Hubbry Logo
Cruiser tankCruiser tankMain
Open search
Cruiser tank
Community hub
Cruiser tank
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cruiser tank
Cruiser tank
Cruiser tank
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

The cruiser tank (sometimes called cavalry tank or fast tank) was a British tank concept of the interwar period for tanks designed as modernised armoured and mechanised cavalry, as distinguished from infantry tanks. Cruiser tanks were developed after medium tank designs of the 1930s failed to satisfy the Royal Armoured Corps. The cruiser tank concept was conceived by Giffard Le Quesne Martel, who preferred many small light tanks to swarm an opponent, instead of a few expensive and unsatisfactory medium tanks. "Light" cruiser tanks (for example the Cruiser Mk I) carried less armour and were correspondingly faster, whilst "heavy" cruiser tanks (such as the Cruiser Mk II) had more armour and were slightly slower.

The British cruiser tank series started in 1938 with the A9 and A10 cruiser tanks, followed by the A13, A13 Mark II, the A13 Mark III Covenanter in 1940 and the A15 Crusader which entered service in 1941. The Crusader was superseded by the A27 Cromwell in 1944. The A34 Comet, a better-armed development of Cromwell, began to enter service in late 1944. The Centurion tank of 1946 became the "Universal tank" of the United Kingdom, transcending the cruiser and infantry tank roles and becoming one of the first main battle tanks (MBT).

Background

[edit]

Dissatisfaction with experimental medium tank designs of the mid-1930s led to the development of specialised fast cruiser tanks, where armour thickness was sacrificed for speed and infantry tanks, in which speed was sacrificed for heavier armour. Financial constraints had made it impossible to produce a vehicle suitable for close support and for exploitation. The thinking was behind several tank designs which saw action during the Second World War. British armoured operations theory flowed from the decision to build two types of tank and equip two types of unit and formation. Cruisers were operated by armoured regiments of the Royal Armoured Corps, established on 4 April 1939, in armoured divisions, some regiments coming from the Royal Tank Regiment (RTR) and some from cavalry regiments converted during the war. Infantry tanks went to Army Tank Battalions, sometimes grouped administratively into Army Tank Brigades of the RTR. Small, fast, lightly armed tanks like the Light Tank Mk VI operated as reconnaissance vehicles.

Giffard Le Quesne Martel originated the cruiser concept while Assistant Director and then Deputy Director of Mechanisation at the War Office in the 1930s. Martel considered that medium tanks were too complicated and expensive for infantry support, where they would be too vulnerable to anti-tank weapons and rejected claims that they could fire accurately when moving, so would gain no benefit from their speed. Martel preferred a large number of smaller and simpler tanks to swamp an opponent, instead of a few comparatively expensive medium tanks. Work should continue on a universal tank in the long term but from 1936 to 1939, Martel gave much thought to the infantry tank; he did not want medium tank development to be split but saw the logic of it, given the constraints on tank development. Tanks were necessary for mobile operations in armoured divisions and for infantry support in attacks on fortified defensive positions; a vehicle satisfactory for both tasks appeared to be impossible to attain. Two types of vehicle led to two theories and procedures, infantry tank thinking coming from the experience of tank operations from 1916 to 1918, when British tanks had been used for infantry support. Armoured division theory emphasised the speed of cruiser tanks and independent action to protect flanks, attack the opponent's flanks and rear, to counter-attack and conduct pursuit operations.

Development

[edit]
A damaged Cruiser Mk I Close Support abandoned in Calais, 1940.

Like naval cruisers, cruiser tanks were fast and mobile for operations independent from slower-moving infantry with their heavier infantry tanks and artillery. When gaps had been forced through the opponent's front by the infantry tanks, cruisers were to penetrate to the rear and attack lines of supply and communication centres in accordance with the theories of J.F.C. Fuller, Percy Hobart and Basil Liddell Hart. The cruiser tank was designed for use in a manner similar to cavalry, which made speed the most important factor and to achieve this, early cruisers were lightly armoured and armed to save weight.

The emphasis on speed unbalanced[citation needed] the British designs; on limited engine power, the speed was possible only by sacrificing armour protection (by comparison infantry tanks operating at soldiers' pace could carry far more armour). The idea that "speed is armour" was considered most important in the Royal Tank Corps. It was not realised[citation needed] that the principle of mobility was a liability against the German policy of accepting lower speeds for superior armour and armament[clarification needed], ensuring that even one round from a German medium tank could easily destroy a cruiser.[clarification needed]

Cruiser Tank Mark I (A9)

An even bigger problem for most cruiser tanks was the small calibre of their main gun. The first cruisers were armed with the 2-pounder (40 mm) gun. This gun had adequate armour penetration against early war tanks but was never issued high explosive ammunition. This made the cruisers less able to deal with towed anti-tank guns, which was a serious deficiency at the long ranges of engagements during the Desert Campaign. The additional machine gun turret (as mounted on the Crusader) was no substitute for HE rounds. As the armour of German tanks increased British cruisers were up-gunned with the more powerful 57 mm Ordnance QF 6 pounder, starting with the Crusader Mk. III (an interim move pending the introduction of the next cruiser tank). Early marques of what would become the Cromwell were also fitted with the 6-pounder but the gun still did not have a satisfactory HE round. The Cromwell as planned was to have a High Velocity 75 mm gun but the gun was too large for the turret ring and so it was decided that the new Cromwell tanks would be fitted with the QF 75 mm (a bored-out 6-pounder that could take US 75 mm ammunition). The new 75 mm gun provided greater HE capability at the expense of some armour penetration and it was still adequate to deal with the majority of German armoured vehicles. Part of the Cromwell's success was its high-power to weight ratio, provided by the adoption of the Rolls-Royce Merlin engine as the Meteor, which delivered sufficient power for the Cromwell to have a maximum speed around 40 mph (64 km/h) on roads. The M4 Sherman had a top speed on roads of about 30 mph (48 km/h). The Cromwell also had slightly superior cross-country speed and mobility. The new engine enabled the tank to be far more heavily armoured and armed than previous cruiser designs.

As the Cromwell could not be fitted with the HV 75 mm, work was undertaken to produce a tank for the powerful 17-pounder anti-tank gun, able to take on the most powerfully-armed German vehicles. The Cruiser Mk VIII Challenger was developed, mounting a 17-pounder gun on a lengthened Cromwell hull in a new turret. The Challenger was an unhappy compromise, though it was popular with its crews. The cut in armour protection to allow the mounting of the larger gun meant it was not well suited to closer range engagements and it threw its tracks more often than the Cromwell. As the UK had large numbers of US M4 Sherman tanks, an extemporaneous conversion of the Sherman to take a 17-pounder (as the Sherman Firefly) proved effective in providing more 17-pounder-gun tanks. The Firefly accompanied Churchills, Shermans and Cromwells generally at a ratio of 1:4. The production of Fireflies greatly outpaced that of the Challenger but in Cromwell-equipped units, the Challenger was generally preferred as the Sherman had a slower road speed and inferior cross-country mobility.

The culmination of British efforts was the Comet tank with a cut down 17-pounder design, the 77 mm HV. The Comet was a further development of the Cromwell, a "heavy" cruiser tank, which sought to remove the need for 17-pounder armoured vehicles, such as the Challenger or Firefly. The Comet reduced its road speed in comparison to the Cromwell to 32 mph (51 km/h), in favour of better armour protection and a weapon able to penetrate the armour of the heavier German tanks whilst not sacrificing HE capability. The tank had a short service life as design for the Centurion was already well underway, with the first prototype arriving in 1945. Despite the emphasis on mobility, most early cruiser designs were plagued by mechanical unreliability, notably in the hot and gritty desert of the North Africa Campaign. This problem was usually caused by rushed development and introduction into service. After the debacle in France of 1940, cruiser tank designs were ordered "off the drawing board", particularly given the urgent need for tanks. The Liberty engine which also powered early Cruiser tanks was beginning to show its age and was being pushed to its limit in tanks such as the Crusader. This problem was not fully solved until the débût of the Cromwell in 1944, with its powerful and reliable Rolls-Royce Meteor engine.

History

[edit]

Interwar

[edit]
Tank production October 1938 – June 1940[1]
Year Light I tank/
Cruiser 		Total
1938
4th Qtr		 169 29 198
1939 734 235 969
1940
to June		 140 418 558
Total 1,043 682 1,725

In 1936, the War Office decided on a light tank for the cavalry, a cruiser tank, a medium tank and an infantry or assault tank. By 1938, the medium tank had stagnated as a research project, in favour of heavier cruiser and infantry tanks and after the outbreak of war, the move towards heavy infantry tanks capable of breaking through the Siegfried Line (Westwall) on the German border.[2]

In 1934, Sir John Carden of Vickers-Armstrongs had produced a "Woolworth" medium tank to a 1934 specification (General Staff number A.9) for a close support tank, using elements of the Medium Mk III design (which had been abandoned due to financial reasons) but lighter and using a commercial engine to be cheaper.[3] It was accepted as an interim design for limited production as the Cruiser Tank Mark I. It was expected to be replaced by a Christie suspension design. From 1937–1938, 125 A9s were built. The A9 was lightly armoured but capable of 25 mph (40 km/h) and carried a highly-effective 2-pounder anti-tank gun.

The Cruiser Mk II (A10), was designed by Carden as an infantry tank, built to the same design with added armour for 30 mm (1.2 in) of protection. It was insufficiently armoured for the role but as a "heavy cruiser", it was put into production in July 1938 as another interim design. It had the same gun as the A9, was the first to be equipped with the Besa machine gun and 175 Mk IIs were produced by September 1940.[4] Experience with the A9 during the Battle of France in 1940 revealed shortcomings, including inadequate armour and a lack of space for the crew, but it saw useful service in France, the Western desert and Greece in 1941. Orders for the Mk I and Mk II Cruisers were limited, for an advanced and faster cruiser tank which would incorporate Christie suspension designed by J. Walter Christie and have better armour.

The Cruiser Mark III (A13) with large wheels typical of the Christie suspension

In 1936, General Giffard LeQuesne Martel, a pioneer in tank design who had published works on armoured warfare and pioneered the lightly armoured "tankette" concept to enhance infantry mobility, became Assistant Director of Mechanization at the War Office. Later that year, Martel had watched Soviet tanks at the Red Army's autumn manoeuvres including the BT tank, which they had developed from Christie's work. He urged the adoption of a tank that would use the suspension system and also follow the Christie practice of using a lightweight aircraft engine such as the Liberty L-12 engine or a Napier Lion. The government authorised purchase and licensing of a Christie design via the Nuffield Organization.[5][6]

The tank A13 E1 was rudimentary and too small for British use but the Nuffield suspension was most effective and this became the basis of the Cruiser Mk III (A13). Following testing of two Nuffield-built prototypes (A13E2 and A13E3), the A13 was ordered into production and 65 were manufactured by mid-1939.[6] The Mk III weighed 31,400 pounds (14.2 t), had a crew of 4, a 340 hp engine which gave a top speed of 30 mph (48 km/h) and was armed with a 2-pounder (40 mm) gun and a machine gun. When it was introduced in 1937, the army still lacked a formal tank division.[7] The trackless element of the Christie suspension was discarded as adding little value for the extra complexity. The Cruiser Mk IV (A13 Mk II) had heavier armour than the Mk III and production started in 1938.[8]

Second World War

[edit]
2-pounder armed Crusader in the desert.

The Tank, Cruiser, Mk VI, (Crusader), was used in large numbers in the Western Desert Campaign. The contemporary Covenanter was unreliable and was retained in the UK for training use. The Cavalier, Centaur and Cromwell tanks were the planned successors to the Covenanter and Crusader. Intended to be in production by 1942, the project was delayed and the Crusader was up-gunned as an interim measure with the Mk.III 6-pounder gun; the Cavalier was a development of Crusader. Centaur and Cromwell tanks were an alternative design using the Cavalier engine and the new Rolls-Royce Meteor respectively - the three vehicles were similar in appearance. Orders for the Cavalier were cut back while the similarity between Centaur and Cromwell meant some Centaurs were finished as Cromwells. The Cavalier was used for training while Centaur and Cromwell tanks went into action at the Invasion of Normandy. The Comet tank entered service in north-west Europe in 1945 but neither the Cromwell or Comet tanks were in sufficient numbers to replace American tanks in the British Army.

Comet

During the war, the development of much more powerful engines and better suspension enabled cruiser tanks to increase in size, armour and firepower while retaining their speed and mobility. With "cruiser" tanks similarly armoured to heavier, slower, infantry tanks, the convergence of cruisers and infantry tank designs made the distinction obsolete. The Centurion tank was designed as a heavy cruiser, by combining the mobility of a cruiser tank and armour of an Infantry tank. The Centurion transcended its cruiser tank origins and became the first modern British main battle tank.

Cruiser tanks in other armies

[edit]

In the 1930s, the Czechoslovak Army divided its tank into three categories, light tanks - cavalry, light tanks - infantry and medium tanks. The cavalry category was analogical to cruiser-tank concept. The cruiser-tank concept was also employed by Canada, and Soviet Union in the 1930s, as exemplified by the BT tank series (bystrokhodniy tank, [fast tank]).

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Chamberlain, Peter; Ellis, Chris (1969). British and American Tanks of World War II: The Complete Illustrated History of British, American and Commonwealth Tanks, Gun Motor Carriages and Special Purpose Vehicles, 1939–1945. New York, NY: Arco. ISBN 978-0-668-01867-8.
  • Harris, J. P. (1995). Men, Ideas and Tanks: British Military Thought and Armoured Forces, 1903–1939. Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-4814-2.
  • Postan, M. M. (1952). British War Production. History of the Second World War: United Kingdom Civil Series. London: HMSO. OCLC 459583161.
  • Postan, M. M.; et al. (1964). Hancock, K. (ed.). Design and Development of Weapons: Studies in Government and Industrial Organisation. History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Civil Series. London: HMSO & Longmans, Green & Co. OCLC 681432.
  • Steele, Brett D. (2005). Military Re-engineering Between the World Wars. RAND. ISBN 978-0-8330-3721-3.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cruiser tank

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A cruiser tank was a class of fast, lightly armored developed by the in for mobile warfare, intended to exploit breakthroughs made by slower infantry tanks and conduct flanking maneuvers or deep into enemy territory. These vehicles emphasized speed over heavy protection, typically mounting a 2-pounder or later 75mm , and were part of a doctrinal division of tank roles formalized in 1936 alongside light and infantry tanks. The concept evolved from interwar experiments influenced by observations of Soviet maneuvers in 1936, leading to early prototypes like the A9 and A10 Cruiser Marks I and II, which entered limited production in 1937 but suffered from mechanical unreliability and thin armor during initial combat in and in 1940. Subsequent designs incorporated for improved mobility, as seen in the A13 Marks I and II, which formed the basis for later models and saw action in the and early desert campaigns. The cruiser tank aimed to equip armored divisions for rapid exploitation, but early models were often outmatched by German Panzers due to inadequate firepower and protection. Key cruiser tanks included the Covenanter (A13 Mark V), produced from 1940 but plagued by overheating and limited to training roles; the Crusader (A15 Mark VI), with over 5,300 units built and serving as the primary cruiser in from 1941 to 1943 despite fragility; and the late-war Cromwell (A27 Mark VIII), introduced in 1944 with a reliable for speeds up to 40 mph, though initially undergunned. The Comet (A34), representing a balanced design for 1944-1945 that combined good mobility, reliability, and firepower from its 77mm high-velocity gun, was the final and most advanced cruiser entering service in 1945 and saw limited but effective use in Northwest , marking the culmination of British cruiser development before the shift to universal tank designs . Overall, cruiser tanks numbered in the thousands and played a vital role in British armored operations, though their specialized role highlighted the limitations of pre-war amid evolving warfare tactics.

Definition and Characteristics

Design Philosophy

The cruiser tank emerged as a British armored vehicle concept in the , characterized by its emphasis on speed and mobility over heavy armor, designed primarily for , exploitation of breakthroughs, and rapid maneuvers in the role of modernized mechanized . This philosophy drew directly from cavalry doctrines, which sought to replace horse-mounted units with fast tanks capable of independent operations on the , allowing them to outflank enemies and disrupt rear areas. Key figures such as Lieutenant-General Sir Giffard Le Quesne Martel played a pivotal role in advocating for mobile tank forces, promoting the development of agile armored units as an alternative to slower, heavily protected medium tanks that dominated earlier British thinking. Martel's innovations in tankettes and his broader push for mechanized warfare during the 1920s and 1930s influenced the cruiser concept, emphasizing vehicles that could achieve high speeds—up to 30 mph on roads—to enable dynamic tactical responses. Cruiser tanks were distinctly positioned apart from infantry tanks, which were slow and heavily armored for direct support of foot soldiers during assaults, and tanks, which were limited to scouting and lacked significant firepower. This classification stemmed from the British War Office's 1936 decision to divide tank development into specialized categories: for , for breakthrough operations, and cruisers for fast, armed exploitation, reflecting a doctrinal split to optimize roles under resource constraints. The strategic rationale for cruiser tanks was shaped by the post-World War I environment, particularly the , which prohibited Germany from possessing tanks and thereby limited its immediate armored threat but heightened British concerns over potential rapid and the need for versatile forces to counter maneuvers in . This context drove the prioritization of mobility to enable quick responses to aggression from continental powers, aligning with Britain's imperial commitments and the perceived requirements for fluid, cavalry-like operations in future conflicts.

Technical Specifications and Limitations

Cruiser tanks were engineered for rapid battlefield maneuverability, achieving road speeds of up to 30-40 mph through lightweight construction and advanced suspension systems. The Christie suspension, adopted in models like the A13, utilized large, interleaved road wheels and long-travel springs to enhance cross-country performance, allowing average off-road speeds of 15-20 mph while maintaining stability over rough terrain. Armor thickness typically ranged from 10-40 mm, prioritizing mobility over protection by using riveted or welded steel plates that offered resistance primarily against small-arms fire and shell fragments rather than dedicated anti-tank rounds. Armament in cruiser tanks evolved to balance speed with increasing combat demands, starting with coaxial machine guns and the QF 2-pounder (40 mm) gun in early designs for anti- and light vehicle engagements. Mid-war variants upgraded to the QF 6-pounder (57 mm) for improved anti-tank capability against medium armor, while later models incorporated the 75 mm ROQF gun, which provided high-explosive shells for support alongside armor-piercing rounds. Turret designs generally featured two-man layouts with hydraulic traversal for quicker aiming, though early fire control systems relied on basic optical sights without stabilization, limiting accuracy during movement. Early cruiser tanks employed the Liberty-derived V12 petrol engine, such as the Nuffield Liberty producing around 340 hp, which suffered from poor fuel efficiency of approximately 0.8-1 mile per gallon on roads in operational conditions and frequent overheating in hot environments. Later developments introduced the Rolls-Royce Meteor V12, a detuned Merlin aircraft engine delivering 600 hp with better reliability, achieving fuel efficiency of 0.5-1.5 miles per gallon depending on terrain while reducing breakdown rates through improved cooling and lower stress levels. These design choices imposed significant limitations, as the thin armor rendered cruiser tanks highly vulnerable to German 50 mm and 75 mm anti-tank guns, which could penetrate hull and turret sides at ranges under 1,000 yards, leading to high loss rates in direct engagements. Mechanical unreliability was exacerbated in desert operations, where dust ingress and temperatures exceeding 100°F caused frequent engine failures and high breakdown rates in some units. The emphasis on speed over resulted in power-to-weight ratios of 10-15 hp/ in initial models, enabling quick flanking but compromising on size and ammunition storage compared to slower, heavier infantry tanks.

British Development and Production

Interwar Period Foundations

Following the end of , British tank development shifted away from the heavier medium tanks like the , which had been the mainstay of the 1920s armoured forces, due to severe budget constraints imposed by the economic aftermath of the war and the . Lessons from interwar maneuvers highlighted the need for more mobile vehicles capable of exploiting breakthroughs, influencing a doctrinal pivot toward faster "" tanks designed for and flanking operations rather than direct support. This transition was hampered by prioritization of naval and funding, leaving the army with limited resources for mechanization, resulting in only modest production runs and experimental designs throughout the and early 1930s. The conceptualization of cruiser tanks gained formal traction with the War Office's 1934 specification for a high-speed medium tank, leading to the development of key prototypes such as the A9 Cruiser Mark I. Designed by Sir John Carden at Vickers-Armstrongs, the A9 prototype (A9E1) was completed in 1936, incorporating innovative features like hydraulic turret traverse and a 2-pounder gun, though early trials at Bovington revealed issues with its coil-spring bogie suspension, including track derailments on rough terrain. The A13 Mark II prototype, evolving from the same specification, introduced sloped armor concepts on its turret sides for improved protection against projectiles, with trials at Bovington in 1937-1938 confirming its superior mobility using an adapted Christie suspension system originally purchased from American designer J. Walter Christie in the late 1920s. These prototypes marked the British Army's first serious attempt to standardize fast, lightly armoured cruisers for armoured divisions. Production milestones began with initial orders in late 1937 for 125 A9 Cruiser Mark I tanks, split between (50 units) and (75 units), with deliveries starting in January 1939 amid steel shortages that necessitated imports from . By 1939, production scaled to include 175 A10 heavy cruiser tanks, including close support variants equipped with howitzers, built primarily by Metropolitan-Cammell Carriage and Wagon. Overall, early cruiser output reached approximately 590 units (A9, A10, and initial A13 series) by the end of 1940, reflecting a gradual ramp-up despite ongoing supply challenges. Institutional factors played a crucial role in these foundations, with the Mechanisation Board—established in —overseeing the evaluation and procurement of new designs to modernize the cavalry and infantry arms. Woolwich Arsenal contributed significantly by standardizing components and conducting design refinements during the , which limited full-scale prototyping but ensured compatibility with existing production lines at private firms like . This collaborative framework amid fiscal laid the groundwork for Britain's cruiser tank program, prioritizing affordability and speed over heavy armour.

World War II Advancements

During , British cruiser tank development accelerated with key adaptations to enhance reliability and performance in diverse theaters. Welded construction replaced riveting in hulls and turrets by , resulting in lighter yet stronger structures that improved protection without excessive weight gain. For desert operations, particularly in , designs like the Crusader incorporated refined and wider tracks to mitigate sand ingress and track shedding, though challenges with heat and dust persisted. Engine upgrades addressed chronic unreliability; the V12, derived from the aero engine and delivering 600 horsepower, was integrated into the Cromwell starting in late 1942, with full production by 1943, enabling speeds up to 40 mph and better torque for rough terrain. Production efforts surged to meet wartime demands, but faced significant hurdles. Nuffield Mechanizations and Aero Limited ramped up output of the Crusader, producing over 5,300 units between 1941 and 1943, while also handling the A24 Cavalier. Firms like and Birmingham Railway Carriage handled Cromwell production from 1943, though firms like , primarily focused on infantry tanks like the Churchill, contributed by building pilot models for the Cromwell. Raw material shortages, including and specialized alloys, delayed engine availability and overall assembly, forcing prioritization of existing designs and leading to improvised solutions like retained engines in interim models. Doctrinal shifts post-1942 reflected lessons from early campaigns, moving cruiser tanks from pure exploitation roles to integrated operations alongside and . This evolution emphasized versatile "universal" designs capable of both mobility and firepower support, influencing hybrid prototypes that balanced speed with anti-tank capabilities. Testing and iterations highlighted rapid prototyping amid pressures. The A24 Cavalier, an experimental interim cruiser developed by Nuffield in 1941-1942, incorporated Crusader components but suffered from the underpowered engine, leading to only 503 units built before abandonment in favor of Meteor-equipped successors. Early trials in May 1945 involved six A41 prototypes evaluated in Europe, covering over 2,300 miles to assess sloped armor, 17-pounder armament, and reliability as the pinnacle of cruiser evolution toward a universal tank.

Major British Cruiser Tank Models

Early Models (A9, A10, A13)

The A9 Cruiser Mark I represented the initial implementation of the British cruiser tank concept, featuring a design with a main turret armed with a QF 2-pounder (40 mm) gun and two auxiliary machine-gun turrets on the hull sides for anti-infantry support. Weighing approximately 12.75 tons, it achieved a top road speed of 25 mph thanks to its AEC 150 hp engine and coil-spring suspension system, emphasizing mobility over protection with armor ranging from 6 to 14 mm thick. Only 125 units were produced between 1937 and 1939, primarily as pilot models to test the cruiser doctrine during the late . The A10 Cruiser Mark II served as a heavier counterpart to the A9, adopting a single main turret without auxiliary sub-turrets to simplify production and enhance armor protection, reaching up to 15 mm in thickness on key areas. Its close support variant, the A10 Mk II CS, replaced the 2-pounder gun with a 3.7-inch (94 mm) for delivering smoke and high-explosive rounds in coordination with , while retaining the same AEC engine for comparable speeds around 25 mph and a weight of about 13.75 tons. Approximately 30 close support models were built, and A10 units saw early deployment with the British Expeditionary Force in during 1940, where their bolted-on additional armor proved marginally effective against light threats. Building on lessons from the A9 and A10, the A13 Cruiser Mark III and IV introduced the Christie suspension system, characterized by large, independently sprung wheels on sloped trailing arms that enabled superior cross-country performance and road speeds up to 30 mph. Both marks mounted a 2-pounder in a single turret, with the Mk IV featuring improved armor up to 30 mm on the front hull and turret for better against contemporary anti-tank weapons. Weighing around 14 tons, production totaled 65 units for the Mk III from 1938 to 1939 and approximately 225 for the Mk IV through 1940, marking a shift toward more refined cruiser designs. These early models shared several limitations rooted in their rushed interwar development, including mechanical unreliability from inadequate track tensioning and engine cooling that led to frequent breakdowns on rough terrain. Their armament, while sufficient against infantry and light vehicles, proved inadequate for engaging emerging medium tanks due to the 2-pounder gun's lack of high-explosive shells and limited penetration at range. Thin overall armor further exposed them to even small-caliber fire, highlighting the trade-offs in prioritizing speed over durability.

Mid-War Models (Crusader, Cavalier, Centurion Prototypes)

The Crusader (A15) represented a key evolution in British cruiser tank design during the early 1940s, serving as the primary armored vehicle for British forces in the from 1941 to 1943. Developed as an enlargement of the earlier A13, it featured three main marks: the Mk I armed with a 2-pounder (40 mm) gun, and the Mk II and Mk III upgraded to a 6-pounder (57 mm) gun for improved anti-tank capability starting in 1942. Powered by a Nuffield V-12 engine producing 340 horsepower, the Crusader achieved a top speed of 27 mph on roads, emphasizing mobility over heavy armor, with maximum protection of 51 mm. One notable innovation was the incorporation of a full turret basket, which improved efficiency by providing a stable fighting platform and better ammunition handling within the turret. In total, approximately 5,300 units were produced by Nuffield Mechanization and Aero Limited, with the first Crusader III delivered in May 1942. The Covenanter (A13 Mk V), produced from 1940, was another mid-war cruiser tank, though it saw no due to persistent overheating and mechanical issues. Weighing 18 tons, it used a Meadows DAV of 275 horsepower for a top speed of 30 mph, armed with a 2-pounder gun and featuring armor up to 40 mm. Over 1,777 units were built primarily for training and home defense, highlighting production challenges in cruiser development. The Cavalier (A24), initially conceived as a prototype for the Cromwell series, bridged the gap between the Crusader and more advanced designs but suffered from developmental shortcomings. Weighing 27 tons, it was equipped with a 6-pounder main gun and retained components from the Crusader chassis for rapid production, while incorporating thicker armor up to 70 mm on the front hull. It utilized the uprated Nuffield Liberty Mark IV engine of 410 horsepower, though early models faced severe lubrication and cooling issues in hot climates, limiting its operational viability and top speed to around 24 mph. Only 503 units were built between mid-1942 and mid-1943, primarily as gun tanks and observation posts, before the design was largely abandoned in favor of the Meteor-engined Cromwell variants. Wartime engine advancements, such as the Rolls-Royce Meteor derived from the Merlin aero engine, were tested in related prototypes but not standardized on the Cavalier due to these teething problems. Centurion prototypes (A41) marked a pivotal shift toward a "universal tank" concept in 1943, combining speed with protection to address the limitations of specialized designs. Specified in October 1943 by the Tank Board, the early trials featured a 17-pounder (76 mm) gun for potent anti-tank performance and sloped frontal armor of up to 76 mm (initially around 57 mm on some components) to deflect German 88 mm rounds. Powered by the 600+ horsepower engine, these prototypes aimed for 30 mph mobility at 40 tons, with several pilot models constructed starting in 1945 and initial testing conducted by mid-1945, leading to the first production vehicles entering service in 1945. This design philosophy emphasized versatility, paving the way for main battle tanks, though wartime production was limited to these pre-series vehicles. Production of mid-war cruisers like the Crusader emphasized high output to support North African operations, with over 5,000 units rushed into service despite reliability concerns from inadequate trials. However, a common limitation across these models was poor gun depression, typically -5 to -7 degrees, which hindered effective hull-down firing positions on uneven terrain compared to contemporary designs.

Late-War Models (Cromwell, Comet)

The Cromwell (A27), introduced in 1943, represented a significant advancement in British cruiser tank design, powered by the V12 engine delivering 600 horsepower, which enabled a top road speed of 40 mph ungoverned or 32 mph limited for operational reliability. Weighing approximately 28 tons, it featured a 75 mm ROQF gun in later marks (from Cromwell IV onward, introduced November 1943), providing improved firepower for both high-explosive and armor-piercing roles against German medium tanks. Over 3,000 Cromwell tanks were produced by mid-1945, with initial production challenges like engine cooling resolved by May 1944, allowing widespread deployment in Northwest Europe from June 1944. A key variant, the Challenger (A30), addressed the Cromwell's anti-tank limitations by mounting the more powerful 17-pounder gun on an extended Cromwell with enhanced turret armor, though production was limited to around 200 units due to the impending shift toward universal tank designs. The Cromwell's hull incorporated refinements such as frontal armor up to 76 mm (with some variants reaching 102 mm) and improved crew , including better internal layout for the five-man crew, contributing to its reputation for mobility and reliability in fast-paced armored operations. Developed as the Cromwell's successor, the (A34) entered production in September 1944 and represented a balanced British tank of 1944-1945, combining good mobility from the Meteor engine, improved reliability over predecessors, and effective firepower from the high-velocity 77 mm QFSA gun—a derivative of the 17-pounder—offering superior penetration against heavy armor at ranges up to 1,000 yards. Powered by the same Meteor engine, it achieved a top speed of 32 mph despite weighing 33 tons, with frontal armor thickened to 101 mm for better protection without sacrificing mobility. Approximately 1,200 s were built by May 1945, primarily by , and the design included stabilized gun sights for improved accuracy on the move, along with enhanced crew comforts that made it popular among operators. Deployed from early 1945 with units like the 11th Armoured Division, the Comet provided a potent stopgap for British forces in the war's closing stages. As concluded, production of both the Cromwell and ceased in 1945, marking the end of dedicated cruiser tank development in favor of the more versatile , which combined cruiser speed with armor and firepower.

Operational History

North Africa and Mediterranean Campaigns

In , early cruiser models such as the A9 and A10 saw their first major deployment during from December 1940 to February 1941, where the 7th Armoured Division exploited their speed to outmaneuver Italian forces. These tanks, supported by Matildas, achieved decisive victories against Italian M13/40 and tanks, capturing over 138,000 prisoners and hundreds of enemy vehicles while suffering relatively low losses of around 1,900 personnel and fewer than 50 tanks. The operation demonstrated the cruisers' mobility in desert flanking maneuvers, pushing Italian lines back 500 kilometers to El Agheila. The introduction of the in late 1941 marked a shift, with its debut in (November-December 1941), where over 200 Crusaders helped relieve and inflict heavy Axis casualties, including 300 tanks destroyed despite British losses exceeding 500 vehicles from mechanical issues and combat. However, vulnerabilities became evident in the (May-June 1942), where Crusaders' thin armor proved inadequate against German Panzer IIIs and IVs equipped with 5 cm guns; the Eighth Army lost over half its 300 cruiser tanks, dropping to 132 operational by mid-battle, amid total armored casualties of around 540. Speed allowed some flanking successes, but poor coordination and dust ingress exacerbated reliability problems. At the Second Battle of El Alamein (October-November 1942), Crusaders played a reconnaissance and flanking role, with units like the 3rd King's Own Hussars losing 47 of 51 tanks in intense engagements against Axis armor, contributing to over 200 British cruiser losses overall. Their mobility supported Montgomery's armored thrusts, but the 2-pounder gun's lack of high-explosive rounds limited effectiveness against German 50 mm PaK 38 anti-tank guns, highlighting the need for up-gunned variants. Adaptations like improved two-stage air filters on Crusaders mitigated dust-clogging engines, enhancing desert performance after initial trials with A9s revealed the necessity. In the Mediterranean theater, Crusaders continued service through the campaign (November 1942-May 1943), where Mk III variants with 6-pounder guns supported the First Army's advances, aiding the final Axis surrender in . Their speed facilitated in rugged terrain, though ongoing armor weaknesses persisted against late-war German threats. Overall, these campaigns underscored cruiser tanks' doctrinal emphasis on mobility for exploitation and flanking, but exposed critical gaps in protection and firepower against evolving Axis defenses, influencing subsequent British armored tactics.

Northwest Europe and Pacific Theaters

Cruiser tanks suffered significant early losses during the in May 1940, where A13 models equipped units like the and 1st Armoured Division. Many A13s were abandoned or destroyed during the retreat to , contributing to the evacuation of over 338,000 Allied troops but leaving behind substantial armored assets, including dozens of cruiser tanks that were later captured and repurposed by German forces. In the Normandy campaign of 1944, Cromwell tanks equipped the 7th Armoured Division, particularly the 4th County of London Yeomanry, during Operation Perch, where they advanced through a gap in German lines south-west of Bayeux to outflank positions near Caen. The division exploited this breach by pushing five miles overnight from Livry to Villers-Bocage on 12-13 June, aiming to capture the town and disrupt Panzer Lehr Division defenses. However, the bocage terrain—characterized by high hedgerows, narrow roads, and hilly villages—severely hampered their mobility, stretching columns along vulnerable routes like the main road into Villers-Bocage and blocking maneuvers, such as at a railway embankment. This led to heavy losses, including several Cromwells destroyed in ambushes led by Michael Wittmann's Tiger tank, forcing a retreat despite some counter-successes like destroying two Tigers and a Panzer IV. Overall, the Cromwells' speed aided initial exploitation but proved inadequate against the confined, ambush-prone landscape. During Operation Market Garden in September 1944, elements of the 11th Armoured Division supported XXX Corps' advances toward Arnhem using Cromwell tanks, covering the right flank while enabling rapid pushes across Dutch terrain. The Comet tank, introduced in early 1945, saw its combat debut during the final Allied advances into Germany in April 1945, with its enhanced 77mm gun and Rolls-Royce Meteor engine allowing speeds up to 32 mph on roads and facilitating quicker maneuvers than earlier cruisers. This deployment highlighted the Comet's role in late-war exploitation tactics, building on Cromwell-derived designs for improved firepower and velocity. By 1945, over 1,000 British cruiser tanks, including Cromwells, Comets, and variants, were deployed across Northwest Europe with 21st Army Group, equipping armoured regiments in divisions like the 7th and 11th, where each typically fielded around 55 cruisers per unit. These vehicles contributed to key breakthroughs, such as during the advance into Germany, leveraging their mobility for exploitation roles in combined arms operations. However, they were often overshadowed by slower, heavily armoured infantry tanks like the Churchill, which better suited deliberate assaults in built-up or defended areas, while cruisers excelled in open advances but suffered higher losses from anti-tank fire—333 armoured fighting vehicles, mostly cruisers, destroyed between March and May alone. Following VE Day in May 1945, surviving cruiser tanks were repurposed for occupation duties and training, marking the end of their combat role as specialized vehicles.

Cruiser Tank Concepts in Other Nations

Soviet Union and Eastern Influences

The adopted cruiser-like tank concepts in the through the development of the BT (Bystrohodnyy Tank, or "Fast Tank") series, which emphasized high speed for exploitation roles akin to British cruiser designs. In 1930, the Soviets purchased two Christie M1931 tanks from American inventor for $60,000, along with $4,000 in spare parts and a $100,000 license for production rights and patents, with the vehicles arriving in the USSR in early 1931. These prototypes, tested extensively that year, inspired the BT-2 (), BT-5 (), and (1935) models, which retained the Christie suspension system of large, independently sprung wheels for exceptional mobility—reaching speeds of up to 72 km/h (45 mph) on roads and 50 km/h (31 mph) off-road when using auxiliary wheels—while mounting a 45 mm gun and thin 15 mm armor plating for rapid advances rather than prolonged engagements. Over 8,000 BT tanks were produced between 1932 and 1941, forming the backbone of Soviet armored forces and aligning with the Red Army's "deep battle" doctrine, which called for breakthrough forces to exploit gaps with fast-moving units. These tanks saw early combat in the (1936–1939), where approximately 50 BT-5s were supplied to Republican forces and used in rapid assaults, though many were lost to mechanical issues and enemy fire, providing valuable lessons in mobile operations. Similarly, in the (1939) against , around 400 BT-7s supported Soviet counterattacks, demonstrating their speed in flanking maneuvers and contributing to the that shaped pre-war mechanized tactics. During , BT tanks played a prominent role in the initial phases of in June 1941, comprising the majority of the Red Army's roughly 10,000 light tanks deployed against the German invasion, where their speed enabled some early counterattacks and encirclements. However, their thin armor proved vulnerable to German and IV guns, resulting in heavy losses—over 20,000 Soviet tanks destroyed in the opening months, with BT series suffering disproportionately due to obsolescence against improved anti-tank weapons. This experience accelerated the evolution toward more balanced designs, with the BT chassis influencing prototypes like the A-20 and A-32, ultimately leading to the in 1940 as a hybrid cruiser-infantry concept featuring sloped armor, Christie-derived suspension (adapted to tracks only), and greater protection while retaining mobility for deep exploitation. Soviet BT designs shared a doctrinal emphasis on speed for operational exploitation with British cruiser tanks, such as the A13, though the common origin facilitated parallel advancements in high-mobility armor independent of direct trials influence. This convergence underscored the interwar focus on fast tanks to support offensive maneuvers in fluid battles.

Western and Other Armies

In the German , the and Panzer IV evolved into roles analogous to medium cruiser tanks, emphasizing mobility for exploitation and breakthroughs during operations. The , introduced in 1937, featured a top road speed of 40 km/h (25 mph) and was initially armed with a 37 mm gun, later upgraded to a 50 mm KwK 39 for anti-tank engagements, allowing it to spearhead armored advances while supporting infantry. Complementing this, the Panzer IV, entering service in 1939, achieved similar speeds of 40 km/h and carried a 75 mm KwK 37 short-barreled gun optimized for close support, with its chassis proving versatile enough for ongoing upgrades throughout the war. These tanks formed the core of panzer divisions, enabling rapid maneuvers that outpaced enemy defenses in campaigns across . Czechoslovak designs also contributed to cruiser tank concepts, particularly through the LT vz. 35 and LT vz. 38 light tanks, which prioritized speed and firepower for and flanking roles. The LT vz. 35, produced from 1936, reached a top speed of 35 km/h (22 mph) and mounted a 37 mm Škoda A7 gun, serving as a cavalry support vehicle in the before its occupation. The subsequent LT vz. 38, developed in 1938 by , improved on this with a speed of 42 km/h (26 mph) and the same 37 mm armament, designed explicitly for export markets. Several export variants, including the TNH-PS model, were tested by the in 1938, influencing the mobility-focused philosophy of early British cruisers like the A13 through demonstrations of reliable Christie-like suspension and compact turret designs, though no direct adoption occurred. Canada's contribution to cruiser tank development came via the Ram, a domestically produced vehicle adapted from the American M3 to address urgent needs for armored training platforms. Initiated in 1941, the Ram I featured a 2-pounder in a fully traversable turret, while the Ram II variant underwent trials with the more potent 6-pounder to enhance its cruiser capabilities for potential frontline use. 1,899 Ram II cruiser tanks were produced between 1942 and 1943 at , primarily allocated for crew training in and the , as well as home defense against possible invasion, though they saw no combat deployment due to the shift toward standardized Sherman production. Other Western and neutral nations pursued partial analogs to cruiser tanks with varying degrees of success, often constrained by limited resources. Poland's light tank, derived from the Vickers 6-Ton and entering service in 1935, functioned in a cruiser-like role with its 37 mm wz. 37 gun and a top speed of 37 km/h (23 mph), intended for independent tank battalions to support mobile operations; however, production totaled only about 150 units, limiting its impact during the 1939 invasion. In Sweden, the Strv m/21-29, an upgraded version of the German light tank acquired covertly in 1921, represented an early effort at a fast, maneuverable design with machine-gun armament and a modest speed of 16 km/h (10 mph), but its adoption was severely restricted to just 10 vehicles for experimental and coastal defense purposes, reflecting Sweden's neutral stance and industrial constraints.

Legacy and Modern Influence

Post-War Transitions

Following , surplus cruiser tanks such as the Cromwell and saw limited but notable deployment in the (1950-1953) by British and Commonwealth forces. The , serving as the armored reconnaissance regiment of the 7th Armoured Brigade, operated approximately 14 Cromwell tanks during key engagements, including the defense against Chinese offensives at Happy Valley in January 1951, where the vehicles provided mobile despite their obsolescence compared to contemporary threats. The post-war period marked the rapid phasing out of specialized cruiser tanks in favor of the , introduced in 1946 as a universal tank capable of fulfilling both cruiser mobility and infantry support roles. Designed to replace the bifurcated cruiser and infantry tank doctrines, the combined a 20-pounder , enhanced armor up to 118 mm, and the reliable Meteor engine, entering full production in 1945 with over 4,400 units built by the early 1960s across 13 marks and variants. This transition reflected lessons from wartime experiences, prioritizing a single versatile platform over dedicated fast cruisers like the Cromwell, which were withdrawn from front-line service by the mid-1950s. Exports and engineering conversions extended the life of cruiser tanks amid and regional conflicts. In the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Israel acquired a small number of Cromwells—initially through captures and defections from British stocks—using them for infantry support and reconnaissance in operations like Horev, where their mobility proved advantageous in desert terrain despite limited quantities. Post-war, many Cromwells were repurposed as armored recovery vehicles (ARVs) and engineering platforms to support Royal Engineer tasks like obstacle clearance, reflecting their chassis reliability even as combat roles diminished. By the 1950s, NATO's evolving doctrine emphasized main battle tanks (MBTs) as standardized, versatile platforms, effectively ending the era of specialized cruiser types. Influenced by the 1957 Tripartite Conference on Armour among the , , and , this shift prioritized tanks like the —retrospectively classified as an early MBT—for operations, rendering fast, lightly armored cruisers obsolete in favor of balanced firepower, protection, and mobility suitable for nuclear-era battlefields.

Design Impact on Contemporary Tanks

The principles of cruiser tanks, which prioritized a balance between high mobility and potent firepower over maximal armor, have profoundly shaped the design of modern main battle tanks (MBTs), emphasizing versatile platforms capable of exploitation roles in dynamic battlefields. This legacy is evident in vehicles like the German , which achieves road speeds exceeding 40 mph (72 km/h) via its 1,500 hp MTU MB 873 Ka-501 diesel engine, while incorporating multi-layer composite armor—combining steel, ceramics, and spall liners—for enhanced protection without sacrificing agility. Similarly, derivatives of the Soviet series maintain cruiser-inspired mobility with a top speed of 60 km/h and integrate advanced 125mm guns for superior firepower, using composite and explosive reactive armor to address protection needs in a balanced design. These MBTs reflect the evolution from cruiser concepts, where speed enabled flanking maneuvers and rapid response, now scaled to counter contemporary threats like anti-tank guided missiles. Modern and vehicles continue this tradition, adapting cruiser speed for and hybrid operations in urban and . The U.S. Army's Mobile Gun System (MGS), for example, embodies this parallel with its 60 mph top speed on roads and a low-profile turret mounting a 105mm M68A1 , delivering tank-level firepower to support while relying on agility to evade heavy engagements rather than thick armor. In urban doctrines, such as those employed in and , these platforms enable "hit-and-run" tactics akin to cruiser exploitation, integrating with dismounted forces for fluid control of key terrain amid close-quarters combat. The inherent vulnerabilities of cruiser tanks—thin armor prone to penetration by anti-tank guns and early shaped charges—directly informed post-2000 advancements in add-on protections, shifting from passive thickness to layered, reactive solutions. , consisting of spaced steel bars that disrupt warheads like RPGs by triggering premature detonation, evolved from lessons in light-armored vehicle susceptibility during conflicts like , where similar thin protections failed against improvised threats. Complementing this, active protection systems (APS), such as the Kontakt-5 ERA on T-72 upgrades or hard-kill interceptors, actively counter incoming projectiles, addressing the cruiser-era gaps where mobility alone could not mitigate ambush risks in open terrain. Historiographical assessments underscore ongoing debates about cruiser effectiveness, with David Fletcher's analyses praising their velocity in North African engagements—making them elusive targets for Axis forces—but critiquing persistent mechanical unreliability and inadequate armor that limited sustained utility, as detailed in works spanning the to .

References

  1. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/britains-struggle-to-build-effective-tanks-during-the-second-world-war
  2. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/gb/a34-cruiser-tank-comet-mark-i/
  3. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/gb/A9_Cruiser_MkI.php
  4. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/morris-martel-tankettes/
  5. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004721715/BP000019.pdf
  6. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1919Parisv13/ch14subsubch2
  7. https://escholarship.org/content/qt1hw200dw/qt1hw200dw_noSplash_cec49b9c77d17de48e91fd8755fe9e74.pdf
  8. https://ditsong.org.za/en/show-item/the-people-history-development-and-use-of-the-famous-rolls-royce-meteor-engine/
  9. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/gb/Vickers_Medium_MkI-MkII.php
  10. https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.php?armor_id=562
  11. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/operation-sentry-the-first-centurion-trials-1945/
  12. https://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_cruiser_tank_mk_I.html
  13. https://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_cruiser_tank_mk_II.html
  14. https://tank-afv.com/ww2/gb/A10_Cruiser_MkII.php
  15. https://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_cruiser_tank_mk_IV.html
  16. https://tankmuseum.org/tank-nuts/tank-collection/crusader-iii
  17. https://ww2db.com/vehicle_spec.php?q=170
  18. https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.php?armor_id=243
  19. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/gb/covenanter.php
  20. https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.php?armor_id=499
  21. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/gb/centurion.php
  22. https://www.keymilitary.com/article/cent-counted
  23. https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Tank:GB20_Crusader
  24. https://www.rdgmuseum.org.uk/history-and-research/tanks-and-vehicles/the-1940s/the-a27-cromwell-cruiser-tank/
  25. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/the-british-cromwell-tank-what-made-it-such-a-success/
  26. https://ukdefenceforum.net/viewtopic.php?t=942
  27. https://tankmuseum.org/tank-nuts/tank-collection/comet
  28. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/gb/a34-comet.php
  29. https://www.wwiiequipment.com/united-kingdom/tanks/comet.php
  30. https://1420kh.co.uk/the-comet/
  31. https://www.thoughtco.com/world-war-ii-operation-compass-2361489
  32. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/operation-compass-masterstroke-in-the-desert/
  33. https://warhistory.org/@msw/article/the-battle-of-gazala-rommels-masterpiece
  34. https://www.qrhmuseum.com/2nd-battle-of-el-alamein-3rd-the-kings-own-hussars-2-3-november-1942
  35. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/the-tanks-and-guns-of-the-second-world-wars-desert-war
  36. https://horsepowermuseum.co.uk/the-10th-royal-hussars-in-the-battle-for-france-1940/
  37. https://militarymatters.online/military-history/equipment-the-british-lost-at-dunkirk-that-the-germans-reused/
  38. https://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_villers_bocage.html
  39. https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.php?armor_id=68
  40. https://tankmuseum.org/article/crouching-tiger-hidden-comet
  41. https://www.ww2-weapons.com/british-army-in-north-west-europe/
  42. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/british-tank-losses-march-to-may-1945-the-war-in-north-west-europe/
  43. https://www.tankarchives.com/2016/11/christie-m1931.html
  44. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/soviet/soviet_bt-2.php
  45. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/tank-3.htm
  46. https://www.benning.army.mil/armor/earmor/content/issues/2020/Fall/4Candill20.pdf
  47. https://www.slashgear.com/1567383/tanks-involved-in-battle-of-khalkhin-gol/
  48. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/operation-barbarossa-and-germanys-failure-in-the-soviet-union
  49. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/uk/cruiser-mk-iii-a-13-mark-i/
  50. https://www.britannica.com/technology/panzer/Pz-IV
  51. https://tankmuseum.org/tank-nuts/tank-collection/panzer-iv
  52. https://tank-afv.com/ww2/czech/Skoda_CKD_LT-Vz-35.php
  53. https://tank-afv.com/ww2/czech/CKD-Skoda_LT-Vz-38.php
  54. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/british-testing-of-the-praga-tnh-p-8-ton-tank-in-1938/
  55. https://www.tankarchives.com/2023/02/anglo-canadian-cruiser.html
  56. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/canada/ram-tank/
  57. https://tank-afv.com/ww2/polish/polish_7TP.php
  58. https://tank-afv.com/ww2/sweden/ww2-swedish-tanks.php
  59. https://www.qrhmuseum.com/the-korean-war-slaughter-at-happy-valley
  60. https://tankmuseum.org/tank-nuts/tank-collection/cromwell
  61. https://ukdefenceforum.net/viewtopic.php?t=941
  62. https://1420kh.co.uk/centurion-tank/
  63. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/sherman-tanks-of-the-israeli-army/
  64. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a17015005/history-american-tank/
  65. https://www.army-technology.com/projects/leopard/
  66. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/t-72-specs.htm
  67. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/iav-mgs.htm
  68. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA567418.pdf
  69. https://www.ospreypublishing.com/us/crusader-and-covenanter-cruiser-tanks-193945-9781780967387/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.