Hubbry Logo
Languages of BiharLanguages of BiharMain
Open search
Languages of Bihar
Community hub
Languages of Bihar
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Languages of Bihar
Languages of Bihar
Languages of Bihar
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
‹ The template Culture of Bihar is being considered for merging. ›
Part of a series on the
Culture of Bihar
Culture of Bihar
Society
Topics
Symbols

Most of the languages of Bihar, the third most populous state of India, belong to the Bihari subgroup of the Indo-Aryan family. Chief among them are Bhojpuri, spoken in the west of the state, Maithili in the north, Magahi in center around capital Patna and in the south of the state. Maithili has official recognition under the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution of India.[1] The official language of Bihar is Modern Standard Hindi,[2] with Standard Urdu serving as a second official language in 15 districts.[3] Bihari Hindi serves as the lingua franca of the region.

Exact speaker numbers for the main Bihari languages are not known because the more educated prefer to speak in Hindi (in formal situations) and so return this answer on the census, while many in rural areas and the urban poor, especially the illiterate, list their language as "Hindi" And "Urdu" on the census as they regard that as the term for their language.[4]

Other languages include the Indo-Aryan languages like Angika, Bajjika, Surjapuri, Bengali and Tharu; the Dravidian languages Kurukh (84,000 speakers in 2011), Kulehiya/Malto (76,000) and Mal Paharia, as well as the Austroasiatic languages Santali (almost half a million speakers in 2011) and Munda.[5]

History

[edit]
Languages Spoken in Bihar and Jharkhand
Detailed Linguistic map of Bihar and Jharkhand combined

The first success of spreading Modern Standard Hindi occurred in Bihar in 1881, when it displaced Standard Urdu as the sole official medium of the province. In this struggle between Hindi and Urdu standards of the Hindustani language, the potential claims of the three large mother tongues in the region – Bhojpuri, Maithili and Magahi were ignored. After independence, Hindi was again given the sole official status through the Bihar Official Language Act, 1950. Urdu became the second official language in the undivided State of Bihar on 16 August 1947

Official languages

[edit]
Language and script
(L) Bhojpuri story written in Kaithi (1898), (R) Maithili language in Tirhuta and Devanagari scripts

Hindi is the official languages of the State.[6] Urdu is the second official language of the state.

Hindi

[edit]
Main articles: Bihari Hindi and Hindi in Bihar
See also: Hindi

Recognised languages

[edit]

Maithili

[edit]
Main article: Maithili language

Maithili is an Indo-Aryan language native to India and Nepal. In India, it is widely spoken in Bihar.[7][8] Native speakers are also found in other states and union territories of India, most notably in Jharkhand and the National Capital Territory of Delhi.[9] According to Ethnologue, there are about 12 million Maithili speakers in India as per 2011 Census.[10] However, in the 2011 census of India, It was reported by only 1,35,83,464 people as their mother tongue comprising about 1.12% of the total population of India,[11] as many Maithili speakers view it as a dialect of Hindi and report their mother tongue as Hindi. In Nepal, it is spoken in the eastern Terai, and is the second most prevalent language of Nepal.[12] Tirhuta was formerly the primary script for written Maithili. Less commonly, it was also written in the local variant of Kaithi.[13] Today it is written in the Devanagari script.[14]

In 2003, Maithili was included in the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution as a recognised regional language of India, which allows it to be used in education, government, and other official contexts.[15]

Other languages and dialects of Bihar

[edit]

Angika

[edit]
Main article: Angika

Angika is mainly spoken in Anga area which includes Munger, Bhagalpur and Banka districts of Bihar and the Santhal Pargana division of Jharkhand.[16] Its speakers are estimated to be around 15 million.[17] In addition to the Anga area, it is also spoken in some parts of Purnia district of Bihar.[18]

Bajjika

[edit]
Main article: Bajjika

Bajjika or Western Maithili is spoken in eastern India and Nepal. It is often considered to be a dialect of the Maithili language.[19] Bajjika is spoken in the north-western part of Bihar which mostly spans the modern day Tirhut Division and thus is also referred to as Tirhutiya. In Bihar, it is mainly spoken in the Samastipur, Sitamarhi, Muzaffarpur, Vaishali, Sheohar districts. It is also spoken in a part of the Darbhanga district adjoining Muzaffarpur and Samastipur districts.[20]

Researcher Abhishek Kashyap (2013), based on the 2001 census data, estimated that there were 20 million Bajjika speakers in Bihar (including around 11.46 illiterate adults).[21]

Bhojpuri

[edit]
Main article: Bhojpuri language

Bhojpuri is an Indo-Aryan language predominantly spoken in the Bhojpur region located in the western part of Bihar. It is widely spoken in several districts of Bihar, including West Champaran, East Champaran, Saran, Siwan, Gopalganj, Muzaffarpur, Bhojpur, Buxar, Kaimur, and Rohtas. Apart from western Bihar, the Bhojpur region also encompasses eastern Uttar Pradesh, western Jharkhand, some parts of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, as well as the Terai region of Nepal.[22] In Nepal, Bhojpuri is the third most spoken language, primarily used in the central and eastern Terai regions. Globally, there are approximately 150 million Bhojpuri speakers.

Bhojpuri has several dialects: Southern Bhojpuri, Northern Bhojpuri, Western Bhojpuri, and Nagpuria.[23] The Bhojpuri variant of the Kaithi script is the indigenous script of the Bhojpuri language.[24] However, in modern times, Devanagari has become more commonly used for writing Bhojpuri.

There is a demand for the recognition of Bhojpuri language, its inclusion in the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, and its status as an official language in Bihar.[25]

Magahi

[edit]
Main article: Magahi language

Magahi is spoken in the Magadh region in southern Bihar. Its heartland is Patna, Jehanabad, Nalanda, Nawada, Gaya and Sheikhpura districts, with the centres of Magahi culture being Patna, earlier called Pataliputra, and Gaya. In the west, in western Patna district, Arwal and Aurangabad districts, Magahi blends into Bhojpuri spoken across the Son river. Across the Ganga Magahi borders various dialects closely related to Maithili. In the east, in Lakhisarai and Jamui districts, Magahi blends into Angika.[26]

Khortha

[edit]
Main article: Khortha language

Khortha is a language variety spoken in far-southern Bihar adjoining Jharkhand, on the Chota Nagpur plateau. Districts where Khortha is spoken include Aurangabad, Gaya, Nawada and Jamui.[27]

Santali

[edit]
Main article: Santali language

Santhali is a Munda language spoken by the Santhal Adivasis in its heartland in Santhal Parganas in northeastern Jharkhand. As an extension of this population, Santhali is spoken by many people in Jamui, Banka, Munger and Bhagalpur districts. Many Santhali people were also brought to eastern Bihar (Purnia division) as agricultural workers, so large numbers are also found in Araria, Purnia, Katihar and Kishanganj districts.

Surjapuri

[edit]
Main article: Surjapuri language

Surjapuri is a language variety spoken in Purnia division (Araria, Purnia, Katihar and Kishanganj districts), and adjoining areas of West Bengal, although it has been clubbed under Hindi in the census. In fact, it is more closely related to Assamese and Bengali than Hindi, being the western extension of the Kamata group of lects like Rajbanshi in neighbouring Nepal and Rangpuri in nearby Bangladesh. In the west it blends with eastern dialects of Maithili.[28]

Tharu

[edit]
Main article: Tharu languages

Tharu is spoken by the Tharu people of the Terai region in Nepal and neighboring regions of Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar in India. Tharu language is one of the major language spoken in Nepal.[29] Although their own precise classification within Indo-Aryan remains uncertain, Tharu languages have superficial similarities with neighbouring languages such as Awadhi, Maithili, Bengali, Rajbanshi and Bhojpuri. In Bihar it is spoken in northern parts of East Champaran and West Champaran districts.[28]

Classical languages of Bihar

[edit]

Pali

[edit]
Main article: Pali

Sanskrit

[edit]
Main article: Sanskrit

Writing systems

[edit]
Main articles: Indic script, Devanagari, Tirhuta, and Kaithi

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Languages of Bihar

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The languages of comprise a diverse array of primarily Indo-Aryan tongues spoken across the eastern Indian state of , with established as the under the Bihar Official Language Act of 1950, and recognized as a second following amendments in 1980. The vernacular landscape is dominated by the Bihari subgroup of , including Bhojpuri, Maithili, and Magahi, which together with and represent the mother tongues of over 80% of the state's population according to the 2011 census data. Bhojpuri is the most prevalent regional language at approximately 24.9%, closely rivaled by at 25.5%, followed by Maithili (12.4%), Magahi (10.9%), and (8.4%), reflecting 's linguistic continuum rooted in ancient . This diversity encompasses 146 reported mother tongues, underscoring the state's ethnolinguistic complexity amid a population exceeding 100 million. Traditional scripts such as and Mithilakshar have historically complemented , preserving literary traditions in regional languages despite pressures from standardization.

Linguistic Overview

Classification and Diversity

The languages spoken in Bihar primarily belong to the branch of the Indo-European family, with the core group comprising the known as Bihari. This subgroup includes Maithili, Bhojpuri, Magahi, , and , which evolved from and exhibit phonological and grammatical features distinct from Western Indo-Aryan languages like , such as retroflex consonants and case systems. These languages are not mere dialects of , despite frequent administrative grouping under the "Hindi" category in Indian censuses, which understates their independent status and mutual unintelligibility with standard . Complementing the Indo-Aryan dominance are from the Munda branch, including Santali, Mundari, and Ho, spoken by tribal populations primarily in the southern and eastern parts of the state. These languages feature agglutinative morphology and Austroasiatic , contrasting sharply with Indo-Aryan , and are used by approximately 1.5 million speakers collectively as per 2011 data. , an Indo-Aryan language with heavy Perso-Arabic lexicon, serves as a literary and religious medium for Muslim communities. Bihar's linguistic diversity is marked by over 140 reported mother tongues in the 2011 Census, though dominated by a few major ones: Hindi (reported by 56.7% of the 104 million population, inclusive of Bihari varieties), Maithili (12.3%), Urdu (10.9%), Bhojpuri (7.5%), and Magahi (3.7%). This diversity reflects historical migrations, Prakrit evolution, and substrate influences from pre-Indo-Aryan languages, resulting in dialect continua with significant variation; for instance, Bhojpuri dialects range from standardized forms to transitional varieties bordering Awadhi. Minority languages like Bengali and Nepali appear in border districts, adding to the mosaic, while scripts such as Kaithi and Mithilakshar historically encoded regional phonological distinctions before Devanagari standardization.

Major Language Families

The languages spoken in Bihar predominantly belong to the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-European language family, which encompasses the majority of the state's linguistic diversity and is used by over 90% of the population as primary or secondary tongues. Within this family, the Eastern Indo-Aryan or Bihari subgroup predominates, including Bhojpuri (with around 50 million speakers regionally, many in western Bihar), Maithili (concentrated in the northern Mithila region), Magahi (prevalent in central and southern areas around Patna), Angika, and Bajjika; these evolved from Magadhi Prakrit and exhibit phonological and grammatical traits distinct from Western Hindi dialects, such as aspirated stops and case markers derived from Sanskrit. Hindi itself, often reported as a mother tongue in censuses due to standardization pressures, shares Indo-Aryan roots but functions as a literary and official medium overlaying these vernaculars. **, from the Munda subgroup, are spoken by (indigenous) groups, particularly in the Chota Nagpur plateau-influenced southern districts, representing a pre-Indo-Aryan substrate layer in the region's . Key examples include Santali (a scheduled with millions of speakers across eastern , including significant communities in ), Mundari (estimated at 750,000 speakers in and neighboring states combined), Ho, and smaller varieties like Kurmali; these feature agglutinative morphology, sesquisyllabic , and Austroasiatic-specific unrelated to Indo-Aryan terms, reflecting ancient migrations from . Tribal populations, comprising about 1.3% of 's 104 million residents per the 2011 census, sustain these amid pressures from dominant Indo-Aryan neighbors. Dravidian languages form a minor but distinct family, spoken by specific Scheduled Tribes like the Oraon, who use Kurukh (also called Oraon), a North Dravidian tongue with nearly 2 million speakers across , , , and as of 2011. Kurukh retains Dravidian hallmarks such as retroflex consonants, agglutinative verb systems, and non-Indo-European terms, with Oraon communities in 's districts maintaining it alongside or ; Malto, another North Dravidian isolate, persists among small Paharia groups in with around 76,000 speakers regionally. These languages evidence relic Dravidian pockets in northern , possibly predating expansions, though their speaker bases remain under 1% statewide due to assimilation.

Historical Evolution

Ancient and Classical Period

The region of ancient Magadha, encompassing much of modern , witnessed the transition from Old Indo-Aryan to Middle Indo-Aryan Prakrits during the first millennium BCE. , used in ritual and literary contexts from approximately 1500 BCE, appears in later Vedic texts referencing Magadha, indicating early Indo-Aryan presence, though spoken vernaculars likely diverged regionally by the late (c. 1000–500 BCE). By the 6th century BCE, with the rise of the kingdom under dynasties like the Haryankas, emerged as the primary vernacular, reflecting phonetic and grammatical simplifications from , such as the loss of intervocalic consonants and vowel shifts characteristic of eastern dialects. Magadhi Prakrit gained prominence during the Mauryan Empire (322–185 BCE), serving as the administrative language of the court and the populace in Magadha, as evidenced by Ashoka's rock edicts inscribed in a closely related Prakrit form around 250 BCE. This dialect, centered in Bihar, influenced , the canonical language of early , which Theravada traditions link to Magadhi as a standardized form for preserving the Buddha's teachings from the 5th–3rd centuries BCE onward. 's , including retention of 'r' sounds and aspiration patterns akin to Magadhi, underscores its roots in the region's speech, facilitating the spread of Buddhist literature from centers like and Nalanda. In the classical period (c. 200 BCE–600 CE), Prakrits like —associated with and used in Jain canonical texts compiled from the BCE—coexisted with a under empires such as the Guptas (c. 320–550 CE), where dominated elite literature and inscriptions, yet vernacular Prakrits persisted among the populace. , a transitional Prakrit blending Magadhi elements, preserved semi-erudite forms for religious discourse, evidencing causal continuity from spoken Magadhi to later eastern Indo-Aryan developments. This era's bilingualism, with Prakrits handling everyday and dramatic expressions while advanced grammar and philosophy, laid foundational phonological traits—such as implosive consonants and —for proto-Bihari languages.

Medieval and Early Modern Period

In the medieval period, spanning approximately the 12th to 16th centuries, the Bihari languages—Maithili, Magahi, and Bhojpuri—evolved from earlier Apabhramsa forms into more standardized vernaculars amid regional political fragmentation following the decline of central Magadha authority. Maithili, centered in the Mithila region, flourished as a literary medium under the Karnata and succeeding Oiniwar dynasties (c. 1325–1526), which ruled Mithila and used it for court records and cultural patronage. The Oiniwar era marked a peak for Maithili, with royal deeds inscribed on palm leaves in the language, reflecting its administrative and cultural prominence. The poet (c. 1352–1448), a courtier under Oiniwar king Shiva Simha, composed seminal works in Maithili, including Kirtilata and songs devoted to Krishna, blending erotic and themes that drew from poetics while employing vernacular idiom. These texts not only codified Maithili grammar and vocabulary but also exerted influence on Bengali, Nepali, and Oriya literatures, establishing it as one of the earliest developed Indo-Aryan vernaculars with a corpus of secular and religious writings. The script, tracing its roots to post-Gupta Brahmi derivatives (after c. 550 AD) and linked to scribal practices, became integral for documenting in legal, administrative, and folk contexts during this era. Employed for Magahi, Bhojpuri, and even early Maithili texts, Kaithi enabled practical record-keeping in regional courts and communities, distinct from elite or incoming Persian usages under influence. During the early modern period (c. 16th–18th centuries), Mughal overlordship introduced Persian as the imperial administrative language across Bihar, resulting in lexical incorporations into local dialects and the emergence of Urdu by the 17th century through Perso-Arabic fusion with Bihari substrates. Nonetheless, vernacular Bihari languages sustained oral traditions, devotional compositions, and sub-regional documentation, with Kaithi persisting for non-official writings in Magahi and Bhojpuri. Maithili's literary continuity waned post-Oiniwar conquest in 1526 but endured in scholarly circles, while scripts like Mithilakshar supplemented Kaithi for specialized Maithili usage.

Colonial Era and Modern Standardization

During the British colonial period in India, the administration in Bihar shifted official language use from Persian to Urdu in 1837, followed by the adoption of standardized Hindi in Devanagari and Kaithi scripts by 1881, replacing Perso-Arabic script for administrative purposes. This transition facilitated the recording of local languages in British censuses, which began systematically from 1871 and continued through 1941, capturing data on mother tongues in Bihar and influencing perceptions of linguistic diversity. The Kaithi script, derived from ancient Brahmi and widely used for Bihari languages like Magahi and Bhojpuri, was officially recognized and employed in government offices and courts in Bihar during this era, unlike its discouragement elsewhere in India. Colonial policies also impacted specific languages, such as Maithili, where efforts from the to involved state appropriation and documentation, often through the Mithilakshar (, though administrative standardization leaned toward variants. Migration of Bihari speakers, including Bhojpuri laborers to plantations abroad in the , spread these languages globally but did not lead to formal standardization under colonial rule. Linguistic territorialism in –1950s saw minorities, like Bengali-Biharis, strategically mobilize to preserve their languages amid province reorganizations. Post-independence, the Act of 1950 designated as the sole official language, with as secondary, enforcing script and marginalizing indigenous scripts like , which was phased out from official use in favor of standardized governance. , including Maithili, Bhojpuri, and Magahi, faced reclassification in censuses—grouped as "Bihari" in 1961 but subsumed under "Hindi" by 1971—affecting over 120 million speakers and hindering independent standardization efforts. Maithili received Eighth Schedule recognition in 2003, prompting some revival of Mithilakshar, but in , dominance persists, contributing to the decline of local orthographies and vocabularies. This Hindi-centric approach, driven by national policy, has been critiqued for eroding Bihari linguistic identities, with native languages increasingly sidelined in education and administration.

Demographic Profile

Speaker Populations and Percentages

According to the , Bihar's population totaled 104,099,452, with mother tongue data revealing a diverse linguistic landscape dominated by , including both standardized and regional Bihari varieties reported separately. was the most frequently reported mother tongue at 26,590,625 speakers (25.54%), followed closely by Bhojpuri with 25,881,691 speakers (24.86%). Maithili accounted for 12,918,324 speakers (12.41%), while Magahi had 11,316,313 speakers (10.87%). Urdu speakers numbered 8,769,007 (8.42%), and Surjapuri had 1,857,930 speakers (1.78%). The remaining 14.33% of the population reported other mother tongues, encompassing smaller Bihari languages such as and , as well as minority languages like Bengali, Kurukh, and various tribal dialects, each typically below 1% statewide. This distribution reflects self-reported data, where standardization pressures may lead some speakers of Bihari dialects to declare as their mother tongue, potentially understating regional language vitality in official tallies. No comprehensive has been conducted since 2011, though provisional estimates suggest Bihar's exceeded 125 million by 2023, implying proportional growth in speaker bases absent updated linguistic surveys.
LanguageSpeakersPercentage
26,590,62525.54%
Bhojpuri25,881,69124.86%
Maithili12,918,32412.41%
Magahi11,316,31310.87%
8,769,0078.42%
Surjapuri1,857,9301.78%
These figures underscore the prominence of (Bhojpuri, Maithili, and Magahi collectively over 48% of the population), challenging narratives of monolingualism in the state despite its official status.

Regional and Social Distribution

Bhojpuri is predominantly spoken in western and northwestern Bihar, including the districts of Bhojpur, Rohtas, , Kaimur, Saran, Siwan, Gopalganj, East Champaran, and West Champaran. Maithili prevails in northern Bihar, across districts such as , Madhubani, , , , , , , , and parts of . Magahi dominates south-central Bihar, in areas encompassing , Gaya, Nalanda, , , , Arwal, , , and . Eastern districts like and Banka feature Angika, while appears in portions of Vaishali, , and ; Khortha and Surjapuri occur in scattered pockets near and the border, respectively. These distributions align with Bihar's administrative divisions, where the Tirhut and divisions favor Maithili, Magadh division emphasizes Magahi, and Saran division centers on Bhojpuri, per 2011 Census mother tongue patterns. Urban-rural gradients influence prevalence, with rural areas retaining mother tongues at higher rates—over 90% in many districts—while cities exhibit . Socially, language affiliation ties closely to regional ethnic clusters and castes, such as Maithil Brahmins and Kayasthas favoring Maithili, Bhumihars and Yadavs often using Bhojpuri or Magahi variants, though inter-caste multilingualism occurs via migration. Rural populations, comprising 88.7% of Bihar's 2011 total, speak these languages as primary mediums, whereas urban migrants in blend Magahi with Bhojpuri and Maithili, alongside for inter-group communication. Muslim communities in northern districts incorporate alongside Maithili, reflecting religious demographics. , reported as a mother tongue by 25.5% statewide in 2011, bridges social divides but masks underlying Bihari vernaculars in informal domains.

Official Languages of the State

, in the Devanagari script, serves as the primary official language of , as established by the Bihar Official Language Act, 1950, which mandated its use for official purposes and outlined a phased replacement of English. This act, enacted on December 30, 1950, extended to the entire state and emphasized 's role in administration, legislation, and judicial proceedings. Urdu was designated the second via a state government notification in 1981, marking as the first Indian state to accord such status to Urdu despite Hindi's dominance. This provision recognizes Urdu's use in official capacities within 15 districts with significant Urdu-speaking communities, primarily for communications, , and signage, though Hindi remains the default for statewide administration. Implementation has included directives for bilingual documentation in relevant areas, reflecting Urdu's historical presence from the Mughal era onward, but practical enforcement varies by district and has faced debates over .

Scheduled and Recognized Languages

The Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution lists 22 languages recognized for official use at the national level, with , , Maithili, and Santali being the primary ones spoken in . , an original scheduled language since 1950, functions as the state's primary official medium under the Official Language Act of 1950, written in script. , also originally scheduled, received second official language status in through in 1981, permitting its use in administration, , and in districts with significant Muslim populations, such as those in the Seemanchal and central regions. Maithili gained scheduled status via the 92nd Act of 2003, which expanded the to promote regional languages with substantial speaker bases and literary traditions. This recognition supports its application in , broadcasting, and cultural programs in Bihar's northern districts like , Madhubani, and , where it serves over 10 million speakers as a mother tongue per the 2011 Census. Despite this, Maithili lacks full official parity with or at the state level, limiting its administrative deployment, though state policies encourage its standardization in Tirhuta (Mithilakshar) script alongside . Santali, another 2003 addition to the schedule, holds recognition for approximately 1.2 million speakers in Bihar's Santhal Pargana-adjacent areas and southern districts, primarily among tribal communities. Its status facilitates usage in education under the Act and tribal welfare schemes, though practical implementation remains uneven due to low institutional support outside . These scheduled designations underscore national efforts to preserve linguistic diversity, yet in Bihar, they have not translated to equivalent state-level protections for non-official entries like Maithili and Santali, amid ongoing debates over resource allocation.
LanguageScheduled SinceKey Status in BiharPrimary Script(s)
Hindi1950Primary officialDevanagari
Urdu1950Second officialPerso-Arabic
Maithili2003Recognized for education/cultureTirhuta, Devanagari
Santali2003Recognized for tribal useOl Chiki, Devanagari

Ongoing Demands for Recognition

The Mahagathbandhan opposition alliance in Bihar renewed demands in October 2024 for granting official language status to Bhojpuri, the state's most widely spoken regional language with over 50 million speakers, by including it in the Eighth Schedule of the . This push, articulated by leaders including RJD's , emphasizes Bhojpuri's cultural and demographic dominance—spoken by approximately 40% of Bihar's population—yet its classification as a dialect has historically limited institutional support, prompting calls for parliamentary intervention to enable use in , administration, and media. Parallel efforts focus on elevating Maithili, already listed in the Eighth Schedule since 2003, to classical language status. In October 2024, the Janata Dal (United), a key NDA ally, urged the central government to recognize Maithili's antiquity, citing its ancient literary tradition dating back over 1,000 years, including works like the Varnaratnakara from the 14th century. The Bihar government, under Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, formally submitted this request to the Centre in November 2024, arguing for parity with recently accorded languages like Marathi and Pali, which would unlock funding for preservation, research, and promotion amid Maithili's 13 million speakers in the state. Demands for Magahi and , each with millions of speakers in central and eastern , include calls for Eighth inclusion to address their marginalization in official domains. In September 2022, the state government announced institutional support for eight regional languages, including Magahi (around 12 million speakers), (over 1 million), Bhojpuri, and Maithili, through measures like script development and academic programs, but critics note slow implementation has fueled persistent advocacy by linguistic organizations and regional parties for co-official status alongside and under the Act. These efforts reflect broader identity-based movements, where proponents argue that recognition would preserve linguistic diversity against 's dominance, though linguistic surveys classify them as distinct from standard .

Primary Bihari Languages

Maithili

Maithili is an Eastern Indo-Aryan language native to the Mithila region, spanning northern Bihar in India and parts of southeastern Nepal. It serves as the primary language of the Maithil ethnic group and has been a vehicle for literary expression since at least the medieval period, when it functioned as a court language in eastern India. Classified independently from Hindi dialects despite historical groupings under "Bihari" by linguists like George Grierson, Maithili exhibits distinct phonological and grammatical features, such as aspirated stops and a rich system of case endings./4_Deepesh%20Kumar%20Thakur.pdf) In Bihar, Maithili speakers numbered approximately 12 million as of the 2011 census, accounting for 12.41% of the state's population and making it the third most spoken language after and . The language predominates in districts such as , Madhubani, , , and , where it is used in daily communication, , and local media. Migration has led to Maithili-speaking communities in urban centers like and beyond , though often serves as a in formal domains. Maithili gained formal recognition in through inclusion in the Eighth Schedule of the via the 92nd Amendment Act of 2003, enabling its use in and central government services. Within , it holds third official language status alongside and , supporting its instruction in schools and use in state administration. In neighboring , it ranks as the second since 2018. Efforts for further elevation, such as status, have stalled due to lack of state-level proposals, despite its ancient literary corpus. Historically written in the Mithilakshar (also known as —a Brahmi-derived system from the —Maithili transitioned largely to in the 20th century for standardization and compatibility with printing presses. Tirhuta persists in cultural and religious contexts, with recent digital fonts aiding revival. Maithili boasts medieval Vaishnava by (c. 1350–1448), who composed devotional works influencing Bengali and traditions, alongside later and developments in the 19th–20th centuries. Modern authors continue this legacy, though challenges like script standardization and competition from Hindi persist./4_Deepesh%20Kumar%20Thakur.pdf)

Bhojpuri

Bhojpuri is an Eastern Indo-Aryan primarily spoken in the western and northern districts of , such as Bhojpur, Rohtas, , Siwan, Saran, Kaimur, Gopalganj, and . It extends into eastern and northern , forming part of the broader Bhojpuri-speaking region. According to the , Bhojpuri serves as the mother tongue for approximately 24.86% of Bihar's population, making it one of the most widely spoken languages in the state. Nationwide, it has around 50.6 million speakers in . The language features several dialects, including Southern Standard Bhojpuri in areas like Bhojpur and Rohtas, Northern Standard in parts of , Western Standard, and Nagpuria variants. Historically, Bhojpuri was written in the script, prevalent in northern including and for administrative and literary purposes until the late 19th century. Since 1894, the script has become the standard for writing Bhojpuri, aligning it with orthography. Bhojpuri's literary tradition emphasizes oral narratives, with such as the Lorikayan epic emerging between the 11th and 14th centuries CE. Written literature developed in the early during British colonial rule, gaining prominence through figures like , who popularized Bhojpuri folk theater. The earliest written records date to the , though its oral heritage predates this, tracing descent from via influences. Despite its prevalence, Bhojpuri lacks official language status in Bihar or India at the national level, though it holds second-language recognition in Jharkhand since 2018. Political demands for granting it official status in Bihar persist, with opposition alliances pledging to advocate in Parliament as of October 2024. The language's name was established by the 17th century, first appearing in writing in 1789.

Magahi

Magahi, also known as Magadhi, is an Indo-Aryan language of the Eastern subgroup, spoken primarily in southern and northern , with smaller communities in adjacent areas of and . It forms part of the Bihari language continuum, distinguished by its phonological and grammatical traits from neighboring varieties, including the retention of aspirated stops and a simplified case system derived from antecedents. The records 12,706,825 speakers of Magadhi/Magahi as a mother tongue, concentrated in districts such as Gaya, , Nalanda, , Arwal, Bhojpur, , Rohtas, , and in Bihar, alongside portions of Jharkhand's Palamu and divisions. This figure undercounts total usage, as many speakers report due to administrative pressures and lack of distinct census categories for regional vernaculars, a pattern observed across where grouping inflates proficiency claims. Dialectal variation exists, with subdialects like Babhua, Kumhari, and Northern Magahi reflecting geographic divergence, though remains high within core areas. Tracing its lineage to —the vernacular of the ancient empire centered in present-day from circa 600 BCE—Magahi evolved through Apabhramsha stages, preserving archaic features like the merger of and postpositional syntax absent in standard . Historically, it served administrative roles in medieval but transitioned to oral dominance under Mughal and British policies favoring Persian and English, limiting literary codification. Traditionally inscribed in script for revenue records and folk texts until the , modern Magahi overwhelmingly uses , reflecting post-independence standardization efforts. Magahi's literary tradition emphasizes oral genres, including lokgeet (folk songs) on agrarian life, festivals, and epics like those narrating local deities, with sparse written works such as 20th-century prose by authors like emerging amid revivalist movements. Lacking federal scheduled status under the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, it holds second recognition in since 2018, enabling limited educational and media use, while Bihar's government has petitioned for inclusion without success as of 2023. Linguistic analysis highlights its honorific conjugations—distinguishing non-honorific, , and high- forms—and reliance on numeral classifiers over inherent , diverging from Western Indo-Aryan patterns.

Angika and Bajjika

is an Eastern Indo-Aryan language of the Bihari subgroup, spoken primarily in Bihar's region, including districts such as , Banka, , , , , Jamui, , , and , as well as adjacent areas in Jharkhand's and . Estimates of native speakers range widely due to underreporting in censuses where many identify it under ; a 2025 linguistic survey notes approximately 745,600 speakers across and eastern . It employs the script in modern usage, though historical texts used . Distinct phonological features include aspirated stops and retroflex sounds typical of , with vocabulary influenced by , , and local Dravidian substrates, setting it apart from neighboring Maithili despite shared roots. Bajjika, also classified as an Eastern Indo-Aryan language, is concentrated in northern districts like , , , Vaishali, and Sheohar, extending into Nepal's region with over 200,000 speakers there. Speaker estimates for hover around 20 million based on analyses of 2001 data adjusted for underenumeration, reflecting its role as a in rural and semi-urban communities. Like , it uses predominantly, with some persistence of Mithila scripts in literature; its morphology features verb conjugations and case markings akin to Maithili but with western innovations, such as unique pronominal forms, supporting arguments for its independence from Maithili classification despite mutual intelligibility in border areas. Both languages lack Eighth Schedule status under India's Constitution, prompting sustained advocacy for recognition amid Maithili's prioritization; counter-demands arose in the 1960s–1970s during Mithila state movements, emphasizing cultural and linguistic divergence. In December 2023, community leaders petitioned authorities for curriculum integration from primary through higher education under the , citing erosion from dominance and the need for preservation via formal instruction. achieved second-language status in in 2018, facilitating limited administrative and educational use, while revival initiatives include sociolinguistic documentation to counter assimilation pressures. These efforts highlight causal factors like and media exposure accelerating shift, underscoring empirical needs for data-driven policy over politically favored consolidations.

Other Variants like Khortha and Surjapuri

Khortha is an Indo-Aryan classified within the Eastern Magahi subgroup of , functioning as a among diverse communities in the Chota Nagpur region. It is primarily spoken in southern districts adjoining , such as Gaya, , and , where it coexists with Magahi and . The 2011 Indian recorded approximately 8 million native speakers nationwide, with a notable but minority presence in reflecting its role as a contact influenced by tribal and migrant populations. Linguistic studies highlight Khortha's use of classifiers and measure words, akin to other Eastern Indo-Aryan varieties, alongside phonological shifts like aspirated stops and retroflex sounds distinguishing it from standard . Surjapuri, another Indo-Aryan variety linked to the Bihari and Bengali-Assamese continuum, is concentrated in Bihar's , particularly , , , and districts east of the . Predominantly spoken by Muslim communities of Rajbanshi descent, it exhibits lexical and syntactic affinities with neighboring Kamta and Rajbanshi languages, including numeral classifiers and verb-final structures typical of the region. Speaker estimates range from 200,000 to several hundred thousand, underscoring its status as a minority tongue amid pressures from and Bengali influences. In September 2022, the government proposed establishing academies for Surjapuri alongside to promote documentation and preservation, responding to for its recognition as a distinct rather than a variant. Both Khortha and Surjapuri lack official script standardization, relying on or for limited written forms, and face assimilation risks due to dominance in and media.

Other Significant Languages

Urdu

Urdu functions as the second of , a status granted on August 16, 1989, enabling its use for filing petitions and maintaining court records in districts with substantial Muslim populations, as well as in upon parental demand. This recognition stems from the language's role among Bihar's Muslim minority, who constitute about 17% of the state's population per the census, though not all report as their primary tongue. The language employs the Perso-Arabic script and draws from Indo-Aryan roots with heavy Persian, , and Turkish vocabulary, adapted locally through phonetic and lexical borrowings from Bihari dialects like Bhojpuri and Magahi. According to the , Urdu ranked as the fifth most spoken mother tongue in , with 8,651,416 speakers comprising 8.4% of the state's 104 million residents. Concentrations are highest in northern and central districts such as (45.4% Urdu speakers), (28.1%), and (24.5%), reflecting historical Muslim settlements from the onward, when Turkic and Afghan migrations introduced Perso-Arabic linguistic elements. By the , under Mughal patronage, gained traction as a vernacular medium in Bihar's urban centers like , evolving from Khari Boli influences via military camps () and courtly interactions, though it displaced Persian as the administrative language only in 1837 following British policy shifts favoring vernaculars over classical Persian. Bihari Urdu dialects exhibit substrate effects from regional Indo-Aryan languages, including aspirated consonants and vowel shifts uncommon in standardized Delhi Urdu, such as the pronunciation of /q/ as /k/ in rural variants. Despite official protections, Urdu-medium schools have declined from over 1,500 in the 1990s to fewer than 800 by 2022, amid broader shifts toward Hindi dominance in education and administration, prompting concerns over cultural erosion among speakers. Urdu literature in Bihar includes works depicting rural life, as in Akhtar Orenvi's Hasrat-e-Tameer (published 1940s), which chronicles agrarian struggles, and poetry by figures like Raza Naqvi Wahi (born 1919 in Siwan), awarded for ghazals blending Sufi themes with local ethos. Institutions like Patna's Government Urdu Library preserve over 100,000 manuscripts and texts, supporting research into this regional canon.

Austroasiatic Languages like Santali

The of Bihar belong to the Munda subgroup and are primarily spoken by tribal communities such as the Santhals, Mundas, and Hos, who inhabit the state's eastern and southeastern regions. These languages predate the into the region and reflect ancient substrate influences on local , with speakers numbering in the low hundreds of thousands collectively. Santali stands out as the most widely spoken among them in Bihar, serving as a for cultural practices including oral traditions, , and rituals among the Santhal population. Santali, classified under the North Munda branch of Austroasiatic, had approximately 458,000 mother-tongue speakers in Bihar according to the , representing about 0.44% of the state's population. This figure underscores its minority status amid dominant Indo-Aryan tongues, with concentrations in districts like Banka, , , , and , where Santhal settlements cluster due to historical agrarian migrations and forest-based livelihoods. Speakers often exhibit bilingualism with or local Bihari variants for inter-community interaction, preserving Santali for intra-group communication and identity. Beyond Santali, smaller Austroasiatic pockets include Mundari (spoken by Munda tribes in southern Bihar fringes) and Ho (among Ho communities overlapping with borders), each with fewer than 50,000 speakers in the state, contributing to Bihar's linguistic mosaic of pre-Indo-Aryan isolates. Linguistically, Santali features agglutinative morphology, where affixes denote , and a tonal system distinguishing meanings via pitch variations—traits atypical of surrounding but indicative of its Southeast Asian Austroasiatic roots. Its includes six vowels and a contrastive set of stops, nasals, and fricatives, with vocabulary drawing from animistic worldview terms absent in Sanskritic loans. Recognition came via inclusion in the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution in 2003 under the 92nd Amendment, enabling limited official use in education and administration, though implementation in remains uneven due to resource constraints and assimilation pressures. The , devised in 1925 by , promotes literacy but competes with adaptations in print media. Efforts to document and teach Santali persist through tribal welfare programs, countering decline from .

Minority Languages including Tharu

Tharu, an Indo-Aryan language spoken by the Tharu ethnic community, is concentrated in Bihar's northern Terai-adjacent districts of West Champaran and East Champaran. Closely related to neighboring Bhojpuri and Maithili, it incorporates lexical and phonological elements from these languages, shaped by historical migrations and interactions in the Indo-Gangetic floodplains. The Tharu people, classified as Other Backward Classes in Bihar, maintain traditional livelihoods in agriculture and forestry, but precise speaker counts for the language are unavailable from state records, with estimates suggesting a small base vulnerable to assimilation. Language shift poses an existential threat to Tharu in , as younger speakers increasingly adopt for schooling, employment, and media consumption, eroding intergenerational transmission. Community elders report oral traditions, including and songs, as primary repositories of the language, yet formal documentation and remain absent, accelerating decline since at least the early . Efforts by local Tharu organizations to preserve it through cultural festivals have yielded limited success, hampered by the lack of official recognition or inclusion in state linguistic surveys. Other minority languages in Bihar encompass Dravidian tongues like Kurukh, spoken by the Oraon tribal population across central and southern districts, and smaller isolates tied to migrant or indigenous groups such as Bengali variants in border enclaves. These languages collectively represent less than 1% of the state's linguistic diversity per 2011 census aggregates, often overshadowed by dominant Indo-Aryan forms and lacking institutional support.

Classical and Literary Languages

Sanskrit

, the classical Indo-Aryan language of ancient , has profoundly influenced Bihar's intellectual and religious traditions, serving as the primary medium for philosophical, scientific, and liturgical texts in the region historically known as and . Centers of learning such as Nalanda (established around 5th century CE and flourishing until the 12th century) and emphasized Sanskrit scholarship, where texts on grammar, logic, medicine (e.g., treatises), and were studied and composed. These institutions attracted scholars from across , preserving and advancing Sanskrit works that integrated empirical observations in fields like astronomy and . Ancient scholars from Bihar contributed key Sanskrit texts, including (c. 476–550 CE), a native of the region, whose outlined mathematical concepts like zero, pi approximations, and heliocentric elements in verse form. Similarly, , linked to the kingdom (modern northern Bihar), authored sections of the and , foundational Vedic and philosophical works emphasizing rational inquiry into cosmology and self. Bihar's manuscript repositories, such as the Bihar Research Society in (founded 1915), hold over 10,000 Sanskrit manuscripts, underscoring the region's role in textual preservation amid historical invasions that destroyed sites like Nalanda in 1193 CE. In contemporary Bihar, Sanskrit persists through dedicated education rather than vernacular use, with institutions like Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University (established 1961 in ) offering degrees in traditional subjects such as (logic), Vyakarana (grammar), and . The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, operational since the mid-20th century, regulates secondary and senior secondary Sanskrit curricula, enrolling thousands annually to sustain priestly training and scholarly lineages. Affiliated colleges under , numbering at least 16 in Bihar as of 2024, further propagate the language, though enrollment remains modest compared to regional vernaculars, reflecting its niche role in ritual and academia amid modern linguistic shifts. This institutional framework counters broader declines in classical language proficiency, prioritizing fidelity to original texts over interpretive adaptations.

Pali and Prakrit

, a Middle Indo-Aryan language, originated in the eastern Indian region encompassing ancient Magadha, corresponding to modern , where it served as the liturgical language for early Buddhist texts. Scholars associate Pali with dialects spoken in Magadha, the kingdom centered in present-day Bihar, and it is posited that himself employed an early form of from this area, advocating vernacular communication over for accessibility. The language facilitated the preservation of the Tipitaka, the Buddhist canon, with Bihar's viharas—monastic centers like those in Nalanda—playing a key role in its transmission before the canon was committed to writing around the 1st century BCE in . Prakrit languages, as vernacular Middle Indo-Aryan tongues, held administrative and literary prominence in ancient , particularly through and its variant Ardhamagadhi, both tied to the kingdom. , spoken in the region south of the encompassing , formed the basis for Emperor Ashoka's edicts (circa 268–232 BCE), inscribed in across central and eastern to propagate dhamma policies; these inscriptions, numbering over 30 major rock and pillar edicts, used a dialect continuum reflecting local Magadhi phonology, such as the retention of 'r' sounds and vowel shifts. Ardhamagadhi Prakrit, meaning "half-Magadhi," gained traction in , serving as the medium for canonical texts like the Agamas, composed between the 5th century BCE and 5th century CE, with Mahavira's teachings delivered in this dialect in 's vicinity. These languages exerted lasting phonological and lexical influence on Bihari vernaculars, with evolving into Eastern Indo-Aryan forms underlying modern Bhojpuri, Magahi, and Maithili; features like aspirate loss and retroflex consonants trace back to substrates, while contributed Buddhist terminology to regional lexicons. Though supplanted by in elite spheres by the (4th–6th centuries CE) and later by Apabhramsha transitional forms, and persist in through Buddhist and Jain scholarship, with recent governmental recognition in affirming their classical status for preserving philosophical and ethical discourses. Archaeological evidence from sites like underscores their role in Bihar's pre-medieval cultural continuum, distinct from dominance elsewhere.

Linguistic Characteristics

Phonology and Morphology

The Bihari languages, including Maithili, Bhojpuri, Magahi, Angika, and Bajjika, share phonological traits rooted in their Eastern Indo-Aryan heritage, such as a contrastive inventory of aspirated and unaspirated stops, retroflex consonants, and frequent nasalization influenced by adjacent Dravidian and Austroasiatic languages. Consonant systems typically comprise 30–34 phonemes, encompassing bilabial, dental, retroflex, palatal, velar, and glottal series, with distinctions in voicing, aspiration, and nasality; for example, Bhojpuri includes 34 consonants alongside six oral vowels. Vowel inventories vary but often feature 6–10 monophthongs, with Maithili distinguishing eight oral vowels (/i, e, æ, a, ə, ɔ, o, u/) and corresponding nasal counterparts (/ĩ, ẽ, æ̃, ã, ə̃, ɔ̃, õ, ũ/), where nasalization serves phonemic contrast, as evidenced by acoustic analyses showing formant lowering in nasal vowels. Magahi exhibits ten vowels, including centralized schwa /ə/, with phonological processes like vowel harmony and sandhi rules affecting juncture forms. Suprasegmental features include stress-timed rhythm and tone-like pitch accents in some dialects, though pitch is not phonemic; regional variations, such as implosive-like realizations of /b, d, ɖ/ in Bhojpuri dialects, arise from substrate influences. Morphological structure in these languages is predominantly inflectional and fusional, with nominal paradigms marking gender (masculine/feminine), number (singular/plural), and case via postpositions rather than strict synthetic endings, reflecting simplification from Middle Indo-Aryan stages. Verbal morphology stands out for its complexity, featuring intricate paradigms for tense (present, past, future), aspect (perfective/imperfective), mood (indicative, subjunctive), and person-number agreement, often with honorific tiers; Bajjika and Angika verbs conjugate across multiple auxiliaries and stems, yielding dozens of forms per root, among the richest in Indo-Aryan. In Magahi, affixation dominates for derivation (e.g., causative -āu-, denominative -ā- ) and inflection (e.g., past tense -l- ), compounded by reduplication for iteratives and echo-word formation for emphasis, as in emphatic constructions like khanā-pānā ('eat and such'). Derivational morphology employs prefixes (e.g., negative nə-) and suffixes for nouns from verbs, with compounding common in kinship and agricultural lexica; cross-dialectal convergence, such as shared infinitive markers like -nā in Maithili and Magahi, underscores mutual intelligibility despite substrate divergences. These features facilitate nuanced social indexing, including respect via verb alternations, but face erosion from Hindi standardization.

Syntax and Vocabulary Influences

The syntax of the —Maithili, Bhojpuri, and Magahi—exhibits core Eastern Indo-Aryan traits derived from Middle Indo-Aryan and Apabhramsha intermediaries, including a predominant subject-object-verb (SOV) , postpositional case marking, and agreement with the subject rather than the object. These structures reflect conservative retention of -derived patterns, such as non-finite verbal forms in subordinate clauses and ergative alignment in perfective tenses, though with regional simplifications like reduced case distinctions compared to classical . External syntactic influences remain minimal, with no substantial evidence of Dravidian-style retroflexion-driven shifts or Austroasiatic agglutinative layering; any substrate effects from pre-Indo-Aryan languages in appear confined to lexical borrowing rather than reorderings of phrase structure. Dialectal convergence among Bihari varieties, such as shared copular forms and strategies in embedded clauses, further reinforces internal evolution over foreign imposition. Vocabulary in Bihari languages draws heavily from roots, comprising (direct borrowings) and (evolved derivatives) words that form the bulk of basic , particularly in Maithili, where grammatical treatises from the onward explicitly model morphology on Paninian sutras. Persian and loanwords, introduced via Mughal-era administration and Islamic cultural contact from the , primarily affect domains like , , and —examples include talab (pond, from Persian) supplanting native pokhar in some dialects, though Bihari varieties retain fewer such integrations than standard . Austroasiatic substrate contributions, likely from in Bihar's tribal regions, manifest in desi terms for local , , and cultivation practices, such as agricultural nouns absent from core Indo-Aryan stocks, reflecting pre-Indo-Aryan linguistic layers displaced around 1500–1000 BCE. loans, post- British rule, appear sparingly in urban registers for technology and administration, but core vocabulary stability underscores Indo-Aryan dominance.

Writing Systems

Dominant Scripts

The Devanagari script serves as the primary writing system for the majority of spoken in , including , Bhojpuri, Maithili, and Magahi, reflecting its standardization in official, educational, and literary contexts since the late 19th century. For Bhojpuri, replaced the historical script around 1894, becoming the standard for print and digital media. Similarly, Maithili, once written in the indigenous Mithilakshar (, now predominantly employs in , particularly in , for education, administration, and publications, though Mithilakshar persists in limited ritualistic uses by scholars. Urdu, a significant in with roots in Perso- influences, utilizes the Nastaliq variant of the Perso- script, which accommodates Urdu phonetics through additional characters for native sounds absent in or Persian. This script's prevalence among Muslim communities underscores Urdu's distinct identity from Devanagari-based languages, despite shared vocabulary with . For like Santali, the , invented in 1925 by , holds official recognition and is increasingly adopted for its alphabetic design tailored to Santali's , comprising 30 characters written left-to-right. However, remains in parallel use, especially in Bihar's transitional contexts where Santali speakers interact with Hindi-dominant systems, leading to bilingual orthographic practices. These scripts' dominance is evidenced by their integration into state education policies and support, facilitating broader literacy amid pressures.

Historical and Variant Usage

The Kaithi script, derived from Brahmi through intermediate forms, served as the predominant for such as Bhojpuri, Magahi, and from at least the 16th century until the early 20th century. Widely employed in administrative records, land documents, religious texts, and personal correspondence across undivided , Kaithi functioned as the vernacular script for both Hindu and Muslim communities, including for and variants spoken in the region. Its usage persisted under Mughal and British administrations, where it was adopted for official purposes in courts and offices until the early 1900s, reflecting its role as a practical, alternative to more formal scripts. For Maithili, the Mithilakshar (also known as emerged around the 10th century CE as a distinct variant derived from the Gaudī or Proto-Bengali branch of Brahmi scripts, primarily used for literary works in Maithili and . This script coexisted with for everyday and administrative writing of Maithili until the , when standardization efforts favored , leading to Mithilakshar's decline into near-extinction. Variant usages included regional adaptations of these scripts, such as angular forms of for engraving on mosques and temples, and stylistic differences in Mithilakshar manuscripts from northern . The shift to as the dominant script for most in occurred progressively from the late , driven by standardization and post-independence linguistic policies promoting in Nagari script, rendering historical variants like and Mithilakshar obsolete in official and educational contexts by the mid-20th century. Efforts to revive these scripts in , including university initiatives since 2020, aim to decode archival records and preserve , though proficiency remains limited.

Cultural and Societal Role

Literature and Oral Traditions

Maithili possesses the most extensive written literary tradition among Bihar's indigenous languages, originating in the 8th century CE with compositions of mystical songs by Buddhist monks, which continued into subsequent periods. The medieval poet (c. 1350–1448) elevated Maithili through his on themes of devotion and romance, composed at a time when dominated courtly expression, thereby making accessible to the masses. Comprehensive histories, such as Jayakanta Mishra's two-volume work published in 1949 and 1954, document this evolution from early tantric influences to modern prose forms, including novels emerging in the early 20th century by authors like Baidyanath Mishra Yatri and Hari Mohan Jha. Bhojpuri and Magahi literatures, by comparison, emphasize oral over written forms, with Bhojpuri maintaining a "persistent orality" featuring epics centered on inter-caste romances, conflicts, and migrant narratives, often performed by specific castes during rituals or festivals. Magahi's earliest documented texts appear in literature from the medieval era, while modern written works remain sparse, exemplified by the first novel Fool Bahadur translated and published around 2024, though folk compositions in script persist regionally. Both languages draw from shared Indo-Aryan roots, but their literatures reflect agrarian and migratory lifestyles, with limited hindering broader textual production until recent revival efforts. Oral traditions across form a vital repository of cultural , encompassing folk tales, ballads, riddles, and songs transmitted generationally to convey morals, historical events, and social norms. In Maithili, these include ritual songs and narratives integral to festivals, while Bhojpuri features genres like chaita (spring songs) and kajri ( laments), often accompanying life-cycle events or labor migrations. Magahi and related dialects preserve similar lok sahitya (folk literature), such as cautionary tales of forest survival or familial intrigue, collected in anthologies like those documenting 78 stories from Bihar's oral heritage. These traditions, resilient despite Hindi's dominance, underscore causal links between linguistic continuity and community identity, with empirical collections revealing patterns of motifs and ethical dilemmas predating colonial records.

Role in Education, Media, and Identity

Hindi functions as the primary medium of instruction and official language in Bihar's educational institutions, supplemented by English and optional third languages such as Urdu, Sanskrit, or regional tongues like Bhojpuri in select syllabi. Despite policy intentions outlined in the Bihar State Policy on Language in Education to incorporate Maithili, Magahi, and Bhojpuri for early-grade mother-tongue learning, implementation has faltered due to resource shortages and prioritization of Hindi proficiency for state exams and higher education. In March 2025, the state government proposed consolidating eight language academies—including those for Maithili, Magahi, and Bhojpuri—under a unified body to bolster promotion, though this targets cultural preservation more than curricular reform. Regional languages maintain a niche but expanding footprint in Bihar's media landscape, with Bhojpuri leading through dedicated outlets like the Khabar Bhojpuri news portal, launched in to deliver content in the vernacular, and television channels such as Mahuaa TV and Hamar TV featuring Bhojpuri films, music, and news broadcasts. Maithili and Magahi receive less coverage, confined largely to folk programming on public broadcasters like and , alongside sporadic digital content amid calls for dedicated platforms to counter 's dominance in print and . Overall, newspapers and radio bulletins in predominantly operate in Hindi, with regional variants appearing in supplements or community broadcasts rather than standalone editions. These languages underpin Bihari cultural identity, fostering sub-regional affiliations—Maithili in the Mithila belt evoking historical literary traditions, Bhojpuri symbolizing resilience, and Magahi linking to ancient heritage—yet face erosion from Hindi's administrative and educational , prompting for Eighth inclusion to affirm distinct ethnic markers beyond or pan-Indian ties. Linguistic pride manifests in demands for media amplification and policy recognition, as seen in persistent campaigns since the 1960s Official Language Act, which subsumed them under , viewing their vitality as essential to resisting assimilation while navigating multilingual state dynamics.

Challenges and Debates

Language Shift to Hindi

In Bihar, a marked towards has occurred since the mid-20th century, driven by its designation as the state's under the Bihar Official Language Act of 1950, which prioritized and Urdu for administration and governance. This policy, reinforced by the Bihar Official Language (Amendment) Act of 1980, established in script as the dominant medium, marginalizing indigenous like Bhojpuri, Maithili, and Magahi, which lack comparable institutional support. Census data reflect this trend: speakers constituted 83.47% of 's population in 1911, rising to 86.55% by 1951, with further growth evident in the 2011 Census where accounted for over 56% of reported mother tongues after excluding previously bundled regional varieties like Maithili. The shift accelerated through education and media, where Hindi serves as the primary medium of instruction from primary levels onward, fostering monolingualism among younger cohorts. In 2011, 95.2% of Hindi speakers in Bihar were monolingual, up from 90.2% in 1991 for undivided Bihar, indicating reduced bilingualism in regional languages. Bollywood films, national media, and urban migration further normalized Hindi usage, as speakers of Bhojpuri (spoken by approximately 5 million as mother tongue in Bihar per 2011 data) and Magahi adopt Hindi for socioeconomic mobility, often reclassifying their native tongues as "dialects" in surveys. Maithili, despite Eighth Schedule recognition in 2003, saw its reported speakers drop to about 12.5% of Bihar's population by 2011, with analyses from 2021-2024 highlighting accelerated decline due to script abandonment (from Mithilakshar to ) and preference for Hindi in formal domains. This transition stems from post-independence linguistic policies favoring as a unifying , which in Bihar's context subsumed Eastern Indo-Aryan varieties under the "" umbrella, limiting script development and literary for . Empirical evidence from tribal communities shows parallel shifts, with groups like the Oraon increasingly adopting over indigenous tongues, correlating with but linguistic assimilation. Critics argue this erodes , as regional languages lose domains like and oral traditions to variants, though proponents view it as pragmatic consolidation amid Bihar's 104 million population (2011 Census). Preservation efforts remain limited, with no widespread reversal despite demands for Eighth Schedule inclusion of and .

Classification as Dialects vs Distinct Languages

The classification of the primary vernaculars spoken in Bihar—namely Bhojpuri, Maithili, and Magahi—has long been contested between viewing them as dialects of or as distinct languages within the Indo-Aryan family. In the early 20th-century conducted by George A. Grierson, these varieties were grouped under the "" as a separate eastern branch of Indo-Aryan, distinct from the western and central varieties; Grierson documented their unique phonological, morphological, and lexical features, such as the retention of Old Indo-Aryan case endings in nominal declensions and distinct conjugations not found in Standard , while noting limited with Hindi proper. This classification emphasized their independent evolution from , with internal dialectal variations but sufficient divergence from to warrant separate status. Linguistically, the debate hinges on criteria like , structural divergence, and genealogical separation. Studies indicate low to moderate between Standard and these Bihari varieties; for instance, native Hindi speakers from outside often struggle to comprehend unadapted Bhojpuri or Maithili speech due to differences in (e.g., Bhojpuri's merger of and additional aspirated stops) and (with up to 40-50% non-cognate terms influenced by local Dravidian or Munda substrates), though bilingualism in facilitates partial understanding among urban speakers. Among themselves, Bhojpuri, Maithili, and Magahi exhibit higher intelligibility, sharing core grammatical patterns like subject-object-verb order and postpositional marking, yet they form a rather than a single uniform code. Scholars argue that these features align them more closely with like Bengali than with , supporting distinct language status over subsumption, particularly given speaker and literary traditions predating modern standardization. In administrative and census contexts in India, however, Bhojpuri and Magahi have been consistently categorized as "dialects of " since the 1951 Census, subsuming their speakers (over 50 million for Bhojpuri alone in 2011) under the Hindi aggregate to reflect national linguistic policy favoring as a unifying medium; Maithili, by contrast, gained recognition as the eighth scheduled in 2003 following regional advocacy and judicial intervention, despite comparable linguistic divergence. This differential treatment highlights a socio-political dimension, where classifications serve to consolidate 's dominance in and , potentially underrepresenting Bihar's vernacular diversity; critics, including linguists, contend that such grouping ignores empirical and mutual unintelligibility thresholds (typically below 80% for dialect status), echoing Grierson's earlier separation while prioritizing administrative utility over philological rigor. International linguistic databases like reinforce their status as autonomous languages with ISO codes (e.g., bho for Bhojpuri, mai for Maithili), based on structural and sociolinguistic criteria independent of Indian policy.

Preservation and Political Controversies

The Bihar state government has initiated efforts to preserve regional languages through the strengthening of dedicated language academies. In March 2025, authorities announced enhancements to eight existing institutions, including the Maithili Academy, Magahi Academy, and others focused on Bhojpuri-related dialects like and , aiming to promote literary development and cultural documentation amid declining usage. These academies support publication of texts and research, countering the historical scarcity of standardized written literature in languages such as Magahi and Bhojpuri, which has hindered their institutionalization. Academic and expert recommendations emphasize integrating preservation into and . Proposals include establishing specialized centers in state universities for documenting and teaching native dialects and associated scripts, such as Mithila Akshar for Maithili, to combat endangerment driven by dominance in formal settings. Media initiatives and inclusion of regional languages in primary curricula have been highlighted as vital for Maithili, with similar calls extending to Bhojpuri and Magahi to sustain oral traditions against and migration-induced shifts. Political controversies center on demands for expanded official recognition beyond Hindi and Urdu, which hold state-level status. In October 2024, the opposition Mahagathbandhan alliance intensified advocacy for Bhojpuri's designation as an official language, pledging parliamentary action to address its exclusion despite over 50 million speakers across Bihar and neighboring regions, viewing the omission as neglect of cultural identity. Maithili, recognized in the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, encountered setbacks when the Bihar government failed to submit a formal proposal for classical language status by October 2024, resulting in its exclusion from national grants for preservation, a decision attributed to administrative oversight rather than linguistic merit. Historical tensions underscore communal dimensions, as the 1980 elevation of Urdu to second official language status sparked protests from Maithili-speaking Brahmin communities, who perceived it as preferential treatment favoring Muslim populations over indigenous Indo-Aryan tongues. Broader debates persist over classifying Bihari languages as dialects of Hindi versus distinct entities, with proponents arguing that Eighth Schedule inclusion and state policies would enable resource allocation for dictionaries, broadcasting, and judicial use, preventing further erosion evidenced by falling speaker proficiency among youth. These disputes reflect competing priorities between Hindi standardization for administrative unity and regional assertions of autonomy, often politicized during elections without resolution.

References

  1. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/12216/1/act1english_1950.pdf
  2. https://shuddhashar.com/languages-to-dialects-of-hindi-a-relegation-of-the-languages-of-bihar-in-the-agenda-of-hindi-nationalism/
  3. https://langlex.com/cens/StateLangProfile.php?statename=BIHAR
  4. https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/linguistic-survey-of-india-bihar/
  5. https://jolr.ru/files/%28190%29jlr2016-14-3-4%28227-258%29.pdf
  6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24652488
  7. https://www.biharwadimission.com/blog/2024/01/08/languages-and-dialects-of-bihar-2/
  8. https://language.census.gov.in/
  9. https://web.mit.edu/rbhatt/www/24.956/l1.pdf
  10. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/10196
  11. http://project.ndl.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/NDLI-Paper_Archiving-Endangered-Munda-Languages-in-a-Digital-Library.pdf
  12. https://brill.com/previewpdf/book/9789004283572/B9789004283572_006.xml
  13. https://meap.library.ucla.edu/about/news/a-brief-note-on-kurukh/
  14. https://trp.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ARSS-Vol.7-No.2-July-September-2018-pp.57-61.pdf
  15. http://www.sahapedia.org/prakrit-language-and-literature-brief-introduction
  16. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-culture/prakrit-pali-classical-languages-9603753/
  17. https://www.ames.ox.ac.uk/prakrit
  18. https://digital.lib.washington.edu/bitstreams/0d0b657f-6b56-4542-b77a-42ad8f88fcfd/download
  19. https://brians.wsu.edu/2016/11/14/vidyapati-1352-1448-love-songs-to-krishna/
  20. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/723904
  21. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.28-Issue8/Ser-4/D2808042526.pdf
  22. https://nepjol.info/index.php/AV/article/view/9704
  23. https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianHistory/comments/1iy0n4g/in_bihar_why_persian_was_replaced_by_urdu_in_1837/
  24. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00194646231183347
  25. https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2005/05343-kaithi.pdf
  26. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0376983619889512
  27. https://www.dynamiclanguage.com/the-bhojpuri-language-and-its-global-presence/
  28. https://www.quora.com/How-did-Hindi-damage-Bihars-languages
  29. https://just-international.org/articles/hindi-imposition-has-devastated-north-india/
  30. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/states-native-languages-being-pushed-to-oblivion/articleshow/89711759.cms
  31. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/42458/download/46089/C-16_25062018.pdf
  32. https://mithilalifestyleandculture.design.blog/2020/12/19/maithili-language/
  33. http://hummithilawasi.blogspot.com/2012/08/history-of-maithili-language.html
  34. https://www.walshmedicalmedia.com/open-access/magahi-and-magadh-language-and-people.pdf
  35. https://patna.nic.in/demography/
  36. https://www.indianemployees.com/acts-rules/details/bihar-official-language-act-1950
  37. https://www.gktoday.in/question/which-is-the-first-state-in-india-to-make-urdu-as
  38. https://www.telegraphindia.com/jharkhand/urdu-loses-second-language-tag/cid/861362
  39. https://travel.com/regions/asia/india/bihar/bihar-india-official-and-widely-spoken-languages/
  40. https://www.outlookindia.com/national/when-bihar-cm-karpoori-thakur-made-urdu-second-language
  41. https://rajbhasha.gov.in/en/languages-included-eighth-schedule-indian-constitution
  42. https://rajbhasha.bihar.gov.in/document/compendium.pdf
  43. https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/list-of-languages-in-the-8th-schedule/
  44. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/bihar/maithili-language-missed-out-on-classical-status-for-lack-of-proposal-from-bihar-government/article68810651.ece
  45. https://ijrcs.org/wp-content/uploads/IJRCS202504022-min.pdf
  46. https://lisindia.ciil.org/santali/Santali_vari.html
  47. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/bihar/mahagathbandhan-demands-official-language-status-for-bhojpuri-in-bihar/article68748414.ece
  48. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/mahagathbandhan-renews-call-for-official-language-status-for-bhojpuri/articleshow/114185436.cms
  49. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/bihar/mahagathbandhan-demands-official-language-status-for-bhojpuri-in-bihar-3230433
  50. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/oppn-steps-up-demand-for-bhojpuri-as-official-language-1830008
  51. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/bihar/jdu-demands-classical-language-status-for-maithili/article68727948.ece
  52. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/bihar-jdu-classical-language-status-maithili-9607851/
  53. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/bihar-government-pushes-for-maithilis-classical-language-status/articleshow/115459258.cms
  54. https://thefederal.com/category/states/north/bihar/bhojpuri-vs-maithili-jdu-opposition-not-on-same-page-on-promoting-languages-in-bihar-150103
  55. https://www.mustgo.com/worldlanguages/maithili/
  56. https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/EighthSchedule_19052017.pdf
  57. https://learnlipi.com/maithili/
  58. https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/BPLR/
  59. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/6/34380.pdf
  60. https://www.mustgo.com/worldlanguages/bhojpuri/
  61. https://kids.kiddle.co/Bhojpuri_language
  62. https://www.indianetzone.com/bhojpuri_literature
  63. https://www.facebook.com/BiharFoundationGov/posts/a-brief-on-bhojpuri-language-literatureamong-the-bihari-languages-bhojpuri-cover/1753818638031944/
  64. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bihari-languages
  65. https://www.outlookindia.com/national/how-grouping-of-languages-inflated-number-of-hindi-speakers-news-195648
  66. https://www.hindustantimes.com/lifestyle/art-culture/following-centuries-of-neglect-will-magadhi-finally-get-its-due-101631280539516.html
  67. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-18146-7_11
  68. https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/7675/
  69. https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/2010723/files/ggr_046007.pdf
  70. https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2501058.pdf
  71. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/angika.htm
  72. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijsl-2014-0001/html
  73. https://www.translationservices.com/post/bajjika-our-newest-translation-language-hailing-from-india
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259569512_The_Bajjika_language_and_speech_community_Abhishek_Kumar_Kashyap
  75. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/plea-to-promote-angika-bajjika/articleshow/105865921.cms
  76. https://selindia.org/languages/khortha/
  77. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jsall-2021-2028/html
  78. https://escholarship.org/content/qt1jb2s6vt/qt1jb2s6vt_noSplash_cb2590c066ccb1ccec8ff05f9994f445.pdf
  79. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1906U61.pdf
  80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326894738_Classifiers_in_Surjapuri
  81. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/iit-p-wing-trying-to-conserveendangered-languages-of-bihar/articleshow/94930140.cms
  82. https://www.outlookindia.com/national/explained-why-bihar-government-wants-to-set-up-academies-of-surajpuri-and-bajjika-dialects-news-226320
  83. https://www.academia.edu/45186288/A_Linguistic_Description_of_Surjapuri_Mother_Tongue_SpoKEN_in_Bihar_State
  84. https://www.biharanjuman.org/urdu_in_bihar.htm
  85. https://minoritycommissionbihar.com/statistics-pdf/statistics-listWise17-14.pdf
  86. https://www.newsclick.in/bihar-where-urdu-destined-die
  87. https://www.newageislam.com/islamic-personalities/syed-amjad-hussain-new-age-islam/exploring-life-legacy-akhtar-orenvi-pioneer-urdu-fiction-poetry/d/133917
  88. https://govturdulibrary.com/
  89. https://www.languagesgulper.com/eng/Munda.html
  90. https://testbook.com/bihar-gk/languages-of-bihar
  91. https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/jbsc/028/04/0507-0522
  92. https://livingtongues.org/projects/asia/india/munda-languages/santali-2/
  93. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-asian-studies/article/santal-indigenous-knowledge-cultural-heritage-and-the-politics-of-representation/D32179243814AFADEC303F1FCB46C82C
  94. https://sweetcom.in/2025/01/exploring-the-santali-language-a-rich-cultural-heritage/
  95. https://theprint.in/india/bihar-tharu-and-surjapuri-languages-facing-extinction/993794/
  96. https://www.sanskrit.nic.in/about_sanskrit.php
  97. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sanskrit-as-a-language-of-science-its-role-in-history-and-modern-times/articleshow/99083335.cms
  98. https://hayatashraf.quora.com/Scholars-in-Bihar-like-in-any-other-state-in-India-contribute-to-various-academic-disciplines-and-fields-of-research
  99. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/inside-bihars-forgotten-manuscript-treasures/articleshow/123067006.cms
  100. https://www.bssbpatna.ac/
  101. https://sanskrit.nic.in/uploads/2024_09_23_Affiliated_Institutions_list.pdf
  102. https://www.ames.ox.ac.uk/pali
  103. https://www.fabriziomusacchio.com/weekend_stories/told/2024/2024-12-26-pali/
  104. https://www.budsas.org/ebud/ebsut059.htm
  105. https://lotusarise.com/edicts-of-ashoka/
  106. https://currentaffairs.chinmayaias.com/prakrit-and-pali-languages/
  107. https://www.bihar.world/pilgrimage-sites/barabar-hill/sasaram/sasaram/
  108. https://ijels.com/upload_document/issue_files/21IJELS-107202036-TheHierarchy.pdf
  109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30029290
  110. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447019306643
  111. https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v9i10/SR201026030150.pdf
  112. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3477825
  113. http://www.edicions.ub.edu/revistes/dialectologia33/documentos/1985.pdf
  114. https://www.academia.edu/30198953/On_the_linguistic_resources_of_Bajjika
  115. http://www.languageinindia.com/dec2022/vinodkumarmorphologicalprocessesmagahifinal.pdf
  116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216612002056
  117. https://www.ijital.org/images/issues/current-issues/current-issue-2024/current-issue-v10-issue-3/1.%2520Prof%2520Jha%2520Issue%25203.pdf
  118. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abhishek-Kashyap/publication/307970526_Lexicogrammar_of_the_Bihari_Languages_a_metafunctional_survey/links/5b21f572458515270fc6ef09/Lexicogrammar-of-the-Bihari-Languages-a-metafunctional-survey.pdf
  119. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/711aa8d1-0ea8-4c39-b841-1573b924f52c/download
  120. https://hasp.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/ejvs/article/download/828/806/1648
  121. http://ijlc.thebrpi.org/journals/ijlc/Vol_2_No_1_March_2014/7.pdf
  122. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/6/34250.pdf
  123. https://sources.mandala.library.virginia.edu/sites/mandala-sources.lib.virginia.edu/files/pdf-files/572.pdf
  124. https://maithiliresearch.wordpress.com/2015/01/20/maithili-language-an-introduction/
  125. https://jasas.info/wp-content/themes/jasas/pdf/relevance/ijsas_vol07/159_Miki%2520Nishioka-and-Rajesh-Kumar.pdf
  126. https://zinglanguages.com/bhojpuri-language/
  127. https://fid4sa-repository.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/113/1/MT_Substrates_1999.pdf
  128. https://www.milestoneloc.com/devanagari-script/
  129. http://lisindia.ciil.org/Hindi/Hindi_script.html
  130. https://rekhtalearning.com/blog/busting-fiction-establishing-facts-the-case-of-urd/
  131. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/santali.htm
  132. https://scroll.in/article/811908/do-you-know-of-the-ol-chiki-script-it-could-be-santhals-and-indias-route-to-their-language
  133. https://english.mainmedia.in/history-of-kaithi-the-disappearing-millennium-old-script-once-used-for-religious-texts-and-mosque-carvings/
  134. https://swarajyamag.com/culture/kaithi-is-key-to-unlocking-land-records-in-bihar-the-problem-is-very-few-understand-it
  135. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/tirhuta.htm
  136. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/2-universities-plan-revival-of-near-extinct-scripts/articleshow/74273037.cms
  137. http://lisindia.ciil.org/Maithili/Maith_lite.html
  138. https://maithilisong.com/maithili-literature/
  139. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-royal-asiatic-society/article/history-of-maithili-literature-by-drjayakanta-mishra-vol-i-introduction-by-prof-s-k-chatterji-pp-xxviii-469-tirabhukti-publications-allahabad-1949/627885AAEACAE2C82B92318EA6743872
  140. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/maithili-literature-has-grown-in-stature/articleshow/19334572.cms
  141. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bhojpuri-language
  142. https://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0405/ch4.xhtml
  143. https://thesouthfirst.com/the-language-question/magahi-a-language-that-refuses-to-die-despite-hindi-imperialism/
  144. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS-r8yQfsUA
  145. https://www.folklore.ee/folklore/vol13/bihar.htm
  146. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.403661
  147. https://pragmaticpersona.com/2025/03/02/why-folk-tales-of-bihar-matter-today/
  148. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijhcs/v10-i2/1.pdf
  149. https://teachmint.storage.googleapis.com/public/673517041/StudyMaterial/a32e6393-4e40-4e3a-9d6d-5db38e342b57.pdf
  150. https://m.thewire.in/article/society/bihar-as-indigenous-languages-get-a-raw-deal-mother-tongue-education-project-fails
  151. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/bihar-government-proposes-one-unified-body-for-8-language-academies-in-the-state/articleshow/118921717.cms
  152. https://khabarbhojpuri.com/
  153. https://www.newsonair.gov.in/regional-units/bihar/
  154. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/28119/download/31301/43944_1911_LIN.pdf
  155. https://www.thehindu.com/data/over-90-in-hindi-belt-states-speak-only-one-language-rest-of-india-is-more-bilingual-data/article69285848.ece
  156. https://scroll.in/article/884754/surging-hindi-shrinking-south-indian-languages-nine-charts-that-explain-the-2011-language-census
  157. https://charchajunction8.wordpress.com/2025/05/07/the-decline-of-maithili-in-bihar-a-four-year-analysis-of-language-shift/
  158. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-asian-studies/article/marginalized-voice-in-the-history-of-hindi/84E174420195AFCB7F8CF347CDDDEF11
  159. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356162036_Language_Shift_Among_Tribal_Languages_Of_India_A_Case_Study_Bihar_Undivided
  160. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376837481_KINSHIP_TERMS_IN_BHOJPURI_MAITHILI_AND_MAGAHI_AN_ETHNOLINGUISTICS_STUDY
  161. https://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.23428
  162. https://ignca.gov.in/Asi_data/23428.pdf
  163. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03085694.2023.2225984
  164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/312831
  165. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365428193_Patterns_of_Language_Use_and_Language_Preferences_of_Maithili_Speakers_in_Bihar
  166. https://www.theindiaforum.in/article/what-census-obscures
  167. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00856401.2023.2275444
  168. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED163813.pdf
  169. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/144516186.pdf
  170. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manish_Singh114/publication/344255358_Variations_in_Bhojpuri_A_sociolinguistic_study/links/5f60ff6d4585154dbbd52871/Variations-in-Bhojpuri-A-sociolinguistic-study.pdf
  171. https://education.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/government-policies/bihar-govt-to-strengthen-language-academies-to-promote-multiple-dialects-minister/118942278
  172. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/experts-lay-stress-on-conserving-endangered-languages/articleshow/81140777.cms
  173. https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19800731-decision-to-make-urdu-second-official-language-in-bihar-provokes-furore-from-maithil-brahmins-821314-2014-01-17
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.