Hubbry Logo
SirolimusSirolimusMain
Open search
Sirolimus
Community hub
Sirolimus
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sirolimus
Sirolimus
from Wikipedia

Sirolimus
Clinical data
Trade namesRapamune, others
Other namesRapamycin, ABI-009
License data
Pregnancy
category
  • AU: C
Routes of
administration
By mouth, intravenous, topical
ATC code
Legal status
Legal status
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability14% (oral solution), lower with high-fat meals; 18% (tablet), higher with high-fat meals[8]
Protein binding92%
MetabolismLiver
Elimination half-life57–63 hours[9]
ExcretionMostly fecal
Identifiers
  • (1R,9S,12S,15R,16E,18R,19R,21R,23S,24E,26E,28E,30S,32S,35R)-1,18-dihydroxy-12-[(2R)-1-((1S,3R,4R)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl)-2-propanyl]-19,30-dimethoxy-15,17,21,23,29,35-hexamethyl-11,36-dioxa-4-azatricyclo[30.3.1.04,9]hexatriaconta-16,24,26,28-tetraene-2,3,10,14,20-pentone
CAS Number
PubChem CID
DrugBank
ChemSpider
UNII
KEGG
ChEBI
ChEMBL
PDB ligand
CompTox Dashboard (EPA)
ECHA InfoCard100.107.147 Edit this at Wikidata
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC51H79NO13
Molar mass914.187 g·mol−1
3D model (JSmol)
Solubility in water0.0026 [10]
  • O[C@@H]1CC[C@H](C[C@H]1OC)C[C@@H](C)[C@@H]4CC(=O)[C@H](C)/C=C(\C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](OC)C(=O)[C@H](C)C[C@H](C)\C=C\C=C\C=C(/C)[C@@H](OC)C[C@@H]2CC[C@@H](C)[C@@](O)(O2)C(=O)C(=O)N3CCCC[C@H]3C(=O)O4
  • InChI=1S/C51H79NO13/c1-30-16-12-11-13-17-31(2)42(61-8)28-38-21-19-36(7)51(60,65-38)48(57)49(58)52-23-15-14-18-39(52)50(59)64-43(33(4)26-37-20-22-40(53)44(27-37)62-9)29-41(54)32(3)25-35(6)46(56)47(63-10)45(55)34(5)24-30/h11-13,16-17,25,30,32-34,36-40,42-44,46-47,53,56,60H,14-15,18-24,26-29H2,1-10H3/b13-11+,16-12+,31-17+,35-25+/t30-,32-,33-,34-,36-,37+,38+,39+,40-,42+,43+,44-,46-,47+,51-/m1/s1 checkY
  • Key:QFJCIRLUMZQUOT-HPLJOQBZSA-N checkY
  (verify)

Sirolimus, also known as rapamycin and sold under the brand name Rapamune among others, is a macrolide compound that is used to coat coronary stents, prevent organ transplant rejection, treat a rare lung disease called lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and treat perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa).[1][2][11] It has immunosuppressant functions in humans and is especially useful in preventing the rejection of kidney transplants. It is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase inhibitor[2] that reduces the sensitivity of T cells and B cells to interleukin-2 (IL-2), inhibiting their activity.[12]

This compound also has a use in cardiovascular drug-eluting stent technologies to inhibit restenosis.

A plaque, written in Portuguese, commemorating the discovery of sirolimus on Easter Island, near Rano Kau

It is produced by the bacterium Streptomyces hygroscopicus and was isolated for the first time in 1972, from samples of Streptomyces hygroscopicus found on Easter Island.[13][14][15] The compound was originally named rapamycin after the native name of the island, Rapa Nui.[11] Sirolimus was initially developed as an antifungal agent. However, this use was abandoned when it was discovered to have potent immunosuppressive and antiproliferative properties due to its ability to inhibit mTOR. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1999.[16] Hyftor (sirolimus gel) was authorized for topical treatment of facial angiofibroma in the European Union in May 2023.[6]

Medical uses

[edit]

In the US, sirolimus, as Rapamune, is indicated for the prevention of organ transplant rejection[1] and for the treatment of lymphangioleiomyomatosis;[1] and, as Fyarro, in the form of protein-bound particles, for the treatment of adults with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa).[2]

In the EU, sirolimus, as Rapamune, is indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in adults at low to moderate immunological risk receiving a renal transplant[4][5] and for the treatment of people with sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis with moderate lung disease or declining lung function;[4][5] and, as Hyftor, for the treatment of facial angiofibroma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex.[6][7]

Prevention of transplant rejection

[edit]

The chief advantage sirolimus has over calcineurin inhibitors is its low toxicity toward kidneys. Transplant patients maintained on calcineurin inhibitors long-term tend to develop impaired kidney function or even kidney failure; this can be avoided by using sirolimus instead. It is particularly advantageous in patients with kidney transplants for hemolytic-uremic syndrome, as this disease is likely to recur in the transplanted kidney if a calcineurin-inhibitor is used. However, on 7 October 2008, the FDA approved safety labeling revisions for sirolimus to warn of the risk for decreased renal function associated with its use.[17][18] In 2009, the FDA notified healthcare professionals that a clinical trial conducted by Wyeth showed an increased mortality in stable liver transplant patients after switching from a calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen to sirolimus.[19] A 2019 cohort study of nearly 10,000 lung transplant recipients in the US demonstrated significantly improved long-term survival using sirolimus + tacrolimus instead of mycophenolate mofetil + tacrolimus for immunosuppressive therapy starting at one year after transplant.[20]

Sirolimus can also be used alone, or in conjunction with a calcineurin inhibitor (such as tacrolimus), and/or mycophenolate mofetil, to provide steroid-free immunosuppression regimens. Impaired wound healing and thrombocytopenia are possible side effects of sirolimus; therefore, some transplant centers prefer not to use it immediately after the transplant operation, but instead administer it only after a period of weeks or months. Its optimal role in immunosuppression has not yet been determined, and it remains the subject of a number of ongoing clinical trials.[12]

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

[edit]

In May 2015, the FDA approved sirolimus to treat lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a rare, progressive lung disease that primarily affects women of childbearing age. This made sirolimus the first drug approved to treat this disease.[21] LAM involves lung tissue infiltration with smooth muscle-like cells with mutations of the tuberous sclerosis complex gene (TSC2). Loss of TSC2 gene function activates the mTOR signaling pathway, resulting in the release of lymphangiogenic growth factors. Sirolimus blocks this pathway.[1]

The safety and efficacy of sirolimus treatment of LAM were investigated in clinical trials that compared sirolimus treatment with a placebo group in 89 patients for 12 months. The patients were observed for 12 months after the treatment had ended. The most commonly reported side effects of sirolimus treatment of LAM were mouth and lip ulcers, diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, sore throat, acne, chest pain, leg swelling, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, dizziness, muscle pain and elevated cholesterol. Serious side effects including hypersensitivity and swelling (edema) have been observed in renal transplant patients.[21]

While sirolimus was considered for treatment of LAM, it received orphan drug designation status because LAM is a rare condition.[21]

The safety of LAM treatment by sirolimus in people younger than 18 years old has not been tested.[1]

Coronary stent coating

[edit]

The antiproliferative effect of sirolimus has also been used in conjunction with coronary stents to prevent restenosis in coronary arteries following balloon angioplasty. The sirolimus is formulated in a polymer coating that affords controlled release through the healing period following coronary intervention. Several large clinical studies have demonstrated lower restenosis rates in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents when compared to bare-metal stents, resulting in fewer repeat procedures. However, this kind of stent may also increase the risk of vascular thrombosis.[22]

Vascular malformations

[edit]

Sirolimus is used to treat vascular malformations. Treatment with sirolimus can decrease pain and the fullness of vascular malformations, improve coagulation levels, and slow the growth of abnormal lymphatic vessels.[23] Sirolimus is a relatively new medical therapy for the treatment of vascular malformations[24] in recent years, sirolimus has emerged as a new medical treatment option for both vascular tumors and vascular malformations, as a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), capable of integrating signals from the PI3K/AKT pathway to coordinate proper cell growth and proliferation. Hence, sirolimus is ideal for "proliferative" vascular tumors through the control of tissue overgrowth disorders caused by inappropriate activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway as an antiproliferative agent.[25][26]

Angiofibromas

[edit]

Sirolimus has been used as a topical treatment of angiofibromas with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Facial angiofibromas occur in 80% of patients with TSC, and the condition is very disfiguring. A retrospective review of English-language medical publications reporting on topical sirolimus treatment of facial angiofibromas found sixteen separate studies with positive patient outcomes after using the drug. The reports involved a total of 84 patients, and improvement was observed in 94% of subjects, especially if treatment began during the early stages of the disease. Sirolimus treatment was applied in several different formulations (ointment, gel, solution, and cream), ranging from 0.003 to 1% concentrations. Reported adverse effects included one case of perioral dermatitis, one case of cephalea, and four cases of irritation.[27]

In April 2022, sirolimus was approved by the FDA for treating angiofibromas.[28][29]

Adverse effects

[edit]

The most common adverse reactions (≥30% occurrence, leading to a 5% treatment discontinuation rate) observed with sirolimus in clinical studies of organ rejection prophylaxis in individuals with kidney transplants include: peripheral edema, hypercholesterolemia, abdominal pain, headache, nausea, diarrhea, pain, constipation, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, increased creatinine, fever, urinary tract infection, anemia, arthralgia, and thrombocytopenia.[1]

The most common adverse reactions (≥20% occurrence, leading to an 11% treatment discontinuation rate) observed with sirolimus in clinical studies for the treatment of lymphangioleiomyomatosis are: peripheral edema, hypercholesterolemia, abdominal pain, headache, nausea, diarrhea, chest pain, stomatitis, nasopharyngitis, acne, upper respiratory tract infection, dizziness, and myalgia.[1]

The following adverse effects occurred in 3–20% of individuals taking sirolimus for organ rejection prophylaxis following a kidney transplant:[1]

System Adverse effects
Body as a whole Sepsis, lymphocele, herpes zoster infection, herpes simplex infection
Cardiovascular Venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis), rapid heart rate
Digestive Stomatitis
Hematologic/lymphatic Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP/HUS), leukopenia
Metabolic Abnormal healing, increased lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), hypokalemia, diabetes
Musculoskeletal Bone necrosis
Respiratory Pneumonia, epistaxis
Skin Melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma
Urogenital Pyelonephritis, ovarian cysts, menstrual disorders (amenorrhea and menorrhagia)

Diabetes-like symptoms

[edit]

While sirolimus inhibition of mTORC1 appears to mediate the drug's benefits, it also inhibits mTORC2, which results in diabetes-like symptoms.[30] This includes decreased glucose tolerance and insensitivity to insulin.[30] Sirolimus treatment may additionally increase the risk of type 2 diabetes.[31] In mouse studies, these symptoms can be avoided through the use of alternate dosing regimens or analogs such as everolimus or temsirolimus.[32]

Lung toxicity

[edit]

Lung toxicity is a serious complication associated with sirolimus therapy,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][excessive citations] especially in the case of lung transplants.[40] The mechanism of the interstitial pneumonitis caused by sirolimus and other macrolide MTOR inhibitors is unclear, and may have nothing to do with the mTOR pathway.[41][42][43] The interstitial pneumonitis is not dose-dependent, but is more common in patients with underlying lung disease.[33][44]

Lowered effectiveness of immune system

[edit]

There have been warnings about the use of sirolimus in transplants, where it may increase mortality due to an increased risk of infections.[1]

Cancer risk

[edit]

Sirolimus may increase an individual's risk for contracting skin cancers from exposure to sunlight or UV radiation, and risk of developing lymphoma.[1] In studies, the skin cancer risk under sirolimus was lower than under other immunosuppressants such as azathioprine and calcineurin inhibitors, and lower than under placebo.[1][45]

Impaired wound healing

[edit]

Individuals taking sirolimus are at increased risk of experiencing impaired or delayed wound healing, particularly if they have a body mass index more than 30 kg/m2 (classified as obese).[1]

Interactions

[edit]

Sirolimus is metabolized by the CYP3A4 enzyme and is a substrate of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux pump; hence, inhibitors of either protein may increase sirolimus concentrations in blood plasma, whereas inducers of CYP3A4 and P-gp may decrease sirolimus concentrations in blood plasma.[1]

Pharmacology

[edit]

Pharmacodynamics

[edit]

Unlike the similarly named tacrolimus, sirolimus is not a calcineurin inhibitor, but it has a similar suppressive effect on the immune system. Sirolimus inhibits IL-2 and other cytokine receptor-dependent signal transduction mechanisms, via action on mTOR (mammalian Target Of Rapamycin, rapamycin being another name for sirolimus), and thereby blocks activation of T and B cells. Ciclosporin and tacrolimus inhibit the secretion of IL-2, by inhibiting calcineurin.[12]

The mode of action of sirolimus is to bind the cytosolic protein FK-binding protein 12 (FKBP12) like tacrolimus. Unlike the tacrolimus-FKBP12 complex, which inhibits calcineurin (PP2B), the sirolimus-FKBP12 complex inhibits the mTOR pathway by directly binding to mTOR Complex 1 (mTORC1).[12]

mTOR has also been called FRAP (FKBP-rapamycin-associated protein), RAFT (rapamycin and FKBP target), RAPT1, or SEP. The earlier names FRAP and RAFT were coined to reflect the fact that sirolimus must bind FKBP12 first, and only the FKBP12-sirolimus complex can bind mTOR. However, mTOR is now the widely accepted name, since Tor was first discovered via genetic and molecular studies of sirolimus-resistant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that identified FKBP12, Tor1, and Tor2 as the targets of sirolimus and provided robust support that the FKBP12-sirolimus complex binds to and inhibits Tor1 and Tor2.[46][12]

Pharmacokinetics

[edit]

Sirolimus is metabolized by the CYP3A4 enzyme and is a substrate of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux pump.[1] It has linear pharmacokinetics.[47] In studies on N=6 and N=36 subjects, peak concentration was obtained in 1.3 hours +/r- 0.5 hours and the terminal elimination was slow, with a half life around 60 hours +/- 10 hours.[48][47] Sirolimus was not found to effect the concentration of ciclosporin, which is also metabolized primarily by the CYP3A4 enzyme.[47]

The bioavailabiliy of sirolimus is low, and the absorption of sirolimus into the blood stream from the intestine varies widely between patients, with some patients having up to eight times more exposure than others for the same dose. Drug levels are, therefore, taken to make sure patients get the right dose for their condition.[12][non-primary source needed] This is determined by taking a blood sample before the next dose, which gives the trough level. However, good correlation is noted between trough concentration levels and drug exposure, known as area under the concentration-time curve, for both sirolimus (SRL) and tacrolimus (TAC) (SRL: r2 = 0.83; TAC: r2 = 0.82), so only one level need be taken to know its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. PK profiles of SRL and of TAC are unaltered by simultaneous administration. Dose-corrected drug exposure of TAC correlates with SRL (r2 = 0.8), so patients have similar bioavailability of both.[49][non-primary source needed]

Chemistry

[edit]

Sirolimus is a natural product and macrocyclic lactone.[9]

Biosynthesis

[edit]

The biosynthesis of the rapamycin core is accomplished by a type I polyketide synthase (PKS) in conjunction with a nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS). The domains responsible for the biosynthesis of the linear polyketide of rapamycin are organized into three multienzymes, RapA, RapB, and RapC, which contain a total of 14 modules (figure 1). The three multienzymes are organized such that the first four modules of polyketide chain elongation are in RapA, the following six modules for continued elongation are in RapB, and the final four modules to complete the biosynthesis of the linear polyketide are in RapC.[50] Then, the linear polyketide is modified by the NRPS, RapP, which attaches L-pipecolate to the terminal end of the polyketide, and then cyclizes the molecule, yielding the unbound product, prerapamycin.[51]

Figure 1: Domain organization of PKS of rapamycin and biosynthetic intermediates
Figure 2: Prerapamycin, unbound product of PKS and NRPS
Figure 3: Sequence of "tailoring" steps, which convert unbound prerapamycin into rapamycin
Figure 4: Proposed mechanism of lysine cyclodeaminase conversion of L-lysine to L-pipecolic acid

The core macrocycle, prerapamycin (figure 2), is then modified (figure 3) by an additional five enzymes, which lead to the final product, rapamycin. First, the core macrocycle is modified by RapI, SAM-dependent O-methyltransferase (MTase), which O-methylates at C39. Next, a carbonyl is installed at C9 by RapJ, a cytochrome P-450 monooxygenases (P-450). Then, RapM, another MTase, O-methylates at C16. Finally, RapN, another P-450, installs a hydroxyl at C27 immediately followed by O-methylation by Rap Q, a distinct MTase, at C27 to yield rapamycin.[52]

The biosynthetic genes responsible for rapamycin synthesis have been identified. As expected, three extremely large open reading frames (ORF's) designated as rapA, rapB, and rapC encode for three extremely large and complex multienzymes, RapA, RapB, and RapC, respectively.[50] The gene rapL has been established to code for a NAD+-dependent lysine cycloamidase, which converts L-lysine to L-pipecolic acid (figure 4) for incorporation at the end of the polyketide.[53][54] The gene rapP, which is embedded between the PKS genes and translationally coupled to rapC, encodes for an additional enzyme, an NPRS responsible for incorporating L-pipecolic acid, chain termination and cyclization of prerapamycin. In addition, genes rapI, rapJ, rapM, rapN, rapO, and rapQ have been identified as coding for tailoring enzymes that modify the macrocyclic core to give rapamycin (figure 3). Finally, rapG and rapH have been identified to code for enzymes that have a positive regulatory role in the preparation of rapamycin through the control of rapamycin PKS gene expression.[55] Biosynthesis of this 31-membered macrocycle begins as the loading domain is primed with the starter unit, 4,5-dihydroxocyclohex-1-ene-carboxylic acid, which is derived from the shikimate pathway.[50] Note that the cyclohexane ring of the starting unit is reduced during the transfer to module 1.[citation needed] The starting unit is then modified by a series of Claisen condensations with malonyl or methylmalonyl substrates, which are attached to an acyl carrier protein (ACP) and extend the polyketide by two carbons each.[citation needed] After each successive condensation, the growing polyketide is further modified according to enzymatic domains that are present to reduce and dehydrate it, thereby introducing the diversity of functionalities observed in rapamycin (figure 1).[citation needed] Once the linear polyketide is complete, L-pipecolic acid, which is synthesized by a lysine cycloamidase from an L-lysine, is added to the terminal end of the polyketide by an NRPS.[citation needed] Then, the NSPS cyclizes the polyketide, giving prerapamycin, the first enzyme-free product.[citation needed] The macrocyclic core is then customized by a series of post-PKS enzymes through methylations by MTases and oxidations by P-450s to yield rapamycin.[citation needed]

Society and culture

[edit]
[edit]

In February 2023, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency adopted a positive opinion, recommending the granting of a marketing authorization for the medicinal product Hyftor, intended for the treatment of angiofibroma.[56] The applicant for this medicinal product is Plusultra pharma GmbH.[56] Hyftor was authorized for medical use in the European Union in May 2023.[7]

Sirolimus, as Rapamune solution, was approved for medical use in the United States in 1999;[16] and as Rapamune tablets in August 2000.[57]

Sirolimus, as Fyarro, was approved for medical use in the United States in November 2021.[58][59]

Sirolimus, as Hyftor, was approved for medical use in the United States in March 2022.[28]

Research

[edit]

Cancer

[edit]

The antiproliferative effects of sirolimus may have a role in treating cancer. When dosed appropriately, sirolimus can enhance the immune response to tumor targeting[60] or otherwise promote tumor regression in clinical trials.[61] Sirolimus seems to lower the cancer risk in some transplant patients.[62]

Sirolimus was shown to inhibit the progression of dermal Kaposi's sarcoma in patients with renal transplants.[63] Other mTOR inhibitors, such as temsirolimus (CCI-779) or everolimus (RAD001), are being tested for use in cancers such as glioblastoma multiforme and mantle cell lymphoma. However, these drugs have a higher rate of fatal adverse events in cancer patients than control drugs.[64]

A combination therapy of doxorubicin and sirolimus has been shown to drive Akt-positive lymphomas into remission in mice.[citation needed] Akt signalling promotes cell survival in Akt-positive lymphomas and acts to prevent the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy drugs, such as doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide.[citation needed] Sirolimus blocks Akt signalling and the cells lose their resistance to the chemotherapy.[citation needed] Bcl-2-positive lymphomas were completely resistant to the therapy; eIF4E-expressing lymphomas are not sensitive to sirolimus.[65][66][67][68][69]

Tuberous sclerosis complex

[edit]

Sirolimus also shows promise in treating tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), a congenital disorder that predisposes those afflicted to benign tumor growth in the brain, heart, kidneys, skin, and other organs.[citation needed] After several studies conclusively linked mTOR inhibitors to remission in TSC tumors, specifically subependymal giant-cell astrocytomas in children and angiomyolipomas in adults, many US doctors began prescribing sirolimus (Wyeth's Rapamune) and everolimus (Novartis's RAD001) to TSC patients off-label.[citation needed] Numerous clinical trials using both rapamycin analogs, involving both children and adults with TSC, are underway in the United States.[70]

Effects on longevity

[edit]

mTOR, specifically mTORC1, was first shown to be important in aging in 2003, in a study on worms; sirolimus was shown to inhibit and slow aging in worms, yeast, and flies, and then to improve the condition of mouse models of various diseases of aging.[71][72] Sirolimus was first shown to extend lifespan in wild-type mice in a study published by NIH investigators in 2009; the studies have been replicated in mice of many different genetic backgrounds.[72] A study published in 2020 found late-life sirolimus dosing schedules enhanced mouse lifespan in a sex-specific manner: limited rapamycin exposure enhanced male but not female lifespan, providing evidence for sex differences in sirolimus response.[73][74] The results are further supported by the finding that genetically modified mice with impaired mTORC1 signalling live longer.[72]

Sirolimus has potential for widespread use as a longevity-promoting drug, with evidence pointing to its ability to prevent age-associated decline of cognitive and physical health. In 2014, researchers at Novartis showed that a related compound, everolimus, increased elderly patients' immune response on an intermittent dose.[75] This led to many in the anti-aging community self-experimenting with the compound.[76] However, because of the different biochemical properties of sirolimus, the dosing is potentially very different from that of everolimus. Ultimately, due to known side-effects of sirolimus, as well as inadequate evidence for optimal dosing, it was concluded in 2016 that more research was required before sirolimus could be widely prescribed for this purpose.[72][77] Two human studies on the effects of sirolimus (rapamycin) on longevity did not show statistically significant benefits. However, due to limitations in the studies, further research is needed to fully assess its potential in humans.[78]

Sirolimus has complex effects on the immune system—while IL-12 goes up and IL-10 decreases, which suggests an immunostimulatory response, TNF and IL-6 are decreased, which suggests an immunosuppressive response. The duration of the inhibition and the exact extent to which mTORC1 and mTORC2 are inhibited play a role, but were not yet well understood according to a 2015 paper.[79]

Topical administration

[edit]

When applied as a topical preparation, researchers showed that rapamycin can regenerate collagen and reverse clinical signs of aging in elderly patients.[80] The concentrations are far lower than those used to treat angiofibromas.[citation needed]

SARS-CoV-2

[edit]

Rapamycin has been proposed as a treatment for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 insofar as its immunosuppressive effects could prevent or reduce the cytokine storm seen in very serious cases of COVID-19.[81] Moreover, inhibition of cell proliferation by rapamycin could reduce viral replication.[81]

Atherosclerosis

[edit]

Rapamycin can accelerate degradation of oxidized LDL cholesterol in endothelial cells, thereby lowering the risk of atherosclerosis.[82] Oxidized LDL cholesterol is a major contributor to atherosclerosis.[83]

Lupus

[edit]

As of 2016, studies in cells, animals, and humans have suggested that mTOR activation is a process underlying systemic lupus erythematosus and that inhibiting mTOR with rapamycin may be a disease-modifying treatment.[84] As of 2016 rapamycin had been tested in small clinical trials in people with lupus.[84]

Lymphatic malformation (LM)

[edit]

Lymphatic malformation, lymphangioma or cystic hygroma, is an abnormal growth of lymphatic vessels that usually affects children around the head and neck area and more rarely involving the tongue causing macroglossia. LM is caused by a PIK3CA mutation during lymphangiogenesis early in gestational cell formation causing the malformation of lymphatic tissue. Treatment often consists of removal of the affected tissue via excision, laser ablation or sclerotherapy, but the rate of recurrence can be high and surgery can have complications. Sirolimus has shown evidence of being an effective treatment in alleviating symptoms and reducing the size of the malformation by way of altering the mTOR pathway in lymphangiogenesis. Although an off label use of the drug, Sirolimus has been shown to be an effective treatment for both microcystic and macrocystic LM. More research is however needed to develop and create targeted, effective treatment therapies for LM.[85]

Graft-versus-host disease

[edit]

Due to its immunosuppressant activity, Rapamycin has been assessed as prophylaxis or treatment agent of Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. While contrasted results were obtained in clinical trials,[86] pre-clinical studies have shown that Rapamycin can mitigate GVHD by increasing the proliferation of regulatory T cells, inhibiting cytotoxic T cells and lowering the differentiation of effector T cells.[87][88]

Applications in biology research

[edit]

Rapamycin is used in biology research as an agent for chemically induced dimerization.[89] In this application, rapamycin is added to cells expressing two fusion constructs, one of which contains the rapamycin-binding FRB domain from mTOR and the other of which contains an FKBP domain. Each fusion protein also contains additional domains that are brought into proximity when rapamycin induces binding of FRB and FKBP. In this way, rapamycin can be used to control and study protein localization and interactions.[citation needed]

Neurogenerative disorders

[edit]

As suppression of autophagy has been indicated as a contributing factor in a variety of neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's Disease, Rapamycin has been proposed as a potential treatment for these conditions, although results suggest it may not be effective in all cases.[90]

Veterinary uses

[edit]

A number of veterinary medicine teaching hospitals are participating in a long-term clinical study examining the effect of rapamycin on the longevity of dogs.[91]

A clinical trial led by NC State College of Veterinary Medicine (HALT), run at a number of veterinary hospitals across the US, found that rapamycin reverses the effects of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in cats.[92]

In March 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration announced conditional approval of sirolimus delayed-release tablets (Felycin-CA1) for the management of ventricular hypertrophy in cats with subclinical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.[93][94] This is the first product approved for use in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy for any indication.[94] Cardiomyopathy is a disease of the heart muscle.[94] Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in cats causes thickening of the heart's left ventricle.[94] It is the most common heart disease in cats and is one of the most common causes of death in cats.[94] While the cause is unknown in most cases, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is associated with a genetic mutation in certain breeds, such as Maine Coons, Ragdolls, and Persians.[94] Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a progressive disease.[94] Cats in the subclinical phase have thickening of their heart wall but do not show clinical symptoms of the disease yet.[94] Cats may live for years in the subclinical phase, while others may progress to congestive heart failure, arterial thromboembolism, or sudden death.[94]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Sirolimus, also known as rapamycin, is a macrolide compound isolated from the bacterium Streptomyces hygroscopicus found in a soil sample collected from Easter Island (Rapa Nui) during a 1964 scientific expedition. Discovered in 1975 by researchers at Ayerst Laboratories (now part of Pfizer), it was initially identified for its antifungal properties but later recognized for its potent immunosuppressive effects. Sirolimus functions by binding to the immunophilin FKBP12, forming a complex that inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell growth, proliferation, and survival, thereby suppressing T-lymphocyte activation and preventing immune rejection of transplanted organs. Approved by the U.S. (FDA) in 1999 under the brand name Rapamune, sirolimus is primarily indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants, typically used in combination with corticosteroids and cyclosporine. In 2015, the FDA expanded its approval to include the treatment of (LAM), a rare, progressive lung disease that predominantly affects women, where sirolimus stabilizes lung function by inhibiting the growth of abnormal smooth muscle-like cells. Due to its inhibition, sirolimus has also been investigated for anticancer applications, including in and other malignancies, though it is not FDA-approved for these indications and is often used off-label or in clinical trials. As a lipophilic with a long of approximately 62 hours, it is administered orally and requires to avoid toxicity, such as , , and impaired .

Medical uses

Prevention of organ transplant rejection

Sirolimus, also known as rapamycin, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on September 15, 1999, for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in renal transplant recipients aged 13 years and older, specifically in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. This approval was based on pivotal phase III trials demonstrating its efficacy in reducing acute rejection episodes when added to standard immunosuppressive regimens. In the context of transplantation, sirolimus exerts its immunosuppressive effects by binding to FKBP12, forming a complex that inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, thereby blocking interleukin-2 (IL-2)-induced signal transduction and preventing T-cell proliferation and activation. Standard dosing for sirolimus in renal transplantation involves an initial oral loading dose of 6 mg administered as soon as possible after surgery, followed by a maintenance dose of 2 mg once daily, adjusted based on therapeutic drug monitoring. Target trough concentrations in whole blood are typically maintained at 5 to 15 ng/mL when used concomitantly with cyclosporine to balance efficacy and minimize toxicity, with levels measured using methods like high-performance liquid chromatography or immunoassay. Dose adjustments are necessary for hepatic impairment, concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers, and in pediatric or elderly patients, where pharmacokinetics may vary. While primarily approved for renal transplants, sirolimus is also employed off-label in other solid organ transplants, such as liver and heart, often in calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens to preserve renal function. Efficacy data from the two pivotal randomized, double-blind trials—the U.S. study (n=719) and the multinational study (n=576)—showed that sirolimus significantly reduced the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months compared to when combined with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. In the U.S. , efficacy failure rates (composite of biopsy-proven rejection, graft loss, or death) were 18.7% for 2 mg sirolimus (p=0.002) and 16.8% for 5 mg sirolimus (p<0.001) versus 32.3% for . Similar reductions were observed in the multinational , establishing sirolimus as a potent alternative to antimetabolites for preventing acute rejection without increasing early graft loss. According to the 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline, sirolimus is recommended as an alternative to antimetabolite agents (e.g., mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine) in maintenance immunosuppression regimens that include a calcineurin inhibitor, particularly for adult renal transplant recipients at low-to-moderate immunologic risk (e.g., no prior rejection episodes and low panel-reactive antibody levels). This approach is favored in patients where calcineurin inhibitor minimization or withdrawal is considered to mitigate long-term nephrotoxicity, though conversion to sirolimus-based therapy should occur after the first few months post-transplant to avoid wound healing complications. Ongoing monitoring of graft function and drug levels is essential to optimize outcomes in this setting.

Treatment of lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Sirolimus received FDA approval in 2015 as the first treatment for (LAM), a rare progressive lung disease primarily affecting women, based on results from the Multicenter International LAM Efficacy of Sirolimus (MILES) trial. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 89 patients with moderate lung impairment (FEV1 ≤70% predicted), sirolimus treatment over 12 months resulted in a 12% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) compared to a 9% decline in the placebo group, demonstrating stabilization of lung function. The therapy also reduced symptoms such as dyspnea and improved quality of life measures. The recommended dosing for LAM is an initial oral dose of 2 mg once daily, with subsequent adjustments to maintain whole blood trough concentrations between 5 and 15 ng/mL, typically measured 10-20 days after initiation. This therapeutic range inhibits mTOR-driven proliferation of abnormal smooth muscle-like LAM cells in lung lesions, as sirolimus specifically targets the mTOR pathway to suppress cell growth and survival. Treatment is indicated for women with declining lung function, particularly those with FEV1 less than 70% of predicted, but is contraindicated during pregnancy due to its teratogenic potential, which includes risks of fetal growth restriction and malformations. Long-term sirolimus therapy has shown sustained benefits, including slowed decline in FEV1 and an 85% lower risk of death or lung transplantation compared to untreated patients in observational cohorts. These outcomes reflect reduced disease progression and decreased reliance on invasive interventions like transplantation. On a histological level, sirolimus addresses LAM's characteristic proliferation of LAM cells by reducing vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) levels, a biomarker of lymphatic involvement, thereby limiting lesion expansion and cyst formation in the lungs.

Use in coronary stents

Sirolimus-eluting stents represent a significant advancement in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for preventing in-stent restenosis, the re-narrowing of arteries due to tissue growth after stent placement. The Cypher stent, developed by Cordis (a Johnson & Johnson company), was the first drug-eluting stent approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on April 24, 2003, for treating de novo lesions in native coronary arteries up to 30 mm long with reference vessel diameters between 2.5 and 3.5 mm. This bare-metal stent is coated with a polymer matrix containing sirolimus, which is released locally to inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, a key driver of neointimal hyperplasia. The mechanism of action in these stents involves sirolimus binding to FKBP12, forming a complex that inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, thereby suppressing cell cycle progression and reducing excessive tissue growth at the implantation site. The non-erodible polymer (polyethylene-co-vinyl acetate and poly n-butyl methacrylate) controls the release of approximately 80% of the 140 μg/cm² sirolimus dose within 30 days, with the remainder eluting over subsequent months, providing sustained local antiproliferative effects while minimizing systemic exposure. This targeted delivery has been shown to dramatically lower restenosis rates compared to bare-metal stents; for instance, the Randomized Study with the Sirolimus-Coated BX Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent (RAVEL) trial, involving 238 patients with single de novo lesions, reported binary angiographic restenosis rates of 0% in the sirolimus-eluting group versus 26.6% in the bare-metal group at 6 months follow-up. Similarly, the Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Coronary Lesions (SIRIUS) trial, which enrolled 1,101 patients with more complex lesions, demonstrated in-segment restenosis rates of 8.9% versus 36.3% at 8 months. Long-term data from these and subsequent studies confirm sustained benefits in reducing target vessel revascularization (TVR), with 5-year follow-up from SIRIUS showing TVR rates of 16.3% for sirolimus-eluting stents compared to 28.0% for bare-metal stents. However, early concerns emerged regarding an increased risk of late stent thrombosis (beyond 30 days) and very late stent thrombosis (beyond 1 year), attributed in part to delayed endothelialization from the polymer and drug effects, with rates up to 0.6% annually in some analyses. These risks prompted refinements in stent design. Sirolimus continues to be utilized in second-generation drug-eluting stents, such as the Orsiro stent (Biotronik), which features an ultrathin (60 μm) cobalt-chromium strut with a bioresorbable polymer that fully degrades within 12-24 months, enhancing vascular healing and reducing thrombosis risk while maintaining antiproliferative efficacy. Clinical trials like BIOSCIENCE have shown Orsiro to outperform durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents in target lesion failure rates at 2 years (6.7% vs. 9.8%). This evolution has solidified sirolimus-eluting stents' role in contemporary PCI for a broad range of coronary lesions.

Treatment of vascular malformations

Sirolimus has emerged as a promising systemic therapy for complex vascular malformations, particularly low-flow types such as venous and lymphatic malformations that are refractory to conventional treatments like sclerotherapy or surgery. By inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, sirolimus disrupts abnormal endothelial cell proliferation and vascular remodeling, leading to regression of malformed vessels. This off-label application has gained traction based on clinical evidence from prospective studies and trials conducted between 2020 and 2025, demonstrating substantial clinical benefits in reducing lesion size, alleviating symptoms, and improving quality of life. Oral sirolimus is administered at low doses of 1-2 mg/m² daily, often divided into twice-daily regimens (e.g., 0.8 mg/m² per dose), with therapeutic trough levels targeted at 5-10 ng/mL to balance efficacy and minimize adverse effects. This dosing strategy promotes vessel regression through mTOR inhibition while allowing for pharmacokinetic adjustments based on individual metabolism. Recent guidelines emphasize lower trough targets to reduce toxicity compared to higher levels (10-15 ng/mL) used in transplant settings. Clinical studies from 2020 to 2025 report response rates of 70-80% in size reduction for venous malformations unresponsive to sclerotherapy, with partial or complete radiological improvements observed in the majority of cases. For instance, a 2021 prospective multicenter study of complicated vascular anomalies found response rates exceeding 80% in lymphatic malformations and venolymphatic types, with significant decreases in lesion volume. A 2023 European phase III trial further confirmed high efficacy in slow-flow malformations, with 50% of patients experiencing symptom improvement within the first few months. These outcomes highlight sirolimus's role in managing extensive or multifocal lesions where traditional interventions fail. In specific applications, sirolimus is particularly effective for lymphatic malformations (LM) and venolymphatic malformations, where it reduces cystic components and associated complications. Patients often report improvements in pain, swelling, and functional limitations, such as enhanced mobility in limb-involved cases. A 2023 meta-analysis of prospective studies noted marked symptom relief in venous malformations, including decreased bleeding and oozing, underscoring its utility in symptomatic, low-flow anomalies. Treatment monitoring involves serial imaging with MRI or ultrasound to assess lesion volume and vascular changes every 3-6 months, alongside measurement of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels as potential biomarkers of response. Trough level monitoring ensures adherence to the 5-10 ng/mL target, with dose adjustments to prevent under- or over-dosing. In pediatric patients, who comprise a significant portion of cases due to the congenital nature of these malformations, sirolimus is considered safe for children over 1 year of age when used under close supervision. Studies from 2023-2025 emphasize the need for regular growth monitoring, including height, weight, and developmental assessments, as mTOR inhibition may influence somatic growth, though no long-term disruptions have been widely reported in low-dose regimens.

Treatment of facial angiofibromas

Sirolimus is utilized in the treatment of facial angiofibromas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), benign skin lesions characterized by reddish papules on the face that can cause cosmetic disfigurement and psychosocial distress. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved sirolimus topical gel 0.2% (Hyftor) in March 2022 for this indication in patients aged 6 years and older, marking the first topical mTOR inhibitor specifically for TSC-related facial angiofibromas. In a phase 3 randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 62 patients, twice-daily application of the gel for 12 weeks resulted in a significant reduction in lesion size and redness, with 23% of treated patients achieving improved or markedly improved outcomes compared to 6% on placebo; approximately 13% experienced at least a 50% reduction in lesion size. Application of the topical gel involves a thin layer applied twice daily to the affected facial areas in the morning and evening, with a maximum daily dose of 600 mg (about 2 cm strand) for ages 6-11 years and 800 mg (about 2.5 cm strand) for those 12 years and older; care must be taken to avoid the eyes, mouth, and mucous membranes to prevent irritation. RCTs have demonstrated decreased erythema and volume of angiofibromas, alongside improvements in quality of life as measured by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, which decreased by an average of 3.6 points in adults and 2.8 points in children after treatment. For severe or multifocal disease where topical therapy is insufficient, low-dose oral sirolimus serves as an alternative, typically administered at 1-2 mg daily (adjusted to achieve trough levels of 3-8 ng/mL), leading to 60-75% clinical improvement in lesion appearance in observational studies with median treatment durations of 12 months. Combination therapy with laser treatments, such as pulsed dye laser or erbium:YAG laser, enhances efficacy when used alongside topical sirolimus for maintenance, reducing recurrence and further improving cosmetic outcomes in refractory cases. This approach is particularly beneficial for patients with extensive lesions, providing synergistic reduction in vascularity and papule elevation without increasing adverse events significantly.

Adverse effects

Sirolimus carries FDA boxed warnings for increased risk of mortality, graft loss, and hepatic artery thrombosis in de novo liver transplant patients, as well as excess mortality, graft loss, and wound healing complications in lung transplant patients. Its use is not recommended in these settings.

Metabolic disturbances

Sirolimus, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), is associated with significant metabolic disturbances, primarily manifesting as hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia in transplant recipients. These effects arise from mTOR's central role in regulating insulin signaling and lipid homeostasis, leading to impaired glucose tolerance and altered lipoprotein metabolism. Hyperglycemia and new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) after transplantation occur in approximately 30-50% of patients receiving , with higher rates observed in regimens combining sirolimus with calcineurin inhibitors. The mechanism involves mTOR inhibition disrupting insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) phosphorylation, thereby reducing insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues such as skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, and impairing beta-cell function in the pancreas. This leads to decreased glucose uptake and elevated fasting glucose levels, often requiring antidiabetic intervention within the first year post-transplant. Dyslipidemia, particularly hypertriglyceridemia, affects 40-60% of sirolimus-treated patients, with elevations in triglycerides often exceeding 300 mg/dL and necessitating lipid-lowering therapy such as statins. Sirolimus promotes hepatic very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) secretion by upregulating apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB100) expression and disrupting sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) pathways, while also reducing lipoprotein lipase activity through insulin signaling alterations. Hypercholesterolemia is similarly prevalent, occurring in 46-80% of cases, contributing to an atherogenic lipid profile. Risk factors for these metabolic disturbances include higher sirolimus doses (e.g., trough levels >8 ng/mL), concurrent use of inhibitors like , older age, and pre-existing or impaired glucose tolerance. These factors exacerbate mTOR-mediated inhibition of metabolic pathways, increasing the likelihood of severe or triglyceride levels >1000 mg/dL. Management strategies focus on mitigation without compromising . Dose reduction of sirolimus to trough levels of 5-8 ng/mL can alleviate symptoms in up to 70% of cases, while metformin effectively controls by enhancing insulin sensitivity, often in combination with sirolimus. For , statins like are first-line, with omega-3 fatty acids added for refractory hypertriglyceridemia; dietary modifications emphasizing low intake are also recommended. Routine monitoring includes quarterly assessments of HbA1c for glycemic control and lipid panels to guide adjustments. Long-term follow-up data indicate that sirolimus-associated metabolic disturbances may contribute to cardiovascular risk, though a 2024 nationwide of transplant recipients found no significant overall difference in compared to non-sirolimus regimens, with increased risk noted only in subgroups such as those with pre-transplant ; ongoing lipid and glucose management remains essential.

Pulmonary and immunological toxicities

Sirolimus, an inhibitor used for in and treatment of (LAM), is associated with pulmonary toxicities, most notably interstitial pneumonitis, occurring in approximately 5-15% of patients depending on the clinical context. This condition typically manifests as progressive dyspnea, non-productive cough, fatigue, and fever, often developing within months to years of initiation, with radiographic evidence of bilateral interstitial infiltrates or ground-glass opacities on (HRCT). Diagnosis requires exclusion of infectious etiologies through (BAL) and other microbiological tests, as symptoms overlap with opportunistic infections. The underlying mechanism of sirolimus-induced involves inhibition disrupting alveolar epithelial and endothelial repair processes, leading to impaired lung and heightened inflammatory responses. Specifically, signaling is crucial for regulating function and endothelial barrier integrity; its blockade promotes (PKC)-dependent myosin light chain (MLC) phosphorylation, endothelial contraction, and vascular hyperpermeability, culminating in alveolar and potential . In most cases, resolves upon sirolimus discontinuation or dose reduction, with improvement observed in 70-100% of reported instances within 2-4 weeks, though severe cases may require corticosteroids. Immunologically, sirolimus suppresses T-cell proliferation and cytokine production via pathway inhibition, increasing susceptibility to opportunistic infections, particularly Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in solid organ transplant recipients. This risk is heightened in the early post-transplant period, with studies reporting elevated PJP incidence without prophylaxis; accordingly, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is recommended for at least 6-12 months or longer in high-risk patients to mitigate this threat. While sirolimus may confer relative protection against (CMV) compared to inhibitors due to its antiviral effects on T-cell activation, vigilant monitoring for viral reactivation remains essential in seropositive recipients. To detect pulmonary toxicities early, baseline pulmonary function tests (PFTs), including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and (DLCO), are advised before initiating sirolimus, with annual monitoring thereafter or more frequently in symptomatic patients or those with underlying like LAM. Dose adjustment or discontinuation is warranted if FEV1 declines by more than 10-15% from baseline without alternative explanation, alongside clinical correlation via imaging and symptom assessment. In LAM patients, where sirolimus is FDA-approved for stabilizing function, the incidence of may be higher due to pre-existing cystic changes, but randomized trials demonstrate that therapeutic benefits—such as reduced FEV1 decline and improved —outweigh these risks in moderate-to-severe .

Oncogenic risks and wound healing issues

Sirolimus, as an inhibitor used in immunosuppressive regimens, presents a complex profile regarding oncogenic risks due to its dual role in suppressing immune while directly inhibiting tumor proliferation pathways. In organ transplant recipients, the overall of malignancies is elevated compared to the general , but sirolimus-based has been associated with a lower incidence of de novo cancers relative to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Specifically, large registry analyses indicate a 26-40% reduction in overall cancer with sirolimus use, driven primarily by decreased rates of non-melanoma cancers (NMSC) and other solid tumors. Regarding , sirolimus demonstrates protective effects, with studies reporting a 44-56% lower incidence of NMSC in patients converted to or maintained on sirolimus compared to those on inhibitors like or cyclosporine. This benefit arises from inhibition, which curbs proliferation and UV-induced DNA damage responses in skin cells, contrasting with the pro-oncogenic effects of other immunosuppressants that enhance viral oncogenesis and immune evasion. Consequently, annual dermatologic screening is recommended for all transplant recipients on sirolimus to monitor for early NMSC, though the absolute risk remains lower than in non-sirolimus cohorts. For (PTLD), sirolimus is linked to a reduced incidence of 30-50% versus inhibitors, attributed to its antiproliferative action on Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells; rates are typically 1-2% overall in sirolimus-treated heart and transplant patients, lower than the 3-5% seen with alternative regimens. Paradoxically, while sirolimus inhibits tumor growth in preclinical models of various cancers by blocking mTOR-driven and progression, its long-term immunosuppressive use (>5 years) may still confer a net oncogenic risk in the transplant setting due to sustained T-cell suppression, though show overall malignancy rates 15-29% lower than with comparators in registries like the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. In contexts outside transplantation, sirolimus exhibits anti-cancer efficacy, but in immunosuppressed patients, this is tempered by the need for ongoing therapy. Sirolimus also impairs , with post-transplant surgical site dehiscence occurring in 20-30% of cases involving de novo sirolimus initiation, compared to 10-15% with inhibitors alone. This delay stems from inhibition reducing fibroblast proliferation, collagen synthesis, and (VEGF) expression, thereby hindering formation and epithelialization. Management strategies include temporary discontinuation of sirolimus 5-10 days prior to to mitigate risks, followed by cautious reinitiation once healing progresses; perioperative dose reduction or bridging with alternative agents is often employed in high-risk patients.

Interactions

Pharmacokinetic interactions

Sirolimus undergoes extensive metabolism primarily via the 3A4 () enzyme and is a substrate for the (P-gp) efflux transporter, making its highly susceptible to interactions with modulators of these pathways. Concomitant use of strong and/or P-gp inhibitors can significantly increase sirolimus exposure, while inducers can substantially decrease it, necessitating careful dose adjustments and to maintain target trough concentrations typically between 5-15 ng/mL in transplant settings. Strong inhibitors such as markedly elevate sirolimus levels; for instance, multiple-dose (200 mg daily) increases sirolimus Cmax by approximately 4.3-fold and AUC by 10.9-fold after a single 5 mg dose. Concomitant administration with such agents is generally avoided if possible; if unavoidable, sirolimus dosage should be reduced (e.g., by up to 80-90% based on monitoring) and blood levels closely tracked to prevent . Similarly, other strong inhibitors like or can produce comparable elevations in exposure, requiring the same precautionary approach. In contrast, strong inducers like rifampin accelerate sirolimus clearance; pretreatment with rifampin (600 mg daily for 14 days) decreases AUC and Cmax by about 82% and 71%, respectively, following a 20 mg sirolimus dose. Avoidance of strong inducers is recommended; if co-administration is necessary, sirolimus dosing may need to be increased (e.g., doubled initially) with frequent trough level assessments to ensure . Food intake influences sirolimus absorption, with high-fat meals increasing Cmax by up to 35% for the oral solution and 65% for tablets, alongside modest rises in AUC (23-35%), though time to peak concentration is delayed. To minimize variability, sirolimus should be administered consistently with respect to meals. , a moderate inhibitor, further elevates sirolimus exposure and is contraindicated; patients should avoid it for at least 8 hours before and after dosing. Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential when interactions are present or suspected, using validated assays such as high-performance liquid chromatography- (HPLC-MS) or liquid chromatography-tandem (LC-MS/MS) to measure trough concentrations, with adjustments made to achieve therapeutic ranges. Monitoring should occur frequently during initiation of interacting agents and at least every three months once stable.

Pharmacodynamic interactions

Sirolimus exhibits pharmacodynamic synergy with inhibitors such as , resulting in additive through complementary inhibition of T-cell proliferation pathways—sirolimus via blockade and via inhibition—which enhances rejection prevention in transplant recipients. However, this combination increases the risk of , including worse renal allograft survival and higher rates of compared to sirolimus paired with mycophenolate mofetil, likely due to overlapping effects on renal and tubular function. To address this, sequential minimization protocols are recommended, involving gradual dose reduction of the inhibitor (e.g., to low-dose levels) while escalating sirolimus, thereby preserving efficacy while mitigating renal toxicity. Similarly, co-administration with ACE inhibitors heightens the risk of via combined renal effects that impair excretion and aldosterone regulation, necessitating close monitoring. The combination of sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil amplifies risk through additive , as both agents inhibit hematopoietic cell proliferation—mycophenolate via purine synthesis blockade and sirolimus via mTOR-mediated effects—leading to lower levels in transplant patients. Clinical guidelines contraindicate live during sirolimus therapy due to profound that may cause vaccine-strain infections. Additionally, monitoring for prolongation is advised when sirolimus is combined with certain antibiotics (e.g., or fluoroquinolones), as in immunosuppressed patients may exacerbate arrhythmogenic risks.

Pharmacology

Mechanism of action

Sirolimus exerts its primary pharmacological effects through allosteric inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (), a serine/ that integrates signals from nutrients, growth factors, and energy status to regulate cellular processes such as growth and metabolism. The drug binds with high affinity to the immunophilin FKBP12 (FK506-binding protein 12 kDa), forming a sirolimus-FKBP12 complex that docks onto the FKBP12-rapamycin binding (FRB) domain of , thereby preventing activation. This interaction specifically targets without directly affecting mTORC2 at therapeutic concentrations, although prolonged exposure can indirectly impair mTORC2 assembly. The inhibition of by the sirolimus-FKBP12 complex blocks phosphorylation of key downstream effectors, including ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1). Dephosphorylation of S6K1 reduces its activity, limiting phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 and thereby decreasing translation of mRNAs encoding ribosomal proteins and elongation factors essential for protein synthesis. Similarly, unphosphorylated 4E-BP1 sequesters , preventing formation of the eIF4F initiation complex and further suppressing cap-dependent mRNA translation, particularly of transcripts involved in progression and survival. These effects culminate in reduced global protein synthesis, enhanced via partial, substrate-selective relief of mTORC1 inhibition on ULK1/Atg13—as sirolimus induces autophagy less completely than full mTOR blockade—which is time- and dose-dependent (e.g., weaker at lower doses like 0.1 µM) and milder than induction by nutrient starvation or ATP-competitive inhibitors, and arrest in the due to upregulated p27Kip1 and diminished expression. In the context of immunosuppression, sirolimus potently inhibits IL-2-driven T-cell proliferation by disrupting mTORC1-dependent signaling downstream of the IL-2 receptor, which normally promotes T-lymphocyte activation, clonal expansion, and cytokine production without inducing apoptosis. This selective blockade spares regulatory T cells, which are less dependent on mTORC1 for function, contributing to sirolimus's favorable profile in preventing allograft rejection. Beyond immune cells, the anti-proliferative actions extend to vascular smooth muscle cells, where mTORC1 inhibition prevents migration and neointimal hyperplasia in response to injury, and to tumor cells, where it curbs growth by limiting anabolic processes and promoting catabolism in various malignancies.47735-1/fulltext) The structure-activity relationship of sirolimus highlights its macrocyclic lactone () core as critical for nanomolar affinity binding to FKBP12, with the effector domain of the drug-FKBP12 complex enabling specific interaction; modifications to this core, as seen in analogs, can retain FKBP12 binding but alter potency. At therapeutic doses used for , sirolimus exhibits no antibacterial activity, despite its origin as an , as the concentrations required for effects far exceed those for inhibition. Compared to , a 40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl) , sirolimus shares the identical inhibition mechanism via FKBP12 binding but possesses a longer plasma , influencing dosing regimens.

Pharmacokinetics

Sirolimus demonstrates low oral of approximately 14%, with rapid absorption leading to peak concentrations (T_max) achieved in 1 to 2 hours following administration. Its absorption is nonlinear, resulting from saturation of intestinal efflux and CYP3A4-mediated metabolism, which can lead to disproportionate increases in exposure at higher doses. Food intake, particularly high-fat meals, may slightly enhance by up to 35%, though this effect is generally not clinically significant. The drug exhibits extensive distribution, with a (V_d) of approximately 12 L/kg, reflecting high and penetration into tissues. Sirolimus is highly bound to plasma proteins, at about 92%, primarily to and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein. It partitions extensively into erythrocytes, resulting in higher concentrations in compared to plasma, and shows minimal penetration across the blood-brain barrier, with a brain-to-plasma ratio of around 0.006. Metabolism occurs predominantly via the 3A4 (CYP3A4) enzyme in the liver and gut, with minor contributions from CYP3A5 and CYP2C8, yielding at least seven major metabolites through O-demethylation and pathways. Key metabolites include 41-O-demethylsirolimus and 46-O-demethylsirolimus, which exhibit substantially lower immunosuppressive activity than the parent drug. Excretion is primarily fecal, accounting for 91% of the administered dose, mainly as metabolites, while urinary elimination is minimal at about 2%. The terminal elimination averages 62 hours in stable renal transplant patients, enabling once-daily dosing and attainment of steady-state concentrations within 5 to 7 days. Given the marked inter- and intrapatient variability in , influenced by factors such as polymorphisms and concomitant medications, routine is essential. Trough whole-blood concentrations are typically targeted at 5 to 15 ng/mL, measured by methods like HPLC or LC-MS/MS, though levels can affect readings due to the drug's partitioning into red blood cells, necessitating corrections in anemic patients.

Chemistry

Chemical structure and properties

Sirolimus has the molecular formula C51H79NO13 and a molecular weight of 914.17 g/mol. It is a macrocyclic characterized by a 31-membered ring structure incorporating a pipecolic acid-derived moiety, a triene system with four trans double bonds (three conjugated), and a at position 16. The molecule features 15 chiral centers, including those at C13 and C21, contributing to its defined as a single produced in manufacture. Physically, sirolimus appears as a white to off-white crystalline powder. It exhibits low aqueous solubility, with approximately 2.6 μg/mL in , but is freely soluble in organic solvents such as (up to 40 mg/mL), , acetone, and . Its is reflected in a logP value of 4.85, indicating high partitioning into non-polar environments. Sirolimus is sensitive to light exposure and acidic conditions, undergoing degradation within 30 minutes in simulated gastric environments, which necessitates protection during storage and formulation. It is typically stored as a at -20°C to maintain stability. A notable derivative, , is obtained by modifying sirolimus with a 2-hydroxyethyl group at the 40-O position, enhancing its and pharmacokinetic profile.

Biosynthesis

Sirolimus, known generically as rapamycin, is produced by the soil actinomycete Streptomyces hygroscopicus, a bacterium originally isolated from soil on Easter Island (Rapa Nui). The biosynthesis is governed by a ~100 kb gene cluster that encodes a type I polyketide synthase (PKS) system, along with accessory enzymes for tailoring modifications. This cluster was first cloned and characterized in 1995, revealing its modular organization essential for assembling the compound's complex macrolide structure. The core PKS pathway involves the multifunctional enzymes RapA, RapB, and RapC, which collectively comprise 14 extension modules for chain elongation. The process initiates with a propionyl-CoA starter unit loaded onto RapA's loading module, followed by iterative condensations with primarily extender units, supplemented by methylmalonyl-CoA in select modules to introduce branching methyl groups. RapA handles modules 1–3, RapB modules 4–10, and RapC modules 11–14, culminating in the thioesterase domain of RapC that releases and cyclizes the nascent 27-carbon chain into pre-rapamycin, the initial macrocyclic intermediate. Post-PKS tailoring then refines this scaffold through hydroxylation at C-27 by the monooxygenase RapJ, further oxidation and at C-16 by RapN (another P450), and methoxylation at C-16 by the O-methyltransferase RapI using S-adenosylmethionine as the methyl donor; additional steps incorporate a pipecolic acid unit via the synthetase RapP and methylate the C-39 position with RapM. Industrial-scale production employs submerged fermentation of S. hygroscopicus, where yields have been optimized to 100–200 mg/L through media adjustments such as carbon source supplementation (e.g., glucose or ), nitrogen balancing, and pH/DO control to favor over growth. Initial wild-type titers were lower (~50 mg/L), but empirical tweaks and mutant selection doubled productivity in early processes. has further advanced analog production via of the rap cluster in amenable hosts like Streptomyces lividans or cluster-free strains, enabling precursor-directed feeding of modified extender units and targeted module edits to generate variants with altered bioactivity.

History

Discovery and isolation

Sirolimus, originally known as rapamycin, was first isolated in 1972 by Surendra N. Sehgal and colleagues at Ayerst Research Laboratories in , , from a soil sample collected on Rapa Nui () during the 1964-1965 Medical Expedition to Easter Island (METEI). The sample contained the actinomycete strain NRRL 5491, from which the compound was extracted during fermentation studies aimed at discovering new antibiotics. Named rapamycin after the island of its origin, the molecule was initially characterized as a with potent activity, particularly against Candida species, though its development as an antifungal was hindered by observed toxicity in preclinical models. The chemical structure of rapamycin was elucidated in 1975 through techniques including (NMR) spectroscopy, , and chemical degradation studies conducted by Sehgal's team, revealing a complex 31-membered macrocyclic with a unique triene system. This structural determination was detailed in early publications from the group, confirming its novelty among known antibiotics. An early patent for its production and antifungal use, US Patent 3,993,749, was granted in 1976 to Ayerst, McKenna & Harrison Ltd., covering the fermentation process and isolation methods from S. hygroscopicus. Research interest shifted in the early 1980s, after Ayerst closed its research laboratory amid corporate consolidation. Following the 1987 merger of its divisions with to form Wyeth-Ayerst, , having preserved samples at home, shared them with colleagues, where testing in models of transplantation demonstrated potent immunosuppressive effects by prolonging graft survival. This serendipitous rediscovery pivoted the compound's focus from antifungal to immunomodulatory applications, with subsequent patents expanding its scope beyond initial claims.

Clinical development and approvals

The clinical development of sirolimus began in the with Phase I and II trials focused on its safety and efficacy as an immunosuppressant for renal transplant recipients. Early Phase I studies in quiescent cyclosporine-prednisolone-treated patients demonstrated a reversible decrease in platelet and counts as the primary , with no significant impact on renal function. Phase II dose-escalation trials in living-donor renal transplant recipients, involving ascending doses from 0.5 to 5.0 mg/m² per day combined with cyclosporine and corticosteroids, established tolerability and preliminary efficacy in preventing acute rejection, paving the way for larger studies. These trials, conducted primarily by Wyeth-Ayerst (later ), confirmed sirolimus's role in concentration-controlled regimens, leading to its advancement to Phase III evaluation. Pivotal Phase III trials for renal transplantation, including multicenter studies randomizing patients to sirolimus with full- or reduced-dose cyclosporine plus steroids, demonstrated superior prophylaxis against acute rejection compared to azathioprine-based regimens, with 12-month graft survival rates exceeding 90%. These results supported the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of sirolimus (as Rapamune oral solution) on September 15, 1999, for preventing organ rejection in renal transplant patients aged 13 years and older, initially in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) followed with marketing authorization for Rapamune on March 14, 2001, for the same indication in adults. Expansion into device applications occurred with the Cypher sirolimus-eluting coronary stent, receiving CE Mark approval in Europe in April 2002 and FDA Premarket Approval in April 2003, based on trials showing reduced restenosis rates compared to bare-metal stents. Subsequent development targeted rare indications, with the Multicenter International Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus (MILES) trial—a randomized, double-blind study of 89 patients—demonstrating stabilization of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and reduction in vascular endothelial growth factor-D levels, leading to FDA approval on May 29, 2015, for (LAM) in adults with moderate impairment. The EMA extended Rapamune's authorization for LAM in , emphasizing its benefit on function in a population lacking prior approved therapies. Post-approval studies included pediatric extensions for renal transplantation, confirming and in children as young as 1 year, with ongoing trials evaluating long-term durability. In 2022, the FDA approved Hyftor (sirolimus topical gel 0.2%) for facial angiofibromas associated with complex in patients aged 6 years and older, based on a Phase III trial showing significant lesion improvement at week 12. Generic sirolimus formulations entered the U.S. market following expiration in , with initial approvals around enhancing accessibility.

Society and culture

In the United States, sirolimus is approved by the (FDA) as a prescription medication and is not classified as a under the . It has received orphan drug designation for the treatment of (LAM) since 2012 and for facial angiofibromas associated with complex (TSC). Multiple generic versions of sirolimus, equivalent to the branded Rapamune, have been approved by the FDA since 2019, including those from manufacturers such as Amneal, , and Zydus. As a small-molecule drug, sirolimus does not have biosimilars but relies on generic approvals through standard pathways. In the European Union, sirolimus (as Rapamune) was authorized for marketing on March 13, 2001, through the centralized authorization procedure by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), making it available across all member states as a prescription-only medicine. In May 2023, the EMA approved the topical gel formulation (Hyftor) for the treatment of facial angiofibromas associated with TSC in patients aged 6 years and older. Generic versions of sirolimus became available in the EU following patent expiry around 2010, with bioequivalence guidance issued by the EMA in 2015 to support their approval. Sirolimus received approval in in 2001 for the prevention of organ transplant rejection and is classified as a . In Japan, sirolimus was approved by the (PMDA) for lymphangioleiomyomatosis in July 2014, for tuberous sclerosis complex-associated skin lesions (as a topical gel formulation) in 2018, and for refractory vascular tumors and refractory vascular malformations in 2021. It is not approved for the prevention of organ transplant rejection or for anti-aging purposes. While approved for specific indications globally, of sirolimus is restricted in certain countries, often requiring special regulatory approvals or institutional review.

Formulations and availability

Sirolimus is primarily administered orally in tablet and solution forms for immunosuppressive therapy. The branded product Rapamune, produced by , is available as triangular-shaped tablets in strengths of 0.5 mg (tan), 1 mg (white), and 2 mg (brown), as well as an oral solution at a concentration of 1 mg/mL supplied in 60 mL amber glass bottles. Generic equivalents of these oral formulations are manufactured by companies including Pharmaceuticals Inc., U.S., and , enhancing accessibility following FDA approvals starting in 2020. The oral solution requires refrigeration at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F) for storage, with protection from light, though it can be held at room temperature up to 25°C (77°F) for limited periods not exceeding 15 days after opening. Topical formulations of sirolimus are utilized for dermatological applications, particularly in treating facial angiofibromas associated with complex. The FDA-approved Hyftor (sirolimus topical gel) 0.2%, manufactured by Nobelpharma America LLC, is applied twice daily to affected areas and represents the first topical sirolimus product for this indication. Off-label compounded topical creams, often at concentrations of 0.1% to 0.4%, are also prepared by pharmacies for similar uses, providing customized options where commercial products are unavailable. In , sirolimus is incorporated into drug-eluting stents to prevent restenosis, with the Cypher stent (sirolimus-eluting on a polymer-coated platform) being a seminal example from Cordis Corporation, though newer variants and balloons continue to evolve the technology. For veterinary use, Felycin-CA1 (sirolimus delayed-release tablets), developed by PRN Pharmacal and conditionally approved by the FDA in March 2025, is administered once weekly at 0.3 mg/kg to cats for managing in subclinical . Global availability of sirolimus has been influenced by manufacturing challenges, including of the Rapamune oral solution and tablets reported in 2021-2022 due to production constraints, which prompted increased reliance on generics. , generic sirolimus costs approximately $500 per month for a typical , though actual prices vary by and insurance; patient assistance programs, such as Pfizer RxPathways, support eligible uninsured or underinsured individuals in accessing the medication.

Research

Oncology

Sirolimus, a selective inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1 (mTORC1), has been investigated in oncology for its potential to disrupt dysregulated cell proliferation and survival signaling in various tumors, particularly those reliant on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Although sirolimus itself lacks regulatory approval for cancer treatment, its structural analog everolimus received FDA approval in 2009 for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) refractory to sorafenib or sunitinib, demonstrating prolonged progression-free survival in phase III trials. Sirolimus has been evaluated in clinical trials for hematologic malignancies, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), where it has shown promise in post-transplant settings; for instance, a retrospective analysis reported improved overall survival among lymphoma patients receiving sirolimus for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. In solid tumors, sirolimus has been tested in phase II trials, often in combination regimens, alongside notable disease stabilization. For example, a phase II study of sirolimus combined with metronomic in relapsed/ pediatric solid tumors observed disease in 25% of patients and prolonged disease (≥6 months) in a subset, though overall antitumor activity was modest. Similarly, in advanced with hormone receptor positivity, sirolimus added to endocrine therapy extended in retrospective evaluations, highlighting its role in enhancing sensitivity through pathway suppression. Resistance to sirolimus often arises from incomplete pathway inhibition, as its primary targeting of triggers feedback activation of mTORC2, leading to compensatory and sustained prosurvival signaling. This mechanism underscores the development of next-generation , such as dual mTORC1/mTORC2 antagonists (e.g., OSI-027 and PP242), which have entered clinical trials to overcome such resistance by fully ablating both complexes and preventing feedback loops. In pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs), recent phase II studies from 2023 have explored sirolimus in combination with metronomic for recurrent or cases, reporting stable disease in 20% of patients with tumors and objective responses in select subgroups. As of November 2025, sirolimus remains investigational in , with approved uses limited to its analogs like . Biomarkers within the PI3K pathway, such as activating PIK3CA mutations or PTEN loss, have been associated with enhanced sensitivity to sirolimus in trials, predicting better responses in tumors with hyperactive upstream signaling; a pilot study in refractory solid tumors harboring PIK3CA alterations confirmed tolerability but limited monotherapy efficacy, supporting biomarker-driven combination strategies.

Tuberous sclerosis complex

Sirolimus exerts its therapeutic effect in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) by inhibiting the hyperactive pathway resulting from mutations in the TSC1 or TSC2 genes, which normally suppress mTOR signaling to prevent uncontrolled and formation. In TSC, loss of TSC1/TSC2 function leads to constitutive activation, promoting the development of benign tumors such as renal angiomyolipomas. By binding to FKBP12 and allosterically inhibiting , sirolimus reduces protein synthesis and , thereby targeting the root molecular abnormality underlying these hamartomatous lesions. Clinical evidence for sirolimus in TSC-associated renal comes from a pivotal phase 2 trial, where patients received an initial of 6 mg followed by 2 mg daily, titrated to maintain trough levels of 5-10 ng/mL. This regimen resulted in a median volume reduction of 53% at 12 months, with sustained regression observed up to 24 months in responders, highlighting its efficacy in shrinking these potentially life-threatening tumors and reducing the need for invasive interventions. Long-term monitoring typically involves serial MRI scans to assess size and progression, alongside routine blood tests to ensure therapeutic trough levels of 5-10 ng/mL and monitor for adverse effects like or . For neurological manifestations, particularly seizures in TSC, sirolimus has shown promise in phase 2 studies, with approximately 30% of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in frequency when used adjunctively; updated analyses from ongoing cohorts in 2024 indicate a similar responder rate for control, underscoring its role in modulating mTOR-driven neuronal hyperexcitability. A prospective in 23 children aged 1-11 years with TSC reported a 41% reduction in frequency after sirolimus treatment, with sustained effects in responders. (Detailed mechanisms in TSC are covered in the Tuberous sclerosis complex section.)

Longevity and aging

Sirolimus, also known as rapamycin, inhibits the mTORC1 complex within the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which regulates cellular growth and metabolism. Hyperactive mTORC1 drives aging by promoting senescence, inflammation, and age-related diseases, while its inhibition enhances autophagy for cellular cleanup, reduces inflammation, preserves stem cell function, and reprograms metabolism to mimic caloric restriction. This has garnered significant interest in longevity research due to regulation of cellular processes implicated in aging. Preclinical studies in mice have demonstrated that low-dose sirolimus extends median lifespan by 10-20%, with effects attributed to enhanced autophagy, a cellular recycling mechanism that clears damaged components and delays age-related decline. For instance, chronic administration in female 129/Sv mice reduced tumor burden and prolonged survival, while intermittent dosing in genetically diverse strains similarly increased both median and maximum lifespan in males and females. These findings build on earlier observations in yeast, worms, and flies, where mTOR inhibition extended lifespan by up to 25%, highlighting sirolimus's conserved geroprotective potential across species. Notably, this lifespan extension occurs despite metabolic side effects such as hyperglycemia, glucose intolerance, and insulin resistance, which are often described as benevolent or adaptive in the longevity context, akin to metabolic changes in caloric restriction . Ongoing veterinary research, such as the Test of Rapamycin in Aging Dogs (TRIAD) trial within the Dog Aging Project, is evaluating low-dose sirolimus's impact on canine healthspan and lifespan in over 500 middle-aged dogs, aiming to bridge preclinical insights to larger mammals. At the mechanistic level, sirolimus promotes by reducing the burden of senescent cells—dysfunctional cells that accumulate with age and secrete pro-inflammatory factors—and improving mitochondrial function. By suppressing , sirolimus inhibits the (SASP), limiting tissue damage from chronic , as shown where it suppressed SASP in human cells. Additionally, it reverses age-related mitochondrial (ROS) production and enhances mitophagy, reducing mitochondrial mass in senescent cells while preserving bioenergetic efficiency. Longevity-promoting doses do not compromise mitochondrial function in skeletal muscle, maintaining mitochondrial content, endurance, and respiration rates . Rapamycin is not referred to as a "mitochondrial toxin" in scientific literature; instead, such doses may improve mitochondrial quality or protect against dysfunction in some contexts. These effects collectively delay , such as and metabolic dysregulation, without relying solely on canonical pathways in some models. Early human trials have begun to translate these findings, with the Participatory Evaluation (of) Aging (With) Rapamycin (for) (PEARL) study (2020-2025) providing key evidence for immune preservation in healthy elderly participants. This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial administered intermittent low-dose sirolimus (5 mg weekly) to adults aged 50-85, demonstrating dose-dependent improvements in immune function, including enhanced responses and reduced markers after 48 weeks, alongside gains in physical healthspan metrics like and reduced pain. No serious adverse events were linked to the drug, though minor issues like mouth sores occurred more frequently in the treatment group. These results suggest sirolimus may counteract age-related immune decline without broad at low doses. A 2026 study published in Aging Cell by Kell et al. demonstrated that rapamycin exerts geroprotective effects in the aging human immune system by enhancing resilience against DNA damage. In vitro, rapamycin and other mTOR inhibitors suppressed senescence in human T cells exposed to acute genotoxic stress by reducing DNA damage markers such as γH2AX and senescence marker p21, thereby improving cell survival rather than merely slowing proliferation. In vivo, low-dose rapamycin treatment (1 mg daily for 4 months) in older adults significantly lowered levels of p21 and other senescence markers compared to placebo. These findings reveal a novel genoprotective mechanism through which rapamycin mitigates DNA damage in immune cells, contributing to delayed immunosenescence and overall anti-aging effects. Recent 2025 reviews underscore sirolimus's promise for delaying while noting manageable risks. A systematic analysis of preclinical and highlighted benefits like preserved T-cell function and lowered in older adults, potentially extending healthspan, but cautioned against side effects such as mild infections or oral ulcers observed in short-term use. Another review of off-label applications emphasized that while animal lifespan extensions are robust, evidence remains preliminary, with pros including metabolic improvements outweighed by cons like potential changes in susceptible individuals. Overall, these evaluations advocate for further long-term studies to balance geroprotective gains against tolerability. Off-label use of low-dose sirolimus for is rising among biohacking communities, often inspired by transplant patient data showing long-term safety at similar doses. In a cohort of 333 healthy adults self-administering intermittent sirolimus, no significant increases in serious health risks were reported beyond transient mouth sores, mirroring safety profiles from organ transplant recipients where it prevents rejection without major growth or hematopoietic disruptions over years. Physicians increasingly prescribe it for anti-aging, though regulatory bodies like the FDA have not approved it for this purpose. In Japan, sirolimus is approved and prescribed for specific diseases such as lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), certain skin lesions associated with tuberous sclerosis complex, and intractable vascular malformations, but it is not approved or generally prescribed for anti-aging purposes. Human use for anti-aging remains experimental and off-label, and reliable sources do not confirm anti-aging clinics or prescription examples in Japan, emphasizing the need for monitored use.

Neurological disorders

Sirolimus, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin () pathway, has shown potential in modulating pathological processes in various neurological disorders by regulating cellular , inflammation, and neuronal signaling. In conditions characterized by dysregulated activity, such as and associated with complex (TSC), low-dose sirolimus has been investigated for its neuroprotective effects without the immunosuppressive doses typically used in transplantation. In , a 2025 exploratory study of amyloid-positive patients treated with low-dose sirolimus (target blood levels 2-5 ng/mL) for 22 weeks demonstrated improvements in plasma biomarkers, including an increased Aβ42/40 ratio and reduced p-181 levels, suggesting potential modulation of pathology and tau hyperphosphorylation. These findings build on preclinical evidence of mTOR inhibition reducing accumulation and in mouse models. Phase II clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate sirolimus's efficacy and safety in early-stage , focusing on cognitive outcomes and biomarker changes in patients. For , particularly in TSC where hyperactivation contributes to genesis, sirolimus serves as an adjunct therapy to reduce intractable s. A prospective in 23 children aged 1-11 years with TSC reported a 41% reduction in frequency after sirolimus treatment, with sustained effects in responders. (Detailed mechanisms in TSC are covered in the Tuberous sclerosis complex section.) In TSC-associated autism spectrum disorder, small cohort studies have observed improvements in social behaviors with inhibition. An noted statistically significant enhancements in adaptive social functioning and reductions in behavioral problems among pediatric patients treated with sirolimus alongside . A key challenge in sirolimus's application to disorders is its poor penetration across the blood-brain barrier due to its lipophilic nature and efflux by transporters. Preclinical studies have explored nanoformulations, such as liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles, to enhance brain delivery and in models of neurodegeneration. Regarding safety, low-dose sirolimus regimens (e.g., 1-5 mg/day) minimize risks observed in high-dose animal models, where accumulation led to mild pathological changes like and neuronal loss in rats. Clinical data support that therapeutic low doses avoid these effects while providing targeted inhibition.

Cardiovascular and vascular applications

Sirolimus has demonstrated potential in preclinical models of by inhibiting plaque formation. In apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE-null) mice fed a high-fat diet, oral administration of sirolimus significantly reduced aortic atherosclerotic lesion area by up to 50%, an effect attributed to its suppression of vascular and independent of lipid-lowering mechanisms. Similar findings in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice showed that low-dose sirolimus decreased atherogenesis and modulated plaque composition toward a more stable with reduced . These results highlight sirolimus's role in targeting signaling pathways that drive plaque progression, though human translation remains investigational. Clinical trials in 2024 have explored sirolimus-coated balloons for , particularly in femoropopliteal lesions prone to restenosis. The SIRONA , a randomized study of 414 patients, found sirolimus-coated balloons noninferior to paclitaxel-coated balloons in reducing late lumen loss at 12 months, with primary patency rates of approximately 80% in both arms and bailout stenting needed in about 22% of sirolimus cases. Similarly, the SELUTION SFA reported sustained vessel patency in 72% of patients at 12 months following sirolimus-coated balloon for superficial disease, supporting its safety profile with low rates of major adverse limb events. These outcomes align with 2024 European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommending sirolimus-coated balloons as a class IIa option for peripheral interventions. In , particularly proliferative forms, phase II trials have evaluated low-dose sirolimus for inducing remission. A real-world study and meta-analysis of 57 patients with active systemic , including proliferative , reported renal remission in 41.2% of cases after sirolimus initiation, often at doses of 2 mg daily, with improvements in and serological markers without significant changes in 24-hour urine protein levels. A 2025 real-world comparing sirolimus to mycophenolate mofetil in patients with showed comparable complete remission rates of around 50% at 52 weeks for both, but sirolimus allowed steroid tapering in 60% of responders, suggesting in refractory vascular and renal complications. For cutaneous lymphatic malformations, 2025 data on topical sirolimus indicate substantial lesion reduction. In a cohort of pediatric patients with microcystic lymphatic malformations, 0.1% sirolimus applied twice daily led to a mean volume reduction of over 50% at 6 months, with 60% of lesions showing at least partial response and minimal systemic absorption. A of therapies confirmed sirolimus's superior in reduction compared to other agents, achieving up to 60% volume decrease in superficial lesions, though associated with mild local irritation in 20% of cases. These findings position topical sirolimus as a non-invasive option for localized vascular anomalies beyond systemic approved indications. Sirolimus prophylaxis post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has shown benefits in mitigating chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-related vascular damage. In a meta-analysis of over 1,600 patients, sirolimus-based regimens reduced the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD by approximately 25-30% compared to calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy, with lower rates of vascular complications such as sclerosis and endothelial injury due to mTOR inhibition of alloimmune responses. Combined with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus decreased chronic GVHD occurrence to 35% at 2 years in mismatched unrelated donor HSCT, preserving vascular integrity and reducing non-relapse mortality. Recent 2025 updates emphasize sirolimus-coated balloons for coronary in-stent restenosis. The EASTBOURNE registry extension reported target lesion failure rates below 10% at 2 years with sirolimus balloons in restenosis, outperforming plain balloons in late lumen loss reduction. A multicenter randomized of 300 patients confirmed noninferiority of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-coated balloons, with 9-month angiographic restenosis in 15% of sirolimus cases and sustained clinical benefits in high-risk anatomy. These advancements underscore sirolimus's expanding role in vascular interventions to prevent recurrent .

Veterinary uses

Organ transplantation in animals

Sirolimus, also known as rapamycin, has been investigated primarily in canine models for its immunosuppressive effects in , particularly renal allografts, as a preclinical model for use. In a 1995 study, sirolimus monotherapy prolonged renal allograft survival in dogs but was associated with significant toxicity, prompting exploration of combination therapies to enhance efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. When combined with low-dose cyclosporine, antilymphocyte serum, and donor infusion, sirolimus demonstrated synergistic , extending graft survival beyond that achieved with cyclosporine alone. In dogs, typical dosing for immunosuppressive purposes in experimental transplant settings has been adapted from pharmacokinetic studies, with of 0.1 mg/kg daily achieving therapeutic blood concentrations in the nanograms per milliliter range. Target trough levels are generally aimed at 8-12 ng/mL to balance efficacy and safety, similar to protocols, though adjusted for canine . Combinations with cyclosporine are common to reduce the required sirolimus dose and mitigate from the latter, allowing for lower overall exposure to both agents. Monitoring involves (HPLC) for precise trough level assessment, akin to practice, but challenges arise in small animals due to limited and the need for frequent sampling. Efficacy in preventing rejection has been observed in historical canine renal transplant models, where sirolimus contributed to graft rates exceeding 50% at 100 days post-transplant in combination regimens, compared to shorter with monotherapy or cyclosporine alone. Use in cats is restricted due to their smaller size, which complicates dosing and monitoring, and the relative rarity of organ transplants in feline veterinary practice; no large-scale efficacy data exist for felines. Complications in canine models mirror those in humans but emphasize gastrointestinal tolerability issues, such as anorexia, , and , particularly at doses above 0.05 mg/kg/day. Low-dose regimens (0.1-0.2 mg/kg daily) improve tolerance, with fewer severe events reported in combined , though hematologic effects like can occur and require vigilant monitoring. Overall, sirolimus's role in veterinary remains investigational, with clinical application limited to specialized centers performing experimental or compassionate transplants.

Feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

In March 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted conditional approval to Felycin-CA1, a delayed-release formulation of sirolimus (also known as rapamycin), for the management of ventricular hypertrophy associated with subclinical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in cats. This marks the first targeted therapy specifically approved for this condition, which affects approximately 15% of the general cat population and is characterized by thickening of the heart muscle without overt clinical signs. Sirolimus acts by inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, a key regulator of cell growth that contributes to maladaptive cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in HCM. At the recommended dose of 0.3 mg/kg administered orally once weekly, the low-dose regimen minimizes systemic immunosuppression while promoting cardiac remodeling. The efficacy of sirolimus in feline subclinical HCM was demonstrated in the RAPACAT trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 36 client-owned cats diagnosed with preclinical HCM via echocardiography. Cats received either 0.3 mg/kg delayed-release sirolimus or placebo weekly for 6 months, with assessments including echocardiography, serum biomarkers like NT-proBNP, and complete blood counts at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Treatment resulted in a significant 17-22% reduction in left ventricular free wall and interventricular septal thicknesses compared to placebo (P < 0.01), alongside decreased NT-proBNP levels indicating reduced cardiac stress. Of the 28 cats completing the study, none progressed to clinical HCM, suggesting sirolimus delays disease advancement. Sirolimus has proven well-tolerated in treated cats, with only mild, infrequent adverse events such as transient gastrointestinal upset and no evidence of clinically significant immunosuppression or alterations in serum biochemistry at this dosing level. Long-term use requires monitoring via echocardiography every 3 months to track left ventricular wall thickness and overall cardiac function, alongside routine blood work to ensure safety. This approach provides a disease-modifying option for subclinical HCM, potentially improving quality of life and extending the preclinical phase in affected cats.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.