Hubbry Logo
Compressed natural gasCompressed natural gasMain
Open search
Compressed natural gas
Community hub
Compressed natural gas
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Compressed natural gas
Compressed natural gas
from Wikipedia

Compressed natural gas (or simply shortened as CNG) is a fuel gas mainly composed of methane (CH4), compressed to less than 1% of the volume it occupies at standard atmospheric pressure. It is stored and distributed in hard containers at a pressure of 20–25 megapascals (2,900–3,600 psi; 200–250 bar), usually in cylindrical or spherical shapes.

CNG is used in traditional petrol/internal combustion engine vehicles that have been modified, or in vehicles specifically manufactured for CNG use: either alone (dedicated), with a segregated liquid fuel system to extend range (dual fuel), or in conjunction with another fuel (bi-fuel). It can be used in place of petrol, diesel fuel, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). CNG combustion produces fewer undesirable gases than the aforementioned fuels. In comparison to other fuels, natural gas poses less of a threat in the event of a spill, because it is lighter than air and disperses quickly when released. Biomethane, biogas from anaerobic digestion or landfill, can be used.

In response to high fuel prices and environmental concerns, CNG has been used in auto rickshaws, pickup trucks, transit and school buses, and trains.

The cost and placement of fuel storage containers is the major barrier to wider/quicker adoption of CNG as a fuel. It is also why municipal government, public transportation vehicles were the most visible early adopters of it, as they can more quickly amortize the money invested in the new (and usually cheaper) fuel. In spite of these circumstances, the number of vehicles in the world using CNG has grown steadily (30 percent per year).[1] Now, as a result of the industry's steady growth, the cost of such fuel storage cylinders has been brought down to a much more acceptable level. Especially, for the CNG Type 1 and Type 2 cylinders, many countries are able to make reliable and cost effective cylinders for conversion need.[2]

Energy density

[edit]

CNG's energy density is the same as liquefied natural gas at 53.6 MJ/kg. Its volumetric energy density, 9 MJ/L, is 42 % of that of LNG (22 MJ/L) because it is not liquefied, and is 25 percent that of diesel fuel.[3]

History

[edit]

Gases provided the original fuel for internal combustion engines. The first experiments with compressed gases took place in France in the 1850s. Natural gas first became a transport fuel during World War I. In the 1960s, Columbia Natural Gas of Ohio tested a CNG carrier. The ship was to carry compressed natural gas in vertical pressure bottles; however, this design failed because of the high cost of the pressure vessels. Since then, there have been attempts at developing a commercially viable CNG carrier. Several competing CNG ocean transport designs have evolved. Each design proposes a unique approach to optimizing gas transport, while using as much off-the-shelf technology as possible, to keep costs competitive.

In the early 2000s, Canadian company SeaNG developed the Coselle system, a novel CNG carrier design that used coiled steel pipe cartridges to store compressed natural gas more efficiently. This approach received classification approval and demonstrated a potential alternative to traditional vertical pressure vessels, which had been previously limited by high costs and weight.[4]

Around the same time, major classification societies such as Det Norske Veritas (DNV) and the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) introduced formal certification rules for CNG carriers. These standards helped establish safety and design criteria that allowed CNG vessel projects to progress toward commercial viability, promoting broader acceptance within the maritime industry.[5]

Following these developments, new CNG carrier designs emerged, including EnerSea Transport’s VOTRANS system, which utilized horizontal pressure vessels to reduce structural stress and improve cargo handling efficiency. Additionally, modular designs like the GASVESSEL project explored composite cylinder technologies to enhance flexibility and lower operational costs.[6]

Uses

[edit]

Motor vehicles

[edit]
CNG pumps at a Brazilian fueling station

Worldwide, there were 14.8 million natural gas vehicles (NGVs) by 2011, with the largest numbers in Iran (4.07 million),[7] Pakistan (2.85 million), Argentina (2.07 million), Brazil (1.7 million) and India (1.1 million),[8] with the Asia-Pacific region leading with 5.7 million NGVs, followed by Latin America with almost four million vehicles.[9]

Several car and vehicle manufacturers, such as Fiat, Opel/General Motors, Peugeot, Volkswagen, Toyota, Honda, Maruti Suzuki, Hyundai, Tata Motors, and others, sell bi-fuel cars. In 1995, The Supreme Court of India decided that cars put into circulation after 1995 would have to run on unleaded fuel. At the beginning of 2005, 10,300 CNG busses and 20,000 CNG cars ran on Delhi’s roads.[10] In 2006 Fiat Siena Tetrafuel was introduced in the Brazilian market, equipped with a 1.4-litre FIRE engine that runs on E100, E25 (Standard Brazilian Gasoline), Ethanol, and CNG.

Any existing petrol vehicle can be converted to a dual-fuel petrol/CNG vehicle. Authorized shops can do the retrofitting, which involves installing a CNG cylinder, plumbing, a CNG injection system, and electronics. The cost of installing a CNG conversion kit[11] can often reach $8,000 on passenger cars and light trucks, and is usually reserved for vehicles that travel many miles each year. CNG costs about 50% less than petrol, and emits up to 90% fewer emissions than petrol.[12]

Locomotives

[edit]

CNG locomotives are operated by several railroads. The Napa Valley Wine Train in the US successfully retrofitted a diesel locomotive to run on compressed natural gas before 2002.[13] This converted locomotive was upgraded to utilize a computer-controlled fuel injection system in May 2008, and is now the Napa Valley Wine Train's primary locomotive.[14] Ferrocarril Central Andino in Peru, has run a CNG locomotive on a freight line since 2005.[15] CNG locomotives are usually diesel–electric locomotives that have been converted to use compressed natural gas generators instead of diesel generators to generate the electricity that drives the traction motors. Some CNG locomotives are able to selectively fire their cylinders only when there is a demand for power, which, theoretically, gives them a higher fuel-efficiency than conventional diesel engines. CNG is also cheaper than petrol or diesel fuel.[citation needed]

Natural gas transport

[edit]

CNG is used to transport natural gas by sea for intermediate distances, using CNG carrier ships, especially when the infrastructure for pipelines or LNG is not in place. At short distances, undersea pipelines are often more cost-effective, and for longer distances, LNG is often more cost-effective.

Advantages

[edit]
A CNG-powered bus being refueled in Madrid, Spain.
  • Natural gas vehicles have lower maintenance costs than other hydrocarbon-fuel-powered vehicles.
  • CNG fuel systems are sealed, preventing fuel losses from spills or evaporation.
  • Increased life of lubricating oils, as CNG does not contaminate and dilute the crankcase oil.
  • Being a gaseous fuel, CNG mixes easily and evenly in air.
  • CNG is less likely to ignite on hot surfaces, since it has a high auto-ignition temperature (540 °C), and a narrow range (5–15 percent) of flammability.[16]
  • CNG-powered vehicles are considered to be safer than petrol-powered vehicles.[17][18][19]
  • Less pollution and more efficiency:
    • CNG emits significantly less pollution directly than petrol or oil when combusted (e.g., unburned hydrocarbons (UHC), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur oxides (SOx) and PM (particulate matter)). For example, an engine running on petrol for 100 km produces 22 kilograms of CO2, while covering the same distance on CNG emits only 16.3 kilograms of CO2.[20][better source needed]
    • The lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions for CNG compressed from California's pipeline natural gas is given a value of 67.70 grams of CO2-equivalent per megajoule (gCO2e/MJ) by CARB (the California Air Resources Board), approximately 28 percent lower than the average petrol fuel in that market (95.86 gCO2e/MJ).
    • CNG produced from landfill biogas was found by CARB to have the lowest greenhouse gas emissions of any fuel analyzed, with a value of 11.26 gCO2e/MJ (more than 88 percent lower than conventional petrol) in the low-carbon fuel standard that went into effect on January 12, 2010.[21]
    • Due to lower carbon dioxide emissions, switching to CNG can help mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.[16] However, natural gas leaks (both in the direct use and in the production and delivery of the fuel) represent an increase in greenhouse gas emissions. The ability of CNG to reduce greenhouse gas emissions over the entire fuel lifecycle will depend on the source of the natural gas and the fuel it is replacing.

Drawbacks

[edit]

Compressed natural gas vehicles require a greater amount of space for fuel storage than conventional petrol-powered vehicles. Since it is a compressed gas, rather than a liquid like petrol, CNG takes up more space for each GGE (petrol gallon equivalent). However, the cylinders used to store the CNG take up space in the trunk of a car or bed of a pickup truck that has been modified to additionally run on CNG. This problem is solved in factory-built CNG vehicles that install the cylinders under the body of the vehicle, leaving the trunk free, e.g., Fiat Multipla, New Fiat Panda, Volkswagen Touran Ecofuel, Volkswagen Caddy Ecofuel, Chevy Taxi, which sold in countries such as Peru. Another option is installation on roof (typical on buses), but this could require structural modifications. In 2014, a test (by the Danish Technological Institute) of Euro6 heavy vehicles on CNG and diesel showed that CNG had higher fuel consumption, the same noise and production of CO2 and particulates, but NOX emission was lower.[22]

Leakage of unburned methane as natural gas is a significant issue because methane, the primary component of natural gas, is a powerful, short-lived greenhouse gas. It is more than 100 times more potent at trapping energy than carbon dioxide (CO2), the principal contributor to man-made climate change.

Comparison with other natural gas fuels

[edit]

Compressed natural gas is often confused with LNG (liquefied natural gas). Both are stored forms of natural gas. The main difference is that CNG is stored at ambient temperature and high pressure, while LNG is stored at low temperature and nearly ambient pressure. In their respective storage conditions, LNG is a liquid and CNG is a supercritical fluid. CNG has a lower cost of production and storage compared to LNG as it does not require an expensive cooling process and cryogenic tanks. However, CNG requires a much larger volume to store the energy equivalent of petrol and the use of very high pressures (3000 to 4000 psi, or 205 to 275 bar). As a consequence of this, LNG is often used for transporting natural gas over large distances, in ships, trains or pipelines, where the gas is converted into CNG before distribution to the end user.

Natural gas is being experimentally stored at lower pressure in a form known as an ANG (adsorbed natural gas) cylinder, where it is adsorbed at 35 bar (500 psi, the pressure of gas in natural gas pipelines) in various sponge-like materials, such as carbon[23] and MOFs (metal-organic frameworks).[24] The fuel is stored at similar or greater energy density than CNG. This means that vehicles can be refueled from the natural gas network without extra gas compression, the fuel cylinders can be slimmed down and made of lighter, weaker materials.

It is possible to mix the ANG and CNG technology to reach an increased capacity of natural gas storage. In this process known as high pressure ANG, a high pressure CNG tank is filled by absorbers such as activated carbon (which is an adsorbent with high surface area) and stores natural gas by both CNG and ANG mechanisms.[25]

Compressed natural gas is sometimes mixed with hydrogen (HCNG), which increases the H/C ratio (hydrogen/carbon ratio) of the fuel and gives it a flame speed up to eight times higher than CNG.[26]

Codes and standards

[edit]

The lack of harmonized codes and standards across international jurisdictions is an additional barrier to NGV market penetration.[27] The International Organization for Standardization has an active technical committee working on a standard for natural gas fuelling stations for vehicles.[28]

Despite the lack of harmonized international codes, natural gas vehicles have an excellent global safety record. Existing international standards include ISO 14469-2:2007 which applies to CNG vehicle nozzles and receptacle[29] and ISO 15500-9:2012 specifies tests and requirements for the pressure regulator.[30]

The National Fire Protection Association's NFPA 52 code covers natural gas vehicle safety standards in the United States.

Worldwide adoption

[edit]
Top ten countries
with the largest NGV vehicle fleets – 2013[31][32]

(millions)
Rank Country Registered
fleet
Rank Country Registered
fleet
1 Iran 3.50 6 Italy 0.82
2 Pakistan 2.79 7 Colombia 0.46
3 Argentina 2.28 8 Uzbekistan 0.45
4 Brazil 1.75 9 Thailand 0.42
5 China 1.58 10 Indonesia 0.38
World Total = 18.09 million NGV vehicles

Iran, Pakistan, Argentina, Brazil and China have the highest number of CNG run vehicles in the world.[8]

Natural gas vehicles are increasingly used in Iran, Pakistan,[33] the Asia-Pacific region, the Indian capital of Delhi, and other large cities such as Ahmedabad, Mumbai, Pune, and Kolkata, as well as cities such as Lucknow, Kanpur, Varanasi, and others.

Its use is also increasing in South America, Europe, and North America, because of rising petrol prices.[9]

Africa

[edit]

Egypt is amongst the top 10 countries in CNG adoption, with 128,754 CNG vehicles and 124 CNG fueling stations. Egypt was also the first nation in Africa and the Middle East to open a public CNG fueling station in January 1996.[34]

The vast majority (780,000) have been produced as dual fuel-vehicles by the auto manufacturer in the last two years, and the remainder have been converted utilizing after market conversion kits in workshops. There are 750 active refueling stations country wide with an additional 660 refueling stations under construction and expected to come on stream. Currently the major problem facing the industry as a whole is the building of refueling stations that is lagging behind dual fuel vehicle production, forcing many to use petrol instead.

Nigeria CNG started with a pilot project in Benin City Edo State in 2010 by NIPCO Gas Limited. NIPCO Gas Limited is a 100% subsidiary of NIPCO PLC. As of June 2020, seven CNG stations have been built in Benin City Edo State, with about 7,500 cars running on CNG in Benin City Edo state. In Benin City Edo state, major companies such as Coca-Cola, 7up, Yongxing Steel are using CNG to power their fork-lifts/trucks while Edo City Transport Ltd (ECTS) is also running some of its buses on CNG. Kwale, Nigeria CNG stations were inaugurated by Mr. Abhishek Sharma, the head of marketing (Natural Gas) from NIPCO Gas Limited in 2019.

Asia

[edit]
A CNG powered Hino bus, operated by BMTA in Thailand.

China

[edit]
A CNG powered bus in Beijing. CNG buses in Beijing were introduced in late 1998.

In China, companies such as Sino-Energy are active in expanding the footprint of CNG filling stations in medium-size cities across the interior of the country, where at least two natural gas pipelines are operational.[citation needed]







Vietnam

[edit]

In Vietnam, the compressed natural gas (CNG) market is developing, driven by the demand for cleaner energy and domestic natural gas supply. Companies such as PV GAS CNG (a subsidiary of Vietnam Oil and Gas Group), Gas South, and CNG Vietnam are key suppliers, building transportation and distribution infrastructure for CNG to serve industrial and transportation sectors.

CNG station in Vietnam (CNG PRU system) by Phuc Sang Minh Gas

Additionally, **Phuc Sang Minh Gas (JPS Gas)**, with its website at [1](https://jpsgas.com.vn/), is also an experienced player in the gas supply industry in Vietnam, including compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and liquefied natural gas (LNG). The company has been operating since 2006 and contributes to the growth of the domestic gas market. Their turnkey solutions have made them the number one provider of comprehensive LPG, CNG, and LNG solutions in Vietnam.

Malaysia

[edit]

In Malaysia, the use of CNG was originally introduced for taxicabs and airport limousines during the late 1990s, when new taxis were launched with CNG engines while taxicab operators were encouraged to send in existing taxis for full engine conversions. The practice of using CNG remained largely confined to taxicabs predominately in the Klang Valley and Penang due to a lack of interest. No incentives were offered for those besides taxicab owners to use CNG engines, while government subsidies on petrol and diesel made conventional road vehicles cheaper to use in the eyes of the consumers. Petronas, Malaysia's state-owned oil company, also monopolises the provision of CNG to road users. As of July 2008, Petronas only operates about 150 CNG refueling stations, most of which are concentrated in the Klang Valley. At the same time, another 50 were expected by the end of 2008.[35]

As fuel subsidies were gradually removed in Malaysia starting June 5, 2008, the subsequent 41 percent price hike on petrol and diesel fuel led to a 500 percent increase in the number of new CNG cylinders installed.[36][37] National car maker Proton considered fitting its Waja, Saga and Persona models with CNG kits from Prins Autogassystemen by the end of 2008,[38] while a local distributor of locally assembled Hyundai cars offers new models with CNG kits.[39] Conversion centres, which also benefited from the rush for lower running costs, also perform partial conversions to existing road vehicles, allowing them to run on both petrol or diesel and CNG with a cost varying between RM3,500 to RM5,000 for passenger cars.[36][40]

Myanmar

[edit]

The Ministry of Transport of Myanmar passed a law in 2005 which required that all public transport vehicles – buses, trucks and taxis, be converted to run on CNG. The Government permitted several private companies to handle the conversion of existing diesel and petrol cars, and also to begin importing CNG variants of buses and taxis. Accidents and rumours of accidents, partly fueled by Myanmar's position in local hydrocarbon politics,[41] has discouraged citizens from using CNG vehicles, although now almost every taxi and public bus in Yangon, Myanmar's largest city, run on CNG. CNG stations have been set up around Yangon and other cities, but electricity shortages mean that vehicles may have to queue up for hours to fill their gas containers.[42] The Burmese opposition movements are against the conversion to CNG, as they accuse the companies of being proxies of the junta, and also their desire that the petrodollars earned by the regime should go towards the defense sector rather than towards improving the infrastructure or welfare of the people.

India

[edit]

In India, there are over 4500 CNG Stations all over the country now as compared to 2014 when the country only had about 900 CNG Stations. The government is aiming to increase the use of CNG powered vehicles by setting up more CNG stations in the country, the aim is to increase the current number to 8000 CNG Stations in the next two years.[43][44]

As of December 2022, the state of Gujarat has the highest number of CNG Pumps in the country followed by Uttar Pradesh being the second highest and with Maharashtra falling little behind the above regions.[45]

Pakistan

[edit]

In Pakistan, the Karachi government under the order of the Supreme Court in 2004 made it mandatory for all city buses and auto rickshaws to run on CNG with the intention of reducing air pollution.

In 2012, the federal government announced plans to gradually phase out CNG over a period of approximately three years given natural gas shortages which have been negatively affecting the manufacturing sector.[46] Aside from limiting electricity generation capacity, gas shortages in Pakistan have also raised the costs of business for key industries including the fertilizer, cement and textile sectors.[47]

Singapore

[edit]
A retired CNG powered Volvo B10BLE bus, operated by SBS Transit in Singapore.

In Singapore, CNG was once used by public transport vehicles like buses and taxis, as well as goods vehicles until 2018. During its heyday in 2008 onwards, more owners of private cars had sought interest in converting their petrol-driven vehicles to also run on CNG – due to rising petrol prices. The initial cost of converting a regular vehicle to dual fuel at the German conversion workshop of C. Melchers, for example, is around S$3,800; with the promise of real cost-savings that dual-fuel vehicles bring over the long term.

Singapore currently has five operating filling stations for natural gas. Sembcorp Gas Pte Ltd. runs the station on Jurong Island and, jointly with Singapore Petroleum Company, the filling station at Jalan Buroh. Both these stations are in the western part of the country. Another station on the mainland is in Mandai Link to the north and is operated by SMART Energy. SMART also own a second station on Serangoon North Ave 5 which was set up end of March 2009; The fifth and largest station in the world, located in Toh Tuck, was opened by the UNION Group in September 2009. This station is recognized by the Guniness World Records as being the largest in the world with 46 refuelling hoses. The Union Group, which operates 1000 CNG Toyota Wish taxis then planned to introduce another three daughter stations and increase the CNG taxi fleet to 8000 units.

As a key incentive for using this eco-friendly fuel Singapore has a green vehicle rebate for users of CNG technology. First introduced in January 2001, the GVR grants a 40 percent discount on the OMV (open market value) cost of newly registered green passenger vehicles. This initiative will end at the end of 2012 as the government believes the 'critical mass' of CNG vehicles would then have been built up.

Due to reliability issues and lower ranges that CNG provided (as cited by users’ feedback), refueling stations mostly concentrated in the western end of Singapore, the rising demand of greener solutions like hybrid technologies, led to its demise where both public buses and the last CNG taxis were on its way to being scrapped in 2018.[48]

Europe

[edit]
CNG powered bus in Italy

In Italy, there are more than 1173 CNG stations.[49] The use of methane for vehicles, started in the 1930s and has continued off and on until today. Since 2008 there have been a large market expansion for natural gas vehicles (CNG and LPG) caused by the rise of petrol prices and by the need to reduce air pollution emissions.[50] Before 1995 the only way to have a CNG-powered car was by having it retrofitted with an after-market kit. A large producer was Landi Renzo, Tartarini Auto, Prins Autogassystemen, OMVL, BiGAs,... and AeB for electronic parts used by the most part of kit producer. Landi Renzo and Tartarini selling vehicles in Asia and South America. After 1995 bi-fuel cars (petrol/CNG) became available from several major manufacturers. Currently Fiat, Opel, Volkswagen, Citroën, Renault, Volvo and Mercedes sell various car models and small trucks that are petrol/CNG powered. Usually CNG parts used by major car manufacturers are actually produced by automotive aftermarket kit manufacturers, e.g. Fiat use Tartarini Auto components, Volkswagen use Teleflex GFI[51] and Landi Renzo components.

In Belgium, CNG is a very new fuel. At the beginning of 2014 there were only 17 refuelling stations, all of them in Flanders, but the number is now increasing rapidly. At the beginning of 2015 there were 29 refueling stations in Belgium, all of them in Flanders.[citation needed] As of January 2017, there are 76 active refueling stations in Belgium, most of them being in Flanders since only 7 of them are in Wallonia or Brussels.[52] As a fuel and compared to petrol, CNG has an advantageous fiscal treatment with lower excises duties (although VAT is always paid). Since CNG, as a car fuel, is not totally exempted of excise duties, CNG cars do not pay a prime road tax to partially compensate the State for the loss of revenue. Instead LPG cars pay a prime road tax in Belgium, because LPG is totally exempted from excise duties. Since CNG is not totally exempted of excise duties, in Belgium it is allowed to connect a car to the home network of natural gas and to refuel the car from home. The purchase of CNG cars is not subsidised by the government, but by the Belgian producers and distributors of natural gas. Fiat and Volkswagen sell factory-equipped CNG-cars in Belgium. At the end of 2018 there were 11,188 vehicles running with CNG in Belgium.[53]

CNG powered bus in Germany

In Germany, CNG-generated vehicles are expected to increase to two million units of motor-transport by 2020. The cost for CNG fuel is between 1/3 and 1/2 compared to other fossil fuels in Europe.[citation needed] In 2016 there are around 900 CNG stations in Germany[54] and major German car manufacturers like Volkswagen, Mercedes, Opel, Audi offer CNG engines on most of their models. Augsburg is one of the few cities that only run CNG operated public buses since 2011.[55]

In Turkey, Ankara municipality is increasingly using CNG buses, where numbers have reached 1090 by 2011.[56] Istanbul has started in 2014 with an order of 110 buses.[57] Konya also added 60 buses to its fleet the same year.[58][59]

In Portugal, there are 9 CNG refueling stations as of September 25, 2017.[60]

In Hungary, there are four public CNG refueling stations in the cities Budapest, Szeged, Pécs and Győr. The public transportation company of Szeged, Szolnok and some districts in Budapest runs buses mainly on CNG.[61]

In Bulgaria, there are 96 CNG refueling stations as of July 2011. One can be found in most of Bulgaria's big towns.[62] In the capital Sofia there are 22 CNG stations making it possibly the city with the most publicly available CNG stations in Europe. There are also quite a few in Plovdiv, Ruse, Stara Zagora and Veliko Tarnovo as well as in the towns on the Black Sea – Varna, Burgas, Nesebar and Kavarna. CNG vehicles are becoming more and more popular in the country. The fuel is mostly used by taxi drivers because of its much lower price compared to petrol. Currently (as of July, 2015) the city of Sofia is rapidly renewing its public transport fleet with MAN Lion's City buses running on CNG.[63] Also, many companies switch to CNG cargo vans and even heavy trucks for their daily operations within city limits.

In North Macedonia, there is one CNG station located in the capital Skopje, but it is not for public use. Only twenty buses of the local Public Transport Company have been fitted to use a mixture of diesel and CNG. The first commercial CNG station in Skopje is in the advanced stage of development and was expected to start operation in July 2011.[citation needed]

In Serbia, there are about 20 public CNG refuelling stations as of August 2019. Four in the capital Belgrade, and the rest in the towns of Subotica (1), Novi Sad (1), Zrenjanin (1), Pancevo (2), Kruševac (1), Kragujevac (1), Cacak (2), and so on. Detailed list is currently available on CNGEurope Web site. [citation needed]

In Slovenia, there are four public CNG refuelling stations as of December 2018. Two in the capital Ljubljana, and one each in Maribor and Jesenice. Additionally, at least 14 new refuelling stations are planned in all city municipalities by the end of 2020.[64] Ljubljana Passenger Transport operates 66 CNG fuelled city buses, as of May 2016.[65][66] Its Maribor counterpart, Marprom has 19 CNG city buses in their fleet, as of October 2018.[67][68]

In Croatia, there are two public CNG refuelling stations situated close to the center of Zagreb and in Rijeka.[69] At least 60 CNG buses are in use as a form of a public transport (Zagreb public transport services).

In Estonia, there are 11 public CNG refuelling stations – four in the country's capital Tallinn, and one each in Tartu, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Jõhvi, and Narva.[70] From 2011 on, Tartu has five Scania-manufactured CNG buses operating its inner-city routes.[71]

CNG powered bus in Sweden

In Sweden, there are currently 90 CNG filling stations available to the public (as compared to about 10 LPG filling stations), primarily located in the southern and western parts of the country as well the Mälardalen region[72] Another 70–80 CNG filling stations are under construction or in a late stage of planning (completions 2009–2010). Several of the planned filling stations are located in the northern parts of the country, which will greatly improve the infrastructure for CNG car users.[73] There are approx. 14,500 CNG vehicles in Sweden (2007), of which approx. 13,500 are passenger cars and the remainder includes buses and trucks.[74] In Stockholm, the public transportation company SL currently operates 50 CNG buses but have a capacity to operate 500.[75] The Swedish government recently prolonged its subsidies for the development of CNG filling stations, from 2009 to 2012–31 to 2010-12-31.[76]

In Spain, CNG is a very new fuel and the refueling network is being developed. In Madrid, the EMT, uses 1915 buses running with CNG.[77] At the beginning of 2015 there were 35 CNG refueling stations in Spain. Several car brands sell brand-new cars running with CNG, including Fiat, Volkswagen, Seat and Skoda among others.[citation needed]

As of 2013, there are 47 public CNG filling stations in the Czech Republic, mainly in the big cities.[78] Local bus manufacturers SOR Libchavy and Tedom produce CNG versions of their vehicles, with roof-mounted cylinders.

Middle East

[edit]

Iran

[edit]

Iran has one of the largest fleets of CNG vehicles and CNG distribution networks in the world. There are 2335 CNG fueling stations, with a total of 13,534 CNG nozzles.[79] The number of CNG burning vehicles in Iran exceeds 3.5 million. CNG consumption by Iran's transportation sector is around 20 million cubic meters per day.[80]

North America

[edit]
The Honda Civic GX is factory-built to run on CNG and it is available in several U.S. regional markets.
Buses powered with CNG are common in the United States such as the New Flyer Industries C40LF bus in Washington, D.C. shown here.

Canada

[edit]

Natural gas has been used as a motor fuel in Canada for over 20 years.[81] With assistance from federal and provincial research programs, demonstration projects and NGV market deployment programs during the 1980s and 1990s, the population of light-duty NGVs grew to over 35,000 by the early 1990s. This assistance resulted in a significant adoption of natural gas transit buses as well.[82]

The NGV market started to decline after 1995, eventually reaching today's vehicle population of about 12,000.[82]

This figure includes 150 urban transit buses, 45 school buses, 9,450 light-duty cars and trucks, and 2,400 forklifts and ice-resurfacers. The total fuel use in all NGV markets in Canada was 1.9 PJs (petajoules) in 2007 (or 54.6 million liters of petrol liters equivalent), down from 2.6 PJs in 1997. Public CNG refueling stations have declined in quantity from 134 in 1997 to 72 today. There are 22 in British Columbia, 12 in Alberta, 10 in Saskatchewan, 27 in Ontario and two in Québec. There are only 12 private fleet stations.[27]

Canadian industry has developed CNG-fueled truck and bus engines, CNG-fueled transit buses, and light trucks and taxis.

Fuelmaker Corporation of Toronto, the Honda-owned manufacturer of CNG auto refueling units, was forced into bankruptcy by parent Honda USA for an unspecified reason in 2009.[83] The various assets of Fuelmaker were subsequently acquired by Fuel Systems Corporation of Santa Ana, California.

United States

[edit]
This MARTA bus is a New Flyer XN40 which runs on CNG. 70% of MARTA's bus fleet is CNG.
CNG Fueling Station in Columbus, Ohio

Similar to Canada, the United States has implemented various NGV initiatives and programs since 1980, but has had limited success in sustaining the market. There were 105,000 NGVs in operation in 2000; this figure peaked at 121,000 in 2004, and decreased to 110,000 in 2009.[82]

In the United States, federal tax credits are available for buying a new CNG vehicle. Use of CNG varies from state to state; only 34 states have at least one CNG fueling site.[84]

In Texas, Railroad Commissioner David Porter launched his Texas Natural Gas Initiative in October 2013 to encourage the adoption of natural gas fuel in the transportation and exploration and production sectors.[85] As of 2015 Texas is rapidly becoming a leader in natural gas infrastructure in the US with 137 natural gas fueling stations (private and public).[86] Nine months into FY2015 Commissioner Porter reports Texas CNG, LNG Sales Show 78 Percent Increase Over FY 2014 year to date.[87] Per Commissioner Porter[87] in June 2015: "Natural gas vehicles are becoming mainstream faster than expected. These collections are nearly double the amount collected last year at this time. At 15 cents per gallon equivalent, $3,033,600 of motor fuel tax equates to the sale of 20,224,000 gallon equivalents of natural gas." The $3 million in Texas natural gas tax receipts is for both CNG and LNG for FY2015 through the May 2015. The Texas fiscal year starts Sept 1 so 9 months tax collections are represented.

In Athens, Ala., the city and its Gas Department installed a public CNG station on the Interstate 65 Corridor, making it the only public CNG station between Birmingham and Nashville as of February 2014. The city's larger fleet vehicles such as garbage trucks also use this public station for fueling. The city also has two slow-fill non-public CNG stations for its fleet. Athens has added CNG/petrol Tahoes for police and fire, a CNG Honda Civic, CNG Heil garbage trucks, and CNG/petrol Dodge pickup trucks to its fleet.

In California, CNG is used extensively in local city and county fleets, as well as public transportation (city/school buses). There are 90 public fueling stations in southern California alone, and travel from San Diego so the Bay Area to Las Vegas and Utah is routine with the advent of online station maps such as www.cngprices.com. Compressed natural gas is typically available for 30-60 percent less than the cost of petrol in much of California.

Gwinnett County Transit Orion VII CNG 029 on the 35 Bus on Peachtree Corners.

The 28 buses running the Gwinnett County Transit local routes run on 100 percent CNG. Additionally, about half of the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority express fleet, which runs and refuels out of the Gwinnett County Transit facility, uses CNG.[88]

The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority was running 360 CNG buses as early as in 2007, and is the largest user in the state.[89]

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) of New York City currently has over 900 buses powered by compressed natural gas, with CNG bus depots located in Brooklyn, The Bronx, and Queens.

The Nassau Inter-County Express (or NICE Bus, formerly New York MTA Long Island Bus) runs a 100% Orion CNG-fueled bus fleet for fixed-route service, consisting of 360 buses for service in Nassau County, parts of Queens, New York, and the western sections of Suffolk County.

The City of Harrisburg, Arkansas has switched some of the city's vehicles to compressed natural gas in an effort to save money on fuel costs. Trucks used by the city's street and water, sewer, and gas departments have been converted from petrol to CNG.[90]

Personal use of CNG is currently a small niche market, though with current tax incentives and a growing number of public fueling stations available, it is experiencing unprecedented growth. The state of Utah offers a subsidised statewide network of CNG filling stations at a rate of $1.57/gge,[91] while petrol is above $4.00/gal.

Elsewhere in the nation, retail prices average around $2.50/gge, with home refueling units compressing gas from residential gas lines for under $1/gge. Other than aftermarket conversions, and government used vehicle auctions, the only currently[when?] produced CNG vehicle in the United States is the Honda Civic GX sedan, which is made in limited numbers and available only in states with retail fueling outlets.

An initiative, known as Pickens Plan, calls for the expansion of the use of CNG as a standard fuel for heavy vehicles has been recently started by oilman and entrepreneur T. Boone Pickens. California voters defeated Proposition 10 in the 2008 General Election by a significant (59.8 percent to 40.2 percent) margin. Proposition 10 was a $5 billion bond measure that, among other things, would have given rebates to state residents that purchase CNG vehicles.

On February 21, 2013, T. Boone Pickens and New York Mayor, Michael Bloomberg unveiled a CNG powered mobile pizzeria. The company, Neapolitan Express uses alternative energy to run the truck as well as 100 percent recycled and compostable materials for their carryout boxes.[92]

Congress has encouraged conversion of cars to CNG with a tax credits of up to 50 percent of the auto conversion cost and the CNG home filling station cost. However, while CNG is much cleaner fuel, the conversion requires a type certificate from the EPA. Meeting the requirements of a type certificate can cost up to $50,000. Other non-EPA approved kits are available. A complete and safe aftermarket conversion using a non-EPA approved kit can be achieved for as little as $400 without the cylinder.[93]

Deployments
[edit]

AT&T ordered 1,200 CNG-powered cargo vans from General Motors in 2012. It is the largest-ever order of CNG vehicles from General Motors to date.[94] AT&T has announced its intention to invest up to $565 million to deploy approximately 15,000 alternative fuel vehicles over a 10-year period through 2018, will use the vans to provide and maintain communications, high-speed Internet and television services for AT&T customers.[95]

South America

[edit]
CNG station in Rosario, Argentina.

CNG vehicles are commonly used in South America, where these vehicles are mainly used as taxicabs in main cities of Argentina and Brazil.[96] Normally, standard petrol vehicles are retrofitted in specialized shops, which involve installing the gas cylinder in the trunk and the CNG injection system and electronics. Argentina and Brazil are the two countries with the largest fleets of CNG vehicles,[96] with a combined total fleet of more than 3.4 million vehicles by 2009.[9] Conversion has been facilitated by a substantial price differential with liquid fuels, locally produced conversion equipment and a growing CNG-delivery infrastructure.

As of 2009 Argentina had 1,807,186 NGV's with 1,851 refueling stations across the nation,[9] or 15 percent of all vehicles;[96] and Brazil had 1,632,101 vehicles and 1,704 refueling stations,[9] with a higher concentration in the cities of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo.[96][97]

Colombia had an NGV fleet of 300,000 vehicles, and 460 refueling stations, as of 2009.[9] Bolivia has increased its fleet from 10,000 in 2003 to 121,908 units in 2009, with 128 refueling stations.[9] Peru had 81,024 NGVs and 94 fueling stations as 2009,[9] but that number is expected to skyrocket as Peru sits on South America's largest gas reserves.[96] In Peru several factory-built NGVs have the cylinders installed under the body of the vehicle, leaving the trunk free. Among the models built with this feature are the Fiat Multipla, the new Fiat Panda, the Volkswagen Touran Ecofuel, the Volkswagen Caddy Ecofuel and the Chevy Taxi. Other countries with significant NGV fleets are Venezuela (15,000) and Chile (8,064) as of 2009.[9]

Oceania

[edit]

During the 1970s and 1980s, CNG was commonly used in New Zealand in the wake of the oil crises, but fell into decline after petrol prices receded. At the peak of natural gas use, 10 percent of New Zealand's cars were converted, around 110,000 vehicles.[98]

A Custom Coaches bodied Mercedes-Benz O405NH running on CNG, operated by Sydney Buses in Australia
Transperth Mercedes-Benz OC500LE running on CNG

For a period of time, Brisbane Transport in Queensland, Australia adopted a policy of purchasing only CNG buses. Brisbane Transport has 215 Scania L94UB and 324 MAN 18.310 models as well as 30 MAN NG 313 articulated CNG buses. The State Transit Authority purchased 100 Scania L113CRB, 283 Mercedes-Benz O405NH and 254 Euro 5-compliant Mercedes-Benz OC500LE buses.[99]

In the 1990s, Benders Busways of Geelong, Victoria trialled CNG buses for the Energy Research and Development Corporation.[100]

Martin Ferguson, Ollie Clark and Noel Childs featured on The 7:30 Report raised the issue of CNG as an overlooked transport fuel option in Australia, highlighting the large volumes of LNG currently being exported from the North West Shelf in light of the cost of importing crude oil to Australia.[101]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Compressed natural gas (CNG) is , chiefly composed of (CH₄), that is compressed to high pressures typically ranging from 3,000 to 3,600 pounds per (psi), reducing its volume to less than 1% of the space it occupies at standard . Stored in specialized high-pressure cylinders or tanks onboard vehicles, CNG serves primarily as an for internal engines, where it is decompressed and mixed with air for . As a vehicular fuel, CNG produces fewer emissions of nitrogen oxides, , and particulate matter compared to or diesel equivalents, making it suitable for fleet applications like buses and trucks in urban environments. Its domestic abundance in countries with substantial reserves, coupled with relatively low costs and an established distribution network, has driven adoption, powering over 175,000 vehicles in the United States and approximately 23 million globally. Notable expansions occur in nations such as , and , where policy incentives and resource availability have promoted CNG infrastructure for and private vehicles to mitigate and import dependency. However, limitations including lower volumetric —necessitating larger storage volumes for comparable range—and sparse refueling stations pose barriers to widespread use, particularly for light-duty consumer vehicles. Safety records indicate CNG's non-toxicity and lighter-than-air dispersion reduce spill risks relative to fuels, though high-pressure systems require rigorous .

Fundamentals

Definition and Composition

Compressed natural gas (CNG) is , predominantly (CH4), that has been compressed to high pressures, typically ranging from 200 to 250 bar (2,900 to 3,600 psi), reducing its volume to approximately 1% of that occupied at standard atmospheric conditions of 1 bar and 15°C. This form enables efficient storage and transport in rigid containers, distinguishing it from low-pressure pipeline , which requires on-site compression for end-use applications like vehicular fueling. The molecular composition of CNG mirrors processed , with comprising 85-95% by volume, supplemented by 2-10% (C2H6), trace amounts of (C3H8) and (C4H10), and inert gases such as . Unlike raw wellhead , which may contain higher levels of condensable , (CO2 up to several percent), (H2S), and , CNG for applications undergoes purification via processes like sweetening for H2S removal, to prevent hydrate formation, and hydrocarbon separation to achieve vehicle-grade quality. These steps ensure the gas meets performance thresholds for combustion efficiency and cylinder integrity, often targeting over 95% content to optimize energy yield and minimize emissions of non-methane . Vehicle-grade CNG must adhere to international standards for safe on-board storage, such as ISO 11439, which specifies design parameters assuming compatible dry gas compositions free of corrosive impurities exceeding defined limits (e.g., H2S below 20 mg/m³ and CO2 limited to avoid acidity). This purification elevates CNG's suitability as a cleaner-burning alternative to liquid fuels, as its high purity reduces precursors during compared to unrefined gas mixtures. Variations in source gas can influence final composition—for instance, biogas-derived CNG may require additional upgrading to match fossil-derived profiles—but commercial specifications prioritize consistency for engine reliability.

Physical and Chemical Properties

Compressed natural gas (CNG) is primarily composed of (CH₄), constituting 70–95% by volume depending on the source, with (C₂H₆) up to 10%, (C₃H₈) up to 3%, and trace amounts of higher hydrocarbons, (0–5%), (0–8%), and hydrogen sulfide. This composition renders CNG chemically stable and relatively inert at ambient conditions, though it reacts exothermically with oxygen during , producing and as primary products. Physically, CNG at (STP, 0 °C and 1 ) exhibits a low of 0.717–0.90 kg/m³, reflecting its gaseous state and high compressibility governed by the approximations (with real-gas deviations via Z ≈ 0.9–1.0 at typical pressures). The of its dominant component, , is -161.5 °C at 1 , ensuring it remains fully gaseous at ambient temperatures without . Compression to 200–250 bar at 20–25 °C reduces its to less than 1% (typically 0.4–0.5%) of the STP , increasing to 180–220 kg/m³ while maintaining a supercritical fluid-like behavior without phase change. CNG's ranges from 537–570 °C, requiring higher for spontaneous ignition compared to many conventional fuels. Its flammability limits in air are narrow, spanning 5–15% by volume, beyond which mixtures are either too lean or too rich to sustain . Naturally odorless and colorless, commercial CNG incorporates odorants such as mercaptans (e.g., ethyl mercaptan at ~1–10 ppmv) or to enable via human olfaction at concentrations below flammability thresholds. With a of 0.55–0.65 (lighter than air), CNG demonstrates high molecular (~2.2 × 10⁻⁵ m²/s for in air), facilitating rapid upward dispersion and dilution in ventilated environments, which limits pooling and persistent vapor cloud formation relative to denser liquid hydrocarbons.

Energy Density and Storage

Compressed natural gas (CNG) exhibits a lower volumetric than liquid , with approximately 9 MJ/ at standard storage pressures of around 250 bar (3,600 psi), compared to 32 MJ/ for . This disparity arises from the gaseous state of CNG even when compressed, requiring roughly 3.6-4 times the storage volume for equivalent compared to . One (GGE), defined as the energy content of 1 U.S. of (about 120 MJ), equates to 126.67 standard cubic feet of at . Gravimetrically, however, CNG offers comparable density to at 53.6 MJ/kg, highlighting its efficiency per unit but underscoring volumetric challenges for space-constrained applications like . CNG is stored in high-pressure cylinders, predominantly Type IV constructions featuring a liner overwrapped with carbon composites for reduced weight and resistance. These cylinders are rated for service pressures up to 3,600 psi and have a typical lifespan of 15-20 years, subject to periodic inspections every 3 years or 36,000 miles. The non-corrosive nature of minimizes internal degradation risks associated with metallic liners in other types, enhancing long-term safety. Filling processes generate significant heat due to adiabatic compression, potentially raising temperatures by 50-100°C, which can limit fill capacity if unmanaged. Standards require temperature-compensated dispensing to ensure settled pressure does not exceed 3,600 psi at 70°F (21°C), preventing overfilling and maintaining consistent delivery. This thermal trades minor complexity for operational reliability, balancing the fuel's advantages—such as lower flammability limits and no spill risks—against reduced range. Typical tanks, holding 8-15 GGE, yield 200-300 miles of range, constrained by tank and efficiency rather than gravimetric limits.

Production and Infrastructure

Compression Process

The production of compressed natural gas (CNG) from involves pretreatment followed by multi-stage mechanical compression to achieve storage pressures typically around 3,600 psi (25 MPa). gas first passes through to remove particulates, liquids, and contaminants, then undergoes to limit to less than 7 lb per million standard cubic feet (MMscf), preventing formation that could block lines or cylinders under high pressure. commonly employs glycol absorption units or dryers, ensuring the gas remains below -40°F (-40°C) at operating pressures. Compression occurs in 3 to 4 stages using reciprocating or centrifugal compressors, with intercooling between stages to dissipate heat and approximate isothermal conditions, thereby reducing the total work input compared to single-stage adiabatic compression. Each stage limits the pressure ratio to 4:1 to 5:1 to control discharge temperatures below 350°F (177°C) and avoid material degradation or excessive energy use. Reciprocating compressors predominate in CNG facilities due to their suitability for high-pressure ratios and variable flows, while centrifugal types suit higher-volume, steady-state operations. Modern compression systems incorporate aftercoolers post-final stage and prioritize via heat exchangers, with the overall process demanding 3-5% of the gas's higher heating value—far lower than LNG's energy due to avoiding phase change . For compressing methane to 220 bar from 1 bar using modern multi-stage CNG compressors, typical real-world electrical energy consumption is 0.25-0.45 kWh/kg (efficiency 70-85%, including losses), equivalent to 0.20-0.35 kWh per Nm³. Typical facility capacities range from 1,000 to 5,000 scfm, scalable via parallel units for larger . This staged approach minimizes thermodynamic losses, as intercooling lowers subsequent stage inlet temperatures and volumes, enabling near-optimal pressure ratios per stage for minimal shaft work.

Distribution and Refueling Networks

Compressed natural gas distribution networks rely on refueling stations connected to existing natural gas pipelines, where on-site compressors elevate pipeline gas from typical distribution pressures of 20 to 60 psi to vehicle-ready levels of 3,000 to 3,600 psi. Station infrastructure includes priority panels, dryers to remove moisture, and buffer storage in cascades of high-pressure tubes that store gas at tiered pressures for sequential dispensing, optimizing fill efficiency and reducing compressor load. Refueling methods differ by application: time-fill stations, suited for fleet operations, gradually compress gas directly into vehicles over several hours, often overnight, which limits heat generation and allows for fuller tanks due to natural gas's expansion cooling. In contrast, fast-fill stations for public or transient use employ cascade systems to deliver fuel in 3 to 5 minutes by drawing from pre-compressed banks, though this can result in warmer, less dense fills requiring larger onboard storage for equivalent range. Combination stations integrate both approaches to serve diverse needs. As of 2024, the global network comprised approximately 40,000 CNG refueling stations, with over 70% concentrated in —led by , , and —owing to these nations' extensive reserves and vehicle conversion incentives that offset infrastructure demands. In comparison, hosted fewer than 1,500 public stations, highlighting regional disparities driven by varying pipeline access and market maturity. High upfront , typically $500,000 to $1 million per station for equipment, site preparation, and compression systems, represent a primary barrier to network expansion, even as operational efficiencies from low-cost domestic gas yield payback periods of 3 to 7 years for high-volume sites. These expenses, compounded by specialized safety requirements for high-pressure handling, limit scalability in regions without subsidized gas supplies or fleet commitments.

Historical Development

Early Innovations (19th-20th Century)

The initial development of gas-fueled internal combustion engines in the laid groundwork for later applications, though early prototypes primarily utilized manufactured rather than compressed derived from natural reservoirs. In 1860, Étienne Lenoir constructed the first commercially viable , a double-acting, spark-ignition design producing about 0.5 horsepower, which powered stationary equipment and rudimentary vehicles using illuminating gas mixtures. These engines operated without compression, achieving low efficiency of around 4%, but demonstrated the feasibility of gaseous fuels in designs. experimentation emerged later, with compressed variants tested in during the mid-19th century for storage, though vehicular use remained impractical until infrastructure advanced. By the , pioneered compressed (CNG) as a vehicular amid domestic oil scarcity and policies under Mussolini, initiating a national NGV program in the where abundant natural gas fields existed. and other manufacturers retrofitted taxis and trucks to run on CNG stored in high-pressure cylinders, achieving widespread deployment with over 10,000 vehicles by the decade's end; government subsidies and mandates prioritized CNG for public fleets to reduce imports. This marked the first systematic of CNG, leveraging networks for refueling, though wartime disruptions curtailed expansion. Post-World War II, efforts shifted toward energy diversification in resource-rich nations, with promoting utilization in the 1950s to bolster self-sufficiency amid Peronist industrialization. State-owned expanded gas pipelines and explored vehicular conversions, installing CNG systems in buses and trucks to offset imported oil dependence, though adoption remained limited to urban fleets due to rudimentary compression technology. In the United States, mid-century experiments by firms like tested CNG in passenger cars and delivery vehicles during the 1950s-1960s, but cheap prices and inadequate refueling halted commercialization; a notable 1960s trial involved a CNG-powered ship by Columbia Gas, highlighting storage challenges like cylinder weight. The oil crises catalyzed renewed prototyping, as embargoes quadrupled prices and exposed vulnerabilities, prompting governments and automakers to revisit CNG for its domestic abundance in regions like . Early prototypes included dedicated CNG engines with modified carburetors for methane's higher , tested in fleets; Japan's research in the late foreshadowed the 1990s NGV, a bi-fuel model emphasizing reduced emissions via technology. These innovations faced scalability issues, including range limitations from low —about 25% less than —yet validated CNG's viability under scarcity.

Post-2000 Expansion and Technological Advances

The shale gas revolution in the United States, accelerated by hydraulic fracturing advancements from 2008 onward, dramatically reduced natural gas prices, falling from peaks above $12 per million British thermal units in 2008 to under $3 by 2009, facilitating greater adoption of compressed natural gas (CNG) in vehicle fleets. This cost advantage enabled conversions in sectors like transit and trucking, where low fuel prices improved economic viability over diesel, contributing to sustained U.S. NGV deployments exceeding 175,000 vehicles by the 2020s. Market dynamics, rather than mandates, drove this scalability as abundant domestic supply undercut imported fuels. Globally, the NGV fleet expanded from approximately 1 million vehicles in to over 28 million by , reflecting improvements and resource availability rather than uniform policy incentives. Post- innovations in storage and engines enhanced practicality; Type 4 composite-overwrapped tanks, utilizing full liners with carbon reinforcements, achieved up to 40% weight reductions compared to earlier metal-lined designs, improving range and without sacrificing pressure ratings up to 3600 psi. Bi-fuel systems, allowing seamless electronic switching between CNG and via integrated engine controls, proliferated in the and , mitigating by enabling fallback to liquid fuels during refueling gaps. In , targeted subsidies in the , including up to INR 100,000 per under national policies, spurred CNG uptake, growing the fleet from under 3 million in 2015 to over 5 million by 2019 amid urban air quality mandates. This contrasted with the , where stringent green mandates prioritizing battery electric vehicles—such as the package aiming for 55% emissions cuts by 2030 and a 2035 sales ban—stifled NGV expansion, limiting adoption to niche markets despite . Empirical data underscores market responsiveness: India's growth aligned with subsidized expansion, while EU policies diverted investment toward , yielding slower CNG penetration.

Applications

Transportation Sector

Compressed natural gas (CNG) fuels a diverse range of vehicles in the transportation sector, including passenger cars, buses, refuse trucks, and locomotives, typically via dedicated or bi-fuel spark-ignition engines adapted for gaseous fuel delivery. As of 2024, the global fleet of natural gas vehicles (NGVs) stands at approximately 28.4 million units, with Asia-Pacific accounting for over 55% of the market and light-duty vehicles comprising the majority in the region due to widespread adoption in countries like Iran, Pakistan, and India for taxis and private cars. CNG engines in light-duty applications generally experience a power output reduction of 10-30% relative to gasoline counterparts, attributable to the fuel's lower and the need for adjusted air-fuel mixtures, though this is often mitigated by higher compression ratios enhancing . Retrofitting existing vehicles to bi-fuel CNG systems involves substantial upfront costs, ranging from $2,000 to $5,000 for basic kits in some markets, though comprehensive installations in heavier vehicles can exceed $10,000 depending on cylinder capacity and . In heavy-duty trucking, CNG-powered 18-wheelers and similar rigs deliver fuel economies equivalent to 7-9 miles per (GGE), though real-world tests show penalties of 10-29% compared to diesel baselines due to storage and constraints. The leads in refuse truck adoption, with nearly 18,000 CNG units operational by 2021, comprising about 60% of new refuse truck orders, as fixed urban routes facilitate predictable refueling and infrastructure alignment. India's rail sector exemplifies CNG integration in locomotives and diesel-electric multiple units (DEMUs), where 20% fuel substitution with CNG has been implemented since around 2021, reducing diesel consumption and while leveraging lower gaseous fuel costs. This approach supports fleet in high-utilization scenarios, though range limitations from cylinder storage necessitate proximity to compression stations.

Stationary and Industrial Uses

Compressed natural gas (CNG) serves stationary applications in power generation where connectivity is limited or intermittent, particularly for generators and peaking facilities. systems, such as those for data centers, rely on truck-delivered CNG to ensure continuous operation during grid outages, providing a flexible alternative to diesel with lower emissions and utilizing existing infrastructure for refueling. Peaking power plants employ CNG storage and on-site compression to meet short-term demand surges, enabling gas turbines to operate efficiently without sole dependence on supply; for example, configurations integrating CNG with turbines allow rapid startup and high ramp rates for grid stability. In industrial contexts, CNG supports heating and process needs in off-grid or remote sites via virtual pipeline delivery, transporting compressed gas by truck to locations lacking permanent . Sectors including textiles, ceramics, , and use CNG to fuel boilers, dryers, and furnaces, reducing reliance on imported fuels and enabling operations up to 500 km from compression sources. This approach proved valuable in regions with supply constraints, such as Pakistan's after 2010, where gas shortages prompted shifts to alternative delivery for captive heating and power amid load-shedding episodes affecting over 400 factories. Stationary CNG adoption remains limited, as direct access offers lower compression and handling costs for most fixed installations, confining CNG to niche roles like temporary or supplemental supply. Emerging initiatives blend (RNG) into CNG for industrial and power uses, aiming to cut lifecycle emissions through biogas-derived feedstocks, with European applications reaching 32% of RNG in power and heating by 2023.

Performance Advantages

Operational and Economic Benefits

Compressed natural gas (CNG) demonstrate enhanced operational reliability due to the fuel's gaseous state, which prevents vapor locking and ensures consistent performance across varying temperatures. CNG produces fewer particulates and residues than diesel, reducing wear, extending intervals between oil changes and tune-ups, and minimizing oil dilution issues common in diesel engines. In heavy-duty applications, CNG engines achieve and horsepower parity or slight advantages over comparable diesel counterparts, as evidenced by fleet tests showing higher peak ratings in CNG . Economically, CNG offers significant fuel cost reductions for high-utilization fleets, with average savings of approximately $0.61 per diesel gallon equivalent (DGE) compared to diesel as of early 2024. These differentials, stemming from the abundance of domestic supplies, enable payback periods of 2-4 years for high-mileage operations through lower per-mile expenses. From an perspective, CNG leverages domestically produced , particularly from formations, to power over 175,000 vehicles in the United States, thereby diminishing reliance on imported . This shift supports greater fuel supply stability, as production has surged due to hydraulic fracturing advancements since the early .

Environmental Profile

Compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles produce tailpipe (CO2) emissions approximately 20% lower than equivalent diesel vehicles, owing to methane's higher hydrogen-to-carbon ratio, which yields more energy per unit of carbon during . They also generate near-zero particulate matter compared to diesel, significantly reducing local from and associated impacts. (NOx) emissions from CNG engines can be comparable to or higher than diesel without advanced catalysts, but three-way catalysts or systems enable reductions to levels meeting stringent standards. Lifecycle (GHG) assessments, encompassing well-to-wheel emissions from extraction through , estimate CNG pathways yield 10-20% lower total GHGs than diesel equivalents under assumptions of minimal upstream losses, as reflected in U.S. fleet average data from the Environmental Protection Agency. However, —a primary component of —possesses a (GWP) of 84-87 times that of CO2 over a 20-year horizon and 27-30 times over 100 years, per metrics, amplifying the climate impact of any uncombusted releases. Empirical measurements indicate average leakage rates across the supply chain of 1-3%, with some studies reporting up to 3% or higher; leakage exceeding 2-3% erodes or reverses CNG's GHG advantages relative to diesel by elevating effective upstream emissions. These leakage estimates derive from field observations and atmospheric monitoring, highlighting variability tied to production methods and infrastructure age, rather than idealized models.

Criticisms and Limitations

Technical and Safety Challenges

Compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles store fuel at pressures up to 3,600 psi (25 MPa), necessitating robust composite or steel-lined cylinders that add significant weight—typically 100-200 kg for passenger cars—reducing payload capacity and compared to counterparts. Engine knock can occur under high loads due to variable content in CNG, but modern electronic control units (ECUs) mitigate this by retarding and adjusting air-fuel ratios based on real-time sensor data, enabling compression ratios of 12:1 or higher leveraging CNG's high (120-130 RON). Cold starts in sub-zero temperatures pose challenges from reduced and potential fuel line icing, often addressed via auxiliary electric heaters or bi-fuel systems that initiate on before switching to CNG once warmed. Safety concerns center on high-pressure rupture risks, yet U.S. data indicate an extremely low for CNG containers, with only 19 incidents reported over 33 years of widespread use, equating to less than 0.0001% annual failure probability under certified conditions. CNG's auto-ignition temperature of approximately 537°C exceeds gasoline's 247-280°C, reducing spontaneous ignition likelihood during crashes or mechanical failures. In the event of leaks, CNG disperses rapidly upward due to its low (0.55 relative to air), minimizing pooling and fire spread risks unlike liquid fuels. Empirical incident data affirm CNG's safety parity or superiority: a fleet study of 8,331 vehicles (NGVs) recorded seven fires versus higher proportional rates in fleets, with NGV collision rates 31% lower and injury rates 37% lower per million miles traveled, and zero fatalities compared to 1.28 for conventional vehicles. These outcomes stem from stringent testing (e.g., burst pressures 2.25-3.33 times service pressure) and the fuel's narrower flammability range (5-15% in air versus 's 1.4-7.6%), limiting sustained without ignition sources.

Environmental and Lifecycle Drawbacks

Despite its lower carbon intensity compared to diesel in tailpipe , compressed natural gas (CNG) faces significant environmental drawbacks in its lifecycle (GHG) emissions profile, primarily due to upstream (CH4) leakage throughout the natural gas . , with a 84-87 times that of CO2 over a 20-year horizon, undermines CNG's purported benefits when leakage rates exceed 1-3% of produced gas, rendering total lifecycle emissions comparable to or exceeding those of diesel in the short to medium term. Industry-average upstream leakage intensities hover around 1% as of , though measurements in U.S. basins reveal rates up to 1.6%, with critiques from organizations like the (EDF) estimating that such fugitive emissions can inflate the overall GHG footprint of natural gas vehicles by up to 50% relative to optimistic models, potentially negating reductions for decades post-switch from conventional fuels. Renewable natural gas (RNG), derived from , offers partial mitigation by avoiding fossil extraction leaks, but it constitutes less than 5% of the broader supply available for CNG compression as of 2024, limiting its scalability and leaving most CNG reliant on conventional sources with persistent leakage risks. Even in niche applications like U.S. heavy-duty fleets, where RNG comprised up to 79% of on-road fuel in 2023, global and overall remains minimal, with viable RNG volumes projected to displace at most 4-9% of fossil demand in targeted regions, insufficient to alter the dominant fossil-based lifecycle emissions pathway. Lifecycle assessments incorporating high-GWP accounting further reveal that CNG heavy-duty vehicles can exhibit higher near-term impacts than diesel equivalents, particularly when vehicle efficiency penalties (5-13%) from engines are factored in alongside supply-chain losses. Operational aspects of CNG production and use introduce additional, albeit minor, resource burdens, such as consumption during compression for cooling and processes to prevent formation and , which adds cumulatively to the fuel's lifecycle despite being lower than for liquid fuels. End-of-life management of CNG storage cylinders poses challenges, as Type III and IV composite tanks—typically certified for 15-20 years of service—cannot be recertified beyond their manufacturer-specified expiration and require specialized defueling and disposal to mitigate residual hazards, with composite materials complicating material recovery due to variable wall thicknesses and embedded liners. These factors highlight that while CNG avoids some pollutants, its environmental profile is not inherently low-impact across the full causal chain from extraction to scrappage.

Economic and Infrastructure Barriers

The establishment of CNG refueling stations requires substantial upfront capital , often exceeding $1 million per station for comprehensive facilities capable of serving fleet operations, encompassing compressors, storage cylinders, and systems. Profitability typically demands a threshold of 100 to 200 dedicated vehicles to amortize costs through consistent fueling volume, limiting viability to high-density fleet corridors rather than sporadic individual users. These economic hurdles deter private absent guaranteed , as evidenced by slower station rollout in regions without subsidized fleet commitments. Natural gas price fluctuations exacerbate adoption risks, with volatility directly eroding the fuel cost savings that underpin CNG's appeal. In 2022, U.S. prices surged over 60% year-over-year amid supply disruptions from the Russia-Ukraine conflict, temporarily narrowing CNG's price advantage against and diesel equivalents to under 20% in some markets. Such spikes, recurring in global markets due to geopolitical events and seasonal demand, undermine long-term budgeting for operators and heighten uncertainties, often extending beyond five years even in optimal scenarios. Infrastructure scalability faces inherent constraints from vehicle retrofitting expenses and geographic disparities. Converting conventional engines to CNG incurs $5,000 to $15,000 per unit, restricting widespread uptake to new OEM production or captive fleets, while rural areas suffer persistent refueling voids owing to low density and extension costs that exceed $1 million per mile in undeveloped regions. Urban clusters dominate station placements, with over 90% of U.S. facilities serving metropolitan fleets, leaving interstate and countryside gaps that amplify for non-fleet users. Government interventions favoring electric vehicles, including billions in subsidies like the U.S. Reduction Act's $7,500 tax credits, distort market dynamics by crowding out unsubsidized alternatives such as CNG, redirecting infrastructure funds toward charging networks despite CNG's lower lifecycle emissions in gas-abundant regions. In contrast, India's city-level mandates, aligned with domestic gas pricing below $3 per , propelled CNG vehicle sales share to 19.5% of passenger cars by 2025, demonstrating empirical success where policy enforces economic viability amid urban pollution pressures and fuel import dependence. This approach succeeded by leveraging existing pipeline infrastructure and tax exemptions on CNG kits, avoiding the fiscal distortions seen in EV-centric policies that prioritize intermittent renewables over dispatchable gas.

Comparative Analysis

With Other Natural Gas Forms (LNG)

Compressed natural gas (CNG) stores natural gas as a supercritical fluid under high pressure, typically 200-360 bar, achieving a volumetric reduction of approximately 200-360 times compared to its gaseous state at standard conditions. In contrast, liquefied natural gas (LNG) involves cooling the gas to -162°C for liquefaction, yielding a volumetric density about 600 times that of gaseous natural gas, or roughly 2-3 times higher than CNG on an energy-equivalent basis. This superior energy density of LNG—around 22 MJ/L versus CNG's lower value—allows for compact storage, making it preferable for heavy-duty vehicles requiring extended ranges, such as semi-trucks operating over 1,000 miles without refueling. The trade-offs manifest in vehicle applications: LNG's cryogenic requirements demand specialized insulated tanks and handling to minimize boil-off losses from ingress, which can reach 0.1-0.5% per day in storage but are reduced to low levels (under 1% over typical use) in modern heavy-duty vehicle designs through venting or reliquefaction systems. CNG avoids phase-change issues but experiences gradual pressure decay from minor or leaks, though losses remain minimal without . Consequently, LNG suits long-haul trucking where range efficiency outweighs added complexity, while CNG dominates urban and medium-duty fleets with shorter daily routes, as evidenced by U.S. deployments where LNG powers a notable portion of long-distance heavy-duty operations despite overall adoption remaining under 1% of the total fleet. Infrastructure costs further differentiate the forms: CNG fueling stations, relying on compression from pipeline gas, cost around $400,000 for small fast-fill setups, whereas LNG stations require liquefaction or delivery systems with cryogenic equipment, escalating expenses to $1-4 million. This makes CNG more accessible for distributed urban networks, but LNG's density advantage reduces refueling frequency, potentially lowering operational downtime for high-mileage users despite higher upfront investments.

With Conventional Fuels (Gasoline/Diesel)

Compressed natural gas (CNG) combustion yields 20-30% lower lifecycle CO2-equivalent emissions than gasoline or diesel equivalents, primarily due to methane's lower carbon content per unit of energy released. Tailpipe emissions from CNG engines produce virtually no soot or particulate matter, unlike diesel combustion, which generates significant black carbon deposits. This cleaner burn extends engine oil life by reducing contamination, lowering maintenance costs in fleet applications by up to 50% compared to diesel vehicles. CNG engines exhibit 10-15% lower than diesel or counterparts, attributable to the fuel's reduced volumetric content (approximately 25% of diesel's on a storage basis). However, optimized CNG engines achieve (BSFC) parity with diesel, often demonstrating 5-12% higher through operation and higher octane tolerance. Diesel's higher supports superior in heavy-duty uses, but CNG's gaseous state avoids injection complexities, enhancing completeness. Feedstock costs for CNG remain 40-50% below diesel or equivalents, reflecting natural gas's lower production and market pricing. Bi-fuel configurations, integrating CNG and systems, address power limitations by allowing seamless switching, enabling fleet vehicles to outperform dedicated models in fuel economy and operational uptime.

With Emerging Alternatives (Hydrogen, EVs)

Compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles offer advantages over hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCEVs) in terms of storage pressure, production efficiency, and deployment scale. Hydrogen requires compression to 350–700 bar for vehicular storage to achieve comparable energy density, approximately 2–3 times the 200–250 bar typical for CNG, increasing material stresses and costs for tanks and infrastructure. In contrast, CNG leverages direct compression of abundant natural gas with over 90% efficiency, avoiding the 20–30% energy losses in hydrogen production via steam methane reforming from the same feedstock. Well-to-wheel efficiency for CNG vehicles reaches 20–30%, surpassing hydrogen pathways at 15–25% due to conversion and fuel cell losses, even for gray hydrogen. Empirically, global FCEV adoption lags far behind CNG, with cumulative sales under 100,000 units as of mid-2024, compared to over 28 million vehicles in operation. costs further highlight CNG's edge: equivalent from CNG runs about $2–3 per (GGE), versus $10+ per kg for , making CNG 3–5 times cheaper per mile in practice. 's inefficiencies stem from its low volumetric , necessitating -intensive production and distribution not required for pipeline-sourced CNG, which utilizes existing infrastructure with minimal adaptation. Against battery electric vehicles (EVs), CNG provides faster refueling (3–5 minutes versus 30+ minutes for fast charging) and independence from grid constraints, enabling dispatchable operation without straining demand. EVs rely on grids where fuels generate 61% of global , yielding well-to-wheel efficiencies of 10–25% in coal-heavy regions like and , comparable to or worse than CNG's 20–30% when accounting for upstream . CNG often draws from domestic reserves, reducing import dependencies and vulnerabilities inherent in EV battery minerals and hydrogen's production scalability limits, while empirical data shows CNG fleets scaling to millions without the intermittency or issues plaguing EVs in non-renewable grids.

Regulatory and Safety Standards

Global Codes and Certifications

ISO 11439:2013 establishes minimum requirements for lightweight refillable high-pressure cylinders used for on-board storage of (CNG) as an automotive , covering materials, , and qualification tests including hydrostatic burst, pressure , and extreme exposure. These tests ensure cylinders maintain integrity under operational stresses, with burst requirements calibrated to exceed service pressures by factors such as 2.25 times or more, depending on cylinder type and material, to provide margins against failure. The standard references a nominal working of 200 bar, though adaptations exist for higher pressures up to 260 bar in some applications. UN ECE Regulation No. 110 (R110) provides uniform provisions for the approval of specific CNG components in motor vehicles, including cylinders, fuel lines, and filling units, with revisions post-2010 increasingly referencing ISO 11439 in Annex 3 to align testing protocols. This , formalized in proposals from 2014 onward, reduces redundant qualification efforts for manufacturers by enabling type approvals based on shared empirical criteria, thereby supporting and exports of CNG systems across UNECE member states and beyond. Complementary standards from the ANSI/CSA NGV series, such as NGV 2 for CNG containers, specify , , and requalification procedures including burst limits exceeding 2.25 times operating , influencing global adoption through their rigorous empirical validation despite originating in North American consensus processes. Similarly, NGV 1 covers fueling connection devices with and leakage tests to ensure secure interfaces. These codes collectively prioritize causal factors like resistance over theoretical models, verified through and production testing.

Risk Mitigation Practices

Leak detection in CNG systems relies on methane sensors installed at fueling stations and on vehicles, which trigger alarms and automatic shutoffs upon detecting concentrations above safe thresholds, typically 5-15% lower explosive limit. Comprehensive inspections, including visual checks for damage and pressure testing of cylinders and lines, are conducted at intervals recommended by manufacturers and codes, often annually or every 3-5 years for cylinders, to identify , , or loose fittings before failures occur. Overpressure risks are addressed through pressure relief devices (PRDs) integrated into cylinders and dispensers, which vent excess gas upward and away from ignition sources if internal temperatures reach 212-220°F (100-104°C), preventing rupture during fires or thermal events. Standard valves for NGV2 CNG cylinders include thermal PRDs for fire release, manual shut-off valves, suitability for 6mm high-pressure pipe connections, and external types meeting NGV2 interface requirements. These devices, combined with excess flow valves that halt gas release during sudden line breaks, ensure controlled depressurization rather than explosive failure. Personnel training, mandated under NFPA 52 for CNG fueling stations, covers leak detection techniques, emergency shutdown procedures, and equipment handling, with documented programs emphasizing hands-on simulation to minimize operational errors. Post-incident reviews of accidents, such as those in operational fleets, indicate human factors contribute to fewer than 20% of cases, with predominant causes traced to material defects (37%) or rather than procedural lapses, underscoring the efficacy of engineered safeguards. U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) data on natural gas distribution systems report serious incident rates averaging 2.4-2.8 per 100,000 miles annually from 1999-2011, reflecting high delivery reliability with minimal injuries or fatalities compared to liquid hydrocarbon . In contrast to or diesel spills, which pool and persist, creating expansive hazards, CNG releases ascend and dissipate rapidly in open air, limiting ignition windows and environmental persistence.

Global Adoption

Market Overview and Statistics

As of 2024, the global fleet of natural gas vehicles (NGVs), which primarily operate on compressed (CNG), totaled approximately 28.4 million units, reflecting steady in transportation sectors seeking cost-effective alternatives to liquid fuels. The corresponding CNG market, encompassing production, distribution, and refueling , reached a value of USD 177.8 billion in 2024, driven by demand from heavy-duty fleets and urban . This market is forecasted to expand at a (CAGR) of 11.7% from 2024 to 2030, supported by investments in emerging economies and policy incentives for emissions reduction. Leading NGV markets are concentrated in and , with countries such as , , , , and each maintaining fleets exceeding 2 million vehicles, often incentivized by subsidized prices and mandates for public transit conversion. In contrast, , particularly the , accounts for a smaller share with around 175,000 to 200,000 NGVs, predominantly in dedicated fleet applications like refuse trucks and transit buses rather than consumer vehicles. Worldwide, public CNG refueling stations number approximately 40,000, though this figure includes varying degrees of private infrastructure and is unevenly distributed, with densities highest in high-adoption regions. Renewable natural gas (RNG), derived from biogenic sources like landfills and , is increasingly blended into CNG supplies for NGVs, particularly in the and , where it enhances environmental credentials without requiring vehicle modifications. Integration levels remain modest at 5-10% of total NGV fueling in these markets as of , but production capacity is expanding rapidly—North American RNG output grew 35% year-over-year to support transportation end-uses. This trend aligns with regulatory credits and carbon intensity reduction goals, though scalability depends on feedstock availability and cost competitiveness against fossil CNG.

Regional Variations and Case Studies

In , India's adoption of CNG vehicles exceeds 7.5 million units as of 2024, propelled by judicial mandates in high-pollution urban centers like since 1998 and subsequent national policies expanding refueling stations to over 7,400 by fiscal 2025, leveraging domestic reserves to curb oil imports and emissions. China's fleet emphasizes urban buses, with widespread deployment in cities to exploit abundant resources and reduce diesel dependency, though recent policy shifts prioritize electrification for heavier vehicles. Pakistan's approximately 4 million CNG vehicles stem from early 2000s incentives to offset imported oil costs amid limited refining capacity, though infrastructure strains and gas shortages have tempered growth. In the Americas, maintains around 3 million CNG vehicles, supported by vast shale reserves and fiscal incentives like lower taxes since the 1990s, enabling over 4,000 stations and positioning it as South America's leader in utilization for transport. The focuses CNG on commercial fleets, including transit buses and refuse trucks, driven by state-level emissions regulations in and cost savings for operators, with alternative-fuel Class 8 trucks reaching 14.9% adoption in 2024 led by CNG variants. Iran's over 4.4 million natural gas vehicles, including CNG conversions, enhance against by substituting imported , backed by domestic gas production and a station-to-vehicle ratio of roughly 1:1,800 as of 2025. Europe and Oceania exhibit minimal CNG penetration, under 1% of vehicle fuel share, as policy frameworks prioritize battery-electric vehicles through subsidies and bans on internal combustion engines by 2035, rendering CNG less competitive despite some municipal bus trials in countries like and . This contrasts with resource-rich adopters, where CNG's viability hinges on localized gas abundance and import avoidance rather than supranational decarbonization mandates. The global compressed natural gas (CNG) market experienced a rebound following the pandemic-induced contraction in transportation demand, with the sector valued at approximately USD 159.9 billion in 2023 and projected to expand to USD 344.6 billion by 2030 at a (CAGR) of around 11.6%, primarily driven by adoption in heavy-duty vehicles such as buses and trucks in emerging markets. In , the market is forecasted to reach USD 52.7 billion by 2030, supported by investments and incentives for fleet conversions amid rising costs. (RNG) integration has gained traction as a lower-emission variant, with production scaling in regions like the to meet decarbonization mandates without fully displacing fossil-based CNG. Adoption trends from 2021 onward highlighted accelerated uptake in , particularly , where CNG vehicle sales surged 33% in 2024 compared to 2023, fueled by government subsidies and urban air quality regulations expanding refueling stations to over 7,000. Globally, CNG-powered heavy vehicles dominated new registrations, accounting for over 60% of the in 2024, as operators prioritized cost savings over diesel amid fluctuating oil prices. Technological advancements included more efficient reciprocating compressors capable of higher flow rates—up to 20% faster filling times in some models introduced post-2022—enhancing station throughput for commercial fleets. Hybrid CNG-electric systems emerged in pilot programs for medium-duty trucks, combining onboard compression with battery storage to extend range, though scalability remains limited by battery costs and gaps. The 2022 indirectly influenced European CNG dynamics by exacerbating supply disruptions, prompting some nations like to explore domestic NGV conversions as a hedge against import reliance, though LNG terminals received priority investment over CNG programs. volatility persisted into 2024, with U.S. spot prices swinging 44% year-over-year due to weather-driven demand spikes and export pressures, translating to higher CNG retail costs that tempered fleet expansions. Proponents view CNG as a pragmatic bridge fuel for emissions reduction in hard-to-electrify sectors, citing up to 25% lower CO2 output versus diesel, while critics argue it prolongs infrastructure lock-in, delaying shifts to zero-emission alternatives amid net-zero targets by 2050. By mid-2025, volatility eased to pre-crisis norms, stabilizing but underscoring CNG's vulnerability to broader market fluctuations.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.