Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Microphone
View on Wikipedia

A microphone, colloquially called a mic (/maɪk/),[1] or mike,[a] is a transducer that converts sound into an electrical signal. Microphones are used in telecommunication, sound recording, broadcasting, and consumer electronics, including telephones, hearing aids, and mobile devices.
Several types of microphone are used today, which employ different methods to convert the air pressure variations of a sound wave to an electrical signal. The most common are the dynamic microphone, which uses a coil of wire suspended in a magnetic field; the condenser microphone, which uses the vibrating diaphragm as a capacitor plate; and the contact microphone, which uses a crystal of piezoelectric material. Microphones typically need to be connected to a preamplifier before the signal can be recorded or reproduced.
History
[edit]In order to speak to larger groups of people, a need arose to increase the volume of the human voice. The earliest devices used to achieve this were acoustic megaphones. Some of the first examples, from fifth-century-BC Greece, were theater masks with horn-shaped mouth openings that acoustically amplified the voice of actors in amphitheaters.[4] In 1665, the English physicist Robert Hooke was the first to experiment with a medium other than air with the invention of the "lovers' telephone" made of stretched wire with a cup attached at each end.[5]
In 1856, Italian inventor Antonio Meucci developed a dynamic microphone based on the generation of electric current by moving a coil of wire to various depths in a magnetic field. This method of modulation was also the most enduring method for the technology of the telephone as well. Speaking of his device, Meucci wrote in 1857, "It consists of a vibrating diaphragm and an electrified magnet with a spiral wire that wraps around it. The vibrating diaphragm alters the current of the magnet. These alterations of current, transmitted to the other end of the wire, create analogous vibrations of the receiving diaphragm and reproduce the word."[6]
In 1861, German inventor Johann Philipp Reis built an early sound transmitter (the "Reis telephone") that used a metallic strip attached to a vibrating membrane that would produce intermittent current. Better results were achieved in 1876 with the "liquid transmitter" design in early telephones from Alexander Graham Bell and Elisha Gray – the diaphragm was attached to a conductive rod in an acid solution.[7] These systems, however, gave a very poor sound quality.

The first microphone that enabled proper voice telephony was the (loose-contact) carbon microphone. This was independently developed by David Edward Hughes in England and Emile Berliner and Thomas Edison in the US. Although Edison was awarded the first patent in mid-1877 (after a long legal dispute), Hughes had demonstrated his working device in front of many witnesses some years earlier, and most historians credit him with its invention.[8][9][10][11] The Berliner microphone found commercial success through the use by Alexander Graham Bell for his telephone and Berliner became employed by Bell.[12] The carbon microphone was critical in the development of telephony, broadcasting and the recording industries.[13] Thomas Edison refined the carbon microphone into his carbon-button transmitter of 1886.[10][14] This microphone was employed at the first radio broadcast ever, a performance at the New York Metropolitan Opera House in 1910.[15]

In 1916, E.C. Wente of Western Electric developed the next breakthrough with the first condenser microphone.[16] In 1923, the first practical moving coil microphone was built. The Marconi-Sykes magnetophone, developed by Captain H. J. Round, became the standard for BBC studios in London.[17][18] This was improved in 1930 by Alan Blumlein and Herbert Holman who released the HB1A and was the best standard of the day.[14]
Also in 1923, the ribbon microphone was introduced, another electromagnetic type, believed to have been developed by Harry F. Olson, who applied the concept used in a ribbon speaker to making a microphone.[19] Over the years these microphones were developed by several companies, most notably RCA that made large advancements in pattern control, to give the microphone directionality.[citation needed]
With television and film technology booming there was a demand for high-fidelity microphones and greater directionality. Electro-Voice responded with their Academy Award-winning shotgun microphone in 1963.[20]
During the second half of the 20th century, development advanced quickly with the Shure Brothers bringing out the SM58 and SM57.[21]
Varieties
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (April 2023) |
Microphones are categorized by their transducer principle (condenser, dynamic, etc.) and by their directional characteristics (omni, cardioid, etc.). Sometimes other characteristics such as diaphragm size, intended use or orientation of the principal sound input to the principal axis (end- or side-address) of the microphone are used to describe the microphone.
Condenser
[edit]

The condenser microphone, invented at Western Electric in 1916 by E. C. Wente,[22] is also called a capacitor microphone or electrostatic microphone—capacitors were historically called condensers. The diaphragm acts as one plate of a capacitor, and audio vibrations produce changes in the distance between the plates. Because the capacitance of the plates is inversely proportional to the distance between them, the vibrations produce changes in capacitance. These changes in capacitance are used to measure the audio signal.[23] The assembly of fixed and movable plates is called an element or capsule.
Condenser microphones span the range from telephone mouthpieces through inexpensive karaoke microphones to high-fidelity recording microphones. They generally produce a high-quality audio signal and are now the popular choice in laboratory and recording studio applications. The inherent suitability of this technology is due to the very small mass that must be moved by the incident sound wave compared to other microphone types that require the sound wave to do more work.
Condenser microphones require a power source, provided either via microphone inputs on equipment as phantom power or from a small battery. Power is necessary for establishing the capacitor plate voltage and is also needed to power the microphone electronics. Condenser microphones are also available with two diaphragms that can be electrically connected to provide a range of polar patterns, such as cardioid, omnidirectional, and figure-eight. It is also possible to vary the pattern continuously with some microphones, for example, the Røde NT2000 or CAD M179.
There are two main categories of condenser microphones, depending on the method of extracting the audio signal from the transducer: DC-biased microphones, and radio frequency (RF) or high frequency (HF) condenser microphones.
DC-biased condenser
[edit]With a DC-biased condenser microphone, the plates are biased with a fixed charge (Q). The voltage maintained across the capacitor plates changes with the vibrations in the air, according to the capacitance equation (C = Q⁄V), where Q = charge in coulombs, C = capacitance in farads and V = potential difference in volts. A nearly constant charge is maintained on the capacitor. As the capacitance changes, the charge across the capacitor does change very slightly, but at audible frequencies it is sensibly constant. The capacitance of the capsule (around 5 to 100 pF) and the value of the bias resistor (100 MΩ to tens of GΩ) form a filter that is high-pass for the audio signal, and low-pass for the bias voltage. Note that the time constant of an RC circuit equals the product of the resistance and capacitance.
Within the time frame of the capacitance change (as much as 50 ms at 20 Hz audio signal), the charge is practically constant and the voltage across the capacitor changes instantaneously to reflect the change in capacitance. The voltage across the capacitor varies above and below the bias voltage. The voltage difference between the bias and the capacitor is seen across the series resistor. The voltage across the resistor is amplified for performance or recording. In most cases, the electronics in the microphone itself contribute no voltage gain as the voltage differential is quite significant, up to several volts for high sound levels.
RF condenser
[edit]
RF condenser microphones use a comparatively low RF voltage, generated by a low-noise oscillator. The signal from the oscillator may either be amplitude modulated by the capacitance changes produced by the sound waves moving the capsule diaphragm, or the capsule may be part of a resonant circuit that modulates the frequency of the oscillator signal. Demodulation yields a low-noise audio frequency signal with a very low source impedance. The absence of a high bias voltage permits the use of a diaphragm with looser tension, which may be used to achieve wider frequency response due to higher compliance. The RF biasing process results in a lower electrical impedance capsule, a useful by-product of which is that RF condenser microphones can be operated in damp weather conditions that could create problems in DC-biased microphones with contaminated insulating surfaces. The Sennheiser MKH series of microphones use the RF biasing technique. A covert, remotely energized application of the same physical principle called the Thing was devised by Soviet Russian inventor Leon Theremin and used to bug the US Ambassador's residence in Moscow between 1945 and 1952.
Electret condenser
[edit]
An electret microphone is a type of condenser microphone invented by Gerhard Sessler and James West at Bell laboratories in 1962.[24] The externally applied charge used for a conventional condenser microphone is replaced by a permanent charge in an electret material. An electret is a ferroelectric material that has been permanently electrically charged or polarized. The name comes from electrostatic and magnet; a static charge is embedded in an electret by the alignment of the static charges in the material, much the way a permanent magnet is made by aligning the magnetic domains in a piece of iron.
Due to their good performance and ease of manufacture, hence low cost, the vast majority of microphones made today are electret microphones; a semiconductor manufacturer estimates annual production at over one billion units.[25] They are used in many applications, from high-quality recording and lavalier (lapel mic) use to built-in microphones in small sound recording devices and telephones. Prior to the proliferation of MEMS microphones, nearly all cell-phone, computer, PDA and headset microphones were electret types.[citation needed]
Unlike other capacitor microphones, they require no polarizing voltage, but often contain an integrated preamplifier that does require power. This preamplifier is frequently phantom powered in sound reinforcement and studio applications. Monophonic microphones designed for personal computers (PCs), sometimes called multimedia microphones, use a 3.5 mm plug as usually used for stereo connections; the ring, instead of carrying the signal for a second channel, carries power.
Valve microphone
[edit]A valve microphone is a condenser microphone that uses a vacuum tube (valve) amplifier.[26] They remain popular with enthusiasts of tube sound.
Dynamic
[edit]

The dynamic microphone (also known as the moving-coil microphone) works via electromagnetic induction. They are robust, relatively inexpensive and resistant to moisture. This, coupled with their potentially high gain before feedback, makes them popular for on-stage use.
Dynamic microphones use the same dynamic principle as in a loudspeaker, only reversed. A small movable induction coil, positioned in the magnetic field of a permanent magnet, is attached to the diaphragm. When sound enters through the windscreen of the microphone, the sound wave moves the diaphragm which moves the coil in the magnetic field, producing a varying voltage across the coil through electromagnetic induction.
Ribbon
[edit]
Ribbon microphones use a thin, usually corrugated metal ribbon suspended in a magnetic field. The ribbon is electrically connected to the microphone's output, and its vibration within the magnetic field generates the electrical signal. Ribbon microphones are similar to moving coil microphones in the sense that both produce sound by means of magnetic induction. Basic ribbon microphones detect sound in a bi-directional (also called figure-eight, as in the diagram below) pattern because the ribbon is open on both sides. Also, because the ribbon has much less mass, it responds to the air velocity rather than the sound pressure. Though the symmetrical front and rear pickup can be a nuisance in normal stereo recording, the high side rejection can be used to advantage by positioning a ribbon microphone horizontally, for example above cymbals, so that the rear lobe picks up sound only from the cymbals. The figure-eight response of a ribbon microphone is ideal for Blumlein pair stereo recording. Other directional patterns are produced by enclosing one side of the ribbon in an acoustic trap or baffle, allowing sound to reach only one side. The classic RCA Type 77-DX microphone has several externally adjustable positions of the internal baffle, allowing the selection of several response patterns ranging from figure-eight to unidirectional.
A good low-frequency response in older ribbon microphones could be obtained only when the ribbon was suspended very loosely, which made them relatively fragile. Modern ribbon materials, including new nanomaterials,[27][failed verification] have now been introduced that eliminate those concerns and even improve the effective dynamic range of ribbon microphones at low frequencies. Protective wind screens can reduce the danger of damaging a vintage ribbon, and also reduce plosive artifacts in the recording.
In common with other classes of dynamic microphones, ribbon microphones do not require phantom power; in fact, this voltage can damage some older ribbon microphones. Some new modern ribbon microphone designs incorporate a preamplifier and, therefore, do require phantom power, and circuits of modern passive ribbon microphones (i.e. those without the aforementioned preamplifier) are specifically designed to resist damage to the ribbon and transformer by phantom power.
Carbon
[edit]
The carbon microphone was the earliest type of microphone. The carbon button microphone (also known as the Berliner or Edison microphone) uses a capsule or button containing carbon granules pressed between two metal plates. A voltage is applied across the metal plates, causing a small current to flow through the carbon. One of the plates, the diaphragm, vibrates in sympathy with incident sound waves, applying a varying pressure to the carbon. The changing pressure deforms the granules, causing the contact area between each pair of adjacent granules to change, and this causes the electrical resistance of the mass of granules to change. The changes in resistance cause a corresponding change in the current flowing through the microphone, producing the electrical signal. Carbon microphones were once commonly used in telephones; they have extremely low-quality sound reproduction and a very limited frequency response range but are very robust devices. The Boudet microphone, which used relatively large carbon balls, was similar to the granule carbon button microphones.[28]
Unlike other microphone types, the carbon microphone can also be used as a type of amplifier, using a small amount of sound energy to control a larger amount of electrical energy. Carbon microphones found use as early telephone repeaters, making long-distance phone calls possible in the era before vacuum tubes. Called a Brown's relay,[29] these repeaters worked by mechanically coupling a magnetic telephone receiver to a carbon microphone: the faint signal from the receiver was transferred to the microphone, where it modulated a stronger electric current, producing a stronger electrical signal to send down the line.
Piezoelectric
[edit]
A crystal microphone or piezo microphone[30] uses the phenomenon of piezoelectricity—the ability of some materials to produce a voltage when subjected to pressure[b]—to convert vibrations into an electrical signal. Crystal microphones were once commonly supplied with vacuum tube (valve) equipment, such as domestic tape recorders. Their high output impedance matched the high input impedance (typically about 10 MΩ) of the vacuum tube input stage well. They were difficult to match to early transistor equipment and were supplanted by dynamic microphones, and later small electret condenser devices. The high impedance of the crystal microphone made it very susceptible to handling noise, both from the microphone itself and from the connecting cable.[citation needed]
Piezoelectric transducers are often used as contact microphones to amplify sound from acoustic musical instruments, to sense drum hits and trigger electronic samples, and to record sound in challenging environments, such as underwater under high pressure. Saddle-mounted pickups on acoustic guitars are typically piezoelectric devices that contact the strings passing over the saddle. This type of microphone is different from magnetic coil pickups commonly visible on typical electric guitars, which use magnetic induction, rather than mechanical coupling, to pick up vibration.
Fiber-optic
[edit]
A fiber-optic microphone converts acoustic waves into electrical signals by sensing changes in light intensity, instead of sensing changes in capacitance or magnetic fields as with conventional microphones.[31][32]
During operation, light from a laser source travels through an optical fiber to illuminate the surface of a reflective diaphragm. Sound vibrations of the diaphragm modulate the intensity of light reflecting off the diaphragm in a specific direction. The modulated light is then transmitted over a second optical fiber to a photodetector, which transforms the intensity-modulated light into analog or digital audio for transmission or recording. Fiber-optic microphones possess high dynamic and frequency range, similar to the best high-fidelity conventional microphones.
Fiber-optic microphones do not react to or influence any electrical, magnetic, electrostatic or radioactive fields (this is called EMI/RFI immunity). The fiber-optic microphone design is therefore ideal for use in areas where conventional microphones are ineffective or dangerous, such as inside industrial turbines or in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment environments.
Fiber-optic microphones are robust, resistant to environmental changes in heat and moisture, and can be produced for any directionality or impedance matching. The distance between the microphone's light source and its photodetector may be up to several kilometers without need for any preamplifier or another electrical device, making fiber-optic microphones suitable for industrial and surveillance acoustic monitoring.
Fiber-optic microphones are used in very specific application areas such as for infrasound monitoring and noise cancellation. They have proven especially useful in medical applications, such as allowing radiologists, staff and patients within the powerful and noisy magnetic field to converse normally, inside the MRI suites as well as in remote control rooms.[33] Other uses include industrial equipment monitoring and audio calibration and measurement, high-fidelity recording and law enforcement.[34]
Laser
[edit]A laser beam is aimed at the surface of a window or other plane surface that is affected by sound. The vibrations of this surface change the angle at which the beam is reflected, and the motion of the laser spot from the returning beam is detected and converted to an audio signal. In a more robust and expensive implementation, the returned light is split and fed to an interferometer, which detects movement of the surface by changes in the optical path length of the reflected beam. The former implementation is a tabletop experiment; the latter requires an extremely stable laser and precise optics. Laser microphones have been studied for their ability to detect sound vibrations on distant surfaces.
An experimental type of laser microphone is a device that uses a laser beam and smoke or vapor to detect sound vibrations in free air. On August 25, 2009, US patent 7,580,533 issued for a Particulate Flow Detection Microphone based on a laser-photocell pair with a moving stream of smoke or vapor in the laser beam's path. Sound pressure waves cause disturbances in the smoke that in turn cause variations in the amount of laser light reaching the photodetector. A prototype of the device was demonstrated at the 127th Audio Engineering Society convention in New York City from 9 through October 12, 2009.[citation needed]
Liquid
[edit]Early microphones did not reproduce intelligible speech until Alexander Graham Bell made improvements, including a variable-resistance water microphone and transmitter. Bell's water transmitter consisted of a metal cup filled with water with a small amount of sulfuric acid added. A sound wave caused the diaphragm to move, forcing a needle to move up and down in the water. The electrical resistance between the wire and the cup was then inversely proportional to the size of the water meniscus around the submerged needle. Elisha Gray filed a patent caveat for a version using a brass rod instead of the needle.[when?] Other minor variations and improvements were made to the water microphone by Majoranna, Chambers, Vanni, Sykes, and Elisha Gray, and one version was patented by Reginald Fessenden in 1903.[citation needed] These were the first working microphones, but they were impractical for commercial applications. The famous first phone conversation between Bell and Watson took place using a water microphone.[citation needed]
MEMS
[edit]
The MEMS microphone is also called a microphone chip or silicon microphone. A pressure-sensitive diaphragm is etched directly into a silicon wafer by MEMS processing techniques and is usually accompanied with an integrated preamplifier.[35] Most MEMS microphones are variants of the condenser microphone design. Digital MEMS microphones have built-in analog-to-digital converter (ADC) circuits on the same CMOS chip, making the chip a digital microphone and so more readily integrated with modern digital products. Major manufacturers producing MEMS silicon microphones are Cirrus Logic,[36] InvenSense (product line sold by Analog Devices),[37] Akustica, Infineon, Knowles Electronics, Memstech, Sonion MEMS, Vesper, AAC Acoustic Technologies,[38] and Omron.[39]
In the 2010s, piezoelectric MEMS microphones were developed. These are a significant architectural and material change from existing condenser-style MEMS designs.[40]
Plasma
[edit]In a plasma microphone, a plasma arc of ionized gas is used. The sound waves cause variations in the pressure around the plasma in turn causing variations in temperature which alter the conductance of the plasma. These variations in conductance can be picked up as variations superimposed on the electrical supply to the plasma.[41] This is an experimental form of microphone.
Speakers as microphones
[edit]A loudspeaker, a transducer that turns an electrical signal into sound waves, is the functional opposite of a microphone. Since a conventional speaker is similar in construction to a dynamic microphone (with a diaphragm, coil and magnet), speakers can actually work "in reverse" as microphones. Reciprocity applies, so the resulting microphone has the same impairments as a single-driver loudspeaker: limited low- and high-end frequency response, poorly controlled directivity, and low sensitivity. In practical use, speakers are sometimes used as microphones in applications where high bandwidth and sensitivity are not needed such as intercoms, walkie-talkies or video game voice chat peripherals, or when conventional microphones are in short supply.
However, there is at least one practical application that exploits those weaknesses: the use of a medium-size woofer placed closely in front of a "kick drum" (bass drum) in a drum set to act as a microphone. A commercial product example is the Yamaha Subkick, a 6.5-inch (170 mm) woofer shock-mounted into a 10" drum shell used in front of kick drums. Since a relatively massive membrane is unable to transduce high frequencies while being capable of tolerating strong low-frequency transients, the speaker is often ideal for picking up the kick drum while reducing bleed from the nearby cymbals and snare drums.[42]
Capsule design and directivity
[edit]The inner elements of a microphone are the primary source of differences in directivity. A pressure microphone uses a diaphragm between a fixed internal volume of air and the environment and responds uniformly to pressure from all directions, so it is said to be omnidirectional. A pressure-gradient microphone uses a diaphragm that is at least partially open on both sides. The pressure difference between the two sides produces its directional characteristics. Other elements such as the external shape of the microphone and external devices such as interference tubes can also alter a microphone's directional response. A pure pressure-gradient microphone is equally sensitive to sounds arriving from front or back but insensitive to sounds arriving from the side because sound arriving at the front and back at the same time creates no gradient between the two. The characteristic directional pattern of a pure pressure-gradient microphone is like a figure-8. Other polar patterns are derived by creating a capsule that combines these two effects in different ways. The cardioid, for instance, features a partially closed backside, so its response is a combination of pressure and pressure-gradient characteristics.[43]
Polar patterns
[edit]- Microphone polar sensitivity. Microphone is parallel to the page facing upwards in each diagram.
-
Omnidirectional
-
Subcardioid
-
Supercardioid
-
Hypercardioid
-
Bi-directional or Figure-8
-
Lobar
A microphone's directionality or polar pattern indicates how sensitive it is to sounds arriving at different angles about its central axis. The polar patterns illustrated above represent the locus of points in polar coordinates that produce the same signal level output in the microphone if a given sound pressure level (SPL) is generated from that point. How the physical body of the microphone is oriented relative to the diagrams depends on the microphone design. For large-membrane microphones such as in the Oktava (pictured above), the upward direction in the polar diagram is usually perpendicular to the microphone body, commonly known as "side fire" or "side address". For small diaphragm microphones such as the Shure (also pictured above), it usually extends from the axis of the microphone commonly known as "end fire" or "top/end address".
Some microphone designs combine several principles in creating the desired polar pattern. This ranges from shielding (meaning diffraction/dissipation/absorption) by the housing itself to electronically combining dual membranes.
Omnidirectional
[edit]An omnidirectional (or nondirectional) microphone's response is generally considered to be a perfect sphere in three dimensions. In the real world, this is not the case. As with directional microphones, the polar pattern for an "omnidirectional" microphone is a function of frequency. The body of the microphone is not infinitely small and, as a consequence, it tends to get in its own way with respect to sounds arriving from the rear, causing a slight flattening of the polar response. This flattening increases as the diameter of the microphone (assuming it's cylindrical) reaches the wavelength of the frequency in question. Therefore, the smallest diameter microphone gives the best omnidirectional characteristics at high frequencies.
The wavelength of sound at 10 kHz is 1.4" (3.5 cm). The smallest measuring microphones are often 1/4" (6 mm) in diameter, which practically eliminates directionality even up to the highest frequencies. Omnidirectional microphones, unlike cardioids, do not employ resonant cavities as delays, and so can be considered the "purest" microphones in terms of low coloration; they add very little to the original sound. Being pressure-sensitive they can also have a very flat low-frequency response down to 20 Hz or below. Pressure-sensitive microphones also respond much less to wind noise and plosives than directional (velocity sensitive) microphones.
Areas of application: studios, old churches, theaters, on-site TV interviews, etc.[44]
An example of a nondirectional microphone is the round black eight ball.[45]
Unidirectional
[edit]A unidirectional microphone is primarily sensitive to sounds from only one direction. The diagram above (lobar) illustrates a number of these patterns. The microphone faces upwards in each diagram. The sound intensity for a particular frequency is plotted for angles radially from 0 to 360°. (Professional diagrams show these scales and include multiple plots at different frequencies. The diagrams given here provide only an overview of typical pattern shapes, and their names.)
Cardioid, hypercardioid, supercardioid, subcardioid
[edit]
The most common unidirectional microphone is a cardioid microphone, so named because the sensitivity pattern is "heart-shaped" (i.e. a cardioid). The cardioid family of microphones are commonly used as vocal or speech microphones since they are good at rejecting sounds from other directions. In three dimensions, the cardioid is shaped like an apple centered around the microphone, which is the "stem" of the apple. The cardioid response reduces pickup from the side and rear, helping to avoid feedback from the monitors. Since these directional transducer microphones achieve their patterns by sensing pressure gradient, putting them very close to the sound source (at distances of a few centimeters) results in a bass boost due to the increased gradient. This is known as the proximity effect.[46] The SM58 has been the most commonly used microphone for live vocals for more than 50 years[47] demonstrating the importance and popularity of cardioid mics.
The cardioid is effectively a superposition of an omnidirectional (pressure) and a figure-8 (pressure gradient) microphone;[48] for sound waves coming from the back, the negative signal from the figure-8 cancels the positive signal from the omnidirectional element, whereas, for sound waves coming from the front, the two add to each other. However, in low frequencies a cardioid microphone behaves as an omnidirectional microphone.
By combining the two components in different ratios, any pattern between omni and figure-8 can be achieved, which comprise the first-order cardioid family. Common shapes include:
- A hypercardioid microphone is similar to cardioid, but with a slightly larger figure-8 contribution, leading to a tighter area of front sensitivity and a smaller lobe of rear sensitivity. It is produced by combining the two components in a 3:1 ratio, producing nulls at 109.5°. This ratio maximizes the directivity factor (or directivity index).[49][50]
- A supercardioid microphone is similar to a hypercardioid, except there is more front pickup and less rear pickup. It is produced with about a 5:3 ratio, with nulls at 126.9°. This ratio maximizes the front-back ratio; the energy ratio between front and rear radiation.[49][50]
- The subcardioid microphone has no null points. It is produced with about 7:3 ratio with 3–10 dB level between the front and back pickup.[51][52]
Three such cardioid microphones/hydrophones could be orthogonally oriented as a collocated triad to improve the gain and also create a steerable beam pattern.[53][54]
Bi-directional
[edit]"Figure-8" or bi-directional microphones receive sound equally from both the front and back of the element. Most ribbon microphones are of this pattern. In principle they do not respond to sound pressure at all, only to the change in pressure between front and back; since sound arriving from the side reaches front and back equally there is no difference in pressure and therefore no sensitivity to sound from that direction. In more mathematical terms, while omnidirectional microphones are scalar transducers responding to pressure from any direction, bi-directional microphones are vector transducers responding to the gradient along an axis normal to the plane of the diaphragm. This also has the effect of inverting the output polarity for sounds arriving from the back side.
Shotgun
[edit]This section may be too technical for most readers to understand. (September 2023) |


Shotgun microphones are the most highly directional of simple first-order unidirectional types. They have the classic polar response of a hypercardioid or supercardioid.[55][56] This is achieved by a process of cancellation of off-axis waves entering the longitudinal array of slots.[57] A consequence of this technique is the presence of some rear lobes that vary in level and angle with frequency and can cause some coloration effects.[citation needed]
Boundary
[edit]Several approaches have been developed for effectively using a microphone in less-than-ideal acoustic spaces, which often suffer from excessive reflections from one or more of the surfaces (boundaries) that make up the space. If the microphone is placed in, or very close to, one of these boundaries, the reflections from that surface have the same timing as the direct sound, thus giving the microphone a hemispherical polar pattern and improved intelligibility. Initially, this was done by placing an ordinary microphone adjacent to the surface, sometimes in a block of acoustically transparent foam. Sound engineers Ed Long and Ron Wickersham developed the concept of placing the diaphragm parallel to and facing the boundary.[58]
While a boundary microphone was initially implemented using an omnidirectional element, it is also possible to mount a directional microphone close enough to the surface to gain some of the benefits of this technique while retaining the directional properties of the element.
Application-specific designs
[edit]A lavalier microphone is made for hands-free operation. These small microphones are worn on the body. Originally, they were held in place with a lanyard worn around the neck, but more often they are fastened to clothing with a clip, pin, tape or magnet. The lavalier cord may be hidden by clothes and either run to an RF transmitter in a pocket or clipped to a belt (for mobile use), or run directly to the mixer (for stationary applications).
A wireless microphone transmits the audio as a radio or optical signal rather than via a cable. Most professional wireless microphones send their signal using a small radio transmitter to a nearby receiver connected to the sound system.
A contact microphone picks up vibrations directly from a solid surface or object, as opposed to sound vibrations carried through air. One use for this is to detect sounds of a very low level, such as those from small objects or insects. The microphone commonly consists of a magnetic (moving coil) transducer, contact plate and contact pin. The contact plate is placed directly on the vibrating part of a musical instrument or other surface, and the contact pin transfers vibrations to the coil. Contact microphones have been used to pick up the sound of a snail's heartbeat and the footsteps of ants. A portable version of this microphone has recently been developed.
A throat microphone is a variant of the contact microphone that picks up speech directly from a person's throat, which it is strapped to. This lets the device be used in areas with ambient sounds that would otherwise make the speaker inaudible.

A parabolic microphone uses a parabolic reflector to collect and focus sound waves onto a microphone receiver, in much the same way that a parabolic antenna (e.g. satellite dish) does with radio waves. Typical uses of this microphone, which has unusually focused front sensitivity and can pick up sounds from many meters away, include nature recording, outdoor sporting events, eavesdropping, law enforcement, and even espionage. Parabolic microphones are not typically used for standard recording applications, because they tend to have a poor low-frequency response as a side effect of their design.
A stereo microphone integrates two microphones in one unit to produce a stereophonic signal. A stereo microphone is often used for broadcast applications or field recording where it would be impractical to configure two separate condenser microphones in a classic X-Y configuration (see microphone practice) for stereophonic recording. Some such microphones have an adjustable angle of coverage between the two channels.
A noise-canceling microphone is a highly directional design intended for noisy environments. One such use is in aircraft cockpits where they are normally installed as boom microphones on headsets. Another use is in live event support on loud concert stages for vocalists involved with live performances. Many noise-canceling microphones combine signals received from two diaphragms that are in opposite electrical polarity or are processed electronically. In dual diaphragm designs, the main diaphragm is mounted closest to the intended source and the second is positioned farther away from the source so that it can pick up environmental sounds to be subtracted from the main diaphragm's signal. After the two signals have been combined, sounds other than the intended source are greatly reduced, substantially increasing intelligibility. Other noise-canceling designs use one diaphragm that is affected by ports open to the sides and rear of the microphone, with the sum being a 16 dB rejection of sounds that are farther away. One noise-canceling headset design by Crown using a single diaphragm has been used prominently by vocal artists such as Garth Brooks, Britney Spears and Janet Jackson.[59]
Stereo microphone techniques
[edit]Various standard techniques are used with microphones used in sound reinforcement at live performances, or for recording in a studio or on a motion picture set. By suitable arrangement of one or more microphones, desirable features of the sound to be collected can be kept, while rejecting unwanted sounds.
Powering
[edit]Microphones containing active circuitry, such as most condenser microphones, require power to operate the active components. The first of these used vacuum-tube circuits with a separate power supply unit, using a multi-pin cable and connector. With the advent of solid-state amplification, the power requirements were greatly reduced and it became practical to use the same cable conductors and connector for audio and power. During the 1960s several powering methods were developed, mainly in Europe. The two dominant methods were initially defined in German DIN 45595 as Tonaderspeisung [de] or T-power and DIN 45596 for phantom power. Since the 1980s, phantom power has become much more common, because the same input may be used for both powered and unpowered microphones. In consumer electronics such as DSLRs and camcorders, "plug-in power" is more common, for microphones using a 3.5 mm phone plug connector. Phantom, T-power and plug-in power are described in international standard IEC 61938.[60]
Connectors and connectivity
[edit]

The most common connectors used by microphones are:
- Male XLR connector on professional microphones
- 1⁄4 inch (sometimes referred to as 6.35 mm) phone connector on less expensive musician's microphones, using an unbalanced 1⁄4 in (6.35 mm) TS (tip and sleeve) phone connector. Harmonica microphones commonly use a high impedance 1⁄4 inch TS connection to be run through guitar amplifiers.
- 3.5 mm (sometimes referred to as 1⁄8 inch mini) TRS (tip, ring and sleeve) stereo (also available as TS mono) mini phone plug on prosumer camera, recorder and computer microphones.
- USB allows direct connection to PCs. Electronics in these microphones powered over the USB connection performs preamplification and ADC before the digital audio data is transferred via the USB interface.
Some microphones use other connectors, such as a 5-pin XLR, or mini XLR for connection to portable equipment. Some lavalier (or "lapel", from the days of attaching the microphone to the news reporter's suit lapel) microphones use a proprietary connector for connection to a wireless transmitter, such as a radio pack. Since 2005, professional-quality microphones with USB connections have begun to appear, designed for direct recording into computer-based software.
Impedance bridging
[edit]When choosing a pre-amplifier for a certain microphone, the microphone's impedance must be known. Impedance is a frequency-dependent electrical characteristic, measured in ohms (Ω), that relates voltage to current. When not concerned with power transfer, signals are generally transferred as varying voltages and this is also the case for microphones. To obtain the highest signal amplitude one uses a method called impedance bridging. In this configuration the output impedance of the microphone should be negligible in comparison with the input impedance of the pre-amplifier (in practice a pre-amp impedance at least 10 times greater than the microphone impedance is recommended). By doing so, the signal is attenuated minimally and almost no power is used in the process.[61]
The main alternative to impedance bridging is impedance matching which maximizes power transfer for a given source impedance. However, this has not been relevant since the early 20th century when amplifiers were very expensive and produced a lot of heat. To reduce the number of amplifiers in telephone lines, power loss needed to be minimal so source and load impedances were matched. A downside to impedance matching is the 6 dB loss in signal that occurs as only half the voltage level appears at the pre-amplifier's input.[61] Certain ribbon and dynamic microphones however are exceptions, due to the designers' assumption of a certain load impedance being part of the internal electro-acoustical damping circuit of the microphone.[62][dubious – discuss]
Different microphones can have vastly different impedances and this depends on the design. In passive microphones, this value relates closely to the impedance of the coil (or similar mechanism). In active microphones, this value describes the output impedance of its internal amplifier circuitry.
Low impedance is considered under 600 Ω. Medium impedance is considered between 600 Ω and 10 kΩ. High impedance is above 10 kΩ. Owing to their built-in amplifier, condenser microphones typically have an output impedance between 50 and 200 Ω.[61][63]
Digital microphone interface
[edit]
The AES42 standard, published by the Audio Engineering Society, defines a digital interface for microphones. Microphones conforming to this standard directly output a digital audio stream through an XLR or XLD male connector, rather than producing an analog output. Digital microphones may be used either with new equipment with appropriate input connections that conform to the AES42 standard, or else via a suitable interface box. Studio-quality microphones that operate in accordance with the AES42 standard are now available from a number of microphone manufacturers.
Measurements and specifications
[edit]
Because of differences in their construction, microphones have their own characteristic responses to sound. This difference in response produces non-uniform phase and frequency responses. Additionally, microphones are not uniformly sensitive to sound pressure and can accept differing levels without distorting. Although for scientific applications microphones with a more uniform response are desirable, this is often not the case for music recording, as the non-uniform response of a microphone can produce a desirable coloration of the sound. There is an international standard for microphone specifications,[64] but few manufacturers adhere to it. As a result, comparison of published data from different manufacturers is difficult because different measurement techniques are used. Caution should be used in drawing any solid conclusions from this or any other published data, however, unless it is known that the manufacturer has supplied specifications in accordance with IEC 60268-4.
A frequency response diagram plots the microphone sensitivity in decibels over a range of frequencies (typically 20 Hz to 20 kHz), generally for perfectly on-axis sound (sound arriving at 0° to the capsule). Frequency response may be less informatively stated textually like so: "30 Hz–16 kHz ±3 dB". This is interpreted as meaning a nearly flat, linear, plot between the stated frequencies, with variations in amplitude of no more than plus or minus 3 dB. However, one cannot determine from this information how smooth the variations are, nor in what parts of the spectrum they occur. Note that commonly made statements such as "20 Hz–20 kHz" are meaningless without a decibel measure of tolerance. Directional microphones' frequency response varies greatly with distance from the sound source, and with the geometry of the sound source. IEC 60268-4 specifies that frequency response should be measured in plane progressive wave conditions (very far away from the source) but this is seldom practical. Close talking microphones may be measured with different sound sources and distances, but there is no standard and therefore no way to compare data from different models unless the measurement technique is described.
The self-noise or equivalent input noise level is the sound level that creates the same output voltage as the microphone does in the absence of sound. This represents the lowest point of the microphone's dynamic range, and is particularly important should you wish to record sounds that are quiet. The measure is often stated in dB(A), which is the equivalent loudness of the noise on a decibel scale frequency-weighted for how the ear hears, for example: "15 dBA SPL" (SPL means sound pressure level relative to 20 micropascals). The lower the number the better. Some microphone manufacturers state the noise level using ITU-R 468 noise weighting, which more accurately represents the way we hear noise, but gives a figure some 11–14 dB higher. A quiet microphone typically measures 20 dBA SPL or 32 dB SPL 468-weighted. Very quiet microphones have existed for years for special applications, such the Brüel & Kjaer 4179, with a noise level around 0 dB SPL. Recently some microphones with low noise specifications have been introduced in the studio/entertainment market, such as models from Neumann and Røde that advertise noise levels between 5–7 dBA. Typically this is achieved by altering the frequency response of the capsule and electronics to result in lower noise within the A-weighting curve while broadband noise may be increased.[citation needed]
The clipping level is an important indicator of maximum usable level, as the 1% total harmonic distortion (THD) figure usually quoted under max SPL is really a very mild level of distortion, quite inaudible especially on brief high peaks. Clipping is much more audible. For some microphones, the clipping level may be much higher than the max SPL.[citation needed]
The dynamic range of a microphone is the difference in SPL between the noise floor and the maximum SPL. If stated on its own, for example, "120 dB", it conveys significantly less information than having the self-noise and maximum SPL figures individually.
Sensitivity indicates how well the microphone converts acoustic pressure to an output voltage. A high sensitivity microphone creates more voltage and so needs less amplification at the mixer or recording device. This is a practical concern but is not directly an indication of the microphone's quality, and in fact the term sensitivity is something of a misnomer, "transduction gain" being perhaps more meaningful, (or just "output level") because true sensitivity is generally set by the noise floor, and too much "sensitivity" in terms of output level compromises the clipping level. There are two common measures. The (preferred) international standard is made in millivolts per pascal at 1 kHz. A higher value indicates greater sensitivity. The older American method is referred to a 1 V/Pa standard and measured in plain decibels, resulting in a negative value. Again, a higher value indicates greater sensitivity, so −60 dB is more sensitive than −70 dB.[citation needed]
Measurement microphones
[edit]
Some microphones are intended for testing speakers, measuring noise levels and otherwise quantifying an acoustic experience. These are calibrated transducers and are usually supplied with a calibration certificate that states absolute sensitivity against frequency. The quality of measurement microphones is often referred to using the designations "Class 1", "Type 2", etc., which are references not to microphone specifications but to sound level meters.[65] A more comprehensive standard[66] for the description of measurement microphone performance was recently adopted.
Measurement microphones are generally scalar sensors of pressure; they exhibit an omnidirectional response, limited only by the scattering profile of their physical dimensions. Sound intensity or sound power measurements require pressure-gradient measurements, which are typically made using arrays of at least two microphones, or with hot-wire anemometers.
Calibration
[edit]To take a scientific measurement with a microphone, its precise sensitivity must be known (in volts per pascal). Since this may change over the lifetime of the device, it is necessary to regularly calibrate measurement microphones. This service is offered by some microphone manufacturers and by independent certified testing labs. All microphone calibration is ultimately traceable to primary standards at a national measurement institute such as NPL in the UK, PTB in Germany and NIST in the United States, which most commonly calibrate using the reciprocity primary standard. Measurement microphones calibrated using this method can then be used to calibrate other microphones using comparison calibration techniques.
Depending on the application, measurement microphones must be tested periodically (every year or several months, typically) and after any potentially damaging event, such as being dropped (most such microphones come in foam-padded cases to reduce this risk) or exposed to sounds beyond the acceptable level.
Arrays
[edit]A microphone array is any number of microphones operating in tandem. There are many applications:
- Systems for extracting voice input from ambient noise (notably telephones, speech recognition systems, hearing aids)
- Surround sound and related technologies
- Locating objects by sound: acoustic source localization (e.g. military use to locate the source(s) of artillery fire). Aircraft location and tracking.
- High fidelity original recordings
- 3D spatial beamforming for localized acoustic detection of subcutaneous sounds
Typically, an array is made up of omnidirectional microphones distributed about the perimeter of a space, linked to a computer that records and interprets the results into a coherent form.
Windscreens
[edit]Windscreens (or interchangeably, windshields) provide a method of reducing the effect of wind on microphones. While pop-screens give protection from unidirectional blasts, foam "hats" shield wind into the grille from all directions, and blimps, zeppelins, and baskets entirely enclose the microphone and protect its body as well. The latter is important because, given the extreme low-frequency content of wind noise, vibration induced in the housing of the microphone can contribute substantially to the noise output.
The shielding material used – wire gauze, fabric or foam – is designed to have a significant acoustic impedance. The relatively low particle-velocity air pressure changes that constitute sound waves can pass through with minimal attenuation, but higher particle-velocity wind is impeded to a far greater extent. Increasing the thickness of the material increases wind attenuation but also begins to compromise high-frequency audio content. This limits the practical size of simple foam screens. While foams and wire meshes can be partly or wholly self-supporting, soft fabrics and gauzes require stretching on frames or laminating with coarser structural elements.
Since all wind noise is generated at the first surface the air hits, the greater the spacing between the shield periphery and microphone capsule, the greater the noise attenuation. For an approximately spherical shield, attenuation increases by (approximately) the cube of that distance. With full basket windshields there is an additional pressure chamber effect, first explained by Joerg Wuttke,[67] which, for two-port (pressure gradient) microphones, allows the shield and microphone combination to act as a high-pass acoustic filter.
Since turbulence at a surface is the source of wind noise, reducing gross turbulence can add to noise reduction. Both aerodynamically smooth surfaces, and ones that prevent powerful vortices being generated, have been used successfully. Historically, artificial fur has proved very useful for this purpose since the fibers produce micro-turbulence and absorb energy silently. If not matted by wind and rain, the fur fibers are very transparent acoustically, but the woven or knitted backing can give significant attenuation. As a material, it suffers from being difficult to manufacture with consistency and is hard to keep in pristine condition on location. Thus there is an interest in moving away from its use.[68]

-
Various microphone covers
-
Two recordings being made—a blimp is being used on the left. An open-cell foam windscreen is being used on the right.
-
"Dead cat" and a "dead kitten" windscreens. The dead kitten covers a stereo microphone for a DSLR camera. The difference in name is due to the size of the enclosure.
See also
[edit]- Geophone – transducer for sound within the earth
- Hydrophone – transducer for sound in water
- Ionophone – plasma-based microphone
- Microphone blocker – computer accessory for disabling internal microphone.
- Microphone connector
- Nominal impedance
Notes
[edit]- ^ The long-standard spelling mike, dating to the 1920s, for the abbreviated casual name—following the same orthographic principle as bike for bicycle—is now often supplanted by the newer mic, which came into use among sound engineers in the 1960s. In 2010 the Associated Press's style guide altered its standard spelling for the term from mike to mic, while retaining miked in spelling the past participle of the verb to mic/mike (rather than the ungainly miced or mic'd).[2][3]
- ^ An example of this is potassium sodium tartrate, which is a piezoelectric crystal that works as a transducer, both as a microphone and as a slimline loudspeaker component.
References
[edit]- ^ Zimmer, Ben (July 29, 2010). "How Should 'Microphone' be Abbreviated?". The New York Times. Retrieved September 10, 2010.
- ^ Okrent, Arika (July 20, 2015). "Is a Microphone a 'Mic' or a 'Mike'?". Mental Floss. Retrieved February 13, 2024.
- ^ Abadi, Mark (November 20, 2017). "Everyone Is Blasting Trump for Writing 'Mike' Instead of 'Mic' — but Here's Why Trump Is Right". Business Insider. Retrieved February 13, 2024.
- ^ Montgomery, Henry C. (1959). "Amplification and High Fidelity in the Greek Theater". The Classical Journal. 54 (6): 242–245. JSTOR 3294133.
- ^ McVeigh, Daniel (2000). "An Early History of the Telephone: 1664–1866: Robert Hooke's Acoustic Experiments and Acoustic Inventions". Archived from the original on September 3, 2003.
- ^ Lander, Jack (July 1, 2017). "Who Invented the Telephone?". Inventors Digest. Archived from the original on December 1, 2022.
- ^ MacLeod, Elizabeth (1999). Alexander Graham Bell: An Inventive Life. Toronto: Kids Can Press.
- ^ Nahin, Paul J. (2002). Oliver Heaviside: The Life, Work, and Times of an Electrical Genius of the Victorian Age. JHU Press. p. 67. ISBN 9780801869099.
- ^ Estreich, Bob. "David Edward Hughes". Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 30, 2013.
- ^ a b Huurdeman, Anton (2003). The Worldwide History of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
- ^ "David Hughes". Retrieved December 17, 2012.
- ^ Wile, Frederic Willam 1926 Emile Berliner: Maker of the Microphone, The Bobbs-Merrill Company Publishers, Indianapolis
- ^ "David Edward Hughes: Concertinist and Inventor" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on December 31, 2013. Retrieved December 17, 2012.
- ^ a b Robjohns, Hugh (2001). "A Brief History of Microphones" (PDF). Microphone Data Book. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 25, 2010.
- ^ Schwertly, Scott. "The History of the Microphone". Ethos3.com. Retrieved May 9, 2023.
- ^ Fagen, M.D. A History of Engineering and Science in the Bell System: The Early Years (1875–1925). New York: Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1975
- ^ Hennessy, Brian (2005). The Emergence of Broadcasting in Britain. Southerleigh. ISBN 9780955140808.
- ^ "The Marconi-Sykes Magnetophone". Retrieved June 18, 2018.
- ^ "1931 Harry F. Olson and Les Anderson, RCA Model 44 Ribbon Microphone". Mix Magazine. September 1, 2006. Archived from the original on March 24, 2008. Retrieved April 10, 2013.
- ^ "The Electro-Voice Model 642 Cardiline Microphone Earns the First Academy Award for Microphone Design in 22 Years!" (PDF). Audio. June 1963. p. 58. Retrieved September 25, 2025.
- ^ "History – The evolution of an audio revolution". Shure Americas. Archived from the original on September 15, 2012. Retrieved April 13, 2013.
- ^ "Bell Laboratories and The Development of Electrical Recording". Stokowski.org (Leopold Stokowski site). Archived from the original on June 21, 2023.
- ^ "Electromechanical Transducer". Britannica. Retrieved June 2, 2024.
- ^ Sessler, G.M.; West, J.E. (1962). "Self-Biased Condenser Microphone with High Capacitance". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 34 (11): 1787–1788. Bibcode:1962ASAJ...34.1787S. doi:10.1121/1.1909130.
- ^ Van Rhijn, Arie. "Integrated Circuits for High Performance Electret Microphones". National Semiconductor. Archived from the original on August 19, 2010.
- ^ Institute BV Amsterdam, SAE. "Microphones". Practical Creative Media Education. Retrieved March 7, 2014.
- ^ "Local firms strum the chords of real music innovation". Mass High Tech: The Journal of New England Technology. February 8, 2008. Archived from the original on February 19, 2008.
- ^ "Boudet's Microphone". Machine-History.com. Archived from the original on August 22, 2015.
- ^ "Brown Type G Telephone Relay Owned by Edwin Howard Armstrong". National Museum of American History. Retrieved June 15, 2022.
- ^ Lee, Woon Seob; Lee, Seung S. (2008). "Piezoelectric Microphone Built on Circular Diaphragm" (PDF). Sensors and Actuators A. 144 (2): 367–373. Bibcode:2008SeAcA.144..367L. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2008.02.001. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 17, 2013. Retrieved March 28, 2023.
- ^ Paritsky, Alexander; Kots, A. (1997). "Fiber optic microphone as a realization of fiber optic positioning sensors". In Shladov, Itzhak; Rotman, Stanley R (eds.). 10th Meeting on Optical Engineering in Israel. Proceedings of the SPIE. Vol. 3110. Bellingham, Washington, US: International Society for Optical Engineering. pp. 408–409. Bibcode:1997SPIE.3110..408P. doi:10.1117/12.281371. ISBN 9780819425324. S2CID 110338054.
- ^ US 6462808, Alexander Paritsky and Alexander Kots, "Small Optical Microphone/Sensor", published October 8, 2002
- ^ Karlin, Susan. "Case Study: Can You Hear Me Now?". RT-Image.com. Valley Forge Publishing. Archived from the original on July 15, 2011.
- ^ Goulde, Berg (February 9, 2017). "15 Best Microphones for Computer". Microphone top gear. Retrieved March 20, 2023.
- ^ Rose, Bruce (January 8, 2019). "Comparing MEMS and Electret Condenser (ECM) Microphones". CUIDevices.com. Retrieved March 27, 2023.
- ^ "Cirrus Logic Completes Acquisition of Wolfson Microelectronics". MarketWatch.com. Retrieved August 21, 2014.
- ^ "Analog Devices to Sell Microphone Product Line to InvenSense" (Press release). Analog Devices. Retrieved November 27, 2015.
- ^ "MEMS Microphone Will Be Hurt by Downturn in Smartphone Market". Seeking Alpha. August 23, 2009. Retrieved August 23, 2009.
- ^ "OMRON to Launch Mass-Production and Supply of MEMS Acoustic Sensor Chip". Retrieved November 24, 2009.
- ^ "MEMS Mics Taking Over". EETimes.
- ^ Akino, Hiroshi; Shimokawa, Hirofumi; Kikutani, Tadashi; Green, Jackie (April 2014). "On the Study of the Ionic Microphone". Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 62 (4): 254–264. doi:10.17743/jaes.2014.0013.
- ^ Crane, Larry (July 2004). "Yamaha SubKick – The Tape Op Review". RecordingHacks.com. Retrieved April 11, 2023.
- ^ Bartlett, Bruce. "How a Cardioid Microphone Works". Archived from the original on December 12, 2016. Retrieved February 12, 2015.
- ^ "Types of microphones". MicSpeech. April 12, 2019.
- ^ History & Development of Microphone. Archived July 4, 2008, at the Wayback Machine Lloyd Microphone Classics.
- ^ Proximity Effect. Archived October 16, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Geoff Martin, Introduction to Sound Recording.
- ^ "History – The evolution of an audio revolution". Shure. Archived from the original on July 16, 2012. Retrieved July 30, 2013.
- ^ Rayburn, Ray A. (November 12, 2012). Eargle's The Microphone Book: From Mono to Stereo to Surround – A Guide to Microphone Design and Application. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781136118135.
- ^ a b Sena, E. De; Hacihabiboglu, H.; Cvetkovic, Z. (January 2012). "On the Design and Implementation of Higher Order Differential Microphones". IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing. 20 (1): 162–174. Bibcode:2012ITASL..20..162D. doi:10.1109/TASL.2011.2159204. hdl:11511/30509. S2CID 206602089.
- ^ a b Benesty, Jacob; Jingdong, Chen (October 23, 2012). Study and Design of Differential Microphone Arrays. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9783642337529.
- ^ Berners, Dave (December 2005). "Ask the Doctors: The Physics of Mid-Side (MS) Miking". Universal Audio WebZine. Universal Audio. Retrieved July 30, 2013.
- ^ "Directional Patterns of Microphones". Retrieved July 30, 2013.
- ^ Wong, Kainam; Nnonyelu, Chibuzo; Wu, Yue (February 2018). "A Triad of Cardioid Sensors in Orthogonal Orientation and Spatial Collocation – Its Spatial-Matched-Filter-Type Beam-Pattern". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 66 (4): 895–906. Bibcode:2018ITSP...66..895W. doi:10.1109/TSP.2017.2773419. S2CID 3298960.
- ^ Nnonyelu, Chibuzo; Wong, Kainam; Wu, Yue (January 2019). "Cardioid microphones/hydrophones in a collocated and orthogonal triad—A steerable beamformer with no beam-pointing error". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 145 (1): 575–588. Bibcode:2019ASAJ..145..575N. doi:10.1121/1.5087697. PMID 30710946. S2CID 73422758. Retrieved February 1, 2021.
- ^ Hawkins, Brian S.; Ferguson, Abby (May 30, 2023). "The Best Shotgun Mics". Popular Science. Recurrent Ventures. Retrieved September 15, 2025.
- ^ Parnell-Brookes, Jase; May, Tom (August 18, 2025). "The Best Shotgun Mics for Isolating Your Audio in 2025". Digital Camera World. Future US. Retrieved September 15, 2025.
- ^ McAllister, Max (January 28, 2023). "The 5 Best Shotgun Microphones for Your Home Studio". ProduceLikeAPro.com. Produce Like a Pro Academy. Retrieved September 15, 2025.
- ^ US 4361736, Long, Edward M. & Wickersham, Ronald J., "Pressure recording process and device", published November 30, 1982
- ^ "The Crown Differoid Microphone" (PDF). Crown Audio. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 10, 2012.
- ^ Multimedia Systems – Guide to the Recommended Characteristics of Analogue Interfaces to Achieve Interoperability (Technical report). IEC. 61938:2013. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
- ^ a b c "Should I Match Impedances of My Microphone to My Mixer?". Shure Service & Repair. Shure. May 23, 2022. Retrieved June 27, 2022.
- ^ Robertson, A. E.: "Microphones" Illiffe Press for BBC, 1951–1963
- ^ Eargle, John; Foreman, Chris (2002). Audio Engineering for Sound Reinforcement. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard Corporation. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-634-04355-0.
- ^ Sound System Equipment – Part 4: Microphones (Technical report). IEC. September 12, 2018. 60268-4:2018. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
- ^ IEC Standard 61672 and ANSI S1.4
- ^ IEC 61094
- ^ "Joerg Wuttke – Microphones and Wind". FilmeBase.pt. Retrieved June 3, 2024.
- ^ "Rycote Cyclone". Rycote.com. Retrieved June 3, 2024.
Further reading
[edit]- Corbett, Ian. Mic It!: Microphones, Microphone Techniques, and Their Impact on the Final Mix. CRC Press, 2014.
- White, Paul. Using Microphone Polar Patterns Effectively. Sound on Sound, SOS Publications Group, 2007.
- Eargle, John. The Microphone Book. Taylor & Francis, 2004.
- "The Invention of the Microphone". Scientific American. July 13, 1878. p. 16.
External links
[edit]Microphone
View on GrokipediaHistory
Early Developments
The phonautograph, invented by French typographer and inventor Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville in 1857, represented the earliest known device for capturing sound, though it functioned mechanically rather than electrically by visualizing acoustic waves as graphical traces on soot-covered paper using a vibrating diaphragm and stylus.[15][16] This non-reproducible recording tool laid foundational concepts for sound transduction but did not enable playback or electrical transmission.[17] In 1876, Alexander Graham Bell developed a liquid transmitter for his early telephone experiments, where sound vibrations moved acidified water in a container to vary electrical resistance between electrodes, marking an initial step toward electrical sound signaling.[18][19] The following year, 1877, saw the independent invention of the carbon microphone by British-American inventor David Edward Hughes, who demonstrated a device using loose carbon contacts to modulate electrical current based on diaphragm vibrations, significantly improving telephone sensitivity.[20][21] Concurrently, German-American inventor Emile Berliner patented a loose-contact carbon transmitter in 1877, employing a carbon rod that varied resistance under diaphragm pressure to convert sound into electrical signals, which became integral to early telephony systems.[22][23] By 1878, American inventor Thomas Edison refined the carbon microphone for practical telephone use, incorporating a chamber of carbon granules that compressed and altered electrical resistance in response to diaphragm vibrations, enabling clearer voice transmission over distances.[24][25] That same year, Francis Blake introduced the carbon button microphone, featuring a dense carbon disc pressed against a platinum point by the diaphragm to achieve stable resistance variation, which the Bell Telephone Company adopted for its reliability in commercial lines.[26][27] These early carbon-based microphones, while revolutionary for telephony, suffered from inherent limitations including high inherent noise from granule friction producing a persistent hiss, low fidelity due to restricted frequency response that distorted higher audio tones, and susceptibility to humidity which caused carbon particles to clump and degrade performance.[28][29][30]20th Century Innovations
The 20th century marked a pivotal era in microphone technology, transitioning from rudimentary carbon-based designs to sophisticated high-fidelity transducers that enabled precise acoustic capture for radio broadcasting and sound recording. Early in the century, the invention of the condenser microphone by Edward C. Wente at Bell Laboratories in 1916 revolutionized audio transduction through the principle of variable capacitance, where sound waves vibrate a thin diaphragm relative to a fixed backplate, altering the capacitance to generate an electrical signal.[31] This design offered superior sensitivity and frequency response compared to carbon microphones, which had served as precursors in telephone and early recording applications.[32] Building on electromagnetic principles, the moving-coil dynamic microphone saw practical refinement in the 1920s, with its foundational patent originating from Ernst Werner von Siemens in 1877, though widespread adoption followed advancements in permanent magnets and amplifiers. Siemens's concept involved a coil attached to a diaphragm moving within a magnetic field to induce voltage, providing durability for live and broadcast use. By the 1930s, Shure Brothers commercialized robust models like the Model 33N, making high-quality dynamic microphones accessible for professional applications.[33][34] A significant leap came with the ribbon microphone, introduced by Harry F. Olson at RCA in 1931, featuring a thin, corrugated aluminum ribbon suspended in a magnetic field that vibrated to produce a velocity-sensitive output with natural warmth and low noise. The RCA PB-31, Olson's early prototype, set standards for bidirectional patterns and was instrumental in capturing orchestral and vocal nuances.[35] These innovations fueled the 1920s adoption of microphones in radio broadcasting, where condenser and dynamic models replaced acoustic horns, enabling clear transmission of speech and music from studios like those of Westinghouse and NBC.[36] Post-World War II advancements further enhanced versatility and performance. The Neumann U 47, released in 1947, was the first commercially successful switchable-pattern condenser microphone, allowing selection between cardioid and omnidirectional modes via a dual-diaphragm capsule and tube amplification, which became a staple in studios for its balanced tonal response.[37] In 1962, James E. West and Gerhard M. Sessler at Bell Laboratories invented the electret condenser microphone, incorporating a permanently charged electret material in the diaphragm to eliminate the need for external bias voltage, thus simplifying design and reducing costs for portable and consumer applications.[38] The 1950s emergence of stereo recording techniques, such as the Decca Tree configuration using three omnidirectional microphones for spacious imaging, integrated these high-fidelity mics to capture immersive soundscapes.[39] These developments profoundly influenced music recording, particularly in jazz and rock genres. In jazz, close-miking with ribbon and condenser microphones, as pioneered in Rudy Van Gelder's sessions during the 1950s and 1960s, allowed intimate capture of improvisational dynamics and ensemble textures, emphasizing subtle nuances in artists like John Coltrane.[40] For rock, dynamic microphones facilitated aggressive close-miking of amplified instruments, enabling the raw energy of guitar cabinets and drums in multitrack recordings from the 1950s onward, as exemplified by the Shure SM57's role in capturing high-SPL sources without distortion.[41] Overall, 20th-century microphone innovations shifted the focus toward studio-quality fidelity, transforming broadcasting into a mass medium and recording into an art form of sonic precision.Modern Advancements
The advent of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) microphones marked a pivotal shift in microphone technology starting in the early 2000s, enabling unprecedented miniaturization and cost-efficiency for consumer electronics. The first commercialized MEMS microphones were introduced by Knowles in 2002, featuring silicon-based diaphragms that replaced traditional electret materials, allowing for smaller form factors and integration into multi-mic arrays.[42] This innovation facilitated the embedding of tiny, low-cost microphone arrays in smartphones, where multiple units could capture spatial audio while maintaining high sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) above 60 dB. By leveraging semiconductor fabrication processes, MEMS designs reduced manufacturing costs by up to 50% compared to conventional microphones, spurring their widespread adoption in portable devices.[43] Parallel to this, the development of digital microphones with integrated analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) emerged in the 2000s, streamlining audio processing by outputting direct digital signals. Knowles pioneered the pulse-density modulation (PDM) interface during this period, which combined the MEMS sensor with an on-chip sigma-delta ADC to produce a single-bit digital stream, minimizing external circuitry needs and power consumption to under 1 mW. This integration proved essential for battery-constrained applications, enabling seamless connectivity in devices like wireless earbuds and smartwatches. In the 2010s, MEMS microphones proliferated in Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems, with shipments exceeding 4 billion units annually by mid-decade, supporting voice-enabled sensors in smart homes and wearables.[43] Advancements in microphone arrays advanced further with beamforming techniques for far-field voice capture, particularly in smart assistants launched post-2014. Amazon's Echo device utilized a seven-microphone circular array employing acoustic beamforming to focus on user voices up to 3 meters away, suppressing noise and reverberation through phase-aligned signal processing for improved directionality and SNR gains of 10-15 dB.[44] Recent innovations in the 2020s have addressed sustainability and autonomy challenges. Research into self-powered microphones via acoustic energy harvesting, using piezoelectric nanogenerators to convert sound waves into electricity, has yielded prototypes generating up to 10 μW/cm², eliminating batteries for low-power IoT nodes.[45] AI-enhanced noise cancellation, as in Shure's MV7+ model with real-time DSP denoiser, reduces ambient interference by adaptively filtering non-speech signals, achieving up to 20 dB noise reduction without hardware changes.[46] Sustainable manufacturing efforts include PFAS-free membranes, replacing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances with biodegradable alternatives to minimize environmental impact during production.[47] Key challenges in these advancements include extending battery life in wireless systems and safeguarding privacy in always-on arrays. Wireless microphones often face rapid drain, with transmitters consuming 50-100 mA during operation, prompting solutions like low-power protocols that extend runtime to 8-12 hours via efficient modulation.[48] Privacy concerns arise from continuous listening in mic arrays, where unintended data capture risks unauthorized transmission; mitigation strategies involve local processing and user-configurable muting to limit cloud uploads.[49] By 2025, emerging wireless lavalier systems are aligning with low-latency standards for enhanced connectivity, supporting applications in immersive audio environments.[50]Principles of Operation
Acoustic-to-Electrical Transduction
Microphones convert sound waves, which are variations in air pressure propagating through a medium, into electrical signals through a process known as acoustic-to-electrical transduction.[51] These pressure waves, typically ranging from 20 μPa to over 100 Pa in amplitude for audible sounds, impinge on a thin, flexible diaphragm within the microphone capsule, causing it to vibrate in sympathy with the incident acoustic energy.[51] The diaphragm's displacement is proportional to the sound pressure, with sensitivity determined by its material properties and design, enabling the capture of frequencies from approximately 20 Hz to 20 kHz relevant to human hearing.[52] The core transduction mechanism relies on the mechanical motion of the diaphragm to generate an electrical output via various physical principles, such as electromagnetic induction, electrostatic capacitance variation, or piezoelectric effects.[51] In general, the process unfolds in sequential stages: acoustic input as pressure waves induces mechanical displacement of the diaphragm; this motion then modulates an associated generating element to produce a proportional electrical signal; finally, the low-level output is often amplified to line level for practical use in recording or transmission systems.[51] The sound pressure level (SPL), a logarithmic measure of acoustic intensity, quantifies this input using the formula where is the root-mean-square sound pressure in pascals and is the standard reference pressure corresponding to the threshold of human hearing at 1 kHz.[53] Fidelity in transduction, or the accuracy of the electrical signal in representing the original sound, is influenced by diaphragm characteristics, including its mass and stiffness, which determine the system's resonance frequency.[54] The natural resonance frequency of the diaphragm, modeled as a simple harmonic oscillator, is given by where is the effective mass of the diaphragm and is its stiffness.[55] Lower mass reduces inertia for faster response to high frequencies but may increase susceptibility to noise, while optimal stiffness tunes the resonance above the audible range (typically 5–10 kHz for condenser designs) to minimize coloration and ensure flat frequency response.[56] These factors collectively ensure high signal-to-noise ratios and low distortion, critical for applications from studio recording to scientific measurement.[51]Key Physical Mechanisms
The key physical mechanisms underlying microphone transduction convert acoustic pressure variations into electrical signals through distinct principles, primarily electromagnetic, electrostatic, piezoelectric, and resistive effects.[57] These mechanisms exploit the motion or deformation of a diaphragm in response to sound waves, generating measurable electrical changes that represent the audio signal.[57] In electromagnetic induction, as applied to certain dynamic transducers, the diaphragm's motion drives a coil or conductor through a magnetic field, inducing a voltage according to Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction.[57] The induced electromotive force is given by where is the number of turns in the coil, and is the rate of change of magnetic flux due to the conductor's velocity in the field.[58] This voltage is directly proportional to the speed of diaphragm motion, which correlates with sound pressure amplitude and frequency.[57] Electrostatic capacitance variation forms the basis for condenser transducers, where the diaphragm and a fixed backplate form the plates of a parallel-plate capacitor.[57] Sound-induced displacement of the diaphragm alters the spacing between plates, changing the capacitance according to with as the permittivity of the medium and as the plate area.[59] For a constant charge on the capacitor, this capacitance change modulates the voltage , which is then buffered by an impedance converter to produce the output signal.[57] The piezoelectric effect in relevant transducers arises from the direct generation of electric charge in certain crystalline materials under mechanical stress from the diaphragm.[60] The resulting voltage across the material is expressed as where is the piezoelectric voltage constant, is the material thickness, and is the applied stress.[60] This voltage directly reflects the stress magnitude, enabling conversion of acoustic pressure into an electrical output without requiring an external magnetic field or varying capacitance.[60] Resistive variation occurs in carbon-based transducers, where sound pressure compresses a bed of carbon granules between conductive plates, altering the effective resistance of the granule mass.[61] The resistance follows the relation with as resistivity, as the effective length, and as the cross-sectional area; compression reduces or while potentially changing , yielding a that modulates current in a biased circuit.[62] This change in resistance produces a varying electrical signal proportional to the sound wave's pressure variations.[61] Across these mechanisms, fundamental trade-offs influence design choices, such as balancing sensitivity—often enhanced by thinner diaphragms or larger areas—against ruggedness, as thinner structures are more prone to damage from mechanical shock.[63] Frequency response is similarly constrained by mechanical resonance, where the diaphragm's natural frequency limits the usable bandwidth to roughly one-third of the resonance frequency to avoid distortion, with stiffer materials raising resonance but potentially reducing sensitivity.[63] In modern micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) implementations, scaling reduces size while preserving these principles, though it amplifies trade-offs in noise and resonance control.[64]Components
Capsule and Diaphragm
The capsule functions as the core transducer housing in a microphone, enclosing the diaphragm along with a backplate in condenser designs and acoustic ports that enable sound waves to interact with the internal components while managing pressure differentials.[65][66] This sealed or semi-sealed structure protects the delicate elements inside and shapes the microphone's overall acoustic behavior by controlling how sound enters and propagates within.[54] At the heart of the capsule lies the diaphragm, a lightweight membrane engineered to vibrate in response to acoustic pressure variations, typically constructed from materials like Mylar (a biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate film), gold-sputtered plastic, or thin aluminum foil to balance sensitivity and rigidity.[67][9] These diaphragms are extraordinarily thin, with thicknesses generally ranging from 2 to 10 micrometers, allowing for high sensitivity to subtle sound pressures while minimizing inertial effects that could distort higher frequencies.[68] Diaphragm shapes are selected based on the desired acoustic properties: circular forms predominate in omnidirectional capsules for uniform pressure response across all directions, whereas ribbon microphones employ elongated, corrugated aluminum strips—often described as slotted or pleated—to enhance flexibility and directionality.[54][69] Tensioning the diaphragm is a critical manufacturing step, stretching it taut to elevate its resonant frequency beyond the audible range, thereby ensuring a flat frequency response and consistent performance.[54][70] Acoustic design within the capsule optimizes sound capture through strategic elements like ports for pressure equalization, which prevent static imbalances and act as acoustic low-pass filters to attenuate infrasonic noise.[71] In some configurations, rear ports or labyrinthine chambers facilitate phase differences for directional control, while damping materials—such as fine meshes or compliant foams—are integrated to suppress unwanted resonances and achieve smoother amplitude characteristics.[66][54] Durability of the capsule and diaphragm hinges on careful material selection and engineering to withstand mechanical and environmental stresses.[65] Tension must be precisely controlled to avoid fatigue-induced stretching or tearing over time, particularly in thinner foils prone to work hardening.[70] Polymer diaphragms like Mylar exhibit vulnerability to humidity, which can cause swelling, altered tension, and sensitivity shifts, necessitating protective storage with desiccants in moist conditions.[72][73] Aluminum options offer better resistance to corrosion but require passivation to mitigate oxidation.[74] Overall, these factors ensure long-term reliability in professional applications.Electronics and Housing
The electronics within a microphone primarily consist of preamplifiers and impedance converters that condition the weak signal generated by the transducer for transmission over cables. In condenser microphones, a field-effect transistor (FET) serves as the impedance converter, transforming the high-impedance output of the capacitor capsule—typically in the megaohm range—into a low-impedance signal suitable for matching with preamplifier inputs, thereby minimizing signal loss and noise.[75][76] This FET stage provides high input impedance to the capsule while delivering a low output impedance, often around 50–200 ohms, ensuring efficient current flow and compatibility with professional audio lines.[77] Microphone circuits often incorporate transformer-balanced outputs to facilitate long cable runs without degradation from electromagnetic interference, as the transformer isolates the signal lines and maintains balance between the hot and cold conductors.[75] Active electronics, powered via phantom schemes such as the AES-standard 48 V DC supplied over balanced lines, enable low-noise amplification in condenser and electret models, supporting output levels up to -10 dBu or higher for professional use.[78][79] The XLR connector, per AES14-1992, standardizes balanced audio with pin 1 as ground/shield, pin 2 as hot (positive signal), and pin 3 as cold (negative signal), rejecting common-mode noise in cable lengths exceeding 100 meters.[80][81] Housing materials are selected to balance durability, weight, and electromagnetic protection; metal enclosures, such as die-cast zinc or brass, provide effective RF shielding by attenuating interference signals above 1 MHz, essential for maintaining signal integrity in broadcast environments.[82] In contrast, lightweight plastic housings, often reinforced with conductive coatings, are favored for portable applications like lavalier or handheld wireless microphones, reducing overall weight to under 100 grams while offering sufficient mechanical protection without compromising mobility.[83] To mitigate handling noise, microphones employ shock mounts and suspensions that utilize viscoelastic materials for isolation, where elastic bands or lyre structures absorb mechanical vibrations through energy dissipation in deformable polymers, attenuating low-frequency rumble by up to 20–30 dB.[84] These systems decouple the microphone body from mounts or stands, preventing structure-borne noise from transmitting to the capsule during operation or transport.[85]Types by Transducer Principle
Dynamic Microphones
Dynamic microphones operate on the principle of electromagnetic induction, where sound waves cause a mechanical element to move within a magnetic field, generating an electrical signal.[1] The most common type is the moving-coil dynamic microphone, featuring a lightweight diaphragm attached to a voice coil suspended in the gap of a permanent magnet.[86] Sound pressure causes the diaphragm to vibrate, moving the coil through the magnetic field and inducing a voltage proportional to the velocity of motion via Faraday's law.[61] This design, often housed in a rugged metal body, converts acoustic energy directly into electrical output without requiring external power.[87] A variant of the dynamic microphone is the ribbon type, which uses a thin corrugated metal strip, typically 2-5 micrometers thick, suspended freely between the poles of a strong magnet.[88] The ribbon acts as both diaphragm and conductor, vibrating in response to sound waves to generate voltage through its motion in the magnetic field, offering higher sensitivity than moving-coil designs but with greater fragility due to the delicate ribbon element.[89] Dynamic microphones are prized for their durability and ability to handle high sound pressure levels up to 150 dB without distortion, making them suitable for demanding environments, though they exhibit lower sensitivity around -50 dB re 1 V/Pa compared to other types.[90] They require no phantom power, enhancing reliability in live settings, and typically provide a frequency response of 50 Hz to 15 kHz, adequate for most vocal and instrumental applications.[91] These microphones are widely used for capturing vocals and drums in live performances and studio recordings, where their robustness withstands close-miking of loud sources.[92] Dynamic microphones vary in their response mechanisms: traditional moving-coil models often function as pressure microphones, sensitive to absolute sound pressure, while ribbon variants and certain pressure-gradient designs respond to the difference in pressure between the front and rear of the diaphragm, akin to velocity microphones.[93] This distinction influences their suitability for different acoustic scenarios, with velocity types like ribbons providing a more directional output.[94]Condenser Microphones
Condenser microphones, also known as capacitor or electrostatic microphones, operate through a structure in which a lightweight diaphragm serves as one plate of a capacitor, paired with a fixed rigid backplate as the other. The diaphragm is electrically charged, and incident sound waves cause it to vibrate, altering the spacing between the plates and thereby modulating the capacitance to produce an AC electrical signal representative of the acoustic pressure. This process draws on the basic physics of parallel-plate capacitors, where capacitance varies inversely with plate separation.[8][95] Subtypes of condenser microphones differ primarily in their biasing mechanisms to maintain the necessary voltage across the capacitor plates. DC-biased, or true condenser, models rely on an external DC polarization voltage, commonly provided through 48 V phantom power, to charge the capsule externally for precise control and high performance. RF-biased variants use a high-frequency radio-frequency carrier signal superimposed on the audio, which demodulates the capacitance variations to yield a low-noise output suitable for specialized low-impedance applications. Electret condensers incorporate a permanent electrostatic charge embedded in a electret material, typically a thin foil integrated into the diaphragm or backplate, allowing self-biasing without external power for the capsule itself.[96][97] These microphones excel in high-fidelity applications due to their typical sensitivity of around -40 dB re 1 V/Pa, which allows capture of fine details in acoustic signals. They provide a broad frequency bandwidth, generally spanning 20 Hz to 20 kHz, ensuring accurate reproduction of the full audible spectrum. Low inherent self-noise, often 10-20 dBA, further enhances their suitability for recording quiet sources with minimal added hiss.[98][99][100] Valve, or tube, condenser microphones integrate vacuum tube amplification directly in the microphone body, typically employing a triode such as the 12AX7 for impedance matching and signal boosting. The tube circuitry introduces subtle harmonic distortion and saturation, contributing to a warm, euphonic tonal quality that softens transients and enriches midrange presence, a characteristic prized in vintage studio environments from the 1940s to 1960s.[101][102] Condenser microphones necessitate external power to polarize the capsule and drive the electronics, distinguishing them from passive designs. They exhibit sensitivity to environmental humidity, where elevated moisture levels can condense on the diaphragm, altering its tension or causing electrical issues that degrade performance. Maximum sound pressure level handling is typically 120-140 dB SPL, often augmented by built-in attenuation pads to prevent distortion in louder scenarios.[95][103][104]Ribbon Microphones
Ribbon microphones represent a distinct subcategory of dynamic microphones, utilizing a lightweight, corrugated ribbon as the primary transducer element rather than a voice coil attached to a diaphragm. The ribbon, commonly constructed from thin aluminum foil approximately 1.5 to 5 microns thick, is suspended taut between the poles of strong permanent magnets, forming a narrow gap where it is exposed to a uniform magnetic field.[88][105][106] Sound waves striking the ribbon cause it to oscillate, generating voltage through electromagnetic induction as the conductive material moves perpendicular to the magnetic flux; this velocity-sensitive mechanism produces an output signal directly proportional to the particle velocity of the air rather than pressure, contributing to their characteristic bidirectional response.[107][108] By nature, this configuration yields an inherent figure-8 polar pattern, with equal sensitivity to sounds arriving from the front and rear while rejecting those from the sides.[105] The ribbon's exceptionally low mass—typically 1 to 2 milligrams—enables superior transient response compared to heavier moving-coil dynamics, allowing precise capture of rapid sound pressure changes without inertia-induced smearing.[107][109] In the late 1990s and early 2000s, manufacturers like Royer Labs pioneered modern updates to overcome historical limitations, incorporating thinner aluminum ribbons (such as 2.5-micron elements) for enhanced durability and frequency extension, alongside active electronics powered by phantom voltage to boost output without compromising the passive core.[110][111] Protective grilles and windscreen-compatible designs were also refined to mitigate damage from air blasts or handling, extending their viability in professional environments.[112][113] These microphones deliver a signature "velvety" sonic profile through a gentle high-frequency roll-off above 10-15 kHz, emphasizing midrange warmth and natural timbre that suits close-miking of brass, strings, and guitar amplifiers while reducing harshness in transients.[105][114] However, their low sensitivity—often around -60 dB re 1 V/Pa—demands clean, high-gain preamplification to avoid noise, and the ribbon's fragility renders them vulnerable to wind, plosives, and mechanical shock, potentially causing tears or impedance shifts if mishandled.[115][116][117] After fading from prominence in the mid-20th century due to durability concerns and the rise of more robust alternatives, ribbon microphones saw a significant revival starting in the 1990s, driven by boutique innovators like Royer Labs (founded 1998) and AEA Ribbons, who reintroduced handcrafted models with improved reliability for orchestral ensembles, vocal tracking, and electric guitar cabinet capture in studios.[112][118]Piezoelectric and Carbon Microphones
Carbon microphones operate on a resistive principle where sound waves cause a diaphragm to compress carbon granules packed between two electrodes, varying the electrical resistance in the circuit and modulating the current from a battery or power source. This simple design made them inexpensive and robust for early communication devices. They were widely used in telephone handsets during the 1920s, providing sufficient signal levels without amplification before vacuum tube technology became common. However, carbon microphones suffer from high electrical noise due to granule movement and inconsistent contact, limiting their suitability for high-fidelity applications. The frequency response of carbon microphones is typically narrow, ranging from approximately 300 Hz to 3000 Hz, which aligns with voice telephony needs but excludes low bass and high treble frequencies. Despite these drawbacks, their advantages include low cost, no requirement for external power beyond a simple DC source, and mechanical durability, making them ideal for rugged, portable use in early 20th-century telephony. In modern contexts, carbon microphones are primarily employed in the restoration of vintage audio equipment, where enthusiasts recreate their characteristic lo-fi, noisy sound for historical recordings or novelty effects. Piezoelectric microphones, also known as crystal microphones, generate voltage through the deformation of piezoelectric crystals, such as Rochelle salt or quartz, when sound pressure flexes an attached diaphragm. This direct conversion of mechanical stress to electrical charge occurs without moving coils or external power, relying on the material's inherent properties. They are particularly suited for contact applications, where the microphone is attached directly to a vibrating surface, such as in acoustic guitar pickups that capture string and body resonances for amplification. The output charge in a piezoelectric microphone is given by the equation where is the piezoelectric charge constant (in coulombs per newton) and is the applied force from acoustic pressure. Advantages of piezoelectric microphones include their passive operation—no batteries or magnets required—compact size, and high sensitivity to vibrations, making them rugged for instrument use. However, they exhibit poor frequency response with peaks at mechanical resonances, high output impedance that demands specialized preamplification, and distortion at higher sound levels, rendering them unsuitable for precise studio recording. Contemporary applications of piezoelectric microphones emphasize their low-cost and durable nature, such as in budget contact lavalier microphones for field recording or as transducers in hydrophones for underwater sound capture, where their ability to withstand pressure variations is beneficial.Exotic Transducer Types
Fiber-optic microphones function by modulating light intensity through the vibration of a diaphragm that serves as a reflective surface. In these devices, sound waves cause the diaphragm to vibrate, altering the coupling of light between input and output optical fibers, thereby producing an intensity-modulated signal proportional to the acoustic pressure.[119] Early designs from the 1990s utilized a mirrored membrane to deflect the beam and influence waveguide coupling, achieving flat frequency responses across the audio range with noise-equivalent pressure levels around 38 dB(A).[120] Contemporary applications leverage this principle in electromagnetic interference (EMI)-immune environments, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, where a fiber-optic vibrometer detects minute vibrations—down to 8 pm peak displacement at audible frequencies—by measuring changes in light intensity obstructed by the vibrating element.[121] Optical fiber separation ensures complete immunity to radiofrequency interference (RFI), making these microphones ideal for high-field medical settings.[122] Laser-based microphones, often implemented as laser Doppler vibrometers, enable non-contact measurement of diaphragm vibrations by detecting the Doppler shift in reflected laser light. The frequency shift is calculated as , where is the surface velocity, is the laser's incident frequency, and is the speed of light; this shift arises from interference between the reference and Doppler-shifted beams.[123] Such systems characterize microphone performance by scanning the diaphragm to map velocity amplitudes and frequencies, offering lower uncertainty in sensitivity calibration compared to traditional methods, with repeatable results from central diaphragm regions.[124] This non-intrusive approach suits delicate or remote acoustic testing, extending to broadband analysis from DC to over 6 GHz with femtometer resolution. Liquid microphones rely on fluid displacement to transduce acoustic pressure into electrical signals, particularly suited for high-pressure environments like underwater applications. In these designs, sound-induced movement of a rod or membrane displaces conductive liquid—such as acidulated water or mercury—altering electrical resistance or capacitance to generate the output.[125] Mercury-based variants provide robust sensing for extreme pressures exceeding 30,000 psi due to the fluid's high density and compressibility resistance, finding use in specialized hydrophones for oceanic monitoring where traditional diaphragms would fail.[126] Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) microphones feature silicon diaphragms etched using photolithography processes, forming a capacitive structure that converts sound pressure into electrical signals. The diaphragm, typically 1-2 μm thick, vibrates relative to a fixed backplate, with integrated application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) providing amplification and signal conditioning on a single chip for compact packaging.[127] By 2025, MEMS technology dominates consumer audio, achieving over 90% penetration in mid-to-high-end smartphones due to their small size, reliability, and performance matching electret condensers.[128] Emerging trends include multi-axis sensing capabilities in wearables, where integrated MEMS arrays support voice pick-up, noise cancellation, and motion-compensated audio for applications like bone-conduction headsets and AI-driven health monitoring.[129] Plasma microphones exploit ionized air as the transducing medium, inverting the principle of plasma tweeters by detecting acoustic-induced variations in plasma arc current. A high-voltage discharge creates the plasma, and sound waves modulate the ionized gas density, causing fluctuations in the discharge current that correspond to pressure levels up to 145 dB SPL (355 Pa).[130] Early experiments in the 1960s explored such arcs for high sound pressure level (SPL) detection, though noise from the discharge limited adoption; niche uses persist in sirens and extreme acoustic environments where diaphragm-free operation enables ultra-high SPL tolerance.[131] Overall, exotic types like optical and MEMS variants offer key advantages, including EMI immunity for fiber-optic designs in shielded settings and extreme miniaturization for MEMS in portable devices.[132]Directional Characteristics
Polar Pattern Fundamentals
Microphone directivity arises primarily from phase differences in sound waves arriving at different points on or within the microphone capsule, leading to constructive or destructive interference that varies with the angle of incidence. In omnidirectional microphones, the capsule is small relative to the sound wavelength, resulting in nearly uniform pressure across the diaphragm and no significant phase variation, yielding equal sensitivity from all directions. Directional patterns emerge when these phase differences are exploited, either through the microphone's inherent design or by combining responses from multiple sensing elements.[133] Polar plots illustrate microphone sensitivity as a function of angle θ relative to the principal axis, typically in decibels (dB) on a circular graph spanning 360 degrees. An omnidirectional pattern appears as a circle with 0 dB variation across all θ, indicating isotropic response. In contrast, directional patterns show lobes and nulls; for example, a figure-of-eight pattern has maximum sensitivity at θ = 0° and 180° (front and rear) with a null at θ = 90° (sides). These plots are frequency-dependent, often shown at mid-frequencies like 1 kHz for standardization.[133][134] Pressure microphones, such as typical condenser or dynamic types with a single-sided diaphragm, respond to the scalar sound pressure P, which has no inherent directionality and thus produces an omnidirectional pattern. Velocity or pressure-gradient microphones, like ribbon designs, sense the particle velocity or the spatial gradient of pressure (∂P/∂x), which for a plane wave is proportional to P cos θ, introducing directionality since the gradient points along the propagation direction. The figure-of-eight pattern of a pure pressure-gradient microphone reflects this cosine dependence, with sensitivity dropping to zero at θ = 90°.[133] A cardioid pattern, common in many practical microphones, results from combining omnidirectional (pressure) and bidirectional (gradient) responses, often with front-back cancellation to reject rear-incident sound. The normalized response for an ideal low-frequency cardioid is given by: This equation yields maximum sensitivity (2) at θ = 0° and a null (0) at θ = 180°, creating a heart-shaped polar plot. The combination achieves this by adding the omni signal to the gradient signal, where the gradient's cos θ term reinforces the front while canceling the rear.[134][133] Key factors influencing these patterns include the ratio of sound wavelength λ to capsule spacing or size. For omnidirectional behavior, λ must greatly exceed the spacing (typically λ > 10 × spacing), ensuring negligible phase differences across the capsule; at higher frequencies where λ approaches the capsule diameter (e.g., >1 inch capsules distort above ~15 kHz), even pressure microphones exhibit increased directivity due to shadowing and diffraction. This wavelength dependence limits pattern uniformity across the audio spectrum, necessitating small capsules for broadband omnidirectionality.[133]Omnidirectional Patterns
Omnidirectional microphones, also known as pressure microphones, feature a single diaphragm exposed on one side to incoming sound waves while the rear side is enclosed in a sealed chamber, allowing the device to respond equally to sound pressure from all directions without phase cancellation effects.[135] A small vent in the housing ensures pressure equalization between the internal chamber and the external environment, preventing static pressure imbalances that could displace the diaphragm and distort measurements.[136] This design contrasts with unidirectional patterns, which rely on phase differences between front and rear sound arrivals to achieve directionality.[86] These microphones excel in capturing natural ambiance and provide a wide sweet spot due to their uniform sensitivity, resulting in smoother off-axis frequency responses and less coloration from room reflections compared to directional types.[86] However, their lack of directionality makes them highly sensitive to unwanted room reverb and external noise sources, limiting their use in reverberant or noisy environments.[86] Examples include measurement microphones like the DPA 4006, which maintain a flat frequency response from 10 Hz to 20 kHz, making them suitable as pressure-operated omnidirectional standards for acoustic calibration.[137] Key limitations involve the absence of proximity effect, which prevents bass boost from close sources, and heightened vulnerability to wind noise; windscreens are essential, offering over 20 dB attenuation at wind speeds of 10 m/s.[86][9][138] In applications such as ambient field recording and calibration standards, omnidirectional microphones provide comprehensive spatial sound capture without directional bias, ideal for immersive audio or acoustic testing where uniform pressure sensing is required.[139][140]Unidirectional Patterns
Unidirectional microphone patterns prioritize sensitivity to sound sources from the front while rejecting signals from the sides and rear, making them essential for isolating performers or instruments in environments with ambient noise or feedback risks. The cardioid pattern, the most common unidirectional type, features a single front-facing lobe shaped like an inverted heart, achieved through a rear port that introduces a phase delay to sound arriving from behind the diaphragm. This delay causes destructive interference for rearward signals, resulting in a polar response described by the formula , where is the angle of incidence relative to the microphone's front axis; at , sensitivity is maximum (1), dropping to 0.5 (6 dB down) at and null at .[61] Hypercardioid and supercardioid patterns are variants of the cardioid, offering narrower front lobes for greater directivity while introducing a small rear lobe that picks up some sound from behind. The hypercardioid has the tightest acceptance angle, approximately 105° for a 3 dB drop, providing deeper nulls at the sides but with rear sensitivity peaking around 110° off-axis, which demands precise aiming to avoid feedback.[141] In contrast, the supercardioid maintains an acceptance angle of about 115°, with its deepest rejection at 125° off-axis and less rear pickup than the hypercardioid, balancing isolation and ease of use in live settings.[141] These patterns enhance off-axis rejection compared to the omnidirectional baseline, typically attenuating signals by 6 dB or more at 90°, though performance varies with frequency due to the pattern's widening at lower frequencies.[142] The subcardioid, also known as wide cardioid, widens the front lobe beyond the standard cardioid to capture more ambient sound while retaining some rear rejection, positioning it between cardioid and omnidirectional patterns for applications needing natural room tone. Its acceptance angle exceeds that of the cardioid, often approaching 130° or more for a 3 dB drop, making it suitable for acoustic ensembles where full isolation is unnecessary.[143] All unidirectional patterns are realized through acoustic labyrinths—internal chambers with ports and baffles that impose phase shifts on rear-incident sound, combining pressure (omnidirectional) and pressure-gradient (figure-eight) responses in varying proportions.[144] A key advantage of unidirectional patterns is their off-axis rejection, which minimizes bleed from nearby sources; for instance, cardioid microphones typically exhibit about 6 dB attenuation at 90° off-axis, improving gain-before-feedback in stage use.[142] However, they introduce proximity effect, a low-frequency boost that intensifies as the source approaches within 0.6 m (2 feet), enhancing bass warmth for close-miked vocals but requiring distance management to avoid muddiness.[87] In multi-pattern microphones, such as dual-diaphragm condensers, switches allow selection among unidirectional variants like cardioid, supercardioid, hypercardioid, and subcardioid, enabling on-the-fly adjustments for varying isolation needs without changing equipment.[145]Bidirectional and Specialized Patterns
Bidirectional microphones, also known as figure-8 or bidirectional patterns, exhibit equal sensitivity to sound arriving from the front and rear while nulling signals from the sides at 90 degrees. This pattern arises from a velocity gradient principle, where the microphone responds to the difference in air particle velocity between two points, typically implemented in ribbon or condenser designs with front and rear ports.[146][133] In stereo recording, the figure-8 pattern is essential for techniques like Blumlein stereo, which employs two such microphones oriented at 90 degrees to capture a natural, immersive soundstage with coincident positioning. Similarly, in mid-side (MS) stereo, a figure-8 microphone serves as the "side" channel, oriented perpendicular to a forward-facing "mid" microphone, enabling post-production adjustment of stereo width while maintaining mono compatibility by deriving the center image solely from the mid signal. These applications leverage the pattern's symmetric dual lobes for spatial accuracy, though they require careful placement to avoid phase issues from off-axis room reflections.[146][147] Boundary microphones produce a hemispherical polar pattern when mounted on a flat surface, effectively doubling the sound pressure via the image principle, where reflections from the boundary reinforce direct sound, yielding a 6 dB sensitivity gain. This design minimizes comb-filtering artifacts from surface reflections, providing uniform coverage over a half-sphere above the mounting plane, ideal for capturing multiple talkers without discrete aiming. In conference settings, boundary microphones offer advantages such as low-profile installation for unobtrusive aesthetics and broad hemispherical pickup to cover table discussions, though they can inadvertently capture handling noise or vibrations from the surface and may be obscured by documents.[148] Shotgun microphones extend hypercardioid patterns using an interference tube—a slotted cylinder ahead of the capsule—that delays off-axis sound waves, causing destructive interference and lobed directivity for focused on-axis capture. This results in substantial off-axis rejection, often exceeding 20 dB at angles around 125 degrees, enhancing isolation in video production or broadcasting while narrowing the acceptance angle at higher frequencies. The tube's length influences the rejection bandwidth, with longer designs providing deeper nulls but increased susceptibility to wind noise.[149][150] Toroidal patterns, resembling a doughnut shape, emerge in line-array microphones for conferencing, where multiple elements steer coverage to prioritize horizontal table-level sound while attenuating vertical overhead noise like HVAC or echoes. Exemplified by the Shure MXA310, this pattern in array configurations excels in huddle rooms by rejecting non-participant audio, promoting clear remote collaboration, but demands digital processing for beamforming and may underperform in highly reverberant spaces without acoustic treatment.[151]Design and Construction
Capsule Geometry and Directivity
The geometry of a microphone capsule significantly influences its inherent directivity by interacting with incoming sound waves through diffraction and pressure gradients, independent of electronic processing or external acoustic modifications. Spherical capsules are particularly effective for omnidirectional patterns, as their symmetric shape minimizes diffraction artifacts and maintains a wide polar response across frequencies. In such designs, the spherical housing around a small pressure transducer results in a smooth pressure buildup on the capsule surface, starting above approximately 1 kHz, which enhances high-frequency response without introducing sharp peaks or dips commonly seen in less symmetric forms. This geometry yields a gentle rise of up to +6 dB in the free-field response at 0° incidence and supports a broad acceptance angle, making it ideal for capturing diffuse sound fields with natural reverberation.[152] In contrast, cylindrical capsule geometries approximate line-source behavior, promoting greater directivity along the axis perpendicular to the cylinder's length, which is useful for applications requiring focused pickup from extended sources like strings or ambient lines. The elongated shape creates asymmetric pressure distribution, with reduced sensitivity off the sides due to phase interference from the curved surface, enhancing axial directivity at mid-to-high frequencies compared to spherical forms. However, this can introduce more pronounced frequency-dependent variations, such as elevated response boosts up to 10 dB in certain directions, necessitating careful design to balance uniformity.[152] The size of the diaphragm relative to the sound wavelength plays a critical role in determining the frequency range over which an omnidirectional pattern remains effective. A larger diaphragm, such as one with a 1 cm diameter, maintains omnidirectionality well into lower frequencies (e.g., below 500 Hz) because the wavelength is much longer than the diaphragm size, resulting in uniform pressure across the surface (ka << 1, where k = 2π/λ). At higher frequencies, however, the same size leads to increased directivity due to acoustic shadowing and edge diffraction, where off-axis waves interfere destructively at the edges. Smaller diaphragms (e.g., under 0.5 cm) extend the omnidirectional range to higher frequencies by keeping ka small longer, reducing directionality onset and providing flatter off-axis response up to 10-15 kHz.[71] Acoustic shadowing from the capsule's edges further contributes to high-frequency directivity through diffraction effects, where sound waves bending around the boundary create pressure gradients. This phenomenon is quantified by the directivity index DI ≈ 10 \log_{10} \left(1 + \frac{(ka)^2}{2}\right), where k = 2\pi / \lambda is the wavenumber, a is the effective radius, and the approximation holds for moderate ka values typical in microphone capsules. For a 1 cm diameter capsule (a ≈ 0.5 cm), significant directivity (e.g., 3-6 dB gain on-axis) emerges above 5-10 kHz, as rear and side waves are shadowed, enhancing forward sensitivity while narrowing the polar pattern. Multi-capsule designs employing coincident placement—where diaphragms are aligned at the same acoustic center—enable versatile directivity patterns without introducing spatial phase issues from separation. By combining signals from two or more closely spaced capsules (e.g., one omnidirectional and one bidirectional), patterns like cardioid can be synthesized via simple addition or subtraction, preserving coherence across the spectrum. This approach avoids the comb-filtering artifacts of spaced arrays and allows seamless switching between omnidirectional, figure-8, and intermediate lobes in a single housing.[153] The choice of diaphragm materials and thickness impacts directivity preservation by minimizing mass loading effects that could alter acoustic compliance. Thin diaphragms (1-10 μm), often made from lightweight materials like Mylar or gold-sputtered polymers, reduce inertial mass, raising the resonant frequency above the audible range (typically >20 kHz) and ensuring uniform response without low-pass filtering from added mass. This preserves the intended directivity at high frequencies by avoiding resonance-induced distortions that could broaden or irregularize the polar pattern.[154]Phasing and Interference Tubes
Interference tubes, commonly employed in shotgun microphones, consist of a slotted cylindrical structure positioned in front of a directional transducer capsule to achieve heightened directivity via acoustic wave interference. On-axis sound waves propagate unimpeded along the tube's central axis to reach the capsule, whereas off-axis waves enter laterally through precisely spaced slots, incurring a path-length delay that induces destructive interference and attenuates their amplitude upon recombination at the capsule.[149][155] The tube's length is engineered to correspond to half the wavelength () of the intended operating frequencies, optimizing cancellation for those bands and thereby forming a lobed polar pattern with enhanced forward sensitivity.[156] Phasing plugs serve as porous or perforated barriers integrated into the rear ports of cardioid microphone capsules, facilitating a deliberate acoustic delay for sound entering from the back. This delay generates a frequency-dependent phase shift, expressed as , where denotes frequency and the time delay, enabling destructive interference that suppresses rearward sound while preserving frontal response.[157][158] The plug's material and porosity are calibrated to ensure the phase inversion approximates 180 degrees across the desired bandwidth, contributing to the characteristic heart-shaped polar pattern.[159] Grilles and slots incorporated into interference tubes and phasing structures inherently attenuate higher frequencies through mechanisms such as viscous drag within narrow apertures and diffraction at edges, which collectively shape the overall frequency response. Multi-slot configurations, with varying widths and spacings, extend this attenuation broadband to mitigate excessive high-frequency emphasis, promoting a more balanced directivity across the audio spectrum.[160][161] Despite their efficacy, phasing and interference tubes exhibit limitations rooted in their acoustic principles, including frequency-dependent lobing where on-axis sensitivity exhibits peaks at harmonics of the primary design frequency due to constructive reinforcement. Additionally, the elongated, slotted geometry renders these designs vulnerable to wind turbulence, which generates erratic pressure fluctuations and amplifies noise in outdoor environments.[149][162] These constraints often necessitate supplemental windshields or careful placement to maintain performance integrity.[163]Boundary and Stereo Configurations
Boundary microphones, also known as pressure zone microphones (PZM), utilize a design where the capsule is positioned extremely close to a flat, reflective surface such as a table or wall, creating a pressure zone that aligns direct and reflected sound waves in phase. This boundary effect doubles the sound pressure level, providing a 6 dB gain in sensitivity and producing a hemispherical pickup pattern with uniform response over the upper half-space.[164][165] The configuration minimizes phase interference and comb filtering, ensuring even coverage across a wide area, which makes boundary microphones particularly suitable for conference rooms and meetings where unobtrusive, low-profile placement on surfaces is essential for capturing multiple participants without visual distraction.[166][167] Stereo microphone configurations employ pairs of microphones to replicate spatial audio cues, enhancing immersion by capturing width, depth, and ambiance. The XY technique uses two coincident cardioid microphones angled at 90 degrees (typically ±45 degrees from the center), with capsules positioned as close as possible to avoid time differences and ensure mono compatibility. This setup delivers a stable, focused stereo image with good frontal resolution and reduced phase issues.[168] The ORTF technique, developed by the French broadcasting organization, positions two cardioid microphones 17 cm apart at a 110-degree angle, simulating human interaural time and level differences for a natural, wide stereo spread that balances direct sound and reverberation.[168] Spaced omnidirectional pairs, often separated by 20–60 cm or more depending on the source distance, emphasize ambiance and low-frequency response through intentional time delays, creating a spacious, enveloping sound ideal for orchestral or environmental recordings, though they may introduce a central "hole" in the image if spacing is excessive.[169] The Blumlein pair, a coincident technique using two figure-eight microphones crossed at 90 degrees, captures bidirectional sensitivity to produce a realistic horizontal soundstage with excellent localization and rear ambiance pickup. This configuration is mathematically equivalent to a mid-side (M/S) array where the "mid" is derived from the forward lobes and the "side" from the differing lateral responses; decoding yields the left (L) and right (R) channels via the formulas: where M is the mid signal and S is the side signal, often requiring a 3 dB adjustment to the side for level matching.[170][171] These stereo methods provide immersive audio by preserving spatial relationships, with applications in music production and broadcasting for lifelike reproduction.[140] Advancements in spatial audio have extended stereo principles to higher-order configurations, such as ambisonic microphone arrays for virtual reality (VR). These arrays, comprising multiple capsules arranged spherically or irregularly, encode full 3D sound fields into ambisonic coefficients, enabling six-degrees-of-freedom head tracking in VR environments; recent IEEE research has improved encoding accuracy for compact, wearable designs to enhance binaural reproduction fidelity.[172][173]Powering and Interfaces
Power Supply Methods
Microphones, particularly condenser and electret types, require external power to operate their active components, such as polarizing the diaphragm or powering internal amplifiers.[79] This power is supplied through various methods depending on the microphone design and application, ensuring compatibility with professional audio systems while minimizing interference with the audio signal. The most common method is phantom power, standardized under IEC 61938, which delivers +48 V DC through a balanced XLR cable on pins 2 and 3 relative to ground (pin 1), with a maximum current of 10 mA per microphone to support condenser capsules.[174] This voltage is applied equally to both audio lines via matched resistors, typically 6.81 kΩ, allowing the power to be "invisible" to balanced audio signals while providing stable operation for professional condenser microphones.[175] An older alternative, T-power (also known as A-B powering or Tonaderspeisung), supplies 12 V DC directly between the audio lines (pins 2 and 3) without a ground reference, originating as a European standard under DIN 45595 for remote powering of condenser microphones in broadcast settings.[176] Though largely obsolete due to incompatibility with phantom power systems, it persists in some film and location recording equipment where legacy compatibility is needed.[177] For electret condenser microphones, which use a permanently charged material, bias power provides a lower voltage of 1.5-10 V DC, often via plug-in power on 3.5 mm jacks, with common values like 2.5 V in camera or portable recorder applications to energize the JFET amplifier.[178] This method suits compact, low-power devices where full phantom power would be excessive. Wireless and self-powered microphones typically rely on internal batteries, such as AA or rechargeable lithium-ion cells, to drive transmitters and capsules independently of cable-based supplies, offering mobility in live sound and broadcasting. Some digital USB microphones draw 5 V from the host device's USB bus power, integrating amplification and conversion in a plug-and-play format for computer-based recording.[179] Emerging designs incorporate RF induction for wireless charging, extending operational time without frequent battery swaps.[180] Safety features, including current-limiting resistors in power supplies (e.g., 6.81 kΩ in phantom systems), prevent damage from short circuits or improper connections by restricting current flow to safe levels, protecting both microphones and connected equipment.Analog and Impedance Considerations
Microphones are typically designed with low output impedance, known as low-Z, ranging from 150 to 600 ohms, which facilitates long cable runs and reduces susceptibility to electromagnetic interference.[181] In contrast, high-Z microphones, with impedances exceeding 10 kΩ, are often used for direct instrument connections, such as guitars, but they are more prone to noise pickup over distance.[181] To minimize signal loss in these setups, a bridging configuration is employed where the input impedance of the preamplifier or mixer is at least 10 times greater than the microphone's output impedance, ensuring over 90% of the voltage is transferred.[182] Balanced analog connections are standard for professional microphones to reject common-mode noise, such as hum from power lines, through differential signaling. In this method, the audio signal is sent on two conductors with opposite polarity, and the receiving device subtracts one from the other, canceling noise that affects both lines equally while preserving the desired signal.[183] XLR connectors are predominantly used for microphone balanced lines due to their three-pin design (hot, cold, and ground) and robust construction, while TRS (tip-ring-sleeve) 1/4-inch jacks serve similar purposes for shorter runs or instrument inputs.[183] Loading effects occur when the input impedance of the receiving device interacts with the microphone's output impedance, potentially causing a voltage drop according to the voltage divider principle:where is the output voltage, is the microphone's open-circuit voltage, is the input impedance, and is the microphone's output impedance.[184] This drop becomes significant if the bridging ratio is not maintained, reducing signal level and potentially altering frequency response. Cable capacitance introduces a high-frequency roll-off in analog microphone signals, acting as a low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency given by:
where is the effective source impedance (typically the microphone or transformer output impedance) and is the cable's capacitance per unit length, often around 100 pF/m for standard microphone cables.[185] Longer cables exacerbate this effect, attenuating treble response, particularly with high-impedance sources. Ribbon microphones, known for their low output levels, incorporate step-up transformers to boost signal voltage and match impedance to standard low-Z lines, often using turns ratios around 1:37 to 1:40.[105] These transformers isolate the ribbon element and provide the necessary gain without active electronics. Phantom power compatibility must be considered in balanced analog setups, as it supplies DC bias without interfering with the audio signal path.[186]