Hubbry Logo
ToryToryMain
Open search
Tory
Community hub
Tory
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tory
Tory
Tory
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on
Toryism
Royal Oak
Principles
Variants
General topics
Intellectuals
Politicians
Related topics

A Tory (/ˈtɔːri/) is an individual who supports a political philosophy known as Toryism, based on a British version of traditionalist conservatism which upholds the established social order as it has evolved through the history of Great Britain. The Tory ethos has been summed up with the phrase "God, King (or Queen) and Country".[1] Tories are monarchists, were historically of a high church Anglican religious heritage, and were opposed to the liberalism of the Whig party.[2][3]

The philosophy originates from the Cavaliers, a royalist faction which supported the House of Stuart during the Wars of the Three Kingdoms. The Tories, a British political party which emerged during the late 17th century, was a reaction to the Whig-controlled Parliaments that succeeded the Cavalier Parliament.[4] As a political term, Tory (a word of Irish origin) was first used during the Exclusion Crisis of 1678–1681.

It also has exponents in other parts of the former British Empire, such as the Loyalists of British America, who opposed secession during the American War of Independence. Loyalists who fled to the Canadas at the end of the conflict, known as the United Empire Loyalists, formed the support base for political cliques in Upper and Lower Canada. Toryism remains prominent in the politics of Canada and the United Kingdom. The British Conservative Party and Conservative Party of Canada, and their supporters, continue to be referred to as Tories. Adherents to traditional Toryism in contemporary times are referred to as High Tories, who typically defend the ideas of hierarchy, natural order, and aristocracy.

Etymology

[edit]
Further information: Rapparee

The word Tory derives from the Irish tóraí, meaning "outlaw" (literally "pursuer"). It entered the English language in the 17th century, when it was used to describe Irish outlaws who survived by committing acts of robbery and plunder against English settlers. Later, it came to denote any Catholic or Royalist who had taken up arms against the English government.[5]

The word entered English politics during the Exclusion Crisis, emerging as a pejorative term for supporters of the Duke of York and his hereditary right to inherit the throne despite his Catholic religion.[6][7][8] According to Daniel Defoe, it was popularised by Titus Oates, who once received a warning that a group of Irish Tories intended to assassinate him. Following this incident, Oates "could never hear any man [...] talk against the plot, or against the witnesses, but he thought he was one of these tories, and call'd almost every man a tory that oppos'd him in discourse; till at last the word tory became popular, and it stuck so close to the [Yorkist] party in all their bloody proceedings that they had no way to get it off".[9]

Although both Tory and Whig originated as pejoratives, they soon became neutral terms for the two major factions in British politics.[10] The suffix -ism was added to make Whiggism and Toryism, meaning the principles and methods of each faction.

During the American Revolution, the term Tory was used interchangeably with the term "Loyalist" in the Thirteen Colonies to refer to colonists who remained loyal to the Crown during the conflict.[6] The term contrasts the colloquial term used to describe supporters of the revolution, "Patriots" or "Whigs".

Political history

[edit]
Royalist supporters, such as the Cavaliers, were referred to as tories during the Interregnum and Restoration period in Great Britain.

Towards the end of Charles II's reign (1660–1685) there was some debate about whether his brother, James, Duke of York, should be allowed to accede to the throne because of James's Catholicism. "Whigs", originally a reference to Scottish cattle-drovers (stereotypically radical anti-Catholic Covenanters), was the abusive term directed at those who wanted to exclude James on the grounds that he was a Catholic. Those who were not prepared to exclude James were labelled "Abhorrers" and later "Tories". Titus Oates applied the term Tory, which then signified an Irish robber, to those who would not believe in his Popish Plot and the name gradually became extended to all who were supposed to have sympathy with the Catholic Duke of York.[11]

United Kingdom

[edit]
Main article: Conservatism in the United Kingdom
See also: Tories (British political party)
Lord Belasyse was the second Tory to lead a Ministry in Great Britain.

The Tory political faction originally emerged within the Parliament of England to uphold the legitimist rights of James II to succeed his brother Charles II to the thrones of the three kingdoms. James became a Catholic at a time when the state institutions were fiercely independent from the Catholic Church—this was an issue for the Exclusion Crisis supporting Patricians, the political heirs to the nonconformist Roundheads and Covenanters. During the Exclusion Crisis, the word Tory was applied in the Kingdom of England as a nickname to the opponents of the bill, called the Abhorrers. The word "Tory" had connotations of Papist and outlaw derived from its previous use in Ireland.[12][9]

There were two Tory ministries after James II acceded to the throne: the first led by the Earl of Rochester, the second by Lord Belasyse. A significant faction took part in the Glorious Revolution, the military coup d'état that ousted James II with the Whigs to defend the Church of England and definitive Protestantism. A large but dwindling faction of Tories continued to support James in exile and his Stuart heirs to the throne, especially in 1714 after the Hanoverian Succession by George I, the first Hanoverian monarch. Although only a minority of Tories gave their adhesion to the Jacobite risings, this was used by the Whigs to discredit the Tories and paint them as traitors. After the advent of the Prime Ministerial system under the Whig Robert Walpole, Lord Bute's premiership in the reign of George III marked a revival. Under the Corn Laws (1815–1846), a majority of Tories supported protectionist agrarianism with tariffs being imposed at the time for higher food prices, self-sufficiency and enhanced wages in rural employment.

English Tories from the time of the Glorious Revolution up until the Reform Act 1832 were characterised by strong monarchist tendencies, support for the Church of England and hostility to radical reform, while the Tory party was an actual organisation which held power intermittently throughout the same period.[13] Conservatism began to emerge in the late 18th century—it synthesised moderate Whig economic policies and many Tory social values to create a new political philosophy and faction in opposition to the French Revolution. Edmund Burke and William Pitt the Younger led the way in this. Interventionism and strong-armed forces were to prove a hallmark of Toryism under subsequent prime ministers. The word Conservative began to be used in place of Tory during the 1830s, as Robert Peel's followers began to re-interpret elements of Tory tradition under a banner of support for social reform and free trade.[8] The party was eventually succeeded by the Conservative and Unionist Party, with the term Tory enduring to become an interchangeable phrase with Conservative.[8]

Canada

[edit]
Part of a series on
Conservatism in Canada
Schools
Principles
History
Active parties
Federal

Provincial

Defunct parties
Federal

Provincial

Media
Other organizations
Related
Main article: Conservatism in Canada
See also: Upper Canada Tories

The term Tory was first used to designate the pre-Confederation British ruling classes of Upper Canada and Lower Canada, known as the Family Compact and the Château Clique, an elite within the governing classes and often members within a section of society known as the United Empire Loyalists. The United Empire Loyalists were American loyalists from the Thirteen Colonies who resettled elsewhere in British North America during or after the American Revolutionary War.

In post-Confederation Canada, the terms "Red Tory" and "Blue Tory" have long been used to describe the two wings of the Conservative and previously the Progressive Conservative (PC) parties. The dyadic tensions originally arose out of the 1854 political union of British-Canadian Tories, French-Canadian traditionalists and the monarchist and loyalist leaning sections of the emerging commercial classes at the time—many of whom were uncomfortable with the pro-American and annexationist tendencies within the liberal Clear Grits. Tory strength and prominence in the political culture was a feature of life in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Ontario and Manitoba.[14]

By the 1930s, the factions within Canadian Toryism were associated with either the urban business elites or with rural traditionalists from the country's hinterland. A "Red Tory" is a member of the more moderate wing of the party (in the manner of John Farthing and George Grant). They are generally unified by their adherence to British traditions in Canada.[15]

Throughout the course of Canadian history, the Conservative Party was generally controlled by MacDonaldian Tory elements, which in Canada meant an adherence to the English-Canadian traditions of Monarchy, Empire-Commonwealth, parliamentary government, nationalism, protectionism, social reform and eventually acceptance of the necessity of the welfare state.[16]

Loyalist refugees on their way to the Canadas during the American Revolution. 1901 illustration by Howard Pyle. The Loyalists helped establish the base of support for political cliques in the Canadas, locally referred to as Tories.

By the 1970s, the Progressive Conservative Party was a Keynesian-consensus party. With the onset of stagflation in the 1970s, some Canadian Tories came under the influence of neo-liberal developments in the United Kingdom and the United States, which highlighted the policies for privatization and supply-side interventions. In Canada, these Tories have been labelled neoconservatives—which has a somewhat different connotation in the United States. By the early 1980s, there was no clear neoconservative in the Tory leadership cadre, but Brian Mulroney (who became leader in 1983) eventually came to adopt many policies from the Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan governments.[17]

As Mulroney took the Progressive Conservative Party further in this direction, with policy initiatives in the areas of deregulation, privatization, free-trade and a consumption tax called the Goods and services tax (GST), many traditionally-minded Tories became concerned that a political and cultural schism was occurring within the party.

The 1986 creation of the Reform Party of Canada attracted some of the neo-liberals and social conservatives away from the Tory party, and as some of the neoconservative policies of the Mulroney government proved unpopular, some of the provincial-rights elements moved towards Reform as well. In 1993, Mulroney resigned rather than fight an election based on his record after almost nine years in power. This left the Progressive Conservatives in disarray and scrambling to understand how to make Toryism relevant in provinces such as Quebec, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia that had never had a strong Tory tradition and political culture.

Thereafter in the 1990s, the Progressive Conservatives were a small party in the House of Commons of Canada and could only exert legislative pressure on the government through their power in the Senate of Canada. Eventually, through death and retirements, this power waned. Joe Clark returned as leader, but the schism with the Reformers effectively watered down the combined Blue and Red Tory vote in Canada.

By the late 1990s, there was talk of the necessity of uniting the right in Canada to deter further Liberal Party majorities. Many Tories—both red and blue—opposed such moves, while others took the view that all would have to be pragmatic if there was any hope of reviving a strong party system. The Canadian Alliance party (as the Reform Party had become) and some leading Tories came together on an informal basis to see if they could find common ground. While Progressive Conservative Leader Joe Clark rebuffed the notion, the talks moved ahead and eventually, in December 2003, the Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservative parties voted to rejoin as a new party called the Conservative Party of Canada.

After the merger of the Progressive Conservatives with the Canadian Alliance in 2003, there was debate as to whether the "Tory" appellation should survive at the federal level. Commentators speculated that some Alliance members would take offence at the term. Nevertheless, it was officially adopted by the merged party during the 2004 leadership convention. Stephen Harper, former leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Prime Minister from 2006 to 2015, regularly refers to himself as a Tory and says the new party is a natural evolution of the conservative political movement.[18][19] However, there were some dissident Red Tories who were against the merger. They formed the rival Progressive Canadian Party.

United States

[edit]
See also: Loyalist (American Revolution)
Depiction of the death of British Major Patrick Ferguson, during the American Revolutionary War. He was shot while commanding Loyalist regulars and militia at the Battle of Kings Mountain.

The term "Loyalist" was used in the American Revolution for those who remained loyal to the British Crown. About 80% of the Loyalists remained in the United States after the war. The 60,000 or so Loyalists who settled in Nova Scotia, Quebec, the Bahamas, or returned to Great Britain after the American War of Independence are known as United Empire Loyalists.[20]

On 12 February 1798, Thomas Jefferson (of the Democratic-Republican Party) described the conservative Federalist Party as "[a] political Sect [...] believing that the executive is the branch of our government which the most needs support, [who] are called federalists, sometimes aristocrats or monocrats, and sometimes Tories, after the corresponding sect in the English Government of the same definition".[21] However, that was clearly a hostile description by the Federalists' foes of whom Jefferson was one and not a name used by the Federalists themselves. The Federalist Party was dissolved in 1835 with no successor parties.

Later, the Democratic-Republican Party splintered into different parties, with the two dissidences being the National Republican Party and the Whig Party. The rest of the party would become the Democratic Party. The National Republican Party would then merge with the Whig Party, giving rise to what would be called the Second Party System.[22] Although the Whig Party adopted its name from its British counterpart, the term "Tories" had already completely fallen out of favour in the US.

During the American Civil War, Confederate forces commonly referred to Southern Unionists as Tories, drawing a parallel with the Tories of the American Revolutionary War. To the Confederates, Southern Unionists symbolised a direct challenge to their political aspirations and were viewed as "traitors to the white race". Conversely, Unionists regarded Southern Unionists as a loyal segment of the Southern population, swept by the tide of succession, and around whom the foundations of Reconstruction would be built.[23]

Texas Revolution

[edit]

In Texas in 1832–1836, support for the Texas Revolution was not unanimous. The "Tories" were men who supported the Mexican government. The Tories generally were long-term property holders whose roots were outside of the lower South. They typically had little interest in politics and sought conciliation rather than war. The Tories wanted to preserve the economic, political and social gains that they enjoyed as citizens of Mexico, and the revolution threatened to jeopardise those gains.[24]

Current usage

[edit]

Tory has become shorthand for a member of the Conservative Party or for the party in general in Canada and the UK, and can be used interchangeably with the word Conservative.[8]

North America

[edit]

In the United States, Tory is often used as a historical term to describe supporters of Great Britain during the American Revolution. However, in Canadian parlance, British supporters during the revolution are called Loyalists, with the term Tory being used as a contemporary political term.[25]

In Canada, a Tory refers to a member of the Conservative Party of Canada, while the party as a whole are colloquially referred to as the Tories.[8][25] It is also used to refer to the party's predecessor, including the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. In addition to the federal Conservative Party, the terms have also been used to describe provincial Conservative/Progressive Conservative parties and their members. LGBTory is an advocacy group for LGBT supporters of the Conservative Party of Canada and provincial conservative parties.

The terms "Blue Tory" and "Red Tory" describe two factions of Canada's federal and provincial conservative parties. The former leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario, Tim Hudak, adopted the term "Purple Tory" to characterize himself, aiming to avoid the strong ideological stance and instead provide a conciliatory position between Blue Tories and Red Tories.[26] The term "Pink Tory" is also used by Canadian politics as a pejorative term to describe a conservative party member who is perceived as liberal.

United Kingdom

[edit]
Members of LGBT+ Conservatives with a banner reading LGBTory. The group is the LGBT wing of the United Kingdom's Conservative Party.

In the United Kingdom, the Conservative and Unionist Party is often colloquially referred to as the Tories, both by themselves and by opponents, and also in the media. Members and voters of the party are also often referred to as "Tories" as well. The British Broadcasting Corporation's own style guide permits the use of the term Tory, although it requires the term Conservative to be used in its first instance.[8]

In Scotland, the term Tory refers not only to members and supporters of the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party, but is also used to accuse other parties of being insufficiently opposed to that party. For example, members and supporters of the Scottish Labour Party (especially those from the "Blairite and Brownite" factions) may be referred to as Red Tories by traditional Labour members and advocates of an independent Scotland such as members and supporters of the Scottish National Party, the Alba Party (formerly Solidarity), the Scottish Socialist Party and the Scottish Greens. Similarly, Labour supporters have referred to SNP members and supporters as being Tartan Tories.[27]

Australia

[edit]

In Australia, Tory is occasionally used as a pejorative term by members of the Australian Labor Party to refer to conservative members of the Liberal Party of Australia and National Party of Australia parties (who are in a long-standing coalition).[28] The term is not used anywhere near as often as in the UK and Canada, and it is rare – though not unheard of – for members of those parties to self-describe as 'Tories'.

Writing in the Australian Dictionary of Biography, Michael Persse notes the impact of 'Liberal Toryism' on the colonial era Australian statesman William Charles Wentworth when he was in Britain.[29] Chief Justice Garfield Barwick titled his memoir A Radical Tory.[30] The newspaper of the University of Sydney Conservative Club is named The Sydney Tory.[31] A moderate faction of the Australian Greens has been pejoratively dubbed the Tree Tories by the hard left faction.[32][33]

Modern proponents

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tory

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Tory is a political designation originating in late 17th-century Britain, derived from the Irish Gaelic word tóraidhe meaning "outlaw" or "pursued man," initially applied to Catholic rebels in Ireland before denoting supporters of the Stuart monarchy's hereditary succession and divine right during the of 1678–1681. Opposed to the Whigs' push for parliamentary limits on royal power and exclusion of Catholic James II, Tories championed the Anglican Church, traditional social hierarchies, and resistance to revolutionary changes, forming a faction that dominated politics intermittently until the early . The Tory label evolved into a synonym for members and voters of the United Kingdom's Conservative Party, which traces its roots to the Tory grouping and emphasizes free-market economics, national , and institutional continuity over radical reform. In North American , particularly during the (1775–1783), "Tory" referred to Loyalists—colonists loyal to the British Crown—who comprised up to one-third of the population in some regions, often enduring property confiscation, mob violence, and exile to or Britain for opposing independence. This transatlantic usage highlights the term's association with fidelity to established authority amid upheaval, though it carried pejorative connotations of backwardness or in republican narratives. Defining Tory characteristics include skepticism toward abstract and preference for organic societal evolution, influencing variants like Canada's "Red Tories" who blend with communitarian welfare policies. Controversies surrounding Tories often stem from their defense of and , as seen in the Loyalist after Yorktown or British Tories' resistance to Chartist agitation, yet empirical records affirm their role in stabilizing governance against factional excess.

Etymology and Origins

Irish Linguistic Roots

The term "Tory" originates from the Irish Gaelic tóraidhe (modern tóraí), denoting an , robber, or pursued individual, derived from tóir, meaning "pursuit." This linguistic root reflects a descriptor for fugitives evading capture rather than any organized affiliation. The word entered English usage in the mid-17th century, with the earliest recorded application around 1646 to designate Irish bandits known for their predatory activities. In the historical context of Ireland's upheavals, "Tory" specifically labeled dispossessed Catholic fighters and survivors who, after the and amid the Cromwellian conquest from 1649 to 1653, adopted guerrilla raiding against English military forces and Protestant settlers. These groups, often remnants of defeated Confederate or armies, operated from remote bogs and forests, targeting supply lines and isolated holdings in a bid for subsistence and retribution. Contemporary accounts from Cromwellian soldiers, such as those preserved in Gaelic poetry recalling trooper speech from the , used the term pejoratively for these elusive adversaries who defied formal surrender. The application arose causally from systemic land seizures under the regime, where parliamentary ordinances like the 1652 Act for the Settling of redistributed vast Catholic estates to English adventurers and soldiers, displacing proprietors and fueling localized resistance. This was not driven by unified but by immediate exigencies of —raiding for food and amid economic devastation and suppression, as English forces systematically cleared strongholds to consolidate control. The term thus encapsulated pragmatic evasion and predation in response to conquest, without implying coordinated political aims.

Transition to English Political Slang

The Irish term tóraí, denoting an or pursuer associated with 17th-century who resisted Cromwellian forces and Protestant settlers, entered English political lexicon during the of 1679–1681 as a derogatory label applied by parliamentary exclusionists to their adversaries. Whig-aligned writers repurposed it to portray supporters of James, —opponents of bills excluding him from the throne due to his Catholicism—as akin to the predatory Irish insurgents, thereby evoking images of lawless papist aggression against constitutional order. This etymological adaptation transformed the word's connotation from literal in Gaelic contexts to a metaphorical slur imputing "" defiance of parliamentary supremacy to monarchists who prioritized hereditary succession. The term's political debut is dated to approximately 1679–1680 in polemical writings, predating its widespread adoption by a year or so, as evidenced by early attributions and analyses of period . Contemporary pamphlets and diaries from the crisis era document this slur's deployment by Whig propagandists, who linked Tories to the earlier Irish Catholic uprisings of the 1640s, framing them as threats to Protestant despite many targeted figures being Anglican defenders of . The label thus encapsulated a rhetorical strategy to delegitimize royalist adherence to traditional succession without imputing actual criminality, though it carried undertones of barbarism drawn from the Irish prototype.

Historical Development in the British Isles

Seventeenth-Century Emergence in

The Tory faction emerged in during the late 1670s amid escalating political divisions following the Restoration of Charles II in , which reinstated monarchical authority after the Commonwealth's republican experiment but failed to resolve underlying tensions over religious conformity and parliamentary prerogatives. alignments formed around defense of the crown's policies against nonconformist pressures and perceived encroachments by a faction advocating greater parliamentary oversight, particularly in matters of succession and ecclesiastical discipline. By prioritizing hereditary succession and the Anglican establishment, proto-Tories positioned themselves as bulwarks against the destabilizing influences of and contractual interpretations of governance that risked eroding traditional hierarchies. The catalyst for Tory consolidation was the fabricated of 1678, propagated by , which alleged a Jesuit conspiracy to assassinate Charles II and install his Catholic brother James, , via regicide and massacres akin to those in Ireland and France. This hysteria fueled the from 1679 to 1681, wherein opponents—later termed Whigs—pushed three failed bills to exclude James from the throne, invoking fears of Catholic absolutism while aligning with Protestant dissenters skeptical of royal indulgence toward Catholics. Tories, in response, rallied to uphold the indivisibility of the crown's divine-right inheritance and the Church of England's supremacy, decrying Whig agitation as seditious innovation that echoed the civil wars' chaos; their resistance manifested in electoral victories by 1681, restoring royalist majorities in and quelling the exclusionist threat. Empirically, Tories distinguished themselves from Whigs through adherence to non-resistance doctrines and the view of as a God-ordained rather than a conditional contract revocable by subjects, thereby averting immediate radical upheaval by reinforcing institutional continuity over populist appeals to religious alarmism. This stance, rooted in causal preservation of established authority against factional overreach, solidified the Tory identity as defenders of absolutist prerogatives within England's mixed constitution by the early 1680s, prior to subsequent dynastic shifts.

Evolution in the United Kingdom

Following the of 1688, many Tories pragmatically accommodated the new constitutional settlement under William III and Mary II, distancing themselves from absolute Jacobite restorationism to preserve monarchical and ecclesiastical institutions amid Whig dominance. Although retained sympathy among some Tory ranks, leading to electoral setbacks after the 1714 Hanoverian accession—when George I excluded Tory ministers due to perceived Stuart loyalties—the party gradually shifted toward acceptance of the Protestant succession, enabling survival as a parliamentary force focused on Anglican establishment and landed interests. This adaptation prioritized institutional continuity over dynastic purity, fostering resilience against Whig oligarchy until the late eighteenth century. In the nineteenth century, under from 1832 to 1846, Toryism formalized as the Conservative Party through pragmatic reforms that integrated electoral realities while resisting radical change. The 1834 , issued by Peel as leader, endorsed the 1832 Reform Act's limited expansion—granting voting rights to middle-class males in boroughs and counties—while pledging opposition to further upheaval, thereby reorienting the party toward moderate constitutionalism and away from unreformed exclusionism. Peel's 1846 repeal of the , motivated by Irish famine relief and long-term grain shortages, embraced principles despite fierce internal resistance—only 112 Conservatives supported the measure against 241 opponents—splitting the party into Peelites and protectionists but ultimately stabilizing agricultural policy by aligning it with industrial expansion and averting broader economic dislocation. Twentieth-century Tory evolution peaked in electoral dominance through adaptive leadership emphasizing national resilience and market-oriented stability. Winston Churchill's Conservative premiership from May 1940 to July 1945 orchestrated Britain's wartime coalition, mobilizing resources for Allied victory against via strategic alliances and domestic that preserved social cohesion amid existential threats. Returning as from 1951 to 1955, Churchill oversaw post-war reconstruction, including housing drives and imperial transitions that maintained institutional frameworks. Margaret Thatcher's tenure from 1979 to 1990 marked a high point of policy innovation, with three consecutive election victories—securing 339 seats in 1979, 397 in 1983, and 376 in 1987—driven by of state industries (e.g., British Telecom in 1984), union curbs via the 1980-1984 Employment Acts, and monetary controls that reduced inflation from 13.4% in 1980 to 4.6% by 1983, fostering economic recovery from despite initial recessions. These shifts institutionalized as a vehicle for pragmatic governance, prioritizing empirical outcomes like sustained GDP growth over ideological stasis.

Role in Irish Politics

In Ireland, the term Tory referred to members of the who staunchly defended the Act of Union 1801, which dissolved the Irish Parliament on January 1, 1801, and integrated Ireland into the United Kingdom by allocating 100 Irish members to the Westminster House of Commons. This position stemmed from a desire to safeguard Protestant privileges against repeal campaigns led by figures like , who sought to revive Irish self-governance amid fears of Catholic-majority dominance and potential instability following the 1798 Rebellion. Tory unionism thus prioritized imperial cohesion over local autonomy, reflecting a causal prioritization of centralized British authority to mitigate sectarian risks in a demographically divided society. Throughout the nineteenth century, Irish Tories forged alliances with the , a Protestant loyalist society founded in 1795, to resist enacted via the Roman Catholic Relief Act on April 13, 1829, which removed key barriers to Catholic participation in and public office. Many Tories, particularly ultra-conservatives in , decried the measure as eroding and inviting papal influence, prompting widespread opposition including from the Grand Orange Lodge until its temporary dissolution in 1825 under government pressure. This resistance underscored deep sectarian tensions, as Tories viewed emancipation not merely as reform but as a concession that could destabilize the Protestant establishment's monopoly on power in a Catholic-plurality . The under the , effective May 3, 1921, marked a decline in overt Tory influence south of the border, where the term faded with the ascendancy of independent . In , however, "Tory" lingered as a descriptor for unionist conservatives who upheld the region's constitutional ties to Britain, often aligning with the UK Conservative Party at Westminster while navigating local Protestant dominance and opposition to reunification. This residual usage highlighted Tories' marginal yet enduring role in bolstering unionist defenses of empire amid persistent ethno-religious divides.

Toryism in Colonial and Post-Colonial Contexts

United States Loyalists

During the from 1775 to 1783, an estimated 15 to 20 percent of white colonists, or roughly 300,000 to 400,000 individuals out of a population of about 2 million, remained loyal to the British Crown, often referred to as Tories or Loyalists. These colonists prioritized adherence to established legal and parliamentary authority over the radical break advocated by revolutionaries, viewing the conflict as a defense of constitutional continuity rather than a quest for abstract liberties. Motivations included strong economic dependencies on British trade networks, apprehension toward the anarchy of extralegal committees and that characterized Patriot enforcement, and a pragmatic doubt in the untested ideals of drawn from Enlightenment philosophy. Tories actively supported through militia service, intelligence provision, and economic sabotage against rebels, particularly in regions like New York and the where Loyalist sentiment was concentrated. In New York, which housed a significant portion of Loyalists, British occupation until 1783 shielded many from immediate reprisals, but elsewhere, such as the , guerrilla warfare intensified divisions, with events like the in 1780 highlighting Loyalist defeats and subsequent retaliatory violence. Persecution escalated as Patriot-controlled legislatures enacted loyalty oaths, , and vigilante attacks, driving thousands into even before the war's end; estimates suggest up to Loyalists fled at various points, facing , , or execution for their stance. Following the Treaty of Paris in 1783, which nominally recommended property restitution for Loyalists who had not borne arms against the , state governments in places like New York and the proceeded with widespread confiscations, seizing estates valued in the millions of pounds sterling to fund war debts and redistribute land. Over 60,000 to 80,000 Loyalists ultimately emigrated, primarily to Britain or its remaining North American territories, forfeiting homes and livelihoods despite the treaty's provisions, which weakly enforced amid local resentments. This mass dispossession underscored the revolution's intolerance for dissent, compelling Tories to uphold monarchical and hierarchical traditions abroad while the emergent republic consolidated power through federal mechanisms that marginalized such counter-revolutionary impulses.

Canadian Conservatism

Following the , approximately 10,000 Loyalists, many of whom held Tory sympathies from their allegiance to the British Crown, migrated to , with a significant portion settling in after 1783. This influx established a foundation of conservative emphasizing loyalty to and tradition, influencing land distribution policies that favored settled, hierarchical social structures over egalitarian . By the 1810s, this evolved into the , an oligarchic network of appointed officials, clergy, and landowners who dominated executive, legislative, and judicial roles in until the 1830s, prioritizing stability and imperial ties amid threats from American expansionism. Their rule, rooted in Loyalist principles, resisted radical reforms, fostering a governance model that balanced elite stewardship with colonial autonomy, though it provoked rebellions in due to perceived exclusion of reformers. Sir , leader of the Conservative Party, orchestrated on July 1, 1867, through the British North America Act, creating a federal dominion that integrated provinces under a , deliberately diverging from the unitary or republican models south of the border. This Tory-inspired framework preserved British parliamentary traditions, divided powers between federal and provincial levels to accommodate regional differences—such as Quebec's civil law system—and embedded safeguards like the appointed to temper democratic excesses, empirically averting the fragmentation seen in U.S. disputes. Macdonald's vision emphasized pragmatic union over ideological purity, crediting Tory loyalism for enabling via shared tariffs and like the Canadian Pacific Railway, completed in 1885, which unified the nation against continental absorption. In the twentieth century, Tory elements persisted within the Progressive Conservative Party, exemplified by Brian Mulroney's negotiation of the Canada-United States , signed January 2, 1988, which dismantled protectionist barriers inherited from Macdonald's , aligning with classical liberal reforms akin to those of British Tories under . This deal, expanded into NAFTA in 1994, boosted from $177 billion in 1988 to over $600 billion by 2000, demonstrating causal links between reduced tariffs and export growth in sectors like and resources, while maintaining safeguards for cultural industries reflective of conservative . The "Tory" label waned after the 2003 merger forming the , as fusion with reformist elements shifted rhetoric toward broader conservatism, though foundational loyalist and federalist principles endured in policy continuity.

Australian Adaptations

The penal colony established at Sydney Cove in 1788 primarily consisted of convict transportees under military oversight, alongside free settlers whose loyalties remained tied to the British Crown, fostering a preference for imperial authority and social hierarchy amid contemporaneous revolutionary fervor in America and France. This colonial foundation embedded conservative inclinations among the officer class and propertied arrivals, who resisted egalitarian pressures from emancipist convicts and nascent democratic experiments, though without forming a cohesive Tory faction akin to Britain's. During the nineteenth century, expansive pastoralists—derisively termed "squatters"—emerged as a conservative interest group, illegally occupying vast lands for sheep grazing and lobbying against "free selection" acts like ' 1861 legislation, which aimed to subdivide estates for smallholders and mirrored British liberal reforms eroding aristocratic enclosures. These landowners, often of British gentry origin, defended tenure rights through political alliances, echoing Tory defense of landed privilege, yet their influence waned against Australia's frontier ethos of rough equality among working stockmen, which diluted hierarchical pretensions and prioritized practical land access over inherited status. In the twentieth century, "Tory" invocations remained sporadic and pejorative, occasionally applied to conservative leaders like , Australia's longest-serving from 1949 to 1966, whose staunch and skepticism of radical change evoked traditionalist echoes during his tenure. Post-1975 —wherein Governor-General John Kerr dismissed Prime Minister on , invoking reserve powers derived from the —revived latent loyalist sentiments among conservatives advocating retention against republican pushes, though the term itself rarely framed these debates, underscoring Toryism's marginal adaptation in Australia's Westminster-derived but increasingly federal system.

Core Ideological Principles

Foundational Tenets of Tory Thought

Tory thought posits as an organic entity, akin to a , where institutions and hierarchies emerge gradually through historical processes rather than deliberate construction from abstract principles. This conception rejects the contractual model of society as a blank slate forged by rational agreement, emphasizing instead an inherited partnership spanning generations, in which individuals inherit duties and rights shaped by accumulated wisdom and practical necessities. articulated this in his 1790 Reflections on the Revolution in , arguing that binds "those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born," with equal rights to participation but not to identical shares, as variances in contribution and circumstance demand hierarchical differentiation. Egalitarian critiques, which demand leveling such structures, falter empirically by disregarding the causal realities of human inequality and the stabilizing role of tested traditions, often leading to disruption when imposed ahistorically. Central to Tory causal reasoning is the prioritization of empirical bulwarks against societal disorder, including the , secure property rights, and an established national church. These elements, viewed as products of organic evolution, provide continuity and moral order, countering the abstract "" that warned precipitated the French Revolution's chaos from 1789 to 1799, marked by over 40,000 executions during the alone. Property, in particular, anchors not as an innate endowment but as a prescriptive fostering responsibility and restraint, while the church instills virtues indispensable for amid imperfection. Tories thus favor these institutions as pragmatic defenses, substantiated by their endurance through crises, over speculative redesigns that invite anarchy by severing causal links to proven precedents. In distinction from liberalism's faith in engineered progress via universal reason, Toryism advocates , prudent evolution attuned to societal complexities, resisting radical reforms that override inherited . This approach, rooted in empirical observation of from hasty abstractions, privileges adaptation within existing frameworks—such as measured extensions of —over wholesale reconstruction, as evidenced in Burke's endorsement of organic change to conserve order rather than impose equality. Hierarchical , far from arbitrary, arises naturally to coordinate diverse capacities, enabling stability without the illusions of perfectibility that egalitarians project onto unproven ideals.

Variants and Internal Debates

High Toryism embodies an ultra-traditionalist orientation within Toryism, prioritizing the established Anglican Church, agrarian hierarchies, and resistance to liberal economic reforms that threatened inherited social structures. Adherents viewed the as integral to national cohesion, opposing dilutions of its primacy in favor of broader religious or state neutrality. This strand crystallized in opposition to Sir Robert Peel's faction, whose free-trade policies undermined protectionist safeguards for British agriculture; Peel's repeal of the on June 25, 1846, despite vehement intra-party resistance, precipitated a profound , with High Tories decrying it as an abandonment of duties to landed interests and ecclesiastical order. The resulting Protectionist wing, emphasizing organic societal bonds over individualistic , underscored Toryism's internal tension between doctrinal fidelity and pragmatic governance. One-Nation Toryism emerged as a , advancing Disraeli's vision of paternalistic stewardship to integrate industrial workers into the national fabric amid rapid . In his 1874–1880 ministry, Disraeli pursued reforms like the Public Health Act of 1875, which empowered local authorities to combat sanitation crises in burgeoning cities, and housing legislation to mitigate working-class deprivation, aiming to avert class antagonism through elite-led benevolence rather than detachment. This variant reflected adaptive realism by acknowledging causal links between unchecked industrialization and social instability, favoring incremental state intervention to sustain hierarchical unity without eroding traditional authority. Twentieth-century debates intensified between Thatcherite , which from 1979 prioritized and enterprise to counter —evident in policies like the of state industries and union curbs—and communitarian "" critiques advocating localized solidarity over global market abstractions. Tories contended that Thatcherism's emphasis on personal agency exacerbated community disintegration, favoring instead policies reinforcing mutual obligations and skepticism toward neoliberal economics. By the , these tensions manifested in disputes over , with traditionalists urging protectionist measures to safeguard domestic against supranational integration, highlighting Toryism's enduring dialectic between empirical adaptation and preservation of foundational institutions.

Achievements and Societal Contributions

Preservation of Institutions and Stability

Tories, having initially championed strong monarchical authority during the Restoration, aligned with the post-Glorious settlement by rejecting Jacobite efforts to reinstate absolutist Stuart rule, thereby upholding the 1689 ' limits on royal power and guarantees of ary consent for taxation and lawmaking. This stance prevented any successful restoration of personal monarchy, sustaining a hybrid constitutional system where the reigns but does not rule, a framework that has endured for over 335 years without reversion to pre-1689 absolutism. By prioritizing institutional continuity over ideological purity—such as accepting William III and later Hanoverian succession—Tory parliamentarians ensured regular elections, free speech in debate, and protections became entrenched norms, countering narratives of mere reactionism with evidence of adaptive guardianship. In imperial administration during the , Tory-led governments under figures like Lord Derby and focused on pragmatic administrative reforms to maintain order across vast territories, averting widespread revolts through measured and investments rather than rigid centralization. For example, following the 1857 Indian Rebellion, Conservative policies emphasized efficient recruitment via competitive exams (codified in 1853 under prior Tory influence) and railway expansion, which by 1900 spanned over 25,000 miles and facilitated troop movements that quelled unrest without full-scale partition until later. In settler colonies, Tories endorsed gradual , such as approving the Canadian Act, which integrated provinces under a federal structure loyal to , reducing separatist pressures evident in the 1837-1838 rebellions and enabling stable dominion status without the violent seen elsewhere. These approaches, blending with local , governed an peaking at 13.7 million square miles by 1920, demonstrating proactive stability over obstruction. Post-World War II, Conservative leaders like Winston Churchill adapted welfare institutions to postwar realities, committing in the 1951 manifesto to retain the National Health Service and National Insurance while resisting further nationalizations, thus stabilizing society amid reconstruction without embracing full socialist control. Churchill's government expanded housing via 300,000 annual builds and maintained full employment policies, averting the economic volatility that plagued more ideologically rigid regimes and fostering social cohesion that supported 1950s growth rates averaging 3% annually. Edward Heath's 1970-1974 administration further refined these by enacting the 1970 Social Services Act to integrate family allowances and supplementary benefits, adapting to inflation pressures while preserving institutional frameworks against radical overhaul, which helped mitigate unrest like the 1970s strikes without dismantling core welfare provisions. Such measured evolutions underscored Tory capacity for reform within tradition, prioritizing societal equilibrium over dogmatic stasis.

Policy Innovations and Economic Impacts

Sir Robert Peel's of the in marked a pivotal Tory-led shift toward , abolishing tariffs on imported grain to prioritize industrial competitiveness over agricultural . This policy facilitated a surge in British s, as lower food costs enhanced for urban workers and redirected resources from inefficient farming to productive sectors, contributing to mid-Victorian economic expansion despite initial distress in agrarian regions. Quantitative general equilibrium models indicate the raised overall welfare by reallocating labor and capital, with output benefiting from cheaper inputs and expanded foreign markets. Margaret Thatcher's program in the , exemplified by the 1984 flotation of British Telecom—which transferred 50.2% of shares to public ownership—aimed to dismantle state monopolies, foster , and curb fiscal burdens from subsidized enterprises. This reform injected efficiency into telecommunications infrastructure, enabling rapid network modernization and investment exceeding £7.7 billion in the ensuing years, while generating over £13 billion in revenues from BT alone. Broader privatizations across 40+ state firms reduced employment by 600,000 and correlated with macroeconomic recovery, as privatized entities delivered higher and contributed to the sustained growth phase of the by minimizing government intervention in capital allocation. Empirical data on real GDP growth from 1955 onward reveal Tory administrations achieving an annualized rate of 2.5%, modestly exceeding Labour's 2.26%, with notable performance in key Conservative spans like 1951–1964 (post-war reconstruction under Churchill and successors) and 1979–1997 (Thatcher-Major era of supply-side reforms). These periods featured causal mechanisms such as and fiscal restraint, which alleviated inherited from prior Labour governance and sustained compounding expansion through incentives, contrasting with redistribution-focused alternatives that often coincided with slower productivity gains.

Criticisms and Controversies

Accusations of Reactionism and Elitism

Critics of Toryism, particularly from progressive and left-leaning perspectives, have long accused the tradition of reactionism, portraying its adherence to established hierarchies and institutions as a reflexive opposition to egalitarian reforms aimed at dismantling aristocratic privilege. For instance, the Conservative Party's cautious and divided stance on extending —initially resisting full male enfranchisement before and maintaining reservations about women's inclusion even in the 1918 Representation of the People Act—has been cited as evidence of preservation of power among landed elites and traditional classes. This perceived intransigence contributed to electoral backlash, such as the 1906 Liberal landslide, where Tory policies on tariff reform and education were framed as regressive defenses of imperial and class interests against and broader democratic access. Such historical charges extend to accusations of delayed moral progress, with some detractors alleging Tory reluctance to fully embrace immediate abolition in , prioritizing colonial economic interests and compensation for slaveholders over humanitarian urgency, despite individual Tory figures like advancing anti-slavery efforts earlier. In response, Tory defenders argue that their hierarchical worldview—rooted in merit-based authority rather than birth alone—serves as a causal check against the volatility of unchecked mass democracy, which can precipitate fiscal irresponsibility and social disorder, as evidenced by the Republic's in 1923 amid reparative pressures and populist governance failures. In contemporary terms, post-2010 Tory-led measures have drawn similar rebukes for entrenching , with left-leaning analyses attributing spikes in relative —from 7.3 million affected in 2011 to higher figures by mid-decade—and stalled gains to disproportionate cuts in welfare and public services favoring fiscal prudence over redistribution. However, empirical fiscal data counters that these policies achieved substantial deficit reduction, lowering the shortfall from 10% of GDP in 2009–10 to approximately 2% by 2018–19, averting potential sovereign debt crises through disciplined expenditure control rather than inflationary borrowing. Tory rationales frame this "elitist" as a prudent of priorities, shielding long-term stability from short-term democratic demands for unchecked spending that risk intergenerational burdens.

Internal Failures and Modern Challenges

The John Major government's adherence to the (ERM) led to the crisis on September 16, 1992, when speculative pressures forced the to withdraw the pound from the system after spending approximately £3.3 billion in reserves and raising interest rates temporarily to 15% in a failed defense effort. This self-inflicted economic humiliation, stemming from an overcommitment to fixed exchange rates incompatible with domestic monetary conditions, shattered the Conservative Party's reputation for sound fiscal management, paving the way for internal recriminations and contributing to electoral vulnerability in subsequent years. Following the 2016 Brexit referendum, Conservative administrations under , , and subsequent leaders faced execution shortcomings that undermined the sovereignty objectives central to the vote, particularly in immigration policy. Net migration surged to record highs, with 764,000 arrivals in the year ending December 2022 and provisional figures exceeding 685,000 for the year ending June 2023, driven largely by non-EU humanitarian and work visas rather than the anticipated curbs on free movement. This outcome contradicted the party's pledges to reclaim as a hallmark of national independence, exposing flaws in post-referendum planning and regulatory implementation that prioritized international commitments over domestic priorities. The July 4, 2024, general amplified these deviations' consequences, as the Conservatives lost 251 seats—dropping from 365 in 2019 to 121—amid a vote share collapse from 43.6% to 23.7%, the lowest in the party's modern history. Pragmatic voices within conservative circles, including analyses of vote fragmentation to (which secured 14.3% nationally), attribute this wipeout to leadership's centrist pivots—such as diluting manifesto commitments on tax cuts and deregulation—that failed to retain the working-class and rural base galvanized by , resulting in empirical turnout and loyalty erosion without compensatory gains from the center.

Modern Usage and Proponents

In the United Kingdom

In contemporary British , "Tory" persists as a colloquial synonym for members and supporters of the Conservative Party, often wielded pejoratively by Labour leaders and outlets aligned with the left to imply outdated elitism or incompetence. , for example, has sustained rhetorical assaults framing the "Tories" as emblematic of governmental failure during his 2024 campaign and subsequent tenure. This usage draws on entrenched partisan traditions, though it contrasts with internal Conservative efforts to reappropriate the label; , elected in late 2024, invoked the "Tory party" explicitly in her 2025 conference address while articulating a vision for ideological renewal amid electoral setbacks. The Conservatives' landslide defeat in the July 4, , general election—reducing their parliamentary seats from 365 to 121—has intensified party-wide reflection on vulnerabilities to populist challengers like , which garnered 14.3% of the vote despite winning only five seats under the first-past-the-post system. This outcome highlighted right-wing vote fragmentation, with siphoning disaffected Conservative voters on issues like and distrust, prompting debates at the 2025 conference over strategic adaptation versus ideological purity. Analysts note that failure to address this rivalry risks further erosion, as two-thirds of 2024 Conservative-to-Reform defectors remain potentially recoverable but demand policy shifts away from perceived . Modern Tory rhetoric and platforms uphold commitments to in policy domains, echoing historical emphases on national self-determination against supranational or bureaucratic overreach. On , the party proposes annual caps legislated by and a dedicated removals force targeting 750,000 deportations of illegal entrants within five years, aiming to reverse net migration trends exceeding 700,000 annually under prior governance. Regarding net zero, Conservatives advocate repealing the 2008 Act's binding targets, arguing such mandates prioritize ideological goals over affordable and could elevate emissions short-term while constraining industrial . These stances position the party in opposition to Labour's expansions, framing them as defenses of democratic control over borders and economy.

In Canada and Other Commonwealth Nations

In , "Tory" endures as an archaic label for traditional conservatives within the modern Conservative Party, often denoting establishment-oriented figures distinct from populist strains. The term gained renewed scrutiny following the Conservative Party's failure to capitalize on anti-incumbent sentiment in the April 28, 2025, federal election, where the Liberals under secured a despite trailing in polls for years. , the party leader, lost his Carleton seat—a riding he had held since —exacerbating internal debates over a perceived "Tory ," an ingrained psychological and strategic favoring opposition over bold proposals. This , articulated by observers like George Perlin, highlights how historical Tory impulses contribute to electoral underperformance against resilient Liberal holds. In , the descriptor "Tory" surfaces sporadically for the Liberal Party, especially post the Coalition's defeat in the May 3, 2025, federal election, where Peter Dutton's opposition to Anthony Albanese's Labor failed to sway voters toward change. This usage evokes the monarchy-affirming conservatism of , who as Liberal prime minister from 1949 to 1966 championed ties and imperial loyalty. Critics, including left-leaning media, deploy "Tory" pejoratively to frame Liberal policies as elitist or backward-looking, amid the party's post-election reckoning. Across other realms, residual Tory influences persist in anti-republican advocacy, exemplified by Australia's 1999 constitutional referendum, where 55% voted to retain the , defeating proposals for an elected . Such sentiments reflect a broader, fading attachment to monarchical institutions among conservative factions wary of radical constitutional shifts. This loyalty underscores Tory thought's emphasis on continuity, though electoral setbacks in 2025 contexts signal its waning rhetorical potency in diverse polities.

Residual Influence Elsewhere

In the United States, paleoconservative thinkers have occasionally invoked Tory traditions as a counterpoint to neoconservative , emphasizing inherited customs, local attachments, and wariness of ideological . Russell Kirk's The Roots of American Order (1974) identifies London's constitutional heritage—including monarchical continuity and prescriptive —as a foundational influence on American institutions, echoing Tory resistance to Whiggish abstractions of progress and contractarianism. This perspective informed critiques of neoconservatism's faith in democratic exportation, portraying it as a modern Whiggery detached from organic social orders. Such nods persist in niche traditionalist circles, where Toryism symbolizes agrarian localism and cultural rootedness against cosmopolitan elites, as seen in defenses of and toward centralized power. However, explicit Tory framing remains marginal, overshadowed by fusionist conservatism's dominance since the and lacking institutional traction in major parties or policy debates. Beyond the Anglosphere, Tory-like emphases on sovereignty and tradition appear analogously in right-wing anti-globalist strains that resist supranational and . These movements prioritize national hierarchies and historical continuity, akin to Tory , but deploy indigenous terms rather than "Tory," which sees virtually no adoption in non-English-speaking contexts during the . Post-Trump has further diluted any residual echoes, redirecting focus to transactional over intellectual Toryism, with publications confirming its confinement to esoteric discussions rather than broader revival.

References

  1. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Tory
  2. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-30899534
  3. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Tory
  4. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/parliamentaryauthority/revolution/overview/whigstories/
  5. https://www.theirishstory.com/2019/01/18/the-strange-history-of-the-term-tory-in-ireland/
  6. https://www.gosportconservatives.org/brief-history-conservative-party
  7. https://consoc.org.uk/history-of-the-conservative-party/
  8. https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/tories
  9. https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/loyalists
  10. https://www.toriesfightingfortheking.com/WhoTories.htm
  11. https://northcarolinahistory.org/encyclopedia/tories/
  12. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/politics-and-government/conservative-party-political-party
  13. https://www.nps.gov/teachers/classrooms/loyalists-in-american-revolution.htm
  14. https://greenly.earth/en-us/blog/ecology-news/conservative-party-history-beliefs-and-environmental-policy
  15. https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/irishmr/vol03/no09/gallagher.htm
  16. https://www.theprincetontory.com/criminals-catholics-and-conservatives-a-brief-history-of-toryism/
  17. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/origins-of-whig-and-tory-in-english-political-language/83395811DB380A29B4AE3E5A4FBBD4DC
  18. https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=harding&book=england&story=charles2
  19. https://www.britannica.com/event/Popish-Plot
  20. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Whig-Party-England
  21. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1715-1754/survey/v-tories
  22. https://www.alistairlexden.org.uk/news/hanoverian-succession-and-downfall-tory-party-tercentenary-essay
  23. https://www.alistairlexden.org.uk/news/sir-robert-peel-and-tamworth-manifesto-190-years
  24. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/the-corn-laws/
  25. https://victorianweb.org/history/cornlaws2.html
  26. https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-prime-ministers/winston-churchill
  27. https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-prime-ministers/margaret-thatcher
  28. https://apnews.com/article/britain-election-labour-conservative-1979-thatcher-9042d0bbb3ab0a9d58d807812cf5004f
  29. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/legislativescrutiny/parliamentandireland/collections/ireland/act-of-union-1800/
  30. https://victorianweb.org/history/ireland1.html
  31. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/manuscriptsandspecialcollections/learning/dukeofnewcastle/theme3/catholicemancipation.aspx
  32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30008708
  33. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/irish-partition/
  34. https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/american-war-independence-outbreak
  35. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/meet-the-defiant-loyalists-who-paid-dearly-for-choosing-the-wrong-side-in-the-american-revolution-180986716/
  36. https://community.weber.edu/weberreads/loyalists.htm
  37. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/family-compact
  38. https://theconversation.com/brian-mulroney-champion-of-free-trade-brought-canada-closer-to-the-u-s-during-his-reign-as-prime-minister-224852
  39. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Sandboxes/admin/Australian_Politics_and_Policy_-_Senior_Edition_%28Chen_Barry_and_Butcher%29/01%253A_Introduction/1.03%253A_Australian_political_thought
  40. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/PJlPubPI/2009/24.pdf
  41. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10314618808595775
  42. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/114725/2/b12269803.pdf
  43. https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/bigideas/australia-forums-the-legacy-of-sir-robert-menzies/3528872
  44. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Practice_and_Procedure/platparl/c04
  45. https://www.tutor2u.net/politics/reference/organic-society-state-conservatism
  46. https://www.constitution.org/2-Authors/eb/rev_fran.htm
  47. https://revolution.chnm.org/items/show/321
  48. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2017/09/burke-principle-order-russell-kirk.html
  49. https://www.tutor2u.net/politics/reference/edmund-burke-1729-1797
  50. https://www.acton.org/pub/commentary/2017/11/07/edmund-burkes-conservative-case-free-markets
  51. https://kirkcenter.org/conservatism/ten-conservative-principles/
  52. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2011/10/society-as-contract-edmund-burke.html
  53. https://www.tutor2u.net/politics/reference/hierarchy-conservatism
  54. https://victorianweb.org/history/conservative.html
  55. https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/westernumirror/article/download/15855/12279
  56. https://historyofparliament.com/2025/04/19/disraeli-one-nation-conservatism/
  57. https://www.tutorchase.com/notes/a-level-ocr/history/11-3-2-one-nation-conservatism--reforms-187480
  58. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/173205/8/McMeeking2021_Article_PrimeMinisterialPowersOfPatron.pdf
  59. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/essays/52797/rise-of-the-red-tories
  60. https://journals.openedition.org/osb/5513
  61. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bill-of-Rights-British-history
  62. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/parliamentaryauthority/revolution/overview/billofrights/
  63. https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-Europe/The-conservative-reaction
  64. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/victorians/indian_rebellion_01.shtml
  65. https://academic.oup.com/histres/article/94/265/532/6291436
  66. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Conservative-Party-political-party-United-Kingdom
  67. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-winston-churchill/churchill-and-social-policy/8106F7BE7A5C79AF7D5D8FA585E282BA
  68. https://academic.oup.com/book/12160/chapter/161573928
  69. https://www.britannica.com/topic/conservatism/Great-Britain
  70. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w28142/w28142.pdf
  71. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/economic-consequences-sir-robert-peel-quantitative-assessment-repeal-corn-laws
  72. https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp1126.pdf
  73. https://cps.org.uk/research/the-performance-of-privatisation-vol-ii-privatisation-and-its-effect-on-the-exchequer/
  74. https://www.cato.org/cato-journal/winter-2017/margaret-thatchers-privatization-legacy
  75. https://shura.shu.ac.uk/27982/8/Algarhi-DoesUKEconomy%2528VoR%2529.pdf
  76. https://academic.oup.com/book/10546/chapter/158498147
  77. https://figshare.le.ac.uk/articles/journal_contribution/The_Conservative_Party_and_the_impact_of_the_1918_Reform_Act/10233869
  78. https://liberalhistory.org.uk/history/1906-election/
  79. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/conservative-political-economy-and-the-problem-of-colonial-slavery-18231833/3F9DCD82DDE54436ADD06CC122A1AF3B
  80. https://www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/cs-true-cost-austerity-inequality-uk-120913-en_0.pdf
  81. https://ifs.org.uk/publications/conservatives-and-economy-2010-24
  82. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/austerity-public-services.pdf
  83. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/black-wednesday.asp
  84. https://www.daviddjward.com/black-wednesday-30-years-on/
  85. https://www.gresham.ac.uk/watch-now/leaving-erm-1992
  86. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/long-term-international-migration-flows-to-and-from-the-[uk](/page/United_Kingdom)/
  87. https://www.bbc.com/news/election/2024/uk/results
  88. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-uk-election-results/parties/conservative/
  89. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/06/27/centrist-politics-failing-us-uk-france-elections/
  90. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0qe5jyj319o
  91. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/08/badenoch-sets-out-her-vision-to-redefine-tory-party-but-few-are-listening
  92. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c75q0gk32gdo
  93. https://politicalquarterly.org.uk/blog/the-2024-general-election-and-the-rise-of-reform-uk-2/
  94. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly7l65xy23o
  95. https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/52476-a-year-after-the-2024-election-which-voters-have-abandoned-the-conservative-party-and-why
  96. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c708g5x2yqzo
  97. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/10/07/chris-philp-tories-more-migrants-leave-britain-than-enter/
  98. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn97x3jy8w1o
  99. https://www.conservatives.com/news/controlling-immigration
  100. https://www.nytimes.com/news-event/canada-election
  101. https://thehub.ca/2025/10/25/the-weekly-wrap-return-of-the-tory-syndrome/
  102. https://montrealgazette.com/news/opinion-is-poilievre-falling-victim-to-tory-syndrome
  103. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg7x1glvwdo
  104. https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/can-peter-dutton-pull-off-a-trump-20241113-p5kq6j
  105. https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/labor-victory-proves-public-rejected-malicious-media-falsehoods%2C19703
  106. https://kirkcenter.org/essays/the-many-roots-of-american-order/
  107. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2017/01/locating-the-tory-tradition-in-american-history-james-baresel.html
  108. https://firstthings.com/the-right-right/
  109. https://theconversation.com/how-anti-globalisation-switched-from-a-left-to-a-right-wing-issue-and-where-it-will-go-next-90587
  110. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10357718.2025.2574599
  111. https://prospect.org/power/conservative-crackup/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.