Hubbry Logo
AmputationAmputationMain
Open search
Amputation
Community hub
Amputation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Amputation
Amputation
Amputation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Amputation
An amputee running with a blade prosthetic
SpecialtySurgery

Physical medicine and rehabilitation

Emergency medicine
ComplicationsPhantom limb syndrome
CausesTrauma or intentional as part of surgery and sometimes corporal punishment
Part of a series on
Corporal punishment
By place
By implementation
By country
Court cases
Politics
Campaigns against corporal punishment
Criminal procedure
Criminal trials and convictions
Rights of the accused
Rights of the victim
Verdict
Sentencing
Post-sentencing
Related areas of law
Portals

Amputation is the removal of a limb or other body part by trauma, medical illness, or surgery. As a surgical measure, it is used to control pain or a disease process in the affected limb, such as malignancy or gangrene. In some cases, it is carried out on individuals as a preventive surgery for such problems. A special case is that of congenital amputation, a congenital disorder, where fetal limbs have been cut off by constrictive bands. In some countries, judicial amputation is currently used to punish people who commit crimes.[1][2][3][4] Amputation has also been used as a tactic in war and acts of terrorism; it may also occur as a war injury. In some cultures and religions, minor amputations or mutilations are considered a ritual accomplishment.[5][6][7] When done by a person, the person executing the amputation is an amputator.[8][9] The oldest evidence of this practice comes from a skeleton found buried in Liang Tebo cave, East Kalimantan, Indonesian Borneo dating back to at least 31,000 years ago, where it was done when the amputee was a young child.[10] A prosthesis or a bioelectric replantation restores sensation of the amputated limb.

Types

[edit]

Leg

[edit]

Lower limb amputations can be divided into two broad categories: minor and major amputations. Minor amputations generally refer to the amputation of digits. Major amputations are commonly below-knee- or above-knee amputations. Common partial foot amputations include the Chopart, Lisfranc, and ray amputations.

Common forms of ankle disarticulations include Pyrogoff, Boyd, and Syme amputations.[11] A less common major amputation is the Van Nes rotation, or rotationplasty, i.e. the turning around and reattachment of the foot to allow the ankle joint to take over the function of the knee.

Types of amputations include:

An above-knee amputation
partial foot amputation
amputation of the lower limb distal to the ankle joint
ankle disarticulation
amputation of the lower limb at the ankle joint
trans-tibial amputation
amputation of the lower limb between the knee joint and the ankle joint, commonly referred to as a below-knee amputation
knee disarticulation
amputation of the lower limb at the knee joint
trans-femoral amputation
amputation of the lower limb between the hip joint and the knee joint, commonly referred to an above-knee amputation
hip disarticulation
amputation of the lower limb at the hip joint
trans-pelvic disarticulation
amputation of the whole lower limb together with all or part of the pelvis, also known as a hemipelvectomy or hindquarter amputation

Arm

[edit]
The 18th century guide to amputations

Types of upper extremity amputations include:

  • partial hand amputation
  • wrist disarticulation
  • trans-radial amputation, commonly referred to as below-elbow or forearm amputation
  • elbow disarticulation
  • trans-humeral amputation, commonly referred to as above-elbow amputation
  • shoulder disarticulation
  • forequarter amputation

A variant of the trans-radial amputation is the Krukenberg procedure in which the radius and ulna are used to create a stump capable of a pincer action.

Other

[edit]
Partial amputation of index finger

Genital modification and mutilation may involve amputating tissue, although not necessarily as a result of injury or disease.

Laryngectomy is the amputation of the larynx.

Self-amputation

[edit]

In some rare cases when a person has become trapped in a deserted place, with no means of communication or hope of rescue, the victim has amputated their own limb. The most notable case of this is Aron Ralston, a hiker who amputated his own right forearm after it was pinned by a boulder in a hiking accident and he was unable to free himself for over five days.[12]

Body integrity dysphoria is a rare condition in which an individual feels compelled to remove one or more of their body parts, usually a limb. In some cases, that individual may take drastic measures to remove the offending appendages, either by causing irreparable damage to the limb so that medical intervention cannot save the limb, or by causing the limb to be severed.[13]

Urgent

[edit]

In surgery, a guillotine amputation is an amputation performed without closure of the skin in an urgent setting.[14] Typical indications include catastrophic trauma or infection control in the setting of infected gangrene.[14] A guillotine amputation is typically followed by a more time-consuming, definitive amputation such as an above or below knee amputation.[14]

Causes

[edit]

Circulatory disorders

[edit]

Neoplasm

[edit]
Transfemoral amputation due to liposarcoma

Trauma

[edit]
Three fingers from a soldier's right hand were traumatically amputated during World War I.
  • Severe limb injuries in which the efforts to save the limb fail or the limb cannot be saved.
  • Traumatic amputation (an unexpected amputation that occurs at the scene of an accident, where the limb is partially or entirely severed as a direct result of the accident, for example, a finger that is severed from the blade of a table saw)
  • Amputation in utero (Amniotic band)

Congenital anomalies

[edit]

Infection

[edit]

Frostbite

[edit]

Frostbite is a cold-related injury occurring when an area (typically a limb or other extremity)[17] is exposed to extreme low temperatures, causing the freezing of the skin or other tissues.[18] Its pathophysiology involves the formation of ice crystals upon freezing and blood clots upon thawing, leading to cell damage and cell death.[18] Treatment of severe frostbite may require surgical amputation of the affected tissue or limb;[19] if there is deep injury autoamputation may occur.[20]

Athletic performance

[edit]

Sometimes professional athletes may choose to have a non-essential digit amputated to relieve chronic pain and impaired performance.

Criminal penalties

[edit]

  • According to Quran 5:38, the punishment for stealing is the amputation of the hand. Under Sharia law, after repeated offense, the foot may also be cut off. This is still in practice today in countries like Brunei, the United Arab Emirates,[24] Iran,[25][26] Saudi Arabia,[27] Yemen,[28] and 11 of the 36 states within Nigeria.[29][30]
  • Cross-amputation is one of the Hudud punishments prescribed under Islamic jurisprudence (Sharia law) and involves cutting off the right hand and left foot of the alleged transgressor.[31][32] The scriptural authority for the double amputation procedure is in the Quran (surah 5.33–34) which stipulates:

    The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might for mischief through the land is execution or crucifixion, or cutting of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land. As for the thief, male or female, cut off their hands and feet from opposite ends in recompense for what they have committed.[33]

    The severe punishment, for "highway robbery (hirabah, qat' al-tariq) and civil disturbance against Islam", is usually carried out in a single session in public, without anaesthetic and using a sword. The ancient punishment is practised in Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia,[34] Sudan,[35] Somalia,[36] Mauritania, the Maldives,[37] Iran,[38] Afghanistan (under Taliban rule),[citation needed] and Yemen.[39]
  • In 1779, Thomas Jefferson proposed a bill to the Virginia Assembly that ostensibly would have replaced capital punishment with other penalties, including amputation, for certain crimes,[40][41] although not all were really punishable by death at the time.[42] For the crimes of rape, sodomy, and polygamy (the last removed from a later version), the punishment was to be castration for men or rhinotomy for women.[43] For intentional maiming, the bill specified literal eye for an eye retribution.[44] The bill never passed, due to the combination of its perceived barbarity in some parts and perceived leniency in others.[41][45]
  • In England, the Offences within the Court Act 1541 provided for cutting off a hand as punishment for striking someone inside a courtroom. Thomas Jefferson's punishments revision bill also intended to repeal this.[46] The punishment was abolished in England and Wales by the Offences Against the Person Act 1828.
  • As of 2021, this form of punishment is controversial, as most modern cultures consider it to be morally abhorrent, as it has the effect of permanently disabling a person and constitutes torture. It is thus seen as grossly disproportionate for crimes less than those such as murder.[47]

Surgery

[edit]

Method

[edit]
Curved knives such as this one were used, in the past, for some kinds of amputations.

Surgeons performing an amputation have to first ligate the supplying artery and vein, so as to prevent hemorrhage (bleeding). The muscles are transected, and finally, the bone is sawed through with an oscillating saw. Sharp and rough edges of bones are filed, skin and muscle flaps are then transposed over the stump, occasionally with the insertion of elements to attach a prosthesis.

Amputation of the leg of First Lieutenant Antônio Carlos de Mariz e Barros, commander of the Brazilian Battleship Tamandaré (Henrique Fleiuss, Semana Illustrada, 1866)

Distal stabilisation of muscles is often performed. This allows effective muscle contraction which reduces atrophy, allows functional use of the stump and maintains soft tissue coverage of the remnant bone. The preferred stabilisation technique is myodesis where the muscle is attached to the bone or its periosteum. In joint disarticulation amputations tenodesis may be used where the muscle tendon is attached to the bone. Muscles are attached under similar tension to normal physiological conditions.[48]

An experimental technique known as the "Ewing amputation" aims to improve post-amputation proprioception.[49][50] Another technique with similar goals, which has been tested in a clinical trial,[51] is Agonist-antagonist Myoneural Interface (AMI).[52]

In 1920,  Dr. Janos Ertl Sr. of Hungary, developed the Ertl procedure in order to return a high number of amputees to the workforce.[53] The Ertl technique, an osteomyoplastic procedure for transtibial amputation, can be used to create a highly functional residual limb. Creation of a tibiofibular bone bridge provides a stable, broad tibiofibular articulation that may be capable of some distal weight bearing. Several different modified techniques and fibular bridge fixation methods have been used; however, no current evidence exists regarding comparison of the different techniques.[54]

Post-operative management

[edit]

A 2019 Cochrane systematic review aimed to determine whether rigid dressings were more effective than soft dressings in helping wounds heal following transtibial (below the knee) amputations. Due to the limited and very low certainty of evidence available, the authors concluded that it was uncertain what the benefits and harms were for each dressing type. They recommended that clinicians consider the pros and cons of each dressing type on a case-by-case basis: rigid dressings may potentially benefit patients who have a high risk of falls; soft dressings may potentially benefit patients who have poor skin integrity.[55]

A 2017 review found that the use of rigid removable dressings (RRD's) in trans-tibial amputations, rather than soft bandaging, improved healing time, reduced edema, prevented knee flexion contractures and reduced complications, including further amputation, from external trauma such as falls onto the stump.[56]

Post-operative management, in addition to wound healing, considers maintenance of limb strength, joint range, edema management, preservation of the intact limb (if applicable) and stump desensitization.

Trauma

[edit]

Traumatic amputation is the partial or total avulsion of a part of a body during a serious accident, like traffic, labor, or combat.[57][58]

Traumatic amputation of a human limb, either partial or total, creates the immediate danger of death from blood loss.[59]

Orthopedic surgeons often assess the severity of different injuries using the Mangled Extremity Severity Score. Given different clinical and situational factors, they can predict the likelihood of amputation. This is especially useful for emergency physicians to quickly evaluate patients and decide on consultations.[60]

Causes

[edit]
Private Lewis Francis was wounded July 21, 1861, at the First Battle of Bull Run by a bayonet to the knee.

Traumatic amputation is uncommon in humans (1 per 20,804 population per year). Loss of limb usually happens immediately during the accident, but sometimes a few days later after medical complications. Statistically, the most common causes of traumatic amputations are:[61]

  • Vehicle accidents (cars, motorcycles, bicycles, trains, etc.)
  • Labor accidents (equipment, instruments, cylinders, chainsaws, press machines, meat machines, wood machines, etc.)
  • Agricultural accidents, with machines and mower equipment
  • Electric shock hazards
  • Firearms, bladed weapons, explosives
  • Violent rupture of ship rope or industry wire rope
  • Ring traction (ring amputation, de-gloving injuries)
  • Building doors and car doors
  • Animal attacks
  • Gas cylinder explosions[62]
  • Other rare accidents[63]

Treatment

[edit]

The development of the science of microsurgery over the last 40 years has provided several treatment options for a traumatic amputation, depending on the patient's specific trauma and clinical situation:[64]

  • 1st choice: Surgical amputation - break - prosthesis
  • 2nd choice: Surgical amputation - transplantation of other tissue - plastic reconstruction.
  • 3rd choice: Replantation - reconnection - revascularisation of amputated limb, by microscope (after 1969)
  • 4th choice: Transplantation of cadaveric hand (after 2000)[58]

Epidemiology

[edit]
Up to 50,000 Ukrainians lost their limbs during the Russian invasion of Ukraine.[65]
  • In the United States in 1999, there were 14,420 non-fatal traumatic amputations according to the American Statistical Association. Of these, 4,435 occurred as a result of traffic and transportation accidents and 9,985 were due to labor accidents. Of all traumatic amputations, the distribution percentage is 30.75% for traffic accidents and 69.24% for labor accidents.[66][not specific enough to verify]
  • The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics reported 6,200 cases of work-related amputations in 2018. The most common causes of amputations were machinery (58% cases), crush injuries from parts or material (15%), and other tools/instruments/equipment such hand tools (7%).[67]
  • A study found that in 2010, 22.8% of patients undergoing amputation of a lower extremity in the United States were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days.[68]
  • In 2017, an estimated 57.7 million people globally were living with existing traumatic limb injuries. Of these 57.7 million, the leading causes of amputation "were falls (36.2%), road injuries (15.7%), other transportation injuries (11.2%), and mechanical forces (10.4%)."[69]
  • On 2 August 2023, an investigation by The Wall Street Journal found that Ukrainian medical amputations in the war came to between 20,000 and 50,000 including both military and civilians. In comparison, during World War One 41,000 British and 67,000 Germans needed amputations.[70]
  • In 2025, Israel's attacks on the Gaza Strip during the Gaza war caused Gaza to have the highest number of child amputees per capita in the world.[71][72]

Prevention

[edit]

Methods in preventing amputation, limb-sparing techniques, depend on the problems that might cause amputations to be necessary. Chronic infections, often caused by diabetes or decubitus ulcers in bedridden patients, are common causes of infections that lead to gangrene, which, when widespread, necessitates amputation.[73]

There are two key challenges: first, many patients have impaired circulation in their extremities, and second, they have difficulty curing infections in limbs with poor blood circulation.[74][75]

Crush injuries where there is extensive tissue damage and poor circulation also benefit from hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). The high level of oxygenation and revascularization speed up recovery times and prevent infections.[76]

A study found that the patented method called Circulator Boot achieved significant results in prevention of amputation in patients with diabetes and arteriosclerosis.[77][78] Another study found it also effective for healing limb ulcers caused by peripheral vascular disease.[79] The boot checks the heart rhythm and compresses the limb between heartbeats; the compression helps cure the wounds in the walls of veins and arteries, and helps to push the blood back to the heart.[80]

For victims of trauma, advances in microsurgery in the 1970s have made replantation of severed body parts possible.

The establishment of laws, rules, and guidelines, and the employment of modern equipment help protect people from traumatic amputations.[81]

Prognosis

[edit]

The individual may experience psychological trauma and emotional discomfort. The stump will remain an area of reduced mechanical stability. Limb loss can present significant or even drastic practical limitations.[82]

A large proportion of amputees (from 50 to 80% to 80-100%, according to different studies) experience the phenomenon of phantom limbs;[83][84] they feel body parts that are no longer there. These limbs can itch, ache, burn, feel tense, dry or wet, locked in or trapped or they can feel as if they are moving. Some scientists believe it has to do with a kind of neural map that the brain has of the body, which sends information to the rest of the brain about limbs regardless of their existence. Phantom sensations and phantom pain may also occur after the removal of body parts other than the limbs, e.g. after amputation of the breast, extraction of a tooth (phantom tooth pain) or removal of an eye (phantom eye syndrome).

A similar phenomenon is an unexplained sensation in a body part unrelated to the amputated limb. It has been hypothesized that the portion of the brain responsible for processing stimulation from amputated limbs, being deprived of input, expands into the surrounding brain, (Phantoms in the Brain: V.S. Ramachandran and Sandra Blakeslee) such that an individual who has had an arm amputated will experience unexplained pressure or movement on his face or head.[85]

In many cases, the phantom limb aids in adaptation to a prosthesis, as it permits the person to experience proprioception of the prosthetic limb. To support improved resistance or usability, comfort or healing, some types of stump socks may be worn instead of or as part of wearing a prosthesis.[82]

Another side effect can be heterotopic ossification, especially when a bone injury is combined with a head injury. The brain signals the bone to grow instead of scar tissue to form, and nodules and other growth can interfere with prosthetics and sometimes require further operations. This type of injury has been especially common among soldiers wounded by improvised explosive devices in the Iraq War.[86]

Due to technological advances in prosthetics, many amputees live active lives with little restriction. Organizations such as the Challenged Athletes Foundation have been developed to give amputees the opportunity to be involved in athletics and adaptive sports such as amputee soccer.[87]

Nearly half of the individuals who have an amputation due to vascular disease will die within 5 years, usually secondary to the extensive co-morbidities rather than due to direct consequences of an amputation. This is higher than the five year mortality rates for breast cancer, colon cancer, and prostate cancer.[88] Of persons with diabetes who have a lower extremity amputation, up to 55% will require amputation of the second leg within two to three years.[89]

Etymology

[edit]

The word amputation is borrowed from Latin amputātus, past participle of amputāre "to prune back (a plant), prune away, remove by cutting (unwanted parts or features), cut off (a branch, limb, body part)," from am-, assimilated variant of amb- "about, around" + putāre "to prune, make clean or tidy, scour (wool)". The English word "Poes" was first applied to surgery in the 17th century, possibly first in Peter Lowe's A discourse of the Whole Art of Chirurgerie (published in either 1597 or 1612); his work was derived from 16th-century French texts and early English writers also used the words "extirpation" (16th-century French texts tended to use extirper), "disarticulation", and "dismemberment" (from the Old French desmembrer and a more common term before the 17th century for limb loss or removal), or simply "cutting", but by the end of the 17th century "amputation" had come to dominate as the accepted medical term.[90]

Notable cases

[edit]

Without prosthesis

[edit]

With prosthesis

[edit]

Other

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Amputation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Amputation is the surgical removal of a limb or other body part, such as a , , hand, foot, , or , typically performed to treat severe trauma, irreversible , vascular insufficiency, , or congenital anomalies that threaten life or limb viability. The practice dates back at least 31,000 years, with archaeological evidence from indicating deliberate amputation and subsequent survival, marking one of the earliest known surgical interventions. Historically, amputations were common in warfare and as punishments, evolving through advancements in techniques during the and later with and antisepsis in the , which drastically reduced mortality rates from near-certain to survivable procedures. In contemporary medicine, the leading causes of non-traumatic amputations are peripheral vascular disease and diabetes mellitus, accounting for approximately 56-93% of lower extremity cases, while trauma remains a primary for and acute amputations. Procedures vary by level—such as below-knee or above-knee for lower limbs—and aim to preserve maximal function, often followed by prosthetic fitting and rehabilitation to mitigate impacts on mobility and . Despite challenges like increased energy expenditure and complication risks, successful outcomes can reduce pain and enhance psychological well-being for many patients.

History

Etymology and Ancient Practices

The term amputation derives from the Latin amputātiō, the noun form of amputāre, meaning "to cut around" or "to prune away," from ambi- ("around" or "on both sides") and putāre ("to prune," "to trim," or "to cut"). This etymology reflects origins in horticultural before its application to surgical limb removal, with the English term first appearing in medical contexts in the early , though analogous procedures occurred in prehistoric and ancient societies. Archaeological findings provide evidence of therapeutic amputations in dating to approximately 3000 BCE, including mummified remains from sites like Dayr al-Barsha exhibiting healed stumps indicative of post-operative and survival. In , the (c. 1750 BCE) codified punitive amputations as penalties for crimes, such as the severing of a surgeon's hand for unsuccessful operations causing patient death. Hippocrates (c. 460–370 BCE) documented amputations for gangrenous limbs in Greek medical texts, recommending circular incisions and cautery with hot irons to achieve , though ligature use remained rudimentary and inconsistent. The Roman author (c. 25 BCE–50 CE), in De Medicina, outlined more systematic techniques, including eschar formation via caustics or ligation of vessels to control bleeding post-excision.73840-X/fulltext) Survival rates for these procedures were low, with mortality often exceeding 50% due to hemorrhage, shock, and uncontrolled , as no effective antisepsis existed.

Medieval to 19th Century Developments

In medieval , amputation was primarily performed on battlefields to treat severe wounds, with surgeons like Guy de Chauliac (c. 1300–1368) describing techniques involving tight bands for initial compression followed by red-hot irons for cauterization to achieve . This method stemmed from the era's humoral theory, aiming to prevent blood loss and "bad humors," but resulted in high mortality rates, often exceeding 80%, due to uncontrolled from lack of antisepsis and tissue necrosis from burning. Persistent , compounded by delayed wound care and contaminated environments, made survival rare without subsequent intervention. By the 18th century, surgical approaches evolved toward more anatomical precision, with Pierre Dionis (1643–1718) advocating flap techniques in his Cours d'opérations de chirurgie (first published 1708), which preserved muscle and skin for better stump coverage over traditional circular incisions that left bony prominences prone to ulceration. However, guillotine-style amputations—rapid double-flap or straight cuts—dominated military contexts like the (1799–1815), where operative speed was prioritized amid mass casualties, yielding mortality rates around 50% primarily from postoperative . Jean-Louis Petit (1674–1750) advanced in the early 1700s by inventing the screw tourniquet (c. 1710s), allowing controlled arterial compression superior to ligatures alone, which reduced intraoperative blood loss but did not address . The mid-19th century marked pivotal reductions in mortality through and antisepsis. William T.G. Morton's demonstration of ether on October 16, 1846, at enabled painless, deliberate operations, with performing Europe's first ether-assisted amputation on December 21, 1846, facilitating flap refinements and lowering shock-related deaths, though persisted at rates near 40–60%. Joseph Lister's introduction of carbolic acid antisepsis in 1867 at dramatically curbed wound infections; in his series of 40 amputations from 1867–1870, mortality fell to 15% (6 deaths), compared to pre-antisepsis averages of 45% or higher, dropping further to under 20% by the late 1800s as techniques standardized. These innovations causally linked to improved outcomes by minimizing bacterial contamination, evidenced by comparative hospital records showing as the dominant pre-Lister killer.

20th Century Advancements and World Wars

Trench warfare during caused extensive lower limb injuries from and machine guns, leading to over 41,000 limb amputations among British forces due to and irreparable damage. Contaminated wounds necessitated aggressive débridement, with surgeons adopting delayed primary closure—initially leaving wounds open after excision and closing them 3–5 days later once infection risk subsided—to markedly lower rates compared to immediate suturing. World War II advancements included widespread penicillin use from 1943 onward, which reduced mortality from bacterial infections like staphylococcal from 75% to 10% in treated cases, and standardized blood transfusions that mitigated hemorrhagic shock. These interventions, combined with rapid evacuation and plasma expanders, dropped overall amputation-related mortality below 5%, a sharp decline from prior wars. Surgical refinements emphasized guillotine amputations followed by revisions for conical stumps with balanced musculature to optimize prosthetic suspension and prevent . In the post-1950s era, experiences demonstrated that immediate post-healing prosthetic fitting—often within weeks of surgery during initial hospitalization—accelerated ambulation training and reduced complications like contractures. Empirical data from military orthopedic reviews underscored preserving the in lower limb cases and in cases, as these levels conserved biomechanical leverage, lowered energy expenditure for by up to 25% versus higher transections, and improved long-term prosthetic control.

Causes and Epidemiology

Vascular and Metabolic Disorders

Vascular disorders, particularly (PAD), represent the predominant cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputations, accounting for an estimated 56-93% of such procedures. PAD arises from atherosclerotic narrowing of arteries supplying the limbs, impairing and predisposing tissues to ischemia. In the United States, approximately 150,000 non-traumatic lower extremity amputations occur annually, with the majority attributable to , a metabolic condition that exacerbates vascular pathology through hyperglycemia-induced endothelial damage and neuropathy. , strongly associated with and sedentary lifestyles, underlies roughly 80% of non-traumatic lower limb amputations in Western populations. The causal pathway typically begins with atherosclerosis, driven by modifiable factors such as smoking and hyperlipidemia, which promote plaque buildup and arterial occlusion in PAD. Reduced blood flow results in chronic limb ischemia, fostering non-healing ulcers—often on the feet—that progress to infection and gangrene if untreated, ultimately requiring amputation to prevent systemic sepsis. Empirical data indicate that 85-86% of diabetic amputations are preceded by such foot ulcers, which are largely preventable through rigorous glycemic control, regular podiatric screening, and vascular interventions. Personal behavioral risks amplify these outcomes: elevates the by 65% ( 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.50), independent of other confounders, by accelerating and impairing . Concurrent and PAD confer a 51.8-fold higher amputation compared to alone, underscoring the of metabolic and vascular insults rooted in factors like use and rather than immutable systemic barriers. Early cessation of and can mitigate PAD progression, reducing amputation incidence by addressing root causal mechanisms.

Trauma

Traumatic amputations occur when severe mechanical forces directly sever or irreparably damage limbs, often necessitating surgical removal to prevent life-threatening complications such as , irreversible ischemia, or overwhelming . These injuries account for approximately 20-30% of all major amputations in developed countries, though the proportion has declined with advances in and trauma care. In the United States, civilian traumatic amputations number around 30,000 to 40,000 annually, primarily affecting extremities from accidents involving machinery, vehicles, or firearms. High-velocity mechanisms, such as explosions, gunshot wounds, and high-speed motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), produce extensive tissue cavitation, vascular disruption, and fragmentation, frequently resulting in mangled extremities with high contamination risks. In contrast, crush injuries from industrial accidents or building collapses lead to prolonged compression, causing , , and delayed ischemia due to vascular . Military conflicts exemplify high-velocity trauma; during the and wars, over 1,500 U.S. service members sustained major limb amputations, with many bilateral and involving multiple levels, predominantly from improvised explosive devices (IEDs) that propel fragments and blast waves. Decision-making for amputation hinges on immediate causal factors like absent distal pulses, prolonged warm ischemia time exceeding 6 hours, or severe soft-tissue loss incompatible with salvage. The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS), incorporating skeletal/soft-tissue injury, limb ischemia, shock, and age, predicts amputation need; scores ≥7 correlate with poor salvage outcomes in initial validations, though later studies report variable sensitivity around 50-100% due to improved techniques. Irreversible tissue death from hypoxia or bacterial ingress mandates excision to preserve systemic , prioritizing patient survival over limb preservation. In acute settings, guillotine amputations—transecting bone and perpendicularly without flap closure—facilitate rapid hemorrhage control and in hemodynamically unstable patients or those with gross contamination, often followed by staged revision for prosthetic fitting. This approach contrasts with primary definitive amputations, which aim for immediate myodesis and skin coverage when stability allows, reducing revision rates and infection risks.

Infections and Necrosis

Infections such as caused by and represent severe septic processes that frequently necessitate amputation due to rapid tissue destruction and systemic toxicity, as antibiotics alone often fail to halt progression without extensive surgical intervention. involves toxin-mediated myonecrosis with gas production in tissues, typically following trauma or contaminated wounds, leading to amputation in approximately 20% of cases despite and supportive care, with mortality rates of 25% or higher if untreated or delayed. , often polymicrobial, spreads along fascial planes post-infection or trauma, resulting in amputation rates of 20-50% in affected extremities due to limits of serial when tissue viability is compromised beyond salvageable margins. Diabetes mellitus exacerbates these risks through , which impairs pain sensation and early detection of infections, allowing unchecked progression to ; this condition elevates lower limb amputation risk up to 20-fold compared to non-diabetics, primarily via recurrent foot ulcers evolving into deep infections resistant to conservative management. Empirical data indicate that in infections, amputation occurs in 31% of cases, often when neuropathy delays intervention until or extensive ensues. Amputation thresholds are determined by irreversible tissue death exceeding debridement capacity—typically when over half the compartment shows non-viable muscle or when systemic (e.g., from clostridial toxins) threatens multi-organ failure—prioritizing proximal levels to excise all infected/necrotic zones and prevent hematogenous spread. Delayed treatment causally amplifies mortality, as bacterial proliferation outpaces host defenses within hours, rendering limbs unsalvageable; historical frostbite-induced , such as in polar expeditions, underscores this, where untreated cryogenic led to gangrenous amputations in up to 15-20% of severe cases due to vascular compromise and secondary . Overall, infections and contribute to 10-20% of major lower limb amputations globally, particularly in comorbid populations, highlighting the primacy of prompt excision over prolonged antimicrobial trials.

Neoplasms and Congenital Conditions

Amputations for neoplasms occur primarily when malignant tumors, such as or soft tissue sarcomas, invade critical structures like neurovascular bundles or multiple compartments, rendering limb-salvage surgery infeasible. In cases, amputation is indicated for unresectable tumors, particularly in advanced AJCC stage IV disease or unfavorable anatomic locations, with historical data showing it as the standard prior to advancements in the 1970s, where limb-sparing attempts often failed due to local recurrence and metastasis. Contemporary studies report amputation rates around 16% for upper extremity , though overall lower with neoadjuvant enabling salvage in most patients. For melanomas, major amputation is reserved for intractable, recurrent, or advanced extremity cases post-failure of isolated limb or excision, achieving long-term survival in select patients but remaining rare due to preference for . The rationale prioritizes oncologic control and survival over functional preservation, as 19th-century limb-sparing efforts without effective adjuvant therapy led to high metastatic rates, whereas amputation historically offered equivalent or superior outcomes by ensuring wide margins. Modern evidence supports limb salvage where feasible, yet amputation persists for 5-10% of extremity sarcomas involving extensive bone and soft tissue, reducing local recurrence risk at the cost of higher complication rates in salvage alternatives. Socioeconomic disparities also influence decisions, with lower-income patients facing higher amputation likelihoods due to access barriers for complex reconstructions. Congenital conditions necessitating amputation include severe dysmelia or amniotic band syndrome (ABS), where fibrous bands cause intrauterine limb constrictions or amputations, with ABS incidence estimated at 1 in 1,200 to 15,000 births and often requiring postnatal surgical intervention for non-viable or deformed segments. Transverse limb deficiencies, a form of dysmelia, occur in approximately 1 in 20,000 births, sometimes mandating amputation to facilitate prosthetics or address associated anomalies like . The 1960s thalidomide epidemic exemplified , a proximal limb absence affecting thousands globally, where surgical amputations were performed in severe cases to optimize prosthetic fitting and function despite the malformation's non-malignant nature.

Non-Medical Indications

Punitive amputations have been prescribed in legal codes for specific offenses, including , across various historical and contemporary systems. The , dating to approximately 1750 BCE, mandated limb amputation as punishment for certain crimes, establishing an early precedent for corporal penalties involving dismemberment, though not exclusively tied to . In Islamic under law, penalties include hand amputation for sariqa (a narrowly defined form of meeting strict evidentiary criteria, such as stealing a valuable item from a secure location without necessity). This punishment requires multiple witnesses or confession and applies only to offenses exceeding a minimum value threshold, as outlined in interpretations. Contemporary application persists in select jurisdictions adhering to , notably , where Article 278 of the Islamic Penal Code authorizes finger or hand amputation for qualifying convictions. In August 2025, Iranian authorities executed such amputations on three individuals convicted of , using guillotines or surgical tools under judicial supervision. Similar sentences have been reported in and , though enforcement varies and often requires high evidentiary standards to avoid (retaliatory) alternatives. Iranian officials assert that amputation serves as an effective deterrent against by imposing permanent incapacity, potentially reducing through direct causal linkage to the offense (e.g., impairing manual theft). However, empirical studies on deterrence from corporal punishments like amputation remain limited and inconclusive; broader criminological research emphasizes certainty of apprehension over punishment severity in preventing , with no robust longitudinal data isolating amputation's specific impact on rates in systems. Self-inflicted amputations occur rarely, typically under extreme desperation or psychiatric compulsion, distinct from elective medical procedures. In survival scenarios, individuals trapped without aid have resorted to auto-amputation to escape imminent death; , pinned by a in a canyon on April 26, 2003, broke his and , then used a to sever his after five days of entrapment, enabling self-rescue and subsequent medical treatment. Comparable cases include a 2010 incident where a man, pinned by his arm in a furnace for three days amid , partially amputated it with available tools. Such acts stem from rational calculus of survival costs versus benefits, often involving improvised methods like fracturing bones before cutting . In psychiatric contexts, self-amputation manifests in fewer than 1% of self-mutilation cases, predominantly among those with acute , , or , where delusional beliefs drive the behavior. Documented instances include upper-extremity amputations in non-psychotic individuals with comorbid personality disorders, though most reported cases (e.g., 13 deliberate upper-limb events from 1968–1998) link to command hallucinations or severe dissociation. Claims of self-amputation for athletic or endurance enhancement, such as in ultra-endurance sports, lack verified documentation and appear anecdotal without supporting clinical or biographical evidence.

Types

Upper Limb Amputations

Upper limb amputations comprise approximately 17% of all limb amputations, with the majority occurring in males aged 20 to 40 years due to their higher exposure to occupational and recreational hazards. In contrast to lower limb amputations, where and predominate, upper limb cases are disproportionately caused by trauma, accounting for 70-75% of instances in civilian and populations analyzed in national databases. Surgical prioritizes preserving as much length and functional anatomy as possible, particularly to maintain grip and motion, which are critical for . Amputations are classified by anatomical level, ranging from partial hand amputations (e.g., digit or ray resections) to more proximal procedures. Transcarpal (wrist-level) and () amputations preserve the and radioulnar pronation-supination, enabling superior functional recovery and ease of rehabilitation compared to higher levels. Transhumeral (above-) amputations, by contrast, sacrifice the , resulting in greater biomechanical challenges, reduced leverage for prosthetic control, and prolonged rehabilitation timelines due to the need for compensatory and movements. disarticulation, disarticulation, and forequarter amputations (resecting the entire arm, , and portions of the ) are reserved for extensive trauma or , with forequarter procedures carrying the highest morbidity from loss of stability. Empirical data indicate that upper limb amputees experience higher employment return rates than lower limb amputees, with studies documenting 93% resumption of work for cases versus 87% for lower, attributed to less disruption in mobility and bipedal ambulation. This disparity holds across cohorts, including industrial injuries, where younger patients with distal losses return to faster, often within 6 months. Cosmetic considerations also favor outcomes in visible professions, as residual limb concealment and adaptive strategies mitigate more effectively than with lower limb losses.

Lower Limb Amputations

Lower limb amputations represent approximately 85% of all amputations performed. These procedures are predominantly indicated for vascular insufficiency, particularly in patients with compounded by , which accounts for over 80% of non-traumatic cases. Preservation of functional length is prioritized to optimize mobility, with transtibial (below-knee) amputations favored over transfemoral (above-knee) levels when feasible, as the former allows retention of the for enhanced prosthetic stability and control. Transtibial amputations enable more efficient gait biomechanics compared to transfemoral ones, requiring roughly 25% less energy expenditure due to the leverage provided by the preserved knee and shorter prosthetic components. This efficiency stems from reduced compensatory hip and pelvic movements in transtibial cases, facilitating better propulsion and balance during ambulation with prostheses. In contrast, transfemoral amputations demand greater muscular effort from the residual limb and contralateral side, increasing fatigue and limiting walking distances. Knee disarticulation serves as an intermediate option, offering end-weight-bearing potential while avoiding femoral bone resection, though it is less common due to prosthetic fitting challenges. For forefoot or midfoot involvement, Syme amputation—an ankle —preserves the heel pad for direct , indicated primarily for or severe where higher-level resection is avoidable. This level supports a bulbous stump suited to specific prosthetic designs, yielding good functional outcomes in select patients with viable posterior . Partial foot amputations, such as ray or transmetatarsal resections, aim to maintain plantar sensation and lever arm for but are limited by poor tissue viability in vascular cases. Bilateral lower limb amputations carry elevated mortality risks, with 1-year rates exceeding 29% in vascular cohorts, attributed to compounded cardiovascular strain, susceptibility, and rehabilitation barriers. Above-knee bilateral procedures amplify this hazard compared to below-knee equivalents, underscoring the imperative for unilateral salvage when possible to mitigate systemic . Overall, level selection balances immediate viability against long-term ambulatory potential, with data indicating higher prosthesis utilization rates (up to 90%) in transtibial versus transfemoral cases.

Amputations of Other Body Parts

Digit amputations, encompassing and toes, represent the most frequent type of partial amputation, predominantly arising from traumatic . In the United States, such result in approximately 45,000 digit amputations annually. contributes to digit loss, with historical data indicating amputation rates of up to 41% in severe cases without thrombolytic intervention, though treatments like tissue plasminogen activator can reduce this to 10%. These procedures often preserve hand function through or attempts, succeeding in about 30-54% of cases depending on injury severity. Mastectomy, entailing the surgical excision of breast tissue, serves as a primary intervention for , classified as an ablative amputation in oncologic contexts. In one , 72% of patients opted for over , reflecting its role in managing localized disease despite comparable long-term survival to conservative approaches. Recurrence rates post- in young females approximate 15.65% at five years, underscoring the procedure's palliative yet curative intent in advanced cases. Genital amputations remain uncommon, typically indicated for malignancy or severe trauma. Penectomy, the partial or total removal of the penis, addresses penile cancer, with an estimated 2,100 new diagnoses yearly in the United States as of 2024. Survival post-penectomy exceeds 80% for early-stage disease, though patients experience substantial psychological distress, including body image disruption and sexual dysfunction. Similar interventions for vulvar cancer may involve clitoridectomy or vulvectomy, driven by neoplastic invasion rather than vascular or infectious etiologies. Rarer non-limb amputations include partial or total for tumors or traumatic severance, where self-mutilation or accidents necessitate reconstruction to mitigate speech and impairments. Coccygectomy, excision of the , occurs for refractory or sacral tumors, though data on incidence is sparse, with procedures reserved for cases unresponsive to conservative management. These interventions prioritize tissue viability and functional restoration, often yielding variable psychosocial outcomes.

Surgical Procedures

Preoperative Assessment

The preoperative assessment for amputation entails a systematic, multidisciplinary to weigh limb salvage against amputation, guided by objective criteria to optimize functional outcomes and minimize futile interventions. This integrates injury severity scoring, vascular , tissue viability testing, and patient-specific factors to predict salvage success rates, which can drop below 70% in severe trauma cases per predictive models. In traumatic mangled extremities, the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) serves as a validated tool, scoring skeletal/ (0-3 points), limb ischemia (0-3), shock (0-2), age (>30 years adds 0-2), and ischemia duration; scores ≥7 correlate with >90% amputation likelihood, prompting primary amputation to avert prolonged ischemia and secondary failure. The Limb Salvage Index (LSI) complements this by quantifying damage across skeletal, , , arterial, and venous compartments (each 0-2 points), where scores <6 predict successful salvage in over 90% of cases, while higher scores favor amputation. These systems prioritize causal factors like persistent ischemia over subjective judgment, though their predictive accuracy varies by injury type, with MESS outperforming LSI in tibial fractures. Vascular evaluation is critical, employing angiography or computed tomography angiography to map arterial patency and perfusion deficits, informing amputation level by identifying viable tissue margins. Preoperative viability tests, such as fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography, assess skin flap perfusion non-invasively, reducing re-amputation risk by confirming adequate blood supply at proposed levels. Comorbidities profoundly influence decision-making; diabetes mellitus elevates amputation healing failure and mortality risks by impairing microvascular perfusion and immunity, with affected patients facing 2- to 15-fold higher lower extremity amputation incidence compared to non-diabetics, particularly when conjoined with peripheral artery disease. Other factors like renal failure compound this, necessitating optimization of glycemic control and cardiovascular status preoperatively. Psychiatric screening evaluates depression, anxiety, and coping capacity, as up to 50% of candidates exhibit preoperative anxiety that impacts consent and adherence; early intervention via counseling enhances adjustment and reduces postoperative psychological distress. Overall, this assessment aims to avert salvage attempts with >30% secondary amputation rates in high-MESS cohorts, prioritizing evidence-based thresholds over optimistic salvage biases.

Operative Techniques

A pneumatic or manual is applied proximally to achieve , with ischemia time limited to under 2 hours to minimize tissue damage from . Incisions are planned to create full-thickness soft-tissue flaps that provide durable, padded coverage over the residual bone end, preferred over circular incisions which risk inadequate soft-tissue bulk and pressure necrosis due to uneven distribution around bony prominences. Dissection proceeds sharply through skin, , and , with major vessels individually doubly ligated or transfixed to ensure , while nerves are identified, sharply transected under gentle traction to allow proximal retraction, and managed to prevent formation. The is divided with an oscillating saw distal to the planned level, followed by shortening of the distal segment by 1-2 cm to facilitate muscle retraction and reduce end-bearing pressure, with rasping to smooth sharp edges and promote periosteal coverage. Deep muscle layers are stabilized via myodesis, suturing or muscle directly to through holes or to the , enhancing stump stability and prosthetic weight-bearing by countering abductor/adductor imbalances; superficial muscles may undergo myoplasty, layered opposition to fill dead space. In emergent cases, such as uncontrolled or trauma, a guillotine amputation employs a single transverse incision without flaps, leaving the stump open for drainage and , often revised to a definitive procedure after 48-72 hours once is controlled. For definitive closures, flaps are approximated without tension over suction drains, with skin edges meticulously opposed to minimize scarring. Advanced intraoperative techniques include targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), introduced in the early , wherein severed nerves are coapted to expendable motor branches of nearby muscles to provide physiologic targets for axonal regrowth, empirically reducing incidence and compared to standard transection.

Levels and Methods of Amputation

Amputation levels are selected to maximize residual limb length while ensuring adequate soft tissue coverage, vascularity, and preservation for optimal prosthetic fitting and function. Preservation of major joints like the or reduces energy expenditure during ambulation or manipulation compared to higher levels, with studies indicating that retaining the in lower limb amputations yields superior efficiency and lower metabolic cost than transfemoral amputations. Shorter residual limbs generally facilitate prosthetic suspension but increase the biomechanical demands on the body, leading to higher energy consumption; for instance, very short transfemoral stumps (less than 7.5 cm proximal to the ) correlate with poorer leverage and higher rates of prosthetic abandonment. Methods of amputation include primary (immediate closure) for clean wounds with viable tissue and secondary (staged or ) for contaminated or ischemic cases, where initial open amputation allows drainage before definitive closure. Primary methods involve myodesis or myoplasty to stabilize muscles against , while secondary approaches, often used in , permit and reduce reoperation rates in cases by 20-30% compared to immediate closure. at joints, such as the or , avoids bone sectioning, minimizing periosteal irritation, heterotopic ossification, and stump pain while preserving condylar leverage for end-weight bearing. In amputations, levels prioritize preservation for pronation/supination and grip. disarticulation retains full length, enabling myoelectric prosthetic control with less socket migration than transradial levels. Optimal transradial stump length is 10-15 cm distal to the , balancing leverage for flexion with sufficient muscle bulk for suspension; shorter stumps (under 5 cm) increase humeral stress but reduce formation risks. disarticulation preserves humeral length for push-pull activities, outperforming transhumeral levels in functional scores by maintaining biceps-triceps antagonism. For lower limbs, transtibial levels are preferred over transfemoral when feasible, with optimal tibial residual length of 12-14 cm from the tibial plateau to support dynamic and reduce contralateral joint loading. disarticulation offers advantages over mid-thigh transfemoral amputation by retaining femoral length for better adductor stability and prosthetic alignment, with showing 15-20% lower energy expenditure and fewer revisions due to preserved patellar . However, in severe infections, higher levels like mid-femoral amputation may be chosen for debridement margins, despite compromising leverage and increasing sitting instability. Hip , as a last resort, sacrifices pelvic efficiency but is indicated when proximal precludes lower options.
LimbLevelOptimal Residual LengthKey Functional Benefit
UpperTransradial10-15 cm from rotation preservation
UpperTranshumeral4-5 cm proximal to joint leverage
LowerTranstibial12-14 cm from tibial plateau preservation for
LowerTransfemoral7.5-10 cm proximal to Adductor muscle balance
Lower Full lengthEnd-weight bearing stability

Postoperative Management

Immediate Care

In the immediate postoperative period following amputation, patients require close monitoring for hemodynamic stability, including continuous assessment of such as , , and urine output, to address potential blood loss averaging 500-1000 mL during and prevent . Fluid resuscitation with crystalloids or blood products is administered as needed to maintain , with or lactate levels guiding in high-risk cases.00104-1/fulltext) Pain management prioritizes multimodal analgesia, with regional techniques like epidural or perineural catheters providing superior opioid-sparing effects compared to systemic opioids alone, reducing risks of respiratory depression and postoperative nausea while effectively controlling stump pain in the first 24-72 hours. Epidural infusions of local anesthetics with or without opioids demonstrate versatility and efficacy for acute stump pain, supported by clinical showing decreased analgesic requirements.30088-4/fulltext) Wound protocols involve applying compressive soft or rigid dressings immediately in the operating room to achieve and minimize , with the residual limb elevated above heart level for 24-48 hours to further reduce swelling, though prolonged elevation is avoided to prevent flexion contractures. Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics, such as , are continued for 24 hours postoperatively, with extended courses up to 5 days considered in contaminated cases to lower surgical site infection rates from baseline levels of 10-20%. Vigilance for in the residual limb or contralateral leg is essential, involving serial neurovascular examinations for disproportionate pain, pallor, or , as this rare but critical complication can arise within 48 hours due to or tight dressings. Early mobilization commences within 24 hours with bed-based exercises and progression to sitting or standing by day 2-3 when stable, empirically reducing deep vein thrombosis risk—which affects 10-50% of amputees in the early postoperative phase, particularly the elderly—through enhanced venous return alongside pharmacologic prophylaxis. Dressing inspections and changes occur as needed for excessive drainage, with gentle residual limb massage initiated cautiously to promote circulation without disrupting sutures.01193-2/pdf)

Wound Healing and Infection Control

Wound healing following amputation proceeds through the standard phases of , proliferation, and remodeling, typically spanning 4 to 6 weeks for primary closure in uncomplicated cases, during which forms and epithelialization occurs to mature the stump. The inflammatory phase involves and debris clearance within days, followed by proliferative and deposition; delays arise from ischemia or comorbidities, extending maturation and risking dehiscence. In patients with , healing is empirically delayed approximately twofold compared to non-diabetics due to microvascular disease impairing and oxygenation, compounded by hyperglycemia-induced dysfunction and neuropathy reducing protective sensation. Poor vascularity in diabetic limbs correlates with higher rates of non-healing stumps, necessitating vigilant monitoring and potential revision. Postoperative infection rates range from 7% to 35% in major lower limb amputations, with superficial site infections predominant; control involves serial of necrotic tissue, broad-spectrum antibiotics guided by culture, and strict to prevent formation. (NPWT) applied to closed incisions reduces surgical site infections by stabilizing the wound bed, minimizing , and promoting , with meta-analyses showing decreased complication rates and faster rehabilitation in vascular amputees. Adequate nutrition supports synthesis and immune function, with randomized trials demonstrating improved stump in transtibial amputees receiving supplementary high-protein feeds (1.25–2.0 g/kg/day), countering catabolic stress and reducing dehiscence risk. Caloric deficits exacerbate delays, underscoring preoperative optimization where feasible.

Complications

Surgical Complications

Hemorrhage during amputation surgery arises primarily from inadequate ligation of major vessels or in patients with . Intraoperative blood loss can exceed calculated estimates by twofold in transfemoral amputations, necessitating vigilant to prevent . Postoperative formation in the stump, resulting from venous oozing or anticoagulation use, contributes to tension and breakdown, often requiring evacuation and drainage. Wound dehiscence occurs in 1-2% of cases following major lower limb amputation, more frequently in below-knee procedures (1.7%) than above-knee (1.3%), due to poor tissue or excessive tension on closure flaps. exacerbates this risk through and impaired synthesis, with smokers exhibiting a significantly higher incidence of dehiscence ( 2.86). Preoperative for at least 4 weeks mitigates these effects by improving microvascular function and reducing overall postoperative complications. Surgical site infections affect 6-7% of lower extremity amputations, driven by contamination during or host factors like , leading to delayed healing and potential . Revision is necessitated in up to 20% of initial amputations, commonly due to flap from inadequate blood supply, intraoperative , or hematoma-induced pressure . independently doubles the odds of requiring revision, underscoring the causal role of in tissue ischemia. Poor surgical planning, such as suboptimal stump length or flap design, further elevates revision rates by compromising residual limb viability.

Phantom Limb Pain and Neurologic Issues

Phantom limb pain (PLP) refers to the perception of pain in the amputated limb, distinct from residual limb pain, and arises from maladaptive neuroplastic changes and peripheral nerve pathology. Approximately 60-80% of amputees experience PLP, with prevalence persisting in 50-60% beyond one year post-amputation. Neurologic mechanisms include peripheral formation, where transected regenerate into disorganized, hypersensitive nodules that generate ectopic neural impulses, contributing to both local and . Central plays a key role via in the , where adjacent brain regions (e.g., for face or trunk) invade the deafferented limb representation, leading to distorted sensory processing and pain referral. This reorganization correlates with PLP intensity, as evidenced by showing expanded representations of intact body parts overlapping former limb areas. Evidence challenges simplistic remapping causality, noting stable cortical maps in some cases despite pain, suggesting interplay with preserved function and individual variability. Non-invasive interventions like exploit visual-motor mismatch to reverse maladaptive plasticity, with randomized trials reporting pain reductions of 15-48% in intensity after 4-8 weeks, though efficacy varies by adherence and baseline pain. Recent approaches include perineuromal hydrodissection, an ultrasound-guided injection separating nerves from surrounding ; a 2025 in war-related amputees found it reduced acute PLP by modest degrees alongside residual pain, with lower needs at one month. For acute postoperative PLP, virtual reality-delivered graded (VR-GMI) protocols—progressing from limb recognition to imagined and mirrored movements—show feasibility in early intervention, aiming to preempt chronicity through sequential cortical activation. Untreated PLP correlates with psychiatric comorbidity, including depression rates exceeding 30% in affected amputees, driven by chronic nociceptive input amplifying emotional distress via shared neural pathways. Neurologic issues extend to sympathetic dysregulation, where aberrant autonomic signaling exacerbates , underscoring the need for multimodal targeting of peripheral and central drivers.

Long-Term Health Impacts

Amputations, especially lower limb procedures due to dysvascular etiologies like and , confer substantial long-term mortality risks, with 5-year rates ranging from 40% to over 70% in longitudinal cohorts, largely driven by persistent comorbidities rather than the amputation itself. These outcomes reflect underlying systemic vascular , as evidenced by meta-analyses showing pooled 5-year mortality of 62-64% in such patients. Cardiovascular strain exacerbates this, with amputees exhibiting elevated risks of , , and compared to non-amputees, attributable to factors including reduced , altered , and pre-existing . Biomechanical changes from prosthetic gait impose asymmetric loading, increasing spinal compressive forces and trunk muscle demands, which contribute to chronic in up to 50% of lower limb amputees per cross-sectional and perturbation-based studies. This altered load distribution, observed in musculoskeletal modeling of walking, elevates shear and compressive stresses on the lumbosacral spine, potentially accelerating degenerative changes over years. Residual limb disuse and develop rapidly post-amputation due to reduced mechanical loading on the stump , with studies documenting significant bone mineral density losses in the distal or within 5+ years, predisposing to fractures and pain. Contralateral limb overload from weight-bearing asymmetry doubles the risk, with knee osteoarthritis prevalence reaching 66% in the sound limb versus lower rates in non-amputees, as quantified in radiographic and epidemiological reviews. Sedentary lifestyles post-amputation hasten these declines through compounded , whereas structured rehabilitation attenuates bone loss and degeneration via targeted loading, per intervention trials.

Rehabilitation and Prosthetics

Physical and Occupational Therapy

Physical therapy following amputation begins in the pre-prosthetic phase, typically starting on postoperative day 1, to promote residual limb healing, prevent complications, and prepare for future mobility. Initial interventions include gentle (ROM) exercises at the pain tolerance limit for the residual limb and intact joints, alongside isometric strengthening to maintain muscle function and avoid . These exercises target and flexion contractures, which pose a significant if untreated, with physical therapy modalities such as and positioning proven to delay or prevent their development in at-risk patients. Stump shaping and shrinking form core components of pre-prosthetic care, involving compression bandaging or removable rigid dressings to reduce and contour the residual limb for optimal prosthetic fit later, while incorporating and postural training to facilitate independence in bed mobility and transfers. Energy conservation techniques, such as pacing activities and using assistive devices for transfers, are introduced early to manage and support building, with evidence indicating that structured programs enhance overall functional outcomes. Occupational therapy complements physical efforts by addressing (ADLs), adaptive equipment training, and reintegration into vocational or avocational roles, often starting concurrently in the acute phase. Therapists teach one-handed techniques, dressing aids, and environmental modifications to foster independence, with multidisciplinary interventions shown to improve community participation and reduce long-term dependency. Randomized controlled trials of intensive rehabilitation protocols, including occupational components, demonstrate that 6-week programs can halve dependency rates by enhancing adaptive skills like driving simulations and workplace simulations. Early occupational involvement, evidenced in VA/DoD guidelines, correlates with faster return to premorbid function levels.

Prosthetic Technologies

Prosthetic technologies encompass a range of devices designed to restore function and mobility following amputation, evolving from rudimentary mechanical constructs to sophisticated systems integrating sensors and actuators. Mechanical prosthetics rely on physical linkages for operation, while bionic variants incorporate electronic interfaces to approximate biological control, prioritizing durability, alignment, and energy efficiency over cosmetic enhancements alone. Upper extremity prosthetics are categorized into passive, body-powered, and myoelectric types. Passive devices offer cosmetic restoration and limited passive positioning, aiding in symmetry and skin protection without active control. Body-powered systems use harnesses and cables actuated by shoulder or torso movements to drive hooks or hands, providing intuitive, low-maintenance functionality for tasks like grasping. Myoelectric prosthetics, in contrast, employ surface electrodes to capture electromyographic (EMG) signals from residual muscles, translating them into proportional motor commands for multi-articulated hands or wrists, though they require battery power and precise . Lower limb prosthetics emphasize biomechanical replication, featuring custom sockets to distribute load on the residual limb, rigid or adjustable pylons for and alignment, and terminal feet optimized for and . Carbon fiber-reinforced energy-storing and returning (ESAR) feet, introduced in designs like the Flex-Foot in the 1980s, flex during strike to absorb shock—reducing peak pressures by up to 20%—and recoil in late stance to return stored , enhancing stride efficiency and reducing metabolic cost compared to non-dynamic solid-ankle cushioned (SACH) feet. Hydraulic or pneumatic dampers in knees further modulate swing and stance phases, preventing falls in uneven conditions. Empirical outcomes indicate that approximately 70% of prosthetic users with lower limb amputations achieve community-level ambulation (K-level 3 or higher), with success influenced by residual limb length, comorbidities, and device fit rather than technology sophistication alone; transtibial users exceed 80% ambulation rates, while transfemoral cases drop below 50% due to greater energy demands. Costs range from $10,000 for basic mechanical lower limb systems to $50,000 for advanced components like knees, excluding ongoing maintenance or replacements every 3-5 years. Access barriers, including prohibitive expenses, inconsistent insurance coverage, and shortages of certified prosthetists, limit utilization, particularly in low-income settings where fewer than 20% of amputees receive devices, highlighting that prosthetic efficacy hinges on personalized and systemic integration over device features.

Recent Innovations (2023-2025)

In early 2025, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center expanded procedures, implanting a titanium abutment directly into the residual bone to enable socket-free prosthetic attachment, thereby eliminating pistoning and socket-related discomfort that affects many traditional prosthetic users. This bone-anchored approach facilitates more natural and load transfer, with patients reporting improved mobility for those previously intolerant to socket prosthetics. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI), often combined prophylactically at the time of amputation, have demonstrated significant reductions in both and residual limb , with 2025 analyses showing clinically meaningful improvements over standard management. These nerve transfer techniques redirect sensory nerves to motor targets or wrap them in autologous grafts to prevent formation, yielding superior patient-reported outcomes compared to historical controls. Perineuromal hydrodissection, involving fluid injection to separate nerves from surrounding , emerged as an adjunctive intervention for acute postamputation in 2025 observational studies, particularly amid conflict-related injuries. When added to therapy, it achieved greater reductions in residual limb scores (mean decrease of 4 points on a 10-point scale at 12 weeks) and proportional opioid sparing versus opioids alone, with higher rates of positive opioid reduction at 48 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks post-procedure. Artificial intelligence algorithms for prosthetic socket design gained traction in 2024-2025 trials, using 3D scans and to optimize shape and fit, achieving satisfaction levels comparable to manual plaster molding while potentially streamlining fabrication. These models predict residual limb volume changes and personalize interfaces, addressing fit issues that contribute to prosthetic abandonment. The U.S. Department of and Department of Defense issued an updated Clinical Practice Guideline for Rehabilitation of Lower Limb Amputation in February 2025, incorporating evidence-based modules on pre-amputation optimization, , and prosthetic integration to standardize care and improve functional recovery timelines. The guideline emphasizes multidisciplinary pathways, including early TMR/RPNI consideration, to reduce complications and support community reintegration.

Prevention

Lifestyle Interventions for Preventable Causes

A significant proportion of non-traumatic lower limb amputations, primarily resulting from (PAD) and complications such as neuropathy and foot ulcers, are attributable to modifiable risk factors including use, , and . Up to 85% of -related amputations can be prevented through targeted interventions addressing these factors, emphasizing individual adherence to evidence-based behavioral changes over external attributions. Lifestyle modifications directly mitigate causal pathways, such as acceleration from and impaired from chronic , supported by (RCT) data and longitudinal studies. Smoking cessation represents a critical intervention for PAD, where tobacco use drives and plaque formation, doubling the risk of progression to critical limb ischemia (CLI). Among patients with symptomatic PAD, quitting smoking is associated with improved amputation-free survival and reduced all-cause mortality, with cohort studies showing hazard ratios for amputation decreasing by up to 50% within years of abstinence. RCTs of intensive cessation programs in PAD patients demonstrate sustained quit rates leading to symptom relief in and halted disease advancement, underscoring the causal reversal of nicotine-induced vascular damage. Cessation after 5-9 years correlates with a 57% reduction in PAD incidence compared to continued smoking, highlighting time-dependent benefits from biochemical recovery of arterial function. For , rigorous glycemic control via medication adherence, dietary restriction of refined carbohydrates, and regular monitoring prevents neuropathy and ulceration, the precursors to amputation. Intensive glucose management in reduces amputation risk by 36% (relative risk 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.95), per of RCTs including over 6,900 participants, by limiting microvascular damage and infection susceptibility. Early intensive control specifically lowers long-term (DFU) incidence by preserving nerve integrity and perfusion, with follow-up data from trials like DCCT/EDIC showing persistent effects decades later. Daily self-foot inspections and professional podiatric exams, integrated with control, further avert progression from minor wounds, as poor HbA1c levels (>9%) independently elevate amputation odds by impairing healing cascades. Weight management through sustained caloric deficit, aerobic exercise (150 minutes weekly), and resistance training addresses obesity's role in insulin resistance and PAD exacerbation, preventing up to 58% of type 2 diabetes onset in at-risk individuals per the Diabetes Prevention Program RCT. Regular physical activity exerts a protective effect against lower extremity amputation in diabetics, with meta-analyses linking >150 minutes/week of moderate exercise to lowered inflammatory markers and improved endothelial function, reducing CLI requirements. In severe obesity comorbid with diabetes, bariatric procedures like Roux-en-Y gastric bypass yield 51% lower odds of diabetes-related foot complications, including ulcers amenable to amputation, via rapid glycemic normalization and adipose reduction, as evidenced by observational cohorts adjusted for confounders. These interventions prioritize causal disruption of metabolic overload, with adherence yielding measurable risk attenuation independent of socioeconomic variables.

Trauma and Infection Prevention Strategies

In motor vehicle crashes, the use of seat belts reduces the risk of moderate to critical injuries by 50% and fatal injuries by 45-60%, thereby lowering the incidence of severe limb trauma that may require amputation. Helmets for motorcyclists similarly mitigate impact forces, preventing ejections and crush injuries to extremities. Occupational safety regulations, such as those implemented by the (OSHA) since the 1970s, mandate , procedures, and worker training to address hazards like unguarded presses and saws, which account for a significant portion of industrial amputations. These measures target high-risk sectors, with OSHA's National Emphasis Program on amputations, renewed in 2025, focusing inspections on equipment that poses amputation risks to further eliminate mechanical pinch points and rotating parts. Military personnel utilize blast-mitigating gear, including pelvic protection systems and lower extremity armor, to attenuate shock waves and fragmentation from improvised devices. Cadaveric testing demonstrates that such protective clothing significantly reduces lower limb severity from sand-based blasts compared to unprotected states. To avert infections progressing to and subsequent amputations, adherence to protocols—such as thorough handwashing and proper cleaning—prevents bacterial ingress, while tetanus eliminates a key that can cause necrotic tissue requiring or excision. Vaccines against pneumococcus and further diminish risk by curbing respiratory infections that may disseminate systemically. For , which can necessitate amputation of digits or limbs due to irreversible tissue damage, preventive tactics include multilayered clothing to maintain insulation and moisture-wicking layers to keep skin dry, alongside avoiding prolonged exposure below -20°C (-4°F). If exposure occurs, rapid rewarming in 40-42°C (104-108°F) baths, without rubbing or dry heat, halts progression, though refreezing must be avoided to prevent compounded vascular .

Prognosis

Functional and Survival Outcomes

Transtibial amputations, preserving the knee joint, enable higher rates of independent mobility compared to more proximal levels, with approximately 78% of patients returning to independent ambulatory status post-rehabilitation. Functional recovery metrics, such as , are more favorable in traumatic cases among younger patients without comorbidities, whereas dysvascular etiologies limit outcomes due to associated frailty. Survival following lower limb amputation varies significantly by etiology, with dysvascular cases—predominantly from and —showing a 2-year of about 47%, reflecting of 1.5 years. Traumatic amputations, occurring in healthier populations, yield markedly higher 2-year approaching 90%, underscoring etiology-specific disparities. Overall 5-year mortality post-major lower extremity amputation ranges from 40% to 80%, driven primarily by pre-amputation comorbidities like cardiovascular and renal disease rather than the procedure itself. Health-related quality of life, as measured by scores, is reduced in lower limb amputees, with physical component summaries often below population norms (e.g., mean PCS <50), though mitigates some decline. Bilateral amputations correlate with inferior functional metrics, including reduced capacity for community-level walking (e.g., <500 meters independently), compared to unilateral cases.

Factors Influencing Recovery

Age and the of amputation significantly predict recovery trajectories. Younger patients, particularly those with traumatic amputations, exhibit higher rates of prosthetic utilization and functional mobility, with studies reporting prosthesis use exceeding 80% in trauma cohorts compared to 50-70% in vascular or diabetic cases. Multivariate analyses indicate that trauma-related amputations, often occurring in individuals under 50, correlate with superior restoration and return-to-work rates due to fewer baseline comorbidities and greater pre-amputation physical reserves. In contrast, advanced age (over 75) impairs and balance, though select cohorts of octogenarians achieve comparable mobility scores to those in their 60s when comorbidities are controlled. Comorbidities such as diabetes and smoking independently elevate revision surgery risks by approximately twofold. Diabetic patients face heightened re-amputation odds (odds ratio 1.6-2.0) from impaired vascularization and neuropathy, with smokers showing accelerated tissue necrosis and proximal stump failures in below-knee procedures. These factors compound in multivariate models, where smoking cessation pre-amputation reduces healing delays by enhancing perfusion, underscoring nicotine's causal role in vasoconstriction over mere correlation. Psychological resilience emerges as a robust predictor, with and correlating moderately (r ≈ 0.3-0.5) with prosthetic adherence and self-reported function at 6-12 months post-amputation. Resilient individuals demonstrate lower interference and higher goal-directed behaviors, independent of demographic variables, as low resilience pre-surgery forecasts poor outcomes via heightened depression and avoidance. Rehabilitation discipline outperforms demographic predictors in longitudinal data, with consistent engagement yielding 20-30% better mobility gains regardless of age or . Early, intensive protocols emphasizing balance and drive and cardiovascular adaptations, mitigating effects more effectively than baseline traits alone. Access to structured programs amplifies this, though patient-initiated adherence—via self-motivation—remains the proximal determinant of stump conditioning and prosthetic competence.

Controversies and Ethical Considerations

Elective Amputations for Body Integrity Dysphoria

(BIID), also known as body integrity identity disorder, is a rare psychological condition characterized by an intense, persistent desire for the amputation of a healthy limb, often accompanied by the feeling that the limb does not belong to the body despite intact sensory and motor function. Individuals with BIID typically report lifelong distress from this mismatch, leading some to pursue self-amputation or petition surgeons for elective procedures, though such requests remain highly controversial due to the absence of medical necessity and potential for irreversible harm. is limited to case reports, with no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating amputation as a treatment, raising questions about whether the condition stems from a treatable or perceptual anomaly rather than an authentic identity incongruence warranting surgical intervention. Case reports document instances where elective amputation has alleviated BIID symptoms. In a 2024 report, a 20-year-old male underwent voluntary below-knee amputation of his left after years of distress, reporting immediate resolution of and high satisfaction at six-month follow-up, with no observed. Similarly, a one-year follow-up of another patient in 2024 confirmed sustained remission of BIID symptoms post-amputation, including improved and adaptation via use, though the authors noted the procedure's rarity and ethical constraints limiting broader application. These outcomes suggest short-term psychological benefits in select cases (n<10 reported globally), but long-term data is scarce, with unknown risks of , pain, or functional decline; alternatives like simulations for temporary limb "removal" remain unproven in resolving core distress. Ethically, elective amputations for BIID challenge principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, as surgeons risk performing mutilative surgery on healthy tissue without evidence of superior outcomes over conservative psychiatric treatments such as or medication. Proponents invoke patient , arguing that denying amputation perpetuates akin to untreated mental illness, yet critics highlight causal uncertainties—potentially rooted in neurological misprocessing rather than immutable identity— and the of affirming delusions over reality-based interventions. Legal barriers persist; in jurisdictions like , such procedures could constitute absent therapeutic justification. The debate draws parallels to treatments, where both involve to align perceived identity with physical form, yet BIID lacks the institutional normalization and longitudinal studies supporting affirmative care in gender cases, prompting scrutiny of whether surgical indulgence risks pathologizing dissatisfaction without addressing underlying psychiatric factors. Truth-seeking analysis favors empirical caution: positive post-amputation reports, while consistent in small samples, do not override first-principles concerns about irreversibility and the ethical hazard of equating subjective distress with objective mismatch, especially absent RCTs or biomarkers validating amputation's in remission. Prioritizing non-invasive options aligns with causal realism, viewing BIID as a disorder amenable to brain-based therapies rather than anatomical alteration.

Punitive Amputations and Deterrence

Punitive amputations, prescribed under hudud ordinances in Sharia law, involve severing the right hand or fingers for theft offenses meeting specific criteria, such as the stolen value exceeding a nisab threshold and absence of necessity. In Iran, authorities carried out finger amputations on two men convicted of theft on October 30, 2024, using a guillotine-like device, marking a rare but documented resurgence of the practice after periods of dormancy. Similarly, Iranian officials amputated fingers of a theft convict on July 27, 2022, via mechanical means, with Amnesty International verifying the event through witness accounts and medical reports, though the organization emphasizes humanitarian concerns over procedural efficacy. In Saudi Arabia, hand amputation remains legally mandated for qualified theft under the Quran's hudud (e.g., Surah Al-Ma'idah 5:38), but executions have been infrequent, with only four known hand amputations in the past decade, none for armed robbery, amid stricter evidentiary requirements like witness testimony or confession. Historically, analogous corporal penalties trace to ancient Near Eastern codes, including the Babylonian (c. 1750 BCE), which applied lex talionis principles—matching injury to offense, such as eye removal for eye damage—though typically incurred fines or restitution rather than limb severance, reflecting a graduated severity based on social status and crime scale. In contrast, amputations derive directly from Islamic jurisprudence, intended as fixed, divinely ordained deterrents rather than discretionary fines, with cross-amputation (hand and opposite foot) reserved for highway robbery. Proponents of such punishments, drawing from rational choice theory in , argue that their visibility and specificity—permanently impairing the instrument of the crime—elevate perceived costs, fostering greater general deterrence than incarceration, where offenders may discount abstract future imprisonment due to uncertainty or . remains sparse; no large-scale, peer-reviewed studies quantify among amputees, but anecdotal reports from Saudi contexts suggest near-zero reoffending for post-punishment, attributed to physical incapacity and , though official data gaps hinder causal attribution. Causal reasoning supports potential efficacy in high-crime environments: where enforcement is swift and certain, as in systems requiring multiple witnesses, the punishment's irrevocability outperforms probabilistic prison terms, per models like Gary Becker's economic theory of crime, which weights expected utility against risks. Saudi Arabia's reported crime index (around 22-30 on scales, lower than many Western nations with lenient sentencing) correlates with strict penalties, including low violent theft rates despite petty theft comprising 47% of offenses, suggesting deterrence amid cultural enforcement, though confounders like religious norms and surveillance complicate isolation. Iran's theft-related amputations, while less frequent, align with periodic spikes in application during crackdowns, potentially curbing opportunism in resource-scarce settings. Critics, including the , condemn the practice as incompatible with , citing 2022 statements against Iranian cases as "abhorrent" and urging physician non-complicity, reflecting institutional priorities on over outcome-based metrics. This meta-preference for deontological prohibitions, often amplified by Western frameworks, may undervalue context-specific deterrence; in jurisdictions with exceeding 60% under incarceration-focused systems, hudud's severity—when applied judiciously—could yield net societal gains by prioritizing causal prevention over rehabilitation assumptions lacking robust validation. Absent randomized controls, the evidentiary void favors theoretical priors: punishments with high certainty and tailored proportionality likely suppress more effectively than equivalents reliant on prolonged confinement, particularly for offenses where stems from low barriers to reentry.

References

  1. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/procedures/21599-amputation
  2. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/amputation
  3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546594/
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05160-8
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10512952/
  6. https://theconversation.com/modern-surgery-began-with-saws-and-iron-hands-how-amputation-transformed-the-body-in-the-renaissance-222864
  7. https://now.aapmr.org/lower-limb-amputations-epidemiology-and-assessment/
  8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534773/
  9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544350/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6428046/
  11. https://www.etymonline.com/word/amputation
  12. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/amputate
  13. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-3152-8_1
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9809921/
  15. https://www.academia.edu/679572/Evidence_of_amputation_as_medical_treatment_in_ancient_Egypt
  16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24522383/
  17. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EI3O/COM-23464.xml?language=en
  18. https://rtie.com.au/research_papers/the-history-of-amputation/
  19. https://sagy.vikingove.cz/en/amputation-of-the-lower-limbs-of-the-early-middle-ages-and-their-prostheses/
  20. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-1-84628-509-7.pdf
  21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24621427
  22. https://surgery.edwardworthlibrary.ie/operations/amputations/
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1281639/
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5085941/
  25. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/library-and-publications/library/blog/lister-in-the-library-careful-procedure-and-attention-to-detail/
  26. https://www.wired.com/2011/06/0617lister-performs-antiseptic-surgery/
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4530413/
  28. https://www.westernfrontassociation.com/world-war-i-articles/health-in-returning-veterans-of-the-first-world-war-the-impact-of-wounds-agassing-injury-and-medical-and-psychological-conditions-from-a-study-of-the-pension-ledgers-by-dr-peter-hodgkinson/
  29. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/mutilation-and-disfiguration/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10402984/
  31. https://academic.oup.com/milmed/article/184/11-12/214/5518569
  32. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/health-and-medicine/military-medicine-battlefield
  33. https://opentextbooks.clemson.edu/sciencetechnologyandsociety/chapter/medical-advancements-caused-by-wwii/
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9762220/
  35. https://achh.army.mil/history/book-vietnam-orthovietnam-ch09/
  36. https://achh.army.mil/history/book-vietnam-orthovietnam-ch07/
  37. https://medcoeckapwstorprd01.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/pfw-images/borden/rehab1/RH1ch4.pdf
  38. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000967
  39. https://diabetes.org/advocacy/amputation-prevention-alliance
  40. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Pathology_Leading_to_Amputation
  41. https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/podiatry/article/8355
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5774386/
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335521001959
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7377955/
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/traumatic-amputation
  46. https://www.swoperodante.com/traumatic-amputation-injuries-causes-stats/
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8082077/
  48. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/iraq-afghanistan-amputees_n_2089911
  49. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23192067/
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8207579/
  51. https://journals.lww.com/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.660
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9555904/
  53. https://orthop.washington.edu/patient-care/limb-loss/general-principles-of-amputation-surgery.html
  54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537030/
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6167772/
  56. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/24739-gas-gangrene
  57. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/217943-overview
  58. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-13278-8
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020138307004391
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10321308/
  61. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/41/4/891/36974/Limb-and-Person-Level-Risk-Factors-for-Lower-Limb
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11227953/
  63. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560552/
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2978163/
  65. https://www.ejves.com/article/S1078-5884%2820%2930246-X/pdf
  66. https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/39/12/6807
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8533806/
  68. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1256857-guidelines
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4052018/
  70. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2002/0315/p1123.html
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10264616/
  72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545283/
  73. https://fetalmedicine.org/education/fetal-abnormalities/extremities/limb-deficiency-or-amputation
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4737249/
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4160514/
  76. https://yaqeeninstitute.org/read/paper/stoning-and-hand-cutting-understanding-the-hudud-and-the-shariah-in-islam
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0047235294900213
  78. https://www.jurist.org/news/2025/08/iran-authorities-amputate-fingers-of-three-individuals-convicted-of-theft/
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314476769_Corporal_Punishment_Amputation_of_a_Hand_The_Concept_of_sariqa_Theft_in_Theory_and_in_Practice
  80. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/01/iran-authorities-amputate-a-mans-hand-in-shocking-act-of-cruelty/
  81. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/five-things-about-deterrence
  82. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/climber-ralston-amputate-arm-utah
  83. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna37620783
  84. https://www.psychiatrist.com/jcp/upper-extremity-self-amputation-replantation-case/
  85. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21846162/
  86. https://isbrave.com/guides/amputation-statistics-in-the-united-states/
  87. https://now.aapmr.org/upper-limb-amputations/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6145564/
  89. https://www.e-arm.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.5535/arm.22121
  90. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540962/
  91. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26527583/
  92. http://www.oandplibrary.org/poi/1985_02_069.asp
  93. https://academic.oup.com/occmed/article/67/3/227/2967467
  94. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03093640802555917
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/amputation-of-lower-limb
  96. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/diabetes-complications/preventing-diabetes-related-amputations.html
  97. https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/2347-9264.2018.70
  98. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20196687/
  99. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/03093640903433928?download=true
  100. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32501929/
  101. https://www.annalsofvascularsurgery.com/article/S0890-5096%2824%2900254-1/fulltext
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7481367/
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5321791/
  104. https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-015-0832-7
  105. https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/549/mangled-extremity-severity-score-mess-score
  106. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/15385744231152024
  107. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2025068/
  108. https://vascular.org/pmg/vascular-conditions/amputations
  109. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29121845/
  110. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7085715/
  111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X25000036
  112. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.314595
  113. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10655619/
  114. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2049080122016247
  115. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241295940
  116. https://jocr.co.in/wp/2017/01/2250-0685-662-fulltext/
  117. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39293555/
  118. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1232102-technique
  119. https://operativereview.com/amputation/
  120. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29761748/
  121. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1894411-technique
  122. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39389633/
  123. https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/fulltext/2024/01000/targeted_muscle_reinnervation_at_the_time_of.27.aspx
  124. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8669807/
  125. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Principles_of_Amputation
  126. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521419326345
  127. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/471700/
  128. https://medicine.missouri.edu/sites/default/files/pm-r/UEA_eval_and_levels.pdf
  129. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4904133/
  130. https://www.orthobullets.com/trauma/1052/amputations
  131. https://gmka.org/en/articles/amputation-of-upper-and-lower-extremities/
  132. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4179362/
  133. https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/18/3/504/2924698
  134. https://www.brighamandwomens.org/assets/BWH/patients-and-families/rehabilitation-services/pdfs/general-le-amputation-bwh.pdf
  135. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9131228/
  136. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588409000495
  137. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588407004911
  138. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8885273/
  139. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9985278/
  140. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/diabetes/in-depth/amputation-and-diabetes/art-20048262
  141. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36243476/
  142. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320739
  143. https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/10/1072
  144. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6220668/
  145. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11222165/
  146. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22342693/
  147. https://publishing.rcseng.ac.uk/doi/10.1308/rcsann.2023.0011
  148. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588425003351
  149. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14024546_Improved_wound_healing_in_transtibial_amputees_receiving_supplementary_nutrition
  150. https://dietitiansondemand.com/nutrition-for-amputations/
  151. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11858377/
  152. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5557193/
  153. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521411010378
  154. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/1151013
  155. https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2020-smoking-greatly-increases-risk-of-complications-after-surgery
  156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890509621008086
  157. https://www.jvascsurg.org/article/S0741-5214%2811%2901037-8/pdf
  158. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39453607/
  159. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11734843/
  160. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127518300257
  161. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11371778/
  162. https://www.tmrnerve.com/blog/post-amputation-neuroma-pain
  163. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31568042/
  164. https://www.jci.org/articles/view/94003
  165. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6143485/
  166. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-025-02037-7
  167. https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/138/8/2140/331219
  168. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22378591/
  169. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ejp.1859
  170. https://rapm.bmj.com/content/early/2025/02/26/rapm-2024-106307
  171. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40409745/
  172. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6051014/
  173. https://www.clinicalpainadvisor.com/features/the-role-of-psychological-factors-in-phantom-limb-pain-reviewed/
  174. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590011000460
  175. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9833438/
  176. https://www.jfas.org/article/S1067-2516%2820%2930333-1/abstract
  177. https://www.annalsofvascularsurgery.com/article/S0890-5096%2817%2930643-X/fulltext
  178. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.123.033304
  179. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18281705/
  180. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5844821/
  181. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1981651
  182. https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/fulltext/2022/11150/low_back_pain_in_people_with_lower_limb.8.aspx
  183. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10189091/
  184. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1359/jbmr.080402
  185. https://academic.oup.com/milmed/article/181/suppl_4/38/4209438
  186. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883540314002290
  187. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40141-014-0063-0
  188. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/13/3/772
  189. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7756831/
  190. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3482407/
  191. https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/100/5/773/5707560
  192. https://research.aota.org/ajot/article/71/1/7101180030p1/6246/Effectiveness-of-Occupational-Therapy
  193. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/rehab/amp/
  194. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7340716/
  195. https://www.embs.org/pulse/articles/a-new-era-for-bionic-limbs/
  196. https://now.aapmr.org/upper-limb-prosthetics/
  197. https://hhs.iowa.gov/media/12167/download?inline
  198. https://www.armdynamics.com/research-and-technology/prosthetic-technology
  199. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/prosthetic-foot
  200. https://www.ossur.com/en-nz/prosthetics/pro-flex-family
  201. https://www.ottobock.com/en-gb/prosthetics/lower-limb-prosthetics/prosthetic-feet
  202. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7590920/
  203. https://journals.lww.com/jpojournal/fulltext/2021/07000/mobility_analysis_of_amputees__maat_6___mobility%2C.2.aspx
  204. https://orthoticslimited.com/blog/cost-of-prosthetic-limbs/
  205. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24002236
  206. https://www.utsouthwestern.edu/newsroom/articles/year-2025/feb-innovative-procedure-amputees.html
  207. https://utswmed.org/medblog/implants-mobility-amputees/
  208. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12331023/
  209. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.23.24319539v2.full-text
  210. https://meeting.peripheralnerve.org/program/2023/P17.cgi
  211. https://rapm.bmj.com/content/early/2025/02/16/rapm-2024-106307
  212. https://rapm.bmj.com/content/rapm/early/2025/02/16/rapm-2024-106307.full.pdf
  213. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389161318_Perineuromal_hydrodissection_for_acute_postamputation_pain_An_observational_study_in_a_time_of_war
  214. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324012334
  215. https://livingwithamplitude.com/ai-amputee-care-artificial-intelligence/
  216. https://www.health.mil/News/Dvids-Articles/2025/02/24/news491386
  217. https://diabetes.org/newsroom/ADA-unveils-amputation-prevention-alliance-to-address-diabetes-related-amputation-pandemic
  218. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25282696/
  219. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.031
  220. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2019/study-quantifies-smokings-strong-link-to-peripheral-artery-disease
  221. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04323462
  222. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/45/2/357/139191/Risk-of-Foot-Ulcer-and-Lower-Extremity-Amputation
  223. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/36/11/3591/38010/HbA1c-and-Lower-Extremity-Amputation-Risk-in-Low
  224. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11494447/
  225. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1056872724001399
  226. https://www.cdc.gov/seat-belts/facts/index.html
  227. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/811160
  228. https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle-safety/seat-belts
  229. https://www.osha.gov/enforcement/directives/cpl-2-133
  230. https://www.osha.gov/news/newsreleases/osha-national-news-release/20250626
  231. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41314-022-00050-3
  232. https://www.cdc.gov/sepsis/prevention/index.html
  233. https://www.sepsis.org/sepsis-basics/prevention-vaccines/
  234. https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/how-vaccination-can-reduce-sepsis-and-save-millions-lives
  235. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2020/0401/p440.html
  236. https://www.heraldopenaccess.us/openaccess/a-surgeon-s-perspective-on-lower-extremity-amputation-and-rehabilitation
  237. https://www.jvascsurg.org/article/S0741-5214%2817%2932390-X/fulltext
  238. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174391910600135X
  239. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10257952/
  240. https://drc.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001355
  241. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10388641/
  242. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020138311003457
  243. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2743731/
  244. https://www.jbjs.org/reader.php?rsuite_id=929004
  245. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37119956/
  246. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3474996/
  247. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321227598_Smoking_increases_the_risk_of_diabetic_foot_amputation_A_meta-analysis
  248. https://www.jvascsurg.org/article/S0741-5214%2825%2901670-2/abstract
  249. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7541554/
  250. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213589
  251. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10252808/
  252. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999323001120
  253. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/body-integrity-identity-disorder-biid
  254. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10966911/
  255. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ccr3.9156
  256. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11220458/
  257. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iconap-24/126006584
  258. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14777509231160398
  259. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15265160802588194
  260. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0968533220934529
  261. https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/ethics-consult/89521
  262. https://annelawrence.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Lawrence-2009-Parallels-between-GID-and-BIID-book-chapter.pdf
  263. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269697839_Body_Integrity_Identity_Disorder_and_Gender_Dysphoria_A_Pilot_Study_to_Investigate_Similarities_and_Differences
  264. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945222000879
  265. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2024/10/iran-amputates-fingers-two-men-convicted-theft-ngos
  266. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/07/iranian-officials-must-be-held-accountable-for-amputating-the-fingers-of-two-men/
  267. https://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/165hammurabi.html
  268. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/penalty-hand-amputation-theft-islamic-justice-comparative-criminal
  269. https://www.sfu.ca/~allen/deter.pdf
  270. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/crime-rate-by-country
  271. https://www.wma.net/news-post/amputation-punishment-condemned-by-world-medical-association/
  272. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/deterrence-effective-results-meta-analysis-punishment
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.