Hubbry Logo
SatanismSatanismMain
Open search
Satanism
Community hub
Satanism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Satanism
Satanism
from Wikipedia

The inverted pentagram is a widespread symbol of Satanism.[1]

Satanism refers to a group of religious, ideological, or philosophical beliefs based on Satan—particularly his worship or veneration.[2] Because of the ties to the historical Abrahamic religious figure, Satanism—as well as other religious, ideological, or philosophical beliefs that align with Satanism—is considered a countercultural Abrahamic religion.

The phenomenon of Satanism shares "historical connections and family resemblances" with the Left Hand Path milieu of other occult figures such as Asmodeus, Beelzebub, Hecate, Lilith, Lucifer, Mephistopheles, Pan, Prometheus, Samael, and Set.[2] Self-identified Satanism is a relatively modern phenomenon, largely attributed to the 1966 founding of the Church of Satan by Anton LaVey in the United States—an atheistic group that does not believe in a supernatural Satan.[3][4]

Accusations of groups engaged in "devil worship" have echoed throughout much of Christian history. During the Middle Ages, the Inquisition led by the Catholic Church alleged that various heretical Christian sects and groups, such as the Knights Templar and the Cathars, performed secret Satanic rituals. In the subsequent Early Modern period, belief in a widespread Satanic conspiracy of witches resulted in the trials and executions of tens of thousands of alleged witches across Europe and the North American colonies, peaking between 1560 and 1630.[5][6] The terms Satanist and Satanism emerged during the Reformation and Counter-Reformation (1517–1700),[7] as both Catholics and Protestants accused each other of intentionally being in league with Satan.[8]

Since the 19th century various small religious groups have emerged that identify as Satanist or use Satanic iconography. While the groups that appeared after the 1960s differed greatly, they can be broadly divided into nontheistic Satanism and theistic Satanism.[9] Those venerating Satan as a supernatural deity are unlikely to ascribe omnipotence, instead relating to Satan as a patriarch. Nontheistic Satanists regard Satan as a symbol of certain human traits, a useful metaphor without ontological reality.[10] Contemporary religious Satanism is predominantly an American phenomenon, although the rise of globalization and the Internet have seen these ideas spread to other parts of the world.[11]

Etymology and definitions

[edit]

Etymology

[edit]
The Fallen Angel (1847) by Alexandre Cabanel

The term Satan has evolved from a Hebrew term for "adversary" or "to oppose", into the Christian figure of a fallen angel who tempts mortals into sin. The word Satan was not originally a proper name, but rather an ordinary noun that means "adversary". In this context, it appears at several points in the Old Testament.[12] For instance, in the Book of Samuel, David is presented as the satan ("adversary") of the Philistines, while in the Book of Numbers, the term appears as a verb, when Jehovah sent an angel to satan ("to oppose") Balaam.[13]

Prior to the composition of the New Testament, the idea developed within Jewish communities that Satan was the name of an angel who had rebelled against Jehovah and had been cast out of Heaven along with his followers; this account would be incorporated into contemporary texts such as the Book of Enoch.[14] This Satan was then featured in parts of the New Testament, where he was presented as a figure who tempts humans to commit sin; in the Book of Matthew and the Book of Luke, he attempted to tempt Jesus of Nazareth as the latter fasted in the wilderness.[15]

While the early Christian idea of the Devil was not well developed, it gradually adapted and expanded through the creation of folklore, art, theological treatises, and morality tales, thus providing the character with a range of extra-Biblical associations.[16] Beginning in the early middle ages, the concept developed in Christianity of the devil as "archrepresentative of evil", and of the Satanist "as malign mirror image of the good Christian".[17]

The word Satanism was adopted into English from the French satanisme.[18] The terms Satanism and Satanist are first recorded as appearing in the English and French languages during the 16th century, when they were used by Christian groups to attack other, rival Christian groups.[7] In a Roman Catholic tract of 1565, the author condemns the "heresies, blasphemies, and sathanismes [sic]" of the Protestants.[18] In an Anglican work of 1559, Anabaptists and other Protestant sects are condemned as "swarmes of Satanistes [sic]".[18] As used in this manner, the term Satanism was not used to claim that people literally worshipped Satan, but instead that they deviated from true Christianity, and thus were serving the will of Satan.[19] During the 19th century, the term Satanism began to be used to describe those considered to lead a broadly immoral lifestyle,[19] and it was only in the late 19th century that it came to be applied in English to individuals who were believed to consciously and deliberately venerate Satan.[19] This latter meaning had appeared earlier in the Swedish language; the Lutheran Bishop Laurentius Paulinus Gothus had described devil-worshipping sorcerers as Sathanister in his Ethica Christiana, produced between 1615 and 1630.[20]

Definitions

[edit]

Some definitions of Satanism:

  • the worship or veneration of the figure from Christian belief known as Satan, the Devil or Lucifer[2]
  • the "intentional, religiously motivated veneration of Satan"[21][19]
  • "a system in which Satan is celebrated in a prominent position"[22] This definition has the advantage of avoiding "assumptions about the nature of religion".[23]
  • the simultaneous presence of three characteristics:
1) the worship of the character in the Bible whose name is Satan or Lucifer,
2) the organization of these "Satanists" into a group with at least some kind of organization and hierarchy, and ...
3) and has some kind of ritual or liturgical practices [...]
whether the group with these characteristics perceives Satan as personal or impersonal, real or symbolic, does not matter.[24]

But these definitions of Satanism are limited to

  • figures and groups who identify as Satanists or at least admirers of Satan (Romantic Satanists, hellfire clubs and modern Satanists).

... excluding

  • figures and groups accused of worshipping Satan and in the process committing horrible crimes (in the middle ages, during the 1980–1994 Satanic ritual abuse moral panic, etc.) but who either appear to have not been satanists or to not have actually existed.

According to Laycock, excluding the second group, you leave out most of the history of Satanism.[23]

If you do include both groups, you have two sides with very different views on who or what Satan was/is and represented. The accusers usually follow the Christian idea of Satan as an irredeemably evil fallen angel who seeks the destruction of both God and humanity, but who, along with his followers, is doomed to fail and to suffer eternal punishment.[3] While the self-identified Satanists often do not believe that Satan actually exists as a being (they believe he is a symbol and a "Promethean figure",[25] "an esoteric symbol of a vital force that permeates the universe"),[26] let alone is trying to destroy humanity.

Definitions that would include the "satanism" of heresy crusades and moral panics is:

In their study of Satanism, the religious studies scholars Asbjørn Dyrendal, James R. Lewis, and Jesper Aa. Petersen stated that the term Satanism "has a history of being a designation made by people against those whom they dislike; it is a term used for 'othering'".[28]

Eugene Gallagher noted that Satanism was usually "a polemical, not a descriptive term".[29]

Similar to the way certain Christian denominations accuse each other of heresy, different satanic groups—mainly the Church of Satan (CoS), the Temple of Set (ToS), the Order of Nine Angles (ONA), and The Satanic Temple (TST)—often accuse one another of being fraudulent Satanists and/or ignorant of true Satanism.[3]

[edit]

Because the original concept of Satan came from Judaism and was embraced by Christianity, and because Satanists, almost by definition, oppose the teachings of those religions, people drawn to Satanism will often move on to "post-Satanism", i.e. to a religion that does not declare itself "Satanic", but includes elements of Satanism (e.g. Temple of Set). Others may regards themselves as Satanists but promote mythological figures and traditions outside of Christianity or Judaism.[30] These religions are sometimes called Satanic and sometimes post-Satanic.[Note 1]

Diane E. Taub and Lawrence D. Nelson complain that Satanism "is frequently defined either too broadly or too narrowly", with accusers sometimes including non-satanic groups such as Santeria, Witchcraft, Eastern religions as well as Freemasonry; and academics (for example Carlson and Larue)[31] and others sometimes restricting its definition to "recognized Satanic churches and their members", excluding those who "believes in a literal Satan". Taub and Nelson define Satanism as "the literal or symbolic worship of Satan, the enemy of the Judeo-Christian God".[32]

Devil in society

[edit]
Devil mask from Portugal

Historical and anthropological research suggests that nearly all societies have developed the idea of a sinister and anti-human force that can hide itself within society.[33] This commonly involves a belief in witches, a group of individuals who invert the norms of their society and seek to harm their community, for instance by engaging in incest, murder, and cannibalism.[34] Allegations of witchcraft may have different causes and serve different functions within a society.[35] For instance, they may serve to uphold social norms,[36] to heighten the tension in existing conflicts between individuals,[36] or to scapegoat certain individuals for various social problems.[35]

Another contributing factor to the idea of Satanism is the concept that there is an agent of misfortune and evil who operates on a cosmic scale,[37] something usually associated with a strong form of ethical dualism that divides the world clearly into forces of good and forces of evil.[38] The earliest such entity known is Angra Mainyu, a figure that appears in the Persian religion of Zoroastrianism.[37][39] This concept was also embraced by Judaism and early Christianity, and although it was soon marginalized within Jewish thought, it gained increasing importance within early Christian understandings of the cosmos.[40]

The Native South American terrible god Tiw is traditionally honored with the syncretic dance and parade Diablada ('Dance of the Devils') that was opposed to the Catholic Church in origin.[41]

Accusations of Satanism

[edit]

According to author Arthur Lyons, "Satanic religions are as old as monotheism and have their origins in Persia of the sixth century",[Note 2] and Joe Carter of the conservative ecumenical journal First Things writes that "real satanism has been around since the beginning of history, selling an appealing message: Your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God."[43][Note 3]

On the other hand, religious scholar Joseph Laycock writes that the "available evidence suggests" that Satanism began as "an imaginary religion Christians invented to demonize their opponents".[23] Confessions of worship of Satan came only after torture or other forms of coercion in early modern Europe.[23] While early stories of satanic activity have been commonly labeled and regarded as propaganda based on falsehood, they also partially shaped the beliefs of what would become modern religious Satanism. Those who absorbed and accepted the tales sometimes began to imitate them (celebrating Black Masses for example), a process known to folklorists as "ostension".[45]

Medieval and Early Modern Christendom

[edit]
Francisco de Goya's Witches' Sabbath (1789), which depicts the Devil flanked by Satanic witches. The witch-cult hypothesis states that such stories are based upon a real-life pagan cult that revered a horned god.

As Christianity expanded throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe, it came into contact with a variety of other religions, which it regarded as "pagan". Christianity being a monotheist religion, Christian theologians believed that since there was only one God (the God of Christianity) the gods and goddesses with supernatural powers venerated by these "pagans" could not be genuine divinities but must actually be demons.[46] However, they did not believe that "pagans" were deliberately worshipping devils, but were instead simply misguided and unaware of the "true" God.[47]

Those Christian groups regarded as heretics by the Roman Catholic Church were treated differently, with theologians arguing that they were deliberately worshipping the Devil.[48] This was accompanied by claims that such individuals engaged in acts of evil—incestuous sexual orgies, the murder of infants, and cannibalism—all stock accusations that had previously been leveled at Christians themselves in the Roman Empire.[49] In Christian iconography, the Devil and demons were given the physical traits of figures from classical mythology, such as the god Pan, fauns, and satyrs.[47]

The first recorded example of such an accusation being made within Western Christianity took place in Toulouse in 1022, when two clerics were tried for allegedly venerating a demon.[50] Throughout the Middle Ages, this accusation would be applied to a wide range of Christian heretical groups, including the Paulicians, Bogomils, Cathars, Waldensians, and the Hussites.[51] The Knights Templar were accused of worshipping an idol known as Baphomet, with Lucifer having appeared at their meetings in the form of a cat.[52] As well as these Christian groups, these claims were also made about Europe's Jewish community.[53] In the 13th century, there were also references made to a group of "Luciferians" led by a woman named Lucardis which hoped to see Satan rule in Heaven. References to this group continued into the 14th century, although historians studying the allegations concur that these Luciferians were probably a fictitious invention.[54]

Within Christian thought, the idea developed that certain individuals could make a pact with Satan.[55] This may have emerged after observing that pacts with gods and goddesses played a role in various pre-Christian belief systems, or that such pacts were also made as part of the Christian cult of saints.[56] Another possibility is that it derives from a misunderstanding of Augustine of Hippo's condemnation of augury in his On Christian Doctrine, written in the late 4th century. Here, he stated that people who consulted augurs were entering quasi pacts (covenants) with demons.[57] The idea of the diabolical pact made with demons was popularized across Europe in the story of Faust, probably based in part on the real life Johann Georg Faust.[58]

As the late medieval gave way to the early modern period, European Christendom experienced a schism between the established Roman Catholic Church and the breakaway Protestant movement. In the ensuing Reformation and Counter-Reformation (1517–1700 CE), both Catholics and Protestants accused each other of deliberately being in league with Satan.[8] It was in this context that the terms Satanist and Satanism emerged.[7]

Witch trials

[edit]
The torture used against accused witches, 1577. Estimates of the number of people executed for witchcraft in Europe vary between 40,000 and 60,000.

The early modern period also saw fear of Satanists reach its "historical apogee" in the form of the witch trials of the fifteenth to the eighteenth centuries,[59] when between 40,000 and 60,000 were executed, almost all in Europe.[60] This came about as the accusations which had been leveled at medieval heretics, among them that of devil-worship, were applied to the pre-existing idea of the witch, or practitioner of malevolent magic.[61] The idea of a conspiracy of Satanic witches was developed by educated elites, although the concept of malevolent witchcraft was a widespread part of popular belief, and folkloric ideas about the night witch, the wild hunt, and the dance of the fairies were incorporated into it.[62] The earliest trials took place in Northern Italy and France, before spreading it out to other areas of Europe and to Britain's North American colonies, being carried out by the legal authorities in both Catholic and Protestant regions.[59]

Most historians agree that the majority of those persecuted in these witch trials were innocent of any involvement in Devil worship.[63] Historian Darren Eldridge writes that claims that there actually was a cult of devil-worshippers being pursued by witch hunters "have not survived the scrutiny of surviving trial records" done by historians from 1962 to 2012.[64] However, in their summary of the evidence for the trials, the historians Geoffrey Scarre and John Callow thought it "without doubt" that some of those accused in the trials had been guilty of employing magic in an attempt to harm their enemies and were thus genuinely guilty of witchcraft.[65]

Affair of the Poisons

[edit]

In a scandal starting with the poisoning of three people, prominent members of the French aristocracy, including members of the king's inner circle, were implicated and sentenced on charges of poisoning and witchcraft. Between 1677 and 1682, during the reign of King Louis XIV, 36 people were executed in Satanic panic known to history as the Affair of the Poisons.[66] At least some of the accusers were implicated others under torture and in hopes of saving their lives. These highly unreliable reports include what "may be the first report of a satanic mass using a woman as an altar".[66]

18th- to 20th-century Christendom

[edit]
Stanislas de Guaita drew the original goat pentagram, which first appeared in the book La Clef de la Magie Noire in 1897. Adaptations of this inverted pentagram would later become synonymous with Baphomet.

The Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution changed humanity's understanding of the world. The mathematics of Isaac Newton and psychology of John Locke "left little space for the intervention of supernatural beings".[67] Charles Darwin's theory of evolution undermined the doctrine of the Fall in the Garden of Eden and the role of the diabolical serpent, while also providing an "alternative account of human evil" in the form of "a residual effect of our animal nature".[68] The Industrial Revolution and urbanization disturbed traditional social relations and folk ideas to undermine belief in witchcraft and the devil.[68] Understanding of disorders of the mind undercut demonic possession.[68] But while the hunting and killing of alleged witches waned, belief in Satan did not disappear.

During the 18th century, gentleman's social clubs became increasingly prominent in Britain and Ireland, among the most secretive of which were the Hellfire Clubs, which were first reported in the 1720s.[69] The most famous of these groups was the Order of the Knights of Saint Francis, which was founded circa 1750 by the aristocrat Sir Francis Dashwood and which assembled first at his estate at West Wycombe and later in Medmenham Abbey.[70] A number of contemporary press sources portrayed these as gatherings of atheist rakes where Christianity was mocked, and toasts were made to the Devil.[71] Beyond these sensationalist accounts, which may not be accurate portrayals of actual events, little is known about the activities of the Hellfire Clubs.[71] Introvigne suggested that they may have engaged in a form of "playful Satanism" in which Satan was invoked "to show a daring contempt for conventional morality" rather than to pay homage to him.[72]

The French Revolution of 1789 dealt a blow to the hegemony of the Roman Catholic Church in parts of Europe, and soon a number of Catholic authors began making claims that it had been masterminded by a conspiratorial group of Satanists.[73] Among the first to do so was French Catholic priest Jean-Baptiste Fiard, who publicly claimed that a wide range of individuals, from the Jacobins to tarot card readers, were part of a Satanic conspiracy.[74] Fiard's ideas were furthered by Alexis-Vincent-Charles Berbiguier de Terre-Neuve du Thym (1765–1851), who devoted a lengthy book to this conspiracy theory; he claimed that Satanists had supernatural powers allowing them to curse people and to shapeshift into both cats and fleas.[75] Although most of his contemporaries regarded Berbiguier as suffering from mental illness,[76] his ideas gained credence among many occultists, including Stanislas de Guaita, a Cabalist who used them for the basis of his book, The Temple of Satan.[77]

A reaction to this was the Taxil hoax in 1890s France, where an anti-clerical writer Léo Taxil (aka Marie Joseph Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès), publicly converted to Catholicism and then published several works alleging to expose the Satanic doings of Freemasons. In 1897, Taxil called a press conference promising to introduce a key character of his stories but instead announced that his revelations about the Freemasons were made up, and thanked the Catholic clergy for helping to publicize his stories.[78] Nine years later he told an American magazine that at first he thought readers would recognize his tales as obvious nonsense, "amusement pure and simple", but when he realized they believed his stories and that there was "lots of money" to be made in publishing them, he continued to perpetrate the hoax.[79] Around the same time, another convert to Catholicism Joris-Karl Huysmans, also helped promote the concept of active Satanist groups in his 1891 work Là-bas (Down There). Huysmans "helped to cement" the idea the black mass as Satanic rite and inversion of the Roman Catholic mass, with a naked woman for an altar.[2] (Unlike Taxil, his conversion was apparently genuine and his book was published as fiction.)

In the early 20th century, the British novelist Dennis Wheatley produced a range of influential novels in which his protagonists battled Satanic groups.[80] At the same time, non-fiction authors such as Montague Summers and Rollo Ahmed published books claiming that Satanic groups practicing black magic were still active across the world, although they provided no evidence that this was the case.[81] During the 1950s, various British tabloid newspapers repeated such claims, largely basing their accounts on the allegations of one woman, Sarah Jackson, who claimed to have been a member of such a group.[82] In 1973, the British Christian Doreen Irvine published From Witchcraft to Christ, in which she claimed to have been a member of a Satanic group that gave her supernatural powers, such as the ability to levitate, before she escaped and embraced Christianity.[83]

In the United States during the 1960s and 1970s, various Christian preachers—the most famous being Mike Warnke in his 1972 book The Satan-Seller—claimed that they had been members of Satanic groups who carried out sex rituals and animal sacrifices before discovering Christianity.[84] According to Gareth Medway in his historical examination of Satanism, these stories were "a series of inventions by insecure people and hack writers, each one based on a previous story, exaggerated a little more each time".[85]

Other publications made allegations of Satanism against historical figures. The 1970s saw the publication of the Romanian Protestant preacher Richard Wurmbrand's book in which he argued—without corroborating evidence—that the socio-political theorist Karl Marx had been a Satanist.[86]

Ritual abuse hysteria

[edit]

At the end of the 20th century, a moral panic arose from claims that a Devil-worshipping cult was committing sexual abuse, murder, and cannibalism in its rituals, and including children among the victims of its rites.[87] Initially, the alleged perpetrators of such crimes were labeled "witches", although the term Satanist was soon adopted as a favored alternative,[87] and the phenomenon itself came to be called "the Satanism Scare".[88] Those active in the scare alleged that there was a conspiracy of organized Satanists who occupied prominent positions throughout society, from the police to politicians, and that they had been powerful enough to cover up their crimes.[89]

Preceded by some significant but isolated episodes in the 1970s, a great Satanism scare exploded in the 1980s in the United States and Canada and was subsequently exported towards England, Australia, and other countries. It was unprecedented in history. It surpassed even the results of Taxil's propaganda, and has been compared with the most virulent periods of witch hunting. The scare started in 1980 and declined slowly between 1990... and 1994, when official British and American reports denied the real existence of ritual satanic crimes. Particularly outside the U.S. and U.K., however, its consequences are still felt today.

Sociologist of religion Massimo Introvigne, 2016[90]

One of the primary sources for the scare was Michelle Remembers, a 1980 book by the Canadian psychiatrist Lawrence Pazder in which he detailed what he claimed were the repressed memories of his patient (and wife) Michelle Smith. Smith had claimed that as a child she had been abused by her family in Satanic rituals in which babies were sacrificed and Satan himself appeared.[91][92] In 1983, allegations were made that the McMartin family—owners of a preschool in California—were guilty of sexually abusing the children in their care during Satanic rituals. The allegations resulted in a lengthy and expensive trial, in which all of the accused would eventually be cleared.[93][94] The publicity generated by the case resulted in similar allegations being made in various other parts of the United States.[95]

A key claim by the "anti-Satanists"[attribution needed] of the Satanic Scare was that any child's claim about Satanic ritual abuse must be true, because children do not lie.[96] Although some involved in the anti-Satanism movement were from Jewish and secular backgrounds,[97] a central part was played by fundamentalist[contentious label] and evangelical Christians, in particular Pentecostal Christians, with Christian groups holding conferences and producing books and videotapes to promote belief in the conspiracy.[88] Various figures in law enforcement also came to be promoters of the conspiracy theory, with such "cult cops"[attribution needed] holding various conferences to promote it.[98] The scare was later imported to the United Kingdom through visiting evangelicals and became popular among some of the country's social workers,[99] resulting in a range of accusations and trials across Britain.[100]

In the late 1980s, the Satanic Scare had lost its impetus following increasing skepticism about such allegations,[101] and a number of those who had been convicted of perpetrating Satanic ritual abuse saw their convictions overturned.[102] In 1990, an agent of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Ken Lanning, revealed that he had investigated 300 allegations of Satanic ritual abuse and found no evidence for Satanism or ritualistic activity in any of them.[102] In the UK, the Department of Health commissioned the anthropologist Jean La Fontaine to examine the allegations of SRA.[103] She noted that while approximately half did reveal evidence of genuine sexual abuse of children, none revealed any evidence that Satanist groups had been involved or that any murders had taken place.[104] She noted three examples in which lone individuals engaged in child molestation had created a ritual performance to facilitate their sexual acts, with the intent of frightening their victims and justifying their actions, but that none of these child molesters were involved in wider Satanist groups.[105]

By 1994, the Satanic ritual abuse hysteria[contentious label] had died down in the US and UK,[90] and by the 21st century, hysteria about Satanism has waned in most Western countries, although allegations of Satanic ritual abuse continued to surface in parts of continental Europe and Latin America.[106] In the United States SRA ideas persisted among much of the public even as law enforcement had grown tired of false leads. A 1994 survey for the women's magazine Redbook reported in 1994,

  • 70 percent of those polled "believe that at least some people who claim that they were abused by satanic cults as children, but repressed the memories for years, are telling the truth"[107][108]
  • 32 percent agreed with the statement, "The FBI and the police ignore evidence because they don't want to admit the cults exist",[108][109] and
  • 22 percent agreed that cult leaders use brainwashing to ensure that the victims would not tell.[108]

QAnon

[edit]

Another Satanic conspiracy theory arose in the United States by 2017,[110] with unsubstantiated allegations of organized Devil-worshippers in prominent positions committing sexual abuse, murder, and cannibalism. The source of such claims began within a far-right political movement, made by an anonymous individual or individuals known as "Q", which were relayed and developed by online communities and influencers. The central QAnon claim purports that a global child sex trafficking ring made up of Democratic politicians, Hollywood actors, high-ranking government officials, business tycoons, and medical experts,[111] were kidnapping, sexually abusing and eating children, but that (then-President) Donald Trump would round up the cabal and bring them to justice in a climactic event known to supporters as "the storm".[112][113][114][115] With the lack of any evidence of child abuse or harm, and failure of the prophesized "storm" to appear before the inauguration of a new president, the conspiracy has waned but not entirely disappeared.[116]

Precursors of modern Satanism

[edit]

Literary

[edit]

From the late 1600s through to the 1800s, the character of Satan was increasingly rendered unimportant in western philosophy, and ignored in Christian theology, while in folklore he came to be seen as a foolish rather than a menacing figure.[117] The development of new values in the Age of Enlightenment (in particular, those of reason and individualism) contributed to a shift in many Europeans' concept of Satan.[117] In this context, a number of individuals took Satan out of the traditional Christian narrative and reread and reinterpreted him in light of their own time and their own interests, in turn generating new and different portraits of Satan.[118]

The shifting concept of Satan owes many of its origins to John Milton's epic poem Paradise Lost (1667), in which Satan features as the protagonist.[119] Milton was a Puritan and had never intended for his depiction of Satan to be a sympathetic one.[120] However, in portraying Satan as a victim of his own pride who rebelled against the Judeo-Christian god, Milton humanized him and also allowed him to be interpreted as a rebel against tyranny.[121] In this vein, the 19th century saw the emergence of what has been termed literary Satanism or romantic Satanism,[122] where in poetry, plays, and novels, God is portrayed not as benevolent but using His omnipotent power for tyranny. Whereas in Christian doctrine Satan was an enemy of not only god but humanity, in the romantic portrayal he was a brave, noble, rebel against tyranny, a friend to other victims of the all powerful bully, i.e. humans. These writers saw Satan as a metaphor to criticize the power of churches and state and to champion the values of reason and liberty.[123]

This was how Milton's Satan was understood by John Dryden[124] and later readers such as the publisher Joseph Johnson,[125] and the anarchist philosopher William Godwin, who reflected it in his 1793 book Enquiry Concerning Political Justice.[121] Paradise Lost gained a wide readership in the 18th century, both in Britain and in continental Europe, where it had been translated into French by Voltaire.[126] Milton thus became "a central character in rewriting Satanism" and would be viewed by many later religious Satanists as a "de facto Satanist".[118]

According to Ruben van Luijk, this cannot be seen as a "coherent movement with a single voice, but rather as a post factum identified group of sometimes widely divergent authors among whom a similar theme is found".[127] For the literary Satanists, Satan was depicted as a benevolent and sometimes heroic figure,[128] with these more sympathetic portrayals proliferating in the art and poetry of many romanticist and decadent figures.[118] For these individuals, Satanism was not a religious belief or ritual activity, but rather a "strategic use of a symbol and a character as part of artistic and political expression".[129]

Guillaume Geefs, Le génie du mal, 1848

Among the romanticist poets to adopt this concept of Satan was the English poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, who had been influenced by Milton.[130] In his poem Laon and Cythna, Shelley praised the "serpent", a reference to Satan, as a force for good in the universe.[131] Another was Shelley's fellow British poet Lord Byron, who included Satanic themes in his 1821 play Cain, which was a dramatization of the Biblical story of Cain and Abel.[122] These more positive portrayals also developed in France; one example was the 1823 work Eloa by Alfred de Vigny.[132] Satan was also adopted by the French poet Victor Hugo, who made the character's fall from Heaven a central aspect of his La Fin de Satan, in which he outlined his own cosmogony.[133] Although the likes of Shelley and Byron promoted a positive image of Satan in their work, there is no evidence that any of them performed religious rites to venerate him, and thus they cannot be considered to be religious Satanists.[127]

Radical left-wing political ideas had been spread by the American Revolution of 1775–83 and the French Revolution of 1789–99. The figure of Satan, who was seen as having rebelled against the tyranny imposed by Jehovah, was appealing to many of the radical leftists of the period.[134] For them, Satan was "a symbol for the struggle against tyranny, injustice, and oppression... a mythical figure of rebellion for an age of revolutions, a larger-than-life individual for an age of individualism, a free thinker in an age struggling for free thought".[129] The French anarchist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who was a staunch critic of Christianity, embraced Satan as a symbol of liberty in several of his writings.[135] Another prominent 19th century anarchist, the Russian Mikhail Bakunin, similarly described the figure of Satan as "the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds" in his book God and the State.[136] These ideas probably inspired the American feminist activist Moses Harman to name his anarchist periodical Lucifer the Lightbearer.[137] The idea of this "Leftist Satan" declined during the 20th century.[137]

Occult

[edit]
The Sabbatic Goat, also known as the Goat of Mendes or Baphomet, as illustrated by Éliphas Lévi, has become one of the most common symbols of Satanism.[138]

In 17th-century Sweden, a number of highway robbers and other outlaws living in the forests informed judges that they venerated Satan because he provided more practical assistance than Jehovah,[139] practices now regarded as "folkloric Satanism".[20]

The figure of "Lucifer" was taken up by the French ceremonial magician Éliphas Lévi (1810–1875), who shocked convention by turning the traditional figure of evil into a brave rebel against tyranny.[123] Lévi has been described as a "Romantic Satanist",[140][141] a Romantic literary movement that formed no organizations and did not worship Satan, but did make a crucial break away from the traditional Christian figure of the "Lord of Darkness" doomed to failure and punishment for his wickedness.[23] They reimagined Satan as an enemy of God the powerful, but not of the weak and mortal human race. In other words, a figure humans could sympathize with.[23] As Lévi moved toward political conservatism in later life, he retained the use of the term, but instead applied it to what he believed was a morally neutral facet of "the absolute".[140][141]

Lévi was not the only occultist who used the term Lucifer without adopting the term Satan in a similar way.[141] The early Theosophical Society believed that "Lucifer" was a force that aided humanity's awakening to its own spiritual nature;[142] the Society began publishing the journal Lucifer in 1887.[143]

The first person to promote an explicitly "Satanic" philosophy was the Polish writer Stanisław Przybyszewski (1868–1927), a "decadent Bohemian" who based his ideology on Social Darwinism of the 1890s,[144] publishing The Synagogue of Satan in 1897.[26]

Danish occultist Carl William Hansen (1872–1936), who used the pen name Ben Kadosh, listed "Luciferian" as his religious affiliation in answer to the Danish national census (his wife and children were listed as Lutheran),[143] making him among the earliest "self-declared Satanists".[26] Hansen sought to spread a cult of Satan/Lucifer,[26] and was involved in a variety of esoteric groups, including Martinism, Freemasonry, and Ordo Templi Orientis, drawing on their ideas to establish his own philosophy.[143] He provided a Luciferian interpretation of Freemasonry in a 1906 pamphlet, although his work had little influence outside of Denmark.[145][146]

Throughout his life British occultist Aleister Crowley (1875–1947) was widely described as a Satanist, usually by detractors.[147] Crowley did not consider himself a Satanist, nor did he worship Satan, as he did not accept the Christian world view in which Satan was believed to exist.[148] He nevertheless used imagery considered satanic, for instance, describing himself as "the Beast 666" and referring to the Whore of Babylon in his work, sending "Antichristmas cards" to his friends later in life.[149] Crowley "in many ways embodies the pre-Satanist esoteric discourse on Satan and Satanism through his lifestyle and his philosophy", with his "image and thought" becoming an "important influence" on the later development of religious Satanism.[145] Both Crowley and LaVey "cultivated a sinister public image and sported shaved heads".

In 1928, the Fraternitas Saturni (FS) was established in Germany; its founder, Eugen Grosche, published Satanische Magie ("Satanic Magic") that same year.[150] The group connected Satan to Saturn, claiming that the planet related to the Sun in the same manner that Lucifer relates to the human world.[150]

Maria de Naglowska, a Russian occultist who had fled to France following the Russian Revolution, established the esoteric group Brotherhood of the Golden Arrow in Paris in 1932.[151][152] She promoted a theology centered on what she called the Third Term of the Trinity consisting of Father, Son, and Sex, the last of which she deemed to be most important.[151] Her early disciples, who underwent what she called "Satanic Initiations", included models and art students recruited from bohemian circles.[151] The Golden Arrow disbanded after Naglowska abandoned it in 1936.[153] Hers was "a quite complicated Satanism, built on a complex philosophical vision of the world, of which little would survive its initiator".[154]

Herbert Sloane claims Our Lady of Endor Coven, a Satanic group based in Toledo, Ohio, was founded in 1948. Describing his Satanic tradition as the Ophite Cultus Sathanas, the group first came to public attention in 1969.[155][156] The group had a Gnostic doctrine about the world, in which the Judeo-Christian creator god is regarded as evil, and the Biblical serpent is presented as a force for good, who had delivered salvation to humanity in the Garden of Eden.[155][157] Sloane's claim of a 1940s origin remain unproven: potentially fabricated to make his group appear older than the (1966) establishment of the Church of Satan.[158][156]

Contemporary tendencies and groups

[edit]

"The intentional, religiously motivated veneration of Satan" is the "working definition" of Satanism of historian of religion Ruben van Luijk,[19] comes in different forms. Satanism has been called a "new religious movement",[159] and other times judged too diffuse to merit that description and been called instead a "milieu" (Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen),[160] united by "family resemblance",[28] and the fact that most of them were self religions.[160] Some of the resemblances in this Satanic milieu are:

  • the positive use of the term Satanist as a designation,
  • an emphasis on individualism,
  • a genealogy that connects them to other Satanic groups,
  • a transgressive and antinomian stance,
  • a self-perception as an elite, and
  • an embrace of values such as pride, self-reliance, and productive non-conformity.[161]

A minority of Satanists have some type of association with the political far-right.[162]

Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen argue that the groups within the Satanic milieu can be divided into three groups: reactive Satanists, rationalist Satanists, and esoteric Satanists.[163]

  • Reactive Satanism (they believe) encompass "popular Satanism, inverted Christianity, and symbolic rebellion" and situates itself in opposition to society while at the same time conforming to society's perspective of evil.[163]
  • Rationalist Satanism is used to describe the trend in the Satanic milieu which is atheistic, skeptical, materialistic, and epicurean.[164] According to Joseph Laycock, "most contemporary Satanists" are nontheistic.[3]
  • Esoteric Satanism applied to those forms which are theistic and draw upon ideas from other forms of Western esotericism, neopaganism, Buddhism, and Hinduism.[164]

Diane E. Taub and Lawrence D. Nelson (publishing in 1993, at the end of the "Satanic panic") divide Satanism into two:

  • "Establishment" Satanism, or the "respectable" form of Satanism that is "usually highly visible and structured",[32] and emphasizes its law-abiding nature. (This may include both Rationalist Satanism and Esoteric Satanism.) An example of "Establishment Satanism" is the Church of Satan, which "officially condemns illegal activity".[165] (Other Establishment Satanists are the Church of Satanic Brotherhood or the Temple of Set.)[166] It is the variety of Satanism most studied by academic sociologists,[167] who also represent Satanism in their "discourse" as "harmless, law-abiding alternative religions",[167] ignoring the second type of Satanism ...
  • "Underground" Satanism, the Satanism of "reputed criminal elements", and the variety that lay groups and the media tend to focus on (especially during the Satanic Panic of the 1980s).[168][169] (Satanic Underground may be similar to Reactive Satanism.) Information on the underground is often less than reliable, as reports are sensational and the Satanists themselves are secretive.[170][171][172][173] Establishment and Underground Satanism conflict, the first wanting to preserve its social acceptance and tax-exempt status that the sensational crimes or alleged crimes of the underground put in jeopardy. How much cause and effect there is a between Underground Satanism and crime comes into question because according to at least one report, "nearly worshipping criminal has had a history of anti-social behavior ... long before taking up occult trappings.")[174][175] On the other hand, evidence of personality disorders does not mean the disorder sufferer does not have sincere Satanic beliefs.[176][171]

Contemporary religious Satanism is predominantly an American phenomenon but has spread elsewhere via globalization and the Internet,[11] allowing for intra-group communication and creation of a forum for Satanist disputes.[11] Satanism started to reach Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s—in time with the fall of the Communist Bloc—and most noticeably in Poland and Lithuania, predominantly Roman Catholic countries.[177][178]

Nontheistic Satanism

[edit]

LaVeyan Satanism and Church of Satan

[edit]
The sigil of Baphomet, official insignia of the Church of Satan and LaVeyan Satanism

Satanism as "a self-declared religion" began in 1966 with the founding of the Church of Satan (CoS) by Anton Szandor LaVey. Religious scholars have called the Church not only the oldest, continuous satanic organization[179][180][181][182] but the most influential, with "numerous imitator and breakaway groups".[179][183]

The church was founded in San Francisco, California, in an era when there was much public interest in the occult, witchcraft, and Satanism. A "gigantic media circus"[184] developed around Anton LaVey, "the Father of Satanism" and his Satanic aesthetics. LaVey shaved his head, wore a goatee, performed Black Masses with nude women serving as altars.[185] He was invited on national talk shows and mingled with celebrities attending his satanic parties.[186][187] As an entrepreneur, he saw an opening for a new religion in the spiritual void of a secularizing post-Christian West.[188]

But LaVey also promoted his ideas and his 1969 Satanic Bible as "the best-known and most influential statement of Satanic theology".[189] It sold nearly a million copies.[179] These had "very little" connection with "either Satan or the worship of Satan",[190] but were based on the Romantic literary concept of Satan, not as a symbol of evil, but as a rebel anti-hero, defying God’s tyranny with charisma and bravery.[191] Together with the romanticism, "humanism, hedonism, aspects of pop psychology and the human potential movement" were woven together by LaVey,[186] and publicized with "a lot of showmanship".[179] Philosopher Ayn Rand, who argued that "selfishness" is a virtue[192] in that "unfettered self-interest is good and altruism is destructive",[193] was a major influence. According to both LaVey[194] and sociologist of religion James R. Lewis,[195] Ayn Rand's thought was a cornerstone of his philosophy, along with "ceremony and ritual" or "ritual magic".

Other influences were Friedrich Nietzsche, who celebrated the Ubermensch, proclaimed "God is dead", and preached against the 'slave's morality' of mercy, charity, and helping the weak;[190][196] English occultist Aleister Crowley, famous for the axiom "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the [moral] Law"; and Arthur Desmond, who strongly associated with Social Darwinism and the expression "the survival of the fittest".[185]

LaVey used Christianity as a "negative mirror" for his new faith,[197] rejecting the basic principles, theology and values of Christian belief,[198] along with other major religions and philosophies such as humanitarianism and liberal democracy—which he saw as negative forces. Instead of idealism, humility, abstinence, self-denigration, obedience, herd behavior, spirituality, and irrationality;[199] he praised the seven deadly sins (i.e. pride, greed, wrath, envy, lust, gluttony and sloth), as virtues not vices.[200][201] LaVey went beyond discouraging sexual inhibitions and feelings of guilt and shame over fetishes,[202][203] calling for a celebration of, and indulgence in, humanity's animal nature and its desires, which Christianity sought to suppress.[198] Human beings should seek out the carnal rather than the spiritual;[204] satisfying the ego's desires enhanced an individual's pride, self-respect, and self-realization.[205] Hate, and aggression were necessary and advantageous for survival,[206] victims should not "turn the other cheek"[207] but take an "eye for an eye".[208]

Satanists should be individualistic, non-conformist, contemptuous of "colorless" mainstream society.[209] LaVey saw Satanism as something like a personality type as much as a belief, since Satanists "are outsiders by their nature",[209] and "born, not made".[210] Since gods are actually a creation of man and not the other way around, LaVey asked, "'Why not really be honest and if you are going to create a god in your image, why not create that god as yourself'.... every man is a god if he chooses to recognize himself as one."[211][32] Not everyone would measure up to being a god however. Human social equality was a "myth", leading to "mediocrity" and support of the weak at the expense of the strong.[212][213] "Social stratification" was part of LaVey and the Church's "Five Point Program".[214][215]

A "true Satanic society" was described in Lavey's church's periodical The Black Flame and highlighted by anthropologist Jean La Fontaine; it would be one in which the population consists of "free-spirited, well-armed, fully-conscious, self-disciplined individuals, who will neither need nor tolerate any external entity 'protecting' them or telling them what they can and cannot do".[216] Another version of the Satanic society envisioned by LaVey was the breeding of an elite people "superior" in their creativity and nonconformity.[217] These would live apart from the rest of the human "herd"—who would be relegated into ghettoes, ideally "space ghettoes" located on other planets.[218]

LaVey's ideas were also said to "seem contradictory".[186] According to CoS priest Gavin Baddeley, LaVey's church combined "a love of life garbed in the symbols of death and fear",[219][186] and while LaVey himself pontificated on personal freedom, he "micromanaged the lives of his followers".[220] Some doubted his atheist naturalism.[221] LaVey insisted the church scoffed at the supernatural, but also told an interviewer he considered "curses and hexes" against enemies a form of human sacrifice "by proxy".[222]

Contradictions in his thought have been explained by his wanting it to have as wide appeal as possible,[186] balancing, in his words, "nine parts" of "respectability" to "one part" of "outrageousness".[186][223] If Satanism was to be Satanic, it required some outrageous/anti-social elements, but if it was going to be a viable organization, these could not be allowed to frighten off potential congregants and attract unwanted attention.

One "outrageous" issue that LaVey was criticized for was his "ambivalent relationship" with far-right groups (United Klans of America, National Renaissance Party, and the American Nazi Party) that he neither endorsed nor rejected.[224][225]

LaVey died in 1997, but the church maintains a purist approach to his thought,[226] insisting he and the church have "codified" Satanism as "a religion and philosophy",[227] and dismisses other Satanist groups (atheistic or otherwise), as reverse-Christians, pseudo-Satanists or Devil worshipers.[228]

First Satanic Church

[edit]

After LaVey's death in 1997, the Church of Satan was taken over by a new administration and its headquarters were moved to New York City. LaVey's daughter, the High Priestess Karla LaVey re-founded The First Satanic Church on 1999 in San Francisco. This church has been called "a lot more exclusive" than the original and as of late 2023 was known for producing a "Black X-Mass concert" in San Francisco "every year for the last couple decades".[229]

Satanic Reds

[edit]

Differing from other Satanic organizations, the Satanic Reds, founded in 1997 by Tani Jantsang, is a unique organization blending Marxist-communist politics with Lovecraftian occultism mixed with elements of Central Asian folklore and the advocacy of social welfare;[230] the group became notable mainly for their online activism and usage of communist symbols merged with Satanist ones. However, the Satanic Reds claim to belong to the left-hand path but do not identify as theistic Satanists in the manner of believing in Satan as a god with a personality, since they conceive it as Sat and Tan, "Being and Becoming", similarly to the fictional deity of chaos Nyarlathotep from Lovecraft's Cthulhu Mythos.[230]

The Satanic Temple

[edit]
The headquarters of the Satanic Temple and Salem Art Gallery at Salem, Massachusetts

The Satanic Temple (TST), has been called the "most prominent" satanic organization "in terms of both size and public activity" (as of late 2023).[231] Based in Salem, Massachusetts and active since 2012,[232] it claims 700,000 members worldwide.[233] Like the older Church of Satan, its congregants do not believe in a supernatural Satan, but if the CoS saw Satanism as a "negative mirror" of Christianity, reversing Christian principles of altruism (helping the downtrodden and community-mindedness) to selfishness, the Christian principles TST wants to reverse are politically conservative activist/fundamentalist ones—the elimination of the right to abortion, of the teaching of evolution, of the separation of church and state, etc. This "left-wing",[231] "socially engaged Satanism",[234] involves activism,[231] rather than the individualism and right-wing-oriented,[235] "getting what you want for yourself",[236] of the CoS.[Note 4]

They have been called "rationalist, political pranksters" (by Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen),[238] with pranks designed to highlight religious hypocrisy and advance the cause of secularism.[239] One such prank was performing a "Pink Mass" over the grave of the mother of the evangelical Christian and prominent anti-LGBTQ preacher Fred Phelps and claiming that the mass converted the spirit of Phelps' mother into a lesbian.[238] The "Seven Fundamental" tenets of the temple on its website mention compassion, justice, freedom, inviolability of the human body, conforming to scientific understanding, human fallibility—but say nothing about Satan.[240][241][242] The Temple has been described as using the literary Satan as metaphor to promote pragmatic skepticism, rational reciprocity, personal autonomy, and curiosity;[242] and as a symbol to represent "the eternal rebel" against arbitrary authority and social norms.[243][244]

The temple has also demanded the privileges the government affords Christians, such as giving prayers before city council meetings, erecting (satanic) statues on government property, and distributing its materials in public schools. As the movement became bigger, its congregations volunteered to clean highways and help the homeless, at least in part to demonstrate they were civic minded and not evil.[245][246] It has made efforts at lobbying,[247] with a focus on the separation of church and state and using satire against Christian groups that it believes interfere with personal freedom.[247]

Lucien Greaves has described the Satanic Temple as being a progressive and updated version of LaVey's Satanism,[239] posted a fairly detailed refutation of LaVey's doctrines,[221] accusing the CoS of fetishizing authoritarianism,[247][248] and explaining how elements of Social Darwinism and Nietzscheanism within LaVeyan Satanism are incongruent with game theory, reciprocal altruism, and cognitive science.[249] The Church of Satan, on the other hand, has declared the TST members as only "masquerading" as Satanists,[250][251] being in violation of the "five decades of a clearly defined belief system called Satanism expounded by a worldwide organization" (i.e. LaVeyan Satanism).[227]

Theistic Satanism

[edit]

Theistic Satanism, otherwise referred to as spiritual Satanism, or devil worship,[252][253] is a form of Satanism with the primary belief that Satan is an actual deity or force to revere or worship.[9][254] Other characteristics of theistic Satanism may include a belief in magic, which is manipulated through ritual, although that is not a defining criterion, and theistic Satanists may focus solely on devotion.

First Church of Satan

[edit]

The First Church of Satan (FCoS), a splinter group that separated from LaVey's Church of Satan during the 1970s,[255] attempts to rediscover the teachings of Aleister Crowley and believe that Anton LaVey actually was a magus in the early days of the Church of Satan but gradually renounced his powers, became isolated and embittered.[255] Furthermore, the First Church of Satan strongly criticizes the current Church of Satan as a pale shadow of its former self, and they strive to "maintain a Satanic organization that is not hostile or manipulative toward its own members".[255]

Turku Society for the Spiritual Sciences

[edit]

Pekka Siitoin founded the satanist group called the Turku Society for the Spiritual Sciences (Turun Hengentieteen Seura) on September 1, 1971. The society stated its founding principles as "promot[ing] nationalist patriotic activity [and] development of Aryan spirituality". The society also stated opposition to capitalism, communism and "the Jewish religion based on Jehovah's tyranny."[256] Siitoin believed in neo-Gnosticism and Theosophy and combined these with antisemitism and satanism. The society allegedly performed satanic orgies which researcher of religion Pekka Iitti opined might not be "far off from the truth".[257] Several of the perpetrators of the Kursiivi printing house arson in November 1977 were members of the society.[258][259]

Order of Nine Angles

[edit]
Flag of the O9A

The Order of Nine Angles, claiming to have been established in the 1960s, rose to public recognition in the early 1980. This movement expressed the idea that groups like Church of Satan were "too benevolent and law-abiding" to be true Satanists. This notion grew, particularly among musicians and fans of extreme heavy metal music, where being more extreme meant being more authentic.[25] These antinomian and amoral Satanic (or post-Satanic) groups are sometimes called the "sinister tradition" of Satanism.[25]

The O9A describe their occultism as "Traditional Satanism".[260] The O9A's writings not only encourage human sacrifice,[261] but insist it is required in Satanism,[25] referring to their victims as opfers.[262] According to the Order's teachings, such opfers must demonstrate character faults that mark them out as being worthy of death.[263][264] No O9A cell has admitted to carrying out a sacrifice in a ritualized manner, but rather, Order members have joined the police and military to carry out such killings.[265]

Temple of Set

[edit]

The Temple of Set is an occult left-hand path religious organization. It was founded in 1975 when Michael Aquino, the founder of a Church of Satan Grotto in Louisville, Kentucky, and editor of the Church's newsletter, The Cloven Hoof, left the church, taking 28 members with him.[266][267] Aquino's anger that LaVey had devalued his high level grade of "magister" in the church may have initiated his break, but Aquino also disagreed with LaVey's materialist philosophy, arguing that while the church might publicly be materialist, Satan as symbol was "only part of the truth". Aquino held a ritual to ask Satan "where to lead" his CoS defectors and, on the night of 21–22 June 1975, Satan allegedly told him to "Reconsecrate my Temple and my Order in the true name of Set. No longer will I accept the bastard title of a Hebrew fiend." Thus Aquino came to believe that the name Satan was a corruption of the name Set, the Egyptian god of darkness.[268][269] The philosophy of the Temple of Set may be summed up as "enlightened individualism"—enhancement and improvement of oneself by personal education, experiment, and initiation. This process is necessarily different and distinctive for each individual. The members do not agree on whether Set is real or symbolic, and they're not expected to.[270]

Temple of the Black Light

[edit]

The Temple of the Black Light, formerly known as the Misanthropic Luciferian Order, is a Satanic occult order founded in Sweden in 1995. The group espouses a philosophy known as "Chaosophy". Chaosophy asserts that the world that mankind lives in, and the universe that it lives in, all exist within the realm known as Cosmos. Cosmos is made of three spatial dimensions and one linear time dimension. Cosmos rarely ever changes and is a materialistic realm. Another realm that exists is known as Chaos. Chaos exists outside of the Cosmos and is made of infinite dimensions and unlike the Cosmos, it is always changing. Members of the TotBL believe that the realm of Chaos is ruled over by 11 dark gods, the highest of them being Satan, and all of said gods are considered manifestations of a higher being. This higher being is known as Azerate, the Dragon Mother, and is all of the 11 gods united as one. The TotBL believes that Azerate will resurrect one day and destroy the Cosmos and let Chaos consume everything. The group has been connected to the Swedish black/death metal band Dissection, particularly its front man Jon Nödtveidt.[271] Nödtveidt was introduced to the group "at an early stage".[272] The lyrics on the band's third album, Reinkaos, are all about beliefs of the Temple of the Black Light.[273] Nödtveidt committed suicide in 2006.[274][275]

Temple of Zeus

[edit]

The Temple of Zeus is a western esoteric occult organization that combines Satanism, the ancient alien astronaut "hypothesis", and antisemitism.[276] It was originally founded as the Joy of Satan Ministries in the early 2000s by Maxine Dietrich (pseudonym of Andrea Maxine Dietrich),[277][278] wife of the National Socialist Movement of the United States' co-founder and former leader Clifford Herrington.[279] With its inception, spiritual Satanism was born—a current that until recently was regarded only as "theist", but then defined into "Spiritual Satanism" by theistic Satanists who concluded that the term spiritual in Satanism represented the best answer to the world,[280] considering it a "moral slap" toward the earlier carnal and materialistic LaVeyan Satanism, and instead focusing its attention upon spiritual evolution.[280] Temple of Zeus presents a unique synthesis of theistic Satanism, Nazism, Gnosticism, neopaganism, Western esotericism, UFO conspiracy theories, and extraterrestrial hypotheses similar to those popularized by Zecharia Sitchin and David Icke.[278]

Luciferianism

[edit]
The sigil of Lucifer

Luciferians reportedly revere Lucifer not as the devil, but as a destroyer, guardian, liberator,[281] light bringer, and/or guiding spirit to darkness,[282] or even as the true god, as opposed to Jehovah.[281]

Personal Satanism

[edit]

In contrast to the organized and doctrinal Satanist groups is the personal Satanism of individuals, who identify as Satanists due to their affinity for the general idea of Satan, including such characteristics as viciousness and/or subversion.

Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen used the term reactive Satanism to describe one form of modern Satanism. They described this as an adolescent and anti-social means of rebelling in a Christian society, by which an individual transgresses cultural boundaries.[163] which tends to fall into two tendencies:

  • "Satanic tourism"—characterized by the brief period of time in which an individual was involved;
  • "Satanic quest"—typified by a longer and deeper involvement.[164]

The researcher Gareth Medway noted that in 1995 he encountered a British woman who stated that she had been a practicing Satanist during her teenage years. She had grown up in a small mining village and had come to believe that she had psychic powers. After hearing about Satanism in some library books, she declared herself a Satanist and formulated a belief that Satan was the true god. After her teenage years she abandoned Satanism and became a chaos magickian.[283]

Some personal Satanists are teenagers or mentally disturbed individuals who have engaged in criminal activities.[284] During the 1980s and 1990s, several groups of teenagers were apprehended after sacrificing animals and vandalizing both churches and graveyards with Satanic imagery.[285] Introvigne stated that these incidents were "more a product of juvenile deviance and marginalization than Satanism".[285] In a few cases, the crimes of these personal Satanists have included murder.

  • In 1970, two separate groups of teenagers—one led by Stanley Baker in Big Sur, and the other by Steven Hurd in Los Angeles, killed a total of three people and consumed parts of their corpses in what they later claimed were sacrifices devoted to Satan.[286]
  • The American serial killer Richard Ramirez claimed that he was a theistic Satanist; during his 1980s killing spree he left an inverted pentagram at the scene of each murder and at his trial called out "Hail Satan!".[287]
  • In 1984 on Long Island, a group allegedly called the Knights of the Black Circle killed one of its own members, Gary Lauwers, over a disagreement regarding the group's illegal drug dealing; group members later related that Lauwers' death was a sacrifice to Satan.[286] In particular, self-declared Satanist and alleged member of the Knights of the Black Circle, Ricky "the Acid King" Kasso, became notorious for torturing and murdering Lauwers while attempting to force Lauwers to declare "I love Satan" during the murder.[288]
  • Nikolai Ogolobyak, who confessed to being a member of a Satanic cult, was sentenced to 20 years in 2010 for the ritual killing of four teenagers in Russia's Yaroslavl region.[289]

Demographics

[edit]

A survey in the Encyclopedia of Satanism found that people became involved with Satanism in many diverse ways and were found in many countries. The survey found that more Satanists were raised as Protestant Christians than Catholic.[290]

Beginning in the late 1960s, organized Satanism emerged out of the occult subculture with the formation of the Church of Satan. It was not long, however, before Satanism had expanded well beyond the Church of Satan. The decentralization of the Satanist movement was considerably accelerated when Anton LaVey disbanded the grotto system in the mid-1970s. At present, religious Satanism exists primarily as a decentralized subculture [...] Unlike traditional religions, and even unlike the early Satanist bodies such as the Church of Satan and the Temple of Set, contemporary Satanism is, for the most part, a decentralized movement. In the past, this movement has been propagated through the medium of certain popular books, especially LaVey's Satanic Bible. In more recent years, the internet has come to play a significant role in reaching potential "converts", particularly among disaffected young people.

— Religion scholar and researcher of new religious movements James R. Lewis[291]

Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen observed that from surveys of Satanists conducted in the early 21st century, it was clear that the Satanic milieu was "heavily dominated by young males".[292] They nevertheless noted that census data from New Zealand suggested that there may be a growing proportion of women becoming Satanists.[needs update][292] In comprising more men than women, Satanism differs from most other religious communities, including most new religious communities.[293] Most Satanists came to their religion through reading, either online or books, rather than through being introduced to it through personal contacts.[294] Many practitioners do not claim that they converted to Satanism, but rather state that they were born that way, and only later in life confirmed that Satanism served as an appropriate label for their pre-existing worldviews.[295] Others have stated that they had experiences with supernatural phenomena that led them to embracing Satanism.[296]

The surveys revealed that atheistic Satanists appeared to be in the majority, although the numbers of theistic Satanists appeared to grow over time.[291][297][298] Beliefs in the afterlife varied, although the most common beliefs about the afterlife were reincarnation and the idea that consciousness survives bodily death.[299] The surveys also demonstrated that most recorded Satanists practiced magic,[300] although there were differing opinions as to whether magical acts operated according to etheric laws or whether the effect of magic was purely psychological.[301] A number of Satanists described performing cursing, in most cases as a form of vigilante justice.[302] Most practitioners conduct their religious observances in a solitary manner, and never or rarely meet fellow Satanists for rituals.[303] Rather, the primary interaction that takes place between Satanists is online, on websites or via email.[304] From their survey data, Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen noted that the average length of involvement in the Satanic milieu was seven years.[305] A Satanist's involvement in the movement tends to peak in their early twenties and drops off sharply in their thirties.[306] A small proportion retain their allegiance to the religion into their elder years.[307] When asked about their ideology, the largest proportion of Satanists identified as apolitical or non-aligned, while only a small percentage identified as conservative.[308] A small minority of Satanists expressed support for Nazism; conversely, over two-thirds expressed opposition or strong opposition to it.[296]

2021 Canadian census

[edit]

The 2021 Canadian census states that 5,890 Canadians identify as Satanist, representing 0.02% of the population.[309]

Compared to the general population, Satanists are more likely to be male, aged in their 20s or 30s, and not a member of any recognized minority group, although the Japanese are an exception (with the Japanese comprising 0.3% of both Satanists and the population as a whole).

Comparison of Satanists in Canada against the general population[309]
General population Satanists
Total population 36,328,480 5,890
Gender Male 17,937,165 (49.4%) 3,430 (58.2%)
Female 18,391,315 (50.6%) 2,460 (41.8%)
Age 0 to 14 5,992,555 (16.5%) 175 (3%)
15 to 19 2,003,200 (5.5%) 210 (3.6%)
20 to 24 2,177,860 (6%) 810 (13.8%)
25 to 34 4,898,625 (13.5%) 2,755 (46.8%)
35 to 44 4,872,425 (13.4%) 1,250 (21.2%)
45 to 54 4,634,850 (12.8%) 470 (8%)
55 to 64 5,162,365 (14.2%) 165 (2.8%)
65 and over 6,586,600 (18.1%) 60 (1%)
Racial background White 26,689,275 (73.5%) 5,480 (93%)
South Asian 2,571,400 (7%) 40 (0.7%)
Chinese 1,715,770 (4.7%) 50 (0.9%)
Black 1,547,870 (4.3%) 100 (1.7%)
Filipino 957,355 (2.6%) 35 (0.6%)
Arab 694,015 (1.9%) 25 (0.4%)
Latin American 580,235 (1.6%) 55 (0.9%)
Southeast Asian 390,340 (1.1%) 20 (0.3%)
West Asian 360,495 (1%) 0 (0%)
Korean 218,140 (0.6%) 0 (0%)
Japanese 98,890 (0.3%) 15 (0.3%)
Other 172,885 (0.5%) 20 (0.3%)
Multi-ethnic 331,805 (0.9%) 50 (0.8%)
[edit]

In 2004, it was claimed that Satanism was allowed in the Royal Navy of the British Armed Forces, despite opposition from Christians.[310][311][312] In 2016, under a Freedom of Information request, the Navy Command Headquarters stated that, "we do not recognise satanism as a formal religion, and will not grant facilities or make specific time available for individual 'worship'."[313]

In 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States debated in the case of Cutter v. Wilkinson over protecting minority religious rights of prison inmates after a lawsuit challenging the issue was filed to them.[314][315] The court ruled that facilities that accept federal funds cannot deny prisoners accommodations that are necessary to engage in activities for the practice of their own religious beliefs.[316][317]

In 2019, The Satanic Temple was granted religious IRS 501(c)(3) status.[318]

Metal and rock music

[edit]
Heavy metal singer King Diamond is a member of the Church of Satan.

During the 1960s and 1970s, several rock bands— namely the American band Coven and the British band Black Widow, employed the imagery of Satanism and witchcraft in their work.[319] References to Satan also appeared in the work of those rock bands which were pioneering the heavy metal genre in Britain during the 1970s.[320] For example, the band Black Sabbath made mention of Satan in their lyrics, although some of the band's members were practicing Christians, and other lyrics affirmed the power of the Christian God over Satan.[321] In the 1980s, greater use of Satanic imagery was made by heavy metal bands such as Slayer, Kreator, Sodom, and Destruction.[322] Bands active in the subgenre of death metal—among them Morbid Angel and Entombed, also adopted Satanic imagery, combining it with other morbid and dark imagery, such as that of zombies and serial killers.[323]

Satanism would come to be more closely associated with the subgenre of black metal,[320] in which it was foregrounded over the other themes that had been used in death metal.[324] A number of black metal performers incorporated self-injury into their act, framing this as a manifestation of Satanic devotion.[324] The first black metal band, Venom, proclaimed themselves to be Satanists, although this was more an act of provocation than an expression of genuine devotion to the Devil.[325] Satanic themes were also used by the black metal bands Bathory and Hellhammer.[326] However, the first black metal act to more seriously adopt Satanism was Mercyful Fate, whose vocalist, King Diamond, joined the Church of Satan.[327] More often than not musicians associating themselves with black metal say they do not believe in legitimate Satanic ideology and often profess to being atheists, agnostics, or religious skeptics.[328]

In contrast to King Diamond, various black metal Satanists sought to distance themselves from LaVeyan Satanism, for instance by referring to their beliefs as "devil worship".[329] These individuals regarded Satan as a literal entity,[330] and in contrast to Anton LaVey, they associated Satanism with criminality, suicide, and terror.[329] For them, Christianity was regarded as a plague which required eradication.[331] Many of these individuals, most prominently Varg Vikernes and Euronymous, were involved in the early Norwegian black metal scene.[332][333] Between 1992 and 1996, such people destroyed around fifty Norwegian churches in arson attacks.[334] Within the black metal scene, a number of musicians later replaced Satanic themes with those deriving from Heathenry, a form of neopaganism.[335]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Satanism denotes a spectrum of individualistic philosophies and religions that revere as a symbol of defiance against authoritarian , personal , and carnal nature, predominantly in nontheistic forms that reject literalism. Contemporary Satanism crystallized with Anton Szandor LaVey's founding of the on April 30, 1966, articulating an atheistic creed of , ritual psychodrama for , and inversion of Christian moral constraints without belief in deities or . This LaVeyan paradigm emphasizes empirical self-interest and , influencing subsequent groups while marginalizing , which posits as a genuine and persists in fragmented, esoteric sects but commands far smaller adherence. , established in 2013, extends nontheistic Satanism into activism, deploying satirical provocations to champion religious neutrality, bodily autonomy, and scientific rationalism against perceived theocratic encroachments. Notable controversies include the 1980s-1990s "Satanic Panic," a media-amplified alleging organized ritual abuse networks, subsequently discredited through lack of prosecutable evidence and investigative scrutiny revealing in accusations.

Etymology and Definitions

Etymology

The term "Satanism" combines the proper name "" with the "-ism," denoting a system of beliefs or practices associated with Satan. "" originates from the Hebrew שָׂטָן (śāṭān), a noun meaning "adversary," "opponent," or "accuser," which in biblical contexts often carried the definite article haśśāṭān ("the adversary") and functioned as a descriptive title rather than a personal name for a singular entity. This Hebrew root entered Greek as satán and Latin as Satan, influencing European languages through biblical translations, where it increasingly denoted a specific supernatural antagonist by the medieval period. The English word "Satanism" first appears in records from the 1560s, initially connoting a disposition influenced by or explicit worship of him, evolving from earlier associations with demonic traits. Its earliest documented use dates to , per lexicographic sources, though a 1559 Anglican tract applied it pejoratively to Anabaptists as practitioners of "Satanism" to denote heretical opposition to established doctrine. Historically, the term functioned primarily as an accusatory epithet leveled by Christian authorities against perceived enemies, such as non-conformists or pagans, rather than as a self-identified religious label until the .

Core Definitions


Satanism encompasses a range of ideological and religious movements centered on the veneration or symbolic use of Satan, typically in opposition to Abrahamic moral frameworks that depict him as an adversary. These movements emerged prominently in the 20th century, distinguishing themselves through emphasis on individualism, skepticism toward traditional authority, and rejection of supernatural literalism in most cases. While historical accusations of devil worship date back centuries, modern Satanism self-identifies as a deliberate philosophical or ritualistic system rather than mere inversion of Christianity.
The primary distinction within Satanism lies between theistic and non-theistic variants. Theistic Satanism posits Satan as a real, or entity worthy of , often involving prayers, invocations, or pacts akin to other polytheistic practices, though such groups remain fragmented and lack centralized institutions comparable to mainstream religions. Proponents may draw from traditions or reinterpret biblical figures, but empirical evidence of organized theistic Satanist communities is limited to small, esoteric circles without widespread verifiable membership data. In contrast, non-theistic or atheistic Satanism, which dominates contemporary expressions, treats Satan as a metaphorical symbolizing human carnality, self-deification, and defiance of , explicitly denying belief in gods or devils as literal beings. The , founded by Anton Szandor LaVey on April 30, 1966, in , represents the foundational non-theistic form, codified in (1969), which outlines nine Satanic statements and eleven Satanic rules of the earth promoting indulgence, responsibility, and vital existence over or derived from theistic guilt. Rituals serve psychodramatic purposes for emotional release, not efficacy, with membership historically peaking in the thousands but emphasizing individual practice over communal worship. The , established in 2013 by and Malcolm Jarry, adopts a similar non-theistic stance but focuses on , including campaigns for and against perceived theocratic overreach, guided by seven tenets prioritizing empathy, reason, and justice. Unlike the Church of Satan, which critiques The Satanic Temple as performative rather than authentically Satanic, the latter has grown to include international chapters and public monuments, such as statues erected in 2015 to challenge Christian displays. Both reject criminality or harm, with explicit prohibitions against abuse, positioning Satanism as a countercultural ethic rather than pathology. Modern Satanism, as formalized by through the founded on April 30, 1966, is atheistic and symbolic, treating as a for human ego, self-preservation, and defiance of dogmatic constraints rather than a literal being. This sets it apart from , a decentralized set of beliefs that reveres or similar entities as real deities capable of interaction, often incorporating rituals directed toward infernal forces for or , without the organized or rejection of found in LaVeyan variants. Satanism further diverges from , which centers on —distinct from in many traditions—as a figure of intellectual enlightenment, self-deification, and promethean , prioritizing ascension through wisdom and often avoiding the adversarial carnality emphasized in Satanic philosophy. While both fall under left-hand path esotericism, Luciferianism typically eschews overt rebellion against societal norms in favor of personal , drawing more from gnostic and hermetic sources than the hedonistic individualism of Satanism's foundational texts like (1969). In distinction from witchcraft, particularly modern Wicca developed by Gerald Gardner in the 1950s, Satanism rejects nature-centric polytheism or duotheism (e.g., worship of a Horned God and Triple Goddess) and does not derive from pre-Christian pagan survivals; Wiccans explicitly disavow devil worship, viewing the Christian Satan as an alien Abrahamic construct superimposed on folk deities during medieval persecutions. Historical European witch trials (circa 1450–1750) conflated malefic magic with diabolical pacts due to inquisitorial theology, but empirical analysis of trial records shows scant evidence of organized Satanic cults, underscoring that witchcraft involved localized folk practices unrelated to modern Satanic self-worship. Unlike broader occultism, which encompasses diverse pursuits like (e.g., Golden Dawn systems from 1888 onward) aimed at mystical union or cosmic harmony, Satanism operates as a carnally oriented philosophy that dismisses otherworldly transcendence in favor of earthly mastery and for psychological , without reliance on external spirits or hierarchical initiations. , established in 2013, extends nontheistic Satanism into civic activism—such as campaigns for reproductive rights and against religious favoritism—but maintains symbolic rather than devotional use of Satanic imagery, differentiating it from traditional occult groups' esoteric secrecy. These boundaries highlight Satanism's emphasis on empirical self-interest over supernaturalism or communal prevalent in related domains.

Satan in Abrahamic Traditions

Biblical and Theological Depictions

In the Hebrew Bible, the term śāṭān (שָׂטָן), often rendered as "," functions as a title meaning "adversary" or "accuser," typically denoting a role rather than a proper name for an independent entity of evil. It appears sparingly, notably in the (chapters 1–2), where ha-śāṭān ("the satan") acts as a member of the who, with 's permission, challenges Job's righteousness by afflicting him to test his faith. Similarly, in Zechariah 3:1–2, ha-śāṭān accuses the before , functioning as a celestial rather than an autonomous rebel. In 1 Chronicles 21:1, śāṭān incites to take a , contrasting with the parallel account in 2 Samuel 24:1 attributing the action to , underscoring the figure's subordinate and non-demonic nature. Jewish theology interprets śāṭān not as a fallen or inherently being but as an angelic agent subservient to , embodying the yetzer ha-ra ( inclination) that tempts humans toward while remaining under divine authority. This view rejects notions of dualism, viewing as a mechanism for moral testing and rather than opposition to 's sovereignty; does not rebel but executes 's will, as seen in post-biblical texts like the where it prosecutes souls but lacks independent power. In the New Testament, Satan emerges as a more antagonistic figure, identified as the devil (diabolos, "slanderer") who actively opposes God and humanity. Jesus encounters him as the tempter in the wilderness (Matthew 4:1–11; Luke 4:1–13), where Satan offers power in exchange for worship, and as the "prince of this world" (John 12:31; 14:30) and "father of lies" (John 8:44). Revelation 12:9 and 20:2 equate him with the "ancient serpent," the dragon, and deceiver of the whole world, cast out of heaven with his angels, portraying a cosmic adversary bound for a millennium before final defeat. He influences events like entering Judas Iscariot (Luke 22:3) and hindering apostles (1 Thessalonians 2:18), yet remains limited by divine permission. Christian theological development amplified these depictions, interpreting Old Testament passages typologically: , describing the fall of the king of as the "morning star" (hêlēl) descending to , and 28:12–19, lamenting the king of Tyre's expulsion from Eden-like perfection, as allegories for Satan's primordial rebellion as , a high-ranking who fell through pride. Early like (c. 185–254 CE) and Augustine (354–430 CE) elaborated this, positing Satan's voluntary leading to his role as tempter and ruler of demons, though always under God's ultimate control, evolving from prosecutor to cosmic foe by the patristic era. In Islamic theology, the Quran presents Iblis (often equated with Shaytan, "adversary") as a jinn, not an angel, who refuses God's command to prostrate before Adam (Quran 2:34; 7:11–18; 15:28–44; 38:71–85), citing superiority due to creation from fire over clay. Cursed and expelled, Iblis vows to mislead humanity until Judgment Day, whispering temptations (waswasa) but lacking coercive power, serving as a test of faith wherein humans bear responsibility for yielding to his suggestions. Shaytan and his progeny (shayatin) represent evil impulses, but God's omniscience ensures no ultimate threat, with refuge sought through recitation of protective verses like Ayat al-Kursi (Quran 2:255).

Historical Societal Role of the Devil Figure

In and society from onward, the —often equated with —served as the primary antagonist to divine order, embodying temptation, deception, and the origin of , thereby providing a framework for understanding human suffering and moral failure without impugning God's benevolence. Early like (354–430 CE) depicted the as a whose rebellion explained the presence of in a world created good, a concept that permeated pastoral teachings to encourage vigilance against . This theological role extended socially, as clerical authorities invoked the Devil to enforce communal norms, attributing personal misfortunes, crop failures, or epidemics to demonic influence, which fostered reliance on rituals like exorcisms for protection. By the (c. 1000–1300 CE), the 's image evolved into a more active societal threat, depicted in art and sermons as a grotesque tempter forging explicit pacts with humans, shifting from mere deceiver to recruiter of infernal allies. This portrayal intensified during the 14th-century (1347–1351), when the was blamed for plagues alongside and lepers, leading to pogroms that killed thousands, such as the Strasbourg of 2,000 in 1349, framed as devil-worshippers poisoning wells. Ecclesiastical institutions leveraged this fear for control, as inquisitors used devilish accusations to suppress , exemplified by the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), which mandated annual confessions partly to detect satanic influences. The and saw the Devil's role peak in witch hunts, where societal anxieties over disorder were projected onto supposed devil-pact adherents, primarily women and outsiders. The (1486), authored by , systematized as requiring a diabolical pact for maleficium (harmful magic), influencing inquisitorial procedures across Europe and justifying torture to extract confessions of sabbats and carnal unions with demons. Resulting persecutions, concentrated in the and , executed an estimated 40,000–60,000 individuals between 1450 and 1750, with peaks like the Würzburg trials (1626–1631) claiming 900 victims, often marginalized poor or elderly women scapegoated for community ills. These episodes functioned causally to reinforce social hierarchies, channeling economic stresses and religious schisms into unified action against a common infernal enemy, while bolstering clerical authority amid challenges. In broader Abrahamic contexts, the Devil's societal function varied: in , ha-Satan remained a divine testing (e.g., Book of Job, c. 6th–4th century BCE), limiting its use as a mass compared to ; in , (expelled for refusing to bow to , per 7:11–18) symbolized hubris and whispered temptations (waswas), invoked in to explain moral lapses but less for large-scale persecutions until later folk integrations. Overall, the figure's historical utility lay in externalizing chaos—blaming for wars, famines, or dissent—thus preserving social cohesion by directing aggression outward rather than questioning systemic failures.

Historical Accusations

Pre-Modern and Early Modern Cases

Accusations of devil worship in pre-modern primarily targeted religious dissenters and marginalized groups, often conflating with pacts with , though no supports the existence of organized Satanic practices. Medieval church authorities, preoccupied with demonic influence, projected fantasies of devil-led cults onto heretics such as the Cathars in the 12th-13th centuries, alleging they venerated as a good deity while scorning the biblical , but these claims stemmed from inquisitorial propaganda rather than observed rituals. Similarly, accusations against the in the 14th century included assertions of renouncing Christ and offering kisses to the devil's posterior, extracted under and lacking corroboration from independent sources. A prominent case occurred in 1307 when King ordered the arrest of the Knights Templar on October 13, charging them with , including denying Christ, spitting and urinating on the cross, and worshipping a demonic head known as , interpreted as a representation of . Confessions from over 100 Templars were obtained through , such as prolonged suspension and threats of burning, but many recanted upon release from duress, and the order's grand master, , retracted his admission before his execution in 1314. The accusations served political and financial motives, as Philip sought to seize Templar assets to alleviate royal debts, with papal bull dissolving the order in 1312 despite insufficient evidence of Satanic worship. In the , from the late 15th to 18th centuries, witch trials escalated these claims, with approximately 40,000-60,000 executions across for alleged pacts with the devil, attendance at nocturnal sabbats involving blasphemous rites, and maleficium aided by demonic familiars. The 1486 treatise codified the notion of witches as Satan's formal servants who sealed compacts through renunciation of baptism and carnal acts with demons, influencing inquisitorial procedures that relied on and coerced testimonies. Major outbreaks included the Trier trials (1581-1593), where 368 executions occurred amid claims of mass devil worship, and the trials (1626-1629), prosecuting over 900 individuals for similar offenses, often targeting the poor and socially vulnerable under pressure from Catholic zeal. These prosecutions, driven by theological speculation and judicial torture rather than verifiable acts of Satanism, declined by the mid-17th century as skepticism grew, exemplified by the 1692 Salem trials' later discrediting, revealing systemic fabrication over genuine cultic activity.

Modern Accusations and Moral Panics

In the late , particularly during the and early , widespread accusations of organized Satanic activity proliferated in the United States and other Western countries, fueling what became known as the Satanic Panic—a characterized by fears of clandestine Satanic cults engaging in ritualistic crimes, including , , and . These claims often originated from sessions, where individuals purportedly recalled suppressed traumas involving Satanic elements, amplified by media coverage, evangelical seminars, and training on "occult crime." Despite thousands of allegations—estimated at over 12,000 cases of alleged Satanic ritual abuse—no physical evidence, such as bodies, artifacts, or forensic traces supporting large-scale organized Satanic networks, was ever substantiated across investigations. The panic's catalysts included the 1980 book by and psychiatrist , which detailed the author's alleged recovered memories of childhood Satanic abuse in during the 1950s, including graphic rituals with the Virgin Mary figure desecrated; the book, lacking independent corroboration, sold widely and influenced subsequent claims. High-profile cases, such as the 1983 in , involved daycare workers accused of tunneling underground for Satanic sacrifices based on children's interviews under suggestive questioning; the seven-year prosecution, costing $15 million, ended in 1990 with all charges dropped due to inconsistent testimony and absence of physical proof. Similar episodes in Kern County, (1982–1985), led to over 30 convictions based on coerced child statements, many later overturned on appeal as evidence of prosecutorial overreach and lack of ritual artifacts emerged. Federal scrutiny culminated in a 1992 report by FBI supervisor Kenneth V. Lanning, who examined over 300 alleged Satanic ritual abuse cases and concluded that while some occurred, the Satanic and ritual components were unsupported by , often attributable to adult , child during interrogations, or cultural rather than verifiable cults. companies, facing multimillion-dollar claims for ritual abuse, routinely litigated and defeated them in court by demonstrating the absence of tangible proof, further underscoring the claims' evidentiary voids. The phenomenon extended to cultural scapegoating, with accusations leveled at , role-playing games like , and even Halloween symbols, reflecting broader societal anxieties over , family breakdown, and youth subcultures amid economic shifts. By the mid-1990s, the subsided as recovered techniques were discredited in psychological circles for inducing false recollections, and appellate courts vacated convictions reliant on uncorroborated ; however, residual elements persisted into the through online communities, where Satanic tropes merged with theories about elite cabals, though these too lacked forensic validation. Investigations consistently revealed that isolated abuses, when they occurred, stemmed from familial or opportunistic perpetrators invoking Satanic imagery for , not affiliation with hierarchical cults capable of the alleged scale. This era highlighted vulnerabilities in investigative methods, where and media outpaced causal analysis grounded in .

Satanic Ritual Abuse Hysteria

The Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) hysteria emerged in the late 1970s and peaked during the 1980s in the United States, involving widespread allegations of organized, intergenerational Satanic cults engaging in the ritualistic sexual, physical, and psychological abuse of children, often including elements like animal sacrifice, cannibalism, and forced participation in mock religious ceremonies. These claims typically surfaced through "recovered memories" elicited via hypnosis or suggestive therapy, with proponents asserting thousands of victims across hundreds of cases, though no physical evidence—such as bodies, artifacts, or forensic traces—ever corroborated the more extreme assertions. The phenomenon was fueled by cultural anxieties over child welfare, daycare centers, and perceived moral decay, amplified by media coverage and self-proclaimed experts in ritual abuse. A pivotal influence was the 1980 book Michelle Remembers by Michelle Smith and psychiatrist Lawrence Pazder, which detailed Smith's purported recovered memories of childhood abuse in a Canadian Satanic involving buried-alive rituals and encounters with the ; the book, despite lacking independent verification, sold widely and shaped therapeutic practices and public perceptions of SRA as a hidden epidemic. This narrative inspired similar testimonies, leading to investigations in over 300 U.S. communities by the late , with allegations peaking around 1984-1985 amid books, seminars, and talk shows promoting the idea of vast underground networks. Critics later noted the book's fabrications, including disproven timelines and influences from Pazder's Catholic background, but it nonetheless primed social workers and for interpreting ambiguous child statements as evidence of . Prominent cases exemplified the hysteria's dynamics, such as the in , beginning in 1983 after a parent's letter to police alleged abuse, escalating to claims of tunnel-based rituals, animal killings, and flights in hot air balloons; involving 360 children interviewed via anatomically correct dolls and leading questions, the seven-year prosecution cost $15 million and resulted in no convictions, with defendant Ray Buckey acquitted on all remaining charges in January 1990 due to inconsistent, coached testimonies lacking corroboration. Similar day care scandals, like those in Kern County, California (1982-1985), produced over 30 convictions based on children's accounts of blood-drinking and witch flights, many later overturned as physical evidence failed to materialize and interviewing techniques were deemed coercive. By the early 1990s, at least a dozen states saw wrongful convictions reversed, highlighting prosecutorial overreach and the influence of among investigators. Federal scrutiny culminated in FBI behavioral analyst Kenneth Lanning's 1992 report, which examined hundreds of SRA allegations over a decade and found "little or no corroborative evidence" for organized Satanic involvement in multigenerational abuse rings, attributing claims instead to , symbolism, and psychological rather than literal cults. Lanning documented that while some occurred, the Satanic elements were unsubstantiated projections, often arising from adults' fears or therapeutic inducement of false memories, a view echoed in critiques of therapy's pseudoscientific foundations. Psychological research post-hysteria linked the panic to mass delusion mechanisms, including leading interviews that implanted fantasies in young children, as seen in experiments replicating SRA-like narratives through suggestion alone. The hysteria waned by the mid-1990s as failed prosecutions, expert retractions, and exposés discredited core proponents; for instance, the Federal Bureau of Investigation's broader reviews confirmed no nationwide , shifting focus to verifiable patterns without overlays. Over 12,000 were logged by advocacy groups, but zero instances yielded empirical proof of ritualistic elements, underscoring the episode as a classic driven by rather than causal reality. include reformed child interviewing protocols to minimize suggestion and caution against credulity in extraordinary claims absent physical traces, though echoes persist in modern narratives.

Precursors to Modern Forms

Literary and Romantic Influences

John Milton's Paradise Lost, first published in 1667, presented Satan as a formidable adversary to God, characterized by rhetorical eloquence, strategic defiance, and a tragic fall from grace, qualities that later Romantic writers elevated to heroic status despite Milton's intent to portray him as a villain. This epic poem served as the foundational text for subsequent literary rehabilitations of the figure, shifting focus from theological condemnation to admiration for Satan's rebellious individualism. In the Romantic era of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, authors reimagined Satan as a symbol of emancipation from tyrannical authority and a champion of human creativity, drawing directly from Milton's depiction to critique religious and political oppression. William Blake, in works like The Marriage of Heaven and Hell (written around 1790–1793), famously declared that Milton was "of the Devil's party without knowing it," interpreting Satan as an embodiment of vital energy and imagination in opposition to the restrictive deity Urizen, who represented dogmatic reason. Percy Bysshe Shelley echoed this in his Essay on the Devil and Devils (published posthumously in 1840 but written earlier), praising Milton's Satan as a noble rebel whose defiance exposed the flaws in omnipotent tyranny, influencing Shelley's own Promethean figures in Prometheus Unbound (1820). Lord Byron further popularized the Satanic archetype through protagonists in (1821) and Manfred (1817), portraying them as tormented Byronic heroes akin to Milton's Satan—solitary, defiant, and intellectually superior to conventional morality—thereby embedding Satanism's symbolic allure in broader cultural rebellion against orthodoxy. These literary portrayals, often termed "Romantic Satanism," did not constitute organized worship or theistic devotion but provided a philosophical and aesthetic framework that prefigured modern Satanism's emphasis on self-sovereignty and anticlericalism, as later groups like the explicitly referenced such influences in their rejection of Abrahamic subservience.

Occult and Esoteric Traditions

The 19th-century occult revival in and Britain laid foundational elements for later Satanic symbolism through esoteric reinterpretations of adversarial figures, though without organized devil-worship. Éliphas Lévi, born Alphonse Louis Constant in 1810 and dying in 1875, synthesized Kabbalistic, alchemical, and magical traditions in works like Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie (1854–1856), portraying figures such as not as embodiments of evil but as symbols of polarity and equilibrium between opposites. Lévi explicitly rejected belief in as a literal entity, viewing such notions as , yet his androgynous goat-headed image—combining hermaphroditic features, a , and insignia—became a visual archetype appropriated by 20th-century Satanists for its transgressive connotations. This era's , influenced by Romantic individualism, emphasized personal and rebellion against dogmatic religion, providing philosophical motifs of enlightenment through that echoed Luciferian themes. Early 20th-century esoteric movements built on these foundations, with (1875–1947) exemplifying the integration of adversarial archetypes into ritual practice, despite his disavowal of Satanism. Crowley's Thelemic system, outlined in (1904), centered on the principle " shall be the whole of the Law," drawing from Egyptian, Qabalistic, and Eastern sources to promote self-deification and opposition to Abrahamic moral constraints, which sensationalist media framed as Satanic. Although Crowley rejected explicit Satan worship—preferring terms like "Beast 666" from —he incorporated inverted Christian symbols and evocations in orders like the (O.T.O.), influencing modern Satanism's ritual aesthetics and emphasis on individualism over theistic submission. His works, including Magick in Theory and Practice (1929), supplied grimoires and ceremonial frameworks later adapted by groups seeking esoteric autonomy. Luciferianism emerged as a distinct esoteric strand venerating as a bearer of light and intellect, predating and paralleling modern Satanism while often avoiding crude demonolatry. Historical Luciferianism, traceable to 19th-century Theosophical currents via Helena Blavatsky's (1888), recast as a Promethean rebel imparting forbidden wisdom, distinct from the vengeful of . This tradition prioritized philosophical self-improvement and hermetic knowledge over hedonistic rebellion, influencing later theistic Satanists who blended it with occult practices like and magic. Unlike atheistic forms, esoteric Luciferianism maintained a metaphysical reverence for adversarial entities as catalysts for , though for organized cults remains scant prior to the , with most claims rooted in hoaxes like Léo Taxil's 1890s fabrications of Masonic devilry. These traditions collectively furnished modern Satanism with symbolic repertoires—pentagrams, inverted crosses, and antinomian rhetoric—without constituting direct worship of as a .

Origins of Organized Satanism

Church of Satan Foundation (1966)

The Church of Satan was founded on April 30, 1966—known as Walpurgisnacht, a date historically linked to witchcraft rituals—by Anton Szandor LaVey in San Francisco, California, establishing the first publicly declared organization devoted to Satanism as a formal philosophy. LaVey, born Howard Stanton Levey on April 11, 1930, in Chicago, had previously led informal gatherings through his Magic Circle in the 1950s, where occult enthusiasts discussed topics like magic, hypnosis, and Aleister Crowley's works; by the mid-1960s, amid San Francisco's burgeoning counterculture, he formalized this into a church, declaring 1966 as Anno Satanas (A.S.) Year One to symbolize a new era of human-centered individualism. The founding occurred at LaVey's residence, later known as the Black House at 6114 California Street, which served as the organization's headquarters and site for early rituals until its sale in 1999. From inception, the rejected theistic beliefs in a literal or any deities, instead treating as a archetypal representing human pride, carnal instincts, rational self-interest, and against imposed moral constraints—core tenets LaVey articulated in early writings and lectures that prefigured (published 1969). Members, initially numbering in the dozens and comprising local artists, intellectuals, and performers, were required to affirm and self-reliance, with rituals designed as theatrical psychodramas to release emotions and affirm personal power rather than invoke external forces. LaVey, who shaved his head in a symbolic act of priesthood, positioned the church as a deliberate inversion of Christian norms, emphasizing over and vital over spiritual , which attracted media scrutiny and public fascination in the permissive atmosphere of 1960s . Early activities included public ceremonies, such as LaVey's 1967 "satanic baptism" of his three-year-old daughter Zeena at the Black House, which featured inverted crosses and invocations to as a for enlightenment, drawing reporters and cementing the group's provocative image. The organization operated without formal membership dues initially, relying on LaVey's charisma and publicity stunts—like driving an ambulance with "Satan" markings—to build visibility, though internal biographies note that some details of LaVey's pre-1966 exploits (e.g., circus work or police ) remain unverified and possibly embellished for mythic effect. By late , the church had gained enough traction to host lectures and rites that critiqued organized religion's , laying groundwork for LaVeyan Satanism's emphasis on , where only the strong and self-aware were deemed worthy of affiliation. This foundation distinguished the from prior groups by explicitly branding itself Satanic, prioritizing empirical self-empowerment over mysticism.

Early Schisms and Evolutions

In the early 1970s, the experienced multiple internal schisms stemming from disputes over organizational structure, leadership authority, and theological emphasis, which fragmented its growing membership base of occult enthusiasts and countercultural figures. These conflicts arose as the church's initial decentralized model of regional grottos—local chapters numbering around 20 by 1970—faced challenges from rapid expansion and differing interpretations of LaVey's psychodramatic rituals, with some members favoring literal beliefs despite the founder's atheistic framework. A pivotal reorganization occurred on May 1, 1975 (Walpurgisnacht), when disbanded all grottos and centralized authority under a small priesthood loyal to him in , reserving higher degrees like Magus for his personal selection rather than merit-based promotion. This shift, intended to curb perceived incompetence and parasitism among regional leaders, alienated many priests who viewed it as an abandonment of and a move toward , including the introduction of fees for titles that some interpreted as . also issued decrees rejecting supernaturalism, excommunicating members who insisted on theistic elements in Satanism, which had been tolerated in the church's formative years as a pragmatic accommodation for recruits. The most significant schism produced the , founded by Michael A. Aquino—a U.S. Army and former Church magister—on June 21, 1975, following his receipt of a revelatory vision from the entity Set. Aquino, who had joined in 1969 and risen to high ranks, criticized LaVey's policies as diluting genuine initiatory practices, leading him and about 12-20 followers to establish a theistic order emphasizing self-deification through the ancient Egyptian deity Set, reinterpreting Satan as a linguistic corruption of Set's name rather than a mere . The Temple of Set's emergence highlighted a core evolution in Satanism: divergence between LaVeyan atheism, which prioritized psychological self-empowerment and skepticism of the occult, and theistic variants seeking literal metaphysical engagement. Smaller splinter groups formed concurrently, including the Church of Satanic Brotherhood under John Dewey Allee, the World Church of Satanic Liberation, and Ordo Templi Satanas, often led by ex-priests rejecting centralization and advocating more democratic or theistic approaches. These schisms reduced the Church of Satan's active organized presence but prompted its evolution into a more insular, individualistic institution, where affiliation shifted toward ideological alignment via (1969) rather than formal hierarchies, fostering long-term resilience against further fragmentation. By the late , this refocus reinforced core tenets of carnal individualism and anti-egalitarianism, distinguishing from its offshoots amid broader cultural scrutiny.

Varieties of Satanism

Atheistic Satanism

Atheistic Satanism, also termed non-theistic or symbolic Satanism, conceptualizes Satan not as a literal entity but as a potent representing human carnality, rational , and defiance against imposed moral absolutes. Adherents, who are atheists or agnostics, reject belief in gods, , or the , viewing such concepts as anthropomorphic projections onto an indifferent . in this framework derives from subjective human values rather than divine command, prioritizing personal responsibility, in life's pleasures, and toward unsubstantiated . This variant emerged prominently in the late as a reaction to organized religion's perceived hypocrisies, drawing on Enlightenment-era and Romantic literary rebellions while eschewing supernaturalism. Core tenets often include self-deification—wherein individuals position themselves as the arbiters of their own —and a pragmatic that celebrates physical existence over spiritual transcendence. Unlike theistic forms, atheistic Satanism employs not for but as tools for emotional and psychological reinforcement.

Church of Satan and LaVeyan Principles

The , established on April 30, 1966, in by Anton Szandor LaVey (born Howard Stanton Levey, 1930–1997), represents the foundational organization of atheistic Satanism. LaVey, a former carnival worker and musician, formalized the philosophy in (1969), which codifies Satanism as an atheistic religion of indulgence, vital existence, and opposition to "other people's" guilt-inducing ethics. The Church's structure initially included a priesthood and grottos for local chapters, but evolved toward a more elitist, invitation-only model under subsequent high priests like . LaVeyan principles are encapsulated in the Nine Satanic Statements, which affirm Satan's symbolic virtues: indulgence over abstinence, vital existence over spiritual pipe dreams, and defiance against herd conformity. Complementing these are the Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth, practical edicts such as "Do not give opinions or advice unless asked" and "Do not harm little children," emphasizing interpersonal responsibility without . Rituals, termed "" or psychodramas, serve to purge inhibitions through symbolic inversion of Christian rites, but hold no expectation of literal magical efficacy; any perceived results stem from psychological suggestion and focused will. The Church maintains a strict rejection of proselytizing, drugs, and politics, viewing Satanism as a solitary path for self-actualized individuals rather than a communal movement.

The Satanic Temple and Political Activism

The (TST), founded in 2013 by (pseudonym for Douglas Misicko) and Malcolm Jarry, distinguishes itself as a nontheistic activist network rather than a traditional priesthood like the , which it is not affiliated with and which has publicly critiqued its approaches as diluted or performative. TST frames as a mascot for Enlightenment values—reason, compassion, and resistance to authoritarianism—explicitly denying supernaturalism while seeking recognition as a tax-exempt to challenge religious privileges in . By 2023, it reported chapters in multiple countries and membership in the tens of thousands, sustained through merchandise, events, and litigation. Central to TST are the Seven Fundamental Tenets, which prioritize empathy ("Act with compassion and respect"), scientific understanding ("Beliefs should conform to one's best scientific understanding"), and bodily autonomy ("One's body is inviolable, subject to one's own will alone"). Political efforts leverage : in 2014, TST sought equal placement for Satanic monuments beside displays, successfully highlighting selective accommodations; the After School Satan program, launched around 2016, counters evangelical clubs in public schools with curriculum on and . Post-2022 overturning of , TST sued under its 2021 S.B. 8 law, arguing abortion as a religious rite exempt from bans, and established clinics framing terminations as rituals. Critics, including the , contend such activism politicizes Satanism, subordinating individualism to collective advocacy, yet TST's strategy has amplified visibility, forcing debates on secular governance.

Church of Satan and LaVeyan Principles

The , established by Anton Szandor LaVey on April 30, 1966, in , represents the foundational organization of modern atheistic Satanism, rejecting supernaturalism and theistic worship in favor of Satan as a metaphorical embodying human pride, rational self-interest, and opposition to irrational constraints. LaVey, a former worker and musician, formalized the group amid the , conducting public rituals to challenge religious norms while promoting a grounded in and psychological self-empowerment. Membership requires an application fee and adherence to its hierarchical structure, ranging from registered members to priests, emphasizing personal achievement over egalitarian collectivism. LaVeyan principles, primarily articulated in The Satanic Bible (1969), posit that humans are inherently selfish animals driven by survival instincts, with ethics derived from rather than divine command or . Rituals serve as psychodramatic tools for emotional , not invocations of entities, aligning with a view that rejects otherworldly in favor of earthly and strategic social navigation. The philosophy critiques for promoting guilt and self-denial, advocating instead for indulgence tempered by responsibility, as Satan symbolizes defiance against tyrannical authority and embrace of one's vital existence. Central to these tenets are the Nine Satanic Statements, which declare:
  • represents indulgence instead of .
  • represents vital existence instead of spiritual pipe dreams.
  • represents undefiled wisdom instead of hypocritical self-deceit.
  • represents kindness to those who deserve it instead of love wasted on ingrates.
  • represents vengeance instead of .
  • represents responsibility to the responsible instead of concern for vampires.
  • represents man as just another animal, sometimes better, more often worse than those that walk on all fours.
  • represents all of the so-called sins, as they all lead to physical, mental, or emotional gratification.
  • has been the best friend the Church has ever had, as he has kept it in business all these years.
Complementing these are the Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth, practical directives for interpersonal conduct, including prohibitions against unnecessary interference, such as "Do not harm little children" and "When walking in open territory, bother no one; if someone bothers you, ask them to stop; if they do not stop, destroy them." These rules prioritize and reciprocity, reflecting a Social Darwinist lens where strength and cunning prevail over weakness or parasitism. LaVeyan Satanism distinguishes itself by scorning and , urging adherents to cultivate personal power through merit and reject pity for the unproductive, as articulated in critiques of "psychic vampires" who drain the capable. While influential, the Church maintains exclusivity, with no proselytizing and a focus on individual sovereignty, leading to internal evolutions post-LaVey's death under leaders like , who uphold the original carnal, anti-spiritual framework.

The Satanic Temple and Political Activism

(TST), founded in 2013 by ( of Douglas Misicko) and Malcolm Jarry, operates as a nontheistic organization that employs Satanic imagery symbolically to advocate for and individual autonomy, distinguishing itself from the Church of Satan's more individualistic philosophy by emphasizing collective political action. TST's Seven Fundamental Tenets prioritize reason, empathy, bodily autonomy, and justice over dogmatic authority, framing not as a but as a for rebellion against arbitrary rule. This atheistic stance underpins its activism, which targets perceived encroachments of religious privilege, particularly Christian influence in public institutions, through legal challenges and public stunts designed to invoke First Amendment protections. TST's political efforts gained prominence with campaigns asserting equal religious access, such as the 2014 push for a statue alongside monuments on state capitols, exemplified by a 2018 in where members unveiled a goat-headed figure to highlight selective religious displays. In education, TST launched Clubs starting in 2016 to counter evangelical programs like Good News Clubs, offering science-based activities in public schools where religious clubs are permitted, thereby testing policies on equal access; by 2023, these clubs operated in multiple states amid opposition from conservative groups. On reproductive rights, TST's 2015 Religious Reproductive Rights campaign declared a protected religious under its tenets of bodily inviolability, leading to lawsuits in states like and seeking exemptions from restrictions; while some early injunctions succeeded, federal courts largely rejected broader claims by 2022, affirming that such rituals do not override state laws. Further activism includes opposition to non-denominational or chaplains in public schools, with TST vowing in 2024 to deploy its ministers if Christian nationalists succeed in such programs, framing it as a defense of pluralism rather than endorsement of beliefs. The organization achieved IRS recognition as a tax-exempt church in 2019, enabling legal standing in over 10 lawsuits by 2023, though successes are mixed; for instance, a 2024 federal court dismissed TST's suit against a for denying a Satanic at a public event, ruling it lacked free speech violation. Critics, including former members and the , argue TST prioritizes partisan provocation over genuine religious practice, citing internal schisms like 2018 disputes over hiring a with alt-right ties and 2024 branch secessions amid leadership accusations of . Such efforts have amplified TST's membership to hundreds of thousands claimed by 2023, though verifiable adherent numbers remain elusive, positioning it as a counterforce to religious via ironic symbolism rather than theological devotion.

Theistic Satanism

Theistic Satanism comprises religious and spiritual practices that venerate Satan as a literal deity, supernatural entity, or objective spiritual force, rather than a mere symbol or archetype. Practitioners engage in rituals, invocations, and offerings directed toward Satan, often viewing him as an adversary to established religious orders, a promoter of individual enlightenment, or a manifestation of chaotic or primal energies. This orientation contrasts sharply with atheistic Satanism, such as LaVeyan traditions, which deny the existence of any supernatural beings and frame Satan as a metaphor for human carnality, self-interest, and rebellion against dogma. Theistic Satanists draw from diverse sources, including biblical depictions of the , pre-Christian pagan deities equated with , and esoteric traditions emphasizing adversarial . Beliefs vary considerably, with some adherents positing as a polytheistic god among others, while others see him as a singular dark sovereign in an acausal or infernal realm accessible through magickal practices. Unlike the centralized established on April 30, 1966, theistic variants lack unified doctrine or large-scale organization, manifesting primarily as solitary pursuits, small covens, or fringe groups. Historical claims of organized worship, such as those during the European witch hunts from the 15th to 18th centuries, are largely discredited as products of inquisitorial rather than of theistic Satanist communities. Prominent examples include the (O9A), a British-origin network emerging in the 1970s that integrates Satanism with hermetic initiation, "insight roles" involving immersion in extreme ideologies, and reverence for dark entities in a cosmology of acausal dimensions. The , founded on June 21, 1975, by Michael Aquino after his schism from the , reinterprets the Satanic principle through the Egyptian deity Set—equated with the biblical adversary—as a catalyst for Xeper, or self-evolving godhood, via intellectual and magickal disciplines. These groups, while influential in left-hand path circles, have faced scrutiny for associations with violence and extremism, though adherents maintain their practices foster personal transcendence rather than societal harm.

Order of Nine Angles

The Order of Nine Angles (ONA or O9A) originated in the during the 1970s as a decentralized theistic Satanic tradition blending occultism with esoteric practices aimed at personal and cosmic transformation. It was developed through writings attributed to "Anton Long," a whose real identity is often linked to , a British activist with neo-Nazi associations, though Myatt has denied involvement. The group's foundational texts, such as Hostia and Naos, outline a "sinister tradition" merging ancient , Satanism, and into a left-hand path system rejecting conventional morality. ONA operates through autonomous cells called nexions, emphasizing self-initiation over centralized authority. ONA's cosmology features an acausal realm beyond standard space-time, inhabited by dark gods or entities that nexions—portals between causal and acausal—allow initiates to access and influence for evolutionary purposes. Adherents pursue ic change to dismantle dominance and establish a "Galactic " governed by Social Darwinist principles, supremacy, and fascist structures, ultimately enabling in a sixth . This involves manipulating historical forms like National Socialism as tools for chaos, with the goal of evolving humanity into a superior through transgression and hardship. Belief in these entities distinguishes ONA as theistic, contrasting atheistic Satanism, with rituals invoking and other dark forces to harness acausal energies. The core practice is the Seven Fold Sinister Way, a graded initiatory path from neophyte to immortal, incorporating esoteric knowledge, physical ordeals (such as running 20 miles in under 2.5 hours), and practical trials. Insight roles require adherents to immerse in extreme ideologies or roles—such as joining neo-Nazi, jihadist, or groups—to embody amoral perspectives and achieve pathei-mathos (wisdom via suffering). Texts advocate culling, or selective , to remove societal "dross" and align with , historically through magickal or direct means but sometimes interpreted symbolically in modern contexts. Additional rites involve sexual transgression, random , and operations at sites of notorious crimes to draw acausal power. ONA's influence extends to far-right extremism, serving as an accelerant for through its rejection of ethics and promotion of destabilization. It has inspired groups like , linked to five murders, and the UK-proscribed Sonnenkrieg Division, with ONA adherents convicted in terror offenses, including eight UK neo-Nazis between April 2019 and April 2021. Notable cases include U.S. private Ethan Melzer's 2020 plot to attack his unit after ONA exposure and a 16-year-old UK individual's terror planning in 2020. While not formally designated a terrorist organization, counter-extremism analyses describe ONA as an "incubator" for due to its online dissemination since the .

Temple of Set

The was established on June 21, 1975, by Michael A. Aquino, a U.S. Army and former high-ranking member of the , following a precipitated by doctrinal disputes over the existence of forces in Satanism. Aquino, who had performed a known as the "Satanic Working" in 1974 to seek guidance from , reported receiving a revelation identifying the entity as Set, an ancient Egyptian representing isolate intelligence and opposition to cosmic uniformity, rather than the atheistic symbolism emphasized by . This event, documented in Aquino's The Book of Coming Forth by Night, positioned the Temple as a vehicle for genuine theistic engagement with Set as a non-fictional principle, diverging from LaVey's psychodramatic approach. Incorporated as a tax-exempt nonprofit religious organization in that year, the Temple attracted an initial cadre of around 500 members from the split, though it has since maintained a policy of non-disclosure regarding current numbers, with external estimates suggesting a persistent small scale of a few hundred initiates worldwide. Central to Setian philosophy is the concept of Xeper, derived from ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs meaning "to come into being," which encapsulates a process of deliberate self-creation and evolution toward personal godhood through the awakening of the "Black Flame"—an eternal, isolate spark of consciousness inherited from Set. Unlike conventional religions that promote submission to universal oneness or external deities, Setianism privileges causal self-determination, viewing the individual psyche as the locus of divinity and employing "Lesser Black Magic" (psychological manipulation) and "Greater Black Magic" (metaphysical transformation) to isolate and elevate the self from natural entropy. Set is revered not as a moral adversary but as the archetypal gift-giver of self-consciousness, enabling humans to transcend mere biological existence; this theistic framework acknowledges Set's objective reality while rejecting anthropomorphic worship in favor of philosophical alignment. Aquino, who led as High Priest in multiple terms until 1996 and authored key texts like The Temple of Set, framed this path as a continuation of Left-Hand Path traditions, emphasizing empirical self-experimentation over dogmatic faith. Practices within the Temple revolve around initiatory degrees—beginning with Setian I and advancing through rigorous , study of esoteric texts, , and workings designed to refine the initiate's will and apprehension of non-natural principles. Local units called Pylons facilitate collaborative and discussion, overseen by a hierarchical structure including the (currently held post-Aquino's death on September 1, 2019), the Council of Nine for policy, and an Executive Council for administration. Membership requires formal application after independent review of Temple , with no recruitment or public evangelism; advancement depends on demonstrated mastery of Xeper, often involving personal magical journals and peer recognition rather than rote adherence. The organization has historically distanced itself from the "Satanism" label, viewing it as a transient cultural , while maintaining continuity with theistic currents through its affirmation of Set as the eternal adversary to undifferentiated existence.

Luciferianism and Hybrid Variants

Luciferianism constitutes a philosophical and spiritual framework that reveres as an or entity embodying enlightenment, intellectual pursuit, and individual , prioritizing self-deification through knowledge and balance between light and shadow aspects of existence. Practitioners often interpret not as synonymous with the Christian but as a prelapsarian bringer of light, symbolizing rebellion against dogmatic ignorance in favor of and . This tradition encompasses both theistic of as a guiding force and atheistic symbolic usage, with rituals aimed at personal transformation rather than mere indulgence. In contrast to atheistic Satanism's emphasis on carnal and adversarial , Luciferianism accords greater weight to spiritual evolution, , and the integration of oppositional forces, critiquing Satanism for over-reliance on physical gratification without transcendent aim. Theistic Satanism's direct worship of as a of chaos or power diverges from Luciferianism's focus on ordered enlightenment, though overlaps exist in shared Left-Hand Path rejection of subservience to external deities. These distinctions arise from Luciferianism's roots in esoteric traditions valuing Promethean over Satanic prideful antagonism. Prominent figures include , an occult author who has published over 27 works on Luciferian magick since the early 2000s, advocating paths to isolate self-sanctification and adversarial influence on reality. Organizations such as the Assembly of Light Bearers, founded by Ford in 2013 as successor to the Greater Church of Lucifer, promote Luciferian philosophy through structured initiation and philosophical dissemination. The , established in in the 1920s, integrates Luciferian elements with Saturnian , portraying as the benevolent light-bearer in opposition to tyrannical cosmic forces. Hybrid variants emerge in eclectic practices merging Luciferian enlightenment motifs with Satanic ritualism or individualism, often in modern Left-Hand Path experimentation where symbolizes liberation alongside Satanic self-deification. For instance, some adherents blend Ford's Luciferian —incorporating serpentine invocations for wisdom—with LaVeyan for cathartic rebellion, creating personalized systems that defy strict categorization. These hybrids reflect causal influences from 19th-century Romantic Satanism's elevation of as a decadent liberator, adapting to contemporary without formalized doctrines.

Personal and Non-Affiliated Practices

Personal and non-affiliated Satanism involves individuals who self-identify as Satanists and engage in practices aligned with Satanic philosophy or devotion without joining formal organizations like the or . This approach stems from core Satanic emphases on individualism, self-reliance, and rejection of hierarchical authority, allowing practitioners to adapt rituals, meditations, and philosophical reflections to personal circumstances. Such solitary engagement is common, as affiliation is not required for self-identification; one need only align with foundational texts like Anton LaVey's (1969) to consider oneself a Satanist. Atheistic personal practices, predominant among non-affiliated Satanists, treat Satan as a symbol of human potential rather than a literal entity. Solitary rituals, outlined in LaVey's The Satanic Rituals (1972), include psychodramatic ceremonies such as the "Ritual of Destruction" or "Compassion," adapted for private use to achieve emotional release, focus intent, or reinforce self-empowerment. These are described as forms of self-therapy, often performed alone to avoid group dynamics and emphasize personal efficacy over communal validation. Practitioners may incorporate elements like invocations, altars with symbolic items (e.g., black candles or the Sigil of Baphomet), and affirmations of the Nine Satanic Statements, conducted in home settings without external oversight. Theistic non-affiliated practices, by contrast, entail belief in Satan or adversarial deities as real entities, with solitary through , offerings, or magical operations aimed at personal communion or influence over reality. These vary widely, often involving customized invocations or meditations on Luciferian or diabolic archetypes, but remain underdocumented due to practitioners' preference for and aversion to institutional structures. Independent theistic Satanists typically form loose or nonexistent networks, prioritizing direct experiential engagement over organized doctrine. Both variants share practices like creation for goal manifestation—drawing from chaos magic influences—or daily reflection on themes of , vital existence, and defiance of , without mandatory group participation. Non-affiliation appeals to those distrustful of organizational politics or seeking unmediated spiritual , resulting in a diffuse community sustained through online forums and self-published grimoires rather than centralized bodies.

Demographics and Organizations

Adherent Estimates and Surveys

Reliable estimates of Satanist adherents remain elusive, primarily due to the lack of centralized reporting by major organizations, the solitary or loosely affiliated nature of many practitioners, and discrepancies between self-identification, formal membership, and active participation. Atheistic variants, such as those aligned with the , emphasize and do not maintain public registries, with the organization explicitly avoiding disclosure of precise figures to prevent external pressures or misconceptions about scale. Historical data suggest peaks in the with several thousand international affiliates through local "grottoes," but current active engagement is presumed far lower, likely in the low thousands at most, based on the group's focus on registered priests and elite inner circles rather than mass enrollment. The Satanic Temple (TST), a nontheistic activist group, reports significantly higher numbers, estimating over 700,000 "official members" as of recent analyses, though this encompasses free sign-ups via online forms that signify symbolic affiliation rather than doctrinal commitment or ritual involvement. Critics and observers note that such figures may be inflated for political leverage in public campaigns, as TST's model prioritizes broad coalitions over vetted adherents, and internal data on sustained activity remains undisclosed. Independent verification is limited, with no mandatory dues or vetting processes distinguishing casual supporters from dedicated participants. Theistic Satanism, involving literal belief in Satan as a deity, attracts even fewer followers, typically organized in small, ephemeral groups or practiced individually without formal affiliation. Scholarly accounts describe these networks as fragmented, with adherent counts rarely exceeding dozens per organization and global totals speculated to be under 5,000 based on sporadic online and ritual community reports, though no comprehensive surveys exist to confirm. National censuses provide rare empirical snapshots via self-reporting. In the United Kingdom, the number of individuals identifying as Satanists rose from 1,893 in the 2011 census to 5,054 in the 2021 census, reflecting a tripling amid broader declines in traditional religious affiliation, though this includes diverse interpretations from atheism to theism without verifying practice. Similar self-identification in other countries, such as small clusters in Scandinavia or the United States via voluntary surveys, yields negligible percentages—often under 0.01% of populations—but lacks standardization. Academic surveys offer limited but revealing demographic insights from targeted samples. A 2014 online questionnaire of 140 self-identified Satanists found 60% viewing Satan symbolically or as an rather than a literal , with respondents predominantly white, educated males in their 20s-40s from Western countries, underscoring the niche, urban-subcultural appeal over mass appeal. Larger belief surveys, such as those tracking general Satan rather than organized Satanism, indicate broader cultural fascination but minimal commitment to Satanic tenets. Worldwide, conservative extrapolations from these sources suggest fewer than 10,000-20,000 dedicated adherents, far below sensationalized claims, with most activity confined to forums and occasional events rather than sustained communities. Satanism, encompassing both atheistic and theistic variants, remains concentrated in Western countries, with the United States serving as the primary hub due to the origins of major organizations like the Church of Satan (founded in San Francisco in 1966) and The Satanic Temple (headquartered in Salem, Massachusetts, since 2013). The Church of Satan reports members in nearly every nation worldwide, reflecting gradual international dissemination through publications and online outreach, though formal affiliations remain limited outside North America and Europe. Theistic groups, such as the Temple of Set (established 1975), maintain pylons primarily in the United States, Australia, and select European countries, with decentralized practices enabling sporadic presence elsewhere via personal networks. Membership estimates for organized Satanism are imprecise, as groups prioritize privacy and avoid public disclosures to deter infiltration or sensationalism. The peaked at several thousand members around 1971 but enforces a policy against revealing current figures, stating only consistent growth over decades. The has experienced membership spikes tied to public campaigns, such as after the 2014 Hobby Lobby decision, leading to temporary surges in national cardholders, though sustained active participation is lower and not quantified officially; it operates congregations in multiple U.S. states and internationally. The Temple of Set's membership hovered around 500–600 at its founding but has contracted to approximately 200–300 today, indicative of schismatic tendencies and niche appeal. In , self-identified Satanists in rose notably in the 2021 census, with the South East reporting 795 adherents—a 165% increase from 2011—amid broader growth in alternative spiritualities, though this likely captures unaffiliated individuals rather than organized members. The , originating in the during the 1970s, lacks formal membership tallies due to its leaderless, cell-based structure but has influenced far-right extremists across the U.S., , and through online dissemination since the , without evidence of mass recruitment. Overall trends show atheistic Satanism expanding visibility via and media, contrasting with stagnant or fragmented theistic groups, yet total adherents worldwide number in the low thousands, constrained by cultural stigma and .

Religious Recognition Efforts

The Satanic Temple achieved formal recognition as a tax-exempt church under Section 501(c)(3) of the by the U.S. on April 25, 2019, following its application process that emphasized its nontheistic religious practices and organizational structure. This status, equivalent to that granted to traditional religious institutions, enables tax-deductible donations and underscores TST's legal assertion of despite its atheistic tenets, which prioritize rational and opposition to supernaturalism. The recognition facilitated subsequent advocacy, including invoking religious exemptions in legal challenges to state laws on and public education. The , founded in 1966 by , has maintained legal recognition as a since its inception, incorporating as a nonprofit and securing accommodations for rituals such as weddings and funerals under U.S. law. This early establishment allowed it to perform ceremonies recognized by civil authorities and military chaplains to counsel adherents in the armed forces, predating broader Satanic activism. Unlike TST's public campaigns, the Church of Satan pursued quieter integration, focusing on philosophical Satanism without aggressive litigation for pluralism. The , established in 1975 after a from the , incorporated as a nonprofit in , obtaining tax-exempt status as a recognized religion shortly thereafter. This legal framework supported its initiatory structure and esoteric practices centered on Setian self-deification, enabling operations as a formal religious entity distinct from atheistic Satanism. Such incorporations reflect efforts by Left-Hand Path groups to claim protections under religious freedom laws, though they remain smaller and less publicly confrontational than TST. These recognition efforts have primarily aimed at securing equal treatment under laws like the , prompting debates over whether nontheistic or symbolic Satanism qualifies as religion equivalent to theistic s, with courts often deferring to organizational self-definition when consistent with sincere beliefs. TST, in particular, has leveraged its status in over a dozen lawsuits by 2023 to challenge perceived Christian privileges in public spaces and policies. Mainstream sources, potentially influenced by institutional biases favoring traditional religions, have variably portrayed these bids as provocative rather than substantive claims, yet federal rulings affirm their validity for exemption purposes. In the 1980s and early 1990s, numerous legal proceedings arose from allegations of satanic ritual abuse (SRA), including high-profile cases like the in California (1983–1990), where seven defendants faced charges of child molestation tied to purported but were ultimately acquitted after costs exceeded $15 million and no physical evidence corroborated the claims. Similar outcomes marked cases such as the convictions (1994), later vacated in 2011 due to lack of evidence linking the defendants' purported interests to the crimes, highlighting prosecutorial overreach amid cultural hysteria rather than substantiated satanic networks. These trials, often fueled by now widely discredited, resulted in few convictions upheld on appeal and underscored the absence of empirical proof for organized SRA, with investigations like the FBI's 1992 report concluding no ritualistic satanic crime rings existed. The Satanic Temple (TST), a nontheistic organization founded in 2013, has pursued over a dozen federal lawsuits since 2015 to assert religious equality under the First Amendment and (RFRA), often challenging Christian privileges in public spaces. Notable victories include a 2023 preliminary and $200,000 settlement against Saucon Valley in for denying access to its Club while permitting other religious groups, affirming equal facilities use. In 2024, TST and the settled a discrimination suit against a Memphis-area that imposed unequal fees and canceled events for the Satan Club, securing policy changes and damages. However, setbacks occurred, such as the 2023 dismissal of TST's RFRA challenge to Indiana's ban, which sought exemptions for members' "religious abortion rituals," and a 2025 Ninth Circuit affirmance dismissing its suit for lack of standing. TST has also litigated for ceremonial equality, suing cities like (2023) and (2023–2024) after denials to deliver non-theistic invocations at council meetings, claiming viewpoint discrimination; the Chicago case advanced past initial dismissal on free speech grounds. In 2025, a Florida federal court allowed TST's suit against Broward County schools to proceed over rejected banners reading "Satan Loves the First ," rejecting claims of viewpoint bias in graduation ad policies. Internationally, Russia's banned the "International Satanism Movement" as extremist on July 23, 2025, despite no formal organization by that name, potentially criminalizing symbols or texts associated with under anti-extremism laws pushed by Orthodox Church leaders. Associations with the (O9A), a theistic Satanist network linked to , have featured in U.S. terrorism prosecutions, such as the 2020 arrest of Army private Ethan Melzer for plotting a unit attack while communicating with O9A members, pleading guilty in 2023 to charges without the group itself facing organizational . In 2025, TST-Iowa filed a civil complaint alleging state in denying a Capitol event permit, echoing broader conflicts over public access for minority religions. These cases reflect ongoing tensions between Satanist groups' pushes for legal parity and perceptions of threat, with TST's strategy yielding precedents for pluralism while theistic variants like O9A draw scrutiny for extremism ties absent direct evidentiary links to doctrine-mandated violence.

Cultural Representations

In Music and Subcultures

![Tuska 20130628 - King Diamond - 32.jpg][float-right] Satanic themes have permeated since the genre's inception, often serving as symbolic rebellion against rather than endorsement of literal Satan worship. Black Sabbath's 1970 self-titled album featured imagery, drawing accusations of Satanism despite the band's denial of such beliefs. Similarly, bands like incorporated Satanic lyrics and visuals for shock value, but frontman has stated they are devout Christians who use the imagery to provoke. This aesthetic adoption peaked during the 1980s Satanic Panic, a period of public hysteria linking heavy metal to ritual abuse and devil worship, though investigations found scant evidence of causal connections between the music and criminal acts. The Norwegian scene of the early 1990s represented a more explicit intersection of music and Satanism, with figures like of Mayhem promoting as core to the genre. Between 1992 and 1996, over 50 were burned or vandalized, with at least eight arsons in 1992 directly tied to scene members, including ' destruction of the 800-year-old on June 6, 1992. These acts stemmed from anti-Christian sentiments, sometimes framed as Satanic ritual but increasingly intertwined with pagan revivalism; Vikernes later rejected Satanism for Norse heathenry. Few prominent musicians adhere to organized Satanism. , vocalist of , has been a member of Anton LaVey's since the 1980s, visiting its Black House headquarters and citing as influential in his atheistic philosophy of . However, LaVey himself condemned rock and metal music, associating it with antithetical to tenets like responsibility and disdain for drugs. In subcultures, enthusiasts often embrace Satanic sigils and rhetoric as markers of nonconformity, fostering underground communities centered on , ethos, and extreme ideologies. Yet, surveys of participants reveal varied beliefs, with many prioritizing aesthetic extremity over theological commitment, distinguishing it from formal Satanic organizations. This subcultural use of Satanism has influenced adjacent scenes like but remains marginal compared to its role as provocative imagery in broader heavy metal fandom.

In Media, Art, and Philosophy

In , depictions of evolved from medieval monsters symbolizing to Romantic portrayals emphasizing beauty, defiance, and tragic nobility. William Blake's watercolor Satan in His Original Glory (1805) presents as a resplendent amid celestial motifs, highlighting pre-fall perfection and aligning with Romantic sympathy for the rebel figure. Similarly, 's The (1847) shows a humiliated yet defiant with emotional depth, including a tear and red-rimmed eyes, reflecting a shift toward viewing as a complex, admirable anti-hero rather than mere evil. These interpretations drew from John Milton's (1667), influencing artists to portray as majestic and golden in defiance, as in Sir Thomas Lawrence's chalk drawing Satan as the (1797). Philosophically, Romantic thinkers rehabilitated Satan as a symbol of rebellion against authoritarian tyranny, transforming him from biblical adversary to emblem of individual freedom and creative vigor. Influenced by Milton, argued that the poet aligned with the Devil's party by depicting Satan's magnetic rebellion, seeing him as an outcast embodying doubt and expression over blind obedience. and echoed this, portraying Satan as a well-spoken gentleman raging against , a view that permeated 19th-century literature like Heinrich Heine's charming Devil figure. This symbolic framework underpins modern atheistic Satanism, as formalized by in (1969), where Satan represents indulgence over abstinence, vital existence over spiritual illusions, and human autonomy as a literary of rather than a literal . In media, representations of Satanism frequently sensationalize fictional cults engaging in ritualistic evil, diverging from the atheistic, symbolic practices of groups like the founded in 1966. Films such as (1968) depict Satanic covens plotting supernatural harm, fueling cultural fears but misaligning with LaVeyan rejection of and emphasis on rational . Literary works rooted in , however, more accurately capture philosophical Satanism by using the figure to critique dogma, as in Milton's influential portrayal of 's principled stand—"Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven"—which inspired atheistic interpretations prioritizing personal liberty. Mainstream media often amplifies theistic stereotypes despite empirical evidence from surveys showing most self-identified Satanists view Satan metaphorically, highlighting a disconnect driven by horror genre conventions rather than factual organizational doctrines.

Criticisms and Controversies

Associations with Crime and Extremism

During the 1980s and early 1990s, widespread allegations of Satanic ritual abuse (SRA) emerged in the United States and other Western countries, claiming organized Satanic cults engaged in , , and other atrocities as part of ; these claims, often based on recovered memories or witness testimonies, led to over 12,000 reported cases but lacked or corroboration upon investigation. Empirical reviews by law enforcement and researchers, including analyses of thousands of abuse reports, found no verifiable instances of widespread, organized Satanic cults committing ritual crimes, attributing the panic to moral , suggestive interviewing techniques, and media amplification rather than causal links to Satanism as a belief system. In contrast to these unsubstantiated claims, documented criminal acts invoking Satanism typically involve "self-styled" individuals—such as sociopaths, drug addicts, or serial killers—who adopt Satanic rhetoric to rationalize personal violence rather than participation in structured groups promoting such behavior; federal assessments indicate these cases represent isolated criminal pathology, not evidence of Satanism inherently driving organized crime. Mainstream organizations like the Church of Satan and The Satanic Temple have no recorded history of endorsing or facilitating member crimes, with the latter more often targeted by violence, including a 2025 pipe bomb attempt against its Salem headquarters and the 2023 destruction of its Iowa altar, both prosecuted as hate crimes. Certain fringe esoteric groups, however, have explicitly linked Satanism to and violence. The (O9A), founded in the 1970s in the UK, promotes an philosophy encouraging "insight roles" in extremist networks, , and accelerationist tactics to hasten through terrorism; it has influenced neo-Nazi cells like , with adherents linked to murders, kidnappings, and plots, including the 2020 stabbing death of a U.S. Marine recruiter. O9A texts advocate blending Satanism with political extremism, rejecting mainstream variants as diluted, and U.S. authorities classify it as a dangerous mobilizing pre-radicalized individuals for attacks rather than a mere philosophical school. Similarly, Joy of Satan Ministries, a theistic group established in the 2000s, fuses Satan worship with explicit Nazi ideology, including antisemitic rituals and claims of ancient Aryan-Satanic heritage; its leadership has historical ties to neo-Nazi figures, such as the marriage of high priestess Maxine Dietrich to National Socialist Movement leader Clifford Herrington, prompting internal white supremacist debates over Satanic compatibility. These connections have led to of vulnerable individuals into hybrid occult-racial , though no large-scale crimes are directly attributed to the group itself. Overall, while such outliers exist, comprehensive data from justice agencies show no empirical basis for associating Satanism broadly with systemic crime or , with verifiable incidents confined to marginal, ideologically deviant sects.

Moral and Philosophical Objections

Moral objections to Satanism, particularly its LaVeyan form founded by in 1966, center on its explicit rejection of Abrahamic ethical frameworks, which view as an adversary to divine order and goodness. Christian critics argue that LaVeyan tenets, such as indulgence over abstinence and vital existence over spiritual pipe dreams as outlined in (1969), promote unchecked that equates the "seven deadly sins" with pathways to , inverting biblical calls to and pursuit of holiness (e.g., Galatians 5:22-23). This philosophy is seen as fostering , where actions are justified by personal desire rather than objective standards, potentially eroding communal virtues like and . Philosophically, LaVeyan Satanism's ethical egoism—drawing from Nietzsche's master morality and Ayn Rand's objectivism—prioritizes self-interest and strength, dismissing altruism as "sucker morality" that weakens the individual. Critics contend this framework lacks a coherent basis for reciprocity or long-term social stability, as its retributive justice ("an eye for an eye") and survival-of-the-fittest ethos reduce ethics to power dynamics, risking exploitation without transcendent accountability. For instance, LaVey's elevation of carnal lust over agape love redefines human relations transactionally, which empirical observations of hedonistic excess link to personal and societal dysfunction, such as increased alienation among adherents influenced by its anti-theistic materialism. Theistic variants of Satanism face sharper moral condemnation for literal veneration of a malevolent entity, interpreted in as aligning with deception and rebellion against creation's purpose (:12-15). Even atheistic strands, like those of the , are philosophically faulted for inconsistency: LaVey advocated personal yet imposed hierarchical controls on followers, undermining claims of unbridled . These critiques, often from religious scholars, highlight how Satanism's symbolic inversion of theistic symbols—e.g., mocking the as "pallid incompetence"—serves not liberation but a reactive that substitutes ego-worship for substantive metaphysics.

Responses and Self-Defenses

The , founded by in 1966, defends its philosophy as a form of symbolic emphasizing , self-responsibility, and rejection of supernaturalism, positioning Satan as a for human carnality rather than a to be worshiped. In response to accusations of promoting immorality or evil, spokespersons assert that codifies ethical guidelines in (1969), advocating indulgence tempered by pragmatism and non-interference unless provoked, thereby framing criticisms as misunderstandings rooted in Christian dualism that demonizes natural human instincts. The organization explicitly distances itself from criminality by automatically terminating membership for any felony conviction, especially those involving antisocial acts that contradict its tenets of personal accountability and social productivity. The Satanic Temple (TST), established in 2013 as a nontheistic activist group, counters moral and philosophical objections by invoking its Seven Fundamental Tenets, which prioritize empathy, scientific understanding, justice, bodily autonomy, and freedom of will as superior humanistic principles over dogmatic impositions. TST leaders, such as , have publicly rejected literal worship, describing instead as a symbol of defiance against arbitrary authority and a tool for advocating and . In defending against claims of societal harm, TST engages in litigation and public campaigns—such as after-school clubs paralleling Christian programs—to demonstrate commitment to equal application of religious freedoms, arguing that exclusions based on perceived "evil" associations violate constitutional protections. Both organizations rebut associations with crime and extremism by highlighting the absence of verifiable linking formal Satanism to organized illicit networks; historical panics, including the 1980s-1990s allegations of widespread abuse, were investigated by law enforcement and found unsubstantiated, often attributable to isolated psychopaths or copycat self-stylers rather than doctrinal groups. policies reinforce this by prohibiting proselytizing or coercive recruitment, viewing such as antithetical to Satanic self-determination, while TST's tenets explicitly condemn injustice and retribution without due process. Critics' persistent linkages, they argue, reflect in media and religious narratives rather than empirical causation, with formal Satanists maintaining that individual crimes do not indict philosophical frameworks any more than abuses by adherents of other ideologies discredit them wholesale.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.