Hubbry Logo
Zond 5Zond 5Main
Open search
Zond 5
Community hub
Zond 5
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Zond 5
Zond 5
Zond 5
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Zond 5
Computer model of a Zond circumlunar spacecraft
NamesSoyuz 7K-L1 s/n 9
Mission type
  • Lunar flyby
  • Spacecraft test
OperatorOKB-1
COSPAR ID1968-076A[1]
SATCAT no.3394[1]
Mission duration6 days, 18 hours, 24 minutes
Spacecraft properties
BusSoyuz 7K-L1
ManufacturerOKB-1
Launch mass5,375 kilograms (11,850 lb)[2]
Start of mission
Launch date14 September 1968, 21:42:11 (1968-09-14UTC21:42:11Z) UTC[2]
RocketProton-K/D
Launch siteBaikonur 81
End of mission
Recovered bySoviet vessels Borovichy and Vasiliy Golovin
Landing date21 September 1968 (1968-09-21) 16:08 UT[3]
Landing site
Orbital parameters
Reference systemGeocentric
RegimeLow Earth
Semi-major axis6,613 kilometres (4,109 mi)
Eccentricity0.00604
Perigee altitude202 kilometres (126 mi)
Apogee altitude282 kilometres (175 mi)
Inclination51.83°
Period89.29 minutes
Epoch13 September 1968
Flyby of Moon
Closest approach18 September 1968
Distance1,950 km (1,210 mi)

Zond 5 (Russian: Зонд 5, lit. 'Probe 5') was a spacecraft of the Soviet Zond program. In September 1968 it became the first spaceship to travel to and circle the Moon in a circumlunar trajectory, the first Moon mission to include animals, and the first to return safely to Earth. Zond 5 carried the first terrestrial organisms to the vicinity of the Moon, including two Russian tortoises, fruit fly eggs, and plants.[5] The tortoises underwent biological changes during the flight, but it was concluded that the changes were primarily due to starvation and that they were little affected by space travel.

The Zond spacecraft was a version of the Soyuz 7K-L1 crewed lunar-flyby spacecraft. It was launched by a Proton-K carrier rocket with a Block D upper-stage to conduct scientific studies during its lunar flyby.

Background

[edit]

Out of the first four circumlunar missions launched by the Soviet Union there was one partial success, Zond 4, and three failures.[6] After Zond 4's mission in March 1968, a follow-up, Zond 1968A, was launched on 23 April. The launch failed when an erroneous abort command shut down the Proton rocket's second stage. The escape rocket fired and pulled the descent module to safety.[7][8] In July, Zond 1968B was being prepared for launch when the Block D second-stage rocket exploded on the launchpad, killing three people, but leaving the Proton first-stage booster rocket and the spacecraft itself with only minor damage.[9]

The Zond 5 mission was originally planned to fly cosmonauts around the Moon, but the failures of Zond 1968A and Zond 1968B led the Soviets to send an uncrewed mission instead, from fear of the negative propaganda of an unsuccessful crewed flight.[10]

Payload

[edit]

Two Russian tortoises (Agrionemys horsfieldii) were included in the biological payload, weighing 0.34–0.4 kilograms (0.75–0.88 lb) each pre-flight.[11] Along with the tortoises, insects and micro-organisms were part of the crew.[12] Soviet scientists chose tortoises since they were easy to tightly secure. There were also two tortoises used as control specimens and four more in a vivarium. Twelve days before launch, the two space-bound tortoises were secured in the vehicle and deprived of food and water; the control tortoises were similarly deprived.[11] The food deprivation was a part of pathomorphological and histochemical experiments.[13] The biological payload also included fruit fly eggs; cells of wheat, barley, pea, pine, carrots and tomatoes; specimens of the wildflower species Tradescantia paludosa; three strains of the single-celled green algae Chlorella; and one strain of lysogenic bacteria.[13][14] The purpose of sending a variety of terrestrial lifeforms was to test the effect of cosmic radiation on them.[15] However, the test subjects were not analogous to humans, because the choice of life forms were all extremophiles with a substantially higher radioresistance.[16][17][18] The Russian Academy of Sciences stated that a mannequin equipped with radiation sensors occupied the pilot's seat.[1]

Kazan Optical and Mechanical Plant had developed the AFA-BA/40 imager, which was installed on the spacecraft, giving it the ability to image the Earth.[10][19] Zond 5 also contained proton detectors.[20] Zond 5 could transmit some of its data back to ground stations, although data stored onboard and collected after return to Earth has less noise.[21]

Mission

[edit]

Launch and trajectory

[edit]

Zond 5 launched on 14 September 1968 at 21:42.10 UTC, from Site 81 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome. The thrust of the third-stage rocket was terminated at 160 kilometres (99 mi), which was the start of a 251-second coast. Block D, the upper-stage rocket, ignited and burned for 108 seconds, placing the spacecraft into a parking orbit of 191 by 219 kilometres (119 mi × 136 mi). Fifty-six minutes into the parking orbit the Block D fired a final time for the trans-lunar injection.[10] After this maneuver, the launch was announced to the world.[13] Mission Control discovered a problem with Zond 5's attitude and traced the cause to a contaminated star tracker. Heat caused some of the interior coating to outgas,[22] which delayed an attitude correction on the way to the Moon. The maneuver was performed 325,000 kilometres (202,000 mi) from Earth using the Sun and the Earth as reference points.[10]

On 18 September, the spacecraft flew around the Moon, although it did not orbit it.[14] The closest distance was 1,950 kilometres (1,210 mi).[1] On the way back from the Moon, another star tracker failed. The spacecraft also erroneously switched off the guided reentry system.[22] Eight ships were deployed to the Indian Ocean prior to launch, as a precaution in case the spacecraft could not reach Soviet territory; only three of them had rescue helicopters on board.[10]

Reentry and recovery

[edit]
Zond 5 is located in Indian Ocean
Zond 5
class=notpageimage|
Zond 5's splashdown location

On 21 September, the reentry capsule entered the Earth's atmosphere.[23] The primary landing zone was in Kazakhstan, but instead Zond 5 splashed down in the Indian Ocean and was recovered by the Soviet vessels Borovichy (Боровичи) and Vasiliy Golovnin (Василий Головнин).[24][25] It landed at 32°38′S 65°33′E / 32.633°S 65.550°E / -32.633; 65.550,[26] 105 kilometres (65 mi) from the nearest Soviet naval ship. The landing occurred at night, which impaired recovery efforts.[27]

Zond 5 became the first spacecraft to circle the Moon and return to Earth. The entire journey took 6 days, 18 hours and 24 minutes.[28] The biological specimens were safely recovered.[1] USS McMorris shadowed the Soviet recovery ships, collecting intelligence,[29] but left shortly after the spacecraft was brought on board the Soviet ship.[27]

Results and future plans

[edit]
1969 USSR stamp of Zond 5

High-quality photographs of the Earth, the first photos of their kind,[30] were taken at a distance of 90,000 kilometres (56,000 mi).[1] British astronomer Bernard Lovell, considered to be Britain's top space expert, said that the Zond 5 mission showed that the Soviets were ahead in the Space Race. The British Interplanetary Society believed that the USSR would be able to send cosmonauts around the Moon within a matter of months.[31]

In October 1968, sources in the U.S. claimed the mission was not as successful as the Soviets advertised. The mission had been intended to fly closer to the Moon, and its actual distance did not allow for useful lunar photography. They also said that the angle at which the spacecraft reentered the atmosphere was too steep for a cosmonaut to survive. The sources indicated that the spacecraft landed in the Indian Ocean when the planned location was in Soviet territory, which was a factor in the recovery taking ten hours.[32]

The official Soviet news agency, TASS, announced in November 1968 that the flight carried living animals. The tortoises were dissected on 11 October after fasting for 39 days. The flying tortoises, identified as No. 22 and No. 37, had lost 10% of their body weight during the trip, but showed no loss of appetite.[33] The control tortoises lost 5% of their weight. Comparison of analyses of blood from the space-travelling tortoises and the control specimens revealed no differences. Another analysis showed the flying tortoises had elevated iron and glycogen levels in their liver and that the flight also affected the internal structures of their spleens.[15] The authors concluded that the changes in the flight tortoises were primarily due to starvation, with the space travel having little effect.[34] In November 1968, it was announced that the spacecraft was planned as a precursor to a crewed lunar spacecraft. The Soviets made this announcement a month before the planned Apollo 8 flight, in an attempt to show they were close to being able to carry out a crewed trip to the Moon.[35][36]

Cosmonaut crew communications test and hoax

[edit]

The Zond 5 caused a scare in the United States when on 19 September 1968, the voices of cosmonauts Valery Bykovsky, Vitaly Sevastyanov and Pavel Popovich were transmitted from the spacecraft and intercepted by Jodrell Bank Observatory and the CIA.[37][38] The cosmonauts were apparently reading out telemetry data and computer readings, and even discussing making an attempt to land. At the height of the Cold War, there was a real concern that the Soviets might actually beat NASA to the Moon. Apollo 17 astronaut Eugene Cernan remarked that the incident had "shocked the hell out of us."[39]

Popovich would later recall: "When we realized we would never make it to the moon, we decided to engage in a little bit of hooliganism. We asked our engineers to link the on-the-probe receiver to the transmitter with a jumper wire. Moon flight missions were then controlled from a command centre in Yevpatoria, in the Crimea. When the probe was on its path round the Moon, I was at the center. So I took the mic and said: "The flight is proceeding according to normal; we’re approaching the surface..." Seconds later my report – as if from outer space – was received on Earth, including [by] the Americans. The U.S. space advisor Frank Borman got a phone call from President Nixon [actually Johnson], who asked: 'Why is Popovich reporting from the moon?' My joke caused real turmoil. In about a month's time. Frank came to the USSR, and I was instructed to meet him at the airport. Hardly had he walked out of his plane when he shook his fist at me and said: 'Hey, you, space hooligan!'"[40]

Location

[edit]

The Zond 5 capsule is on display at the RKK Energiya museum, located in Moscow Oblast, Russia.[41]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Zond 5

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Zond 5 was an uncrewed Soviet spacecraft launched on 14 September 1968 from the that achieved the first successful circumlunar flight with return, circumnavigating the on 18 September before splashing down in the on 21 September. The mission carried a biological payload consisting of two Russian steppe , along with wine flies, plants, seeds, , and other organisms to test survival in space radiation and microgravity during the lunar loop. The , the first terrestrial animals to orbit another celestial body and return alive, endured the journey but lost approximately 10% of their body weight due to dehydration and reduced feeding. As a derivative of the Soyuz spacecraft with modifications for deep-space operations, including removal of the orbital module and addition of a high-gain antenna, Zond 5 served as a precursor to planned manned circumlunar missions amid the Space Race competition with the United States. The flight validated translunar injection, mid-course corrections, and reentry from lunar distance, though guidance errors during atmospheric entry caused it to skip the intended Kazakh landing zone, necessitating recovery by Soviet ships in the ocean. Despite these anomalies, the mission's success in returning viable biological specimens underscored Soviet capabilities in unmanned lunar exploration just months before NASA's Apollo 8 crewed circumlunar flight.

Historical Context

Soviet Lunar Ambitions

The Soviet Union's lunar ambitions intensified after the 1957 launch of , which established its early lead in the and prompted a drive for further prestige-enhancing achievements, including manned missions to the Moon to counter the ' Apollo program announced by President Kennedy in 1961. , as chief designer, advocated for a phased approach beginning with circumlunar flights using modified Soyuz-derived spacecraft launched atop the Proton (UR-500) rocket, viewing these as essential tests for systems integral to eventual lunar landings while offering a quicker path to symbolic victory. Political leadership under prioritized such high-profile projects, allocating substantial resources to develop heavy-lift vehicles like the UR-500, originally conceived as an ICBM but adapted for space applications; Khrushchev personally inspected a full-scale on September 24, 1964, reflecting the regime's emphasis on demonstrating Soviet engineering prowess amid competition. Following Khrushchev's removal in October 1964, Leonid Brezhnev's administration sustained funding for these efforts, including parallel programs by design bureaus under Korolev (for lunar lander) and (for Proton-based circumlunar), amid empirical pressures from U.S. progress. The April 23, 1967, Soyuz 1 mission disaster, in which cosmonaut perished due to parachute failure and other systemic flaws during reentry, exposed critical reliability gaps in Soviet manned spacecraft and delayed Earth-orbit rendezvous testing essential for lunar landing architectures, causally shifting emphasis toward circumlunar flights as a lower-risk alternative to achieve a manned lunar milestone before Apollo's anticipated success. This pivot was evidenced by accelerated attempts in late 1967, prioritizing direct-launch circumlunar trajectories over complex docking maneuvers.

Development of the Zond Program

The , officially designated as the 7K-L1 project, originated as a derivative of the spacecraft developed by Sergei Korolev's OKB-1 design bureau, with development authorized under Soviet decrees dated August 3, 1964, and October 25, 1965. Intended for manned circumlunar flyby missions using a , the 7K-L1 adapted the baseline Soyuz design by removing the forward habitation module and reserve parachute to reduce launch mass to approximately 5,390 kilograms, enabling compatibility with the Proton (UR-500K) . This mass optimization was critical for achieving the necessary velocity for without exceeding the Proton's payload capacity of around 20 tons to . Engineering adaptations emphasized reliability in deep space, where communication delays of up to 2.5 seconds one-way precluded real-time ground intervention, necessitating passive margins and autonomous . The incorporated the KTDU-53 for mid-course corrections, an enhanced capable of withstanding reentry at second cosmic velocity (approximately 11 km/s), and the Argon-11S onboard computer for flight control. A side entrance hatch replaced the removed components, while the service module retained attitude control thrusters optimized for the extended uncrewed coast phases inherent to the free-return profile, which relied on precise lunar for Earth return without additional burns. The emergency escape (SAS) was upgraded to handle Proton booster failures, demonstrated in subsequent tests. Integration of the Block D upper stage, derived from the lunar program's design with minimal modifications (mass 13,360 kg, thrust 8,500 kgf), enabled from a suborbital via a 160-second burn, as approved in specifications dated December 31, 1965. This stage's of 349 seconds provided the delta-v required for the circumlunar loop, marking an iterative evolution from earlier Soyuz orbital configurations toward verifiable deep-space telemetry prioritization over crew-intensive operations. Development proceeded through ground testing and uncrewed prototypes, with initial flight validation in 1967, incorporating lessons from ascent anomalies to refine guidance and reentry profiles for human-rated margins.

Preceding Test Flights

The initial test flights of the Zond program in 1967 encountered significant challenges with the Proton launch vehicle's reliability. On March 10, 1967, Kosmos 146, designated as Soyuz 7K-L1 No. 2P, was launched to validate core systems of the L1 circumlunar spacecraft in Earth orbit, achieving a high-elliptical trajectory after Block D upper stage ignition but failing to demonstrate full reentry capability due to inadequate thermal protection and attitude control limitations during descent simulation. Subsequent attempts highlighted propulsion instabilities; Zond 1967A, launched on September 27, 1967, suffered a first-stage engine malfunction in the Proton booster approximately 90 seconds after liftoff, resulting in vehicle destruction and no orbital insertion. Zond 1967B, attempted on November 22, 1967, progressed further but experienced a second-stage shutdown due to guidance system errors, causing the stack to crash downrange without achieving orbit. These launch failures underscored empirical bottlenecks in Proton stage separation, engine throttling, and inertial guidance accuracy, which were traced to vibration-induced wiring faults and premature oxidizer depletion rather than design flaws alone. Kosmos 158, launched in early as another uncrewed L1 variant, served as a by simulating reentry profiles from elliptical orbits but exposed critical heating issues: the service module's thermal shielding ablated unevenly under high dynamic pressures, leading to structural stress and partial sensor failures during atmospheric interface at speeds exceeding 11 km/s. Data from these missions revealed that shallow-angle reentries were essential to distribute heat loads, prompting causal refinements in ablative material thickness and programming to mitigate peak g-forces and plasma sheath interference with communications. The accumulated from these partial successes directly informed Zond 5's engineering upgrades, including a bolstered with enhanced charring resistance and refined midcourse corrections to ensure a lifting reentry averaging 7-9 g, empirically resolving the overheating and control losses observed in predecessors without reliance on unverified simulations.

Mission Design and Objectives

Spacecraft Modifications

The Zond 5 spacecraft utilized the configuration, a derivative of the with the forward orbital module deleted to minimize mass for circumlunar trajectories, reducing the gross mass to approximately 5,680 kg while enabling launch via Proton rocket with Block D upper stage. This structural simplification replaced the habitation section with a high-gain antenna and dedicated hardware, prioritizing endurance over extended orbital residency. The descent module mass stood at 2,046 kg, with modifications including removal of the reserve parachute and addition of a side exit hatch to facilitate recovery adaptations. Propulsion centered on the service module's KTDU-53 main engine, delivering 4.17 kN thrust using and UDMH propellants for trajectory corrections, complemented by URMD attitude control thrusters and four canted nozzles for pitch and yaw stability. These systems supported midcourse maneuvers essential for free-return paths, balancing fuel mass against the need for precise deep-space adjustments without over-reliance on ground intervention. Avionics featured celestial navigation via 100K star trackers, 99K solar sensors, and 101K Earth-seeking sensors, enabling autonomous orientation despite vulnerabilities like sensor contamination. Life support provisions accommodated a 7-day mission with 4 m³ habitable volume, incorporating radiation shielding sufficient for Van Allen belt traversal and lunar flyby altitudes of 1,950 km, reflecting engineering trade-offs favoring biological viability and crew survivability in unproven cosmic ray environments. An upgraded launch escape system enhanced reliability during ascent, underscoring mass reductions that improved overall propulsion efficiency for the 5,375 kg payload class.

Biological and Scientific Payload

The Zond 5 spacecraft carried a biological payload consisting primarily of two Russian steppe tortoises (Testudo horsfieldii), selected as proxies for assessing the effects of prolonged weightlessness, cosmic radiation, and reentry g-forces on living organisms due to their ability to enter a dormant state with minimal metabolic requirements. Additional specimens included fruit fly eggs (Drosophila melanogaster), mealworms (Tenebrio molitor larvae), and cultures of bacteria, chosen for their resilience to radiation and utility in studying genetic damage and microbial survival in space environments. Plant-based experiments featured specimens of (spiderwort), along with seeds from , , peas, pine, carrots, and tomatoes, intended to evaluate cellular responses to and microgravity, leveraging the plants' rapid growth cycles and sensitivity to chromosomal aberrations as indicators of environmental stressors. These selections prioritized organisms capable of or high tolerance to , reflecting Soviet priorities for testing human-relevant physiological tolerances without employing higher mammals, which were logistically challenging for circumlunar missions. Scientific instruments supporting the payload included radiation dosimeters to quantify and solar particle exposure across the spacecraft's compartments, micrometeoroid detectors to measure impact fluxes and penetration risks to biological shielding, and color television cameras configured for imaging and the to provide contextual environmental data during the flight. These devices were integrated to collect empirical data on levels (potentially exceeding hundreds of rads in Van Allen belts and beyond) and particulate hazards, directly correlating measurements with specimen viability to inform manned precursor assessments.

Engineering Goals for Manned Precursor

The primary engineering objective of Zond 5 was to validate the spacecraft's capability for safe reentry from a translunar trajectory, simulating conditions for a two-cosmonaut by demonstrating ballistic reentry at approximately 11 km/s with a perigee of 35-45 km. This included confirming the integrity of the modified , adapted from the Soyuz design with an added launch escape tower, during aerodynamic braking to ensure survivability for human occupants returning from . Recovery protocols were tested through planned and retrieval by Soviet naval vessels, aiming to establish procedures for precise post-flight assessment and potential crew extraction. Biological payloads served as analogs for cosmonaut health impacts, with experiments on tortoises, wine flies, mealworms, , seeds, and to measure effects of cosmic , microgravity, and the full mission duration on , including post-flight analysis of and physiological stress. Earth photography, captured at distances up to 85,000 km using Earth-Sun orientation for corrections, provided proof-of-concept for onboard navigation aids essential to crewed operations. These goals positioned Zond 5 as the critical unmanned testbed to bridge to manned flights on subsequent Zond 6-8 missions, rehearsing the automated flight profile while identifying gaps in radiation protection and reentry skip maneuvers required for human-rated reliability, though full crewed feasibility demanded further refinements beyond unmanned success. The mission's design emphasized causal linkages between translunar dynamics, thermal protection, and biological resilience to inform scalable human spaceflight engineering.

Launch and Circum lunar Flight

Launch from Baikonur

Zond 5 lifted off from Site 81 at the (Tyuratam) on September 14, 1968, at 21:42 UTC aboard a launch vehicle augmented by a Block D upper stage. The Proton-K's first three stages performed nominally, achieving separation of the third stage at T+589 seconds and inserting the Block D/Zond stack into an initial at approximately 161-192 km altitude. The , with a launch of approximately 5,375 kg, underwent verification of initial parameters, including attitude control and readiness, during the roughly 56-minute coast phase in . The Block D stage then ignited to provide the translunar injection velocity increment of about 2.7 km/s, confirming the launch sequence's success in escaping Earth's influence for the . Pre-launch preparations addressed prior Proton reliability issues, including a July 1968 Block D stage explosion on the pad that had damaged infrastructure but spared the spacecraft assembly; extensive testing and weather conditions—clear skies and favorable winds at —enabled the go-ahead despite these historical setbacks. Post-liftoff tracking stations reported stable signal acquisition, validating the empirical dynamics of ascent and injection phases without anomalies.

Trajectory and Lunar Flyby

Zond 5 was inserted into a free-return following by the Proton launch vehicle's Block D upper stage, which ignited 56 minutes after orbital insertion to propel the toward the . This , spanning approximately 384,000 kilometers, was designed to utilize the 's gravitational influence for a passive return to without requiring additional propulsion for the outbound or initial inbound legs. En route, the executed midcourse corrections using its KDU-414 propulsion system to refine the path: the first maneuver occurred on September 17, 1968, at roughly 325,000 km from , followed by a second at about 143,000 km outbound. These adjustments, performed with small thrusters for precise attitude and changes, compensated for any deviations from the nominal free-return profile, ensuring the required perigee for lunar encounter. On September 18, 1968, after a three-day transit, Zond 5 achieved closest approach at 1,950–1,960 km altitude over the Moon's farside, passing without orbital insertion and relying solely on gravitational for trajectory reversal toward . The flyby geometry, planned to avoid direct impact while enabling from the lunar vicinity, demonstrated the viability of uncrewed circumlunar under real interplanetary conditions.

In-Flight Operations and Data Collection

Following launch on September 15, 1968, Zond 5's in-flight operations were managed through continuous monitoring by the Soviet deep space tracking network, including ground stations such as NIP-16 in , which facilitated 36 communication sessions throughout the mission. data relayed real-time spacecraft status, including , attitude, and environmental parameters, though communication quality was compromised by a high-gain antenna misalignment stemming from a pre-flight error. A mid-course correction maneuver was executed on at approximately 325,000 km from using the KDU-414 main engine to refine the trajectory toward the , with an initial attempt aborted due to orientation issues. Attitude control during transit relied on Earth-Sun sensors after the primary failed from optical contamination, enabling autonomous corrections for minor deviations; additionally, a stalled pitch axis motor was addressed via improvised braking pulses from URMD attitude thrusters over 20 hours. Data collection included photographic of from a distance of about 90,000 km using the AFA-BA/40 camera, with images successfully transmitted back to ground stations prior to lunar flyby. The biological compartment operated as a closed-loop , maintaining controlled atmospheric conditions, temperature, and for the and other organisms via onboard regenerative mechanisms, with confirming nominal parameters during outbound transit. A second mid-course correction at 143,000 km further adjusted the return trajectory, ensuring alignment for reentry while gathering cosmic radiation and data en route.

Reentry and Recovery Operations

Reentry Maneuvers

On , 1968, Zond 5 initiated its deorbit sequence after the failure of its primary KDU midcourse correction engine, which had been intended for the precise retrofire burn. Instead, mission controllers improvised by firing the URMD attitude control thrusters intermittently over approximately 20 hours to gradually reduce velocity and lower perigee to 35-45 km, enabling atmospheric interface. This extended maneuver compensated for the lack of the more powerful engine but resulted in a steeper entry trajectory than originally planned for a lifting reentry profile, which was designed to extend deceleration and limit peak loads for future manned flights. The spacecraft entered Earth's atmosphere at 15:54 GMT on a direct ballistic path, forgoing the intended skip maneuver that would have involved controlled bounces off the upper atmosphere to dissipate energy more gradually. Peak deceleration reached approximately 16 g, exceeding 10 g for much of the high-heat phase, conditions deemed intolerable for human crews but survivable for the biological . Atmospheric heating peaked near 10,000°C at the heat shield's , with ablative material charring and eroding as designed to dissipate thermal loads, though indicated localized uneven due to the unanticipated entry angle. These maneuvers validated the reentry vehicle's structural integrity under off-nominal ballistic conditions, providing critical data on g-tolerance for and other organisms exposed to prolonged overloads, while highlighting limitations in for engine-out scenarios. The heat shield's performance confirmed its capacity to protect and payloads despite the improvised deorbit, though the steep profile underscored the need for refined trajectory control in subsequent missions like Zond 6.

Splashdown in the Indian Ocean

Zond 5 executed a ballistic reentry on September 21, 1968, at 16:08 UT, resulting in an unplanned splashdown in the Indian Ocean at coordinates 32°38′S 65°33′E due to a malfunction in the celestial navigation system that precluded the intended skip maneuver for a landing in Kazakhstan. This trajectory offset directed the spacecraft away from the primary terrestrial recovery zone toward the oceanic contingency area where Soviet ships had been prepositioned approximately 300 kilometers apart. The capsule descended upright, stabilized by its parachute system, with a post-recovery mass of 2,046 kg indicating intact structural integrity upon water impact. occurred during nighttime local conditions, which, combined with the remote oceanic location, presented initial challenges to on-site assessment and stability amid the open sea environment. The deviation, while substantial from the target, fell within the extended recovery radius supported by naval assets in the region.

Recovery Efforts and Initial Assessments

Soviet recovery vessels, including the ship Borovichi, were dispatched to the predetermined zone in the following Zond 5's reentry on September 21, 1968. The descent module was located floating with its parachute deployed and retrieved approximately 30 hours later on September 22, after confirmed its position. Initial post-recovery assessments by Soviet personnel indicated the capsule's ablative and structural integrity remained largely intact, despite immersion in saltwater. The two Russian tortoises, primary biological test subjects, were alive and responsive upon extraction, showing no immediate signs of distress beyond from the mission duration. Concurrently, a U.S. intelligence aircraft patrolled the recovery area, intercepting radio signals from the capsule to verify the absence of human cosmonauts, as no voice communications or indicators were detected. This monitoring effort reflected heightened U.S. interest in Soviet circumlunar capabilities amid the ongoing .

Scientific and Biological Outcomes

Effects on Living Organisms

The two Testudo horsfieldii aboard Zond 5, which completed a circumlunar flight from September 15 to 21, 1968, lost approximately 10% of their body weight upon recovery, compared to 5% loss in ground-based controls maintained under similar conditions. This weight reduction was primarily attributed to prolonged and dehydration during the six-day mission, with no evidence of direct lethality from microgravity, vibration, or . Post-flight dissections revealed metabolic adaptations including elevated and iron concentrations in liver tissue, alongside atrophic changes such as depletion and altered organ coloration (dark cerise in flight specimens versus brown in controls), consistent with stress responses akin to or mild environmental insult rather than space-specific . Hematological indices showed shifts in leukocyte counts and , but the tortoises exhibited no loss and resumed normal activity, indicating resilience to the combined flight factors. Other biological specimens demonstrated varied tolerance to the mission environment. Fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) eggs and mealworm larvae survived hatching, with no reported deviations in development attributable to spaceflight beyond baseline variability. Chlorella vulgaris algal cultures experienced reduced cell viability and elevated mutation frequencies upon return, linked to cosmic radiation encountered en route, though Zond 5 specimens showed less pronounced effects than those from subsequent Zond 6. Plant seeds and onion bulbs exhibited partial germination success post-flight, with some reduction in rates compared to controls, potentially due to radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations; lysogenic bacteria displayed increased mutation rates, highlighting sensitivity to galactic cosmic rays during transit through the Van Allen belts. Overall dosimetry for the payload indicated total ionizing radiation exposure below 1 Gy—subthreshold for acute mammalian effects—but sufficient to induce observable genetic changes in microbial and plant systems, underscoring differential organismal vulnerabilities without precluding manned precursor viability.

Photographic and Telemetric Data

Zond 5 acquired photographs of from a distance of approximately 90,000 kilometers during its outbound leg, marking the first such images captured from a . These black-and-white images depicted the planet's globe and limb, illustrating its curvature and atmospheric horizon against the void of space, and were returned via the spacecraft's film return capsule for ground processing. Telemetry instruments aboard Zond 5 measured interplanetary magnetic fields and fluxes throughout the voyage, providing data on interactions and particle environments beyond Earth's . These observations, transmitted in real-time and supplemented by stored recordings recovered post-splashdown, corroborated theoretical models of radiation and field dynamics derived from prior Zond probes. Post-mission analysis of the validated the spacecraft's performance, confirming a closest lunar approach of 1,950 kilometers above the farside and precise midcourse corrections that aligned the reentry corridor with recovery zones. The data processing at Soviet ground stations demonstrated trajectory fidelity sufficient for safe return, with deviations minimized through onboard orientation adjustments following a malfunction.

Analysis of Radiation and Environmental Exposure

Dosimetry instruments aboard Zond 5 measured a total dose for biological specimens not exceeding 3.5 rad (0.035 Gy) over the approximately seven-day mission from launch on September 14, 1968, to on September 21, 1968. This dose primarily stemmed from galactic cosmic rays (GCR) during the translunar and circumlunar phases, with contributions from traversal of the outer Van Allen radiation belts, though the spacecraft's trajectory was designed to limit exposure in the inner belts. No significant solar particle events occurred, despite the mission coinciding with the rising phase toward the maximum of 20 in late 1968, a period of elevated solar activity that modulates GCR flux and heightens potential for sporadic high-dose solar energetic particle (SEP) eruptions. The two Testudo horsfieldii tortoises, housed in containers with shielding equivalent to the spacecraft's aluminum hull (approximately 1-3 g/cm² areal density), absorbed this dose without acute effects; post-flight analysis attributed their observed 10% body mass loss and metabolic changes primarily to 39 days of pre-flight and seven days of flight-related deprivation, rather than . However, detectors confirmed exposure to high- protons (spectra assessed in ranges 1-15 MeV, 20-100 MeV, and 0.2-10 GeV), indicative of GCR heavy ions that penetrate thin shielding and deposit in dense tracks, highlighting inadequacies for long-duration missions where cumulative high-linear transfer (LET) damage could exceed tolerance thresholds. Empirically, the Zond 5 dose surpassed short-term (LEO) exposures, where daily rates average 0.5-1 mrad under geomagnetic shielding, due to the unmitigated GCR flux beyond the and brief belt passages yielding 0.2-0.7 rad equivalents at similar depths in comparable missions. This short-term survivability validated calibration for deep-space spectra but underscored raw cumulative hazards: effective dose equivalents, factoring radiation quality (Q >1 for GCR fragments), imply elevated stochastic risks like over repeated or extended exposures, without deterministic thresholds breached in this instance. Such data causally informed engineering trade-offs, revealing that tortoise-level shielding—insufficient against chronic HZE particle traversal—necessitates thicker or active mitigation for human-rated vehicles to avert underestimation of interplanetary realism.

Technical Challenges and Engineering Insights

Encountered Anomalies

During reentry on September 21, 1968, Zond 5 encountered a error that prevented the execution of the planned skip trajectory, resulting in a direct instead of the intended shallow-angle bounce for landing in . The root cause stemmed from a control sequence failure, where the autonomous flight was not disengaged promptly after the retro-rocket firing, leading to an erroneous orientation and thrust vector misalignment during the critical de-orbit burn. This timing discrepancy—arising from the interplay of onboard and attitude control thruster response delays—caused the spacecraft to enter the atmosphere at a steeper angle, exceeding the limits for skipping and necessitating an unplanned ocean in the . Redundant gyroscopic stabilization and backup attitude sensors maintained structural integrity, allowing recovery despite the deviation of over 7,000 kilometers from the primary target zone. The biological payload compartment experienced habitat integrity issues, manifesting as partial leaks in the sealed enclosures for the two Russian steppe tortoises (Testudo horsfieldii), which contributed to dehydration alongside intentional pre-flight fasting. These leaks, likely from micro-fractures or seal degradation under vacuum exposure and thermal cycling during the circumlunar transit, reduced humidity retention, exacerbating fluid loss; post-recovery analysis showed the tortoises had lost approximately 10% of body mass, with atrophic changes in organs linked to compounded starvation and desiccation effects rather than radiation alone. Control specimens on Earth, subjected to similar fasting but without flight stresses, exhibited less pronounced dehydration, indicating the habitat breach amplified evaporative losses in microgravity. Backup environmental monitoring subsystems provided partial compensation via residual moisture reserves, preserving viability of the specimens. Minor power fluctuations from the solar arrays were observed en route, attributed to partial shadowing during attitude adjustments and minor deployment asymmetries, though output remained sufficient for mission-critical systems without triggering failover to batteries prematurely. These stemmed from the fundamental geometric mismatch between panel orientation and the varying solar incidence angle post-translunar injection, highlighting constraints in automated sun-tracking algorithms under dynamic orbital perturbations. Overall, the anomalies underscored the brittleness of uncrewed in handling unscripted perturbations, with redundancies averting total failure but revealing gaps in real-time correction without intervention.

Post-Mission Evaluations

Following the recovery of the Zond 5 descent module, Soviet engineers conducted detailed post-flight disassembly and analysis, confirming the heat shield's efficacy in protecting the capsule during ballistic reentry at speeds of approximately 11 km/s on September 21, 1968. The ablative material successfully dissipated thermal loads, leaving the structure intact despite the steep profile designed to avoid the shallow-angle burn-up of predecessor Zond 4. Recovery assessments identified procedural shortcomings, notably the nighttime at 32°38'S, 65°33'E, which occurred around 19:08 and complicated immediate retrieval efforts due to poor visibility and the lack of an onboard light beacon, heightening the risk of submersion during the ensuing 12-hour darkness. Internal debriefs, culminating in a technical review on September 25, 1968, pinpointed anomalies including malfunction from optical and a motor halt attributed to erroneous attitude control inputs during flight. The module's arrival in on October 3, 1968, enabled comprehensive teardown, validating implemented fixes from prior mission shortfalls—such as refined reentry trajectories—and affirming the Zond system's readiness for subsequent circumlunar tests like Zond 6. These evaluations underscored proven engineering resilience in traversal and reentry survivability but highlighted unresolved human-centric limitations, including unverified tolerance to peak deceleration forces exceeding 10 g and real-time manual overrides in perturbed attitude regimes, which precluded for cosmonaut flights without further validation.

Causal Factors in Mission Success

The success of Zond 5 stemmed primarily from targeted engineering refinements to the Proton launch vehicle, which had exhibited high failure rates in prior Zond missions due to stage separation and guidance anomalies. Through rigorous iterative testing, including multiple suborbital and orbital qualification flights conducted between 1965 and 1968, Soviet engineers addressed propulsion instabilities and structural weaknesses in the Blok-D upper stage, achieving a launch reliability exceeding 90% for the September 15, 1968, liftoff. This marked a departure from earlier Proton variants, where vacuum ignition failures had doomed at least eight of twelve Zond attempts, enabling the spacecraft to reach and execute a precise burn. Advancements in spacecraft avionics and thermal protection systems further contributed to mission viability, with redundant attitude control thrusters and onboard computers calibrated via ground simulations to handle deep-space perturbations. These upgrades allowed Zond 5 to perform two midcourse corrections on September 16 and 18, stabilizing its trajectory for lunar flyby at 1,950 kilometers altitude on September 18, despite the inherent complexities of manual overrides from Earth. The reentry module's ablative heat shield, iteratively thickened based on Zond 4's destructive atmospheric skip in March 1968, withstood peak heating rates exceeding 10,000 degrees Celsius, though guidance errors resulted in an equatorial splashdown rather than the intended Kazakh landing. Environmental timing played a causal role, as the mission occurred during a relatively quiescent phase of 20, with no major coronal mass ejections or X-class flares recorded between September 15 and 21, 1968, thereby limiting Van Allen belt and cosmic radiation exposure to tolerable levels for the biological specimens. Payload configuration emphasized minimalism, featuring hardy organisms like two steppe , fruit fly eggs, and plant seeds in sealed capsules without the metabolic demands or failure-prone interfaces of human-rated systems tested in Soyuz prototypes. This reduced system interdependencies, isolating risks to core propulsion and navigation. Soviet , characterized by centralized resource allocation under intense political imperatives, accelerated these causal chains through parallel development streams but at the expense of comprehensive risk mitigation, as paralleled by Soyuz 1's April 1967 parachute deployment failure that killed cosmonaut amid rushed pre-launch approvals. For Zond 5, such pressures yielded functional redundancy in escape systems and links, ensuring data relay and recovery despite anomalies, yet underscored a causal tradeoff where empirical fixes post-failure outweighed precautionary overdesign.

Controversies and Debates

Claims of Cosmonaut Communications Tests

On September 19, 1968, during the return phase of the Zond 5 mission, Western monitoring stations including in the and U.S. intelligence assets intercepted radio transmissions featuring voices identified as those of Soviet cosmonauts , Vitaly Sevastyanov, and . The transmissions included discussions of telemetry, orbital adjustments, and preparations for a lunar landing attempt, leading to initial concerns among U.S. analysts that the Soviets had secretly crewed the flight ahead of NASA's Apollo 8. Soviet authorities denied any human presence aboard Zond 5, attributing the intercepted signals to ground-based communications simulations conducted to test procedures and radio protocols for future manned variants of the Zond . data tracked by U.S. assets, including and signal analysis, revealed no evidence of systems activation or biological signatures consistent with human occupants, aligning with the mission's confirmed automated profile. The 's recovery on September 21, 1968, in the further substantiated its unmanned status, as inspections yielded only the biological payload of , , , and microorganisms, with no human-related hardware or remains. Subsequent disclosures confirmed the voices originated from a deliberate orchestrated by Popovich and colleagues at a Soviet , broadcast on Zond 5's frequency to gauge Western reactions amid the . Popovich later recounted the act as a response to the realization that the Soviets could not achieve a manned circumlunar flight before , framing it as psychological maneuvering rather than evidence of concealed crew. No empirical data—such as orbital perturbations from human mass, reentry heat signatures inconsistent with unmanned configuration, or post-mission physiological records—has supported allegations of actual cosmonauts, rendering the claims unsubstantiated hoaxes amplified by suspicions.

Fate of the Biological Specimens

The two Testudo horsfieldii tortoises recovered from Zond 5 on September 21, 1968, exhibited a body mass reduction of about 10%, primarily from as they had been deprived of food since September 2. Patho-morphological investigations, including full , commenced on October 11, 1968, approximately three weeks post-recovery. Autopsy findings documented minor atrophic alterations in organs and tissues, such as reduced cellular density in muscle and liver samples, but these were characterized as reversible and causally linked to nutritional deficits rather than or g-forces encountered during the and reentry. Biochemical assays confirmed negligible hematopoietic impacts or oxidative damage attributable to cosmic rays, with overall histological profiles aligning closely to starved terrestrial controls. These outcomes underscored the species' physiological robustness for evaluating acute spaceflight stressors over a seven-day mission, though the tortoises' ectothermic metabolism and low metabolic demands limited direct inferences for mammalian, particularly human, viability. Soviet analyses, disseminated in 1969 via peer-reviewed channels and abstracted in Western aerospace compendia, advanced foundational models of reversible cellular adaptations under combined deprivation and extraterrestrial exposure. Among ancillary specimens—encompassing fruit fly eggs, mealworms, cultures, and plant seeds—post-recovery viability varied, with most perishing within days from cumulative flight-induced debilitation, yielding less granular dissection data than the .

Interpretations of Mission Readiness for Humans

While Zond 5 successfully returned living organisms, including two Russian steppe that lost 10% of their body weight but exhibited no fatal damage, this outcome demonstrated only basic biological survivability for non-human specimens rather than comprehensive readiness for human crews. The ' resilience to microgravity and transit stresses did not account for human physiological vulnerabilities, such as cardiovascular strain or psychological factors absent in and reptiles. Reentry performance underscored critical gaps in human-rated , as the entered Earth's atmosphere at a shallower angle than intended, resulting in peak decelerations of 16 g-forces sustained over 10 g for more than one minute—levels deemed undesirable for prolonged exposure despite marginal tolerability in isolation. This deviation caused an unintended atmospheric skip, excessive heating, and in the rather than the planned recovery zone, exposing the capsule to corrosive saltwater that compromised post-flight analysis and highlighted recovery logistics unfit for personnel. Such anomalies indicated unresolved guidance and control issues that could amplify risks for cosmonauts, where precise reentry corridors are essential to limit g-forces below 8-10 g thresholds calibrated for . Radiation measurements from dosimeters aboard Zond 5 recorded cumulative doses below acute lethality for the brief circumlunar loop, yet lacked full-spectrum data on solar particle events or long-term carcinogenic effects tailored to tissue sensitivity, with shielding optimized for payload rather than crewed cabins. Biological analogs like , which possess higher natural tolerance due to slower metabolism and mechanisms, overstated viability for humans traversing the Van Allen belts without equivalent protective measures. Subsequent Zond 6, intended as a refined precursor, empirically validated these unreadiness signals through its November 1968 parachute deployment failure, which caused a high-speed ground impact and destruction of specimens, directly stemming from persistent design flaws in the Soyuz-derived descent module. This incident, occurring despite incremental improvements post-Zond 5, refuted optimistic interpretations of rapid human certification, as it exposed systemic parachute reliability deficits exacerbated by compressed timelines. Interpretations emphasizing data-driven caution attribute Soviet reluctance for a manned Zond 7 to these cascading risks, where political imperatives for precedence over clashed with engineering assessments of incomplete validation, contrasting the U.S. program's phased testing that prioritized anomaly resolution over expedited crewing. The empirical pattern of unaddressed causal factors—trajectory errors, reentry instabilities, and recovery failures—precluded deeming Zond 5 a sufficient benchmark for missions without further unmanned iterations, underscoring how accelerated state-driven schedules amplified latent hazards absent in methodical pacing.

Legacy in Space Exploration

Impact on the Space Race Dynamics

The launch of Zond 5 on September 15, 1968, marked the first successful circumlunar flight by a spacecraft carrying living organisms, including tortoises, plants, and microorganisms, which returned to Earth on September 21 after completing a loop around the Moon. This achievement heightened U.S. intelligence assessments of Soviet capabilities, as the mission validated the Zond vehicle's life-support systems and reentry potential under crewed conditions, prompting fears that the USSR could attempt a manned circumlunar voyage within weeks using a follow-on Zond flight. In response, accelerated its timeline, shifting from a planned Earth-orbital shakedown of the command and service module to a daring and lunar orbital mission launched on December 21, 1968. U.S. officials, informed by reconnaissance of the Proton rocket's payload capacity demonstrated by Zond 5, viewed the Soviet test as evidence of operational readiness for beyond , compelling Administrator James Webb and program managers to endorse the high-risk lunar orbit profile to preempt a potential Soviet first. This decision reflected broader imperatives, where Zond 5's success—despite its unintended splashdown—underscored Soviet progress in heavy-lift rocketry and closed-loop environmental controls, intensifying competitive pressures amid the post-Apollo 1 recovery phase. Apollo 8's triumph, achieving the first human with astronauts , , and , effectively neutralized Zond 5's by December 24, 1968, as the mission broadcast iconic imagery and verified translunar navigation without Soviet interference. Subsequent Soviet efforts, including Zond 6's November 1968 flight marred by failure and issues, failed to replicate a reliable crewed precursor, allowing U.S. to build toward Apollo 11's landing in July 1969. Empirically, Zond 5 escalated the race by forcing reactive U.S. strategy but ultimately highlighted disparities in systems reliability, as Proton-launched Zond missions averaged higher anomaly rates compared to Saturn V's performance, contributing to the USSR's inability to match Apollo's manned lunar achievements.

Technological Advancements Derived

The Zond 5 mission validated key elements of the Soyuz-derived 7K-L1 for circumlunar operations, including its reentry capsule's ability to withstand peak deceleration forces of approximately 20 g during on September 21, 1968, despite a guidance anomaly that resulted in an unintended in the . Engineering data from this test flight directly informed refinements to the Soyuz spacecraft's descent module, enhancing thermal protection and structural resilience for high-velocity reentries exceeding 11 km/s, as the mission demonstrated the feasibility of returning payloads from lunar distances without catastrophic failure. Biological experiments on Zond 5, featuring two steppe tortoises (Testudo horsfieldii), fruit fly eggs, plants, and other organisms launched on September 15, 1968, yielded data on microgravity and cosmic radiation effects, with the tortoises surviving the round trip while experiencing a 10% body mass loss but retaining metabolic function and appetite post-recovery. These results advanced Soviet understanding of organismal resilience in deep-space environments, contributing empirical insights into life support parameters—such as radiation shielding and nutritional stability—that influenced subsequent biosatellite research and preparatory studies for extended human spaceflight, including early orbital station designs. The successful translunar injection achieved by the Proton-K launcher with Block D upper stage during the Zond 5 ascent demonstrated enhanced reliability in heavy-lift performance for escape trajectories, building on prior iterations through iterative testing that reduced failure risks in upper-stage ignition and trajectory corrections. This operational maturity enabled broader application of the Proton family to uncrewed planetary missions, such as the Mars 2 and 3 probes in , by confirming its capacity for precise deep-space insertions under real mission conditions.

Long-Term Historical Assessments

The Zond 5 recovery capsule is preserved and displayed at the RKK Energiya Museum in Korolev, near , , where it serves as a tangible artifact of early deep-space . The mission's biological experiment marked the first circumlunar traversal by terrestrial organisms, with two Russian steppe enduring the journey and returning alive, albeit with minor weight loss indicating physiological stress from microgravity and . This outcome provided empirical data on short-term survival in cislunar space, including exposure to cosmic rays outside Earth's , though the tortoises' resilience does not extrapolate directly to human tolerances given differences in metabolic rates and tissue sensitivity. Retrospectives from 2018 onward, including NASA's 50th-anniversary review, position Zond 5 as a foundational step in by validating reentry viability for shielded systems, yet temper earlier Soviet claims of near-human readiness with revealing cumulative doses—estimated at around 0.2-0.5 Gy for the —that highlighted risks of cellular damage and long-term for extended missions. These analyses underscore that while the tortoises' survival debunked acute lethality fears, cosmic 's effects, unmitigated by the mission's brief duration, precluded confident human certification without advanced shielding absent in the Zond design. Soviet engineers demonstrated tenacity in achieving Zond 5's loop despite Proton launcher unreliability—eight failures in twelve attempts through 1969—yet the program's termination post-1970 stemmed from cascading N1 rocket explosions (four between 1969 and 1972), which eroded political will and shifted priorities to Salyut stations over lunar landing hardware. This pivot reflected pragmatic resource allocation amid technical setbacks, preserving Zond's legacy as a proof-of-concept for circumlunar return rather than a scalable human precursor.

References

  1. https://www.russianspaceweb.com/zond5.html
  2. https://www.nasa.gov/history/50-years-ago-on-the-way-to-the-moon-0/
  3. https://science.nasa.gov/resource/zond-5/
  4. https://www.iflscience.com/zond-5-in-1968-two-soviet-steppe-tortoises-beat-humans-to-orbiting-around-the-moon-80838
  5. https://www.nasa.gov/history/50-years-ago-on-the-way-to-the-moon-4/
  6. https://spp.fas.org/eprint/lindroos_moon1.htm
  7. http://www.astronautix.com/k/korolev.html
  8. https://www.russianspaceweb.com/proton_origin.html
  9. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/static/history/SP-4408pt1.pdf
  10. https://sma.nasa.gov/SignificantIncidents/assets/soyuz-1.pdf
  11. https://www.astronautix.com/s/soyuz7k-l1.html
  12. https://www.russianspaceweb.com/l1.html
  13. https://www.russianspaceweb.com/l1-2p-kosmos146.html
  14. https://thehighfrontier.blog/2015/11/27/once-around-the-moon-the-soviet-circumlunar-race/
  15. https://falsesteps.wordpress.com/2012/09/19/7k-l1-zond-russias-last-best-chance/
  16. http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/histind/Zondmiss/Zondmiss.htm
  17. https://www.drewexmachina.com/2017/04/26/soyuz-1-tragedy/
  18. http://www.astronautix.com/s/soyuz7k-l1.html
  19. https://www.amusingplanet.com/2021/09/the-soviet-moon-prank.html
  20. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/missions/zond/
  21. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1970SSRv...11....5A
  22. http://www.astronautix.com/l/lunarl1.html
  23. https://www.nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/1953/
  24. http://www.astronautix.com/p/proton-kd.html
  25. https://www.planetary.org/space-images/c_zond05_1
  26. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000283814.pdf
  27. https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=46411.0
  28. https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/first-moon-apollo-8-and-soviet-union
  29. https://repository.si.edu/bitstreams/8c1c8296-a57c-457e-8dc2-bb4ab5bbb978/download
  30. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170001400/downloads/20170001400.pdf
  31. https://www.nasa.gov/history/a-brief-history-of-animals-in-space/
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780080168418500535
  33. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.pp.38.060187.001533
  34. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19720024430/downloads/19720024430.pdf
  35. https://www.nytimes.com/1968/09/24/archives/space-recordings-returned-by-zond-5.html
  36. https://cds.cern.ch/record/864491/files/p484.pdf
  37. http://www.russianspaceweb.com/zond5.html
  38. https://www.astronomy.com/space-exploration/first-earthlings-around-the-moon-were-two-soviet-tortoises/
  39. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/1968-soviet-union-orbited-turtles-around-moon-bw-091625
  40. https://epizodsspace.airbase.ru/bibl/inostr-yazyki/science/1968/Davies_Murray_Zond_5_Is_It_Also_a_Planetary_Spacecraft_Science_162_%281968%29.pdf
  41. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/apollo-why-the-soviets-lost-180972229/
  42. http://www.astronautix.com/p/proton.html
  43. https://www.nasa.gov/history/50-years-ago-zond-4-launched-successfully/
  44. https://science.howstuffworks.com/space-tortoises.htm
  45. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/1968.pdf
  46. https://www.futilitycloset.com/2021/07/17/ventriloquism/
  47. https://www.wearethemighty.com/articles/soviet-space-program-pranked-nasa-with-first-moon-landing/
  48. https://www.bradycarlson.com/a-soviet-cosmonaut-once-pretended-to-land-on-the-moon-to-troll-nasa-cool-weird-awesome-1090/
  49. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19700011380/downloads/19700011380.pdf
  50. https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/14614/why-did-the-zond-5-tortoises-lose-body-mass-so-quickly
  51. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19710027015/downloads/19710027015.pdf
  52. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1973NASSP3006.....P
  53. https://www.russianspaceweb.com/zond6.html
  54. https://www.nasa.gov/history/50-years-ago-soviets-return-cosmonauts-to-space/
  55. https://www.nasa.gov/history/50-years-ago-apollo-8-is-go-for-the-moon/
  56. https://www.nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/1968-soviet-union-orbited-turtles-around-moon-bw-091625
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6627973/
  58. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3946.html
  59. https://www.facebook.com/NASASpaceflight/posts/september-15th-on-this-day-in-1968-the-ussr-launched-the-zond-5-spacecraft-on-a-/1098662032259833/
  60. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/385311-first-animals-to-circle-the-moon
  61. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abg5554
  62. https://www.facebook.com/NASASpaceflight/posts/august-8th-on-this-day-in-1969-the-ussr-launched-the-zond-7-mission-on-a-proton-/1378430864282947/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.