Hubbry Logo
List of premodern combat weaponsList of premodern combat weaponsMain
Open search
List of premodern combat weapons
Community hub
List of premodern combat weapons
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
List of premodern combat weapons
List of premodern combat weapons
List of premodern combat weapons
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

This is a list of notable types of weapons that were used in warfare, and more broadly in combat, prior to the advent of the early modern period, i.e., approximately prior to the start of the 16th century. It therefore excludes objects that may be broadly understood as weapons but are not combat weapons, such as ceremonial weapons and ritual tools shaped or conceptualized as weapons, hunting weapons, and other items that may be perceived as weapons but for which there is no historical evidence of their use in combat during the relevant period.

The entries are grouped according to their uses, with similar weapons categorized together. Some weapons may fit more than one category (e.g. the spear may be used either as a polearm or as a projectile), and the earliest gunpowder weapons that fill within this period are also included.

Hand-to-hand combat

[edit]

Hand or fist weapons and fans

[edit]

Single-handed weapons not resembling a straight dagger blade, usually wielded without wrist action; often protects the forearm.

Edged and bladed weapons

[edit]
Main article: Edged and bladed weapons

Thrusting and cutting weapons for melee combat. Col. D.H. Gordon's classification has been used where applicable.[2][3]

Swords

[edit]
For broader coverage of this topic, see Lists of swords.
See also: Types of swords and Classification of swords
Curved one-handed
[edit]
Straight one-handed
[edit]
Curved two-handed
[edit]
Hand-and-a-half and two-handed greatswords
[edit]
Shortswords
[edit]

Delineated as 20-28 inches/51–71 cm total length.[2]

Curved shortswords include the following:

Straight shortswords include the following:

Axe-like
[edit]

Generally, convex blades used for heavy chopping or slashing.

Other
[edit]

Fighting knives and daggers

[edit]
Main articles: Fighting knife and Knife
Further information: List of daggers
Sickles and sickle like knives
[edit]

Generally short, concave blades used for heavy cutting.

  • Arit (Maduresian, Indonesian)
  • Karambit, kerambit, korambit (Minangkabauian, Indonesian)
  • Kujang (Sundanese, Indonesian)
  • Kukri (Indian)
  • Mandau (Malaysian, Indonesian, Bornean, Bruneian)
  • Pichangatti[1] (Indian)
  • Punyal (Philippinese, Southeast Asian)
  • Sickle (Improvised, worldwide)
  • Sudanese sickle knife[1] (African)

Picks and pickaxes

[edit]

Axes

[edit]
Main article: Axe

Truncheons and blunt weapons

[edit]

Usually wielded with one or two hands at close quarters with striking motions, although some sharp-pointed truncheons like the sai were more often used for stabbing.

Polearms and spears

[edit]
Main articles: Polearm and Spear

Wielded mainly with two hands. Primarily for hand-to-hand combat with sweeping, thrusting, and or hooking motions.

Blunt staves

[edit]
See also: Stick-fighting

Spears

[edit]
Main article: List of types of spears

Polearms with axe-like blades

[edit]

Polearms with spikes and hammers

[edit]

Flexible weapons

[edit]

Whips

[edit]
Main article: Whip § Weapons

Used for whipping.

Sectional and composite

[edit]

Having multiple handles or holdable sections.

Chains and ropes

[edit]
Main article: Chain weapon

Having a heavy object attached to a flexible chain or rope. Wielded by swinging, throwing, or projecting the end, as well as wrapping, striking, and blocking with the chain or rope, sometimes attached to another type of weapon.

Shields

[edit]
Main article: Shield

Used not only to block strikes and missiles but also swung outwardly (or in quick upward motions) to strike an opponent. Also used to rush an opponent (known as shield bashing). Some shields had spikes, sharp edges, or other offensive designs.

Thrown

[edit]

Throwing blades and darts

[edit]

Throwing spears

[edit]
Further information: List of types of spears § Normally thrown

All could be used as spears, but were designed and primarily used for throwing.

Throwing axes

[edit]
Main article: Throwing axe

Could also be used as axe weapons, but were specifically designed for throwing.

Throwing balls

[edit]
  • Bolas, ayllo, liwi, qilumitautit (Central American, South American, Arctic)
  • Slungshot not to be confused with a slingshot (Improvised, Worldwide)
  • Stone, rock (Improvised, Worldwide)

Throwing sticks

[edit]
Main article: Throwing stick
  • Boomerang (Australian, Worldwide)
  • Knobkierrie, knopkierie, knobkerry, also a blunt weapon (African)
  • Rungu (East African)
  • Stick, branch (Improvised, Worldwide)

Gunpowder-based

[edit]
See also: History of the firearm and Gunpowder § History
An illustration of an "eruptor", a proto cannon from the 14th century Ming Dynasty book Huolongjing. The cannon was capable of firing proto shells, cast iron bombs filled with gunpowder.

Slings

[edit]

Bows

[edit]
Main article: Bow and arrow

Longbows

[edit]
Main article: Longbows

Recurve bows

[edit]
Main article: Recurve bow

Short bows and reflex bows

[edit]
Main articles: Short bow and Reflex bow

Crossbows

[edit]
Main article: Crossbow

Blowguns

[edit]

Stationary, mounted, or wheeled ballistic devices

[edit]
Further information: List of siege engines

This section includes ballistic (missile-launching) siege engines and similar larger ballistic devices which were either stationary, mounted on moving objects such as carts or elephants, or wheeled.

Flamethrowers

[edit]
Main articles: Flamethrower § History, and Early thermal weapons

See also

[edit]

Swords

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

List of premodern combat weapons

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The list of premodern combat weapons encompasses the diverse array of arms and armaments employed in warfare, hunting, and personal defense from the prehistoric era through the end of the , roughly concluding around 1500 CE with the onset of the . These weapons, crafted from materials like stone, bronze, iron, and early steel, were designed for close-quarters combat, ranged attacks, and operations, reflecting technological innovations and cultural adaptations across global civilizations prior to the widespread dominance of gunpowder-based firearms. Key categories include hand-to-hand weapons such as clubs, maces, swords, and daggers, which emphasized direct physical confrontation; polearms like spears, pikes, and halberds, valued for their reach and versatility in formation fighting; and projectile weapons including slings, bows, crossbows, and thrown javelins or axes, enabling attacks from a distance to disrupt enemy lines. In medieval , for instance, the evolution from spears and axes to iron swords and chainmail-piercing maces paralleled shifts in armor and tactics, with relying on spears and swords as core armaments while favored lances and sabers. Similar developments occurred in other regions, such as the bronze weapons of ancient during the Shang and Zhou dynasties, where ritual and combat blades underscored social hierarchy and military prowess. This compilation highlights the historical significance of these weapons not only as tools of destruction but also as symbols of power, status, and innovation, influencing battles from the clashes in the to the knightly engagements of 15th-century . By examining their forms and uses, the list illustrates how premodern societies balanced offense, defense, and logistics in an age defined by melee and manual propulsion rather than industrialized firepower.

Hand-to-Hand Combat Weapons

Fist Weapons

Fist weapons encompass a variety of handheld devices designed to augment the natural striking power of the human fist, primarily through added weight, reinforcement, or protrusions, without extending beyond the hand itself. These implements, prevalent from antiquity through the medieval period, were employed across diverse cultures to enhance unarmed combat effectiveness, often integrating with grappling or punching techniques in martial traditions. Materials typically included leather for strapping and padding, metals such as iron or lead for impact, and occasionally bone for primitive reinforcements, allowing for concealability and direct force application. The ancient Roman cestus (or caestus), a precursor to modern , consisted of leather thongs wrapped around the fists and weighted with lead or iron plates to increase punching lethality. Worn by gladiators in the arena, it transformed bare-knuckle strikes into devastating blows capable of fracturing bones or causing internal injuries during hand-to-hand bouts. Variations appeared in Greek pugilism as early as the BCE, evolving into the more armored Roman form by the CE, where it emphasized raw power over finesse. In medieval , iron gauntlets served dual purposes as protective armor and offensive tools for punching, with reinforced knuckle sections enabling armored fighters to deliver concussive strikes against unarmored foes or to grapple in close quarters. Excavations at sites like the 14th-century Castle of Cucagna in have uncovered such "iron fists" (Hentzen), featuring articulated metal plates that allowed clenching for impactful blows while shielding the hand. These were particularly valued in judicial duels or skirmishes where swords were impractical. In , mehen (knuckle duster-like) devices were used in wrestling and combat to enhance strikes. Chinese tie quan (iron fists) represented weighted knuckle dusters from the , formed as paired metal guards slipped over the fingers to amplify punches in unarmed duels or as backups to polearms. Historical illustrations depict them as simple iron loops or plates, enhancing grip and impact for styles like those in martial arts. Similar devices appeared in Viking contexts as sap-like weighted leather gloves, though evidence remains sparse, suggesting informal adaptations for brawls. Historically, fist weapons found application in gladiatorial spectacles, where the prolonged brutal entertainments, and in street fighting across , from Roman taverns to Indian alleys, where their portability aided surprise attacks. These tools often complemented by focusing force on vital points, though their use declined with advancing armor and firearms.

Edged Weapons

Edged weapons encompass a diverse array of cutting and piercing implements designed for , evolving from prehistoric stone and tools to sophisticated iron and blades by the period. These weapons prioritized slicing, thrusting, and hooking mechanics to inflict deep wounds or disable opponents, distinguishing them from blunt instruments that relied on impact force. Materials progressed from brittle in early civilizations, which limited blade length and durability, to stronger in the , and finally to high-carbon in medieval and , enabling longer, sharper edges resistant to bending during strikes. Swords represent the quintessential edged weapon, varying by region and era to suit tactical needs such as close-quarters thrusting or mounted slashing. The Roman gladius, a double-edged short sword measuring 24 to 30 inches, was optimized for stabbing in tight legionary formations from the 3rd century BCE onward. In contrast, the Japanese katana, emerging during the Heian period (794–1185 CE), featured a curved, single-edged blade forged through differential hardening for exceptional sharpness and flexibility, serving as both a battlefield tool and a samurai status symbol. Middle Eastern variants like the Persian shamshir, a curved saber that evolved between the 9th and 12th centuries and gained popularity around the 16th century, facilitated powerful cavalry cuts with its pronounced arc. European longswords, such as the arming sword of the 13th–15th centuries, balanced one- or two-handed use with straight blades up to 35 inches long, often paired with shields for defensive versatility in infantry clashes. Celtic longswords of the La Tène style (5th–1st century BCE) exemplified early iron advancements, with broad, leaf-shaped blades exceeding 2 feet in length designed for sweeping slashes in tribal warfare across Europe. Daggers and knives served as compact backups for close-range stabbing, often penetrating armor gaps or finishing wounded foes. The medieval European baselard, popular from the , featured a straight, double-edged blade about 10–12 inches long with a distinctive H-shaped hilt, favored by civilians and soldiers alike for its simplicity. The rondel dagger, widespread in Europe, had a slender, triangular blade up to 12 inches for thrusting through plate armor joints, secured by circular guards that prevented slipping. In , the kris dagger, dating to at least the 13th century, boasted a wavy blade symbolizing spiritual power and serpentine motifs, used for both ritual ceremonies and poisoned close combat strikes. The Anglo-Saxon seax, a single-edged knife from the 5th–11th centuries, ranged from 4 to 24 inches and symbolized freemanship when worn on the belt, functioning as a utility tool and sidearm. Axes provided versatile chopping power, with designs adapting to one- or two-handed grips for or use. Battle axes, such as the Viking of the 8th–11th centuries, incorporated a hooked lower blade edge for catching and pulling shields or limbs, enhancing control in chaotic melees. The Frankish francisca, a one-handed axe from the (4th–8th centuries), featured a thin, curved head for both chopping and penetration, though its primary role shifted from throwing to melee in later adaptations. Native American tomahawks with stone heads from prehistoric times served as lightweight, one-handed weapons for swift overhead strikes in woodland combat. Picks and war picks emerged in the late medieval period to counter plate armor, emphasizing penetration over slashing. The footman's pick, a one-handed tool from 14th–16th century , had a narrow, pyramidal spike for punching through helmets and breastplates, often paired with a head for versatility. The , designed for mounted knights in the , featured a longer shaft and reinforced spike to target unarmored gaps from horseback, with Italian guerra variants omitting the hammer for a pure piercing focus. In , the tanto—a short under 12 inches—blended combat utility with ritual importance from the , its straight blade aiding in or as a concealed backup weapon.

Blunt Weapons

Blunt weapons, also known as impact or concussion weapons, encompass a diverse array of rigid implements designed primarily for delivering crushing blows rather than cutting or piercing, making them effective for smashing bones, causing internal trauma, and deforming armor without requiring penetration. These weapons were employed by and across various cultures from antiquity through the medieval period, often as secondary arms when edged weapons proved less effective against protected foes. Their simplicity and versatility allowed widespread adoption, evolving from basic wooden tools to sophisticated metal constructs optimized for battlefield and force transfer. The historical evolution of blunt weapons traces back to prehistoric times, with wooden clubs representing one of humanity's earliest combat tools, as evidenced by archaeological finds from Neolithic sites where fire-hardened sticks served as basic striking implements for hunting and interpersonal violence. By the ancient period, these evolved into more specialized forms; for instance, in ancient Rome, non-projectile clubs known as clavae were used by auxiliaries and in close-quarters skirmishes against heavily armored cavalry like the Sassanid clibanarii, where their concussive impact disrupted formations without the need for thrusting. In the medieval era, advancements in metallurgy led to steel-headed maces, which superseded wooden variants for greater durability and penetration against plate armor, as seen in the transition from simple Neolithic clubs to flanged designs by the 13th century in Europe. Clubs and maces formed the core of blunt weaponry, ranging from plain wooden shafts to spiked or flanged metal heads tailored for armor penetration. The morning star mace, characterized by a spherical head studded with iron spikes, emerged in medieval around the as an , particularly effective in battles like the Golden Spurs in 1302, where Flemish guildsmen wielded thick-shafted versions to batter French knights. In , the gada—a bulbous-headed mallet often made of wood or iron—served both as a tool and training implement in gada-yuddha , with its weighted design promoting swings that generated high momentum for crushing strikes, as described in ancient epics like the . The Persian gurz, or bull-headed mace, originated in Achaemenid times from the vazra (meaning "club"), featuring a heavy spherical or ox-shaped head on a wooden shaft, used by cavalry for smashing through helmets and shields while symbolizing divine power in Zoroastrian iconography. Similarly, the Maori , a short-handled club of wood, stone (onewa), or whalebone with a flat, sharpened striking edge, was a primary hand-to-hand for close combat, delivering precise blows to subdue opponents in traditional warfare. Truncheons and batons represented lighter, often concealable variants of blunt weapons, emphasizing speed and targeted impacts over raw power. Lead-weighted cudgels, common in ancient and medieval , incorporated molten lead in the striking end to increase momentum without adding length, allowing for quick, debilitating strikes to joints or the head in urban skirmishes or as improvised arms. In , the tie bian (iron whip club), a rigid bar-mace of forged iron dating to the and Ming dynasties, featured a tapered shaft for better balance and reach compared to traditional maces, enabling users to bypass shields and deliver focused concussions against armored . Medieval European nightsticks, essentially short wooden or lead-reinforced batons, were carried by town guards for non-lethal control but adapted for combat to stun rather than kill in crowded melees. War hammers emerged as specialized blunt weapons in 13th- and 14th-century , designed specifically to counter the rise of plate armor by concentrating force on a flat or peen-faced head for denting metal and transmitting shockwaves to the wearer. One-handed variants, often without piercing picks to maintain pure impact focus, featured a face opposite a simple pommel, weighing around 1-2 kg to optimize swing velocity for use against mounted knights. These hammers allowed strikes that deformed breastplates or helmets, causing concussions or broken limbs beneath, as their short shafts (typically 50-60 cm) facilitated rapid, overhead blows in tight formations. Tactically, blunt weapons excelled against armored opponents by leveraging —typically with 60-80% of mass at the head—to maximize transfer, often deforming plate or chainmail to restrict movement and induce blunt force trauma like rib fractures or cerebral injuries. In roles, such as with the Persian gurz, riders swung from horseback to exploit for devastating impacts on shields, while favored maces and hammers for half-swording techniques that wedged weapons into armor gaps post-concussion. This reliance on over precision made them indispensable in premodern , where a single well-placed strike could incapacitate a fully protected foe.

Flexible Weapons

Flexible weapons encompass a category of premodern implements that leverage chains, cords, ropes, or segmented links to generate , unpredictability, and reach in strikes, distinguishing them from rigid hand-to-hand arms. These weapons appeared across Eurasian martial traditions, particularly in , Okinawa, and medieval , where their whipping or swinging motion allowed for rapid, wrapping attacks effective against armored or shielded opponents prior to 1700. Their design emphasized control and training to harness the inherent risks of entanglement or recoil, often adapting from agricultural or punitive tools into roles. Whips and scourges, constructed from thongs, knotted cords, or metal-linked lashes attached to handles, served as lashing weapons for inflicting lacerating blows in close-quarters combat. The Chinese bian, a flexible typically 3 to 5 meters long with a metal dart tip, was employed in like those documented in (1368–1644) treatises for sweeping strikes and disarming foes. The Russian , a braided with a hardened rawhide thong often weighted at the end, was used in from medieval times for flogging strikes in mounted combat, capable of tearing flesh through light armor due to its rigidity and velocity. Sectional weapons consist of multiple rigid segments connected by short chains or cords, enabling folding for concealment and unfolding for swift, multi-directional assaults. The , comprising two wooden batons linked by a cord or chain, emerged in 15th-century Okinawa as a farmer's tool repurposed for resistance against , allowing rapid spins and strikes to target joints or weapons in unarmed or armed duels. Similarly, the Chinese sanjiegun or three-sectional staff—three hardwood rods joined by metal rings and chains, dating to the (960–1279)—facilitated whipping motions and blocks, with its collapsible design suiting close combat in confined spaces like . Chain weapons feature a weighted head on a flexible linkage, exploiting for powerful impacts. The European flail, a short connected by a to a spiked iron ball or mace head, appeared in 14th-century illustrations of revolts and knightly armories, valued for its ability to generate high-velocity swings against lines, though archaeological evidence remains limited to a few 15th-century Eastern European examples. In , the liu xing chui or —a metal ball on a long rope or , recorded in (206 BCE–220 CE) texts and refined by the Ming era—permitted ranged whipping or retrieval techniques, often wielded in pairs for offense and defense. Rope and cord weapons utilized weighted cords for entanglement or blunt force, focusing on non-bladed variants in premodern contexts. Precursors to the bola, such as simple weighted ropes employed by South American indigenous groups from pre-Columbian times (ca. 1000 BCE), involved handheld swinging to limbs or trip adversaries in skirmishes, adapting later European cords for similar restraining tactics. In combat, flexible weapons excelled at entangling enemy limbs or weapons to disrupt balance, as seen in Chinese martial manuals where chain whips could snare shafts, and at bypassing shields by wrapping around edges to strike exposed areas, a tactic noted in European flail depictions against pikemen formations. Training emphasized precision to avoid self-injury, often integrating these arms with rigid tools for hybrid engagements.

Shields

Shields served as essential defensive tools in premodern combat, providing protection against and attacks while sometimes incorporating offensive elements like spiked bosses. Evolving from simple prehistoric hides stretched over frames, they developed into specialized designs tailored to tactical needs across cultures, from individual dueling to massed formations. Round shields were among the earliest and most widespread types, prized for their balance of mobility and coverage. The Celtic caetra, used by Iberian warriors such as the from the 3rd century BCE, was a small, concave approximately 50-60 cm in diameter, constructed from layered wood or with a central iron umbo for reinforcement and deflection. like the caetrati employed it alongside javelins and swords for skirmishing, allowing agile maneuvers in open terrain. Similarly, Viking s from the 8th to 11th centuries featured a wooden plank construction laminated with glue, covered in or , and centered by an iron umbo that could be spiked for bashing opponents. These shields, typically 80-90 cm across, were integral to shield-wall formations in Norse warfare, where interlocking edges created a defensive barrier during raids and battles. Bucklers represented a compact for close-quarters combat, particularly in the late medieval and periods from the 13th to 16th centuries. This small, round metal , no larger than 45 cm in diameter, was center-gripped for rapid parrying and binding of enemy blades, often made from hammered with rolled edges for durability and a central boss. European fencers paired it with rapiers or sideswords in civilian duels and urban skirmishes, emphasizing speed over broad protection. Larger shields like kite and tower designs addressed vulnerabilities in mounted or roles. The Norman kite shield, prevalent in 11th-century , was a teardrop-shaped wooden board about 90 cm long, leather-faced for weather resistance, and strapped to the left arm to shield the rider's body and legs during charges. In contrast, the Roman served as a tower shield for legionaries from the 1st century BCE to the 3rd century CE, a semi-cylindrical rectangle roughly 120 cm by 60 cm, built from layered wood glued and bound with rawhide, featuring a metal umbo for thrusting. Roman tactics relied on the scutum in phalanx-like testudo formations, where overlapped shields formed an impenetrable wall against arrows and spears. Pavise and mantlet shields catered to ranged combatants in late medieval , from the 14th to 15th centuries. The was a tall, convex oblong (up to 150 cm high) made from a wooden core sheathed in or , often with a fold-down stand for propping; crossbowmen used it as portable cover during sieges and open battles, sometimes painted with . Mantlets functioned similarly as wheeled or freestanding barriers, constructed from reinforced and hide to archers or crossbowmen from return fire, though smaller variants doubled as body shields for foot soldiers. Across regions, materials emphasized availability and resilience: laminated wood cores for strength, animal hide or facings for flexibility and , and metal bosses or rims for added offense, as seen in the Viking umbo's potential for jabbing. Tactically, shields enabled formation fighting in Greek hoplite phalanxes or Roman legions, while individual use prevailed in Celtic skirmishes or duels; African variants, such as shields used by various tribes in pre-colonial times, were elongated ovals of stretched hide over wooden frames, used in close melee to deflect thrusts during tribal conflicts. These regional adaptations underscored shields' role in balancing defense with cultural warfare styles.

Pole Weapons

Spears

Spears were fundamental thrusting weapons in premodern combat, consisting of a long shaft topped with a pointed metal or wooden tip designed for piercing armor or flesh, and employed globally from the era through early modern periods in formations and individual duels. Originating as implements, they evolved into specialized military tools for maintaining distance in , with lengths varying by region and tactic to suit one-handed or two-handed use. Some designs allowed adaptation for throwing, though most emphasized close-quarters stabbing over ranged delivery. Short spears, typically wielded one-handed alongside a , prioritized thrusting in dense formations. The Greek dory, measuring 2.3 to 2.8 meters with a leaf-shaped iron head and weighing 1 to 2 kilograms, enabled simultaneous engagement across ranks for effective stabbing. Similarly, the early Roman hasta, an 8-foot (about 2.5-meter) thrusting spear, served as the primary weapon for legionaries before the pilum's dominance, focusing on penetration in hand-to-hand clashes rather than projection. Longer spears extended reach for tactics and anti-cavalry roles, often requiring two hands. The Macedonian sarissa, introduced by Philip II around 359–336 BCE and spanning 4 to 6 meters, allowed pezhetairoi infantrymen to project a wall of points up to 20 feet deep, deterring charges in the syntagma formation. In 15th-century , Swiss pikes of 4.5 to 6.5 meters formed impenetrable squares, countering mounted knights by bracing shafts against the ground to absorb impacts. Regional variations highlighted cultural adaptations. The African , a spear used by Nguni peoples of about 1.5 to 2 meters with a slender iron or wooden head, served in and skirmishes for ranged attacks before close combat. The Maori , a 1.5-meter wooden staff with a carved, pointed tip resembling a , facilitated agile thrusts and parries in duels or skirmishes, prized for its balance in mau rākau . In , the qiang encompassed versatile forms from 2 to 4 meters, with red-tasseled iron heads for or use, earning its title as the "king of weapons" for fluid stabbing and sweeping motions in wushu traditions. Spear construction typically involved a straight wooden shaft of or cornel wood, 2 to 3 centimeters in diameter, fitted with a or iron head via socket (a hollow base sliding over the shaft tip) or tang (a protruding spike wedged into a slit and bound with sinew or ). Socketed designs dominated later periods for stability, while tanged heads appeared in earlier examples; many included a bronze butt spike (sauroter) opposite the point for planting in during defensive stands or as a secondary . Over millennia, transitioned from hunting javelins to sophisticated anti-cavalry tools, with extended lengths and butt spikes enabling phalanxes to repel charges by creating bristling barriers that impaled attackers. This evolution peaked in Hellenistic and infantry doctrines, where massed spear walls dictated battlefield control until firearms supplanted them.

Staves

Staves are blunt-ended pole weapons primarily designed for striking, blocking, and parrying in , valued for their simplicity, reach, and versatility in both and formations from ancient times through the premodern era. Typically constructed from sturdy woods like , , or , these weapons allow users to deliver powerful blows using leverage along the full length of the staff, making them effective against armored or unarmored opponents without requiring advanced . Their non-lethal potential also suited them for and non-fatal confrontations, though some designs incorporated iron-shod ends for added impact. The , a prominent English example, consists of a stout or pole measuring 6 to 9 feet in length and 1.25 to 1.5 inches in thickness, optimized for duels and through superior leverage and speed. In English traditions, it served as a foot weapon for both offensive strikes and defensive maneuvers, often wielded by common folk due to its ease of from local timber. Similarly, the bo staff from Okinawa, typically 6 feet long and made of or dense wood, forms a cornerstone of kobudo and , evolving from everyday tools like walking sticks into a refined implement by the . Regional variants highlight the staff's adaptability across cultures. The Chinese gun, a long wooden staff recognized as one of the four major weapons alongside the , sword, and saber, emphasizes fluid, circular motions in wushu traditions and was a foundational tool in Shaolin Temple training. In , the lathi—a flexible staff—found use in like and as a implement by authorities, leveraging its length for sweeping attacks. Common techniques with staves include sweeping strikes to unbalance foes, overhead or lateral blocks to deflect blades, and disarming maneuvers that trap or twist an opponent's weapon, often exploiting the staff's dual ends for rapid transitions. Some designs featured weighted ends—such as lead caps or iron fittings—to increase momentum in strikes without compromising balance. Historically, staves were quintessential peasant weapons, accessible to those barred from bladed arms, as seen in English folklore where the quarterstaff features in Robin Hood tales as a symbol of yeoman resistance, and in Shaolin practices where monks honed discipline and defense through staff routines for centuries.

Blade Polearms

Blade polearms are long-shafted weapons featuring broad, edged blades designed primarily for slashing and hooking maneuvers, distinguishing them from thrusting-oriented spears through their emphasis on cutting power and versatility against armored foes or cavalry. These weapons proliferated in medieval Europe and Asia, where their extended reach allowed infantry to engage mounted warriors effectively, often combining axe-like chopping with spear-point thrusting and hook elements for dismounting riders. Their design evolved from earlier handheld axes, adapting the chopping blade to a pole for greater leverage and range. Halberds emerged in 14th-century as a response to heavily armored knights, featuring an axe blade topped by a spike for thrusting and an opposing hook for pulling riders from horses. Widely adopted by Swiss and Dutch through the , they served as versatile tools in pike formations, enabling slashing, stabbing, and grappling in close-quarters battle. The halberd's multi-functional head made it a staple for foot soldiers, symbolizing defensive prowess in European conflicts. Glaives, first documented in 13th-century , consist of a long, broad single-edged blade resembling a affixed to a pole, allowing for powerful sweeping cuts and thrusts. The related guisarme, prevalent from the 11th to 15th centuries across , incorporates a hooked extension alongside its blade, derived from agricultural tools like weeding irons, to trip or unhorse opponents. Both were favored by continental infantry for their simplicity and effectiveness in dismounted combat, with the guisarme's hook providing tactical advantages in unbalancing foes. The , a two-handed with a long, curved axe-like blade, originated in 14th-century and gained prominence in 16th-century among arquebusiers. Lacking the rear hook of a , it emphasized heavy chopping blows, often used to support firearms as a rest or in to cleave through armor. Its robust design suited Eastern European warfare, where it functioned as both offensive weapon and ceremonial guard tool into the . In , the appeared around 1000 AD, featuring a curved single-edged blade mounted on a wooden shaft, ideal for and in anti-cavalry roles during the medieval period up to 1600 AD. Warrior monks and noblewomen also wielded it for defense, leveraging its reach to sweep and slice against mounted or grouped enemies. The weapon's graceful arc enabled fluid, sweeping attacks, contributing to its enduring legacy in martial traditions like . Premodern blade polearms typically featured shafts of wood, valued for its strength and flexibility, measuring 5 to 7 feet in to optimize reach without sacrificing control. or iron heads were secured with langets—thin metal strips riveted along the shaft—to reinforce against impacts and prevent splitting during vigorous use. This construction balanced weight for two-handed wielding, ensuring durability in prolonged engagements.

Hammer Polearms

Hammer polearms were specialized weapons developed primarily in the late medieval period for anti-armor combat, featuring a long shaft topped with a crushing head, often paired with a piercing spike to exploit weaknesses in plate armor. These weapons extended the reach of handheld blunt instruments, allowing and knights to deliver concussive blows or punctures from a safe distance against mounted or heavily protected foes. Their design emphasized leverage and impact, with wooden or metal shafts typically measuring 6 to 8 feet in length to provide superior range over swords or maces. A common configuration included a flat or rounded hammer face for stunning blows against helmets, opposed by a peen spike or beak for penetrating armor joints or thinner plates. This dual-purpose head maximized versatility in close-quarters , where the hammer could dent or shatter defenses while the spike targeted vulnerabilities. Weights generally ranged from 5 to 8 pounds, balancing portability with destructive force suitable for prolonged engagements. The , originating in 14th-century and named for its "crow's beak" spike, exemplified this form as a pole-mounted optimized for piercing plate armor during the . English war hammer poles, often variants of the pollaxe, featured a hammer and spike head on extended shafts for dismounting or breaking formations, gaining prominence in 15th-century judicial duels and battles in and . These long-handled versions allowed wielders to hook and topple opponents from horseback, leveraging the weapon's length for tactical superiority.

Thrown Weapons

Throwing Blades

Throwing blades encompass a diverse array of edged weapons engineered for ranged projection, typically featuring compact, aerodynamic designs that prioritize spin and balance for effective flight. These implements, distinct from daggers due to their optimized hurling grips and trajectories, were employed across cultures for tactics, , or precision strikes in premodern warfare. Their use emphasized surprise and disruption rather than mass engagement, often integrating into broader arsenals of scouts, warriors, or specialized fighters. Historical evidence traces such weapons to prehistoric innovations, evolving through regional adaptations in materials like wood, stone, and metal. The , a circular ring with a sharpened outer edge, originated in ancient and was thrown horizontally like a discus to inflict slashing wounds at distance. First referenced in such as the , it measured approximately 12 to 30 centimeters in diameter and could be wielded singly or in multiples from a belt. By the , Sikh Akali warriors refined its use as a , launching it with wrist flicks to sever limbs or decapitate foes in close-quarters battles. Archaeological and artistic records, including 16th-century paintings of Hindu ascetics in combat, confirm its battlefield role across . In , the emerged as a concealed throwing blade, often in star-shaped (shaken) or straight-pin (bo) forms, crafted from iron or steel for and applications. Dating to at least the , early prototypes included stone variants unearthed in , evolving into metal designs by the (1603–1868) for distracting guards or targeting vulnerabilities. These palm-sized weapons, translating to "hidden hand blade," were spun for stability, penetrating light armor or causing bleeding at short ranges. Excavations of ninja-related sites have revealed production molds, underscoring their tactical integration in and . Throwing knives, linear blades balanced for end-over-end rotation, appeared in various forms across continents, serving as versatile ranged supplements to close-combat daggers. In , kul-style throwing knives from the Azande and related groups in the , forged from iron with broad, hooked blades up to 50 centimeters long, were hurled for and , their asymmetrical design aiding flight and impact. Australian Aboriginal blades, curved wooden or stone-tipped throwers with honed leading edges, functioned as non-returning edged projectiles in , predating European contact by millennia. Ethnographic studies and skeletal evidence from northwestern reveal peri-mortem trauma consistent with sharp-edged boomerang strikes, indicating their lethality in intertribal conflicts around 800 years ago. These implements, spanning 50 to 90 centimeters, were launched overhead to slice or club at 10 to 20 meters, their shape ensuring controlled descent. Forensic analysis of a 13th-century confirms such weapons inflicted deep lacerations akin to metal blades. Aerodynamics in throwing blades hinged on balanced mass distribution and rotational spin imparted by snap, stabilizing flight against wind and for effective ranges up to 20 meters. Chakrams and , with symmetric profiles, generated lift via disc-like or finned structures, while knives and boomerangs used for tumbling or paths. Historical manuals emphasize grip techniques—such as index-finger indexing for chakrams—to achieve precision, with penetration depths varying by but consistently targeting exposed flesh over armor.

Throwing Spears

Throwing spears, optimized for by hand or auxiliary devices, served as vital ranged weapons in premodern and warfare, enabling warriors and hunters to engage targets at distances unattainable with spears. These weapons typically featured lightweight shafts balanced for flight, often with pointed or barbed heads for penetration, and were employed globally from the era through . Their design prioritized velocity and accuracy over thrusting durability, distinguishing them from close-combat variants. In , the akontion (or ) was a slender, throwable used by such as peltasts, who hurled it overhand to harass heavier formations before closing in. To enhance range and spin, throwers employed the ankyle, a looped around the shaft and fingers, which imparted during release and could extend throws beyond 25 meters in trained hands. Archaeological recreations confirm effective combat ranges of 30-40 meters for such techniques, emphasizing the akontion's role in skirmishing tactics. The Roman pilum represented a specialized heavy , standard issue for from the onward, designed for short-range volleys immediately preceding . Its distinctive feature was a long, pyramidal iron head attached to a wooden shaft, engineered to bend or break upon shield impact, preventing reuse by enemies and encumbering their defenses. Typically 2-2.5 meters long and weighing 2-4 kilograms, the pilum achieved ranges of 20-30 meters when thrown overhand, as evidenced by legionary training manuals and battlefield finds. Prehistoric cultures worldwide utilized atlatl —elongated, flexible throwing spears propelled by a levered —to amplify force and distance in . These , often 1.5-2 meters in length with fletched tails for stabilization, date back over 30,000 years in and appeared in the by at least 10,000 BCE, as shown by a well-preserved example recovered from a Yellowstone ice patch. In and the U.S. Southwest, atlatls extended hand-thrown ranges to 50-100 meters, with the device's hook engaging the dart's base for an overhand whipping motion. Australian Aboriginal peoples employed the woomera, a curved wooden functioning similarly to an atlatl, to launch multi-pointed lances in and . Ethnographic accounts from the 19th-20th centuries describe spears of 2-3 meters hurled overhand with the woomera for distances up to 50 meters, leveraging the tool's leverage for greater velocity against kangaroos or foes. Archaeological evidence from sites like Mungo confirms this practice's antiquity, with skeletal wear indicating repetitive throwing motions over millennia. Among early medieval , the emerged as a barbed around the 5th-6th centuries CE, favored by for its ability to lodge in targets and cause severe wounds. Featuring a socketed iron head with multiple barbs on a 1.5-2 meter shaft, it was thrown overhand at 20-40 meter ranges to disrupt enemy lines, as noted in contemporary histories like those of . Common techniques across these cultures involved overhand throws, where the arm extended like a sling to generate speed, achieving typical combat ranges of 30-50 meters depending on weight and user strength. with feathers or leaves, as seen in and Mesoamerican darts, improved aerodynamic stability during flight, reducing wobble in some traditions. While some throwing spears could double as weapons in a pinch, their primary optimization was for ranged delivery.

Throwing Axes

Throwing axes, also known as hafted hatchets designed for hurling, were specialized premodern weapons optimized for short-range projection in combat, often employed by infantry to disrupt enemy formations before close-quarters engagement. These axes featured compact designs with balanced weight distribution to facilitate accurate throws, distinguishing them from heavier melee variants through their lighter construction and aerodynamic properties. Prominent in tactics among Germanic tribes, Romans, Native Americans, and Vikings, throwing axes emphasized embedding capability and spin-induced stability over penetration depth. The , a signature Merovingian axe used from the 5th to 8th centuries CE, exemplified early medieval design with its distinctive curved head that enhanced embedding in shields or flesh upon impact. This iron-headed weapon, wielded by Frankish warriors, had a narrow triangular blade narrowing to a backward-curving neck, allowing for effective rotation during flight. Historical accounts describe its deployment in volleys just prior to charges, with an optimal throwing distance of 10 to 15 meters to shatter enemy shields and sow disorder. The francisca's short haft, typically around 40-45 cm, contributed to its momentum, making it versatile for both ranged and subsequent hand-to-hand use. In Roman legions, the securis served as a multipurpose carried by soldiers for engineering tasks and occasional use from the 1st to 4th centuries CE, with rare adaptations for short-range throws in auxiliary or siege contexts. This single- or double-edged tool, often with a sharp blade on one side and a poll on the other, was compact, with hafts under 50 cm, enabling quick deployment alongside primary arms like the . Archaeological finds from Late Roman sites suggest it influenced subsequent throwing axes through its balanced , though it was not standardized for hurling. Native American tomahawk variants, prevalent in pre-colonial eras across North American indigenous cultures, included lightweight stone- or wood-headed axes suitable for throwing in warfare and hunting from at least the (c. 1000 BCE onward). These hand axes, often with hafts of 30-40 cm and broad, grooved heads for grip and balance, allowed one-handed throws to disable prey or enemies at close range, emphasizing agility over power. Ethnographic and archaeological evidence indicates their use among tribes like the Algonquian and for tactical skirmishes, where the light weight (under 1 kg) facilitated rapid retrieval and reuse. Unlike European models, pre-colonial tomahawks integrated ceremonial elements, such as pipe bowls in some designs, but retained combat efficacy through weighted heads promoting stable spin. Viking lighter axe variants, including adaptations of the Danish axe during the 8th to 11th centuries CE, were occasionally employed for ranged throws in Scandinavian and Anglo-Saxon battles, though primarily as hand weapons. These compact versions featured thin, broad blades on short hafts (30-50 cm) for enhanced portability and hurling, contrasting the longer-shafted two-handed Danish axe used for sweeping strikes. Historical sagas and grave finds from sites like Mammen, , reveal smaller iron axes balanced for projection up to 15 meters, hurled to harass foes before boarding actions or shield walls. Such throws exploited the axe head's weight for rotational stability, embedding deeply to fracture armor or morale. Common to these throwing axes was a design philosophy prioritizing balance, with short hafts of 30-50 cm and weighted heads (typically 0.5-1 kg) to ensure spin stability during flight, achieving effective ranges of 10-15 meters in scenarios. This configuration allowed for predictable —often one or two full turns—maximizing accuracy and impact without excessive velocity that could cause deviation. In contrast to axes, which favored longer hafts for leverage, throwing variants minimized length to reduce wind resistance and improve grip for overhand or sidearm releases.

Throwing Clubs and Sticks

Throwing clubs and sticks represent a class of simple, portable wooden weapons designed for hurling to deliver blunt force trauma in premodern tribal and , often serving dual purposes in and among forager societies. These implements, typically crafted from dense hardwoods for and balance, were thrown overhand or sidearm to achieve rotational stability in flight, enhancing accuracy and impact at short to medium ranges. Archaeological and ethnographic evidence indicates their widespread use across continents, from to and , where they functioned as accessible alternatives to more complex projectile arms, particularly among pastoralists and warriors without access to . Their effectiveness stemmed from the generated by the thrower's momentum, amplified by weighted ends that caused tumbling or spinning motion upon release. The design of throwing clubs emphasized aerodynamic shaping to promote , with common features including curved profiles, knobbed or bulbous heads for , and lengths of 50-100 cm to suit human arm leverage. Materials were predominantly hardwoods like or , selected for resistance to splintering during impacts that could fracture bone or stun targets. Effective ranges varied by form and user skill, generally spanning 10-30 meters for combat applications, where the weapon's spin broadened the lethal zone by creating unpredictable trajectories. Asymmetrical or hooked shapes, as seen in evolutionary models of these tools, allowed for straighter flights in basic variants while more refined curves induced controlled for greater and stability. These designs prioritized portability and ease of production, often carved from naturally bent branches without advanced tooling. Non-returning war boomerangs, prominent among Australian Aboriginal groups, exemplify curved throwing sticks adapted for , measuring approximately 75 cm in length and fashioned from wood. Unlike recreational returning variants, these straight-flying weapons were hurled to strike enemies or game at distances up to 50 meters, leveraging their flattened, airfoil-like cross-section for stable rotation and penetration through light cover. Ethnographic records from southeastern highlight their role in intertribal conflicts, where warriors used them to harass foes before closing for , often in volleys for suppressive effect. Their blunt edges inflicted concussive wounds, making them ideal for non-lethal subdual in fights or lethal strikes in warfare. In , the served as a versatile throwing club among Zulu and Nguni peoples, featuring a shaft of about 60-70 cm topped with a spherical or whorled knob for weighted impact. Carved from dense woods like , the knob's compression and ribbed design concentrated force on a small area, enabling throws of 15-20 meters to crack shields or skulls in battle. Historical accounts from the document spherical variants specifically balanced for hurling, used by warriors to disrupt enemy lines before engaging with spears. Beyond combat, these clubs symbolized status and were employed in ceremonial executions, underscoring their cultural significance in premodern societies. Barbarian throwing clubs encountered by Roman forces in northern Europe represented weighted wooden precursors to later Roman innovations like the plumbata, consisting of 40-60 cm sticks with bulbous or stone-weighted ends for enhanced momentum. These clubs, used by Germanic and tribes from the 1st century BCE onward, were thrown in skirmishes to 10-20 meters, their rotation aiding in penetrating leather armor or disorienting legionaries. Archaeological parallels suggest they influenced Roman adoption of similar weighted darts, adapting the blunt-impact principle for auxiliary troops in late antiquity. Such weapons bridged handheld clubs and thrown projectiles, emphasizing raw power over precision in tribal warfare.

Projectile Weapons

Slings

The sling is a simple yet effective premodern projectile weapon consisting of a pouch attached to two cords, typically measuring around one meter in total length, used to hurl stones, clay pellets, or lead bullets through centrifugal force generated by whirling the device overhead or at the side before release. Archaeological evidence traces its origins to the Neolithic period, with early examples crafted from leather or plant fibers for the pouch and cords, allowing for repeated launches without the need for complex manufacturing. In combat, slings provided skirmishers with a lightweight, portable tool for harassing enemy formations at range, often outpacing the velocity of early bows in skilled hands due to the momentum of the whirling motion. Simple slings, the most widespread variant, featured a basic or pouch to cradle such as smooth river stones or molded lead projectiles, enabling warriors to engage from distances up to 200 meters with practice. The biblical account of defeating with a sling and stone exemplifies its use in ancient Near Eastern warfare, where shepherds and soldiers alike employed it as a readily available weapon against armored foes, corroborated by archaeological finds of sling stones from sites in the . These devices required minimal training for basic proficiency but rewarded expertise with lethal accuracy, as evidenced by elite units capable of striking targets at hair's breadth precision. Staff slings, an extended variant, attached a short sling pouch to the end of a wooden pole roughly one to two meters long, allowing users to launch heavier projectiles like stones or pots with greater force and arc, particularly suited for defensive roles in medieval European sieges. This design, known in Latin as the fustibalus from late Roman texts, enabled legionaries to propel over obstacles while maintaining a stable two-handed grip, evolving into a tool for both stone-throwing and, in later adaptations, incendiary pots during Byzantine and medieval engagements. Primary accounts from Publius Flavius Renatus describe its integration into Roman training, where soldiers practiced with bundled twig targets to hone distance and impact. Regionally, Balearic slingers from the Iberian islands gained renown in armies for their precision, employing slings with varying cord lengths to achieve ranges exceeding 300 meters, as noted by in descriptions of Carthaginian forces during the . In Polynesia, Māori warriors utilized the kōtaha, a sling-like device with cords attached to a wooden handle for hurling or stones, serving as a versatile projectile tool in close-quarters skirmishes and hunts. Sling ammunition varied by availability and intent, with common options including clay pellets baked for uniformity and lead bullets known as , often molded in almond shapes weighing 30-50 grams to optimize and penetration. Roman glans frequently bore inscriptions such as names of commanders or mocking phrases toward enemies, as discovered in Republican-era sites in , providing propagandistic value alongside ballistic effectiveness. These projectiles could fracture bones or pierce light armor at high velocities, underscoring the sling's role as a cost-effective equalizer in premodern battles.

Bows

Bows, as premodern combat weapons, consist of flexible limbs connected by a string that stores elastic when drawn, propelling arrows via tension release, a principle distinct from the used in slings. These weapons emerged around 64,000 years ago in Africa, with evidence from , , indicating early use in hunting and later warfare across and the . By the , bows became standardized in combat, offering ranged precision and rapid fire rates of up to 10-12 arrows per minute for skilled archers. Self-bows, constructed from a single piece of wood such as , , or , represent the simplest and most widespread early design, prized for their reliability in various climates. The , a notable self-bow variant made from yew heartwood for its natural composite strength, measured about 6 feet in length with a draw weight of 70-150 pounds, enabling effective ranges up to 300 meters. It played a pivotal role in the (1337-1453), where massed volleys decimated French knights at battles like Agincourt in 1415, contributing to English tactical victories. In contrast, short bows, often under 4 feet, were favored for mobility; Asian short reflex bows, like those used by steppe nomads, allowed archers to shoot accurately from horseback due to their compact size and curved limbs that increased power without added length. Recurve and composite bows advanced bow design through , enhancing power and compactness for mounted warfare. Recurve bows feature limbs that curve away from the archer when strung, storing more energy; the Mongol composite recurve, built from wood, horn, and sinew glued together, was a hallmark of 13th-century invasions under , with draw weights up to 100 pounds and ranges exceeding 300 meters, enabling hit-and-run tactics across vast steppes. Composite bows originated in ancient and around 2000 BCE, layering wood with animal horn on the belly and sinew on the back to counter bending stresses, as seen in Assyrian reliefs depicting royal hunts. Scythian composites, refined by nomadic from the 8th century BCE, incorporated and fish glue for waterproofing, allowing effective use in diverse terrains from the to . Arrows for bows varied by target and era, optimized for penetration, stability, and retrieval. Broadheads, with wide, razor-sharp blades, were designed for hunting and unarmored foes to cause massive bleeding, as evidenced in medieval European arrowheads recovered from shipwrecks (1545). Bodkin points, narrow and pyramidal, pierced plate armor, with 14th-century English examples featuring quadrangular tips that focused force on small areas. Fletching, typically three feathers or parabolic vanes attached near the nock—a notched rear end fitting the string—stabilized flight by inducing spin, with ancient Egyptian arrows using feathers bound by sinew for arrows up to 30 inches long. Self-nocking designs, where the shaft end split to hold the string, improved draw consistency in composite bows.

Crossbows

Crossbows represent a class of premodern combat weapons that mechanically assist in drawing and locking a bowstring, enabling sustained aim and greater power than traditional bows, which demand constant manual tension during use. First developed in ancient during the (475–221 BCE), crossbows featured a transverse prod mounted on a stock with a trigger mechanism, allowing infantry to fire bolts with precision and force. Archaeological evidence from the state of confirms their existence by the 4th century BCE, where they revolutionized warfare by democratizing ranged combat beyond elite archers. The Chinese repeating crossbow, or chu ko nu, exemplified early ingenuity with its magazine-fed design, invented around the BCE and attributed in legend to the strategist , though predating him. This compact weapon held up to 10 short bolts in a wooden magazine above the stock, loaded via a that simultaneously spanned the string and advanced the next bolt, enabling rapid semi-automatic fire at rates of 8–10 shots per minute. While individual bolts had lower penetration than single-shot models due to a lighter draw weight of about 50–100 pounds, the chu ko nu excelled in close-quarters skirmishes and defensive volleys, remaining in use through the (1368–1644 CE) for its reliability in humid conditions and simplicity of production. In medieval , crossbows proliferated from the onward, evolving into the by the , a heavier variant with a prod capable of draw weights exceeding 800 pounds for superior armor-piercing capability. European handheld crossbows, often used in and sieges, were typically spanned by inserting a foot into a (goose-foot design) at the bow's end and pulling the string rearward with a hook or belt, achieving effective ranges of 200–300 meters. More powerful arbalests required mechanical aids like the , a crank-turned system that halved the effort needed for spanning, or the cranequin, a late-15th-century rack-and-pinion device clamped to the stock for precise, high-torque draws on prods up to 1,200 pounds. Genoese mercenaries, professional crossbowmen from the , dominated 14th-century battlefields with their disciplined ranks and arbalests reaching up to 400 meters, serving French forces at Crécy in 1346 where 2,000–3,000 fought in pavise-shield formations despite tactical setbacks from volleys. Crossbow projectiles, known as bolts or quarrels, were short (20–30 cm) and heavy compared to arrows, fletched with feathers for stability and tipped with square or pyramidal iron heads forged for deep penetration into or plate armor. These broad-headed designs maximized transfer on impact, often featuring bodkin points to punch through defenses at short range. The 1139 Second sought to curb their proliferation by banning crossbows and bows as "murderous art" against Christians under penalty of (Canon 29), reflecting ecclesiastical fears of their lethality in feudal warfare, though enforcement proved ineffective as they continued in use against non-Christians and in secular conflicts.

Blowguns

Blowguns, also known as blowpipes, are premodern ranged weapons consisting of a long, narrow tube through which lightweight are propelled solely by the force of the user's breath, enabling silent and precise projection for and . Prevalent in tropical regions before 1700, these weapons were favored for their stealth, requiring no mechanical components and relying on human lung capacity for operation. Their use spanned , , and parts of , where they allowed hunters and warriors to fell small to medium game or enemies from concealed positions without alerting prey. In , the Sumatran exemplified regional adaptations, crafted from tubes roughly 2 meters long by Malay and Dayak peoples for both and warfare. These blowguns fired poison-tipped with reported accuracy up to 40 meters, leveraging the tube's length to maximize air and dart stability. were often constructed from shafts or thorns, fitted with soft cotton or fiber seals at the base to create an airtight fit and ensure efficient propulsion. South American variants, prevalent among Amazonian indigenous groups, featured hardwood tubes—typically from palm or chonta—ranging 1.5 to 2.5 meters in length, with mouthpieces for direct exhalation to drive . These blowpipes were integral to strategies, where penetrated animal hides and delivered , a paralytic poison derived from plant extracts like Strychnos toxifera, causing rapid for lethality. Historical artifacts from the late confirm dart construction from palm stems about 35 cm long, bound with cotton and sharpened tips, often breaking off inside targets to prevent removal. African blowguns, such as the short fukadi tubes used for small game, were less widespread but employed in certain forest regions for discreet . Darts in these systems utilized , a poison from plants, applied to tips made of thorns or wood with fiber seals, enhancing lethality against birds and . Overall, techniques emphasized controlled lung power, generating dart velocities up to 100 m/s for while maintaining operational silence, distinguishing them from noisier weapons.

Early Gunpowder Weapons

Handheld Firearms

Handheld firearms represent a pivotal development in premodern combat, emerging as portable black powder weapons that transitioned warfare from mechanical projectile systems to chemical propulsion. Originating in 13th-century , these devices evolved from earlier incendiary tools into metal-barreled guns capable of projecting lead projectiles, spreading to the Islamic world and by the 14th and 15th centuries. The earliest handheld firearms were hand cannons, which evolved from the —a or early metal tube filled with and projectiles, used in during the 10th and 11th centuries under the for close-range flame and shrapnel projection. By the late , excavations have uncovered metal hand-cannon barrels dating to around 1288 CE, indicating a shift to more durable bronze or iron construction for handheld use. Notable examples include the (circa 1288 CE) and the (1298 CE), both bronze and portable for individual soldiers. These weapons were ignited manually by touching a lit fuse or to the priming powder in a , firing irregular projectiles like pellets or arrows at short ranges of 10–20 meters; they were employed in Mongol campaigns during the late . In , handgonnes appeared in the as simple metal tubes fitted to wooden stocks, with the earliest surviving example, the Loshult gun from , dated to around 1326 CE. These were shoulder-fired or hand-held, spreading via trade and Mongol influences to the Islamic world, where Mamluk forces used similar pot-de-fer devices by the late . Arquebuses appeared in the as improved shoulder-fired guns, first adopted by the and European forces for better accuracy over hand cannons. In the Ottoman military, the tüfek (arquebus) was integrated into units by the mid-1400s, influencing tactics during campaigns against European states, with barrels typically 2–3 feet long for stability when braced against the shoulder. European adoption followed suit, with Spanish and Italian armies using them in the from the 1490s, where the weapon's effective range reached approximately 100 meters against massed targets. The mechanism lowered a burning into the priming pan via a serpentine lever, allowing aimed fire without manual ignition, though loading times limited rates to 1–2 shots per minute. Premodern handheld firearms typically used barrels with calibers ranging from .50 to .75 inches, loaded with loose charges (2–6 drams, measured by horn or flask) rammed down the muzzle followed by a greased patch-wrapped lead ball of matching diameter (20–50 grams). was carried in bandoliers with pre-measured flasks ("twelve apostles") and loose balls in pouches, allowing 10–20 rounds per ; from cloth or paper sealed the charge. These systems were prone to unreliability in wet conditions, as rain could extinguish the in matchlocks or dampen , reducing misfire rates from 20–50% in dry weather to near-total failure in prolonged exposure, necessitating covered storage and oiling.

Incendiary Devices

Incendiary devices in premodern warfare encompassed a range of tools designed to project or burning substances, primarily developed in the and Chinese contexts to ignite enemies, structures, or ships during close-quarters or naval engagements. These weapons relied on flammable mixtures that produced persistent, hard-to-extinguish fires, often leveraging natural derivatives for their and self-igniting properties. Unlike later projectile-based firearms, these devices emphasized streams of or hurled incendiaries to create chaos and deny positions, with roots tracing to the in and the 10th century in . The Byzantine , introduced around the , represented an early pinnacle of incendiary technology, employed effectively in naval defenses such as the repulse of fleets during the sieges of in 674–678 CE. This hand-held or ship-mounted pump system forced a incendiary through a tube, projecting ignited streams up to 15 meters to envelop targets in burning oil that adhered and burned on water. The formula, a closely guarded state secret lost by the 13th century, was primarily petroleum-based sourced from the , thickened with resins for stickiness, though some accounts suggest additives like quicklime to enhance ignition upon contact with moisture; modern analyses rule out components such as sulfur or saltpeter. Ship-mounted variants, integrated into warships, allowed crews to swivel the for broad coverage, making a decisive factor in Byzantine maritime supremacy until the empire's decline. In , the emerged during the in the 10th century as a portable bamboo-tube device that sprayed flames, marking an early integration of into incendiary warfare amid conflicts like the Jin-Song Wars. Constructed by attaching a tube filled with a gunpowder- mixture to a shaft, it expelled a short burst of fire and scorching particles upon ignition, effective at close range for repelling infantry charges. The , a distilled , combined with 's saltpeter, , and to create an unquenchable blaze that clung to targets, with records from the 1044 compendium detailing its use in shocking and burning adversaries. By the early (14th–15th centuries), the huo qiang evolved as a more refined portable flame projector, featuring metal or rolled-paper barrels for lighter, infantry-carried versions that projected flames over 3–6 meters, often in naval or siege contexts. Mongol forces in the 13th century adapted Chinese innovations for incendiary arrows and pots, deploying them extensively in sieges to ignite fortifications and demoralize defenders. These consisted of arrows with gunpowder-soaked rags or ceramic pots filled with naphtha-gunpowder mixtures hurled via catapults, as seen in the 1258 where flaming projectiles set wooden defenses ablaze. The mixtures typically blended for persistence, for volatility, and saltpeter to sustain , creating fires resistant to water; ship-mounted pots were also used in amphibious assaults, such as the 1274 and 1281 invasions of . This tactical use amplified the Mongols' siege efficacy across , bridging Eastern and Western incendiary traditions.

Siege Weapons

Tension and Torsion Engines

Tension and torsion engines represent a pivotal advancement in premodern siege warfare, harnessing from twisted fibers to propel with greater force and accuracy than earlier handheld weapons. Originating in the Hellenistic world during the BCE, these machines evolved from tension-based designs to sophisticated torsion systems, primarily employed by Greek, Roman, and Byzantine forces for breaching fortifications and providing support. Unlike simpler devices, they required crews to operate and relied on the elastic properties of organic materials to store and release energy, enabling ranges far exceeding those of individual archers. The , a key precursor to larger engines, was an tension-powered weapon invented around 400 BCE in Syracuse during conflicts with . This "belly shooter" featured a braced against the user's and cocked via a sliding ratchet mechanism, where the shooter pressed down with their body weight to draw the string, allowing even those of average strength to achieve powerful shots. It fired standard arrows or short bolts up to 300 yards, penetrating armor effectively during sieges like the assault on in 397 BCE, and its design influenced subsequent developments by introducing mechanical tension aids. Building on this, the emerged as a two-armed torsion by the late BCE under Macedonian engineers, reaching widespread Roman adoption in the BCE. Constructed with a wooden frame supporting two arms connected to skeins of twisted animal sinew or horsehair, the ballista used a and ratchet system to wind the torsion springs, launching bolts up to 1 meter long at ranges of approximately 400 meters. These machines were instrumental in sieges, such as the Great's campaign against Tyre in 332 BCE, where ballistae mounted on ships and towers bombarded walls to facilitate breaches. The , or scorpio, served as a compact variant of the optimized for and support from the Roman Republican era onward. This smaller torsion engine, often one per century in legions, featured similar sinew-based springs within a wooden reinforced by metal, propelling lighter bolts with precision up to 300-400 meters at rates of 3-4 shots per minute. It excelled in anti-personnel roles during battles and sieges, targeting enemy leaders or formations while being mobile enough for rapid deployment. Materials for these engines emphasized durability and elasticity, with frames typically carved from hardwoods like or , while the critical torsion skeins were bundles of animal sinew—often from or horses—for superior tensile strength, supplemented by in drier climates to resist humidity. Maintenance was essential, as sinew required periodic re-twisting and oiling to prevent weakening, and bolts were fletched wooden shafts tipped with iron or for penetration. In Byzantine continuations through the medieval period, these designs persisted in fortified defenses, underscoring their enduring tactical value in crew-operated operations.

Counterweight Engines

Counterweight engines represented a pivotal advancement in premodern siege warfare, utilizing energy from falling weights to propel with greater force and distance than earlier manpower-driven systems. These machines, which emerged and proliferated from the 6th to the 15th centuries across Islamic, Byzantine, and European contexts, transformed assaults on fortified positions by enabling the launch of heavy stones against walls and defenders. Unlike tension-based engines that relied on twisted fibers or springs, counterweight designs leveraged simple mechanical leverage through a pivoting beam, achieving superior efficiency in scaling up projectile mass and impact. The , the quintessential engine, consisted of a long hinged beam pivoted near one end, with a heavy suspended from the short arm and a sling attached to the long arm for releasing projectiles. Traction-powered variants, where crews pulled ropes to swing the beam, originated in during the amid the , marking the initial development of beam-sling . The fully , replacing human traction with a fixed or sliding mass, was invented in the Islamic world in the early and rapidly diffused westward through Crusader conflicts, reaching by mid-century. A notable early European deployment occurred at the Siege of Castelnuovo Bocca d'Adda in 1199, where forces used trebuchets to propel boulders against fortifications, demonstrating their effectiveness in breaching defenses. Design variations, such as the floating arm trebuchet where the beam's pivot allowed freer motion to reduce friction, appeared in later medieval adaptations to optimize energy transfer, though primary evidence remains tied to standard hinged-beam models. boxes, often filled with compacted earth, sand, or lead for adjustable mass, enabled fine-tuning of power based on target distance and fortifications. Bricoles served as lighter, frame-mounted iterations of counterweight engines, featuring swing arms with attached weights for field use where full-scale trebuchets proved cumbersome. Their compact structure facilitated quicker assembly and higher firing rates, making them ideal for open battles or secondary roles. Historical accounts describe bricoles launching lighter projectiles in rapid succession to suppress or disrupt formations. Typical payloads for these engines ranged from 50 to 200 kg stones, with effective ranges of 200 to 300 meters depending on size and arm length, allowing attackers to strike deep into defended areas while minimizing exposure. This gravitational provided a clear advantage over torsion engines by accommodating heavier loads without the limitations of elastic materials.

Early Gunpowder Artillery

Early gunpowder artillery emerged in 12th-century , where innovations in black powder formulations enabled the development of true cannons alongside bombs and incendiary devices. These early weapons descended briefly from handheld fire lances but evolved into larger, fixed artillery pieces that propelled projectiles using explosive force. By the 13th century, technology spread westward via Mongol invasions and trade routes, reaching where it transformed siege warfare by allowing attackers to breach fortifications previously impregnable to mechanical engines. The pot-de-fer represented one of the earliest forms of iron bombards, originating in during the as vase-shaped vessels designed to fire stone balls. These pear-shaped devices, cast from iron with a narrow muzzle and wide powder chamber, were loaded from the breech and ignited via a , producing a loud report more for intimidation than precision. European adaptations appeared by the early , such as those depicted in Walter de Milemete's 1326 , where the pot-de-fer fired iron or arrows wrapped in leather for a secure fit, achieving ranges up to 700 yards when elevated on earthen mounds. In 14th-century , bombards became prominent as large wrought-iron siege guns, often exceeding 1 meter in caliber to hurl massive projectiles at castle walls. Constructed from longitudinal iron staves forged into tubes and reinforced by heat-shrunk hoops to contain explosive pressure, these weapons were cumbersome, requiring teams to maneuver and load them horizontally on the ground. Notable examples include the , a 15th-century Scottish bombard with a 20-inch bore, built from 25 iron staves bound by wide hoops, capable of firing 330-pound stone balls over 2 miles. Their destructive power revolutionized assaults, as seen in the Ottoman of in 1453, where giant bombards breached the city's Theodosian Walls after weeks of . Ribauldequins, or organ guns, emerged in 14th-century Europe, with the first recorded use by in 1339 during the , as multi-barrel volley weapons consisting of several small-caliber iron tubes mounted parallel on a wheeled to deliver rapid, concentrated fire. French forces later employed them in the Wars of Religion for suppressive barrages against advancing pikemen. By the mid-15th century, refinements allowed up to 10-12 barrels, each about 1-2 inches in diameter, loaded with powder and shot for coordinated volleys that mimicked the sound and impact of a . Ammunition for early gunpowder artillery varied by weapon size and purpose, with large bombards primarily using solid stone cannonballs for their availability and low cost in breaching walls, transitioning to cast-iron spheres as metallurgy improved. Smaller pieces, including ribauldequins, employed —clusters of iron or lead balls packed in canvas bags—to scatter shrapnel-like patterns against personnel , enhancing in defensive positions. Barrel construction relied on wrought-iron hoops to withstand the internal pressure of black powder , preventing bursts during firing. A key milestone occurred at the in 1503, where Spanish forces under used entrenched and small arms to decisively repel French assaults, marking the first major demonstration of gunpowder's dominance in combined-arms tactics that foreshadowed its supremacy in sieges. This engagement highlighted artillery's role in neutralizing traditional and pike formations, shifting European toward fortified positions and explosive ordnance.

References

  1. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/early-modern-europe-introduction/content-section-2
  2. https://www.worldhistory.org/collection/279/a-gallery-of-prehistoric-and-ancient-weapons/
  3. https://www.pugetsound.edu/sites/default/files/file/gill-jason_0.pdf
  4. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/shang-and-zhou-dynasties-the-bronze-age-of-china
  5. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/warfare-in-bronze-age-society/introducing-bronze-age-warfare/36FB62B1111F3254CEFDF79724034471
  6. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1238/the-weapons-of-an-english-medieval-knight/
  7. https://americanart.si.edu/artwork/caestus-18736
  8. https://www.si.edu/object/tiger-claw-weapon-bagh-nakh-or-bagh-naka%253Anmnhanthropology_8412804
  9. https://www.academia.edu/8267957/OLD_IRON_IRON_FISTS_AND_OTHER_FINDS_FROM_THE_MEDIEVAL_CASTLE_OF_CUCAGNA
  10. https://www.britannica.com/sports/boxing/Ancient-times
  11. https://greatmingmilitary.blogspot.com/2016/05/exotic-weapons-from-san-cai-tu-hui.html
  12. https://edtechdev.stanford.edu/weapons-of-rome
  13. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/es-272-culture-tech-spring-2003/pages/samurai-swords/
  14. https://sevenswords.uk/shamshir/
  15. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/arms-and-armor-common-misconceptions-and-frequently-asked-questions
  16. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/470298
  17. https://www.academia.edu/43095866/MR_edgedweapons
  18. https://prodigy.ucmerced.edu/libweb/hkw7d3/0OK016/HistoryOfTheDagger.pdf
  19. https://asia.si.edu/explore-art-culture/collections/search/edanmdm:fsg_F1906.295/
  20. https://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/05/21/08/00001/WELTON_A.pdf
  21. https://solarspell-dls.sfis.asu.edu/mea/wikipedia/wp/a/Axe.htm
  22. https://www.academia.edu/34305073/Game_Design_by_ALEXANDER_MACRIS_with_TAVIS_ALLISON_and_GREG_TITO_TM
  23. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/21876
  24. https://acoup.blog/2019/06/21/collections-punching-through-some-armor-myths/
  25. https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/stone-age-men-could-kill-one-swing-their-club-009252
  26. https://www.facebook.com/Romanhistoryold/posts/how-the-romans-used-clubmen-against-clibanariiclibanarii-were-a-formidable-type-/479600824978737/
  27. https://www.academia.edu/39026557/The_Mace_in_Medieval_Georgia
  28. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/29617
  29. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/gorz
  30. https://irishstick.wordpress.com/2021/05/28/getting-medieval-just-how-old-is-bataireacht/
  31. https://greatmingmilitary.blogspot.com/2015/10/tie-bian-and-tie-jian.html
  32. https://gmic.co.uk/topic/45737-truncheons-nightsticks-billy-clubs-and-34cudgels34/
  33. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/weapons-of-war-the-war-hammer/
  34. https://www.historynet.com/medieval-flail/
  35. https://www.mandarinmansion.com/glossary/ruan-tiebian
  36. https://www.academia.edu/9806089/Constructing_a_Martial_Tradition_Rethinking_a_Popular_History_of_Karate_Dou
  37. https://www.academia.edu/34706505/MORTAL_BEAUTY_ARMS_AND_ARMOUR_OF_INDIA_AND_CHINA
  38. https://www.academia.edu/49175774/The_Medieval_Weapon_that_Never_Existed_The_Military_Flail
  39. https://greatmingmilitary.blogspot.com/2018/11/fei-chui.html
  40. https://www.britannica.com/technology/bola
  41. https://chinesemartialstudies.com/2019/11/03/rediscovering-chinas-flails/
  42. https://www.thecollector.com/evolution-of-shields-from-ancient-soldiers-to-riot-police/
  43. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/94487/lorrio_zapatero_6_4.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  44. https://www.academia.edu/959258/Iberian_Warrior_Figurines_and_the_Warrior_Image_in_Western_Mediterranean_Sculpture
  45. https://www.academia.edu/477692/Early_Anglo_Saxon_shields_Archaeologia_Monograph_110_London_Society_of_Antiquaries_of_London_1992
  46. https://combatarchaeology.org/was-linen-or-textile-used-for-viking-shields-new-perspectives-on-round-shield-constructions/
  47. https://www.academia.edu/49142498/The_medieval_and_renaissance_buckler_Definition_and_Typology
  48. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc103377/m2/1/high_res_d/dissertation.pdf
  49. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/learn/teaching-resources/story-of-1066/collectible-5/
  50. https://www.historyhit.com/kinds-of-ancient-roman-shields/
  51. https://www.academia.edu/94826811/Wood_Leather_and_Canvas_A_Pavise_with_the_Coat_of_Arms_of_Munich
  52. https://www.discovermiddleages.co.uk/medieval-weapons/medieval-shields
  53. https://www.battlemerchant.com/en/blog/the-physics-behind-historical-shields-how-the-design-determined-their-efficiency-and-protective-effect
  54. https://australian.museum/visit/audio-tours/200-treasures/tour_stop/17/
  55. https://www.dbu.edu/international-culture-collection/africa/
  56. https://escholarship.org/content/qt9819d1v6/qt9819d1v6_noSplash_0f49ae9cf329809f77e07b098f566b4b.pdf
  57. https://www.academia.edu/128370959/EARLY_IRON_AGE_WEAPONS_IN_ANCIENT_THRACE
  58. https://www.academia.edu/36450011/All_your_strength_is_in_your_spears_How_hoplites_wielded_their_spear_dory_
  59. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1692/roman-armor--weapons/
  60. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.2307/504637
  61. https://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/p4013coll2/id/2516/download
  62. https://digital.wpi.edu/downloads/2801pg95n
  63. http://jwma.aemma.org/articles/2001/jwmaart_docherty_0501.htm
  64. https://stoccata.org/about/weapons-taught/english-quarterstaff/
  65. https://www.genbukai.org/images/kobudo-files/weapon-bo.pdf
  66. https://www.dmaofsiouxfalls.org/kobudo-weapons.html
  67. http://www.americankangdukwon.org/sakwon.html
  68. https://www.blacfoundation.org/pdf/drraj_2.pdf
  69. https://snsct.snscourseware.org/files/1725806336.pdf
  70. https://www.usatkj.org/kodokan-bojutsu---staff-fighting.html
  71. https://usashaolintemple.org/chanbuddhism-shaolinstaff/
  72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvvmxs5
  73. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/polearm/
  74. https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1916.1559
  75. https://blog.nationalmuseum.ch/en/2022/01/the-rise-of-the-all-purpose-weapon-halberd/
  76. https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1916.1563
  77. https://academic.schafferlibrarycollections.org/samurai-armor/exhibits/show/naginata/history-of-the-naginata
  78. https://www.arms-n-armor.com/blogs/news/what-are-langets-on-a-polearm-for
  79. http://myarmoury.com/feature_spot_poleaxe.html
  80. https://www.academia.edu/12283706/Ponderous_Cruel_and_Mortal_A_Review_of_Medieval_Poleaxe_Technique_from_Surviving_Treatises_of_the_Fourteenth_and_Fifteenth_Centuries_2003_
  81. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/34089
  82. https://www.rom.on.ca/blog-post/weapon-wednesday-chakram-india
  83. https://fireandsteel.ca/blogs/blogs/chakram-urumi-katar-and-their-cultural-origins-exploring-unique-weapons-of-ancient-india
  84. https://www.wallacecollection.org/explore/explore-in-depth/the-sikh-empire/sikh-arms-armour/spotlight-arms-armour/gold-decorated-quoits-chakkar-chakra-chakram/
  85. https://thrower-archive.knifethrowing.info/africa.html
  86. https://swordis.com/blog/african-swords/
  87. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/death-of-kaakutja-a-case-of-perimortem-weapon-trauma-in-anaboriginal-man-from-northwestern-new-south-wales-australia/3E957293B27AB3CD1A30FA7F3DB2BC80
  88. https://www.livescience.com/56194-boomerang-attack-archaeological-evidence.html
  89. https://www.knifethrowing.info/physics_of_knife_throwing.html
  90. https://production.cbts.edu/index.php/535BMv/897195/Ancient-Greek-Weapons-And-Armor.pdf
  91. https://www.academia.edu/1406260/Throwing_the_Greek_Dory_How_Effective_is_the_Attached_Ankyle_at_Increasing_the_Distance_of_the_Throw
  92. https://www.academia.edu/2631534/Recreating_the_Ancient_Greek_Javelin_Throw_How_Far_Was_the_Javelin_Thrown
  93. https://pages.vassar.edu/livy/files/2013/02/Roman_Army.pdf
  94. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/26aa9d39-17fb-4881-98a2-ff1f3825fa16/content
  95. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/context/younghistorians/article/1075/viewcontent/The_Roman_Army_Strategy__Tactics__and_Innovation.pdf
  96. https://dnr.alaska.gov/parks/oha/publiceducation/lessonplanatlatl.pdf
  97. https://hands.unm.edu/atlatls.html
  98. https://www.colorado.edu/asmagazine/2010/06/21/cu-researcher-finds-10000-year-old-weapon
  99. https://www.in.gov/dnr/historic-preservation/files/hp_atlatl.pdf
  100. https://iblog.iup.edu/trowelsandtribulations/2022/04/15/mungo-man-and-mungo-lady-repatriation-and-reburial/
  101. https://spencerart.ku.edu/art/collections-online/artist/22590
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11343701/
  103. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/bitstreams/648f06a4-1c13-4018-822f-856a71265008/download
  104. https://www.academia.edu/31904875/Image_and_reality_in_medieval_weaponry_and_warfare_Wales_1100_1450
  105. https://thescholarship.ecu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/7bc8e0ff-7dba-46ac-a3de-9657e43f5276/content
  106. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/the-battle-ax/
  107. https://www.wiltshiremuseum.org.uk/news-articles/artworks/francisca-throwing-axe/
  108. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1905-0520-1117
  109. https://www.romanobritain.org/8-military/mil_roman_soldiers_thrown-weapons.php
  110. https://archive.org/download/americanindianto01pete/americanindianto01pete.pdf
  111. https://en.natmus.dk/historical-knowledge/denmark/prehistoric-period-until-1050-ad/the-viking-age/weapons/axes/
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10073058/
  113. https://exarc.net/issue-2024-2/ea/scheme-evolution-throwing-sticks
  114. https://australian.museum/learn/cultures/first-nations-collections/boomerangs/
  115. http://samilitaryhistory.org/misc/kieries.html
  116. https://www.clevelandart.org/art/2010.232
  117. https://www.academia.edu/5269824/Kozlenko_A_Barbarian_Throwing_Clubs_and_the_origins_of_Roman_Plumbata_The_Enemies_of_Rome_Proceedings_of_the_15_th_International_Roman_Military_Equipment_Conference_Budapest_2005_Ed_L_Kocsis_Journal_of_Roman_Military_Equipment_Studies_2008_Vol_16_P_341_344
  118. https://www.academia.edu/37815276/Slinging_in_the_Biblical_World_And_What_We_Can_Learn_about_David_Defeating_Goliath_NEASB_63_2018_1_12_
  119. https://www.academia.edu/85470003/Taking_a_Sling_How_David_Defeated_Goliath
  120. https://a-r-m-e-s.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/476-255-279-Griffiths.pdf
  121. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/bitstreams/1bc31d79-4205-4319-919a-94b7b1197b51/download
  122. https://www.roman-britain.co.uk/classical-references/vegetius/
  123. http://jaanmarss.planet.ee/juhendid/Mehaanilised_kaugrelvad_keskajal/andmebaas/fustibalus/fustibal_index.php.htm
  124. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20703603
  125. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1753&context=honorstheses
  126. https://www.academia.edu/112986647/NEW_EVIDENCE_OF_ROMAN_GOVERNORS_AND_OFFICERS_ON_GLANDES_INSCRIPTAE_FROM_REPUBLICAN_HISPANIA
  127. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-11086110
  128. https://www.historynet.com/the-ingeniously-simple-but-deadly-chukonu-crossbow/
  129. https://www.musee-archerie-valois.fr/en/2021/10/01/repeating-crossbow/
  130. https://medievalbritain.com/type/medieval-life/weapons/medieval-crossbow/
  131. https://www.medieval.eu/mercenaries-in-the-14th-century/
  132. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/33754
  133. https://finds.org.uk/counties/findsrecordingguides/crossbow-bolts-quarrels/
  134. https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum10.htm
  135. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/evolutionary-human-sciences/article/global-database-on-blowguns-with-links-to-geography-and-language/312FBB0D47A53369A7FAD5A990A6F2C3
  136. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331377032_Sumpit_Blowgun_as_Traditional_Weapons_with_Dayak_High_Protection
  137. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2561576
  138. https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/pdf2023/fpl_2023_ostapkowicz001.pdf
  139. https://www.chemistryworld.com/podcasts/curare-and-ouabain/3008865.article
  140. https://alcheminc.com/blowgunhist.html
  141. https://opentextbooks.clemson.edu/sciencetechnologyandsociety/chapter/gunpowder-in-medieval-china/
  142. https://archaeology.org/issues/may-june-2020/collection/fire-lances-cannons/weapons-of-the-ancient-world/
  143. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43286061
  144. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1231/artillery-in-medieval-europe/
  145. https://www.military-history.org/feature/wmd-pike-and-shot-the-spanish-tercio.htm
  146. https://www.academia.edu/53982149/LATE_16TH_CENTURY_SPANISH_MUSKETRY_POWDER_LOADS_FOR_MODERN_HISTORICAL_REENACTMENT
  147. https://www.academia.edu/33042318/Greek_fire_revisited_current_and_recent_research_2006_
  148. https://news.duke.edu/stories/2023/07/31/was-the-ancient-napalm-greek-fire-a-jewish-invention/
  149. https://www.jpost.com/archaeology/article-753024
  150. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293557937_Origin_of_the_Huoqiang_fire-lance_and_its_development_into_Liuxing_shooting_star_in_China
  151. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-royal-asiatic-society/article/mongol-empire-the-first-gunpowder-empire/9128388937125B6FBA9E5F708E27AC8F
  152. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43307240
  153. https://brewminate.com/torsion-siege-engines-in-the-ancient-and-medieval-worlds/
  154. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/types-of-weapons-used-by-ancient-greece/
  155. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/649/roman-artillery/
  156. https://www.historyonthenet.com/engines-of-destruction-the-evolution-of-siege-warfare-alexander-the-great
  157. http://www.historyisnowmagazine.com/blog/2025/7/15/the-history-and-development-of-the-ballista
  158. https://www.unrv.com/military/catapults.php
  159. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/roman-army/siege-machines-of-ancient-romans/roman-scorpio/
  160. https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/cahfac_history/29/
  161. https://www.historyextra.com/period/medieval/qa-when-and-where-was-the-trebuchet-invented/
  162. https://uccshes.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/the-invention-of-the-counterweight-trebuchet.pdf
  163. https://www.medievalists.net/2013/01/the-trebuchet/
  164. http://militaryhistoryvisualized.com/weapons-101-trebuchet-traction-counterweight-medieval-equipment/
  165. https://www.military.com/off-duty/2020/01/31/why-trebuchet-was-superior-siege-engine.html
  166. https://npshistory.com/series/interpretive/3/is3a1.htm
  167. https://engines.egr.uh.edu/episode/1744
  168. https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-2703
  169. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/3075029/no.ntnu%253Ainspera%253A144930348%253A54380673.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  170. https://ultimaproject.org/2020/07/09/a-17th-century-organ-gun-from-lviv/
  171. https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/617fd96a-41ca-4a99-a8ef-774f78df897a/content
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.