Hubbry Logo
CommodusCommodusMain
Open search
Commodus
Community hub
Commodus
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Commodus
Commodus
Commodus
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Roman imperial dynasties
Aureus of Commodus
Nerva–Antonine dynasty (AD 96–192)
Chronology
Nerva 96–98
Trajan 98–117
Hadrian 117–138
Antoninus Pius 138–161
Lucius Verus 161–169
Marcus Aurelius 161–180
Commodus 177–192
Family
Succession
Preceded by
Flavian dynasty		 Followed by
Year of the Five Emperors

Commodus (/ˈkɒmədəs/;[5] Latin: [ˈkɔmmɔdʊs]; 31 August 161 – 31 December 192) was Roman emperor from 177 to 192, first serving as nominal co-emperor under his father Marcus Aurelius and then ruling alone from 180. Commodus's sole reign is commonly thought to mark the end of the Pax Romana, a golden age of peace and prosperity in the history of the Roman Empire.

Commodus accompanied his father during the Marcomannic Wars in 172 and on a tour of the Eastern provinces in 176. The following year, he became the youngest emperor and consul up to that point, at the age of 16. His solo reign saw less military conflict than that of Marcus Aurelius, but internal intrigues and conspiracies abounded, goading Commodus to an increasingly dictatorial style of leadership. This culminated in his creating a deific personality cult, including his performances as a gladiator in the Colosseum. Throughout his reign, Commodus entrusted the management of affairs to his palace chamberlain and praetorian prefects, namely Saoterus, Perennis, and Cleander.

Commodus was assassinated by the wrestler Narcissus in 192, ending the Nerva–Antonine dynasty. He was succeeded by Pertinax, the first claimant in the tumultuous Year of the Five Emperors.

Early life and rise to power (161–180)

[edit]

Early life

[edit]

Lucius Aelius Aurelius Commodus was born on 31 August AD 161 in Lanuvium, near Rome.[6] He was the son of the reigning emperor, Marcus Aurelius, and Aurelius' first cousin, Faustina the Younger, the youngest daughter of Emperor Antoninus Pius, who had died only a few months before. Commodus had a twin brother, Titus Aurelius Fulvus Antoninus, who died in 165. On 12 October 166, Commodus was made caesar together with his younger brother, Marcus Annius Verus.[6][7] The latter died in 169 having failed to recover from an operation, which left Commodus as Marcus Aurelius's sole surviving son.[7]

He was looked after by his father's physician, Galen,[8][9] who treated many of Commodus's common illnesses. Commodus received extensive tutoring from a multitude of teachers with a focus on intellectual education.[10] Among his teachers, Onesicrates, Antistius Capella, Titus Aius Sanctus, and Pitholaus are mentioned.[10][11]

Left: Medallion depicting the caesar Commodus (right) with his father Marcus (left), AD 172
Right: Aureus of Commodus as co-augustus, AD 177[12]
Commodus c. 170–175 AD, Romano-Germanic Museum.

Commodus is known to have been at Carnuntum, the headquarters of Marcus Aurelius during the Marcomannic Wars, in 172. It is presumed that there, on 15 October 172, he was given the victory title Germanicus, in the presence of the army. The title suggests Commodus was present at his father's victory over the Marcomanni. On 20 January 175, Commodus entered the College of Pontiffs, the starting point of a career in public life.[6][13]

In 175, Avidius Cassius, Governor of Syria, declared himself emperor following rumours that Marcus Aurelius had died. Having been accepted as emperor by Syria, Palestina and Egypt, Cassius carried on his rebellion even after it had become obvious Marcus was still alive. During the preparations for the campaign against Cassius, Commodus assumed his toga virilis on the Danubian front on 7 July 175, thus formally entering adulthood. Cassius, however, was killed by one of his centurions before the campaign against him could begin. Commodus subsequently accompanied his father on a lengthy trip to the Eastern provinces, during which he visited Antioch. The Emperor and his son then travelled to Athens, where they were initiated into the Eleusinian Mysteries. They then returned to Rome in the autumn of 176.[13]

Marcus Aurelius was the first emperor since Vespasian to have a legitimate biological son, though he himself was the fifth in the line of the so-called Five Good Emperors, also known as the Adoptive Emperors, each of whom had adopted his successor. Commodus was the first (and until 337, the only) emperor "born in the purple," meaning during his father's reign.[14]

On 27 November 176, Marcus Aurelius bestowed the title of Imperator on Commodus.[15] Modern authors often use this date as the beginning of his reign,[4] but the exact chronology of events is uncertain.[16] Commodus is first mentioned as Augustus (emperor) on 17 June 177,[17] but he reckoned his reign back to his salutation in 176.[16][18] For instance, he assumed the tribunicia potestas (tribunician power) around February 177, but in April 177 he started to backdate this event to November 176.[19]

On 23 December 176, the two imperatores celebrated a joint triumph.[20] On 1 January 177, Commodus became consul for the first time, which made him, aged 15, the youngest consul up to that time (the minimum age for the consulship was around 30).[21] He subsequently married Bruttia Crispina before accompanying his father to the Danubian front once more in 178. Marcus Aurelius died there on 17 March 180, leaving the 18-year-old Commodus as sole emperor.[22]

Sole reign (180–192)

[edit]
Commodus c. 180 AD, Getty Museum.

Upon his ascension, Commodus devalued the Roman currency. He reduced the weight of the denarius from 96 per Roman pound to 105 per Roman pound (3.85 grams to 3.35 grams). He also reduced the silver purity from 79 percent to 76 percent – the silver weight dropping from 2.57 grams to 2.34 grams. In 186, he further reduced the purity and silver weight to 74 percent and 2.22 grams respectively, being 108 to the Roman pound.[23] His reduction of the denarius during his rule was the largest since the empire's first devaluation during Nero's reign.

The obverse image of a silver denarius depicting Roman Emperor Commodus (177–192 CE)

Whereas the reign of Marcus Aurelius had been marked by almost continuous warfare, Commodus's rule was comparatively peaceful in the military sense, but was also characterised by political strife and the increasingly arbitrary and capricious behaviour of the emperor himself. In the view of Cassius Dio, his accession marked the descent "from a kingdom of gold to one of iron and rust".[24]

Despite his notoriety, and considering the importance of his reign, Commodus's years in power are not well chronicled. The principal surviving literary sources are Herodian, Cassius Dio (a contemporary and sometimes first-hand observer and Senator during Commodus's reign, whose reports for this period survive only as fragments and abbreviations), and the Historia Augusta (untrustworthy because of its character as a work of literature rather than of history, with elements of fiction embedded within its biographies; in the case of Commodus, it probably embroiders what the author found in reasonably good contemporary sources).

Commodus remained with the Danube armies for only a short time before negotiating a peace treaty with the Danubian tribes. He then returned to Rome and celebrated a triumph for the conclusion of the wars on 22 October 180. Unlike the preceding emperors Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius, he seems to have had little interest in the business of administration. He tended throughout his reign to leave the practical running of the state to a succession of favourites, beginning with Saoterus, a freedman from Nicomedia who had become his chamberlain.

Dissatisfaction with this state of affairs led to a series of conspiracies and attempted coups, which in turn eventually provoked Commodus to take charge of affairs, which he did in an increasingly dictatorial manner. Nevertheless, though the senatorial order came to hate and fear him, the evidence suggests he remained popular with the army and the common people for much of his reign, not least because of his lavish shows of largesse (recorded on his coinage) and because he staged and took part in spectacular gladiatorial combats. He was not an inspired combatant. He killed animals by bow, standing above the arena. When he fought fellow gladiators, they would purposely submit. During this period Rome's economy declined.

One of the ways he paid for his donatives (imperial handouts) and mass entertainments was to tax the senatorial order. On many inscriptions, the traditional order of the two nominal powers of the state, the Senate and People (Senatus Populusque Romanus) was provocatively reversed (Populus Senatusque...).

Conspiracies of 182

[edit]
Commodus with attributes of Helios, Apollo and Jupiter, late 2nd century AD, sardonyx cameo relief, Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg

At the outset of his reign, Commodus, aged 18, inherited many of his father's senior advisers, notably Tiberius Claudius Pompeianus (the second husband of Commodus's eldest sister Lucilla), his father-in-law Gaius Bruttius Praesens, Titus Fundanius Vitrasius Pollio, and Aufidius Victorinus the Prefect of the City of Rome. He also had four surviving sisters, all of them with husbands who were potential rivals. Lucilla was over ten years his senior and held the rank of Augusta as the widow of her first husband, Lucius Verus.

The first crisis of the reign came in 182, when Lucilla engineered a conspiracy against her brother. Her motive is alleged to have been the envy of the Empress Crispina. Lucilla's husband, Pompeianus, was not involved, but two men alleged to have been her lovers, Marcus Ummidius Quadratus Annianus (the consul of 167, also her first cousin) and Appius Claudius Quintianus, attempted to murder Commodus as he entered a theater. They bungled the job and were seized by the emperor's bodyguard.

Quadratus and Quintianus were executed. Lucilla was exiled to Capri and later killed. Pompeianus retired from public life. One of the two praetorian prefects, Publius Tarrutenius Paternus, had actually been involved in the conspiracy but his involvement was not discovered until later. In the meantime, he and his colleague, Sextus Tigidius Perennis, were able to arrange for the murder of Saoterus, the hated chamberlain.

Commodus took the loss of Saoterus badly, and Perennis now seized the chance to advance himself by implicating Paternus in a second conspiracy, one apparently led by Publius Salvius Julianus, the son of the jurist Salvius Julianus and betrothed to Paternus' daughter. Salvius and Paternus were executed along with a number of other prominent consulars and senators. Didius Julianus, the future emperor and a relative of Salvius Julianus, was dismissed from the governorship of Germania Inferior.

Cleander

[edit]

After the murder of the powerful Saoterus, Perennis took over the reins of government and Commodus found a new chamberlain and favourite in Cleander, a Phrygian freedman who had married one of the emperor's mistresses, Demostratia. Cleander was in fact the person who had murdered Saoterus. After these attempts on his life, Commodus spent much of his time outside Rome, mostly on the family estates at Lanuvium. As he was physically strong, his chief interest was sport: he took part in horse racing, chariot racing, and combat with beasts and men, mostly in private but occasionally in public.

Dacia and Britain

[edit]

Commodus was inaugurated in 183 as consul with Aufidius Victorinus as colleague and assumed the title Pius. War broke out in Dacia: few details are available, but it appears two future contenders for the throne, Clodius Albinus and Pescennius Niger, both distinguished themselves in the campaign. Also, in Britain in 184, the governor Ulpius Marcellus re-advanced the Roman frontier northward to the Antonine Wall, but the legionaries revolted against his harsh discipline and acclaimed another legate, Priscus, as emperor.[25]

Priscus refused to accept their acclamation, and Perennis had all the legionary legates in Britain cashiered. On 15 October 184, at the Capitoline Games, a Cynic philosopher publicly denounced Perennis before Commodus. His tale was considered false and he was immediately put to death. According to Cassius Dio, Perennis, though ruthless and ambitious, was not personally corrupt and was a generally good administrator.[25]

However, the following year a detachment of soldiers from Britain (they had been drafted to Italy to suppress brigands) also denounced Perennis to the emperor as plotting to make his own son emperor (they had been enabled to do so by Cleander, who was seeking to dispose of his rival), and Commodus gave them permission to execute him as well as his wife and sons. The fall of Perennis brought a new spate of executions: Aufidius Victorinus committed suicide. Ulpius Marcellus was replaced as governor of Britain by Pertinax. Brought to Rome and tried for treason, Marcellus narrowly escaped death.

Cleander's zenith and fall (185–190)

[edit]
Remnant of a Roman bust of a youth with a blond beard, perhaps Commodus, who is said to have always dyed his hair and used gold dust.[26] National Archaeological Museum, Athens

Cleander proceeded to concentrate power in his own hands and to enrich himself by taking responsibility for all public offices. He sold (and bestowed entry to) Senate seats, army commands, governorships, and increasingly, suffect consulships, to the highest bidder. Unrest rose throughout the empire, with large numbers of army deserters causing trouble in Gaul and Germany. Pescennius Niger dealt with the deserters in Gaul in a military campaign. The revolt in Brittany was put down by two legions brought over from Britain.

In 187, one of the leaders of the deserters, Maternus, came from Gaul intending to assassinate Commodus at the Festival of the Great Goddess in March but was betrayed and executed. In the same year Pertinax unmasked a conspiracy by two enemies of Cleander, Antistius Burrus (one of Commodus's brothers-in-law) and Arrius Antoninus. As a result, Commodus appeared more rarely in public, preferring to live on his estates.

Early in 188, Cleander disposed of the current praetorian prefect, Atilius Aebutianus, and took over supreme command of the Praetorian Guard at the new rank of a pugione ("dagger-bearer"), with two praetorian prefects subordinate to him. Now at the zenith of his power, Cleander continued to sell public offices as his private business. The climax came in the year 190, which had 25 suffect consuls—a record in the 1,000-year history of the Roman consulship—all appointed by Cleander (they included the future Emperor Septimius Severus).

In the spring of 190, Rome was afflicted by a food shortage, for which the praefectus annonae Papirius Dionysius, the official actually in charge of the grain supply, contrived to lay the blame on Cleander. At the end of June, a mob demonstrated against Cleander during a horse race in the Circus Maximus: he sent the Praetorian Guard to put down the disturbances, but Pertinax, who was now City Prefect of Rome, dispatched the Vigiles Urbani to oppose them. Cleander fled to Commodus, who was at Laurentum in the house of the Quinctilii, for protection, but the mob followed him calling for his head.

At the urging of his mistress Marcia, Commodus had Cleander beheaded and his son killed. Other victims at this time were the praetorian prefect Julius Julianus, Commodus's cousin Annia Fundania Faustina, and his brother-in-law Mamertinus. Papirius Dionysius was executed, too. In AD 191, Commodus took more of the reins of power, though he continued to rule through a cabal consisting of Marcia, his new chamberlain Eclectus, and the new praetorian prefect Quintus Aemilius Laetus.

Megalomania (190–192)

[edit]
Medallion of Commodus depicting him as Hercules, AD 192.

In opposition to the Senate, in his pronouncements and iconography, Commodus had always stressed his unique status as a source of god-like power, liberality, and physical prowess. Innumerable statues around the empire were set up portraying him in the guise of Hercules, reinforcing the image of him as a demigod, a physical giant, a protector, and a warrior who fought against men and beasts (see § Commodus and Hercules and § Commodus the Gladiator below). Moreover, as Hercules, he could claim to be the son of Jupiter, the supreme god of the Roman pantheon. These tendencies now increased to megalomaniacal proportions. Far from celebrating his descent from Marcus Aurelius, the actual source of his power, he stressed his own personal uniqueness as the bringer of a new order, seeking to re-cast the empire in his own image.

During 191, the city of Rome was extensively damaged by a fire that raged for several days, during which many public buildings including the Temple of Pax, the Temple of Vesta, and parts of the imperial palace were destroyed.

Perhaps seeing this as an opportunity, early in 192 Commodus, declaring himself the new Romulus, ritually re-founded Rome, renaming the city Colonia Lucia Annia Commodiana. All the months of the year were renamed to correspond exactly with his (now twelve) names: Lucius, Aelius, Aurelius, Commodus, Augustus, Herculeus, Romanus, Exsuperatorius, Amazonius, Invictus, Felix, and Pius. The legions were renamed Commodianae, the fleet which imported grain from Africa was termed Alexandria Commodiana Togata, the Senate was entitled the Commodian Fortunate Senate, his palace and the Roman people themselves were all given the name Commodianus, and the day on which these reforms were decreed was to be called Dies Commodianus.[27]

Thus, he presented himself as the fountainhead of the Empire, Roman life, and religion. He also had the head of the Colossus of Nero adjacent to the Colosseum replaced with his own portrait, gave it a club, placed a bronze lion at its feet to make it look like Hercules Romanus, and added an inscription boasting of being "the only left-handed fighter to conquer twelve times one thousand men".[28]

Assassination (192)

[edit]
Damnatio memoriae of Commodus on an inscription in the Museum of Roman History in Osterburken, Germany. The abbreviation "CO" has been restored with paint.

In November 192, Commodus held Plebeian Games, in which he shot hundreds of animals with arrows and javelins every morning, and fought as a gladiator every afternoon, winning all the fights. In December, he announced his intention to inaugurate the year 193 as both consul and gladiator on 1 January.

When Marcia found a list of people Commodus intended to have executed, she discovered that she, the prefect Laetus, and Eclectus were on it. The three of them plotted to assassinate the emperor. On 31 December, Marcia poisoned Commodus's food, but he vomited up the poison, so the conspirators sent his wrestling partner Narcissus to strangle him in his bath.[29]

Upon his death, the Senate declared him a public enemy (a de facto damnatio memoriae) and restored the original name of the city of Rome and its institutions. Statues of Commodus were demolished. His body was buried in the Mausoleum of Hadrian.

Commodus's death marked the end of the Nerva–Antonine dynasty. Commodus was succeeded by Pertinax, whose reign was short; he became the first claimant to be usurped during the Year of the Five Emperors.

In 195, the emperor Septimius Severus, trying to gain favour with the family of Marcus Aurelius, rehabilitated Commodus's memory and had the Senate deify him.[30]

Character and physical prowess

[edit]

Character and motivations

[edit]

Cassius Dio, a first-hand witness, describes him as "not naturally wicked but, on the contrary, as guileless as any man that ever lived. His great simplicity, however, together with his cowardice, made him the slave of his companions, and it was through them that he at first, out of ignorance, missed the better life and then was led on into lustful and cruel habits, which soon became second nature."[31]

His recorded actions do tend to show a rejection of his father's policies, his father's advisers, and especially his father's austere lifestyle, and an alienation from the surviving members of his family. It seems likely that he was raised in an atmosphere of Stoic asceticism, which he rejected entirely upon his accession to sole rule.

After repeated attempts on Commodus's life, Roman citizens were often killed for making him angry. One such notable event was the attempted extermination of the house of the Quinctilii. Condianus and Maximus were executed on the pretext that while they were not implicated in any plots, their wealth and talent would make them unhappy with the current state of affairs.[32] Another event, as recorded by the historian Aelius Lampridius, took place at the Roman baths at Terme Taurine, where the emperor had an attendant thrown into an oven after he had found his bathwater to be lukewarm.[33][34]

Changes of name

[edit]
Two aurei of AD 186 and 192 showing Commodus' change from "Marcus Aurelius Commodus Antoninus" to his original "Lucius Aelius Aurelius Commodus"

His original name was Lucius Aelius Aurelius Commodus.[35] On his father's death in 180, Commodus changed this to Marcus Aurelius Commodus Antoninus, before changing back to his birth name in 191.[2] Later that year he adopted as his full style Lucius Aelius Aurelius Commodus Augustus Herculeus Romanus Exsuperatorius Amazonius Invictus Felix Pius (the order of some of these titles varies in the sources). "Exsuperatorius" (the supreme) was a title given to Jupiter, and "Amazonius" identified him again with Hercules.

An inscribed altar from Dura-Europos on the Euphrates shows that Commodus's titles and the renaming of the months were disseminated to the farthest reaches of the Empire; moreover, that even auxiliary military units received the title Commodiana, and that he claimed two additional titles: Pacator Orbis (pacifier of the world) and Dominus Noster (Our Lord). The latter eventually would be used as a conventional title by Roman emperors, starting about a century later, but Commodus seems to have been the first to assume it.[36]

Commodus and Hercules

[edit]

Disdaining the more philosophic inclinations of his father, Commodus was extremely proud of his physical prowess. The historian Herodian, a contemporary, described Commodus as an extremely handsome man.[37] As mentioned above, he ordered many statues to be made showing him dressed as Hercules with a lion's hide and a club. He thought of himself as the reincarnation of Hercules, frequently emulating the legendary hero's feats by appearing in the arena to fight a variety of wild animals. He was left-handed and very proud of the fact.[38] Cassius Dio and the writers of the Augustan History say that Commodus was a skilled archer, who could shoot the heads off ostriches in full gallop, and kill a panther as it attacked a victim in the arena.

Commodus the gladiator

[edit]

Commodus also had a passion for gladiatorial combat, which he took so far as to take to the arena himself, dressed as a secutor.[39] The Romans found Commodus's gladiatorial combat to be scandalous and disgraceful.[40] According to Herodian, spectators of Commodus thought it unbecoming of an emperor to take up arms in the amphitheater for sport when he could be campaigning against barbarians among other opponents of Rome. The consensus was that it was below his office to participate as a gladiator.[41] Popular rumors spread alleging he was not actually the son of Marcus Aurelius, but of a gladiator his mother Faustina had taken as a lover at the coastal resort of Caieta.[42]

Cassius Dio claimed that citizens of Rome who lacked feet (either through accident or illness) were taken to the arena, where they were tethered together for Commodus to club to death while pretending they were giants.[43] Dio also wrote that it was Commodus's custom to privately use deadly weapons to fight, murdering and maiming his opponents.[44][45]

Commodus was also known for fighting exotic animals in the arena, often to the horror and disgust of the Roman populace. According to Cassius Dio, Commodus once killed 100 lions in a single day.[46] Later, he decapitated a running ostrich with a specially designed dart[47] and afterward carried his sword and the bleeding head of the dead bird over to the Senators' seating area, and motioned to suggest that they were to be next.[48] Dio notes that the targeted senators actually found this more ridiculous than frightening, and chewed on laurel leaves to conceal their laughter.[49] On other occasions, Commodus killed three elephants on the floor of the arena by himself,[50] and a giraffe.[51]

  • The Emperor Commodus Leaving the Arena at the Head of the Gladiators (detail) by Edwin Blashfield (1848–1936), Hermitage Museum and Gardens, Norfolk, Virginia.
    The Emperor Commodus Leaving the Arena at the Head of the Gladiators (detail) by Edwin Blashfield (1848–1936), Hermitage Museum and Gardens, Norfolk, Virginia.
[edit]

Nerva–Antonine family tree

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Commodus

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Lucius Aelius Aurelius Commodus (31 August AD 161 – 31 December 192) was from 180 to 192, initially as co-ruler with his father from 177 and then solely after the latter's death. Born to and Annia Galeria at , Commodus was the first emperor "" to inherit the throne directly from his biological father, breaking the adoptive succession of the prior Antonine rulers. His rule began with the negotiation of peace treaties ending his father's protracted against Germanic tribes, allowing a withdrawal of Roman forces from contested frontiers. However, accounts from contemporary senatorial historians and —written by elites antagonistic to Commodus's populist leanings and personal indulgences—portray a shift toward autocratic eccentricity, including Commodus's adoption of the identity of , issuance of coinage depicting himself as the god, and active participation in gladiatorial spectacles where he reportedly fought hundreds of bouts against impaired or staged opponents. These behaviors, potentially amplified by sources hostile to his neglect of senatorial privileges and favoritism toward the and plebeian amusements, fostered administrative corruption, economic strain from lavish games, and elite conspiracies that ended with his strangulation by the wrestler Narcissus in a plot involving his chamberlain Cleander's successor Laetus and mistress Marcia. Commodus's assassination precipitated the and the empire's descent into civil war, symbolizing the termination of the Pax Romana's stability under the Antonines.

Early Life and Rise to Power (161–180)

Birth and Family Background

Lucius Aelius Aurelius Commodus was born on 31 August 161 in Lanuvium, an ancient town approximately 20 miles southeast of Rome. He was the tenth known child of Emperor Marcus Aurelius, who had ascended to the throne earlier that year alongside Lucius Verus, and Annia Galeria Faustina, known as Faustina the Younger, daughter of the previous emperor Antoninus Pius. Commodus shared his birth with a twin brother, Titus Aurelius Fulvus Antoninus, who died in 165 at around four years old. Marcus Aurelius and Faustina had at least thirteen children in total, including several sons who predeceased them in infancy or early childhood, such as an unnamed son born in 159 and another in 161 shortly before Commodus. Commodus thus became the only surviving son, with surviving sisters including Annia Aurelia Fadilla, Vibia Aurelia Sabina, and Lucilla, the latter of whom was born in 148 or 149 and later married Lucius Verus. This high infant mortality reflected common patterns in Roman elite families, exacerbated by the Antonine Plague that ravaged the empire from 165 onward. The family belonged to the Antonine dynasty, with himself adopted by in 138 as part of a succession plan tracing back to and . Faustina's lineage connected directly to earlier emperors through her father, emphasizing the interconnected imperial bloodlines designed to stabilize rule through . Later historiographical accounts, such as those in the unreliable , propagated unsubstantiated rumors questioning Commodus's paternity and alleging Faustina's infidelity with a gladiator or , claims dismissed by contemporary evidence like coins and inscriptions affirming his status as Marcus's biological heir.

Education and Upbringing

Lucius Aelius Aurelius Commodus was born on 31 August 161 in Lanuvium, about 20 miles southeast of Rome, as the son of Emperor Marcus Aurelius and Faustina the Younger. He entered the world as one of twins, though his brother died shortly after birth, leaving Commodus as the sole surviving male heir. From infancy, his status marked him as a presumptive successor, the first Roman emperor to be born during his father's reign, often termed "born in the purple." Commodus's upbringing blended imperial privilege with the rigors of a court shadowed by perpetual warfare, as spent much of the 160s and 170s on campaigns against Parthians and Germanic tribes. Raised primarily in under the supervision of tutors and imperial guardians while his father was absent, he benefited from Marcus's deliberate efforts to secure top educators despite wartime constraints. His education followed the elite Roman model for future rulers, emphasizing intellectual disciplines such as Latin and Greek languages, , to cultivate oratory and skills. Military training and physical conditioning received comparatively less focus, with ancient commentators attributing this—or perhaps Commodus's inherent disposition—to later shortcomings in leadership. By his early teens, he gained practical exposure to life, accompanying Marcus on Danube frontier expeditions against the around 172, at age 11. This blend of scholarly preparation and battlefield observation positioned him for formal elevation as Caesar in 166 and co-Augustus by 177.

Co-Rulership with Marcus Aurelius

In November 176 AD, acclaimed his son Commodus as imperator during the on the frontier, followed by his elevation to the rank of in the summer of 177 AD, formally establishing co-emperorship at age 15. This decision deviated from the adoptive succession practiced by prior Antonine emperors, prioritizing biological lineage amid ongoing threats from Germanic tribes and the recent revolt of in 175 AD, which had prompted Marcus to summon Commodus from to the front. Commodus, who had previously held the title of Caesar since around 166 AD, thus gained full imperial powers, including tribunicia potestas and proconsular imperium, as evidenced by contemporary coinage and inscriptions depicting both rulers. Commodus joined at the legionary base of in , participating in the final phases of the protracted campaigns against the , , and from 177 to 180 AD. In 178 AD, the co-emperors advanced north across the , securing victories over the Cotini, , Naristi, and , which allowed for the establishment of Roman outposts beyond the river, such as in . These operations, conducted amid harsh conditions including plague and , relied on Commodus' presence to symbolize continuity and deter internal dissent, though primary accounts from later historians like , writing under hostile Severan patronage, emphasize Marcus' dominance and downplay Commodus' contributions. Marcus Aurelius fell ill and died on March 17, 180 AD, at (modern ), reportedly of natural causes exacerbated by the , though some contemporary suspicions of poisoning by physicians favoring Commodus persist in Dio's narrative without corroboration. Commodus, now sole emperor at 18, promptly negotiated a peace with the and , withdrawing Roman forces to the limes rather than pursuing total conquest, a pragmatic shift from his father's more expansionist aims that preserved resources but drew later criticism for perceived weakness. This transition marked the end of co-rulership, with Commodus returning to in late 180 AD amid celebrations, having administered frontier provinces under Marcus' tutelage.

Sole Reign and Policies (180–192)

Initial Consolidation and War Termination (180–182)

Upon the death of on 17 March 180 at during the , Commodus, then 18 years old, was immediately acclaimed imperator by the legions stationed along the frontier. Recognizing the exhaustion of Roman forces from nearly two decades of conflict, compounded by the ongoing and logistical strains, Commodus prioritized termination of hostilities over continued conquest. He dispatched envoys to negotiate with the , , and Iazyges , compelling them to evacuate lands south of the , withdraw settlements at least 13 Roman miles from the river, and provide thousands of hostages as guarantees of compliance. These terms, while falling short of Marcus Aurelius's ambitions for provincial and Marcomannic kingdom establishment, extracted and stabilized the , allowing of legions and resource reallocation. Minor skirmishes persisted into 181, but the core agreements held, earning Commodus the honorifics Germanicus Maximus and Sarmaticus Maximus from the . Commodus then marched to Rome, entering the city on 20 180 and celebrating a triumph on 22 , complete with processions of captured barbarians and displays. To secure , he distributed substantial donatives—300 denarii per soldier and 75 to Praetorians—while staging lavish and distributions to the urban populace, reinforcing his position amid potential senatorial skepticism over the incomplete victories. Administrative continuity was maintained through retention of key figures from his father's regime, including praetorian prefects Tarrutenius Paternus and Tigidius Perennis, though Commodus increasingly favored equestrians and military men over traditional senatorial elites. By 182, consolidation efforts intensified amid emerging internal threats; Paternus was executed on conspiracy charges linked to a plot involving Commodus's sister , elevating Perennis to sole prefect and centralizing control over the . This purge eliminated a perceived rival within the administration, while Perennis's expanded influence ensured alignment of military and imperial interests, marking an early shift toward reliance on praetorian authority rather than senatorial consensus. These measures, grounded in pragmatic security amid the empire's fiscal pressures, preserved short-term stability without major frontier breaches during this period.

Internal Conspiracies and Power Struggles

In 182, Commodus faced his first significant conspiracy, orchestrated by his sister in collaboration with consular senators such as Ummidius Quadratus and Appius Claudius Pompeianus , along with the prefect Tarrutenius Paternus. The plot aimed to assassinate Commodus as he entered the hunting theater; a soldier named , selected for the task, wounded Commodus in the neck but failed to kill him, reportedly exclaiming, "This is what the has sent you by me." The conspiracy collapsed upon detection; Quadratus and others were executed, while was initially exiled to before her subsequent strangulation, marking the beginning of Commodus' broader purges against perceived senatorial threats. These events, detailed in senatorial histories like those of , reflect Commodus' shift toward distrust of the aristocracy, resulting in the deaths of multiple high-ranking officials and the weakening of traditional senatorial influence. Following the elimination of figures like the Greek , Commodus elevated the equestrian Sextus Tigidius to around 182, granting him extensive administrative control amid the 's disinterest in governance. ' power grew amid accusations of overreach, culminating in 185 when mutinous soldiers from Britain—numbering around 1,500 javelin-armed troops—marched on , alleging plotted to install his son as . A Cynic philosopher's public denunciation at the Capitoline Games further fueled suspicions, leading Commodus to order ' immediate beheading along with his family; his replacement by the Cleander signaled Commodus' preference for lowborn favorites over established elites. Accounts from Dio and , both drawing from senatorial perspectives hostile to Commodus' autocratic style, portray these executions as responses to genuine usurpation fears exacerbated by military unrest. Cleander, a Phrygian who had risen from slavery to serve as Commodus' chamberlain, assumed Perennis' role and amassed unprecedented influence by 186, reportedly appointing 25 successive Praetorian Prefects (many his own ) and selling public offices for profit, which enriched him but alienated the populace and army. His downfall came in 190 amid a severe grain shortage following fires and plague in the prior year; public riots erupted, with the mob demanding his head, prompted by Commodus' sister and mistress Marcia, who warned of Cleander's armed retainers plotting against the . Commodus ordered Cleander's and ; his head was paraded to the crowd, while his sons, associates, and concubines were lynched and mutilated, their bodies dumped in the . This episode, corroborated across Dio, , and the —sources that emphasize Cleander's corruption to critique Commodus' reliance on unreliable favorites—illustrated the fragility of his regime, as unchecked favorites fueled economic grievances and factional . Throughout his reign, Commodus executed numerous opponents, including the Quintilii brothers (consuls and generals), prefects like Paternus and Julianus, and up to six consuls simultaneously, often on vague charges of , as reported by Dio and the . These purges, while rooted in real threats like military revolts and familial intrigue, eroded institutional stability, shifting power to equestrians and freedmen and fostering a climate of that undermined the senatorial order inherited from .

Administrative Favorites and Corruption Claims

Upon assuming sole rule, Commodus delegated significant administrative authority to favored praetorian prefects, beginning with , whom he appointed after the execution of the previous favorite, , around 182 AD. , an equestrian, effectively managed imperial affairs, including military commands, but ancient accounts attribute to him and , such as plundering provincials and eliminating rivals. In 185 AD, accusations from British legionaries—claiming plotted to install his son as emperor—prompted Commodus to order his execution, along with that of his family; reports the prefect was strangled after being handed over by soldiers. These charges, relayed through senatorial historians like and , may reflect factional rivalries rather than verified , as Perennis's equestrian background alienated traditional elites. Perennis's downfall elevated the freedman to in 186 AD, granting him unprecedented influence as chamberlain and . Cleander amassed wealth by auctioning high offices: records him selling praetorships for up to 30 million sesterces and creating 500 "" from imperial slaves and freedmen to bolster his network, practices decried as corrupting the senatorial order. He allegedly manipulated grain distribution, exacerbating a in around 189–190 AD by prioritizing profiteering over supply stability, leading to public unrest. Such claims, primarily from Dio—a senator writing post-Commodus—emphasize moral decay but align with Commodus's policy of empowering non-senatorial administrators, bypassing traditional to centralize control. Cleander's regime collapsed in 190 AD amid a shortage , where a mob, inflamed by his perceived mismanagement, stormed the palace; Commodus, informed by his mistress Marcia, authorized centurions to execute Cleander, whose body was torn apart by the crowd. Post-execution purges targeted Cleander's associates, with Dio noting the sale of confiscated properties to refill the , suggesting fiscal motivations amid Commodus's spectacles. While these episodes fueled narratives of systemic under Commodus, contemporary is limited to hostile sources, which overlook potential efficiencies in equestrian administration but confirm the instability from unchecked favorites' ambitions. No direct epigraphic or fiscal records independently verify the scale of , though the rapid turnover of prefects indicates Commodus's reliance on personal loyalty over institutional checks.

Military Campaigns and Frontier Stability

Upon ascending to sole rule following Marcus Aurelius' death on March 17, 180 AD at on the frontier, Commodus swiftly negotiated peace treaties with the and , concluding the protracted that had strained Roman resources since 166 AD. These agreements preserved Roman control over Marcomannia as far as the Bohemian borders but relinquished deeper conquests across the , including territories recently occupied by Roman forces. , a senator writing under the with evident antipathy toward Commodus, attributes this rapid settlement to the emperor's eagerness to abandon the rigors of campaigning for 's comforts, claiming it defied the counsel of experienced generals who urged exploitation of recent victories. Empirical outcomes, however, indicate the pacts held initially, averting immediate collapse of the Danube defenses amid ongoing recovery from the . Commodus commemorated the accords with a triumph in on October 22, 180 AD, adopting the Germanicus Maximus and distributing donatives to troops, which stabilized legionary loyalty without further personal involvement in northern operations. Administrative delegation underpinned frontier management, as Commodus entrusted military oversight to praetorian prefects rather than leading expeditions himself. Tigidius Perennis, prefect from circa 180 to 185 AD, coordinated patrols and quelled residual unrest among tribes like the Buri, maintaining the limes without major incursions during his tenure. In 182–183 AD, reports of Dacian unrest prompted limited Roman responses, including punitive raids that reaffirmed provincial boundaries without escalating to full , as noted in fragmentary accounts aligning with Commodus' assumption of additional imperial acclamations. Perennis' execution in 185 AD amid accusations of overreach—possibly fabricated amid court intrigues—shifted authority to Cleander, yet the and sectors experienced no systemic breaches, contrasting with the incessant engagements under . This relative quiescence suggests effective deterrence through fortified limes systems and subsidized barbarian clientelae, though senatorial sources like Dio exaggerate Commodus' disengagement to portray neglect. A notable exception occurred in Britain, where northern tribes exploited post-plague vulnerabilities to breach defenses around 183–184 AD, prompting Commodus to dispatch Ulpius Marcellus, a seasoned governor from Marcus' era. Marcellus' campaigns restored order, pushing rebels back and temporarily reoccupying segments of the Antonine Wall, earning Commodus his seventh imperator acclamation and the title Britannicus Maximus by 185 AD. The Historia Augusta, a late and often unreliable collection prone to sensationalism, credits Marcellus with decisive victories, though legionary mutinies—stemming from harsh discipline and supply strains—required suppression, highlighting tensions in remote provinces. Despite these frictions, the frontier stabilized without territorial losses, as evidenced by sustained coinage propaganda emphasizing martial triumphs. Overall, Commodus' approach prioritized consolidation over expansion, yielding a decade of de facto stability across key frontiers, sustained by prefectural efficiency rather than imperial charisma—a pragmatic adaptation to inherited overextension, per assessments balancing hostile narratives against archaeological continuity in fortifications.

Economic Management and Fiscal Realities

Upon assuming sole rule in 180 AD, Commodus inherited a strained by the prolonged and under , which had depleted treasury reserves through military expenditures estimated in the hundreds of millions of and reduced agricultural output. To address fiscal pressures, Commodus initiated a modest of the in 180 AD, reducing its silver content from 79% to 76% and slightly decreasing its size, a policy that contributed to emerging inflationary pressures but did not yet trigger widespread instability. Numismatic evidence confirms this adjustment, reflecting a continuation of wartime financial expedients rather than aggressive manipulation. Commodus's administration relied on selling public offices and honors to generate revenue, particularly under influential freedmen like Cleander, who auctioned consulships, governorships, and commands. In 190 AD alone, records indicate 25 suffect consuls were appointed, far exceeding prior norms and suggesting commodified access to power that enriched the imperial coffers but eroded senatorial prestige. , a senator affected by these practices, describes Commodus taxing the senatorial order heavily to fund personal extravagance, though his account reflects class antagonism toward the emperor's autocratic favoritism of non-elites. similarly notes fiscal burdens, but both historians, writing post-assassination amid senatorial narratives, may amplify corruption claims to justify . Public expenditures under Commodus emphasized urban patronage in Rome, including expanded grain distributions via the annona and lavish gladiatorial spectacles, with the emperor personally funding and participating in events that strained resources amid ongoing barbarian subsidies for frontier peace. These outlays, while maintaining social stability in the capital, exacerbated deficits inherited from prior reigns, prompting reliance on ad hoc revenues like office sales over structural reforms. Inflation manifested in credit market disruptions by the late 180s, yet the economy avoided collapse, as trade and agriculture persisted without recorded famines or revolts tied to fiscal policy during his rule. Empirical continuity in coin hoards and inscriptions indicates relative fiscal resilience until the 192 AD succession crisis. Historiographical assessments of Commodus's fiscal management are colored by elite biases; senatorial sources like Dio decry "excessive government" and taxation hikes as ruinous, yet causal analysis reveals these as responses to war legacies rather than inherent profligacy, with debasement levels milder than under successors like . No contemporary non-senatorial evidence contradicts basic stability, underscoring how institutional privileges shaped adversarial portrayals over objective economic decline.

Self-Presentation and Personal Eccentricities

Identification with Hercules

Commodus cultivated a personal identification with , the Roman adaptation of the Greek demigod , portraying himself in sculptures and coinage as the hero equipped with a club and lion skin. This self-presentation is evidenced by a marble bust from the late second century CE, discovered in the Horti Lamiani gardens and now in the , depicting Commodus in with Hercules' attributes. Similar depictions appear in other statues and medallions, such as a bronze medallion from 192 CE showing Commodus with a lion skin and pouring a , styled after . The association predated the final years of his reign, with a papyrus from Egypt's Fayum region referencing Commodus-Hercules around 186-187 CE, indicating early public acknowledgment. Coinage provides further material evidence; denarii from the period feature Commodus' head wearing a lion-skin headdress on the obverse, while reverses depict ' club or the figure itself, evolving into explicit "Hercules Commodianus" issues by 191 CE following the . Provincial dedications, including an altar from on the , attest to the imperial cult's propagation of this image, accepted by military communities as Commodus incarnate. Ancient historians like and , writing from senatorial perspectives hostile to Commodus for his abandonment of adoptive succession, describe this identification critically, attributing it to megalomania rather than strategic legitimacy. Yet, the consistency across numismatic, sculptural, and epigraphic records—independent of literary bias—confirms the deliberate policy, likely aimed at invoking ' patronage for Commodus' gladiatorial exploits and to legitimize rule through divine association, a motif echoed in prior emperors like . By 192 CE, Commodus adopted the epithet Hercules Romanus, renaming after the hero in a bid for .

Gladiatorial Performances and Public Spectacles

![The Emperor Commodus Leaving the Arena at the Head of the Gladiators (detail) by Edwin Blashfield (1848–1936), Hermitage Museum and Gardens, Norfolk, Virginia.](./assets/The_Emperor_Commodus_Leaving_the_Arena_at_the_Head_of_the_Gladiators_by_American_muralist_Edwin_Howland_Blashfield_(1848-1936) Commodus engaged extensively in arena spectacles, participating directly in both venationes (animal hunts) and gladiatorial combats, activities unprecedented for a reigning . According to the , who served as a senator during Commodus's , the would enter the amphitheater each morning to slaughter wild animals, including ostriches decapitated with arrows and other beasts killed with javelins or clubs, often from a raised platform for safety. In the afternoons, Commodus fought as a gladiator, typically adopting the style with and , though contests were arranged such that opponents—professionals, the disabled, or women—posed minimal threat, submitting without genuine resistance. , a contemporary Greek , corroborates this, noting Commodus's preference for spectacles where he could display prowess against bound or handicapped foes, emphasizing the theatrical rather than nature of these performances. These appearances numbered in the hundreds, with the later Historia Augusta claiming Commodus fought 735 gladiatorial bouts and slew numerous beasts, though this source, compiled over a century later, reflects senatorial disdain and potential exaggeration. Dio reports that Commodus, attired as Hercules with a lion-skin headdress and wielding a club, received a daily million sesterces from the gladiatorial purse, funding his obsession while straining imperial finances. Spectacles peaked in November 192 during the Plebeian Games, where he daily killed hundreds of animals and fought gladiators, planning further to enter the arena as consul on the New Year, an act senators viewed as debasing the office. Attendance was compulsory for elites; Dio describes senators compelled to watch in equestrian togas and cloaks, barred from senatorial attire to underscore Commodus's disdain for traditional hierarchies. While popular with the plebs for free grain and entertainment, these events scandalized the , as attests, portraying them as symptomatic of Commodus's of invincibility and divine favor. Accounts from Dio and , both from elite perspectives antagonistic to Commodus's , prioritize his eccentricities over any stabilizing effects of mass spectacles, yet archaeological evidence like passages linked to imperial access supports the scale of organized events.

Name Changes and Symbolic Reforms

In 191 AD, Commodus formally altered his nomenclature to incorporate " Romanus," marking a pivotal shift in his imperial identity toward emulation of the demigod , as evidenced by contemporary coinage and inscriptions from bearing the updated title in his 31st . This adoption extended to additional epithets such as Exsuperatorius (the supreme, akin to ) and Amazonius (evoking ' labors), which he appended to his official style, reflecting a deliberate alignment with mythic invincibility and divine prowess. Exploiting the destruction from the great fire that ravaged Rome in 191 AD, Commodus proclaimed the city's refounding on January 1, 192 AD, renaming it Colonia Lucia Annia Commodiana (the Colony of Commodus) to signify a purported rebirth under his auspices, with commemorative coins minted to propagate this designation. He further personalized the Roman calendar by reassigning the twelve months to honor his own names and titles, for instance transforming August into Commodus, October into Herculeus, and others to match epithets like Lucius or Aelius. These reforms extended to military nomenclature, with the legions redesignated as Commodianae to bind the army to his persona, while Commodus commissioned statues depicting himself in ' attire, complete with lion skin and club, to visually reinforce this symbolic fusion of emperor and deity. Such acts, while rooted in precedents of imperial self-deification, intensified perceptions of autocratic excess, as chronicled in sources like the , though their practical impact on governance remained limited to rather than substantive policy shifts.

Psychological Traits and Motivations

Ancient historians, writing after Commodus' and under regimes that condemned his memory, portrayed him with a mix of direct observations and retrospective bias; , a senator who served under Commodus but composed his history later, described the as "not naturally wicked, but... guileless as any man that ever lived," attributing his flaws to "great simplicity... together with his cowardice," which rendered him "the slave of his companions." , another near-contemporary, emphasized Commodus' neglect of governance for personal indulgences, depicting him as falling into "drunken madness" and ordering the execution of elder statesmen appointed by , reflecting traits of impulsivity and distrust toward established advisors. These accounts, while valuable, must be weighed against their authors' incentives to vilify Commodus to exalt successors like , who positioned himself as a restorer of Aurelian virtues; Dio's own senatorial class suffered purges under Commodus, potentially coloring his emphasis on the emperor's naivety as a pretext for poor judgment rather than innate malevolence. Commodus displayed pronounced megalomania, evidenced by his mid-reign (ca. 190 AD) insistence on renaming "Colonia Commodiana," the months of the year after aspects of his persona (e.g., , Aelius, Aurelius for through ), and the as "Commodian," actions symbolizing a god-emperor complex that supplanted republican traditions. This self-aggrandizement, coupled with his emulation of —adopting the god's attributes, club, and lion-skin in —suggests narcissistic motivations to transcend mortal limitations and secure divine , possibly as compensation for the burdensome legacy of his Stoic father, whose philosophical restraint Commodus overtly rejected in favor of autocratic spectacle. Modern analyses interpret these as hallmarks of narcissistic personality traits, where external validation through public adoration (e.g., arena victories) masked underlying potentially rooted in early-life absences during ' campaigns, fostering abandonment-related insecurity. Paranoia emerged as a defining trait, rationally fueled by genuine threats including the 182 family conspiracy involving his sister , which prompted mass executions of senators and officials, eroding trust in the elite. Dio notes this led to reliance on freedmen and athletes over traditional counselors, amplifying isolation and reinforcing a ; corroborates purges of perceived threats, framing them as Commodus' fear-driven overreactions that destabilized administration. Motivations here appear causal: repeated plots (at least four documented attempts) incentivized preemptive violence to preserve power, blending with a deluded as an invincible , though ancient sources' bias may inflate this into outright madness rather than adaptive ruthlessness in a precarious . Overall, Commodus' reflects a causal interplay of inherited privilege, manipulative influences, and experiential pressures, yielding a ruler more hedonistic opportunist than irredeemable , per Dio's nuanced baseline assessment.

Assassination and Immediate Aftermath (192)

Final Conspiracy and Execution

In late 192, Commodus compiled a list targeting his chamberlain , his concubine Marcia, and Aemilius Laetus for execution on the first day of the , prompting the trio to preemptively conspire against him. According to , a Roman senator and who drew on contemporary reports, the plot crystallized when Marcia discovered the incriminating document among Commodus' papers, leading the conspirators to administer in beef broth during a meal on 31. The emperor vomited the substance, thwarting the initial attempt, after which the group summoned the athlete Narcissus under the pretense of a routine and instructed him to strangle Commodus in the tub. Herodian, a Greek writing in the early third century and closer to the events as a contemporary observer, corroborates the core elements: Marcia, , and Laetus orchestrated the killing out of , with Narcissus executing the strangulation after poison failed, emphasizing the conspirators' fear of Commodus' erratic purges. Both accounts align on the method and participants, though Dio notes Commodus' age at death as 31 years and 4 months, following a reign of 12 years, 9 months, and 14 days from his accession on November 16, 180. The sources, primarily senatorial in perspective and potentially colored by toward Commodus' autocratic style, provide the principal evidence, with no surviving contradictory contemporary records. Narcissus' role as strangler, drawn from his status as a favored wrestler, underscores the improvised nature of the act, completed successfully that night in Commodus' residence.

Succession Crisis

Upon the strangulation of Commodus by the athlete Narcissus on 31 December 192 AD, orchestrated by his chamberlain , mistress Marcia, and , the conspirators swiftly elevated Publius Helvius —the respected urban prefect and former military commander—to the throne, with his proclamation occurring the following day, 1 January 193 AD. This selection reflected the absence of any designated heir from Commodus, whose only child had predeceased him and whose personal life yielded no viable successor, leaving the imperial transition vulnerable to palace intrigue rather than institutional continuity. Pertinax's brief tenure, lasting until 28 March 193 AD, focused on rectifying the fiscal extravagance of Commodus' rule through measures, including the public auction of Commodus' opulent palace furnishings, gladiatorial equipment, and exotic beasts, alongside efforts to curb corruption and restore senatorial influence. These reforms, however, alienated the , whose donatives and privileges—elevated under Commodus to 12,000–16,000 sesterces annually per guardsman—faced reduction, prompting a of approximately 300 soldiers who stormed the imperial palace and dispatched Pertinax with blows from their swords and clubs. The Guard's unchecked power, unopposed by Commodus' favoritism toward them, thus precipitated the emperor's downfall after just 87 days, exposing the fragility of reliance on over broader consensus. In the ensuing vacuum, the Praetorians openly auctioned the imperial office within their camp, inviting bids from assembled senators; a competition ensued between , a wealthy consular, and Titus Flavius Sulpicianus, the city prefect and Pertinax's father-in-law, with Julianus securing victory by pledging 25,000 sesterces per guardsman—five times the standard annual pay—leading to his acclamation as emperor on 28 March 193 AD. This spectacle, corroborated in accounts by and despite their senatorial biases against military overreach, incited public fury in , where mobs decried the sale as debasing the and called for Pertinax's deification. The , coerced by the Guard, ratified Julianus, but provincial governors responded decisively: in , in , and in Britain each mobilized legions, proclaiming themselves emperor and fracturing imperial unity. Severus, leveraging his command of three legions and swift —including promises of and higher pay—marched on Rome, arriving by early June 193 AD; he disbanded the , executing Laetus and Julianus (beheaded on 1 June), thereby resolving the immediate crisis but inaugurating the , a civil war that persisted until Severus' consolidation of power in 197 AD. The episode underscored the causal peril of Commodus' failure to establish adoptive or merit-based succession, akin to his adoptive grandfather's practices, instead fostering a system where praetorian donatives trumped senatorial or popular legitimacy, eroding the Antonine stability.

Historiographical Evaluation

Biases and Limitations of Ancient Sources

The primary ancient literary sources on Commodus—, , and the —exhibit a pronounced senatorial bias, reflecting the elite class's animosity toward an emperor who systematically marginalized their influence. Commodus' policies, including the execution or of numerous senators and his preference for equestrians in administration, fostered deep among this order, which dominated historical writing. , a senator writing in the early AD under (who had damned Commodus' memory to legitimize his own rule), drew on personal observations from his youth during the reign but infused his account with moralistic condemnation, portraying Commodus as a debauched to underscore senatorial ideals of restraint and dignity. , composing shortly after Commodus' death around 240 AD, similarly emphasized autocratic excesses and gladiatorial excesses as deviations from philosophical emperorship, aligning with a narrative that vilified rulers who alienated the aristocracy. The , a collection of imperial biographies from the late AD falsely attributed to multiple authors, amplifies these biases through fabricated anecdotes and , rendering it particularly unreliable for Commodus' life. While purporting to draw from lost senatorial records, it includes implausible tales of Commodus' infancy and vices, likely invented to entertain or propagandize, with modern scholars dismissing much of its content as fictional due to anachronisms and inconsistencies absent in earlier sources like Dio. This work's pseudepigraphic nature and distance from events exacerbate its limitations, as it prioritizes over factual chronology, contrasting with Dio and Herodian's relative contemporaneity but shared elite perspective. Broader limitations stem from the sources' post-assassination context and lack of countervailing voices: no pro-Commodus accounts survive, as his regime's erasure of records and the subsequent Pertinax-Septimian suppressed favorable evidence, leaving skewed toward "malicious gossip" typical of Roman elite narratives against non-philosophical rulers. These texts often omit or downplay administrative continuities from ' era, such as stable provincial governance, while exaggerating personal eccentricities to symbolize imperial decline, necessitating corroboration with non-literary evidence like inscriptions and coins that reveal despite senatorial disdain. Such biases, rooted in class conflict rather than exhaustive , demand cautious interpretation to avoid conflating aristocratic grievances with objective tyranny.

Traditional Negative Portrayals

Ancient historians such as , , and the compilers of the portrayed Commodus as a despotic ruler whose megalomania, indulgence in spectacles, and administrative neglect marked a sharp departure from the principled governance of his father, , ushering in an era of imperial decay. , a senator who survived Commodus's reign and wrote in the early , described Commodus as abandoning state affairs for personal pleasures, including chariot-racing and gladiatorial combats where he personally slew numerous animals and opponents, often in rigged or unchallenging bouts, thereby degrading the emperor's dignity and squandering public resources. Dio further accused Commodus of renaming "Colonia Commodiana" and the months of the year after his titles, proclaiming himself the reincarnation of , and executing hundreds of senators and elites on suspicions of , fostering an atmosphere of terror among the aristocracy. He famously lamented that under Commodus, the empire transitioned "from a kingdom of gold to one of iron and rust," attributing economic strain, corruption, and military vulnerabilities to the emperor's favoritism toward freedmen like Cleander, who auctioned offices and amassed fortunes. Herodian, a contemporary Greek writing around 240 CE, echoed Dio's criticisms, depicting Commodus as inherently from youth, systematically eliminating his father's experienced advisors and commanders shortly after assuming sole power in 180 CE, including ordering the deaths of elder statesmen to consolidate control. detailed how Commodus prematurely ended the against his father's counsel, returning to to prioritize lavish games and personal security over frontier defense, which emboldened barbarian incursions. He portrayed the emperor's reliance on praetorian prefects like Perennis and Cleander as enabling rampant , with Cleander selling consulships, commands, and grain supplies, culminating in famines, urban riots in 190 CE, and the prefect's by an angry mob. Commodus, in 's account, responded to such crises with , executing thousands in purges and further isolating himself in spectacles, where his gladiatorial performances—totaling hundreds of appearances—symbolized his detachment from imperial responsibilities. The Historia Augusta, a late 4th-century collection of imperial biographies often sensationalized for dramatic effect, amplified these themes by presenting Commodus as vicious from childhood, prone to cruelty, dishonesty, and debauchery, including rumors of matricide and fratricide to secure the throne. It claimed he fought as a gladiator over 700 times, slaying ostriches with arrows during senatorial sessions to mock the assembly and rigging fights against disabled or drugged opponents for easy victories, while renaming himself "Hercules" and demanding divine honors. The text accused him of bankrupting the treasury through extravagant distributions to the plebs and military, poisoning public water with laxatives for amusement, and fostering moral decay via incestuous relationships and public lewdness. Following his assassination on December 31, 192 CE, the Senate's damnatio memoriae—erasing his name from monuments and records—reflected this historiographical consensus, with inscriptions decrying him as the "gladiator murderer." These accounts, primarily from senatorial perspectives, emphasized Commodus's perceived betrayal of Stoic ideals, contrasting his rule with the Pax Romana's zenith and blaming his personal failings for initiating the empire's 3rd-century instability.

Revisionist Assessments and Potential Achievements

Revisionist historians have challenged the predominantly negative portrayal of Commodus' reign, attributing much of the ancient criticism to the biases of senatorial authors such as and , who resented his favoritism toward equestrians, the , and the plebeian masses over the , as well as his execution of approximately 20 senators accused of . These sources, written post-assassination amid senatorial efforts to legitimize the Severan dynasty's break from the Antonines, often exaggerated Commodus' eccentricities to contrast him with idealized predecessors like , while overlooking evidence of administrative continuity through capable prefects such as Perennis (c. 182–185 AD) and Cleander (c. 186–190 AD), who handled fiscal and military matters effectively until their own downfalls via intrigue. A key potential achievement was Commodus' negotiation of peace treaties with the and in 180 AD, shortly after assuming sole rule on March 17 of that year following ' death; this concluded the protracted (166–180 AD), which had strained Roman resources with heavy casualties and plague, allowing the empire to redirect efforts toward internal recovery rather than indefinite frontier expansion. Modern reassessments view this not as —as ancient critics claimed—but as pragmatic realism, given the empire's exhaustion, enabling relative stability for the subsequent 12 years with no major invasions, civil wars, or territorial losses on the scale of prior conflicts. Domestically, Commodus maintained economic functionality despite currency debasement (reducing the ' silver content from about 79% under Marcus to 76% by 192 AD), which funded donatives to the and spectacles that secured among troops and urban populace, evidenced by the absence of widespread revolts or famines during his rule. His popularity with these groups contrasted sharply with senatorial disdain, as indicated by the lack of popular unrest at his and the rapid failure of Pertinax's (r. 193 AD) measures, which alienated the Praetorians. Further evidence against universal condemnation comes from ' rehabilitation of Commodus' memory; in 195 AD, Severus secured senatorial deification of Commodus to legitimize his own claim as son of , ordering the execution of Commodus' assassin Narcissus and restoring his damnatio memoriae-reversed honors, suggesting that Commodus' policies aligned with priorities later embraced by the Severans. This act underscores how revisionist perspectives weigh the empire's operational continuity under Commodus against propagandistic , positing that systemic decline attributed to him more accurately stemmed from cumulative pressures like the and overextension, which persisted beyond his on December 31, 192 AD.

Balanced Weighing of Evidence

The ancient sources on Commodus, primarily , , and the , exhibit clear senatorial biases, portraying him as a tyrannical megalomaniac whose rule initiated Rome's decline, yet these accounts were composed decades after his death by authors aligned with the elite class that orchestrated his assassination and subsequent . Such narratives emphasize his gladiatorial excesses and administrative neglect while downplaying the stability he maintained, reflecting resentment toward an emperor who prioritized military and plebeian support over senatorial privileges, in contrast to his father ' more consultative style. Empirical evidence from inscriptions and coinage indicates relative continuity and peace during his sole rule from 180 to 192 CE: the concluded without major territorial losses, frontiers remained secure with no large-scale barbarian incursions or civil until his final year, and the army's loyalty is attested by widespread adoption of the Commodiana across legions, suggesting effective rather than universal disorder. Economically, while Commodus debased the by reducing silver content from about 50% under Marcus to around 30% by 192 CE—likely to cover plague recovery and debts—the overall fiscal system endured without immediate collapse, as volumes and urban projects persisted. Revisionist analyses highlight achievements overlooked in hostile texts, such as administrative delegation to prefects like Perennis and Cleander, which sustained bureaucratic function amid his disinterest in governance, and public spectacles that bolstered popular approval, evidenced by minimal recorded plebeian unrest until manipulated conspiracies. However, tangible negatives include recurrent purges—over 20 documented senatorial executions—and favoritism toward freedmen, fostering elite alienation and enabling the 192 conspiracy, though these mirror patterns under "good" emperors like Domitian. Weighing the evidence, Commodus' eccentric self-deification as and aversion to policy alienated the , amplifying post-mortem vilification, but the empire's intact borders, loyal legions, and economic resilience—post-Antonine Plague—undermine claims of precipitous decline attributable solely to him; causal factors like inherited fiscal strains and elite intrigue better explain tensions than inherent "madness," positioning his 12-year tenure as flawed continuity rather than rupture. Modern assessments, informed by epigraphic data over literary hyperbole, thus favor a nuanced view: an undignified autocrat whose personal failings exacerbated but did not originate systemic pressures.

References

  1. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Historia_Augusta/Commodus*.html
  2. https://roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/commod.htm
  3. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/thayer/e/roman/texts/cassius_dio/73*.html
  4. https://www.thoughtco.com/commodus-roman-emperor-4771680
  5. https://www.crystalinks.com/commodus.html
  6. https://www.numisforums.com/topic/5294-faustina-friday-%25E2%2580%2593-the-children-of-faustina-the-younger-part-i/
  7. https://ancientromelive.org/commodus/
  8. https://historum.com/t/commodus-son-of-a-gladiator.59818/
  9. https://brewminate.com/lucius-aurelius-commodus-a-supersized-ego-and-the-end-of-the-pax-romana/
  10. https://amazingbibletimeline.com/blog/commodus-lucius-aurelius/
  11. https://www.thestoicmom.com/stoicism-parenting-and-modern-life/archives/09-2022
  12. https://www.thecollector.com/facts-on-roman-emperor-commodus/
  13. https://sententiaeantiquae.com/2021/08/05/a-failure-of-education-commodus-cruelty-2/
  14. https://donaldrobertson.name/2018/01/19/why-did-marcus-aurelius-allow-commodus-to-succeed-him/
  15. https://www.getty.edu/education/college/true_crime_in_ancient_times/pdf/timeline_of_commodus.pdf
  16. https://www.davidvswest.co.uk/emperor-commodus/
  17. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/wars/marcomannic-wars/
  18. https://omniatlas.com/maps/europe/1800316/
  19. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/e/roman/texts/cassius_dio/72*.html
  20. https://medium.com/stoicism-philosophy-as-a-way-of-life/was-marcus-aurelius-murdered-8a57093279de
  21. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/marcomannic-wars
  22. https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=resources&s=char-dir&f=commodus
  23. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004502321/BP000005.pdf
  24. https://worldhistoryedu.com/roman-emperor-commodus-life-reign-atrocities-committed-assassination/
  25. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/73*.html
  26. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/herodian-s-roman-history/herodian-1.9/
  27. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/herodian-s-roman-history/herodian-1.13/
  28. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/73*.html
  29. https://www.unrv.com/decline-of-empire/commodus.php
  30. https://www.roman-britain.co.uk/people/ulpius-marcellus/
  31. https://omniatlas.com/maps/europe/1921230/
  32. https://www.cato.org/cato-journal/fall-1994/how-excessive-government-killed-ancient-rome
  33. https://fee.org/articles/the-emperor-who-tried-to-bring-sound-economics-back-to-rome-and-paid-with-his-life/
  34. https://www.romanemperors.com/roman-emperor-commodus-177-192-ce
  35. https://historycooperative.org/roman-emperor-commodus/
  36. https://grbs.library.duke.edu/index.php/grbs/article/download/16474/7344/0
  37. https://etedge-insights.com/featured-insights/analysis/how-hyperinflation-destroyed-ancient-rome/
  38. https://www.numisforums.com/topic/4177-commodus-the-annona-civica-grain-market-regulation-and-the-connection-with-the-antonine-plague/
  39. https://www.walksinrome.com/blog/statue-of-emperor-commodus-as-hercules-capitoline-museums-rome
  40. https://donaldscarinci.com/commodus-as-hercules-on-the-denarius/
  41. https://www.numisforums.com/topic/3723-commodus-transformation-to-hercules-romanus/
  42. https://www.thecollector.com/emperor-commodus-as-hercules/
  43. https://www.judaism-and-rome.org/dedication-commodus-hercules-ae-1928-86
  44. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/cassius_dio/73*.html
  45. https://scalar.usc.edu/works/ancient-leadership-in-the-era-of-donald-trump/media/HeksterHercules.pdf
  46. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/herodian-s-roman-history/
  47. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/herodian-s-roman-history/herodian-1.15/
  48. https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/italy-opens-commodus-passage-colosseum-public-2025-10-08/
  49. https://www.history.com/articles/commodus-worst-roman-emperor-gladiator
  50. https://www.facebook.com/thewittyhistorian/posts/the-day-commodus-took-over-the-calendaron-new-years-day-in-192-ce-roman-emperor-/524459740628518/
  51. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/encyclopaedia_romana/severans/severans.html
  52. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/term/BIOG140659
  53. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/herodian-s-roman-history/herodian-1.17/
  54. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2025/2025.05.41/
  55. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/herodian-s-roman-history/herodian-1.14/
  56. https://antigonejournal.com/2023/03/commodus-problem-child/
  57. https://bigthink.com/the-past/marcus-aurelius-commodus-stoicism/
  58. https://www.ancientworldmagazine.com/articles/army-revolt-military-disorder-reign-commodus/
  59. https://historum.com/t/most-mad-roman-emperors.71744/page-3
  60. https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/herodian_01_book1.htm
  61. https://www.unrv.com/decline-of-empire/pertinax.php
  62. https://roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/pertinax.htm
  63. https://markbwilson.com/courses/~readings/ar/ar61.pdf
  64. https://nordopen.nord.no/nord-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/3049237/IngjerdArn%25C3%25B8y.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  65. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/curiosities/commodus-did-not-like-senators/
  66. https://historum.com/t/authenticity-and-reliability-of-historia-augusta.195279/
  67. https://www.quora.com/Is-Historia-Augusta-good-for-beginning-Roman-history
  68. https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/commodus.htm
  69. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/150819/150819.pdf
  70. https://www.bookpump.com/bwp/pdf-b/2337228b.pdf
  71. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/thayer/e/roman/texts/cassius_dio/73*.html
  72. https://www.thecollector.com/commodus-gladiator-emperor-rome/
  73. https://www.reddit.com/r/history/comments/kl0udl/the_reign_of_commodus_was_very_different_from/
  74. https://historum.com/t/anyone-else-surprised-by-the-length-of-commodus-reign.15760/
  75. https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-historical-context-surrounding-the-reign-of-Roman-Emperor-Commodus-Why-was-he-so-hated-by-the-people-of-Rome-during-his-rule
  76. https://www.academia.edu/1444166/Was_Commodus_Really_That_Bad
  77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/300981
  78. https://www.ancienthistorybulletin.org/subscribed-users-area/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Jarvis.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.