Hubbry Logo
Sea surface temperatureSea surface temperatureMain
Open search
Sea surface temperature
Community hub
Sea surface temperature
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sea surface temperature
Sea surface temperature
Sea surface temperature
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Sea surface temperature since 1979 in the extrapolar region (between 60 degrees south and 60 degrees north latitude).[1]

Sea surface temperature (or ocean surface temperature) is the temperature of ocean water close to the surface. The exact meaning of surface varies in the literature and in practice. It is usually between 1 millimetre (0.04 in) and 20 metres (70 ft) below the sea surface. Sea surface temperatures greatly modify air masses in the Earth's atmosphere within a short distance of the shore. The thermohaline circulation has a major impact on average sea surface temperature throughout most of the world's oceans.[2]

Warm sea surface temperatures can develop and strengthen cyclones over the ocean. Tropical cyclones can also cause a cool wake. This is due to turbulent mixing of the upper 30 metres (100 ft) of the ocean. Sea surface temperature changes during the day. This is like the air above it, but to a lesser degree. There is less variation in sea surface temperature on breezy days than on calm days.

Coastal sea surface temperatures can cause offshore winds to generate upwelling, which can significantly cool or warm nearby landmasses, but shallower waters over a continental shelf are often warmer. Onshore winds can cause a considerable warm-up even in areas where upwelling is fairly constant, such as the northwest coast of South America. Coastal sea surface temperature values are important within numerical weather prediction as the sea surface temperature influences the atmosphere above, such as in the formation of sea breezes and sea fog.

It is very likely that global mean sea surface temperature increased by 0.88 °C between 1850–1900 and 2011–2020 due to global warming, with most of that warming (0.60 °C) occurring between 1980 and 2020.[3]: 1228  The temperatures over land are rising faster than ocean temperatures. This is because the ocean absorbs about 90% of excess heat generated by climate change.[4]

Definitions

[edit]
See also: Ocean temperature
Global map of sea surface temperature, showing warmer areas around the equator and colder areas around the poles (20 December 2013 at 1-km resolution).

Sea surface temperature (SST), or ocean surface temperature, is the water temperature close to the ocean's surface. The exact meaning of surface varies according to the measurement method used, but it is between 1 millimetre (0.04 in) and 20 metres (70 ft) below the sea surface.

For comparison, the sea surface skin temperature relates to the top 20 or so micrometres of the ocean's surface.

The definition proposed by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for sea surface temperature does not specify the number of metres but focuses more on measurement techniques: Sea surface temperature is "the subsurface bulk temperature in the top few metres of the ocean, measured by ships, buoys and drifters. [...] Satellite measurements of skin temperature (uppermost layer; a micrometre thick) in the infrared or the top centimetre or so in the microwave are also used, but must be adjusted to be compatible with the bulk temperature."[5]: 2248 

The temperature further below that is called ocean temperature or deeper ocean temperature. Ocean temperatures (more than 20 metres below the surface) also vary by region and time, and they contribute to variations in ocean heat content and ocean stratification.[3] The increase of both ocean surface temperature and deeper ocean temperature is an important effect of climate change on oceans.[3]

Extent of "surface"

[edit]
See also: Ocean stratification and Photic zone

The extent of the ocean surface down into the ocean is influenced by the amount of mixing that takes place between the surface water and the deeper water. This depends on the temperature: in the tropics the warm surface layer of about 100 m is quite stable and does not mix much with deeper water, while near the poles winter cooling and storms makes the surface layer denser and it mixes to great depth and then stratifies again in summer. This is why there is no simple single depth for ocean surface. The photic depth of the ocean is typically about 100 m and is related to this heated surface layer. It can be up to around 200 m deep in the open ocean.[6][7]

Variations and changes

[edit]
Sea surface temperature and flows

Local variations

[edit]
See also: Upwelling

The sea surface temperature (SST) has a diurnal range, just like the Earth's atmosphere above, though to a lesser degree due to its greater thermal inertia.[8] On calm days, the temperature can vary by 6 °C (10 °F).[9] The temperature of the ocean at depth lags the Earth's atmosphere temperature by 15 days per 10 metres (33 ft), which means for locations like the Aral Sea, temperatures near its bottom reach a maximum in December and a minimum in May and June.[10] Near the coastline, some offshore and longshore winds move the warm waters near the surface offshore, and replace them with cooler water from below in the process known as Ekman transport. This pattern generally increases nutrients for marine life in the region, and can have a profound effect in some regions where the bottom waters are particularly nutrient-rich.[11] Offshore of river deltas, freshwater flows over the top of the denser seawater, which allows it to heat faster due to limited vertical mixing.[12] Remotely sensed SST can be used to detect the surface temperature signature due to tropical cyclones. In general, an SST cooling is observed after the passing of a hurricane, primarily as the result of mixed layer deepening and surface heat losses.[13] In the wake of several day long Saharan dust outbreaks across the adjacent northern Atlantic Ocean, sea surface temperatures are reduced 0.2 C to 0.4 C (0.3 to 0.7 F).[14] Other sources of short-term SST fluctuation include extratropical cyclones, rapid influxes of glacial fresh water[15] and concentrated phytoplankton blooms[16] due to seasonal cycles or agricultural run-off.[17][clarification needed]

The tropical ocean has been warming faster than other regions since 1950, with the greatest rates of warming in the tropical Indian Ocean, western Pacific Ocean, and western boundary currents of the subtropical gyres.[3] However, the eastern Pacific Ocean, subtropical North Atlantic Ocean, and Southern Ocean have warmed more slowly than the global average or have experienced cooling since the 1950s.[3]

Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation

[edit]

Ocean currents, such as the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, can affect sea surface temperatures over several decades.[18] The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) is an important driver of North Atlantic SST and Northern Hemisphere climate, but the mechanisms controlling AMO variability remain poorly understood.[19] Atmospheric internal variability, changes in ocean circulation, or anthropogenic drivers may control the multidecadal temperature variability associated with AMO.[20] These changes in North Atlantic SST may influence winds in the subtropical North Pacific and produce warmer SSTs in the western Pacific Ocean.[21]

Weekly average sea surface temperature in the ocean during the first week of February 2011, during a period of La Niña[broken anchor].

Regional variations

[edit]
The 1997 El Niño observed by TOPEX/Poseidon. The white areas off the tropical coasts of South and North America indicate the pool of warm water.[22]
Main article: El Niño-Southern Oscillation

El Niño is defined by prolonged differences in Pacific Ocean surface temperatures when compared with the average value. The accepted definition is a warming or cooling of at least 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) averaged over the east-central tropical Pacific Ocean. Typically, this anomaly happens at irregular intervals of 2–7 years and lasts nine months to two years.[23] The average period length is 5 years. When this warming or cooling occurs for only seven to nine months, it is classified as El Niño/La Niña "conditions"; when it occurs for more than that period, it is classified as El Niño/La Niña "episodes".[24]

The sign of an El Niño in the sea surface temperature pattern is when warm water spreads from the west Pacific and the Indian Ocean to the east Pacific. It takes the rain with it, causing extensive drought in the western Pacific and rainfall in the normally dry eastern Pacific. El Niño's warm rush of nutrient-poor tropical water, heated by its eastward passage in the Equatorial Current, replaces the cold, nutrient-rich surface water of the Humboldt Current. When El Niño conditions last for many months, extensive ocean warming and the reduction in Easterly Trade winds limits upwelling of cold nutrient-rich deep water and its economic impact to local fishing for an international market can be serious.[25]

Among scientists, there is medium confidence that the tropical Pacific will transition to a mean pattern resembling that of El Niño on centennial time scale, but there is still high uncertainty in tropical Pacific SST projections because it is difficult to capture El Niño variability in climate models.[3]

Surface air temperatures over land masses have been increasing faster than the sea surface temperature.[26]

Recent increase due to climate change

[edit]
The global average sea surface temperature has been increasing since around 1900 (graph showing annual average and 5-year smoothed average, relative to the average value for the years 1951-1980).
Further information: Effects of climate change on oceans § Rising ocean temperature

Overall, scientists project that all regions of the oceans will warm by 2050, but models disagree for SST changes expected in the subpolar North Atlantic, the equatorial Pacific, and the Southern Ocean.[3] The future global mean SST increase for the period 1995-2014 to 2081-2100 is 0.86 °C under the most modest greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, and up to 2.89 °C under the most severe emissions scenarios.[3]

A study published in 2025 in Environmental Research Letters reported that global mean sea surface temperature increases had more than quadrupled, from 0.06 K per decade during 1985–89 to 0.27 K per decade for 2019–23.[27] The researchers projected that the increase inferred over the past 40 years would likely be exceeded within the next 20 years.[27]

Measurement

[edit]
Temperature profile of the surface layer of the ocean (a) at night and (b) during the day

There are a variety of techniques for measuring this parameter that can potentially yield different results because different things are actually being measured. Away from the immediate sea surface, general temperature measurements are accompanied by a reference to the specific depth of measurement. This is because of significant differences encountered between measurements made at different depths, especially during the daytime when low wind speed and high sunshine conditions may lead to the formation of a warm layer at the ocean's surface and strong vertical temperature gradients (a diurnal thermocline).[9] Sea surface temperature measurements are confined to the top portion of the ocean, known as the near-surface layer.[28]

Thermometers

[edit]

The sea surface temperature was one of the first oceanographic variables to be measured. Benjamin Franklin suspended a mercury thermometer from a ship while travelling between the United States and Europe in his survey of the Gulf Stream in the late eighteenth century. SST was later measured by dipping a thermometer into a bucket of water that was manually drawn from the sea surface. The first automated technique for determining SST was accomplished by measuring the temperature of water in the intake port of large ships, which was underway by 1963. These observations have a warm bias of around 0.6 °C (1 °F) due to the heat of the engine room.[29]

Fixed weather buoys measure the water temperature at a depth of 3 metres (9.8 ft). Measurements of SST have had inconsistencies over the last 130 years due to the way they were taken. In the nineteenth century, measurements were taken in a bucket off a ship. However, there was a slight variation in temperature because of the differences in buckets. Samples were collected in either a wood or an uninsulated canvas bucket, but the canvas bucket cooled quicker than the wood bucket. The sudden change in temperature between 1940 and 1941 was the result of an undocumented change in procedure. The samples were taken near the engine intake because it was too dangerous to use lights to take measurements over the side of the ship at night.[30]

Many different drifting buoys exist around the world that vary in design, and the location of reliable temperature sensors varies. These measurements are beamed to satellites for automated and immediate data distribution.[31] A large network of coastal buoys in U.S. waters is maintained by the National Data Buoy Center (NDBC).[32] Between 1985 and 1994, an extensive array of moored and drifting buoys was deployed across the equatorial Pacific Ocean designed to help monitor and predict the El Niño[broken anchor] phenomenon.[33]

Weather satellites

[edit]
See also: Weather satellite and Satellite temperature measurement
2003–2011 SST based on MODIS Aqua data

Weather satellites have been available to determine sea surface temperature information since 1967, with the first global composites created during 1970.[34] Since 1982,[35] satellites have been increasingly utilized to measure SST and have allowed its spatial and temporal variation to be viewed more fully. Satellite measurements of SST are in reasonable agreement with in situ temperature measurements.[36] The satellite measurement is made by sensing the ocean radiation in two or more wavelengths within the infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum or other parts of the spectrum which can then be empirically related to SST.[37] These wavelengths are chosen because they are:

  1. within the peak of the blackbody radiation expected from the Earth,[38] and
  2. able to transmit adequately well through the atmosphere[39]

The satellite-measured SST provides both a synoptic view of the ocean and a high frequency of repeat views,[40] allowing the examination of basin-wide upper ocean dynamics not possible with ships or buoys. NASA's (National Aeronautic and Space Administration) Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) SST satellites have been providing global SST data since 2000, available with a one-day lag. NOAA's GOES (Geostationary Orbiting Earth Satellites) Archived 2020-08-17 at the Wayback Machine satellites are geo-stationary above the Western Hemisphere which enables them to deliver SST data on an hourly basis with only a few hours of lag time.

There are several difficulties with satellite-based absolute SST measurements. First, in infrared remote sensing methodology the radiation emanates from the top "skin" of the ocean, approximately the top 0.01 mm or less, which may not represent the bulk temperature of the upper meter of ocean due primarily to effects of solar surface heating during the daytime, reflected radiation, as well as sensible heat loss and surface evaporation. All these factors make it somewhat difficult to compare satellite data to measurements from buoys or shipboard methods, complicating ground truth efforts.[41] Secondly, the satellite cannot look through clouds, creating a cool bias in satellite-derived SSTs within cloudy areas.[9] However, passive microwave techniques can accurately measure SST and penetrate cloud cover.[37] Within atmospheric sounder channels on weather satellites, which peak just above the ocean's surface, knowledge of the sea surface temperature is important to their calibration.[9]

Importance to the Earth's atmosphere

[edit]
Sea-effect snow bands near the Korean Peninsula
See also: Air mass, Numerical weather prediction, Precipitation (meteorology), and Effects of climate change on oceans

Sea surface temperature affects the behavior of the Earth's atmosphere above, so their initialization into atmospheric models is important. While sea surface temperature is important for tropical cyclogenesis, it is also important in determining the formation of sea fog and sea breezes.[9] Heat from underlying warmer waters can significantly modify an air mass over distances as short as 35 kilometres (22 mi) to 40 kilometres (25 mi).[42] For example, southwest of Northern Hemisphere extratropical cyclones, curved cyclonic flow bringing cold air across relatively warm water bodies can lead to narrow lake-effect snow (or sea effect) bands. Those bands bring strong localized precipitation, often in the form of snow, since large water bodies such as lakes efficiently store heat that results in significant temperature differences—larger than 13 °C (23 °F)—between the water surface and the air above.[43] Because of this temperature difference, warmth and moisture are transported upward, condensing into vertically oriented clouds which produce snow showers. The temperature decrease with height and cloud depth are directly affected by both the water temperature and the large-scale environment. The stronger the temperature decrease with height, the taller the clouds get, and the greater the precipitation rate becomes.[44]

Tropical cyclones

[edit]
Seasonal peaks of tropical cyclone activity worldwide
Average equatorial Pacific temperatures
Main articles: Tropical cyclogenesis and Tropical cyclones and climate change

Ocean temperature of at least 26.5°C (79.7°F) spanning through at minimum a 50-metre depth is one of the precursors needed to maintain a tropical cyclone (a type of mesocyclone).[45][46] These warm waters are needed to maintain the warm core that fuels tropical systems. This value is well above 16.1 °C (60.9 °F), the long term global average surface temperature of the oceans.[47] However, this requirement can be considered only a general baseline because it assumes that the ambient atmospheric environment surrounding an area of disturbed weather presents average conditions. Tropical cyclones have intensified when SSTs were slightly below this standard temperature.

Tropical cyclones are known to form even when normal conditions are not met. For example, cooler air temperatures at a higher altitude (e.g., at the 500 hPa level, or 5.9 km) can lead to tropical cyclogenesis at lower water temperatures, as a certain lapse rate is required to force the atmosphere to be unstable enough for convection. In a moist atmosphere, this lapse rate is 6.5 °C/km, while in an atmosphere with less than 100% relative humidity, the required lapse rate is 9.8 °C/km.[48]

At the 500 hPa level, the air temperature averages −7 °C (18 °F) within the tropics, but air in the tropics is normally dry at this height, giving the air room to wet-bulb, or cool as it moistens, to a more favorable temperature that can then support convection. A wet-bulb temperature at 500 hPa in a tropical atmosphere of −13.2 °C (8.2 °F) is required to initiate convection if the water temperature is 26.5 °C (79.7 °F), and this temperature requirement increases or decreases proportionally by 1 °C in the sea surface temperature for each 1 °C change at 500 hpa. Inside a cold cyclone, 500 hPa temperatures can fall as low as −30 °C (−22 °F), which can initiate convection even in the driest atmospheres. This also explains why moisture in the mid-levels of the troposphere, roughly at the 500 hPa level, is normally a requirement for development. However, when dry air is found at the same height, temperatures at 500 hPa need to be even colder as dry atmospheres require a greater lapse rate for instability than moist atmospheres.[49][50] At heights near the tropopause, the 30-year average temperature (as measured in the period encompassing 1961 through 1990) was −77 °C (−132 °F).[51] One example of a tropical cyclone maintaining itself over cooler waters was Epsilon late in the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season.[52]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sea surface temperature

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Sea surface temperature (SST) is the temperature of the uppermost layer of the ocean, typically defined as the skin temperature within the top few millimeters of the , though bulk measurements extend to depths of about 10 meters. Measured primarily through satellite-based and for broad coverage, supplemented by observations from buoys, ships, and drifting instruments, SST provides a foundational for monitoring ocean-atmosphere interactions. SST exerts profound influence on global weather patterns, marine ecosystems, and climate dynamics, as the oceans absorb approximately 90% of excess heat from anthropogenic , modulating atmospheric temperatures and driving phenomena such as El Niño-Southern Oscillation events, intensification, and shifts in precipitation regimes. Spatial and temporal variability arises from solar insolation, wind-driven mixing, ocean currents, of cooler deep waters, and evaporative cooling, with diurnal cycles amplified under low-wind conditions and interannual fluctuations linked to coupled ocean-atmosphere processes. Empirical records indicate a global SST rise of about 0.062°C per decade since 1900, accelerating in recent decades, though discrepancies between observed patterns and simulations highlight uncertainties in capturing regional warming structures and internal variability.

Definitions and Fundamentals

Definition and Measurement Depth

Sea surface temperature (SST) is the temperature of in the immediate vicinity of the ocean-atmosphere interface, serving as a key indicator of upper and air-sea heat exchange. The precise depth of measurement is not uniform and depends on the observational method, leading to distinctions between skin SST—sampled in the top ~10 micrometers to 1 millimeter—and bulk SST, which integrates temperatures over a deeper layer typically from a few centimeters to 1–2 meters. This variability arises because in-situ instruments like buoys and ship intakes probe subsurface water, while infrared satellite radiometers detect radiative emissions from the molecular skin layer. The cool causes the skin layer to be systematically cooler than the bulk by 0.1–0.3°C on average, with differences up to ~1°C during calm, low-wind conditions due to uncompensated evaporative and at the interface. Bulk measurements, common in historical records, often occur at depths of 0.2–1.0 meters for moored buoys and floats (above 5 meters), or deeper (up to several meters) for ship engine-room intakes used since the 1930s. Some modern datasets adjust in-situ observations to a nominal bulk depth of ~0.2 meters for consistency in analyses. These depth distinctions matter for applications like climate modeling and calculations, as bulk SST better represents mixed-layer temperatures relevant to ocean circulation, while skin SST directly informs satellite-derived air-sea interactions. Uncorrected mixing of skin and bulk data can introduce biases of several tenths of a degree in global averages, necessitating depth-specific corrections in long-term records.

Units, Scales, and Skin vs. Bulk Distinctions

Sea surface temperature (SST) is conventionally measured and reported in degrees (°C), consistent with international standards for oceanographic data, though conversions to (K) are used in thermodynamic calculations where absolute temperature is required. SST data are analyzed across diverse spatial scales, ranging from localized point measurements by buoys (sub-kilometer resolution) to global satellite-derived grids at approximately 1–25 km horizontal resolution, enabling assessments from mesoscale features like eddies to basin-wide patterns. Temporal scales span instantaneous snapshots from radiometers to diurnal cycles (with variations up to 3°C daily), seasonal fluctuations, and long-term monthly or annual averages for climate monitoring. A critical distinction exists between skin SST (T_skin), the temperature of the ocean's uppermost molecular layer (approximately 10–1000 μm thick) as sensed by infrared radiometers, and bulk SST (T_bulk), the temperature integrated over the subsurface or measured at depths of 0.5–10 m by thermistors on ships or buoys. The cool-skin effect, arising from suppressed at the air-sea interface and conductive loss to the cooler atmosphere, typically renders T_skin 0.1–0.3°C lower than T_bulk under average conditions, with nighttime differences averaging -0.23 and daytime values around -0.11 due to partial solar absorption mitigating the gradient. This ΔT (T_bulk - T_skin > 0) varies inversely with (stronger mixing reduces the gradient) and increases with net radiative loss, impacting air-sea flux estimates by up to 11 W m⁻² if unaccounted for in bulk-based models. observations primarily yield skin SST, necessitating adjustments for compatibility with bulk in-situ data in blended products.

Measurement Methods and Data Quality

Historical Techniques and Known Biases

Prior to the widespread adoption of automated systems, sea surface temperature (SST) measurements relied primarily on manual shipboard techniques. From the late through the mid-20th century, the dominant method involved hauling aboard ships using buckets—initially wooden, later canvas or insulated rubber—and inserting thermometers to record temperatures. This approach, documented in historical records from merchant and naval vessels, provided sparse global coverage but formed the basis of early datasets like those compiled by the International Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (ICOADS). By the to , many vessels transitioned to measuring temperatures from intakes (ERI), where was pumped for cooling and sampled via thermometers in pipelines. This shift reduced labor but introduced methodological inconsistencies, as ERI readings were typically taken deeper (1-5 meters) and affected by ship-specific factors. Bucket measurements exhibited a systematic cold due to losses during hauling and exposure. in uninsulated buckets cooled by 0.2-0.3°C on average from , transfer to air, and wind-induced mixing, with greater losses (up to 0.5°C or more) in high latitudes, windy conditions, or when using older wooden buckets with longer exposure times of 3-5 minutes. Field comparisons from the onward confirmed buckets averaged 0.1-0.4°C cooler than simultaneous ERI or readings, a difference scaling with air-sea gradients and ventilation rates. Conversely, ERI methods introduced a warm from frictional heating in pipes and residual engine warmth, estimated at 0.1-0.3°C, though wartime data (e.g., 1939-1945) may show amplified warming up to 0.25°C due to operational stresses. Night marine air (NMAT), sometimes used as SST proxies, added further offsets of -0.4°C or more relative to direct measurements, varying by deck exposure and insulation. Adjustments for these biases in modern datasets, such as HadSST or ERSST, apply time- and method-dependent corrections derived from paired observations and models, but uncertainties persist, particularly for pre-1940 where metadata on bucket types or haul times is incomplete. Recent analyses indicate early-20th-century SSTs (1900-1930) may be biased cold by an additional 0.2-0.4°C due to undercorrected canvas losses, potentially inflating apparent warming trends in adjusted records. Misclassification of ERI as in archives exacerbates errors, leading to overcorrections in some regions, as evidenced by negative offsets in high-variability areas like the North Atlantic. These issues highlight the challenges of homogenizing heterogeneous observations, with peer-reviewed critiques noting that institutional adjustments sometimes prioritize trend consistency over raw bias physics, contributing to debates on mid-century cooling signals. Overall, unresolved spatial and metadata gaps limit precision to ±0.2-0.5°C for basin-scale historical SSTs before 1950.

Contemporary In-Situ and Remote Sensing Approaches

In-situ measurements of sea surface (SST) are obtained through direct contact with the surface or near-surface layers, providing bulk data typically representative of the top 1-10 meters. Contemporary methods include ship-based observations from the Voluntary Observing Ships (VOS) program, where hull-mounted sensors or intakes measure with accuracies around 0.1-0.2°C after , though intake systems can introduce biases up to 0.5°C due to pipe conduction effects. Fixed moorings, such as those in the Tropical Atmosphere (TAO)/Triangle Trans- Buoy Network (TRITON) array, deploy thermistors at depths of 1-5 meters, achieving precisions of 0.005-0.01°C via regular against standards. Drifting buoys, including those from the Global Drifter Program, use surface thermistors insulated from solar heating, yielding uncertainties of approximately 0.1°C, with over 1,000 active units providing global coverage since the 1980s. Profiling floats under the program primarily measure subsurface temperature-salinity profiles from 2 meters to 2,000 meters, but recent modifications enable near-surface (0.2-1 meter) readings with accuracies comparable to buoys (around 0.002°C for sensors), supplementing SST datasets in data-sparse regions like the . These in-situ platforms collectively form the basis for operational networks like the International Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (ICOADS), with involving metadata flagging for changes to minimize biases exceeding 0.3°C in unadjusted records. Remote sensing approaches derive SST from satellite-based , offering global coverage at high spatial resolutions but primarily capturing skin-layer temperatures (top micrometers). Infrared (IR) sensors, such as the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) operational since 1981 on NOAA platforms, retrieve SST via multi-channel algorithms correcting for atmospheric and aerosols, achieving root-mean-square errors of 0.5-0.6 K against in-situ bulk data after cloud masking. The (MODIS) on NASA's Aqua and Terra satellites, active since 2002, employs similar split-window techniques with dual-view capabilities, yielding accuracies of 0.3-0.5 K in clear-sky conditions, though susceptible to cloud contamination affecting up to 80% of observations in tropical regions. Microwave radiometers, like the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) from 2002-2011 and successors, penetrate clouds to measure emissivity-based SST with resolutions of 50-60 km and errors around 0.5-1.0 K, complementing IR data in overcast areas but limited by land proximity and rain interference. Blended products integrate in-situ and data using optimal or , as in NOAA's Daily Optimum Interpolation SST (OISST) version 2.1, which since 1981 combines AVHRR paths with /drifter inputs to reduce uncertainties to 0.2-0.3°C globally, though zonal biases persist in high-latitude waters due to sparse validation. Validation studies highlight systematic cool biases in skin SST relative to bulk in-situ (0.1-0.3 K on average), attributable to cool-skin effects from air-sea , necessitating depth-specific adjustments for applications.

Data Processing, Adjustments, and Uncertainty Estimates

Raw sea surface temperature (SST) data, primarily sourced from the International Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (ICOADS), undergo initial to flag and exclude outliers, duplicates, and implausible values based on statistical tests and metadata checks. then involves adjustments to account for systematic errors from historical measurement methods, such as canvas bucket cooling due to evaporation (estimated at 0.2–0.3°C before ) and the shift to engine-room intake thermometers, which sample warmer water at depths of 5–10 meters and introduce a warm relative to SST. In datasets like NOAA's Extended Reconstructed SST (ERSST) version 5, adjustments are derived by comparing SST anomalies to night marine air temperature (NMAT) from sources like HadNMAT2, applying time-varying that reduce apparent cooling trends in early records by up to 0.1°C per decade before 1950. The UK Met Office's HadSST.4 employs a pairwise homogenization approach, using comparisons between collocated ship and buoy measurements to detect and correct method-specific offsets, with an ensemble of 200 members varying adjustment parameters to quantify residual uncertainty from incomplete metadata on measurement types. For contemporary data, satellite-derived SST from sensors (e.g., MODIS, AVHRR) requires atmospheric corrections for contamination and variations, calibrated against in-situ s with root-mean-square differences of 0.5–1.0°C, though diurnal warming in skin-layer measurements adds a 0.1–0.3°C offset relative to bulk SST used in most records. Gridding follows via optimal or reduced-space reconstruction, filling sparse regions with , though this amplifies uncertainties in data-poor areas like the pre-1980. Uncertainty estimates encompass instrumental precision (0.01–0.1°C for modern buoys vs. 0.5°C for early buckets), sampling coverage (dominating pre-1950 with global gaps >50% in some decades), and structural errors from adjustment assumptions, quantified via Monte Carlo ensembles or covariance propagation. In NOAA's GlobalTemp version 5, total uncertainty for annual global SST averages 0.02–0.05°C since 1950, rising to 0.1–0.3°C in the nineteenth century due to unresolved biases like inconsistent bucket insulation. Independent analyses confirm higher twentieth-century variability uncertainties, with unresolved ship metadata leading to potential cold biases of 0.1–0.2°C in mid-century records, challenging trend attributions without full error propagation. Recent peer-reviewed critiques emphasize that while adjustments mitigate known biases, persistent metadata gaps—such as misclassified engine intake reports—contribute up to 0.1°C/decade uncertainty in hemispheric trends, underscoring the need for metadata recovery to refine estimates.

Patterns of Natural Variability

Major Oscillatory Modes (e.g., AMO, PDO, ENSO)

The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) represents the primary interannual mode of sea surface temperature (SST) variability, driven by coupled ocean-atmosphere dynamics in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. ENSO cycles typically span 2 to 7 years, with the El Niño phase featuring positive SST anomalies exceeding 0.5°C in the Niño 3.4 region (5°S-5°N, 120°-170°W) for at least five consecutive three-month seasons, while the La Niña phase involves corresponding negative anomalies. These anomalies arise from weakened or reversed easterly trade winds, leading to reduced upwelling of cooler subsurface waters and accumulation of warm surface waters in the eastern Pacific, with peak deviations reaching 2-3°C during strong events like the 1997-1998 El Niño. ENSO influences global SST patterns through atmospheric teleconnections, such as the Pacific-North American pattern, which can induce warming in the Indian Ocean and cooling in the Atlantic during El Niño phases. The (PDO) constitutes a longer-term mode of SST variability over the North Pacific (north of 20°N), characterized by phases lasting 20 to 30 years, with positive phases exhibiting cooler central North Pacific SSTs and warmer anomalies along eastern continental margins, akin to an expanded El Niño pattern. The PDO index, derived as the leading principal component of monthly SST anomalies in this region, reveals multidecadal shifts, such as the transition to a positive phase around that coincided with enhanced Pacific SST contrasts. This oscillation modulates interannual ENSO impacts and contributes to decadal-scale SST trends, with negative phases associated with broader cooling in the extratropical Pacific. Observational records since the early , corroborated by paleoclimate proxies, indicate PDO-related SST variance explaining up to 20-30% of North Pacific low-frequency variability. The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) drives basin-scale SST fluctuations in the North Atlantic Ocean on timescales of 60 to 80 years, indexed by the detrended area-averaged SST anomalies over 0°-60°N, 75°W-7.5°W. Warm phases, such as the one persisting from the mid-1990s into the , feature positive SST anomalies of about 0.4°C above the long-term mean, linked to weakened meridional overturning circulation and reduced heat export to the deep ocean. Cool phases, evident in the mid-20th century, show opposite anomalies, influencing transatlantic SST gradients and interacting with modes like ENSO by altering equatorial . Instrumental data from 1856 onward, supplemented by coral and sediment proxies extending back millennia, confirm the AMO's coherence with North Atlantic SST variance, accounting for approximately 50% of multidecadal signal in the region. These modes interact nonlinearly; for instance, a positive AMO phase can enhance Pacific SST variability by modulating strength, thereby amplifying ENSO teleconnections to the PDO domain. Empirical indices from reanalysis datasets, such as HadSST4 and ERSSTv5, quantify their contributions, revealing that together they explain a substantial portion of non-anthropogenic SST variance prior to 1950, though attribution debates persist regarding internal versus forced components in recent decades.

Seasonal, Diurnal, and Regional Variations

Sea surface temperature (SST) displays marked seasonal variations driven by annual cycles in solar insolation, with amplitudes generally increasing from the toward the poles. In tropical regions, seasonal SST ranges typically span 1–3°C, reflecting the 's high thermal that dampens insolation changes, as observed in monthly datasets spanning decades. At mid-to-high latitudes, ranges exceed 10°C, with maxima in late summer (–) averaging 15–25°C in open oceans and minima below 5°C in winter, influenced by reduced , enhanced heat loss, and seasonal formation. patterns are phase-shifted by six months, peaking in – due to greater coverage mitigating land effects. Diurnal SST cycles arise from daytime net radiative heating and nighttime cooling through emission, loss, and , yielding global mean amplitudes of 0.2–0.5°C but up to 3–4°C in low-wind, high-insolation conditions over stratified waters. Observations from buoys and satellites indicate diurnal warming peaks in the afternoon, with rectification effects amplifying mean SST by 0.1–0.5°C regionally, particularly in the tropical Pacific where weak winds and clear skies enhance surface heating. In frontal zones or areas, amplitudes are suppressed by vertical mixing, limiting cycles to under 1°C, as confirmed by in-situ profiles showing rapid decay of warm layers under windy conditions. Regional SST patterns reflect latitudinal gradients, ocean circulation, and local forcings, with equatorial averages of 26–30°C contrasting polar values below 2°C. Warm anomalies occur in western boundary currents like the , elevating North Atlantic SSTs by 5–10°C above zonal means, while coastal —such as off —depresses temperatures by 5–8°C through of subsurface cold water. Enclosed basins exhibit amplified variability; for instance, the North reaches spring maxima exceeding 30°C due to monsoon-driven mixing reductions. These spatial heterogeneities, evident in global composites, underscore circulation's role in redistributing heat against radiative gradients.

Pre-1900 Proxies and Sparse Observations

Direct measurements of sea surface temperature (SST) prior to 1900 were limited to sporadic shipboard observations, primarily using uninsulated wooden buckets or canvas bags to haul seawater samples, which introduced cooling biases of up to 0.5–1°C due to evaporation and conduction during measurement. These records, compiled in databases like ICOADS, date back to the 17th century but become denser only after 1850, with pre-1850 data concentrated in the North Atlantic and North Pacific trade routes, covering less than 10% of global ocean areas and negligible southern hemisphere sampling. Coverage gaps and measurement inconsistencies result in uncertainties exceeding 1°C in regional means, complicating global estimates. Proxy reconstructions extend SST estimates further back, relying on geochemical indicators in marine archives such as corals, planktonic foraminifera in sediment cores, and organic biomarkers. In tropical regions, coral δ¹⁸O and Sr/Ca ratios provide annually resolved SST proxies calibrated against modern instrumental data, revealing multi-decadal variability; for instance, Indo-Pacific reconstructions indicate cooler SSTs during the Little Ice Age (circa 1450–1850) by 0.5–1°C relative to the Medieval Warm Period (circa 950–1250). Mid-latitude sediment cores use Mg/Ca ratios in foraminifera shells, which track calcification temperatures, or alkenone unsaturation indices (Uᵏ'₃₇) from haptophyte algae, yielding SST estimates with typical errors of 1–1.5°C; North Atlantic records from these methods show peak LIA cooling around 1700, with SSTs 1–2°C below 20th-century averages in some basins. TEX₈₆ indices from archaeal lipids offer complementary deep-water signals but are prone to non-temperature influences like subsurface remineralization, adding reconstruction uncertainty. These proxies capture natural oscillations, such as reduced North Atlantic SSTs during the linked to volcanic forcing and solar minima, contrasting with regionally warmer MWP conditions in parts of the and North Pacific, though global synchrony remains debated due to hemispheric asymmetries and proxy variances. Multi-proxy ensembles, integrating dozens of records, estimate pre-industrial global SST variability of ±0.5°C over centuries, but sparse —favoring coastal and zones—limits basin-scale confidence, with proxies virtually absent before 1800. against sparse 19th-century observations highlights systematic offsets, such as proxy underestimation of seasonal amplitudes, underscoring the need for site-specific validations to mitigate over-reliance on linear temperature-proxy relationships.

20th-Century Records and Interdecadal Shifts

Global sea surface temperature (SST) records for the derive primarily from in-situ measurements compiled in datasets such as HadSST3 and NOAA's Extended Reconstructed SST version 5 (ERSSTv5), which integrate ship-based observations adjusted for historical biases like canvas bucket warming effects. These datasets indicate an overall warming trend of approximately 0.05–0.07°C per from to 2000, though with significant interdecadal variability and regional differences. Early 20th-century estimates (–1930) exhibit a cold bias in some reconstructions due to differences in national measurement practices, such as U.S. versus U.K. ship data, potentially understating early warming rates by up to 0.1–0.2°C in global means. The century featured distinct phases: pronounced warming from to , averaging 0.1–0.2°C per globally and stronger in the and North Atlantic; a mid-century stasis or slight cooling (–1970) of about -0.01 to 0.0°C per , linked to influences and oscillatory modes; and accelerated warming post-1970, exceeding 0.1°C per . Interdecadal shifts, evident as step-like changes in decadal anomaly fields, occurred around the (onset of early warming), (transition to cooling), and 1976–1977 ( regime shift marking renewed warming). These shifts align with multi-decadal oscillations like the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, which peaked warmly mid-century before declining. Uncertainties in 20th-century SST records stem from sparse coverage (less than 10% before 1950) and adjustments for measurement changes, with of ±0.1–0.3°C in early decades widening to ±0.05°C post-1950. Despite these, the empirical record shows no monotonic trend but rather modulated variability, with global means rising from about -0.2°C anomaly (relative to 1961–1990 baseline) in the to near-zero by the 1940s, dipping slightly in the 1960s–1970s, and reaching +0.3–0.4°C by 2000. Regional contrasts, such as North Atlantic warmth versus Pacific cooling mid-century, underscore the role of internal ocean-atmosphere dynamics in these shifts.

Post-2000 Observations Including 2023-2025 Peaks

Since 2000, global sea surface temperature (SST) datasets, including NOAA's Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature version 5 (ERSSTv5), have recorded a continuation of multidecadal warming, with annual mean anomalies relative to the 1971-2000 baseline rising from approximately 0.2–0.4°C in the early 2000s to 0.7–0.9°C by the early 2020s. This trend reflects improved data coverage from floats and observations, alongside adjustments for historical measurement biases such as shifts from buckets to engine intakes on ships, which contribute to higher post-2000 trends in adjusted datasets. The years 2023–2025 featured exceptional peaks, driven in part by the 2023–2024 El Niño event superimposed on the long-term trend. In 2023, global mean SST reached record highs, with daily averages exceeding prior maxima starting April 4, and an all-time daily peak of 18.99°C on August 22. Monthly anomalies in NOAA's Operational Interpolated OISST frequently surpassed 1.0°C above the 20th-century average, marking the warmest year for ocean surfaces to that point. Similarly, Copernicus data confirmed 2023 as a record for extra-polar SST. In 2024, the annual extra-polar SST average hit a new record of 20.87°C, 0.51°C above the 1991–2020 mean, exceeding 2023 despite the El Niño's weakening. August 2024 tied August 2023 for the highest monthly anomaly at 1.27°C in NOAA records. By , with the onset of La Niña conditions, SSTs remained elevated but declined from prior peaks; September's global average of 20.72°C ranked third-highest for the month, 0.20°C below September 2023. These records across independent datasets like NOAA OISST, ERSSTv5, and Copernicus ERA5 indicate robust observational evidence of recent extremes, though analyses attribute the 2023–2024 jump's magnitude as a low-probability event (1-in-512 years) under current warming rates without invoking additional unforced variability.

Causal Attribution and Debates

Contributions from Solar, Volcanic, and Internal Variability

Solar variability influences sea surface temperature primarily through fluctuations in total solar irradiance (TSI), which varies by approximately 0.1% over the 11-year solar cycle, corresponding to a peak-to-peak change of about 1.3 W/m². This forcing translates to a global surface temperature response of roughly 0.1°C, with lagged effects on ocean heat uptake potentially amplifying regional SST anomalies in the North Atlantic and Pacific. Empirical analyses indicate that solar contributions account for up to 0.05–0.1°C of multidecadal SST variability since 1900, though TSI has remained relatively stable or slightly declined since the 1950s amid accelerating SST trends. Studies attributing solar forcing to broader climate signals, such as through bottom-up amplification via ocean-atmosphere coupling, suggest it explains portions of early 20th-century warming but diminishes in explanatory power post-1950 relative to observed SST increases of over 0.5°C globally. Volcanic eruptions contribute to SST variability through stratospheric sulfate s that reflect incoming solar radiation, inducing temporary . The 1991 eruption, injecting ~20 million tons of , produced a of -3 W/m² and lowered global SST by 0.2–0.5°C for 1–2 years, with recovery tied to aerosol residence times of 1–3 years. Similarly, the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai eruption cooled SST by ~0.1°C, countering expectations of warming from emissions due to dominant aerosol scattering effects. Over the , clustered volcanic events, such as those in the 1810s, 1880s, and 1990s, imprinted multiyear cooling dips on SST records, masking underlying trends but contributing less than 0.1°C per decade on average to long-term changes. Attribution models often underestimate volcanic cooling by a factor of two, potentially due to insufficient representation of aerosol microphysics and heat redistribution. Internal variability, arising from chaotic ocean-atmosphere interactions, drives substantial SST fluctuations independent of external forcings, particularly on decadal to multidecadal timescales. Modes such as the Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV), with a 60–80-year period and amplitude of ~0.4°C in North Atlantic SST, contribute ~0.1–0.2°C to global mean SST anomalies, influencing hemispheric patterns through meridional overturning circulation shifts. Pacific Decadal Variability similarly modulates equatorial SST, with sub-decadal components linking to circulation changes and global teleconnections. Detection-attribution studies quantify internal variability as responsible for 20–50% of interdecadal SST swings since 1900, including the early 20th-century warm phase and mid-century hiatus, though it does not explain the post-1980 acceleration exceeding 0.15°C/decade. While some analyses view apparent multidecadal oscillations as artifacts of volcanic clustering rather than purely internal dynamics, empirical reconstructions affirm internal modes' role in amplifying or dampening forced trends, with signal-to-noise ratios favoring external dominance in recent decades.

Evidence for and Against Dominant Anthropogenic Forcing

Observational records indicate that global sea surface temperatures (SSTs) have risen by approximately 0.88°C from 1850 to 2020, with attribution studies estimating that anthropogenic account for the majority of this trend since the mid-20th century, based on detection and attribution methods that match observed warming patterns to simulated fingerprints of . These analyses, incorporating multi-model ensembles, suggest that without human-induced forcings, SSTs would have shown little net change or slight cooling due to volcanic and solar influences over the same period. Energy budget constraints further support this, as the observed increase in Earth's radiative imbalance—measured at about 0.9 W/m² from 2005 to 2019—aligns closely with estimates of anthropogenic forcing after accounting for internal variability. However, discrepancies between projections and observations challenge claims of dominant anthropogenic control, particularly in regional SST patterns; for instance, coupled models systematically fail to reproduce observed historical trends in the tropical Pacific and , where cooling or slower warming has occurred despite uniform forcing. Recent revisions to early-20th-century reveal that historical SSTs were cooler than previously estimated—up to 0.5–1°C lower in some basins—implying that the post-1900 warming rate may have been overstated relative to natural baselines, and that models exhibit a cold bias in simulating pre-industrial variability. Multi-decadal natural oscillations, such as the Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV) and Pacific Decadal Variability (PDV), contribute substantially to observed SST changes, with reconstructions attributing around 30% of global mean surface air (closely tied to SST) variations from 1880–2017 to these internal modes rather than external forcings alone. Solar and volcanic forcings provide additional evidence against anthropogenic dominance in specific epochs; for example, the early-20th-century warming (1910–1940) correlates with increased solar irradiance and reduced volcanic activity, detectable in SST records independent of rising CO2 levels, which were then below 310 ppm. Volcanic eruptions, such as Pinatubo in 1991, induced rapid global SST cooling of 0.2–0.5°C lasting 2–3 years, effects not fully replicable in greenhouse-gas-only simulations, highlighting non-additive interactions with ocean dynamics. The 2023–2024 SST peaks, exceeding 21°C in the Niño 3.4 region, have been linked more to transient reductions in ship-emitted aerosols and ENSO amplification than to steady CO2 accumulation, as models underpredict such abrupt excursions without invoking unforced variability. These patterns underscore that while anthropogenic forcing contributes to long-term trends, natural variability and other external factors can dominate decadal-scale SST fluctuations, complicating causal attribution.

Discrepancies Between Models, Proxies, and Direct Measurements

Climate models from the phases 5 and 6 frequently exhibit biases in simulating sea surface temperature (SST) trends compared to direct instrumental observations, particularly in spatial patterns and regional gradients. For instance, models fail to reproduce the observed enhanced east-west SST gradients and shoaling in the tropical Pacific, with simulated trends placing observations at the edge of model ensembles. Similarly, CMIP6 models display persistent warm SST biases in the , featuring zonally oriented non-uniform patterns that deviate from satellite and buoy measurements. These discrepancies arise partly from inadequate representation of ocean-atmosphere interactions, leading models to overestimate warming in certain basins while underestimating variability in others, such as the North Pacific where trends diverge from float and reanalysis data. Proxy-based SST reconstructions, derived from sources like coral Sr/Ca ratios and alkenone (Uk37) indices, reveal inconsistencies with both direct measurements and model outputs, often due to calibration challenges and proxy-specific sensitivities. Coral proxy records show multidecadal trends that correlate weakly with instrumental SST on interannual scales because of dominant seasonal aliasing effects, inflating uncertainties in extending records backward. Detrended Holocene variability differs significantly between Mg/Ca (foraminiferal) and Uk37 proxies, with the former indicating higher amplitudes not captured in instrumental extensions or model simulations of internal variability. Multiproxy ensembles estimate greater ocean SST variability over the instrumental era than CMIP models simulate, highlighting model underestimation of natural oscillations like the . The 2023–2024 global SST jump, exceeding 0.2°C in some records and linked to El Niño but amplified beyond typical events, underscores model-observation gaps; while CMIP ensembles associate such anomalies with El Niño, the observed magnitude lies outside most unforced simulations, suggesting deficiencies in capturing abrupt transitions. Pattern effects in observed SST trends—favoring tropical over high-latitude warming—have slowed global surface warming relative to model expectations, influencing radiative feedbacks and equilibrium climate sensitivity estimates when models are forced with observed rather than simulated patterns. These mismatches persist even in higher-resolution models, which do not consistently align with the tropical Pacific warming asymmetry seen in direct measurements since the 1980s. Proxy data further challenge model assumptions of low pre-industrial variability, as paleoclimate records imply stronger zonal gradients in the tropical Pacific than late-20th-century simulations or projections.

Interactions with Earth's Climate System

Heat Fluxes and Ocean-Atmosphere Coupling

The net surface at the ocean-atmosphere interface represents the primary mechanism for energy exchange influencing sea surface temperature (SST), comprising shortwave radiation (incoming solar minus reflected), longwave radiation (outgoing thermal minus atmospheric downwelling), flux (conductive transfer driven by air-sea temperature differences), and flux (evaporative cooling tied to , gradients, and SST). Globally, shortwave radiation dominates inputs during daylight, averaging 160-200 W/m² in clear conditions but reduced by clouds and , while latent and longwave fluxes typically act as losses, with latent often exceeding 100 W/m² in windy, dry regimes. These fluxes determine SST evolution through the mixed layer heat budget, where net flux QnetQ_{net} drives temperature change via ∂SST∂t≈Qnetρcph\frac{\partial SST}{\partial t} \approx \frac{Q_{net}}{\rho c_p h}, with ρ\rho as density, cpc_p specific , and hh depth; positive QnetQ_{net} (e.g., 0.5-1 W/m² ocean-wide imbalance since the ) implies subsurface uptake and gradual SST rise, modulated by and vertical mixing. Observations from flux reanalyses, such as those integrating and buoy data, reveal regional variability: equatorial zones exhibit net cooling via enhanced latent fluxes, while subtropical gyres show radiative dominance. Ocean-atmosphere arises from bidirectional feedbacks, where SST gradients induce low-level wind convergence (e.g., via thermal wind balance) and modulate , while atmospheric variability—such as tracks or ENSO-related circulation shifts—alters fluxes through and . In midlatitudes, weakened large-scale flux feedbacks under recent warming conditions dampen SST anomalies by enhancing damping terms in sensible and latent fluxes, as warmer SSTs increase evaporative losses proportional to the Clausius-Clapeyron relation. Mesoscale , evident in western boundary currents, amplifies interactions via sharpened SST fronts that intensify heat release to the atmosphere, influencing intensity and positioning. Turbulent fluxes, comprising up to 50-70% of total exchange in extratropics, exhibit sensitivity to skin-layer effects—thin (0.1-1 mm) cool skins reducing effective SST for flux calculations by 0.2-0.5°C diurnally. Empirical estimates from coupled models and in-situ arrays (e.g., floats, flux moorings) underscore that internal variability, rather than unidirectional forcing, dominates short-term flux-SST correlations, with coupled modes like the emerging from these interactions without requiring external forcings for initiation. Uncertainties persist in bulk formula parameterizations for latent and sensible fluxes, which can bias net estimates by 10-20 W/m² regionally due to sparse and observations, highlighting the need for high-resolution coupled simulations to resolve scale-dependent feedbacks.

Influences on Atmospheric Phenomena (e.g., Tropical Cyclones, Monsoons)

Sea surface temperatures (SSTs) provide the primary energy source for through , which fuels release and sustains convective activity. Formation generally requires SSTs exceeding 26.5°C over an area of at least 50 km radius to support adequate moisture convergence and low-level . Empirical analyses confirm this threshold, though approximately 4% of documented have developed in regions with area-averaged SSTs below 26.5°C, highlighting nuances in local conditions like and atmospheric stability. Higher SSTs correlate with increased maximum potential intensity, enabling stronger winds and heavier via enhanced ocean-atmosphere heat and moisture fluxes. Observations link marine heatwaves, periods of anomalously warm SSTs, to , as elevated temperatures amplify flux and storm-scale efficiency. SST anomalies influence frequency and tracks indirectly through basin-wide patterns, such as El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), where warmer central Pacific SSTs suppress Atlantic activity by increasing . In the western North Pacific, climatological SST maxima align with peak seasons, underscoring the thermodynamic control exerted by seasonal warming. While rising global SSTs have been associated with intensified storms in some datasets, attribution to anthropogenic forcing remains contested, with internal variability and observational biases complicating long-term trends. For monsoons, meridional and zonal SST gradients drive large-scale circulation, establishing low-level convergence over landmasses during boreal summer. In the Indian monsoon system, elevated Arabian Sea SSTs enhance evaporative moisture supply, correlating with increased rainfall inevitability in pre- and post- phases. Ocean-atmosphere coupling reinforces monsoon strength; for instance, strong diurnal SST variations in the trigger onset by warming surface layers and destabilizing the atmosphere. Empirical evidence shows subtropical North Atlantic SSTs positively correlating with summer rainfall over adjacent continents, mediated by shifts in the . ENSO modulates dynamics, with El Niño-induced warm equatorial Pacific SSTs weakening the Indian summer through suppressed convection and altered , as evidenced by historical rainfall deficits during positive ENSO phases. Atlantic SST anomalies influence East Asian monsoon variability via teleconnections, where cooler tropical North Atlantic conditions favor enhanced precipitation. These interactions highlight SSTs' role in interannual predictability, though models often overestimate sensitivity due to unresolved air-sea feedbacks.

Feedback Loops and Teleconnections

Feedback loops involving sea surface temperature (SST) primarily operate through ocean-atmosphere interactions and radiative processes. Warmer SSTs enhance , increasing atmospheric —a potent —that amplifies and sustains elevated temperatures, constituting a positive feedback observed in both models and satellite data spanning 1983–2014. Cloud feedbacks linked to SST patterns further contribute, with reductions in low-level marine stratocumulus clouds over subtropical oceans allowing greater solar insolation to reach the surface, thereby elevating SSTs in a positive loop documented in eastern Pacific observations. In polar regions, SST-driven sea ice retreat exposes darker ocean surfaces, reducing and absorbing more shortwave , which perpetuates Arctic amplification as quantified by declining September sea ice extent correlating with rising local SSTs since 1979. Negative feedbacks can mitigate SST rises, such as enhanced upper-ocean stratification that limits vertical heat fluxes from deeper layers, as evidenced in coupled model simulations where increased surface warming suppresses entrainment of cooler subsurface water. Within modes like the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the Bjerknes feedback reinforces SST anomalies: anomalous equatorial Pacific warming weakens easterly , reducing and deepening the , which sustains the warm phase through 1997–1998 event analyses showing SST peaks exceeding 2°C above average. These loops exhibit nonlinearity, with stronger feedbacks during extreme SST deviations, as reconstructed from coral proxies and buoy measurements indicating amplified responses beyond linear model predictions. Teleconnections transmit SST anomalies to remote atmospheric patterns via atmospheric bridges and Rossby wave propagation. ENSO-driven SST variations in the Niño 3.4 region (5°S–5°N, 120°–170°W) excite planetary-scale waves, altering positions and over , as seen in weakened Pacific-North American (PNA) patterns during El Niño winters from 1950–2020 reanalyses. The Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV), characterized by North Atlantic SST oscillations of ~0.4°C over 60–80-year cycles, teleconnects to Sahel rainfall deficits during warm phases, with correlations exceeding 0.5 in 20th-century instrumental records linking basin-wide SSTs to meridional circulation shifts. (PDO) SST footprints modulate extratropical storm tracks, influencing East Asian monsoon intensity through altered extensions observed in 1920–2020 SST datasets. These teleconnections vary with background SST patterns; for instance, anthropogenic tropical warming gradients weaken ENSO impacts on circulation, as simulated in CMIP6 ensembles projecting 20–30% reductions in teleconnection strength by 2100 under RCP8.5 scenarios calibrated against 1979–2014 ERA5 data. Observational constraints highlight uncertainties, with cloud-SST interactions amplifying or damping signals depending on stability gradients, underscoring the need for resolved mesoscale processes in attribution studies. Empirical evidence from floats and satellite altimetry confirms that internal variability in SST, rather than solely external forcings, drives much of the interannual teleconnection strength, as quantified by variance partitioning in Pacific sector analyses.

Broader Implications and Criticisms

Ecological and Marine Life Effects

Rising sea surface temperatures (SST) have triggered extensive , with the 2023–2025 event—the fourth global-scale occurrence—impacting 83.9% of the world's areas through bleaching-level heat , as reported by NOAA Coral Reef Watch from January 2023 to May 2025. This thermal , often exceeding 1–2°C above seasonal norms, causes corals to expel symbiotic algae, compromising and leading to tissue necrosis if recovery fails, with mass mortality observed in regions like the and . Such events disrupt reef ecosystems, reducing habitat complexity and , though some coral species demonstrate resilience via adaptive symbiont shifts or genetic variation. Warmer SST drives poleward shifts in marine species distributions, with 157 fish and invertebrate populations in U.S. waters exhibiting an average northward biomass center displacement of 17 miles from 1989 to 2019, accelerating in recent decades amid SST rises of 0.1–0.2°C per decade in many basins. In the Northeast Atlantic, warm-affinity fish now comprise 64% of surveyed stocks, surpassing cold-affinity species since the late 1980s, altering community structures and predator-prey dynamics. Elevated SST also correlates with increased infectious disease prevalence in marine populations, as evidenced by associations between SST anomalies and higher mortality from pathogens, compounded by pollutants like PCBs in coastal zones. For marine mammals, including seals and cetaceans in U.S. waters, SST-driven habitat compression and prey scarcity have induced nutritional stress and range contractions, though empirical data remain limited by confounding factors like fisheries overlap. Increased SST promotes , inhibiting nutrient and reducing primary productivity by up to 20–30% in subtropical gyres since the 1980s, which cascades to lower trophic levels and fisheries yields. However, certain experience benefits from moderate warming, including shortened larval incubation periods, enhanced growth rates, and improved metabolic efficiency, enabling population expansions in suitable habitats. These heterogeneous responses underscore that while dominant effects favor thermophilic , ecosystem-wide disruptions from rapid SST variability—such as marine heatwaves—predominate, with temporal SST fluctuations linked to local extinctions of habitat-formers like .

Socioeconomic Impacts on Fisheries and Navigation

Rising sea surface temperatures (SST) have induced poleward shifts in species distributions, reducing catches of tropical and subtropical stocks while enabling expansions in temperate and polar fisheries. Empirical analyses of global fisheries data indicate that ocean warming has decreased maximum body sizes in over 60% of surveyed populations, with average reductions of 20-30% linked to metabolic constraints on growth and under elevated temperatures. In the South Atlantic, pelagic fisheries catches from 1978 to 2018 showed widespread declines correlated with SST anomalies exceeding 1°C, as warmer waters disrupted larval survival and prey availability for large predators like tunas. However, regional variability persists; logarithmic models of SST effects in the Australian predict catch increases for certain demersal species due to enhanced metabolic rates up to thermal optima, though exceeding these thresholds risks abrupt collapses. These shifts have socioeconomic consequences, including revenue losses estimated at 15-35% in equatorial fisheries over the past eight decades, disproportionately affecting small-scale operators in developing nations reliant on nearshore stocks. High SST extremes exacerbate these impacts, projecting net global fisheries revenue declines of up to 30% by mid-century in vulnerable regions, compounded by reduced stock from amplified stress. For navigation, elevated SST contributes to Arctic sea ice thinning by enhancing heat fluxes into the ice base, extending ice-free periods and facilitating trans-Arctic shipping routes such as the , which shortened transit times from to by up to 40% during low-ice summers of 2012-2020 compared to Suez Canal alternatives. This has boosted commercial traffic, with vessel transits increasing from 34 in 2013 to over 100 annually by 2023, yielding fuel savings of 20-30% per voyage. Conversely, warmer SST intensifies formation and strength by providing higher for storm development, elevating wave heights and wind speeds that damage shipping ; for instance, SST anomalies above 28°C correlated with a 10-15% rise in cyclone intensity in the North Atlantic since 1980, disrupting routes and causing delays or hull stresses. In the Arctic, reduced ice cover heightens navigational risks from multiyear ice remnants, erratic currents driven by altered , and increased fog from open water evaporation, necessitating advanced ice-class vessels and raising insurance premiums by 5-10% for polar operations. Overall, while new routes offer efficiency gains, unmitigated SST-driven weather variability poses cascading risks to global maritime safety and logistics, with projected increases in extreme event frequency potentially offsetting distance savings through higher operational costs.

Critiques of Alarmist Narratives and Policy Overreach

Critics argue that narratives portraying sea surface temperature (SST) rise as an unequivocal harbinger of catastrophe driven primarily by anthropogenic gases overlook substantial natural variability, including oscillations such as the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), (AMO), and (PDO), which have modulated recent anomalies. For instance, the record global SSTs observed from April 2023 onward coincided with a strong El Niño event, a pattern replicated in climate models only during such natural phases rather than as a direct linear response to cumulative CO2 forcing. This variability contributed to the 1998–2013 slowdown in global surface warming, including SST, where the rate dropped to near zero despite rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations, a period termed the "hiatus" that models largely failed to anticipate without invoking internal dynamics or pattern effects in warming distribution. SST datasets themselves face scrutiny for potential biases from historical measurement transitions, such as from canvas buckets to engine-room intakes and modern buoys, which may inflate recent trends by underestimating past temperatures. Independent analyses using instrumentally homogeneous indicate post-1970 warming rates of approximately 0.11°C per , slower than some adjusted datasets suggest, while revisions to early-20th-century estimates reveal prior SSTs were likely warmer than previously assumed, reducing the implied centennial trend. These issues compound model discrepancies, where simulations often overestimate tropical SST responses due to excessive equilibrium , leading to projections of amplified extremes like marine heatwaves that empirical data do not consistently support as unprecedented when normalized for natural cycles. Such narratives underpin policies presuming SST-driven tipping points necessitate immediate, stringent interventions like net-zero emissions targets, yet the attributable anthropogenic fraction in short-term SST fluctuations remains contested, with natural forcings explaining much of the variance in regional hotspots. Economic assessments highlight that strategies framed around averting SST-related risks, such as enhanced coastal defenses or subsidies, frequently yield costs exceeding modeled benefits, particularly when discounting future uncertainties and ignoring adaptive capacities that have historically mitigated ocean-linked impacts without radical decarbonization. For example, claims linking SST rise to surging intensity lack observational backing, as global has not trended upward despite multidecadal warming, undermining justifications for policies with trillions in projected abatement expenses. Critics contend this overreach diverts resources from verifiable resilience measures, prioritizing speculative SST scenarios over empirically grounded cost-benefit evaluations that account for internal variability.

References

  1. https://ecowatch.noaa.gov/thematic/sea-surface-temperature
  2. https://www.eoportal.org/other-space-activities/sea-surface-temperature
  3. https://www.remss.com/measurements/sea-surface-temperature/
  4. https://www.climate.gov/maps-data/data-snapshots/data-source/sst-sea-surface-temperature
  5. https://science.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/earth/explore/earth-indicators/ocean-warming/
  6. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sea-surface-temperature.html
  7. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2025JC022862
  8. https://oceanacidification.noaa.gov/oap_pubs/an-overview-of-ocean-climate-change-indicators-sea-surface-temperature-ocean-heat-content-ocean-ph-dissolved-oxygen-concentration-arctic-sea-ice-extent-thickness-and-volume-sea-level-and-streng/
  9. https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/research_highlight/crucial-role-of-sea-surface-temperature-warming-patterns-in-near-term-high-impact-weather-and-climate-projection/
  10. https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-sea-surface-temperature
  11. https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/SeaSurfaceTemperature
  12. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atot/40/4/JTECH-D-22-0081.1.xml
  13. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017jc012688
  14. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atot/37/1/jtech-d-19-0161.1.xml
  15. https://climate.copernicus.eu/climate-indicators/sea-surface-temperature
  16. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-06/sea-surface-temp_documentation.pdf
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425719303852
  18. https://gcos.wmo.int/site/global-climate-observing-system-gcos/essential-climate-variables/sea-surface-temperature
  19. https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/resources/atbd/sst/
  20. https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/30008/
  21. http://www.atmo.arizona.edu/~brunke/html_work/research/skin.html
  22. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jgrd.50786
  23. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990JGR....9513341S/abstract
  24. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020JC016498
  25. https://pure.psu.edu/en/publications/cool-skin-and-warm-layer-effects-on-sea-surface-temperature
  26. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/33/18/jcliD190972.xml
  27. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017GL076475
  28. https://os.copernicus.org/articles/9/683/2013/os-9-683-2013.pdf
  29. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/32/9/jcli-d-18-0562.1.xml
  30. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.3078
  31. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/34/11/JCLI-D-20-0907.1.xml
  32. https://phuybers.sites.fas.harvard.edu/Doc/Chan_JofC2020.pdf
  33. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-content/monitoring-references/docs/smith-reynolds-2002.pdf
  34. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-marine-042120-111807
  35. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08230-1
  36. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2025GL116615
  37. https://www.atmos.colostate.edu/~davet/ao/ThompsonPapers/DavisThompsonKennedyKent_BAMS2019.pdf
  38. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/43907/noaa_43907_DS1.pdf
  39. https://www.oceanobservers.org/Learn-about-observing-the-ocean/Ship-based-measurements-SOT
  40. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2019.00434/full
  41. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2013RG000434
  42. https://www.ukargo.net/knowledge_transfer/uk_data_applications/understanding_sst/
  43. https://argo.ucsd.edu/
  44. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1025872/
  45. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-024-03147-w
  46. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/14/2241
  47. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/extended-reconstructed-sst
  48. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/30/20/jcli-d-16-0836.1.xml
  49. https://hadleyserver.metoffice.gov.uk/hadsst4/documentation/HadSST.4.0.1.0_product_user_guide.pdf
  50. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/28/3/jcli-d-14-00006.1.xml
  51. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/33/4/jcli-d-19-0395.1.xml
  52. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/100/4/bams-d-18-0104.1.xml
  53. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2010JD015220
  54. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/enso/
  55. https://psl.noaa.gov/enso/
  56. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/pdo/
  57. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/29/12/jcli-d-15-0508.1.xml
  58. https://psl.noaa.gov/pdo/
  59. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-marine-040422-084555
  60. https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/atlantic-multi-decadal-oscillation-amo
  61. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006GL026242
  62. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017GL072524
  63. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep40861
  64. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/35/12/JCLI-D-21-0603.1.xml
  65. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/36/15/JCLI-D-22-0545.1.xml
  66. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024JC021075
  67. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1543177/full
  68. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/4/628
  69. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-024-01391-8
  70. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-33057-y
  71. https://rainbow.ldeo.columbia.edu/~alexeyk/Papers/KentKennedy2021.pdf
  72. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014pa002717
  73. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014166117
  74. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0530-7
  75. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2021PA004291
  76. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-021-01043-1
  77. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JC012079
  78. https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/sst-data-hadsst3
  79. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.642372/full
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6033150/
  81. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/94JD00548
  82. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/12/5/1520-0442_1999_012_1257_idiagw_2.0.co_2.xml
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2752544/
  84. https://judithcurry.com/2011/06/29/critique-of-the-hadsst3-uncertainty-analysis/
  85. https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.noaa.ersst.v5.html
  86. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024GL108369
  87. https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/international-report-confirms-record-high-global-temperatures-greenhouse-gases-in-2023
  88. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series
  89. https://climate.copernicus.eu/global-climate-highlights-2024
  90. https://www.ecmwf.int/en/about/media-centre/news/2025/2024-was-warmest-year-record-copernicus-data-show
  91. https://climate.copernicus.eu/copernicus-third-warmest-september-record-amid-persistently-high-ocean-temperature
  92. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08674-z
  93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222414210_Empirical_analysis_of_the_solar_contribution_to_global_mean_air_surface_temperature_change
  94. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1165386/full
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0377027389900814
  96. https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/hunga-volcano-eruption-cooled-southern-hemisphere
  97. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/effect-of-volcanic-eruptions-significantly-underestimated-in-climate-projections
  98. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021GL095023
  99. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abc5810
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8319337/
  101. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AGUFMGC32E..08K/abstract
  102. https://scitechdaily.com/new-ocean-data-shakes-up-our-understanding-of-climate-change/
  103. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-019-0075-7
  104. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2005GL025622
  105. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/16/24/1520-0442_2003_016_4094_vasfoc_2.0.co_2.xml
  106. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-48381-3
  107. https://psl.noaa.gov/people/amy.solomon/pubs/DPWG_submitted2BAMS_6Nov09.pdf
  108. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/35/14/JCLI-D-21-0648.1.xml
  109. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-023-00456-6
  110. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024GL113561
  111. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/23/5/2009jcli2386.1.xml
  112. https://phuybers.sites.fas.harvard.edu/Doc/Laepple_EPSL2013.pdf
  113. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1412077111
  114. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2312093121
  115. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/38/13/JCLI-D-24-0248.1.xml
  116. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02039-0
  117. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.612361/full
  118. https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/pubs/outstand/haye1160/haye1160.shtml
  119. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017jc013137
  120. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/33/17/jcliD190642.xml
  121. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54394-9
  122. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11372042/
  123. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1136558/full
  124. https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/17/5145/2024/
  125. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/53777/noaa_53777_DS1.pdf
  126. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/64686/noaa_64686_DS1.pdf
  127. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169809522002009
  128. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/28/20/jcli-d-14-00637.1.xml
  129. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/96/11/bams-d-13-00254.1.xml
  130. https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/18/795/2018/
  131. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01239-4
  132. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021GL096712
  133. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1002/joc.6348
  134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9636401/
  135. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377026524000502
  136. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023GL108015
  137. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/eint/20/6/ei-d-15-0028.1.xml
  138. http://www.cms1924.org/Attachment/Doc/1165911204.pdf
  139. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/36/2/JCLI-D-22-0061.1.xml
  140. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00382-018-4489-4
  141. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8325336/
  142. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/35/24/JCLI-D-21-0405.1.xml
  143. https://globalocean.noaa.gov/the-ocean/ocean-heat/
  144. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/73/8/jas-d-15-0287.1.xml
  145. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017rg000568
  146. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/55139
  147. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/what-are-teleconnections-connecting-earths-climate-patterns-global
  148. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/36/6/JCLI-D-22-0275.1.xml
  149. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-024-00608-2
  150. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/37/16/JCLI-D-23-0562.1.xml
  151. https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/noaa-confirms-4th-global-coral-bleaching-event
  152. https://reefbites.com/2025/10/21/the-fourth-global-coral-bleaching-event-where-do-we-go-from-here/
  153. https://www.aims.gov.au/research-topics/environmental-issues/coral-bleaching/coral-bleaching-events
  154. https://icriforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/08_shams_bleaching_alert_25August2025_English.pdf
  155. https://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13750-024-00349-y
  156. https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-marine-species-distribution
  157. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/changes-in-fish-distribution-in
  158. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-025-07858-7
  159. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666900522000077
  160. https://www.unh.edu/inquiryjournal/blog/2021/11/exploring-sea-surface-temperatures-effect-global-ocean-productivity-our-changing-climate
  161. https://www2.gbrmpa.gov.au/learn/threats/sea-temperature
  162. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11190259/
  163. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-49459-8
  164. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12383501/
  165. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abh0895
  166. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-53308-5
  167. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213305424000225
  168. https://britanniapandi.com/2025/01/climate-change-climate-change-severe-weather-and-its-impact-on-shipping-risks/
  169. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018GL081397
  170. https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/variables/ocean/sst-sea-surface-temperature
  171. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6686362/
  172. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1601207
  173. https://judithcurry.com/2017/01/04/focus-on-sea-surface-temperatures/
  174. https://www.americanactionforum.org/research/comparing-the-benefits-and-costs-of-notable-climate-policies/
  175. https://cei.org/blog/former-gov-christie-todd-whitman-partisan-of-epa-overreach/
  176. https://judithcurry.com/2025/05/07/a-critique-of-the-apocalyptic-climate-narrative/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.