Hubbry Logo
Underfloor heatingUnderfloor heatingMain
Open search
Underfloor heating
Community hub
Underfloor heating
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Underfloor heating
Underfloor heating
Underfloor heating
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Underfloor heating pipes, before they are covered by the screed

Underfloor heating and cooling is a form of central heating and cooling that achieves indoor climate control for thermal comfort using hydronic or electrical heating elements embedded in a floor. Heating is achieved by conduction, radiation and convection. Use of underfloor heating dates back to the Neoglacial and Neolithic periods.

History

[edit]

Underfloor heating has a long history back into the Neoglacial and Neolithic periods. Archeological digs in Asia and the Aleutian islands of Alaska reveal how the inhabitants drafted smoke from fires through stone covered trenches which were excavated in the floors of their subterranean dwellings. The hot smoke heated the floor stones and the heat then radiated into the living spaces. These early forms have evolved into modern systems using fluid filled pipes or electrical cables and mats. Below is a chronological overview of under floor heating from around the world.

Time period, c. BC[1] Description[1]
5,000 Evidence of "baked floors" are found foreshadowing early forms of kang and dikang "heated floor" later ondol meaning "warming chimney" in Manchuria and Korea respectively.[2]
3,000 Korean fire hearth, was used both as kitchen range and heating stove.
1,000 Ondol type system used in the Aleutian Islands, Alaska[3] and in Unggi, Hamgyeongbuk-do (present-day North Korea).
1,000 More than two hearths were used in one dwelling; one hearth located at the center was used for heating, the other at the perimeter was used for cooking throughout the year. This perimeter hearth is the initial form of the budumak (meaning kitchen range), which composes the combustion section of the traditional ondol in Korea. At this point the floor it's still not heated directly from below but rather by thermal convection of hearth and stove from above.
500 Romans scale up the use of conditioned surfaces (floors and walls) with the invention of the hypocausts.[4]
200 Central hearth developed into gudeul (meaning heat releasing section of ondol) and perimeter hearth for cooking became more developed and budumak was almost established in Korea.
50 China, Korea and Roman Empire use kang, dikang/ondol and hypocaust respectively.
Time period, c. AD[5] Description[5]
500 Anecdotal literary reference to radiant cooling system in the Middle East using snow packed wall cavities.
700 More sophisticated and developed gudeul was found in some palaces and living quarters of upper-class people in Korea. Countries in the Mediterranean Basin (Iran, Algeria, Turkey et al.) use various forms of hypocaust type heating in public baths and homes (ref.: tabakhana, atishkhana, sandali) but also use heat from cooking (see: tandoor, also tanur) to heat the floors.[6][7][8]
1000 Ondol continues to evolve in Asia. The most advanced true ondol system was established. The fire furnace was moved outside and the room was entirely floored with ondol in Korea.
1300 Hypocaust type systems used to heat monasteries in Poland and teutonic Malbork Castle.[9]
1400 Hypocaust type systems used to heat hammams of the Ottoman Empire.
1500 Attention to comfort and architecture in Europe evolves; China and Korea continue to apply floor heating with wide scale adoption.
1600 In France, heated flues in floors and walls are used in greenhouses.
1700 Benjamin Franklin studies the French and Asian cultures and makes note of their respective heating system leading to the development of the Franklin stove. Steam based radiant pipes are used in France. Hypocaust type system used to heat public bath (hammam) in the citadel town of Erbil located in modern-day Iraq.[10]
1800 Beginnings of the European evolution of the modern water heater/boiler and water based piping systems including studies in thermal conductivities and specific heat of materials and emissivity/reflectivity of surfaces (Watt/Leslie/Rumford).[11] Reference to the use of small bore pipes used in the John Soane house and museum.[12]
1864 Underfloor heating type system used at Civil War hospital sites in America.[13] Reichstag building in Germany uses the thermal mass of the building for cooling and heating.
1899 The earliest beginnings of polyethylene-based pipes occur when German scientist, Hans von Pechmann, discovered a waxy residue at the bottom of a test tube, colleagues Eugen Bamberger and Friedrich Tschirner called it polymethylene but it was discarded as having no commercial use at the time.[14]
1904 Liverpool Cathedral in England is heated with system based on the hypocaust principles.
1905 Frank Lloyd Wright makes his first trip to Japan, later incorporates various early forms of radiant heating in his projects.
1907 England, Prof. Barker granted Patent No. 28477 for panel warming using small pipes. Patents later sold to the Crittal Company who appointed representatives across Europe. A.M. Byers of America promotes radiant heating using small bore water pipes. Asia continues to use traditional ondol and kang—wood is used as the fuel, combustion gases sent under floor.
1930 Oscar Faber in England uses water pipes used to radiant heat and cool several large buildings.[15]
1933 Explosion at England's Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI) laboratory during a high pressure experiment with ethylene gas results in a wax like substance—later to become polyethylene and the re-beginnings of PEX pipe.[16]
1937 Frank Lloyd Wright designs the radiant heated Herbert Jacobs house, the first Usonian home.
1939 First small scale polyethylene plant built in America.
1945 American developer William Levitt builds large scale developments for returning GIs. Water based (copper pipe) radiant heating used throughout thousands of homes. Poor building envelopes on all continents require excessive surface temperatures leading in some cases to health problems. Thermal comfort and health science research (using hot plates, thermal manikins and comfort laboratories) in Europe and America later establishes lower surface temperature limits and development of comfort standards.
1950 Korean War wipes out wood supplies for ondol, population forced to use coal. Developer Joseph Eichler in California begins the construction of thousands of radiant heated homes.
1951 J. Bjorksten of Bjorksten Research Laboratories in Madison, WI, announces first results of what is believed to be the first instance of testing three types of plastic tubing for radiant floor heating in America. Polyethylene, vinyl chloride copolymer, and vinylidene chloride were tested over three winters.[17]
1953 The first Canadian polyethylene plant is built near Edmonton, Alberta.[18]
1960 NRC researcher from Canada installs underfloor heating in his home and later remarks, "Decades later it would be identified as a passive solar house. It incorporated innovative features such as the radiant heating system supplied with hot water from an automatically stoked anthracite furnace."[19]
1965 Thomas Engel patents method for stabilizing polyethylene by cross linking molecules using peroxide (PEx-A) and in 1967 sells license options to a number of pipe producers.[20]
1970 Evolution of Korean architecture leads to multistory housings, flue gases from coal based ondol results in many deaths leading to the removal of the home based flue gas system to a central water based heating plants. Oxygen permeation becomes corrosion issue in Europe leading to the development of barriered pipe and oxygen permeation standards.
1980 The first standards for floor heating are developed in Europe. Water-based ondol system is applied to almost all of residential buildings in Korea.
1985 Floor heating becomes a traditional heating systems in residential buildings in Middle Europe and Nordic countries and increasing applications in non-residential buildings.
1995 The application of floor cooling and thermal active building systems (TABS) in residential and commercial buildings are widely introduced into the market.[21]
2000 The use of embedded radiant cooling systems in the middle of Europe becomes a standard system with many parts of the world applying radiant based HVAC systems as means of using low temperatures for heating and high temperatures for cooling.
2010 Radiant conditioned Pearl River Tower in Guangzhou, China, topped out at 71 stories.

Description

[edit]

Modern underfloor heating systems use either electrical resistance elements ("electric systems") or fluid flowing in pipes ("hydronic systems") to heat the floor. Either type can be installed as the primary, whole-building heating system or as localized floor heating for thermal comfort. Some systems allow for single rooms to be heated when they are a part of a larger multi-room system, avoiding any wasted heat. Electrical resistance can only be used for heating; when space cooling is also required, hydronic systems must be used. Other applications for which either electric or hydronic systems are suited include snow/ice melting for walks, driveways and landing pads, turf conditioning of football and soccer fields and frost prevention in freezers and skating rinks. A range of underfloor heating systems and designs are available to suit different types of flooring.[22] Some underfloor heating systems are designed to be laid within the floor construction with the pipework embedded within a screed beneath the floor covering, typically used in extensions or new builds, meanwhile other underfloor heating systems can be fitted directly on top of an existing floor (providing it is level and stable) using self-adhesive panels into which the pipework is laid and a self-levelling screed is poured, a popular solution for retrofit projects.[23]

Electric heating elements or hydronic piping can be cast in a concrete floor slab ("poured floor system" or "wet system"), under the floor covering ("dry system") or attached directly to a wood sub floor ("sub floor system" or "dry system"). Underfloor heating can also be installed in suspended timber joisted floors (both ground and upper floors), either between the joists using a metal plate to transfer the heat across the floor above, or by incorporating the pipework within a specially designed structural floor deck.[24]

Some commercial buildings are designed to take advantage of thermal mass which is heated or cooled during off-peak hours when utility rates are lower. With the heating/cooling system turned off during the day, the concrete mass and room temperature drift up or down within the desired comfort range. Such systems are known as thermally activated building systems or TABS.[25][26]

The terms radiant heating and radiant cooling are commonly used to describe this approach because radiation is responsible for a significant portion of the resulting thermal comfort but this usage is technically correct only when radiation composes more than 50% of the heat exchange between the floor and the rest of the space.[27]

Hydronic systems

[edit]

Hydronic systems use water or a mix of water and anti-freeze such as propylene glycol[28] as the heat transfer fluid in a "closed-loop" that is recirculated between the floor and the boiler.

Various types of pipes are available specifically for hydronic underfloor heating and cooling systems and are generally made from polyethylene including PEX, PEX-Al-PEX and PERT. Older materials such as Polybutylene (PB) and copper or steel pipe are still used in some locales or for specialized applications.

Hydronic systems require skilled designers and tradespeople familiar with boilers, circulators, controls, fluid pressures and temperature. The use of modern factory assembled sub-stations, used primarily in district heating and cooling, can greatly simplify design requirements and reduce the installation and commissioning time of hydronic systems.

Hydronic systems can use a single source or combination of energy sources to help manage energy costs. Hydronic system energy source options are:

Underfloor heating is particularly suitable when the energy source is a heat pump, because underfloor heating uses lower water temperatures than systems using radiators, which improves the efficiency of the heat pump.[29]

  • Underfloor heating pipes, before they are covered by the screed
    Underfloor heating pipes, before they are covered by the screed
  • Underfloor heating pipes, before they are covered by a concrete garage slab
    Underfloor heating pipes, before they are covered by a concrete garage slab
  • Radiant tubing layout, Project: BCIT Aerospace Hangar, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Radiant tubing layout, Project: BCIT Aerospace Hangar, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Manifold assembly
    Manifold assembly
  • Modern factory assembled hydronic control appliances for underfloor heating and cooling, shown with covers on
    Modern factory assembled hydronic control appliances for underfloor heating and cooling, shown with covers on
  • Modern factory assembled hydronic control appliances for underfloor heating and cooling, shown with covers off
    Modern factory assembled hydronic control appliances for underfloor heating and cooling, shown with covers off
  • Wax actuators
    Wax actuators

Electric systems

[edit]
Electric floor heating installation, cement being applied

Electric systems are used only for heating and employ non-corrosive, flexible heating elements including cables, pre-formed cable mats, bronze mesh, and carbon films. Due to their low profile, they can be installed in a thermal mass or directly under floor finishes. Electric systems can also take advantage of time-of-use electricity metering and are frequently used as carpet heaters, portable under area rug heaters, under laminate floor heaters, under tile heating, under wood floor heating, and floor warming systems, including under shower floor and seat heating. Large electric systems also require skilled designers and tradespeople but this is less so for small floor warming systems. Electric systems use fewer components and are simpler to install and commission than hydronic systems. Some electric systems use line voltage technology while others use low voltage technology. The power consumption of an electric system is not based on voltage but rather wattage output produced by the heating element.

Features

[edit]

Airflow from vertical temperature gradients

[edit]
Vertical temperature gradient, caused by stable stratification of air inside a room without underfloor heating. The floor is over three degrees Celsius colder than the ceiling.

Thermal comfort quality

[edit]

As defined by ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55 – Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, thermal comfort is, "that condition of mind which expresses satisfaction with the thermal environment and is assessed by subjective evaluation." Relating specifically to underfloor heating, thermal comfort is influenced by floor surface temperature and associated elements such as radiant asymmetry, mean radiant temperature, and operative temperature. Research by Nevins, Rohles, Gagge, P. Ole Fanger et al. show that humans at rest with clothing typical of light office and home wear, exchange over 50% of their sensible heat via radiation.

Underfloor heating influences the radiant exchange by warming the interior surfaces. The heating of the surfaces suppresses body heat loss resulting in a perception of heating comfort. This general sensation of comfort is further enhanced through conduction (feet on floor) and through convection by the surface's influence on air density. Underfloor cooling works by absorbing both short wave and long wave radiation resulting in cool interior surfaces. These cool surfaces encourage the loss of body heat resulting in a perception of cooling comfort. Localized discomfort due to cold and warm floors wearing normal footwear and stocking feet is addressed in the ISO 7730 and ASHRAE 55 standards and ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbooks and can be corrected or regulated with floor heating and cooling systems.

Indoor air quality

[edit]

Underfloor heating can have a positive effect on the quality of indoor air by facilitating the choice of otherwise perceived cold flooring materials such as tile, slate, terrazzo, and concrete. These masonry surfaces typically have very low VOC emissions (volatile organic compounds) in comparison to other flooring options. In conjunction with moisture control, floor heating also establishes temperature conditions that are less favorable in supporting mold, bacteria, viruses and dust mites.[30][31] By removing the sensible heating load from the total HVAC (Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning) load, ventilation, filtration and dehumidification of incoming air can be accomplished with dedicated outdoor air systems having less volumetric turnover to mitigate distribution of airborne contaminates. There is recognition from the medical community relating to the benefits of floor heating especially as it relates to allergens.[32][33]

Energy

[edit]

Under floor radiant systems are evaluated for sustainability through the principles of efficiency, entropy, exergy[34] and efficacy. When combined with high-performance buildings, underfloor systems operate with low temperatures in heating and high temperatures in cooling[35] in the ranges found typically in geothermal[36] and solar thermal systems. When coupled with these non-combustible, renewable energy sources the sustainability benefits include reduction or elimination of combustion and greenhouse gases produced by boilers and power generation for heat pumps[37] and chillers, as well as reduced demands for non-renewables and greater inventories for future generations. This has been supported through simulation evaluations[38][39][40][41] and through research funded by the U.S. Department of Energy,[42][43] Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation,[44] Fraunhofer Institute ISE[45] as well as ASHRAE.[46]

Safety and health

[edit]

Low-temperature underfloor heating is embedded in the floor or placed under the floor covering. As such it occupies no wall space and creates no burn hazards, nor is it a hazard for physical injuries due to accidental contact leading to tripping and falling. This has been referenced as a positive feature in healthcare facilities including those serving elderly clients and those with dementia.[47][48][49] Anecdotally, under similar environmental conditions, heated floors will speed evaporation of wetted floors (showering, cleaning, and spills). Additionally, underfloor heating with fluid-filled pipes is useful in heating and cooling explosion-proof environments where combustion and electrical equipment can be located remotely from the explosive environment.

There is a likelihood that underfloor heating may add to offgassing and sick building syndrome in an environment, particularly when the carpet is used as flooring.[citation needed]

Electric underfloor heating systems cause low frequency magnetic fields (in the 50–60 Hz range), old 1-wire systems much more so than modern 2-wire systems.[50][51] The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified static and low-frequency magnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic (Group 2B).[52]

Longevity, maintenance and repair

[edit]

Equipment maintenance and repair is the same as for other water or electrical based HVAC systems except when pipes, cables or mats are embedded in the floor. Early trials (for example homes built by Levitt and Eichler, c. 1940–1970s) experienced failures in embedded copper and steel piping systems as well as failures assigned by the courts to Shell, Goodyear and others for polybutylene and EPDM materials.[53][54] There also have been a few publicized claims of failed electric heated gypsum panels from the mid-1990s.[55]

Failures associated with most installations are attributable to job site neglect, installation errors, and product mishandling such as exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Pre-pour pressure tests required by concrete installation standards[56] and good practice guidelines[57] for the design, construction, operation and repair of radiant heating and cooling systems mitigate problems resulting from improper installation and operation.

Fluid based systems using cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) a product developed in the 1930s and its various derivatives such as PE-rt have demonstrated reliable long term performance in harsh cold-climate applications such as bridge decks, aircraft hangar aprons, and landing pads. PEX has become a popular and reliable option in-home use for new concrete slab construction, and new underfloor joist construction as well as (joist) retrofit. Since the materials are produced from polyethylene and its bonds are cross-linked, it is highly resistant to corrosion or the temperature and pressure stresses associated with typical fluid-based HVAC systems.[58] For PEX reliability, installation procedures must be precise (especially at joints) and manufacturers specifications for a maximum temperature of water or fluid, etc. must be carefully followed.

Design and installation

[edit]
General considerations for placing radiant heating and cooling pipes in flooring assemblies where other HVAC and plumbing components may be present
Typical underfloor heating and cooling assemblies. Local practices, codes, standards, best practices, and fire regulations will determine actual materials and methods.

The engineering of underfloor cooling and heating systems is governed by industry standards and guidelines.[59][60][notes 2]

Technical design

[edit]

The amount of heat exchanged from or to an underfloor system is based on the combined radiant and convective heat transfer coefficients.

  • Radiant heat transfer is constant based on the Stefan–Boltzmann constant.
  • Convective heat transfer changes over time depending on
    • the air's density and thus its buoyancy. Air buoyancy changes according to surface temperatures and
    • forced air movement due to fans and the motion of people and objects in the space.

Convective heat transfer with underfloor systems is much greater when the system is operating in a heating rather than cooling mode.[61] Typically with underfloor heating the convective component is almost 50% of the total heat transfer and in underfloor cooling the convective component is less than 10%.[62]

Heat and moisture considerations

[edit]

When heated and cooled pipes or heating cables share the same spaces as other building components, parasitic heat transfer can occur between refrigeration appliances, cold storage areas, domestic cold water lines, air conditioning and ventilation ducts. To control this, the pipes, cables and other building components must all be well insulated.

With underfloor cooling, condensation may collect on the surface of the floor. To prevent this, air humidity is kept low, below 50%, and floor temperatures are maintained above the dew point, 19 °C (66F).[63]

Building systems and materials

[edit]
  • Heat losses to below grade
  • Heat losses at the exterior floor framing
    • The heated or cooled sub-floor increases the temperature difference between the outdoors and the conditioned floor.
    • The cavities created by the framing timbers such as headers, trimmers and cantilevered sections must then be insulated with rigid, batt or spray type insulations of suitable value based on climate and building techniques.
  • Masonry and other hard flooring considerations
    • Concrete floors must accommodate shrinkage and expansion due to curing and changes in temperature.
    • Curing times and temperatures for poured floors (concrete, lightweight toppings) must follow industry standards.
    • Control and expansion joints and crack suppression techniques are required for all masonry type floors including;
  • Wood flooring
    • The dimensional stability of wood is based primary on moisture content,[67] however, other factors can mitigate the changes to wood as it is heated or cooled, including;
  • Piping standards[notes 3]

Control system

[edit]
See also: Hydronics

Underfloor heating and cooling systems can have several control points including the management of:

  • Fluid temperatures in the heating and cooling plant (e.g. boilers, chillers, heat pumps).
    • Influences the efficiency
  • Fluid temperatures in distribution network between the plant and the radiant manifolds.
    • Influences the capital and operating costs
  • Fluid temperatures in the PE-x piping systems, which is based on;[27]
    • Heating and cooling demands
    • Tube spacing
    • Upward and downward losses
    • Flooring characteristics
  • Operative temperature
  • Surface temperatures for;[68]
    • Comfort
    • Health and safety
    • Material integrity
    • Dew point (for floor cooling).

Mechanical schematic

[edit]
Example of a radiant based HVAC schematic

Illustrated is a simplified mechanical schematic of an underfloor heating and cooling system for thermal comfort quality[68] with a separate air handling system for indoor air quality.[69][70] In high performance residential homes of moderate size (e.g. under 3000 ft2 (278 m2) total conditioned floor area), this system using manufactured hydronic control appliances would take up about the same space as a three or four piece bathroom.

Modeling piping patterns with finite element analysis

[edit]

Modeling radiant piping (also tube or loop) patterns with finite element analysis (FEA) predicts the thermal diffusions and surface temperature quality or efficacy of various loop layouts. The performance of the model (left image below) and image to the right are useful to gain an understanding in relationships between flooring resistances, conductivities of surrounding mass, tube spacings, depths and fluid temperatures. As with all FEA simulations, they depict a snap shot in time for a specific assembly and may not be representative of all floor assemblies nor for system that have been operative for considerable time in a steady state condition. The practical application of FEA for the engineer is being able to assess each design for fluid temperature, back losses and surface temperature quality. Through several iterations it is possible to optimize the design for the lowest fluid temperature in heating and the highest fluid temperature in cooling which enables combustion and compression equipment to achieve its maximum rated efficiency performance.

  • Thermal diffusions and surface temperature quality (efficacy) of various piping layouts
    Thermal diffusions and surface temperature quality (efficacy) of various piping layouts
  • Typical FEA output screen shots of wire mesh, thermal isotherms and color-coded mapping
    Typical FEA output screen shots of wire mesh, thermal isotherms and color-coded mapping

Economics

[edit]

There is a wide range of pricing for underfloor systems based on regional differences, materials, application and project complexity. It is widely adopted in the Nordic, Asian and European communities. Consequently, the market is more mature and systems relatively more affordable than less developed markets such as North America where market share for fluid based systems remains between 3% and 7% of HVAC systems (ref. Statistics Canada and United States Census Bureau).

In energy efficiency buildings such as Passive House, R-2000 or Net Zero Energy, simple thermostatic radiator valves can be installed along with a single compact circulator and small condensing heater controlled without or with basic hot water reset[71] control. Economical electric resistance based systems also are useful in small zones such as bathrooms and kitchens, but also for entire buildings where heating loads are very low. Larger structures will need more sophisticated systems to deal with cooling and heating needs, and often require building management control systems to regulate the energy use and control the overall indoor environment.

Low temperature radiant heating and high temperature radiant cooling systems lend themselves well to district energy systems (community based systems) due to the temperature differentials between the plant and the buildings which allow small diameter insulated distribution networks and low pumping power requirements. The low return temperatures in heating and high return temperatures in cooling enable the district energy plant to achieve maximum efficiency. The principles behind district energy with underfloor systems can also be applied to stand alone multi story buildings with the same benefits.[72] Additionally, underfloor radiant systems are ideally suited to renewable energy sources including geothermal and solar thermal systems or any system where waste heat is recoverable.

In the global drive for sustainability, long term economics supports the need to eliminate where possible, compression for cooling and combustion for heating. It will then be necessary to use low quality heat sources for which radiant underfloor heating and cooling is well suited.[clarify][citation needed]

System efficiency

[edit]

System efficiency and energy use analysis takes into account building enclosure performance, efficiency of the heating and cooling plant, system controls and the conductivities, surface characteristics, tube/element spacing and depth of the radiant panel, operating fluid temperatures and wire to water efficiency of the circulators.[73] The efficiency in electric systems is analyzed by similar processes and includes the efficiency of electricity generation.

Though the efficiency of radiant systems is under constant debate with no shortage of anecdotal claims and scientific papers presenting both sides, the low return fluid temperatures in heating and high return fluid temperatures in cooling enable condensing boilers,[74] chillers[75] and heat pumps[76] to operate at or near their maximum engineered performance.[77][78] The greater efficiency of 'wire to water' versus 'wire to air' flow due to water's significantly greater heat capacity favors fluid based systems over air based systems.[79] Both field application and simulation research have demonstrated significant electrical energy savings with radiant cooling and dedicated outdoor air systems based in part on the previous noted principles.[80][81]

In Passive Houses, R-2000 homes or Net Zero Energy buildings the low temperatures of radiant heating and cooling systems present significant opportunities to exploit exergy.[82]

In residential underfloor heating (UFH) systems, the material of the manifold plays a crucial role in **thermal performance and durability**. Nickel-plated brass manifolds are widely used due to **higher thermal conductivity and improved corrosion resistance** compared to stainless steel alternatives.

Research from industry bodies indicates that **nickel-plated brass manifolds can enhance system efficiency and longevity in UFH applications**.[83][84]

Efficiency considerations for flooring surface materials

[edit]

System efficiency is also affected by the floor covering serving as the radiational boundary layer between the floor mass and occupants and other contents of the conditioned space. For example, carpeting has a greater resistance or lower conductance than tile. Thus carpeted floors need to operate at higher internal temperatures than tile which can create lower efficiencies for boilers and heat pumps. However, when the floor covering is known at the time the system is installed, then the internal floor temperature required for a given covering can be achieved through proper tube spacing without sacrificing plant efficiency (though the higher internal floor temperatures may result in increased heat loss from the non-room surfaces of the floor).[85]

The emissivity, reflectivity and absorptivity of a floor surface are critical determinants of its heat exchange with the occupants and room. Unpolished flooring surface materials and treatments have very high emissivity's (0.85 to 0.95) and therefore make good heat radiators.[86]

With underfloor heating and cooling ("reversible floors") flooring surfaces with high absorbance and emissivity and low reflectivity are most desirable.

Thermographic evaluation

[edit]
Thermographic images of a room heated with low temperature radiant heating shortly after starting up the system

Thermography is a useful tool to see the actual thermal efficacy of an underfloor system from its start up (as shown) to its operating conditions. In a startup it is easy to identify the tube location but less so as the system moves into a steady state condition. It is important to interpret thermographic images correctly. As is the case with finite element analysis (FEA), what is seen, reflects the conditions at the time of the image and may not represent the steady conditions. For example, the surfaces viewed in the images shown, may appear ‘hot’, but in reality are actually below the nominal temperature of the skin and core temperatures of the human body and the ability to ‘see’ the pipes does not equate to ‘feel’ the pipes. Thermography can also point out flaws in the building enclosures (left image, corner intersection detail), thermal bridging (right image, studs) and the heat losses associated with exterior doors (center image).

Global examples of large modern buildings using radiant heating and cooling

[edit]

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Underfloor heating.

References

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Underfloor heating

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Underfloor heating, also known as radiant floor heating, is a system that delivers heat directly to the floor surface, allowing warmth to radiate upward to objects, people, and the surrounding space for efficient . This method relies on both infrared radiation and , where heated floors warm the air above them, creating an even distribution of heat without the drafts or dust circulation associated with forced-air systems. The concept traces its origins to ancient civilizations, with the Roman hypocaust system—developed around 80 BC—using hot air circulated under raised floors to heat public baths and villas, marking one of the earliest forms of central underfloor heating. Modern underfloor heating emerged in the , gaining popularity during the 1940s as hydronic systems that circulate hot water through embedded pipes, evolving from earlier gravity-fed hot water setups to more efficient pumped configurations. Today, two primary types dominate: hydronic systems, which use boilers to heat water circulated through tubing beneath the floor, suitable for larger homes and integrable with sources like solar; and electric systems, employing heating cables or mats for quicker installation in smaller spaces, often leveraging off-peak for cost savings. These can be installed in "wet" setups embedded in concrete for or "dry" configurations between subfloors for faster response times. Underfloor heating offers notable advantages, including higher energy efficiency compared to baseboard or forced-air systems due to the elimination of duct losses and lower operating temperatures (typically 85-120°F for hydronic), while providing silent, allergen-free comfort ideal for allergy sufferers. However, challenges include higher upfront installation costs, especially for retrofits, slower heat-up times in thick-slab designs (up to several hours), and reduced efficiency with insulating floor coverings like thick carpets. Optimal performance requires compatible flooring such as ceramic tile or thin wood, and professional design to ensure structural support and zoning for even heat distribution.

Overview

Definition and Principles

Underfloor heating (UFH), also known as radiant floor heating, is a form of that delivers warmth primarily through and from the floor surface to the occupied space above. In this system, heat is generated by embedded pipes or cables beneath the flooring, which warm the floor material itself, turning it into a large radiant panel that emits radiation directly to people and objects in the room. The core principles of underfloor heating rely on three main mechanisms: , , and conduction, with both and contributing significantly to . Radiant heat transfer occurs via from the warmer floor surface to cooler bodies, such as occupants or furniture, providing direct warmth, while circulates heat as air warmed by the floor rises gently, in contrast to systems that can create drafts. This radiative process follows the Stefan-Boltzmann law, which quantifies the net qq between surfaces as: q=ϵσ(T4−Tsur4)q = \epsilon \sigma (T^4 - T_{\text{sur}}^4) where ϵ\epsilon is the surface emissivity, σ\sigma is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.67×10−85.67 \times 10^{-8} W/m²K⁴), TT is the absolute temperature of the floor surface, and TsurT_{\text{sur}} is the temperature of the surroundings, all in Kelvin. Convection supplements radiation as warmed air near the floor rises gently, while conduction transfers heat from the heating elements through the floor materials to the surface, with the rate depending on the material's thermal conductivity—higher-conductivity materials like tile facilitate quicker and more even surface warming. Underfloor heating offers several general advantages rooted in its principles, including uniform heat distribution across the space at lower air temperatures (typically 18–22°C), which eliminates hot air pockets and drafts common in convective systems, enhancing overall comfort. Additionally, its design supports capabilities, allowing independent control of heat in different rooms or areas for targeted .

System Types

Underfloor heating systems are broadly classified into two primary types: hydronic, which circulates heated liquid through , and electric, which employs resistive elements to generate directly. These categories encompass the core architectures used in residential, commercial, and industrial applications, with hydronic systems often favored for larger-scale installations due to their with low-temperature sources, while electric systems provide and rapid response in smaller or retrofit scenarios. Hydronic systems operate via a closed-loop network of embedded in the floor, where heated water or a water-glycol is circulated to transfer warmth to the space above. The pipes, typically made from (PEX) for its flexibility, resistance, and cost-effectiveness, or for its superior thermal conductivity in certain high-demand setups, are laid at spacings of 10 to 30 cm to ensure even distribution across the floor surface. These networks connect to a central source, such as a or , which maintains the fluid temperature and enables integration with options like solar thermal systems. Electric systems, in contrast, utilize resistive heating cables or pre-assembled foil mats to produce heat through electrical resistance, offering a more straightforward alternative without the need for fluid circulation. The cables or mats are embedded within a layer or installed beneath compatible materials like tiles or laminate, converting into output with high at the point of use. Operating on voltages ranging from 12 V for low-voltage in wet areas to 240 V for standard household systems, these elements typically deliver power densities of 100 to 200 W/m², adjustable based on room insulation and desired floor surface temperature. Hybrid systems combine elements of both hydronic and electric approaches, often integrating electric mats in targeted zones with hydronic piping for broader coverage, to enhance zoning flexibility in multi-room buildings. This configuration allows precise control over individual areas, such as bathrooms or sunrooms, while leveraging the efficiency of water-based heating elsewhere; however, it involves higher upfront costs due to the dual infrastructure and potential compatibility challenges between components.

History

Ancient and Traditional Applications

Underfloor heating originated in ancient civilizations, with one of the earliest and most sophisticated systems being the developed by the around 500 BCE and later refined by the Romans starting in the late 2nd century BCE. This system circulated hot air from a furnace beneath raised floors supported by small pillars known as pilae, typically made of , terracotta, or stone, allowing heat to radiate upward through tiled or surfaces. Commonly employed in public bathhouses () and elite villas, the hypocaust extended to wall channels (hypocaustum subductum) for more even distribution, but its construction was labor-intensive, requiring skilled masonry and constant fuel supply from wood or fires. Limitations included potential smoke leakage if seals failed and high operational costs due to fuel inefficiency in colder climates. In East Asia, traditional underfloor heating emerged independently much earlier, with the Korean ondol system traceable to around 3000 BCE in rudimentary forms and becoming widespread by the 15th century CE. The ondol (meaning "warm stone") directed smoke and hot gases from a wood-fired kitchen stove through horizontal clay or stone flues beneath a thick masonry floor, often covered with oiled paper or mats for insulation. This design integrated heating with cooking, promoting floor-sitting lifestyles in hanok homes, but early indoor furnaces led to issues like overheating, smoke infiltration, and carbon monoxide risks, prompting a shift to outdoor furnaces around 1000–1200 CE for better safety and efficiency. Similar principles appeared in China's kang system from the 11th century BCE, using raised brick platforms with flues for heated beds and floors, though heat loss to the ground reduced overall effectiveness. In Japan, analogous but less prevalent methods, such as heated platforms akin to the kang, drew from continental influences but remained secondary to other heating practices like braziers. Early European bathhouses beyond , such as those in Celtic and Germanic regions, adapted hypocaust-like underfloor channels from the 1st century CE, using stone and clay tiles to channel furnace-heated air. In the , pre-1000 CE hammams (ḥammām) in Byzantine and early Islamic contexts, like those under Umayyad rule (661–750 CE), incorporated similar underfloor heating derived from Roman thermae, with hot air passing through subterranean channels beneath marble or stone floors to maintain warmth in communal bathing spaces. These systems relied on wood or olive pits for and featured domed ceilings for retention, yet suffered from labor demands for stoking fires and occasional structural failures due to poor ventilation. Across these cultures, materials like clay tiles and stone slabs were universal for durability and heat retention, but common drawbacks included smoke hazards and the need for daily maintenance, limiting widespread domestic use to wealthier or institutional settings.

Modern Innovations

The revival of underfloor heating in the began with the introduction of electric systems, marked by U.S. Patent 847,027 granted to in 1907 for an "Electric Floor Heater," which utilized embedded resistance wires to provide radiant heat. This innovation laid the groundwork for modern electric underfloor heating, though initial adoption was limited due to high costs and unreliable supply. Following , hydronic systems experienced widespread adoption in , particularly in residential , where they were paired with oil-fired boilers to circulate hot water through pipes embedded in concrete slabs, offering efficient and even heat distribution in post-war housing booms. Key milestones in the mid-to-late further advanced the technology. In the 1960s, underfloor heating became integrated with networks in Scandinavian countries like and , where municipal combined heat and power plants supplied low-pressure hot water to residential floors, promoting energy efficiency in cold climates and supporting urban expansion. By the 1980s, the development of flexible mats facilitated retrofits in existing buildings across , allowing installation under tiles or laminates without major structural changes, and aligning with emerging building standards for uniform heating. Entering the 2000s, low-temperature hydronic systems gained prominence, operating at 30–40°C to pair effectively with heat pumps, reducing demands and enabling compatibility with energy-efficient designs in new constructions. Recent advancements up to 2025 have focused on , including AI-optimized via sensors that monitor , , and in real-time to adjust heat output per room, potentially cutting use by 20–30% through predictive algorithms. These systems now integrate seamlessly with renewables, such as solar thermal collectors that preheat water for hydronic loops, enhancing in off-grid or hybrid setups. Additionally, low-emissivity materials applied to floor surfaces or insulation layers minimize radiative heat loss downward, improving overall efficiency by up to 15% in radiant floor systems. The global spread of underfloor heating has been particularly notable in cold climates, with adoption rates reaching 40–50% in new builds across by the early 2020s, driven by regulatory incentives for low-carbon heating and integration with district systems.

System Components

Hydronic Systems

Hydronic underfloor heating systems circulate heated through embedded piping to provide radiant warmth, relying on a network of specialized components for efficient operation. Central to these s are manifolds, which distribute and control the flow of heating to multiple circuits, typically accommodating 2 to 12 loops per unit with flow capacities up to 20 gallons per minute (GPM). Circulation pumps, sized based on design flow rates and friction losses, propel the fluid through the network while accounting for elevation changes and potential noise from excessive velocities. Expansion tanks maintain pressure by accommodating of the fluid, preventing over-pressurization. Heat sources include boilers—either condensing for higher at lower temperatures or non-condensing—geothermal heat pumps capable of supplying up to 120°F (49°C), electric boilers, or solar collectors, often integrated with mixing valves to temper high-temperature outputs for floor compatibility. Piping in hydronic systems commonly consists of (PEX) tubing, such as PEX-a variants with oxygen barriers to minimize in the distribution network; these pipes are flexible, rated for pressures up to 100 psi at 180°F (82°C), and available in diameters from 3/8 inch to 2 inches. Loop configurations vary between patterns, which run pipes in parallel back-and-forth paths for straightforward installation, and spiral (or counterflow spiral) layouts, which coil the tubing concentrically to promote more uniform heat distribution and lower pressure losses across the circuit. Spiral configurations achieve better thermal homogeneity, with average floor temperature variations as low as 0.5°C at inlet temperatures of 55°C, compared to setups that may exhibit banding but offer up to 15% higher overall heat gain. Fluid dynamics in these systems govern performance through controlled flow rates and pressure management, ensuring laminar flow for optimal heat transfer. Typical flow rates per loop range from 0.5 to 3 liters per minute (L/min), calculated as total heat loss divided by the product of temperature differential (ΔT), fluid specific heat (Cp), and density (γ)—for instance, approximately 1.5 L/min for a 3,600 Btu/hr load at a 20°F ΔT. Pressure drops arise primarily from viscous friction in the pipes and are modeled using the Hagen-Poiseuille equation for laminar conditions: ΔP = (8μLQ)/(πr⁴), where ΔP is the pressure difference, μ is fluid viscosity, L is pipe length, Q is volumetric flow rate, and r is pipe radius; this relationship highlights the inverse fourth-power dependence on radius, emphasizing the need for adequate pipe sizing to minimize losses. Heat delivery occurs at moderate temperatures to ensure comfort and , with supply temperatures typically between 30°C and 50°C (86°F to 122°F) for floor applications, maintaining a mean heating water temperature around 54°C for outputs of 25 Btu/h-ft² and a return of 10–20°F to avoid overheating the floor surface. In regions prone to freezing, or mixtures are added for protection, with concentrations up to 50% by volume lowering the freezing point to -34°C while remaining compatible with system materials, though lower ratios (e.g., 30–40%) suffice for milder climates to preserve . These systems excel in for large areas, supporting extensive via modular manifolds and pumps to cover commercial or multi-story installations without proportional losses. Additionally, they integrate seamlessly with domestic hot water production through open direct configurations or dual-purpose heat exchangers, allowing a single or tank to serve both space heating and potable needs.

Electric Systems

Electric underfloor heating systems utilize electrical resistance elements embedded in the floor to generate and distribute warmth directly to the space above. These systems primarily consist of heating cables or mats connected to a power source and controlled by thermostats, offering a dry installation method without circulating fluids. The core components include heating cables, which are resistive wires designed to produce heat when electrified, and heating mats, which integrate pre-spaced cables into a flexible mesh for simplified layout. Heating cables come in single-core variants, featuring one conductive wire that requires a return lead for circuit completion, and twisted or double-core types, where two conductors are intertwined to minimize electromagnetic fields and allow easier single-end connections. Mats typically embed these cables—often double-core—at uniform intervals, such as 3 inches, within a fiberglass or plastic backing to ensure consistent placement during installation. Thermostats serve as the control interface, regulating power supply based on floor or air temperature sensors to maintain desired levels and prevent overheating. Heat generation in these systems relies on , where electrical current passing through the resistive elements converts energy into thermal output according to the principle P=I2RP = I^2 R, with PP representing power, II the current, and RR the resistance of the cable. Circuit design emphasizes uniform spacing of cables or mats to achieve even heat coverage across the floor area, typically with loops or serpentine patterns that avoid overlaps, which could create hotspots and risk cable damage or inefficiency. Power ratings vary by application: for comfort heating in residential spaces like bathrooms, systems operate at 100-200 W/m² to provide gentle warmth without excessive floor temperatures, while snow-melting applications on driveways or roofs demand higher outputs up to 300 W/m² to overcome environmental loads. Variants include line-voltage systems operating at standard household supplies of 120-240 V for direct connection and efficiency in larger areas, contrasted with low-voltage options at 12-24 V, which require a step-down but enhance safety by reducing shock risk in wet environments like bathrooms. Self-regulating cables represent an advanced variant, incorporating a core that automatically adjusts resistance—and thus heat output—in response to ambient changes, increasing power in colder sections and reducing it where warmer to optimize use and prevent overheating. A key advantage of electric systems is their suitability for into existing structures, as thin mats or cables can be installed beneath floor finishes with minimal disruption, unlike fluid-based alternatives. Additionally, the absence of pipes eliminates risks of leaks or , ensuring long-term reliability without maintenance related to fluid circulation. Compared to heat pump systems, which typically use hydronic distribution to achieve a coefficient of performance greater than 1, direct electric underfloor heating features simpler installation and lower upfront hardware costs, avoiding pumps, manifolds, or boilers. However, its resistive heating yields an efficiency of 1 at the point of use, resulting in higher energy consumption and operating costs; this often requires oversized solar photovoltaic or battery systems for renewable integration, elevating total expenses. Moreover, reversible heat pumps enable integrated cooling via the underfloor loop, whereas electric systems lack such capability, potentially reducing comfort in summer.

Operating Mechanisms

Heat Distribution and Transfer

In underfloor heating systems, heat primarily transfers from the source—such as hot in hydronic or electrical elements—to the occupied through conduction within the floor assembly and from the floor surface. Conduction occurs as flows through the and , governed by Fourier's , which states that the qq is proportional to the negative : q=−kdTdxq = -k \frac{dT}{dx}, where kk is the thermal conductivity of the material and dTdx\frac{dT}{dx} is the along the direction of heat flow. This process ensures efficient lateral and vertical heat spreading within the layer, minimizing losses if properly insulated. Radiation accounts for a significant portion of the output, often exceeding 50% in well-designed radiant systems, where energy is emitted directly from the warmer floor surface to cooler objects and occupants in . This mode, combined with minor convection, contributes to uniform warmth by directly heating bodies and furniture via efficient water conduction in hydronic systems, without relying heavily on air heating. This distinguishes underfloor systems from forced air heating, which relies on forced convection with poor air conduction, leading to heat rising, temperature stratification, and increased roof losses that reduce efficiency. The combined conduction and paths enable the floor to act as a large-area emitter, with total heat fluxes typically ranging from 66 to 85 / under standard operating conditions like 35°C supply water temperatures. Heat distribution patterns depend on pipe spacing, which influences the formation of isotherms—the lines of constant across the surface. Closer spacing, such as 100-200 mm, promotes more even isotherms and heating zones by reducing temperature variations between pipes, while wider spacing (up to 300 mm) can create uneven zones with cooler areas midway between pipes. This effect is particularly evident in simulations showing temperature gradients decreasing with tighter layouts, ensuring consistent coverage in larger rooms. Key factors affecting transfer efficiency include floor screed thickness, typically 5-10 cm, which balances thermal mass for even distribution against response time, and insulation beneath the system with R-values of 2-5 m²K/W to minimize downward heat loss. Thinner screeds (around 5 cm) enhance responsiveness but require precise pipe placement, while insulation in this R-range, often achieved with 70-150 mm of expanded polystyrene, directs over 90% of heat upward in temperate installations. Output calculations for heat load are based on room size, external , and desired indoor temperature, yielding 50-100 W/m² in temperate zones to offset losses through walls, windows, and ventilation while maintaining floor surface temperatures below 29°C for comfort. For example, a 20 m² room in a mild might require 80 W/m² total output, adjusted for pipe spacing and insulation to achieve steady-state efficiency.

Thermal Gradients and Airflow

Underfloor heating systems generate a vertical in which the surface is warmer than the by approximately 2–3°C, an ideal range that promotes occupant comfort by aligning heat distribution with preferences. This gradient arises primarily from the low-temperature heat emission (typically 25–29°C surface temperature), which warms the adjacent to the without excessive overheating. As a result, natural currents form, with warmer air rising slowly from the level, facilitating gentle throughout the occupied zone. The upward induced by this gradient reduces thermal stratification compared to overhead or radiator-based systems, where cooler air pools near the floor and warmer air accumulates at the . In underfloor heating, the rising plumes create a more uniform vertical profile, minimizing spots at ankle level and enhancing overall room circulation. In multi-story buildings, this consistent indoor warmth can amplify the , where buoyancy-driven pressure differences between floors encourage natural ventilation through vertical shafts or openings, aiding passive without mechanical assistance. Airflow patterns in underfloor heating are modeled as buoyancy-driven flows, qualitatively explained by , whereby the reduced density of heated air near the floor causes it to displace denser cooler air above, establishing low-velocity convective loops. These flows operate at velocities typically below 0.2 m/s, far lower than those in systems, thereby preventing drafts and ensuring stable indoor conditions. The low output temperature of the system inherently limits air movement intensity, promoting displacement-like ventilation that prioritizes the breathing zone. A key advantage of these dynamics is the provision of effective air circulation without reliance on fans or blowers, which eliminates and mechanical wear while fostering a quieter indoor environment. The subdued convective velocities also minimize dust resuspension and particle transport, as opposed to high-velocity systems that can stir allergens and particulates, thereby supporting cleaner air distribution in residential and commercial spaces.

Performance Characteristics

Comfort and Indoor Environment

Underfloor heating systems enhance by providing uniform heat distribution from the floor, which elevates the mean radiant temperature (MRT) to more closely align with air temperature, allowing occupants to feel comfortable at lower ambient air temperatures compared to traditional convective systems. This radiant effect reduces vertical temperature stratification, minimizing drafts and hot spots, and contributes to a more even operative temperature across the space. According to ISO 7730, can be predicted using the Predicted Vote (PMV) model, which assesses the average thermal sensation on a scale from -3 (cold) to +3 (hot), with values near zero indicating neutral comfort; studies on radiant floor heating systems report PMV values within the acceptable range of -0.5 to +0.5. By relying on rather than circulation, underfloor heating minimizes and movement, as there are no high-level radiators or fans to stir up particles from surfaces or floors. This leads to improved , with reduced airborne contaminants that can exacerbate respiratory issues. The absence of currents helps maintain cleaner air, particularly beneficial for sufferers, by limiting the redistribution of mites and throughout the room. Underfloor heating supports humidity control by avoiding the drying effects common in systems, helping to stabilize relative humidity (RH) levels and prevent overly dry air that can cause discomfort or irritation. However, heated floors do not actively remove moisture from the air like a dehumidifier; they primarily prevent surface condensation by warming floors above the dew point rather than lowering overall humidity levels. For severe cases in older or poorly ventilated homes with high humidity, underfloor heating should be combined with dehumidifiers, improved ventilation, or insulation upgrades for effective moisture management. This even heating promotes a more balanced indoor environment in the ideal RH range of 40-60% without excessive supplemental humidification for dryness issues. guidelines emphasize this RH range for optimal occupant health and comfort, noting its role in reducing issues like dry skin and . Health benefits include reduced exposure to allergens due to lower dust circulation and the provision of barefoot comfort, with recommended floor surface temperatures of 24-29°C ensuring warmth underfoot without discomfort or overheating. These temperatures align with standards for radiant floors, providing a cozy sensation that enhances overall , especially in homes where occupants frequently go . Field studies, including those from the Center for the Built Environment, indicate that radiant systems like underfloor heating yield higher occupant satisfaction rates—up to 66% greater likelihood of equal or better temperature comfort—compared to systems, as measured through surveys on sensation and air quality.

Energy Use and Efficiency

Underfloor heating systems operate at significantly lower supply water temperatures, typically 35–45°C, compared to 60–70°C required for conventional systems. This reduced temperature demand enhances compatibility with low-grade heat sources such as air-source s, enabling (COP) values of 3–5, where the system delivers 3–5 units of heat per unit of electrical input. Direct electric underfloor heating systems, which rely on resistive heating elements, achieve a COP of approximately 1, resulting in substantially higher electricity consumption compared to heat pump-integrated hydronic systems; this efficiency gap can elevate operational costs and necessitate oversized renewable energy setups, such as larger solar photovoltaic arrays or battery storage, for equivalent performance. In contrast, higher-temperature radiators limit heat pump efficiency, often requiring supplementary heating and lowering overall COP to below 3 in colder conditions. Key efficiency factors include zonal control mechanisms, which allow independent room regulation and minimize overheating in unused spaces, yielding energy savings of 10–30% through reduced standby losses and optimized runtime. Warm-up times differ between electric and hydronic systems: electric underfloor heating warms up quickly (typically 20-60 minutes) due to direct heating elements, making it suitable for on-demand use; hydronic (wet) systems take longer (2-8+ hours) because of the thermal mass in screed or concrete, rendering them better for continuous, steady heating. Seasonal performance is further supported by the system's radiant , which maintains steady indoor temperatures and improves seasonal COP () by aligning output with varying external conditions without frequent cycling. Hydronic underfloor systems, in particular, benefit from this steady operation, achieving higher ratings when paired with modulating controls. Relative to convective heating systems like or units, underfloor heating demonstrates greater efficiency; studies show radiant systems save 26-35% energy at the same operative temperature, with water-based radiant systems achieving 15-30% overall savings by avoiding air convection losses and low-temperature radiant terminals providing an additional 20-30% savings under identical conditions. This advantage stems from uniform heat distribution and elimination of duct losses, as reported by the . In mild climates, typical specific energy use for underfloor heating ranges from 50–80 kWh/m²/year, depending on insulation levels and demand profiles, with energy-efficient structures approaching the lower end through passive design synergies.

Safety, Health, and Durability

Underfloor heating systems incorporate multiple safety features to mitigate risks associated with overheating and electrical malfunctions. In both hydronic and electric variants, thermostats equipped with floor sensors regulate surface temperatures to prevent excessive heat buildup, typically limiting the maximum temperature to 29°C to avoid burns, material degradation, or hazards. For electric systems, compliance with (IEC) standards, such as IEC 60335-2-96, ensures protection against electrical shocks, short circuits, and overheating through requirements for insulation, grounding, and fault detection mechanisms. Health considerations for underfloor heating primarily involve exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in electric installations and potential thermal risks. Electric underfloor heating generates low-frequency magnetic fields, but when using two-core cables or properly designed single-core systems, exposure levels remain below the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) reference limit of 100 µT for the general public at 50 Hz, posing no established health risks. Scalding risks are effectively mitigated by the inherently low operating temperatures of underfloor systems, which distribute gentle radiant heat without hot surfaces exceeding safe thresholds, contrasting with traditional radiators that can reach hazardous levels. Durability of underfloor heating systems varies by type but is generally robust with proper installation. Hydronic systems feature PEX or similar with an expected lifespan of 30 to 50 years or more, as these materials resist degradation from thermal cycling and pressure. Electric systems, relying on heating cables or mats, typically last 20 to 30 years, supported by warranties and resistance to wear under normal loads. In hydronic setups, from oxygen or water chemistry can shorten component life, necessitating the addition of chemical inhibitors to form protective films on metal surfaces and maintain system integrity. Basic is essential for ensuring long-term and , with annual professional inspections recommended to detect early signs of issues. These checks include visual examinations for pipe leaks, electrical faults, or indicators, such as unusual , cold spots, or pressure drops, allowing for timely interventions to prevent system failure.

Design and Installation

Technical Planning

Technical planning for underfloor heating systems begins with precise load calculations to determine the required heating capacity based on the building's thermal characteristics. Heat loss assessments are essential, incorporating factors such as U-values for components like walls, windows, and roofs, which measure the rate of through materials in watts per square meter per (W/m²K). Infiltration losses, arising from unintended air leakage, are also quantified, often using the formula for total heat loss: Total Heat Loss = (Surface Area × ΔT × U-value) + Air Infiltration Heat Loss, where ΔT represents the temperature difference between indoor and outdoor conditions. These calculations ensure the system is sized to meet without excess capacity, typically using specialized software for simulations; for instance, with plugins like Uponor's UFH tool enables detailed modeling of heat distribution and load requirements in compliance with standards such as EN 1264. Layout design follows load assessment, focusing on pipe or cable placement to achieve uniform heat output across the space. Coverage ratios generally range from 80% to 100% of the for primary heating applications, ensuring adequate radiant emission while accounting for fixed fixtures like furniture that may obstruct . Zoning is planned according to room usage patterns, with separate circuits for high-occupancy areas such as living rooms versus low-use spaces like hallways, allowing independent to optimize comfort and efficiency. This approach divides the system into loops, typically limited to 100-120 meters per circuit to maintain flow rates, and integrates briefly with hydronic components like for even distribution. Compliance with established standards is critical during planning to guarantee safety, performance, and energy efficiency. In , EN 1264 provides guidelines for dimensioning water-based systems, specifying thermal output calculations, maximum floor surface temperatures (e.g., 29°C for comfort), and installation methods. Similarly, in addresses radiant floor heating through requirements for insulation (minimum R-3.5 under heated slabs) and energy efficiency in commercial buildings. Peak loads are designed accordingly, with typical values around 100 W/m² for floors to handle design conditions without exceeding thermal limits. Prerequisites for effective implementation include evaluating integration with broader HVAC systems for hybrid setups, where underfloor heating supplements air-based distribution to balance loads in mixed-use buildings. When installing underfloor heating with a new central heating system, consider replacing existing radiators to optimize performance, as underfloor systems operate at lower temperatures (35-50°C) and provide even heat distribution, avoiding redundancy and potential system imbalances. This ensures seamless operation, such as coordinating with heat pumps for low-temperature supply water (35-45°C), enhancing overall system efficiency without compromising radiant performance.

Materials and Building Integration

Underfloor heating systems require careful selection of flooring materials to ensure efficient heat transfer, with thermal resistance (R-value, measured in m²K/W) being a critical factor. For optimal performance, the total R-value of floor coverings should generally not exceed 0.15 m²K/W, particularly for low-resistance materials like ceramic tiles or stone, which exhibit high thermal conductivity (e.g., approximately 1.3 W/mK for ceramic) and allow rapid heat emission to the room. Carpets, however, tolerate slightly higher resistance, up to 0.25 m²K/W or 2.5 tog (where 1 tog ≈ 0.1 m²K/W), provided the combined carpet and underlay do not impede heat flow excessively; thicker plush carpets with padding can reach R-values around 0.56 m²K/W but may reduce system responsiveness if not selected carefully. Screed layers encasing the heating elements must balance structural integrity with thermal performance. (calcium sulfate-based) screeds offer superior thermal conductivity, typically around 2.0 W/mK, compared to traditional sand-cement screeds at about 1.0 W/mK, enabling faster heat-up times and more even distribution in underfloor systems. screeds also dry more quickly (often within 2-3 days per 50 mm thickness) and self-level effectively, reducing cracking risks, though they require protection during curing to prevent . Sand-cement screeds, while more robust in high- environments and easier to work with on-site, demand longer drying periods (up to 1-2% loss per week) and may slightly lower overall heating efficiency due to their lower conductivity. Insulation beneath the heating system is essential to minimize downward heat loss, directing up to 90% of energy upward into the space. Extruded polystyrene (XPS) or expanded polystyrene (EPS) boards, with thicknesses ranging from 25-100 mm, provide R-values of approximately 0.03-0.035 m²K/W per mm and can yield efficiency gains of 10-20% by reducing ground losses, particularly in slab-on-grade constructions. XPS is preferred for its higher (up to 300 kPa) and moisture resistance, making it suitable for load-bearing applications, while EPS offers cost-effective insulation for less demanding suspended floors. Structural integration varies by subfloor type and building phase. In new builds on concrete slabs, preparation involves placing insulation directly beneath the slab (minimum R-5 or 25 mm XPS equivalent) and embedding pipes in the , allowing seamless incorporation without height loss. Joist-and-batten suspended floors require insulation fill in the bays (minimum R-11) and aluminum heat diffuser plates to bridge gaps, ensuring even heat spread while maintaining airflow. Moisture barriers, such as 6-mil sheets or vapor retarders (permeance <0.1 perms), are standard under slabs to prevent from compromising the system or flooring adhesives. Retrofits present distinct challenges compared to new constructions, often involving overlay systems to preserve existing floor levels. New builds facilitate full-depth integration, reducing material costs by 20-30% and avoiding disruptions, but retrofits on timber joists may necessitate low-profile electric mats (5-10 mm thick) or hydraulic overlays (15-50 mm), with structural assessments required to confirm load capacity and ceiling height impacts (typically 20-40 mm rise). In century-old houses, further challenges include limited ceiling heights, wooden beam structures, and poor insulation to basements or ground, which can exacerbate heat loss and structural concerns. Solutions encompass low build-up systems achieving 10-30 mm height increases, such as groove milling into existing beams or floorboards followed by leveling compounds or plates; dry systems utilizing aluminum heat distribution plates on or between beams topped with chipboard or gypsum; or pre-made low-profile plates. Insulation like mineral wool must be added under heating pipes to prevent downward heat loss and meet energy standards. In both cases, subfloor leveling and priming are critical to avoid air pockets that could hinder . Key constraints include avoiding thick rugs or overlays with thermal impedance exceeding 0.25 m²K/W, as they can trap heat, increase energy use by up to 15%, and cause localized overheating or material degradation. Low-pile rugs (under 2.5 tog total) are recommended to maintain system balance.

Control and Automation Systems

Control and automation systems for underfloor heating regulate heat output to maintain desired temperatures while optimizing performance. Basic controls typically include floor-sensing thermostats that monitor the floor surface temperature to prevent overheating and ensure even distribution. These thermostats can be mechanical, such as capillary types featuring a liquid-filled bulb connected by a tube to a diaphragm that expands or contracts with temperature changes to open or close the heating circuit, or digital variants that use electronic sensors for precise readings and adjustable setpoints. Timers integrated into these thermostats enable scheduling to align heating cycles with patterns, allowing users to program daily or weekly routines for automatic activation and deactivation. For electric underfloor heating, control types include simple on/off mechanisms that fully energize or de-energize the heating elements based on thresholds, and more advanced (PWM) systems that vary power delivery by rapidly switching the circuit on and off at adjustable duty cycles, providing smoother regulation and reduced on components. Advanced automation extends to wireless zoning, where multiple thermostats communicate via protocols like to independently control separate areas, often managed through mobile apps for remote adjustments and monitoring. AI-driven predictive controls analyze weather forecasts, occupancy data, and historical patterns to preemptively adjust heating output, ensuring proactive temperature management. These systems integrate seamlessly with building management systems (BMS) for centralized oversight in commercial settings and with voice assistants like or for hands-free operation. Feedback loops in modern controllers use continuous sensor inputs to maintain stability within ±1°C, incorporating safety limits to cap floor temperatures at around 29°C to avoid discomfort or material damage.

Evaluation and Maintenance

Efficiency Assessment

Assessing the operational efficiency of underfloor heating systems involves measuring the ratio of useful heat delivered to the space relative to the total input energy, denoted as system efficiency η = \frac{useful heat}{input energy}. Well-designed hydronic underfloor heating systems, when paired with high-efficiency boilers, can achieve efficiencies up to 95%, as the radiant transfer minimizes losses compared to forced-air systems. This metric highlights the system's ability to convert energy into effective heating, with electric variants approaching 100% efficiency due to direct conversion without combustion losses. Flooring materials significantly influence this efficiency by affecting thermal resistance (R-value, in m²K/W), which determines heat transfer from the heating elements to the room. For instance, ceramic tile with an R-value of approximately 0.05 m²K/W facilitates rapid and efficient heat emission, while , such as at around R=0.10 m²K/W, provides moderate resistance that can slightly reduce output but maintains comfort without excessive energy use. Standards recommend keeping total floor covering R-values below 0.15 m²K/W to optimize performance and avoid underutilizing the system's capacity. Tools like , often using FLIR cameras, enable non-invasive detection of hot spots or uneven heating in installed systems by visualizing surface gradients during operation. For hydronic setups, flow meters integrated into manifolds measure and regulate water circulation rates across loops, ensuring balanced distribution and preventing inefficiencies from over- or under-flow in individual circuits. Optimization techniques focus on post-installation adjustments to maximize . Balancing loops involves fine-tuning manifold valves to equalize flow resistance, compensating for variations in pipe lengths and ensuring uniform heat output across zones. Insulation audits, conducted via thermal imaging or direct measurement, identify gaps in subfloor insulation that could lead to downward heat loss, recommending enhancements like adding rigid foam boards to significantly improve overall system performance. International standards such as ISO 11855 provide frameworks for performance classification of underfloor heating systems, categorizing them into Classes A through D based on thermal output, response time, and construction type—where Class A represents low-resistance dry systems for rapid heating, and Class D denotes higher-mass wet systems for steady-state efficiency. Compliance with these classifications guides installers in selecting and verifying systems that align with building energy demands, ensuring measurable improvements in .

Longevity and Repair

Underfloor heating systems, both hydronic and electric, require regular to ensure reliable operation and prevent premature wear. For hydronic systems, annual inspections should include checking the for smooth operation and cleaning or replacing filters and strainers to remove that could restrict flow. These checks help maintain system and circulation efficiency. Electric systems generally demand less frequent servicing, but annual electrical insulation resistance tests using a megger (mega-ohmmeter) are recommended to verify the integrity of heating cables and prevent faults. Common failures in underfloor heating often stem from material degradation or installation issues. In hydronic setups, pipe leaks are frequent and can be detected through a noticeable in the system, which may result from or physical damage. For electric systems, cable breaks typically manifest as localized overheating or uneven heating in affected areas, signaling insulation damage or wire discontinuity. Repair strategies vary by system type but aim to minimize disruption. Hydronic pipe leaks can often be addressed with sleeve patching using compression fittings to seal the damaged section without full replacement. Electric cable breaks may require splicing with manufacturer-approved repair kits or, in accessible cases, rerouting the cable to bypass the fault. Most underfloor heating components carry warranty periods of 10 to 25 years, covering defects in pipes, cables, and manifolds when properly installed and maintained. To extend the lifespan of underfloor heating systems, proactive measures focus on fluid quality and operational limits. In hydronic systems, monitoring the pH of the circulating fluid—ideally maintaining it between 8.0 and 10.0—prevents corrosion and scale buildup that could shorten pipe life. Avoiding overloads, such as exceeding manufacturer-specified temperature thresholds, reduces stress on components and supports overall durability.

Testing and Modeling Techniques

Testing and modeling techniques for underfloor heating systems involve a combination of numerical simulations and empirical validations to predict thermal performance, ensure uniform heat distribution, and verify system efficiency prior to and after installation. Finite element analysis (FEA) is a primary modeling approach used to simulate in underfloor heating configurations, particularly for evaluating pipe layouts and their impact on floor surface temperatures. In FEA models, the system is discretized into finite elements to solve the two-dimensional heat conduction equation, ∇·(k∇T) + Q = ρc ∂T/∂t, where k is thermal conductivity, T is , Q is source, ρ is , and c is , often implemented in software such as Mechanical for transient and steady-state analyses. These models account for pipe spacing, material properties of the and , and boundary conditions like room air to predict and gradients across the floor. For instance, parametric studies using FEA have shown that closer pipe spacing (e.g., 100-200 mm) reduces temperature variations between pipes and the midway point, improving overall uniformity compared to wider spacings. Empirical testing complements modeling through laboratory mockups and in-situ measurements to validate predictions against real-world conditions. Laboratory assessments often employ ASTM C518, a standard test method using a heat flow meter apparatus to measure steady-state transmission properties of assemblies under controlled hot and cold plate conditions, simulating the output from embedded pipes through insulation and finish materials. This allows quantification of resistance (R-value) for composite sections, ensuring the system meets design requirements without excessive energy loss. In-situ testing involves embedding heat flux sensors, such as Hukseflux HFP01 plates, directly into the or surface to monitor real-time heat flow and surface temperatures during operation, providing data on actual performance influenced by building-specific factors like insulation and occupancy. These sensors measure in W/m² with accuracies typically better than ±5%, enabling adjustments to flow rates for optimal distribution and identifying hotspots or inefficiencies post-installation. Advanced techniques extend these methods to more complex interactions. (CFD) simulations, often using Fluent, model airflow induced by the warm floor surface, predicting velocity fields and temperature stratification in the room to assess comfort levels and avoid drafts. For example, CFD analyses reveal that underfloor heating promotes stable vertical temperature gradients, with air velocities below 0.2 m/s in occupied zones, enhancing overall . Building Information Modeling (BIM) integration facilitates design validation by incorporating underfloor heating layouts into 3D architectural models, allowing simulation of thermal performance alongside structural and MEP systems using tools like Uponor's UFH Revit plug-in, which automates pipe routing and heat load calculations per EN 1264 standards. This enables clash detection and iterative optimization before construction, reducing installation errors. In applications, these techniques support pre-installation predictions of heat output uniformity, targeting surface temperature variations within ±2°C across the floor to ensure occupant comfort and compliance with standards like EN 1264, where simulations guide pipe pattern selection for even distribution in residential and commercial spaces.

Applications and Economics

Residential and Commercial Uses

In residential settings, underfloor heating is widely applied for whole-house systems that incorporate zoning to allow independent temperature control in different rooms, optimizing energy use based on occupancy and needs. This approach is particularly effective in homes where even heat distribution enhances comfort without hot spots or drafts. In bathrooms, underfloor heating is often paired with heated towel rails to provide both floor warmth and dry, warm towels, improving hygiene and user experience in moisture-prone areas. Retrofitting underfloor heating during renovations has become increasingly common in the UK, enabling upgrades in existing structures without extensive structural changes, as detailed in guides for water-based systems suitable for older properties. Commercial applications of underfloor heating differ in scale, typically involving larger zones to accommodate high-traffic areas like offices and hotels, where zoning enables precise control over expansive floor spaces for uniform comfort and efficiency. In outdoor commercial contexts, hydronic underfloor systems using looped tubing are employed for snow melting in driveways and walkways, circulating heated fluid to prevent ice buildup and reduce maintenance needs in cold climates. Adaptations of underfloor heating include low-temperature hydronic systems designed for passive houses, which operate at reduced water temperatures (around 30-35°C) to match the low heating demands of highly insulated structures, improving overall energy performance. Hybrid systems combine underfloor heating with cooling via in-floor chilled beams, allowing seasonal switching between warm water for heating and chilled water for cooling in the same piping network, suitable for buildings requiring year-round climate control. Market trends indicate robust growth in residential underfloor heating installations across the , with the overall market expanding from US$1.56 billion in 2022 to a projected US$2.91 billion by 2030 at a CAGR of 8.1%, driven by energy efficiency regulations and demand for sustainable home heating solutions. This growth reflects a broader shift toward and retrofit options in residential applications from 2020 onward.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Underfloor heating systems involve significant upfront installation costs, which vary by type and . Hydronic systems, which circulate hot water through tubing embedded in the floor, typically range from $6 to $22 per , including materials, labor, and integration with a or heat source. Electric systems, using heating cables or mats, generally cost $8 to $15 per for similar components. These figures exclude materials and can increase in remote areas or complex retrofits due to labor and site preparation needs. Operating costs for underfloor heating are often 20-40% lower than traditional radiator systems, primarily due to higher in distribution at lower temperatures (around 35-45°C for hydronic versus 70°C for s). This results from reduced energy loss and the system's ability to maintain even temperatures without drafts or over-heating zones. Electric variants may incur higher bills in regions with elevated rates, but hydronic setups paired with efficient boilers can achieve substantial annual savings of hundreds of dollars per . The primary benefits include a of 5-10 years, accelerated by incentives such as tax credits for qualifying efficient heating installations. Lifecycle costs, evaluated through (TCO) models, favor underfloor heating over time, with initial investments offset by reduced operational and replacement needs. Regional variations significantly influence economics; in cold climates like northern U.S. states or , greater heating demands amplify savings, potentially shortening payback to under 7 years, while milder areas may extend it beyond 10 years. Subsidies for integrating underfloor heating with renewables, such as solar thermal or heat pumps, further enhance viability in supported regions. Compared to systems, underfloor heating proves cheaper long-term due to elimination of duct losses (up to 30% of in air systems) and improved . This edge grows with renewable pairings, lowering TCO through sustained lower utility bills.

Global Case Studies

One notable implementation of underfloor heating is found in the in , Washington, USA, completed in 2013. This six-story office building employs a geothermal hydronic radiant , where tubing embedded in slabs circulates warmed sourced from ground loops to provide even heating throughout the . The contributes to the building's net-zero status by minimizing heat loss and integrating with on-site renewables, achieving annual use well below conventional office buildings. In Asia, the in , , opened in 2011, showcases advanced combined with radiant cooling elements in its 71-story design. The system uses raised floors to deliver conditioned air and radiant surfaces for , paired with wind turbines and solar panels to offset energy demands. This integration has enabled energy savings of approximately 30% compared to standard high-rises in the region, emphasizing resilience in a subtropical climate. Europe provides examples like the in , inaugurated in 2005. The venue features a hydronic underfloor heating and cooling system in its expansive foyer, utilizing reversible pipes to switch between modes for year-round comfort in a large seating over 1,700. Installed by Uponor in with engineers Rambøll, the system maintains precise temperatures without drafts, supporting the building's low-energy profile through efficient water-based distribution. Another European case is the in , , completed in 2007. This exhibition and delivery center incorporates hydronic underfloor heating across its vast 180,000 square meter footprint to ensure uniform warmth in high-traffic areas. The system enhances occupant comfort while aligning with the facility's , reducing reliance on traditional radiators and contributing to overall operational efficiency. In , the Manitoba Hydro Place in , , opened in 2013, utilizes geothermal radiant floor heating connected to 400-foot-deep boreholes for heat exchange. This 18-story headquarters achieves Platinum certification, with the underfloor system delivering 70% greater than typical towers through low-temperature operation and integration with a dedicated outdoor air system. Recent post-2020 developments highlight underfloor heating in sustainable urban projects. These global implementations reveal key lessons on scalability, including challenges in for uniform distribution across expansive floors, which requires precise controls to avoid hotspots in high-rises. Initial installation costs can be 20-30% higher than conventional systems, though long-term maintenance is simplified due to fewer visible components. savings typically range from 20-50% over traditional forced-air heating, driven by radiant and lower operating temperatures, as demonstrated in monitored cases like the and .

References

  1. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/radiant-heating
  2. https://www.ashrae.org/about/mission-and-vision/ashrae-industry-history/air-conditioning-and-refrigeration-timeline
  3. https://www.pmmag.com/articles/91874-a-brief-history-of-radiant-heating
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/underfloor-heating
  5. https://midatlanticmasonryheat.com/mid-atlantic-masonry-heat-blog/principles-of-radiant-home-heating
  6. https://euroheat.com.au/understanding-the-stefan-boltzmann-constant-for-radiant-heat-transfer/
  7. https://www.warmup.com/blog/what-is-the-best-flooring-for-underfloor-heating
  8. https://lifemechanical.ca/underfloor-heating-everything-you-need-to-know/
  9. https://www.warmup.co.uk/blog/the-benefits-of-multi-zone-underfloor-heating
  10. https://www.warmup.com/blog/electric-vs-hydronic-radiant-floor-heating
  11. https://www.accio.com/plp/hydronic_underfloor_tubing
  12. https://www.pexheat.com/blog/pexheat-blog-1/pex-tubing-21
  13. https://res.kan-therm.com/kan/upload/underfloor-heating-technical.pdf
  14. https://www.underfloorheating-uk.co.uk/Cache/Downloads/Devimat-deviflex-installation-guide.pdf
  15. https://warmshield.ca/2024/09/25/hybrid-radiant-floor-heating-systems/
  16. https://www.radiantwayinc.com/
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293488137_Part_1_History_of_Radiant_Heating_Cooling_Systems
  18. https://depts.washington.edu/hrome/Authors/kjw2/BathsBathinginAncientRome/pub_zbarticle_view_printable.html
  19. https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2017/03/heat-storage-hypocausts-air-heating-in-the-middle-ages/
  20. https://dbdh.org/district-heating-history/
  21. https://www.thermogroup.com.au/the-history-of-underfloor-heating/
  22. https://www.jlconline.com/how-to/hvac/hydronic-heating-for-low-load-houses_o
  23. https://ufhs.co.uk/news/item/how-ai-is-transforming-underfloor-heating-the-future-of-smart-heating
  24. https://www.fastwarm.com/blogs/can-underfloor-heating-run-on-solar-energy
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544223029869
  26. https://underfloorheating.info/european-ufh-market-growth-analysis/
  27. https://www.rehau.com/downloads/497804/radiantheatingsystemsdesignguide-855601-rehau.pdf
  28. https://www.iieta.org/download/file/fid/168798
  29. https://www.h2xengineering.com/blogs/underfloor-heating-design-guide-radiant/
  30. https://www.tec-science.com/mechanics/gases-and-liquids/hagen-poiseuille-equation-for-pipe-flows-with-friction/
  31. https://www.radiantmadesimple.com/post/best-water-temperature-for-radiant-floor-heating
  32. https://hughydronics.com/blogs/news/a-glycol-primer-and-faq
  33. https://www.radiantcompany.com/system/opensystem/
  34. https://www.radiantec.com/about-radiant-heating/open-direct-system/
  35. https://www.scottprecisionwire.com/electric-underfloor-heating-loose-wire-explained/
  36. https://www.justradiators.co.uk/advice-centre/underfloor-heating-explained/
  37. https://online2.ogs.ny.gov/dnc/masterspec24/docs/Division23HeatingVentilatingAndAirConditioning/238313.0RadiantHeatingElectricCables.docx
  38. https://old.ntinow.edu/browse/vtAbnU/2S9046/easy_heat__floor_thermostat__manual.pdf
  39. https://www.electrical4u.com/joules-law/
  40. https://www.warmzone.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Mat-Cable-Installation-Manual-2019.pdf
  41. https://theheatingpartnership.co.uk/blogs/news/common-mistakes-when-installing-electric-underfloor-heating
  42. https://www.warmup.com/blog/guide-to-underfloor-heating-heat-output
  43. https://www.fenixgroup.cz/en/faq/frequently-asked-questions-ecofloor
  44. https://www.warmzone.com/floor-heating/floorheat/
  45. https://www.amazon.com/Meters-Self-regulating-Heating-Voltage-Protection/dp/B09836FM54
  46. https://www.warmup.com/blog/self-regulating-heat-tape
  47. https://tradeunderfloor.co.uk/electric-vs-water-based-heating-expert-guide-to-choosing-the-best-underfloor-heating-for-your-home/
  48. https://gtdsupply.com/blogs/articles/electric-vs-hydronic-underfloor-heating
  49. https://www.familyhandyman.com/article/electric-vs-hydronic-radiant-floor-heating-systems/
  50. https://www.thermosphere.com/blog/water-underfloor-heating-vs-electric-underfloor-heating
  51. https://weloveheatpumps.com/heat-pump-underfloor-heating/
  52. https://odr.chalmers.se/bitstreams/e1839c98-8389-41c9-a51c-6b513694338a/download
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360132319301337
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778818323557
  55. https://www.warmlyyours.com/en-US/posts/Your-Cheat-Sheet-for-Radiant-Heat-vs-Forced-Air-1099
  56. https://louisvillehvacpros.com/radiant-floor-vs-forced-air-heating-system-comparison-efficiency/
  57. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/7/2096
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-temperature-distribution-in-the-depth-of-30-cm-under-the-ground-when-pipe-spacing-is_fig1_320060718
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8838762/
  60. https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/question/is-there-such-a-thing-as-too-much-under-slab-insulation
  61. https://www.itap.it/wp-content/uploads/Sizing_EN.pdf
  62. https://www.heatmerchants.ie/media/documents/HMUnderFloorHeatingTechnicalGuide.pdf
  63. https://www.underfloorheatingsystems.co.uk/news/underfloor-heating-temperatures-2/
  64. https://journals.ku.edu.np/kuset/article/download/521/376/957
  65. https://www.daikin.eu/en_us/daikin-blog/8-misconceptions-underfloor-heating.html
  66. https://www.iso.org/standard/39155.html
  67. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1420
  68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14635817/
  69. https://dampsolving.com/does-heating-help-with-damp/
  70. https://us.thermosoft.com/blog/myths-of-radiant-floor-heating
  71. https://www.thefloorheatingwarehouse.co.uk/the-impact-of-underfloor-heating-on-indoor-air-quality/
  72. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/06/e3sconf_reee2018_03007.pdf
  73. https://cbe.berkeley.edu/centerline/nine-radiant-buildings-demonstrate-energy-efficiency-and-occupant-satisfaction/
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8547689/
  75. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/buildings/heating
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778824009149
  77. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/heat-pump-systems
  78. https://www.fastwarm.com/blogs/what-are-the-differences-between-underfloor-heating-systems
  79. https://origin-gph.com/how-long-does-underfloor-heating-take-to-warm-up/
  80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778821008562
  81. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/8/2068
  82. https://www.silcoplumbing.com/how-to-maximize-comfort-and-efficiency-with-radiant-floor-heating/
  83. https://global.purmo.com/en/the-indoors/energy-saving/boosting-energy-efficiency-how-low-temperature-heating-can-help-save-up-to-30-per-cent-energy
  84. https://nordictec-store.com/blog/post/power-consumption-heat-pump-costs
  85. https://dasinya.dpu.edu.krd/index.php/pub/article/download/5/3/175
  86. https://www.theunderfloorheatingstore.com/pages/underfloor-heating-temperature-guide
  87. https://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:110:0::::FSP_PROJECT,FSP_ORG_ID:34650,6180&cs=1F8B0E4A5E4A5E4A5E4A5E4A5E4A5E4A
  88. https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/85017
  89. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/en/sd-web/oVd7pX0ecj6k/Fact%2520sheet%2520electric%2520floor%2520heating%2520systems.pdf
  90. https://gaia.co.uk/underfloor-heating-in-schools-and-colleges/
  91. https://sunsolarelectrical.ca/blog/how-long-does-radiant-in-floor-heating-last/
  92. https://www.thisoldhouse.com/heating-cooling/23495573/all-about-radiant-floor-heating
  93. https://heatinghelp.com/systems-help-center/oxygen-diffusion-corrosion-in-radiant-heating-systems/
  94. https://www.theunderfloorheatingstore.com/pages/underfloor-heating-maintenance
  95. https://www.warmup.com/blog/conducting-heat-loss-calculations
  96. https://www.uponor.com/en-gb/specification/bim-platform
  97. https://www.theunderfloorheatingstore.com/pages/how-to-measure-up-underfloor-heating
  98. https://hughydronics.com/blogs/news/best-tips-for-zoning-your-hydronic-home
  99. https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/products/water-based-surface-embedded-heating-and-cooling-systems-dimensioning-1
  100. https://www.ashrae.org/file%2520library/technical%2520resources/standards%2520and%2520guidelines/standards%2520addenda/90_1_2022_r_20240531.pdf
  101. https://designbuilder.co.uk/helpv8.0/Content/EditingHeatedFloor.htm
  102. https://www.radiatoroutlet.co.uk/blog/using-underfloor-heating-alongside-radiators
  103. https://www.wundagroup.com/journal/2022/05/11/can-underfloor-heating-replace-radiators/
  104. https://www.beama.org.uk/static/cf84f209-83ae-47a4-9dc444a2c382a0ab/BEAMA-Underfloor-guide-Choosing-your-floor-covering-to-maximise-your-underfloor-heating-efficiency.pdf
  105. https://www.phrc.psu.edu/assets/docs/Webinars/Radiantfloorhandouts.pdf
  106. https://www.tarmac.com/wp-content/plugins/tarmac.com/components/downloads/file-download.php?download_id=6824
  107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031015
  108. https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/11/f5/insulation_guide.pdf
  109. https://www.wagnermeters.com/concrete-moisture-test/concrete-info/getting-the-vapors/
  110. https://tradeunderfloor.co.uk/underfloor-heating-costs-in-new-builds/
  111. https://eu.schluter.com/en-DE/retrofitting-a-floor-heating-system-in-an-older-property-7239.html
  112. https://www.fastwarm.com/blogs/underfloor-heating-in-period--heritage-homes-whats-possible-without-compromising-character
  113. https://www.radiant-floor-heating.com/galleries/pdfs/Heated-floors-and-carpet-report.pdf
  114. https://www.jaye-heater.com/info/how-does-capillary-thermostat-work-for-underfl-102826956.html
  115. https://us.thermosoft.com/floor-heating/products/thermostats
  116. https://ojelectronics.com/floorheating/products/clock-thermostat-ocd4/
  117. https://www.andrianos.gr/en/news/articles-hvac/how-heating-control-algorithms-work-in-salus-controls-thermostats
  118. https://engocontrols.com/en/category/underfloor-heating/wireless-system-underfloor-heating/
  119. https://www.uponor.com/en-en/products/heating-and-cooling-solutions/uponor-smatrix-ai
  120. https://coolautomation.com/other-hvac-control-devices/underfloor-heating-controller/
  121. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3880
  122. https://www.warmboard.com/blog/hydronic-vs-electric-heating-which-is-better/
  123. https://www.greenwavedist.com/blog/underfloor-heating/can-radiant-floor-heating-replace-a-furnace/
  124. https://warmerinside.co.uk/underfloor-heating-tile-flooring
  125. https://www.lumberkingflooring.co.uk/blog/post/maximizing-heat-efficiency-how-engineered-wood-thickness-impacts-underfloor-heating
  126. https://www.centralheating.co.nz/assets/resources/Timber-Flooring-and-Underfloor-Hydronic-Heating.pdf
  127. https://www.flir.com/discover/instruments/energy-audit/flir-thermal-imaging-cameras-reveal-hidden-defects-in-floor-heating-systems/
  128. https://global.purmo.com/en/the-indoors/underfloor-heating/the-essential-role-of-underfloor-heating-manifolds-and-flow-meters-in-achieving-a-balanced-system
  129. https://www.myson.co.uk/blog-articles/2025/essential-role-of-UFH-manifolds-and-flow-meters
  130. https://www.nextlevelufhs.co.uk/blog/maximising-underfloor-heating-efficiency/
  131. https://www.rehva.eu/rehva-journal/chapter/iso-11855-the-international-standard-on-the-design-dimensioning-installation-and-control-of-embedded-radiant-heating-and-cooling-systems
  132. https://trade.centralheating.co.nz/assets/resources-v2/Underfloor-Heating-Annual-Maintenance-Guide.pdf
  133. https://www.warmup.com/wp-content/uploads/How-to-use-a-megger-Warmup.pdf
  134. https://wbiwarm.com/underfloor-heating-repair-guide-2/
  135. https://www.underfloorheatingtradesupplies.co.uk/blog/common-underfloor-heating-problems/
  136. https://www.britishconcretepolishing.co.uk/blog/guides/repairing-damaged-heating-pipes/
  137. https://www.warmup.com/warmupedia/questions/how-to-repair-a-damaged-mat-or-loose-wire-system
  138. https://damaninstallatie.nl/en/Elektra/What-warranty-can-you-expect-with-an-electric-underfloor-heating-installation/
  139. https://www.achrnews.com/articles/143829-the-dos-and-donts-of-hydronic-system-glycol
  140. https://www.thefloorheatingwarehouse.co.uk/how-to-maintain-your-underfloor-heating-system-for-longevity/
  141. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960148105002624
  142. https://cmec.wsu.edu/documents/2016/04/thermal-dynamics-of-radiant-floor-heating-with-wooden-flooring-systems.pdf
  143. https://www.astm.org/c0518-21.html
  144. https://www.hukseflux.com/products/heat-flux-sensors/heat-flux-sensors
  145. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352710216300419
  146. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/56ea8f1e-2996-4d10-9e58-d1da0842b9fa/en-1264-4-2001
  147. https://www.thefloorheatingwarehouse.co.uk/top-5-underfloor-heating-trends-for-uk-homes-in-2025/
  148. https://www.thermosphere.com/blog/best-underfloor-heating-for-bathrooms/
  149. https://www.channelheatsystems.co.uk/retrofit-underfloor-heating-the-complete-uk-guide-2025/
  150. https://www.allislandradiant.net/elevating-workspaces-the-ultimate-guide-to-commercial-radiant-floor-heating-systems
  151. https://www.warmzone.com/snow-melting/about-heated-driveways/
  152. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544225014677
  153. https://airfixture.com/products/ufad/perimeter-systems/in-floor-chilled-beams
  154. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/report/europe-underfloor-heating-market
  155. https://www.researchdive.com/238/underfloor-heating-market
  156. https://todayshomeowner.com/flooring/cost/radiant-floor-heating-cost/
  157. https://www.green-flare.com/post/underfloor-heating-initial-costs-vs-long-term-savings
  158. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Nov/IRENA_IEA_REN21_Policies_Heating_Cooling_2020.pdf
  159. https://www.warmup.com/blog/radiant-heat-vs-forced-air
  160. https://bullittcenter.org/building/building-features/warmth-from-below/
  161. https://global.ctbuh.org/resources/papers/download/1629-case-study-pearl-river-tower-guangzhou.pdf
  162. https://www.uponor.com/en-us/r/the-opera-house-in-copenhagen
  163. https://www.first-traceheating.co.uk/blog/top-5-buildings-with-ufh
  164. https://cbe.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/CaseStudy-Bullit.pdf
  165. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X21002574
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.