Clipper
View on Wikipedia

A clipper was a type of mid-19th-century merchant sailing vessel, designed for speed. The term was also retrospectively applied to the Baltimore clipper, which originated in the late 18th century.
Clippers were generally narrow for their length, small by later 19th-century standards, could carry limited bulk freight, and had a large total sail area. "Clipper" does not refer to a specific sailplan; clippers may be schooners, brigs, brigantines, etc., as well as full-rigged ships. Clippers were mostly constructed in British and American shipyards, although France, Brazil, the Netherlands, and other nations also produced some. Clippers sailed all over the world, primarily on the trade routes between the United Kingdom and China, in transatlantic trade, and on the New York-to-San Francisco route around Cape Horn during the California gold rush. Dutch clippers were built beginning in the 1850s for the tea trade and passenger service to Java.[1]
The boom years of the clipper era began in 1843 in response to a growing demand for faster delivery of tea from China and continued with the demand for swift passage to gold fields in California and Australia beginning in 1848 and 1851, respectively. The era ended with the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869.
Origin and usage of "clipper"
[edit]The etymological origin of the word clipper is uncertain, but is believed to be derived from the English language verb "to clip", which at the time meant "to run or fly swiftly".[2]
The first application of the term "clipper", in a nautical sense, is likewise uncertain. The type known as the Baltimore clipper originated at the end of the 18th century on the eastern seaboard of the USA. At first, these fast sailing vessels were referred to as "Virginia-built" or "pilot-boat model", with the name "Baltimore-built" appearing during the War of 1812. In the final days of the slave trade (circa 1835–1850) – just as the type was dying out – the term, Baltimore clipper, became common. The common retrospective application of the word "clipper" to this type of vessel has caused confusion.[3]: 62–62
The Oxford English Dictionary's earliest quote (referring to the Baltimore clipper) is from 1824.[4] The dictionary cites Royal Navy officer and novelist Frederick Marryat as using the term in 1830.[a] British newspaper usage of the term can be found as early as 1832 and in shipping advertisements from 1835.[6][7] A US court case of 1834 has evidence that discusses a clipper being faster than a brig.[8]
Definitions
[edit]
A clipper is a sailing vessel designed for speed, a priority that takes precedence over cargo-carrying capacity or building or operating costs. It is not restricted to any one rig (while many were fully rigged ships, others were barques, brigs, or schooners), nor was the term restricted to any one hull type. Howard Chapelle lists three basic hull types for clippers. The first was characterised by the sharp deadrise and ends found in the Baltimore clipper. The second was a hull with a full midsection and modest deadrise, but sharp ends – this was a development of the hull form of transatlantic packets. The third was more experimental, with deadrise and sharpness being balanced against the need to carry a profitable quantity of cargo. A clipper carried a large sail area and a fast hull; by the standards of any other type of sailing ship, a clipper was greatly over-canvassed. The last defining feature of a clipper, in the view of maritime historian David MacGregor, was a captain who had the courage, skill, and determination to get the fastest speed possible out of her.[9]: 16–21 [10]: 321–322
In assessing the hull of a clipper, different maritime historians use different criteria to measure "sharpness", "fine lines" or "fineness", a concept which is explained by comparing a rectangular cuboid with the underwater shape of a vessel's hull. The more material one has to carve off the cuboid to achieve the hull shape, the sharper the hull. Ideally, a maritime historian would be able to look at either the block coefficient of fineness or the prismatic coefficient[b] of various clippers, but measured drawings or accurate half models may not exist to calculate either of these figures.[10]: 43–45 An alternative measure of sharpness for hulls of a broadly similar shape is the coefficient of underdeck tonnage, as used by David MacGregor in comparing tea clippers. This could be calculated from the measurements taken to determine the registered tonnage, so can be applied to more vessels.[11]: 87–88
An extreme clipper has a hull of great fineness, as judged either by the prismatic coefficient, the coefficient of underdeck tonnage, or some other technical assessment of hull shape. This term has been misapplied in the past, without reference to hull shape. As commercial vessels, these are totally reliant on speed to generate a profit for their owners, as their sharpness limits their cargo-carrying capacity.
A medium clipper has a cargo-carrying hull that has some sharpness. In the right conditions and with a capable captain, some of these achieved notable quick passages. They were also able to pay their way when the high freight rates often paid to a fast sailing ship were not available (in a fluctuating market).
The term "clipper" applied to vessels between these two categories. They often made passages as fast as extreme clippers, but had less difficulty in making a living when freight rates were lower.[9]: 16
History
[edit]

The first ships to which the term "clipper" seems to have been applied were the Baltimore clippers, developed in the Chesapeake Bay before the American Revolution, and reached their zenith between 1795 and 1815. They were small, rarely exceeding 200 tons OM.[12][page needed] Their hulls were sharp ended and displayed much deadrise. They were rigged as schooners, brigs, or brigantines.[9] In the War of 1812, some were lightly armed, sailing under letters of marque and reprisal, when the type – exemplified by Chasseur, launched at Fells Point, Baltimore in 1814 – became known for her incredible speed; the deep draft enabled the Baltimore clipper to sail close to the wind.[13] Clippers, running the British blockade of Baltimore, came to be recognized for speed rather than cargo space.
The type existed as early as 1780. A 1789 drawing of HMS Berbice (1780) – purchased by the Royal Navy in 1780 in the West Indies – represents the earliest draught of what became known as the Baltimore clipper.
Vessels of the Baltimore clipper type continued to be built for the slave trade, being useful for escaping enforcement of the British and American legislation prohibiting the trans-Atlantic slave trade.[14]: 308 Some of these Baltimore clippers were captured when working as slavers, condemned by the appropriate court, and sold to owners who then used them as opium clippers – moving from one illegal international trade to another.[15]: 91
Ann McKim, built in Baltimore in 1833 by the Kennard & Williamson shipyard,[16][17] is considered by some to be the original clipper ship.[18] (Maritime historians Howard I. Chapelle and David MacGregor decry the concept of the "first" clipper, preferring a more evolutionary, multiple-step development of the type.[15]: 72 ) She measured 494 tons OM, and was built on the enlarged lines of a Baltimore clipper, with sharply raked stem, counter stern, and square rig. Although Ann McKim was the first large clipper ship ever constructed, she cannot be said to have founded the clipper ship era, or even that she directly influenced shipbuilders, since no other ship was built like her, but she may have suggested the clipper design in vessels of ship rig. She did, however, influence the building of Rainbow in 1845, the first extreme clipper ship.[12]
In Aberdeen, Scotland, shipbuilders Alexander Hall and Sons developed the "Aberdeen" clipper bow in the late 1830s; the first was Scottish Maid launched in 1839.[19] Scottish Maid, 150 tons OM, was the first British clipper ship.[12] "Scottish Maid was intended for the Aberdeen-London trade, where speed was crucial to compete with steamships. The Hall brothers tested various hulls in a water tank and found the clipper design most effective. The design was influenced by tonnage regulations. Tonnage measured a ship's cargo capacity and was used to calculate tax and harbour dues. The new 1836 regulations measured depth and breadth with length measured at half midship depth. Extra length above this level was tax-free and became a feature of clippers. Scottish Maid proved swift and reliable and the design was widely copied."[20] The earliest British clipper ships were built for trade within the British Isles (Scottish Maid was built for the Aberdeen to London trade[21]). Then followed the vast clipper trade of tea, opium, spices, and other goods from the Far East to Europe, and the ships became known as "tea clippers".
From 1839, larger American clipper ships started to be built beginning with Akbar, 650 tons OM, in 1839, and including the 1844-built Houqua, 581 tons OM. These larger vessels were built predominantly for use in the China tea trade and known as "tea clippers".[12][page needed] Then in 1845 Rainbow, 757 tons OM, the first extreme clipper, was launched in New York. These American clippers were larger vessels designed to sacrifice cargo capacity for speed. They had a bow lengthened above the water, a drawing out and sharpening of the forward body, and the greatest breadth further aft. Extreme clippers were built in the period 1845 to 1855.
In 1851, shipbuilders in Medford, Massachusetts, built what is sometimes called one of the first medium clippers, the Antelope, often called the Antelope of Boston to distinguish her from other ships of the same name. A contemporary ship-design journalist noted that "the design of her model was to combine large stowage capacity with good sailing qualities."[22] Antelope was relatively flat-floored and had only an 8-inch deadrise at half-floor.
The medium clipper, though still very fast, could carry more cargo. After 1854, extreme clippers were replaced in American shipbuilding yards by medium clippers.[12][page needed] The Flying Cloud was a clipper ship built in 1851 that established the fastest passage between New York and San Francisco within weeks of her launching, then broke her own records three years later, which stood at 89 days 8 hours until 1989. (The other contender for this "blue ribbon" title was the medium clipper Andrew Jackson – an unresolvable argument exists over timing these voyages "from pilot to pilot").[9]: 60–61 Flying Cloud was the most famous of the clippers built by Donald McKay. She was known for her extremely close race with the Hornet in 1853; for having a woman navigator, Eleanor Creesy, wife of Josiah Perkins Creesy, who skippered the Flying Cloud on two record-setting voyages from New York to San Francisco; and for sailing in the Australia and timber trades.
Clipper ships largely ceased being built in American shipyards in 1859 when, unlike the earlier boom years, only four clipper ships were built; a few were built in the 1860s. [9]: 14

British clipper ships continued to be built after 1859. From 1859, a new design was developed for British clipper ships that was nothing like the American clippers; these ships continued to be called extreme clippers. The new design had a sleek, graceful appearance, less sheer, less freeboard, lower bulwarks, and smaller breadth. They were built for the China tea trade, starting with Falcon in 1859, and continuing until 1870. The earlier ships were made from wood, though some were made from iron, just as some British clippers had been made from iron prior to 1859. In 1863, the first tea clippers of composite construction were brought out, combining the best of both worlds. Composite clippers had the strength of an iron hull framework but with wooden planking that, with properly insulated fastenings, could use copper sheathing without the problem of galvanic corrosion. Copper sheathing prevented fouling and teredo worm, but could not be used on iron hulls. The iron framework of composite clippers was less bulky and lighter, so allowing more cargo in a hull of the same external shape.[11]: 84–88 [12][page needed]
After 1869, with the opening of the Suez Canal that greatly advantaged steam vessels (see Decline below), the tea trade collapsed for clippers.[12]: 332 From the late 1860s until the early 1870s, the clipper trade increasingly focused on the Britain to Australia and New Zealand route, carrying goods and immigrants, services that had begun earlier with the Australian Gold Rush of the 1850s. British-built clipper ships and many American-built, British-owned ships were used. Even in the 1880s, sailing ships were still the main carriers of cargo between Britain, and Australia and New Zealand. This trade eventually became unprofitable, and the ageing clipper fleet became unseaworthy.[12][page needed]
Opium clippers
[edit]
Before the early 18th century, the East India Company paid for its tea mainly in silver. When the Chinese emperor chose to embargo European-manufactured commodities and demand payment for all Chinese goods in silver, the price rose, restricting trade. The East India Company began to produce opium in India, something desired by the Chinese as much as tea was by the British. This had to be smuggled into China on smaller, fast-sailing ships, called "opium clippers".[11]: 9, 34 Some of these were built specifically for the purpose – mostly in India and Britain, such as the 1842-built Ariel, 100 tons OM.[12][page needed] Some fruit schooners were bought for this trade, as were some Baltimore clippers.[15]: 90–97
China clippers and the apogee of sail
[edit]

Among the most notable clippers were the China clippers, also called tea clippers, designed to ply the trade routes between Europe and the East Indies.[23] The last example of these still in reasonable condition is Cutty Sark, preserved in dry dock at Greenwich, United Kingdom. Damaged by fire on 21 May 2007 while undergoing conservation, the ship was permanently elevated 3.0 m above the dry dock floor in 2010 as part of a plan for long-term preservation.
Clippers were built for seasonal trades such as tea, where an early cargo was more valuable, or for passenger routes. One passenger ship survives, the City of Adelaide designed by William Pile of Sunderland. The fast ships were ideally suited to low-volume, high-profit goods, such as tea, opium, spices, people, and mail. The return could be spectacular. The Challenger returned from Shanghai with "the most valuable cargo of tea and silk ever to be laden in one bottom".[24] Competition among the clippers was public and fierce, with their times recorded in the newspapers.
The last China clippers had peak speeds over 16 knots (30 km/h),[25] but their average speeds over a whole voyage were substantially less. The joint winner of the Great Tea Race of 1866 logged about 15,800 nautical miles on a 99-day trip. This gives an average speed slightly over 6.6 knots (12.2 km/h).[26]: 269–285 The key to a fast passage for a tea clipper was getting across the China Sea against the monsoon winds that prevailed when the first tea crop of the season was ready.[11]: 31, 20 These difficult sailing conditions (light and/or contrary winds) dictated the design of tea clippers. The US clippers were designed for the strong winds encountered on their route around Cape Horn.
Donald McKay's Sovereign of the Seas reported the highest speed ever achieved by a sailing ship of the era, 22 knots (41 km/h), made while running her easting down to Australia in 1854. (John Griffiths' first clipper, the Rainbow, had a top speed of 14 knots.) Eleven other instances are reported of a ship's logging 18 knots (33 km/h) or over. Ten of these were recorded by American clippers. Besides the breath-taking 465-nautical-mile (861 km) day's run of the Champion of the Seas, 13 other cases are known of a ship's sailing over 400 nautical miles (740 km) in 24 hours. With few exceptions, though, all the port-to-port sailing records are held by the American clippers.[27] The 24-hour record of the Champion of the Seas, set in 1854, was not broken until 1984 (by a multihull), or 2001 (by another monohull).[28]
Decline
[edit]
The American clippers sailing from the East Coast to the California goldfields were working in a booming market. Freight rates were high everywhere in the first years of the 1850s. This started to fade in late 1853. The ports of California and Australia reported that they were overstocked with goods that had been shipped earlier in the year. This gave an accelerating fall in freight rates that was halted, however, by the start of the Crimean War in March 1854, as many ships were now being chartered by the French and British governments. The end of the Crimean War in April 1856 released all this capacity back on the world shipping markets – the result being a severe slump. The next year had the Panic of 1857, with effects on both sides of the Atlantic. The United States was just starting to recover from this in 1861 when the American Civil War started, causing significant disruption to trade in both Union and Confederate states.[9]: 14–15
As the economic situation deteriorated in 1853, American shipowners either did not order new vessels, or specified an ordinary clipper or a medium clipper instead of an extreme clipper. No extreme clipper was launched in an American shipyard after the end of 1854 and only a few medium clippers after 1860.
By contrast, British trade recovered well at the end of the 1850s. Tea clippers had continued to be launched during the depressed years, apparently little affected by the economic downturn.[9]: 15 The long-distance route to China was not realistically challenged by steamships in the early part of the 1860s. No true steamer (as opposed to an auxiliary steamship) had the fuel efficiency to carry sufficient cargo to make a profitable voyage. The auxiliary steamships struggled to make any profit.

The situation changed in 1866 when the Alfred Holt-designed and owned SS Agamemnon made her first voyage to China. Holt had persuaded the Board of Trade to allow higher steam pressures in British merchant vessels. Running at 60 psi instead of the previously permitted 25 psi, and using an efficient compound engine, Agamemnon had the fuel efficiency to steam at 10 knots to China and back, with coaling stops at Mauritius on the outward and return legs – crucially carrying sufficient cargo to make a profit.[29]
In 1869, the Suez Canal opened, giving steamships a route about 3,000 nautical miles (5,600 km; 3,500 mi) shorter than that taken by sailing ships round the Cape of Good Hope. Despite initial conservatism by tea merchants, by 1871, tea clippers found strong competition from steamers in the tea ports of China. A typical passage time back to London for a steamer was 58 days, while the fastest clippers could occasionally make the trip in less than 100 days; the average was 123 days in the 1867–68 tea season.[30][31][11]: 225–243 The freight rate for a steamer in 1871 was roughly double that paid to a sailing vessel. Some clipper owners were severely caught out by this; several extreme clippers had been launched in 1869, including Cutty Sark, Norman Court and Caliph.[c]

Surviving ships
[edit]Of the many clipper ships built during the mid-19th century, only two are known to survive. The only intact survivor is Cutty Sark, which was preserved as a museum ship in 1954 at Greenwich for public display. The other known survivor is City of Adelaide; unlike Cutty Sark, she was reduced to a hulk over the years. She eventually sank at her moorings in 1991, but was raised the following year, and remained on dry land for years. Adelaide (or S.V. Carrick) is the older of the two survivors, and was transported to Australia for conservation.[33][34]
In popular culture
[edit]Sailing cards
[edit]
Departures of clipper ships, mostly from New York and Boston to San Francisco, were advertised by clipper-ship sailing cards. These cards, slightly larger than today's postcards, were produced by letterpress and wood engraving on coated card stock. Most clipper cards were printed in the 1850s and 1860s, and represented the first pronounced use of color in American advertising art. Perhaps 3,500 cards survive. With their rarity and importance as artifacts of nautical, Western, and printing history, clipper cards are valued by both private collectors and institutions.[35]
Basketball team
[edit]The Los Angeles Clippers of the National Basketball Association take their name from the type of ship. After the Buffalo Braves moved to San Diego, California in 1978, a contest was held to choose a new name. The winning name highlighted the city's connection with the clippers that frequented San Diego Bay. The team retained the name in its 1984 move to Los Angeles.[36]
Airliners
[edit]The airline Pan Am named its aircraft beginning with the word 'Clipper' and used Clipper as its callsign. This was intended to evoke an image of speed and glamour.
Space probe
[edit]The Europa Clipper is a NASA probe that is currently on a mission to explore Jupiter and its moons; it was launched in 2024 and is expected to reach Jupiter in 2030.
See also
[edit]People associated with clipper ships
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Marryat is generally considered by maritime historians to be a reliable source on nautical matters from his time.[5]
- ^ The block coefficient of fineness is a mathematical measure of sharpness used by naval architects, which compares the hull with a hypothetical block equal in length, breadth, and height to the immersed part of the hull. The prismatic coefficient makes a similar comparison to a prism with the immersed hull's dimensions, and is considered to the best indicator of potential speed. The lower the coefficient, the more material has to be removed from the hypothetical cuboid. Many commercial sailing vessels are unlikely to have had a prismatic coefficient less than 0.57.
- ^ Caution is needed in interpreting Basil Lubbock's count of the number of extreme clippers launched in 1869. He states there were 25, but apparently without evidence such as having sight of reliable plans or half models. MacGregor stated that at least five of those in Lubbock's list were medium clippers, thereby calling into question the categorisation of the others.[32]: 253
References
[edit]- ^ Barnwell, R.G. (1857). Commercial Relations of the United States with Foreign Countries. United States Department of State. pp. 260–264.
- ^ Clark, Arthur Hamilton (1910). The Clipper Ship Era. New York: The Knickerbocker Press. p. 57. ISBN 9781015965065.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ Chapelle, Howard Irving (1930). The Baltimore Clipper, its Origin and Development. New York: Bonanza Books.
- ^ "clipper". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
- ^ Batchvarov, Kroum (3 July 2021). "The Merchant Ship in the British Atlantic, 1600–1800: Continuity and Innovation in a Key Technology". International Journal of Nautical Archaeology. 50 (2): 403–406. doi:10.1080/10572414.2021.1987716.
- ^ "Westmeath Journal". 14 June 1832. p. 1.
and may be called an American Clipper
- ^ "Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser". 22 December 1835. p. 1. Retrieved 13 May 2020.
The well-known Clipper Saguenay
- ^ Gibert, Pedro; United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit) (1834), A report of the trial of Pedro Gibert, Bernardo de Soto, Francisco Ruiz, Nicola Costa, Antonio Ferrer, Manuel Boyga, Domingo de Guzman, Juan Antonio Portana, Manuel Castillo, Angel Garcia, Jose Velazquez, and Juan Montenegro alias Jose Basilio de Castro, before the United States Circuit Court : on an indictment charging them with the commission of an act of piracy, on board the brig Mexican, of Salem : containing a full statement of the testimony, and the arguments of the counsel on both sides, the charge of the court, pronounced by the Hon. Judge Story : and the verdict of the jury : with an appendix containing several documents never before published, Russell, Odiorne & Metcalf; Providence : M. Brown & Co.; Portland : Colman & Chisholm; Salem : John M. Ives, retrieved 15 September 2019
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c d e f g h MacGregor, David R (1993). British & American Clippers: A Comparison of their Design, Construction and Performance in the 1850s. London: Conway Maritime Press Ltd. ISBN 0-85177-588-8.
- ^ a b Chapelle, Howard I. (1967). The Search for Speed Under Sail, 1700–1855. Bonanza Books.
- ^ a b c d e MacGregor, David R. (1983). The Tea Clippers, Their History and Development 1833–1875 (Second ed.). Conway Maritime Press Limited. ISBN 0-85177-256-0.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Clark, Arthur Hamilton (1912). The Clipper Ship Era: An Epitome of Famous American and British Clipper Ships, Their Owners, Builders, Commanders, and Crews, 1843–1869. G.P. Putnam's Sons.
The Clipper Ship Era.
- ^ Villiers 1973.
- ^ Grindal, Peter (2016). Opposing the Slavers. The Royal Navy's Campaign against the Atlantic Slave Trade (Kindle ed.). London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd. ISBN 978-0-85773-938-4.
- ^ a b c MacGregor, David R (1988). Fast Sailing Ships, their design and construction, 1775–1875 (2nd ed.). London: Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 0-87021895-6.
- ^ Dear, I.C.B., & Kemp, Peter, eds. Oxford Companion to Ships and the Sea (Oxford University Press, 2005).
- ^ Website "Ann McKim" – details, at bruzelius.info Accessed 30 March 2009.
- ^ Ukers, William Harrison (1935). All about Tea. Tea and Coffee Trade Journal Company. p. 87.
Ann McKim clipper ship.
- ^ "Alexander Hall & Sons Ltd". Aberdeen Ships. 4 November 2006. Retrieved 8 April 2013.
- ^ "Aberdeen Built Ships". Aberdeenships.com. 22 February 2013. Retrieved 8 April 2013.
- ^ "Alexander Hall & Son Shipyard". The Doric Columns – Aberdeen. 1 September 2013. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
- ^ Boston Daily Atlas, 29 November 1851
- ^ Jefferson, Sam (2014). Clipper Ships and the Golden Age of Sail: Races and Rivalries on the Nineteenth Century High Seas. A&C Black. ISBN 978-1472900289.
- ^ Forbes, Allan; Ralph Mason Eastman (1952). Yankee ship sailing cards... State Street Trust Co.
- ^ Dash, Mike. "The Great Tea Race of 1866". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 26 June 2022.
- ^ Lubbock, Basil (1981) [1914]. The China Clippers. Glasgow: Brown, Son and Ferguson Ltd. ISBN 0851741096.
- ^ Lyon, Jane D (1962). Clipper Ships and Captains. New York: American Heritage Publishing.
- ^ "24 Hour Distance". Sailspeedrecords.com. Retrieved 8 April 2013.
- ^ Jarvis, Adrian (1993). "Chapter 9: Alfred Holt and the Compound Engine". In Gardiner, Robert; Greenhill, Dr. Basil (eds.). The Advent of Steam – The Merchant Steamship before 1900. Conway Maritime Press Ltd. pp. 158–159. ISBN 0-85177-563-2.
- ^ Clark, Arthur H (1911). The Clipper Ship Era 1843–1869. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons. p. 332.
- ^ "Agamemnon (1865); Passenger/cargo vessel". Ship models. National Maritime Museum.
- ^ MacGregor, David R. (1988). Fast Sailing Ships, their Design and Construction, 1775–1875 (Second ed.). London: Conway Maritime Press Ltd. ISBN 0-87021-895-6.
- ^ "City of Adelaide website – Condensed History". Cityofadelaide.org.au. Retrieved 8 April 2013.
- ^ Jim Carrick. "The Future of the S.V. Carrick". History Scotland magazine. Archived from the original on 8 February 2006.
- ^ Neale, Jane. "Clipper Ship Cards". American Antiquarian Society. Archived from the original on 8 October 2013. Retrieved 11 July 2014.
- ^ "Behind The Name – Clippers". nba.com. Retrieved 15 March 2023.
Further reading
[edit]- Carl C. Cutler, Greyhounds of the Sea (1930, 3rd ed. Naval Institute Press 1984)
- Alexander Laing, Clipper Ship Men (1944)
- David R. MacGregor, Fast Sailing Ships: Their Design and Construction, 1775–1875 Naval Institute Press, 1988 ISBN 0-87021-895-6
- Oxford English Dictionary (1987) ISBN 0-19-861212-5.
- Bruce D. Roberts, Clipper Ship Sailing Cards, 2007, Lulu.com. ISBN 978-0-9794697-0-1.
- Bruce D. Roberts, Clipper Ship Cards: The High-Water Mark in Early Trade Cards, The Advertising Trade Card Quarterly 1, no. 1 (Spring 1994): 20–22.
- Bruce D. Roberts, Clipper Ship Cards: Graphic Themes and Images, The Advertising Trade Card Quarterly 1, no. 2 (Summer 1994): 22–24.
- Bruce D. Roberts, Museum Collections of Clipper Ship Cards, The Advertising Trade Card Quarterly 2, no. 1 (Spring 1995): 22–24.
- Bruce D. Roberts, Selling Sail with Clipper Ship Cards, Ephemera News 19, no. 2 (Winter 2001): 1, 11–14.
- Chris and Lesley Holden (2009). Life and Death on the Royal Charter. Calgo Publications. ISBN 978-0-9545066-2-9.
Overview and introduction
[edit]- Knoblock, Glenn A. (2014). The American Clipper Ship, 1845–1920: A Comprehensive History, with a Listing of Builders and Their Ships. Jefferson: McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-7112-6.
- Ross, Donald Gunn III. "Era of the Clipper Ships Web Site". Archived from the original on 30 March 2010. Retrieved 3 September 2011. – Beautifully illustrated introduction, by a member of Donald McKay's family
- Clark, Arthur H. (1910). The Clipper Ship Era, An Epitome of Famous American and British Clipper Ships, Their Owners, Builders, Commanders, and Crews, 1843–1869. Camden, ME: G.P. Putnam's Sons. ISBN 978-0-7222-0657-7.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) – Basic reading, a favorite of Franklin Delano Roosevelt - Westward by Sea: A Maritime Perspective on American Expansion, 1820–1890, digitized source materials from Mystic Seaport, via Library of Congress American Memory
- Currier & Ives (1959). American clipper ship prints by the Curriers. American Neptune. Salem, MA: The American Neptune.
American clipper ships
[edit]- Cutler, Carl C (1984). Greyhounds of the sea: The story of the American clipper ship (3rd ed.). Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-0-87021-232-1. – The definitive narrative history, useful for checking discrepancies between sources
- Crothers, William L (1997). The American-built clipper ship, 1850–1856 : characteristics, construction, and details. Camden, ME: International Marine. ISBN 0-07-014501-6. – The comprehensive reference for design and construction of American-built clipper ships, with numerous drawings, diagrams, and charts. Gives examples of how each design feature varies in different ships.
- Howe, Octavius T; Matthews, Frederick C. (1986) [First published 1926–1927]. American Clipper Ships 1833–1858. Volume 1 and 2. Salem, MA; New York: Marine Research Society; Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-25115-8. Articles on individual ships, broader coverage than Crothers
Clipper ships by type
[edit]- Lubbock, Basil (1984). The China clippers. The Century seafarers. London: Century. ISBN 978-0-7126-0341-6.
- Lubbock, Basil (1968) [1921]. The Colonial Clippers (2nd ed.). Glasgow: James Brown & Son. pp. 86–87. OCLC 7831041. – British and Australian clippers
- Lubbock, Basil (1932). The Nitrate Clippers (1st ed.). Glasgow: Brown, Son & Ferguson. pp. 86–87. ISBN 978-0-85174-116-1.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - Lubbock, Basil (1967) [1933]. The Opium Clippers. Boston, MA: Charles E. Lauriat Co. ISBN 978-0-85174-241-0. – One of the few comprehensive books on these ships
External links
[edit]- City of Adelaide Clipper Ship, one of the few surviving clippers
- Westward by Sea Library of Congress collection of sailing cards.
- The Shipslist: Baltimore Clipper
- The Clipper Ship Card Collection at the New-York Historical Society
Clipper
View on GrokipediaDefinitions and Characteristics
Etymology and Terminology
The term "clipper" derives from the Middle English verb "clippen," meaning to embrace or hold closely, which evolved by the late 16th century into senses implying swift movement, such as cutting through air or water rapidly.[6] In maritime contexts, it specifically denoted a vessel capable of "clipping" time from passages, emphasizing speed over capacity, as in the phrase "to clip along" for fast progress.[7] This etymology aligns with early 19th-century American usage for swift schooners, predating the full-rigged clippers of the 1840s.[1] Historically, "clipper" lacked a rigid technical definition and was applied loosely to any fast-sailing merchant vessel, often with sharp, raking bows, tall masts leaned aft, and slender hulls optimized for velocity rather than cargo volume.[8] By the mid-19th century, it commonly referred to three-masted, square-rigged ships built for global trade routes carrying time-sensitive goods like tea, opium, or guano, achieving speeds up to 20 knots under ideal conditions.[9] Subtypes included the "Baltimore clipper," small, agile schooners from the early 1800s used for privateering and coastal packets, and later "extreme clippers" with finer lines for record-breaking voyages.[1] The designation was retrospective for precursors and not universally standardized, with British and American builders sometimes marketing vessels as "clippers" based on perceived speed advantages.[10]Core Design Features
Clipper ships were characterized by hull designs optimized for hydrodynamic efficiency, featuring long, narrow forms with sharp, raked bows and sterns to reduce wave-making resistance and enhance speed. These vessels typically maintained length-to-beam ratios of 5:1 to 8:1, allowing for slender profiles that prioritized velocity over bulk cargo capacity. For instance, the Cutty Sark (launched 1869) measured 85.35 meters in length with a beam of 10.97 meters, enabling a maximum speed of 17.5 knots under optimal conditions.[11] Construction methods evolved to support these demanding forms: early clippers from the 1830s were built entirely of wood with fine-end hull lines, while by the 1860s, composite builds became standard, incorporating wooden planking over iron frames for greater strength and lighter weight, often with iron spars and copper sheathing to deter fouling. This progression addressed the structural challenges of extreme slenderness, as seen in tea clippers like those developed around 1863.[12][1] Rigging emphasized maximal sail power, with most clippers employing three masts in a fully square-rigged configuration, augmented by fore-and-aft sails on jibs and spanker for maneuverability. Vast sail areas—up to 3,000 square meters on the Cutty Sark—included specialized upper sails such as skysails, moonrakers, and studding sails to capture light winds and achieve bursts exceeding 20 knots, as recorded on vessels like the Sovereign of the Seas.[11][12][13] These features collectively distinguished clippers by balancing speed with seaworthiness, though at the cost of higher crew demands and fragility in heavy weather, underpinning their role in time-sensitive trades.[1]Distinctions from Other Sailing Vessels
Clipper ships differed from conventional merchant sailing vessels, such as East Indiamen or bulk traders, in their prioritization of hydrodynamic efficiency over cargo volume. Traditional merchant ships emphasized broad beams and capacious holds to accommodate large payloads, often resulting in length-to-beam ratios below 4:1 and average speeds of 8-10 knots on ocean passages.[1] In contrast, clippers featured razor-sharp bow entries, raked stems, and elongated, V-shaped hulls with ratios typically between 6:1 and 7:1, reducing wave resistance and enabling bursts up to 18-20 knots while sacrificing hold space to around 40-50% of displacement capacity.[14][15] Rigging configurations further set clippers apart from smaller coastal types like brigs, schooners, or barkentines, which favored fore-and-aft sails for agility in restricted waters. Clippers, predominantly full-rigged ships or barques, deployed expansive square-rigged sail plans with up to 20-25 sails per mast, including lightweight upper tiers like royals, skysails, and moonrakers, to harness wind for sustained high speeds across open oceans.[1][15] This demanded larger crews—often 30-50 for a 1,000-ton vessel—compared to the 10-20 on equivalent brigs, reflecting the operational intensity required to manage such canvas in variable conditions.[14] Unlike naval frigates or ships-of-the-line, which balanced speed with armament, heavy framing, and stability for combat, clippers omitted guns and reinforced planking to minimize weight, achieving superior passage times; for instance, the clipper Flying Cloud logged San Francisco to Boston in 89 days in 1851, outpacing frigate averages by 20-30%.[1] Early Baltimore clippers, schooner-rigged precursors from the 1810s-1830s, influenced this ethos but scaled up for transoceanic trade, distinguishing the type from purely littoral schooners by their deep-water endurance and payload focus on high-value, low-bulk goods like tea or opium.[15] These traits rendered clippers uneconomical for routine bulk freight, underscoring their niche as express carriers in perishable or time-sensitive trades.[14]Historical Development
Precursors and Early Examples (Pre-1830s)
The Baltimore clipper, originating in the Chesapeake Bay region during the late 18th century, served as the foundational precursor to the mid-19th-century clipper ship, with the term "clipper" first applied to these fast schooners around the 1770s. These vessels, typically two-masted with topsail configurations, featured innovative sharp, V-shaped hulls, raked stems, shallow drafts, and oversized sail plans that prioritized velocity over cargo volume, enabling them to outpace bulkier merchant ships and naval vessels in coastal and inter-island trade.[12][16] Development accelerated post-American Revolutionary War in the 1780s–1790s, drawing from European sloop and lugger influences adapted to local conditions like shallow bays and time-sensitive commerce in timber, tobacco, and provisions. By the early 1800s, refinements included heart-shaped midsections for stability, low freeboards to reduce wind resistance, and raking masts with the foremast taller than the main for efficient sail handling, achieving speeds unattainable by contemporary square-riggers.[16][17] During the War of 1812, Baltimore clippers proved their mettle as privateers, leveraging superior maneuverability to evade British blockaders and capture prizes; the Chasseur, built in Baltimore in 1812, exemplifies this, seizing 45 enemy ships in five months and logging a record 95-day passage from Canton to the Virginia Capes under light winds. Other notable examples included the Prince de Neufchatel (1812), which repelled larger foes in the English Channel, underscoring the type's tactical edge derived from hydrodynamic fine lines rather than armament.[17][12] Following the 1808 U.S. prohibition on the transatlantic slave trade, many clippers shifted to smuggling and blockade-running, further emphasizing speed adaptations like copper sheathing for fouled hulls, which preserved performance on extended voyages. These pre-1830 designs laid causal groundwork for later clippers by establishing empirical principles of hull streamlining and sail-to-displacement ratios, scaled to larger hulls for ocean trade without steam reliance.[18][19]Opium Clippers and Initial Trade Specialization (1830s-1840s)
The opium clippers developed in the late 1820s and 1830s as fast-sailing vessels optimized for smuggling opium from production centers in India to markets in China, where imports were prohibited but demand surged due to addictive properties and trade imbalances. These ships prioritized speed over cargo capacity, featuring sharp hulls, extensive sail plans, and lightweight construction to evade Chinese patrol vessels and complete voyages swiftly, often anchoring offshore to transship cargo via local junks.[20] The expiration of the British East India Company's monopoly on China trade in 1833 intensified private smuggling operations, prompting firms like Jardine Matheson to commission specialized clippers capable of multiple annual runs.[3] The Red Rover, launched in Calcutta on December 12, 1829, stands as one of the earliest purpose-built opium clippers, with dimensions of 97 feet in length and 254 tons burthen, enabling it to operate between Calcutta and the Pearl River Delta. Acquired by Jardine Matheson in 1832, it exemplified the schooner-like design adapted from Baltimore clippers, armed for defense and rigged for bursts of speed exceeding 14 knots.[21] Similarly, the Water Witch, a barque constructed in 1831 at Kidderpore near Calcutta, demonstrated advanced capabilities by achieving two round-trip voyages per year between India and China, a feat rare among contemporaries due to its hydrodynamic efficiency and robust teak framing.[22] Initial specialization focused on the opium route's demands: vessels carried 200–400 chests per trip, each weighing about 140 pounds of raw opium, yielding profits that offset risks from monsoons, piracy, and imperial edicts. By the early 1840s, as Chinese commissioner Lin Zexu destroyed over 20,000 chests in 1839, triggering the First Opium War (1839–1842), these clippers proved vital for sustaining exports amid escalating enforcement, with fleets numbering around 100 ships by mid-decade.[20] Designs evolved from smaller schooners to larger brigs and barques, incorporating iron reinforcements in some cases, which enhanced durability without sacrificing velocity essential for competitive edge in the contraband market.[3] This period marked the clipper's transition from niche smuggling tool to prototype for global fast trade, though ethical critiques of the trade's role in Chinese societal decay were voiced contemporaneously by observers like missionary Karl Gützlaff.[20]Peak Era: Tea Races, Silk, and Gold Rush Clippers (1840s-1850s)
The peak era of clipper ships in the 1840s and 1850s coincided with surging demand for rapid transport of high-value commodities, including Chinese tea and silk, as well as supplies for the California Gold Rush following the 1848 gold discovery at Sutter's Mill. American shipyards in New York and Boston produced extreme clippers—narrow, sharp-bowed vessels with vast sail area—capable of averaging 15-18 knots and peaking at 22 knots, slashing voyage times and enabling owners to command premium freight rates for perishable or time-sensitive cargoes.[3] These ships carried limited bulk but excelled in efficiency for goods like tea, where arriving first with the new season's harvest yielded up to 10 shillings per pound more than later arrivals.[23] In the tea trade, innovation accelerated after the 1842 Treaty of Nanking opened additional Chinese ports, with Foochow emerging as a key loading point by the early 1850s, offering new-season teas six weeks earlier than Canton. The Rainbow, launched in New York in 1845 as the first true extreme clipper, exemplified this shift, completing New York to Canton in 102 days and establishing benchmarks for speed in the China trade.[23] Subsequent vessels like the Sea Witch (1846) further refined designs, prompting informal races from Chinese ports to London or New York, where clippers averaged 90-100 days for Foochow to London passages by the mid-1850s, outpacing traditional East Indiamen by months.[23] British builders responded with ships like the Torrington (1846), but American clippers dominated until post-1849 deregulation allowed U.S. vessels access to British markets.[23] Silk exports from China, valued for their delicacy and market timeliness, paralleled tea in benefiting from clipper velocity, as faster transits reduced exposure to humidity and pests that could degrade quality during prolonged voyages. Clippers transported raw silk alongside tea, leveraging their speed for cargoes where value density justified high construction costs—often exceeding $100,000 per vessel—and crews of 30-50 facing grueling conditions to maximize sail exposure.[3][24] The California Gold Rush intensified clipper demand, transforming San Francisco from a 2,000-person outpost to over 100,000 residents by 1852 through influxes of miners, provisions, and equipment via Cape Horn routes. Ships like the Flying Cloud, built in East Boston in 1851, set enduring records with a New York to San Francisco passage of 89 days and 21 hours—halving prior averages—and daily runs up to 374 nautical miles.[3] Other notables, including the Sea Witch and Stag Hound, ferried thousands, with builders like Donald McKay producing over 30 clippers in the early 1850s to meet the frenzy, though many vessels were later abandoned in San Francisco Bay as steam and rail supplanted sail for bulk goods.[3] This era peaked around 1857, with over 500 clippers constructed, fundamentally accelerating global commerce before steamships eroded their edge.[25]Decline and Transition to Steam Power (1860s Onward)
The clipper ship era entered decline in the 1860s as steam-powered vessels increasingly demonstrated superior reliability for scheduled commercial voyages, outpacing the wind-dependent speed of sailing clippers. While clippers excelled in bursts of velocity during favorable conditions, steamships maintained consistent propulsion irrespective of weather, enabling predictable arrival times critical for perishable or time-sensitive cargoes like tea. The Great Tea Race of 1866, involving five British clippers departing Foochow on May 28—including the Taeping and Ariel, which finished nearly tied after 99 days—marked the last major competitive effort in the tea trade, after which steamers captured the market due to their ability to adhere to fixed itineraries without risking delays from calms or adverse winds.[26] Economic factors compounded the shift, with the Panic of 1857 diminishing speculative demand for rapid transport in gold rush and opium trades, reducing the premium on clipper speed. By the late 1860s, steam tonnage overtook sailing vessels in key routes, as improved engines lowered fuel costs and coaling infrastructure expanded globally. Clippers found niche roles in trades like Australian wool, where steamships were disadvantaged by the need to carry heavy coal loads to remote ports lacking bunkering facilities, allowing sail to persist marginally longer in such bulk, low-value cargoes.[13][25][27] The opening of the Suez Canal in November 1869 decisively favored steam over sail for Europe-Asia routes, as prevailing winds in the Mediterranean and Red Sea hindered sailing vessels' tacking efficiency, while steamships transited directly without auxiliary sail reliance. This led to a roughly 178 percent surge in steamship utilization on Asian lines from 1869 to 1874, accelerating the obsolescence of clippers designed for open-ocean great-circle routes. Late-built composite clippers, such as the Cutty Sark launched in 1869 with iron framing and wooden planking for durability, attempted to compete but were repurposed for wool and grain by the 1870s as steam lines dominated passenger and high-value freight.[28][29] By the 1880s, clipper construction had ceased, with surviving vessels either wrecked, dismantled for scrap, or downgraded to tramp freighters carrying inexpensive commodities where fuel efficiency was less critical. The transition reflected causal advantages of mechanical power: steam's independence from meteorological variability enabled industrialized trade networks, rendering clippers' hydrodynamic optimizations economically irrelevant outside exceptional circumstances. Global sailing tonnage, dominant at a 10:1 ratio over steam in 1860, inverted rapidly thereafter, underscoring the inexorable displacement by reliable, scalable propulsion.[30][31][32]Technical and Operational Aspects
Hull Construction and Hydrodynamics
Clipper hulls were initially constructed entirely from wood, with frames typically formed from durable hardwoods such as white oak and live oak, planked over with softer woods like yellow pine or cedar to achieve a lightweight yet strong structure optimized for speed over cargo capacity.[33] This all-wood construction dominated American-built clippers in the 1840s and 1850s, allowing for the sharp, flowing lines essential to their performance, though it limited longevity due to rot and fouling.[14] By the late 1850s, British shipbuilders pioneered composite construction, combining iron frames with wooden planking—often teak for resistance to tropical waters—reducing weight while enhancing rigidity and durability, as exemplified in vessels like the Cutty Sark launched in 1869.[1] These composite hulls weighed approximately 20-30% less than equivalent all-wood designs for the same strength, facilitating higher speeds without excessive material stress.[34] The hull form evolved from the sharp, V-shaped underwater profiles of precursor Baltimore clippers in the 1830s, which featured raked stems and transoms to slice through waves with minimal resistance, to the "extreme" clippers of the 1850s with even finer bow entries and elongated waterlines.[12] Key dimensions included length-to-beam ratios of 5:1 to 7:1, with beams rarely exceeding 20 feet on ships over 200 feet long, prioritizing hydrodynamic efficiency over stability or capacity.[14] Midships sections were often U-shaped or semi-circular above the waterline for cargo hold utility, transitioning to a deep, narrow V below to minimize wetted surface area and frictional drag, enabling velocities up to 20 knots in ideal conditions.[1] Hydrodynamically, clipper designs drew from John Scott Russell's wave-line theory of the 1830s, which posited that hulls should conform to the cycloidal curves of generated waves—featuring a hollowed bow wave pattern and fine run aft—to reduce wave-making resistance, the dominant drag component at speeds above hull speed (approximately 1.34 times the square root of waterline length in feet).[35] This approach, while empirically successful in light to moderate winds, overlooked viscous effects and prismatic coefficients exceeding 0.6, leading to higher resistance in heavy seas compared to fuller-bodied merchant ships; post-19th-century analysis via Froude's towing tank experiments confirmed that clippers' slender forms excelled in transitional speeds but suffered pounding and wetness forward.[35] The raked clipper bow and counter stern further aided in deflecting spray and maintaining trim under sail, though at the expense of deck space and crew safety in beam seas.[12] Overall, these features allowed clippers to achieve average passage times 30-50% faster than conventional packet ships on routes like China to London, driven by reduced total resistance through optimized displacement-length ratios around 100-150.[14]Rigging, Sails, and Speed Optimization
Clipper ships featured a three-masted ship rig, with square sails on the foremast, mainmast, and mizzenmast to optimize propulsion across varying wind directions during extended voyages.[1] This full rigging included multiple tiers of square sails per mast: courses at the lowest level, followed by topsails (often doubled for greater area), topgallants, royals, and frequently skysails or even moonrakers at the top to harness lighter winds aloft.[9] Headsails such as jibs, flying jibs, and staysails forward of the foremast provided additional drive and balance, particularly when sailing close to the wind. Standing rigging consisted of iron wire shrouds and stays for durability under high tension, while running rigging used hemp ropes to facilitate quick adjustments by the crew.[36] Masts were raked aft by approximately 5 to 10 degrees, utilizing the masts' inherent weight to counteract the forward thrust of wind on the sails, thereby reducing stress on the rigging and improving structural integrity without excessive stays.[37] Mast heights often reached about three-quarters of the ship's length, enabling expansive sail plans; for instance, the clipper Red Jacket had a mainmast extending 50 meters above the deck, supporting primary sails up to 29 meters wide and expandable to 49 meters with studding sails on extended booms.[12] Speed optimization centered on maximizing sail area relative to hull displacement, often exceeding 20,000 square feet in extreme designs, to generate propulsive force that propelled clippers to sustained speeds of 15-18 knots and peaks over 20 knots in favorable conditions.[38][12] Studding sails, lightweight additions rigged outside the square sails on booms during fair weather and following winds, significantly boosted downwind performance by increasing canvas without altering the primary rig.[39] Captains and crews emphasized dynamic sail handling: setting upper tiers promptly in building breezes to leverage gradient winds, reefing lower sails in squalls to maintain stability, and minimizing drag through precise trimming, all of which demanded highly skilled labor to avoid broaching or structural failure while chasing records like the 21-knot burst achieved by certain American clippers in 1856.[12] This approach prioritized velocity over cargo capacity, distinguishing clippers from bulk-oriented vessels.Crew Demands, Risks, and Performance Metrics
Clipper ships typically required crews of 25 to 50 sailors, depending on vessel size, to manage their extensive rigging and sails under demanding conditions.[38] These crews included a captain, mates, able-bodied seamen skilled in rapid sail handling, and ordinary seamen or apprentices, often drawn from diverse nationalities such as Chinese, Arab, Indian, and European workers to meet the operational tempo of high-speed voyages.[1] The demands were intense, with sailors working in rotating watches amid constant adjustments to optimize speed, exposing them to physical exhaustion from hauling heavy canvas in gales or calms, as captains prioritized velocity over crew welfare to win races or beat competitors.[40] Operational risks were elevated due to the ships' fine hulls and vast sail plans, which enhanced speed but reduced stability and increased vulnerability to capsizing, particularly when overloaded with cargo to maximize profits.[1] Crews faced perils from violent storms, especially around Cape Horn, where high winds could dismast vessels or sweep men overboard, as documented in accounts of clippers like those in the California trade suffering wrecks from grounding or structural failure.[41] Injuries from falls, boom strikes, or rope strains were common during maneuvers, compounded by inadequate safety measures and harsh discipline from captains enforcing relentless performance.[42] Food shortages and scurvy arose on extended passages if provisions spoiled, while fire risks from wooden construction and open flames added to the hazards, contributing to high crew mortality rates compared to slower merchantmen.[43] Performance metrics underscored the clippers' engineering for velocity, with sustained speeds averaging over 250 nautical miles per day—far exceeding the 150 miles of conventional ships—and peaks up to 20 knots under ideal winds.[1] [38] Notable records included the Flying Cloud's 89-day passage from New York to San Francisco in 1851, halving prior averages, and the Lightning's 436-nautical-mile 24-hour run in 1854.[1] [38] The Sovereign of the Seas achieved a verified burst of 22 knots in 1852, while the Cutty Sark logged 17.5 knots routinely, with a best daily distance of 363 nautical miles, metrics derived from logbooks cross-verified against chronometer timings and celestial observations.[12] These figures, though exceptional, came at the cost of fragility, as the emphasis on low displacement and sharp lines limited reliability in adverse conditions.[38]| Vessel | Key Performance Record | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flying Cloud | 89 days, New York to San Francisco | 1851 | [1] |
| Lightning | 436 nautical miles in 24 hours | 1854 | [38] |
| Sovereign of the Seas | 22 knots peak speed | 1852 | [12] |
| Cutty Sark | 363 nautical miles daily maximum | 19th century | [44] |