Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Solar thermal collector
View on Wikipedia
| Part of a series on |
| Sustainable energy |
|---|
A solar thermal collector collects heat by absorbing sunlight. The term "solar collector" commonly refers to a device for solar hot water heating, but may also refer to large power generating installations such as solar parabolic troughs and solar towers, or to non-water-heating devices such as solar cookers or solar air heaters.[1]
Solar thermal collectors are either non-concentrating or concentrating. In non-concentrating collectors, the aperture area (i.e., the area that receives the solar radiation) is roughly the same as the absorber area (i.e., the area absorbing the radiation). A common example of such a system is a metal plate that is painted a dark color to maximize the absorption of sunlight. The energy is then collected by cooling the plate with a working fluid, often water or glycol running in pipes attached to the plate.
Concentrating collectors have a much larger aperture than the absorber area. The aperture is typically in the form of a mirror that is focussed on the absorber, which in most cases are the pipes carrying the working fluid.[2] Since the sun moves through the sky during the day, concentrating collectors often require some form of solar tracking system, and are sometimes referred to as "active" collectors for this reason.
Non-concentrating collectors are typically used in residential, industrial and commercial buildings for space heating, while concentrating collectors in concentrated solar power plants generate electricity by heating a heat-transfer fluid to drive a turbine connected to an electrical generator.[3]
Heating water
[edit]Flat-plate and evacuated-tube solar collectors are mainly used to collect heat for space heating, domestic hot water, or cooling with an absorption chiller. In contrast to solar hot water panels, they use a circulating fluid to displace heat to a separated reservoir. The first solar thermal collector designed for building roofs was patented by William H. Goettl and called the "Solar heat collector and radiator for building roof".[4]
Evacuated flat-plate solar collectors are a more recent innovation and can be used for Solar Heat for Industrial Cooling (SHIC) and Solar Air Conditioning (SAC), where temperature in excess of 100 °C (212 °F) are required.[5][6] These non-concentrating collectors harvest both diffuse and direct light and can make use of steam instead of water as fluid.
Flat plate collectors
[edit]
Flat-plate collectors are the most common solar thermal technology in Europe.[7] They consist of an (1) enclosure containing (2) a dark-colored absorber plate with fluid circulation passageways, and (3) a transparent cover to allow transmission of solar energy into the enclosure. The sides and back of the enclosure are typically insulated to reduce heat loss to the ambient. A heat transfer fluid is circulated through the absorber's fluid passageways to remove heat from the solar collector. The circulation fluid in tropical and sub-tropical climates is typically water. In climates where freezing is likely, a heat transfer fluid similar to an automotive antifreeze solution may be used instead of water, or in a mixture with water. If a heat transfer fluid is used, a heat exchanger is typically employed to transfer heat from the solar collector fluid to a hot water storage tank. The most common absorber design consists of copper tubing joined to a high conductivity metal sheet (copper or aluminum). A dark coating is applied to the sun-facing side of the absorber assembly to increase its absorption of solar energy. A common absorber coating is black enamel paint.
In higher performance solar collector designs, the transparent cover is tempered soda-lime glass having reduced iron oxide content same as for photovoltaic solar panels. The glass may also have a stippling pattern and one or two anti-reflective coatings to further enhance transparency. The absorber coating is typically a selective coating, where selective stands for having the special optical property to combine high absorption in the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum coupled to low emittance in the infrared one. This creates a selective surface, which reduces black body energy emission from the absorber and improves performance. Piping can be laser or ultrasound welded to the absorber sheet to reduce damage to the selective coating, which is typically applied prior to joining to large coils in a roll-to-roll process.
Absorber piping configurations include:
- harp: traditional design with bottom pipe risers and top collection pipe, used in low pressure thermosyphon and pumped systems;
- serpentine: one continuous S-shaped pipe that maximises temperature but not total energy yield in variable flow systems, used in compact solar domestic hot water only systems (no space heating role);
- flooded: consisting of two sheets of metal molded to produce a wide circulation zone that improves heat transfer;
- boundary layer: consisting of several layers of transparent and opaque sheets that enable absorption in a boundary layer. Because the energy is absorbed in the boundary layer, heat conversion may be more efficient than for collectors where absorbed heat is conducted through a material before being accumulated in the circulating liquid.[citation needed]
A flat plate collector making use of a honeycomb structure to reduce heat loss also at the glass side too has also been made available commercially. Most flat plate collectors have a life expectancy of over 25 years.[citation needed].
Evacuated tube collectors
[edit]



Evacuated tube collectors are the most common solar thermal technology in the world.[7] They make use of a glass tube to surround the absorber with high vacuum and effectively resist atmospheric pressure. The vacuum that surrounds the absorber greatly reduces convection and conduction heat loss, therefore achieving greater energy conversion efficiency. The absorber can be either metallic as in the case of flat plate collectors or being a second concentric glass tube ("Sydney Tube"). Heat transfer fluid can flow in and out of each tube or being in contact with a heat pipe reaching inside the tube. For the latter, heat pipes transfer heat to the fluid in a heat exchanger called a "manifold" placed transversely with respect to the tubes.[citation needed] The manifold is wrapped in insulation (glass wool) and covered by a protective metal or plastic case also used for fixing to supports.
Glass-metal evacuated tubes are made with flat or curved metal absorber sheets same as those of flat plates. These sheets are joined to pipes or heat pipes to make "fins" and placed inside a single borosilicate glass tube. An anti-reflective coating can be deposited on the inner and outer surfaces of such tubes to improve transparency. Both selective and anti-reflective coating (inner tube surface) will not degrade until the vacuum is lost.[8] A high vacuum-tight glass-metal seal is however required at one or both sides of each evacuated tube. This seal is cycled between ambient and fluid temperature each day of collector operation and might lead to failures in time.
Glass-glass evacuated tubes are made with two borosilicate glass tubes fused together at one or both ends (similar a vacuum bottle or dewar flask). The absorber fin is placed inside the inner tube at atmospheric pressure. Glass-glass tubes have a very reliable seal, but the two layers of glass reduce the amount of sunlight that reaches the absorber. The selective coating can be deposited on the inner borosilicate tube (high vacuum side) to avoid this, but heat has then to flow through the poorly conducting glass thickness of the inner tube in this case. Moreover, moisture may enter the non-evacuated area inside the inner tube and cause absorber corrosion in particular when made from dissimilar materials (galvanic corrosion).
A Barium flash getter pump is commonly evaporated inside the high vacuum gap in between tubes to keep the internal pressure stable through time.
The high temperatures that can occur inside evacuated tubes may require special design to prevent thermal shock and overheating. Some evacuated tube collectors work as a thermal one-way valve due to their heat pipes. This gives them an inherent maximum operating temperature that acts as a safety feature.[9] Evacuated tubes collectors can also be provided with low concentrating reflectors at the back of the tubes realising a CPC collector.[10]
Comparisons of flat plate and evacuated tube collectors
[edit]A longstanding argument exists between proponents of these two technologies. Some of this can be related to the structure of evacuated tube collectors which have a discontinuous absorbance area. An array of evacuated tubes collectors on a roof has space between the individual tubes and a vacuum gap between each tube and its absorber inside, covering only a fraction of the installation area on a roof. If evacuated tubes are compared with flat-plate collectors on the basis of the area of roof occupied (gross area), a different conclusion might be reached than if the absorber or aperture areas were compared. The recent revision of the ISO 9806 standard[11] states that the efficiency of solar thermal collectors should be measured in terms of gross area and this might favour flat plates in respect to evacuated tube collectors in direct comparisons.



Flat-plate collectors usually lose more heat to the environment than evacuated tubes because there is no insulation at the glass side. Evacuated tube collectors intrinsically have a lower absorber to gross area ratio (typically 60–80% less) than flat plates because tubes have to be spaced apart. Although several European companies manufacture evacuated tube collectors (mainly glass-metal type), the evacuated tube market is dominated by manufacturers in China, with some companies having track records of 15–30 years or more. There is no unambiguous evidence that the two designs differ in long-term reliability. However, evacuated tube technology (especially for newer variants with glass-metal seals and heat pipes) still needs to demonstrate competitive lifetimes. The modularity of evacuated tubes can be advantageous in terms of extensibility and maintenance, for example, if the vacuum in one heat pipe tube is lost it can be easily be replaced with minimal effort.

In most climates, flat plate collectors will generally be more cost-effective than evacuated tubes.[14] However, evacuated tube collectors are well-suited to cold ambient temperatures and work well in situations of low solar irradiance, providing heat more consistently throughout the year. Unglazed flat plate collectors are the preferred devices for heating swimming pool water. Unglazed collectors may be suitable in tropical or subtropical environments if domestic hot water needs to be heated by less than 20 °C (36 °F) over ambient temperature. Evacuated tube collectors have less aerodynamic drag, which may allow for a simpler installation on roofs in windy locations. The gaps between the tubes may allow for snow to fall through the collector, minimizing the loss of production in some snowy conditions, though the lack of radiated heat from the tubes can also prevent effective shedding of accumulated snow. Flat plate collectors might be easier to clean. Other properties, such as appearance and ease of installation are more subjective and difficult to compare.
Evacuated flat plate collectors
[edit]Evacuated flat plate solar collectors provide all the advantages of both flat plate and evacuated tube collectors combined. They surround a large area metal sheet absorber with high vacuum inside a flat envelope made of glass and metal. They offer the highest energy conversion efficiency of any non-concentrating solar thermal collector,[15] but require sophisticated technology for manufacturing. They should not be confused with flat plate collectors featuring low vacuum inside. The first collector making use of high vacuum insulation was developed at CERN,[16] while TVP SOLAR SA of Switzerland was the first company to commercialise Solar Keymark certified collectors in 2012.[17]
Evacuated flat plate solar collectors require both a glass-metal seal to join the glass plate to the rest of the metal envelope and an internal structure to support such plate against atmospheric pressure. The absorber has to be segmented or provided with suitable holes to accommodate such structure. Joining of all parts has to be high vacuum-tight and only materials with low vapour pressure can be used to prevent outgassing. Glass-metal seal technology can be based either on metallized glass[18] or vitrified metal[19] and defines the type of collector. Different from evacuated tube collectors, they make use of non-evaporable getter (NEG) pumps to keep the internal pressure stable through time. This getter pump technology has the advantage of providing some regeneration in-situ by exposure to sunlight. Evacuated flat plate solar collectors have been studied for solar air condition and compared to compact solar concentrators.[20]
Polymer flat plate collectors
[edit]These collectors are an alternative to metal collectors. These may be wholly polymer, or they may include metal plates in front of freeze-tolerant water channels made of silicone rubber. Polymers are flexible and therefore freeze-tolerant and can employ plain water instead of antifreeze, so that they may be plumbed directly into existing water tanks instead of needing heat exchangers that lower efficiency. By dispensing with a heat exchanger, temperatures need not be quite so high for the circulation system to be switched on, so such direct circulation panels, whether polymer or otherwise, can be more efficient, particularly at low solar irradiance levels. Some early selectively coated polymer collectors suffered from overheating when insulated, as stagnation temperatures can exceed the polymer's melting point.[21][22] For example, the melting point of polypropylene is 160 °C (320 °F), while the stagnation temperature of insulated thermal collectors can exceed 180 °C (356 °F) if control strategies are not used. For this reason, polypropylene is not often used in glazed selectively coated solar collectors. Increasingly, polymers such as high temperate silicones (which melt at over 250 °C (482 °F)) are being used. Some non polypropylene polymer based glazed solar collectors are matte black coated rather than selectively coated to reduce the stagnation temperature to 150 °C (302 °F) or less.
In areas where freezing is a possibility, freeze-tolerance (the capability to freeze repeatedly without cracking) can be achieved by the use of flexible polymers. Silicone rubber pipes have been used for this purpose in UK since 1999. Conventional metal collectors are vulnerable to damage from freezing, so if they are water filled they must be carefully plumbed so they completely drain using gravity before freezing is expected so that they do not crack. Many metal collectors are installed as part of a sealed heat exchanger system. Rather than having potable water flow directly through the collectors, a mixture of water and antifreeze such as propylene glycol is used. A heat exchange fluid protects against freeze damage down to a locally determined risk temperature that depends on the proportion of propylene glycol in the mixture. The use of glycol lowers the water's heat carrying capacity marginally, while the addition of an extra heat exchanger may lower system performance at low light levels.[citation needed]
A pool or unglazed collector is a simple form of flat-plate collector without a transparent cover. Typically, polypropylene or EPDM rubber or silicone rubber is used as an absorber. Used for pool heating, it can work quite well when the desired output temperature is near the ambient temperature (that is, when it is warm outside). As the ambient temperature gets cooler, these collectors become less effective.[citation needed]
Bowl collectors
[edit]A solar bowl is a type of solar thermal collector that operates similarly to a parabolic dish, but instead of using a tracking parabolic mirror with a fixed receiver, it has a fixed spherical mirror with a tracking receiver. This reduces efficiency but makes it cheaper to build and operate. Designers call it a fixed mirror distributed focus solar power system. The main reason for its development was to eliminate the cost of moving a large mirror to track the sun as with parabolic dish systems.[23]
A fixed parabolic mirror creates a variously shaped image of the sun as it moves across the sky. Only when the mirror is pointed directly at the sun does the light focus on one point. That is why parabolic dish systems track the sun. A fixed spherical mirror focuses the light in the same place independent of the sun's position. The light, however, is not directed to one point but is distributed on a line from the surface of the mirror to one half radius (along a line that runs through the sphere center and the sun).[citation needed]

As the sun moves across the sky, the aperture of any fixed collector changes. This causes changes in the amount of captured sunlight, producing what is called the sinus effect of power output. Proponents of the solar bowl design claim the reduction in overall power output compared with tracking parabolic mirrors is offset by lower system costs.[23]
The sunlight concentrated at the focal line of a spherical reflector is collected using a tracking receiver. This receiver is pivoted around the focal line and is usually counterbalanced. The receiver may consist of pipes carrying fluid for thermal transfer or photovoltaic cells for direct conversion of light to electricity.
The solar bowl design resulted from a project of the Electrical Engineering Department of the Texas Technical University, headed by Edwin O'Hair, to develop a 5 MWe power plant. A solar bowl was built for the town of Crosbyton, Texas as a pilot facility.[23] The bowl had a diameter of 65 ft (20 m), tilted at a 15° angle to optimize the cost/yield relation (33° would have maximized yield). The rim of the hemisphere was "trimmed" to 60°, creating a maximum aperture of 3,318 square feet (308.3 m2). This pilot bowl produced electricity at a rate of 10 kW peak.[citation needed]
A 15-metre (49 ft) diameter Auroville solar bowl was developed from an earlier test of a 3.5-metre (11 ft) bowl in 1979–1982 by the Tata Energy Research Institute. That test showed the use of the solar bowl in the production of steam for cooking. The full-scale project to build a solar bowl and kitchen ran from 1996 and was fully operational by 2001.[citation needed]
In locations with average available solar energy, flat plate collectors are sized approximately 1.2 to 2.4 square decimeter per liter of one day's hot water use.
Applications
[edit]The main use of this technology is in residential buildings where the demand for hot water has a large impact on energy bills. This generally means a situation with a large family or a situation in which the hot water demand is excessive due to frequent laundry washing. Commercial applications include laundromats, car washes, military laundry facilities and eating establishments. The technology can also be used for space heating if the building is located off-grid or if utility power is subject to frequent outages. Solar water heating systems are most likely to be cost effective for facilities with water heating systems that are expensive to operate, or with operations such as laundries or kitchens that require large quantities of hot water. Unglazed liquid collectors are commonly used to heat water for swimming pools but can also be applied to large-scale water pre-heating. When loads are large relative to the available collector area, the bulk of the water heating can be done at low temperature, lower than swimming pool temperatures where unglazed collectors are well established in the marketplace as the right choice. Because these collectors need not withstand high temperatures, they can use less expensive materials such as plastic or rubber. Many unglazed collectors are made of polypropylene and must be drained fully to avoid freeze damage when air temperatures drop below 44 °F (7 °C) on clear nights.[24] A smaller but growing percentage of unglazed collectors are flexible meaning they can withstand water freezing solid inside their absorber. The freeze concern only needs to be the water-filled piping and collector manifolds in a hard freeze condition. Unglazed solar hot water systems should be installed to "drainback" to a storage tank whenever solar radiation is insufficient. There are no thermal shock concerns with unglazed systems. Commonly used in swimming pool heating since solar energy's early beginnings, unglazed solar collectors heat swimming pool water directly without the need for antifreeze or heat exchangers. Hot water solar systems require heat exchangers due to contamination possibilities and in the case of unglazed collectors, the pressure difference between the solar working fluid (water) and the load (pressurized cold city water). Large-scale unglazed solar hot water heaters, like the one at the Minoru Aquatic Center in Richmond, BC operate at lower temperatures than evacuated tube or boxed and glazed collector systems. Although they require larger, more expensive heat exchangers, all other components including vented storage tanks and uninsulated plastic PVC piping reduce the costs of this alternative dramatically compared to the higher temperature collector types. When heating hot water, we are actually heating cold to warm and warm to hot. We can heat cold to warm as efficiently with unglazed collectors, just as we can heat warm to hot with high-temperature collectors.[citation needed]
Heating air
[edit]A simple solar air collector consists of an absorber material, sometimes having a selective surface, to capture radiation from the sun and transfers this thermal energy to air via conduction heat transfer. This heated air is then ducted to the building space or to the process area where the heated air is used for space heating or process heating needs. Functioning in a similar manner as a conventional forced-air furnace, solar-thermal-air systems provide heat by circulating air over an energy collecting surface, absorbing the sun's thermal energy, and ducting air coming in contact with it. Simple and effective collectors can be made for a variety of air conditioning and process applications.[citation needed]
Many applications can utilize solar air heat technologies to reduce the carbon footprint from the use of conventional heat sources, such as fossil fuels, to create a sustainable means to produce thermal energy. Applications such as space heating, greenhouse season extension, pre-heating ventilation makeup air, or process heat can be addressed by solar air heat devices. In the field of 'solar co-generation', solar thermal technologies are paired with photovoltaics (PV) to increase the efficiency of the system by taking heat away from the PV collectors, cooling the PV panels to improve their electrical performance while simultaneously warming air for space heating.[citation needed]
Space heating and ventilating
[edit]Space heating for residential and commercial applications can be done through the use of solar air heating panels. This configuration operates by drawing air from the building envelope or from the outdoor environment and passing it through the collector where the air warms via conduction from the absorber and is then supplied to the living or working space by either passive means or with the assistance of a fan. A pioneering figure of this type of system was George Löf, who built a solar-heated air system in 1945 for a house in Boulder, Colorado. He later included a gravel bed for heat storage.[citation needed]
Ventilation, fresh air or makeup air is required in most commercial, industrial and institutional buildings to meet code requirements. By drawing air through a properly designed unglazed transpired air collector or an air heater, the solar heated fresh air can reduce the heating load during daytime operation. Many applications are now being installed where the transpired collector preheats the fresh air entering a heat recovery ventilator to reduce the defrost time of HRV's. The higher your ventilation and temperature the better your payback time will be.[citation needed]
Process heating
[edit]Solar air heat is also used in process applications such as drying laundry, crops (i.e. tea, corn, coffee) and other drying applications. Air heated through a solar collector and then passed over a medium to be dried can provide an efficient means by which to reduce the moisture content of the material.[citation needed]
High temperature process heat can be produced by a solar furnace.
Solar air heating collector types
[edit]Collectors are commonly classified by their air-ducting methods as one of three types:
- through-pass collectors
- front-pass
- back pass
- combination front and back pass collectors
Collectors can also be classified by their outer surface:
- glazed
- unglazed
Through-pass air collector
[edit]Offering the highest efficiency of any solar technology the through-pass configuration, air ducted onto one side of the absorber passes through a perforated material and is heated from the conductive properties of the material and the convective properties of the moving air. Through-pass absorbers have the most surface area which enables relatively high conductive heat transfer rates, but significant pressure drop can require greater fan power, and deterioration of certain absorber material after many years of solar radiation exposure can additionally create problems with air quality and performance.
Back, front, and combination passage air collector
[edit]In back-pass, front-pass, and combination type configurations the air is directed on either the back, the front, or on both sides of the absorber to be heated from the return to the supply ducting headers. Although passing the air on both sides of the absorber will provide a greater surface area for conductive heat transfer, issues with dust (fouling) can arise from passing air on the front side of the absorber which reduces absorber efficiency by limiting the amount of sunlight received. In cold climates, air passing next to the glazing will additionally cause greater heat loss, resulting in lower overall performance of the collector.
Glazed systems
[edit]Glazed systems usually have a transparent top sheet and insulated side and back panels to minimize heat loss to ambient air. The absorber plates in modern panels can have absorptivity of more than 93%. Glazed Solar Collectors (recirculating types that are usually used for space heating). Air typically passes along the front or back of the absorber plate while scrubbing heat directly from it. Heated air can then be distributed directly for applications such as space heating and drying or may be stored for later use. Payback for glazed solar air heating panels can be less than 9–15 years depending on the fuel being replaced.
Unglazed systems
[edit]Unglazed systems, or transpired air systems have been used to heat make-up or ventilation air in commercial, industrial, agriculture and process applications. They consist of an absorber plate which air passes across or through as it scrubs heat from the absorber. Non-transparent glazing materials are less expensive and decrease expected payback periods. Transpired collectors are considered "unglazed" because their collector surfaces are exposed to the elements, are often not transparent and not hermetically sealed.
Unglazed transpired solar collectors
[edit]Background
[edit]The term "unglazed air collector" refers to a solar air heating system that consists of a metal absorber without any glass or glazing over top. The most common type of unglazed collector on the market is the transpired solar collector. The technology has been extensively monitored by these government agencies, and Natural Resources Canada developed the feasibility tool RETScreen™ to model the energy savings from transpired solar collectors. Since that time, several thousand transpired solar collector systems have been installed in a variety of commercial, industrial, institutional, agricultural, and process applications in countries around the world. This technology was originally used primarily in industrial applications such as manufacturing and assembly plants where there were high ventilation requirements, stratified ceiling heat, and often negative pressure in the building. With the increasing drive to install renewable energy systems on buildings, transpired solar collectors are now used across the entire building stock because of high energy production (up to 750 peak thermal Watts/square metre), high solar conversion (up to 90%) and lower capital costs when compared against solar photovoltaic and solar water heating.
Solar air heating is a renewable energy heating technology used to heat or condition air for buildings or process heat applications. It is typically the most cost-effective of all the solar technologies, especially in large scale applications, and it addresses the largest usage of building energy in heating climates, which is space heating and industrial process heating. They are either glazed or unglazed.
Method of operation
[edit]Unglazed air collectors heat ambient (outside) air instead of recirculated building air. Transpired solar collectors are usually wall-mounted to capture the lower sun angle in the winter heating months as well as sun reflection off the snow and achieve their optimum performance and return on investment when operating at flow rates of between 4 and 8 CFM per square foot (72 to 144 m3/h.m2) of collector area.
The exterior surface of a transpired solar collector consists of thousands of tiny micro-perforations that allow the boundary layer of heat to be captured and uniformly drawn into an air cavity behind the exterior panels. This heated ventilation air is drawn under negative pressure into the building's ventilation system where it is then distributed via conventional means or using a solar ducting system.
Hot air that may enter an HVAC system connected to a transpired collector that has air outlets positioned along the top of the collector, particularly if the collector is west facing. To counter this problem, Matrix Energy has patented a transpired collector with a lower air outlet position and perforated cavity framing to perpetrate increased air turbulence behind the perforated absorber for increased performance.
This cutaway view shows the SolarWall transpired solar collector components and air flow. The lower air inlet mitigates the intake of heated air to the HVAC system during summer operation.
The extensive monitoring by Natural Resources Canada and NREL has shown that transpired solar collector systems reduce between 10 and 50% of the conventional heating load and that RETScreen is an accurate predictor of system performance. Transpired solar collectors act as a rainscreen and they also capture heat loss escaping from the building envelope which is collected in the collector air cavity and drawn back into the ventilation system. There is no maintenance required with solar air heating systems and the expected lifespan is over 30 years.
Variations of transpired solar collectors
[edit]Unglazed transpired collectors can also be roof-mounted for applications in which there is no suitable south-facing wall or for other architectural considerations.
Each ten-foot (3.05 m) module will deliver 250 CFM (425 m3/h)of preheated fresh air typically providing annual energy savings of 1100 kWh (4 GJ) annually. This unique two-stage, modular roof-mounted transpired collector operating a nearly 90% efficiency each module delivering over 118 L/s of preheated air per two square meter collector. Up to seven collectors may be connected in series in one row, with no limit to the number of rows connected in parallel along one central duct typically yielding 4 CFM of preheated air per square foot of available roof area.
Transpired collectors can be configured to heat the air twice to increase the delivered air temperature making it suitable for space heating applications as well as ventilation air heating. In a 2-stage system, the first stage is the typical unglazed transpired collector and the second stage has glazing covering the transpired collector. The glazing allows all of that heated air from the first stage to be directed through a second set of transpired collectors for a second stage of solar heating.
Generating electricity
[edit]Parabolic troughs, dishes and towers described in this section are used almost exclusively in solar power generating stations or for research purposes. Parabolic troughs have been used for some commercial solar air conditioning systems. Although simple, these solar concentrators are quite far from the theoretical maximum concentration.[25][26] For example, the parabolic trough concentration is about 1/3 of the theoretical maximum for the same acceptance angle, that is, for the same overall tolerances for the system. Approaching the theoretical maximum may be achieved by using more elaborate concentrators based on nonimaging optics.[25] Solar thermal collectors may also be used in conjunction with photovoltaic collectors to obtain combined heat and power.[27][28]

Parabolic trough
[edit]This type of collector is generally used in solar power plants. A trough-shaped parabolic reflector is used to concentrate sunlight on an insulated tube (Dewar tube) or heat pipe, placed at the focal point, containing coolant which transfers heat from the collectors to the boilers in the power station.
Parabolic dish
[edit]
With a parabolic dish collector, one or more parabolic dishes concentrate solar energy at a single focal point, similar to the way a reflecting telescope focuses starlight, or a dish antenna focuses radio waves. This geometry may be used in solar furnaces and solar power plants.
The shape of a parabola means that incoming light rays which are parallel to the dish's axis will be reflected toward the focus, no matter where on the dish they arrive. Light from the sun arrives at the Earth's surface almost completely parallel, and the dish is aligned with its axis pointing at the sun, allowing almost all incoming radiation to be reflected towards the focal point of the dish. Most losses in such collectors are due to imperfections in the parabolic shape and imperfect reflection.
Losses due to atmospheric scattering are generally minimal. However, on a hazy or foggy day, light is diffused in all directions through the atmosphere, which significantly reduces the efficiency of a parabolic dish. In dish stirling power plant designs, a stirling engine coupled to a dynamo is placed at the focus of the dish. This absorbs the energy focused onto it and converts it into electricity.
Power tower
[edit]
A power tower is a large tower surrounded by tracking mirrors called heliostats. These mirrors align themselves and focus sunlight on the receiver at the top of the tower, collected heat is transferred to a power station below. This design reaches very high temperatures. High temperatures are suitable for electricity generation using conventional methods like steam turbine or a direct high-temperature chemical reaction such as liquid salt.[29] By concentrating sunlight, current systems can get better efficiency than simple solar cells. A larger area can be covered by using relatively inexpensive mirrors rather than using expensive solar cells. Concentrated light can be redirected to a suitable location via optical fiber cable for such uses as illuminating buildings. Heat storage for power production during cloudy and overnight conditions can be accomplished, often by underground tank storage of heated fluids. Molten salts have been used to good effect. Other working fluids, such as liquid metals, have also been proposed due to their superior thermal properties.[30]
However, concentrating systems require sun tracking to maintain sunlight focus at the collector. They are unable to provide significant power in diffused light conditions. Solar cells are able to provide some output even if the sky becomes cloudy, but power output from concentrating systems drops drastically in cloudy conditions as diffused light cannot be concentrated well.
General principles of operation
[edit]A solar thermal collector functions as a heat exchanger that converts solar radiation into thermal energy.[31] It differs from a conventional heat exchanger in several aspects. The solar energy flux (irradiance) incident on the Earth's surface has a variable and relatively low surface density, usually not exceeding 1100 W/m2 without concentration systems. Moreover, the wavelength of incident solar radiation falls between 0.3 and 3 μm, which is significantly shorter than the wavelength of radiation emitted by most radiative surfaces.[31]
The collector absorbs the incoming solar radiation, converting it into thermal energy. This thermal energy is then transferred to a heat transfer fluid circulating within the collector.[32] The heat transfer fluid can be air, water, oil, or a mixture including glycol (an antifreeze fluid), especially in forced circulation systems.[32] Concentration systems may utilize phase change materials such as molten salts.[33] The thermal energy of the heat transfer fluid can then be used directly or stored for later use.[34] The transfer of thermal energy occurs through convection, which can be either natural or forced depending on the specific system.[35][36]
Standards
[edit]- ISO test methods for solar collectors.[37]
- EN 12975: Thermal solar systems and components. Solar collectors.
- EN 12976: Thermal solar systems and components. Factory-made systems.
- EN 12977: Thermal solar systems and components. Custom-made systems.
- Solar Keymark:[38] Thermal solar systems and components. Higher level EN 1297X series certification which includes factory visits.
- International Code Council / Solar Rating & Certification Corporation:[39] Testing is performed by independent laboratories and typically includes selection of a collector to be tested from a sample group of at least six solar collectors.
- ICC 901/ICC-SRCC™ 100: Solar Thermal Collector Standard
- ICC 900/ICC-SRCC™ 300: Solar Thermal System Standard
- ICC 902/APSP 902/ICC-SRCC™ 400: Solar Pool and Spa Heating System Standard
See also
[edit]- Concentrated solar power
- Cross-linked polyethylene § PEX-AL-PEX
- Insulated glazing
- List of solar thermal power stations
- List of thermal conductivities
- Nanofluids in solar collectors
- Particle receiver
- Seasonal thermal energy storage (STES)
- Selective surface
- Solar cooker
- Solar Flower Tower
- Solar thermal energy
- Solar-assisted heat pump
- Trombe wall
- Zeolite
References
[edit]- ^ Norton, Brian (2013-10-11). Harnessing solar heat. Dordrecht: Springer. ISBN 978-94-007-7275-5. OCLC 862228449.
- ^ Rabl, Ari. (1985). Active solar collectors and their applications. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 1-4294-0091-9. OCLC 614480348.
- ^ Sreekumar, S.; Joseph, A.; Kumar C. S., S.; Thomas, S. (2020-03-10). "Investigation on influence of antimony tin oxide/silver nanofluid on direct absorption parabolic solar collector". Journal of Cleaner Production. 249: 588–601. Bibcode:2020JCPro.24919378S. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119378.
- ^ [1], "Solar heat collector and radiator for building roof", issued 1977-02-07
- ^ "IEA SHC || Task 49 || IEA SHC || Task 49". task49.iea-shc.org. Retrieved 2019-04-28.
- ^ "IEA SHC || Task 48 || IEA SHC || Task 48". task48.iea-shc.org. Retrieved 2019-04-28.
- ^ a b "IEA SHC || IEA SHC || Solar Heat Worldwide Markets and Contribution to the Energy Supply". www.iea-shc.org. Retrieved 2019-04-28.
- ^ "Solar Evacuated Tube Collectors" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-10-06.
- ^ [2], "Heat pipe for a solar collector", issued 2008-04-07
- ^ Kim, Yong; Han, GuiYoung; Seo, Taebeom (April 2008). "An evaluation on thermal performance of CPC solar collector". International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 35 (4): 446–457. Bibcode:2008ICHMT..35..446K. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2007.09.007.
- ^ ISO 9806:2017. Solar energy – Solar thermal collectors – Test methods International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
- ^ a b Honeyborne, Riaan (14 April 2009). "Flat plate versus Evacuated tube solar collectors" (PDF). Go Green Heat Solutions, via Internet Archive. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 October 2017. Retrieved 2017-10-04.
- ^ Tom Lane. Solar Hot Water Systems: Lessons Learned, 1977 to Today. p. 5.
- ^ Trinkl, Christoph; Wilfried Zörner; Claus Alt; Christian Stadler (2005-06-21). "Performance of Vacuum Tube and Flat Plate Collectors Concerning Domestic Hot Water Preparation and Room Heating" (PDF). 2nd European Solar Thermal Energy Conference 2005 (estec2005). CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR SOLAR ENGINEERING at Ingolstadt University of Applied Sciences. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
- ^ Moss, R.W.; Henshall, P.; Arya, F.; Shire, G.S.F.; Hyde, T.; Eames, P.C. (2018-04-15). "Performance and operational effectiveness of evacuated flat plate solar collectors compared with conventional thermal, PVT and PV panels". Applied Energy. 216: 588–601. Bibcode:2018ApEn..216..588M. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.001.
- ^ Benvenuti, C. (May 2013). "The SRB solar thermal panel". Europhysics News. 44 (3): 16–18. Bibcode:2013ENews..44c..16B. doi:10.1051/epn/2013301. ISSN 0531-7479.
- ^ "DIN CERTCO - Register-Nr. 011-7S1890 F". www.dincertco.tuv.com. Retrieved 2019-04-28.
- ^ [3], "Evacuable flat panel solar collector", issued 2004-01-22
- ^ [4], "Vacuum solar thermal panel with a vacuum-tight glass-metal sealing", issued 2009-07-08
- ^ Buonomano, Annamaria; Calise, Francesco; d’Accadia, Massimo Dentice; Ferruzzi, Gabriele; Frascogna, Sabrina; Palombo, Adolfo; Russo, Roberto; Scarpellino, Marco (February 2016). "Experimental analysis and dynamic simulation of a novel high-temperature solar cooling system". Energy Conversion and Management. 109: 19–39. Bibcode:2016ECM...109...19B. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2015.11.047.
- ^ Kearney, Meghan; Davidson, Jane H.; Mantell, Susan (2005). "Polymeric Absorbers for Flat Plate Collectors: Can Venting Provide Adequate Overheat Protection?". Solar Energy. pp. 253–257. doi:10.1115/ISEC2005-76005. ISBN 978-0-7918-4737-4. INIST 17036823.
- ^ Mendes, João Farinha; Horta, Pedro; Carvalho, Maria João; Silva, Paulo (2008). "Solar Thermal Collectors in Polymeric Materials: A Novel Approach Towards Higher Operating Temperatures". Proceedings of ISES World Congress 2007 (Vol. I – Vol. V). pp. 640–643. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75997-3_118. ISBN 978-3-540-75996-6.
- ^ a b c Calhoun, Fryor (November 1983). Duel for the Sun. Texas Monthly.
- ^ Tom Lane, Solar Hot Water Systems, Lessons Learned 1977 to Today p7
- ^ a b Chaves, Julio (2015). Introduction to Nonimaging Optics, Second Edition. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4822-0673-9.
- ^ Roland Winston et al., Nonimaging Optics, Academic Press, 2004 ISBN 978-0127597515
- ^ Mojiri (2013). "Spectral beam splitting for efficient conversion of solar energy — A review". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 28: 654–663. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.026.
- ^ Taylor, R.A. (2012). "Nanofluid-based optical filter optimization for PV/T systems". Light: Science & Applications. 1 (10): e34. Bibcode:2012LSA.....1E..34T. doi:10.1038/lsa.2012.34.
- ^ Woody, Todd. "Secret Ingredient To Making Solar Energy Work: Salt". Forbes magazine. Retrieved 13 March 2013.
- ^ Boerema (2012). "Liquid sodium versus Hitec as a heat transfer fluid in solar thermal central receiver systems". Solar Energy. 86 (9): 2293–2305. Bibcode:2012SoEn...86.2293B. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2012.05.001.
- ^ a b Duffie, John A.; Beckman, William A. (2013). Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. Wiley. p. 236. ISBN 978-1-118-41280-0.
- ^ a b Kalogirou, Soteris A. (2004). Solar Energy Engineering: Processes and Systems. Academic Press. p. 240. ISBN 978-0-12-397270-5.
- ^ Müller-Steinhagen, Hans; Trieb, Frank (2004). Concentrating Solar Power and Desalination Plants. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-044495-6.
- ^ Kalogirou, Soteris A. (2004). Solar Energy Engineering: Processes and Systems. Academic Press. p. 270. ISBN 978-0-12-397270-5.
- ^ "Sửa chữa máy nước nóng năng lượng mặt trời". hoanggiangsolar.com. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
- ^ Duffie, John A.; Beckman, William A. (2013). Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. Wiley. p. 478. ISBN 978-1-118-41280-0.
- ^ "ISO 9806-1:1994 - Test methods for solar collectors -- Part 1: Thermal performance of glazed liquid heating collectors including pressure drop". iso.org. 2012. Retrieved September 17, 2012.
- ^ "The Solar Keymark, The main quality label for solar thermal". estif.org. 2012. Retrieved September 17, 2012.
- ^ "SRCC is the principal certification program within the United States". solar-rating.org. 2018. Archived from the original on April 1, 2018. Retrieved March 31, 2018.
External links
[edit]Solar thermal collector
View on GrokipediaPrinciples of Operation
Basic Components and Design
A solar thermal collector is a device designed to capture incoming solar radiation and convert it into usable thermal energy primarily through the absorption process on a specialized surface.[4] This conversion enables the heating of fluids for various applications, with the core functionality relying on the interplay of materials that maximize energy capture while minimizing losses.[5] The fundamental components of a solar thermal collector include an absorber plate, typically constructed from highly conductive metals such as copper or aluminum, coated with selective surfaces to enhance solar absorption.[6] These coatings, like black chrome or modern TiNOx, achieve high solar absorptivity greater than 0.95 and low thermal emissivity below 0.05, significantly improving performance by trapping heat.[7] A transparent cover, often made of low-iron glass or durable plastic, protects the absorber while allowing up to 90% of solar radiation to pass through and reducing convective and radiative heat losses.[5] Insulation materials, such as fiberglass or foam, are applied to the back and sides to prevent conduction losses to the environment. Fluid conduits—usually copper tubes or integrated channels—circulate heat transfer fluids like water, air, or thermal oils directly over or through the absorber to extract the captured heat. The structural frame, often aluminum or steel, encases these elements, providing rigidity and weather resistance.[8] Design variations in solar thermal collectors accommodate different environmental and performance needs. Orientation can be fixed, typically tilted toward the equator at an angle approximating the local latitude for optimal year-round capture, or employ tracking mechanisms to follow the sun's path and increase exposure.[5] Absorber geometry varies between flat plates, which offer simplicity and lower cost for diffuse radiation, and tubular designs, which reduce edge losses and suit evacuated systems. Flow patterns in the conduits may be arranged in series for uniform temperature rise or parallel configurations to minimize pressure drops and enhance efficiency across larger areas.[9] The historical evolution of these components traces back to early 20th-century innovations, such as William J. Bailey's 1908 design featuring copper coils within an insulated box, which laid the groundwork for modern flat-plate collectors.[10] Advancements in selective coatings emerged in the mid-20th century, with black chrome electroplating in the 1970s providing selective spectral properties for better thermal retention.[11] Contemporary developments, like TiNOx cermet-based coatings introduced in the late 20th century, further optimize these properties for high-temperature operation. The absorbed solar radiation in a collector is fundamentally described by the equation where is the collector aperture area, is the absorptance of the surface, and is the incident solar irradiance.[12]Heat Transfer and Efficiency Fundamentals
Solar thermal collectors operate by absorbing solar radiation and transferring the resulting heat to a working fluid through conduction, convection, and radiation. Conduction primarily occurs within the absorber plate, where incident solar energy is converted to thermal energy and conducted to embedded or attached fluid passages. Convection then transfers this heat from the absorber surface to the circulating fluid, either via forced convection in liquid or air systems or natural convection in some designs. Radiation losses from the elevated-temperature absorber surfaces to the cover and surroundings represent a key inefficiency, as the hot plate emits long-wave infrared radiation that is partially transmitted or absorbed depending on the materials used.[13] Thermal losses significantly impact collector performance and are divided into top, bottom/side, and edge categories. Top losses arise from convection currents in the air gap between the absorber and transparent cover, combined with infrared radiation exchange from the absorber to the cooler cover and subsequently to the ambient. These are modeled using an overall top heat loss coefficient that depends on wind speed, cover emittance, and gap spacing. Bottom and side losses occur mainly through conduction via the insulating backing and casing materials, with the loss rate proportional to the temperature difference between the absorber and ambient. Edge effects exacerbate losses in compact collectors due to the higher perimeter area relative to the total aperture, often requiring enhanced insulation at boundaries.[14] The fundamental performance of solar thermal collectors is captured by the instantaneous efficiency equation derived from the Hottel-Whillier-Bliss model: Here, is the collector efficiency, is the useful heat gain rate, is the aperture area, is the incident solar irradiance, is the heat removal factor (accounting for finite fluid flow rate and temperature rise), is the optical transmittance-absorptance product, is the overall heat loss coefficient (incorporating all loss paths), is the inlet fluid temperature, and is the ambient temperature.[15][16] This equation stems from an energy balance on the absorber plate under steady-state conditions. The absorbed solar flux minus the total thermal losses (where is the local plate temperature) yields the maximum possible useful heat if the plate were isothermal. However, due to finite conductance and fluid heating along the flow path, the actual useful heat is , with defined as , where is the collector efficiency factor, is the mass flow rate, and is the specific heat. This model, originally developed by Hottel and Woertz (1942), refined by Whillier (1953), and extended by Bliss (1955), provides a foundational framework for predicting collector output across various designs.[15][17] Non-normal solar incidence reduces optical performance, addressed by the incidence angle modifier , which scales the normal-incidence as . This factor, often approximated empirically as where is the incidence angle and is a collector-specific coefficient (typically 0.1-0.2 for flat-plate types), accounts for increased reflection at the cover and absorber as rays deviate from perpendicular. For glazed collectors, the optical efficiency at normal incidence typically ranges from 0.7 to 0.8, balancing cover transmittance (around 0.9 for low-iron glass) with absorber absorptance (0.9-0.95 for black paints or selective coatings).[18] In high-temperature solar thermal applications, such as power generation, collector efficiency interacts with thermodynamic limits like the Carnot efficiency, which caps heat-to-work conversion at (with temperatures in Kelvin). For collectors delivering heat at 500-1000 K to an engine rejecting at ambient (300 K), this yields theoretical maxima of 40-70%, though practical systems achieve far less due to irreversibilities and collector losses themselves. This principle underscores the trade-off between higher operating temperatures (reducing collector efficiency via increased ) and improved engine performance.[19]Types of Collectors
Non-Concentrating Collectors
Non-concentrating solar thermal collectors capture both direct and diffuse solar radiation across their full aperture area without optical focusing, making them suitable for low- to medium-temperature applications such as domestic hot water and space heating. These collectors typically operate below 150°C and rely on absorber surfaces to convert incident radiation into heat, which is transferred to a working fluid via conduction and convection. Their design emphasizes simplicity and cost-effectiveness, with heat losses primarily managed through insulation and selective coatings rather than concentration mechanisms.[20] Flat-plate collectors, one of the earliest and most widely adopted non-concentrating designs, were pioneered in the 1940s through experimental work by H.C. Hottel and B.B. Woertz, who quantified their performance under various conditions. The core structure consists of an absorber sheet—typically copper or aluminum with a selective black coating—bonded to a network of risers (fluid-carrying tubes) and connected by headers for inlet and outlet flow. This assembly is enclosed in an insulated box with one or two transparent covers to minimize convective and radiative losses, allowing typical operating temperatures of 50-100°C. Advantages include mechanical simplicity, low manufacturing costs, and ease of integration into building roofs, though disadvantages arise from higher stagnation temperatures limited by fluid boiling around 100°C, which can cause thermal stress. Typical overall heat loss coefficients (U_L) for these collectors range from 4-6 W/m²K, reflecting moderate insulation effectiveness.[21][5][22] Evacuated-tube collectors enhance performance by enclosing individual absorbers in vacuum-sealed glass tubes, akin to Dewar flasks, where the vacuum annulus suppresses convection and conduction losses. Commercialization accelerated in the 1980s in China, following breakthroughs in all-glass tube manufacturing by Tsinghua University researchers, enabling mass production for domestic markets. Common types include the Sydney (or all-glass) design with double-walled tubes fused at ends, heat-pipe variants using a sealed copper tube with evaporative fluid for efficient transfer, and direct-flow configurations where fluid circulates through U-shaped pipes within the tubes. These achieve higher temperatures up to 150°C and superior capture of diffuse radiation due to their cylindrical geometry, which maintains perpendicular incidence over a wider angle. With U_L values typically 0.5-1 W/m²K, they outperform flat-plate designs in colder or cloudy conditions.[23][24][25] Hybrid evacuated flat-plate collectors merge the planar aesthetics of flat-plate designs with vacuum insulation, featuring a flat absorber sealed between glass panes under partial vacuum to reduce edge and back losses while improving architectural integration. This configuration offers enhanced efficiency at medium temperatures (up to 120°C) and better resistance to overheat compared to standard flat-plates, though at higher complexity and cost.[26] Polymer flat-plate collectors employ lightweight plastic absorbers and tubes, often unglazed, for cost-effective pool heating applications where temperatures remain below 50°C. Their advantages include corrosion resistance, reduced weight for easier installation, and lower upfront costs relative to metal counterparts, but limitations stem from material degradation under prolonged exposure to UV radiation or temperatures exceeding 60°C, restricting them to low-demand uses.[27]Concentrating Collectors
Concentrating solar thermal collectors use optical devices such as mirrors or lenses to focus sunlight onto a smaller receiver area, achieving higher temperatures suitable for industrial processes and power generation compared to non-concentrating designs. This concentration amplifies solar flux, enabling operating temperatures often exceeding 300°C, though it requires precise solar tracking to maintain focus. The key performance metric is the concentration ratio (CR), defined as the ratio of the mirror aperture area to the receiver area, which determines the intensity of the focused radiation and the precision needed for tracking.[28] Mathematically, the concentration ratio is expressed as where is the effective collecting area of the mirrors and is the surface area of the receiver absorbing the concentrated energy.[28] Higher CR values increase flux density but demand greater optical accuracy to minimize losses from misalignment or imperfections.[29] In concentrating systems, efficiency fundamentals from basic heat transfer are adapted for high CR, where optical losses and non-uniform flux distribution become dominant factors. The first commercial parabolic trough installations occurred in the 1980s with the Solar Energy Generating Systems (SEGS) plants in California's Mojave Desert, comprising nine facilities with a total capacity of 354 MW, though by 2025, only SEGS IX remains operational at 80 MW.[30][31] Parabolic trough collectors employ curved mirrors arranged in a linear parabolic shape to focus sunlight along a tubular receiver running parallel to the trough's axis.[30] These systems track the sun on a single axis, typically north-south, to maintain the linear focus, achieving typical operating temperatures of 300–400°C using heat transfer fluids like synthetic oil.[30] Parabolic dish collectors feature a dish-shaped parabolic reflector that provides point focus at the receiver located at the focal point, requiring two-axis tracking to follow the sun's path across the sky.[32] This design concentrates sunlight to high intensities, often integrated with Stirling engines for thermal-to-mechanical conversion, with demonstrated thermal efficiencies up to 30%.[33] Power tower systems, also known as central receiver configurations, utilize an array of heliostats—flat or slightly curved mirrors—that track the sun and reflect beams onto a receiver mounted atop a central tower.[34] This arrangement enables very high concentration ratios and temperatures above 500°C, with recent advancements incorporating molten salt receivers for thermal storage to support near-continuous operation. Notable examples include the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility in California, operational since 2014 with a 392 MW capacity using three central towers, though as of 2025, two units are scheduled to cease operations in 2026, and the Crescent Dunes project in Nevada, which employs molten salt storage for dispatchable power.[34][35][36] Linear Fresnel reflectors simplify the trough design by using long, flat mirrors arranged in rows that pivot to focus sunlight onto a stationary, elevated receiver tube.[37] This configuration reduces structural complexity and costs compared to parabolic troughs, as the receiver remains fixed without vacuum enclosures, though it achieves lower optical efficiencies due to wider beam spread and higher cosine losses.[38] Optical performance in these collectors relies on geometric optics principles, where the sun's finite angular size (about 0.5°) and collector errors produce an image larger than the ideal point focus, quantified by the intercept factor—the fraction of reflected rays that strike the receiver.[39] The intercept factor typically ranges from 0.8 to 0.95 in well-designed systems, decreasing with higher CR due to increased sensitivity to tracking errors and mirror imperfections.[29]Unglazed and Transpired Collectors
Unglazed transpired solar collectors (UTCs) represent a cost-effective category of solar air heaters designed primarily for low-temperature applications such as preheating ventilation air in buildings. These systems feature a perforated metal absorber sheet, typically dark-colored for high solar absorption, mounted parallel to and slightly spaced from a building's south-facing facade, forming a shallow plenum. Ambient air is drawn into the plenum through small perforations (often micro-perforations of 0.5-2 mm diameter) in the absorber via low-velocity suction created by building ventilation fans, allowing the air to heat directly by convection from the solar-warmed surface. This configuration recaptures heat that would otherwise escape through the wall, enhancing overall system efficiency. Wind shields or louvers are commonly integrated along the collector edges to minimize convective heat losses from wind effects.[40][41] The technology was developed and patented in Canada in the late 1980s by Conserval Systems Inc. in collaboration with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), marking a significant advancement in unglazed solar air heating for building integration. Since then, UTCs have achieved widespread adoption across commercial, industrial, and institutional settings, demonstrating reliable performance in diverse climates. The typical temperature rise (ΔT) across the collector is 20-30°C, making them suitable for mild heating needs rather than high-temperature processes. Thermal efficiencies range from 40% to 70% under low operating temperature differences, attributed to the absence of a glazing layer, which results in a relatively low overall heat loss coefficient (U_L) of 5-10 W/m²K through reduced conduction and radiation losses. The airflow rate (V) required for optimal performance is determined by the equation , where is the useful heat gain, is air density, is the specific heat capacity of air, and is the temperature rise; this ensures balanced heat extraction without excessive pressure drops.[42][43][44] Unglazed air collectors, including transpired variants, come in several configurations to suit different airflow paths and building constraints. In back-pass designs, air flows behind an impermeable absorber plate, promoting convective heating through the back side while insulating the front from direct exposure. Front-pass configurations, as seen in standard UTCs, direct air over or through the perforated absorber for immediate contact with the hottest surface. Combination passage systems integrate both approaches, allowing air to traverse multiple zones for enhanced heat transfer in larger installations. These unglazed setups excel in open, low-pressure environments but are limited to moderate temperatures due to higher convective losses compared to enclosed systems.[45][46] In contrast to unglazed air collectors, which prioritize simplicity and cost for applications like crop drying or ventilation preheating at temperatures below 40°C, glazed air collectors incorporate transparent covers to trap heat and reduce losses, enabling outlet temperatures up to 80°C for more versatile uses such as domestic hot air systems. However, the added glazing increases costs and complexity, making unglazed transpired designs preferable for large-scale, facade-integrated air heating where high efficiency at low ΔT is key.[47][48] Recent variations of UTCs include those with optimized micro-perforations to fine-tune airflow uniformity and reduce recirculation losses, improving performance in windy conditions. Additionally, photovoltaic (PV)-integrated transpired collectors combine thermal air heating with electricity generation by mounting PV modules on or within the absorber, allowing hybrid energy output from the same facade area while maintaining thermal efficiencies above 50% for air preheating. These advancements expand UTC applicability to net-zero building designs without compromising core operational principles.[49][50]Advanced and Hybrid Designs
Hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) collectors integrate photovoltaic modules with thermal absorbers to simultaneously generate electricity and capture heat from solar radiation, enhancing overall energy utilization compared to standalone systems.[51] These systems typically feature types such as glazed or unglazed designs for thermal insulation and liquid- or air-cooled configurations for heat extraction, allowing adaptation to various applications like building-integrated systems.[51] Combined efficiencies can reach 60-70% by leveraging the complementary outputs, where electrical efficiency contributes 10-20% and thermal efficiency adds 40-50%, significantly outperforming separate PV and thermal collectors.[52] PVT technology has seen commercialization since the early 2000s, with initial prototypes evolving into market-ready products by the 2010s, driven by demand for cogeneration in residential and commercial sectors.[53] Recent advancements from 2023 to 2025 include perovskite-PV thermal hybrids, which incorporate semi-transparent perovskite layers over thermal absorbers to boost spectral utilization and achieve solar-to-hydrogen efficiencies up to 19% in integrated systems.[54] The global market for advanced solar thermal collectors, including PVT hybrids, is projected to grow to $56.56 billion by 2032, reflecting increased adoption for efficient energy harvesting.[55] Advanced materials have further improved collector performance, with nanofluids such as CuO-water mixtures used in absorber tubes to enhance thermal conductivity by 20-30%, reducing heat transfer losses and elevating overall efficiency.[56] Spectrally selective polymers, engineered for high solar absorptance and low emittance while resisting UV degradation, enable durable coatings on collector surfaces, maintaining optical properties over extended exposure.[57] Evacuated flat-plate hybrids incorporate vacuum insulation between parallel sheets to minimize convection losses, offering sleeker profiles for seamless building integration while achieving optical efficiencies comparable to tubular designs.[26] These configurations support hybrid PVT setups by combining reduced thermal losses with electrical generation in compact forms suitable for urban environments.[58] Compound parabolic concentrators (CPCs) represent a non-tracking low-concentration approach, using parabolic reflectors to capture both direct and diffuse solar radiation with concentration ratios of 2-5, ideal for overcast conditions without mechanical alignment.[59] This design maximizes light collection across varying sky conditions, enhancing yield in regions with high diffuse irradiance.[60] Thermal storage integration, such as phase-change materials (PCMs) embedded in absorbers, addresses intermittency by storing excess heat during peak insolation; paraffin-graphite composites, for instance, maintain stable temperatures in PVT systems, improving daily energy delivery.[61] The combined output of hybrid systems can be approximated by the efficiency equation: where is photovoltaic efficiency, is thermal efficiency, and is the Carnot limit, accounting for the interaction between electrical and thermal pathways.[62]Applications
Residential and Commercial Heating
Solar thermal collectors are widely used in residential settings to provide domestic hot water through systems that can be either active or passive in design. Active systems employ pumps to circulate a heat transfer fluid between the collector and storage tank, allowing for more precise control and higher efficiency in varying conditions, while passive thermosiphon systems rely on natural convection driven by density differences in the heated fluid, making them simpler and lower in cost but suitable primarily for smaller installations where the tank is positioned above the collector. Typical sizing for a single household ranges from 2 to 4 m² of collector area, sufficient to meet a significant portion of daily hot water needs for a family of four. In sunny climates, these systems can achieve a solar fraction of 50-80%, meaning they cover that percentage of the total hot water demand annually without auxiliary heating.[63][64] For space heating in residential buildings, solar thermal collectors are integrated into hydronic systems, where heated fluid from flat-plate or evacuated tube collectors circulates through radiators or underfloor loops to warm interiors. Flat-plate collectors are commonly used due to their cost-effectiveness for temperatures up to 80°C, while evacuated tubes offer better performance in colder or less sunny conditions by minimizing heat losses. These systems are often combined with backup boilers for fossil fuels or biomass, or with heat pumps for enhanced efficiency, allowing solar to contribute 30-60% of annual heating needs depending on climate and insulation levels.[63][65] Solar air heating systems utilize unglazed transpired collectors mounted on building facades to preheat incoming ventilation air, reducing reliance on conventional HVAC equipment. Air passes through perforations in the dark absorber plate, gaining heat directly from solar exposure, which can raise intake air temperatures by up to 22°C and cut heating loads by 20-50% in moderate climates. This approach is particularly effective for low-temperature applications, improving indoor air quality while lowering energy costs with minimal maintenance.[66][67] In commercial applications, unglazed polymer collectors are favored for heating swimming pools, where they efficiently capture solar energy for low-temperature water up to 40°C, often covering 70-100% of seasonal heating demands in sunny regions. For multi-unit apartments, centralized solar thermal systems provide district hot water, integrating collectors on rooftops to serve multiple households via shared storage, enhancing scalability and reducing individual installation needs.[68][63] As of the end of 2024, global installed capacity for solar thermal systems stood at approximately 578 GWth, with residential and commercial heating accounting for the majority of deployments. In the European Union, the revised Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, effective from 2021, requires new buildings to be "solar-ready" for photovoltaic or solar thermal installations to promote integration. Australia's federal rebate program, introduced in 2007, has facilitated over 1 million solar hot water system installations by providing financial incentives that offset up to 20% of costs, driving widespread adoption in households.[69][70][71]Industrial Process Heat and District Heating
Solar thermal collectors play a crucial role in providing medium- to high-temperature heat for industrial processes, typically ranging from 80°C to 150°C, where they support applications such as drying and pasteurization in food processing, as well as heating needs in textiles and chemical manufacturing.[72] These systems often employ concentrating technologies like parabolic troughs or evacuated tube collectors to achieve the required temperatures efficiently, enabling direct substitution of fossil fuels in energy-intensive operations.[73] The solar industrial process heat (SIPH) sector has seen significant expansion, with 106 new plants commissioned in 2024 adding 120 MWth of capacity, representing a 28% increase over the previous year.[74] According to the IEA Solar Heating and Cooling (SHC) programme's 2024 report, the global installed industrial solar thermal capacity reached approximately 1 GWth, underscoring the growing adoption in non-residential sectors.[72] Notable examples include German breweries, such as the Ziemann Holvrieka facility, which integrates Fresnel collectors to generate process heat for high-temperature brewing steps, demonstrating practical implementation in the beverage industry.[75] In district heating applications, solar thermal collectors are deployed in large-scale arrays, often ranging from 10 MWth to 100 MWth, to supply community-wide heating networks, with seasonal storage systems enabling year-round utilization of summer-collected heat.[72] These systems frequently integrate with complementary sources like biomass or waste heat recovery to ensure reliability during low-insolation periods, enhancing overall system resilience. A prominent case is the Danish Marstal district heating plant, commissioned in 1996 at about 8 MWth and expanded to 23 MWth in subsequent decades, with recent upgrades in the 2010s, now covering a substantial portion of local heat demand through hybrid solar integration.[76] System designs for industrial and district applications emphasize robust backup mechanisms, such as gas-fired boilers, alongside thermal storage solutions including sensible heat pits or thermochemical materials to buffer intermittency.[72] The levelized cost of heat (LCOH) for these solar thermal systems typically falls in the range of 0.04–0.08 €/kWh, making them competitive with conventional fuels in suitable climates.[73] Advancements from 2023 to 2025 have focused on hybrid solar-gas configurations, improving dispatchability and reducing emissions in process heat delivery through optimized control strategies and higher-efficiency collectors.[77]Electricity Generation and Power Systems
Concentrated solar power (CSP) systems utilize thermal collectors to generate electricity by concentrating sunlight to heat a fluid, which then produces steam to drive turbines in conventional power cycles. These systems are designed for utility-scale deployment, offering dispatchable power through integration with thermal energy storage (TES), which allows operation beyond daylight hours. Unlike photovoltaic systems, CSP converts solar energy to thermal form first, enabling higher overall system flexibility and capacity factors in regions with high direct normal irradiance. Parabolic trough collectors, a primary CSP configuration, employ linear mirrors to focus sunlight onto receiver tubes containing a heat transfer fluid (HTF), typically synthetic oil heated to around 400°C. This hot oil is pumped to a steam generator, where it transfers heat to water, producing high-pressure steam that powers a Rankine cycle turbine. The Noor Ouarzazate complex in Morocco exemplifies this technology, with a total capacity of 580 MW across multiple phases, fully operational by 2018 and capable of supplying clean electricity to over one million homes.[78] Dish-Stirling systems represent a point-focus CSP variant, using parabolic dishes to concentrate sunlight onto a Stirling engine receiver, where heat drives a closed-cycle piston engine to generate electricity directly. These modular units are suited for smaller-scale applications, typically producing 3 to 25 kW per module, allowing scalable deployment in remote or distributed settings without extensive infrastructure.[79] Power tower systems direct sunlight via heliostat fields—arrays of mirrors tracking the sun—to a central receiver atop a tower, heating HTF such as molten salt to temperatures up to 565°C for steam generation. This configuration supports large-scale plants, though early operations at the Ivanpah facility in California (392 MW, operational since 2014) faced challenges with bird mortality due to solar flux entanglement, estimated at thousands annually in initial years; by the 2020s, these issues were mitigated through enhanced monitoring, flux management, and operational adjustments like reducing steam emissions.[80][81] Thermal energy storage enhances CSP dispatchability, with two-tank molten salt systems storing hot salt (up to 565°C) in one tank and cooler salt (around 290°C) in another, enabling extended operation. This TES can achieve capacity factors up to 60% in optimized plants, compared to typical CSP values of 25-40% and photovoltaic systems' 20%. Global CSP capacity reached 7.2 GW by the end of 2024 and approximately 7.5 GW as of mid-2025, driven by storage advancements and new projects.[82][83] Overall CSP electric efficiency ranges from 15-25%, accounting for optical, thermal, and power block losses, with the thermal-to-electric conversion in the Rankine cycle around 35%. Gross power output can be modeled as: where is electrical power, is thermal efficiency, is incident solar thermal input, and is the storage utilization factor. China leads recent developments, commissioning projects like the 100 MW molten salt tower at Shouhang Dunhuang in 2024, bolstering its position in global CSP expansion.[84][85]Emerging Uses in Cooling and Desalination
Solar thermal collectors enable absorption cooling systems, primarily through single-effect lithium bromide-water (LiBr-H2O) chillers that utilize heat inputs of 80-120°C, commonly generated by evacuated tube collectors. These chillers deliver a coefficient of performance (COP) of 0.6-0.8, making them viable for air conditioning in regions with high solar irradiance. In Mediterranean hotels, such as those in the Balearic Islands, solar-driven absorption systems have been deployed to offset summer cooling loads, integrating with existing infrastructure for efficient thermal utilization.[86][87] The cooling output in these systems follows the relation where represents the thermal energy supplied by the collectors; this equation underpins performance modeling for process integration in air conditioning setups. Single-effect chillers predominate due to their compatibility with medium-temperature solar heat, facilitating seamless coupling with building HVAC systems. Globally, solar cooling capacity approximated 1 GWth by 2024, driven by over 2,000 installations focused on absorption technologies.[88][72] Pilots in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) from 2023 to 2025, including multi-megawatt-scale initiatives in Saudi Arabia, highlight practical deployment, achieving energy savings of 30-50% relative to electric cooling alternatives through reduced grid reliance. These projects underscore solar thermal's role in alleviating peak summer electricity demands in water-scarce, high-cooling-load areas. Medium-temperature collectors prove particularly suitable for such integrations.[89][90] For desalination, solar thermal systems provide 60-90°C heat to multi-effect distillation (MED) and membrane distillation (MD) processes, often hybridized with photovoltaic-thermal (PV-T) setups to enhance efficiency in remote, off-grid locales. MED leverages sequential evaporation stages at these temperatures for scalable water production, while MD employs hydrophobic membranes for vapor transport, both benefiting from solar's low-grade heat availability. Environmental advantages include diminished peak electric demand from concurrent cooling operations and desalinated water costs of 0.5-1 $/m³, promoting sustainable resource management in arid zones.[91][92][93][94]Performance Evaluation
Efficiency Metrics and Testing
The efficiency of solar thermal collectors is quantified through several key performance metrics that capture their ability to convert incident solar radiation into useful thermal energy while accounting for losses due to heat transfer and optical effects. Optical efficiency (η_o) represents the fraction of incident solar irradiance absorbed by the collector under ideal conditions, typically ranging from 0.7 to 0.85 for glazed flat-plate designs, as it depends on the transmittance-absorptance product of the cover and absorber materials. Thermal efficiency (η_th) measures the ratio of useful heat output to the total solar irradiance on the collector aperture area, often expressed as a function of operating temperature and irradiance to reflect real-world performance degradation. The incidence angle modifier (IAM) corrects for reductions in optical efficiency at non-normal incidence angles, with values approaching 1.0 at zero angle and decreasing nonlinearly for off-angle sunlight, enabling accurate modeling across daily and seasonal variations. Stagnation temperature, the maximum fluid temperature achievable under no-flow conditions at peak irradiance, indicates the collector's upper thermal limit and material durability threshold, often exceeding 150°C for selective-coated absorbers. Testing protocols for these metrics distinguish between indoor and outdoor environments to balance control with realism. Indoor testing employs solar simulators to replicate uniform irradiance spectra, allowing precise steady-state measurements where inlet temperature, flow rate, and ambient conditions are held constant, minimizing transient effects for baseline efficiency curves. Outdoor testing, conversely, exposes collectors to natural diurnal cycles of irradiance, wind, and temperature, better capturing real operating dynamics but requiring corrections for variability. Within these setups, steady-state methods assume constant conditions to derive linear efficiency relationships, while quasi-dynamic approaches account for time-varying inputs like fluctuating irradiance, using parameter identification techniques to fit models over short test periods (e.g., 5-10 minutes) for broader applicability in dynamic simulations. The primary international standard for liquid-heating collectors is ISO 9806, which outlines procedures for thermal performance evaluation through an efficiency curve fitted as η = η_0 - a_1 (ΔT / G) - a_2 (ΔT / G)^2, where ΔT is the mean fluid-to-ambient temperature difference and G is global irradiance, with parameters η_0 (optical efficiency), a_1 (linear heat loss coefficient, typically 3-6 W/m²K for flat-plate collectors), and a_2 (second-order loss term for nonlinear effects). This standard supports both steady-state and quasi-dynamic testing modes, with the latter incorporating incidence angle and effective thermal capacity corrections for transient conditions. For air-heating collectors, ASHRAE Standard 93 provides analogous methods, focusing on airflow rates and pressure drops to determine efficiency under steady-state indoor or outdoor conditions, ensuring comparability for unglazed and transpired designs. Recent updates in ISO 9806:2025 extend these protocols to hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) collectors, incorporating separate thermal and electrical efficiency assessments while maintaining the core curve-fitting framework. Certification programs validate these test results to assure product reliability and enable market access. In Europe, the Solar Keymark scheme, administered under CEN/CENELEC, certifies collectors meeting ISO 9806 or EN 12975 requirements, including durability tests such as 300 thermal cycles between -20°C and 100°C to simulate freeze-thaw stresses and hail impact resistance using ice balls up to 35 mm diameter at 27 m/s velocity. In the United States, the Solar Rating and Certification Corporation (SRCC) OG-100 program, aligned with ICC 901/SRCC 100 and based on ISO 9806 procedures, mandates similar performance and reliability evaluations, encompassing stagnation, thermal cycling (up to 500 cycles), and hail tests to confirm structural integrity under extreme weather. These certifications require annual factory audits and retesting, ensuring long-term performance consistency across global markets.Comparisons Across Collector Types
Solar thermal collectors vary significantly in performance, cost, and suitability across types, influencing their selection for specific operational needs. Flat-plate collectors, typically glazed and non-concentrating, offer efficiencies of 50-70% under standard conditions but perform less optimally in cold climates or with diffuse radiation due to higher heat losses. In contrast, evacuated tube collectors achieve efficiencies of 55-75%, excelling in low-light or sub-zero environments thanks to their vacuum insulation, which minimizes convective losses, though they incur higher upfront costs of approximately $150-300 per m² compared to $100-200 per m² for flat-plate models.[95] Concentrating collectors, such as parabolic troughs, enable higher operating temperatures above 150°C, supporting applications like electricity generation with overall system efficiencies of 15-25% when converting to power, but they require direct sunlight, tracking mechanisms, and substantial land areas—often 5-10 acres per MW—making them less versatile than non-concentrating types suited for temperatures below 150°C with simpler, fixed installations.[1][4] Unglazed collectors, commonly used for air preheating, provide efficiencies of 40-60% at low temperatures under 50°C and lower costs around $50-100 per m², but they are susceptible to frost and rapid heat loss in cooler weather, limiting reliability. Glazed collectors, including many flat-plate designs for liquid heating, attain 60-80% efficiencies across moderate temperature ranges, offering better thermal retention at the expense of slightly higher costs.[96][97][98] The following table summarizes key comparative metrics across major collector types, based on standardized testing protocols like those from ISO 9806, which evaluate optical efficiency and heat loss coefficients to derive performance under varying conditions.[99]| Collector Type | Cost ($/m², installed) | Lifespan (years) | Temperature Range (°C) | Efficiency (%) | Example Solar Fraction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat-Plate (Glazed) | 100-200 | 20-30 | 30-80 | 50-70 | 50-70 |
| Evacuated Tube | 150-300 | 25-30 | 50-200 | 55-75 | 60-80 |
| Unglazed (Transpired) | 50-100 | 20-25 | <50 | 40-60 | 30-50 |
| Concentrating (e.g., Parabolic Trough) | 200-500 | 25-30 | >150 | 60-70 (thermal) | 70-90 (in high-DNI sites) |
