Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Chinese Communist Party
View on Wikipedia
Key Information
| Communist Party of China | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"Communist Party of China" in simplified (top) and traditional (bottom) Chinese characters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chinese name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Simplified Chinese | 中国共产党 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Traditional Chinese | 中國共產黨 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hanyu Pinyin | Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abbreviation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chinese | 中共 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hanyu Pinyin | Zhōnggòng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tibetan name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tibetan | ཀྲུང་གོ་གུང་ཁྲན་ཏང | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zhuang name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zhuang | Cunghgoz Gungcanjdangj | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mongolian name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mongolian Cyrillic | Дундад улсын (Хятадын) Эв хамт (Kоммунист) Нам | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mongolian script | ᠳᠤᠮᠳᠠᠳᠤ ᠤᠯᠤᠰ ᠤᠨ (ᠬᠢᠲᠠᠳ ᠤᠨ) ᠡᠪ ᠬᠠᠮᠲᠤ (ᠺᠣᠮᠮᠤᠶᠢᠨᠢᠰᠲ) ᠨᠠᠮ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uyghur name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uyghur | جۇڭگو كوممۇنىستىك پارتىيىسى | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Communist Party of China (CPC),[c][3] commonly known as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP),[4] is the founding and ruling party of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Founded in 1921, the CCP won the Chinese Civil War against the Kuomintang and proclaimed the establishment of the PRC under the chairmanship of Mao Zedong in October 1949. The CCP has since governed China and has had sole control over the country's armed forces and law enforcement. As of 2024[update], the CCP has more than 100 million members, making it the second largest political party by membership in the world.
In 1921, Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao founded the CCP with the help of the Far Eastern Bureau of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks) and Far Eastern Bureau of the Communist International. Although the CCP aligned with the Kuomintang (KMT) during its initial years, the rise of the KMT's right-wing under the leadership of Chiang Kai-shek and subsequent massacres of tens of thousands of CCP members resulted in a split and a prolonged civil war between the CCP and KMT. During the next ten years of guerrilla warfare, Mao Zedong rose to become the most influential figure in the CCP and the party established a strong base among the rural peasantry with its land reform policies. Support for the CCP continued to grow throughout the Second Sino-Japanese War. After the Japanese surrender in 1945, the CCP emerged triumphant in the communist revolution against the Nationalist government. The CCP established the People's Republic of China on 1 October 1949 and the remnants of the Nationalist government retreated to Taiwan shortly after.
Mao Zedong continued to be the most influential member of the CCP until his death in 1976. Under Mao, the party completed its land reform program, launched a series of five-year plans, and eventually split with the Soviet Union. Although Mao attempted to purge the party of capitalist and reactionary elements during the Cultural Revolution, after his death, these policies were only briefly continued by the Gang of Four before a less radical faction seized control. During the 1980s, Deng Xiaoping directed the CCP away from Maoist orthodoxy and towards a policy of economic liberalization. Since the collapse of the Eastern Bloc and the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the CCP has focused on maintaining its relations with the ruling parties of the remaining communist states. The CCP has also established relations with several non-communist parties, including dominant nationalist parties of many developing countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America, as well as social democratic parties in Europe.
As a Marxist–Leninist party, the Chinese Communist Party is organized based on democratic centralism, a principle that entails open policy discussion on the condition of unity among party members in upholding the agreed-upon decision. The highest body of the CCP is the National Congress, convened every fifth year. When the National Congress is not in session, the Central Committee is the highest body, but since that body usually only meets once a year, most duties and responsibilities are vested in the Politburo and its Standing Committee. Members of the latter are seen as the top leadership of the party and the state.[5] Today the party's leader holds the offices of general secretary (responsible for civilian party duties, also the top rank official), chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC) (responsible for military affairs), and president of China (a largely ceremonial position). Because of these posts, the party leader is seen as the country's de facto "paramount leader".[6] The current leader is Xi Jinping, who was elected at the 1st Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee held on 15 November 2012 and has been reelected twice, on 25 October 2017 by the 19th Central Committee and on 10 October 2022 by the 20th Central Committee.
History
[edit]Founding and early history
[edit]The October Revolution and Marxist theory inspired the founding of the CCP.[7]: 114 Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao were among the first to publicly support Leninism and world revolution. Both regarded the October Revolution in Russia as groundbreaking, believing it to herald a new era for oppressed countries everywhere.[8]
Some historical analysis views the May Fourth Movement as the beginning of the revolutionary struggle that led to the founding of the People's Republic of China.[9]: 22 Following the movement, trends towards social transformation increased.[10]: 14 Writing in 1939, Mao Zedong stated that the Movement had shown that the bourgeois revolution against imperialism and China had developed to a new stage, but that the proletariat would lead the revolution's completion.[10]: 20 The May Fourth Movement led to the establishment of radical intellectuals who went on to mobilize peasants and workers into the CCP and gain the organizational strength that would solidify the success of the Chinese Communist Revolution.[11] Chen and Li were among the most influential promoters of Marxism in China during the May Fourth period.[10]: 7 The CCP itself embraces the May Fourth Movement and views itself as part of the movement's legacy.[12]: 24
Study circles were, according to Cai Hesen, "the rudiments [of our party]".[13] Several study circles were established during the New Culture Movement, but by 1920 many grew sceptical about their ability to bring about reforms.[14] China's intellectual movements were fragmented in the early 1920s.[15]: 17 The May Fourth Movement and the New Culture Movement had identified issues of broad concern to Chinese progressives, including anti-imperialism, support for nationalism, support for democracy, promotion of feminism, and rejection of traditional values.[15]: 17 Proposed solutions among Chinese progressives differed significantly, however.[15]: 17

The CCP was founded on 1 July 1921 with the help of the Far Eastern Bureau of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks) and Far Eastern Secretariat of the Communist International, according to the party's official account of its history.[16][17] However, party documents suggest that the party's actual founding date was 23 July 1921, the first day of the 1st National Congress of the CCP.[18] The founding National Congress of the CCP was held 23–31 July 1921.[19][better source needed] With only 50 members in the beginning of 1921, among them Chen Duxiu, Li Dazhao and Mao Zedong,[20] the CCP organization and authorities grew tremendously.[7]: 115 While it was originally held in a house in the Shanghai French Concession, French police interrupted the meeting on 30 July[21] and the congress was moved to a tourist boat on South Lake in Jiaxing, Zhejiang province.[21] A dozen delegates attended the congress, with neither Li nor Chen being able to attend,[21] the latter sending a personal representative in his stead.[21] The resolutions of the congress called for the establishment of a communist party as a branch of the Communist International (Comintern) and elected Chen as its leader. Chen then served as the first general secretary of the CCP[21] and was referred to as "China's Lenin".[citation needed]
The Soviets hoped to foster pro-Soviet forces in East Asia to fight against anti-communist countries, particularly Japan. They attempted to contact the warlord Wu Peifu but failed.[22][23] The Soviets then contacted the Kuomintang (KMT), which was leading the Guangzhou government parallel to the Beiyang government. On 6 October 1923, the Comintern sent Mikhail Borodin to Guangzhou, and the Soviets established friendly relations with the KMT. The Central Committee of the CCP,[24] Soviet leader Joseph Stalin,[25] and the Comintern[26] all hoped that the CCP would eventually control the KMT and called their opponents "rightists".[27][d] KMT leader Sun Yat-sen eased the conflict between the communists and their opponents. CCP membership grew tremendously after the 4th congress in 1925, from 900 to 2,428.[29] The CCP still treats Sun Yat-sen as one of the founders of their movement and claim descent from him[30] as he is viewed as a proto-communist[31] and the economic element of Sun's ideology was socialism.[32] Sun stated, "Our Principle of Livelihood is a form of communism".[33]
The communists dominated the left wing of the KMT and struggled for power with the party's right-wing factions.[27] When Sun Yat-sen died in March 1925, he was succeeded by a rightist, Chiang Kai-shek, who initiated moves to marginalize the position of the communists.[27] Chiang, Sun's former assistant, was not actively anti-communist at that time,[34] even though he hated the theory of class struggle and the CCP's seizure of power.[28] The communists proposed removing Chiang's power.[35] When Chiang gradually gained the support of Western countries, the conflict between him and the communists became more and more intense. Chiang asked the Kuomintang to join the Comintern to rule out the secret expansion of communists within the KMT, while Chen Duxiu hoped that the communists would completely withdraw from the KMT.[36]
In April 1927, both Chiang and the CCP were preparing for conflict.[37] Fresh from the success of the Northern Expedition to overthrow the warlords, Chiang Kai-shek turned on the communists, who by now numbered in the tens of thousands across China.[38] Ignoring the orders of the Wuhan-based KMT government, he marched on Shanghai, a city controlled by communist militias. Although the communists welcomed Chiang's arrival, he turned on them, massacring 5,000[e] with the aid of the Green Gang.[38][41][42] Chiang's army then marched on Wuhan but was prevented from taking the city by CCP General Ye Ting and his troops.[43] Chiang's allies also attacked communists; for example, in Beijing, Li Dazhao and 19 other leading communists were executed by Zhang Zuolin.[44][39] Angered by these events, the peasant movement supported by the CCP became more violent. Ye Dehui, a famous scholar, was killed by communists in Changsha, and in revenge, KMT general He Jian and his troops gunned down hundreds of peasant militiamen.[45] That May, tens of thousands of communists and their sympathizers were killed by KMT troops, with the CCP losing approximately 15,000 of its 25,000 members.[39]
Chinese Civil War and Second Sino-Japanese War
[edit]
The CCP continued supporting the Wuhan KMT government,[39] but on 15 July 1927 the Wuhan government expelled all communists from the KMT.[46] The CCP reacted by founding the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army of China, better known as the "Red Army", to battle the KMT. A battalion led by General Zhu De was ordered to take the city of Nanchang on 1 August 1927 in what became known as the Nanchang uprising.
Initially successful, Zhu and his troops were forced to retreat after five days, marching south to Shantou, and from there being driven into the wilderness of Fujian.[46] Mao Zedong was appointed commander-in-chief of the Red Army, and led four regiments against Changsha in the Autumn Harvest Uprising, hoping to spark peasant uprisings across Hunan.[47] His plan was to attack the KMT-held city from three directions on 9 September, but the Fourth Regiment deserted to the KMT cause, attacking the Third Regiment. Mao's army made it to Changsha but could not take it; by 15 September, he accepted defeat, with 1,000 survivors marching east to the Jinggang Mountains of Jiangxi.[47][48][49]
The near destruction of the CCP's urban organizational apparatus led to institutional changes within the party.[50] The party adopted democratic centralism, a way to organize revolutionary parties, and established a politburo to function as the standing committee of the central committee.[50] The result was increased centralization of power within the party.[50] At every level of the party this was duplicated, with standing committees now in effective control.[50] After being expelled from the party, Chen Duxiu went on to lead China's Trotskyist movement. Li Lisan was able to assume de facto control of the party organization by 1929–1930.[50]
The 1929 Gutian Congress was important in establishing the principle of party control over the military, which continues to be a core principle of the party's ideology.[51]: 280
Li's leadership was a failure, leaving the CCP on the brink of destruction.[50] The Comintern became involved, and by late 1930, his powers had been taken away.[50] By 1935, Mao had become a member of Politburo Standing Committee of the CCP and the party's informal military leader, with Zhou Enlai and Zhang Wentian, the formal head of the party, serving as his informal deputies.[50] The conflict with the KMT led to the reorganization of the Red Army, with power now centralized in the leadership through the creation of CCP political departments charged with supervising the army.[50]
The Xi'an Incident of December 1936 paused the conflict between the CCP and the KMT.[52] Under pressure from Marshal Zhang Xueliang and the CCP, Chiang Kai-shek finally agreed to a Second United Front focused on repelling the Japanese invaders.[53] While the front formally existed until 1945, all collaboration between the two parties had effectively ended by 1940.[53] Despite their formal alliance, the CCP used the opportunity to expand and carve out independent bases of operations to prepare for the coming war with the KMT.[54] In 1939, the KMT began to restrict CCP expansion within China.[54] This led to frequent clashes between CCP and KMT forces[54] which subsided rapidly on the realization on both sides that civil war amidst a foreign invasion was not an option.[54] By 1943, the CCP was again actively expanding its territory at the expense of the KMT.[54]

Mao Zedong became the Chairman of the Politburo in 1943 and the Chairman of the Central Committee in 1945. After the Japanese surrender in 1945, the war between the CCP and the KMT began again in earnest.[55] The 1945–1949 period had four stages; the first was from August 1945 (when the Japanese surrendered) to June 1946 (when the peace talks between the CCP and the KMT ended).[55] By 1945, the KMT had three times more soldiers under its command than the CCP and initially appeared to be prevailing.[55] With the cooperation of the US and Japan, the KMT was able to retake major parts of the country.[55] However, KMT rule over the reconquered territories proved unpopular because of its endemic political corruption.[55]
Notwithstanding its numerical superiority, the KMT failed to reconquer the rural territories which made up the CCP's stronghold.[55] Around the same time, the CCP launched an invasion of Manchuria, where they were assisted by the Soviet Union.[55] The second stage, lasting from July 1946 to June 1947, saw the KMT extend its control over major cities such as Yan'an, the CCP headquarters, for much of the war.[55] The KMT's successes were hollow; the CCP had tactically withdrawn from the cities, and instead undermined KMT rule there by instigating protests among students and intellectuals. The KMT responded to these demonstrations with heavy-handed repression.[56] In the meantime, the KMT was struggling with factional infighting and Chiang Kai-shek's autocratic control over the party, which weakened its ability to respond to attacks.[56]
The third stage, lasting from July 1947 to August 1948, saw a limited counteroffensive by the CCP.[56] The objective was clearing "Central China, strengthening North China, and recovering Northeast China."[57] This operation, coupled with military desertions from the KMT, resulted in the KMT losing 2 million of its 3 million troops by the spring of 1948, and saw a significant decline in support for KMT rule.[56] The CCP was consequently able to cut off KMT garrisons in Manchuria and retake several territories.[57]
The last stage, lasting from September 1948 to December 1949, saw the communists go on the offensive and the collapse of KMT rule in mainland China as a whole.[57] Mao's proclamation of the founding of the People's Republic of China on 1 October 1949 marked the end of the second phase of the Chinese Civil War (or the Chinese Communist Revolution, as it is called by the CCP).[57]
Proclamation of the PRC and the 1950s
[edit]
Mao proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China (PRC) before a massive crowd at Tiananmen Square on 1 October 1949. The CCP headed the Central People's Government.[7]: 118 From this time through the 1980s, top leaders of the CCP (such as Mao Zedong, Lin Biao, Zhou Enlai and Deng Xiaoping) were largely the same military leaders prior to the PRC's founding.[58] As a result, informal personal ties between political and military leaders dominated civil-military relations.[58]
Stalin proposed a one-party constitution when Liu Shaoqi visited the Soviet Union in 1952.[59] The constitution of the PRC in 1954 subsequently abolished the previous coalition government and established the CCP's one-party system.[60][61] In 1957, the CCP launched the Anti-Rightist Campaign against political dissidents and prominent figures from minor parties, which resulted in the political persecution of at least 550,000 people. The campaign significantly damaged the limited pluralistic nature in the socialist republic and solidified the country's status as a de facto one-party state.[62][63]
The Anti-Rightist Campaign led to the catastrophic results of the Second Five Year Plan from 1958 to 1962, known as the Great Leap Forward. In an effort to transform the country from an agrarian economy into an industrialized one, the CCP collectivized farmland, formed people's communes, and diverted labour to factories. General mismanagement and exaggerations of harvests by CCP officials led to the Great Chinese Famine, which resulted in an estimated 15 to 45 million deaths,[64][65] making it the largest famine in recorded history.[66][67][68]
Sino-Soviet split and Cultural Revolution
[edit]
During the 1960s and 1970s, the CCP experienced a significant ideological separation from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union which was going through a period of "de-Stalinization" under Nikita Khrushchev.[69] By that time, Mao had begun saying that the "continued revolution under the dictatorship of the proletariat" stipulated that class enemies continued to exist even though the socialist revolution seemed to be complete, leading to the Cultural Revolution in which millions were persecuted and killed.[70] During the Cultural Revolution, party leaders such as Liu Shaoqi, Deng Xiaoping, Peng Dehuai, and He Long were purged or exiled, and the Gang of Four, led by Mao's wife Jiang Qing, emerged to fill in the power vacuum left behind.
Reforms under Deng Xiaoping
[edit]Following Mao's death in 1976, a power struggle between CCP chairman Hua Guofeng and vice-chairman Deng Xiaoping erupted.[71] Deng won the struggle, and became China's paramount leader in 1978.[71] Deng, alongside Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang, spearheaded the "reform and opening-up" policies, and introduced the ideological concept of socialism with Chinese characteristics, opening China to the world's markets.[72] In reversing some of Mao's "leftist" policies, Deng argued that a socialist state could use the market economy without itself being capitalist.[73] While asserting the political power of the CCP, the change in policy generated significant economic growth.[citation needed] This was justified on the basis that "Practice is the Sole Criterion for the Truth", a principle reinforced through a 1978 article that aimed to combat dogmatism and criticized the "Two Whatevers" policy.[74][better source needed] The new ideology, however, was contested on both sides of the spectrum, by Maoists to the left of the CCP's leadership, as well as by those supporting political liberalization. In 1981, the Party adopted a historical resolution, which assessed the historical legacy of the Mao Zedong era and the future priorities of the CCP.[75]: 6 With other social factors, the conflicts culminated in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre.[76] The protests having been crushed and the reformist party general secretary Zhao Ziyang under house arrest, Deng's economic policies resumed and by the early 1990s the concept of a socialist market economy had been introduced.[77] In 1997, Deng's beliefs (officially called "Deng Xiaoping Theory") were embedded into the CCP's constitution.[78]
Further reforms under Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao
[edit]CCP general secretary Jiang Zemin succeeded Deng as paramount leader in 1989 and continued most of his policies.[79] In the 1990s, the CCP transformed from a veteran revolutionary leadership that was both leading militarily and politically, to a political elite increasingly renewed according to institutionalized norms in the civil bureaucracy.[58] Leadership was largely selected based on rules and norms on promotion and retirement, educational background, and managerial and technical expertise.[58] There is a largely separate group of professionalized military officers, serving under top CCP leadership largely through formal relationships within institutional channels.[58]
The CCP ratified Jiang's Three Represents concept for the 2003 revision of the party's constitution, as a "guiding ideology" to encourage the party to represent "advanced productive forces, the progressive course of China's culture, and the fundamental interests of the people."[80] The theory legitimized the entry of private business owners and bourgeois elements into the party.[80] Hu Jintao, Jiang Zemin's successor as general secretary, took office in 2002.[81] Unlike Mao, Deng and Jiang Zemin, Hu laid emphasis on collective leadership and opposed one-man dominance of the political system.[81] The insistence on focusing on economic growth led to a wide range of serious social problems. To address these, Hu introduced two main ideological concepts: the Scientific Outlook on Development and Harmonious Society.[82] Hu resigned from his post as the CCP general secretary and Chairman of the CMC at the 18th National Congress held in 2012, and was succeeded in both posts by Xi Jinping.[83][84]
General secretaryship of Xi Jinping
[edit]
Since taking power of the general secretary in 2012, Xi Jinping has initiated a wide-reaching anti-corruption campaign, while centralizing powers in the office of CCP general secretary at the expense of the collective leadership of prior decades.[85] Commentators have described the campaign as a defining part of Xi's general secretaryship as well as "the principal reason why he has been able to consolidate his power so quickly and effectively."[86] Xi's leadership has also overseen an increase in the Party's role in China.[87] Xi has added his ideology, named after himself, into the CCP constitution in 2017.[88] Xi's term as general secretary was renewed in 2022.[58][89]
Since 2014, the CCP has led efforts in Xinjiang that involve the detention of more than 1 million Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities in internment camps, as well as other repressive measures. This has been described as a genocide by some academics and some governments.[90][91] On the other hand, a greater number of countries signed a letter penned to the Human Rights Council supporting the policies as an effort to combat terrorism in the region.[92][93][94]

Celebrations of the 100th anniversary of the CCP's founding, one of the Two Centenaries, took place on 1 July 2021.[95] In the sixth plenary session of the 19th Central Committee in November 2021, the CCP adopted a resolution on the Party's history, which for the first time credited Xi as being the "main innovator" of Xi Jinping Thought while also declaring Xi's leadership as being "the key to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation".[96][97] In comparison with the other historical resolutions, Xi's one did not herald a major change in how the CCP evaluated its history.[98]
On 6 July 2021, Xi chaired the Communist Party of China and World Political Parties Summit, which involved representatives from 500 political parties across 160 countries.[99] Xi urged the participants to oppose "technology blockades", and "developmental decoupling" in order to work towards "building a community with a shared future for mankind."[99]
After the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party held in 2022, Xi Jinping was re-elected as the CCP general secretary for a third term, that made Xi the first CCP leader since Mao Zedong to be chosen for a third term.[100][101]
Ideology
[edit]| Part of a series on |
| Communist parties |
|---|
Formal ideology
[edit]
The core ideology of the party has evolved with each distinct generation of Chinese leadership. As both the CCP and the People's Liberation Army promote their members according to seniority, it is possible to discern distinct generations of Chinese leadership.[102]
Marxism–Leninism was the first official ideology of the CCP.[103] According to the CCP, "Marxism–Leninism reveals the universal laws governing the development of history of human society."[103] To the CCP, Marxism–Leninism provides a "vision of the contradictions in capitalist society and of the inevitability of a future socialist and communist societies".[103] According to the People's Daily, Mao Zedong Thought "is Marxism–Leninism applied and developed in China".[103] Mao Zedong Thought was conceived not only by Mao Zedong, but by leading party officials, according to Xinhua News Agency.[104]
Deng Xiaoping Theory was added to the party constitution at the 14th National Congress in 1992.[78] The concepts of "socialism with Chinese characteristics" and "the primary stage of socialism" were credited to the theory.[78] Deng Xiaoping Theory can be defined as a belief that state socialism and state planning is not by definition communist, and that market mechanisms are class neutral.[105] In addition, the party needs to react to the changing situation dynamically; to know if a certain policy is obsolete or not, the party had to "seek truth from facts" and follow the slogan "practice is the sole criterion for the truth".[106] At the 14th National Congress, Jiang reiterated Deng's mantra that it was unnecessary to ask if something was socialist or capitalist, since the important factor was whether it worked.[107] The CCP's ideology today is often summarized as socialism with Chinese characteristics.[108]
The "Three Represents", Jiang Zemin's contribution to the party's ideology, was adopted by the party at the 16th National Congress. The Three Represents defines the role of the CCP, and stresses that the Party must always represent the requirements for developing China's advanced productive forces, the orientation of China's advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people."[109][110] Certain segments within the CCP criticized the Three Represents as being un-Marxist and a betrayal of basic Marxist values. Supporters viewed it as a further development of socialism with Chinese characteristics.[111] Jiang disagreed, and had concluded that attaining the communist mode of production, as formulated by earlier communists, was more complex than had been realized, and that it was useless to try to force a change in the mode of production, as it had to develop naturally, by following the "economic laws of history".[112] The theory is most notable for allowing capitalists, officially referred to as the "new social strata", to join the party on the grounds that they engaged in "honest labor and work" and through their labour contributed "to build[ing] socialism with Chinese characteristics."[113]
In 2003, the 3rd Plenary Session of the 16th Central Committee conceived and formulated the ideology of the Scientific Outlook on Development (SOD).[114] It is considered to be Hu Jintao's contribution to the official ideological discourse.[115] The SOD incorporates scientific socialism, sustainable development, social welfare, a humanistic society, increased democracy, and, ultimately, the creation of a Socialist Harmonious Society. According to official statements by the CCP, the concept integrates "Marxism with the reality of contemporary China and with the underlying features of our times, and it fully embodies the Marxist worldview on and methodology for development."[116]

Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, commonly known as Xi Jinping Thought, was added to the party constitution in the 19th National Congress in 2017.[88] The theory's main elements are summarized in the ten affirmations, the fourteen commitments, and the thirteen areas of achievements.[117]
The party combines elements of both socialist patriotism[118][119][120][121] and Chinese nationalism.[122]
Economics
[edit]Deng did not believe that the fundamental difference between the capitalist mode of production and the socialist mode of production was central planning versus free markets. He said, "A planned economy is not the definition of socialism, because there is planning under capitalism; the market economy happens under socialism, too. Planning and market forces are both ways of controlling economic activity".[73] Jiang Zemin supported Deng's thinking, and stated in a party gathering that it did not matter if a certain mechanism was capitalist or socialist, because the only thing that mattered was whether it worked.[77] It was at this gathering that Jiang Zemin introduced the term socialist market economy, which replaced Chen Yun's "planned socialist market economy".[77] In his report to the 14th National Congress Jiang Zemin told the delegates that the socialist state would "let market forces play a basic role in resource allocation."[123] At the 15th National Congress, the party line was changed to "make market forces further play their role in resource allocation"; this line continued until the 3rd Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee,[123] when it was amended to "let market forces play a decisive role in resource allocation."[123] Despite this, the 3rd Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee upheld the creed "Maintain the dominance of the public sector and strengthen the economic vitality of the state-owned economy."[123]
"... their theory that capitalism is the ultimate [force] has been shaken, and socialist development has experienced a miracle. Western capitalism has suffered reversals, a financial crisis, a credit crisis, a crisis of confidence, and their self-conviction has wavered. Western countries have begun to reflect, and openly or secretively compare themselves against China's politics, economy and path."
The CCP views the world as organized into two opposing camps; socialist and capitalist.[125] They insist that socialism, on the basis of historical materialism, will eventually triumph over capitalism.[125] In recent years, when the party has been asked to explain the capitalist globalization occurring, the party has returned to the writings of Karl Marx.[125] Despite admitting that globalization developed through the capitalist system, the party's leaders and theorists argue that globalization is not intrinsically capitalist.[126] The reason being that if globalization was purely capitalist, it would exclude an alternative socialist form of modernity.[126] Globalization, as with the market economy, therefore does not have one specific class character (neither socialist nor capitalist) according to the party.[126] The insistence that globalization is not fixed in nature comes from Deng's insistence that China can pursue socialist modernization by incorporating elements of capitalism.[126] Because of this there is considerable optimism within the CCP that despite the current capitalist dominance of globalization, globalization can be turned into a vehicle supporting socialism.[127]
Analysis and criticism
[edit]While foreign analysts generally agree that the CCP has rejected orthodox Marxism–Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought (or at least basic thoughts within orthodox thinking), the CCP itself disagrees.[128] Critics of the CCP argue that Jiang Zemin ended the party's formal commitment to Marxism–Leninism with the introduction of the ideological theory, the Three Represents.[129] However, party theorist Leng Rong disagrees, claiming that "Jiang rid the Party of the ideological obstacles to different kinds of ownership ... He did not give up Marxism or socialism. He strengthened the Party by providing a modern understanding of Marxism and socialism—which is why we talk about a 'socialist market economy' with Chinese characteristics."[129] The attainment of true "communism" is still described as the CCP's and China's "ultimate goal".[130] While the CCP claims that China is in the primary stage of socialism, party theorists argue that the current development stage "looks a lot like capitalism".[130] Alternatively, certain party theorists argue that "capitalism is the early or first stage of communism."[130] Some have dismissed the concept of a primary stage of socialism as intellectual cynicism.[130] For example, Robert Lawrence Kuhn, a former foreign adviser to the Chinese government, stated: "When I first heard this rationale, I thought it more comic than clever—a wry caricature of hack propagandists leaked by intellectual cynics. But the 100-year horizon comes from serious political theorists."[130]
American political scientist and sinologist David Shambaugh argues that before the "Practice Is the Sole Criterion for the Truth" campaign, the relationship between ideology and decision making was a deductive one, meaning that policy-making was derived from ideological knowledge.[131] However, under Deng's leadership this relationship was turned upside down, with decision making justifying ideology.[131] Chinese policy-makers have described the Soviet Union's state ideology as "rigid, unimaginative, ossified, and disconnected from reality", believing that this was one of the reasons for the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Therefore, Shambaugh argues, Chinese policy-makers believe that their party ideology must be dynamic to safeguard the party's rule.[131]
British sinologist Kerry Brown argues that the CCP does not have an ideology, and that the party organization is pragmatic and interested only in what works.[132] The party itself argues against this assertion. Hu Jintao stated in 2012 that the Western world is "threatening to divide us" and that "the international culture of the West is strong while we are weak ... Ideological and cultural fields are our main targets".[132] As such, the CCP puts a great deal of effort into the party schools and into crafting its ideological message.[132]
Governance
[edit]Collective leadership
[edit]Collective leadership, the idea that decisions will be taken through consensus, has been the ideal in the CCP.[133] The concept has its origins back to Lenin and the Russian Bolshevik Party.[134] At the level of the central party leadership this means that, for instance, all members of the Politburo Standing Committee are of equal standing (each member having only one vote).[133] A member of the Politburo Standing Committee often represents a sector; during Mao's reign, he controlled the People's Liberation Army, Kang Sheng, the security apparatus, and Zhou Enlai, the State Council and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.[133] This counts as informal power.[133] Despite this, in a paradoxical relation, members of a body are ranked hierarchically (despite the fact that members are in theory equal to one another).[133] Informally, the collective leadership is headed by a "leadership core"; that is, the paramount leader, the person who holds the offices of CCP general secretary, CMC chairman and PRC president.[135] Before Jiang Zemin's tenure as paramount leader, the party core and collective leadership were indistinguishable.[136] In practice, the core was not responsible to the collective leadership.[136] However, by the time of Jiang, the party had begun propagating a responsibility system, referring to it in official pronouncements as the "core of the collective leadership".[136] Academics have noted a decline in collective leadership under Xi Jinping.[137][138][139]
Democratic centralism
[edit]"[Democratic centralism] is centralized on the basis of democracy and democratic under centralized guidance. This is the only system that can give full expression to democracy with full powers vested in the people's congresses at all levels and, at the same time, guarantee centralized administration with the governments at each level ..."
The CCP's organizational principle is democratic centralism, a principle that entails open discussion of policy on the condition of unity among party members in upholding the agreed-upon decision.[141] It is based on two principles: democracy (synonymous in official discourse with "socialist democracy" and "inner-party democracy") and centralism.[140] This has been the guiding organizational principle of the party since the 5th National Congress, held in 1927.[140] In the words of the party constitution, "The Party is an integral body organized under its program and constitution and on the basis of democratic centralism".[140] Mao once quipped that democratic centralism was "at once democratic and centralized, with the two seeming opposites of democracy and centralization united in a definite form." Mao claimed that the superiority of democratic centralism lay in its internal contradictions, between democracy and centralism, and freedom and discipline.[140] Currently, the CCP is claiming that "democracy is the lifeline of the Party, the lifeline of socialism".[140] But for democracy to be implemented, and functioning properly, there needs to be centralization.[140] Democracy in any form, the CCP claims, needs centralism, since without centralism there will be no order.[140]
Supervision
[edit]Shuanggui was an intra-party disciplinary process conducted by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI). The process, which literally translates to "double regulation", aims to extract confessions from members accused of violating party rules. According to the Dui Hua Foundation, tactics such as cigarette burns, beatings and simulated drowning are among those used to extract confessions. Other reported techniques include the use of induced hallucinations, with one subject of this method reporting that "In the end I was so exhausted, I agreed to all the accusations against me even though they were false."[142]
In 2018, the shuanggui process was superseded by liuzhi or "retention in custody", which expands beyond CCP members to the entire public sector, academics, and business leaders.[143][144]
United front
[edit]The CCP employs a political strategy that it terms "united front work" that involves groups and key individuals that are influenced or controlled by the CCP and used to advance its interests.[145][146] United front work is managed primarily but not exclusively by the United Front Work Department (UFWD).[147] The united front has historically been a popular front that has included eight legally permitted political parties alongside other people's organizations which have nominal representation in the National People's Congress and the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC).[148] However, the CPPCC is a body without real power.[149] While consultation does take place, it is supervised and directed by the CCP.[149] Under Xi Jinping, the united front and its targets of influence have expanded in size and scope.[150][151]
Organization
[edit]Central organization
[edit]
The National Congress is the party's highest body, and, since the 9th National Congress in 1969, has been convened every five years (prior to the 9th Congress they were convened on an irregular basis). According to the party's constitution, a congress may not be postponed except "under extraordinary circumstances".[152] The party constitution gives the National Congress six responsibilities:[153]
- Electing the Central Committee;
- Electing the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI);
- Examining the report of the outgoing Central Committee;
- Examining the report of the outgoing CCDI;
- Discussing and enacting party policies; and,
- Revising the party's constitution.
In practice, the delegates rarely discuss issues at length at the National Congresses.[154][page needed] Most substantive discussion takes place before the congress, in the preparation period, among a group of top party leaders.[153] In between National Congresses, the Central Committee is the highest decision-making institution.[155] The CCDI is responsible for supervising party's internal anti-corruption and ethics system.[156] In between congresses the CCDI is under the authority of the Central Committee.[156] The Central Committee, as the party's highest decision-making institution between national congresses, elects several bodies to carry out its work.[157] The first plenary session of a newly elected central committee elects the general secretary of the Central Committee, the party's leader; the Central Military Commission (CMC); the Politburo; the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC). The first plenum also endorses the composition of the Secretariat and the leadership of the CCDI.[157] According to the party constitution, the general secretary must be a member of the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC), and is responsible for convening meetings of the PSC and the Politburo, while also presiding over the work of the Secretariat.[158] The Politburo "exercises the functions and powers of the Central Committee when a plenum is not in session".[159] The PSC is the party's highest decision-making institution when the Politburo, the Central Committee and the National Congress are not in session.[160] It convenes at least once a week.[161] It was established at the 8th National Congress, in 1958, to take over the policy-making role formerly assumed by the Secretariat.[162] The Secretariat is the top implementation body of the Central Committee, and can make decisions within the policy framework established by the Politburo; it is also responsible for supervising the work of organizations that report directly into the Central Committee, for example departments, commissions, publications, and so on.[163] The CMC is the highest decision-making institution on military affairs within the party, and controls the operations of the People's Liberation Army.[164] The general secretary has, since Jiang Zemin, also served as Chairman of the CMC.[164] Unlike the collective leadership ideal of other party organs, the CMC chairman acts as the supreme commander with full authority to appoint or dismiss top military officers at will.[164]

A first plenum of the Central Committee also elects heads of departments, bureaus, central leading groups and other institutions to pursue its work during a term (a "term" being the period elapsing between national congresses, usually five years).[152] The General Office is the party's "nerve centre", in charge of day-to-day administrative work, including communications, protocol, and setting agendas for meetings.[165] The CCP currently has six main central departments: the Organization Department, responsible for overseeing provincial appointments and vetting cadres for future appointments,[166] the Publicity Department (formerly "Propaganda Department"), which oversees the media and formulates the party line to the media,[167][168] the United Front Work Department, which oversees the country's eight minor parties, people's organizations, and influence groups inside and outside of the country,[169] the International Department, functioning as the party's "foreign affairs ministry" with other parties, the Society Work Department, which handles work related to civic groups, chambers of commerce and industry groups and mixed-ownership and non-public enterprises,[170] and the Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission, which oversees the country's legal enforcement authorities.[171] The CC also has direct control over the Central Policy Research Office, which is responsible for researching issues of significant interest to the party leadership,[172] the Central Party School, which provides political training and ideological indoctrination in communist thought for high-ranking and rising cadres,[173] the Institute of Party History and Literature, which sets priorities for scholarly research in state-run universities and the Central Party School and studies and translates the classical works of Marxism.[174][175] The party's newspaper, the People's Daily, is under the direct control of the Central Committee[176] and is published with the objectives "to tell good stories about China and the (Party)" and to promote its party leader.[177] The theoretical magazines Qiushi and Study Times are published by the Central Party School.[173] The China Media Group, which oversees China Central Television (CCTV), China National Radio (CNR) and China Radio International (CRI), is under the direct control of the Publicity Department.[178] The various offices of the "Central Leading Groups", such as the Hong Kong and Macau Work Office, the Taiwan Affairs Office, and the Central Finance Office, also report to the central committee during a plenary session.[179] Additionally, per the principle of "the Party commands the gun", CCP has sole control over the People's Liberation Army (PLA) through its Central Military Commission.[180]
Lower-level organizations
[edit]After seizing political power, the CCP extended the dual party-state command system to all government institutions, social organizations, and economic entities.[181] The State Council and the Supreme Court each has a party group, established since November 1949. Party committees permeate in every state administrative organ as well as the People's Consultation Conferences and mass organizations at all levels.[182] According to scholar Rush Doshi, "[t]he Party sits above the state, runs parallel to the state, and is enmeshed in every level of the state."[182] Modelled after the Soviet Nomenklatura system, the party committee's organization department at each level has the power to recruit, train, monitor, appoint, and relocate these officials.[183]
Party committees exist at the level of provinces, cities, counties, and neighbourhoods.[184] These committees play a key role in directing local policy by selecting local leaders and assigning critical tasks.[5][185] The Party secretary at each level is more senior than that of the leader of the government, with the CCP standing committee being the main source of power.[185] Party committee members in each level are selected by the leadership in the level above, with provincial leaders selected by the central Organizational Department, and not removable by the local party secretary.[185] Neighborhood committees are generally composed of older volunteers.[186]: 118
CCP committees exist inside of companies, both private and state-owned.[187] A business that has more than three party members is legally required to establish a committee or branch.[188][189] As of 2021[update], more than half of China's private firms have such organizations.[190] These branches provide places for new member socialization and host morale boosting events for existing members.[191] They also provide mechanisms that help private firm interface with government bodies and learn about policies which relate to their fields.[192] On average, the profitability of private firms with a CCP branch is 12.6 per cent higher than the profitability of private firms.[193]
Within state-owned enterprises, these branches are governing bodies that make important decisions and inculcate CCP ideology in employees.[194] Party committees or branches within companies also provide various benefits to employees.[195] These may include bonuses, interest-free loans, mentorship programs, and free medical and other services for those in need.[195] Enterprises that have party branches generally provide more expansive benefits for employees in the areas of retirement, medical care, unemployment, injury, and birth and fertility.[196] Increasingly, the CCP is requiring private companies to revise their charters to include the role of the party.[188]
Funding
[edit]The funding of all CCP organizations mainly comes from state fiscal revenue. Data for the proportion of total CCP organizations' expenditures in total China fiscal revenue is unavailable.[citation needed]
Members
[edit]"It is my will to join the Communist Party of China, uphold the Party's program, observe the provisions of the Party constitution, fulfill a Party member's duties, carry out the Party's decisions, strictly observe Party discipline, guard Party secrets, be loyal to the Party, work hard, fight for communism throughout my life, be ready at all times to sacrifice my all for the Party and the people, and never betray the Party."
The CCP reached 100.27 million members at the end of 2024, a net increase of 1.09 million over the previous year.[2][198] It is the second largest political party in the world after India's Bharatiya Janata Party.[199]
To join the CCP, an applicant must go through an approval process.[200] Adults can file applications for membership with their local party branch.[201] A prescreening process, akin to a background check, follows.[201] Next, established party members at the local branch vet applicants' behaviour and political attitudes and may make a formal inquiry to a party branch near the applicants' parents residence to vet family loyalty to communism and the party.[201] In 2014, only 2 million applications were accepted out of some 22 million applicants.[202] Admitted members then spend a year as a probationary member.[197] Probationary members are typically accepted into the party.[203]
In contrast to the past, when emphasis was placed on the applicants' ideological criteria, the current CCP stresses technical and educational qualifications.[197] To become a probationary member, the applicant must take an admission oath before the party flag.[197] The relevant CCP organization is responsible for observing and educating probationary members.[197] Probationary members have duties similar to those of full members, with the exception that they may not vote in party elections nor stand for election.[197] Many join the CCP through the Communist Youth League.[197] Under Jiang Zemin, private entrepreneurs were allowed to become party members.[197]
Membership demographics
[edit]
As of December 2024[update], individuals who identify as farmers, herdsmen and fishermen make up 26.1 million members; members identifying as workers totalled 6.6 million.[202][2] Another group, the "Managing, professional and technical staff in enterprises and public institutions", made up 16.4 million, 11.6 million identified as working in administrative staff and 7.6 million described themselves as party cadres.[204] The CCP systematically recruits white-collar workers over other social groups.[205] By 2024, CCP membership had become more educated, younger, and less blue-collar than previously, with 57.6% of party members having a college degree or above.[198] As of 2022[update], around 30 to 35 per cent of Chinese entrepreneurs are or have been a party member.[206] At the end of 2024, the CCP stated that it has approximately 7.73 million ethnic minority members or 7.7% of the party.[2]
Status of women
[edit]As of 2024[update], 30.99 million women are CCP members, representing 30.9% of the party.[2] Women in China have low participation rates as political leaders. Women's disadvantage is most evident in their severe underrepresentation in the more powerful political positions.[207] At the top level of decision making, no woman has ever been among the members of the Politburo Standing Committee, while the broader Politburo currently does not have any female members. Just 3 of 27 government ministers are women, and importantly, since 1997, China has fallen to 53rd place from 16th in the world in terms of female representation in the National People's Congress, according to the Inter-Parliamentary Union.[208] CCP leaders such as Zhao Ziyang have vigorously opposed the participation of women in the political process.[209] Within the party women face a glass ceiling.[210]
Benefits and responsibilities of membership
[edit]A 2019 Binghamton University study found that CCP members gain a 20% wage premium in the market over non-members.[211] A subsequent academic study found that the economic benefit of CCP membership is strongest on those in lower wealth brackets.[211] CCP households also tend to accumulate wealth faster than non-CCP households.[212] Certain CCP cadres have access to a special supply system for foodstuffs called tegong.[213] CCP leadership cadres have access to a dedicated healthcare system managed by the CCP General Office.[214]
CCP membership additionally comes with several responsibilities. CCP members are required to give between 0.5% and 2% of their monthly salary as membership fee, which goes to the party funds.[215] Members must pay dues regardless of location. They additionally need to regularly attend party meetings and basic organizational cell activities.[198] In 2019, the CCP Central Committee issued a rule requiring members abroad to contact CCP cells at home at least once every six months.[216] Failure to pay dues for six consecutive months is grounds for expulsion, according to party regulations.[217]
Communist Youth League
[edit]The Communist Youth League (CYL) is the CCP's youth wing, and the largest mass organization for youth in China.[218] To join, an applicant has to be between the ages of 14 and 28.[218] It controls and supervises Young Pioneers, a youth organization for children below the age of 14.[218] The organizational structure of CYL is an exact copy of the CCP's; the highest body is the National Congress, followed by the Central Committee, Politburo, and the Politburo Standing Committee.[219] However, the Central Committee (and all central organs) of the CYL work under the guidance of the CCP central leadership.[220] By the end of 2024, the CYLC had 75 million members and 4.4 million organizations throughout China.[221]
Symbols
[edit]At the beginning of its history, the CCP did not have a single official standard for the flag, but instead allowed individual party committees to copy the flag of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.[222] The Central Politburo decreed the establishment of a sole official flag on 28 April 1942: "The flag of the CPC has the length-to-width proportion of 3:2 with a hammer and sickle in the upper-left corner, and with no five-pointed star. The Political Bureau authorizes the General Office to custom-make a number of standard flags and distribute them to all major organs".[222]
According to the People's Daily, "The red color symbolizes revolution; the hammer-and-sickle are tools of workers and peasants, meaning that the Communist Party of China represents the interests of the masses and the people; the yellow color signifies brightness."[222]
Party-to-party relations
[edit]The International Department of the Chinese Communist Party is responsible for dialogue with global political parties.[223]
Communist parties
[edit]The CCP continues to have relations with non-ruling communist and workers' parties and attends international communist conferences, most notably the International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties.[224][better source needed] While the CCP retains contact with major parties such as the Communist Party of Portugal,[225] the Communist Party of France,[226] the Communist Party of the Russian Federation,[227] the Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia,[228] the Communist Party of Brazil,[229] the Communist Party of Greece,[230] the Communist Party of Nepal (UML)[231] and the Communist Party of Spain,[232] the party also retains relations with minor communist and workers' parties, such as the Communist Party of Australia,[233] the Workers Party of Bangladesh, the Bangladesher Samyabadi Dal (ML), the Communist Party of Sri Lanka, the Workers' Party of Belgium, the Hungarian Workers' Party, the Dominican Workers' Party, the Nepal Workers Peasants Party, and the Party for the Transformation of Honduras, for instance.[234] It has poor relations with the Japanese Communist Party.[235] In recent years, noting the self-reform of the European social democratic movement in the 1980s and 1990s, the CCP "has noted the increased marginalization of West European communist parties."[236]
Ruling parties of socialist states
[edit]The CCP has retained close relations with the ruling parties of socialist states still espousing communism: Cuba, Laos, North Korea, and Vietnam.[237] It spends a fair amount of time analysing the situation in the remaining socialist states, trying to reach conclusions as to why these states survived when so many did not, following the collapse of the Eastern European socialist states in 1989 and the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.[238] In general, the analyses of the remaining socialist states and their chances of survival have been positive, and the CCP believes that the socialist movement will be revitalized sometime in the future.[238]
The ruling party which the CCP is most interested in is the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV).[239] In general the CPV is considered a model example of socialist development in the post-Soviet era.[239] Chinese analysts on Vietnam believe that the introduction of the Đổi Mới reform policy at the 6th CPV National Congress is the key reason for Vietnam's current success.[239]
While the CCP is probably the organization with most access to North Korea, writing about North Korea is tightly circumscribed.[238] The few reports accessible to the general public are those about North Korean economic reforms.[238] While Chinese analysts of North Korea tend to speak positively of North Korea in public, in official discussions c. 2008 they show much disdain for North Korea's economic system, the cult of personality which pervades society, the Kim family, the idea of hereditary succession in a socialist state, the security state, the use of scarce resources on the Korean People's Army and the general impoverishment of the North Korean people.[240] Circa 2008, there are those analysts who compare the current situation of North Korea with that of China during the Cultural Revolution.[241][needs update] Over the years, the CCP has tried to persuade the Workers' Party of Korea (or WPK, North Korea's ruling party) to introduce economic reforms by showing them key economic infrastructure in China.[241] For instance, in 2006 the CCP invited then-WPK general secretary Kim Jong Il to Guangdong to showcase the success economic reforms had brought China.[241] In general, the CCP considers the WPK and North Korea to be negative examples of a ruling communist party and socialist state.[241][dubious – discuss]
There is a considerable degree of interest in Cuba within the CCP.[239] Fidel Castro, the former First Secretary of the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC), is greatly admired, and books have been written focusing on the successes of the Cuban Revolution.[239] Communication between the CCP and the PCC has increased since the 1990s.[242] At the 4th Plenary Session of the 16th Central Committee, which discussed the possibility of the CCP learning from other ruling parties, praise was heaped on the PCC.[242] When Wu Guanzheng, a Central Politburo member, met with Fidel Castro in 2007, he gave him a personal letter written by Hu Jintao: "Facts have shown that China and Cuba are trustworthy good friends, good comrades, and good brothers who treat each other with sincerity. The two countries' friendship has withstood the test of a changeable international situation, and the friendship has been further strengthened and consolidated."[243]
Non-communist parties
[edit]Since the decline and fall of communism in Eastern Europe, the CCP has begun establishing party-to-party relations with non-communist parties.[169] These relations are sought so that the CCP can learn from them.[244] For instance, the CCP has been eager to understand how the People's Action Party of Singapore (PAP) maintains its total domination over Singaporean politics through its "low-key presence, but total control."[245] According to the CCP's own analysis of Singapore, the PAP's dominance can be explained by its "well-developed social network, which controls constituencies effectively by extending its tentacles deeply into society through branches of government and party-controlled groups."[245] While the CCP accepts that Singapore is a liberal democracy, they view it as a guided democracy led by the PAP.[245] Other differences are, according to the CCP, "that it is not a political party based on the working class—instead it is a political party of the elite. ... It is also a political party of the parliamentary system, not a revolutionary party."[246] Other parties which the CCP studies and maintains strong party-to-party relations with are the United Malays National Organization, which has ruled Malaysia (1957–2018, 2020–2022), and the Liberal Democratic Party in Japan, which dominated Japanese politics since 1955.[247]
Since Jiang Zemin's time, the CCP has made friendly overtures to its erstwhile foe, the Kuomintang. The CCP emphasizes strong party-to-party relations with the KMT so as to strengthen the probability of the reunification of Taiwan with mainland China.[248] However, several studies have been written on the KMT's loss of power in 2000 after having ruled Taiwan since 1949 (the KMT officially ruled mainland China from 1928 to 1949).[248] In general, one-party states or dominant-party states are of special interest to the party and party-to-party relations are formed so that the CCP can study them.[248] The longevity of the Syrian Regional Branch of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party is attributed to the personalization of power in the al-Assad family, the strong presidential system, the inheritance of power, which passed from Hafez al-Assad to his son Bashar al-Assad, and the role given to the Syrian military in politics.[249]

Circa 2008, the CCP has been especially interested in Latin America,[249] as shown by the increasing number of delegates sent to and received from these countries.[249] Of special fascination for the CCP is the 71-year-long rule of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) in Mexico.[249] While the CCP attributed the PRI's long reign in power to the strong presidential system, tapping into the machismo culture of the country, its nationalist posture, its close identification with the rural populace and the implementation of nationalization alongside the marketization of the economy,[249] the CCP concluded that the PRI failed because of the lack of inner-party democracy, its pursuit of social democracy, its rigid party structures that could not be reformed, its political corruption, the pressure of globalization, and American interference in Mexican politics.[249] While the CCP was slow to recognize the pink tide in Latin America, it has strengthened party-to-party relations with several socialist and anti-American political parties over the years.[250] The CCP has occasionally expressed some irritation over Hugo Chávez's anti-capitalist and anti-American rhetoric.[250] Despite this, the CCP reached an agreement in 2013 with the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), which was founded by Chávez, for the CCP to educate PSUV cadres in political and social fields.[251] By 2008, the CCP claimed to have established relations with 99 political parties in 29 Latin American countries.[250]
Social democratic movements in Europe have been of great interest to the CCP since the early 1980s.[250] With the exception of a short period in which the CCP forged party-to-party relations with far-right parties during the 1970s in an effort to halt "Soviet expansionism", the CCP's relations with European social democratic parties were its first serious efforts to establish cordial party-to-party relations with non-communist parties.[250] The CCP credits the European social democrats with creating a "capitalism with a human face".[250] Before the 1980s, the CCP had a highly negative and dismissive view of social democracy, a view dating back to the Second International and the Marxist–Leninist view on the social democratic movement.[250] By the 1980s, that view had changed and the CCP concluded that it could actually learn something from the social democratic movement.[250] CCP delegates were sent all over Europe to observe.[252] By the 1980s, most European social democratic parties were facing electoral decline and in a period of self-reform.[252] The CCP followed this with great interest, laying most weight on reform efforts within the British Labour Party and the Social Democratic Party of Germany.[252] The CCP concluded that both parties were re-elected because they modernized, replacing traditional state socialist tenets with new ones supporting privatization, shedding the belief in big government, conceiving a new view of the welfare state, changing their negative views of the market and moving from their traditional support base of trade unions to entrepreneurs, the young and students.[253]
Electoral history
[edit]National People's Congress
[edit]| Election | General Secretary | Seats | +/– | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1954–1959 | Peng Zhen | 1,048 / 1,226
|
New | 1st |
| 1959–1964 | 1,047 / 1,235
|
|||
| 1964–1975 | Liu Ningyi | 2,668 / 3,040
|
||
| 1975–1978 | Ji Pengfei | 2,615 / 2,864
|
||
| 1978–1983 | 3,116 / 3,497
|
|||
| 1983–1988 | Hu Yaobang | 1,861 / 2,884
|
||
| 1988–1993 | Peng Chong | 1,986 / 2,892
|
||
| 1993–1998 | Cao Zhi | 2,037 / 2,977
|
||
| 1998–2003 | He Chunlin | 2,130 / 2,979
|
||
| 2003–2008 | Sheng Huaren | 2,178 / 2,985
|
||
| 2008–2013 | Li Jianguo | 2,099 / 2,987
|
||
| 2013–2018 | Wang Chen | 2,157 / 2,987
|
||
| 2018–2023 | Yang Zhenwu | 2,119 / 2,980
|
||
| 2023–2028 | Liu Qi | — | — |
See also
[edit]Footnotes
[edit]- ^ During the Chinese Civil War, party officials were only able to confirm from available documents that the 1st National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party was held in July 1921, but not the specific date of the meeting. In June 1941, the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party declared 1 July the party's "anniversary day". Although the exact date of the 1st National Congress was later determined by party officials to be 23 July 1921, the date of the anniversary has not been changed.[1][better source needed]
- ^ Chinese: 为人民服务; pinyin: Wèi Rénmín Fúwù
- ^ Chinese: 中国共产党; pinyin: Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng
- ^ Chiang Kai-shek strongly opposed this label and the CCP's analysis of the KMT. He believed that the KMT served all Chinese, regardless of political leanings.[28]
- ^ "In the next weeks five thousand Communists were butchered by the stammering machine-guns of the Kuomintang and by the knives of the criminal gangs whom Chiang recruited for slaughter."[39]
Other sources give different estimates, e.g. 5,000–10,000.[40]
References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ 楊立傑 (30 April 2013). "共产主义小组的建立与中国共产党的成立". Xinhua (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 30 April 2013. Retrieved 3 December 2021.
- ^ a b c d e "中国共产党党内统计公报" [Communist Party of China Party Statistics Announcement] (in Chinese). State Council of the People's Republic of China. 30 June 2025. Retrieved 30 June 2025.
- ^ "Style Guide: PRC, China, CCP or Chinese?". Asia Media Centre – New Zealand. Asia New Zealand Foundation. Archived from the original on 25 July 2022. Retrieved 19 June 2022.
Chinese Communist Party (CCP): May also refer to Communist Party of China (CPC) ... CPC is used officially in China and by China's media, whereas English-language media outside of Chinese conventionally use CCP.
- ^ "Chinese Communist Party". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 2 October 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2020.
- ^ a b McGregor, Richard (2010). The Party: The Secret World of China's Communist Rulers. New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-06-170877-0. OCLC 630262666.
- ^ Lindsay Maizland & Eleanor Albert (6 October 2022). "The Chinese Communist Party". The Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
But most of his power stems from his role as general secretary because of how China's political system works: Party institutions and state institutions are technically separate, but the ultimate power comes from the CCP.
- ^ a b c Hunt, Michael (2013). The World Transformed: 1945 to the Present. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-312-24583-2.
- ^ Van de Ven 1991, pp. 26–27.
- ^ Hammond, Ken (2023). China's Revolution and the Quest for a Socialist Future. New York, NY: 1804 Books. ISBN 978-1-7368500-8-4.
- ^ a b c Huang, Yibing (2020). Zheng, Qian (ed.). An Ideological History of the Communist Party of China. Vol. 2. Translated by Sun, Li; Bryant, Shelly. Montreal, Quebec: Royal Collins Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-4878-0391-9.
- ^ Hao, Zhidong (March 1997). "May 4th and June 4th compared: A sociological study of Chinese social movements". Journal of Contemporary China. 6 (14): 79–99. doi:10.1080/10670569708724266. ISSN 1067-0564.
- ^ Šebok, Filip (2023). "Historical Legacy". In Kironska, Kristina; Turscanyi, Richard Q. (eds.). Contemporary China: a New Superpower?. Routledge. pp. 15–28. doi:10.4324/9781003350064-3. ISBN 978-1-03-239508-1.
- ^ Van de Ven 1991, p. 38.
- ^ Van de Ven 1991, p. 44.
- ^ a b c Karl, Rebecca E. (2010). Mao Zedong and China in the Twentieth-Century World: a Concise History. Asia-pacific: Culture, Politics, and Society series. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv11hpp6w. ISBN 978-0-8223-4780-4. JSTOR j.ctv11hpp6w.
- ^ Hé, Lìbō. "Xiǎn wéi rénzhī de zhōnggòng yī dà cānjiāzhě: Éguórén Níkē'ěrsījī" 鲜为人知的中共一大参加者:俄国人尼科尔斯基. People's Daily 中国共产党新闻网 [News of the Communist Party of China] (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 4 November 2007. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
- ^ Party History Research Office of the CPC Central Committee (1997). 共產國際、聯共(布)與中國革命檔案資料叢書. Beijing Library Press. pp. 39–51.
- ^ Tatlow, Didi Kirsten (20 July 2011). "On Party Anniversary, China Rewrites History". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 1 January 2022. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
- ^ "1st. National Congress of The Communist Party of China (CPC)". Archived from the original on 22 December 2017. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
- ^ "Three Chinese Leaders: Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai, and Deng Xiaoping". Asia for Educators. Columbia University. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
- ^ a b c d e Gao 2009, p. 119.
- ^ "News of the Soviets of People's Deputies". 9 October 1920.
- ^ "News of the Soviets of People's Deputies". 16 November 1921.
- ^ 中央檔案館 (1989). 中共中央文件選集1. 中共中央黨校出版社. pp. 187, 271–297.
- ^ 中共中央、共青團中央和共產國際代表聯席會議記錄. December 1924.
- ^ 共產國際有關中國資料選輯 Collection of the Communist International's Materials on China. Institute of Modern History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. 1981. p. 83.
- ^ a b c Schram 1966, pp. 84, 89.
- ^ a b Chiang, Chung Cheng (1957). Soviet Russia in China: a Summing Up at Seventy. Farrar, Straus and Cudahy. OL 89083W.
- ^ 奎松, 楊 (April 2010). 中間地帶的革命. Taiyuan: 山西人民出版社.
- ^ Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany. "The Chinese Communist Party Is Still Afraid of Sun Yat-Sen's Shadow". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 14 March 2021. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
- ^ "Tug of war over China's founding father Sun Yat-sen as Communist Party celebrates his legacy". South China Morning Post. 10 November 2016. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
- ^ Dirlik 2005, p. 20.
- ^ Godley, Michael R. (1987). "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics: Sun Yatsen and the International Development of China". The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs (18): 109–125. doi:10.2307/2158585. JSTOR 2158585. S2CID 155947428.
- ^ 獨秀, Du Xiu (3 April 1926). "中國革命勢力統一政策與廣州事變". 嚮導.
- ^ 中央檔案館 (1989). 中共中央文件選集2. 中共中央黨校出版社. pp. 311–318.
- ^ 奎松, 楊 (2002). "蔣介石從三二零到四一二的心路歷程". 史學月刊. 6.
- ^ 上海市檔案館 (1983). 上海工人三次武裝起義. Shanghai People's Press.
- ^ a b Feigon 2002, p. 42.
- ^ a b c d Carter 1976, p. 62.
- ^ Ryan, Tom (2016). Purnell, Ingrid; Plozza, Shivaun (eds.). China Rising: The Revolutionary Experience. Collingwood: History Teachers' Association of Victoria. p. 77. ISBN 978-1-875585-08-3.
- ^ Schram 1966, p. 106.
- ^ Carter 1976, pp. 61–62.
- ^ Schram 1966, p. 112.
- ^ Schram 1966, pp. 106–109.
- ^ Schram 1966, pp. 112–113.
- ^ a b Carter 1976, p. 63.
- ^ a b Carter 1976, p. 64.
- ^ Schram 1966, pp. 122–125.
- ^ Feigon 2002, pp. 46–47.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Leung 1992, p. 72.
- ^ Duan, Lei (2024). "Towards a More Joint Strategy: Assessing Chinese Military Reforms and Militia Reconstruction". In Fang, Qiang; Li, Xiaobing (eds.). China under Xi Jinping: A New Assessment. Leiden University Press. ISBN 978-90-8728-441-1.
- ^ Leung 1992, p. 370.
- ^ a b Leung 1992, p. 354.
- ^ a b c d e Leung 1992, p. 355.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Leung 1992, p. 95.
- ^ a b c d Leung 1992, p. 96.
- ^ a b c d Leung 1996, p. 96.
- ^ a b c d e f Miller, Alice. "The 19th Central Committee Politburo" (PDF). China Leadership Monitor, No. 55. Hoover Institution. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 February 2021. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
- ^ 哲, 師 (1991). 在歷史巨人身邊——師哲回憶錄. Beijing: 中央文獻出版社. p. 531.
- ^ 子陵, 辛 (2009). 紅太陽的隕落:千秋功罪毛澤東. Hong Kong: 書作坊. p. 88.
- ^ 理羣, 錢 (2012). 毛澤東和後毛澤東時代. Taipei: 聯經. p. 64.
- ^ King, Gilbert (26 September 2012). "The Silence that Preceded China's Great Leap into Famine". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on 14 October 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
- ^ Du, Guang (2007). ""反右"运动与民主革命——纪念"反右"运动五十周年". Modern China Studies (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
- ^ Gráda, Cormac Ó (2007). "Making Famine History" (PDF). Journal of Economic Literature. 45 (1): 5–38. doi:10.1257/jel.45.1.5. hdl:10197/492. ISSN 0022-0515. JSTOR 27646746. S2CID 54763671. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
- ^ Meng, Xin; Qian, Nancy; Yared, Pierre (2015). "The Institutional Causes of China's Great Famine, 1959–1961" (PDF). The Review of Economic Studies. 82 (4): 1568–1611. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.321.1333. doi:10.1093/restud/rdv016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 March 2020. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
- ^ Smil, Vaclav (18 December 1999). "China's great famine: 40 years later". The BMJ. 319 (7225): 1619–1621. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7225.1619. ISSN 0959-8138. PMC 1127087. PMID 10600969.
- ^ Mirsky, Jonathan (7 December 2012). "Unnatural Disaster". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 24 January 2017. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
- ^ Dikötter, Frank. "Mao's Great Famine: Ways of Living, Ways of Dying" (PDF). Dartmouth College. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 July 2020.
- ^ Kornberg & Faust 2005, p. 103.
- ^ Wong 2005, p. 131.
- ^ a b Wong 2005, p. 47.
- ^ Sullivan 2012, p. 254.
- ^ a b Deng Xiaoping (30 June 1984). "Building a Socialism with a specifically Chinese character". People's Daily. Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
- ^ "An article influences Chinese history". China Internet Information Center. 19 January 2008. Archived from the original on 10 March 2008. Retrieved 9 August 2021.
- ^ Doyon, Jérôme; Froissart, Chloé (2024). "Introduction". In Doyon, Jérôme; Froissart, Chloé (eds.). The Chinese Communist Party: a 100-Year Trajectory. Canberra: ANU Press. ISBN 978-1-76046-624-4.
- ^ Sullivan 2012, p. 25.
- ^ a b c Vogel 2011, p. 682.
- ^ a b c Vogel 2011, p. 684.
- ^ Sullivan 2012, p. 100.
- ^ a b Sullivan 2012, p. 238.
- ^ a b Sullivan 2012, p. 317.
- ^ Sullivan 2012, p. 329.
- ^ "Hu Jintao, Xi Jinping meet delegates to 18th CCP National Congress". Xinhua News Agency. 16 November 2011. Archived from the original on 29 September 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ O'Keeffe, Kate; Ferek, Katy Stech (14 November 2019). "Stop Calling China's Xi Jinping 'President,' U.S. Panel Says". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 15 November 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
- ^ "The Rise and Rise of Xi Jinping: Xi who must be obeyed". The Economist. 20 September 2014. Archived from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
- ^ Fiol-Mahon, Alexandra (17 August 2018). "Xi Jinping's Anti-Corruption Campaign: The Hidden Motives of a Modern-Day Mao". Foreign Policy Research Institute. Archived from the original on 17 July 2020. Retrieved 17 July 2020.
- ^ Mitchell, Tom (25 July 2016). "Xi's China: The rise of party politics". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 16 January 2020.
- ^ a b Phillips, Tom (24 October 2017). "Xi Jinping becomes most powerful leader since Mao with China's change to constitution". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 24 October 2017. Retrieved 24 October 2017.
- ^ "The 7 Men Who Will Run China". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 2 June 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
- ^ Kirby, Jen (28 July 2020). "Concentration camps and forced labor: China's repression of the Uighurs, explained". Vox. Archived from the original on 6 December 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
- ^ "'Cultural genocide': China separating thousands of Muslim children from parents for 'thought education'". The Independent. 5 July 2019. Archived from the original on 28 October 2021. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
- ^ Delmi, Boudjemaa (12 July 2019). "Letter to the HRC" (PDF). Human Rights Watch. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 July 2019.
- ^ Qiblawi, Tamara (17 July 2019). "Muslim nations are defending China as it cracks down on Muslims, shattering any myths of Islamic solidarity". CNN. Archived from the original on 4 December 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2022.
- ^ Berlinger, Joshua (15 July 2019). "North Korea, Syria and Myanmar among countries defending China's actions in Xinjiang". CNN. Archived from the original on 29 April 2022. Retrieved 29 April 2022.
- ^ "Inside the plans for the CCP's 100th anniversary". The Week UK. Archived from the original on 25 May 2021. Retrieved 25 May 2021.
- ^ "Chinese Communist party clears way for Xi to tighten grip on power". Financial Times. 11 November 2021. Archived from the original on 11 December 2022. Retrieved 11 August 2022.
- ^ "China's Communist Party passes resolution amplifying President Xi's authority". Reuters. 12 November 2021. Archived from the original on 10 August 2022. Retrieved 11 August 2022.
- ^ Wong, Chun Han; Zhai, Keith (17 November 2021). "How Xi Jinping Is Rewriting China's History to Put Himself at the Center". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 10 August 2022. Retrieved 11 August 2022.
- ^ a b Tian, Yew Lun (6 July 2021). "China's Xi takes dig at U.S. in speech to political parties around world". Reuters. Archived from the original on 27 June 2022. Retrieved 27 June 2022.
- ^ "Xi Jinping's path to precedent-breaking third term - Nikkei Asia". Nikkei Asia. 22 October 2022. Archived from the original on 10 November 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
- ^ Davidson, Helen; Graham-Harrison, Emma (23 October 2022). "China's leader Xi Jinping secures third term and stacks inner circle with loyalists". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 23 October 2022. Retrieved 23 October 2022.
- ^ Whitson, William W. (1973). The Chinese High Command: A History of Communist Military Politics, 1927-71. Praeger. ISBN 978-0-333-15053-5.
- ^ a b c d "Ideological Foundation of the CPC". People's Daily. 30 October 2012. Archived from the original on 28 December 2013. Retrieved 26 December 2013.
- ^ "Mao Zedong Thought". Xinhua News Agency. 26 December 2013. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 26 December 2013.
- ^ Vogel 2011, p. 668.
- ^ Chan 2003, p. 180.
- ^ Vogel 2011, p. 685.
- ^ Shan, Wei; Gu, Yongxin; Chen, Juan (May 2023). "Layering Ideologies from Deng Xiaoping to Xi Jinping: Tracing Ideological Changes of the Communist Party of China Using Text Analysis". China: An International Journal. 21 (2): 34–35. doi:10.1353/chn.2023.a898340.
- ^ Selected Works of Jiang Zemin, Eng. ed., FLP, Beijing, 2013, Vol. III, p. 519.
- ^ Chan 2003, p. 201.
- ^ Kuhn 2011, pp. 108–109.
- ^ Kuhn 2011, pp. 107–108.
- ^ Kuhn 2011, p. 110.
- ^ Izuhara 2013, p. 110.
- ^ Guo & Guo 2008, p. 119.
- ^ "Full text of Hu Jintao's report at 18th Party Congress". People's Daily. 19 November 2012. Archived from the original on 7 June 2013. Retrieved 19 September 2014.
- ^ "His own words: The 14 principles of 'Xi Jinping Thought'". BBC Monitoring. Archived from the original on 28 October 2017. Retrieved 28 October 2017.
- ^ Zhao 2004, p. 28.
- ^ Löfstedt 1980, p. 25.
- ^ Li 1995, pp. 38–39.
- ^ Ghai, Arup & Chanock 2000, p. 77.
- ^ Zheng 2012, p. 119.
- ^ a b c d "Marketization the key to economic system reform". China Daily. Chinese Communist Party. 18 November 2013. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 22 December 2013.
- ^ Buckley, Chris (13 February 2014). "Xi Touts Communist Party as Defender of Confucius's Virtues". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 13 February 2014.
- ^ a b c Heazle & Knight 2007, p. 62.
- ^ a b c d Heazle & Knight 2007, p. 63.
- ^ Heazle & Knight 2007, p. 64.
- ^ Shambaugh 2008, p. 104.
- ^ a b Kuhn 2011, p. 99.
- ^ a b c d e Kuhn 2011, p. 527.
- ^ a b c Shambaugh 2008, p. 105.
- ^ a b c Brown 2012, p. 52.
- ^ a b c d e Unger 2002, p. 22.
- ^ Baylis 1989, p. 102.
- ^ Unger 2002, pp. 22–24.
- ^ a b c Unger 2002, p. 158.
- ^ Baranovitch, Nimrod (4 March 2021). "A Strong Leader for A Time of Crisis: Xi Jinping's Strongman Politics as A Collective Response to Regime Weakness". Journal of Contemporary China. 30 (128): 249–265. doi:10.1080/10670564.2020.1790901. ISSN 1067-0564.
- ^ Shirk, Susan L. (2018). "The Return to Personalistic Rule". Journal of Democracy. 29 (2): 22–36. doi:10.1353/jod.2018.0022. ISSN 1086-3214. Archived from the original on 21 April 2024. Retrieved 21 April 2024.
- ^ Lyman Miller, Alice (31 December 2020), Fingar, Thomas; Oi, Jean C. (eds.), "1. Xi Jinping and the Evolution of Chinese Leadership Politics", Fateful Decisions, Stanford University Press, pp. 33–50, doi:10.1515/9781503612235-005, ISBN 978-1-5036-1223-5
- ^ a b c d e f g h Chuanzi, Wang (1 October 2013). "Democratic Centralism: The Core Mechanism in China's Political System". Qiushi. Archived from the original on 6 January 2014. Retrieved 5 January 2014.
- ^ Biddulph, Sarah (5 July 2018), Fu, Hualing; Gillespie, John; Nicholson, Pip; Partlett, William Edmund (eds.), "Democratic Centralism and Administration in China", Socialist Law in Socialist East Asia (1 ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–223, doi:10.1017/9781108347822.008, hdl:11343/254293, ISBN 978-1-108-34782-2
- ^ Jacobs, Andrew (14 June 2012). "Accused Chinese Party Members Face Harsh Discipline". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 1 January 2022. Retrieved 17 July 2020.
- ^ Xiong, Yong (28 December 2024). "China is building new detention centers all over the country as Xi Jinping widens corruption purge". CNN. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
- ^ "An outrage that even China's supine media has called out". The Economist. 16 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
In 2018 the Communist Party launched a parallel secretive system called liuzhi (retention in custody) for use in cases involving not only party members—who had always been subject to extra-legal forms of detention—but anyone in public service, including academics and hospital staff.
- ^ Brady, Anne-Marie (2017). "Magic Weapons: China's political influence activities under Xi Jinping" (PDF). Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. S2CID 197812164. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 June 2020.
- ^ Tatlow, Didi Kirsten (12 July 2019). "The Chinese Influence Effort Hiding in Plain Sight". The Atlantic. ISSN 1072-7825. Archived from the original on 17 July 2019. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
- ^ Joske, Alex (9 June 2020). "Foreign interference and the Chinese Communist Party?s united front system". The party speaks for you: Foreign interference and the Chinese Communist Party's united front system. Australian Strategic Policy Institute. JSTOR resrep25132. Archived from the original on 9 June 2020. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
- ^ "The United Front in Communist China" (PDF). Central Intelligence Agency. May 1957. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 January 2017. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
- ^ a b Mackerras, McMillen & Watson 2001, p. 70.
- ^ Groot, Gerry (19 September 2016), Davies, Gloria; Goldkorn, Jeremy; Tomba, Luigi (eds.), "The Expansion of the United Front Under Xi Jinping" (PDF), The China Story Yearbook 2015: Pollution, ANU Press, doi:10.22459/csy.09.2016.04a, ISBN 978-1-76046-068-6, archived (PDF) from the original on 4 April 2017, retrieved 31 August 2020
- ^ Groot, Gerry (24 September 2019). "The CCP's Grand United Front abroad". Sinopsis. Archived from the original on 3 November 2019. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
- ^ a b Mackerras, McMillen & Watson 2001, p. 228.
- ^ a b Mackerras, McMillen & Watson 2001, p. 229.
- ^ Wu, Guoguang (18 September 2015). China's Party Congress: Power, Legitimacy, and Institutional Manipulation (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139976800. ISBN 978-1-139-97680-0.
- ^ Mackerras, McMillen & Watson 2001, p. 66.
- ^ a b Joseph 2010, p. 394.
- ^ a b Liu 2011, p. 41.
- ^ "General Secretary of CPC Central Committee". China Radio International. 13 November 2012. Archived from the original on 16 February 2016. Retrieved 8 December 2013.
- ^ Mackerras, McMillen & Watson 2001, p. 85.
- ^ Miller 2011, p. 7.
- ^ Joseph 2010, p. 169.
- ^ Li 2009, p. 64.
- ^ Fu 1993, p. 201.
- ^ a b c Mackerras, McMillen & Watson 2001, p. 74.
- ^ Sullivan 2012, p. 212.
- ^ McGregor, Richard (30 September 2009). "The party organiser". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 9 December 2013.
- ^ McGregor 2012, p. 17.
- ^ Guo 2012, p. 123.
- ^ a b Smith & West 2012, p. 127.
- ^ Wang, Kelly (17 March 2023). "China's Institutional Shake-Up Produces New Department to Better Handle Public's Complaints". Caixin. Archived from the original on 17 March 2023. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
- ^ Guo 2012b, pp. 99, 237.
- ^ Finer 2003, p. 43.
- ^ a b Sullivan 2012, p. 49.
- ^ Chambers 2002, p. 37.
- ^ Yu 2010, p. viii.
- ^ Latham 2007, p. 124.
- ^ "Communist Party mouthpiece People's Daily launches English news app in soft power push". Hong Kong Free Press. 16 October 2017. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
- ^ "Ownership and control of Chinese media". Safeguard Defenders. 14 June 2021. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ Heath 2014, p. 141.
- ^ "Annual Report to Congress – Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2019" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. p. 5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ^ Guo, Baogang (1 November 2020). "A Partocracy with Chinese Characteristics: Governance System Reform under Xi Jinping". Journal of Contemporary China. 29 (126): 809–823. doi:10.1080/10670564.2020.1744374. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 216205948.
- ^ a b Doshi, Rush (30 September 2021). The Long Game: China's Grand Strategy to Displace American Order (1 ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 35. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197527917.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-752791-7. OCLC 1256820870.
- ^ Pieke, Frank N. (2009). The Good Communist: Elite Training and State Building in Today's China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511691737. ISBN 978-0-511-69173-7.
- ^ "China's Communist Party worries about its grassroots weakness". The Economist. 11 June 2020. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 13 June 2020. Retrieved 14 June 2020.
- ^ a b c Gao, Nan; Long, Cheryl Xiaoning; Xu, Lixin Colin (February 2016). "Collective Leadership, Career Concern, and the Housing Market in China: The Role of Standing Committees: Leadership, Careers and Housing Market". Review of Development Economics. 20 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1111/rode.12202. S2CID 150576471.
- ^ Jin, Keyu (2023). The New China Playbook: Beyond Socialism and Capitalism. New York: Viking. ISBN 978-1-9848-7828-1.
- ^ Yan, Xiaojun; Huang, Jie (2017). "Navigating Unknown Waters: The Chinese Communist Party's New Presence in the Private Sector". China Review. 17 (2): 37–63. ISSN 1680-2012. JSTOR 44440170.
- ^ a b "China's Communist Party is tightening its grip in businesses". The Economist. 6 July 2023. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 9 July 2023. Retrieved 9 July 2023.
- ^ Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 227.
- ^ Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 225.
- ^ Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 14.
- ^ Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 225–226.
- ^ Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 230.
- ^ Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 15.
- ^ a b Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 228–229.
- ^ Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 229.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Sullivan 2012, p. 183.
- ^ a b c Zheng, William (30 June 2025). "China's Communist Party: 100 million strong and growing". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 30 June 2025.
- ^ Balachandran, Manu; Dutta, Saptarishi (31 March 2015). "Here's How the BJP Surpassed China's Communists to Become the Largest Political Party in the World". Quartz. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 28 October 2018.
- ^ Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 53–56.
- ^ a b c Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 53.
- ^ a b McMorrow, R. W. (19 December 2015). "Membership in the Communist Party of China: Who is Being Admitted and How?". JSTOR Daily. Archived from the original on 21 December 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2017.
- ^ Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 55.
- ^ "China's Communist Party membership tops entire population of Germany". South China Morning Post. SCMP Group. 30 June 2015. Archived from the original on 3 July 2015. Retrieved 30 June 2015.
- ^ Angiolillo, Fabio (22 December 2023). "Authoritarian Ruling Parties' Recruitment Dilemma: Evidence from China". Journal of East Asian Studies: 1–25. doi:10.1017/jea.2023.20. ISSN 1598-2408.
- ^ Marquis & Qiao 2022, p. 13.
- ^ Bauer, John; Feng, Wang; Riley, Nancy E.; Xiaohua, Zhao (July 1992). "Gender inequality in urban China". Modern China. 18 (3): 333–370. doi:10.1177/009770049201800304. S2CID 144214400.
- ^ Tatlow, Didi Kirsten (24 June 2010). "Women Struggle for a Foothold in Chinese Politics". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 1 January 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
- ^ Judd, Ellen R. (2002). The Chinese Women's Movement. Private Collection: Stanford University Press. p. 175. ISBN 0-8047-4406-8.
- ^ Phillips, Tom (14 October 2017). "In China women 'hold up half the sky' but can't touch the political glass ceiling". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 14 December 2018. Retrieved 17 February 2021.
- ^ a b "Does it pay to be a communist in China?". The Economist. 6 July 2023. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 1 May 2024. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
- ^ Targa, Matteo; Yang, Li (September 2024). "The impact of Communist Party membership on wealth distribution and accumulation in urban China". World Development. 181 106660. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106660. hdl:10419/283577.
- ^ Tsai, Wen-Hsuan (June 2016). "Delicacies for a Privileged Class in a Risk Society: The Chinese Communist Party's Special Supplies Food System". Issues & Studies. 52 (2): 1650005. doi:10.1142/S1013251116500053. ISSN 1013-2511.
- ^ Tsai, Wen-Hsuan (2 November 2018). "Medical Politics and the CCP's Healthcare System for State Leaders". Journal of Contemporary China. 27 (114): 942–955. doi:10.1080/10670564.2018.1488107. ISSN 1067-0564.
- ^ Wong, Chun Han (30 June 2025). "China's Communist Party Now Has 100 Million Members. Many Are in It for the Paycheck". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 1 July 2025.
- ^ Yu, Sun (3 July 2024). "China demands loyalty from young expats in the US". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 3 July 2024. Retrieved 3 July 2024.
- ^ "How to get kicked out of China's Communist Party". The Economist. 5 September 2024. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 5 September 2024. Retrieved 30 June 2025.
- ^ a b c Sullivan 2007, p. 582.
- ^ Sullivan 2007, p. 583.
- ^ "Constitution of the Communist Party of China". People's Daily. Chinese Communist Party. Archived from the original on 24 May 2013. Retrieved 2 January 2014.
- ^ "全国共有共青团员7531.8万名" [There are 75.318 million members of the Communist Youth League nationwide.]. People's Daily. 3 May 2025. Retrieved 3 May 2025.
- ^ a b c "Flag and emblem of Communist Party of China". People's Daily. 29 March 2013. Archived from the original on 27 March 2015. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
- ^ Hackenesch, Christine; Bader, Julia (9 June 2020). "The Struggle for Minds and Influence: The Chinese Communist Party's Global Outreach". International Studies Quarterly. 64 (3): 723–733. doi:10.1093/isq/sqaa028. hdl:11245.1/7324dee8-d4d7-4163-86c5-f0e467a5b65a. ISSN 0020-8833.
- ^ "15 IMCWP, List of participants". International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties. Solidnet.org. 11 November 2013. Archived from the original on 24 December 2013. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "Senior CPC official meets Portuguese Communist Party leader". People's Daily. 21 February 2013. Archived from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "Senior CPC official vows to develop friendly cooperation with French Communist Party". People's Daily. 8 November 2011. Archived from the original on 28 October 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "Senior CPC official meets Russian delegation". People's Daily. 24 August 2010. Archived from the original on 4 January 2014. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "CPC to institutionalize talks with European parties". People's Daily. 19 May 2011. Archived from the original on 9 November 2011. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "Senior CPC leader meets chairman of Communist Party of Brazil". People's Daily. 5 June 2005. Archived from the original on 4 January 2014. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ Vagenas, Elisseos (2010). "The International role of China". Communist Party of Greece. Archived from the original on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
- ^ "A Leadership Delegation of The Communist Party of Nepal (unified Marxist−Leninist)". China Executive Leadership Academy, Jinggangshan. 27 June 2012. Archived from the original on 14 October 2018. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "CPC leader pledges exchanges with Communist Party of Spain". People's Daily. 6 April 2010. Archived from the original on 4 January 2014. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "12th CPA Congress". Central Committee of the Communist Party of Australia. 12 September 2013. Archived from the original on 29 March 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "More foreign party leaders congratulate CPC on National Congress". Xinhua News Agency. 16 November 2007. Archived from the original on 8 January 2014. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ O'Dwyer, Shaun (22 October 2021). "The Japanese Communist Party's Feud with Beijing: Will the Global Left Take Note?". New Bloom Magazine. Retrieved 5 August 2025.
- ^ Shambaugh 2008, p. 100.
- ^ Shambaugh 2008, p. 81.
- ^ a b c d Shambaugh 2008, p. 82.
- ^ a b c d e Shambaugh 2008, p. 84.
- ^ Shambaugh 2008, pp. 82–83.
- ^ a b c d Shambaugh 2008, p. 83.
- ^ a b Shambaugh 2008, p. 85.
- ^ Shambaugh 2008, pp. 85–86.
- ^ Shambaugh 2008, pp. 86–92.
- ^ a b c Shambaugh 2008, p. 93.
- ^ Shambaugh 2008, p. 94.
- ^ Shambaugh 2008, pp. 95–96.
- ^ a b c Shambaugh 2008, p. 96.
- ^ a b c d e f Shambaugh 2008, p. 97.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Shambaugh 2008, p. 98.
- ^ "Chinese Communist Party to train chavista leaders". El Universal. 13 May 2013. Archived from the original on 4 January 2014. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ a b c Shambaugh 2008, p. 99.
- ^ Shambaugh 2008, pp. 99–100.
Sources
[edit]Books
[edit]- Baum, Richard (1996). Burying Mao: Chinese Politics in the Age of Deng Xiaoping. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-03637-3.
- Baylis, Thomas (1989). Governing by Committee: Collegial Leadership in Advanced Societies. State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-88706-944-4.
- Bush, Richard (2005). Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait. Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 978-0-8157-9781-4.
- Broodsgaard, Kjeld Erik; Zheng, Yongnian (2006). The Chinese Communist Party in Reform. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-09928-5.
- Carter, Peter (1976). Mao. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-273140-1.
- Chan, Adrian (2003). Chinese Marxism. Continuum Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8264-7307-3.
- Cheek, Timothy; Mühlhahn, Klaus; Van de Ven, Hans J., eds. (2021). Chinese Communist Party: A Century in Ten Lives. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108904186. ISBN 978-1-108-90418-6. S2CID 241952636.
- Coase, Ronald; Wang, Ling (2012). How China Became Capitalist. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-01936-3.
- Ding, X.L. (2006). The Decline of Communism in China: Legitimacy Crisis, 1977–1989. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-02623-9.
- Dirlik, Arif (2005). The Marxism in the Chinese revolution. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-7425-3069-8. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
- Dittmer, Lowell, et al. (eds.) Informal politics in East Asia, (2000), Informal politics in East Asia
- Feigon, Lee (2002). Mao: A Reinterpretation. Ivan R. Dee. ISBN 978-1-56663-522-6.
- Finer, Catherine Jones (2003). Social Policy Reform in China: Views from Home and Abroad. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7546-3175-0.
- Fu Delete repeated word = Zhengyuan (1993). Autocratic Tradition and Chinese Politics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-44228-2.
- Gao, James (2009). Historical Dictionary of Modern China (1800–1949). Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-6308-8.
- Ghai, Yash; Arup, Chris; Chanock, Martin (12 October 2000). Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Competing Claims in Multi-Ethnic States. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-78642-3. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 29 April 2022.
- Gregor, A. James (1999). Marxism, China & Development: Reflections on Theory and Reality. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4128-2815-4.
- Li, Gucheng (1995). A Glossary of Political Terms of the People's Republic of China. Chinese University Press. ISBN 978-962-201-615-6.
- Guo, Sujian (2012). Chinese Politics and Government: Power, Ideology and Organization. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-55138-0.
- Guo, Xuezhi (2012b). China's Security State: Philosophy, Evolution, and Politics (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139150897. ISBN 978-1-139-15089-7.
- Guo, Sujian; Guo, Baogang (2008). China in Search of a Harmonious Society. Rowman & Littlefield|Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-7391-2624-0.
- Heath, Timothy R. (2014). China's New Governing Party Paradigm: Political Renewal and the Pursuit of National Rejuvenation. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. ISBN 978-1-4094-6201-9.
- Heazle, Michael; Knight, Nick (2007). China–Japan Relations in the Twenty-first Century: Creating a Future Past?. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78195-623-6.
- Izuhara, Misa (2013). Handbook on East Asian Social Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 978-0-85793-029-3.
- Joseph, William (2010). Politics in China: an Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-533530-9.
- Kornberg, Judith; Faust, John (2005). China in World Politics: Policies, Processes, Prospects. University of British Columbia Press. ISBN 978-1-58826-248-6.
- Kuhn, Robert Lawrence (2011). How China's Leaders Think: The Inside Story of China's Past, Current and Future Leaders. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-10425-5.
- Latham, Kevin (2007). Pop Culture China!: Media, Arts, and Lifestyle. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-85109-582-7.
- Leung, Edwin Pak-wah, ed. (1992). Historical Dictionary of Revolutionary China, 1839–1976. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-26457-3.
- Lew, Christopher R.; Leung, Edwin Pak-wah (1996), Historical Dictionary of the Chinese Civil War (2nd ed.), Scarecrow Press
- Li, Cheng (2009). China's Changing Political Landscape: Prospects for Democracy. Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 978-0-8157-5208-0.
- Liu, Guoli (2011). Politics and Government in China. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-313-35731-2.
- Löfstedt, Jan-Ingvar (1980). Chinese Educational Policy: Changes and Contradictions, 1949–79. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. ISBN 978-0-391-02217-1. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
- Mackerras, Colin; McMillen, Donald; Watson, Andrew (2001). Dictionary of the Politics of the People's Republic of China. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-25067-2.
- Richard, McGregor (2012). The Party: The Secret World of China's Communist Rulers (2nd ed.). Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-06-170876-3.
- Marquis, Christopher; Qiao, Kunyuan (2022). Mao and Markets: The Communist Roots of Chinese Enterprise. New Haven: Yale University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv3006z6k. ISBN 978-0-300-26883-6. JSTOR j.ctv3006z6k. OCLC 1348572572. S2CID 253067190.
- Musto, Marcello (2008). Karl Marx's Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy 150 Years Later. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-07382-5.
- Smith, Ivian; West, Nigel (2012). Historical Dictionary of Chinese Intelligence. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-7174-8.
- Ogden, Chris (2013). Handbook of China s Governance and Domestic Politics. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-57953-0.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). Governance in China. OECD Publishing. ISBN 978-92-64-00844-1.
- Pantsov, Alexander (2015). Deng Xiaoping: A Revolutionary Life (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-939203-2.
- Pye, Lucian, The Dynamics of Chinese politics (1987) The Dynamics of Chinese politics
- Saich, Tony. From Rebel to Ruler: One Hundred Years of the Chinese Communist Party (2021)
- Saich, Tony. Finding Allies and Making Revolution The Early Years of the Chinese Communist Party (2020)
- Saich, Tony. Governance and Politics of China (2015)
- Saich, Tony; Yang, Benjamin (1995). The Rise to Power of the Chinese Communist Party: Documents and Analysis. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-1-56324-155-0.
- Schram, Stuart (1966). Mao Tse-Tung. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-14-020840-5.
- Shambaugh, David (2008). China's Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-25492-3.
- Shambaugh, David (2013). China Goes Global: The Partial Power. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-932369-2.
- Snow, Edgar, Red Star Over China 1937 Red Star Over China - The Rise Of The Red Army
- Sullivan, Lawrence (2007). Historical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-6443-6.
- Sullivan, Lawrence (2012). Historical Dictionary of the Chinese Communist Party. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-7225-7.
- Jonathan, Unger (2002). The Nature of Chinese Politics: From Mao to Jiang. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-4115-1.
- van de Ven, Johan (1991). From Friend to Comrade: The Founding of the Chinese Communist Party, 1920–1927. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-91087-4.
- Vogel, Ezra (2011). Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-05544-5.
- Yeh, Wen-hsin (1996). Provincial Passages: Culture, Space, and the Origins of Chinese Communism. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-91632-6.
- Wang, Gunwu; Zheng, Yongian (2012). China: Development and Governance. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-4425-83-4.
- White, Stephen (2000). Russia's New Politics: The Management of a Postcommunist Society. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-58737-2.
- Whitson, William W., The Chinese high command : a history of Communist military politics, 1927–71, (1973)
- Wong, Yiu-chung (2005). From Deng Xiaoping to Jiang Zemin: Two Decades of Political Reform in the People's Republic of China. University Press of America. ISBN 978-0-7618-3074-0.
- Yu, Keping (2010). Democracy and the Rule of Law in China. Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-18212-7.
- Zhao, Suisheng (2004). A Nation-state by Construction: Dynamics of Modern Chinese Nationalism. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-5001-1.
- Zheng, Wang (2012). Never Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations. Columbia University Press. p. 119. ISBN 978-0-231-14891-7. Archived from the original on 19 October 2020. Retrieved 21 August 2019.
Journal articles
[edit]- Abrami, Regina; Malesky, Edmund; Zheng, Yu (2008). "Accountability and Inequality in Single-Party Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Vietnam and China" (PDF). University of California Press. pp. 1–46. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 February 2016. Retrieved 9 December 2013.
- Brown, Kerry (2 August 2012). "The Communist Party of China and Ideology" (PDF). China: An International Journal. 10 (2): 52–68. doi:10.1353/chn.2012.0013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 February 2016. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
- Chambers, David Ian (30 April 2002). "Edging in from the Cold: The Past and Present State of Chinese Intelligence Historiography". Journal of the American Intelligence Professional. Vol. 56, no. 3. Central Intelligence Agency. pp. 31–46. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2016.
- Dynon, Nicholas (July 2008). ""Four Civilizations" and the Evolution of Post-Mao Chinese Socialist Ideology". The China Journal. Vol. 60. University of Chicago Press. pp. 83–109. JSTOR 20647989.
- Li, Cheng (19 November 2009). "Intra-Party Democracy in China: Should We Take It Seriously?". Vol. 30, no. 4. China Leadership Monitor. pp. 1–14. Archived from the original on 4 June 2016. Retrieved 9 December 2013.
- Mahoney, Josef Gregory; Yi, Jiexiong; Li, Xiuling (April 2009). "A Marxist Perspective on Chinese Reforms: Interview with Jiexiong". pp. 177–192. JSTOR 40404544.
- Köllner, Patrick (August 2013). "Informal Institutions in Autocracies: Analytical Perspectives and the Case of the Chinese Communist Party" (PDF). No. 232. German Institute of Global and Area Studies. pp. 1–30. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 November 2020. Retrieved 9 December 2013.
- Miller, H. Lyman (19 November 2009). "Hu Jintao and the Party Politburo" (PDF). Vol. 32, no. 9. China Leadership Monitor. pp. 1–11. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 April 2020. Retrieved 9 December 2013.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Communist Party of China (category) at Wikimedia Commons
Quotations related to Chinese Communist Party at Wikiquote- Official website

Chinese Communist Party
View on GrokipediaOrigins and Early Development
Founding and Influences (1921–1930s)
The Communist Party of China (CPC) was founded on July 23, 1921, during its First National Congress held in Shanghai, with sessions later moved to a boat on Jiaxing Lake to evade detection. The congress convened 13 delegates representing around 50 party members, including Chen Duxiu (陳獨秀), who was elected as the first general secretary, and early participants like Mao Zedong from the Hunan group. Li Dazhao, a co-founder and influential intellectual at Peking University, played a pivotal role in introducing Marxist ideas to Chinese radicals through study groups and writings inspired by the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution.[10][11][12] The CPC's formation was heavily influenced by Marxist-Leninist ideology and direct Soviet intervention via the Communist International (Comintern). In 1920, Comintern agent Grigori Voitinsky arrived in China, providing funding and organizational guidance that facilitated the establishment of communist study groups and the Socialist Youth Corps, precursors to the party. The Comintern's directives emphasized proletarian revolution and internationalism, shaping the CPC's initial urban-focused strategy and subordination to Soviet oversight, as evidenced by the party's prompt affiliation with the Comintern at its Second Congress in 1922. This external catalysis, rather than spontaneous indigenous development, underscores the party's origins as an extension of global Bolshevik efforts to export revolution amid China's post-May Fourth intellectual ferment.[13][14][15] In the 1920s, the CPC experienced rapid but fragile growth, expanding from 53 members in 1921 to approximately 60,000 by 1927, largely through alliance with the Kuomintang (KMT) under Comintern-orchestrated United Front policies starting in 1923, which allowed communists to penetrate labor unions and peasant associations. The 1927 Shanghai Massacre, where KMT leader Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) purged CPC elements, decimated urban membership, reducing it to about 10,000 survivors who fled to rural bases. By the early 1930s, the party shifted toward guerrilla warfare and peasant mobilization in soviet areas, with membership stabilizing around 30,000 amid internal purges and factional struggles influenced by ongoing Comintern debates over strategy.[16][11][17]Survival Amid Warlordism and Japanese Invasion
Following the Kuomintang (國民黨)'s (KMT) purge of communists in urban areas during the Shanghai Massacre of April 1927, the Communist Party of China (CPC) shifted its strategy to establishing rural bases amid China's warlord fragmentation, where regional military cliques controlled territories after the 1911 Revolution.[2] This pivot, influenced by Mao Zedong's emphasis on peasant mobilization through uprisings like the Autumn Harvest Uprising in September 1927, led to the creation of the Jiangxi Soviet in late 1931 as the CPC's primary rural stronghold, encompassing about 3 million people by 1933 and serving as a model for land redistribution and guerrilla warfare.[18] The CPC's Red Army, numbering around 40,000 in the early campaigns, defended these bases against KMT forces while navigating alliances and conflicts with local warlords.[19] The KMT, under Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), launched five encirclement and annihilation campaigns starting in December 1930 to eradicate the Jiangxi Soviet, deploying up to 1 million troops by the fifth campaign in 1933–1934.[20] The first four campaigns were repelled by the Red Army using mobile warfare tactics, inflicting heavy casualties on KMT forces—estimated at over 100,000 in the third campaign alone—but the fifth succeeded in encircling the communists, reducing their controlled area and forcing a breakout on October 16, 1934, with approximately 86,000 troops initiating the Long March.[19][21] This 6,000-mile (9,600 km) retreat across rugged terrain, evading KMT pursuit amid warlord territories, lasted until October 1935, when roughly 8,000 survivors reached Yan'an in Shaanxi Province, representing a survival rate of about 9 percent; the Zunyi Conference in January 1935 during the march elevated Mao to de facto leadership by criticizing prior strategies.[18][22] Parallel to these internal struggles, Japan's invasion escalated with the Mukden Incident on September 18, 1931, leading to the occupation of Manchuria and establishment of the puppet state Manchukuo, prompting the CPC to advocate for a united front against Japanese aggression as early as 1935 through the Anti-Japanese National Salvation Movement.[2] However, the KMT prioritized eliminating the CPC, continuing campaigns until the Xi'an Incident in December 1936, where KMT generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng kidnapped Chiang, pressuring him to form the Second United Front with the CPC in 1937 following the Marco Polo Bridge Incident on July 7, 1937, which marked the full-scale Second Sino-Japanese War.[22] Under this nominal alliance, the CPC's Eighth Route Army and New Fourth Army, totaling around 50,000 at the war's outset, employed guerrilla tactics in rural areas behind Japanese lines, expanding base areas to control over 100 million people by 1945 while avoiding major conventional battles that weakened the KMT, thus preserving and growing CPC strength.[23][22] This survival strategy, leveraging the Japanese threat to halt KMT offensives, positioned the CPC for postwar dominance despite its smaller forces compared to the KMT's millions.[22]Rise to Power and Consolidation
Chinese Civil War and United Front with KMT (1937–1949)
The Xi'an Incident of December 12–25, 1936, involved the detention of Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-shek by his generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, who sought to compel a cessation of the ongoing civil war with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in favor of united resistance against Japanese expansion. Negotiations, mediated by CCP representative Zhou Enlai and others, resulted in Chiang's release on December 25 after his agreement in principle to form a united front against Japan, marking the effective end of open hostilities between the Kuomintang (KMT) and CCP. This paved the way for the formal Second United Front, announced on February 10, 1937, as a coalition to combat Japanese aggression, though underlying ideological conflicts persisted.[24][25] Under the United Front framework, the CCP reorganized its Red Army into the Eighth Route Army and New Fourth Army, nominally subordinated to KMT command but retaining operational autonomy in northern and central China. From 1937 to 1945, amid the Second Sino-Japanese War, the CCP prioritized guerrilla tactics against Japanese forces while avoiding direct confrontation with KMT troops, using the period to consolidate rural base areas such as Yan'an. This strategy enabled territorial expansion from 100,000 square kilometers in 1937 to over 900,000 by 1945, with CCP forces growing from approximately 40,000 combatants to nearly 1 million, bolstered by peasant recruitment and local governance emphasizing anti-Japanese resistance. Clashes between CCP and KMT units occurred sporadically, notably the New Fourth Army Incident in January 1941, where KMT forces ambushed and decimated 9,000 CCP troops, highlighting the alliance's fragility despite nominal cooperation against Japan.[25][26] Japan's surrender in August 1945 dissolved the United Front, prompting renewed civil war as both sides vied for control of Japanese-held territories, particularly Manchuria, where Soviet forces initially facilitated CCP entry by handing over captured weapons. U.S.-brokered peace talks in Chongqing from October 1945 to January 1946 yielded a temporary truce, but violations escalated into full conflict by July 1946, with KMT forces initially holding numerical superiority of about 4 million troops against the CCP's 1.2 million. The CCP's People's Liberation Army (人民解放軍) (PLA) adopted protracted people's war doctrine, emphasizing rural encirclement of cities, supply line disruptions, and avoidance of decisive battles until conditions favored them, contrasting with the KMT's conventional offensives hampered by internal corruption, hyperinflation, and urban-centric focus.[2][27][28] Central to CCP success was its mobilization of peasant support through land reform campaigns in liberated areas, redistributing property from landlords to tenants via public trials and executions, which eliminated opposition and tied rural populations to the cause. By 1947, these reforms had redistributed over 50 million acres, generating 2–3 million peasant recruits and logistical networks of "people's carts" for transport, while KMT policies alienated landowners without equivalent rural appeal. This grassroots base enabled the PLA to outlast KMT resource strains, as evidenced by desertions and mutinies in Nationalist ranks.[2][28] The tide turned decisively in late 1948 with three interconnected PLA offensives. The Liaoshen Campaign (September 12–November 2, 1948) secured Manchuria by capturing Jinzhou and Shenyang, annihilating or capturing around 470,000 KMT troops and yielding vast stockpiles of U.S.-supplied equipment. This victory facilitated the Huaihai Campaign (November 6, 1948–January 10, 1949) in central China, where PLA forces, supported by 5.4 million civilian laborers, encircled and destroyed 550,000 KMT soldiers near Xuzhou, including elite units. Concurrently, the Pingjin Campaign (November 29, 1948–January 31, 1949) isolated and captured Beijing (then Beiping) and Tianjin, eliminating another 520,000 KMT forces with minimal destruction to urban infrastructure through negotiated surrenders. These campaigns, involving over 1.5 million PLA combatants, shattered KMT cohesion, reducing its effective army to under 1 million.[27][29] By April 1949, PLA units crossed the Yangtze River, capturing Nanjing—the KMT capital—on April 23, prompting Chiang's flight to Taiwan and the collapse of organized resistance on the mainland. The CCP proclaimed control over vast territories, culminating in the establishment of the People's Republic of China on October 1, 1949, after mopping-up operations against remaining KMT holdouts. Total civil war casualties exceeded 6 million, with the CCP's adaptive strategy and mass mobilization proving superior to KMT institutional failures.[27][28]Establishment of the People's Republic (1949)
On September 21–30, 1949, the first plenary session of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) convened in Beijing (then Beiping), where delegates from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and allied groups adopted the Common Program of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference as the provisional constitution of the emerging state.[30] The CPPCC also elected a Central People's Government Council comprising 56 members, predominantly CCP leaders, and formally established the People's Republic of China (PRC), designating Beijing as the capital.[31] Although structured as a united front incorporating eight smaller "democratic parties" and mass organizations, the CCP exercised de facto control through its dominance in the CPPCC and command of the People's Liberation Army (PLA).[32] On October 1, 1949, CCP Chairman Mao Zedong proclaimed the founding of the PRC from Tiananmen Gate, announcing the creation of the Central People's Government with himself as chairman, Zhou Enlai as premier, and other CCP figures in key roles such as Zhu De as commander-in-chief of the PLA.[2] [33] This event marked the culmination of the CCP's military triumph in the Chinese Civil War, during which PLA forces had captured major cities like Nanjing in April 1949, forcing Kuomintang (KMT) leader Chiang Kai-shek and remnants of his government to retreat to Taiwan.[34] The proclamation rejected the legitimacy of the Republic of China on Taiwan, asserting the PRC's sovereignty over all Chinese territory.[35] In the immediate aftermath, the CCP prioritized consolidating control by dispatching PLA units to secure remaining mainland territories, including Tibet and Xinjiang, while initiating campaigns against counter-revolutionaries to eliminate KMT loyalists and potential internal threats.[36] The new government structure centralized authority under the CCP-led State Council, subordinating legislative and judicial functions to party directives, thereby embedding the organization's vanguard role in the state's foundational framework.[37] By year's end, the CCP had enrolled over 4.5 million new members, reflecting rapid expansion amid the revolutionary momentum.[34]Initial Reforms: Land Redistribution and Korean War Involvement (1950s)
Following the establishment of the People's Republic of China on October 1, 1949, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) prioritized rural land reform to dismantle the landlord class and secure peasant support, enacting the Agrarian Reform Law on June 30, 1950, which mandated the confiscation of land from landlords without compensation and its redistribution to tenant farmers and landless peasants.[38] The campaign, spanning 1950 to 1953, mobilized peasants through mass meetings involving "speaking bitterness" sessions where grievances against landlords were publicly aired, often escalating into violent struggle sessions that resulted in the classification, persecution, and execution of designated class enemies.[38] Approximately 700 million mu (about 47 million hectares) of land and associated production tools were redistributed to around 300 million previously landless or tenant peasants, fundamentally altering rural property relations and enabling the CCP to extend state control into villages via peasant associations.[39] The land reform process entailed systematic identification of landlords based on criteria such as ownership exceeding local averages or exploitation through rent and usury, leading to public trials and executions estimated at around 1 million landlords and associated figures, though exact figures remain contested due to varying regional intensities and incomplete records.[40] This violence was not incidental but a deliberate CCP strategy to eradicate feudal remnants, foster class hatred, and consolidate revolutionary loyalty, as articulated in party directives emphasizing "struggle" against exploiters to prevent counterrevolution.[41] By 1953, the campaign had redistributed land to over 80% of rural households in implemented areas, paving the way for subsequent collectivization experiments, though it also sowed long-term social disruptions including cadre abuses and false accusations in the absence of formal legal oversight.[39] Concurrently, the CCP committed to the Korean War in October 1950, dispatching the People's Volunteer Army (PVA)—comprising elements of the People's Liberation Army—across the Yalu River after United Nations forces under General Douglas MacArthur approached China's border, framing the intervention as a defensive necessity to safeguard national security against perceived U.S. encirclement.[42] Mao Zedong finalized the decision on October 2, 1950, influenced by Stalin's tacit approval and North Korean requests for aid following the Inchon landing's reversal of North Korean gains, deploying initial forces of about 250,000 troops under Peng Dehuai without a formal war declaration to avoid provoking full Soviet-U.S. escalation.[43] The PVA's entry halted UN advances, inflicting heavy casualties through human-wave tactics and night infiltrations, but at immense cost: Chinese estimates report around 390,000 total PVA casualties, including over 110,000 killed in action by war's end in July 1953.[44] Domestically, the war effort—propagandized as the "Resist America, Aid Korea" campaign—served to unify the populace behind the CCP, suppress dissent, and justify resource mobilization, including conscription of over 1.3 million troops and diversion of industrial output toward military needs, which exacerbated economic strains amid ongoing reconstruction.[45] Intervention motives encompassed ideological solidarity with communist allies, border defense against potential U.S. invasion spillover, and enhancement of Mao's domestic authority by portraying the CCP as a victorious anti-imperialist force, despite Soviet air support limitations that prolonged reliance on ground superiority.[42] The stalemated armistice preserved North Korean regime survival but entrenched China's Cold War alignment with the Soviet bloc, delaying internal reforms and contributing to fiscal deficits equivalent to half of 1950's national budget.[44]Major Policy Disasters and Internal Chaos
Great Leap Forward and Resulting Famine (1958–1962)
The Great Leap Forward was initiated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) under Mao Zedong's leadership in 1958 as the second Five-Year Plan, aiming to rapidly transform China into an industrial powerhouse surpassing Western economies through mass mobilization, agricultural collectivization, and decentralized steel production.[5] The campaign emphasized ideological fervor over technical expertise, with policies including the formation of massive people's communes that merged 25,000 households on average into collective units, abolishing private farming and implementing communal dining halls to enforce labor discipline and resource sharing.[46] Backyard furnaces were promoted nationwide to produce steel, diverting rural labor from agriculture and consuming vast amounts of fuel and scrap metal, while agricultural techniques such as deep plowing, dense planting, and the Four Pests Campaign (targeting sparrows, rats, and other animals) disrupted ecosystems and soil fertility.[5] Local cadres, incentivized by quotas and fearing reprisal, systematically inflated harvest reports—creating an "illusion of superabundance"—which prompted the central government to procure excessive grain for urban areas and exports, leaving rural populations with insufficient food despite adequate aggregate production in some regions.[46][47] These policies precipitated a severe famine from 1959 to 1961, exacerbated by the reallocation of labor to non-agricultural tasks, procurement policies biased toward urban industrial workers, and the breakdown of traditional incentives in communes where output was decoupled from individual effort.[48] Grain output fell sharply from 200 million tons in 1958 to 143.5 million tons in 1960, while exports continued at high levels to fund Soviet loans, and communal mess halls wasted food through poor management.[46] Scholarly estimates of excess deaths range from 16.5 million to over 30 million, with demographic analyses attributing the catastrophe primarily to policy-induced declines in food availability and distribution failures rather than solely natural disasters like droughts, which affected only parts of the country.[49] Higher-end figures, such as 45 million, have been proposed based on archival data revealing widespread violence, torture of underreporting cadres, and deliberate starvation in some areas, though official CCP admissions post-Mao pegged losses at around 16.5 million to minimize ideological damage.[5][47] In response, the CCP began dismantling radical elements by early 1960, restoring private plots and household responsibility in agriculture, but Mao resisted full retreat, purging Defense Minister Peng Dehuai at the 1959 Lushan Conference for criticizing the campaign as a "man-made disaster."[50] Mao formally acknowledged partial responsibility in 1962 at the Seven Thousand Cadres Conference, shifting blame to implementation errors while retaining personal authority, which delayed comprehensive reforms until Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping's pragmatic adjustments in the early 1960s averted total collapse.[50] The episode exposed flaws in top-down central planning and one-man rule, contributing to internal factionalism that later fueled the Cultural Revolution, yet the CCP has since framed it as a temporary deviation from Marxist-Leninist principles rather than a systemic indictment of collectivization.[5]Cultural Revolution and Power Struggles (1966–1976)
The Cultural Revolution, formally the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, was initiated by Mao Zedong through the CCP Central Committee's "May 16 Notification" on May 16, 1966, which warned of bourgeois infiltration within the party and called for a purge of revisionist elements to prevent capitalist restoration.[51] This campaign stemmed from Mao's desire to reconsolidate personal authority after the economic failures of the Great Leap Forward diminished his influence, positioning it as a struggle against perceived internal enemies like Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping, who favored pragmatic policies.[52] Mao mobilized urban youth into Red Guard units to attack "Four Olds" (old ideas, culture, customs, habits) and party officials deemed disloyal, leading to widespread factional violence and the dismantling of established CCP hierarchies.[53] By 1967, the movement escalated into seizures of power by radical groups, with Red Guards persecuting millions through public struggle sessions, beatings, and imprisonments; Liu Shaoqi, the CCP general secretary, was ousted, tortured, and died in custody in 1969.[52] The People's Liberation Army intervened to restore order in 1968, but purges continued, displacing over 22 million urban youth to rural labor and causing profound social disruption. Scholarly estimates attribute 1.1 to 1.6 million deaths to violence, suicides, and mistreatment during the decade, though higher figures exist due to incomplete records and official underreporting.[54] [55] Economic output stagnated, with industrial production falling 13.8% in 1967, as ideological fervor prioritized over practical governance.[52] Power struggles intensified with the elevation of Lin Biao as Mao's designated successor at the 1969 CCP Congress, where Lin's cult of personality rivaled Mao's through promotion of the "Little Red Book." However, suspicions of Lin's ambitions led to his alleged coup plot, culminating in the September 13, 1971, plane crash in Mongolia that killed him and family members while fleeing to the Soviet Union, marking a major setback for Maoist radicals.[56] The vacuum enabled the rise of the Gang of Four—Jiang Qing (Mao's wife), Zhang Chunqiao, Yao Wenyuan, and Wang Hongwen—who dominated propaganda and policy from 1972, pushing ultra-left campaigns against figures like Zhou Enlai and Deng Xiaoping, whom they accused of rightism.[57] The Cultural Revolution effectively concluded with Mao's death on September 9, 1976, after which Hua Guofeng ordered the arrest of the Gang of Four on October 6, 1976, signaling the end of radical Maoist dominance and paving the way for Deng Xiaoping's rehabilitation and reforms.[52] This period exposed deep fissures in CCP leadership, with Mao's personal authority enabling factional chaos that undermined institutional stability and resulted in the persecution of an estimated 36 million people through various campaigns.[55] Post-event CCP evaluations, while officially deeming it a "catastrophe," have varied in acknowledging Mao's central role, reflecting ongoing ideological constraints on historical assessment.[53]Reform and Modernization Era
Deng Xiaoping's Pragmatic Shift (1978–1990s)
Following the death of Mao Zedong in 1976 and the brief interregnum under Hua Guofeng, Deng Xiaoping consolidated power through rehabilitation of purged cadres and alignment with pragmatic elements in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), culminating in his de facto leadership by late 1978.[58] At the Third Plenum of the 11th Central Committee, held December 18–22, 1978, the CCP shifted priorities from ideological class struggle to "socialist modernization," endorsing Deng's "reform and opening up" (gaige kaifang) agenda, which emphasized economic construction as the central task while retaining Marxist-Leninist political orthodoxy.[59] This plenum approved initial rural reforms, including the household responsibility system that dismantled collective farming by allowing peasants to lease land and retain surplus production after fulfilling state quotas, spurring agricultural output growth of 8.2% annually from 1978 to 1984.[58] Deng's policies extended to urban and coastal experimentation, with the establishment of four Special Economic Zones (SEZs)—Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Shantou, and Xiamen—approved by the State Council on July 15, 1979, and formalized on August 26, 1979, to test market mechanisms, tax incentives, and foreign direct investment without fully abandoning state planning.[60] These zones, concentrated in Guangdong and Fujian provinces near Hong Kong and Taiwan, attracted over $1.8 billion in foreign capital by 1985 through lax regulations and export-oriented manufacturing, serving as "windows" for technology transfer and pragmatic adaptation of capitalist tools to socialist ends, as Deng famously articulated in his "black cat, white cat" proverb prioritizing results over ideology.[58] Industrial reforms followed, including enterprise autonomy in profit retention and pricing flexibility by the mid-1980s, alongside gradual price decontrols that reduced subsidies but fueled inflation exceeding 18% in 1988.[58] These measures drove empirical economic transformation: China's real GDP grew at an average annual rate of approximately 9.8% from 1978 to 1992, lifting roughly 150 million people out of extreme poverty by 1990 through market incentives that boosted productivity in agriculture and light industry, though urban-rural disparities widened.[61][62] Deng framed this as "socialism with Chinese characteristics," blending state ownership of key sectors with private enterprise tolerance, but political liberalization lagged, with the CCP maintaining monopoly control via ideological campaigns and suppression of dissent to prevent Soviet-style perestroika unraveling.[58] Tensions erupted in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, triggered by inflation, corruption tied to reforms, and the death of reformist Hu Yaobang, drawing hundreds of thousands of students and workers demanding accountability and expanded rights.[63] Deng, as paramount leader and Central Military Commission chairman, endorsed hardliners like Li Peng, declaring martial law on May 20, 1989, and authorizing the People's Liberation Army to clear Beijing on June 3–4, resulting in the deaths of several hundred to over 2,000 civilians per declassified estimates, prioritizing regime stability over concessions.[64][63] The aftermath saw purges of moderates like Zhao Ziyang, international sanctions, and a temporary reform slowdown, but Deng's 1992 Southern Tour reaffirmed opening-up, accelerating SEZ expansions and private sector growth into the 1990s, cementing the CCP's hybrid model of authoritarian politics and export-led economics.[58]Leadership under Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao (1990s–2012)
Jiang Zemin succeeded Zhao Ziyang as General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in June 1989, following the party's imposition of martial law during the Tiananmen Square protests, a move that consolidated hardliner control while navigating Deng Xiaoping's paramount influence until Deng's death in 1997.[65] Jiang prioritized economic stabilization and growth, appointing Premier Zhu Rongji to overhaul state-owned enterprises (SOEs), which involved laying off over 20 million workers between 1998 and 2001 to address inefficiencies and non-performing loans exceeding 25% of GDP.[66] These reforms facilitated China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) on December 11, 2001, integrating the economy globally and boosting exports from $249 billion in 2001 to $1.2 trillion by 2007, though they exacerbated urban unemployment and rural-urban disparities.[67] Real GDP growth averaged approximately 9.5% annually during Jiang's tenure, driven by foreign direct investment surging to $53.5 billion by 2002, yet official statistics faced skepticism for potential overstatement amid incentives for local officials to inflate figures.[68] [69] Ideologically, Jiang introduced the "Three Represents" theory in July 2001, amending the CCP constitution to assert that the party must represent advanced productive forces, an advanced culture, and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority, effectively opening membership to private entrepreneurs and intellectuals for the first time since 1949.[70] This adaptation, formalized at the 16th National Congress in November 2002, increased party recruits from business elites, with private sector members rising from negligible numbers to over 1 million by 2002, aiming to align the CCP with market dynamics while diluting proletarian orthodoxy; critics within conservative factions viewed it as ideological dilution, but it sustained party legitimacy amid rapid capitalization.[71] [72] Domestically, Jiang's era saw intensified suppression of perceived threats, notably the July 20, 1999, ban on Falun Gong after its April 25 peaceful protest of 10,000 practitioners outside Zhongnanhai, which Jiang personally labeled a political challenge rivaling the party's size; this initiated a nationwide campaign involving mass arrests, forced labor, and propaganda designating the group an "evil cult," with estimates of tens of thousands detained by 2000, prioritizing regime stability over religious freedoms.[73] [65] Hu Jintao succeeded Jiang as General Secretary at the 16th National Congress in November 2002, assuming the presidency in March 2003, and led until the 18th National Congress in November 2012, emphasizing collective leadership within the Politburo Standing Committee to mitigate factionalism.[74] Hu promoted the "Scientific Outlook on Development" and "Harmonious Society" concepts, introduced in 2003 and 2004 respectively, to address imbalances from prior growth, such as environmental degradation and Gini coefficient inequality peaking at 0.49 by 2008; these guided policies like rural healthcare expansion covering 800 million by 2011 and stimulus spending of 4 trillion yuan ($586 billion) post-2008 global financial crisis, sustaining GDP growth averaging 10.5% from 2003 to 2010.[75] [68] However, unchecked local cadre incentives fostered corruption, with high-profile cases like the 2006 execution of Shanghai Party Secretary Chen Liangyu for embezzling 3.5 billion yuan, and Hu himself warning in 2012 that graft threatened the party's survival, as it eroded public trust amid princeling networks and rent-seeking in SOEs.[76] [77] Under Hu, the CCP deepened societal penetration via grassroots cells in private firms, expanding membership to 82 million by 2012, while suppressing dissent in Tibet (2008 unrest) and Xinjiang through enhanced surveillance and cadre training programs.[74] Economic state capitalism advanced, with SOE assets growing to 70% of GDP by 2011, but this entrenched inefficiency and debt, as non-performing loans reemerged; Hu's tenure hosted the 2008 Beijing Olympics, symbolizing global integration, yet human rights constraints persisted, including media censorship during SARS outbreak in 2003, where initial cover-ups delayed response until April.[66] By 2012, widening wealth gaps—with urban-rural income ratio at 3.3:1—and environmental costs like 16 of the world's 20 most polluted cities in China underscored limits of the growth model, setting the stage for Xi Jinping's centralization.[78]Xi Jinping's Centralization and Recent Policies (2012–2025)
Xi Jinping assumed the role of General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party at the 18th National Congress in November 2012, marking the beginning of a period characterized by rapid centralization of authority within the party and state apparatus.[79] This shift reversed aspects of the collective leadership model established under Deng Xiaoping, with Xi accumulating positions such as Chairman of the Central Military Commission and, in 2013, President of the People's Republic of China.[80] His administration emphasized "Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era," incorporated into the party constitution in 2017 and the state constitution in 2018, elevating his ideological framework to guide policy.[81] A cornerstone of Xi's consolidation was the anti-corruption campaign launched in late 2012, which investigated over 1.5 million officials by 2017 and continued into the 2020s, targeting both low-level "flies" and high-ranking "tigers."[82] In 2024 alone, it ensnared a record 56 senior cadres at vice-ministerial level or above, including figures from the financial sector and the People's Liberation Army Rocket Force.[83] While framed as a purification effort, the campaign has been instrumental in eliminating political rivals and securing loyalty, with purges extending to military leadership amid modernization drives.[84][85] In March 2018, the National People's Congress amended the constitution to abolish the two-term limit on the presidency, passed by a vote of 2,958 to 2, enabling Xi's indefinite rule.[86] This was followed by his uncontested third term as General Secretary at the 20th National Congress in October 2022, where the Politburo Standing Committee was filled exclusively with loyalists, further entrenching personalistic rule.[87] By 2023, Xi secured a third presidential term, solidifying control over party, state, and military institutions.[88] Domestically, Xi's policies emphasized state control and ideological conformity. The zero-COVID strategy, enforced from 2020 to late 2022, involved mass testing, lockdowns, and border closures, credited by Xi with minimizing deaths but resulting in economic disruptions and widespread protests that prompted its abrupt end in December 2022.[89] The "common prosperity" initiative, intensified in 2021, aimed to reduce income inequality through regulations on high earners and private enterprises, including mandates for tech firms to align with party goals.[90] A parallel crackdown on technology giants from 2020 onward imposed antitrust fines, delisted apps, and erased trillions in market value, exemplified by actions against Alibaba and Ant Group, to curb perceived excesses and ensure data security under state oversight.[91] Economically, under Xi, China pursued self-reliance amid slowing growth, with GDP expansion at 4.8% in Q3 2025, hampered by property sector woes and trade tensions.[92] The 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025) prioritized technological advancement in AI and semiconductors, while the Fourth Plenum in October 2025 outlined the next plan focusing on high-quality development and national security.[93] In foreign policy, the Belt and Road Initiative, launched by Xi in 2013, has financed over $1 trillion in infrastructure across more than 140 countries, enhancing China's global influence despite debt sustainability concerns in recipient nations.[94] Militarily, Xi oversaw PLA reforms since 2015, restructuring commands for joint operations, reducing troop numbers by 300,000, and accelerating modernization toward 2035 goals, including nuclear and cyber capabilities, though corruption purges have disrupted progress.[95][96] These efforts reflect Xi's vision of a "great rejuvenation" by mid-century, balancing internal control with assertive external posture.[97]
Ideological Framework
Formal Doctrines: Marxism-Leninism to Socialism with Chinese Characteristics
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) formally adheres to Marxism-Leninism as its foundational guiding ideology, viewing it as the theoretical basis for achieving communism through a vanguard party leading the proletariat in revolution and socialist construction.[4] This doctrine, derived from Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' analysis of capitalism and class struggle combined with Vladimir Lenin's emphasis on a disciplined party organization and imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism, was adopted by the CCP upon its founding in 1921 under Comintern influence.[98] In practice, Marxism-Leninism provided the framework for the party's claim to scientific socialism, prioritizing the dictatorship of the proletariat and centralized planning to transition from feudalism and semi-colonialism in China.[99] Mao Zedong Thought represents the first major adaptation of Marxism-Leninism to Chinese conditions, formally enshrined as a guiding principle in the party's constitution following the Seventh National Congress in 1945, though elaborated in the 1949 Common Program and subsequent documents.[100] It integrates Marxist-Leninist tenets with China's revolutionary experience, emphasizing protracted people's war, mass line (from the masses, to the masses), and continuous class struggle in a rural, agrarian context rather than urban proletarian uprising.[101] Mao Zedong Thought guided policies like land reform and collectivization, positing that contradictions persist under socialism, necessitating campaigns against revisionism and bourgeois elements within the party.[99] Post-Mao reforms under Deng Xiaoping introduced Deng Xiaoping Theory, centered on constructing socialism with Chinese characteristics, which prioritized economic modernization over ideological purity while upholding the Four Cardinal Principles (party leadership, Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought, socialist road, and people's democratic dictatorship).[102] Formally outlined at the Twelfth National Congress in 1982 and the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee in December 1978, this theory advocated "seeking truth from facts" through pragmatic reforms, including market mechanisms, foreign investment, and special economic zones, to develop productive forces under state oversight—marking a shift from class struggle to economic construction as the central task.[103] It explicitly rejected dogmatic Soviet-style socialism, arguing for a primary stage of socialism in China requiring capitalist elements for at least 100 years to build material foundations.[104] Subsequent leaders built incrementally on this framework. Jiang Zemin's Theory of Three Represents, first articulated on February 25, 2000, during an inspection in Guangdong and enshrined in the party constitution at the Sixteenth National Congress in November 2002, posits that the party must represent advanced productive forces, advanced culture, and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people.[105] This doctrine justified admitting private entrepreneurs and intellectuals into the party, expanding its base beyond workers and peasants to align with post-reform economic realities.[106] Hu Jintao advanced the Scientific Outlook on Development, introduced in 2003 and incorporated into the party constitution at the Seventeenth National Congress in October 2007, emphasizing people-centered, comprehensive, coordinated, and sustainable development to address imbalances from rapid growth, such as rural-urban disparities and environmental degradation.[107] It stressed freeing minds, seeking truth from facts, and harmonious socialist society-building, continuing Deng's pragmatism while incorporating concepts like with Chinese characteristics for ecological civilization and social equity.[108] Under Xi Jinping, Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era was enshrined in the party constitution at the Nineteenth National Congress on October 24, 2017, and in the state constitution in March 2018, framing the current phase as a "new era" of national rejuvenation through comprehensive national power, strict party discipline, and global influence.[109] [110] This thought synthesizes prior doctrines, stressing the decisive role of party leadership in achieving the "Chinese Dream," anti-corruption, poverty alleviation, and Belt and Road Initiative, while adapting Marxism to contemporary contradictions like those between development and stability.[111] The party's constitution lists all these as interdependent components of its ideological system, requiring study and application to justify adaptive governance amid economic state capitalism and authoritarian control.[4]Economic Ideology: From Collectivism to State Capitalism
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) initially adhered to a collectivist economic ideology inspired by Marxist-Leninist principles, prioritizing communal ownership of production means and central planning to eradicate private enterprise and class distinctions. Under Mao Zedong, this manifested in aggressive collectivization campaigns, including the formation of agricultural cooperatives in 1953 and escalation to people's communes in 1958, which mobilized rural labor for steel production and irrigation projects under the Great Leap Forward, ostensibly to achieve rapid socialist transformation but yielding severe output shortfalls due to distorted incentives and resource misallocation.[58][112] Post-Mao, economic ideology pivoted toward pragmatism at the Third Plenum of the 11th Central Committee in December 1978, where Deng Xiaoping's faction endorsed "reform and opening up," subordinating ideological orthodoxy to growth imperatives with the directive to "seek truth from facts" rather than dogmatic adherence to class struggle. This dismantled collectivist structures through the household responsibility system implemented from 1979 to 1982, granting farm families land-use contracts and retention of surpluses after state quotas, which increased grain output by 33% between 1978 and 1984 by restoring individual incentives. Concurrently, four Special Economic Zones (SEZs) were designated in 1980 in Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Shantou, and Xiamen to experiment with export-oriented policies, tax incentives, and foreign direct investment, drawing $1.9 billion in FDI by 1985 and catalyzing coastal industrialization.[113][114] Deng's 1992 Southern Tour reaffirmed market liberalization amid recentralization threats, leading to accelerated privatization of small SOEs and township enterprises, with non-state firms contributing over 50% of industrial output by 1997. This trajectory coalesced into state capitalism, characterized by CCP dominance over "commanding heights" via state-owned enterprises (SOEs), which accounted for 30-40% of GDP and control 80% of banking assets as of 2020, while private sectors—fostered for efficiency—operate under party committees embedded in firms for ideological alignment and policy enforcement.[58][115] Subsequent adaptations under Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao entrenched this hybrid: Jiang's 2001 "Three Represents" doctrine admitted capitalists into party ranks, enabling WTO accession that year and export-led growth averaging 10% annually through 2010, though SOE reforms lagged, perpetuating inefficiencies like overcapacity in steel and coal. Xi Jinping's tenure since 2012 has accentuated state steering, with "supply-side structural reform" in 2015 targeting zombie firms and the 2021 "common prosperity" campaign imposing regulatory curbs on tech conglomerates (e.g., Alibaba fined $2.8 billion in 2021) and tutoring sectors to redistribute wealth and curb oligarchic influence, reflecting causal prioritization of regime stability over unfettered markets amid debt at 300% of GDP by 2023.[58][115]Internal Adaptations and Suppression of Dissent
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has exhibited ideological adaptability by selectively incorporating non-Marxist elements, such as Confucian ethics and nationalism, into its core doctrines to bolster legitimacy amid economic shifts and social challenges, while preserving Leninist organizational principles. This evolution in approach to traditional Chinese culture included early negation during the Cultural Revolution through campaigns like breaking the Four Olds and criticizing Confucius as feudal remnants; from the 1980s onward, a shift to critical inheritance occurred, and under Xi Jinping, active revival of traditional culture as the "roots and soul" of the nation via promotion of Confucianism, traditional festivals, national studies education, cultural heritage protection, and integration of Marxism with Chinese civilization, emphasizing five-thousand-year continuity and the "Chinese national community" with Han Chinese as the core—representing an internal transformation affirming cultural identity rather than systematic denial.[116][117] This evolution, evident since Deng Xiaoping's 1978 reforms, prioritizes "performance legitimacy" through growth metrics over pure class struggle, allowing the party to justify rule via delivered prosperity rather than revolutionary purity.[118] [119] Under Xi Jinping, adaptations intensified with the 2017 enshrinement of "Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era" in the party constitution at the 19th National Congress, which fuses Marxist rhetoric with cybernetic governance models and anti-corruption as ideological weapons, aiming to recentralize authority after perceived decentralization under predecessors.[120] [121] These shifts reflect causal responses to internal threats like factionalism, evidenced by the party's historical pattern of post-crisis evaluations leading to policy recalibrations, such as post-Cultural Revolution pragmatism.[118] Suppression of dissent within the party and society enforces ideological conformity, utilizing "democratic centralism" to demand unified adherence post-deliberation, where minority views are subordinated to majority decisions binding all members. Dissenters face expulsion or worse; for instance, the 2015 "709 crackdown" targeted over 200 lawyers and activists accused of subverting state power, many linked to rights advocacy challenging party orthodoxy.[9] Ideological campaigns under Xi, including mandatory study sessions of Xi Thought, purge disloyalty, with state media reporting millions of party members disciplined annually for "ideological laxity" via the Central Commission's oversight.[122] [123] Mechanisms extend to societal control, including pervasive surveillance via "big data" systems that profile citizens for potential dissent, integrating AI to preempt challenges to CCP narratives on topics like historical events or leadership.[124] The Great Firewall blocks foreign sites promoting liberal ideas, while domestic platforms like Weibo enforce real-time censorship of keywords related to party criticism, resulting in the deletion of millions of posts yearly.[125] Reports from monitoring groups, which compile verified cases despite CCP denials of systematic abuse, indicate over 1,000 political prisoners detained annually for ideological offenses, though official figures frame these as anti-extremism measures.[126] [127] Such tactics, while effective in maintaining short-term stability, risk long-term brittleness by stifling feedback loops essential for adaptive governance, as internal critiques are equated with disloyalty.[128]Organizational Structure
Central Hierarchy: National Congress to Politburo Standing Committee
The National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) serves as the party's highest organ of power, convening every five years to deliberate on major strategic directions. It comprises approximately 2,300 delegates selected from provincial, municipal, and military party organizations through a multi-tiered election process involving preliminary vetting by higher authorities.[129] The Congress examines reports from the outgoing Central Committee, amends the party constitution, adopts resolutions on key policies, and formally elects the new Central Committee, though these elections largely ratify pre-selected candidates determined by incumbent leaders.[4] The Central Committee, elected by the National Congress, consists of around 200 full members and 170 alternate members, representing the party's elite across government, military, and economic sectors. It convenes at least annually in plenary sessions, known as plenums, to endorse major decisions, but its role is predominantly ceremonial, as routine policymaking occurs in smaller bodies. The Committee elects the Politburo and its Standing Committee during the First Plenum following each National Congress, a process that, per the party constitution, involves competitive elements like preliminary voting, yet remains tightly controlled to ensure alignment with the paramount leader's preferences.[130][129] The Politburo, typically numbering 24 to 25 members, functions as the Central Committee's executive, meeting monthly to direct party and state affairs, including appointments and crisis responses. Composed of senior officials who concurrently hold top state positions, it bridges strategic oversight with operational implementation, though substantive authority concentrates further upward.[9] At the apex sits the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC), limited to seven members as of the 20th Congress in 2022, which conducts the party's core decision-making when larger bodies are absent. Led by the General Secretary—currently Xi Jinping, who has consolidated influence through norm-breaking tenure extensions—the PSC handles high-level policy, personnel, and security matters, operating with minimal transparency and relying on consensus driven by the top leader. Its members, including Premier Li Qiang and others vetted for loyalty, embody the fusion of party control over state functions, with real power dynamics shaped by factional networks and anti-corruption purges rather than formal votes.[131][132]Local and Sectoral Penetration: Party Cells in Enterprises and Society
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) organizes its basic units, known as party branches or cells (dangzhibu), at the grassroots level to extend influence into local communities and various societal sectors. These cells, required by the CCP Constitution for any group of three or more party members, serve as the foundational structure for implementing directives, conducting ideological education, and monitoring compliance with party policies.[133] In rural areas, party branches operate in villages, with over 500,000 such organizations reported as of 2021, focusing on agricultural policy enforcement and social stability. Urban equivalents exist in residential committees (jumin weiyuanhui) and neighborhood stations, where cells integrate with grid-based management systems for surveillance and rapid response to dissent.[134] Sectoral penetration emphasizes embedding party cells in enterprises, both state-owned and private, to align economic activities with political objectives. In state-owned enterprises (SOEs), party committees have long held formal roles in decision-making, often paralleling management boards to ensure loyalty and resource allocation favors national priorities. Under Xi Jinping's leadership since 2012, regulations like the 2015 "party-building" (dangjian) initiatives have accelerated expansion into non-state sectors, mandating cells in private firms to "play a leadership role" in setting direction and implementing policies.[135] [136] By 2017, approximately 73% of private enterprises hosted CCP cells, rising to near-complete coverage by 2021 according to official claims, with over 92% of China's top 500 private firms maintaining such units as of 2019.[137] [138] In private enterprises, party cells typically influence through advisory functions, such as promoting corporate social responsibility aligned with state goals, vetting personnel, and facilitating policy compliance, though their authority has grown to include input on major decisions like mergers or data handling. Examples include tech giants like Alibaba and Tencent, where party committees oversee ideological training and ensure alignment with campaigns such as national security reviews. This structure, formalized in laws like the 2018 Company Law amendments requiring party involvement in corporate governance for listed firms, enables the CCP to monitor economic actors without direct ownership, potentially prioritizing political directives over profit maximization.[139] [140] Critics, including U.S. officials, argue these cells facilitate espionage and undue influence, as evidenced by FBI concerns over embedded CCP members in Western-linked firms operating in China.[141] Beyond enterprises, sectoral cells permeate education, healthcare, and cultural institutions, with universities required to host party branches that enforce curriculum controls and suppress heterodox views. Hospitals and media outlets similarly integrate cells to align operations with propaganda needs. This pervasive network, numbering millions of grassroots organizations by the 2020s, underscores the CCP's strategy of total societal oversight, where cells collect intelligence and mobilize resources during crises like the COVID-19 response.[134] While official narratives frame this as enhancing governance efficiency, empirical patterns show cells reinforcing authoritarian control by embedding party loyalists and preempting independent action.[137][138]Membership Composition and Recruitment Processes
As of December 31, 2024, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) reported a total membership of 100.271 million, reflecting a net increase of 1.086 million from the previous year and steady growth since the party's founding in 1921.[142] This figure positions the CCP as the world's largest political party by membership, comprising approximately 7% of China's population, with expansion driven by targeted recruitment in key sectors like enterprises, rural areas, and among youth.[142] Official data indicate a shift toward higher-quality recruits under recent leadership emphases on education and ideological alignment, though the base remains broad to maintain societal penetration.[143] Membership composition skews toward Han Chinese, with ethnic minorities representing 7.7% (7.734 million members), aligning with China's demographic majority but incorporating targeted inclusion from underrepresented groups.[142] Gender distribution shows 30.9% female (30.995 million), a proportion that has risen modestly over decades but remains imbalanced, with new 2024 recruits achieving near parity at 46% female (979,000 of 2.131 million).[142] Age demographics reveal an aging core, with 28.973 million members aged 61 or older, yet rejuvenation efforts are evident: new members in 2024 were 83.7% aged 35 or below (1.784 million), and under-30 members total 12.272 million.[142] Education levels have increased significantly, with 57.6% (57.786 million) holding a junior college degree or above, reflecting recruitment priorities for skilled professionals amid economic modernization.[142] Occupational breakdown underscores the party's rural and bureaucratic anchors alongside urban expansion:| Occupation Category | Number of Members (millions) |
|---|---|
| Farmers, herders, fishers | 26.144 |
| Retired | 21.469 |
| Workers | 6.639 |
| Party and government personnel | 7.592 |
| Professionals | 16.394 |
| Managers | 11.563 |
| Students | 2.622 |
| Other | 7.849 |