Hubbry Logo
Roanoke ColonyRoanoke ColonyMain
Open search
Roanoke Colony
Community hub
Roanoke Colony
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Roanoke Colony
Roanoke Colony
from Wikipedia

The Roanoke Colony (/ˈr.ə.nk/ ROH-ə-nohk) were two attempts by Sir Walter Raleigh to found the first permanent English settlement in North America. The first colony was established at Roanoke Island in 1585 as a military outpost, and was evacuated in 1586. The more famous second colony, known as the Lost Colony, began when a new group of settlers under John White arrived on the island in 1587; a relief ship in 1590 found the colony mysteriously abandoned. The fate of the 112 to 121 colonists remains unknown.

Key Information

Roanoke Colony was founded by Governor Ralph Lane in 1585 on Roanoke Island in present-day Dare County, North Carolina.[1] Poor relations with some of the local Native American tribes and a lack of supplies troubled Lane's colony. A resupply mission by Sir Richard Grenville was delayed, so Lane abandoned the colony and returned to England with Sir Francis Drake in 1586. Grenville arrived two weeks later and also returned home, leaving behind a small detachment to protect Raleigh's claim.[2] A second expedition led by John White landed on the island in 1587. Sir Walter Raleigh had sent him to establish the "Cittie of Raleigh" on the Chesapeake Bay.[3]

During a stop to check on Grenville's men, ship's pilot Simon Fernandes forced White and his colonists to remain on Roanoke.[4] White returned to England with Fernandes, intending to bring more supplies in 1588.[5] The Anglo-Spanish War delayed his return to Roanoke until 1590,[6] and he found the settlement fortified but abandoned. The cryptic word "CROATOAN" was found carved into the palisade, which White interpreted to mean that the colonists had relocated to Croatoan Island. Before he could follow this lead, rough seas and a lost anchor forced the mission to return to England. That attempt became known as the "Lost Colony".[7]

Speculation that the colonists had assimilated with nearby Indian tribes appears in writings as early as 1605.[8] Investigations by the Jamestown colonists produced reports that the Roanoke settlers had been massacred, and there were stories of people with European features being seen in Indian villages, but no conclusive evidence was found.[9] Interest in the matter fell until 1834, when George Bancroft published his account in A History of the United States. Bancroft's description of the colonists cast them as foundational figures in American culture, particularly White's infant granddaughter Virginia Dare, and it captured the public imagination.[10]

Background

[edit]
A 1529 map depicting "Verazzano's Sea" extending from the North Atlantic to the Outer Banks

The Outer Banks were explored in 1524 by Giovanni da Verrazzano, who mistook Pamlico Sound for the Pacific Ocean, and concluded that the barrier islands were an isthmus. Recognizing this as a potential shortcut to China, he presented his findings to King Francis I of France and King Henry VIII of England, neither of whom pursued the matter.[11]

In 1578, Queen Elizabeth I granted a charter to Sir Humphrey Gilbert to explore and colonize territories "unclaimed by Christian kingdoms".[12] Gilbert had helped to crush the first of the Desmond Rebellions in Ireland's Munster province in the early 1570s. The terms of the charter granted by the Queen were vague, although Gilbert understood it to give him rights to all territory in the New World north of Spanish Florida.[13] Led by Gilbert, the English briefly claimed St. John's, Newfoundland, in 1583, as the first English territory in North America at the royal prerogative of Queen Elizabeth I, but Gilbert was lost at sea on his return journey to England.

Following Gilbert's death in 1583,[14] Queen Elizabeth divided the charter between his brother Adrian Gilbert, and his half-brother Sir Walter Raleigh. Adrian's charter gave him the patent on Newfoundland and all points north, where geographers expected to eventually find a long-sought Northwest Passage to Asia. Raleigh was awarded the lands to the south, though much of it was already claimed by Spain.[15] Richard Hakluyt, however, had by this time taken notice of Verazzano's "isthmus" – located within Raleigh's claim – and was campaigning for England to capitalize on the opportunity.[16]

Raleigh's charter, issued on March 25, 1584, specified that he needed to establish a colony by 1591, or lose his right to colonization.[17] He was to "discover, search, find out, and view such remote heathen and barbarous Lands, Countries, and territories ... to have, hold, occupy, and enjoy".[18] It was expected that Raleigh would establish a base from which to send privateers on raids against the treasure fleets of Spain.[19]

Despite the broad powers granted to Raleigh, he was forbidden to leave the queen's side. Instead of personally leading voyages to the Americas, he delegated the missions to his associates and oversaw operations from London.[20]

Amadas–Barlowe expedition

[edit]

The arrival of the Englishmen in Virginia (1590). Engraving by Theodor De Bry, from a drawing by John White.

Raleigh quickly arranged an expedition to explore his claim. It departed England on April 27, 1584.[21] The fleet consisted of two barques; Philip Amadas was captain of the larger vessel, with Simon Fernandes as pilot, while Arthur Barlowe was in command of the other. There are indications that Thomas Harriot and John White may have participated in the voyage, but no records survive which directly confirm their involvement.[22]

The expedition employed a standard route for transatlantic voyages, sailing south to catch trade winds, which carried them westward to the West Indies, where they collected fresh water. The two ships then sailed north until July 4, when they sighted land at what is now called Cape Fear. The fleet made landfall on July 13 at an inlet north of Hatorask Island,[23] which was named "Port Ferdinando" after Fernandes, who discovered it.[21]

The Native Americans in the region had likely encountered, or at least observed, Europeans from previous expeditions. The Secotan, who controlled Roanoke Island and the mainland between Albemarle Sound and the Pamlico River, soon made contact with the English and established friendly relations. The Secotan chieftain, Wingina, had recently been injured in a war with the Pamlico, so his brother Granganimeo represented the tribe in his place.[24]

Upon their return to England in the autumn of 1584, Amadas and Barlowe spoke highly of the tribes' hospitality and the strategic location of Roanoke. They brought back two natives: Wanchese, a Secotan, and Manteo, a Croatan whose mother was the chieftain of Croatoan Island.[25] The expedition's reports described the region as a pleasant and bountiful land, alluding to the Golden Age and the Garden of Eden, although these accounts may have been embellished by Raleigh.[26]

Queen Elizabeth was impressed with the results of Raleigh's expedition. In 1585, during a ceremony to knight Raleigh, she proclaimed the land granted to him "Virginia" and proclaimed him "Knight Lord and Governor of Virginia". Sir Walter Raleigh proceeded to seek investors to fund a colony.[27]

Lane colony

[edit]
Sir Richard Grenville

For the first colony in Virginia, Raleigh planned a largely military operation focused on the exploration and evaluation of natural resources. The intended number of colonists was 69, but approximately 600 men were sent in the voyage, with about half intended to remain at the colony, to be followed by a second wave later. Ralph Lane was appointed governor of the colony, and Philip Amadas would serve as admiral, although the fleet commander Sir Richard Grenville led the overall mission.[28] Civilian attendants included Joachim Gans, metallurgist, Thomas Harriot, a scientist, and John White, an artist. Manteo and Wanchese, returning home from their visit to England, were also passengers on the voyage.[29]

Voyage

[edit]

The fleet consisted of seven ships: The galleass Tiger (Grenville's flagship, with Fernandes as pilot), the flyboat Roebuck (captained by John Clarke), Red Lion (under the command of George Raymond), Elizabeth (captained by Thomas Cavendish), Dorothy (Raleigh's personal ship, perhaps captained by Arthur Barlowe) and two small pinnaces.[30]

Plymouth, Devon, was the burgeoning home port of Drake, Gilbert, Grenville, and Raleigh

On April 9, 1585, the fleet departed Plymouth, heading south through the Bay of Biscay. A severe storm off the coast of Portugal separated Tiger from the rest of the fleet and sank one of the pinnaces. Fortunately, Fernandes had a plan for such an occurrence, wherein the ships would meet up at Mosquetal,[b] on the south coast of Puerto Rico. Proceeding alone, Tiger made good speed for the Caribbean, arriving at the rendezvous point on May 11, ahead of the other ships.[34]

Ralph Lane's fort at Mosquetal

While awaiting the fleet, Grenville established a base camp, where his crew could rest and defend themselves from Spanish forces. Lane's men used the opportunity as practice for building the fortifications that would be needed at the new colony. The crew also set about replacing the lost pinnace, forging nails and sawing local lumber to construct a new ship.[34] Elizabeth arrived on May 19, shortly after the completion of the fort and pinnace.[35][36]

The remainder of the fleet never arrived at Mosquetal. At least one of the ships encountered difficulties near Jamaica and ran out of supplies, causing its captain to send twenty of his crew ashore. Eventually Roebuck, Red Lion, and Dorothy continued to the Outer Banks, arriving by mid-June. Red Lion left about thirty men on Croatoan Island and departed for privateering in Newfoundland. In the meantime, Grenville established contact with local Spanish authorities, in the hopes of obtaining fresh provisions. When the Spanish failed to deliver the promised supplies, Grenville suspected they would soon attack, so he and his ships abandoned the temporary fort.[37]

Collecting salt in Salinas Bay

Grenville captured two Spanish ships in the Mona Passage, adding them to his fleet. Lane took one of these ships to Salinas Bay, where he captured salt mounds collected by the Spanish. Lane again built fortifications to protect his men as they brought the salt aboard. Grenville's ships then sailed to La Isabela, where the Spanish set aside hostilities to trade with the well-armed English fleet. On June 7, Grenville left Hispaniola to continue to the Outer Banks.[38]

The fleet sailed through an inlet at Wococon Island (near present-day Ocracoke Inlet) on June 26. Tiger struck a shoal, ruining most of the food supplies and nearly destroying the ship.[39] There are indications that Grenville's fleet was supposed to spend the winter with the new colony, perhaps to immediately begin using it as a privateering base. The wreck of Tiger, however, made that impossible. The remaining provisions could not support a settlement as large as had been planned. Moreover, the shallow inlets of the Outer Banks made the region unsuitable as a base for large ships. The colony's top priority would now be to locate a better harbour.[40]

After repairs, Tiger continued with the rest of the fleet to Port Ferdinando, where they reunited with Roebuck and Dorothy. The men left behind by Red Lion were presumably also located during this time.[41] On August 5, John Arundell took command of one of the faster vessels and set sail for England, to report the expedition's safe arrival.[42]

Establishment of the colony

[edit]
The 1585 assault on Aquascogoc village

The loss of provisions from the Tiger meant that the colony would support far fewer settlers than originally planned. Grenville decided that only about 100 men would stay with Lane, which would be enough to fulfill the colony's objectives until another fleet, scheduled to leave England in June 1585, could deliver a second wave of colonists and supplies.[43] However, Grenville could not know that this expedition had been redirected to Newfoundland, to alert fishing fleets that the Spanish had begun seizing English commercial vessels in retaliation for attacks by English privateers.[44] Until a resupply mission could be arranged, Lane's colony would be heavily dependent on the generosity of the natives.[45]

While the Tiger was under repair, Grenville organized an expedition to explore Pamlico Sound and the Secotan villages of Aquascogoc, Pamlico, and Secotan. His party made contact with the locals, presenting Harriot and White with an opportunity to extensively study Native American society.[46] Although much of their research did not survive the 1586 evacuation of the colony, Harriot's extensive survey of Virginia's inhabitants and natural resources was published in 1588, with engravings of White's illustrations included in the 1590 edition.[47][48]

Following this initial exploration, a silver cup was reported missing. Believing the item stolen, Grenville sent Amadas to lead a detachment back to Aquascogoc to demand the return of the missing property. When the villagers did not produce the cup, the English decided that severe retribution was necessary in order to avoid the appearance of weakness. Amadas and his men burnt down the entire town and its crops, sending the natives fleeing.[49][50]

An artist's rendering of Ralph Lane's Roanoke fort; author unknown, 1962

Manteo arranged a meeting for Grenville and Lane with Granganimeo, to provide land for the English settlement on Roanoke Island. Both sides agreed that the island was strategically located for access to the ocean and to avoid detection from Spanish patrols. Lane began construction of a fort on the north side of the island.[51] There are no surviving renderings of the Roanoke fort, but it was likely similar in structure to the one at Mosquetal.[52]

Grenville set sail for England aboard the Tiger on August 25, 1585. Days later, in Bermuda, Grenville raided a large Spanish galleon, the Santa Maria de San Vicente, which had become separated from the rest of its fleet.[53] The merchant ship, which Grenville took back to England as a prize, was loaded with enough treasure to make the entire Roanoke expedition profitable, spurring excitement in Queen Elizabeth's court about Raleigh's colonisation efforts.[54]

The Roebuck left Roanoke on September 8, 1585, leaving behind one of the pinnaces under the command of Amadas.[55] Records indicate that 107 men remained with Lane at the colony. However, historians disagree as to whether White returned to England with Grenville, or spent the winter at Roanoke despite his absence from the list of colonists.[56][57]

Exploration

[edit]
La Virginea Pars map, by John White

Many of the colonists had joined the mission expecting to discover sources of gold and silver. When no such sources were located, these men became dispirited and decided the entire operation was a waste of their time. The English also researched where the local Native Americans obtained their copper, but ultimately never tracked the metal to its origin.[58] The colonists spent the autumn of 1585 acquiring corn from the neighboring villages, to augment their limited supplies. The colony apparently obtained enough corn (along with venison, fish, and oysters) to sustain them through the winter.[59] Little information survives, however, about what transpired at the colony between September 1585 and March 1586, making a full assessment of the winter impossible.[60] The colonists most likely exhausted their English provisions and American corn by October, and the resulting monotony of their remaining food sources no doubt contributed to the men's low morale.[61]

Amadas spent the winter exploring Chesapeake Bay, traveling as far as Cape Henry and the James River. While there his party made contact with the Chesapeake villages of Chesepioc and Skicóak. The Secotans had described Skicóak as the largest city in the region, possibly leading the English to expect something like the wealthy Inca and Aztec kingdoms encountered by the Spanish. Amadas instead found a more modest settlement, although he was impressed with the area's climate and soil quality.[62] Harriot and Gans explored the Virginia territory, meeting Native American tribes and taking stock of natural resources. During his travels, Harriot and his assistants collected data that would eventually be used to produce White's La Virginea Pars map.[63]

Although 16th-century science could not explain the phenomenon, Harriot noticed that each town the colonists visited quickly suffered a deadly epidemic, which may have been influenza or smallpox. Some of the Secotan suspected the disease was caused by supernatural forces unleashed by the English.[64] When Wingina fell sick, his own people could not treat him, but he recovered after requesting prayers from the English. Impressed, Wingina asked the colonists to share this power with other stricken communities, which only hastened the spread of disease. The epidemic likely had a severe impact on the fall harvest, at a time when Lane's colony would be heavily dependent on its neighbors to supplement its limited food supply.[65][66]

Hostilities and food shortages

[edit]
Portrait of a weroance, who may have been Wingina

By spring, relations between the Secotan and the colony were strained, most likely due to the colony's over-reliance on Secotan food. The death of Granganimeo, who had been a powerful advocate for the colony, apparently helped to turn Wingina against the English. Wingina changed his name to "Pemisapan" ("one who watches"), suggesting a newly cautious and vigilant policy, and established a new temporary tribal capital on Roanoke Island. The English did not initially recognize that these developments represented a threat to their interests.[67]

In March, Lane consulted Pemisapan about a plan to explore the mainland beyond Secotan territory. Pemisapan supported the plan and advised Lane that the Chowanoke leader Menatonon was meeting with his allies to plan an attack on the English, and that three thousand warriors had gathered at Choanoac. At the same time, Pemisapan sent word to Menatonon that the English would be coming, ensuring that both sides would expect hostilities. When Lane's well-armed party arrived at Choanoac, he found representatives of the Chowanoke, Mangoak, Weapemeoc, and Moratuc. Since this gathering was not planning an attack, Lane caught them by surprise. He easily captured Menatonon, who informed him that it was Pemisapan who had requested the council in the first place.[68][69][70]

Menatonon quickly gained Lane's trust by offering information about lucrative opportunities in lands the English had not yet discovered. He described a rich and powerful king to the northeast (presumably the leader of the Powhatan), warning that Lane should bring a considerable force if he sought to make contact. Menatonon also corroborated rumors Lane had heard about a sea just beyond the head of the Roanoke River, apparently confirming English hopes of finding access to the Pacific Ocean. The chief's son Skiko described a place to the west called "Chaunis Temoatan" rich in a valuable metal, which Lane thought could be copper or perhaps even gold.[71]

Based on this information, Lane envisioned a detailed plan in which his forces would divide into two groups – one traveling north up the Chowan River, the other along the Atlantic coast—to resettle at Chesapeake Bay. However, he decided to defer this mission until the colony received fresh supplies, which Grenville had promised would arrive by Easter.[72][73] In the meantime, Lane ransomed Menatonon and had Skiko sent back to Roanoke as a hostage. He proceeded with forty men for about 100 miles (160 km) up the Roanoke River in search of Chaunis Temotan, but they found only deserted villages and warriors lying in ambush.[74] Lane had expected the Moratuc to provide provisions for him along his route, but Pemisapan had sent word that the English were hostile and villagers should withdraw from the river with their food.[75]

Lane and his party returned to the colony shortly after Easter, half-starved and empty-handed. During their absence, rumors had spread that they had been killed, and Pemisapan had been preparing to withdraw the Secotan from Roanoke Island and leave the colony to starve. There was no sign of Grenville's resupply fleet, which had not yet even left England. According to Lane, Pemisapan was so surprised that Lane returned alive from the Roanoke River mission that he reconsidered his plans. Ensenore, an elder among Pemisapan's council, argued in favor of the English. Later, an envoy for Menatonon informed Lane that the Weapemeoc leader Okisko had pledged fealty to Queen Elizabeth and Sir Walter Raleigh. This shift in the balance of power in the region further deterred Pemisapan from following through on his plans against the colony. He instead ordered his people to sow crops and build fishing weirs for the settlers.[76]

The renewed accord between the English and the Secotan was short-lived. On April 20 Ensenore died, depriving the colony of its last advocate in Pemisapan's inner circle. Wanchese had risen to become a senior advisor, and his time among the English had convinced him that they were a threat. Pemisapan evacuated the Secotan from Roanoke, destroyed the fishing weirs, and ordered them not to sell food to the English. Left to their own devices, the English had no way to produce enough food to sustain the colony. Lane ordered his men to break up into small groups to forage and beg for food in the Outer Banks and the mainland.[77]

Lane continued to keep Skiko as a hostage. Although Pemisapan met regularly with Skiko and believed him sympathetic to the anti-English cause, Skiko sought to honor his father's intention of maintaining relations with the colony. Skiko informed Lane that Pemisapan planned to organize a war council meeting on June 10 with various regional powers. With the copper the Secotan had gained from trading with the colony, Pemisapan was able to offer substantial inducements to other tribes to side with him in a final offensive against the English. Oksiko declined to get involved, although individual Weapemeocs were permitted to participate. The plan of attack was to ambush Lane and other key leaders as they slept at the colony, and then signal for a general attack on the rest. Based on this information, Lane sent disinformation to the Secotan indicating that an English fleet had arrived, to force Pemisapan's hand.[78]

Forced to accelerate his schedule by the possibility of English reinforcements, Pemisapan gathered as many allies as he could for a meeting on May 31 at Dasamongueponke. That evening, Lane attacked the warriors posted at Roanoke, hoping to prevent them from alerting the mainland the following morning. On June 1, Lane, his top officers, and twenty-five men visited Dasamongueponke under the pretense of discussing a Secotan attempt to free Skiko. Once they were admitted into the council, Lane gave the signal for his men to attack. Pemisapan was shot and fled into the woods, but Lane's men caught up to him and brought back his severed head.[79] The head was impaled outside the colony's fort.[80]

Evacuation

[edit]
Map of Sir Francis Drake's 1585–86 voyage

In June, the colonists made contact with the fleet of Sir Francis Drake, on his way back to England from successful campaigns in Santo Domingo, Cartagena, and St. Augustine.[81] During these raids, Drake had acquired refugees, slaves, and hardware with the intent of delivering them to Raleigh's colony. Upon learning of the colony's misfortunes, Drake agreed to leave behind four months of supplies and one of his ships, the Francis. However, a hurricane hit the Outer Banks, sweeping the Francis out to sea.[82]

After the storm, Lane persuaded his men to evacuate the colony, and Drake agreed to take them back to England. Manteo and an associate, Towaye, joined them. Three of Lane's colonists were left behind and never heard from again. Because the colony was abandoned, it is unclear what became of the slaves and refugees Drake had meant to place there. There is no record of them arriving in England with the fleet, and it is possible Drake left them on Roanoke with some of the goods he had previously set aside for Lane.[83] Drake's fleet, along with Lane's colonists, reached England in July 1586.[84] Upon arrival, the colonists introduced tobacco, maize, and potatoes to England.[85]

Grenville's detachment

[edit]

A single supply ship, sent by Raleigh, arrived at Roanoke just days after Drake evacuated the colony. The crew could not find any trace of the colonists and left. Two weeks later, Grenville's relief fleet finally arrived with a year's worth of supplies and reinforcements of 400 men. Grenville conducted an extensive search and interrogated three natives, one of whom finally related an account of the evacuation.[86] The fleet returned to England, leaving behind a small detachment of fifteen men both to maintain an English presence and to protect Raleigh's claim to Roanoke Island.[87]

According to the Croatan, this contingent was attacked by an alliance of mainland tribes shortly after Grenville's fleet left. Five of the English were away gathering oysters when two of the attackers, appearing unarmed, approached the encampment and asked to meet with two Englishmen peacefully. One of the Native Americans concealed a wooden sword, which he used to kill an Englishman. Another 28 attackers revealed themselves, but the other Englishman escaped to warn his unit. The natives set fire to the house where the English kept their food stores, thus forcing the men to take up whatever arms were handy. A second Englishman was killed; the remaining nine retreated to the shore, and fled the island on their boat. They found their four compatriots returning from the creek, picked them up, and continued onto a small island near the entrance to the Hatteras harbor. The thirteen survivors were never seen again.[88]

Lost colony

[edit]
Death of George Howe

Despite the desertion of the Lane colony, Raleigh was persuaded by Hakluyt, Harriot, and White to make another attempt.[89] However, Roanoke Island would no longer be safe for English settlers, following the hostilities between Lane's men and the Secotan, and the death of Wingina.[90] Hakluyt recommended Chesapeake Bay as the site for a new colony, in part because he believed the Pacific coast lay just beyond the explored areas of the Virginia territory. On January 7, 1587, Raleigh approved a corporate charter to found "the Cittie of Raleigh" with White as governor and twelve assistants.[91] Approximately 115 people agreed to join the colony, including White's pregnant daughter Eleanor and her husband Ananias Dare. The colonists were largely middle-class Londoners, perhaps seeking to become landed gentry.[92] Manteo and Towaye, who had left the Lane colony with Drake's fleet, were also brought along.[93] This time, the party included women and children, but no organized military force.[94]

The expedition consisted of three ships: the flagship Lion, captained by White with Fernandes as master and pilot, along with a flyboat (under the command of Edward Spicer) and a full-rigged pinnace (commanded by Edward Stafford). The fleet departed on May 8.[95]

On July 22, the flagship and pinnace anchored at Croatoan Island. White planned to take forty men aboard the pinnace to Roanoke, where he would consult with the fifteen men stationed there by Grenville, before continuing on to Chesapeake Bay. Once he boarded the pinnace however, a "gentleman" on the flagship representing Fernandes ordered the sailors to leave the colonists on Roanoke.[96][97][98]

The following morning, White's party located the site of Lane's colony. The fort had been dismantled, while the houses stood vacant and overgrown with melons. There was no sign that Grenville's men had ever been there except for human bones that White believed were the remains of one of them, killed by Native Americans.[90][99]

Following the arrival of the flyboat on July 25, all of the colonists disembarked.[90] Shortly thereafter, colonist George Howe was killed by a native while searching alone for crabs in Albemarle Sound.[100]

Baptism of Virginia Dare

White dispatched Stafford to re-establish relations with the Croatan, with the help of Manteo. The Croatan described how a coalition of mainland tribes, led by Wanchese, had attacked Grenville's detachment.[101] The colonists attempted to negotiate a truce through the Croatan, but received no response.[102][103] On August 9, White led a pre-emptive strike on Dasamongueponke, but the enemy (fearing reprisal for the death of Howe) had withdrawn from the village, and the English accidentally attacked Croatan looters. Manteo again smoothed relations between the colonists and the Croatan.[104] For his service to the colony, Manteo was baptized and named "Lord of Roanoke and Dasamongueponke".[105]

On August 18, 1587, Eleanor Dare gave birth to a daughter, christened "Virginia" in honor of being "the first Christian born in Virginia". Records indicate Margery Harvye gave birth shortly thereafter, although nothing else is known about her child.[106]

By the time the fleet was preparing to return to England, the colonists had decided to relocate 50 miles (80 km) up Albemarle Sound.[107] The colonists persuaded Governor White to return to England to explain the colony's desperate situation and ask for help.[103] White reluctantly agreed, and departed with the fleet on August 27, 1587.[108]

1588 relief mission

[edit]
Launch of English fireships against the Spanish Armada, 7 August 1588

After a difficult journey, White returned to England on November 5, 1587.[109] By this time reports of the Spanish Armada mobilizing for an attack had reached London, and Queen Elizabeth had prohibited any able ship from leaving England, so that they might participate in the coming battle.[110][106]

During the winter, Grenville was granted a waiver to lead a fleet into the Caribbean to attack the Spanish, and White was permitted to accompany him in a resupply ship. The fleet was set to launch in March 1588, but unfavourable winds kept them in port until Grenville received new orders to stay and defend England. Two of the smaller ships in Grenville's fleet, the Brave and the Roe, were deemed unsuitable for combat, and White was permitted to take them to Roanoke. The ships departed on April 22, but the captains of the ships attempted to capture several Spanish ships on the outward-bound voyage (in order to improve their profits).[111][112] On May 6 they were attacked by French mariners (or pirates) near Morocco. Nearly two dozen of the crew were killed, and the supplies bound for Roanoke were looted, leaving the ships to return to England.[113]

Following the defeat of the Spanish Armada in August, England maintained the ban on shipping in order to focus efforts on organizing a Counter Armada to attack Spain in 1589. White would not gain permission to make another resupply attempt until 1590.[114]

Spanish reconnaissance

[edit]

The Spanish Empire had been gathering intelligence on the Roanoke colonies since Grenville's capture of Santa Maria de San Vicente in 1585. They feared that the English had established a haven for piracy in North America, but were unable to locate such a base.[115] They had no cause to assume Lane's colony had been abandoned, or that White's would be placed in the same location.[93] Indeed, the Spanish greatly overestimated the success of the English in Virginia; rumors suggested the English had discovered a mountain made of diamonds and a route to the Pacific Ocean.[116]

Following a failed reconnaissance mission in 1587, Philip II of Spain ordered Vicente González to search Chesapeake Bay in 1588. González failed to find anything in Chesapeake, but on the way back he chanced to discover Port Ferdinando along the Outer Banks. The port appeared abandoned. González left without conducting a thorough investigation. Although the Spanish believed González had located the secret English base, the defeat of the Spanish Armada prevented Phillip from immediately ordering an attack upon it. In 1590, a plan was reportedly made to destroy the Roanoke colony and set up a Spanish colony in Chesapeake Bay, but this was merely disinformation designed to misdirect English intelligence.[117]

1590 relief mission

[edit]
John White at the ruins of the Roanoke colony, 1590

Eventually, Raleigh arranged passage for White on a privateering expedition organized by John Watts. The fleet of six ships would spend the summer of 1590 raiding Spanish outposts in the Caribbean, but the flagship Hopewell and the Moonlight would split off to take White to his colony.[114] At the same time, however, Raleigh was in the process of turning the venture over to new investors.[118]

Hopewell and Moonlight anchored at Croatoan Island on August 12, but there is no indication that White used the time to contact the Croatan for information. On the evening of August 15, while anchored at the north end of Croatoan Island, the crews sighted plumes of smoke on Roanoke Island; the following morning, they investigated another column of smoke on the southern end of Croatoan, but found nothing.[118] White's landing party spent the next two days attempting to cross Pamlico Sound, with considerable difficulty and loss of life. On August 17 they sighted a fire on the north end of Roanoke and rowed towards it, but they reached the island after nightfall and decided not to risk coming ashore. The men spent the night in their anchored boats, singing English songs in hopes that the colonists would hear.[119]

White and the others made landfall on the morning of August 18 (his granddaughter's third birthday). The party found fresh tracks in the sand, but were not contacted by anyone. They also discovered the letters "CRO" carved into a tree. Upon reaching the site of the colony, White noted the area had been fortified with a palisade. Near the entrance of the fencing, the word "CROATOAN" was carved in one of the posts.[120] White was certain these two inscriptions meant that the colonists had peacefully relocated to Croatoan Island, since they had agreed in 1587 that the colonists would leave a "secret token" indicating their destination, or a cross pattée as a duress code.[121][122]

Within the palisade, the search party found that houses had been dismantled, and anything that could be carried had been removed. Several large trunks (including three belonging to White, containing the belongings he left behind in 1587) had been dug up and looted. None of the colony's boats could be found along the shore.[123] The party returned to Hopewell that evening, and plans were made to return to Croatoan the following day. However, Hopewell's anchor cable snapped, leaving the ship with only one working cable and anchor. The search mission could not continue given the considerable risk of shipwreck. Moonlight set off for England, but the crew of Hopewell offered a compromise with White, in which they would spend winter in the Caribbean and return to the Outer Banks in the spring of 1591. This plan fell through, though, when Hopewell was blown off course, forcing them to stop for supplies in the Azores. When the winds prevented landfall there, the ship was again forced to change course for England, arriving on October 24, 1590.[124]

Investigations into Roanoke

[edit]

1595–1602: Walter Raleigh

[edit]
Sir Walter Raleigh

Although White failed to locate his colonists in 1590, his report suggested they had simply relocated and might yet be found alive. However, it served Raleigh's purposes to keep the matter in doubt; so long as the settlers could not be proven dead, he could legally maintain his claim on Virginia.[125] Nevertheless, a 1594 petition was made to declare Ananias Dare legally dead so that his son, John Dare, could inherit his estate. The petition was granted in 1597.[126]

During Raleigh's first transatlantic voyage in 1595, he claimed to be in search of his lost colonists, although he later admitted this was misinformation to cover his search for El Dorado. On the return voyage, he sailed past the Outer Banks, and later claimed that weather had prevented him from landing.[125]

Raleigh later sought to enforce his monopoly on Virginia – based on the potential survival of the Roanoke colonists – when the price of sassafras skyrocketed. He funded a 1602 mission to the Outer Banks, with the stated goal of resuming the search.[127] Led by Samuel Mace, this expedition differed from previous voyages in that Raleigh bought his own ship and guaranteed the sailors' wages so that they would not be distracted by privateering.[128] However, the ship's itinerary and manifest indicate that Raleigh's top priority was harvesting sassafras far south of Croatoan Island. By the time Mace approached Hatteras, bad weather prevented them from lingering in the area.[129] In 1603, Raleigh was implicated in the Main Plot and arrested for treason against King James, effectively ending his Virginia charter.[130]

1603: Bartholomew Gilbert

[edit]

In 1603 there was one final expedition with the intention of finding the Roanoke colonists, led by Bartholomew Gilbert. Their intended destination was Chesapeake Bay, but bad weather forced them to land in an unspecified location near there. The landing team, including Gilbert himself, was killed by a group of Native Americans for unknown reasons on July 29. The remaining crew were forced to return to England empty-handed.[131]

1607–1609: John Smith

[edit]
Reproduction of the Zúñiga Map

Following the establishment of the Jamestown settlement in 1607, John Smith was captured by the Powhatan and met with both their leader Wahunsenacawh (often referred to as "Chief Powhatan") and his brother Opechancanough. They described to him a place called "Ocanahonan", where men wore European-style clothing; and "Anone", which featured walled houses. Later, after Smith returned to the colony, he made arrangements with Wowinchopunk, the king of the Paspahegh, to investigate "Panawicke", another place reportedly inhabited by men in European dress. The colony produced a crude map of the region with labels for these villages. The map also featured a place called "Pakrakanick" with a note indicating, "Here remaineth four men clothed that came from Roonocok to Ocanahawan."[132]

In the summer of 1608, Smith sent a letter about this information, along with the map, back to England. The original map is now lost, but a copy was obtained by Pedro de Zúñiga, the Spanish ambassador to England, who passed it on to Philip III of Spain. The copy, now commonly referred to as the "Zúñiga Map", was rediscovered in 1890.[133]

Smith planned to explore Pakrakanick, but a dispute with the Paspahegh ended the mission before it could begin. He also dispatched two search parties, possibly to look for the other villages reported to him, with instructions to find "the lost company of Sir Walter Rawley". Neither group could find any sign of the Roanoke colonists living in the area.[134]

By May 1609, word had reached England's Royal Council for Virginia that the 1587 colonists had been massacred by Wahunsenacawh.[135] The source of this allegation is unknown. Machumps, Wahunsenacawh's brother-in-law, is known to have provided information about Virginia, and he had recently arrived in England.[136] It has been speculated that the same voyage could have also delivered a letter from Smith, although no evidence for this exists.[137]

Based on this intelligence, as well as Smith's earlier report, the Council drafted orders for the Jamestown colony to relocate. These orders recommended "Ohonahorn" (or "Oconahoen"), near the mouth of the Chowan River, as a new base. Among the purported advantages of this location were proximity to "Riche Copper mines of Ritanoc" and "Peccarecamicke", where four of Raleigh's colonists were supposed to be held by a chieftain named "Gepanocon".[138] These orders, along with the new acting governor, Thomas Gates, were delayed due to the shipwreck of the Sea Venture at Bermuda. Gates arrived at Jamestown in May 1610, several months into the Starving Time. The crisis may have deterred the colonists from attempting the proposed relocation. An expedition was sent to the Chowan River, but there is no record of its findings.[139]

1610–1612: William Strachey

[edit]

William Strachey arrived in Jamestown, along with Gates and Machumps, in May 1610. By 1612, he had returned to England, where he wrote The Historie of Travaile into Virginia Britannia, an overview of the Virginia territory.[139] He described "Peccarecamek", "Ochanahoen", "Anoeg", and "Ritanoe" in a manner consistent with Smith's map and the Virginia Council's orders to Gates. However, Strachey introduced additional details about "the slaughter at Roanoak".[140]

Strachey suggested that the lost colonists had spent twenty years living peacefully with a tribe beyond Powhatan territory. Wahunsenacawh, he claimed, carried out the unprovoked attack at the recommendation of his priests, shortly before the arrival of the Jamestown colonists. Based on this account, seven English – four men, two boys, and one woman – survived the assault and fled up the Chowan River. They later came under the protection of a chieftain named "Eyanoco", for whom they beat copper at "Ritanoe".[141]

The Historie of Travaile never directly identifies the tribe that supposedly hosted the Roanoke colonists. However, Strachey did describe an attack against the Chesepians, in which Wahunsenacawh's priests warned him that a nation would arise in Chesapeake Bay to threaten his dominion.[142] It has been inferred that the colonists had relocated to Chesapeake, and both groups were massacred in the same attack.[143]

Strachey believed that the Powhatan religion was inherently Satanic, and that the priests might literally be in communion with Satan. He advocated for England to facilitate the Powhatans' conversion to Christianity. To that end, he recommended a plan in which King James would show mercy to the Powhatan people for the massacre of the Roanoke colonists, but demand revenge upon the priests.[144] However, the London Company did not publish The Historie of Travaile, which fell into obscurity until 1849.[145] There is no indication that any actions were taken against Wahunsenacawh or his priests in retaliation for the alleged massacre.[146]

1625: Samuel Purchas

[edit]
Powhatan attack on Jamestown

After the Powhatan attacked Jamestown in 1622, there was a dramatic shift in English commentary on Native Americans, as writers increasingly questioned their humanity. The London Company sponsored propaganda arguing that the massacre had justified genocidal retaliation, in order to assure potential backers that their investment in the colony would be safe.[147][148]

In this context, Samuel Purchas wrote Virginia's Verger in 1625, asserting England's right to possess and exploit its North American claim. He argued that the natives, as a race, had forfeited their right to the land through bloodshed, citing the 1586 ambush of Grenville's garrison, an alleged attack on White's colonists, and the 1622 Jamestown massacre. Purchas offered no evidence for his claim about the 1587 colony except to state, "Powhatan confessed to Cap. Smith, that hee had beene at their slaughter, and had divers utensills of theirs to shew."[149]

It is possible Smith related the story of Wahunsenacawh's confession to Purchas, as they are known to have spoken together. Smith's own writings, however, never mention the confession, leaving Purchas' claim to stand alone in what historian Helen Rountree dismisses as "an anti-Indian polemic".[150] Even if taken at face value, the alleged confession is not persuasive, as Wahunsenacawh might have invented the story in an attempt to intimidate Smith. The European artifacts allegedly offered as "proof" of a raid on the Roanoke colonists could just as easily have been obtained from other sources, such as Ajacán.[151]

1701–1709: John Lawson

[edit]

Sea traffic through Roanoke Island fell into decline in the 17th century, owing to the dangerous waters of the Outer Banks.[152] In 1672, the inlet between Hatorask and Croatoan islands closed, and the resulting landmass became known as Hatteras Island.[153]

During John Lawson's 1701–1709 exploration of northern Carolina, he visited Hatteras Island and encountered the Hatteras people.[154] Although there is evidence of European activity in the Outer Banks throughout the 17th century, Lawson was the first historian to investigate the region since White left in 1590.[155] Lawson was impressed with the influence of English culture on the Hatteras. They reported that several of their ancestors had been white, and some of them had gray eyes, supporting this claim. Lawson theorized that members of the 1587 colony had assimilated into this community after they lost hope of regaining contact with England.[156] While visiting Roanoke Island itself, Lawson reported finding the remains of a fort, as well as English coins, firearms, and a powder horn.[157]

Scientific research

[edit]

Research into the disappearance of the 1587 colonists largely ended with Lawson's 1701 investigation. Renewed interest in the Lost Colony during the 19th century eventually led to a wide range of scholarly analyses.

1800s–1950: Site preservation

[edit]
Reconstructed earthwork at Fort Raleigh National Historic Site

The ruins that Lawson encountered in 1701 eventually became a tourist attraction. U.S. President James Monroe visited the site on April 7, 1819. During the 1860s, visitors described the deteriorated "fort" as little more than an earthwork in the shape of a small bastion, and reported holes dug nearby in search of valuable relics. Production of the 1921 silent film The Lost Colony and road development further damaged the site. In the 1930s, J. C. Harrington advocated for the restoration and preservation of the earthwork.[158] The National Park Service began administration of the area in 1941, designating it Fort Raleigh National Historic Site. In 1950, the earthwork was reconstructed in an effort to restore its original size and shape.[159]

1998: Climate research

[edit]

In 1998, a team led by climatologist David W. Stahle (of the University of Arkansas) and archaeologist Dennis B. Blanton (of the College of William and Mary) concluded that an extreme drought occurred in Tidewater between 1587 and 1589. Their study measured growth rings from a network of bald cypress trees, producing data ranging from 1185 to 1984. Specifically, 1587 was measured as the worst growing season in the entire 800-year period. The findings were considered consistent with the concerns the Croatan expressed about their food supply.[160]

2005–2019: Genetic analysis

[edit]

Since 2005, computer scientist Roberta Estes has founded several organizations for DNA analysis and genealogical research. Her interest in the disappearance of the 1587 colony motivated various projects to establish a genetic link between the colonists and potential Native American descendants. Examining autosomal DNA for this purpose is unreliable, as so little of the colonists' genetic material would remain after five or six generations. However, testing of Y chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA is more reliable over large spans of time. The main challenge of this work is to obtain a genetic point of comparison, either from the remains of a Lost Colonist or from one of their descendants. While it is conceivable to sequence DNA from 430-year-old bones, there are as yet no bones from the Lost Colony to work with. And, as of 2019, the project had yet to identify any living descendant.[161]

Archaeological research

[edit]

1887–present: Archaeological evidence

[edit]
Archaeological research dig at Fort Raleigh National Historic Site (2009)

Archaeological research on Roanoke Island only began when Talcott Williams discovered a Native American burial site in 1887. He returned in 1895 to excavate the fort but found nothing of significance. Ivor Noël Hume would later make several compelling finds in the 1990s, but none that could be positively linked to the 1587 colony, as opposed to the 1585 outpost.[162]

After Hurricane Emily uncovered a number of Native American artifacts along Cape Creek in Buxton, North Carolina, anthropologist David Sutton Phelps Jr. organized an excavation in 1995. Phelps and his team discovered a ring in 1998, which initially appeared to be a gold signet ring bearing the heraldry of a Kendall family in the 16th century.[163][164] The find was celebrated as a landmark discovery, but Phelps never published a paper on his findings, and neglected to have the ring properly tested. X-ray analysis in 2017 proved the ring was brass, not gold, and experts could not confirm the alleged connection to Kendall heraldry. The low value and relative anonymity of the ring make it more difficult to conclusively associate with any particular person from the Roanoke voyages, which in turn increases the likelihood that it could have been brought to the New World at a later time.[165][166]

A significant challenge for archaeologists seeking information about the 1587 colonists is that many common artifacts could plausibly originate from the 1585 colony, or from Native Americans who traded with other European settlements in the same era. Andrew Lawler suggests that an example of a conclusive find would be female remains (since the 1585 colony was exclusively male) buried according to Christian tradition (supine, in an east–west orientation) which can be dated to before 1650 (by which point Europeans would have spread throughout the region).[167] However, few human remains of any kind have been discovered at sites related to the Lost Colony.[168]

One possible explanation for the extreme deficiency in archaeological evidence is shoreline erosion. The northern shore of Roanoke Island, where the Lane and White colonies were located, lost 928 feet (283 m) between 1851 and 1970. Extrapolating from this trend back to the 1580s, it is likely that portions of the settlements are now underwater, along with any artifacts or signs of life.[169]

2011–present; new archaeological sites

[edit]

In November 2011, researchers at the First Colony Foundation noticed two corrective patches on White's 1585 map La Virginea Pars. At their request, the British Museum examined the original map with a light table. One of the patches, at the confluence of the Roanoke and Chowan rivers, was found to cover a symbol representing a fort at the head of Albemarle Sound. The faint outline of a fort, drawn in what might be invisible ink, was also discovered on the patch itself.[170][171][172] One theory is that White may have been trying to conceal the fort from the Spanish, who saw the colony as a threat. The Spanish had sent an expedition to defeat the colony, but could not find the settlers.[172]

As the symbol is not to scale, it covers an area on the map representing thousands of acres in Bertie County, North Carolina. However, the location is presumed to be in or near the 16th-century Weapemeoc village of Mettaquem. In 2012, when a team prepared to excavate where the symbol indicated, archaeologist Nicholas Luccketti suggested they name the location "Site X", as in "X marks the spot."[173] In 2015 a team excavated the site, located near a Native American village called Mettaquem.[172]

In an October 2017 statement, the First Colony Foundation reported finding fragments of Tudor pottery and weapons at Site X, and concluded that these indicate a small group of colonists residing peacefully in the area.[174] The challenge for this research is to convincingly rule out the possibility that such finds were brought to the area by the 1585 Lane colony, or the trading post established by Nathaniel Batts in the 1650s.[175] In 2019, the Foundation announced plans to expand the research into land that has been donated to North Carolina as Salmon Creek State Natural Area.[176][177]

In 2020, new artifacts were found in North Carolina which researchers believe may be from a colony of survivors of the Lost Colony. These were found at a site about fifty miles west of Roanoke Island. Analysis of the artifacts focused on determining whether they might be from the Lost Colony, since later settlers from other colonies such as Jamestown would have different items and different materials than the Lost Colony settlers, such as for example clay pipes, which were invented later.[172] Another researcher found items at a site about fifty miles south of Roanoke Island.[172]

Another dig by Mark Horton, an archaeologist from the University of Bristol, found European artifacts at the site of a Native American village on Hatteras Island, including part of a sword and part of a gun. This may be evidence that the settlers did indeed assimilate with local Native Americans.[172][178]

In 2020 a book by Scott Dawson was published entitled The Lost Colony and Hatteras Island describing his efforts along with Horton to find artifacts relating to the colony. He also wrote articles in publications, including an article in the magazine American Heritage, which described several significant artifacts: these included several objects that seemed to be manufactured by Europeans, including an olive jar, glass and various manufactured items.[179][180]

Hypotheses about the colony's disappearance

[edit]

Without evidence of the Lost Colony's relocation or destruction, speculation about their fate has endured since the 1590s.[181] The matter has developed a reputation among academics for attracting obsession and sensationalism with little scholastic benefit.[182]

Conjecture about the Lost Colonists typically begins with the known facts about the case. When White returned to the colony in 1590, there was no sign of battle or withdrawal under duress, although the site was fortified. There were no human remains or graves reported in the area, suggesting that everyone was alive when they left. The "CROATOAN" message is consistent with the agreement with White to indicate where to look for them, suggesting they expected White to look for them and wanted to be found.[183]

Powhatan attack at Chesapeake Bay

[edit]
Chief Powhatan, detail of map published by John Smith (1612)

David Beers Quinn concluded that the 1587 colonists sought to relocate to their original destination – Chesapeake Bay – using the pinnace and other small boats to transport themselves and their belongings. A small group would have been stationed at Croatoan, to await White's return and direct him to the transplanted colony. Following White's failure to locate any of the colonists, the main body of the colonists would have quickly assimilated with the Chesepians, while the lookouts on Croatoan would have blended into the Croatan tribe.[citation needed]

Quinn suggested that Samuel Mace's 1602 voyage might have ventured into Chesapeake Bay and kidnapped Powhatans to bring back to England. From there, these abductees would be able to communicate with Thomas Harriot, and might reveal that Europeans were living in the region. Quinn evidently believed circumstances such as these were necessary to explain optimism about the colonists' survival after 1603.[citation needed]

Although Strachey accused Wahunsenacawh of slaughtering the colonists and Chesepians in separate passages, Quinn decided that these events occurred in a single attack on an integrated community, in April 1607. He supposed that Wahunsenacawh could have been seeking revenge for the speculative kidnappings by Mace. In Quinn's estimation, John Smith was the first to learn of the massacre, but for political considerations he quietly reported it directly to King James rather than revealing it in his published writings.[184] Despite Quinn's reputation on the subject, his peers had reservations about his theory, which relies heavily on the accounts of Strachey and Purchas.[185]

Integration with local tribes

[edit]
Watercolor of a Secotan village, by John White

The possibility that the missing colonists could have assimilated into nearby Native American tribes has been suggested since at least 1605.[129] If this integration was successful, the assimilated colonists would gradually exhaust their European supplies (ammunition, clothing) and discard European culture (language, style of dress, agriculture) as Algonquian lifestyle became more convenient.[186] Colonial-era Europeans observed that many people removed from European society by Native Americans for substantial periods of time – even if captured or enslaved – were reluctant to return; the reverse was seldom true. Therefore, it is reasonable to postulate that, if the colonists were assimilated, they or their descendants would not seek reintegration with subsequent English settlers.[187]

This leaves open the question of which tribe, or tribes, the colonists assimilated into. It is widely accepted that the Croatan were ancestors of the 18th-century Hatteras, although evidence of this is circumstantial.[153][188] The present-day Hatteras tribe identifies as descendants of both the Croatan and the Lost Colonists by way of the Hatteras.[189]

Some 17th-century maps use the word "Croatoan" to describe locations on the mainland, across Pamlico Sound from Roanoke and Hatteras. By 1700, these areas were associated with the Machapunga.[190] Oral traditions and legends about the migration of the Croatan through the mainland are prevalent in eastern North Carolina.[191] For example, the "Legend of the Coharie" in Sampson County was transcribed by Ernest M. Bullard in 1950.[192]

More famously, in the 1880s, state legislator Hamilton McMillan proposed that the Native American community in Robeson County (then considered free people of color) retained surnames and linguistic characteristics from the 1587 colonists.[193] His efforts convinced the North Carolina legislature to confer tribal recognition to the community in 1885, with the new designation of "Croatan". The tribe petitioned to be renamed in 1911, eventually settling on the name Lumbee in 1956.[194]

Other tribes purportedly linked to the Roanoke colonists include the Catawba and the Coree.[195] S. A'C. Ashe was convinced that the colonists had relocated westward to the banks of the Chowan River in Bertie County, and Conway Whittle Sams claimed that after being attacked by Wanchese and Wahunsenacawh, they scattered to multiple locations: the Chowan River, and south to the Pamlico and Neuse rivers.[196]

Reports of encounters with pale-skinned, blond-haired people among various Native American tribes occur as early as 1607. Although this is frequently attributed to assimilated Lost Colonists, it may be more easily explained by dramatically higher rates of albinism in Native Americans than in people of European descent.[197] Dawson (2020)[198] proposed that the colonists merged with the Croatan tribe; he claims, "They were never lost. It was made up. The mystery is over."[199][200] However, this conclusion has been called into question. Alain Outlaw, an archaeologist and faculty member at Christopher Newport University, called Dawson's conclusion "storytelling, not evidence-based information", while archaeologist Nick Luccketti wrote, "I have not seen any evidence at Croatoan of artifacts that indicate that Englishmen were living there." In addition, the actual text of Dawson's 2020 book The Lost Colony and Hatteras Island admitted that there was no "smoking gun" of evidence that the colonists had assimilated with the tribe. The book was also not subject to peer review, leaving the question open in spite of the sensationalist headlines that accompanied its publication.[201]

An archaeological dig by Mark Horton, an archaeologist from the University of Bristol, found European artifacts at the site of a Native American village on Hatteras Island, including part of a sword and part of a gun. This may be conclusive proof that the settlers did indeed assimilate with local Native Americans.[172]

Attempt to return to England

[edit]
Construction of a pinnace to evacuate Charlesfort

The colonists could have decided to rescue themselves by sailing for England in the pinnace, left behind by the 1587 expedition. If such an effort was made, the ship could have been lost with all hands at sea, accounting for the absence of both the ship and any trace of the colonists.[202] It is plausible that the colony included sailors qualified to attempt the return voyage. Little is known about the pinnace, but ships of its size were capable of making the trip, although they typically did so alongside other vessels.[203]

The colonists may have feared that taking a standard route across the Atlantic Ocean, with a stop in the Caribbean, would place them at risk of a Spanish attack; and thus chosen to attempt a direct course to England instead. Making such a voyage was not unfeasible – in 1563, French settlers at the failed Charlesfort colony on what is now Parris Island, South Carolina, built a crude boat and successfully (albeit desperately) returned to Europe.[204] Alternatively, the Roanoke colonists could have sailed north along the coast, in the hopes of making contact with English fishing fleets in the Gulf of Maine.[205]

The pinnace would not have been large enough to carry all of the colonists. Additionally, the provisions needed for a transatlantic voyage would further restrict the number of passengers. The colonists may have possessed the resources to construct another seaworthy vessel, using local lumber and spare parts from the pinnace. Considering that ships were later built by survivors of the 1609 Sea Venture shipwreck, it is at least possible that the Lost Colonists could produce a second ship that, with the pinnace, could transport most of their party.[206] Even in these ideal conditions, however, at least some colonists would remain in Virginia, leaving open the question of what became of them.[207]

Conspiracy against Raleigh

[edit]

Anthropologist Lee Miller proposed that Sir Francis Walsingham, Simon Fernandes, Edward Strafford, and others participated in a conspiracy to maroon the 1587 colonists at Roanoke. The purpose of this plot, she argued, was to undermine Walter Raleigh, whose activities supposedly interfered with Walsingham's covert machinations to make England a Protestant world power, at the expense of Spain and other Catholic nations. This conspiracy would have impeded Raleigh and White from dispatching a relief mission until Walsingham's death in 1590.[208] Miller also suggested that the colonists may have been separatists, seeking refuge in America from religious persecution in England. Raleigh expressed sympathy for the separatists, while Walsingham considered them a threat to be eliminated.[209]

According to Miller, the colonists split up, with a small group relocating to Croatoan while the main body sought shelter with the Chowanoke. The colonists, however, would have quickly spread European diseases among their hosts, decimating the Chowanoke and thereby destabilizing the balance of power in the region. From there Miller reasoned that the Chowanoke were attacked, with the survivors taken captive, by the "Mandoag", a powerful nation to the west that the Jamestown colonists only knew from the vague accounts of their neighbors.[210] She concluded that the "Mandoag" were the Eno, who traded the captured surviving Lost Colonists as slaves, dispersing them throughout the region.[211]

Miller's theory has been challenged based on Walsingham's considerable financial support of Raleigh's expeditions, and the willingness of Fernandes to bring John White back to England, instead of abandoning him with the other colonists.[212]

Secret operation at Beechland

[edit]

Local legends in Dare County refer to an abandoned settlement called "Beechland", located within what is now the Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge. The area has had reports of small coffins, some with Christian markings, encouraging speculation of a link to the Lost Colony.[213] Based on these legends, engineer Phillip McMullan and amateur archaeologist Fred Willard concluded that Walter Raleigh dispatched the 1587 colonists to harvest sassafras along the Alligator River. All records suggesting that the colony's intended destination was Chesapeake Bay, and that England had lost contact with the colony, were supposedly falsified to conceal the operation from Spanish operatives and other potential competitors.[214][215]

According to McMullan,[214] Raleigh quietly re-established contact with the colony by 1597, and his sassafras expeditions were simply picking up the colonists' harvests. In this view, the colony was not truly abandoned until the secret of the colony's location died with Raleigh in 1618. After that point, McMullan argued, the colonists would have begun to assimilate with the Croatan at Beechland.[214]

This hypothesis largely depends upon oral traditions and unsubstantiated reports about Beechland, as well as a 1651 map that depicts a sassafras tree near the Alligator River. A significant problem with the hypothesis is that Raleigh supposedly planned a sassafras farm in 1587, to capitalize on a dramatic increase in crop prices, so that he could quickly compensate for the great expense of the failed 1585 colony.[214] The proposed financial motivation overlooks the fact that Richard Grenville's privateering recovered the cost of the 1585 expedition.[115] Additionally, sassafras prices did not skyrocket in value until the late 1590s, well after the establishment of the 1587 colony.[216]

Spanish attack

[edit]

Paul Green, while collecting material for a 1937 stage play, noticed that Spanish records from the period contained abundant references to Raleigh and his settlements.[217] Spanish forces knew of English plans to establish a new Virginia base in 1587 and were searching for it before White's colonists had even arrived. The Spanish Empire had included most of North America in their Florida claim and did not recognize England's right to colonize Roanoke or Chesapeake Bay. Given the Spanish sack of Fort Caroline in 1565, the colonists likely recognized the threat they represented.[c][219] However, the Spanish were still searching for the colony in Chesapeake Bay as late as 1600, suggesting that they also were unaware of its fate.[220]

CORA tree

[edit]

In 2006, writer Scott Dawson proposed that a Southern live oak tree on Hatteras Island, which bears the faint inscription "CORA" in its bark, might be connected to the Lost Colony. The CORA tree had already been the subject of local legends, most notably a story about a witch named "Cora" that was popularized in a 1989 book by Charles H. Whedbee. Nevertheless, Dawson argued that the inscription might represent another message from the colonists, similar to the "CROATOAN" inscription at Roanoke.[221] If so, "CORA" might indicate that the colonists left Croatoan Island to settle with the Coree (also known as the Coranine) on the mainland near Lake Mattamuskeet.[195]

A 2009 study to determine the age of the CORA tree was inconclusive. Damage to the tree caused by lightning and decay has made it impossible to obtain a valid core sample for tree-ring dating. Even if the tree dates back to the 16th century, establishing the age of the inscription would be another matter.[222]

Dare Stones

[edit]

From 1937 to 1941, a series of inscribed stones were discovered that were claimed to have been written by Eleanor Dare, mother of Virginia Dare. They told of the travelings of the colonists and their ultimate deaths. Most historians today believe that they are a fraud because investigations linked all but one to stonecutter Bill Eberhardt.[223] The first one is sometimes regarded as different from the rest, based on a linguistic and chemical analysis, and as possibly genuine.[224]

[edit]
Reverse of a commemorative 1937 US half-dollar coin, depicting Eleanor and Virginia Dare

Raleigh was publicly criticized for his apparent indifference to the fate of the 1587 colony, most notably by Sir Francis Bacon.[125] "It is the sinfullest thing in the world", Bacon wrote in 1597, "to forsake or destitute a plantation once in forwardness; for besides the dishonour, it is the guiltiness of blood of many commiserable persons."[225] The 1605 comedy Eastward Hoe features characters bound for Virginia, who are assured that the lost colonists have by that time intermarried with Native Americans to give rise to "a whole country of English".[226]

United States historians largely overlooked or minimized the importance of the Roanoke settlements until 1834, when George Bancroft lionized the 1587 colonists in A History of the United States.[227] Bancroft emphasized the nobility of Walter Raleigh, the treachery of Simon Fernandes, the threat of the Secotan, the courage of the colonists, and the uncanny tragedy of their loss.[228][229] He was the first since John White to write about Virginia Dare, calling attention to her status as the first English child born on what would become US soil, and the pioneering spirit exhibited by her name.[230][231] The account captivated the American public. As Andrew Lawler puts it, "The country was hungry for an origin story more enchanting than the spoiled fops of Jamestown or the straitlaced Puritans of Plymouth... Roanoke, with its knights and villains and its brave but outnumbered few facing an alien culture, provided all the elements for a national myth."[230]

The first known use of the phrase "The Lost Colony" to describe the 1587 Roanoke settlement was by Eliza Lanesford Cushing in an 1837 historical romance, Virginia Dare; or, the Lost Colony.[232][233] Cushing also appears to be the first to cast White's granddaughter being reared by Native Americans, following the massacre of the other colonists, and to focus on her adventures as a beautiful young woman.[234] In 1840, Cornelia Tuthill published a similar story, introducing the conceit of Virginia wearing the skin of a white doe.[235][236] An 1861 Raleigh Register serial by Mary Mason employs the premise of Virginia being magically transformed into a white doe.[237][238] The same concept was used more famously in The White Doe, a 1901 poem by Sallie Southall Cotten.[239][240]

Re-creation of the tree inscribed with "CRO", from a production of The Lost Colony

The popularity of the Lost Colony and Virginia Dare in the 19th and early 20th centuries coincided with American controversies about rising numbers of Catholic and non-British immigrants, as well as the treatment of African Americans and Native Americans.[232] Both the colony and the adult Virginia character were embraced as symbols of white nationalism.[241] Even when Virginia Dare was invoked in the name of women's suffrage in the 1920s, it was to persuade North Carolina legislators that granting white women the vote would assure white supremacy.[241] By the 1930s this racist connotation apparently subsided, although the VDARE organization, founded in 1999, has been denounced for promoting white supremacists.[242]

Celebrations of the Lost Colony, on Virginia Dare's birthday, have been organized on Roanoke Island since the 1880s.[243] To expand the tourist attraction, Paul Green's play The Lost Colony opened in 1937 and remains in production today. President Franklin D. Roosevelt attended the play on August 18, 1937 – Virginia Dare's 350th birthday.[244]

Bereft of its full context, the colonists' sparse message of "CROATOAN" has taken on a paranormal quality in Harlan Ellison's 1975 short story "Croatoan" and Stephen King's 1999 television miniseries Storm of the Century. It is also the name of a humanlike villain (portrayed by William Shatner) in the fifth season of King's Haven. Croatoan also appears in the 2005 television series Supernatural.[245][246] In the 1994 graphic novel Batman-Spawn: War Devil, "Croatoan" is the name of a powerful demon who, in the 20th century, attempts to sacrifice the entirety of Gotham City to Satan.[247]

The 2011 American Horror Story episode "Birth" relates a fictional legend in which the Lost Colonists mysteriously died, and their ghosts haunted the local Native Americans until a tribal elder banished them with the word "Croatoan".[248] This premise is expanded upon in the sixth season of the series, American Horror Story: Roanoke, which presents a series of fictional television programs documenting encounters with the ghost colonists.[249] The leader of the undead colonists, "The Butcher", is depicted as John White's wife Thomasin, although there is no historical evidence that she was one of the colonists.[250][251]

In the 2015 novel The Last American Vampire, the colonists are the victims of a vampire named "Crowley"; the inscription "CRO" was thus an incomplete attempt to implicate him.[246]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Works cited

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Roanoke Colony, often called the Lost Colony, consisted of two English attempts to establish a permanent settlement in on in present-day , sponsored by Sir Walter Raleigh during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I. The initial 1585 expedition, led by and , transported approximately 108 men to create a military outpost focused on exploration and resource extraction, which was abandoned by 1586 after supplies dwindled and relations with local Native American tribes deteriorated. A subsequent 1587 voyage under John White brought 118 settlers, including men, women, and children, with the aim of founding a self-sustaining community; White, appointed governor, departed for shortly after to procure supplies, leaving the group behind. Upon White's return in 1590, delayed by the Anglo-Spanish War and the crisis, the settlement was found deserted, with houses dismantled and the word "CROATOAN"—referring to a nearby island and its indigenous inhabitants—carved into a palisade post of the fort and the letters "CRO" carved into a tree, but no cross indicating distress as previously instructed. This event marked the first recorded birth of an English child in the , , granddaughter of White, born on August 18, 1587, symbolizing early colonial aspirations amid the unresolved mystery of the colonists' fate, which lacks definitive archaeological or documentary resolution despite ongoing research.

Historical Context

English Imperial Ambitions

In the late , under Queen Elizabeth I pursued imperial expansion in the Americas primarily to counter 's dominance, driven by religious antagonism between Protestant and Catholic , as well as economic incentives to access resources monopolized by under the 1494 . Spanish conquests in and had flooded with gold and silver, fueling envy and prompting English privateers like to raid Spanish treasure fleets, such as Drake's 1572-1573 that captured over 100,000 pounds of gold and silver. These raids, tacitly supported by Elizabeth, escalated tensions, positioning colonization as a strategic means to establish bases for further disruption of Spanish shipping and to claim territory before Spanish expansion northward from . Sir Walter Raleigh, a and explorer favored by Elizabeth, embodied these ambitions through his advocacy for permanent settlements that could yield profitable commodities like pearls, copper, and potentially a to , while serving as outposts for Protestant influence against Spanish Catholicism. On March 25, 1584, Elizabeth granted Raleigh a royal patent authorizing him to "discover, search, find out, and view such remote heathen and barbarous Lands, Countries, and territories not actually possessed of any Christian Prince, nor inhabited by Christian People," explicitly excluding areas held by other Europeans to avoid direct confrontation while implicitly challenging Spanish claims. This charter vested Raleigh with rights to exploit resources, govern settlers, and coin money, reflecting England's shift from exploratory voyages—like John Cabot's 1497 expedition under Henry VII—to sustained territorial acquisition amid growing Anglo-Spanish rivalry that culminated in open war by 1585. Raleigh's initiatives aimed not only at economic gain but also at national prestige and , envisioning colonies that could supply timber, naval stores, and manpower to bolster England's against Spain's Habsburg , which controlled vast Atlantic routes. Reports from voyages, including favorable accounts of temperate climates and amenable native populations along the Carolina coast, reinforced the feasibility of basing operations there to intercept Spanish silver fleets returning via . However, these ambitions were tempered by domestic constraints, such as Elizabeth's reluctance to commit royal funds due to fears of provoking full-scale , leading Raleigh to expeditions privately while leveraging privateering profits.

Native American Societies in the Region

The coastal region encompassing was primarily inhabited by speakers of , organized into semi-autonomous villages grouped under local chiefs known as werowances. These societies included the Chowanoke to the north along the Chowan River, the (or Secotan-Wyngandacoa) around the , the Croatoan on to the south, and smaller groups like the Roanoke on the island itself. Villages typically consisted of 10 to 30 houses arranged around a central area, often enclosed by wooden palisades for defense, with structures covered in bark or woven mats. Social structure was hierarchical, with werowances exercising authority over affiliated villages, advised by councils of elders and supported by class divisions including nobles, commoners, and possibly slaves from warfare. Inheritance of chiefly positions often followed matrilineal lines, emphasizing clan-based relationships and village autonomy within loose confederacies. The Chowanoke chiefdom, one of the largest, comprised multiple towns and was reported by explorer Arthur Barlowe in 1584 to include a principal settlement with numerous houses, indicative of a supporting several hundred warriors. Similarly, the under werowance encompassed about eight villages, with estimates from Thomas Harriot's observations suggesting around 700 to 800 able-bodied fighting men, implying a total of approximately 2,500 to 4,000 when accounting for women, children, and elders. Economically, these societies relied on a mix of , hunting, fishing, and gathering, with cultivation as the staple, supplemented by beans, squash, sunflowers, and . Fields were cleared and tended communally, often by women, while men hunted deer with bows and fished using weirs, nets, and dugout canoes for species like sturgeon and shad. Trade networks exchanged surplus food, shell beads (), copper ornaments acquired from inland sources, and with neighboring groups, fostering inter-village alliances. The Croatoan, a smaller group allied with the English through figures like Manteo, maintained similar practices but emphasized maritime resources due to their island location. Religious practices centered on , with priests or shamans conducting rituals in dedicated temple structures to appease spirits influencing harvests, , and health; offerings included sacrifices of animals or, rarely, humans in times of crisis. Warfare occurred between rival chiefdoms for captives or resources, employing bows, clubs, and , but societies valued and kinship ties to mitigate conflicts. Overall, these Algonquian groups demonstrated adaptive resilience in a resource-rich estuarine environment, with total regional populations likely numbering several thousand prior to sustained European contact in the 1580s.

Pre-1584 Exploration Efforts

The earliest documented European of the coast took place in 1524, when Italian navigator , commissioned by King , sailed along the shoreline from northward to Newfoundland. On approximately March 25, 1524, Verrazzano anchored off the Carolina coast, likely near the , where his crew observed barrier islands, dense forests, and native inhabitants using fire for signaling. He mistakenly interpreted the shallow sounds behind the barriers, such as near , as evidence of a narrow separating the Atlantic from the , an error stemming from limited visibility and navigational assumptions. Verrazzano's accounts provided the first European descriptions of the region's geography and peoples, though his voyage yielded no settlements or territorial claims. In 1526, Spanish explorer led an expedition from with around 500 settlers, including the first Africans brought to as slaves, aiming to establish a colony in the Southeast. Landing initially near in present-day , the group moved northward, possibly reaching the area in southern , before founding the short-lived settlement of , whose precise location remains debated but is generally placed near the or Georgia-South Carolina border. The venture collapsed within months due to harsh winter conditions, disease outbreaks, internal conflicts, and hostilities with local natives, resulting in Ayllón's death on October 18, 1526, and the survivors' retreat to . This failure marked the first European colonial attempt in the but highlighted the challenges of the region's climate and indigenous resistance. Spanish efforts continued inland during Juan Pardo's expeditions of 1566–1567 and 1567–1568, launched from the coastal outpost of to probe northward for overland routes to silver mines and alliances with native groups. Pardo's first march in December 1566 with 125 soldiers traversed and entered , reaching the village of (near modern Morganton) by January 1567, where he constructed Fort San Juan and left a of 30 men. The second expedition followed a similar path, but relations soured, culminating in native attacks that destroyed the forts and killed most Spanish soldiers by 1568. Although focused on the rather than the coastal plain near Roanoke, Pardo's journeys yielded reports on Siouan-speaking tribes and interior geography, informing Spanish awareness of the broader region without establishing enduring coastal presence. These pre-1584 ventures by French and Spanish explorers offered fragmented intelligence on the vicinity, including native societies, resources, and navigational hazards, yet failed to secure permanent footholds due to logistical failures, environmental difficulties, and conflicts. English interest, culminating in Sir Walter Raleigh's 1584 patent, proceeded with limited reference to these antecedents, prioritizing new reconnaissance amid rivalry with .

Early Settlement Attempts

Amadas–Barlowe Reconnaissance (1584)

organized the Amadas–Barlowe reconnaissance as the initial English probe into North American territories granted under his 1584 patent from Queen Elizabeth I, aiming to identify viable sites for permanent settlement and resource extraction. Philip Amadas and Arthur Barlowe commanded two barks equipped with sufficient men and provisions, departing from Plymouth, , on April 27, 1584, under the pilotage of Portuguese navigator Simon Fernandes. The vessels first sailed southward to the for resupply, then proceeded to the , including a stop at , before crossing to the North American mainland. Arriving off the around early July 1584, the expedition anchored near Hatorask Inlet and explored southward to Wococon Island before proceeding to , approximately 35 degrees north latitude. On July 13, 1584, the explorers formally claimed the coastal region in the name of Queen Elizabeth, noting its natural harbors and fertile appearance. During their approximately one-month stay, Amadas and Barlowe established cordial relations with local Algonquian-speaking natives led by Chief (also known as Pemisapan), trading metal tools and beads for food and furs without reported hostilities. Barlowe documented the region's abundant , including deer, birds, and fish, as well as cultivated crops like corn, beans, and , which he later introduced to . The captains secured two native envoys—Manteo from Croatoan Island and Wanchese from Roanoke—to accompany them back, providing intelligence on inland territories and facilitating future diplomacy. The expedition departed Roanoke in late August or early September 1584, evading Spanish patrols en route, and reached by autumn, where Barlowe's detailed , endorsed by Amadas, emphasized the area's potential for English colonization. This optimistic report, published in Richard Hakluyt's Principall Navigations (1589), influenced Raleigh's decision to launch subsequent voyages despite the captains' omission of potential challenges like native and logistical difficulties.

Ralph Lane's Military Colony (1585–1586)

The expedition to establish a military colony at Roanoke departed Plymouth, England, on April 9, 1585, aboard seven vessels commanded by Sir Richard Grenville, with Ralph Lane appointed as governor of the intended settlement. The fleet, carrying approximately 600 soldiers and sailors, made stops in the West Indies before reaching Roanoke Island on June 26, 1585. Upon arrival, the colonists, numbering 107 men under Lane's command after Grenville's departure on August 17, focused on constructing fortifications and houses rather than agriculture, reflecting the outpost's martial purpose. Lane, experienced in Irish fortifications, oversaw the erection of an earthen fort on the northern end of Roanoke Island, enclosing about 80 by 80 feet with bulwarks at the corners. Lane's governance emphasized and acquisition, dispatching parties northward and westward during the winter of 1585–1586 to scout for precious metals and more fertile lands. These expeditions yielded maps and descriptions of inland regions but strained relations with local Native American groups, including the and Chowanoke. Initial interactions involved for food and , yet Lane's of —such as seizing the lame king of the Chowanoke as a guide in March 1586—escalated tensions. Conflicts intensified due to the colonists' dependence on native corn supplies amid failed local cultivation efforts, leading to retaliatory raids. In one incident, English forces burned the Aquascogoc village after its residents withheld food and mutilated an English silver cup. These hostilities, combined with Lane's aggressive tactics, prompted (Pemisapan), the , to plot against the settlers, though English preemptive action thwarted it. Such events marked the first major armed clashes between English forces and coastal Algonquian tribes, fostering mutual distrust. By spring 1586, food shortages and ongoing native hostilities imperiled the colony, with expected resupply from Grenville delayed. Sir Francis Drake's fleet arrived in late June 1586, fresh from raids on Spanish holdings, offering passage back to . A subsequent hurricane destroyed Lane's remaining pinnace and ashore supplies, compelling the evacuation of all 107 colonists aboard Drake's ships on June 18 or 19, 1586. The group reached on July 27, 1586, abandoning the site without establishing a permanent presence. Grenville arrived shortly after with reinforcements but, finding the fort empty, left a detachment of 15 men before returning to .

Evacuation and Grenville's Relief (1586)

By early 1586, the military colony established under 's governance in 1585 had depleted its food supplies and endured hostile relations with neighboring Native American groups, exacerbated by the English killing of the chief Pemisapan (also known as ) during a raid on Dasemunkepeuc village in May 1586. Lane's forces had previously burned Aquascogoc village in 1585 over stolen goods and silver cup, further straining alliances essential for sustenance. Sir Francis Drake's fleet, comprising about 23 ships returning from successful raids against Spanish holdings in the and , anchored off on June 26, 1586. Drake initially supplied the colonists with provisions from his stores and agreed to leave a pinnace and additional men for their defense, but a severe hurricane struck days later, scattering vessels and ruining much of the fleet's rigging and food. Facing imminent starvation and the unreliability of expected relief, opted to evacuate the settlement; nearly all of the roughly 107 men boarded Drake's ships and departed for in late June or early 1586, leaving the fort largely deserted with only a few stragglers initially unaccounted for. A relief squadron dispatched by Sir under Sir Richard Grenville's command arrived at Roanoke in August 1586, mere weeks after Drake's exit, carrying ample supplies but discovering the site abandoned and the structures in disarray. Grenville, determined to preserve 's territorial claim against Spanish rivals, offloaded provisions and left a garrison of 15 armed men to hold the position before sailing back to with the bulk of his force. These soldiers, provisioned for up to two years, vanished without trace by the time John White's 1587 expedition returned, their fate attributed in contemporary accounts to attacks by local tribes or possible assimilation, though no direct evidence survives.

The 1587 Lost Colony

Voyage and Leadership Under John White

In early 1587, Sir commissioned John White to lead an expedition aimed at founding a permanent, self-sustaining English colony near , shifting from the earlier military-focused efforts at Roanoke. White, an artist and cartographer who had documented Native American life and landscapes during the 1585–1586 voyages, was named governor, assisted by twelve council members including Roger Bailie, (White's son-in-law), Christopher Cooper, and others tasked with governance and resource management. The fleet, comprising three vessels—the flagship (a 120-ton piloted by Simon ), an unnamed under Edward Spicer, and a pinnace—departed Plymouth, , on May 8, 1587, with roughly 118 settlers, including 91 men, 17 women, and 9 children, the first such group to include families for long-term settlement. , a Portuguese privateer-turned-pilot familiar with the region from prior transatlantic routes, commanded despite White's authority over colonial affairs, creating tensions from the outset due to Fernandes' reputed impatience and self-interest. After a voyage plagued by minor delays, including a stop in the for provisions, the ships reached the on July 22, 1587, where Fernandes overrode the plan to proceed directly to , insisting instead on anchoring at as a temporary to resupply and contact the 15-man left by in 1586. White's party discovered only bleached bones of the soldiers, of probable violent death at Native hands, underscoring the site's hostility compared to the intended mainland destination. Under leadership, settlers began fortifying the site and repairing structures from Ralph Lane's abandoned colony, but refused to transport them onward, arguing the advancing season risked shipwreck on uncharted shoals and that further delay endangered the vessels' return to amid potential Spanish threats. protested vehemently, citing Raleigh's explicit orders for Chesapeake settlement, yet lacked authority over the mariners; supplies were unloaded hastily, and on August 27, 1587, sailed for with the fleet, stranding the colonists at Roanoke. At the settlers' insistence, fearing starvation without more provisions, reluctantly accompanied the return voyage to secure relief, leaving Dare as acting leader. This decision, driven by logistical desperation rather than abandonment, highlighted pragmatic governance amid maritime constraints and ' dominant role in voyage outcomes.

Establishment on Roanoke Island

The fleet carrying John White's expedition departed Plymouth, England, in May 1587 with over 100 settlers, including men, women, and children, tasked by Sir Walter Raleigh to found a permanent colony intended for the Chesapeake Bay region. After a voyage marked by disputes, the ships reached Roanoke Island on July 22, 1587, where pilot Simon Fernandes halted to inspect the site of the prior military outpost and refused to transport the group farther north, citing risks from hostile native relations reported earlier and his own priorities as a privateer amid rising Anglo-Spanish tensions. This decision stranded the settlers on Roanoke, approximately 140 miles south of their target, compelling them to reoccupy and adapt the abandoned Lane colony site despite White's protests. The colonists discovered the fort partially dismantled, houses torn down or overgrown with vines and inhabited by animals, and only the bleached bones of one from Grenville's 15-man detachment, indicating likely by native attack or . Under governance—formally elected before departure but reaffirmed on arrival—they systematically repaired surviving structures, constructed additional timber-framed houses with thatched roofs, and rebuilt palisades for defense. A small vessel, or pinnace, was built for navigation and supply runs, while agricultural efforts commenced with sowing , , beans, and peas in cleared fields to achieve self-sufficiency, supplemented by , , and with local Croatoan allies. To legitimize their presence, the group held a ceremony baptizing Manteo, the Algonquian interpreter who had accompanied White to , in a makeshift , elevating him as a Christian under English authority as granted by Queen Elizabeth. These foundational steps transformed the military remnants into a civilian settlement dubbed the "Cittie of Ralegh," emphasizing family units and long-term habitation over alone, though provisions remained scarce, foreshadowing White's late-August departure for to procure relief supplies.

Key Events and the Birth of Virginia Dare

Upon landing on on July 22, 1587, the 115 colonists under John White's governance repaired dwellings from Ralph Lane's prior occupation, erected a fort, and sowed crops including , , and peas to sustain the settlement through winter. On August 13, 1587, Manteo, the Croatoan leader who had traveled to with earlier explorers and aided the expedition, was baptized into the and invested with the title of Lord of Roanoke and Dasemunkepeuc per Sir Walter Raleigh's directive, formalizing the alliance against hostile mainland tribes like the Secotans. Five days later, August 18, 1587, Eleanor Dare—John White's daughter and wife of assistant governor Ananias Dare—gave birth to the couple's daughter, Virginia Dare, marking the first documented birth of a child to English parents in the New World. The naming evoked Queen Elizabeth I's epithet as the Virgin Queen, underscoring the colony's loyalty to the English sovereign. White's firsthand narrative, preserved in contemporary records, notes the birth amid strained provisions and intermittent thefts by nearby natives, which were addressed through facilitated by Manteo, though no large-scale conflicts ensued during this interval. The event briefly elevated morale in a venture strained by the captain Simon Fernandes' refusal to proceed to the intended Chesapeake site, forcing reliance on Roanoke's limited resources.

White's Departure and Return (1587–1590)


Following the establishment of the 1587 colony on Roanoke Island, acute shortages of food, clothing, tools, and other essentials—exacerbated by the late arrival and diversion from the Chesapeake—led the 115 settlers to insist that Governor John White return to England to procure supplies and reinforcements. White, reluctant to leave his daughter Eleanor Dare and newborn granddaughter Virginia Dare (born August 18, 1587), departed Roanoke on August 27, 1587, aboard the flagship piloted by Simon Fernandes, arriving in England by November.
White's efforts to organize a swift relief expedition were repeatedly delayed by the intensifying Anglo-Spanish War; in 1588, he joined Francis Drake's fleet, but Drake returned prematurely due to storms, bringing no aid. Further attempts in 1588–1589 failed amid war preparations, privateering distractions, and attacks by French pirates, preventing dedicated resupply until Sir authorized a merchant-privateering voyage in 1590. The fleet—comprising the Hopewell (flagship, commanded by Edward Spicer), John Evangelist, and Little John—sailed from Plymouth on March 20, 1590, but detours pursuing Spanish prizes extended the journey, reaching Hatteras Inlet on August 15. White's party landed at Roanoke on August 17, 1590, observing fires inland but finding the site abandoned and systematically dismantled: houses removed and stacked for relocation, palisades reconfigured into a fort, and heavy items like iron bars and lead pigs left overgrown with weeds. Buried colonists' chests had been unearthed and rifled, with books, pictures, and armor spoiled—likely by natives from Dasamonguepeuk—yet no bodies or signs of battle were evident. The key clues were the word CROATOAN carved in large Roman letters on a chief post of the fort and CRO on a tree, absent the pre-agreed cross symbolizing distress or captivity. Per instructions given before his departure, White concluded the settlers had voluntarily relocated to Croatoan Island (modern Hatteras), home of chief Manteo and allied Croatan people, rather than perishing or being enslaved. Intending to verify at Croatoan, the expedition was thwarted by tempests on August 17–18 that snapped cables, lost anchors, and scattered boats, compounded by dwindling food and water. With the privateering crew prioritizing salvage and return over colony relief, White yielded, and the ships departed for by late August, arriving October 1590—ending direct oversight of the Roanoke venture.

Immediate Investigations and Rival Powers

Failed Relief Missions (1588–1590)

John White, having departed on August 27, 1587, with assurances to return by spring 1588 bearing supplies and reinforcements for the 115 colonists, faced immediate obstacles upon reaching in November 1587. Efforts to assemble a relief fleet were undermined by escalating tensions with , as English merchants and authorities prioritized national defense amid rumors of an impending invasion. White secured two small pinnaces laden with provisions, but these vessels were detained and ultimately plundered by privateers, who seized ordnance, victuals, and other cargo essential for the voyage, rendering the 1588 expedition impossible. The outbreak of the Anglo-Spanish War, culminating in the Spanish Armada's assault on in July 1588, further stalled any resupply attempts. Queen Elizabeth I's government commandeered available shipping for naval operations, leaving Sir and White unable to charter adequate vessels despite repeated solicitations to merchants in and Plymouth. Similar disruptions persisted into 1589, with ongoing hostilities diverting resources and privateering activities capturing potential supply ships; no dedicated relief mission departed that year, extending the colonists' isolation to nearly three years. Desperate for passage, in 1590 joined a privateering fleet commanded by John Watts, consisting of three ships destined for raids on Spanish possessions in the and . After successful captures that enriched the expedition, the fleet diverted to Roanoke, anchoring off the on August 17. White's party landed on August 18 amid storms that damaged anchors and claimed seven sailors' lives, but found the fort dismantled, houses taken apart as if for relocation, and no signs of distress or conflict beyond overgrown fields. The only clues were the word "CROATOAN" carved into a post and "CRO" on a , aligning with pre-departure instructions for the colonists to mark their destination if forced to move to the island of that name. Inclement weather, including gales and flooded inlets, prevented the fleet from sailing the 50 miles to Croatoan Island for a thorough search, despite sightings of fires on Roanoke that suggested possible survivor activity. With provisions low and the privateers unwilling to delay further profitable ventures, the expedition abandoned the effort and returned to by October 1590, having failed to locate or relieve any of the missing settlers. This marked the last organized attempt to aid the 1587 colony during the specified period, leaving its fate unresolved.

Spanish Reconnaissance and Threats

The , asserting exclusive rights to North American territories under the 1494 , regarded English colonies like Roanoke as illegitimate encroachments and potential bases for privateers preying on Spanish shipping. Intelligence on English activities at Roanoke began accumulating after Richard Grenville's 1585 capture of the Spanish vessel Santa María de San Vicente, which heightened Spanish concerns over a northern outpost threatening . Governor Pedro Menéndez Márquez of Spanish Florida, appointed in 1584 and nephew of Pedro Menéndez de Avilés, prioritized scouting and neutralizing English intruders amid reports from coastal Native Americans of foreign settlements north of Santa Elena (modern Parris Island, South Carolina). In June 1588, shortly after the Anglo-Spanish War escalated with the Spanish Armada's launch against England, Márquez dispatched Captain Vicente González with two frigates to reconnoiter the coast near 35°–36° north latitude, the approximate site of Roanoke Island. González proceeded to Chesapeake Bay, probing inlets and rivers for signs of English fortifications or ships, but encountered no colonists, though he mapped harbors deemed suitable for Spanish countermeasures. These reconnaissance efforts underscored the existential threat to Roanoke, as Spanish doctrine mandated the destruction of rival outposts; 's prior 1586 patrols had already targeted suspected English sites following Sir Francis Drake's raids on St. Augustine. By late 1589, Spanish agents via Native intermediaries confirmed the Roanoke site's abandonment, averting a direct assault but prompting to advocate a permanent Spanish fort in to block English reestablishment. The ongoing Anglo-Spanish hostilities, including the 1588 Armada campaign, diverted English resupply fleets like John White's, amplifying the colonists' isolation against potential Florida-based incursions.

Initial Hypotheses from Contemporaries

Upon his return to on August 18, 1590, John White, the colony's governor, observed that the houses had been dismantled in an orderly manner and the settlement enclosed by a , with no signs of violence or hasty abandonment. He discovered the word "CROATOAN" carved into a post of the fort and on a nearby tree, without the pre-arranged distress symbol of a above it, which indicated to White that the colonists had relocated voluntarily to Croatoan Island (modern-day ), the home of Manteo and his tribe, as instructed should supplies run low before his return. Heavy items such as iron bars, lead pigs, and ordnance remained untouched and overgrown with weeds, while lighter personal effects like spoiled chests and rusted armor suggested the departure was planned rather than coerced. White hypothesized that the 117 colonists, including his daughter and granddaughter (born August 18, 1587), had moved to Croatoan for alliance and sustenance with the friendly Croatoan tribe, given prior positive relations and the absence of distress indicators. He noted footprints of "Salvages" near a but attributed potential tampering with goods to hostile tribes like those from Dasamongwepeuk, not to the colonists' fate. Adverse weather, including a hurricane on August 28, 1590, prevented White from sailing to Croatoan to confirm, forcing his return to without resolution. This relocation hypothesis, documented in White's narrative published in Richard Hakluyt's Principal Navigations (1598–1600), represented the earliest contemporary English explanation, emphasizing cooperation with natives over conflict amid the ongoing Anglo-Spanish War. No immediate alternative theories from White's expedition crew or Raleigh's circle contradicted this, though the war's context likely fueled unspoken suspicions of Spanish interference, unverified by on-site evidence.

Post-Disappearance Searches

Raleigh's Expeditions (1590s–1600s)

Following John White's failed relief voyage in 1590, Sir Walter Raleigh maintained interest in locating the vanished Roanoke colonists amid ongoing Anglo-Spanish hostilities and his own disgrace following his secret marriage, leading to imprisonment in 1592, which limited expedition capabilities. No documented searches occurred during the 1590s under Raleigh's direct sponsorship, as resources were diverted to privateering and other ventures. In March 1602, Raleigh commissioned Captain Samuel Mace, a prior participant in Roanoke voyages, to depart from Weymouth, , with orders to scour the coast for survivors. Mace reached the approximately forty leagues south of but encountered no English remnants; instead, his crew collected —a medicinal plant then prized in —and other commodities before returning without new intelligence on the colonists. Raleigh organized a subsequent expedition in 1603, engaging both Mace and Captain Bartholomew Gilbert to probe and adjacent regions for traces. Gilbert's vessel anchored in , where he and four crewmen disembarked to investigate potential settlement sites but were ambushed and killed by Algonquian natives. This incident halted Gilbert's search, yielding no evidence of the lost settlers, and represented Raleigh's final targeted probe before his focus shifted amid renewed legal troubles and the rise of the . These late efforts confirmed the absence of overt colonial remains, underscoring the enduring enigma without substantiating assimilation or survival hypotheses at the time.

Jamestown-Era Reports (1607–1610s)

In 1608, during negotiations amid food shortages at Jamestown, , of the confederacy, reportedly informed Captain John Smith that his warriors had massacred the Roanoke colonists after they sought refuge inland following their abandonment of . According to this account, the colonists—numbering around 30 men initially encountered—had dispersed into the interior, where forces attacked and killed them to prevent alliances with rival tribes, though Smith noted claimed a few may have escaped to other groups. This narrative, conveyed orally to Smith as part of broader discussions on and tribute, aligned with strategy to assert dominance over the newcomers, but lacked corroborating physical evidence and relied solely on the chief's self-interested testimony. Contrasting reports emerged from other Jamestown settlers, including accounts of sightings of European-descended individuals among Native groups. Jamestown explorers, during expeditions into the Chesapeake region around 1608–1609, heard from local tribes of "four men clothed like Englishmen" living with the Chesapeake Bay-area Indians, possibly remnants of the 1585–1586 military garrison left by . These hearsay descriptions included people with light skin, beards, and tools resembling English artifacts, but no direct contact was made, and the claims could reflect distorted memories of earlier Lane survivors or unrelated encounters. William Strachey, Jamestown's secretary from 1610 to 1611, documented additional in his unpublished Historie of Travell into Virginia Britania (c. ), drawing from an Algonquian guide named Machumps who had visited . Machumps asserted that after two decades of peaceful integration near Roanoke, the colonists—estimated at 30—fled southward to Croatoan amid threats but later moved inland to Ritanoe, where Massawomek and Paspahegh warriors attacked, scattering survivors to Peccarecamek and Ochanahoen; Strachey interpreted this as evidence of assimilation rather than total . Strachey also referenced Native descriptions of pre-Jamestown English-style houses and blonde-haired individuals in the interior, suggesting cultural blending, though these details stemmed from unverified tribal lore prone to exaggeration or fabrication for leverage in dealings with colonists. Such reports, while fueling hopes of living descendants, conflicted with Powhatan's claim and yielded no verifiable traces during Jamestown's early forays, highlighting the limitations of oral in a region marked by intertribal rivalries and linguistic barriers.

Later Colonial Accounts (17th–18th Centuries)

In 1709, English explorer John Lawson documented interactions with the Hatteras Indians during his travels in , recording their that "several of their Ancestors were white People, and that they could talk in a , as we do." He noted the prevalence of gray eyes among this group—a physical trait rare among other Native American populations and reportedly absent except near —and interpreted it as corroborating of European admixture. The Hatteras expressed a strong affinity for the English, offering assistance and distinguishing themselves from neighboring tribes through this claimed heritage. Lawson's A New Voyage to Carolina also referenced the physical remnants of the earlier Roanoke settlement, including ruins of the fort established by Ralph Lane in 1585 and scattered old English coins on the island. He attributed the colony's initial failure to either delayed supply ships from England or treachery by local natives, framing it as a cautionary precursor to later Carolinian ventures rather than a definitive explanation for the 1587 disappearance. These details, drawn from direct observation, fueled speculation of survivor integration into indigenous communities, though Lawson provided no firsthand confirmation beyond native testimony. Mid-17th-century and Carolina land records offered indirect allusions to possible English remnants in the Chowan River region, with patents referencing prior "English" occupancy amid native lands, potentially echoing unverified survivor migrations from Roanoke. However, these documents prioritized territorial claims over historical inquiry, yielding no concrete survivor accounts. By the late , such references waned in colonial correspondence, supplanted by broader settlement narratives, with the Roanoke mystery preserved mainly through reprinted earlier voyages and anecdotal Indian claims rather than new empirical findings.

Modern Scholarly and Scientific Inquiry

19th–20th Century Preservation and Early Digs

In the late , interest in preserving the site grew amid renewed historical curiosity about the Lost Colony. Newspaper journalist Talcott Williams visited in 1887 and identified a Native American burial site, prompting early antiquarian attention to the area's archaeological potential. In 1895, Williams received permission to conduct excavations along the presumed location of the earthen fort constructed by the 1585 colonists, marking the first systematic digs at the site; these efforts uncovered features consistent with defensive earthworks but yielded no definitive 16th-century European artifacts directly linked to the . Preservation initiatives formalized around the same period with the formation of the Roanoke Colony Memorial Association in the 1890s, aimed at protecting the site from further and development. This group acquired a 16-acre core portion of the land in 1895, establishing a dedicated effort to safeguard the historical footprint amid ongoing private ownership challenges by families like the Doughs. These actions preceded broader 20th-century federal involvement, reflecting a shift from exploration to structured conservation. By the early , the site's national significance led to expanded archaeological testing beyond Williams' preliminary work, though systematic professional digs remained limited until later decades. On April 5, 1941, the U.S. Secretary of the Interior designated via , encompassing key lands to commemorate Raleigh's colonies and preserve remaining earthworks against natural degradation and potential encroachment. This establishment facilitated ongoing monitoring and minor excavations, prioritizing site integrity over aggressive disturbance, as from rising sea levels had already diminished the island's shoreline by nearly half a mile over centuries. In the 1930s, state efforts supported the Memorial Association's work, laying groundwork for federal protection amid growing public fascination with the colony's enigma.

Climate and Environmental Analyses

Tree-ring chronologies derived from bald cypress trees in the Tidewater region of Virginia, proximal to Roanoke Island, demonstrate that the years 1587–1589 encompassed the most severe multiyear growing-season drought in the 800-year record for the area. This reconstruction, spanning from approximately 1200 to 1980, utilized standardized indices of radial growth anomalies to quantify Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) values, revealing PDSI scores below -4 during the colony's active period—a level indicative of extreme aridity unmatched in the dataset. The spatial extent of this drought encompassed much of the southeastern United States, including coastal North Carolina, as corroborated by complementary proxy records from the period. Such conditions would have critically impaired cultivation and freshwater availability, compelling the 117 colonists—many inexperienced in local farming—to intensify reliance on with Algonquian tribes already facing resource scarcity. Historical accounts from John White's 1587 expedition note early crop failures and strained native relations, aligning with the dendroclimatic evidence of reduced and elevated . While this environmental stressor does not singularly explain the abandonment evidenced by the "CROATOAN" inscription, it furnishes a causal mechanism for heightened vulnerability to , conflict, or coerced migration inland toward perennial water sources. Subsequent analyses, including comparisons with Jamestown's 1606–1612 droughts, reinforce the pattern of climatic extremes undermining early English ventures in the region, though Roanoke's shorter timeline amplified the immediacy of impacts. No or cores from Roanoke-specific sites have yielded contradictory hydroclimatic signals, underscoring the drought's plausibility as a primary exacerbating factor amid multifaceted pressures.

Genetic and Anthropological Studies

Genetic studies aimed at resolving the Roanoke Colony's fate have focused on tracing European lineages in North Carolina's Native American populations, particularly through surname projects linking to colonists like the Berrys. The Lost Colony Y-DNA Project, launched in 2007 by the Lost Colony Research Group, tests paternal lines from families with colonist surnames, seeking matches with English origins or admixed Native groups such as the Hatteras or Lumbee. Similar efforts include mitochondrial DNA analysis for maternal lines from female colonists like Eleanor Dare and autosomal DNA for broader ancestry, but results remain inconclusive due to genetic dilution over 400+ generations and the absence of reference DNA from verified 1587 remains. In specific cases, Y-DNA testing of Berry descendants—presumed kin to colonists Henry and Berry—reveals distinct haplogroup clusters: one aligning with families and another with Hyde lines, indicating shared paternal ancestry within groups but no cross-matches confirming a direct Roanoke link. Attempts to extract from potential post-1587 burials have failed due to degradation, restricted access under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), and findings of primarily Native maternal ancestry in tested samples. These limitations underscore that while suggestive of and intermarriage, genetic data cannot yet empirically verify assimilation without colonist-derived baselines. Anthropological inquiries complement genetics by analyzing cultural and phenotypic evidence of admixture in tribes claiming descent, such as the , whose oral traditions and 19th-century legislative recognitions (e.g., state acts) invoke Roanoke origins alongside Algonquian roots. Ethnographic records, including John Lawson's 1701 observations of Hatteras Indians with "light skin and grey eyes," suggest European , interpreted by some researchers as traces of colonist integration rather than coincidence or later European contact. However, these accounts predate comprehensive physical anthropological methods, and modern analyses prioritize matrilineal Native persistence, with Lumbee self-identification blending Indigenous, European, and African elements—potentially motivated by federal recognition efforts rather than isolated Roanoke descent. No skeletal studies definitively attribute European traits to 16th-century admixture, leaving anthropological support circumstantial and intertwined with archaeological interpretations of hybrid sites. Overall, while both fields bolster the assimilation hypothesis over annihilation, empirical gaps persist, with future recovery offering the strongest potential resolution.

Archaeological Evidence

Key Sites and Artifacts (1880s–2000s)

Archaeological investigations at on , established as a key location associated with the 1585–1587 English ventures, began in earnest in the late and continued through the , primarily under the auspices of the (NPS). Initial efforts focused on verifying the site's earthworks as remnants of Ralph Lane's 1585 fort, yielding artifacts consistent with military and exploratory activities but few direct ties to the 1587 "Lost Colony" settlers. These excavations confirmed the presence of Elizabethan-era structures through post molds, ditches, and , though the broader "Cittie of Ralegh" settlement site remained elusive despite extensive trenching. In 1895, journalist Talcott Williams conducted the first systematic digs at the presumed fort location, excavating 13 trenches measuring 5 by 3 feet and up to 9 feet deep, uncovering charcoal, firepits, iron fragments including a nail, quartzite tools, and Native American sherds indicative of mixed occupation layers. These finds suggested early European disturbance but lacked diagnostic 16th-century English items specific to the colonies. Subsequent NPS-led work in the mid-20th century built on this, with J.C. Harrington initiating test trenches in to map the fort's precise outline, identifying a bastioned earthwork matching contemporary descriptions from John White's maps. By 1950, full excavation of the fort ditch and allowed for its reconstruction, revealing iron tools such as sickles, augers, spikes, and nails; metal casting counters dated to 1550–1574; a balance weight; nuggets; a glass bead; Spanish olive jar and sherds; and a fragment with roofing . Additional 1950s surveys, covering over 3,310 linear feet of trenches west and east of the fort—including areas near the Elizabethan Gardens—yielded lead balls (17 mm diameter, 14 gauge), thin-walled fragments possibly from crucibles, and more olive jar sherds, but no conclusive evidence of the 1587 civilian settlement. Later 20th-century efforts included Ivor Noël Hume's 1991–1993 excavations, which targeted potential scientific workshops linked to and metallurgist Joachim Gans, identifying post holes, pits, and features consistent with 1585–1586 assaying activities through associated debris. In 1982, a wooden barrel was recovered just offshore near the site, potentially linked to colonial-era discard, while a found in 2008 along the Thomas Harriot Trail added to the inventory of minor metal artifacts, though its precise context remains debated. These discoveries collectively affirm the site's role in the 1585 military outpost but highlight the scarcity of artifacts attributable to the vanished 1587 group, prompting ongoing debates about whether the settlement lay adjacent or was dismantled post-abandonment. No skeletal remains or personal items definitively tied to the Lost Colonists emerged from these periods' work. Beyond Fort Raleigh, limited surveys in the explored nearby locales, such as areas around Shallowbag Bay and the "Mother Vineyard" referenced in historical accounts, but yielded primarily post-Elizabethan debris like 18th-century shoe buckles and fragments, underscoring the challenges of distinguishing faint 16th-century traces amid later occupations. Overall, artifacts from –2000s excavations emphasize trade goods, tools, and ceramics reflecting Anglo-Spanish exchanges rather than domestic life, supporting the interpretation of a transient fort rather than a sustained village.

Recent Discoveries (2010s–2025)

Archaeological efforts by the First Colony Foundation in the 2010s focused on Site X near Salmon Creek in , where excavations from 2012 onward revealed approximately 40 sherds of Surrey-Hampshire Border ware pottery, eight sherds of gravel-tempered baluster jars, two , and one aiglet, all consistent with late 16th-century English manufacture. These artifacts, found in association with Native American materials, indicate a brief occupation by a small group potentially including survivors from the 1587 Roanoke settlement, though direct linkage remains interpretive due to dating challenges. Concurrent work by the Croatoan Archaeological Society on Hatteras Island, beginning intensification around 2009 but continuing through the 2010s under Mark Horton and Scott Dawson, uncovered at Cape Creek a slate writing tablet inscribed with an "M," a fragment of an iron rapier hilt, an iron bar, and a copper ingot, dated to the late 1500s via metallurgical analysis. These items, mingled with Croatoan ceramics, suggest European-Native interaction, possibly reflecting partial assimilation of colonists with the local tribe. Excavations at yielded supporting evidence, including 2010 identification of charcoal features as fuel from Thomas Harriot's 1585 metallurgical workshop and 2016 recovery of a burned sherd from a 16th-century delft-ware Albarello amid erosion-exposed contexts. Such finds clarify pre-1587 activities but do not conclusively tie to the missing 1587 group, as earlier military expeditions left comparable traces. In 2021, digs at Native habitation site 31DR1 on produced over a thousand Croatoan shards alongside European artifacts, including iron nails, a , window fragments, a , a 4-pound saker cannonball, metal sea chest , lead shot, beads, and a Tudor Rose-decorated item, pointing to sustained 16th-century English presence within an indigenous village. Discoveries escalated in 2025 with the unearthing of large quantities—"buckets"—of , a blacksmithing , at Hatteras sites, alongside guns, nautical fittings, small cannonballs, an engraved , a , wine glasses, and beads. Horton and Dawson attribute the metalworking residue to English colonists integrated into Croatoan society, arguing against sudden disappearance in favor of long-term coexistence, though skeptics note could derive from sporadic trade or earlier visits rather than definitive 1587 survivor activity. These cumulative finds, while empirically grounded, rely on contextual association without skeletal or documentary corroboration to confirm the full colony's fate.

Interpretation of Finds

Archaeological finds at , including English ceramics dated to the late , have been interpreted as evidence of sustained colonist activity beyond initial expeditions, potentially indicating interaction with Algonquian tribes rather than abandonment. These ceramics, distinct from later Jamestown-era styles, align with documented Roanoke-period techniques and are seen by researchers as remnants of colonists who may have dispersed while maintaining some . The absence of such in strictly native contexts prior to 1587 supports the view that they reflect European influence diffused through trade or cohabitation, though skeptics note the possibility of post-1590 drift from supply ships. Metal artifacts, such as copper rings and ironworking residues like hammer scale recovered on , suggest English technological practices integrated into native sites, consistent with assimilation hypotheses. The hammer scale, byproduct of blacksmithing absent in pre-contact Algonquian , implies colonists taught or shared skills with groups like the Croatoan, as no independent English outpost is evidenced there. Co-occurrence of these with Algonquian pottery shards points to mixed-use areas, but interpretations remain tentative without human remains or dated organic ties confirming 1587-1590 origins. Inland discoveries near the Chowan River, including European-style items in native village layers, are viewed as traces of colonist relocation, possibly in smaller groups to avoid coastal vulnerabilities. These align with John White's 1590 report of the "CROATOAN" carving but challenge Hatteras-centric models, as map analyses indicate Croatan affiliations extended continentward. Critics argue such artifacts could derive from later trade networks, emphasizing the lack of mass violence indicators like weapons or fortifications at dispersal sites. Overall, while finds refute total annihilation without trace, they do not conclusively resolve dispersal routes or survival durations, prioritizing empirical patterns over speculative narratives.

Hypotheses on the Colonists' Fate

Assimilation with Local Tribes

The primary evidence supporting assimilation stems from the carving of "CROATOAN" on a palisade post and "CRO" on a nearby tree discovered by John White upon his return to Roanoke Island on August 18, 1590, indicating the colonists had relocated to Croatoan Island (modern Hatteras Island) without signs of distress, in accordance with prior instructions to signal their location if moving to the allied Croatan tribe led by Manteo. The Croatans had demonstrated friendship toward the English, including Manteo's assistance during earlier expeditions and his baptism as Lord of Roanoke in 1587, providing a plausible refuge amid deteriorating relations with mainland tribes like the Secotans. This relocation likely occurred between August 1587, when White departed for England, and spring 1588, as the colonists faced food shortages and sought integration with sympathetic Algonquian groups for survival. Early 17th-century accounts from Jamestown settlers reinforced the assimilation narrative, with explorer John Smith reporting in 1608 rumors among Chesapeake tribes of up to 30 Roanoke survivors living inland near the or Neuse rivers, some intermarrying with natives and adopting their customs while retaining English traits like gray eyes or knowledge. William Strachey, in his 1612 True Reportory, cited Powhatan's claim that a Chesapeake group called the Eans, possibly including Roanoke remnants, had been massacred, but allowed that some may have dispersed southward toward friendly or territories, aligning with oral traditions of English-descended people among coastal Algonquians. These reports, while secondhand and potentially influenced by Powhatan's rivalry, suggest partial survival through tribal absorption rather than total annihilation, as no mass graves or battle sites have been identified. Archaeological findings on bolster this hypothesis, including European iron flakes and artifacts like a fragment (dated circa 1580–1620) recovered in 2015 excavations by the First Colony Foundation, consistent with colonists maintaining tools while residing in villages. Further digs in 2020–2025 uncovered mixed Algonquian-English refuse layers, such as copper items and glass beads in Native contexts, indicating cultural exchange and cohabitation rather than , with Mark Horton concluding the evidence points to assimilation while preserving select European goods. However, these artifacts lack direct inscriptions or unique markers tying them exclusively to the 1587 group, and some scholars caution that trade networks could explain their presence without requiring full integration. Genetic studies offer limited support, with ongoing efforts by the Lost Colony DNA Project since 2007 analyzing Y-DNA and autosomal markers from and Hatteras descendants, but no conclusive matches to known Roanoke colonists like the Whites or Harvys have emerged, hampered by the absence of reference DNA from 16th-century English migrants and extensive Native admixture over centuries. Anthropological evidence, including 19th-century claims of Roanoke ancestry, remains anecdotal and unverified, though tribal movements post-contact—such as dispersal inland due to epidemics and English expansion—could have obscured descendants. Overall, assimilation represents the most empirically grounded scenario, driven by pragmatic necessities like food scarcity and alliances, yet definitive proof eludes due to the era's sparse records and of sites.

Attacks by Hostile Natives or Spaniards

The military expedition led by in 1585–1586 experienced escalating hostilities with local Native American groups, including the burning of the Aquascogoc village in retaliation for stolen goods and the killing of Chief Wingina of the after intelligence of a planned against the English. These conflicts arose from food shortages, cultural misunderstandings, and mutual suspicions, culminating in Lane's abandonment of the site in June 1586 amid threats of attack and reliance on hostile tribes for sustenance. John White's 1587 civilian colony sought to mend relations through alliances with friendly Croatoan and efforts like the of Manteo, but skirmishes persisted, including a native attack on outlying workers just weeks before White's departure for in August 1587. One posits that hostile natives, seeking revenge for prior English aggressions, the colonists sometime between late 1587 and White's return in 1590. Proponents cite the pattern of intertribal warfare and earlier tensions, suggesting the absence of distress signals like the pre-agreed cross carving might indicate a sudden, overwhelming . However, White found no skeletal remains, weapons, or fortifications breached upon arrival, only dismantled houses and the word "CROATOAN" carved on a post, consistent with an orderly relocation rather than violent destruction. Later Jamestown accounts from 1607–1610 referenced unverified rumors of a , but these lacked corroboration and conflicted with reports of European-descended individuals among tribes. Spanish involvement represents another variant, fueled by Anglo-Spanish rivalry during the lead-up to the 1588 Armada. Spanish authorities, alerted to the colony's existence via captured English sailors in 1587, dispatched probes northward from Florida but prioritized threats in the Caribbean and failed to locate or assault Roanoke specifically. Theorists argue a covert raid could explain the disappearance, given Spain's control of regional seas and motive to eliminate Protestant footholds, yet no Spanish records document such an operation, and White observed no signs of fire, plunder, or foreign intrusion in 1590. The hypothesis remains speculative, undermined by the logistical challenges of undetected naval action in the shallow Outer Banks and the lack of artifacts or survivor traces attributable to Spanish forces. Archaeological surveys at Fort Raleigh and nearby sites have yielded no mass graves, battle debris, or European-native conflict indicators from the relevant period, further eroding the attack narrative in favor of assimilation or relocation models. Empirical assessment prioritizes the CROATOAN inscription—aligned with White's instructions for signaling a move to the friendly Croatoan island—as causal evidence of voluntary dispersal over unsubstantiated violence.

Starvation, Disease, or Failed Return Attempts

The colonists faced acute shortages of provisions upon John White's departure for on August 27, 1587, with the settlement relying on limited stores of corn, meal, and other staples insufficient for the 115 men, women, and children left behind, especially after their unplanned relocation from the intended site to by pilot Simon Fernandes. Tree-ring data from indicate that the period from 1587 to 1589 encompassed the most severe multi-year in the region over the preceding 800 years, conditions that would have severely hampered local and , exacerbating food for unfamiliar with indigenous survival techniques in the coastal environment. This hypothesis posits that prolonged isolation, combined with hostile relations with nearby and other Algonquian groups who had previously withheld food supplies, led to widespread rather than assimilation or relocation, though no skeletal remains indicative of have been uncovered at the site to confirm mass deaths. Disease represents another proposed cause, potentially stemming from European pathogens carried by the colonists or novel exposures to local pathogens, though primary accounts from the 1585–1586 expedition under document no widespread outbreaks among settlers despite interactions with natives who suffered from suspected European-introduced illnesses like . Speculative theories include a "plague" inducing or madness, possibly or compounded by malnutrition, but these lack corroboration from White's journals or subsequent Jamestown inquiries, which reported no mass graves or remnants. The absence of bodily evidence aligns with rapid decomposition in the humid climate or dispersal, yet the hypothesis remains circumstantial, as later English colonies like Jamestown endured similar pressures without total vanishing. Theories of failed return attempts suggest the colonists, equipped with a pinnace and per instructions to leave a if abandoning Roanoke, may have attempted navigation to , the Chesapeake, or Croatoan Island but perished at sea or en route due to storms, navigational errors, or vessel unseaworthiness. The 1590 discovery of the word "CROATOAN" carved on a post and "CRO" on a tree—without the agreed cross indicating distress—implies an organized departure, potentially southward to Croatoan (modern ) for alliance with friendly natives, but searches there by White yielded no trace, possibly due to incomplete surveys amid deteriorating weather. Later reports from Jamestown settlers, including John Smith, referenced unverified sightings of European-like individuals among mainland tribes but no confirmed survivors from sea voyages, underscoring the logistical improbability of a successful transatlantic return without support vessels. These scenarios explain the lack of remains at Roanoke but conflict with the absence of shipwrecks or artifacts along probable routes, rendering them plausible yet unverified alternatives to inland migration.

Fringe Theories and Debunkings

One fringe theory posits that the Roanoke colonists were victims of supernatural forces, such as alien abductions or interdimensional portals, drawing from the colony's abrupt vanishing without traces of violence or mass graves. Proponents cite the carved word "CROATOAN" on a post as a cryptic signal or rune, but this interpretation ignores Governor John White's 1590 account, which described it as a pre-arranged marker indicating relocation to Croatoan Island per his instructions, absent any distress symbols like a cross. Local Native legends, including and Croatoan beliefs, attributed English-introduced diseases to malevolent spirits unleashed by the settlers, with some oral traditions invoking a reptilian or ghostly hauntings that cursed the area post-disappearance. These accounts, recorded in later colonial writings, reflect indigenous explanations for epidemics decimating tribes—such as from European contact—rather than causal evidence for the colonists' fate, as no contemporaneous records from or Lane's expeditions corroborate events affecting the English. Conspiracy theories allege deliberate sabotage by rivals of , such as internal English factions or foreign agents, framing the colony's failure as a plot to discredit colonial ventures amid the Anglo-Spanish War. Anthropologist has speculated on political intrigue involving figures like Simon Fernandes, the pilot who stranded the 1587 group, but this relies on circumstantial motives without documentary proof, such as forged logs or intercepted correspondence, and contradicts supply manifests showing adequate provisions upon arrival. These theories lack empirical substantiation, as archaeological surveys at and Hatteras since the 1880s have yielded European artifacts like pottery and rings consistent with dispersal and assimilation, not cataclysmic events or cover-ups. Genetic studies of and other regional tribes show no conclusive European haplogroups traceable to the 115 colonists, undermining claims of or translocation, while the absence of skeletal remains—despite erosion exposing sites—aligns with relocation over supernatural erasure, per first-hand reports of amicable Croatoan ties. favors prosaic explanations like supply shortages or tribal integration, supported by 17th-century Jamestown accounts of "manned mantles" worn by Natives, over unverified esoterica.

Empirical Evaluation of Competing Claims

The primary for evaluating the fate of the Roanoke colonists derives from John White's 1590 account, which documented the orderly dismantling of structures, absence of distress signals (such as a predefined cross carving), and the inscription "CROATOAN" on a post, indicating a relocation to the nearby island inhabited by allied Native Americans rather than a violent or catastrophic end. Tree-ring data from the region confirm a severe from 1587 to 1589, which would have strained food supplies, but the lack of skeletal remains, defensive fortifications in disarray, or abandoned goods contradicts scenarios of sudden or abandonment under duress. The assimilation hypothesis, positing integration with the Croatoan (Hatteras) tribe, aligns most closely with this evidence. Archaeological excavations on since the 2010s have uncovered European items—including sword hilt fragments, iron nails reworked by natives, and glass beads—mingled with Algonquian pottery in contexts dated to the late , suggesting sustained coexistence rather than trade or scavenging. Independent digs by teams like the First Colony Foundation indicate possible splinter groups, with similar hybrid artifacts inland near Salmon Creek, approximately 50 miles from Roanoke as per relocation instructions. Later Jamestown accounts from 1607–1610 report sightings of European-descended individuals among coastal tribes, including "people with European features" and survivors from Roanoke, providing corroborative absent for other theories. Genetic efforts, such as those by the Lost Colony Research Group, have identified potential Y-DNA haplogroups (e.g., R1b) in descendant claimants like the , but lack definitive autosomal matches to confirmed colonists, rendering this line inconclusive yet not disproving assimilation. Hypotheses of attacks by hostile natives or fare poorly empirically. The 1585–1586 military expedition under provoked conflicts with mainland Secotans, but the 1587 civilian group cultivated ties with the Croatoans, and findings showed no battle traces like arrowheads embedded in remains or burned structures. Spanish reconnaissance in the 1580s, motivated by rivalry with , yielded no records of intercepting the despite coastal patrols; post-1590 searches focused on other threats. Absence of mass graves or weapon caches at Roanoke undermines violence claims, as does the deliberate post-carving. Starvation or explanations account for environmental pressures but ignore the CROATOAN marker and structured departure, which imply agency rather than collapse. The likely prompted the move to Croatoan fisheries and fields, where hybrid artifacts suggest survival and adaptation over perishing en masse. Failed return attempts lack supporting debris or logs, and no European shipwrecks match the timeline. Fringe theories, such as relocation to inland sites like the Bermuda Triangle or transatlantic return, contradict navigational realities and leave no artifacts or records; they rely on speculation without empirical backing and are refuted by coastal-focused evidence. Overall, assimilation emerges as the hypothesis best substantiated by converging archaeological, climatological, and historical data, though definitive proof eludes due to perishable native integration and limited excavation scope.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.