself acts as the resistance. This has potential hazards, so the regulations governing electrode heaters are strict.
Environmental and efficiency aspects
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (May 2021) |
The efficiency of any system depends on the definition of the boundaries of the system. For an electrical energy customer the efficiency of electric space heating is 100% because all purchased energy is converted to heat. However, if a power plant supplying electricity is included, the overall efficiency drops drastically. For example, a fossil-fuel power station only delivers 3-5 units of electrical energy for every 10 units of fuel energy released.[12] Even though the electric heater is 100% efficient, the amount of fuel needed to produce the heat is more than if the fuel were burned in a furnace or boiler at the building being heated. If the same fuel could be used for space heating by a consumer, it would be more efficient overall to burn the fuel at the end user's building. On the other hand, replacing electric heating with fossil fuel burning heaters, isn't necessarily good as it removes the ability to have renewable electric heating, this can be achieved by sourcing the electricity from a renewable source.
Variations between countries generating electrical power affect concerns about efficiency and the environment. In 2015 France generated only 6% of its electricity from fossil fuels, while Australia sourced over 86% of its electricity from fossil fuels.[13] The cleanliness and efficiency of electricity are dependent on the source.
In Sweden the use of direct electric heating has been restricted since the 1980s for this reason, and there are plans to phase it out entirely – see Oil phase-out in Sweden – while Denmark has banned the installation of direct electric space heating in new buildings for similar reasons.[14] In the case of new buildings, low-energy building techniques can be used which can virtually eliminate the need for heating, such as those built to the Passivhaus standard.
In Quebec, however, electric heating is still the most popular form of home heating. According to a 2003 Statistics Canada survey, 68% of households in the province use electricity for space heating. More than 90% of all power consumed in Quebec is generated by hydroelectric dams, which have low greenhouse gases emissions compared to fossil-fuel power stations. Low and stable rates are charged by Hydro-Québec, the provincially owned utility.[15]
In recent years there has been a major trend for countries to generate low-carbon electricity from renewable sources, adding to nuclear power and hydro-electric power which are long-standing low-carbon sources. For example, the carbon footprint of UK electricity per kWh in 2019 was less than half that in 2010.[12] However, because of high capital cost, the cost of electricity has not fallen and is typically 2-3 times that of burning fuel. Hence, direct electric heating may now give a similar carbon footprint to gas- or oil-fired heating, but the cost remains higher, though cheaper off-peak tariffs can reduce this effect.
To provide heat more efficiently, an electrically driven heat pump can raise the indoor temperature by extracting energy from the ground, the outside air, or waste streams such as exhaust air. This can cut the electricity consumption to as little as 35% of that used by resistive heating.[16] Where the primary source of electrical energy is hydroelectric, nuclear, or wind, transferring electricity via the grid can be convenient, since the resource may be too distant for direct heating applications (with the notable exception of solar thermal energy).
The electrification of heat of space and water heating is increasingly proposed as a way forward to decarbonise the current energy system, particularly with heat pumps. In case of large-scale electrification, impacts on the electricity grid due to potential increase in peak electricity demand and exposure to extreme weather events needs to be considered.[17]
Economic aspects
[edit]The operation of electric resistance heaters to heat an area for long periods is costly in many regions. However, intermittent or partial day use can be more cost efficient than whole building heating due to superior zonal control.
For example: A lunch room in an office setting has limited hours of operation. During low-use periods a "monitor" level of heat (50 °F or 10 °C) is provided by the central heating system. Peak use times between the hours of 11:00 and 14:00 are heated to "comfort levels" (70 °F or 21 °C). Significant savings can be realized in overall energy consumption, since infrared radiation losses through thermal radiation are not as large with a smaller temperature gradient both between this space and unheated outside air, as well as between the refrigerator and the (now cooler) lunch room.
Economically, electric heat can be compared to other sources of home heating by multiplying the local cost per kilowatt hour for electricity by the number of kilowatts the heater uses. E.g.: 1500-watt heater at 12 cents per kilowatt hour 1.5×12=18 cents per hour.[18] When comparing to burning fuel it may be useful to convert kilowatt hours to BTUs: 1.5 kWh × 3412.142=5118 BTU.
Industrial applications
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (May 2021) |
Electric heating is widely used in industry.[19]
Advantages of electric heating methods over other forms include precision control of temperature and distribution of heat energy, combustion not used to develop heat, and the ability to attain temperatures not readily achievable with chemical combustion. Electric heat can be accurately applied at the precise point needed in a process, at high concentration of power per unit area or volume. Electric heating devices can be built in any required size and can be located anywhere within a plant. Electric heating processes are generally clean, quiet, and do not emit much byproduct heat to the surroundings. Electrical heating equipment has a high speed of response, lending it to rapid-cycling mass-production equipment.
The limitations and disadvantages of electric heating in industry include the higher cost of electrical energy compared to direct use of fuel, and the capital cost of both the electric heating apparatus itself and the infrastructure required to deliver large quantities of electrical energy to the point of use. This may be somewhat offset by in-plant (on-site) efficiency gains in using less energy overall to achieve the same result.
Design of an industrial heating system starts with assessment of the temperature required, the amount of heat required, and the feasible modes of transferring heat energy. In addition to conduction, convection and radiation, electrical heating methods can use electric and magnetic fields to heat material.
Methods of electric heating include resistance heating, electric arc heating, induction heating, and dielectric heating. In some processes (for example, arc welding), electric current is directly applied to the workpiece. In other processes, heat is produced within the workpiece by induction or dielectric losses. As well, heat can be produced then transferred to the work by conduction, convection or radiation.
Industrial heating processes can be broadly categorized as low-temperature (to about 400 °C or 752 °F), medium-temperature (between 400 and 1,150 °C or 752 and 2,102 °F), and high-temperature (beyond 1,150 °C or 2,102 °F). Low-temperature processes include baking and drying, curing finishes, soldering, molding and shaping plastics. Medium temperature processes include melting plastics and some non-metals for casting or reshaping, as well as annealing, stress-relieving and heat-treating metals. High-temperature processes include steelmaking, brazing, welding, casting metals, cutting, smelting and the preparation of some chemicals.
See also
[edit]- Auxiliary power unit
- Central heating
- Diathermy
- Dielectric heating
- Electroslag welding
- Electroslag remelting
- Energy conservation
- Head-end power
- Heater (types of heaters)
- Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
- Hotel electric power
- Infrared heater
- Microwave oven
- Renewable energy
- Thermal efficiency
- Thermal immersion circulator
- Underfloor heating
References
[edit]- ^ "Electric Heater". Britannica.com. The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica.
- ^ "Energy Efficient Lighting | WBDG Whole Building Design Guide". www.wbdg.org. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- ^ "Comparison of efficiency of air source heat pumps and ground source heat pumps". Icax.co.uk. Retrieved 20 December 2013.
- ^ "Choosing and Installing Geothermal Heat Pumps - Department of Energy". Energy.gov. Retrieved 16 April 2017.
- ^ "Immersion Heaters - Sigma Thermal". Sigma Thermal. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- ^ "Definition of "tea urn" | Collins English Dictionary".
- ^ a b c Max Cryer (8 October 2010). The Godzone Dictionary: Of Favourite New Zealand Words and Phrases. ReadHowYouWant.com. p. 64. ISBN 978-1-4587-7952-6. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
- ^ Leon Reznik (21 August 1997). Fuzzy Controllers Handbook: How to Design Them, How They Work. Newnes. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-08-050716-3. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
- ^ Matsushita Electric Corporation of America (1992). Annual report.
- ^ "Gastech News". 12 August 2012. Archived from the original on 22 February 2017.
- ^ "Electric Resistance Heating - Department of Energy". Energy.gov. Retrieved 16 April 2017.
- ^ a b Kemp, I.C. and Lim, J.S. (2020). Pinch Analysis for Energy and Carbon Footprint Reduction: A User Guide on Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy, 3rd edition. Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-08-102536-9.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser (2020) - "Fossil Fuels". Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: '[1]; retrieved 2020-05-23
- ^ The Green Electricity Illusion, AECB, published 2005-11-11, accessed 26 May 2007
- ^ Snider, Bradley. Home heating and the environment, in Canadian Social Trends, Spring 2006, pp. 15–19. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
- ^ "Ground-Source Heat Pumps (Earth-Energy Systems)". NRCan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2017.
- ^ Eggimann, Sven; Usher, Will; Eyre, Nick; Hall, Jim W. (2020). "How weather affects energy demand variability in the transition towards sustainable heating". Energy. 195 (C) 116947. Bibcode:2020Ene...19516947E. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.116947. S2CID 214266085.
- ^ "How to calculate electric energy cost of common household items - McGill's Repair and Construction, LLC". McGill's Repair and Construction, LLC. 19 January 2014. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- ^ Donald G. Fink and H. Wayne Beaty, Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers, Eleventh Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978, ISBN 0-07-020974-X, pages 21-144 to 21-188
Electric heating
View on GrokipediaPrinciples of Operation
Resistance Heating Fundamentals
Resistance heating, commonly referred to as Joule or Ohmic heating, generates thermal energy through the dissipation of electrical power in a conductive material opposing the flow of electric current. This process arises from collisions between charge carriers, primarily electrons, and the lattice ions of the conductor, converting kinetic energy into heat.[13][14] The fundamental equation describing the instantaneous power output is , where is the electric current in amperes and is the electrical resistance in ohms; alternatively, , with denoting voltage in volts. The total heat energy produced over time is , measured in joules. These relations stem from conservation of energy, where all electrical work against resistance manifests as thermal output, assuming negligible other losses like radiation or convection within the element itself.[15][16] Suitable materials for heating elements exhibit high electrical resistivity (typically 1.0–1.5 × 10^{-6} Ω·m), elevated melting points exceeding 1400°C, and oxidation resistance to maintain longevity under operational temperatures up to 1200–1400°C. Common alloys include nickel-chromium (e.g., Nichrome, 80% Ni–20% Cr, resistivity ~1.1 × 10^{-6} Ω·m) for moderate temperatures and iron-chromium-aluminum (e.g., Kanthal, up to 1400°C service) for higher demands, selected for their balance of cost, formability into wires or ribbons, and thermal stability.[17][18][19] Element design often involves coiling resistive wire to maximize surface area for radiative and convective heat transfer while minimizing volume, with insulation like ceramics or mica sheaths preventing short-circuiting and directing heat outward. Resistance varies with temperature via , where is the temperature coefficient (e.g., ~0.0004/°C for Nichrome), necessitating derating or compensation in control systems to sustain consistent power.[20][21] At the point of use, resistance heating achieves near-100% efficiency in converting electrical input to thermal output, as quantum mechanically, resistive losses fully thermalize the energy without alternative dissipation pathways in optimized elements; practical efficiencies exceed 98% accounting for minor lead and contact losses.[22][23]Advanced Methods Including Induction and Dielectric
Induction heating generates heat in electrically conductive materials through electromagnetic induction, where an alternating current passed through a surrounding coil produces a time-varying magnetic field that induces eddy currents within the workpiece. These eddy currents, encountering the material's electrical resistance, dissipate energy as heat via the Joule effect, enabling rapid and localized heating without direct contact.[24] This method achieves efficiencies often exceeding 80% in optimized systems, surpassing traditional resistance heating in speed and energy use for metallic applications, as the heat forms directly in the target material rather than the heating element.[25] Industrial uses include metal forging, annealing, and pipe welding, where precise control minimizes oxidation and distortion; for instance, it supports curing protective coatings on welded pipes with reduced energy loss compared to convective methods.[26][27] Frequency selection in induction systems influences penetration depth and heating uniformity: lower frequencies (e.g., 50-60 Hz) suit deep heating of large masses, while higher frequencies (up to MHz) enable surface hardening with depths as shallow as 0.5 mm.[28] Power supplies typically employ solid-state inverters for precise control, achieving response times under 10 ms, which supports applications like through-heating steel billets to 1,200°C in seconds for rolling mills.[25] Limitations include suitability only for conductors—non-metallics require hybrid approaches—and higher initial costs, though lifecycle savings from efficiency (up to 90% in self-oscillating designs) and reduced maintenance offset this in high-volume processes.[25] Dielectric heating, in contrast, targets non-conductive or poorly conductive materials like plastics, wood, and ceramics by subjecting them to a high-frequency alternating electric field (typically 1-100 MHz), which causes dielectric losses through dipole rotation and ionic conduction, converting molecular agitation into volumetric heat.[29] This uniform heating mechanism avoids hotspots common in conduction-based methods, with efficiency dependent on the material's loss factor (tan δ), often reaching 50-70% in radio-frequency systems for drying or curing.[30] Applications span industrial drying of textiles and adhesives, food pasteurization, and preheating composites, where it accelerates processes like wood gluing by factors of 5-10 over steam methods while preserving material integrity.[31] Power delivery in dielectric setups uses parallel-plate electrodes or applicators to generate fields up to 10 kV/cm, with penetration depths scaling inversely with frequency and material permittivity—e.g., effective for thicknesses up to 10 cm in low-loss dielectrics at 13.56 MHz.[32] Compared to induction, dielectric heating excels in insulators but demands safety measures against arcing and requires tuning for load variations to maintain efficiency, as mismatches can drop performance below 40%.[33] In process industries, it supports low-carbon alternatives for tasks like insect control in stored grains or uniform thawing, leveraging empirical dielectric property data to optimize energy input per unit volume.[34][35]Historical Development
Early Inventions and Adoption (1870s–1920s)
The late 19th century saw initial practical applications of electric resistance heating following advancements in electrical generation and distribution, though devices remained experimental and power-limited. In 1883, Thomas Edison developed an early electric heater utilizing incandescent wire principles from his lightbulb work, representing one of the first grid-compatible heating prototypes.[36][37] By the early 1890s, General Electric produced some of the first commercial portable electric heaters, often relying on incandescent bulbs or basic coils for radiant heat, targeted at industrial and laboratory settings where electricity was available.[38] Key patents advanced stove and oven designs suited for domestic use. On June 30, 1896, William S. Hadaway Jr. of New York received the first U.S. patent for an electric stove, featuring enclosed resistance elements to distribute heat evenly without open flames, a significant step beyond battery-powered precursors like George B. Simpson's 1859 electroheater.[39] In 1892, Canadian inventor Thomas Ahearn demonstrated a functional electric range in Ottawa, powered by direct current and used publicly to showcase viability for cooking.[40] These innovations leveraged platinum or iron-chromium wires, but high costs and material fragility constrained scalability.[41] Adoption accelerated modestly in the early 20th century as urban electrification expanded, with electric heaters supplementing coal fireplaces and gas systems in affluent households. The 1905 invention of nichrome alloy by Albert Marsh enabled more robust, high-temperature elements resistant to oxidation, facilitating portable room heaters and irons by the 1910s.[42] By the 1920s, thermostatically controlled units emerged, such as those using bimetallic strips by 1927, allowing precise operation in residences, though electric heating comprised less than 10% of U.S. home systems due to high electricity rates—often 10-20 cents per kilowatt-hour—and preference for cheaper fuels.[43] Rural areas lagged, with adoption tied to grid extension under initiatives like the Tennessee Valley Authority precursors, limiting widespread use to cities like New York and Chicago.[44] Early systems emphasized safety over efficiency, with open-coil designs prone to fire risks, prompting gradual regulatory standards.[45]Mid-20th Century Expansion and Standardization
Following World War II, the expansion of electric heating accelerated amid widespread electrification efforts and a postwar housing boom in the United States and Europe. In the U.S., utilities launched the "Live Better Electrically" campaign in the early 1950s, promoting all-electric homes equipped with resistance-based systems such as baseboard heaters to boost electricity demand and modernize suburban developments.[46] This coincided with rural electrification programs that extended grid access, enabling greater adoption of electric space heating in new constructions, where it supplanted coal and wood stoves that had heated about 80% of U.S. homes in 1940.[47] In Britain, fuel shortages prompted aggressive promotion of electric heating from 1945 onward, with manufacturers like Belling & Co scaling up production of domestic bar heaters to meet rising consumer demand during the economic recovery.[38][48] Technological advancements facilitated this growth, particularly in residential applications. Electric resistance baseboard heaters emerged in the late 1940s as a lightweight, installable alternative to traditional cast-iron radiators, gaining traction in the 1950s for their simplicity and integration into baseboard enclosures that convected warm air.[49] Portable radiant electric heaters also proliferated in the 1950s, prized for mobility and quick heat delivery in individual rooms, while features like built-in thermostats and timers—introduced by the late 1940s—improved user control and energy management.[50][51] These systems leveraged abundant hydroelectric power in regions like the U.S. Pacific Northwest, where utilities incentivized electric heating to utilize surplus capacity, though adoption varied geographically due to electricity pricing and climate demands.[46] Standardization efforts in the mid-20th century focused on materials, safety, and performance to support reliable mass production and reduce risks like overheating. Nichrome wire, discovered in the early 1900s but refined for durability, became the predominant resistance material for heating elements due to its high melting point and oxidation resistance, enabling consistent output in both portable and fixed units.[52] Underwriters Laboratories (UL) in the U.S. developed early safety protocols for electric heating appliances, emphasizing enclosure designs to prevent shocks and fires, with standards evolving through the 1950s to cover baseboard and room heaters.[53] Internationally, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) began formulating guidelines for household electric heaters, including performance measurement methods that standardized testing for efficiency and heat output, aiding cross-border manufacturing consistency by the 1960s.[54] These measures addressed causal factors like variable grid voltages and material inconsistencies, promoting safer integration into homes despite electricity's higher operational costs compared to gas in many areas.[55]Late 20th to 21st Century Innovations
In the 1980s, positive temperature coefficient (PTC) ceramic heating elements emerged as a significant advancement in electric resistance heating, with vendors first offering commercial ceramic heaters in 1986. These self-regulating elements, often based on barium titanate materials, increase electrical resistance as temperature rises, inherently limiting maximum surface temperatures to around 250–300°C and reducing risks of overheating or fire compared to traditional nichrome coils.[56] Patents for PTC heater designs, such as those filed in 1978 and granted in the early 1980s, facilitated their integration into portable and automotive applications, enabling safer, more efficient operation without external thermostats.[57] The 1990s brought refinements to radiant electric heating systems, including the enclosure of tubular heating elements in vacuum-sealed glass tubes to minimize convective losses and improve directional heat output. This innovation, adopted by manufacturers in the late 1990s, enhanced the efficiency of quartz and halogen-based radiant heaters, which operate by emitting short-wave infrared radiation for faster warmup times—often reaching full heat in seconds—and targeted warming of surfaces and occupants. Halogen heaters, leveraging gas-filled tungsten filaments, achieved element temperatures up to 2,200°C, providing high luminous efficacy alongside thermal output.[58] Into the 21st century, heat pump technologies for electric heating saw substantial efficiency gains, with coefficient of performance (COP) values improving from typical 2.5–3.0 in 1990s air-source units to over 4.0 in advanced models by the 2010s through variable-speed compressors and enhanced refrigerants. Early 2000s breakthroughs, such as integrated desuperheater coils and inverter-driven systems, allowed heat pumps to maintain performance in colder climates, expanding their viability beyond mild regions; for instance, cold-climate heat pumps certified under U.S. DOE standards post-2015 deliver heating at -15°C outdoor temperatures with minimal supplemental resistance input.[59][60][61] Infrared panel heaters proliferated in the 2000s as low-emissivity surface innovations enabled far-infrared emission (wavelengths 5–15 μm) for direct absorption by human bodies and objects, bypassing air heating for claimed point-of-use efficiencies approaching 100%. These systems, often using carbon or aluminum panels at surface temperatures of 70–100°C, reduced stratification losses in spaces compared to convective heaters. By the 2010s, smart integration via IoT-enabled thermostats and zoning controls further optimized electric heating, with devices like programmable algorithms learning occupancy patterns to cut energy use by 10–20% in residential settings.[62][63][64]Residential Applications
Space Heating Systems
Electric space heating systems for residences convert electrical energy into heat primarily through resistance elements, which achieve 100% efficiency at the point of use by transforming all input electricity into thermal output without flue or combustion losses. These systems distribute heat via convection, radiation, or a combination, suiting various home layouts from single rooms to whole structures. Common installations include baseboard convectors, central forced-air furnaces, and radiant panels or mats, each offering distinct thermal dynamics: convective systems circulate warmed air, while radiant ones heat surfaces and occupants directly for perceived comfort at lower air temperatures.[65][66] Central electric furnaces employ resistance coils to heat air, which fans then propel through ductwork for uniform distribution, often integrating with existing HVAC infrastructure for both heating and cooling. Such systems typically operate at 98-100% combustion-free efficiency but incur 10-30% losses from duct leakage and conduction in uninsulated setups, necessitating sealed, insulated ducts to minimize waste. Compared to baseboard alternatives, central systems can reduce energy use by up to 50% through better zoning and faster room warm-up, though initial retrofits into non-ducted homes add costs. Baseboard systems, by avoiding forced air circulation, tend to circulate less dust and allergens, potentially benefiting indoor air quality and health for allergy sufferers. In contrast, forced air systems can spread dust and pollen if ducts are not well-maintained or filtered, though they enable integration of humidification or dehumidification for humidity control.[66][67][68][69] Electric baseboard heaters, particularly effective as supplemental options for rooms with inadequate central HVAC, are mounted along external perimeter walls and require installation by a qualified electrician. They rely on natural convection to draw cool air over exposed resistive elements, releasing warmed air upward for room filling, offering reliable and silent operation but higher operating costs due to the resistance heating method. Lacking ducts, they eliminate distribution losses inherent to central systems, enabling precise zonal control via individual thermostats that curtail energy to unused areas. However, they promote uneven vertical temperature gradients—warmer near ceilings—and can stir dust, potentially aggravating respiratory issues, while requiring accessible wiring to avoid overloads in older homes.[65][70] Radiant electric systems, including underfloor cables, ceiling panels, or infrared emitters, transfer heat primarily through electromagnetic waves or conduction, yielding drafts-free environments that enhance occupant comfort by warming bodies over ambient air. Floor-based variants embed mats or wires beneath finishes like tile, providing even coverage but demanding compatible flooring to avert overheating risks. Infrared models, using carbon or halogen elements, excel in spot heating with minimal air movement, though their directional output limits whole-room efficacy without multiples.[66][71] Overall, these resistance-based systems provide clean, indoor-emission-free operation with low maintenance, as no fuel storage or venting is required, contrasting combustion alternatives. Drawbacks center on operational economics: in regions with electricity rates exceeding $0.10/kWh, annual costs for a typical 2,000 sq ft home can surpass gas by 2-3 times during peak winter demand, absent subsidies or renewable grid mixes. Air-source heat pumps, while electricity-dependent, amplify effective efficiency to 200-400% via heat transfer rather than generation; ductless mini-split variants, wall- or ceiling-mounted and sized for room areas (e.g., 9-12k BTU for ~128 sq ft), offer 2-3 times the efficiency of resistance heating, quiet operation, zoned control, and effectiveness in cold temperatures, increasingly supplanting pure resistance in milder climates for cost parity.[65][72][9][73]Water and Liquid Heating Systems
Electric water and liquid heating systems in residential applications utilize resistance heating to elevate the temperature of water or other fluids for uses including sanitation, cleaning, and minor process tasks. These systems convert electrical energy into heat via Joule effect in metallic elements, typically achieving near-100% point-of-use efficiency for the conversion process itself, though system-level performance varies with design factors like insulation and demand patterns.[74][75] Conventional electric storage water heaters dominate in many regions, featuring an insulated steel tank of 40-80 gallons capacity fitted with one or two screw-plug immersion elements—coiled nichrome wire encased in copper or stainless steel sheaths, rated at 4500 watts each under 240 volts.[76][77] The elements, with watt densities around 45-60 W/in² for water compatibility, immerse directly in the fluid and activate sequentially via a bimetallic thermostat to sustain temperatures of 120-140°F (49-60°C), yielding recovery rates of approximately 20 gallons per hour per element.[78][79] Standby losses, estimated at 10-20% of annual energy input due to conduction and convection through tank walls, reduce overall Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) to 0.90-0.95 for standard models.[74][80] Tankless electric water heaters provide on-demand heating without storage, passing incoming cold water over or through high-capacity resistance elements—often 18-36 kW total in multiple stages—to deliver flow rates of 2-5 gallons per minute at temperature rises up to 50°F (28°C).[81] This configuration avoids standby losses, yielding 24-34% higher efficiency than storage units for daily demands under 41 gallons, with UEF values nearing 0.99 for the resistive transfer.[81] Installation necessitates robust electrical infrastructure, including 80-150 amp dedicated circuits, limiting suitability to low-to-moderate usage homes or supplemental point-of-use setups where simultaneous draws remain below unit capacity.[81] Point-of-use devices, such as under-sink heaters or electric showers, employ compact inline or inline immersion elements for targeted applications. Electric showers, integrating a 7.5-10.5 kW element directly in the shower unit, heat mains water instantaneously at 8-10 liters per minute, independent of central systems; they equip over 70% of Brazilian residences and substantial UK households, particularly where gas distribution lags or point heating aligns with variable demand.[82][83][84] For non-water liquids like oils in residential hobby applications, submersible elements with adjusted sheath materials (e.g., Incoloy for corrosion resistance) maintain similar resistive operation but at lower watt densities to prevent fluid degradation.[85] These systems prioritize simplicity and modularity, though all require grounding and over-temperature safeguards to mitigate risks from scale buildup or dry-firing.[74]Industrial and Process Applications
High-Temperature Furnaces and Ovens
High-temperature electric furnaces and ovens operate above 1000°F (538°C), typically reaching 1400°F to over 3000°C depending on the heating method, enabling processes like metal heat treatment, ceramic sintering, and glass melting.[86][87][88] These systems distinguish from lower-temperature ovens by using robust electric heating technologies, including resistance elements, induction coils, and electric arcs, which provide precise control and minimal contamination compared to fuel-fired alternatives.[87] Resistance-heated furnaces dominate applications up to 1800°C, employing materials such as molybdenum disilicide (MoSi₂) elements that form a protective quartz layer against oxidation, allowing operation in air atmospheres.[89][90] Nickel-chromium alloys support temperatures to 1600°C, while silicon carbide elements reach similar limits with high thermal shock resistance.[18] These are configured as rod, U-shaped, or tubular elements in batch or continuous furnaces for uniform heat distribution in controlled environments.[91] Induction furnaces, utilizing electromagnetic fields to generate eddy currents in conductive loads, achieve melting temperatures for steel around 1550–1600°C and up to 3000°C in vacuum variants for reactive metals.[92][93] Coreless designs predominate for their flexibility in alloying ferrous and non-ferrous metals, offering rapid heating rates (up to 30°C/s) and energy efficiency through direct energy transfer to the charge.[92] Electric arc furnaces, often powered by graphite electrodes, melt scrap steel at 1800°C or higher, processing batches from 10 to 400 tons with high power densities exceeding 1 MW per ton.[88] In metallurgy, these furnaces facilitate annealing, hardening, and forging of steels and alloys, while in ceramics and glass production, they enable firing at 1200–1700°C for vitrification and shaping.[94][95] Precision zoning and inert atmospheres minimize defects, with electric methods yielding lower oxidation risks than combustion processes.[92] Maintenance focuses on element longevity, with MoSi₂ types lasting 1000–5000 hours under optimal conditions.[96]Fluid and Material Heating Processes
Electric immersion heaters directly submerge tubular resistive elements into fluids such as water, oils, chemicals, or molten metals within industrial tanks, achieving thermal efficiencies near 100% due to minimal convective losses outside the medium.[97][98] These devices support applications including process tank heating, metal plating baths, and asphalt melting, with capacities ranging from kilowatts to megawatts depending on element configuration and fluid volume.[99][100] Circulation heaters, often flanged or screw-plug designs, integrate into piping systems to preheat or maintain temperatures in flowing fluids like gases or viscous liquids, ensuring uniform heat distribution through forced convection in closed loops.[101][102] Employed in sectors such as petrochemical refining and food processing, they enable precise control via thermostats, reducing energy waste compared to indirect methods.[103] Electrode boilers generate hot water or steam by passing alternating current through conductive water between submerged electrodes, converting electrical resistance directly to heat with efficiencies exceeding 97%.[104][105] This method supports rapid startup—reaching full capacity in under two minutes—and is used for auxiliary steam in manufacturing where demand fluctuates, as the process inherently purifies output steam by leaving salts behind.[106][107] Ohmic heating applies electric current directly through conductive fluids in continuous-flow systems, inducing volumetric Joule heating that minimizes temperature gradients and hotspots in viscous or particulate-laden liquids like fruit juices or slurries.[108][109] Industrial implementations, such as in pasteurization, achieve faster processing times than conventional heat exchangers while preserving product quality, with energy efficiency enhanced by the absence of heating surfaces.[110] For solid or granular materials, electric process heaters employ direct-contact resistive elements or radiant panels to preheat bulk substances in drying, forming, or curing operations, offering temperature uniformity within 1°C for consistent outcomes.[111][112] These systems, common in heat treating metals or drying powders, leverage electricity's responsiveness to avoid combustion byproducts, though scalability depends on material conductivity and throughput rates.[113][114]Efficiency and Performance Analysis
Technical Efficiency Metrics
Electric resistance heating systems convert electrical energy to thermal energy through Joule heating, achieving point-of-use efficiencies of nearly 100%, as virtually all input electricity is transformed into heat with minimal losses beyond minor radiation or convection inefficiencies in the device itself.[65][23] This metric, often termed "energy efficiency ratio" at the appliance level, equates to 1:1 for heat output per unit of electricity consumed, delivering approximately 3,412 BTU per kWh input under standard conditions.[23] In contrast, electric heat pump systems, which also rely on electricity but employ vapor-compression cycles to transfer rather than generate heat, are evaluated using the Coefficient of Performance (COP), defined as the ratio of delivered heating capacity to electrical work input. Typical COP values range from 2.0 to 4.0 or higher in moderate climates, meaning 2-4 units of heat are provided per unit of electricity, though performance degrades below freezing temperatures, potentially dropping to 1.0 or requiring auxiliary resistance elements.[115][116] For seasonal assessments, heat pumps use the Heating Seasonal Performance Factor (HSPF), which accounts for variable conditions and averages 7-10 BTU per watt-hour in efficient models, outperforming resistance heating's fixed 3.412 BTU per watt-hour.[117] Overall system efficiency for electric heating incorporates upstream losses in electricity generation and transmission, where more than 60% of primary energy input at power plants—such as 56% losses in natural gas combined-cycle plants (44% thermal efficiency) or higher in coal-fired units (around 32% efficiency)—is dissipated as waste heat before reaching the end user.[118] Thus, while point-of-use metrics highlight resistance heating's direct conversion advantage, primary energy efficiency for grid-supplied electric heating typically falls to 30-40%, underscoring dependency on generation source quality over appliance design alone.[119][65]Comparisons with Gas and Oil Systems
Electric resistance heating systems achieve near-complete conversion of electrical energy to heat at the point of use, with annual fuel utilization efficiency (AFUE) ratings typically ranging from 95% to 100%, as outdoor units experience minor losses from casing inefficiencies.[120] In contrast, natural gas furnaces reach AFUE levels up to 98% for high-efficiency condensing models, while oil furnaces generally operate at 80% to 90% AFUE due to higher combustion and venting losses.[120] [121]| Heating System Type | Typical AFUE Range |
|---|---|
| Electric Resistance Furnace | 95–100% |
| Natural Gas Furnace | 80–98% |
| Oil Furnace | 80–90% |
Environmental Impacts
Emissions and Lifecycle Assessment
Electric heating systems emit no direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the point of use, unlike combustion-based systems such as natural gas boilers, which release CO2, NOx, and other pollutants during operation. Indirect emissions from electric heating stem primarily from upstream electricity generation, with lifecycle GHG intensity depending on the grid's fuel mix; for instance, in regions reliant on coal or gas-dominated grids, operational emissions can range from 400-600 g CO2-eq/kWh of delivered heat for resistance heating, assuming 100% efficiency. Heat pumps, a subset of electric heating, achieve lower operational emissions due to coefficients of performance (COP) of 2-4, reducing effective grid draw by 50-75% compared to resistance methods. In 59 global regions representing 95% of heating demand, heat pumps yielded net lifecycle emission reductions versus fossil alternatives as of 2020 data, though resistance heating showed parity or slight increases in high-carbon grids like parts of New England, where marginal generation from gas peakers elevates impacts.[129][6][130] Lifecycle assessments (LCAs) encompass manufacturing, installation, operation (typically 80-90% of total impact), and decommissioning. Manufacturing emissions for electric systems are higher upfront—around 1-2 t CO2-eq per kW installed capacity for heat pumps due to copper coils, refrigerants, and electronics—compared to 0.5-1 t for gas boilers, but these are amortized over 15-20 year lifespans. Operational phases dominate, with peer-reviewed LCAs indicating heat pumps reduce total GHG by 42% and fossil fuel depletion by 47% versus gas systems in European contexts as of 2025 analyses. Resistance electric heating, however, often exceeds gas boiler lifecycles in dirty grids (e.g., >200 g CO2-eq/kWh heat vs. 150-250 for efficient gas), though advantages emerge with grid decarbonization; a 2023 study of residential systems found electric options lower primary energy use by 20-30% when paired with renewables. Decommissioning impacts are minimal (1-5% of total), aided by recyclable metals, but refrigerant leaks in heat pumps pose minor hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) risks if not managed.[131][131][132]| Heating Type | Lifecycle GHG (g CO2-eq/kWh heat, avg. mixed grid) | Key Assumption Source |
|---|---|---|
| Gas Boiler | 200-300 | Upstream methane included[133] |
| Electric Resistance | 400-600 (operational dominant) | US/EU grid 2023 avg.[6] |
| Air-Source Heat Pump | 100-250 (COP 3, lifecycle) | 42% reduction vs. gas[131] |
Dependency on Electricity Generation Sources
The greenhouse gas emissions associated with electric heating are predominantly indirect and contingent upon the carbon intensity of the electricity generation mix, typically expressed in grams of CO₂ equivalent per kilowatt-hour (gCO₂e/kWh). Resistance-based electric heating delivers heat at approximately 100% efficiency, translating grid intensity directly to emissions per unit of heat output (1 kWh of electricity yields 1 kWh of heat). In contrast, heat pumps achieve coefficients of performance (COP) of 2–4, effectively dividing the grid's carbon footprint by this factor. Thus, in low-carbon grids—such as Norway's hydropower-dominated system with an intensity below 20 gCO₂e/kWh in 2023—electric heating, including resistance types, produces negligible emissions relative to fossil fuel alternatives.[135] Conversely, in coal-reliant grids like Poland's (over 700 gCO₂e/kWh in recent years), resistance heating exceeds the ~200 gCO₂e/kWh emissions of high-efficiency natural gas combustion for equivalent heat delivery.[136][7] Grid decarbonization trends amplify this dependency: the U.S. grid averaged 369 gCO₂e/kWh in 2023, down from higher coal-era levels due to natural gas and renewables displacing coal, yet still rendering resistance heating less favorable than gas without efficiency multipliers like heat pumps.[136][137] The European Union's intensity fell to approximately 250 gCO₂e/kWh by 2023, a 20% reduction from 2022, driven by expanded renewables and nuclear, enabling heat pumps to undercut gas emissions in most member states.[138] Lifecycle analyses further reveal that manufacturing emissions (e.g., from heat pump refrigerants) and upstream fuel extraction add 10–20% to operational footprints, but these are dwarfed by generation sources in high-use scenarios; projections assuming continued grid cleaning favor electrification, though delays in fossil phase-out could defer benefits.[139][7] Nuclear power, with intensities under 20 gCO₂e/kWh comparable to wind and hydro, underscores a low-emission pathway independent of intermittency issues in renewables, yet its underutilization in some grids (e.g., Germany's post-2023 shutdowns increasing reliance on gas and coal) elevates electric heating's effective emissions.[135] Empirical data from diverse grids confirm that while heat pumps often outperform gas even at 400–500 gCO₂e/kWh intensities due to efficiency, resistance systems require sub-200 gCO₂e/kWh thresholds for parity, highlighting the causal link between generation fuel mixes and overall viability.[140][7] This variability necessitates region-specific assessments, as blanket electrification policies risk unintended emission spikes in fossil-heavy contexts without concurrent generation shifts.[141]| Region/Grid Example | Carbon Intensity (gCO₂e/kWh, ~2023) | Implication for Resistance Electric Heating vs. Gas |
|---|---|---|
| Norway (hydro) | <20 | Far lower emissions than gas |
| EU Average | ~250 | Comparable or slightly higher without heat pumps |
| U.S. Average | 369 | Higher than gas; heat pumps needed for advantage |
| Poland (coal-heavy) | >700 | Significantly higher than gas |
Economic and Policy Considerations
Cost Structures and Market Dynamics
Capital costs for electric heating systems include equipment procurement and installation, which vary by type and scale. Residential air-source heat pumps averaged $16,000 after incentives in 2024, with median pre-incentive projects at $19,000 for systems installed that year. [142] [143] Industrial resistance heaters exhibit lower unit costs due to modular designs, often ranging from $500 to $5,000 per kilowatt of capacity depending on voltage and application. [144] Installation expenses escalate in retrofits requiring electrical upgrades, potentially adding 20-50% to totals in older buildings. Operational costs are primarily driven by electricity consumption, with U.S. residential rates averaging 17.47 cents per kilowatt-hour in October 2025. Resistance heating operates at near 100% efficiency but incurs higher fuel expenses compared to gas, with annual U.S. household costs for electric systems estimated at 2,500 versus $540 for natural gas equivalents. [145] Heat pumps reduce this through coefficients of performance (COP) typically 2.5-4 in moderate conditions, yielding effective costs 25-75% below resistance heating; however, COP drops below 1 in subzero temperatures, negating advantages in cold climates. [146] [147] Maintenance remains low, at 1-2% of capital annually, owing to fewer moving parts than combustion systems. [148] Lifecycle cost analyses reveal electric heating's sensitivity to local energy prices and grid decarbonization. In regions with gas at $1.50 per therm, levelized heating costs for efficient electric systems exceed gas by 20-50% absent subsidies, per 2024 comparisons. [149] U.S. Energy Information Administration projections indicate electric-heated households face 4-10% winter bill increases in 2025-2026, outpacing gas rises, due to demand spikes and fixed infrastructure costs. [146] [150]| Heating Type | Annual Operating Cost (U.S. Avg., 2024) | Efficiency Metric | Key Cost Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Gas Furnace | $540 | 95% AFUE | Fuel price per therm |
| Electric Resistance | 1,500 | 100% | Electricity rate (¢/kWh) |
| Heat Pump | 1,200 (varies by COP) | COP 2.5-4 | Climate-dependent performance |