Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Persecution
View on WikipediaThis article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2013) |

Persecution is the systematic mistreatment of an individual or group by another individual or group. The most common forms are religious persecution, racism, and political persecution, though there is naturally some overlap between these terms.[citation needed] The inflicting of suffering, harassment, imprisonment, internment, fear or pain are all factors that may establish persecution, but not all suffering will necessarily establish persecution. The threshold of severity has been a topic of much debate.[1]
International law
[edit]As part of the Nuremberg Principles, crimes against humanity are part of international law. Principle VI of the Nuremberg Principles states that
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:...
(c) Crimes against humanity:
- Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
Telford Taylor, who was Counsel for the Prosecution at the Nuremberg Trials wrote "[at] the Nuremberg war crimes trials, the tribunals rebuffed several efforts by the prosecution to bring such 'domestic' atrocities within the scope of international law as 'crimes against humanity".[2] Several subsequent international treaties incorporate this principle, but some have dropped the restriction "in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime" that is in Nuremberg Principles.
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which is binding on 111 states, defines crimes against humanity in Article 7.1. The article criminalizes certain acts "committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack". These include:
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender.[3]..or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph [e.g. murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, apartheid, and other inhumane acts] or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court
Religious
[edit]Religious persecution is the systematic mistreatment of an individual or group due to their religious affiliation. Not only theorists of secularization (who presume a decline of religiosity in general) would willingly assume that religious persecution is a thing of the past[citation needed]. However, with the rise of fundamentalism and religiously related terrorism, this assumption has become even more controversial[citation needed]. Indeed, in many countries of the world today, religious persecution is a Human Rights problem.
Atheists
[edit]Atheists have experienced persecution throughout their history. Persecution may refer to unwarranted arrest, imprisonment, beating, torture, or execution. It also may refer to the confiscation or destruction of property.
Baháʼís
[edit]The persecution of Baháʼís refers to the religious persecution of Baháʼís in various countries, especially in Iran,[4] which has the seventh largest Baháʼí population in the world, with just over 251,100 as of 2010.[5] The Baháʼí Faith originated in Iran, and it represents the largest religious minority in that country.
Buddhists
[edit]The persecution of Buddhists has been a widespread phenomenon throughout the history of Buddhism, a phenomenon which is continuing today. As early as the 3rd century AD, Buddhists were persecuted by Kirder, the Zoroastrian high priest of the Sasanian Empire. [citation needed]
Anti-Buddhist sentiment in Imperial China between the 5th and 10th century led to the Four Buddhist Persecutions in China of which the Great Anti-Buddhist Persecution of 845 was probably the most severe. However, Buddhism managed to survive in China, but it was greatly weakened. During the Northern Expedition, in 1926 in Guangxi, the Kuomintang Muslim General Bai Chongxi led his troops on a campaign to destroy Buddhist temples and smash idols, they turned the temples into schools and Kuomintang party headquarters.[6] During the Kuomintang Pacification of Qinghai, the Muslim General Ma Bufang and his army wiped out many Tibetan Buddhists in the northeast and eastern Qinghai, and destroyed Tibetan Buddhist temples.[7]
The Muslim invasion of the Indian subcontinent was the first great iconoclastic invasion of the Indian subcontinent.[8] According to William Johnston, hundreds of Buddhist monasteries and shrines were destroyed, Buddhist texts were burnt by the Muslim armies, monks and nuns were killed on the Indo-Gangetic Plain during the 12th and 13th centuries.[9] The Buddhist university of Nalanda was mistaken for a fort because of its walled campus. The Buddhist monks who had been slaughtered were mistaken for Brahmins according to Minhaj-i-Siraj.[10] The walled town, the Odantapuri monastery, was also destroyed by his forces. Sumpa based his account on that of Śākyaśribhadra who was at Magadha in 1200, states that the Buddhist university complexes of Odantapuri and Vikramshila were also destroyed and the monks were massacred.[11] Muslim forces attacked the north-western regions of the Indian subcontinent many times.[12] Many places were destroyed and renamed. For example, Odantapuri's monasteries were destroyed in 1197 by Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khilji and the town was renamed.[13] Likewise, Vikramashila was destroyed by the forces of Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khilji around 1200.[14] The sacred Mahabodhi Temple was almost completely destroyed by the Muslim invaders.[15][16] Many Buddhist monks fled to Nepal, Tibet, and South India to avoid the consequences of war.[17] Tibetan pilgrim Chöjepal (1179-1264), who arrived in India in 1234,[18] had to flee advancing Muslim troops multiple times, as they were sacking Buddhist sites.[19]
In Japan, the haibutsu kishaku during the Meiji Restoration (starting in 1868) was an event which was triggered by the official policy of separation of Shinto and Buddhism (or shinbutsu bunri). This policy caused great destruction to Buddhism in Japan, the destruction of Buddhist temples, images and texts took place on a large scale all over the country and Buddhist monks were forced to return to secular life.[citation needed]
During the 2012 Ramu violence in Bangladesh, a 25,000-strong Muslim mob set fire to at least five Buddhist temples and dozens of homes throughout the town and throughout the surrounding villages after they saw a picture of an allegedly desecrated Quran, which they claimed had been posted on Facebook by Uttam Barua, a local Buddhist man.[20][21]
Christians
[edit]
The persecution of Christians is religious persecution that Christians may be subjected to as a consequence of professing their faith, both historically and in the modern era. Early Christians were persecuted for their faith at the hands of both Jews from whose religion Christianity arose and the Roman Empire which controlled much of the land across which early Christianity was distributed. Early in the fourth century, the religion was legalized by the Edict of Milan, and it eventually became the State church of the Roman Empire.
Christian missionaries, as well as the people that they converted to Christianity, have been the target of persecution, many times to the point of being martyred for their faith.
There is also a history of individual Christian denominations suffering persecution at the hands of other Christians under the charge of heresy, particularly during the 16th century Protestant Reformation as well as throughout the Middle Ages when various Christian groups deemed heretical were persecuted by the Papacy.
In the 20th century, Christians have been persecuted by various groups, and by atheistic states such as the USSR and North Korea. During the Second World War members of many Christian churches were persecuted in Germany for resisting the Nazi ideology.
In more recent times the Christian missionary organization Open Doors (UK) estimates 100 million Christians face persecution, particularly in Muslim-dominated countries such as Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.[22][23] According to the International Society for Human Rights, up to 80% of all acts of persecution are directed against people of the Christian faith.[24]
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormonism)
[edit]This subsection needs additional citations for verification. (January 2026) |
During the 1838 conflict in Missouri known as the Mormon War, tensions between members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter‑day Saints and non‑Mormon settlers and militia escalated into open violence. Governor Lilburn W. Boggs of Missouri issued what became known as the “Extermination Order” on October 27, 1838. The Missouri extermination order forced Mormons to move to Illinois.[25]
This was after Sidney Rigdon gave his July 4th Oration which meant to state that Mormons would defend their lives and property. This speech was taken critically by the state government. Missouri state militia troops slaughtered Mormons in what is now known as the Haun's Mill massacre. Their forcible expulsion from the state caused the death of over a hundred due to exposure, starvation, and resulting illnesses.[26]
The founder of the church, Joseph Smith, was killed in Carthage, Illinois by a mob of about 200 men, almost all of whom were members of the Illinois state militia including some members of the militia who were assigned to guard him. The Mormons suffered through tarring and feathering, their lands and possessions being repeatedly taken from them, mob attacks, false imprisonments, and the US sending an army to Utah to deal with the "Mormon problem" in the Utah War which resulted in a group of Mormons led by John D. Lee massacring settlers at the Mountain Meadows Massacre.[27]
Jehovah's Witnesses
[edit]During the Nazi rule from 1933, Jehovah's Witnesses faced great persecution in Germany. Their refusal to give the Nazi salute, join Nazi organizations, perform compulsory military service, or display loyalty to the regime marked them out as nonconformists and opponents to the state ideology.[28][29] They were banned from preaching and distributing literature, their homes were raided, and many members were dismissed from employment, arrested, or sent to concentration camps.[30]
The Supreme Court of Russia has declared the organization “extremist,” banned its activities, liquidated its legal entities, and ordered confiscation of property.[31][32]
Jehovah’s Witnesses are one of the religious groups most frequently banned worldwide, with official prohibitions or restrictions in several countries spanning Asia‑Pacific, Europe, and the Middle East–North Africa region.[33]
Copts
[edit]The persecution of Copts is a historical and ongoing issue in Egypt against Coptic Orthodox Christianity and its followers. It is also a prominent example of the poor status of Christians in the Middle East despite the religion being native to the region. Copts are the Christ followers in Egypt, usually Oriental Orthodox, who currently make up around 10% of the population of Egypt — the largest religious minority of that country.[a] Copts have cited instances of persecution throughout their history and Human Rights Watch has noted "growing religious intolerance" and sectarian violence against Coptic Christians in recent years, as well as a failure by the Egyptian government to effectively investigate properly and prosecute those responsible.[38][39]
The Muslim conquest of Egypt took place in AD 639, during the Byzantine Empire. Despite the political upheaval, Egypt remained a mainly Christian, but Copts lost their majority status after the 14th century,[40] as a result of the intermittent persecution and the destruction of the Christian churches there,[41] accompanied by heavy taxes for those who refused to convert.[42] From the Muslim conquest of Egypt onwards, the Coptic Christians were persecuted by different Muslims regimes,[43] such as the Umayyad Caliphate,[44] Abbasid Caliphate,[45][46][47] Fatimid Caliphate,[48][49][50] Mamluk Sultanate,[51][52] and Ottoman Empire; the persecution of Coptic Christians included closing and demolishing churches and forced conversion to Islam.[53][54][55]
Since 2011 hundreds of Egyptian Copts have been killed in sectarian clashes, and many homes, Churches and businesses have been destroyed. In just one province (Minya), 77 cases of sectarian attacks on Copts between 2011 and 2016 have been documented by the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights.[56] The abduction and disappearance of Coptic Christian women and girls also remains a serious ongoing problem.[57][58][59]
Dogons
[edit]For almost 1000 years,[60] the Dogon people, an ancient tribe of Mali[61] had faced religious and ethnic persecution—through jihads by dominant Muslim communities.[60] These jihadic expeditions were to forced the Dogon to abandon their traditional religious beliefs for Islam. Such jihads caused the Dogon to abandon their original villages and moved up to the cliffs of Bandiagara for better defense and to escape persecution—often building their dwellings in little nooks and crannies.[60][62] In the early era of French colonialism in Mali, the French authorities appointed Muslim relatives of El Hadj Umar Tall as chiefs of the Bandiagara—despite the fact that the area has been a Dogon area for centuries.[63]
In 1864, Tidiani Tall, nephew and successor of the 19th century Senegambian jihadist and Muslim leader—El Hadj Umar Tall, chose Bandiagara as the capital of the Toucouleur Empire thereby exacerbating the inter-religious and inter-ethnic conflict. In recent years, the Dogon accused the Fulanis of supporting and sheltering Islamic terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda in Dogon country, leading to the creation of the Dogon militia Dan Na Ambassagou in 2016—whose aim is to defend the Dogon from systematic attacks. That resulted in the Ogossagou massacre of Fulanis in March 2019, and a Fula retaliation with the Sobane Da massacre in June of that year. In the wake of the Ogossagou massacre, the President of Mali, Ibrahim Boubacar Keïta and his government ordered the dissolution of Dan Na Ambassagou—whom they hold partly responsible for the attacks. The Dogon militia group denied any involvement in the massacre and rejected calls to disband.[64]
Druze
[edit]Historically the relationship between the Druze and Muslims has been characterized by intense persecution.[66][67][68] The Druze faith is often classified as a branch of Isma'ili. Even though the faith originally developed out of Ismaili Islam, most Druze do not identify as Muslims,[69][70][71] and they do not accept the five pillars of Islam.[72] The Druze have frequently experienced persecution by different Muslim regimes such as the Shia Fatimid Caliphate,[73] Mamluk,[74] Sunni Ottoman Empire,[75] and Egypt Eyalet.[76][77] The persecution of the Druze included massacres, demolishing Druze prayer houses and holy places and forced conversion to Islam.[78] Those were no ordinary killings in the Druze's narrative, they were meant to eradicate the whole community according to the Druze narrative.[79] Most recently, the Syrian Civil War, which began in 2011, saw persecution of the Druze at the hands of Islamic extremists.[80][81]
Ibn Taymiyya a prominent Muslim scholar muhaddith, dismissed the Druze as non-Muslims,[82] and his fatwa cited that Druzes: "Are not at the level of ′Ahl al-Kitāb (People of the Book) nor mushrikin (polytheists). Rather, they are from the most deviant kuffār (Infidel) ... Their women can be taken as slaves and their property can be seized ... they are to be killed whenever they are found and cursed as they described ... It is obligatory to kill their scholars and religious figures so that they do not misguide others",[83] which in that setting would have legitimized violence against them as apostates.[84][85] Ottomans have often relied on Ibn Taymiyya religious ruling to justify their persecution of Druze.[86]
Falun Gong
[edit]Falun Gong was introduced to the general public by Li Hongzhi in Changchun, China, in 1992. For the next few years, Falun Gong was the fastest growing qigong practice in Chinese history and, by 1999, there were millions of practitioners. Following the seven years of widespread popularity, on July 20, 1999, the government of the People's Republic of China began a nationwide persecution campaign against Falun Gong practitioners, except in the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau.[87][88] In late 1999, legislation was created to outlaw "heterodox religions" and retroactively applied to Falun Gong.[89] Amnesty International states that the persecution is "politically motivated" with "legislation being used retroactively to convict people on politically-driven charges, and new regulations introduced to further restrict fundamental freedoms".[90]
Hindus
[edit]Persecution of Hindus refers to the religious persecution inflicted upon Hindus that may undergo as a consequence of professing their faith, both historically and in the current era. Hindus have been brutally persecuted during the historical Islamic rule of the Indian subcontinent[91][better source needed] and during Portuguese rule of Goa.
Even in modern times, Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh have suffered persecution. Most recently, thousands of Hindus from Sindh province in Pakistan have been fleeing to India voicing fear for their safety. After the Partition of India in 1947, there were 8.8 million Hindus in Pakistan (excluding Bangladesh) in 1951. In 1951, Hindus constituted 1.58% of the Pakistani population.[92] Today, the Hindu minority amounts to 1.7 percent of Pakistan's population.[93]
The Bangladesh Liberation War (1971) resulted in one of the largest genocides of the 20th century. While estimates of the number of casualties was 3,000,000, it is reasonably certain that Hindus bore a disproportionate brunt of the Pakistan Army's onslaught against the Bengali population of what was East Pakistan. An article in Time magazine dated 2 August 1971, stated "The Hindus, who account for three-fourths of the refugees and a majority of the dead, have borne the brunt of the Muslim military hatred."[94] Senator Edward Kennedy wrote in a report that was part of United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations testimony dated 1 November 1971, "Hardest hit have been members of the Hindu community who have been robbed of their lands and shops, systematically slaughtered, mass rape and in some places, painted with yellow patches marked "H". All of this has been officially sanctioned, ordered and implemented under martial law from Islamabad". In the same report, Senator Kennedy reported that 80% of the refugees in India were Hindus and according to numerous international relief agencies such as UNESCO and World Health Organization the number of East Pakistani refugees at their peak in India was close to 10 million. In a syndicated column "The Pakistani Slaughter That Nixon Ignored", Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Sydney Schanberg wrote about his return to liberated Bangladesh in 1972. "Other reminders were the yellow "H"s the Pakistanis had painted on the homes of Hindus, particular targets of the Muslim army" (by "Muslim army", meaning the Pakistan Army, which had targeted Bengali Muslims as well), (Newsday, 29 April 1994).
In Bangladesh, on 28 February 2013, the International Crimes Tribunal sentenced Delwar Hossain Sayeedi, the Vice President of the Jamaat-e-Islami to death for the war crimes committed during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War. Following the sentence, activists of Jamaat-e-Islami and its student wing Islami Chhatra Shibir attacked the Hindus in different parts of the country. Hindu properties were looted, Hindu houses were burnt into ashes and Hindu temples were desecrated and set on fire.[95][additional citation(s) needed] The violence included the looting of Hindu properties and businesses, the burning of Hindu homes, the rape of Hindu women,[citation needed] and the desecration and destruction of, according to community leaders, more than 50 Hindu temples; 1,500 Hindu homes were destroyed in 20 districts.[96][97] While the government has held the Jamaat-e-Islami responsible for the attacks on the minorities, the Jamaat-e-Islami leadership has denied any involvement. The minority leaders have protested the attacks and appealed for justice. The Supreme Court of Bangladesh has directed the law enforcement to start suo motu investigation into the attacks. US Ambassador to Bangladesh express concern about attack of Jamaat on Bengali Hindu community.[98][99]
Jews
[edit]
The persecution of Jews is a recurring phenomenon throughout Jewish history. It has occurred on numerous occasions in widely different geographic locations. It may include pogroms, looting and the demolition of private and public Jewish property (e.g., Kristallnacht), unwarranted arrest, imprisonment, torture, killing, or even mass execution (in World War II alone, approximately six million people were deliberately killed because they were Jewish). They have been expelled from their hometowns/countries, hoping to find safe havens in other polities. In recent times anti-Semitism has often been manifested as Anti-Zionism,[100][101] where Anti-Zionism is a prejudice against the Jewish movement for self-determination and the right of the Jewish people to a homeland in the State of Israel. Anti-Zionism can include threats to destroy the State of Israel (or otherwise eliminate its Jewish character), unfounded and inaccurate characterizations of Israel's power in the world, and language or actions that hold Israel to a different standard than other countries.[102]
Muslims
[edit]
The persecution of Muslims has been a recurring phenomenon throughout the history of Islam. Persecution may refer to unwarranted arrest, imprisonment, beatings, torture, or execution. It may also refer to the confiscation or destruction of property, or incitement to hate Muslims.
Persecution can extend beyond those who perceive themselves to be Muslims and include those who are perceived by others as Muslims, or it can include Muslims who are considered non-Muslims by fellow Muslims. The Ahmadiyya regard themselves as Muslims, but are seen by many other Muslims as non-Muslims and "heretics". In 1984, the Government of Pakistan, under General Zia-ul-Haq, passed Ordinance XX,[103] which banned proselytizing by Ahmadis and also banned Ahmadis from referring to themselves as Muslims. According to this ordinance, any Ahmadi who refers to oneself as a Muslim by words, either spoken or written, or by visible representation, directly or indirectly, or makes the call for prayer as other Muslims do, is punishable by imprisonment of up to 3 years. Because of these difficulties, Mirza Tahir Ahmad migrated to London.[citation needed]
Pagans
[edit]Persecution of Pagans refers to the historical and ongoing acts of religious intolerance, violence, and oppression against followers of pagan or polytheistic religions. This persecution has been carried out by various religious and political groups, including Christians, Muslims, and governments throughout history. The rise of Christianity as a state religion in the Late Roman Empire led to the persecution of Pagans, who were seen as a threat to the new faith and persecution of pagans have continued in Post-Roman Europe, Arabia, and North Africa. The destruction and conversion of pagan temples into churches, mosques, or other structures were common practices during the Christianization of the Roman Empire and later the Spread of Islam in Middle East and North Africa. This was done to eradicate paganism and assert the dominance of Christianity and Islam. During the Age of Discovery, Many Europeans consider aspects of Native American, African Tribes, Polynesian, and Aboriginal Australian religion as pagans, which attributed to their genocide and forced conversions. Some notable examples are the Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire, Christianisation of the Germanic peoples, Islamization of the Sudan region, Persecution of pagans under Theodosius I, Persecution of pagans under Constantius II, Scramble for Africa, Colonization of Australia, and Colonization of the Americas. Modern Pagans, who practice various forms of paganism, are a religious minority in every country where they exist. They have been subject to religious discrimination and/or religious persecution. The largest modern Pagan communities are in North America and the United Kingdom, and the issue of discrimination receives most attention in those locations. Although the persecution of Pagans has decreased in recent centuries, it still exists in some parts of the world. The community of Pagans and Wiccans continues to face Christian persecution, particularly in the United States, where they are frequently subjected to negative stereotypes and misconceptions, such as those perpetuated during the Satanic Panic.
Philosophers
[edit]Philosophers throughout the history of philosophy have been held in courts and tribunals for various offenses, often as a result of their philosophical activity, and some have even been put to death. The most famous example of a philosopher being put on trial is the case of Socrates, who was tried for, amongst other charges, corrupting the youth and impiety.[104] Others include:
- Giordano Bruno - pantheist philosopher who was burned at the stake by the Roman Inquisition for his heretical religious views, his cosmological views, or both;[105][106]
- Tommaso Campanella - confined to a convent for his heretical views, namely, an opposition to the authority of Aristotle, and later imprisoned in a castle for 27 years during which he wrote his most famous works, including The City of the Sun;[107]
- Baruch Spinoza - Jewish philosopher who, at age 23, was put in cherem (similar to excommunication) by Jewish religious authorities for heresies such as his controversial ideas regarding the authenticity of the Hebrew Bible, which formed the foundations of modern biblical criticism, and the pantheistic nature of the Divine.[108][109] Prior to that, he had been attacked on the steps of the community synagogue by a knife-wielding assailant shouting "Heretic!",[110] and later his books were added to the Catholic Church's Index of Forbidden Books.
Serers
[edit]The persecution of the Serer people of Senegal, Gambia and Mauritania is multifaceted, and it includes both religious and ethnic elements. Religious and ethnic persecution of the Serer people dates back to the 11th century when King War Jabi usurped the throne of Tekrur (part of present-day Senegal) in 1030, and by 1035, introduced Sharia law and forced his subjects to submit to Islam.[111] With the assistance of his son (Leb), their Almoravid allies and other African ethnic groups who have embraced Islam, the Muslim coalition army launched jihads against the Serer people of Tekrur who refused to abandon Serer religion in favour of Islam.[112][113][114][115] The number of Serer deaths are unknown, but it triggered the exodus of the Serers of Tekrur to the south following their defeat, where they were granted asylum by the lamanes.[115] Persecution of the Serer people continued from the medieval era to the 19th century, resulting in the Battle of Fandane-Thiouthioune. From the 20th to the 21st centuries, persecution of the Serers is less obvious, nevertheless, they are the object of scorn and prejudice.[116][117]
Sikhs
[edit]The 1984 anti-Sikh riots or the 1984 Sikh Massacre was a series of pogroms[118][119][120][121] directed against Sikhs in India, by anti-Sikh mobs, in response to the assassination of Indira Gandhi, on 31 October 1984, by two of her Sikh bodyguards in response to her actions authorising the military operation Operation Blue Star. There were more than 8,000[122] deaths, including 3,000 in Delhi.[120] In June 1984, during Operation Blue Star, Indira Gandhi ordered the Indian Army to attack the Golden Temple and eliminate any insurgents, as it had been occupied by Sikh separatists who were stockpiling weapons. Later operations by Indian paramilitary forces were initiated to clear the separatists from the countryside of Punjab state.[123]
The Indian government reported 2,700 deaths in the ensuing chaos. In the aftermath of the riots, the Indian government reported 20,000 had fled the city, however the People's Union for Civil Liberties reported "at least" 1,000 displaced persons.[124] The most affected regions were the Sikh neighbourhoods in Delhi. The Central Bureau of Investigation, the main Indian investigating agency, is of the opinion that the acts of violence were organized with the support from the then Delhi police officials and the central government headed by Indira Gandhi's son, Rajiv Gandhi.[125] Rajiv Gandhi was sworn in as Prime Minister after his mother's death and, when asked about the riots, said "when a big tree falls, the earth shakes" thus trying to justify the communal strife.[126]
There are allegations that the government destroyed evidence and shielded the guilty. The Asian Age front-page story called the government actions "the Mother of all Cover-ups"[127][128] There are allegations that the violence was led and often perpetrated by Indian National Congress activists and sympathisers during the riots.[129] The chief weapon used by the mobs, kerosene, was supplied by a group of Indian National Congress Party leaders who owned filling stations.[130]
Yazidis
[edit]The Persecution of Yazidis has been ongoing since at least the 10th century.[131][132] The Yazidi religion is regarded as devil worship by Islamists.[133] Yazidis have been persecuted by Muslim Kurdish tribes since the 10th century,[131] and by the Ottoman Empire from the 17th to the 20th centuries.[134] After the 2014 Sinjar massacre of thousands of Yazidis by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, Yazidis still face violence from the Turkish Armed Forces and its ally the Syrian National Army, as well as discrimination from the Kurdistan Regional Government. According to Yazidi tradition (based on oral traditions and folk songs), estimated that 74 genocides against the Yazidis have been carried out in the past 800 years.[135][136][137][138]
Zoroastrians
[edit]Persecution of Zoroastrians is the religious persecution inflicted upon the followers of the Zoroastrian faith. The persecution of Zoroastrians occurred throughout the religion's history. The discrimination and harassment began in the form of sparse violence and forced conversions. Muslims are recorded to have destroyed fire temples. Zoroastrians living under Muslim rule were required to pay a tax called jizya.[139]
Zoroastrian places of worship were desecrated, fire temples were destroyed and mosques were built in their place. Many libraries were burned and much of their cultural heritage was lost. Gradually an increasing number of laws were passed which regulated Zoroastrian behavior and limited their ability to participate in society. Over time, the persecution of Zoroastrians became more common and widespread, and the number of believers decreased by force significantly.[139]
Most were forced to convert due to the systematic abuse and discrimination inflicted upon them by followers of Islam. Once a Zoroastrian family was forced to convert to Islam, the children were sent to an Islamic school to learn Arabic and study the teachings of Islam, as a result some of these people lost their Zoroastrian faith. However, under the Samanids, who were Zoroastrian converts to Islam, the Persian language flourished. On occasion, the Zoroastrian clergy assisted Muslims in attacks against those whom they deemed Zoroastrian heretics.[139]
A Zoroastrian astrologer named Mulla Gushtasp predicted the fall of the Zand dynasty to the Qajar army in Kerman. Because of Gushtasp's forecast, the Zoroastrians of Kerman were spared by the conquering army of Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar. Despite the aforementioned favorable incident, the Zoroastrians during the Qajar dynasty remained in agony and their population continued to decline. Even during the rule of Agha Mohammad Khan, the founder of the dynasty, many Zoroastrians were killed and some were taken as captives to Azerbaijan.[140] Zoroastrians regard the Qajar period as one of their worst.[141] During the Qajar dynasty, religious persecution of the Zoroastrians was rampant. Due to the increasing contacts with influential Parsi philanthropists such as Maneckji Limji Hataria, many Zoroastrians left Iran for India. There, they formed the second major Indian Zoroastrian community known as the Iranis.[142]
Ethnic
[edit]This section needs expansion. You can help by adding missing information. (February 2024) |
Ethnic persecution refers to perceived persecution based on ethnicity. Its meaning is parallel to that of racism, (based on race). The Rwandan genocide remains an atrocity that the indigenous Hutu and Tutsi peoples still believe is unforgivable. The Japanese occupation of China caused the death of millions of people, mostly peasants who were murdered after the Doolittle Raid in early-World War II.[citation needed]
African Americans
[edit]African Americans have faced persecution in the forms of slavery, legal discrimination, and racial violence.
Assyrians
[edit]Due to their Christian faith and ethnicity, the Assyrians have been persecuted since their adoption of Christianity. During the reign of Yazdegerd I, Christians in Persia were viewed with suspicion as potential Roman subversives, resulting in persecutions while at the same time, they promoted Nestorian Christianity as a buffer between the Churches of Rome and Persia. Persecutions and attempts to impose Zoroastrianism continued during the reign of Yazdegerd II.[143][144]
During the eras of Mongol rule under Genghis Khan and Timur, there was indiscriminate slaughter of tens of thousands of Assyrians and destruction of the Assyrian population of northwestern Iran and central and northern Iran.[145]
More recent persecutions since the 19th century include the Massacres of Badr Khan, the Massacres of Diyarbakır (1895), the Adana massacre, the Assyrian genocide, the Simele massacre, and the al-Anfal campaign.
Hazara people
[edit]The Hazara people of central Afghanistan have been persecuted by Afghan rulers at various times in the history. Since the tragedy of 9/11, Sunni Muslim terrorists have been attacking the Hazara community in southwestern Pakistani town of Quetta, home to some 500,000 Hazara who fled persecution in neighbouring Afghanistan. Some 2,400 men, women and children have been killed or wounded with Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claiming responsibility for most of the attacks against the community. Consequently, many thousands have fled the country seeking asylum in Australia.[citation needed]
Roma
[edit]Antiziganism is hostility, prejudice, discrimination or racism directed against the Romani people as an ethnic group, or people who are perceived as being of Romani heritage.
The Porajmos was the planned and attempted effort, often described as a genocide, during World War II by the government of Nazi Germany and its allies to exterminate the Romani (Gypsy) people of Europe. Under the rule of Adolf Hitler, a supplementary decree to the Nuremberg Laws was issued on 26 November 1935, defining Gypsies as "enemies of the race-based state", the same category as Jews. Thus, the fate of Roma in Europe in some ways paralleled that of the Jews.[146] Historians estimate that 220,000 to 500,000 Romani were killed by the Nazis and their collaborators, or more than 25% of the slightly less than 1 million Roma in Europe at the time.[146] Ian Hancock puts the death toll as high as 1.5 million.[147]
Rohingyas
[edit]The UN human rights chief slammed Myanmar's apparent "systematic attack" on the Rohingya minority, warning that "ethnic cleansing" seemed to be underway. Ethnic Rohingya Muslims who fled from security forces in Myanmar's Rakhine State have described killings, shelling, and arson in their villages that have all the hallmarks of a campaign of “ethnic cleansing,” Human Rights Watch said. “Rohingya refugees have harrowing accounts of fleeing Burmese army attacks and watching their villages be destroyed,” said Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia director. “Lawful operations against armed groups do not involve burning the local population out of their homes.” [148]
Sri Lankan Tamils
[edit]Widespread attacks on Sri Lankan Tamils came in the form of island wide ethnic riots, including The 1958 anti-Tamil pogrom and the Black July riots. Further persecution through murders, targeted rape and kidnapping occurred. Whilst previously, the majority of Tamils demanded instead for a separate state, by 1983 armed struggles against Sinhalese extremists began to rise, culminating in the formation of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.[citation needed]
Uyghurs
[edit]Uyghurs and other Turkic peoples in modern-day Xinjiang (called East Turkestan by independence activists) declared two short-lived independent East Turkestan Republics in the 20th century.[149][150] In late 1949, the region and the rest of China came under the control of the People's Republic of China.[149]
Uyghur activist groups have said that anger towards the Chinese government has been fueled by years of state-sponsored oppression and discrimination.[149] In 2017, the China began a large-scale crackdown on the Xinjiang region, which it justifies as a counterterrorism campaign following sporadic terrorist attacks in Xinjiang.[149] Scholars estimate that the Chinese government detained over one million Uyghurs in internment camps (also called re-education camps) in order to indoctrinate them away from religion and Sinicize them (assimilate them into Chinese culture).[149][150] Critics of the policy have described it as the Sinicization of Xinjiang and they have also called it an ethnocide or a cultural genocide,[151][152][153] while some governments, activists, independent NGOs, human rights organizations, academics, government officials, and the East Turkistan Government-in-Exile have called it a genocide.[154][155]
Based on genetics
[edit]People with albinism
[edit]Persecution on the basis of albinism is frequently based on the belief that albinos are inferior to persons with higher concentration of melanin in their skin. As a result, albinos have been persecuted, killed and dismembered, and graves of albinistic people dug up and desecrated. Such people have also been ostracized and even killed because they are presumed to bring bad luck in some areas. Haiti also has a long history of treating albinistic people as accursed, with the highest incidence under the influence of François "Papa Doc" Duvalier.[citation needed]
People with autism
[edit]People with autism spectrum disorders have commonly been victims of persecution, both throughout history and in the present era. In Cameroon children with autism are commonly accused of witchcraft and singled out for torture and even death.[156][157]
Additionally, it is speculated that many of the disabled children murdered during Action T4 in Nazi Germany may have been autistic,[158] making autistic people among the first victims of The Holocaust.
LGBT
[edit]The examples and perspective in this section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (July 2017) |
This section needs to be updated. The reason given is: New instances of persecution, for example Uganda's Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023 and Persecution of transgender people under the second Trump administration. (January 2026) |
A number of countries, especially those countries in the Western world, have passed measures to alleviate discrimination against sexual minorities, including laws against anti-gay hate crimes and workplace discrimination. Some countries have also legalized same-sex marriages or civil unions in order to grant same-sex couples the same protections and benefits as those which are granted to opposite-sex couples. In 2011, the United Nations passed its first resolution which recognizes LGBT rights and, in 2015, same-sex marriages were legalized in all states of the United States.[citation needed]
In many countries around the world, consensual same-sex acts are criminalized, leading to significant persecution and discrimination against individuals identifying as LGBTQ+. This criminalization often results in state-sanctioned violence, discrimination in various aspects of life, and severe legal penalties, including lengthy prison sentences or, in some cases, the death penalty. These laws restrict the fundamental human rights and physical safety of LGBTQ+ individuals, creating an environment of fear and secrecy and often forcing individuals to seek asylum or live in hiding due to the lack of legal protections and persistent societal hostility. Discussion about morality and legality of LGBT conduct is ongoing.[159]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ In 2017, the Wall Street Journal reported that "the vast majority of Egypt's estimated 9.5 million Christians, approximately 10% of the country's population, are Orthodox Copts."[34] In 2019, the Associated Press cited an estimate of 10 million Copts in Egypt.[35] In 2015, the Wall Street Journal reported: "The Egyptian government estimates about 5 million Copts, but the Coptic Orthodox Church says 15-18 million. Reliable numbers are hard to find but estimates suggest they make up somewhere between 6% and 18% of the population."[36] The CIA World Factbook reported a 2015 estimate that 10% of the Egyptian population is Christian (including both Copts and non-Copts).[37]
References
[edit]- ^ Rempell, Scott (2011). "Defining Persecution". Utah Law Review. 2013 (1). Social Science Research Network. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1941006.
- ^ Telford Taylor "When people kill a people", The New York Times, March 28, 1982.
- ^ Article 7.3 of the Rome Statute, which constitutes "compromise text" states that "For the purpose of this Statute, it is understood that the term 'gender' refers to the two sexes, male and female, within the context of society. The term 'gender' does not indicate any meaning different from the above." While under international criminal law persecution based on Gender Identity is also prohibited, during the Rome Diplomatic Conference that adopted the ICC Statute, it was decided to define gender narrowly in order to overcome opposition from the Holy See and other states that were concerned that the ICC could theoretically also look into discriminatory practices of religious institutions. This provision was balanced with that of Article 10, which states that "Nothing in this Part shall be interpreted as limiting or prejudicing in any way existing or developing rules of international law for purposes other than this Statute."
- ^ International Federation for Human Rights (2003-08-01). "Discrimination against religious minorities in Iran" (PDF). fdih.org. Retrieved 2006-10-20.
- ^ "QuickLists: Most Baha'i Nations (2010)". Association of Religion Data Archives. 2010. Archived from the original on 2021-03-02. Retrieved 2020-10-14.
- ^ Diana Lary (1974). Region and nation: the Kwangsi clique in Chinese politics, 1925-1937. Cambridge University Press. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-521-20204-6. Retrieved 2010-06-28.
- ^ David S. G. Goodman (2004). China's campaign to "Open up the West": national, provincial, and local perspectives. Cambridge University Press. p. 72. ISBN 978-0-521-61349-1. Retrieved 2010-06-28.
- ^ Levy, Robert I. Mesocosm: Hinduism and the Organization of a Traditional Newar City in Nepal. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1990 1990.
- ^ William M. Johnston (2000). Encyclopedia of Monasticism: A-L. Routledge. p. 335. ISBN 978-1-57958-090-2.
- ^ Eraly, Abraham (April 2015). The Age of Wrath: A History of the Delhi Sultanate. Penguin UK. ISBN 9789351186588.
- ^ A Comprehensive History Of India, Vol. 4, Part 1, pp. 600 & 601.
- ^ Historia Religionum: Handbook for the History of Religions By C. J. Bleeker, G. Widengren p. 381.
- ^ S. Muthiah. Where the Buddha Walked. p. 41.
- ^ Sanderson, Alexis. "The Śaiva Age: The Rise and Dominance of Śaivism during the Early Medieval Period." In: Genesis and Development of Tantrism, edited by Shingo Einoo. Tokyo: Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo, 2009. Institute of Oriental Culture Special Series, 23, pp. 89.
- ^ The Maha-Bodhi by Maha Bodhi Society, Calcutta (page 8)
- ^ The Maha-Bodhi by Maha Bodhi Society, Calcutta (page 205)
- ^ Islam at War: A History By Mark W. Walton, George F. Nafziger, Laurent W. Mbanda (p. 226)
- ^ The Holy Land Reborn: Pilgrimage and the Tibetan Reinvention of Buddhist India. University of Chicago Press. 15 September 2008. ISBN 9780226356501.
- ^ Roerich, G. 1959. Biography of Dharmasvamin (Chag lo tsa-ba Chos-rje-dpal): A Tibetan Monk Pilgrim. Patna: K. P. Jayaswal Research Institute. pp. 61–62, 64, 98.
- ^ "Protesters burn Bangladesh Buddhist temples". Al Jazeera. 30 September 2012.
- ^ "Religious attacks lead to 300 arrests in Bangladesh". ABC News. 2 October 2012.
- ^ Open Doors: The worst 50 countries for persecution of Christians Archived 2012-03-04 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Open Doors: Weltverfolgungsindex 2012 Archived 2012-07-13 at the Wayback Machine, p. 2
- ^ Philpott, Daniel, Pope Francis and Religious Freedom, Washington, DC: Berkley Center for Religion, Peace & World Affairs
- ^ "The Missouri Mormon War". Missouri Secretary of State. Retrieved 28 January 2026.
- ^ "LDS FAQ: Mormons and Danites: The Historical Background in Missouri - The Mormon War in Missouri". www.jefflindsay.com. Retrieved 2026-01-28.
- ^ "The Mountain Meadows Massacre". newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org. 2007-06-19. Retrieved 2026-01-28.
- ^ "Jehovah's Witnesses in Germany: From the 1890s to the 1930s". Holocaust Encyclopedia. Retrieved 28 January 2026.
- ^ "Nazi Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses". Holocaust Encyclopedia. Retrieved 28 January 2026.
- ^ "Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses notes | National Education Union". neu.org.uk. 2018-08-21. Retrieved 2026-01-28.
- ^ Alec Luhn / Moscow. "'We Liked to Sing. Now We Can Only Whisper.' How Russia Is Stepping Up Its Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses". TIME. Archived from the original on 2025-04-22. Retrieved 2026-01-28.
- ^ Forum, Canopy (2022-06-13). ""Jehovah's Witnesses and Religious Persecution: Do Signed Declarations Help?" by George D. Chryssides". Canopy Forum. Retrieved 2026-01-28.
- ^ Majumdar, Samirah (2021-11-15). "41 countries ban religion-related groups; Jehovah's Witnesses, Baha'is among the most commonly targeted". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2026-01-28.
- ^ Francis X. Rocca & Dahlia Kholaif, Pope Francis Calls on Egypt’s Catholics to Embrace Forgiveness, Wall Street Journal (April 29, 2017).
- ^ Noha Elhennawy, Egyptian woman fights unequal Islamic inheritance laws, Associated Press (November 15, 2019).
- ^ "Five Things to Know About Egypt's Coptic Christians". Wall Street Journal. February 16, 2015.
- ^ "Egypt". The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 30 March 2023.
- ^ Egypt and Libya: A Year of Serious Abuses Archived 2011-07-04 at the Wayback Machine, hrw.org, January 24, 2010
- ^ Zaki, Moheb (May 18, 2010). "Egypt's Persecuted Christians". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on June 3, 2010. Retrieved June 4, 2010.
- ^ Shea, Nina (June 2017). "Do Copts have a future in Egypt". Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 2017-06-20.
- ^ Etheredge, Laura S. (2011). Middle East, Region in Transition: Egypt. Britannica Educational Publishing. p. 161. ISBN 9789774160936.
- ^ Conversion, Exemption, and Manipulation: Social Benefits and Conversion to Islam in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Forcing taxes on those who refuse to convert (PDF),
ʿUmar is depicted as having ordered that "the poll-tax should be taken from all men who would not become Muslims"
- ^ Refugees, United Nations High Commissioner for. "Refworld | World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples – Egypt : Copts of Egypt". Refworld. Retrieved 2020-06-15.
- ^ H. Patrick Glenn, Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 219.
- ^ Goddard, Hugh (2000). A History of Christian–Muslim Relations. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 71. ISBN 1566633400. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
- ^ Feder, Frank (2017). "The Bashmurite Revolts in the Delta and the 'Bashmuric Dialect'". In Gabra, Gawdat; Takla, Hany N. (eds.). Christianity and Monasticism in Northern Egypt: Beni Suef, Giza, Cairo, and the Nile Delta. American University in Cairo Press. pp. 33–35.
- ^ Lapidus, Ira M. (1972). "The Conversion of Egypt to Islam". Israel Oriental Studies. 2: 257.
- ^ Robert Ousterhout, "Rebuilding the Temple: Constantine Monomachus and the Holy Sepulchre" in The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 48, No. 1 (March, 1989), pp.66–78
- ^ John Joseph Saunders (11 March 2002). A History of Medieval Islam. Routledge. pp. 109–. ISBN 978-1-134-93005-0.
- ^ Marina Rustow (3 October 2014). Heresy and the Politics of Community: The Jews of the Fatimid Caliphate. Cornell University Press. pp. 219–. ISBN 978-0-8014-5529-2.
- ^ Teule, Herman G. B. (2013). "Introduction: Constantinople and Granada, Christian-Muslim Interaction 1350-1516". In Thomas, David; Mallett, Alex (eds.). Christian-Muslim Relations. A Bibliographical History, Volume 5 (1350-1500). Brill. p. 10. ISBN 9789004252783.
- ^ Werthmuller, Kurt J. (2010). Coptic Identity and Ayyubid Politics in Egypt, 1218-1250. American Univ in Cairo Press. p. 76. ISBN 9780805440737.
- ^ Lyster, William (2013). The Cave Church of Paul the Hermit at the Monastery of St. Pau. Yale University Press. ISBN 9789774160936.
Al Hakim Bi-Amr Allah (r. 996—1021), however, who became the greatest persecutor of Copts.... within the church that also appears to coincide with a period of forced rapid conversion to Islam
- ^ N. Swanson, Mark (2010). The Coptic Papacy in Islamic Egypt (641-1517). American Univ in Cairo Press. p. 54. ISBN 9789774160936.
By late 1012 the persecution had moved into high gear with demolitions of churches and the forced conversion of Christian ...
- ^ ha-Mizraḥit ha-Yiśreʼelit, Ḥevrah (1988). Asian and African Studies, Volume 22. Jerusalem Academic Press. Muslim historians note the destruction of dozens of churches and the forced conversion of dozens of people to Islam under al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah in Egypt ...These events also reflect the Muslim attitude toward forced conversion and toward converts.
- ^ Eltahawy, Mona (22 December 2016). "Egypt's Cruelty to Christians". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 24 December 2016. Retrieved 22 December 2016.
- ^ United States. Congress. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (July 18, 2012). Escalating Violence Against Coptic Women and Girls: Will the New Egypt be More Dangerous than the Old? : Hearing before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Second Session, July 18, 2012. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved 8 March 2015.
- ^ "Masress : Sectarian tensions rise in wake of crime boss death". Masress. Archived from the original on 25 January 2016. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
- ^ Premier (2018-05-09). "Newlywed becomes 8th Egyptian Christian woman to be kidnapped since April". Premier. Archived from the original on 2019-10-14. Retrieved 2019-10-14.
- ^ a b c Griaule, Marcel; Dieterlen, Germaine; (1965). Le mythe cosmologique. Le renard pâle., 1. Paris: Institut d'Ethnologie Musée de l'homme, p. 17
- ^ The Independent, Caught in the crossfire of Mali's war (25 January 2013) by Kim Sengupta [1] (retrieved March 14, 2020)
- ^ Africa Today, Volume 7, Afro Media (2001), p. 126
- ^ Wise, Christopher, Sorcery, Totem, and Jihad in African Philosophy, Bloomsbury Publishing (2017), p. 68, ISBN 9781350013100 (retrieved March 14, 2020) [2]
- ^ World Politics Review, What Explains the Rise of Communal Violence in Mali, Nigeria and Ethiopia? (Sept. 11, 2019) by Hilary Matfess. [3]
- ^ Syria Druze back Sunnis' revolt with words but not arms. Agence France-Presse. 2012-09-08.
- ^ Swayd, Samy (2015). Historical Dictionary of the Druzes. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 132. ISBN 9781442246171.
Some Muslim rulers and jurists have advocated the persecution of members of the Druze Movement beginning with the seventh Fatimi Caliph Al-Zahir, in 1022. Recurring period of persecutions in subsequent centuries ... failure to elucidate their beliefs and practices, have contributed to the ambiguous relationship between Muslims and Druzes
- ^ K. Zartman, Jonathan (2020). Conflict in the Modern Middle East: An Encyclopedia of Civil War, Revolutions, and Regime Change. ABC-CLIO. p. 199. ISBN 9781440865039.
Historically, Islam classified Christians, Jews, and Zoroastrians as protected "People of the Book," a secondary status subject to payment of a poll tax. Nevertheless, Zoroastrians suffered significant persecution. Other religions such as the Alawites, Alevis, and Druze often suffered more.
- ^ Layiš, Aharôn (1982). Marriage, Divorce, and Succession in the Druze Family: A Study Based on Decisions of Druze Arbitrators and Religious Courts in Israel and the Golan Heights. BRILL. p. 1. ISBN 9789004064126.
the Druze religion, though originating from the Isma'lliyya, an extreme branch of the Shia, seceded completely from Islam and has, therefore, experienced periods of persecution by the latter.
- ^ "Are the Druze People Arabs or Muslims? Deciphering Who They Are". Arab America. 8 August 2018. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
- ^ J. Stewart, Dona (2008). The Middle East Today: Political, Geographical and Cultural Perspectives. Routledge. p. 33. ISBN 9781135980795.
Most Druze do not consider themselves Muslim. Historically they faced much persecution and keep their religious beliefs secrets.
- ^ Yazbeck Haddad, Yvonne (2014). The Oxford Handbook of American Islam. Oxford University Press. p. 142. ISBN 9780199862634.
While they appear parallel to those of normative Islam, in the Druze religion they are different in meaning and interpretation. The religion is considered distinct from the Ismaili as well as from other Muslims belief and practice... Most Druze consider themselves fully assimilated in American society and do not necessarily identify as Muslims..
- ^ De McLaurin, Ronald (1979). The Political Role of Minority Groups in the Middle East. Michigan University Press. p. 114. ISBN 9780030525964.
Theologically, one would have to conclude that the Druze are not Muslims. They do not accept the five pillars of Islam. In place of these principles the Druze have instituted the seven precepts noted above..
- ^ Parsons, L. (2000). The Druze between Palestine and Israel 1947–49. Springer. p. 2. ISBN 9780230595989.
With the succession of al-Zahir to the Fatimid caliphate a mass persecution (known by the Druze as the period of the mihna) of the Muwaḥḥidūn was instigated ...
- ^ Hitti 1924.
- ^ C. Tucker, Spencer C. (2019). Middle East Conflicts from Ancient Egypt to the 21st Century: An Encyclopedia and Document Collection [4 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. pp. 364–366. ISBN 9781440853531.
- ^ Taraze Fawaz, Leila. An occasion for war: civil conflict in Lebanon and Damascus in 1860. p.63.
- ^ Goren, Haim. Dead Sea Level: Science, Exploration and Imperial Interests in the Near East. p.95-96.
- ^ C. Tucker, Spencer C. (2019). Middle East Conflicts from Ancient Egypt to the 21st Century: An Encyclopedia and Document Collection [4 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. p. 364. ISBN 9781440853531.
- ^ Zabad, Ibrahim (2017). Middle Eastern Minorities: The Impact of the Arab Spring. Routledge. ISBN 9781317096726.
- ^ "Syria conflict: Al-Nusra fighters kill Druze villagers". BBC News. 11 June 2015. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
- ^ "Nusra Front kills Syrian villagers from minority Druze sect". thestar.com. 11 June 2015. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
- ^ Roald, Anne Sofie (2011). Religious Minorities in the Middle East: Domination, Self-Empowerment, Accommodation. BRILL. p. 255. ISBN 9789004207424.
Therefore, many of these scholars follow Ibn Taymiyya'sfatwa from the beginning of the fourteenth century that declared the Druzes and the Alawis as heretics outside Islam ...
- ^ Zabad, Ibrahim (2017). Middle Eastern Minorities: The Impact of the Arab Spring. Taylor & Francis. p. 126. ISBN 9781317096733.
- ^ Knight, Michael (2009). Journey to the End of Islam. Soft Skull Press. p. 129. ISBN 9781593765521.
- ^ S. Swayd, Samy (2009). The A to Z of the Druzes. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 37. ISBN 9780810868366.
Subsequently, Muslim opponents of the Druzes have often relied on Ibn Taymiyya's religious ruling to justify their attitudes and actions against Druzes...
- ^ S. Swayd, Samy (2009). The Druzes: An Annotated Bibliography. University of Michigan Press. p. 25. ISBN 9780966293203.
- ^ Faison, Seth (April 27, 1999) "In Beijing: A Roar of Silent Protesters" New York Times, retrieved June 10, 2006
- ^ Kahn, Joseph (April 27, 1999) "Notoriety Now for Exiled Leader of Chinese Movement" New York Times, retrieved June 14, 2006
- ^ Leung, Beatrice (2002) 'China and Falun Gong: Party and society relations in the modern era', Journal of Contemporary China, 11:33, 761 – 784
- ^ The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called heretical organizations , The Amnesty International
- ^ Durant, Will. The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage. p. 459.
The Mohammedan Conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precarious thing, whose delicate complex of order and liberty, culture and peace may at any time be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within. The Hindus had allowed their strength to be wasted in internal division and war; they had adopted religions like Buddhism and Jainism, which unnerved them for the tasks of life; they had failed to organize their forces for the protection of their frontiers and their capitals, their wealth and their freedom, from the hordes of Scythians, Huns, Afghans and Turks hovering about India's boundaries and waiting for national weakness to let them in. For four hundred years (600–1000 AD) India invited conquest; and at last it came.
- ^ "CENSUS OF PAKISTAN, 1951 POPULATION ACCORDING TO RELIGION TABLE 6" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
- ^ Census of Pakistan Archived December 22, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "World: Pakistan: The Ravaging of Golden Bengal - Printout". TIME. 2 August 1971. Archived from the original on March 11, 2007. Retrieved 2013-10-25.
- ^ "Bagerhat Hindu Temple Set on Fire". bdnews24.com. March 2, 2013. Archived from the original on April 7, 2013. Retrieved March 20, 2013.
- ^ "Bangladesh: Wave of violent attacks against Hindu minority". Press releases. Amnesty International. Archived from the original on 2013-03-09. Retrieved 8 March 2013.
- ^ Ethirajan, Anbarasan (9 March 2013). "Bangladesh minorities 'terrorised' after mob violence". BBC News. London. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
- ^ "US worried at violence". The Daily Star (Bangladesh). March 12, 2013. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
- ^ "Mozena: Violence is not the way to resolution". The Daily Ittefaq. March 11, 2013. Archived from the original on 16 November 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
- ^ New antisemitism
- ^ "Anti-zionism as an expression of anti-Semitism in recent years". huji.ac.il. Archived from the original on 12 May 2017. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
- ^ "What Is… Anti-Israel, Anti-Semitic, Anti-Zionist?". Anti-Defamation League.
- ^ "Government of Pakistan – Law for Ahmadis". www.thepersecution.org. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
- ^ "What Was the Charge Against Socrates?" Archived 2009-02-12 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved September 1, 2009
- ^ Martínez, Alberto A. (2018). Burned Alive: Giordano Bruno, Galileo and the Inquisition. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-1780238968.
- ^ Michael J. Crowe, The Extraterrestrial Life Debate 1750–1900, Cambridge University Press, 1986, p. 10, "[Bruno's] sources... seem to have been more numerous than his followers, at least until the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century revival of interest in Bruno as a supposed 'martyr for science.' It is true that he was burned at the stake in Rome in 1600, but the church authorities guilty of this action were almost certainly more distressed at his denial of Christ's divinity and alleged diabolism than at his cosmological doctrines."
- ^ "Tommaso Campanella" - first published Wed Aug 31, 2005" at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Retrieved September 1, 2009
- ^ Scruton, Roger (2002). Spinoza: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford. p. 144. ISBN 978-0-19-280316-0.
- ^ Nadler, Steven M. (2001). Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge University Press. pp. 2, 7, 120. ISBN 978-0-521-00293-6.
- ^ Scruton, Roger (2002). Spinoza: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-19-280316-0.
- ^ Clark, Andrew F., & Phillips, Lucie Colvin, "Historical Dictionary of Senegal". ed: 2, Metuchen, New Jersey : Scrarecrow Press (1994) p 265
- ^ Page, Willie F., "Encyclopedia of African history and culture: African kingdoms (500 to 1500)", pp 209, 676. Vol.2, Facts on File (2001), ISBN 0-8160-4472-4
- ^ Streissguth, Thomas, "Senegal in Pictures, Visual Geography", Second Series, p 23, Twenty-First Century Books (2009), ISBN 1-57505-951-7
- ^ Oliver, Roland Anthony, Fage, J. D., "Journal of African history", Volume 10, p 367. Cambridge University Press (1969)
- ^ a b Mwakikagile, Godfrey, "Ethnic Diversity and Integration in The Gambia: The Land, The People and The Culture," (2010), p 11, ISBN 9987-9322-2-3
- ^ Abbey, M T Rosalie Akouele, "Customary Law and Slavery in West Africa", Trafford Publishing (2011), pp 481-482, ISBN 1-4269-7117-6
- ^ Mwakikagile, Godfrey, "Ethnic Diversity and Integration in The Gambia: The Land, The People and The Culture," (2010), p 241, ISBN 9987-9322-2-3
- ^ State pogroms glossed over. The Times of India. 31 December 2005.
- ^ "Anti-Sikh riots a pogrom: Khushwant". Rediff.com. Retrieved 23 September 2009.
- ^ a b Bedi, Rahul (1 November 2009). "Indira Gandhi's death remembered". BBC. Archived from the original on 2 November 2009. Retrieved 2 November 2009.
The 25th anniversary of Indira Gandhi's assassination revives stark memories of some 3,000 Sikhs killed brutally in the orderly pogrom that followed her killing
- ^ Nugus, Phillip (Spring 2007). "The Assassinations of Indira & Rajiv Gandhi". BBC Active. Retrieved 23 July 2010.[dead link]
- ^ "Delhi court to give verdict on re-opening 1984 riots case against Congress leader Jagdish Tytler". ndtv.com. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
- ^ Charny, Israel W. (1999). Encyclopaedia of genocide. ABC-CLIO. pp. 516–517. ISBN 978-0-87436-928-1. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
- ^ Mukhoty, Gobinda; Kothari, Rajni (1984), Who are the Guilty ?, People's Union for Civil Liberties, retrieved 4 November 2010
- ^ "1984 anti-Sikh riots backed by Govt, police: CBI". IBN Live. 23 April 2012. Archived from the original on 25 April 2012. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
- ^ "1984 anti-Sikh riots 'wrong', says Rahul Gandhi". Hindustan Times. 18 November 2008. Archived from the original on 12 October 2013. Retrieved 5 May 2012.
- ^ Mustafa, Seema (2005-08-09). "1984 Sikhs Massacres: Mother of All Cover-ups". The Asian Age. p. 1.
- ^ Agal, Renu (2005-08-11). "Justice delayed, justice denied". BBC News.
- ^ "Leaders 'incited' anti-Sikh riots". BBC News. August 8, 2005. Retrieved November 23, 2012.
- ^ Kaur, Jaskaran; Crossette, Barbara (2006). Twenty years of impunity: the November 1984 pogroms of Sikhs in India (PDF) (2nd ed.). Portland, OR: Ensaaf. p. 29. ISBN 978-0-9787073-0-9. Retrieved 4 November 2010.
- ^ a b Naby, Eden (2009). "Yazīdīs". In Esposito, John (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195305135. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020.
- ^ Acikyildiz, Birgul (2014-08-20). The Yezidis: The History of a Community, Culture and Religion. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1-78453-216-1.
- ^ Jalabi, Raya (2014-08-11). "Who are the Yazidis and why is Isis hunting them?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ Evliya Çelebi, The Intimate Life of an Ottoman Statesman: Melek Ahmed Pasha (1588–1662), Translated by Robert Dankoff, 304 pp., SUNY Press, 1991; ISBN 0-7914-0640-7, pp. 169–171
- ^ Kizilhan, Jan Ilhan; Noll-Hussong, Michael (2017). "Individual, collective, and transgenerational traumatization in the Yazidi". BMC Medicine. 15 (1): 198. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0965-7. ISSN 1741-7015. PMC 5724300. PMID 29224572.
- ^ Hosseini, S. Behnaz (2020). Trauma and the Rehabilitation of Trafficked Women: The Experiences of Yazidi Survivors. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-07869-5.
- ^ von Joeden-Forgey, Elisa; McGee, Thomas (1 November 2019). "Editors' Introduction: Palimpsestic Genocide in Kurdistan". Genocide Studies International. 13 (1): 1–9. doi:10.3138/gsi.13.1.01. ISSN 2291-1847. S2CID 208687918.
- ^ Six-Hohenbalken, Maria (1 November 2019). "The 72nd Firman of the Yezidis: A "Hidden Genocide" during World War I?". Genocide Studies International. 13 (1): 52–76. doi:10.3138/gsi.13.1.04. S2CID 208688838.
- ^ a b c Houtsma, Martijn Theodoor (1936). First Encyclopaedia of Islam 1913-1936: E.J.Brill's. Vol. 2. BRILL. p. 100. ISBN 90-04-09796-1. 9789004097964.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ Shahmardan, Rashid, History of Zoroastrians past Sasanians, p. 125
- ^ Price, Massoume (2005), Iran's diverse peoples: a reference sourcebook (Illustrated ed.), ABC-CLIO, p. 205, ISBN 9781576079935
- ^ "ZOROASTRIANISM ii. Arab Conquest to Modern – Encyclopaedia Iranica". www.iranicaonline.org. Retrieved 2020-04-03.
- ^ Bauer, Susan Wise (2010). The History of the Medieval World: From the Conversion of Constantine to the First Crusade. W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 85–87. ISBN 978-0-393-07817-6.
- ^ Mullin, Robert Bruce (2006). A Short World History of Christianity. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 82–85. ISBN 978-0-664-23664-9.
- ^ "Nestorian (Christian sect)". Britannica.com. Retrieved 2013-09-18.
- ^ a b "Holocaust Encyclopedia - Genocide of European Roma (Gypsies), 1939-1945". United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM). Retrieved 9 August 2011.
- ^ Hancock, Ian (2005), "True Romanies and the Holocaust: A Re-evaluation and an overview", The Historiography of the Holocaust, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 383–396, ISBN 1-4039-9927-9, archived from the original on 2011-09-28, retrieved 2016-05-10
- ^ "'Military atrocities on Rohingyas have hallmarks of ethnic cleansing'". The Daily Star. September 8, 2017.
- ^ a b c d e Dou, Eva (11 February 2021). "Who are the Uighurs, and what's happening to them in China?". Washington Post. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- ^ a b Simons, Marlise (6 July 2020). "Uighur Exiles Push for Court Case Accusing China of Genocide". The New York Times. New York Times. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- ^ "'Cultural genocide': China separating thousands of Muslim children from parents for 'thought education'". The Independent. 5 July 2019. Archived from the original on 22 April 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
- ^ "'Cultural genocide' for repressed minority of Uighurs". The Times. 17 December 2019. Archived from the original on 25 April 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
- ^ "China's Oppression of the Uighurs 'The Equivalent of Cultural Genocide'". Der Spiegel. 28 November 2019. Archived from the original on 21 January 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
- ^ Alecci, Scilla (October 14, 2020). "British lawmakers call for sanctions over Uighur human rights abuses". International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
- ^ "Uighurs: 'Credible case' China carrying out genocide". BBC News. 2021-02-08. Retrieved 2021-02-08.
- ^ "The Thin Line Between Autism and Witchcraft in Cameroon". africaontheblog.com. 11 April 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
- ^ "Autism Services - New York - ICare4Autism". Autism Services - New York - ICare4Autism. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
- ^ "NeuroTribes, Steve Silberman on a haunting history and new hope for autistic people - Your Say". Your Say. 2 November 2015. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
- ^ "Human Dignity Trust". Human Dignity Trust. Retrieved 2025-12-06.
Sources
[edit]- Hitti, Philip Khūri (1924). Origins of the Druze People and Religion. Forgotten Books. ISBN 978-1-60506-068-2. Retrieved 4 April 2012.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
External links
[edit]Persecution
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Conceptual Foundations
Etymology and Core Meaning
The term "persecution" derives from the Latin noun persecūtio, formed from the verb persequor, meaning "to follow after," "to pursue," or "to chase with hostile intent," combining per- (through or thoroughly) and sequi (to follow).[3] This etymological root emphasizes relentless pursuit or prosecution, often implying aggression or legal hounding, as seen in Roman contexts where it described following adversaries to enforce penalties.[8] Entering Middle English around 1350 via Old French persecucion, the word initially connoted oppression or harassment, particularly in religious contexts such as the trials faced by early Christians under imperial edicts.[9] At its core, persecution refers to the deliberate and sustained infliction of harm, harassment, or subjugation upon individuals or groups due to their religion, race, ethnicity, political beliefs, or other inherent traits, distinguishing it from incidental mistreatment by requiring organized or ideological motivation.[10] Dictionaries consistently frame it as cruel, unfair treatment involving hostility or annoyance over extended periods, often escalating to violence, expulsion, or extermination campaigns, as in historical pogroms or inquisitions targeting nonconformists.[11][2] This meaning underscores causal intent: the persecutor's actions stem from perceiving the victim's difference as a threat warranting suppression, rather than neutral enforcement of law.[12] In legal and asylum contexts, it specifically denotes severe, targeted punishment incompatible with human dignity, as recognized in frameworks like the 1951 Refugee Convention, which protects those fleeing such threats on account of membership in a particular social group.[13]Distinctions from Discrimination, Oppression, and Genocide
Persecution entails the sustained and severe infliction of harm, including threats to life or freedom, on individuals or groups due to their race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group, often involving systematic denial of fundamental rights or physical violence.[14] This exceeds mere unequal treatment, requiring a level of intensity that fundamentally undermines the victim's security and rights, as established in international refugee law under the 1951 Refugee Convention.[15] In contrast to discrimination, which involves differential treatment based on protected characteristics without necessarily rising to extreme harm, persecution demands evidence of serious injury or threat thereof, such as arbitrary arrest, torture, or economic ruination deliberately imposed for the targeted trait.[16] Courts have ruled that generalized harassment or social bias, while discriminatory, fails to constitute persecution unless it escalates to a sustained threat of grievous harm, as mere economic disadvantage or verbal abuse typically does not suffice.[17][18] For instance, in asylum adjudications, patterns of workplace exclusion may amount to discrimination but require additional elements like state complicity or violence to qualify as persecution.[19] Oppression, often framed sociologically as entrenched systemic injustices disproportionately burdening specific groups through institutional power imbalances, differs from persecution in its broader, less necessarily targeted scope; it may manifest as cumulative disadvantages without the acute, identity-driven intolerance central to persecution.[20] Scholarly analyses distinguish oppression as a structural phenomenon akin to Marxist class-based inequities extended to marginalized identities, whereas persecution specifically arises from refusal to tolerate group differences, potentially incorporating but not limited to oppressive mechanisms like surveillance or property seizure.[21] Thus, oppression can underpin persecution—such as through discriminatory laws enabling harm—but lacks the persecutor's explicit animus toward eradicating dissent or difference, rendering it a precondition rather than synonym.[14] Genocide, legally defined under the 1948 UN Convention as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group—through killing, preventing births, or forcibly transferring children—requires a specific dolus specialis intent absent in persecution.[22] While persecution as a crime against humanity involves intentional severe deprivation of rights due to group identity, it does not necessitate the group's physical or biological annihilation, focusing instead on rights violations like forced displacement or enslavement without the exterminatory aim.[23] Persecution may prelude or accompany genocide, as in historical escalations from pogroms to mass extermination, but remains distinct legally, prosecutable under broader human rights frameworks without proving destructive intent.[1][24]Psychological and Sociological Dimensions
Persecution imposes severe psychological consequences on victims, frequently manifesting as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorders, and depression. Survivors of torture and organized persecution exhibit elevated rates of these conditions, including symptoms like intrusive memories, avoidance behaviors, hyperarousal, and emotional dysregulation, often persisting long after the events.[25] Empirical studies of individuals targeted for their social group membership reveal that experiences of traumatic humiliation—such as public degradation or dehumanization—intensify PTSD and depressive symptoms beyond general trauma exposure, due to the erosion of personal agency and identity.[26] Among perpetrators and enablers of persecution, psychological traits associated with authoritarianism play a central role, characterized by rigid conformity to authority, intolerance of ambiguity, and displaced aggression toward perceived inferiors or nonconformists. This personality structure, identified through mid-20th-century research, correlates with support for hierarchical social orders and readiness to justify harm against out-groups under the guise of order or purity.[27] Situational factors, including obedience experiments demonstrating compliance with destructive commands, further explain how ordinary individuals participate in persecutory acts when framed as dutiful or collective necessities.[28] Sociologically, persecution often arises from scapegoating dynamics, where dominant groups redirect frustrations from economic hardship, social upheaval, or internal conflicts onto vulnerable minorities, thereby restoring perceived equilibrium and bolstering in-group cohesion. This mechanism, rooted in frustration-aggression theory, treats the targeted group as a symbolic outlet for unresolved tensions rather than addressing root causes.[29] In-group/out-group distinctions amplify these processes, as evolutionary pressures favor preferential treatment of kin or affiliates while fostering suspicion and hostility toward outsiders, escalating to collective violence in high-threat environments.[30] Historical analyses confirm that such group dynamics transition sporadic prejudice into coordinated persecution, as shared narratives of threat unify perpetrators and suppress dissent.[1]Historical Overview
Ancient and Classical Periods
In classical Athens, the execution of Socrates in 399 BCE exemplified early instances of persecution for perceived threats to civic religion and social order. Charged with impiety toward the gods of the state and corrupting the youth through his philosophical inquiries, Socrates was convicted by a jury of 501 Athenians and sentenced to death by hemlock, amid post-Peloponnesian War sensitivities to intellectual dissent.[31] [32] During the Hellenistic era, Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV Epiphanes launched a systematic campaign against Jewish religious practices in Judea starting in 167 BCE. He banned circumcision, Sabbath observance, and Torah study, desecrated the Second Temple by erecting an altar to Zeus and sacrificing swine, and enforced Hellenistic cults, resulting in mass executions and suicides among resisters, which ignited the Maccabean Revolt led by Judas Maccabeus.[33] [34] In the Roman Empire, Jews faced reprisals following revolts, such as the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE after the First Jewish-Roman War, involving the deaths of over 1 million Jews according to contemporary historian Josephus, though these were primarily military suppressions rather than targeted identity-based persecution outside conflict.[35] Christian communities endured intermittent persecutions from the 1st century CE, initially localized under Emperor Nero in 64 CE, who scapegoated them for the Great Fire of Rome, subjecting adherents to torture, arena executions, and human torch burnings as reported by Tacitus.[36] [35] Empire-wide measures escalated under Decius in 250 CE, mandating libations to Roman gods and emperor worship via certificates, leading to confiscations, exiles, and executions for non-compliance among an estimated growing population of Christians numbering in the millions by then.[37] [38] The Diocletianic Persecution from 303 to 311 CE marked the most intense phase, with edicts ordering church demolitions, scripture burnings, and coerced sacrifices, affecting provinces variably but resulting in approximately 3,000 to 3,500 deaths in the first two years alone, before Galerius's 311 CE tolerance edict halted the policy.[39] [40] These episodes were driven by perceptions of religious nonconformity as disloyalty to state cults, though not all emperors engaged—only about a dozen of 54 from 30 to 311 CE issued anti-Christian edicts—highlighting persecution's sporadic nature amid broader religious pluralism.[37] [41]Medieval to Enlightenment Era
In medieval Europe, religious persecution targeted Jews amid accusations of ritual murder, usury, and well-poisoning, leading to recurrent pogroms and expulsions. During the coronation of Richard I in 1189, anti-Jewish riots erupted in London and York, resulting in over 150 deaths in York alone where 150 Jews committed mass suicide or were killed to evade capture. The Black Death (1347–1351) intensified violence, with Jews scapegoated for the plague; in Strasbourg, some 2,000 Jews were burned alive in 1349 despite papal prohibitions. Expulsions followed, such as Edward I's 1290 decree banishing approximately 2,000–3,000 Jews from England, confiscating their property. Similar patterns occurred in France (1306) and German states, driven by economic resentments over moneylending roles restricted to Jews by Christian prohibitions on usury, though theological antisemitism rooted in deicide charges provided ideological cover.[42] The Catholic Church formalized persecution through the Papal Inquisition, established by Pope Gregory IX in 1231 to combat heresies like Catharism in southern France. Inquisitors employed torture to extract confessions, targeting Albigensians whose dualist beliefs rejected Catholic sacraments; the Albigensian Crusade (1209–1229) had already killed tens of thousands, with subsequent inquisitorial trials leading to burnings and property seizures. Estimates for medieval inquisitorial executions remain low compared to later myths, with fewer than 1,000 documented deaths before 1500, though imprisonment and penances affected thousands more; records from Languedoc show about 400 executions over decades. This system prioritized doctrinal purity over mass slaughter, contrasting with secular pogroms, but enabled state-church alliances to eliminate nonconformists.[43] The Reformation (1517 onward) unleashed reciprocal persecutions between Catholics and Protestants, fracturing Christendom into confessional battlegrounds. In France, the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre of 1572 saw Catholic mobs kill 5,000–10,000 Huguenots in Paris and provinces, triggered by fears of Protestant ascendancy and political intrigue. England's Tudor shifts exemplified volatility: Henry VIII executed over 70 Catholics for refusing the Oath of Supremacy (1534), while Mary I burned about 280 Protestants (1553–1558) for heresy. The Eighty Years' War (1568–1648) in the Netherlands involved Spanish Catholic forces massacring thousands of Calvinists, fueling independence. These conflicts, blending theology with power struggles, caused hundreds of thousands of deaths overall, though targeted persecutions emphasized martyrdom narratives on both sides.[44][45] Witch hunts, peaking from the late 15th to 17th centuries, represented a fusion of religious fervor, misogyny, and social anxieties over misfortune. Prompted by texts like the Malleus Maleficarum (1487), secular and ecclesiastical courts prosecuted alleged sorcerers, predominantly women (75–80%), for pacts with the devil; estimates indicate 40,000–60,000 executions across Europe, concentrated in the Holy Roman Empire where territories like Bamberg saw hundreds burned (1626–1631). Trials relied on spectral evidence and torture, reflecting Catholic-Protestant consensus on satanic threats amid wars and plagues, though Enlightenment skepticism later curbed them, with the last European execution in 1782.[46] The Enlightenment (c. 1685–1815) introduced tolerance philosophies—John Locke's Letter Concerning Toleration (1689) argued separation of church and state to prevent civil strife—but persecutions persisted amid absolutist regimes. Louis XIV's revocation of the Edict of Nantes (1685) outlawed Protestantism, executing resisters and forcing 200,000–400,000 Huguenots to flee, with dragoons billeting to coerce conversions. The suppression of the Jesuits (1773) by Pope Clement XIV, pressured by Bourbon monarchs, dispersed 22,000 members, seizing assets and exiling priests as threats to secular authority. While philosophes like Voltaire decried fanaticism, state-driven expulsions and residual inquisitions in Spain and Portugal underscored uneven progress toward religious liberty, often prioritizing royal control over principled pluralism.[47]19th and 20th Centuries
In the 19th century, ethnic and religious tensions fueled targeted violence against minority groups, particularly Jews in the Russian Empire. Following the assassination of Tsar Alexander II on March 1, 1881, which authorities attributed partly to Jewish revolutionaries, pogroms erupted across southern Russia and Ukraine, beginning in April 1881 in Kyiv and spreading to over 200 communities by summer. These riots involved mobs looting Jewish homes and businesses, assaulting residents, and killing at least 200 people, with tens of thousands displaced; property damage exceeded millions of rubles, exacerbating economic exclusion under the Pale of Settlement laws.[48] Similar waves in 1903–1906, triggered by events like the Kishinev pogrom on April 19–20, 1903, where 49 Jews were murdered and hundreds raped or injured, reflected state tolerance or incitement amid rising nationalism, resulting in over 2,000 deaths across the empire.[49] Ottoman policies against Christian minorities intensified late in the century, culminating in the Hamidian massacres of 1894–1896, where Sultan Abdul Hamid II's forces and Kurdish irregulars killed 100,000 to 300,000 Armenians in response to perceived disloyalty and reform demands, destroying thousands of villages and churches in eastern Anatolia.[50] In the United States, Mormons faced violent expulsion from Missouri in 1838–1839, including the Haun's Mill massacre on October 30, 1838, where 17 were killed by state-backed militias enforcing anti-polygamy and anti-theocratic laws, driving 12,000 adherents westward.[51] The 20th century saw industrialized-scale persecutions under ideological regimes, beginning with the Armenian Genocide of 1915–1916, during World War I, when the Ottoman Committee of Union and Progress orchestrated the deportation and massacre of 1 to 1.5 million Armenians, citing wartime security but executing systematic killings via death marches, concentration camps, and local massacres that reduced the population from 2 million to under 400,000.[52][50] In the Soviet Union, Marxist-Leninist atheism drove campaigns against religion, closing 98% of Orthodox churches by 1939 and executing or imprisoning hundreds of thousands of clergy; under Stalin from 1929 onward, policies like the 1937–1938 Great Purge targeted believers, contributing to 20 million total deaths from repression, famines like the Holodomor (3–5 million Ukrainians, 1932–1933), and gulags, with Christians comprising a disproportionate share due to doctrinal incompatibility.[53][49] Nazi Germany's Holocaust (1941–1945) systematically murdered 6 million Jews through ghettos, Einsatzgruppen shootings, and extermination camps like Auschwitz, where 1.1 million perished, framed as racial purification under the Final Solution decreed at the Wannsee Conference on January 20, 1942.[54] In China, Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward (1958–1962) enforced collectivization and ideological conformity, causing famine and executions that killed 45 million, many for resisting quotas or labeled "rightists"; the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) mobilized Red Guards to persecute intellectuals, officials, and traditionalists, resulting in 1–2 million deaths from beatings, suicides, and purges.[55][56] These episodes, often enabled by totalitarian control and propaganda minimizing religious or ethnic pluralism, dwarfed prior scales, with communist regimes alone accounting for over 100 million deaths globally, though Western historiography has sometimes underweighted them relative to fascist atrocities due to ideological alignments.Post-1945 Developments
In the immediate aftermath of World War II, communist regimes across Eastern Europe and Asia systematically persecuted political opponents, ethnic minorities, and religious adherents to consolidate power. In the Soviet Union, the Gulag forced-labor camp system persisted beyond 1945, housing millions in brutal conditions until major releases began after Joseph Stalin's death in 1953, with post-war deportations targeting Baltic states, Ukrainians, and Crimean Tatars for alleged collaboration or nationalism.[57] Eastern European satellite states, such as Poland and Hungary, saw similar crackdowns, including the arrest and execution of anti-communist clergy and intellectuals, as regimes aligned with Moscow suppressed independent religious institutions to enforce state atheism.[53] These actions reflected ideological drivers rooted in Marxist-Leninist doctrine, which viewed religion and dissent as threats to proletarian unity, leading to the closure of thousands of churches and monasteries by the early 1950s.[58] Decolonization and Cold War proxy conflicts amplified ethnic and religious persecutions globally. The 1947 partition of British India into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan triggered mass migrations and communal riots, with Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs targeting each other in retaliatory killings that claimed between 200,000 and 2 million lives amid forced displacements of up to 15 million people.[59] In Asia, Mao Zedong's People's Republic of China, established in 1949, pursued anti-rightist campaigns and the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976), mobilizing Red Guards to purge "counter-revolutionaries," intellectuals, and cultural traditionalists through public humiliations, forced labor, and executions, resulting in 1 to 2 million deaths and tens of millions subjected to persecution.[60] The Khmer Rouge's seizure of Cambodia in 1975 exemplified radical communist experimentation, enforcing agrarian collectivization and targeting urban dwellers, ethnic minorities, and perceived enemies, which killed 1.5 to 3 million people—about a quarter of the population—through execution, starvation, and disease before the regime's overthrow in 1979.[61] Post-Cold War ethnic conflicts revealed persistent group-based animosities unchecked by superpower rivalry. In Rwanda, from April to July 1994, Hutu extremists orchestrated the genocide of Tutsis and moderate Hutus, using radio propaganda and militias to slaughter approximately 800,000 people in 100 days, often with machetes, amid failures of international intervention.[62] In the Balkans, the Yugoslav wars (1991–1999) involved Serb forces' ethnic cleansing of Bosniaks and Croats, culminating in the Srebrenica massacre of July 1995, where over 8,000 Bosniak men and boys were executed in a UN-designated safe area.[63] Contemporary persecutions underscore enduring ideological and ethno-religious drivers, often enabled by authoritarian state control. In China, policies toward Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang escalated after 2014 with mass internment camps holding over 1 million, involving forced labor, sterilization, and cultural erasure to counter perceived separatism and extremism, actions documented by human rights monitors as systematic oppression.[64] North Korea's juche regime maintains total control, persecuting Christians and other religious minorities through labor camps and executions, viewing faith as foreign subversion.[65] These cases highlight how modern technologies, such as surveillance, amplify traditional mechanisms of isolation, indoctrination, and elimination, with enforcement gaps persisting despite post-1948 Genocide Convention frameworks.[66]Causes and Enabling Factors
Ideological and Doctrinal Drivers
Ideological and doctrinal drivers of persecution often stem from belief systems that categorize out-groups as existential threats, moral inferiors, or ideological deviants, thereby providing a rationale for their suppression, expulsion, or elimination to preserve the purity or dominance of the in-group. These frameworks, whether religious or secular, dehumanize targets by framing them as obstacles to a divinely ordained order, racial destiny, or historical inevitability, enabling perpetrators to view violence as not only permissible but necessary. Historical evidence indicates that such doctrines have fueled large-scale persecutions across eras, with 20th-century secular ideologies alone linked to tens of millions of deaths through systematic purges and genocides.[67] In religious contexts, doctrines emphasizing doctrinal exclusivity or supremacy have justified the subjugation of non-adherents. Under Islamic rule, the dhimmi system, derived from Quranic verses and hadith prescribing protection for "People of the Book" in exchange for jizya tax and submission, institutionalized second-class status for Jews, Christians, and others, imposing restrictions on worship, dress, and testimony while permitting periodic violence and forced conversions when compliance faltered. This framework, implemented from the 7th-century caliphates onward, contributed to the decline of non-Muslim populations in regions like the Middle East and North Africa, where dhimmis faced humiliations and pogroms amid assertions of Islamic superiority. Similarly, early Christian thinkers like Augustine (354–430 CE) argued for coercive measures against heretics to secure their eternal salvation, influencing medieval inquisitions that targeted Jews, Muslims, and dissenting Christians as threats to ecclesiastical unity, resulting in thousands of executions between the 12th and 18th centuries.[68][69] Secular ideologies of the 20th century amplified these dynamics through totalizing worldviews that rejected transcendent morality in favor of utopian engineering via violence. Nazi racial doctrine, articulated in Hitler's Mein Kampf (1925) and codified in the 1935 Nuremberg Laws, posited Jews and other "inferior races" as biological pollutants undermining Aryan supremacy, directly motivating the Holocaust's systematic murder of approximately 6 million Jews from 1941 to 1945 as a purported act of racial hygiene. Marxist-Leninist ideology, emphasizing class struggle and the eradication of "enemies of the people," drove the Soviet Great Purge (1936–1938), in which Stalin's regime executed or imprisoned over 1 million party members, kulaks, and perceived deviationists to enforce ideological conformity, with archival estimates indicating 680,000 to 1.2 million deaths from shootings alone. These cases illustrate how doctrines, by embedding causal narratives of inevitable conflict, mobilize state power for mass persecution, often exceeding religious precedents in scale due to modern bureaucratic efficiency.[70][71]Power Structures and Group Dynamics
In hierarchical societies, power structures facilitate persecution by concentrating authority in the hands of dominant elites or groups, who deploy state or institutional mechanisms to suppress perceived rivals or non-conformists, thereby preserving resource access and social order. This dynamic is evident in authoritarian consolidations, where legal and coercive apparatuses are repurposed to target minorities, as seen in the Nazi regime's Enabling Act of March 23, 1933, which granted Hitler dictatorial powers and enabled the exclusion of Jews and political opponents from civic life.[72] Such structures thrive on information asymmetries and loyalty enforcement, where elites capture benefits from persecution, including economic gains from confiscations or political capital from unifying the majority against a common enemy. Economic analyses frame this as instrumental scapegoating, particularly against economically prominent minorities, to redistribute wealth during crises without challenging the elite's core interests.[73] Absent checks like decentralized governance or independent judiciary, these imbalances perpetuate cycles of exclusion, as dominant groups rationalize violence as necessary for stability. Group dynamics amplify persecution through ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation, rooted in evolutionary tendencies toward tribal cohesion that prioritize kin or ideological allies over outsiders. Social identity processes, as delineated in experimental paradigms, demonstrate that even arbitrary group assignments elicit preferential treatment for ingroup members in resource distribution, fostering derogation of outgroups perceived as competitive threats.[74] This bias intensifies under scarcity or uncertainty, where frustration-aggression is redirected via scapegoating—blaming vulnerable minorities for systemic failures rather than addressing causal factors like policy errors. Gordon Allport's scapegoat theory, articulated in 1954, posits this as a deflection mechanism, supported by historical patterns where economic downturns correlated with pogroms against Jews in medieval Europe, independent of their actual culpability.[75] Empirical studies confirm that ingroup love, rather than overt hatred, often drives initial discrimination, escalating to persecution when outgroups challenge status hierarchies or cultural norms.[76] These mechanisms intersect in mass mobilization, where elites exploit group psychology to legitimize persecution; for example, propaganda frames outgroups as existential dangers, enhancing ingroup solidarity and compliance with repressive policies. Neuroscientific meta-analyses reveal distinct neural processing of ingroup versus outgroup cues, with amygdala activation signaling threat to the latter, predisposing societies toward exclusionary actions when power brokers activate these responses.[77] However, not all ingroup biases lead to violence; persecution requires enabling conditions like elite orchestration and weakened intergroup norms, as decentralized or merit-based structures mitigate escalation by diluting concentrated power. Sociological frameworks emphasize that while academia often attributes such dynamics to external ideologies, first-principles examination reveals them as emergent from human reciprocity preferences, where unchecked dominance hierarchies incentivize predation on minorities to signal strength and deter defection.[1] This interplay underscores persecution's persistence across eras, from Roman imperial edicts against Christians to modern authoritarian suppressions, where group cohesion sustains elite control.Economic and Resource-Based Motivations
Economic motivations for persecution frequently center on the expropriation of property, businesses, and resources from targeted groups, enabling perpetrators to eliminate economic rivals, settle debts, or redistribute wealth to favored constituencies. Such incentives often intersect with crises like famines or pandemics, where scapegoating minorities justifies seizures that alleviate fiscal pressures or enrich elites. Historical analyses indicate that these drivers persist across eras, rationalized through ideological pretexts but rooted in tangible gains from asset liquidation and resource control.[78][79] During the Black Death outbreaks of 1348–1353, severe economic disruptions in Europe triggered pogroms against Jewish communities, who were often moneylenders holding Christian debts. Massacres in over 200 localities allowed rulers and mobs to confiscate Jewish assets, forgiving loans totaling millions in contemporary equivalents and transferring real estate to non-Jewish owners, thereby stabilizing local economies amid population collapse and labor shortages. This pattern recurred in medieval pogroms, where financial interests—such as state taxation of Jewish wealth or popular envy of merchant success—underpinned violence, yielding direct fiscal benefits like the Habsburg monarchy's exploitation of Jewish confiscations for imperial revenue.[78][79] In the 20th century, the Nazi regime's persecution of Jews incorporated systematic economic plunder as a core mechanism. From 1933 onward, Aryanization policies forced the sale of over 100,000 Jewish-owned businesses at fractions of value, generating approximately 12 billion Reichsmarks (equivalent to hundreds of billions in today's dollars) for the state through taxes, forced auctions, and direct seizures. Ordinary Germans participated via opportunism, acquiring homes and firms at bargain prices, while wartime looting of Jewish gold, art, and bank accounts—estimated at 5–6 tons of gold alone—bolstered the German economy. Scholars emphasize that this greed-driven dimension amplified ideological antisemitism, creating self-reinforcing incentives for complicity.[80][1] The Armenian Genocide of 1915–1917 similarly featured property confiscation as an economic pillar, with the Young Turk government auctioning or redistributing Armenian assets—including 1,500 churches, 2,000 schools, and vast agricultural lands—to Muslim civilians and officials. This plunder, formalized through abandonment laws, netted the state billions in modern terms and facilitated Turkish nationalist economic restructuring by vacating prime urban and rural holdings. Comparative studies with the Holocaust highlight how such seizures in both cases incentivized local participation, transforming persecution into a mechanism for wealth transfer and resource homogenization.[81][82] Resource scarcity has also precipitated persecution in agrarian or pastoral settings, where competition over land escalates into targeted expulsions. In East Africa, conflicts since the 1990s over diminishing arable and grazing areas have driven ethnic violence against pastoral minorities like the Somali or Maasai, with armed groups seizing wells and territories valued in millions for livestock economies, disproportionately harming women through displacement. In Rwanda's 1994 genocide, population density exceeding 300 persons per square kilometer intensified Hutu-Tutsi land rivalries, motivating killings that freed up 10–20% of arable land for survivors, though ideological propaganda overshadowed these pressures. These cases underscore how environmental and demographic strains convert economic competition into existential threats against out-groups.[83][84]Legal Frameworks and International Responses
Definitions in International Humanitarian Law
In international humanitarian law (IHL), the term "persecution" lacks a standalone definition in the core treaties, such as the four Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, which instead prohibit specific acts during armed conflicts that may amount to persecutory conduct, including collective punishments (Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention), deportations or transfers of civilians not justified by imperative security reasons (Article 49), and inhumane treatment (Common Article 3).[85] These provisions apply to protected persons, defined as civilians in enemy hands or occupied territory, aiming to prevent discriminatory harm based on factors like nationality, religion, or political opinion, though without codifying "persecution" explicitly.[86] The 1977 Additional Protocols expand civilian protections—Protocol I for international conflicts bans acts causing superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering (Article 35), while Protocol II for non-international conflicts prohibits violence to civilian life and outrages upon personal dignity (Article 4)—but similarly omit a direct definition, addressing persecution through broader safeguards against targeted discrimination.[87] Persecution is more precisely delineated as a crime against humanity in international criminal law frameworks that intersect with IHL, particularly when occurring amid armed conflicts. Article 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (adopted July 17, 1998, entered into force July 1, 2002) defines it as "persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious [or] gender... grounds... in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court," requiring commission as part of a widespread or systematic attack on civilians.[88] Article 7(2)(g) clarifies: "'Persecution' means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity."[88] This encompasses acts like denial of access to food, medical care, or employment on discriminatory bases, provided they equal the gravity of other crimes against humanity, such as murder or enslavement.[89] Judicial interpretations, including from the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), emphasize discriminatory intent as a core element: acts must target groups based on prohibited grounds and demonstrate special intent to remove or harm them, often involving violations of rights under customary international law, such as those in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948).[90] In IHL application, this links to customary rules prohibiting reprisals against protected persons (e.g., ICTY Appeals Chamber in Prosecutor v. Kupreškić, 2000) and ensures prosecution for systematic discrimination in conflicts, as seen in cases involving ethnic targeting during the 1990s Yugoslav wars.[90] Enforcement gaps persist, as IHL relies on state implementation and ad hoc tribunals, with the Rome Statute's framework providing a prosecutorial tool absent in pure IHL treaties.[91]Key Treaties, Conventions, and Tribunals
The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 9, 1948, and entering into force on January 12, 1951, defines genocide as any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm; deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction; imposing measures to prevent births; or forcibly transferring children. [92] Contracting parties affirm genocide as a crime under international law, whether in peace or war, and undertake to prevent and punish it, including through enacting effective legislation, trying perpetrators, and granting extradition where appropriate.[93] The convention obligates states to punish not only genocide but also conspiracy, direct incitement, attempt, and complicity therein. Persecution, distinct from genocide but often overlapping in targeting groups on identity grounds, is codified as a crime against humanity in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, adopted on July 17, 1998, and entering into force on July 1, 2002.[94] Article 7(1)(h) defines it as the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the victim's political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender, or other discriminatory grounds.[94] [88] The statute grants the ICC jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity (including persecution), war crimes, and aggression when committed by nationals of state parties or on their territory, or referred by the UN Security Council.[95] Precursor frameworks include the Nuremberg Charter of 1945, which established the International Military Tribunal to prosecute crimes against humanity, encompassing murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts undertaken against civilian populations before or during war, often through persecution of specific groups.[96] Ad hoc tribunals have applied these instruments to specific conflicts. The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), created by UN Security Council Resolution 827 on May 25, 1993, prosecuted grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, violations of laws of war, genocide, and crimes against humanity, including widespread persecution on political, racial, or religious grounds during the 1990s Balkan wars.[97] The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), established by Resolution 955 on November 8, 1994, focused on genocide and related crimes against humanity from April to July 1994, rendering the first convictions for genocide by an international court and interpreting the 1948 convention's intent requirement.[98] These tribunals completed operations by 2017, with residual functions transferred to the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals.[99]Enforcement Gaps and Geopolitical Influences
Enforcement of international legal frameworks against persecution, defined as a crime against humanity involving severe deprivation of fundamental rights on political, racial, ethnic, or religious grounds, faces significant structural limitations. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which criminalizes persecution under Article 7(1)(h), relies on the principle of complementarity, requiring national jurisdictions to prosecute first unless unwilling or unable; this often results in impunity when states shield perpetrators or lack capacity.[89] Additionally, the ICC's jurisdiction is confined to crimes committed on territories of state parties or via UN Security Council (UNSC) referrals, excluding non-parties like the United States, China, and Russia unless referred— a mechanism invoked only twice, for Darfur in 2005 and Libya in 2011. Unlike genocide, which has a dedicated 1948 Convention with obligations to prevent and punish, no binding treaty specifically addresses crimes against humanity, including persecution, leaving a gap in standalone prevention and enforcement tools despite ongoing draft conventions.[100] Geopolitical dynamics exacerbate these gaps through selective application and veto power in the UNSC, which can authorize referrals to the ICC or impose sanctions but frequently fails due to permanent members' interests. Russia and China vetoed a 2014 UNSC draft resolution referring Syria's situation—where systematic persecution of civilians occurred amid war crimes—to the ICC, despite documentation of over 100,000 deaths and widespread atrocities by regime forces.[101] Similarly, vetoes have blocked accountability for ongoing mass atrocities, such as Russia's actions in Ukraine or China's policies toward Uyghurs, which some experts classify as persecutory acts rising to crimes against humanity; permanent members have used the veto at least 16 times since 2000 to shield allies or themselves from scrutiny in atrocity contexts.[102] This selectivity undermines the ICC's legitimacy, as evidenced by its prosecution focus: of 31 indictments by 2023, over 80% targeted African situations, prompting accusations of geographic bias while powerful non-African states evade investigation absent UNSC action.[103] State sovereignty and economic leverage further hinder enforcement, with non-cooperation common among influential actors. For instance, Sudan's non-compliance with the 2005 Darfur referral has limited ICC arrests, including for Omar al-Bashir, despite genocide charges involving ethnic persecution; geopolitical alliances, such as Russia's support for Assad in Syria, prioritize strategic interests over humanitarian obligations.[104] In response, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution ES-10/24 in 2022, condemning veto use in mass atrocity situations and urging voluntary restraint, though lacking binding force; this highlights a broader causal reality where enforcement correlates inversely with perpetrators' global power, as weaker states face tribunals like the ICTY for Yugoslavia's ethnic persecutions (1991–1999), securing over 90 convictions, while stronger ones benefit from de facto impunity.[105]Religious Persecution
Persecution of Christians
In the contemporary era, Christians constitute the most widely persecuted religious group globally, facing violence, discrimination, and legal restrictions in over 50 countries. The Open Doors World Watch List 2025 ranks 50 nations where believers endure extreme levels of hostility, estimating that 380 million Christians—about 10% of the world's Christian population—experience very high or extreme persecution, including murder, imprisonment, forced displacement, and denial of basic rights.[106] This assessment draws from field reports, survivor testimonies, and quantitative data on incidents like church attacks and arrests, compiled annually by Open Doors, a monitoring organization focused on Christian advocacy.[107] Globally, 4,476 Christians were killed for faith-related reasons during the 2024 reporting period, alongside 18,000 churches or Christian properties attacked and over 16 million displaced, primarily in sub-Saharan Africa.[108] Persecution manifests variably by region and ideology. In communist or authoritarian states like North Korea, ranked first on the World Watch List, underground Christians risk execution, labor camps, or family-wide punishment for possessing Bibles or proselytizing; the regime views Christianity as a foreign threat to Juche ideology, with estimates of 50,000 to 70,000 believers detained in political prison camps.[106] China's restrictions on unregistered "house churches" intensified in 2024, with authorities demolishing structures, detaining pastors, and enforcing surveillance under the guise of "Sinicization," elevating the country four spots to 16th on the list; state control prioritizes loyalty to the Communist Party over religious autonomy.[109] In Pakistan (eighth-ranked), blasphemy laws—Article 295-C of the penal code, carrying a mandatory death penalty—have been weaponized against Christians, often on fabricated charges, leading to mob violence and lynchings; converts from Islam face familial and societal reprisals, with incidents rising in 2024.[110] Islamic extremism drives the majority of fatalities and displacements, particularly in Africa and the Middle East. Nigeria (seventh-ranked) records the highest violence scores, with Islamist militants from Boko Haram and Fulani herdsmen responsible for thousands of deaths annually; in 2024, these groups targeted Christian farming communities in the Middle Belt, displacing over 16 million and scoring maximum points for "Islamic terror" due to systematic killings and abductions.[111] Somalia (second), Yemen (third), and Sudan (fifth) exhibit near-total intolerance, where al-Shabaab or state-aligned Islamists execute converts and bomb churches, leaving tiny Christian remnants underground; in Sudan, post-2023 civil war chaos exacerbated attacks on believers amid Islamist governance shifts.[106] Hindu nationalist policies in India (11th-ranked) have escalated forced reconversions, church burnings, and anti-conversion laws, disproportionately affecting lower-caste converts, though official data underreports due to state complicity.[112] These patterns reflect doctrinal incompatibilities, resource competition, and power consolidation, with empirical tracking revealing underreporting in Western media outlets that prioritize other narratives.[113] Post-1945, state-sponsored suppression peaked under Soviet atheism, decimating churches in Eastern Europe through arrests and executions until the 1990s, while Middle Eastern Christian populations—once 20% of the region—have plummeted due to Islamist insurgencies and sectarian policies; Iraq's Assyrian community, for instance, shrank from 1.5 million in 2003 to under 250,000 by 2025 amid ISIS genocidal campaigns targeting believers for refusal to convert or pay jizya.[114] Enforcement gaps persist, as international bodies like the UN often dilute religious specificity in resolutions, favoring broader human rights framing that obscures faith-based targeting.[115]Persecution of Jews
The persecution of Jews, rooted in religious animus, spans millennia, with doctrines in Christianity portraying Jews as collectively responsible for the crucifixion of Jesus—a charge known as deicide—forming a foundational element of antisemitism.[116] This theological framework, articulated in early Church Fathers' writings and reinforced through medieval canon law, justified discriminatory practices such as forced conversions, ghettoization, and violence. In Islam, Quranic verses depicting Jews as treacherous or cursed, alongside hadiths prophesying their extermination, have similarly fueled religiously motivated hostility, particularly in jihadist ideologies blending scriptural interpretation with modern totalitarianism.[117] In antiquity, Jews faced massacres under Roman rule, including the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE and the slaughter of approximately 50,000 Jews in Alexandria around 66 CE amid Greco-Roman pogroms.[118] Early Christian communities amplified these tensions by accusing Jews of ritual murder and well-poisoning, accusations that persisted into the Middle Ages. During the First Crusade in 1096, Rhineland pogroms killed thousands of Jews in cities like Worms and Mainz, as crusaders viewed them as infidels obstructing the path to Jerusalem.[119] Medieval Europe saw widespread expulsions driven by religious and economic grievances framed in confessional terms. England expelled its approximately 2,000 Jews in 1290 under Edward I, citing usury bans rooted in Church prohibitions on Christian lending.[120] France followed in 1306, confiscating Jewish property amid accusations of host desecration, while Spain's 1492 Alhambra Decree forced out 200,000 Jews, many fleeing to Ottoman lands after refusing conversion. Blood libels, alleging Jews used Christian blood in rituals, incited massacres like the 1348-1351 Black Death pogroms, where Jews were scapegoated for the plague, leading to burnings in Strasbourg and Basel.[118] In the Islamic world, Jews endured dhimmi status under sharia, involving discriminatory taxes (jizya) and periodic violence, such as the 1066 Granada massacre of 4,000 Jews by Muslim mobs.[118] The Ottoman Empire offered relative tolerance compared to Christian Europe, yet pogroms occurred, including the 1840 Damascus affair reviving blood libel accusations against Jews. Eastern European pogroms in the 19th and early 20th centuries combined religious prejudice with tsarist policies. Following Tsar Alexander II's 1881 assassination—blamed on Jewish radicals—over 200 pogroms erupted in Ukraine and Poland, killing dozens and displacing thousands, with attackers citing Jewish "exploitation" and religious otherness.[121] The 1903-1906 wave, amid revolutionary unrest, saw 2,000 Jews murdered in Kishinev (1903) and Odessa (1905), where mobs destroyed synagogues and homes under pretexts of ritual murder.[122] The Holocaust represented the culmination of religiously infused antisemitism evolving into racial ideology under Nazi Germany, systematically murdering six million Jews between 1941 and 1945 through ghettos, mass shootings, and extermination camps like Auschwitz.[123] While pseudoscientific racism dominated Nazi rhetoric, underlying Christian antisemitic tropes—such as eternal Jewish guilt—permeated European collaboration, evident in Lithuanian and Ukrainian auxiliaries' participation in pogroms like Kaunas' 1941 Lietūkis garage massacre.[48] Contemporary religious persecution manifests in Islamist contexts, where antisemitism draws from Quranic exegesis portraying Jews as enemies of Islam, amplified by groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Iran's state-sponsored denial of the Holocaust and calls for Israel's destruction exemplify this fusion of theology and geopolitics.[117] In Christian-majority regions, residual theological antisemitism persists in some Orthodox and evangelical circles, though post-Vatican II reforms have repudiated deicide charges. Reports indicate rising synagogue attacks and rhetoric invoking medieval libels in Europe and the Middle East, underscoring the enduring causal link between religious doctrines and violence against Jews.[124]Persecution of Muslims and Other Abrahamic Faiths
Persecution of Muslims occurs in various forms, including state-sponsored campaigns, ethnic violence, and intra-communal discrimination, often driven by authoritarian regimes or nationalist movements. In China's Xinjiang region, authorities have detained over one million Uyghur Muslims and other Turkic Muslims in internment camps since 2017, subjecting them to forced labor, sterilization, torture, and cultural erasure as part of a broader assimilation policy.[64][125] Independent reports document mass surveillance, destruction of mosques, and separation of families, with the U.S. government and human rights organizations classifying these actions as crimes against humanity or genocide.[66][126] In Myanmar, the Rohingya Muslim minority has faced systematic expulsion and violence, culminating in a 2017 military crackdown that killed thousands and displaced nearly one million to Bangladesh, actions the United Nations has described as ethnic cleansing with genocidal intent.[127][128] Ongoing attacks in Rakhine State as of 2024 echo these events, involving arson, killings, and restrictions on movement, amid denial of citizenship to Rohingya under Myanmar's 1982 laws.[129] In Pakistan, Ahmadi Muslims, who consider themselves part of Islam but are legally designated non-Muslims since 1974, endure blasphemy prosecutions, mosque desecrations, and targeted killings; in 2024 alone, authorities reported hundreds of cases against Ahmadis, including arrests for religious practices.[130][131] Sectarian violence within Muslim-majority countries exacerbates intra-Abrahamic tensions, such as Sunni-Shia clashes in Iraq and Yemen, or attacks on Sufi shrines in Mali and Niger by Islamist groups.[115] In Western contexts, post-9/11 Islamophobia has led to hate crimes, though data from the U.S. Department of Justice indicate spikes tied to geopolitical events rather than systemic policy.[132] Other Abrahamic minorities, such as Bahá'ís in Iran, face institutionalized discrimination including property seizures, arrests, and executions for apostasy, with over 200 Bahá'ís imprisoned as of 2020 under laws enforcing Shia Islamic supremacy.[133] Yazidis, an ancient monotheistic group tracing roots to Abrahamic traditions, suffered genocide by ISIS in 2014, with approximately 5,000 killed and thousands enslaved; remnants in Iraq continue to face threats from militias and displacement.[134] Mandaeans, another gnostic Abrahamic sect in Iraq and Iran, have dwindled to under 100,000 due to targeted killings and forced conversions, particularly during post-2003 instability and ISIS campaigns.[135] These cases highlight vulnerabilities of smaller sects amid dominant religious majorities, often compounded by state inaction or complicity.Persecution of Non-Abrahamic and Minority Religions
Zoroastrians in Iran, adherents of one of the world's oldest monotheistic faiths originating in ancient Persia, face ongoing discrimination under the Islamic Republic's legal framework, which recognizes only Islam, Christianity, Judaism, and Zoroastrianism as protected minorities but grants Zoroastrians fewer rights than Muslims.[136] During the Iran-Iraq War from 1980 to 1988, young Zoroastrians were disproportionately drafted into high-risk suicide missions, reflecting systemic bias against non-Muslim minorities.[137] Contemporary restrictions include barriers to higher education, employment in government, and public worship, contributing to a sharp population decline from millions historically to approximately 25,000 today.[138] Hindus in Pakistan, numbering about 1.96 million or 1.2% of the population primarily in Sindh province, endure forced conversions, abductions, and temple desecrations amid blasphemy laws and societal hostility.[139] In 2020, Amnesty International documented attacks on Hindu sites and urged protection for religious freedom, including temple construction rights.[140] Economic desperation has driven some conversions, often coerced through offers of jobs or land by Muslim groups, exacerbating the minority's vulnerability in a virus-impacted economy.[141] Pakistan's Defence Minister acknowledged in 2024 that Hindus face persistent violence, including murders and assaults, highlighting institutional failures in safeguarding minorities.[142] Sikhs in Pakistan, a dwindling community concentrated in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, report escalating targeted killings and extortion by Islamist militants.[143] In 2023, at least three Sikhs were murdered, with Islamic State-Khorasan claiming responsibility for some attacks, prompting community flight from restive areas.[143] Forced conversions and abductions of Sikh women underscore broader patterns of minority persecution, compounded by inadequate state response.[144] Tibetan Buddhists in China experience intensified suppression under the Chinese Communist Party's policies aimed at eradicating distinct religious and cultural identity.[145] Since 1959, the government has destroyed monasteries, detained monks, and enforced "patriotic re-education" camps, with Human Rights Watch reporting arbitrary arrests and interference in monastic affairs as of 2020.[146] The U.S. State Department has noted China's efforts to control the selection of the Dalai Lama's successor, viewing Tibetan Buddhism as a vehicle for separatism.[146] The Yazidi faith, a monotheistic tradition with ancient Mesopotamian roots distinct from Abrahamic religions, suffered genocide by ISIS in Iraq's Sinjar region starting August 2014.[147] Over two weeks, ISIS killed thousands of Yazidi men, enslaved up to 7,000 women and children, and displaced hundreds of thousands, acts the UN recognized as genocide.[148] Survivors continue facing trauma and inadequate repatriation, with mass graves exhumed revealing systematic atrocities.[147] Bahá'í followers in Iran, the world's largest such community outside its birthplace, endure state-sponsored persecution classified by Human Rights Watch in 2024 as a crime against humanity, involving arbitrary arrests, property seizures, and educational bans.[149] Since the 1979 Revolution, over 200 Bahá'í have been executed, and recent raids target women specifically through interrogations and home confiscations.[150] The regime's policies systematically deny Bahá'í basic rights, framing their faith as a threat to Islamic governance.[151] Indigenous religions in the Americas faced deliberate suppression by colonial and U.S. governments, culminating in the 1883 Code of Indian Offenses that criminalized rituals, dances, and medicine practices until its repeal in 1978 via the American Indian Religious Freedom Act.[152] This policy inhibited access to sacred sites and objects, eroding cultural continuity for tribes like the Lakota and Navajo.[153] Historical forced assimilation through boarding schools further dismantled spiritual traditions, with effects persisting despite legal protections post-1978.[154]Ethnic and Racial Persecution
Historical Pogroms and Expulsions
![Massacre of Jews in the Lietūkis garage, Kaunas, 1941][float-right]Historical pogroms consisted of organized riots and massacres targeting ethnic minorities, particularly Jews in Europe, often incited by rumors of ritual murder or economic grievances. In the Rhineland massacres of 1096, during the First Crusade, thousands of Jews were killed by crusader mobs in cities such as Worms, Mainz, and Cologne, with estimates of up to 5,000 deaths across the region driven by religious fervor and local antagonism.[155] Similar violence erupted in England during the York pogrom of 1190, where approximately 150 Jews were massacred and the community eradicated amid accusations of usury and blood libel.[42] Expulsions frequently followed periods of heightened persecution, serving as state-sanctioned ethnic cleansing. On July 18, 1290, King Edward I of England issued the Edict of Expulsion, banishing all Jews—numbering around 3,000—from the realm by November 1, motivated by financial debts owed to Jewish moneylenders and parliamentary pressure for heavy taxation relief.[156] Assets were seized by the crown, and Jews were forced to depart under threat of death, marking the end of organized Jewish life in England until the 1650s. Similarly, in 1492, the Alhambra Decree by Ferdinand II and Isabella I ordered the expulsion of practicing Jews from Spain by July 31, affecting an estimated 200,000 individuals who either converted or fled to Portugal, North Africa, or the Ottoman Empire, amid Inquisition pressures to eliminate perceived Judaizing influences on conversos.[157] In Eastern Europe, pogroms intensified in the 19th and early 20th centuries within the Russian Empire's Pale of Settlement. Following the 1881 assassination of Tsar Alexander II—falsely blamed on Jews—a wave of pogroms swept southern Russia and Ukraine, resulting in dozens killed, thousands injured, and widespread property destruction, fueled by state inaction and antisemitic propaganda.[158] The 1903 Kishinev pogrom, occurring April 6–7 in Bessarabia (modern Moldova), saw 49 Jews murdered, over 500 wounded, 1,500 homes looted, and numerous rapes, incited by local press blood libel stories and police complicity, galvanizing global Jewish self-defense movements.[159] [160] A subsequent 1905–1906 wave across the empire claimed over 3,000 Jewish lives amid revolutionary unrest. Beyond Jewish communities, ethnic expulsions targeted other groups, such as the forced removal of approximately 15,000 Acadians by British authorities from Nova Scotia in 1755–1764, redistributing French Catholic populations to disrupt alliances with indigenous peoples.[161] These events underscore patterns of ethnic homogenization through violence and displacement, often rationalized by security or economic pretexts but rooted in majority-group resentments and power consolidation.
Colonial and Post-Colonial Eras
During the colonial era, European powers imposed racial hierarchies that facilitated the persecution of indigenous populations through forced labor, displacement, and violence justified by notions of racial superiority. In the Congo Free State, ruled personally by King Leopold II of Belgium from 1885 to 1908, the regime's extraction of rubber and ivory involved systematic atrocities against Congolese ethnic groups, including mutilations—such as severing hands as punishment for failing quotas—and mass killings by the Force Publique militia. Estimates of excess deaths from these policies, disease, and famine range from 5 to 13 million, representing up to half the pre-colonial population, though exact figures remain debated due to limited records.[162][163] In British India, colonial policies exacerbated famines that disproportionately affected Indian populations, with racial doctrines prioritizing British interests and viewing native suffering as secondary. The Bengal Famine of 1943, amid World War II, resulted in 2 to 3 million deaths from starvation and disease, worsened by grain exports to British forces and wartime hoarding, despite ample global supplies. Earlier famines from 1881 to 1920 are linked to exploitative taxation and export-focused agriculture, with one analysis estimating 100 million excess deaths attributable to these systemic policies, though critics argue natural factors and local mismanagement played roles and question the direct causality.[164][165][166] In the Americas, Spanish and Portuguese colonization from the late 15th century onward targeted indigenous ethnic groups like the Aztecs and Incas through conquest, enslavement, and the encomienda system, which forced labor on racial grounds and contributed to population declines of 80-90% in some regions by 1600, primarily via introduced diseases but accelerated by targeted violence and displacement. British settlers in North America similarly persecuted Native American tribes, such as during the Pequot War of 1637, where colonial militias massacred hundreds in ethnic cleansing operations to secure land.[167] Post-colonial transitions often unleashed ethnic tensions amplified by arbitrary colonial borders and favoritism toward certain groups. The 1947 Partition of British India into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan triggered communal riots between Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs, resulting in 1 to 2 million deaths from targeted killings, rapes, and forced migrations affecting 14 million people across Punjab and Bengal.[168][169] In Africa, the 1994 Rwandan genocide saw Hutu extremists systematically target the Tutsi minority—and moderate Hutus—over 100 days following the assassination of President Juvénal Habyarimana, using radio propaganda, machetes, and militias to kill approximately 800,000 people, or 70% of the Tutsi population. Colonial-era Belgian policies had rigidified Hutu-Tutsi ethnic divisions through identity cards and favoritism toward Tutsis, sowing seeds for post-independence retribution.[170][171] Other post-colonial cases include the Nigerian Civil War (1967-1970), where Igbo secessionists in Biafra faced ethnic persecution by federal forces, leading to 1 to 3 million deaths, mostly from starvation due to blockades targeting the Igbo population. In Sudan, the Darfur conflict from 2003 onward involved Arab Janjaweed militias, backed by the government, persecuting non-Arab ethnic groups like the Fur and Zaghawa, with over 300,000 deaths from violence and displacement. These episodes highlight how colonial legacies of ethnic categorization fueled independent states' internal racial and ethnic conflicts.[172][173]Genocide-Linked Cases
The Herero and Namaqua genocide, occurring between 1904 and 1908 in German South West Africa (modern-day Namibia), represented an early 20th-century campaign of ethnic extermination against the Herero and Nama peoples by German colonial forces under General Lothar von Trotha. Following uprisings against colonial rule, German troops issued extermination orders, driving Herero into the Omaheke desert without water and confining Nama in concentration camps where forced labor and disease led to massive mortality. Approximately 50,000 to 80,000 Herero—out of an estimated 80,000—perished, while 10,000 Nama died, constituting up to 80% of the Herero population and over half of the Nama.[174] The Armenian Genocide, perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire's Young Turk government from 1915 to 1923, targeted the Armenian ethnic population amid World War I, involving mass deportations, death marches, and killings intended to eliminate the group as a perceived internal threat. Ottoman authorities organized systematic killings, with Armenians concentrated in eastern Anatolia before forced relocations to Syrian deserts where starvation and attacks claimed lives. Estimates indicate 1 to 1.5 million Armenian deaths, reducing the pre-war population of about 2 million by over half.[52] Nazi Germany's Holocaust, from 1941 to 1945, exemplified racial genocide against Jews, whom the regime classified as an inferior race threatening Aryan purity, leading to industrialized extermination in death camps like Auschwitz. The "Final Solution" policy, formalized at the 1942 Wannsee Conference, coordinated across occupied Europe to murder Jews through gassings, shootings, and starvation. Around 6 million Jews were killed, representing two-thirds of Europe's Jewish population.[175] The 1994 Rwandan Genocide saw Hutu extremists target the Tutsi ethnic minority—and Hutu moderates—over 100 days from April 7 to July 19, using radio propaganda and militias to incite massacres with machetes and firearms, exploiting longstanding ethnic divisions exacerbated by colonial favoritism. The killing spree followed the assassination of President Juvénal Habyarimana, with roadblocks and lists facilitating identification and slaughter. An estimated 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus died, comprising about 70% of the Tutsi population.[170][176] In the Bosnian War's Srebrenica massacre of July 1995, Bosnian Serb forces under Ratko Mladić overran the UN-designated safe area, separating and executing over 8,000 Bosniak men and boys in acts ruled genocide by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia due to intent to destroy the Bosniak ethnic group in the region. Captured after siege, victims were transported to killing sites, shot en masse, and buried in mass graves later exhumed for evidence. This event formed part of broader ethnic cleansing campaigns against Bosniaks, contributing to over 100,000 war deaths.[177][178]Political and Ideological Persecution
Under Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes
In totalitarian regimes, which aspire to comprehensive ideological conformity and state dominance over all aspects of life, persecution manifests as systematic elimination of perceived internal threats through arrests, show trials, forced labor, and executions. The Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin exemplified this during the Great Purge of 1936–1938, a campaign against alleged enemies within the Communist Party, military, and society, resulting in roughly 700,000 to 1 million executions by the NKVD secret police. [179] This included mass operations like NKVD Order No. 00447, which targeted "socially alien elements" such as kulaks and former oppositionists, leading to quotas for arrests and shootings across regions. The accompanying Gulag forced-labor camp system, expanded from 1929 to 1953, held up to 2.5 million prisoners at its peak in the early 1950s, with death tolls from starvation, disease, overwork, and executions estimated at 1.5–1.7 million over its operation, as derived from post-Soviet archival data analyzed by historians. [180] Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler pursued similar ideological purification from 1933, initially targeting political opponents like communists, social democrats, and trade unionists as the first inmates of concentration camps. Dachau, the first camp, opened on March 22, 1933, explicitly for political prisoners, with over 4,000 communists and others detained there by summer 1933 amid the regime's consolidation after the Reichstag Fire Decree. [181] By 1934, the Night of the Long Knives purged internal rivals within the Nazi Party and SA, executing at least 85 high-ranking figures, while expanding arrests of leftists led to tens of thousands in "protective custody" without trial, setting precedents for broader camp networks that by 1939 held over 21,000 political prisoners across sites like Sachsenhausen. [182] These actions enforced Gleichschaltung (coordination), eliminating dissent to align society with National Socialist doctrine. In Maoist China, the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) mobilized youth Red Guards to persecute "capitalist roaders," intellectuals, and party officials for ideological impurity, causing 500,000 to 2 million deaths from beatings, suicides, and factional violence, alongside millions subjected to struggle sessions and labor reeducation. [183] Campaigns like the "Cleansing the Class Ranks" (1968–1969) explicitly targeted perceived counter-revolutionaries, with provincial reports documenting over 500,000 killed in one wave alone. [184] Authoritarian regimes, while less ideologically totalizing than the above, still rely on persecution to suppress challenges to ruling elites, often through security apparatuses and prisons. In Franco's Spain (1939–1975), post-Civil War repression executed or imprisoned around 200,000 Republicans and leftists in labor camps until the 1940s, framing them as threats to national unity under Catholic-authoritarian rule. [185] Contemporary North Korea maintains four major political prison camps (kwalliso), holding an estimated 50,000–65,000 inmates as of 2025, including three generations of families punished under the "guilt-by-association" system for offenses like criticizing the Kim dynasty or consuming foreign media, with conditions involving forced labor, torture, and public executions to deter disloyalty. [186] [187] Satellite imagery and defector testimonies confirm ongoing operations at sites like Camp 16 (Hwasong) and Camp 18, where mortality rates exceed 25% annually from malnutrition and abuse. [188] Across these cases, persecution served causal functions of regime survival: preempting organized opposition, extracting coerced labor for economic goals (e.g., Gulag mining, Nazi armaments), and instilling fear to ensure compliance, with empirical records showing peaks during power consolidation phases rather than external wars alone. Estimates vary due to regime secrecy and post-hoc archival access, but cross-verified data from trials, memoirs, and demographics underscore the scale, countering minimization in state propaganda.Suppression of Dissidents and Intellectuals
Suppression of dissidents and intellectuals has been a hallmark of many totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, where challenges to ideological orthodoxy are met with imprisonment, exile, execution, or forced labor to maintain control over thought and discourse. In such systems, intellectuals—writers, scientists, academics, and artists—are often labeled as enemies for promoting ideas deemed subversive, leading to systematic campaigns that decimate cultural and intellectual elites. These actions not only eliminate opposition but also instill fear, discouraging independent inquiry and enforcing conformity. Historical records document millions affected, with tactics ranging from public denunciations and purges to mass killings, often justified as necessary for ideological purity.[189] In the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin, the Great Purge of 1936–1938 targeted perceived threats within the Communist Party, military, and intelligentsia, resulting in the arrest, trial, and execution of thousands of intellectuals accused of counter-revolutionary activities. Writers, historians, and scientists faced show trials or summary executions, with many sent to Gulag labor camps where mortality rates exceeded 10% annually due to starvation and forced labor. For instance, the regime suppressed dissident literature and exiled figures like physicist Andrei Sakharov in 1980 for criticizing human rights abuses, viewing intellectual dissent as a direct repudiation of proletarian ideology. This persecution extended across the Soviet era, with censorship mechanisms controlling all publications to align with party doctrine.[189][190] During China's Cultural Revolution from 1966 to 1976, Mao Zedong mobilized Red Guard youth groups to attack intellectuals as part of a purge against "bourgeois" elements, leading to the humiliation, beating, and killing of millions, including teachers, professors, and artists. Universities were shut down, libraries ransacked, and public struggle sessions forced confessions of ideological deviation, with estimates of 1–2 million deaths from violence and subsequent purges. Intellectuals were sent to rural labor camps for "re-education," disrupting scientific and cultural progress; for example, geneticist Pu Fuzhou was imprisoned for promoting "Western" science conflicting with Maoist thought. The campaign's chaos reflected a deliberate strategy to eradicate elite knowledge threatening party control.[191][183] Nazi Germany's 1933 book burnings exemplified early ideological suppression, with student-led actions on May 10 destroying over 25,000 volumes by Jewish, pacifist, and leftist authors such as Albert Einstein and Karl Marx in 34 university towns, symbolizing the regime's rejection of "degenerate" ideas. This preceded broader persecution, including the dismissal of Jewish and dissenting academics under the 1933 Civil Service Law, forcing exile for over 2,000 scholars and writers by 1938, which depleted Germany's intellectual capital. Figures like philosopher Theodor Adorno fled to avoid arrest, as the regime equated intellectual pluralism with racial and political treason.[192][193] The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia (1975–1979) pursued extreme anti-intellectualism under Pol Pot, executing or starving an estimated 1.5–3 million people, with intellectuals—identified by traits like wearing glasses or speaking foreign languages—targeted as class enemies in a bid to reset society to agrarian purity. "Smashing" campaigns at sites like Tuol Sleng prison tortured and killed teachers, doctors, and former officials, eradicating nearly all educated professionals; by 1979, literacy rates plummeted as the regime viewed education as corrupting. This decimation, part of a broader genocide, aimed to eliminate any capacity for dissent or reconstruction outside Khmer Rouge ideology.[194][195]| Regime | Period | Key Tactics | Estimated Impact on Intellectuals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soviet Union (Stalin) | 1936–1938 (Great Purge) | Arrests, Gulags, executions | Thousands executed; ongoing suppression of writers and scientists[190] |
| China (Cultural Revolution) | 1966–1976 | Red Guard violence, re-education camps | 1–2 million terrorized or killed; universities closed[191] |
| Nazi Germany | 1933 onward | Book burnings, dismissals, exile | 25,000+ books destroyed; 2,000+ scholars exiled[192] |
| Cambodia (Khmer Rouge) | 1975–1979 | Executions, "smashing" enemies | Near-total elimination of educated class; 1.5–3 million total deaths including intellectuals[195] |
