Hubbry Logo
Western WallWestern WallMain
Open search
Western Wall
Community hub
Western Wall
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Western Wall
Western Wall
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Western Wall

The Western Wall (Hebrew: הַכּוֹתֶל הַמַּעֲרָבִי, romanizedHaKotel HaMa'aravi, lit.'the western wall'; pronunciation; Ashkenazi Hebrew pronunciation: HaKosel HaMa'arovi) is an ancient retaining wall of the built-up hill known to Jews and Christians as the Temple Mount of Jerusalem. Its most famous section, known by the same name, often shortened by Jews to the Kotel or Kosel, is known in the West as the Wailing Wall, and in Arab world and Islamic world as the Buraq Wall (Arabic: حَائِط ٱلْبُرَاق, romanizedḤā'iṭ al-Burāq; ['ħaːʔɪtˤ albʊ'raːq]). In a Jewish religious context, the term Western Wall and its variations is used in the narrow sense, for the section used for Jewish prayer; in its broader sense it refers to the entire 488-metre-long (1,601 ft) retaining wall on the western side of the Temple Mount.

At the prayer section, just over half the wall's total height, including its 17 courses located below street level, dates from the end of the Second Temple period, and is believed to have been begun by Herod the Great.[1] The very large stone blocks of the lower courses are Herodian, the courses of medium-sized stones above them were added during the Umayyad period, while the small stones of the uppermost courses are of more recent date, especially from the Ottoman period.

The Western Wall plays an important role in Judaism due to it being part of the man-made "Temple Mount", an artificially expanded hilltop best known as the traditional site of the Jewish Temple. Because of the Temple Mount entry restrictions, the Wall is the holiest place where Jews are permitted to pray outside the Temple Mount platform, because the presumed site of the Holy of Holies, the most sacred site in the Jewish faith, presumably lies just above and behind it. The original, natural, and irregular-shaped Temple Mount was gradually extended to allow for an ever-larger Temple compound to be built at its top. The earliest source possibly mentioning this specific site as a place of Jewish worship is from the 10th century.[2][3] The Western Wall, in the narrow sense, i.e. referring to the section used for Jewish prayer, is also known as the "Wailing Wall", in reference to the practice of Jews weeping at the site. During the period of Christian Roman rule over Jerusalem (ca. 324–638), Jews were completely barred from Jerusalem except on Tisha B'Av, the day of national mourning for the Temples. The term "Wailing Wall" has historically been used mainly by Christians, with use by Jews becoming marginal.[4] Of the entire retaining wall, the section ritually used by Jews now faces a large plaza in the Jewish Quarter, near the southwestern corner of the Temple Mount, while the rest of the wall is concealed behind structures in the Muslim Quarter, with the small exception of an 8-metre (26 ft) section, the so-called "Little Western Wall" or "Small Wailing Wall". This segment of the western retaining wall derives particular importance from having never been fully obscured by medieval buildings, and displaying much of the original Herodian stonework. In religious terms, the "Little Western Wall" is presumed to be even closer to the Holy of Holies and thus to the "presence of God" (Shechina), and the underground Warren's Gate, which has been out of reach for Jews from the 12th century till its partial excavation in the 20th century.

The entire Western Wall constitutes the western border of al-Haram al-Sharif ("the Noble Sanctuary"), or the Al-Aqsa compound. It is believed to be the site where the Islamic Prophet Muhammad tied his winged steed, the Burāq, on his Night Journey, which tradition connects to Jerusalem, before ascending to heaven. While the wall was considered an integral part of the Haram esh-Sharif and waqf property of the Moroccan Quarter under Muslim rule, a right of Jewish prayer and pilgrimage has long existed as part of the Status Quo regulations.[5][6][7] This position was confirmed in a 1930 international commission during the British Mandate period.

With the rise of the Zionist movement in the early 20th century, the wall became a source of friction between the Jewish and Muslim communities, the latter being worried that the wall could be used to further Jewish claims to the Temple Mount and thus Jerusalem. During this period outbreaks of violence at the foot of the wall became commonplace, with a particularly deadly riot in 1929 in which 133 Jews and 116 Arabs were killed, with many more people injured. After the 1948 Arab–Israeli War the eastern portion of Jerusalem was occupied by Jordan. Under Jordanian control Jews were completely expelled from the Old City including the Jewish Quarter, effectively banning Jewish prayer at the site of the Western Wall for 19 years. This period ended on June 10, 1967, when Israel gained control of the site following the Six-Day War. Three days after establishing control over the Western Wall site, the Moroccan Quarter was bulldozed by Israeli authorities to create space for what is now the Western Wall plaza.

Herodian ashlars of the Western Wall

Etymology

[edit]

Western Wall

[edit]

Early Jewish texts referred to a "western wall of the Temple",[8] but there is doubt whether the texts were referring to the outer, retaining wall called today "the Western Wall", or to the western wall of the actual Temple.[4] The earliest Jewish use of the Hebrew term "ha-kotel ha-ma'aravi", "the Western Wall", as referring to the wall visible today, was by the 11th-century poet Ahimaaz ben Paltiel.[4]

Wailing Wall

[edit]

The name "Wailing Wall", and descriptions such as "wailing place", appeared regularly in English literature during the 19th century.[9][10][11] The name Mur des Lamentations was used in French and Klagemauer in German. This description stemmed from the Jewish practice of coming to the site to mourn and bemoan the destruction of the Temple and the loss of national freedom it symbolized.[4]

Jews may often be seen sitting for hours at the Wailing-place bent in sorrowful meditation over the history of their race, and repeating oftentimes the words of the Seventy-ninth Psalm. On Fridays especially, Jews of both sexes, of all ages, and from all countries, assemble in large numbers to kiss the sacred stones and weep outside the precincts they may not enter.

Charles Wilson, 1881[12]

Al-Buraq Wall

[edit]

Arab world and Islamic world have associated the name Al-Buraq with the wall at least since the 1860s.[13]

Location, dimensions, stones

[edit]
Panorama of the Western Wall with the Dome of the Rock (left) and al-Aqsa mosque (right) in the background
The Western Wall and Dome of the Rock

Prayer section vs. entire wall

[edit]

The term Western Wall commonly refers to a 187-foot (57 m) exposed section of a much longer retaining wall, built by Herod on the western flank of the Temple Mount. Only when used in this sense is it synonymous with the term Wailing Wall. This section faces a large plaza and is set aside for prayer.

In its entirety, the western retaining wall of the Herodian Temple Mount complex stretches for 1,600 feet (488 m), most of which is hidden behind medieval residential structures built along its length.

There are only two other revealed sections: the southern part of the Wall (see Robinson's Arch area), which measures approximately 80 metres (262 ft), and is separated from the prayer area by just a narrow stretch of archaeological remains; and another, much shorter section, known as the Little Western Wall, which is located close to the Iron Gate.

The entire western wall functions as a retaining wall, supporting and enclosing the ample substructures built by Herod the Great around 19 BCE. Herod's project was to create an artificial extension to the small quasi-natural plateau on which the First Temple stood, already widened in Hasmonean times during the Second Temple period, by finally transforming it into the almost rectangular, wide expanse of the Temple Mount platform visible today.

Height, courses, building stones

[edit]

At the Western Wall Plaza, the total height of the Wall from its foundation is estimated at 105 feet (32 m), with the above-ground section standing approximately 62 feet (19 m) high. The Wall consists of 45 stone courses, 28 of them above ground and 17 underground.[14] The first seven above-ground layers are from the Herodian period. This section of wall is built from enormous meleke limestone blocks, possibly quarried at either Zedekiah's Cave[15] situated under the Muslim Quarter of the Old City, or at Ramat Shlomo[16] 4 kilometres (2.5 mi) northwest of the Old City. Most of them weigh between 2 and 8 short tons (1.8 and 7.3 tonnes) each, but others weigh even more, with one extraordinary stone located slightly north of Wilson's Arch[17] measuring 13.55 metres (44.5 ft) long, 3.3 metres (11 ft) high,[18] approximately 1.8 to 2.5 metres (5.9 to 8.2 ft) deep,[19][20] and weighing between 250 and 300 tonnes (280 and 330 short tons).[20] Each of these ashlars is framed by fine-chiseled borders. The margins themselves measure between 5 and 20 centimetres (2 and 8 in) wide, with their depth measuring 1.5 centimetres (0.59 in). In the Herodian period, the upper 10 metres (33 ft) of wall were 1 metre (39 in) thick and served as the outer wall of the double colonnade of the Temple platform. This upper section was decorated with pilasters, the remainder of which were destroyed when the Byzantines reconquered Jerusalem from the Persians in 628.[17]

The next four courses, consisting of smaller plainly dressed stones, are Umayyad work (8th century, Early Muslim period).[21] Above that are 16 to 17 courses of small stones from the Mamluk period (13th–16th centuries) and later.[21]

History

[edit]

Construction and destruction (19 BCE – 70 CE)

[edit]
Engraving, 1850 by Rabbi Joseph Schwarz [he]

According to the Hebrew Bible, Solomon's Temple was built atop what is known as the Temple Mount in the 10th century BCE and destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BCE,[22] and the Second Temple completed and dedicated in 516 BCE. Around 19 BCE Herod the Great began a massive expansion project on the Temple Mount. In addition to fully rebuilding and enlarging the Temple, he artificially expanded the platform on which it stood, doubling it in size. Today's Western Wall formed part of the retaining perimeter wall of this platform. In 2011, Israeli archaeologists announced the surprising discovery of Roman coins minted well after Herod's death, found under the foundation stones of the wall. The excavators came upon the coins inside a ritual bath that predates Herod's building project, which was filled in to create an even base for the wall and was located under its southern section.[23] This seems to indicate that Herod did not finish building the entire wall by the time of his death in 4 BCE. The find confirms the description by historian Josephus Flavius, which states that construction was finished only during the reign of King Agrippa II, Herod's great-grandson.[24] Given Josephus' information, the surprise mainly regarded the fact that an unfinished retaining wall in this area could also mean that at least parts of the splendid Royal Stoa and the monumental staircase leading up to it could not have been completed during Herod's lifetime. Also surprising was the fact that the usually very thorough Herodian builders had cut corners by filling in the ritual bath, rather than placing the foundation course directly onto the much firmer bedrock. Some scholars are doubtful of the interpretation and have offered alternative explanations, such as, for example, later repair work.

Herod's Temple was destroyed by the Romans, along with the rest of Jerusalem, in 70 CE,[25] during the First Jewish–Roman War.

Late Roman and Byzantine periods (135–638)

[edit]

During much of the 2nd–5th centuries of the Common Era, after the Roman defeat of the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE, Jews were banned from Jerusalem. There is some evidence that Roman emperors in the 2nd and 3rd centuries did permit them to visit the city to worship on the Mount of Olives and sometimes on the Temple Mount itself.[26] When the empire started becoming Christian under Constantine I, they were given permission to enter the city once a year, on the Tisha B'Av, to lament the loss of the Temple at the wall.[27] The Bordeaux Pilgrim, who wrote in 333 CE, suggests that it was probably to the perforated stone or the Rock of Moriah, "to which the Jews come every year and anoint it, bewail themselves with groans, rend their garments, and so depart". This was because an imperial decree from Rome barred Jews from living in Jerusalem. Just once per year they were permitted to return and bitterly grieve about the fate of their people. Comparable accounts survive, including those by the Church Father, Gregory of Nazianzus (c. 329–390) and by Jerome in his commentary to Zephaniah written in 392 CE. In the 4th century, Christian sources reveal that the Jews encountered great difficulty in buying the right to pray near the Western Wall, at least on the 9th of Av.[26] In 425 CE, the Jews of the Galilee wrote to Byzantine empress Aelia Eudocia seeking permission to pray by the ruins of the Temple. Permission was granted and they were officially permitted to resettle in Jerusalem.[28]

Archaeology

[edit]

Discovery of underground rooms that could have been used as food storage carved out of the bedrock under the 1,400-year-old mosaic floor of Byzantine structure was announced by Israel Antiquities Authority in May in 2020.

"At first we were very disappointed because we found we hit the bedrock, meaning that the material culture, the human activity here in Jerusalem ended. What we found here was a rock-cut system—three rooms, all hewn in the bedrock of ancient Jerusalem" said co-director of the excavation Barak Monnickendam-Givon.[29]

Early Muslim to Mamluk period (638–1517)

[edit]

Several Jewish authors of the 10th and 11th centuries write about the Jews resorting to the Western Wall for devotional purposes.[30][3] Ahimaaz relates that Samuel ben Paltiel (980–1010) gave money for oil at "the sanctuary at the Western Wall."[31][32][33] Benjamin of Tudela (1170) wrote "In front of this place is the western wall, which is one of the walls of the Holy of Holies. This is called the Gate of Mercy, and hither come all the Jews to pray before the Wall in the open court." The account gave rise to confusion about the actual location of Jewish worship, and some suggest that Benjamin in fact referred to the Eastern Wall along with its Gate of Mercy.[34][35] While Nahmanides (d. 1270) did not mention a synagogue near the Western Wall in his detailed account of the temple site,[36] shortly before the Crusader period a synagogue existed at the site.[37] Obadiah of Bertinoro (1488) states "the Western Wall, part of which is still standing, is made of great, thick stones, larger than any I have seen in buildings of antiquity in Rome or in other lands."[38]

Shortly after Saladin's 1187 siege of the city, in 1193, the sultan's son and successor al-Afdal established the land adjacent to the wall as a charitable trust (waqf). The largest part of it was named after an important mystic, Abu Madyan Shu'aib. The Abu Madyan waqf was dedicated to Maghrebian pilgrims and scholars who had taken up residence there, and houses were built only metres away from the wall, from which they were thus separated by just a narrow passageway,[39] some 4 metres (13 ft) wide.[citation needed]

The first likely mention of the Islamic tradition that Buraq was tethered at the site is from the 14th century. A manuscript by Ibrahim b. Ishaq al-Ansari (known as Ibn Furkah, d. 1328) refers to Bab al-Nabi (lit.'Gate of the Prophet'), an old name for Barclay's Gate below the Maghrebi Gate.[40][41] Charles D. Matthews however, who edited al-Firkah's work, notes that other statements of al-Firkah might seem to point to the Double Gate in the southern wall.[42]

Ottoman period (1517–1917)

[edit]
Wailing Wall, Jerusalem by Gustav Bauernfeind (19th century)

In 1517, the Turkish Ottomans under Selim I conquered Jerusalem from the Mamluks who had held it since 1250. Selim's son, Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, ordered the construction of an imposing wall to be built around the entire city, which still stands today. Various folktales relate Suleiman's quest to locate the Temple site and his order to have the area "swept and sprinkled, and the Western Wall washed with rosewater" upon its discovery.[43] According to a legend cited by Moses Hagiz, Jews received official permission to worship at the site and Ottoman architect Mimar Sinan built an oratory for them there,[44] but, as of Purim 1625, Jews were banned from praying on the Temple Mount and only sometimes dared to pray at the Western Wall, for which purpose a special liturgy had been arranged.[45] Gedaliah of Siemiatycze, who lived in Jerusalem from 1700 to 1706, reports that Jews then had access to the wall and would pray there as often as possible.[46]

Over the centuries, land close to the Wall became built up. Public access to the Wall was through the Moroccan Quarter, a labyrinth of narrow alleyways. In May 1840 a firman issued by Ibrahim Pasha forbade the Jews to pave the passageway in front of the Wall. It also cautioned them against "raising their voices and displaying their books there." They were, however, allowed "to pay visits to it as of old."[3]

Rabbi Joseph Schwarz [he] writing in the mid-19th century records:

This wall is visited by all our brothers on every feast and festival; and the large space at its foot is often so densely filled up, that all cannot perform their devotions here at the same time. It is also visited, though by less numbers, on every Friday afternoon, and by some nearly every day. No one is molested in these visits by the Mahomedans, as we have a very old firman from the Sultan of Constantinople that the approach shall not be denied to us, though the Porte obtains for this privilege a special tax, which is, however, quite insignificant.[47]

Over time the increased numbers of people gathering at the site resulted in tensions between the Jewish visitors who wanted easier access and more space, and the residents, who complained of the noise.[3] This gave rise to Jewish attempts at gaining ownership of the land adjacent to the Wall.

The Western Wall in c. 1870, squeezed in by houses of the Moroccan Quarter, a century before they were demolished

In the late 1830s a wealthy Jew named Shemarya Luria attempted to purchase houses near the Wall, but was unsuccessful,[48] as was Jewish sage Abdullah of Bombay who tried to purchase the Western Wall in the 1850s.[49] In 1869 Rabbi Hillel Moshe Gelbstein settled in Jerusalem. He arranged that benches and tables be brought to the Wall on a daily basis for the study groups he organised and the minyan which he led there for years. He also formulated a plan whereby some of the courtyards facing the Wall would be acquired, with the intention of establishing three synagogues—one each for the Sephardim, the Hasidim and the Perushim.[50] He also endeavoured to re-establish an ancient practice of "guards of honour", which according to the mishnah in Middot, were positioned around the Temple Mount. He rented a house near the Wall and paid men to stand guard there and at various other gateways around the mount. However, this set-up lasted only for a short time due to lack of funds or because of Arab resentment.[51] In 1874, Mordechai Rosanes paid for the repaving of the alleyway adjacent to the wall.[52]

In 1887 Baron Rothschild conceived a plan to purchase and demolish the Moroccan Quarter as "a merit and honor to the Jewish People."[53] The proposed purchase was considered and approved by the Ottoman Governor of Jerusalem, Rauf Pasha, and by the Mufti of Jerusalem, Mohammed Tahir Husseini. Even after permission was obtained from the highest secular and Muslim religious authority to proceed, the transaction was shelved after the authorities insisted that after demolishing the quarter no construction of any type could take place there, only trees could be planted to beautify the area. Additionally the Jews would not have full control over the area. This meant that they would have no power to stop people from using the plaza for various activities, including the driving of mules, which would cause a disturbance to worshippers.[53] Other reports place the scheme's failure on Jewish infighting as to whether the plan would foster a detrimental Arab reaction.[54]

Jews' Wailing Place, Jerusalem, 1891

In 1895 Hebrew linguist and publisher Rabbi Chaim Hirschensohn became entangled in a failed effort to purchase the Western Wall and lost all his assets.[55] The attempts of the Palestine Land Development Company to purchase the environs of the Western Wall for the Jews just before the outbreak of World War I also never came to fruition.[49] In the first two months following the Ottoman Empire's entry into the First World War, the Turkish governor of Jerusalem, Zakey Bey, offered to sell the Moroccan Quarter, which consisted of about 25 houses, to the Jews in order to enlarge the area available to them for prayer. He requested a sum of £20,000 which would be used to both rehouse the Muslim families and to create a public garden in front of the Wall. However, the Jews of the city lacked the necessary funds. A few months later, under Muslim Arab pressure on the Turkish authorities in Jerusalem, Jews became forbidden by official decree to place benches and light candles at the Wall. This sour turn in relations was taken up by the Chacham Bashi who managed to get the ban overturned.[56] In 1915 it was reported that Djemal Pasha, closed off the wall to visitation as a sanitary measure.[57] Probably meant was the "Great", rather than the "Small" Djemal Pasha.

Decrees (firman)s issued regarding the Wall:

Year Issued by Content
c. 1560 Suleiman the Magnificent Official recognition of the right of Jews to pray by the Wall[58][59]
1840 Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt Forbidding the Jews to pave the passage in front of the Wall. It also cautioned them against "raising their voices and displaying their books there." They were, however, allowed "to pay visits to it as of old."[3]
1841* Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt "Of the same bearing and likewise to two others of 1893 and 1909"[3]
1889* Abdul Hamid II That there shall be no interference with the Jews' places of devotional visits and of pilgrimage, that are situated in the localities which are dependent on the Chief Rabbinate, nor with the practice of their ritual.[3]
1893* Confirming firman of 1889[3]
1909* Confirming firman of 1889[3]
1911 Administrative Council of the Liwa Prohibiting the Jews from certain appurtenances at the Wall[3]
  • These firmans were cited by the Jewish contingent at the International Commission, 1930, as proof for rights at the Wall. Muslim authorities responded by arguing that historic sanctions of Jewish presence were acts of tolerance shown by Muslims, who, by doing so, did not concede any positive rights.[60]

British rule (1917–1948)

[edit]
Jewish Legion soldiers at the Western Wall after British conquest of Jerusalem, 1917
1920. From the collection of the National Library of Israel

In December 1917, Allied forces under Edmund Allenby captured Jerusalem from the Turks. Allenby pledged "that every sacred building, monument, holy spot, shrine, traditional site, endowment, pious bequest, or customary place of prayer of whatsoever form of the three religions will be maintained and protected according to the existing customs and beliefs of those to whose faith they are sacred".[61]

In 1919 Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann approached the British Military Governor of Jerusalem, Colonel Sir Ronald Storrs, and offered between £75,000[62] and £100,000[63] (approx. £5m in modern terms) to purchase the area at the foot of the Wall and rehouse the occupants. Storrs was enthusiastic about the idea because he hoped some of the money would be used to improve Muslim education. Although they appeared promising at first, negotiations broke down after strong Muslim opposition.[63][64] Storrs wrote two decades later:

The acceptance of the proposals, had it been practicable, would have obviated years of wretched humiliations, including the befouling of the Wall and pavement and the unmannerly braying of the tragi-comic Arab band during Jewish prayer, and culminating in the horrible outrages of 1929.[62]

In early 1920, the first Jewish-Arab dispute over the Wall occurred when the Muslim authorities were carrying out minor repair works to the Wall's upper courses. The Jews, while agreeing that the works were necessary, appealed to the British that they be made under supervision of the newly formed Department of Antiquities, because the Wall was an ancient relic.[65]

According to Hillel Halkin, in the 1920s, among rising tensions with the Jews regarding the wall, the Arabs ceased using the more traditional name El-Mabka, "the Place of Weeping", which related to Jewish practices, and replaced it with El-Burak, a name with Muslim connotations.[4]

In 1926 an effort was made to lease the Maghrebi waqf, which included the wall, with the plan of eventually buying it.[66] Negotiations were begun in secret by the Jewish judge Gad Frumkin, with financial backing from American millionaire Nathan Straus.[66] The chairman of the Palestine Zionist Executive, Colonel F. H. Kisch, explained that the aim was "quietly to evacuate the Moroccan occupants of those houses which it would later be necessary to demolish" to create an open space with seats for aged worshippers to sit on.[66] However, Straus withdrew when the price became excessive and the plan came to nothing.[67] The Va'ad Leumi, against the advice of the Palestine Zionist Executive, demanded that the British expropriate the wall and give it to the Jews, but the British refused.[66]

In 1928 the World Zionist Organization reported that John Chancellor, High Commissioner of Palestine, believed that the Western Wall should come under Jewish control and wondered "why no great Jewish philanthropist had not bought it yet".[68]

September 1928 disturbances

[edit]

In 1922, a Status Quo agreement issued by the mandatory authority forbade the placing of benches or chairs near the Wall. The last occurrence of such a ban was in 1915, but the Ottoman decree was soon retracted after intervention of the Chacham Bashi. In 1928 the District Commissioner of Jerusalem, Edward Keith-Roach, acceded to an Arab request to implement the ban. This led to a British officer being stationed at the Wall making sure that Jews were prevented from sitting. Nor were Jews permitted to separate the sexes with a screen. In practice, a flexible modus vivendi had emerged and such screens had been put up from time to time when large numbers of people gathered to pray.

The placing of a Mechitza similar to the one in the picture was the catalyst for confrontation between the Arabs, Jews and Mandate authorities in 1928.

On September 24, 1928, the Day of Atonement, British police resorted to removing by force a screen used to separate men and women at prayer. Women who tried to prevent the screen being dismantled were beaten by the police, who used pieces of the broken wooden frame as clubs. Chairs were then pulled out from under elderly worshipers. The episode made international news and Jews the world over objected to the British action. Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld, the Chief Rabbi of the Haredi Jews in Jerusalem, issued a protest letter on behalf of his community, the Edah HaChareidis and Agudas Yisroel, strongly condemning the desecration of the holy site. Various communal leaders called for a general strike. A large rally was held in the Etz Chaim Yeshiva, following which an angry crowd attacked the local police station in which they believed Douglas Valder Duff, the British officer involved, was sheltering.[69]

Commissioner Edward Keith-Roach described the screen as violating the Ottoman status quo that forbade Jews from making any construction in the Western Wall area. He informed the Jewish community that the removal had been carried out under his orders after receiving a complaint from the Supreme Muslim Council. The Arabs were concerned that the Jews were trying to extend their rights at the wall and with this move, ultimately intended to take possession of the Masjid Al-Aqsa.[70] The British government issued an announcement explaining the incident and blaming the Jewish beadle at the Wall. It stressed that the removal of the screen was necessary, but expressed regret over the ensuing events.[69]

A widespread Arab campaign to protest against presumed Jewish intentions and designs to take possession of the Al Aqsa Mosque swept the country and a "Society for the Protection of the Muslim Holy Places" was established.[71] The Jewish National Council (Vaad Leumi) responding to these Arab fears declared in a statement that "We herewith declare emphatically and sincerely that no Jew has ever thought of encroaching upon the rights of Moslems over their own Holy places, but our Arab brethren should also recognise the rights of Jews in regard to the places in Palestine which are holy to them."[70] The committee also demanded that the British administration expropriate the wall for the Jews.[72]

From October 1928 onward, Mufti Amin al-Husayni organised a series of measures to demonstrate the Arabs' exclusive claims to the Temple Mount and its environs. He ordered new construction next to and above the Western Wall.[73] The British granted the Arabs permission to convert a building adjoining the Wall into a mosque and to add a minaret. A muezzin was appointed to perform the Islamic call to prayer and Sufi rites directly next to the Wall. These were seen as a provocation by the Jews who prayed at the Wall.[74][75] The Jews protested and tensions increased.

British police post at the entrance to the Western Wall, 1933
British police at the Wailing Wall, 1934

A British inquiry into the disturbances and investigation regarding the principal issue in the Western Wall dispute, namely the rights of the Jewish worshipers to bring appurtenances to the wall, was convened. The Supreme Muslim Council provided documents dating from the Turkish regime supporting their claims. However, repeated reminders to the Chief Rabbinate to verify which apparatus had been permitted failed to elicit any response. They refused to do so, arguing that Jews had the right to pray at the Wall without restrictions.[76] Subsequently, in November 1928, the Government issued a White Paper entitled "The Western or Wailing Wall in Jerusalem: Memorandum by the Secretary of State for the Colonies", which emphasised the maintenance of the status quo and instructed that Jews could only bring "those accessories which had been permitted in Turkish times."[77]

A few months later, Haj Amin complained to Chancellor that "Jews were bringing benches and tables in increased numbers to the wall and driving nails into the wall and hanging lamps on them."[78]

1929 Palestine riots

[edit]

In the summer of 1929, the Mufti Haj Amin Al Husseinni ordered an opening be made at the southern end of the alleyway which straddled the Wall. The former cul-de-sac became a thoroughfare which led from the Temple Mount into the prayer area at the Wall. Mules were herded through the narrow alley, often dropping excrement. This, together with other construction projects in the vicinity, and restricted access to the Wall, resulted in Jewish protests to the British, who remained indifferent.[76]

On August 14, 1929, after attacks on individual Jews praying at the Wall, 6,000 Jews demonstrated in Tel Aviv, shouting "The Wall is ours." The next day, the Jewish fast of Tisha B'Av, 300 youths raised the Zionist flag and sang Hatikva at the Wall.[72] The day after, on August 16, an organized mob of 2,000 Muslim Arabs descended on the Western Wall, injuring the beadle and burning prayer books, liturgical fixtures and notes of supplication. The rioting spread to the Jewish commercial area of town, and was followed a few days later by the Hebron massacre.[79] One hundred and thirty-three Jews were killed and 339 injured in the Arab riots, and in the subsequent process of quelling the riots 110 Arabs were killed by British police. This was by far the deadliest attack on Jews during the period of British Rule over Palestine.

1930 international commission

[edit]

In 1930, in response to the 1929 riots, the British Government appointed a commission "to determine the rights and claims of Muslims and Jews in connection with the Western or Wailing Wall", and to determine the causes of the violence and prevent it in the future. The League of Nations approved the commission on condition that the members were not British.

The Commission noted that "the Jews do not claim any proprietorship to the Wall or to the Pavement in front of it (concluding speech of Jewish Counsel, Minutes, page 908)."

Members of the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry at the Western Wall, 1946

The Commission concluded that the wall, and the adjacent pavement and Moroccan Quarter, were solely owned by the Muslim waqf. However, Jews had the right to "free access to the Western Wall for the purpose of devotions at all times", subject to some stipulations that limited which objects could be brought to the Wall and forbade the blowing of the shofar, which was made illegal. Muslims were forbidden to disrupt Jewish devotions by driving animals or other means.[3]

The recommendations of the Commission were brought into law by the Palestine (Western or Wailing Wall) Order in Council, 1931, which came into effect on June 8, 1931.[80] Persons violating the law were liable to a fine of 50 pounds or imprisonment up to 6 months, or both.[80]

During the 1930s, at the conclusion of Yom Kippur, young Jews persistently flouted the shofar ban each year and blew the shofar resulting in their arrest and prosecution. They were usually fined or sentenced to imprisonment for three to six months. The Shaw commission determined that the violence occurred due to "racial animosity on the part of the Arabs, consequent upon the disappointment of their political and national aspirations and fear for their economic future."

Jordanian rule (1948–1967)

[edit]

During the 1948 Arab–Israeli War the Old City together with the Wall was controlled by Jordan. Article VIII of the 1949 Armistice Agreement called for a Special Committee to make arrangements for (amongst other things) "free access to the Holy Places and cultural institutions and use of the cemetery on the Mount of Olives".[81] The committee sat multiple times during 1949, but both sides made additional demands and at the same time the Palestine Conciliation Commission was pressing for the internationalization of Jerusalem against the wishes of both parties.[82] No agreement was ever reached, leading to recriminations in both directions. Neither Israeli Arabs nor Israeli Jews could visit their holy places in the Jordanian territories.[83][84] An exception was made for Christians to participate in Christmas ceremonies in Bethlehem.[84] Some sources claim Jews could only visit the wall if they traveled through Jordan (which was not an option for Israelis) and did not have an Israeli visa stamped in their passports.[85] Only Jordanian soldiers and tourists were to be found there. A vantage point on Mount Zion, from which the Wall could be viewed, became the place where Jews gathered to pray. For thousands of pilgrims, the mount, being the closest location to the Wall under Israeli control, became a substitute site for the traditional priestly blessing ceremony which takes place on the Three Pilgrimage Festivals.[86]

"Al Buraq (Wailing Wall) Rd" sign

[edit]

During the Jordanian rule of the Old City, a ceramic street sign in Arabic and English was affixed to the stones of the ancient wall. Attached 2.1 metres (6.9 ft) up, it was made up of eight separate ceramic tiles and said Al Buraq Road in Arabic at the top with the English "Al-Buraq (Wailing Wall) Rd" below. When Israeli soldiers arrived at the wall in June 1967, one attempted to scrawl Hebrew lettering on it.[87] The Jerusalem Post reported that on June 8, Ben-Gurion went to the wall and "looked with distaste" at the road sign; "this is not right, it should come down" and he proceeded to dismantle it.[88] This act signaled the climax of the capture of the Old City and the ability of Jews to once again access their holiest sites.[89] Emotional recollections of this event are related by David Ben-Gurion and Shimon Peres.[90]

First years under Israeli rule (1967–1969)

[edit]

Declarations after the conquest

[edit]
The iconic image of Israeli soldiers shortly after the capture of the Wall during the Six-Day War

Following Israel's victory during the 1967 Six-Day War, the Western Wall came under Israeli control. Brigadier Rabbi Shlomo Goren proclaimed after its capture that "Israel would never again relinquish the Wall", a stance supported by Israeli Minister for Defence Moshe Dayan and Chief of Staff General Yitzhak Rabin.[91] Rabin described the moment Israeli soldiers reached the Wall:

"There was one moment in the Six-Day War which symbolized the great victory: that was the moment in which the first paratroopers—under Gur's command—reached the stones of the Western Wall, feeling the emotion of the place; there never was, and never will be, another moment like it. Nobody staged that moment. Nobody planned it in advance. Nobody prepared it and nobody was prepared for it; it was as if Providence had directed the whole thing: the paratroopers weeping—loudly and in pain—over their comrades who had fallen along the way, the words of the Kaddish prayer heard by Western Wall's stones after 19 years of silence, tears of mourning, shouts of joy, and the singing of 'Hatikvah'".[92]

Demolition of the Moroccan Quarter

[edit]
Moroccan Quarter (cell J9) surrounding the Western Wall (numbered 62) in the 1947 Survey of Palestine map. The two mosques demolished after 1967 are shown in red.

Forty-eight hours after capturing the wall, the military, without explicit government order,[93] hastily proceeded to demolish the entire Moroccan Quarter, which stood 4 metres (13 ft) from the Wall.[94] The Sheikh Eid Mosque, built on the site of one of Jerusalem's earliest Islamic schools (the Afdiliyyah), was pulled down to make way for the plaza.[95] 106 Arab families consisting of 650 people were ordered to leave their homes at night. When they refused, bulldozers began to demolish the buildings with people still inside, killing one person and injuring a number of others.[96][97][98][99]

According to Eyal Weizman, Chaim Herzog, who later became Israel's sixth president, took much of the credit for the destruction of the neighbourhood:

When we visited the Wailing Wall we found a toilet attached to it ... we decided to remove it and from this we came to the conclusion that we could evacuate the entire area in front of the Wailing Wall ... a historical opportunity that will never return. ... We knew that the following Saturday [sic Wednesday], June 14, would be the Jewish festival of Shavuot and that many will want to come to pray ... it all had to be completed by then.[100]

The narrow pavement, which could accommodate a maximum of 12,000 per day, was transformed into an enormous plaza that could hold in excess of 400,000.[101] Several months later, the pavement close to the wall was excavated to a depth of two and half metres, exposing an additional two courses of large stones.[102]

A complex of buildings against the wall at the southern end of the plaza, that included Madrasa Fakhriya and the house that the Abu al-Sa'ud family had occupied since the 16th century, were spared in the 1967 destruction, but demolished in 1969.[103][104] The section of the wall dedicated to prayers was thus extended southwards to double its original length, from 28 to 60 metres (92 to 197 ft), while the 4 metres (13 ft) space facing the wall grew to 40 metres (130 ft).

The narrow, approximately 120 square metres (1,300 sq ft) pre-1948 alley along the wall, used for Jewish prayer, was enlarged to 2,400 square metres (26,000 sq ft), with the entire Western Wall Plaza covering 20,000 square metres (4.9 acres), stretching from the wall to the Jewish Quarter.[105]

Plaza

[edit]

The new plaza created in 1967 is used for worship and public gatherings, including Bar mitzvah celebrations and the swearing-in ceremonies of newly full-fledged soldiers in the Israel Defense Forces. Tens of thousands of Jews flock to the wall on the Jewish holidays, and particularly on the fast of Tisha B'Av, which marks the destruction of the Temple and on Jerusalem Day, which commemorates the reunification of Jerusalem in 1967 and the delivery of the Wall into Jewish hands.

In November 2010, the government approved a NIS 85 million ($23 million) plan to improve access from the Jewish Quarter and upgrade infrastructure at the Wall.[106]

Orthodox rules

[edit]

Conflicts over prayer at the national monument began a little more than a year after Israel's victory in the Six-Day War, which again made the site accessible to Jews. In July 1968 the World Union for Progressive Judaism, which had planned the group's international convention in Jerusalem, appealed to the Knesset after the Ministry of Religious Affairs prohibited the organization from hosting mixed-gender services at the Wall. The Knesset committee on internal affairs backed the Ministry of Religious Affairs in disallowing the Jewish convention attendees, who had come from over 24 countries, from worshiping in their fashion. The Orthodox held that services at the Wall should follow traditional Jewish law for segregated seating followed in synagogues, while the non-Orthodox perspective was that "the Wall is a shrine of all Jews, not one particular branch of Judaism."[107]

Wilson's Arch area

[edit]

Archaeology

[edit]

Transformation into worship area

[edit]
Torah Ark inside men's section of Wilson's Arch

In September 1983, U.S. Sixth Fleet Chaplain, Rabbi Arnold Resnicoff was allowed to hold an unusual interfaith service—the first interfaith service ever conducted at the Wall during the time it was under Israeli control—that included men and women sitting together. The ten-minute service included the Priestly Blessing, recited by Resnicoff, who is a Kohen. A Ministry of Religions representative was present, responding to press queries that the service was authorized as part of a special welcome for the U.S. Sixth Fleet.[108][109][110]

In 2005, the Western Wall Heritage Foundation initiated a major renovation effort under Rabbi-of-the-Wall Shmuel Rabinovitch. Its goal was to renovate and restructure the area within Wilson's Arch, the covered area to the left of worshipers facing the Wall in the open prayer plaza, in order to increase access for visitors and for prayer.[111][112]

The restoration of the men's section included a Torah ark that can house over 100 Torah scrolls, in addition to new bookshelves, a library, heating for the winter, and air conditioning for the summer.[111] A new room was also built for the scribes who maintain and preserve the Torah scrolls used at the Wall.[111] New construction also included a women's section,[113] overlooking the men's prayer area, so that women could use this separate area to "take part in the services held inside under the Arch" for the first time.[114]

On July 25, 2010, a ner tamid, an oil-burning "eternal light," was installed within the prayer hall within Wilson's Arch, the first eternal light installed in the area of the Western Wall.[115] According to the Western Wall Heritage Foundation, requests had been made for many years that "an olive oil lamp be placed in the prayer hall of the Western Wall Plaza, as is the custom in Jewish synagogues, to represent the menorah of the Temple in Jerusalem as well as the continuously burning fire on the altar of burnt offerings in front of the Temple," especially in the closest place to those ancient flames.[115]

Asst. U.S. Sixth Fleet Chaplain Rabbi Arnold Resnicoff leads an unusual interfaith service

A number of special worship events have been held since the renovation. They have taken advantage of the cover, temperature control,[116] and enhanced security.[117]

Robinson's Arch area

[edit]

Archaeology

[edit]
The remains of Robinson's Arch above excavated remnants of the ancient street below.

At the southern end of the Western Wall, Robinson's Arch along with a row of vaults once supported stairs ascending from the street to the Temple Mount.[118][better source needed]

The so-called Isaiah Stone, located under Robinson's Arch, has a carved inscription in Hebrew with a partial and slightly faulty quote from (or paraphrase of) Isaiah 66:14: "And you will see and your heart will rejoice and their bones like an herb [will flourish]" (the correct line from Isaiah would read "... your bones".) This gave room to various interpretations, some speculating about it being written during a period of hope for Jews. Alternatively, it might be connected to nearby graves. The inscription has tentatively been dated to the 4th–8th century, some extending the possible timespan all the way to the 11th century.[119][120]

Non-Orthodox worship area

[edit]

Because it does not come under the direct control of the Rabbi of the Wall or the Ministry of Religious Affairs, the site has been opened to religious groups that hold worship services that would not be approved by the Rabbi of the Western Wall or the Ministry of Religious Affairs in the major men's and women's prayer areas against the Wall.[118][better source needed] The worship site was inaugurated in 2004 and has since hosted services by Reform and Conservative groups, as well as services by the Women of the Wall.[121] A platform has been added in 2013 in order to expand the prayer area.[122]

In Judaism

[edit]

History as place of prayer

[edit]

Jews were banned from Jerusalem by the Roman authorities after the Second Jewish revolt (2nd century CE) and, although there are intermittent accounts of limited 9th of Av services on the Temple Mount, no sources from before the 7th-century Islamic conquest attest to any other Jewish services allowed near the Mount and many report that none were permitted. Sources conflict with regard to the Mount's status under Islamic rule, but Karaite commentator Salmon ben Jeroham (c. 950 CE) reports that Jews were initially granted wide access to the Mount, then restricted to gathering near "one of its gates", then banned entirely before his own time.[123][124]

10th–12th centuries

[edit]

However, a synagogue was apparently founded by the Western Wall (in the broader sense) shortly after the time of Salmon. The Scroll of Ahimaaz, a historical chronicle written in 1050 CE, describes:

Samuel his son arose to replace [Paltiel], and this great man filled his father's place [in c. 980 CE] ... [He] dedicated 20,000 golden drachmas to the One Who Dwells on High, to entreat the favor of the Rider of Clouds. These were alms for the poor...; oil for the synagogue in the western wall, for [the lamps on] its bema ...[125][126][127]

This account of Jewish prayer at the edge of the Mount in confirmed by Daniel ben Azariah, who writes (c. 1055 CE) that Jews were then permitted to "pray near the Mount's gates".[128] In 1099 CE the Crusader army captured Jerusalem, killing almost every Jew inside, and banned Jewish pilgrims from approaching the Mount. In his Scroll of Revelation (c. 1125 CE), Abraham bar Hiyya records that:[129]

... the Romans who destroyed the Temple in the days of the evil Titus, though they despoiled its sanctuary, never claimed any ownership of the holy Mount or any need to pray there. But ever since the evil Constantine converted to Christianity, they have begun to make these claims ... Since [1099 CE] the Christians have desecrated the Mount, made the citadel their church, brought their idols within it, and prevented Jews from praying there. Ever since those villains took over the Mount, no Jew has been allowed to enter it, and none are to be found in all Jerusalem.

Western Wall in the "Florence Scroll", a c. 1315 Jewish pilgrimage guide. The Gates of Mercy are shown adjacent or perhaps as part of the wall.[130]

In another reversal by c. 1167 CE, during the later Crusader period, the Western Wall was reopened to Jewish prayer. Benjamin of Tudela attests:

. . . and the Gate of Jehoshaphat, which faced the Temple in ancient times. There is the Templi Domini, which is the site of the Temple, and on it is a large and very beautiful dome built by Umar bin al-Khataab. Although they come to pray, the gentiles do not bring any images or effigies onto the site. And in front of this place is the western wall, which was one of the walls in[a] the Holy of Holies; this is called the Gate of Mercy[b] and hither come all the Jews to pray before the wall in the courtyard[c].[131]

17th century

[edit]

In 1625, David Finzi reported to the Jewish leadership of Carpi that:[45]

. . . from there we went up to the Temple Mount, passing mundane structures until we reached the peak of the Mount, where once the Temple stood, which was destroyed for our sins. Now a mosque is built upon it, and Jews are prohibited from entering it; only outside it, near the Western Wall, are Jews allowed to gather, and even this only in peaceful times—in difficult times, such as these, the Jewish community has decreed that no one go there. But in the first week of our visit, before this decree, we went all the way in, and kissed it, and I prostrated myself before its base, and there I said the ordered prayers, and also entreated God to bless all the Jews of Carpi ... Though it is called the Western Wall, nothing of the Temple whatever survived the destruction, the looting by thieves, and the construction of the mosque. They built a citadel on the site of the Foundation Stone, surpassingly lovely ...

Tensions eventually calmed again. Gedaliah of Siemiatycze, who lived in Jerusalem from 1700 to 1706, records that:[46]

Only Muslims are permitted to enter the Mount and not Jews or other peoples, unless they convert to the Muslim faith. They say that not just any faith is worthy of the Mount, and they continually remind us that the Muslims have superseded the Jews in the eyes of God. When we go to pray at the Wall, we press right up against it, like the lover in Song of Songs who "standeth behind our wall". On the eve of the New Moon, on Tisha ba'Av, and on other fast days, we go there to pray, and the women to raise their plangent cries, but no one challenges us, and even the qadi who lives there does not object. Though the Arab youths sometimes come to prey on us, they are easily bribed to leave us alone, and if caught by their own elders they are rebuked ... Prayer by the Wall usually meets with God's favor ... . Once in olden times, or so I heard, there was a terrible drought. The Jews declared a day of fasting, and they went with a Torah scroll to the Western Wall to pray, and God answered their prayers so readily that they had to wrap the scroll in their clothes on their return to the synagogue. Every Sabbath morning, after the services at the synagogue, we immediately set off for the Western Wall ... every single one of us, Ashkenazic and Sephardic, old and young ... there we recite those Psalms that mention Jerusalem, and Pitom haQtores, and Aleinu l'Shabeach, and the Kaddish, and we bless those in the diaspora who fundraise for Eretz Yisrael ... .

18th–19th centuries

[edit]
"On Friday afternoon, March 13, 1863, the writer visited this sacred spot. Here he found between one and two hundred Jews of both sexes and of all ages, standing or sitting, and bowing as they read, chanted and recited, moving themselves backward and forward, the tears rolling down many a face; they kissed the walls and wrote sentences in Hebrew upon them... The lamentation which is most commonly used is from Psalm 79:1 "O God, the heathen are come into Thy inheritance; Thy holy temple have they defiled."

(Rev. James W. Lee, 1863)[132]

The writings of various travellers in the Holy Land, especially in the 18th and 19th centuries, tell of how the Wall and its environs continued to be a place of devotion for the Jews.[3] Isaac Yahuda, a prominent member of the Sephardic community in Jerusalem recalled how men and women used to gather in a circle at the Wall to hear sermons delivered in Ladino. His great-grandmother, who arrived in Palestine in 1841, "used to go to the Western Wall every Friday afternoon, winter and summer, and stay there until candle-lighting time, reading the entire Book of Psalms and the Song of Songs...she would sit there by herself for hours."[133]

20th–21st centuries

[edit]

In the past[dubiousdiscuss] women could be found sitting at the entrance to the Wall every Sabbath holding fragrant herbs and spices in order to enable worshipers to make additional blessings. In the hot weather they would provide cool water. The women also used to cast lots for the privilege of sweeping and washing the alleyway at the foot of the Wall.[51]

Throughout several centuries, the Wall is where Jews have gathered to express gratitude to God or to pray for divine mercy. On news of the Normandy landings on June 6, 1944 thousands of Jews went to the Wall to offer prayers for the "success of His Majesty's and Allied Forces in the liberation of all enemy-occupied territory."[134] On October 13, 1994, 50,000 gathered to pray for the safe return of kidnapped soldier Nachshon Wachsman.[135] August 10, 2005 saw a massive prayer rally at the Wall. Estimates of people protesting Israel's unilateral disengagement plan ranged from 50,000 to 250,000 people.[citation needed][136] Every year on Tisha B'Av large crowds congregate at the Wall to commemorate the destruction of the Temple. In 2007 over 100,000 gathered.[137] During the month of Tishrei 2009, a record 1.5 million people visited the site.[138]

Relation to the Foundation Stone

[edit]

In Judaism, the Western Wall is venerated as the sole remnant of the Holy Temple. It has become a place of pilgrimage for Jews, as it is the closest permitted accessible site to the holiest spot in Judaism, namely the Even ha-shetiya or Foundation Stone, which lies on the Temple Mount. According to one rabbinic opinion, Jews may not set foot upon the Temple Mount and doing so is a sin punishable by Kareth. While almost all historians and archaeologists and some rabbinical authorities believe that the rocky outcrop in the Dome of the Rock is the Foundation Stone,[139] some rabbis say it is located directly opposite the exposed section of the Western Wall, near the El-kas fountain.[140] This spot was the site of the Holy of Holies when the Temple stood.

Part of the Temple proper

[edit]

Rabbinic tradition teaches that the western wall was built upon foundations laid by the biblical King Solomon from the time of the First Temple.[141]

Some medieval rabbis claimed that today's Western Wall is a surviving wall of the Temple itself and cautioned Jews from approaching it, lest they enter the Temple precincts in a state of impurity.[142] Many contemporary rabbis believe that the rabbinic traditions were made in reference to the Temple Mount's Western Wall, which accordingly endows the Wall with inherent holiness.[143]

Divine custody

[edit]

A 7th-century Midrash refers to a western wall of the Temple which "would never be destroyed",[8] and a 6th-century Midrash mentions how Rome was unable to topple the western wall due to the Divine oath promising its eternal survival.[144]

Divine Presence

[edit]

An 11th-century Midrash quotes a 4th-century scholar: "Rav Acha said that the Divine Presence has never departed from the Western Wall",[145] and the Zohar (13th century) similarly writes that "the Divine Presence rests upon the Western Wall".[146]

Eighteenth-century scholar Jonathan Eybeschutz writes that "after the destruction of the Temple, God removed His Presence from His sanctuary and placed it upon the Western Wall where it remains in its holiness and honour".[147] It is told that great Jewish sages, including Isaac Luria and the Radvaz, experienced a revelation of the Divine Presence at the wall.[148]

Kabbalah of the word kotel

[edit]

Rabbi Zvi Hirsch Kaindenover discusses the mystical aspect of the Hebrew word kotel when discussing the significance of praying against a wall. He cites the Zohar which writes that the word kotel, meaning wall, is made up of two parts: "Ko", which has the numerical value of God's name, and "Tel", meaning mount, which refers to the Temple and its Western Wall.[149]

Ritual

[edit]
Jews at the Western Wall, 1870s

Status as a synagogue

[edit]

Many contemporary Orthodox scholars rule that the area in front of the Wall has the status of a synagogue and must be treated with due respect.[141] This is the view upheld by the authority in charge of the wall. As such, men and married women are expected to cover their heads upon approaching the Wall, and to dress appropriately. When departing, the custom is to walk backwards away from the Wall to show its sanctity.[141] On Saturdays, it is forbidden to enter the area with electronic devices, including cameras, which infringe on the sanctity of the Sabbath.

Contact with the Wall

[edit]

Some Orthodox Jewish codifiers warn against inserting fingers into the cracks of the Wall as they believe that the breadth of the Wall constitutes part of the Temple Mount itself and retains holiness, while others who permit doing so claim that the Wall is located outside the Temple area.[150][non-primary source needed]

In the past, some visitors would write their names on the Wall, or based upon various scriptural verses, would drive nails into the crevices. These practices stopped after rabbis determined that such actions compromised the sanctity of the Wall.[51] Another practice also existed whereby pilgrims or those intending to travel abroad would hack off a chip from the Wall or take some of the sand from between its cracks as a good luck charm or memento. In the late 19th century the question was raised as to whether this was permitted and a long responsa appeared in the Jerusalem newspaper Havatzelet in 1898. It concluded that even if according to Jewish Law it was permitted, the practices should be stopped as it constituted a desecration.[51] More recently the Yalkut Yosef rules that it is forbidden to remove small chips of stone or dust from the Wall, although it is permissible to take twigs from the vegetation which grows in the Wall for an amulet, as they contain no holiness.[151] Cleaning the stones is also problematic from a halachic point of view. Blasphemous graffiti once sprayed by a tourist was left visible for months until it began to peel away.[152]

Barefoot approach

[edit]
The faithful remove their shoes upon approaching the Wall, c. 1880

There was once an old custom of removing one's shoes upon approaching the Wall. A 17th-century collection of special prayers to be said at holy places mentions that "upon coming to the Western Wall one should remove his shoes, bow and recite...".[51] Rabbi Moses Reicher wrote[year needed] that "it is a good and praiseworthy custom to approach the Western Wall in white garments after ablution, kneel and prostrate oneself in submission and recite "This is nothing other than the House of God and here is the gate of Heaven." When within four cubits of the Wall, one should remove their footwear."[51] Over the years the custom of standing barefoot at the Wall has ceased, as there is no need to remove one's shoes when standing by the Wall, because the plaza area is outside the sanctified precinct of the Temple Mount.[151]

Mourning over the Temple's destruction

[edit]
Tisha B'Av at the Western Wall, 1970s

According to Jewish Law, one is obliged to grieve and rend one's garment upon visiting the Western Wall and seeing the desolate site of the Temple.[153] Bach (17th century) instructs that "when one sees the Gates of Mercy which are situated in the Western Wall, which is the wall King David built, he should recite: Her gates are sunk into the ground; he hath destroyed and broken her bars: her king and her princes are among the nations: the law is no more; her prophets also find no vision from the Lord".[154] Some scholars write that rending one's garments is not applicable nowadays as Jerusalem is under Jewish control. Others disagree, pointing to the fact that the Temple Mount is controlled by the Muslim waqf and that the mosques which sit upon the Temple site should increase feelings of distress. If one hasn't seen the Wall for over 30 days, the prevailing custom is to rend one's garments, but this can be avoided if one visits on the Sabbath or on festivals.[155] According to Donneal Epstein, a person who has not seen the Wall within the last 30 days should recite: "Our Holy Temple, which was our glory, in which our forefathers praised You, was burned and all of our delights were destroyed".[156]

Significance as place of prayer

[edit]
Women at prayer, early 20th century

The Sages of the Talmud stated that anyone who prays at the Temple in Jerusalem, "it is as if he has prayed before the throne of glory because the gate of heaven is situated there and it is open to hear prayer."[157] Jewish Law stipulates that the Silent Prayer should be recited facing towards Jerusalem, the Temple and ultimately the Holy of Holies,[158] as God's bounty and blessing emanates from that spot.[141] It is generally believed that prayer by the Western Wall is particularly beneficial since it was that wall which was situated closest to the Holy of Holies.[141] Rabbi Jacob Ettlinger (1798–1871) writes, making reference to a medieval rabbi, "since the Theology and ritual Israel's prayers ascend on high there... as one of the great ancient kabbalists Rabbi Joseph Gikatilla said, when the Jews send their prayers from the Diaspora in the direction of Jerusalem, from there they ascend by way of the Western Wall."[51] A well-known segula (efficacious remedy) for finding one's soulmate is to pray for 40 consecutive days at the Western Wall,[159] a practice apparently conceived by Rabbi Yisroel Yaakov Fisher (1928–2003).[160]

Egalitarian and non-Orthodox prayer

[edit]
Two large groups of people, seen from slightly above them, separated by a white cloth barrier, standing before a beige stone wall whose top cannot be seen, with another wall in the rear. The group in the foreground is all female, the one in the rear is all male, with many wearing white robes or shrouds
The separate areas for men (top) and women, seen from the walkway to the Dome of the Rock

While during the late 19th century, no formal segregation of men and women was to be found at the Wall,[161] conflict erupted in July 1968 when members of the World Union for Progressive Judaism were denied the right to host a mixed-gender service at the site after the Ministry of Religious Affairs insisted on maintaining the gender segregation customary at Orthodox places of worship. The progressives responded by claiming that "the Wall is a shrine of all Jews, not one particular branch of Judaism."[107]

In 1988, the small but vocal group called Women of the Wall launched a campaign for recognition of non-Orthodox prayer at the Wall.[162][163] Their form and manner of prayer elicited a violent response from some Orthodox worshippers and they were subsequently banned from holding services at the site.[121] After repeated attacks by haredim, in 1989 the Women of the Wall petitioned to secure the right of women to pray at the wall without restrictions.[164]

A decade on, some commentators called for the closure of the Wall unless an acceptable solution to the controversy was found.[165]

In 2003 Israel's Supreme Court upheld the ban on non-Orthodox worship at the Wall,[118][better source needed] disallowing any women from reading publicly from the Torah or wearing traditional prayer shawls at the plaza itself, but instructed the Israeli government to prepare the site of Robinson's Arch to host such events,[164] given that this area does not come under the direct control of the Rabbi of the Wall or the Ministry of Religious Affairs.[118][better source needed] The government responded by allocating Robinson's Arch for such purposes.[164]

The Robinson's Arch worship site was inaugurated in August 2004 and has since hosted services by Reform and Conservative groups, as well as services by the Women of the Wall.[121]

In 2012, critics still complained about the restrictions at the Western Wall, saying Israel had "turned a national monument into an ultra-Orthodox synagogue."[166]

In April 2013 things came to a head. In response to the repeated arrest of women, including Anat Hoffman, found flouting the law, the Jewish Agency observed 'the urgent need to reach a permanent solution and make the Western Wall once again a symbol of unity among the Jewish people, and not one of discord and strife."[121] Jewish Agency leader Natan Sharansky spearheaded a concept that would expand and renovate the Robinson's Arch area into an area where people may "perform worship rituals not based on the Orthodox interpretation of Jewish tradition."[167] The Jerusalem District Court ruled that as long as there was no other appropriate area for pluralistic prayer, prayer according to non-Orthodox custom should be allowed at the Wall,[168] and a judge ruled that the 2003 Israeli Supreme Court ruling prohibiting women from carrying a Torah or wearing prayer shawls had been misinterpreted and that Women of the Wall prayer gatherings at the Wall should not be deemed as disturbing the public order.[121]

Ezrat Yisrael Plaza (prayer platform), Robinson's Arch, opened August 2013

On August 25, 2013, a new 4,480 square foot prayer platform named "Ezrat Yisrael Plaza" was completed as part of this plan of facilitating non-Orthodox worship, with access to the platform at all hours, even when the rest of the area's archaeological park is closed to visitors.[122][169] After some controversy regarding the question of authority over this prayer area, the announcement was made that it would come under the authority of a future government-appointed "pluralist council" that would include non-Orthodox representatives.[170]

In January 2016, the Israeli Cabinet approved a plan to designate a new space at the Kotel that would be available for egalitarian prayer and that would not be controlled by the Rabbinate. Women of the Wall welcomed the decision,[171] although Sephardic Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar of Jerusalem said creating a mixed-gender prayer section was paramount to destroying the Wall. The Chief Rabbinate said it would create an alternate plan.[172] In June 2017, it was announced that the plan approved in January 2016 had been suspended.[173][174]

Prayer notes

[edit]
Slips of paper containing prayers in the cracks of the Wall

There is a much publicised practice of placing slips of paper containing written prayers into the crevices of the Wall. The earliest account of this practice describes Chaim ibn Attar (d. 1743) writing an amulet for a petitioner and instructing him to place it inside the wall.[175] More than a million notes are placed each year[176] and the opportunity to e-mail notes is offered by a number of organisations.[177] It has become customary for visiting dignitaries to place notes too.[178][179]

Chabad tefillin stand

[edit]

Shortly after the Western Wall came under Israeli control in 1967, a stand of the Chabad movement offering phylacteries (tefillin) was erected with permission from Rabbi Yehuda Meir Getz, the first rabbi of the Kotel. The stand offers male visitors the chance to put on tefillin, a daily Jewish prayer ritual. In the months following the Six-Day War an estimated 400,000 Jews observed this ritual at the stand.[180] The stand is staffed by multilingual Chabad volunteers and an estimated 100,000 male visitors put on tefillin there annually.[181][better source needed]

In Islam

[edit]
South-west corner of the Haram from the Ordnance Survey of Jerusalem, 1865)

Tradition of the place of tethering

[edit]

Muslim reverence for the site is derived from the belief that the Islamic prophet Muhammad tied his winged mount Buraq nearby during his night journey to Jerusalem. Various places have been suggested for the exact spot where Buraq was tethered, but for several centuries the preferred location has been the al-Buraq Mosque, which is just inside the wall at the south end of the present Western Wall plaza. The mosque is located above an ancient passageway, which once came out through the long-sealed Barclay's Gate whose huge lintel is still visible directly below the Maghrebi Gate.[182]

There are four different locations, along the southern, eastern, and western wall, with gates known successively or simultaneously as the Gate of the Prophet and al-Buraq.[42]

Early Muslim vs. Mamluk-period traditions

[edit]

US scholar Charles D. Matthews wrote in 1932 that, based on the work of Muslim authors of the 10th to 11th centuries (the later part of the Early Muslim period), the place where Prophet Muhammad had tethered Buraq and entered the haram was considered at the time to be the Double Gate of the Temple Mount's southern wall.[42] To reach this conclusion, which he shares with Charles Wilson and Guy Le Strange, he analysed the relevant texts by Ibn al-Faqih (903), Ibn Abd Rabbih (913), and mainly by Muqaddasi (985) and Nasir-i-Khusrau (1047).[42] One of the earliest authors who are more ambiguous, opening the possibility of identifying the Gate of the Prophet and al-Buraq with either the Double or Barclay's Gate, is Burhan ad-Din ibn al-Firkah of Damascus (d. 1329).[42] Another Mamluk-period writer, Mujir ad-Din (1496), is the first one to unambiguously identify Barclay's Gate as the Gate of al-Buraq or of the Prophet.[42] However, Mujir ad-Din's work is effectively a rework of earlier texts, with as-Suyuti (1471) being the main source—and he fails to mention that as—Suyuti stated that the Gate of the Inspector, located close to the northern end of the western wall, was also known as the Gate of al-Buraq or of the Prophet.[42]

Ottoman-period identification

[edit]

To the previously mentioned variations in identification adds yet another gate, the now walled-up Funeral Gate (bab al-jana'iz), just south of the Golden Gate, also known as 'Gate of al-Buraq' and marked as such on a 1864 Temple Mount map by Melchior de Vogüé, based on the 1833 survey by Frederick Catherwood[42][183] (see Bab al-Rahmah Cemetery at MadainProject.com for a photo and short description).

When a British Jew asked the Egyptian authorities in 1840 for permission to re-pave the ground in front of the Western Wall, the governor of Syria wrote:

It is evident from the copy of the record of the deliberations of the Consultative Council in Jerusalem that the place the Jews asked for permission to pave adjoins the wall of the Haram al-Sharif and also the spot where al-Buraq was tethered, and is included in the endowment charter of Abu Madyan, may God bless his memory; that the Jews never carried out any repairs in that place in the past. ... Therefore the Jews must not be enabled to pave the place.[184]

Carl Sandreczki, who was charged with compiling a list of place names for Charles Wilson's Ordnance Survey of Jerusalem in 1865, reported that the street leading to the Western Wall, including the part alongside the wall, belonged to the Hosh (court/enclosure) of al Burâk, "not Obrâk, nor Obrat".[185] In 1866, the Prussian Consul and Orientalist Georg Rosen wrote that "The Arabs call Obrâk the entire length of the wall at the wailing place of the Jews, southwards down to the house of Abu Su'ud and northwards up to the substructure of the Mechkemeh [Shariah court]. Obrâk is not, as was formerly claimed, a corruption of the word Ibri (Hebrews), but simply the neo-Arabic pronunciation of Bōrâk, ... which, whilst (Muhammad) was at prayer at the holy rock, is said to have been tethered by him inside the wall location mentioned above."[13]

The name Hosh al Buraq appeared on the maps of Wilson's 1865 survey, its revised editions of 1876 and 1900, and other maps in the early 20th century.[186]

British Mandate

[edit]

In 1922, Hosh al Buraq was the street name specified by the official Pro-Jerusalem Council.[187]

In Christianity

[edit]
Pope Francis at the Western Wall

Some scholars[who?] believe that when Jerusalem came under Christian rule in the 4th century, there was a purposeful "transference" of respect for the Temple Mount and the Western Wall in terms of sanctity to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, while the sites around the Temple Mount became a refuse dump for Christians.[188] However, the actions of many modern Christian leaders, including Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI, who visited the Wall and left prayer messages in its crevices, have symbolized for many Christians a restoration of respect and even veneration for this ancient religious site.[188]

Ideological views

[edit]

Jewish

[edit]
A Jew praying at the Western Wall

Most Jews, religious and secular, consider the wall to be important to the Jewish people since it was originally built to hold the Second Temple. They consider the capture of the wall by Israel in 1967 as a historic event since it restored Jewish access to the site after a 19-year gap.[189]

Israeli philosopher Yeshayahu Leibowitz referred to the attitude towards the Western Wall as "idolatry"[190] and publicly decried the Israelis' triumphalism following the 1967 victory.[191]

Dan Bahat, former district archaeologist of Jerusalem who headed the Western Wall Tunnel excavations in the years 1986–2007, decried in 2018 the transformation of this iconic historical site into a regulated place of worship: "The Western Wall is sacrosanct. But out of a national monument, it has become a synagogue."[192]

Israeli

[edit]

A poll carried out in 2007 by the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies indicated that 96% of Israeli Jews were against Israel relinquishing the Western Wall.[193]

Yitzhak Reiter writes that "the Islamization and de-Judaization of the Western Wall are a recurrent motif in publications and public statements by the heads of the Islamic Movement in Israel."[194]

Muslim

[edit]
Western Wall and Dome of the Rock

In December 1973, King Faisal of Saudi Arabia stated that "Only Muslims and Christians have holy places and rights in Jerusalem". The Jews, he maintained, had no rights there at all. As for the Western Wall, he said, "Another wall can be built for them. They can pray against that".[195]

Palestinian

[edit]

The Palestinian National Authority's State Information Service (SIS) stated as fact that the Jews did not consider the Wall as a place for worship until after the Balfour Declaration was issued in 1917.[196]

In 2006, Dr. Hassan Khader, founder of the Al Quds Encyclopedia, told PA television that the first connection of the Jews to the Wall is "a recent one, which began in the 16th century...not ancient...like the roots of the Islamic connection".[197]

The Mufti of Jerusalem, Sheikh Ekrima Sa'id Sabri said in 2007 that "there never was a Jewish temple on the Temple Mount" and that "there is not a single stone with any relation at all to the history of the Hebrews."[198]

In November 2010, an official paper published by the PA Ministry of Information denied Jewish rights to the Wall. It stated that "Al-Buraq Wall is in fact the western wall of Al-Aksa Mosque" and that Jews had only started using the site for worship after the 1917 Balfour Declaration.[199]

American

[edit]
U.S. president Donald Trump (right) visits the Western Wall, accompanied by Rabbi Shmuel Rabinovitch (center), 2017

While recognizing the difficulties inherent in any ultimate peace agreement that involves the status of Jerusalem, the official position of the United States includes a recognition of the importance of the Wall to the Jewish people, and has condemned statements that seek to "delegitimize" the relationship between Jews and the area in general, and the Western Wall in particular. For example, in November 2010, the Obama administration "strongly condemned a Palestinian official's claim that the Western Wall in the Old City has no religious significance for Jews and is actually Muslim property." The U.S. State Department noted that the United States rejects such a claim as "factually incorrect, insensitive and highly provocative."[200]

Administration

[edit]

After the 1967 Arab–Israeli war, Rabbi Yehuda Meir Getz was named the overseer of proceedings at the wall.[201] After Rabbi Getz's death in 1995, Rabbi Shmuel Rabinowitz was given the position.[202] The Western Wall Heritage Foundation is the administrative body put in charge of the Wall.

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Western Wall, known in Hebrew as the Kotel (lit. "Wall"), is a remnant of the ancient that supported the western flank of the expanded platform in 's Old City, constructed by circa 19 BCE as part of his massive rebuilding of the Second Temple complex. The full wall extends approximately 488 meters in length, though the primary exposed prayer plaza section measures about 57 meters long and up to 19 meters high above ground, with massive ashlars at its base characterized by drafted margins and precise masonry that has endured earthquakes and sieges. Following the Roman destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, the wall survived intact, becoming the closest accessible point to the Temple's former where Jews could lawfully pray without violating prohibitions against entering the sanctified mount. The site's religious centrality in Judaism stems from its proximity to the ruins of the First and Second Temples, loci of ancient sacrificial worship and divine presence as described in biblical and rabbinic texts, fostering traditions of lamentation, petitionary prayer, and insertion of written supplications into its crevices—a practice documented continuously since at least the Ottoman era. Archaeological excavations along the wall, including tunnels revealing Herodian-era streets, ritual baths, and stone inscriptions, confirm its Second Temple provenance and underscore layers of Jewish veneration predating Islamic structures atop the mount. After centuries of restricted access under successive Muslim rulers, including bans and riots such as the 1929 disturbances over Jewish worship rights, Israeli forces secured the site during the 1967 Six-Day War, enabling the demolition of adjacent medieval structures to create a spacious plaza accommodating mass gatherings and segregating genders per Orthodox custom. This development transformed it into a global symbol of Jewish resilience and sovereignty, though ongoing disputes over egalitarian prayer spaces reflect internal denominational tensions rather than altering its foundational halakhic status.

Etymology and Designations

Jewish and Hebrew Terms

In Jewish tradition, the primary Hebrew designation for the exposed prayer section of the is HaKotel HaMa'aravi (הַכֹּתֶל הַמַּעֲרָבִי), literally translating to "the Western Wall," reflecting its position as the western boundary of the platform constructed during the era. The term kotel (כֹּתֶל), meaning "wall," derives from rabbinic Hebrew and influences, appearing infrequently in the where synonyms like chomah (חוֹמָה, outer wall or rampart) or kir (קִיר, inner wall) predominate, but gaining prevalence in post-biblical texts to denote a substantial retaining or supporting structure. The full phrase HaKotel HaMa'aravi emphasizes its geographic orientation rather than emotional connotations, distinguishing it from non-Jewish appellations like "Wailing Wall," which Jews do not employ in Hebrew liturgy or literature; instead, it underscores the site's role as the nearest accessible remnant to the Temple's inner sanctum for ritual impurity considerations under . In everyday Hebrew usage among observant , it is often abbreviated to HaKotel (הַכֹּתֶל, ""), a term evoking its symbolic endurance as a link to the destroyed since at least the medieval period, as referenced in responsa and travelogues by figures like Rabbi Obadiah of Bertinoro in 1488 CE. Yiddish-speaking historically rendered it as der Kosel (קאָסעל), adapting the Hebrew kotel with a softened , while Sephardic and Mizrahi traditions align closely with modern Israeli Hebrew of HaKotel HaMa'aravi. In Talmudic sources, such as Tanchuma (Yitro 10), the wall is alluded to indirectly as part of the Temple's western enclosure (cheil or supporting barrier), prophesied to endure due to , though without the precise modern nomenclature, which crystallized post-Islamic conquests when access was restricted. This terminology persists in contemporary Orthodox prayer books and customs, where supplicants approach it for tefillah (petitionary prayer), affirming its status as a site of national lamentation and messianic hope without implying it as 's holiest location, which remains the itself.

Wailing Wall in Western Tradition

In Western European tradition, the term "Wailing Wall" emerged during the to describe the remnant of the ancient where gathered for prayers of lamentation over the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE. European travelers, including artists and writers, observed and documented scenes of devout reciting , weeping, and swaying in mourning, which inspired the evocative nomenclature reflecting perceived sorrow and exile. For instance, British illustrator William Henry Bartlett (1809–1854) produced engravings portraying clusters of in traditional attire pressed against the stones in postures of deep grief, symbolizing the site's role as a focal point for Jewish despair amid Ottoman . Accounts from 17th- and 18th-century Western pilgrims and visitors already noted regular Jewish lamentations at the wall, though the specific "wailing" descriptor gained prominence in 19th-century travelogues amid heightened European interest in and . Baedeker's travel guides, popular among European tourists, referenced these mournful assemblies, reinforcing the image of the site as a poignant emblem of Jewish historical loss rather than a mere architectural feature. This perception contrasted with Jewish self-designations like HaKotel HaMa'aravi (the Western Wall), which emphasized its structural identity as the western boundary of the , while Western observers highlighted the emotional rituals, including rhythmic chanting and physical contact with the stones believed to hold . The "Wailing Wall" appellation persisted in Western diplomatic and journalistic contexts into the early , as evidenced by the International Commission on the Wailing Wall, convened by the League of Nations to address access disputes under British Mandate rule following Arab riots in 1929 that killed 133 . These reports detailed Jewish customs of commemorations, where mourners rent their garments and prostrate before the wall, practices rooted in Talmudic traditions but vividly interpreted through a Western lens of pathos and antiquity. Despite its prevalence in English and other European languages, the term was critiqued by Jewish communities as undignified, underscoring a between external ethnographic framing and internal religious reverence.

Al-Buraq Wall in Islamic Context

In Islamic tradition, the Al-Buraq Wall designates the exposed southwestern section of the retaining wall enclosing the Haram al-Sharif, approximately 50 meters long and 20 meters high, where the Prophet is believed to have tethered his steed al-Buraq during the journey around 621 CE. Al-Buraq, described in as a white, winged creature intermediate in size between a and a capable of placing its hoof at the limit of its gaze, transported from the in to before his ascension to heaven. This narrative, rooted in collections rather than explicit Quranic verses—though the Isra' is referenced in Al-Isra (17:1)—establishes the site's sanctity as part of the compound. The tradition's association with the wall appears in Islamic sources linking the tethering point to a ring or post at what is now the area, influencing Muslim claims of endowment over the site since early Islamic rule. An adjacent subterranean structure known as the , dating to around 710 CE, reinforces this connection with a vaulted chamber built next to the wall, preserving the purported tethering location. The designation "Al-Buraq Wall" gained documented usage in Arab and Islamic contexts by the , amid increasing Ottoman-era scrutiny of Jewish access, framing the wall as an extension of the mosque's southwestern boundary rather than a separate entity. Muslim authorities, including the , maintain that the wall's religious significance precludes non-Islamic alterations or exclusive claims, a position invoked in 20th-century disputes such as the 1929 riots, where it was termed the "Buraq Wall" to assert Islamic custodianship. This interpretation contrasts with archaeological evidence attributing the wall's core construction to the Herodian period (1st century BCE), predating by over six centuries, though Islamic tradition overlays spiritual meaning without disputing the physical antiquity.

Physical Description and Location

Site Within Jerusalem's Old City

The forms the visible segment of the ancient supporting the western flank of the platform, situated within the southeastern sector of . This urban enclosure, bounded by 16th-century Ottoman fortifications spanning roughly 0.9 square kilometers, positions the site adjacent to the Jewish Quarter's perimeter, directly bordering the Muslim Quarter to the north and east. The wall's prayer plaza occupies the area formerly known as the Moroccan Quarter, cleared in to create an open space measuring about 57 meters in exposed length for public access and worship. Access to the site occurs primarily via the (Sha'ar Ha'Ashpot), a in the southern city wall, or through pathways from the Jewish Quarter's synagogues and residential areas. The location places it at the southwestern corner of the elevated esplanade, approximately 488 meters in total wall length, though only a portion remains exposed above contemporary ground level due to accumulated debris and overlying structures. Northward extensions, accessible via tunnels excavated since the , run beneath the Muslim Quarter, revealing buried archaeological layers including Herodian-era and Roman-period modifications. Archaeological investigations confirm the site's integration into the Temple Mount's foundational platform, engineered to enclose and level the natural hill known as Mount Moriah. The wall's base aligns with bedrock strata, supporting the esplanade's artificial expansion, while surface features include massive ashlars characteristic of construction techniques. This positioning underscores the wall's role as the nearest extant point to the ancient Temple's sanctum for Jewish devotional practices, delimited by the Old City's sectarian quarters.

Dimensions, Height, and Stone Composition

The constitutes the exposed western segment of a 488-meter-long that supports the artificial platform of the in . The portion designated for public prayer, known as the Western Wall Plaza, spans approximately 57 meters in length and features 28 visible courses of stone above ground level. The height of the wall varies along its extent due to terrain and subsequent constructions, but in the prayer plaza, it rises about 19 meters above the modern plaza floor, with an additional 17 courses extending underground to the original bedrock foundation, totaling 45 courses. At its maximum preserved elevation, the wall reaches up to 55 meters from the base, though much of this is obscured or buried. The structure employs massive limestone blocks quarried from local Jerusalem-area sources, classified as , encompassing pale limestones, , and dolomitic limestones prized for their durability and aesthetic uniformity. Herodian-era stones, predominant in the lower courses, exhibit characteristic marginal drafting—finely chiseled borders framing roughly hewn faces—and include exceptional monolithic blocks, such as the , measuring 13.6 meters in length, 3.3 meters in height, and over 4 meters in depth, with an estimated weight of 570 tons. Upper courses from later periods incorporate smaller stones with more pronounced tooling, reflecting medieval Islamic reconstructions.

Distinction Between Prayer Section and Full Retaining Wall

The section of the Western Wall accessible for Jewish prayer, often referred to as the Kotel, comprises approximately 57 meters (187 feet) of exposed stone facing the prayer plaza in Jerusalem's Old City. This visible segment represents only a small fraction of the full retaining wall supporting the western side of the Temple Mount platform, which extends for 488 meters (1,600 feet) in total. To the south of the prayer plaza, the wall continues for an additional 80 meters (262 feet), where excavations have revealed -era features including , a remnant of an ancient bridge or stairway leading to the , underscoring the wall's role in the broader infrastructure rather than solely as a prayer site. Northward, the majority of the wall's length—much of it buried under subsequent structures—is accessible via the Western Wall Tunnels, which expose original masonry courses hidden behind medieval and later buildings. These extensions highlight that the prayer area was selected for its proximity to the projected location of the ancient Temple's , prioritizing spiritual significance over the wall's complete physical span. The distinction arises from historical access limitations and urban development; prior to , the prayer space was confined and hemmed in by adjacent structures, while post-war clearing created the current plaza without exposing the full wall due to overlying Islamic and residential quarters. The lower 17 to 29 visible courses in the prayer section are predominantly , dating to the BCE, but upper courses include later restorations, with the tunnels revealing more consistent ancient strata elsewhere along the wall. This differentiation emphasizes the Western Wall's engineering as a massive retaining structure for the enlarged esplanade, rather than a perimeter enclosure of the Temple itself.

Historical Construction and Periods

Herodian Era Construction and Second Temple Destruction (19 BCE–70 CE)

initiated the expansion of the Mount platform around 19 BCE, effectively doubling its size by constructing massive retaining walls to create a vast artificial esplanade capable of supporting enlarged temple courts and structures. This project involved quarrying and placing enormous limestone ashlars, many exceeding 10 meters in length and weighing up to 570 tons, laid without mortar in characteristic bonding with finely dressed margins and bossed centers for seismic stability. The , as the primary western retaining structure, rose over 80 feet above adjacent roadways and extended deep below street level to buttress the platform against the steep Tyropoeon Valley. According to the historian , ambition drove this endeavor to perpetuate his legacy, employing thousands of priests trained as stonemasons to ensure ritual purity in construction. Archaeological excavations reveal that the wall's foundational courses embody this Herodian phase, with associated features like mikvaot (ritual baths) and a paved street indicating ongoing work into the late , though incomplete at Herod's death in 4 BCE. Elements such as , projecting from the wall to support a bridge to the temple courts, further attest to the engineering sophistication, utilizing construction for load distribution. The platform's expansion incorporated earlier Hasmonean extensions but primarily relied on Herod's innovations to enclose approximately square meters, making it one of the largest sacred precincts of antiquity. During the First Jewish-Roman War, Roman forces under besieged in 70 CE, breaching the city walls and systematically dismantling the temple complex after its inner courts were set ablaze on the 9th of Av. The and superstructures were razed in fulfillment of orders to leave "not one stone upon another," as recorded by , yet the peripheral retaining walls—including the Western Wall—were spared total destruction, likely due to their structural role in stabilizing the platform rather than forming the sacred edifice itself. This survival preserved the wall's Herodian integrity, with lower courses intact amid rubble from collapsed upper additions, as evidenced by post-destruction debris layers in tunnels along its base. Subsequent Roman utilization of the site for a temple to further underscores the walls' enduring utility, untouched in their foundational form.

Roman, Byzantine, and Early Islamic Phases (70–638 CE)

Following the Roman legions' destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, the Western Wall endured significant structural damage from the siege and subsequent fires, yet its foundational Herodian masonry—comprising massive ashlar blocks—remained substantially intact, distinguishing it from the razed superstructure above. Archaeological assessments of rubble at the wall's base, including displaced stones in the Jerusalem Archaeological Garden and Davidson Center, attribute much of the visible debris not to deliberate Roman dismantling but to seismic activity during a 363 CE earthquake that devastated half of Jerusalem. In the ensuing Roman era, as Jerusalem was refounded as Aelia Capitolina after the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE, the Temple Mount platform, supported by the Western Wall, accommodated a temple dedicated to Jupiter Capitolinus, implying minimal alteration to the retaining infrastructure to maintain the elevated esplanade. During the Byzantine period (324–638 CE), the , including areas adjacent to the Western Wall, exhibited signs of neglect in historical accounts, often described as a refuse dump amid Christian imperial policies suppressing Jewish and pagan sites. However, sifting of soil yields abundant Byzantine artifacts—such as , tiles, and chancel screens—contradicting notions of total desolation and indicating sustained human activity, including residential remains near the southern end of the platform close to the wall. Numismatic evidence, including 5th–7th century coin weights inscribed with Christian names like "Euthalios" and carat markers, points to an organized Christian presence on the mount, potentially tied to functions requiring standardized imperial measures. A brief interruption occurred with the Sasanian Persian conquest of in 614 CE, during which Jewish forces allied with massacred local and temporarily administered the city, facilitating Jewish return and activity around the , as suggested by period artifacts like a gold medallion depicting a menorah unearthed nearby. This episode, lasting until Byzantine reconquest in 629 CE, involved no documented rebuilding of the Western Wall but marked a fleeting restoration of Jewish access before renewed restrictions. Excavations near the Western Wall plaza reveal small finds from Roman-Byzantine strata, including a refuse dump layer, underscoring continuous, albeit modest, utilization of the area through these phases. The wall's enduring stability as a relic persisted into the eve of the Arab Muslim conquest in 638 CE, setting the stage for subsequent transformations under early Islamic rule.

Medieval Islamic Rule: Umayyad, Abbasid, Fatimid, and Mamluk (638–1517)

Following the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem in 638 CE by Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab, Jews, who had been barred from the city by Byzantine rulers since 135 CE, were permitted to return and resettle, including access for prayer near the Temple Mount and its western retaining wall. Umar reportedly cleared refuse from the site and allowed Jewish worship there, though under dhimmi status requiring payment of the jizya tax and subordination to Islamic authority. During the Umayyad Caliphate (638–750 CE), construction of the Dome of the Rock (completed 691–692 CE) by Caliph Abd al-Malik atop the Temple Mount proceeded without altering the Herodian-era western wall below, which served as the retaining structure for the enlarged platform; Jewish pilgrims continued devotional practices at the wall's base, though space was limited by proximity to the emerging Islamic sacred precinct. Umayyad rulers added upper layers to parts of the wall for structural reinforcement, but the core remained from the Second Temple period, and no evidence indicates systematic desecration or prohibition of Jewish access during this era of relative tolerance aimed at consolidating rule over diverse populations. Under the (750–969 CE), Jerusalem's prominence waned as became the political center, yet Jewish communities persisted in praying at the western wall, with from the 9th–10th centuries attesting to regular visits despite occasional harassment and the wall's use as a refuse dump by some Muslim residents to demean non-Muslims. The wall's narrow alley, hemmed by private Muslim dwellings and a (hospice), restricted gatherings, but no caliphal decrees banned prayer outright; instead, dhimmi protections allowed continuity of rituals, including lamentations over the Temple's destruction, as documented in contemporary Jewish travel accounts. Fatimid rule (969–1099 CE) brought fluctuations in access; while initial tolerance enabled Jewish settlement and prayer at the wall—evidenced by documents describing 10th–11th century rituals—Caliph (r. 996–1021 CE) imposed severe restrictions, including synagogue destructions and temporary expulsions of Jews from around 1012 CE amid broader persecutions of non-Muslims. Later Fatimid caliphs relaxed these, restoring Jewish presence, though the wall's status as the Buraq Wall—linked to Islamic traditions of Muhammad's —gained emphasis in Muslim sources, potentially heightening tensions over shared space without formal exclusion of Jewish devotion. The Mamluk Sultanate (1250–1517 CE), after recapturing Jerusalem from Crusaders in 1244 CE via Ayyubid intermediaries, maintained the wall as a Jewish prayer site amid urban revival, funding restorations of the Haram al-Sharif while tolerating dhimmi access; however, adjacent Mamluk constructions, such as the 13th-century Ribat al-Kurtubuli abutting the wall, narrowed the prayer area to a mere sliver, fostering overcrowding and disputes. Jewish sources record ongoing Tisha B'Av observances there, undeterred by sporadic refuse dumping or local encroachments, reflecting pragmatic Mamluk governance that balanced Islamic primacy with revenue from protected minorities over outright prohibition. Throughout these dynasties, the wall endured as a symbol of Jewish continuity, structurally intact from Herodian foundations, despite intermittent degradations that underscored dhimmi vulnerabilities under sharia-based rule.

Ottoman Dominion and Pre-Modern Access (1517–1917)

The Ottoman Empire assumed control of Jerusalem in 1517 following the defeat of the Mamluks, incorporating the Western Wall into the administrative framework of the region under Suleiman the Magnificent, who ruled from 1520 to 1566. Early in his reign, Suleiman ordered the clearance of debris and ruins adjacent to the Wall, expanding the narrow passageway to facilitate Jewish prayer while maintaining it as a limited alleyway bordered by Muslim-owned properties in the Moroccan Quarter. He issued a firman, or imperial decree, explicitly permitting Jews to access the site for devotional purposes, recognizing the influx of Sephardic Jews fleeing the Spanish Inquisition and affirming the Wall's role as a site of lamentation over the destroyed Temple. Throughout the Ottoman period, Jewish access to the Western Wall—known to as the Al-Buraq Wall and administered as part of the —was permitted but strictly regulated to prevent any assertion of permanent rights or structural alterations. Regulations prohibited the placement of benches, chairs, scrolls, or screens for gender separation, requiring worshippers to pray standing or kneeling on the uneven ground to underscore the site's transient status under Islamic oversight. These rules stemmed from Ottoman efforts to preserve the status quo, avoiding disputes over sovereignty while accommodating Jewish religious practice amid the Wall's proximity to the . Multiple firmans reaffirmed these rights between 1560 and 1911, though enforcement varied, with local Muslim authorities occasionally imposing restrictions or demands for payments to ensure unhindered access. The prayer area remained confined to a slim strip, approximately 28 meters long and 2-3 meters wide, hemmed in by adjacent buildings, which limited gatherings and amplified the site's austere character. Jewish pilgrims and residents, numbering in the thousands by the 19th century, sustained continuous prayer traditions, including Tisha B'Av observances mourning the Temples' destruction, despite the physical hardships and periodic harassments from neighboring residents. As Ottoman authority waned in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, European consular interventions occasionally protected Jewish rights, but underlying tensions persisted due to the Wall's dual religious claims, setting the stage for later conflicts without fundamentally altering pre-modern access patterns.

British Mandate Conflicts and Riots (1917–1948)

Following the British capture of Jerusalem on December 9, 1917, Jewish access to the Western Wall improved initially under military administration, allowing organized prayer and the placement of temporary items like mats during services. However, the site remained part of the Muslim Waqf property adjacent to the Al-Aqsa Mosque, governed by an Ottoman-era status quo that prohibited Jews from making permanent changes, owning the pavement, or installing fixed benches or screens. Tensions escalated in 1928 amid disputes over prayer arrangements. On September 24, 1928, during , Jewish worshippers erected a temporary —a screen to separate men and women—as was customary for Orthodox services; British police removed it the next day at the insistence of the Muslim Supreme Council, led by Haj , who argued it violated the status quo by resembling a synagogue fixture. This intervention provoked Jewish protests worldwide and drew attention to the site's contested status, with Zionist leaders framing it as an infringement on religious rights while Arab authorities viewed Jewish activities as encroachments threatening Islamic sovereignty over the Haram al-Sharif. The 1928 incident set the stage for the 1929 riots. On August 15, 1929, coinciding with Tisha B'Av, a large Jewish procession marched to the Wall and sounded the shofar, interpreted by Arabs as a provocative nationalist assertion following Zionist Congress discussions on the site. Arab counter-demonstrations escalated into violence starting August 23, with riots spreading from Jerusalem to Hebron, Safed, and other areas; in Hebron alone, Arab mobs killed 67 Jews on August 24, including students and yeshiva members, in attacks characterized by widespread looting and mutilation. Overall, the disturbances from August 15–29 resulted in 133 Jews killed and 339 wounded, primarily by Arab assailants, while 116 Arabs were killed and 232 wounded, mostly by British forces restoring order. In response, Britain appointed the in September 1929 to investigate the riots, attributing underlying causes to Arab fears of Jewish immigration and land purchases alongside the immediate trigger of the Wall dispute, though it noted premeditated elements in some attacks despite official Arab denials. A subsequent International Commission on the Western Wall, convened in December 1929 and reporting in 1930, affirmed Muslim ownership of the Wall and pavement but recognized Jews' immemorial right of access for devotional prayer without ownership or proprietary alterations; it upheld the status quo by barring permanent Jewish fixtures like benches or fixed screens while permitting portable mats. These findings, rejected by Jewish representatives as overly restrictive, perpetuated grievances amid rising , contributing to further unrest in the 1936–1939 , during which sporadic clashes near the Wall occurred but did not center on it as prominently.

Jordanian Annexation and Jewish Barred Access (1948–1967)

Following the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Jordanian forces captured , including the Old City and the Western Wall, in late May 1948 after intense fighting that led to the evacuation of the Jewish Quarter. The 1949 Israel- Armistice Agreement, signed on April 3, formalized 's de facto control over these areas, dividing Jerusalem along the Green Line, but included provisions under Article VIII for the protection of holy places and facilitation of free access to them by respective communities. In practice, sealed the armistice lines and denied any access to the Old City, the Western Wall, the cemetery, and other Jewish religious sites, in direct violation of the agreement's intent. On April 24, 1950, Jordan's parliament formally annexed the , including , declaring it an integral part of the Hashemite Kingdom despite opposition from the . This annexation received de jure recognition only from Britain and , with offering partial acknowledgment; the broader , including the states and the , did not accept it as legally valid, viewing it as lacking basis under . Under Jordanian administration, policies systematically barred from the annexed territories: no Jewish residency was permitted in , and access to sacred sites remained prohibited, marking the first time in centuries that were entirely excluded from the Western Wall, with the last recorded Jewish visits occurring in May 1948. Jordanian rule facilitated widespread of Jewish heritage sites, contravening protections. In the Old City, all 58 synagogues—many centuries old—were razed, looted, or converted into stables and chicken coops, including the Hurva and Yochanan ben Zakai synagogues. The ancient , containing over 150,000 graves dating back millennia, suffered extensive vandalism: approximately 40,000 tombstones were smashed, with fragments repurposed for road paving, latrines, and Jordanian military barracks construction; a road was bulldozed through the site, further disturbing burials. These actions reflected a policy of erasing Jewish historical presence, as no reciprocal access was granted to Muslim or Christian sites in Israeli-held , though Jordan's violations were unilateral and unremedied until the 1967 .

Israeli Control, Plaza Creation, and Post-1967 Developments (1967–Present)

During the , Israeli Defense Forces paratroopers under Colonel Motta Gur captured the , including the Western Wall, on June 7, 1967, marking the first Jewish access to the site since Jordanian annexation in 1948. The iconic moment was captured in photographs of soldiers at the Wall, symbolizing reunification under Israeli control. , Chief Chaplain of the IDF, led prayers there and sounded the , emphasizing the site's reclaimed religious significance. To expand the narrow prayer space—previously limited to a 4-meter-wide alley—and enhance security and accessibility, Israeli authorities demolished the adjacent between June 8 and 10, 1967. This neighborhood, housing around 135 structures and 650-700 residents (mostly North African Muslims), was cleared to create a 57-meter-deep plaza accommodating thousands for and gatherings, with residents compensated and relocated to new housing in . The action, undertaken amid wartime conditions, addressed immediate logistical needs following 19 years of Jewish exclusion under Jordanian rule, where access was prohibited despite armistice provisions. Post-1967 excavations in the Western Wall Plaza and surrounding areas uncovered significant archaeological remains, including Herodian-era stones, -period streets, and structures like to the south, confirming the site's ancient engineering. The Western Wall Tunnels, excavated northward from the plaza starting in 1967 and opened progressively, revealed a 488-meter stretch of , drainage systems, and ritual baths from the late era, providing empirical evidence of pre-70 CE construction. These findings, conducted by Israel's Ministry of Religious Affairs and later the , have bolstered historical claims of Jewish continuity at the location, though access to adjacent areas remains restricted due to the Temple Mount's arrangement with the Islamic . Since , the plaza has operated under Israeli administration as a primary site for , divided into separate men's and women's sections per Orthodox , with continuous access except during alerts. Annual visitors exceed 10 million, including note placements in Wall crevices—a practice intensified post-reunification—and large events like Bar Mitzvahs. Debates over egalitarian prayer arose in the , leading to a southern section at designated for mixed-gender services; a 2016 government plan to formalize and expand it as an official plaza was suspended in amid ultra-Orthodox opposition, resulting in ongoing court challenges and alternative prayer protests. enhancements, including barriers post-Second Intifada, have maintained order despite periodic tensions over nearby access. extended civil law to in , asserting over the site, though international recognition varies.

Jewish Religious Significance

Connection to the Temple and Foundation Stone


The Western Wall constitutes the exposed portion of the western retaining wall of the Temple Mount platform, constructed by Herod the Great around 19 BCE as part of his extensive expansion of the Second Temple complex. This project involved quarrying and placing massive limestone blocks, some weighing over 100 tons, to elevate and enlarge the mount to about 1,600 by 1,000 feet, supporting the Temple edifice, courts, and porticos above the natural topography. The wall itself did not enclose the sanctuary but retained earthen fill to create a level artificial esplanade, with the Temple building situated eastward on the platform. Archaeological evidence, including Herodian masonry styles and inscriptions, confirms this construction phase, distinguishing it from earlier Hasmonean additions. Following the Roman legions' destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE under Titus, the retaining walls persisted amid the rubble, with the Western Wall emerging as the most intact remnant proximate to the Temple's core.
In Jewish religious tradition, the Wall's profound significance stems from its position as the nearest accessible point to the (Even HaShtiya), the bedrock outcrop within the identified as the site of the . This stone holds cosmological importance, viewed in rabbinic sources as the navel of the earth from which creation emanated and where the was placed during Temple service. The , entered solely by the on , overlay this stone, symbolizing the interface between divine and earthly realms. Post-destruction, the (Shekhinah) is held to have retreated westward, rendering the Western Wall—mere yards from the projected location—the optimal locus for prayer directed toward the Temple site's sanctity. This theological linkage, rooted in Talmudic and midrashic rather than direct scriptural mandate, elevated the Wall from mere architectural survival to a surrogate for Temple communion, where inserted notes (kvitelach) convey petitions heavenward. Excavations along the Wall, such as those revealing and the ancient street below, further illuminate its Temple adjacency, with debris layers attesting to 70 CE cataclysm while underscoring the platform's enduring stability. Tradition posits the Wall's stones as imbued with residual holiness due to their role in sustaining the Temple's elevation, though halakhic rulings prohibit physical contact with sanctity-bearing elements, confining devotion to the outer face. This connection persists amid restricted Mount access, positioning the Wall as Judaism's preeminent prayer site outside the Temple precinct.

Theological Role: Divine Presence and Custody

In and , the —the immanent aspect of the —holds a central theological role at the Western Wall, conceived as its eternal dwelling place following the Second Temple's destruction in 70 CE. According to Shemot Rabbah 2:2, Acha bar Ya'akov declared that the Shekhinah "has never departed from the Western Wall," distinguishing it from other Temple structures where the Presence is said to have withdrawn progressively during periods of exile and desecration. This tradition posits that while the Shekhinah receded from the , it adhered to the Wall due to its proximity to the and its structural integrity as a retaining barrier for the , symbolizing unbroken divine attachment to the site of revelation. This perpetual indwelling imbues the Western Wall with a custodial function in theological terms: it serves as a guardian of holiness, protected by heavenly decree against destruction, as evidenced in narratives where even adversarial forces, such as the mythical Pangar of Arabia, are allotted the Wall yet compelled to preserve it because "the rests there." The ( 116a) reinforces this by describing the Wall as the 's "permanent home" post-destruction, implying a reciprocal custody wherein the site's material endurance sustains the Presence, and the Presence ensures the site's inviolability amid historical conquests. Halachic discussions, such as those in the and later codes, affirm this by according the Wall permanent sanctity derived from the Temple Mount's intrinsic holiness, which persists eternally and renders adjacent areas like the Wall eligible for sacred activities without ritual impurity concerns. Theological implications extend to efficacy, where the Wall acts as a conduit for petitions ascending directly to the , fostering practices like note insertion into its crevices as symbolic appeals to this abiding Presence. This custodianship underscores a first-principles understanding of divine : the Wall's survival through earthquakes, wars, and sieges—from the Roman to Ottoman rule—empirically aligns with the tradition's causal claim of protection, distinguishing it from other Temple remnants that deteriorated. Such beliefs, rooted in midrashic rather than archaeological contingency, prioritize the site's role in maintaining Jewish covenantal continuity amid dispersion.

Evolution of Prayer and Mourning Practices

Following the Roman destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, the Western Wall emerged as a remnant closest to the former site of the , drawing initial Jewish lamentations amid restricted access under Roman and Byzantine rule. Jews in the petitioned Byzantine Empress around 425 CE for permission to pray near the Temple , indicating early devotional activity at the site's periphery despite prohibitions. By the , textual evidence from 950–980 CE documents Jewish prayer specifically at the foot of the Western Wall, reflecting a sustained, if intermittent, tradition of tied to the Temple's loss. Under medieval Islamic governance, access remained limited, with prayer practices evolving into sporadic gatherings for mourning the Temple's destruction, particularly on , the ninth of Av commemorating the event. These sessions involved recitations of lamentations from the Book of Eicha (Lamentations) and expressions of grief, fostering a custom of audible wailing that later influenced the site's designation as "El-Mabka," or Place of Weeping. By the Ottoman period (1517–1917), a designated narrow allowed more consistent Jewish visitation, where practices intensified to include midnight prayers (Tikkun Chatzot) lamenting and destruction, often led by elders at adjacent sites like the Small Western Wall. The marked a surge in devotional customs, with European travelers observing intensified wailing and prostration during festivals, solidifying the English term "Wailing Wall" by mid-century. The tradition of inserting written s or notes into the Wall's crevices, documented as early as post-70 CE but increasingly common, symbolized direct appeals to believed to linger there, drawing from rabbinic assertions of enduring Shechinah (divine indwelling). Communal evolved from individual to organized services, though confined to a small plaza hemmed by structures until post-1967 expansions. In the British Mandate era (1917–1948), restrictions on rituals like from 1930–1947 spurred defiant practices, heightening the Wall's role as a site of national lamentation amid riots over access. Post-1967 Israeli control facilitated broader participation, transforming mourning into mass assemblies on with thousands reciting kinot (elegies) and maintaining note placement, now collected biannually for burial as sacred refuse. These developments underscore a progression from to institutionalized , rooted in empirical continuity of Jewish attachment despite varying political constraints.

Kabbalistic and Ritual Elements

In Kabbalistic tradition, the Western Wall retains the enduring presence of the , the feminine aspect of the Divine understood as God's immanent manifestation in the world, which Midrashic sources assert never departed from this site following the Temple's destruction. This stems from Shemot Rabbah 2:2, where Rabbi Acha declares, "The has never departed from the Western Wall," a teaching elaborated in to emphasize the Wall's role as a conduit for divine influx amid the cosmic exile of the . Kabbalists view the Wall's proximity to the former —where the dwelled most intensely—as creating a focal point of elevated spiritual energy, enabling prayers uttered there to ascend directly to the heavenly realms. Ritual practices at the Wall incorporate Kabbalistic principles of tikkun (rectification), where physical contact with the stones facilitates communion with the and aids in elevating sparks of holiness trapped in . Devotees often touch, , or press their foreheads against the Wall during prayer, symbolizing yearning to unite with the and arouse heavenly mercy, a custom rooted in the belief that the rests upon it. The tradition of inserting written petitions—kvitel—into the Wall's crevices, practiced since at least the , draws from Kabbalistic efficacy of inscribed words to endure eternally and bypass forgetfulness, channeling requests through the Wall's mystical gateway to the . This practice was notably documented by the Kabbalist Rabbi , who placed such a note during his visit, underscoring its role in personal and cosmic repair. Kabbalistic liturgy at the Wall emphasizes meditative intention () to align with sefirotic emanations, particularly Malchut (associated with the ), transforming lamentation over the Temple's loss into redemptive action. Global prayers are held to converge at this locus, per Kabbalistic cosmology, amplifying collective tikkun efforts toward messianic restoration. These elements distinguish the Wall not merely as a historical remnant but as a living nexus for mystical engagement, where empirical devotion intersects with metaphysical repair.

Islamic Religious Claims

Origins and Development of Al-Buraq Tradition

The Islamic tradition of al-Buraq associates the southwestern corner of the compound with the tethering of the Prophet 's mount, a winged equine-like creature named , during his Night Journey (Isra) from to circa 621 CE, as referenced in the Quran's description of travel to "the Farthest Mosque." Classical collections, including , recount that tethered to a ring or pillar at the mosque upon arrival but provide no details linking it explicitly to the western or its southern plaza section. Similarly, narrates the event without specifying a precise location beyond the mosque environs. The designation "Marbat al-Buraq" (tethering place of al-Buraq), denoting a or shrine in the southwestern corner of the al-Sharif adjacent to the wall, first appears in 10th-century geographic literature, reflecting an early medieval localization of the tradition near the site's gates rather than the wall itself. By the , accounts explicitly tied the tethering to Bab al-Nab (Gate of the Prophet), an entrance at the southern extremity of the western wall, indicating a progressive attribution to the barrier's vicinity amid evolving Muslim topographical descriptions of Jerusalem's sacred landscape. This association intensified during the Ottoman era (1517–1917), when waqf documents and local usage began applying "al-Buraq Wall" to the accessible segment of the facing the area, often in contexts of regulating non-Muslim access to counter perceived encroachments. The nomenclature gained prominence in 20th-century disputes, as evidenced by the 1929 riots and subsequent 1930 international commission, where Muslim authorities invoked the al- tradition to claim proprietary rights over the wall and plaza as an integral part of Al-Aqsa's western boundary, framing as a temporary concession rather than inherent right. Such late developments, absent from 7th-9th century core texts, suggest the tradition's site-specific evolution served to reinforce Islamic spatial claims in a multi-faith contested zone, independent of archaeological or contemporaneous evidence tying to the Herodian-era structure.

Historical Evidence and Late Attributions

The primary Islamic texts recounting the , including hadiths in compiled around 846 CE, describe tethering Al-Buraq—a winged steed—at the "farthest mosque" (Al-Masjid al-Aqsa) in upon arrival, without specifying a particular wall, ring, or location along the Haram al-Sharif enclosure. These accounts emphasize the ascension from the mosque's vicinity but lack topographical details linking to the Western Wall, the retaining structure built by circa 19 BCE to support the platform. The earliest documented association of 's tethering with a specific site near the southwestern perimeter of the al-Sharif appears in a 14th-century manuscript by Ibrahim b. Ishaq al-Ansari (d. circa 1328 CE), which places the event outside Bab al-Nab—a gate along the southern wall adjacent to the area later known for . This reference predates explicit claims to the northern segment of the Western Wall used by , but even here, the tradition remains vague, tied to a gate rather than the exposed masonry of the prayer plaza. No earlier Umayyad, Abbasid, or Fatimid sources from the 7th–12th centuries invoke the narrative to describe or contest the wall itself, despite Muslim control over since 638 CE. The designation "Hait al-Buraq" (Al-Buraq Wall) for the Jewish-accessible portion of the Western Wall emerges more prominently in Ottoman-era records from the 16th–19th centuries, often in administrative contexts acknowledging Jewish usage rights while noting the site's proximity to . However, substantive contestation based on this attribution intensified only in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, coinciding with rising Zionist settlement and Arab nationalist sentiments. For instance, during the 1929 disturbances dubbed "Intifadat al-Buraq" by Arab leaders, the tradition was invoked to assert Muslim proprietorship, leading to the Shaw Commission's investigation, which found no historical Muslim of the itself but upheld status for adjacent structures. Prior Ottoman firmans, such as those from 1840, had permitted without reference to Buraq exclusivity, indicating the claim's evolution from devotional lore to territorial assertion. Archaeological and textual analysis underscores the attribution's post-medieval character: the wall's stones bear no Islamic inscriptions or markers from the formative period of , and early geographers like al-Muqaddasi (985 CE) describe the Haram's environs without Buraq linkage. Scholarly examinations, drawing on primary Arabic chronicles, attribute the tradition's localization to the Western Wall prayer site as a response to Jewish revivalism under Ottoman reforms, rather than unbroken prophetic continuity. This late crystallization aligns with broader patterns where sacred geographies adapt to contemporary rivalries, as evidenced by the absence of Buraq-specific endowments or prohibitions at the site until the Mandate era.

Implications for Access and Sovereignty Claims

The attribution of the Western Wall to the site where tied the has underpinned Muslim claims of exclusive proprietary rights, positioning the structure as an integral component of the Haram al-Sharif rather than a distinct Jewish heritage site. This perspective informed the 1930 International Commission's ruling under the British Mandate, which affirmed Muslim sole ownership of the wall while permitting Jewish access solely for , without rights to partitions, furniture, or structural changes that could imply proprietorship. Violations of these limits, such as Jewish placement of benches or screens, precipitated tensions, including the 1929 riots that killed 133 and 116 amid disputes over access protocols. These claims manifested in severe access restrictions during the Jordanian annexation of from 1948 to 1967, when Jewish visitation was entirely prohibited, contravening prior Mandate-era arrangements and Article 13 of the 1949 Armistice Agreement stipulating free access to holy places. Post-1967 Israeli control expanded the prayer plaza by clearing the adjacent Mugrabi Quarter, enabling unrestricted Jewish worship, yet the Al-Buraq narrative continues to fuel objections to infrastructure like a planned elevator for disabled access, framed by Palestinian sources as facilitating incursions threatening the site's Islamic . The Islamic , administering the , asserts oversight over adjacent areas, contesting archaeological excavations or expansions as potential risks to foundations, thereby limiting Israeli administrative modifications despite the plaza's separation from the Mount proper. In sovereignty terms, the tradition reinforces declarations of the wall's inalienability as waqf property under Muslim jurisdiction, with Palestinian officials asserting that "not a single millimeter of [the Al-Buraq Wall] may fall under any sovereignty other than that of the Palestinian people," rejecting Israeli control as an occupation of Islamic endowment land. This stance echoes Ottoman-era designations of the Haram's enclosing walls as waqf, extended to preclude Jewish national claims despite historical Jewish prayer rights predating formalized Al-Buraq associations. Internationally, UNESCO's 2016 resolution on "Occupied Palestine," which designated the site the "Al-Buraq Wall/Al-Buraq esplanade" without referencing Jewish historical links, has been interpreted as endorsing this framing, prioritizing Islamic nomenclature in heritage designations and implicitly challenging Israel's post-1967 sovereignty over the area. Such resolutions, adopted amid abstentions from Western states, reflect geopolitical pressures but overlook archaeological consensus on the wall's Herodian Jewish origins, amplifying disputes in forums like the UN where Palestinian claims gain traction.

Significance in Christianity and Other Faiths

Christian Historical Views and Pilgrimage

Early Christian theologians interpreted the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE as the fulfillment of ' prophecy in the Gospels, viewing it as divine judgment on the Jewish rejection of Christ and a shift toward a spiritual temple embodied in believers rather than physical structures. This perspective, rooted in texts like Matthew 24:1-2 and Mark 13:1-2, led to supersessionist theology where the Temple's role was seen as obsolete post-resurrection, with no emphasis on preserving or venerating its remnants, including the Western Wall as a retaining structure built around 19 BCE. Patristic literature contains no specific references to the Western Wall, reflecting a detachment from Jewish Temple-focused practices amid Roman destruction and Christian doctrinal evolution. During the Byzantine period (4th–7th centuries CE), Christian pilgrimage to centered on sites of Jesus' Passion, such as the , with accounts like Egeria's itinerary (c. 381–384 CE) detailing visits to Golgotha and the but omitting the Western Wall or Temple remnants. The Temple Mount area, overlaid with pagan and later Islamic structures, held minimal ritual appeal for Christians, who prioritized loci over associations, though some viewed the site's desolation as symbolic vindication of Christian claims. In medieval and Ottoman eras, European Christian travelers occasionally noted Jewish lamentation at the site—coining the term "Wailing Wall" by the to describe observed mourning—but did not integrate it into their own devotional practices, focusing instead on Franciscan custodianship of Passion sites. records, such as those from 12th-century Crusader chroniclers, reference the Temple Mount's ruins symbolically as evidence of prophecy but not as a prayer locus. Modern Christian engagement intensified post-1948 and especially after Israeli control, with evangelical and Catholic pilgrims visiting the Wall as a tangible link to ' era, given its Herodian stones contemporary with his Temple visits (e.g., Luke 2:41-50, John 2:13-22). Over one million annual visitors include who insert notes or reflect on biblical events, though remains secondary to Jewish and is often framed as with Israel's restoration prophecies (e.g., 40–48). This contemporary , peaking during events like the 1980 papal visit by John Paul II, contrasts with historical disinterest, driven by dispensationalist emphasizing Jewish return rather than direct .

References in Broader Abrahamic Contexts

The Temple Mount, of which the Western Wall forms the exposed western retaining segment, holds indirect significance in Christian texts through references to Herod's Temple. The New Testament depicts Jesus frequenting the Temple precincts for teaching and observances, as in Luke 2:41-52 where he debates scholars at age twelve, and prophesying its demolition in Mark 13:1-2, observing the disciples' admiration for its massive stones—many of which comprise the Western Wall, which endured the 70 CE Roman destruction unlike the sanctuary proper. Early Church Fathers like Eusebius acknowledged the site's Jewish templar history, linking it to biblical events without elevating the retaining wall itself to devotional status. In Islamic tradition, beyond the post-Quranic attribution, the is alluded to as al-Masjid al-Aqsa ("the farthest mosque") in 17:1, site of Muhammad's night journey around 621 CE, predating Islamic structures there. Classical Muslim scholars, including (d. 923 CE) and (d. 1373 CE), interpreted this as the Jerusalem sanctuary, historically recognizing its prior Jewish temple amid Solomon's construction narratives shared from biblical sources. Pre-modern Islamic geographies, such as those by al-Muqaddasi (d. 991 CE), described the mount's ruins as remnants of Solomon's edifice, though without specific focus on the western enclosure. Among other Abrahamic groups, such as —who adhere to a variant emphasizing over —the Western Wall lacks any referenced sanctity, their omitting Second Temple-era developments entirely. texts, drawing from Ismaili Shi'ism, occasionally nod to Jerusalem's prophetic heritage via Jethro's association but do not designate the wall as sacred. Shared across , remains the site's tie to Mount Moriah of Genesis 22, Abraham's sacrifice locus ( in Jewish/Christian readings, in Islamic), underscoring causal continuity in patriarchal narratives despite divergent interpretive lenses.

Archaeological Evidence

Excavations at Wilson's Arch and Environs

Wilson's Arch, located along the Western Wall in Jerusalem's Old City, consists of a series of ancient stone arches that formed the initial support for a monumental bridge providing access to the platform during the Second Temple period. The arch, constructed from large ashlars, spans an ancient street level and dates to the late Hasmonean or early era, postdating the late second century BCE but predating the destruction of 70 CE, as evidenced by stratigraphic analysis and architectural features like drainage channels in its pier. Archaeological excavations beneath Wilson's Arch were conducted by the from May 2007 to April 2010, targeting the vaults of the adjacent ancient bridge and revealing eight stratigraphic layers spanning the Hasmonean period through Ottoman times. These digs uncovered evidence of continuous urban development, including Roman-period modifications to the bridge structure, such as added supports and fills that raised street levels after the Temple's destruction. of organic materials from the site, including seeds and wood, corroborated the timeline, with samples systematically collected across strata to refine chronologies independent of ceramic typology. Key discoveries include a Roman-era theater-like structure with tiered stone seating for approximately 200 spectators, unearthed in 2017 during efforts to date the arch precisely; this semi-circular public building, oriented toward the , likely served administrative or judicial functions in the Roman colony of . Additional finds comprised imported vessels, coins from the and Roman periods, and faunal remains indicating trade networks, such as bones from Mediterranean species processed for salting. A 2020 study using microarchaeological techniques and 14C analysis confirmed the arch's construction around 2,000 years ago, aligning with its role as an entry point to the Temple complex. Salvage excavations continued from June 2019 to December 2020 within the Western Wall Tunnels near Wilson's Arch, exposing further remnants of the bridge's causeway and associated infrastructure, including vaulted chambers reused in Byzantine and Islamic periods. These efforts highlight the arch's integration into Jerusalem's Second Temple-era topography, with the bridge spanning a 12-meter-wide valley to connect the Upper City to the , supporting the historical continuity of Jewish ritual infrastructure. The findings underscore Roman-era adaptations post-70 CE, including that repurposed foundations without altering their core .

Robinson's Arch and Southern Wall Findings

Robinson's Arch, situated approximately 12 meters north of the southwestern corner of the Temple Mount enclosure, consists of remnants of a large stone arch integrated into the western retaining wall, which forms the Western Wall. The structure supported a monumental staircase spanning about 17 meters in height, facilitating access from the Lower City or Tyropoeon Valley to an elevated platform on the Temple Mount. Excavations conducted in the area have revealed voussoirs and impost blocks characteristic of Herodian engineering, with the arch's pier constructed from precisely cut ashlars typical of the late Second Temple period. Archaeological digs beneath and adjacent to Robinson's Arch, including work in 2013, have yielded artifacts such as a 1-centimeter seal impression dating to the First Temple period, found in sifted debris, alongside coins from the Herodian era that confirm construction and use during Herod the Great's reign around 20 BCE. In December 2024, excavators uncovered a chisel at the base of the Temple Mount near the Western Wall, providing the first direct tool evidence of the wall's construction, with tool marks on nearby Herodian stones matching the implement's edge. Destruction layers from the Roman siege of 70 CE, including fallen stones and burnt debris, overlie a paved Herodian street running parallel to the wall, underscoring the arch's role in the temple complex before its collapse. Along the Southern Wall of the Temple Mount, excavations have exposed massive ashlars with drafted margins and raised bossage, extending from the southeastern corner westward, forming part of the same retaining structure as the Western Wall. Key findings include the bases of the —double and triple portals with subterranean passageways leading to the mount's interior—flanked by broad staircases designed for ritual ascents, evidenced by stepped alignments and (ritual bath) clusters nearby. A massive stone and arched supports, similar to those at , indicate connected infrastructure for elevated walkways, with pottery and numismatic evidence dating the features to the expansion. These southern excavations also revealed a paved street and foundation vaults paralleling the wall, incorporating elements from earlier Iron Age fortifications but overlaid with Herodian modifications, including relief arches over gateways to distribute weight from the platform above. Ritual artifacts, such as stone vessels resistant to impurity, and architectural alignments with the Western Wall's masonry confirm unified construction under Herod, supporting the enclosure's role in accommodating the Second Temple's courts. The findings collectively demonstrate advanced engineering to level the Temple Mount atop uneven terrain, with earthquake damage and Roman destruction scars preserved in situ.

Interpretations Supporting Herodian Origins

The lower courses of the exhibit distinctive masonry, characterized by massive ashlars—often exceeding 10 meters in length, 3 meters in height, and weighing over 100 tons each—with finely dressed surfaces featuring narrow drafted margins around the edges and slightly projecting central bosses, a technique emblematic of Herod the Great's construction projects from circa 20 BCE to expand the platform. These stones form the foundational that supported the artificial , distinguishing them from earlier Hasmonean or later Roman and Umayyad additions through their precision quarrying from local Judean hillsides and absence of tool marks inconsistent with first-century BCE iron chisels. Excavations along the southern and western extents, particularly Benjamin Mazar's digs from 1968 to 1978 adjacent to the , revealed stratigraphic continuity between these ashlars and -era features, including a monumental paved with large slabs and the piers of , a bridge-like structure dated to Herod's reign via associated pottery and architectural parallels to his fortress at . These findings demonstrate the wall's role in Herod's engineering to level and enlarge the mount by filling valleys with earth retained by the massive substructure, with no intervening layers indicating post- reconstruction in the primary courses. Recent discoveries, such as a iron unearthed in December 2024 at the wall's base amid construction debris consistent with first-century BCE quarrying techniques, provide direct tool evidence linking the to Herod's builders, corroborating the stylistic attribution without reliance on textual sources alone. Archaeologists interpret the uniformity of stone dressing and joint precision—achieved without mortar—as hallmarks of Herod's centralized workshop system, evidenced by comparable blocks at and , reinforcing the consensus that the visible Herodian section spans approximately 488 meters along the western flank. While some post-Herodian fills and repairs exist above the 17 exposed courses, core interpretations prioritize the empirical typology and excavation to affirm the wall's foundational dating to Herod's expansion, predating the Second Temple's destruction in 70 CE.

Contemporary Plaza and Worship Facilities

Main Orthodox Prayer Plaza

The Main Orthodox Prayer Plaza constitutes the primary venue for traditional Jewish prayer at the Western Wall, encompassing a segregated space divided by a into distinct men's and women's sections in accordance with halakhic norms. This arrangement reflects longstanding Orthodox practices emphasizing gender separation during communal worship. Established immediately after Israel's control of the Old City on June 10, 1967, during the , the plaza resulted from the demolition of the adjacent , transforming a confined 28-meter-long, narrow alley into an expansive open area extending 57 meters along the wall and 40 meters in depth, yielding approximately 2,400 square meters of uncovered prayer space. The expansion facilitated mass gatherings, accommodating up to 400,000 visitors on major holidays, and preserved archaeological remnants while prioritizing access to the retaining wall's exposed stones. Prayer activities center on Orthodox liturgy, including daily minyanim, the thrice-annual (Birkat Kohanim) recited by kohanim toward the , and personal devotions such as inserting kvitel notes—slips bearing supplications—into the wall's fissures, a custom documented since the 19th century. Ceremonies require advance rabbinical approval from recognized authorities or congregations of at least 1,000 families, with police clearance for events exceeding 500 participants; amplification is limited to approved systems for larger groups, and non-liturgical elements like speeches or political content are barred. Governed by the Western Wall Heritage Foundation under the Chief Rabbinate, the plaza enforces the Protection of Holy Places Law (1967) and associated regulations, mandating modest dress (covered shoulders and knees, no revealing attire), prohibiting external scrolls, weddings, circumcisions, eating, smoking, or non-Jewish symbols, and restricting animal entry except for service purposes. These measures maintain the site's sanctity as a focal point for Orthodox observance, drawing millions annually for reflection on Jewish continuity amid the remnant of Temple's enclosure.

Non-Orthodox and Egalitarian Areas

The non-Orthodox and egalitarian areas at the Western Wall refer to the section south of the main prayer plaza, adjacent to the archaeological site of , designated for mixed-gender prayer services by , Conservative, and other pluralistic Jewish groups. Known as Ezrat Yisrael, this platform enables worship without the gender segregation and Orthodox liturgical restrictions of the central area, allowing women and men to pray together, read from the , and wear ritual garments interchangeably. The site's development followed excavations revealing Herodian-era features, positioning it as an alternative venue since the early , when initial services began to address demands for inclusive practices amid disputes over access in the traditional plaza. In January 2016, the Israeli cabinet approved a compromise to enlarge Ezrat Yisrael into a 2,000-square-meter uncovered plaza with additional covered sections, enhanced access via a new entrance, and shared governance including non-Orthodox stewards, aiming to accommodate up to 1,200 worshippers and allocate 35 million NIS for infrastructure. This agreement sought to resolve decades of tension between Orthodox authorities, who maintain exclusive control over the main site, and progressive denominations advocating for recognition at Judaism's holiest location. However, implementation stalled in June 2017 after ultra-Orthodox coalition partners withdrew support, citing concerns over diluting the site's halakhic (Jewish legal) status, leaving the area under separate administration by a smaller steering committee rather than the Western Wall Heritage Foundation. As of 2025, the egalitarian section operates in its pre-expansion form, hosting regular services, bar mitzvahs, and events for non-Orthodox visitors, though it receives criticism for inferior visibility, acoustics, and perceived marginalization compared to the Orthodox plaza. Structural incidents, such as a 220-pound stone falling in July 2018 narrowly missing a lone worshipper and requiring closure for repairs, alongside like anti-Israel in August 2025, have underscored maintenance challenges. Proponents view it as a vital space for , while opponents, primarily from Orthodox circles, contend that non-traditional prayer at the Wall's remnant risks profaning its sanctity as a site tied to ancient Temple rituals.

Recent Infrastructure Enhancements

In January 2022, the Israeli cabinet approved a NIS 110 million ($35.4 million) multi-year plan to upgrade infrastructure surrounding the Western Wall, including enhancements to pathways, lighting, and visitor facilities to improve safety and capacity while promoting tourism. To address longstanding accessibility challenges, construction began in September 2024 on two elevators connecting the Jewish Quarter to the Western Wall Plaza, spanning a 26-meter vertical gap and enabling wheelchair users, elderly individuals, and families with strollers to reach the site without relying on steep ramps or stairs; the project, led by the Company for the Development and Renovation of the Jewish Quarter, followed seven years of archaeological and engineering preparations to preserve underlying historical structures. Renovation and preservation work at the —a narrower, 3.5-meter segment adjacent to the main plaza—started on May 5, 2025, after decades of delays due to coordination with religious authorities and archaeological oversight; the effort focuses on stabilizing ancient stones, repairing erosion, and enhancing structural integrity without altering the site's historical appearance. From January 2025 onward, the Western Wall Heritage Foundation initiated essential maintenance at the main plaza, encompassing structural reinforcements, infrastructure upgrades such as electrical and plumbing systems, and stabilization of retaining walls to accommodate growing visitor numbers exceeding 10 million annually pre-pandemic.

Administration and Governance

Israeli Authority and Heritage Site Status

Following Israel's capture of from Jordanian control during the on June 7, 1967, the Western Wall and surrounding areas fell under Israeli military administration, later transitioning to civilian governance as part of unified under Israeli sovereignty. Within days of the capture, the adjacent —comprising approximately 135 structures housing around 650 Arab residents—was demolished to create the Western Wall Plaza, a measuring about 2,400 square meters designed to accommodate mass gatherings previously restricted under Jordanian rule. Under , the Western Wall is designated a holy place pursuant to the Protection of Holy Places Law (1967) and the Regulations for the Preservation of Holy Places to the (1981), which mandate approval for any alterations and prioritize its maintenance for Jewish religious use. These provisions reflect the site's classification as a sacred Jewish remnant, distinct from the adjacent , with administrative authority vested in state bodies rather than private or foreign entities. The Western Wall Heritage Foundation, established in 1988 as a governmental body under the Ministry of Religious Services, holds primary responsibility for the site's day-to-day administration, including infrastructure upkeep, security coordination, visitor facilitation, and archaeological preservation. The Foundation's mandate extends to developing educational initiatives, such as guided tours of the Western Wall Tunnels revealing Herodian-era features, and conservation projects aimed at safeguarding the ancient masonry against erosion and seismic risks. Religious oversight is provided by the of the Western Wall and Holy Places, a position currently held by Rabbi Shmuel Rabinowitz, appointed by the to supervise prayer customs and resolve halakhic matters. This framework positions the Western Wall as a of Israeli national heritage, with state-funded efforts emphasizing its historical continuity as a Jewish spiritual focal point since antiquity, while integrating it into broader and commemoration programs, such as annual events drawing millions of visitors.

Regulations on , , and Conduct

The Western Wall Plaza maintains separate prayer sections for men and women, reflecting Orthodox Jewish customs enforced by the Western Wall Heritage Foundation and the . These divisions ensure gender-segregated worship, with public Torah readings and certain rituals, such as bar ceremonies involving chanting, permitted only in the men's section. Women are restricted from vocal group prayer, wearing tallitot publicly, or reading aloud in the women's section, as upheld by site regulations and prior Israeli rulings interpreting the site's sanctity under Orthodox norms. Organized prayer events in the lower plaza require prior approval from the Foundation, limited to those led by recognized rabbis or congregation heads, and must adhere to halakhic standards without amplification for small groups or political content. The upper plaza allows limited non-prayer ceremonies, such as educational or military events up to 500 participants, but prohibits dancing and restricts sound systems based on attendance size. All activities prioritize the site's dignity, avoiding disruptions to ongoing worship. Insertion of prayer notes, or kvittels, into the Wall's crevices is a longstanding tradition, with hundreds of thousands placed annually by visitors or via the Foundation's website service, which prints and inserts submissions remotely while preserving privacy. No explicit content restrictions are stated, but notes are treated as sacred texts. They are cleared biannually—before Passover and Rosh Hashanah—by rabbis using gloves and disposable wooden tools to avoid direct handling, then collected in sacks and buried in a genizah repository for worn sacred writings, in line with Jewish law on disposing of divine names. Conduct guidelines emphasize reverence: modest is mandatory, with men required to cover their heads (kippot available on site) and both sexes covering shoulders and knees—no shorts, sleeveless tops, or revealing clothing permitted. Prohibitions include eating or drinking (except water in designated areas), smoking, lighting candles, and importing personal scrolls, to prevent . Visitors must approach the Wall fully, back away without turning their backs toward it upon completion, and refrain from disruptive behavior, fostering an atmosphere of solemnity amid continuous prayer activity.

Security Measures and Access Policies

The Western Wall Plaza is protected by Israeli security forces, primarily the Israel Police, which maintain checkpoints at its four entrances where visitors must pass through metal detectors and submit bags for x-ray scanning to detect prohibited items such as weapons. These measures, implemented to counter terrorism risks given the site's proximity to the Temple Mount, include restrictions on metallic objects beyond essentials like belts or watches, with enhanced patrols during religious holidays such as Yom Kippur, where police presence is increased to manage crowds and prevent disruptions. Surveillance cameras and barriers further supplement these protocols, though a 2017 investigative report highlighted occasional lapses in detection efficacy at the perimeter. Access to the plaza is open to the public 24 hours a day, year-round, without entry fees, allowing , non-Jews, and tourists alike to approach the Wall, though Palestinian visitors from the face occasional Israeli security restrictions based on threat assessments. Modest dress is enforced, requiring coverage of shoulders and knees for both men and women, while prohibited items include scrolls, sacred objects like shawls for non-worshippers, electronic devices during times, and consumables such as food or tobacco products. A 2023 Israeli court ruling limited searches of bags potentially containing scrolls to visual checks by site orderlies, barring invasive inspections unless security threats are evident, in response to complaints from women's groups. These policies are codified under Israel's Protection of Holy Places Law, which designates the site as a Jewish heritage area under state oversight, prioritizing public safety while facilitating religious observance; violations, such as unauthorized protests or disruptive behavior, can result in removal by security personnel. Entry to adjacent tunnels requires separate reservations and additional brief screenings, often with group tours to control flow amid the site's high daily footfall of thousands.

Controversies and Competing Claims

Disputes Over Prayer Practices and Inclusivity

The primary disputes at the Western Wall center on the enforcement of Orthodox Jewish practices in the main prayer plaza, which mandates gender segregation and adherence to halachic norms prohibiting women from wearing tallitot (prayer shawls), reading from the aloud, or leading mixed-gender services, versus demands from non-Orthodox groups for egalitarian and inclusive worship options. The plaza, administered by the Orthodox-dominated Western Wall Heritage Foundation under Rabbi Shmuel Rabinowitz, views deviations as disruptions to the site's sanctity as a remnant of the ancient Temple, leading to interventions by security personnel and occasional arrests for activities deemed provocative. In contrast, organizations like , founded in 1988, argue that such restrictions marginalize female and progressive Jewish participation, citing Israel's democratic principles and the site's role as a for all . Tensions escalated through repeated clashes involving , who conduct monthly services in the women's section. Notable incidents include the arrest of 10 women on February 11, 2013, for wearing tallitot during prayer, charged under public disturbance laws; similar detentions occurred on April 11, 2013, involving five women, including group leader Lesley Sachs. Jerusalem's district court ruled in April 2013 that such arrests for wearing religious garments were unlawful, affirming women's right to pray with tallitot in the women's section, though enforcement remains inconsistent amid Orthodox protests and physical barriers erected by site authorities. Ultra-Orthodox counter-demonstrators have disrupted services, including a June 30, 2022, bar mitzvah in the egalitarian area, highlighting reciprocal interference claims. These events underscore a causal divide: Orthodox guardianship prioritizes historical uniformity to preserve perceived spiritual integrity, while reformers leverage legal challenges to expand access, often amplified by Jewish advocacy despite non-Orthodox streams comprising a minority of . Efforts to resolve disputes culminated in the January 31, 2016, government-approved Kotel Agreement, which designated an expanded southern plaza near as a permanent egalitarian space for mixed-gender prayer, administered jointly by , Conservative, and representatives, without altering the main plaza's Orthodox character. The plan passed cabinet by a 15-5 vote but faced immediate backlash from ultra-Orthodox parties, whose coalition leverage prompted to suspend implementation in June 2017, citing political instability. As of 2022, the agreement remained frozen, with the egalitarian area operational only on a limited basis under the Orthodox foundation, prompting petitions demanding justification for the reversal. Legislative pushes have intensified opposition, including a February 2023 bill by MK Uriel Buso to criminalize mixed-gender prayer site-wide and shutter the pluralistic area, advanced amid coalition negotiations. proposed measures in December 2022 to deter egalitarian services, reflecting haredi prioritization of halachic exclusivity over inclusivity. Israel's has intervened repeatedly, criticizing the government's backtracking in hearings as recently as 2023 and exploring enforcement mechanisms, though implementation lags due to recurring ultra-Orthodox veto power in fragile coalitions. These dynamics reveal structural tensions: while empirical data shows growing non-Orthodox immigration and tourism demanding access, political realism favors appeasing influential religious blocs, perpetuating ad hoc accommodations like temporary readings in the main plaza over systemic reform.

Linkages to Temple Mount Tensions

The Western Wall forms the western retaining wall supporting the elevated platform of the Temple Mount, the site of the ancient Jewish Temples, which today encompasses the Al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock under the administration of the Jordanian Islamic Waqf. Due to longstanding restrictions prohibiting Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount itself, the Western Wall serves as the nearest accessible location for Jewish worship, intensifying its symbolic importance as a proxy for the site's holiness. Tensions linking the Western Wall to the trace back to the Ottoman era and escalated in the British Mandate period, particularly during the 1929 riots sparked by disputes over Jewish prayer practices at the Wall, which Arab leaders claimed encroached on Muslim property rights associated with the adjacent Al-Buraq Wall. These events, triggered by a Jewish on including the blowing of a —viewed by as a political assertion—resulted in widespread violence across , with 133 Jews and 116 Arabs killed. The British report attributed the unrest to mutual fears, but noted Arab objections stemmed from perceiving the Wall as integral to the sanctity of the al-Sharif. Following Israel's capture of in the 1967 , Israeli forces secured access to the Western Wall, enabling the creation of the current plaza, while agreeing to maintain the status quo on the by leaving daily administration to the and barring there to avert unrest. This arrangement, formalized in 1967, permits non-Muslim visitors to the Mount under strict conditions—including no , , or religious symbols—but enforces expulsion for perceived violations, even as archaeological and security activities near the Western Wall, such as tunnel excavations, have periodically provoked accusations of undermining Al-Aqsa's foundations. For instance, the 1996 opening of the extension led to clashes killing over 80 and 15 , framed by Palestinian authorities as an assault on Muslim holy sites. Contemporary linkages arise from Jewish Temple rebuilding advocacy groups, such as the Temple Institute, which view the Western Wall as a enduring remnant fostering aspirations for a Third Temple on the Mount, potentially requiring alterations to existing Islamic structures. These movements, including organized ascents to the Temple Mount, heighten Muslim sensitivities, with Waqf officials and Palestinian leaders interpreting intensified Wall activities or nearby digs as preludes to sovereignty challenges, often resulting in restricted Jewish access or inflammatory rhetoric warning of "Judaization" efforts. Despite Israeli security control, the policy of non-enforcement against Waqf-directed restrictions on the Mount perpetuates a discriminatory dynamic, as noted by critics arguing it contravenes Israel's sovereign rights while prioritizing stability over equal religious access.

Ideological Perspectives: Jewish, Israeli, Muslim, and Palestinian

In Jewish religious , the Western Wall—known as the Kotel HaMa'aravi—serves as the closest accessible remnant to the ancient within the platform constructed during the Herodian period around 19 BCE. This proximity imbues it with profound sanctity, as rabbinic tradition holds that the (Shechinah) never departed from the Western side after the Second Temple's destruction in 70 CE, making it a focal point for and supplication. Observant insert written petitions (kvitelach) into its crevices, a practice documented since at least the , symbolizing direct communion with the site's enduring holiness amid historical exile and persecution. From an Israeli national perspective, the Western Wall embodies the realization of Zionist aspirations for Jewish , particularly after Israeli paratroopers captured the Old City on June 7, 1967, during the , ending 19 years of Jordanian control that had barred Jewish access since 1948. The subsequent creation of a 140-meter-long plaza by demolishing adjacent structures in the Moroccan Quarter—actions justified under for secure worship space—transformed it into a venue for state ceremonies, such as Independence Day events, underscoring its role as a symbol of national redemption and unified Jerusalem's indivisibility under Israeli sovereignty. Muslim ideology designates the wall as the Al-Buraq Wall, deriving sanctity from the Prophet Muhammad's alleged tethering of the winged steed there during the night journey referenced in 17:1 and elaborated in hadith collections like . It is claimed as integral (endowed Islamic property) of the adjacent Haram al-Sharif, with assertions that Jewish prayer constitutes an encroachment threatening the Al-Aqsa Mosque's status quo; however, pre-19th-century Islamic texts rarely attribute independent holiness to the wall itself, viewing it primarily as a boundary feature, and heightened claims correlate with 20th-century political tensions rather than continuous . Palestinian nationalist ideology frames the Western Wall as exclusively Muslim heritage within occupied , rejecting Jewish historical ties and portraying Israeli control—established in 1967—as colonial erasure of Palestinian-Islamic identity, with calls to defend it "even to the " and proposals to for reclassification as "Buraq Plaza" part of . These positions, advanced by the Palestinian Authority since the era, often deny archaeological evidence of the wall's construction linked to the Jewish Temples, prioritizing narrative of indigenous Arab custodianship over empirical continuity of Jewish presence documented in Ottoman records and earlier sources.

International Involvement and Criticisms

During the British Mandate period, international commissions investigated disputes over the Western Wall following the riots, which stemmed from competing Jewish and Muslim claims to the site. The 1930 International Commission on the Western Wall, comprising British, Dutch, French, and Italian members, affirmed Jewish rights to pray at the Wall while upholding Muslim ownership of the adjacent pavement, recommending regulations to prevent friction. These efforts reflected early international attempts to balance religious access amid rising tensions. In 1946, the , tasked with examining Jewish displacement and Palestine's future, visited the Western Wall as part of its assessment, documenting historical Jewish attachment in appendices referencing prior disturbances. The committee's report did not alter site administration but underscored the Wall's centrality to amid post-Holocaust pressures. Post-1967, following Israel's capture of , the declined to recognize Israeli sovereignty over the area, including the Western Wall, classifying it as occupied territory under resolutions like UNSC 2334 in 2016, which condemned settlement activities in . This stance echoes broader UN positions viewing pre-1967 Jordanian control—during which Jewish access was barred—as the baseline, despite Jordan's violation of agreements permitting worship. UNESCO resolutions in 2015 and 2016 further drew criticism for diminishing Jewish historical links, employing terms like "Al-Buraq Wall" exclusively, placing "Western Wall Plaza" in quotes, and omitting references to the site's association, actions decried as deliberate historical denial. Adopted by votes such as 10-2 with 8 abstentions in October 2016, these measures aligned with Arab-sponsored initiatives to emphasize Islamic nomenclature, prompting accusations of politicized heritage oversight. The maintains non-recognition of Israeli annexation of , implicitly encompassing the Western Wall within disputed territory slated for Palestinian statehood negotiations, as articulated in policy statements rejecting sovereignty claims beyond 1949 armistice lines. This position contrasts with U.S. affirmations under the Trump administration in , stating no scenario existed where the Western Wall would not remain under Israeli control. Criticisms often emanate from Palestinian and Arab representatives framing the Wall as property integral to , challenging exclusive Jewish prayer zones and linking site administration to broader escalations. Such views underpin UN General Assembly patterns, where resolutions targeting outnumbered those on all other countries combined from 2015 to 2023 (154 versus 71), highlighting institutional asymmetries in addressing the site's status. Despite these, Israeli administration has ensured unprecedented Jewish access since 1967, reversing prior exclusions.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.