Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
French New Wave
View on Wikipedia
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Polish. (10 2023) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
| French New Wave | |
|---|---|
"Three by Truffaut" poster for the US re-release of French New Wave films The 400 Blows, Shoot the Piano Player and Jules and Jim. | |
| Years active | 1958 to late 1960s |
| Location | France |
| Major figures | Jean-Luc Godard, Alain Resnais, Agnès Varda, André Bazin, Jacques Demy, François Truffaut, Éric Rohmer, Claude Chabrol, Jacques Rivette, Chris Marker[1] |
| Influences | Italian neorealism, film noir,[2] classical Hollywood cinema,[2] poetic realism, auteur theory, Parisian cinephile culture, existentialism, Alfred Hitchcock, Art film, New Left, Bertolt Brecht |
| Influenced | Japanese New Wave, L.A. Rebellion, New Hollywood, New German Cinema, Cinema Novo, Dogme 95, British New Wave, Yugoslav Black Wave, New Sincerity, Mumblecore, New Wave Sci-Fi |
The New Wave (French: Nouvelle Vague, French pronunciation: [nuvɛl vaɡ]), also called the French New Wave, is a French art film movement that emerged in the late 1950s. The movement was characterized by its rejection of traditional filmmaking conventions in favor of experimentation and a spirit of iconoclasm. New Wave filmmakers explored new approaches to editing, visual style, and narrative, as well as engagement with the social and political upheavals of the era, often making use of irony or exploring existential themes. The New Wave is often considered one of the most influential movements in the history of cinema. However, contemporary critics have also argued that historians have not sufficiently credited its female co-founder, Agnès Varda,[3] and have criticized the movement's prevailing themes of sexism towards women.[4][5]
The term was first used by a group of French film critics and cinephiles associated with the magazine Cahiers du cinéma in the late 1950s and 1960s. These critics rejected the Tradition de qualité ("Tradition of Quality") of mainstream French cinema,[6] which emphasized craft over innovation and old works over experimentation.[7] This was apparent in a manifesto-like 1954 essay by François Truffaut, Une certaine tendance du cinéma français, where he denounced the adaptation of safe literary works into unimaginative films.[8] Along with Truffaut, a number of writers for Cahiers du cinéma became leading New Wave filmmakers, including Jean-Luc Godard, Éric Rohmer, Jacques Rivette, and Claude Chabrol. The associated Left Bank film community included directors such as Alain Resnais, Agnès Varda, Jacques Demy and Chris Marker.
Using portable equipment and requiring little or no set up time, the New Wave way of filmmaking often presented a documentary style. The films exhibited direct sounds on film stock that required less light. Filming techniques included fragmented, discontinuous editing, and long takes. The combination of realism, subjectivity, and authorial commentary created a narrative ambiguity in the sense that questions that arise in a film are not answered in the end.[9]
Although naturally associated with Francophone countries, the movement has had a continual influence within various other cinephile cultures over the past several decades inside of many other nations. The United Kingdom and the United States, both of them being primarily English-speaking, are of note. "Kitchen sink realism" as an artistic approach intellectually challenging social conventions and traditions in the U.K. is an example, as are some elements of the "new sincerity" subculture within the U.S. that involve deliberately defying certain critical expectations in filmmaking.
Origins of the movement
[edit]
Alexandre Astruc's manifesto "The Birth of a New Avant-Garde: The Camera-Stylo", published in L'Écran on 30 March 1948, outlined some of the ideas that were later expanded upon by François Truffaut and the Cahiers du cinéma.[10] It argues that "cinema was in the process of becoming a new means of expression on the same level as painting and the novel ... a form in which and by which an artist can express his thoughts, however abstract they may be, or translate his obsessions exactly as he does in the contemporary essay or novel. This is why I would like to call this new age of cinema the age of the caméra-stylo."[11]
Some of the most prominent pioneers among the group, including François Truffaut, Jean-Luc Godard, Éric Rohmer, Claude Chabrol, and Jacques Rivette, began as critics for the famous film magazine Cahiers du cinéma. Cahiers co-founder and theorist André Bazin was a prominent source of influence for the movement. By means of criticism and editorialization, they laid the groundwork for a set of concepts, revolutionary at the time, which the American film critic Andrew Sarris called auteur theory. (The original French La politique des auteurs, translated literally as "The policy of authors".) Bazin and Henri Langlois, founder and curator of the Cinémathèque Française, were the dual father figures of the movement. These men of cinema valued the expression of the director's personal vision in both the film's style and script.[12]
Truffaut also credits the American film Little Fugitive (1953) by Ruth Orkin, Ray Ashley and Morris Engel with helping to start the French New Wave, when he said: "Our New Wave would never have come into being, if it hadn't been for the young American Morris Engel who showed us the way to independent production with [this] fine movie."[13]
The auteur theory holds that the director is the "author" of their movies, with a personal signature visible from film to film. They praised movies by Jean Renoir and Jean Vigo, and made then-radical cases for the artistic distinction and greatness of Hollywood studio directors such as Orson Welles, John Ford, Alfred Hitchcock and Nicholas Ray. The beginning of the New Wave was to some extent an exercise by the Cahiers writers in applying this philosophy to the world by directing movies themselves.
Apart from the role that films by Jean Rouch have played in the movement, Chabrol's Le Beau Serge (1958) is traditionally (but debatably) credited as the first New Wave feature. Agnès Varda's La Pointe Courte (1955) was chronologically the first, but did not have a commercial release until 2008. Truffaut, with The 400 Blows (1959), and Godard, with Breathless (1960) had unexpected international successes, both critical and financial, that turned the world's attention to the activities of the New Wave and enabled the movement to flourish. Part of their technique was to portray characters not readily labeled as protagonists in the classic sense of audience identification.
The auteurs of this era owe their popularity to the support they received from their youthful audience. Most of these directors were born in the 1930s and grew up in Paris, relating to how their viewers might be experiencing life. With a high concentration on fashion, urban professional life, and all-night parties, the life of France's youth was exquisitely captured.[14]
The French New Wave was popular roughly between 1958 and 1962.[15][16] The socio-economic forces at play shortly after World War II strongly influenced the movement. Politically and financially drained, France tended to fall back on the old popular pre-war traditions. One such tradition was straight narrative cinema, specifically classical French film. The movement has its roots in rebellion against the reliance on past forms (often adapted from traditional novelistic structures), criticizing, in particular, the way these forms could force the audience to submit to a dictatorial plot-line. They were especially against the French "cinema of quality", the type of high-minded, literary period films held in esteem at French film festivals, often regarded as "untouchable" by criticism.
New Wave critics and directors studied the work of Western classics and applied new avant-garde stylistic direction. The low-budget approach helped filmmakers get at the essential art form and find what was, to them, a much more comfortable and contemporary form of production. Charlie Chaplin, Alfred Hitchcock, Orson Welles, Howard Hawks, John Ford, Sam Fuller and Don Siegel[1] were held up in admiration. French New Wave is influenced by Italian Neorealism[2] and classical Hollywood cinema.[2]
In a 1961 interview, Truffaut said that "the 'New Wave' is neither a movement, nor a school, nor a group, it's a quality" and in December 1962 published a list of 162 film directors who had made their feature film debut since 1959. Many of these directors, such as Edmond Agabra and Henri Zaphiratos, were not as successful or enduring as the well-known members of the New Wave and today would not be considered part of it. Shortly after Truffaut's published list appeared, Godard publicly declared that the New Wave was more exclusive and included only Truffaut, Chabrol, Rivette, Rohmer, and himself, stating that "Cahiers was the nucleus" of the movement. Godard also acknowledged filmmakers such as Resnais, Astruc, Varda, and Demy as esteemed contemporaries, but said that they represented "their own fund of culture" and were separate from the New Wave.[17]
Many of the directors associated with the New Wave continued to make films into the 21st century.[18]
Film techniques
[edit]
The movies featured unprecedented methods of expression, such as long tracking shots (like the famous traffic jam sequence in Godard's 1967 film Weekend). Also, these movies featured existential themes, often stressing the individual and the acceptance of the absurdity of human existence. Filled with irony and sarcasm, the films also tend to reference other films.
Many of the French New Wave films were produced on tight budgets, often shot in a friend's apartment or yard, using the director's friends as the cast and crew. Directors were also forced to improvise with equipment (for example, using a shopping cart for tracking shots.[19]) The cost of film was also a major concern; thus, efforts to save film turned into stylistic innovations. For example, in Jean-Luc Godard's Breathless (À bout de souffle), after being told the film was too long and he must cut it down to one hour and a half he decided (on the suggestion of Jean-Pierre Melville) to remove several scenes from the feature using jump cuts, as they were filmed in one long take. Parts that did not work were simply cut from the middle of the take, a practical decision, and also a purposeful stylistic one.[20]
The cinematic stylings of the French New Wave brought a fresh look to the cinema with improvised dialogue, rapid changes of scene, and shots that broke the common 180° axis of camera movement. In many films of the French New Wave, the camera was used not to mesmerize the audience with elaborate narrative and illusory images, but rather to play with audience expectations. Godard was arguably the movement's most influential figure; his method of filmmaking, often used to shock and awe audiences out of passivity, was abnormally bold and direct.
Godard's stylistic approach can be seen as a desperate struggle against the mainstream cinema of the time, or a degrading attack on the viewer's supposed naivety. Either way, the challenging awareness represented by this movement remains in cinema today. Effects that now seem either trite or commonplace, such as a character stepping out of their role in order to address the audience directly, were radically innovative at the time.
Classic French cinema adhered to the principles of strong narrative, creating what Godard described as an oppressive and deterministic aesthetic of plot. In contrast, New Wave filmmakers made no attempts to suspend the viewer's disbelief; in fact, they took steps to constantly remind the viewer that a film is just a sequence of moving images, no matter how clever the use of light and shadow. The result is a set of oddly disjointed scenes without an attempt at unity; or an actor whose character changes from one scene to the next; or sets in which onlookers accidentally make their way onto camera along with extras, who in fact were hired to do just the same.
At the heart of New Wave technique is the issue of money and production value. In the context of social and economic troubles of a post-World War II France, filmmakers sought low-budget alternatives to the usual production methods, and were inspired by the generation of Italian Neorealists before them. Half necessity and half vision, New Wave directors used all that they had available to channel their artistic visions directly to the theatre.
Finally, the French New Wave, as the European modern Cinema, is focused on the technique as style itself. A French New Wave film-maker is first of all an author who shows in its film their own eye on the world.[21] On the other hand, the film as the object of knowledge challenges the usual transitivity on which all the other cinema was based, "undoing its cornerstones: space and time continuity, narrative and grammatical logics, the self-evidence of the represented worlds." In this way the film-maker passes "the essay attitude, thinking – in a novelist way – on his own way to do essays."[22]
Left Bank
[edit]
The corresponding "right bank" group is constituted of the more famous and financially successful New Wave directors associated with Cahiers du cinéma (Claude Chabrol, François Truffaut, and Jean-Luc Godard). Unlike the Cahiers group, Left Bank directors were older and less movie-crazed. They tended to see cinema akin to other arts, such as literature. However, they were similar to the New Wave directors in that they practiced cinematic modernism. Their emergence also came in the 1950s and they also benefited from the youthful audience.[23] The two groups, however, were not in opposition; Cahiers du cinéma advocated for Left Bank cinema.[24]
Left Bank directors include Chris Marker, Alain Resnais, and Agnès Varda. Varda's husband, Jacques Demy, is sometimes grouped with the Left Bank filmmakers. Roud described a distinctive "fondness for a kind of Bohemian life and an impatience with the conformity of the Right Bank, a high degree of involvement in literature and the plastic arts, and a consequent interest in experimental filmmaking", as well as an identification with the political left. The filmmakers tended to collaborate with one another.[24] Jean-Pierre Melville, Alain Robbe-Grillet, and Marguerite Duras are also associated with the group.[25] The nouveau roman movement in literature was also a strong element of the Left Bank style, with authors contributing to many of the films.[23]
Left Bank films include La Pointe Courte, Hiroshima mon amour, La jetée, Last Year at Marienbad, and Trans-Europ-Express.
Influential names in the New Wave
[edit]Cahiers du cinéma directors
[edit]Source:[26]
Left Bank directors
[edit]Other directors associated with the movement
[edit]
|
Actors and actresses
[edit]- Anna Karina
- Anne Wiazemsky
- Anouk Aimée
- Brigitte Bardot
- Charles Aznavour
- Emmanuelle Riva
- Jean-Paul Belmondo
- Gerard Blain
- Jean-Claude Brialy
- Françoise Dorléac
- Stéphane Audran
- Bernadette Lafont
- Jean-Pierre Léaud
- Claude Jade
- Jeanne Moreau
- Maurice Ronet
- Jean Seberg
- Delphine Seyrig
- Jean-Louis Trintignant
- Sami Frey
- Catherine Deneuve
- Jane Birkin
- Marie-France Pisier
Other collaborators
[edit]- Raoul Coutard – cinematographer
- Henri Decaë – cinematographer
- Georges Delerue – composer
- Paul Gégauff – screenwriter
- Michel Legrand – composer
- Marilù Parolini – photographer, screenwriter
- Suzanne Schiffman – screenwriter
Theoretical influences
[edit]Theoretical followers
[edit]See also
[edit]- Iranian New Wave (Mowje Now)
- Japanese New Wave (Nūberu bāgu)
- Australian New Wave
- British New Wave
- Philippine New Wave (Contemporary Philippine Cinema)
- Cinema Novo (Brazilian New Wave)
- Novo Cinema (Portuguese New Wave)
- Czechoslovak New Wave
- Film noir
- Hong Kong New Wave
- Kitchen sink realism
- L.A. Rebellion
- National cinema
- New French Extremity
- New German Cinema (German New Wave)
- New Hollywood (American New Wave)
- No Wave Cinema
- Nuevo Cine Mexicano
- Parallel Cinema (Indian New Wave)
- Romanian New Wave
- Remodernist Film
- Taiwan New Wave
- Third World Cinema
- Dogme 95
- Yugoslav Black Wave (Jugoslovenski crni talas)
- Vulgar auteurism
- Extreme cinema
- Slow cinema
- Film gris
- B movie
- Cinephilia
- Postmodernist film
- Pauline Kael – film critic in opposition of the auteur theory popularized by Sarris
- Independent film
- Experimental film
- John Cassavetes – American independent filmmaker in the same vein as the French New Wave
- Arthouse action film
Notes and references
[edit]- ^ a b "Movie movements that defined cinema: the French New Wave". 8 August 2016. Archived from the original on 27 June 2019. Retrieved 27 June 2019.
- ^ a b c d Marie, Michel. The French New Wave : An Artistic School. Trans. Richard Neupert. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2002.
- ^ Emanuel Levy (26 March 2022). "French New Wave: Sexism – Agnes Varda, Most Underestimated, Unrecognized Co-Founder". Golden Globes.
- ^ Jonathan Rosenbaum (Spring 2009). "Sexism in the French New Wave". University of California Press.
- ^ "Jean-Luc Godard: The Auteur's Legacy Reassessed". 30 May 2021.
- ^ Grant 2007, Vol. 4, p. 235.
- ^ Grant 2007, Vol. 2, p. 259.
- ^ Truffaut, Francois (16 April 2018). "Une certaine tendance du cinéma français" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 February 2021. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
- ^ Thompson, Kristin. Bordwell, David. Film History: An Introduction, Third Edition. McGraw Hill. 2010, p.407–408.
- ^ "La Camera Stylo – Alexandre Astruc". from "The French New Wave", edited by Ginette Vincendeau and Peter Graham. 30 March 1948. Archived from the original on 13 June 2017. Retrieved 13 June 2017.
- ^ Marie, Michel (2008). The French New Wave: An Artistic School. John Wiley & Sons. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-470-77695-7.
- ^ Thompson, Kristin. Bordwell, David. Film History: An Introduction, Third Edition. McGraw Hill. 2010, p.407
- ^ Sterritt, David. "Lovers and Lollipops". Turner Classic Movies. Turner Classic Movies. Retrieved 26 December 2023.
- ^ Thompson, Kristin. Bordwell, David. Film History: An Introduction, Third Edition. McGraw Hill. 2010, p.409
- ^ Armes, Roy. (1985). French cinema. New York: Oxford University Press. OCLC 456494962.
- ^ Passek, Jean Loup; Ciment, Michel; Cluny, Claude Michel; Frouard, Jean-Pierre, eds. (1986). Dictionnaire du cinéma. Larousse. ISBN 2-03-512303-8. OCLC 438564932.
- ^ Brody, Richard (2008). Everything is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books. pp. 122–123. ISBN 978-0-8050-8015-5.
- ^ Scott, A. O. (25 June 2009). "Living for Cinema, and Through It". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
- ^ Champs-Élysées street scene in Godard's Breathless. Girdner, Ashlee (11 March 2013). "Back to the Scene: The Champs Elysees in Breathless and Beyond". Bonjour Paris. Archived from the original on 25 August 2017. Retrieved 2 April 2016.
The solution for this was to hide Coutard inside of a three-wheeled mail cart, which was fitted with a hole just big enough for the camera lens to stick out, and he then would be pushed alongside the chatting stars.
- ^ "Breathless (1960)". Archived from the original on 5 September 2017. Retrieved 21 July 2018 – via www.imdb.com.
- ^ Pasolini, Pier Paolo (1988–2005). Heretical empiricism. New Academia Publishing. p. 187 of the Italian Edition published by Garzanti in 1972. ISBN 978-0-9767042-2-5. Archived from the original on 31 March 2023. Retrieved 7 November 2015.
- ^ Sainati, Augusto (1998). Supporto, soggetto, oggetto: forme di costruzione del sapere dal cinema ai nuovi media, in Costruzione e appropriazione del sapere nei nuovi scenari tecnologici (in Italian). Napoli: CUEN. pp. 154–155.
- ^ a b Thompson, Kristin. Bordwell, David. Film History: An Introduction, Third Edition. McGraw Hill. 2010, p.412
- ^ a b Jill Nelmes, An Introduction to Film Studies, p. 44. Routledge.
- ^ "Donato Totaro, Offscreen, Hiroshima Mon Amour review, 31 August 2003. Access date: 16 August 2008". Archived from the original on 4 December 2013. Retrieved 21 September 2008.
- ^ a b New Wave Film.com Archived 13 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine, "Where to Start Guide", section outlining directors. Accessed 30 April 2009.
Works cited
[edit]- Grant, Barry Keith, ed. (2007). Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film. Detroit: Schirmer Reference. ISBN 978-0-02-865791-2.
External links
[edit]French New Wave
View on GrokipediaHistorical Origins
Post-War Context and Precursors
Following the Allied liberation of Paris on August 25, 1944, France's film industry underwent reconstruction amid broader economic recovery, yet it remained tethered to the *tradition de qualité*, a production mode prevailing from roughly 1945 to 1960 that prioritized polished literary adaptations, studio sets, and dialogue-heavy narratives drawn from classic French theater and novels.[5] [6] Exemplified by films such as Claude Autant-Lara's Douce (1943, released postwar) and Jean Delannoy's La Symphonie pastorale (1946), this approach emphasized craftsmanship and psychological realism but was faulted for its formalism, resistance to visual experimentation, and reliance on established literary sources over original cinematic expression.[6] [7] By the early 1950s, annual French feature production hovered around 100-120 films, sustained by domestic audiences but increasingly seen as stagnant amid competition from imported works.[8] Foreign cinematic movements offered stark contrasts that sowed seeds of discontent with French norms. Italian Neorealism, crystallized in Roberto Rossellini's Rome, Open City (1945), promoted on-location shooting, non-professional casts, and unvarnished portrayals of postwar hardship, influencing French critics and aspiring directors to question studio-bound artificiality in favor of authentic social observation.[9] [10] Hollywood genres, including low-budget B-movies and film noir, further highlighted efficient storytelling and genre vitality, exposing the tradition de qualité's perceived elitism and disconnection from contemporary realities.[11] Economic pressures and technological shifts enabled nascent independent efforts. Postwar material shortages and inflation constrained high-end productions, prompting experimentation with affordable 16mm film stock and portable equipment for shorts and documentaries, which bypassed studio monopolies.[12] State interventions, including the 1946 creation of the Centre national du cinéma (CNC) and mandatory quotas on foreign imports via the 1946 Blum-Byrnes Agreement, funneled subsidies—totaling millions of francs annually by the 1950s—primarily to established films but inadvertently lowered entry barriers for low-budget ventures as production costs stabilized around 50-100 million old francs per feature for independents.[5] [13] These factors, combined with a generational shift among cinephiles, primed rejection of the prevailing order by the late 1950s.[14]Emergence of Film Criticism
The journal Cahiers du cinéma was established in April 1951 by André Bazin, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, and Joseph-Marie Lo Duca, with contributions from Léonide Keigel, as a platform for in-depth film analysis that emphasized directors' personal expression over commercial conformity.[15][16] Bazin, serving as a primary editor, advocated for cinema's inherent realism rooted in its photographic capacity to preserve objective traces of reality, contrasting this with montage-heavy styles that he viewed as manipulative distortions of truth.[17] This perspective fostered a critical environment where reviewers prioritized films revealing an auteur's unique worldview, challenging the dominant French production model of literary adaptations and scripted psychological dramas.[18] In Cahiers, contributors shifted French film discourse from passive appreciation to rigorous, auteur-centered critique, decrying the "Tradition of Quality" exemplified by directors such as Claude Autant-Lara and Jean Aurenche, whose works relied on scenarists' adaptations of classic literature, resulting in films perceived as intellectually stagnant and lacking directorial imprint.[19] François Truffaut's seminal essay "A Certain Tendency of the French Cinema," published in the January 1954 issue, encapsulated this rebellion by arguing that such productions prioritized verbal elegance and moral generalizations over cinematic specificity, effectively rendering directors as mere executors of screenwriters' visions.[20] Truffaut contended that true cinema emerged from directors imposing personal style on material, a stance that galvanized young critics like Jean-Luc Godard and Éric Rohmer to reject establishment norms in favor of innovative, reality-oriented filmmaking.[19] This critical ferment, influenced by Bazin's ontology of cinema as an extension of human perception rather than artifice, laid the groundwork for viewing film as a medium for authentic personal testimony, prompting a reevaluation of Hollywood genres and European precedents previously dismissed by French elites.[21] By mid-decade, Cahiers had cultivated a cohort of writers who transitioned from reviewers to practitioners, prioritizing spontaneity and direct engagement with the world over polished, tradition-bound narratives.[22]Formation in the Late 1950s
In the late 1950s, the French New Wave began to crystallize as critics from Cahiers du cinéma—notably François Truffaut, Claude Chabrol, Jean-Luc Godard, Jacques Rivette, and Éric Rohmer—transitioned into filmmakers, leveraging informal networks forged through the journal's polemical debates and cinephile gatherings in Paris. This Right Bank group, named for their base on the Seine's right bank, produced early works emphasizing personal expression amid France's post-war economic boom and rising youth culture, which fostered rebellion against established norms.[23][24] Chabrol's Le Beau Serge (1958), premiered out of competition at the Cannes Film Festival, marked the first feature-length production by this cohort, shot on a modest budget in rural locations to explore themes of friendship and disillusionment. Truffaut followed with The 400 Blows (Les Quatre Cents Coups, 1959), a semi-autobiographical account of a delinquent boy's travails in Paris, employing location shooting for authenticity and culminating in its Cannes premiere, where Truffaut received the Best Director award on May 13, 1959. These releases symbolized the movement's break from studio-bound "tradition de qualité" cinema, gaining critical traction despite the ongoing Algerian War (1954–1962), which cast a shadow of national tension over cultural innovations.[25][26][27] Parallel to the Right Bank's Paris-centric, narrative-driven films, tendencies of the Left Bank group—encompassing Agnès Varda, Alain Resnais, and Chris Marker—emerged with roots in documentary and experimental shorts predating 1958, distinguished by intellectual rigor and interdisciplinary influences rather than pure cinephilia. By 1959–1960, festival successes, including Resnais's Hiroshima mon amour (completed 1959, premiered Venice 1961), highlighted this divide, as the groups converged in shared rejection of conventional production while pursuing divergent stylistic paths.[28][24]Theoretical Foundations
Development of Auteur Theory
The foundations of auteur theory emerged from early post-war French film criticism, with Alexandre Astruc's 1948 essay "The Birth of a New Avant-Garde: La Caméra-Stylo" positing the cinema camera as an extension of the director's personal expression, akin to a writer's pen. Astruc argued that filmmakers should wield the camera to convey individual ideas with the autonomy of literary authors, freeing cinema from scripted constraints and elevating it as a dialectical language of images. This concept laid the groundwork for viewing the director as the film's primary creative force, influencing subsequent theorists by emphasizing personal authorship over collaborative industrial processes.[29][30] In 1954, François Truffaut advanced this idea in his seminal Cahiers du Cinéma essay "A Certain Tendency of the French Cinema," critiquing the dominant "tradition of quality" that prioritized screenwriters' psychological realism over directorial vision. Truffaut rejected the scenarist hegemony exemplified by writers like Jean Aurenche and Pierre Bost, who adapted literature into films that diluted original authorial intent through moralizing adaptations. Instead, he championed the director as auteur, whose worldview imprints the film through mise-en-scène—the arrangement of staging, framing, and visual elements—rather than mere dialogue or plot. This shift countered the French industry's dismissal of Hollywood as mere commerce by demonstrating how directors imposed personal signatures amid studio constraints.[19] Cahiers du Cinéma critics, including Truffaut and Jean-Luc Godard, applied auteur theory empirically by analyzing Hollywood classics to reveal consistent thematic and stylistic patterns attributable to directors like Alfred Hitchcock, Howard Hawks, and John Ford. For instance, they dissected Hitchcock's suspense techniques and Hawks's rhythmic editing as expressions of individual psychology, challenging claims of American cinema's artistic inferiority. This mise-en-scène criticism posited that even in collaborative productions, the director's choices in visual composition and narrative rhythm disclosed a unifying personal vision, distinguishing true auteurs from mere technicians. Such analyses substantiated the theory's causal claim: films coherently reflect the director's inner meanings when authorship is centralized.[31][32]Influences from Earlier Cinema and Arts
The French New Wave filmmakers drew heavily from Italian neorealism, a post-World War II movement led by directors such as Roberto Rossellini, whose Rome, Open City (1945) utilized on-location shooting, non-professional actors, and minimal artifice to depict unvarnished human experiences amid wartime devastation.[33][9] This approach prioritized documentary-like authenticity over scripted perfection, influencing the New Wave's shift toward handheld cameras and natural lighting in urban environments, though adapted from rural Italian settings to Parisian streets.[9] Orson Welles' innovations in Citizen Kane (1941), particularly deep-focus cinematography that maintained sharpness across foreground and background planes, provided a technical precedent for composing scenes with layered depth and ambiguity, allowing viewers to explore multiple narrative elements simultaneously without cuts.[33][34] André Bazin, whose writings shaped the theoretical underpinnings, lauded this technique alongside Rossellini's sequence shots for preserving the integrity of real space and time, in opposition to the montage editing of Soviet theorists like Sergei Eisenstein, which Bazin critiqued for imposing artificial discontinuities on reality.[35][36] Literary precedents contributed to the New Wave's fragmented narratives and introspective characters, echoing the realist detail and psychological depth in Honoré de Balzac's 19th-century novels, such as La Comédie humaine (1829–1850), which dissected social fragmentation through interconnected vignettes.[37] Existentialist philosophy from Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus further informed thematic concerns with absurdity and individual agency, as seen in Camus' The Stranger (1942), though these were filtered through Bazinian realism to emphasize observable ambiguity over didactic resolution.[38]Filmmaking Characteristics
Technical Innovations
The French New Wave directors adopted lightweight, portable equipment to enable rapid, low-budget filmmaking outside established studio systems. Handheld cameras, including models like the Nagra-synchronized Éclair Cameflex, allowed for mobile shooting without tripods or dollies, fostering improvisation and direct engagement with environments. This technique reduced production costs and timelines, as crews could operate with minimal personnel, often bypassing permits for urban guerrilla shoots.[39][40] On-location filming with natural and available lighting further streamlined processes by eliminating the need for elaborate lighting rigs or controlled sets. In Jean-Luc Godard's Breathless (released March 16, 1960), cinematographer Raoul Coutard utilized daylight and street lamps almost exclusively, shooting in real Parisian locales to achieve a raw, unpolished aesthetic that mirrored everyday life. This method not only cut expenses—Breathless was produced for around 400,000 francs (equivalent to roughly $80,000 in 1960 USD)—but also prioritized authenticity over polished artifice, diverging from the resource-intensive practices of prior French cinema.[41][40][42] Editing innovations emphasized discontinuity over seamless continuity, with jump cuts emerging as a hallmark to evoke subjective experience and temporal compression. Godard applied over 20 jump cuts in Breathless's opening car sequence alone, excising minor actions to heighten rhythm and reject classical Hollywood's invisible edits, a choice influenced by the film's tight 15-day shoot schedule. Such techniques demanded precise post-production scrutiny but aligned with the movement's ethos of efficiency, often using basic splicing to preserve a documentary-like immediacy.[40][43][44] Sound design shifted toward direct on-set capture with portable recorders, minimizing dubbing and post-synchronization prevalent in 1950s French films. This approach in New Wave productions recorded dialogue and ambient noise live, accepting imperfections like traffic or echoes for heightened realism, as in Breathless where street sounds integrated organically without layered effects. By forgoing extensive studio mixing, filmmakers achieved a sparse, immediate audio texture that reinforced visual spontaneity, though it required adaptive scripting to accommodate unpredictable acoustics.[41][39][3]Narrative and Stylistic Approaches
French New Wave directors rejected conventional linear narratives in favor of elliptical plots that fragmented chronology and embraced ambiguity, prioritizing personal subjectivity over plot-driven coherence.[4][41] This approach often incorporated voice-over narration to convey characters' inner thoughts, as in François Truffaut's Jules et Jim (1962), where a female narrator provides introspective commentary on relationships and memory.[45] Techniques like breaking the fourth wall further engaged audiences directly, with characters addressing the camera through ironic asides, evident in Truffaut's Shoot the Piano Player (1960), to underscore psychological realism and narrative artifice.[46][47] Narratives emphasized chance events and improvisation to capture life's unpredictability, featuring anti-hero protagonists who embodied existential alienation and moral ambiguity, such as Jean-Paul Belmondo's petty criminal in Jean-Luc Godard's Breathless (1960).[48][49] Dialogue was frequently unscripted or loosely structured, allowing actors to respond spontaneously to situations, which heightened authenticity and reflected the directors' commitment to capturing fleeting, unpolished human experiences.[50] Stylistically, films blended extended long takes with abrupt rapid cuts, such as Godard's signature jump cuts in Breathless, to disrupt temporal flow and evoke emotional resonance rather than logical progression.[48][50] This juxtaposition prioritized atmospheric mood and viewer immersion over tidy resolutions, fostering a sense of disorientation that mirrored the protagonists' inner turmoil and the era's uncertainties.[44][9]
