Hubbry Logo
Terraced houseTerraced houseMain
Open search
Terraced house
Community hub
Terraced house
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Terraced house
Terraced house
from Wikipedia
East side of the Place des Vosges in Paris, one of the earliest examples of terraced housing

A terrace, terraced house (UK), or townhouse (US)[a] is a type of medium-density housing which first started in 16th century Europe with a row of joined houses sharing side walls. In the United States and Canada these are sometimes known as row houses or row homes.

Terrace housing can be found worldwide, though it is quite common in Europe and Latin America, and many examples can be found in the United Kingdom, Belgium, United States, Canada, and Australia. The Place des Vosges in Paris (1605–1612) is one of the early examples of the type.

Although in early larger forms it was and still is used for housing the wealthy, as cities and the demands for ever smaller close housing grew, it regularly became associated with the working class. Terraced housing has increasingly become associated with gentrification in certain inner-city areas,[1] drawing the attention of city planning.

Origins and nomenclature

[edit]
Vicars' Close, Wells, built 1348–1430

Though earlier Gothic examples, such as Vicars' Close, Wells, are known, the alignment of the house fronts with the property line really began in the 16th century following Dutch and Belgian models and became called "row" houses in English. For example, in "Yarmouth Rows", Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, the building fronts all were right on the property line.

The term terrace was borrowed from garden terraces by British architects of the late Georgian period to describe streets of houses whose uniform fronts and uniform height created a stylish ensemble rather than a mere "row" of similar homes. Townhouses (or townhomes) are generally two- to three-story structures that share a wall with a neighbouring unit. As opposed to apartment buildings, townhouses do not have neighbouring units above or below them. They are similar in concept to row houses or terraced houses, but share a common design and construction. The first and last of the houses is called an end terrace and is often a different layout from the houses in the middle, sometimes called mid-terrace.

Oceania

[edit]
Rows of terraced houses at 112-116 Canterbury Road Middle Park, Melbourne
Terraced housing at 435 Glebe Point Road, Glebe, Sydney
Cypress Terrace, 158-164 Hotham Street, East Melbourne, an example of well-preserved terraces

In Australia, the term "terrace house" refers almost exclusively to Victorian and Edwardian era terraces or replicas almost always found in the older, inner city areas of the major cities. Terraced housing was introduced to Australia from Britain in the nineteenth century, basing their architecture on those in the UK, France and Italy.[2]

Large numbers of terraced houses were built in the inner suburbs of large Australian cities, particularly Sydney and Melbourne, mainly between the 1850s and the 1890s (terraced housing is rare outside of these cities). Detached housing became the popular style of housing in Australia following Federation in 1901. The most common building material used was brick, often covered with cement render and then painted.

Many terraces were built in the "filigree" style, a style distinguished through heavy use of cast iron ornament, particularly on the balconies and sometimes depicting native Australian flora. In the 1950s, many urban renewal programmes were aimed at eradicating them entirely in favour of modern development.

In recent decades these inner-city areas and their terraced houses have been gentrified. The suburbs in which terrace houses are often found are often sought after in Australia due to their proximity to the Central Business Districts of the major cities. They are therefore sometimes quite expensive even though they may not be the preferred accommodation style. The lack of windows on the side, the small gardens, and the relative darkness of the rooms is at odds with the design favoured for modern Australian homes.[3]

Europe

[edit]

Belgium

[edit]
Rue aux Laines, a typical street in Brussels with a homogeneous series of bourgeois row houses
The houses on the west side of the Grand Place in Brussels representing the different corporations

In Belgium, the row houses are the predominant type of housing around the country and closely associated with the Belgian culture and history. The Grand Place, the central historic place of the capital Brussels, is surrounded by private houses dating from the 17th century, reflecting the city as a mercantile power at that time in northern Europe.[4] Later, in the 19th century, Belgium played an important role in the early history of industrial revolution like the United Kingdom, where an important amount of working class housing was built to accommodate the coal miners in small brick row houses usually called "Coron". These types of constructions are very common in the Walloon region, but also in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region of France. Within the same period (from 1850 to early 1900), major cities like Brussels or Antwerp faced important urban development with the construction of new neighborhoods as extensions of the cities often entirely around individually owned parcels where single family row houses were built and occupied by both the middle class and the bourgeois class.[5] Some houses are internationally renowned for their architecture like the Art Nouveau style Hotel Tassel or the Hôtel van Eetvelde both designed by Victor Horta.[6]

Finland

[edit]
Ribbingshof (1916), Helsinki, the first "row houses" in Finland
Row houses in Kartanonkoski, Vantaa, Finland (2011)

In Finland, an agrarian country where urbanism was a generally late phenomenon, the rivitalo (literally: row house) has not been seen as a particularly urban house type. What is regarded as the first terraced house to be built, Ribbingshof (1916), in the new Helsinki suburb of Kulosaari was designed by renowned architect Armas Lindgren, and was inspired by ideas from the English Garden City movement and Hampstead Garden Suburb, and was seen as a relatively low density residential area. A similarly leafy suburban street of terraced houses was that of Hollantilaisentie (1920) in the suburb of Munkkiniemi, Helsinki, designed by architect Eliel Saarinen. They were initially envisioned as workers' housing, as part of a grand new urban scheme for the entirety of north-west Helsinki, but from the outset became a fashionable middle-class residential area. Later terraced housing in Finland is similarly associated with suburban middle-class living, such as the Tapiola garden city, Espoo, from the 1950s.[7]

France

[edit]

Terraced housing has long been a popular form in Paris, France. The Place des Vosges (1605–1612) was one of the earliest examples of the arrangement. In Parisian squares, central blocks were given discreet prominence, to relieve the façade. Terraced building including housing was also used primarily during Haussmann's renovation of Paris between 1852 and 1870 creating whole streetscapes consisting of terraced rows.

United Kingdom and Ireland

[edit]
Grosvenor Square, one of the earliest terraces in Britain

The first streets of houses with uniform fronts were built by the Huguenot entrepreneur Nicholas Barbon in the rebuilding after the Great Fire of London. Fashionable terraces appeared in London's Grosvenor Square from 1727 onwards and in Bath's Queen Square from 1729 onwards.[8] The Scottish architect Robert Adam is credited with the development of the house itself.[9] Early terraces were also built by the two John Woods in Bath and under the direction of John Nash in Regent's Park, London. The term was picked up by speculative builders like Thomas Cubitt and soon became commonplace.

Upper class Georgian terraces along Dublin's Georgian mile

It is far from being the case that terraced houses were only built for people of limited means. This is especially true in London, where some of the wealthiest people in the country owned them in locations such as Belgrave Square and Carlton House Terrace. These townhouses, in the British sense, were the London residences of noble and gentry families who spent most of the year in their country houses. These terraced houses, often surrounding a garden square, are hallmarks of Georgian architecture. The same was true of many British and Irish cities. In Dublin, Georgian squares such as Merrion Square and Fitzwilliam Square housed the city's upper classes. A type of terraced house known latterly as the "one-floor-over-basement" was a style of terraced house particular to the Irish capital. They were built in the Victorian era for the city's lower middle class and emulated upper class townhouses.[10]

Single floor over basement terraced houses were unique to Dublin in the Victorian era.

By the early Victorian period, a terrace had come to designate any style of housing where individual houses repeating one design are joined into rows. The style was used for workers' housing in industrial districts during the rapid urbanisation following the Industrial Revolution, particularly in the houses built for workers of the expanding textile industry. The terrace style spread widely across the country, and was the usual form of high-density residential housing up to World War II. The 19th century need for expressive individuality inspired variation of façade details and floor-plans reversed with those of each neighbouring pair, to offer variety within the standardised format.[11]

Terraced houses in Macclesfield

A major distinction is between through terraces, whose houses have both a front and a back door, and back-to-backs, which are bricked in on three sides. The 1875 Public Health Act imposed a duty on local authorities to regulate housing by the use of byelaws, and subsequently all byelaw terraced housing was required to have its own privy, with rear access to allow the night soil to be collected as per the Rochdale system. As recently as 2011, byelaw terraced houses made up over 15% of the United Kingdom's housing stock.[12]

Since the Second World War, housing redevelopment has led to many outdated or dilapidated terraces being cleared to make room for tower blocks, which occupy a much smaller area of land. Because of this land use in the inner city areas could in theory have been used to create greater accessibility, employment or recreational or leisure centres. However, sub-optimal or flawed implementation has meant that in many areas (like Manchester or the London estates) the tower blocks offered no real improvement for rehoused residents over their prior terraced houses.[11]

The Circus in Bath is one of many examples of terraced housing in that architecturally distinctive city.

In 2005 the English Heritage report Low Demand Housing and the Historic Environment found that repairing a standard Victorian terraced house over 30 years is around 60% cheaper than building and maintaining a newly built house. In a 2003 survey for Heritage Counts a team of experts contrasted a Victorian terrace with a house built after 1980, and found that:

The research demonstrated that, contrary to earlier thinking, older housing actually costs less to maintain and occupy over the long-term life of the dwelling than more modern housing. Largely due to the quality and life-span of the materials used, the Victorian terraced house proved almost £1,000 per 100 m2 cheaper to maintain and inhabit on average each year.

North America

[edit]

Canada

[edit]

Halifax

[edit]

Halifax's use of rowhouses, townhouses and terraced housing has been consistent throughout its history, particularly on the Peninsula where the city first began settlement. In the older sections of the city are sections of terraced housing used historically for military families, as part of established families' real estate holdings in addition to a country house, and as dwellings for the working classes of the city and as public housing. The most well-known of the terraced housing areas is The Hydrostone, which was originally built as replacement housing stock for those made homeless after the Halifax Explosion; individual owners have, however, altered the exteriors of many of the rowhouses over time to accommodate changing family needs. More recently, there have been rowhouse developments appearing in diverse areas throughout the city.

Montreal

[edit]
Row houses on Rue Sherbrooke in downtown Montreal
Terraced half bay-and-gable row houses, a Victorian residential style unique to Toronto, in Cabbagetown

Montreal has the largest stock of terraced houses in Canada[13] and they are typical in all areas of the city. As is common in other North American cities, in Montreal row houses are often referred to as townhouses.

The streetscape of the city's 19th century neighbourhoods, such as the Plateau, Centre-Sud, and Hochelaga, are dominated by row houses, duplexes and triplexes. Row houses continued to be built throughout the 20th century. In many neighbourhoods, such as Villeray, Parc Extension, and Ville-Émard, they became the dominant form of housing during the post-war period.

In the 21st century, Montreal has continued to build row houses at a high rate, with 62% of housing starts in the metropolitan area being apartment or row units.[13] Apartment complexes, high-rises, and semi-detached homes are less popular in Montreal when compared to large Canadian cities like Toronto or Vancouver but similar to some US cities, in particular Philadelphia. Montreal's characteristic row houses and their iconic alleyways, balconies, and outdoor staircases have become cultural symbols of the city, featured in David Fennario's Balconville and Mordecai Richler's The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz.

Toronto

[edit]

Terraced homes are abundant in Old Toronto. Many of them are constructed in the local bay-and-gable style, popular in the 1870s. Examples of Victorian bay-and-gable style can be found in Cabbagetown, Toronto,[14] Parkdale,[15] The Annex,[16] Kensington Market,[17] areas east of Chinatown, Toronto[18] and Spadina Avenue including Baldwin Village.

The last surviving row of Georgian-style terraced houses in Toronto, known as Walnut Hall, was demolished in 2007 as a result of structural decay.[19]

United States

[edit]
Row houses in Philadelphia's Art Museum area

According to the US Census Bureau,[20] the highest concentration of terraced houses in the United States is in the Mid-Atlantic region, particularly the Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Washington metropolitan areas. The first terraced houses in the nation were Carstairs Row in Philadelphia, designed by builder and architect Thomas Carstairs[21] c. 1799 through 1820, for developer William Sansom, as part of the first speculative housing developments in the United States.[22] Carstairs Row was built on the southern part of the site occupied by "Morris's Folly" – Robert Morris's unfinished mansion designed by L'Enfant.[23] Prior to this time houses had been built not in rows, but individually. It can be contrasted with Elfreth's Alley, the oldest continuously occupied road in the U.S., where all the houses are of varying heights and widths, with different street lines, doorways and brickwork.

Terraced housing in the United States is generally referred to as townhouses. In some cities such as New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, D.C., and San Francisco, where they have been part of the landscape for over a century, they are often called row houses or row homes. Despite the narrow lots, many row houses are relatively large, some being over 2,000 square feet. They typically have two stories, but may have three or more (with the latter often being converted into apartments for separate tenants). The term "townhouse" in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic usually refers to modern terraced houses constructed in the late 20th century and beyond, especially those in suburban settings, which often have home owners associations and include garages. Multi-story attached homes that are grouped in twos or threes are typically called duplexes (or twins) and triplexes respectively.

Baltimore

[edit]
Row houses in Baltimore's Abell neighborhood

Most of Baltimore's housing consists of row houses. A few of Baltimore's row houses date back to colonial times. The style and materials used in their constructions vary throughout the city. A sizable quantity of Baltimore's row houses are clad with formstone, a distinct feature of Baltimore's row houses, typically found in working class and immigrant areas of the city. Marble front steps also make Baltimore's row houses distinct from other cities' row houses. Much like Philadelphia, some areas of the city that contain row houses are neglected. A significant number of Baltimore's row houses were built by the Czech-American real estate developer Frank Novak.

Boston

[edit]

The row houses of Boston are found primarily in the Back Bay, Beacon Hill, and the South End. Back Bay is famous for its rows of Victorian brick townhouse homes – considered one of the best-preserved examples of 19th-century urban design in the United States. Beacon Hill is a neighborhood in Boston consisting of Federal-style rowhouses. The South End is built mostly of mid-nineteenth century bowfronts – aesthetically uniform rows of five-story, predominantly red-brick structures, of mixed residential and commercial uses.

Chicago

[edit]

In Chicago, row houses can be found in the downtown and surrounding areas developed in the late 1800s through 1930s. Many are two and three-flat buildings (consisting of one or sometimes two apartments on a three-floored building). A greystone in Chicago is similar to the brownstone found in New York and Boston, except the façade is clad in Indiana limestone. Most row houses are separated by a gangway that leads under the common wall between the houses leading to the rear of the property (where sometimes a rear house or coach house exists) and alleyway. The vast majority of two and three flats do not share a common wall and are stand alone structures. However, many row houses similar to those found in Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Washington, D.C. do exist, largely on the near south and west sides, though not as common. One particular address, 2319 East 100th street in Jeffrey Manor, became in-famous and is still known by many Chicago citizens as "the townhouse", after the murder of eight student nurses in the night of July 14th, 1966. It´s part of six two-storey-flats in a row.

Savannah

[edit]
The Chatham Square Row in Savannah

Gordon Row, in Savannah, was built in the 1850s.[24] It (and its individual carriage houses to the rear) is a contributing property of the Savannah Historic District, itself on the National Register of Historic Places,[24] and fills an entire city block. After falling into disrepair, the buildings were renovated in the mid-20th century by the Historic Savannah Foundation.[25] Other similar-style row houses exist in Savannah's Scudder's Row, William Remshart Row House, the Quantock Rows on Taylor Street and Jones Street, McDonough Row and Marshall Row.[26]

New Orleans

[edit]

New Orleans has a distinctive style of terrace house in the French Quarter known as the Creole townhouse that is part of what makes the city famous. The façade of the building sits on the property line, with an asymmetrical arrangement of arched openings. Creole Townhouses have a steeply pitched roof, side-gabled, with several roof dormers. The exterior is made of brick or stucco.

New York

[edit]
Townhouses in the Brooklyn Heights Historic District

The row houses of New York City are built with a variety of material, including brownstone, limestone, and brick, and some are wood-frame homes. Row houses are especially prominent in neighborhoods like Middle Village, Woodhaven and Jackson Heights in Queens; Bay Ridge, Bensonhurst, Brooklyn Heights, Bushwick, Canarsie, Marine Park, Park Slope, and Sunset Park in Brooklyn; and Williamsbridge, Wakefield, and Soundview in the Bronx.

Philadelphia

[edit]
Historic homes on Elfreth's Alley, Philadelphia

In historic Philadelphia, the rowhouse (almost always spelled as one word) has been the most common domestic building type in the city and some of its suburbs since colonial times. Some of the oldest rowhouses in the city are narrow three-story "Trinity" houses that accommodated a large population of indentured servants and immigrant workers, in addition to enclaves of free African-Americans in the 19th century.[27] Society Hill is known to have the largest concentration of original 18th- and early 19th-century residential architecture of any place in the United States. The style and type of material used in constructing Philadelphia's rowhouses vary throughout the city. Even in neighborhoods where twin houses are found, their façades and internal layouts usually resemble those of rowhouses.

Most are primarily red brick in construction, often with white stone trim. Some are faced with stone, being brownstone on some blocks in Center City, South Philadelphia, and North Philadelphia and being Wissahickon schist in Mayfair in Northeast Philadelphia and Mt. Airy in Northwest Philadelphia. West Philadelphia has many colorful rowhouses in the Italianate and Queen Anne architectural styles. As rowhouses are very common, the Philadelphia City Planning Commission (PCPC) publishes a specific guide for rowhouse home owners in an effort to detail some of the ways to maintain their properties.[28]

With space within the city's borders at a premium, there has been a push to add a third floor to an existing rowhouse's in recent times, often this third level would include a rooftop deck. While zoning codes do exist which can possibly prevent third stories from being added to homes, Philly Mag claims "The city’s 2012 zoning code overhaul, which increased the height limit for rowhouses from 35 to 38 feet, has made this option increasingly prevalent."[29]

San Francisco

[edit]

San Francisco is also known for its terraced houses in the older neighborhoods of North Beach, the Castro, the Haight-Ashbury, Russian Hill, the Mission District, Duboce Triangle and the Western Addition. The "Painted Ladies" on Steiner Street, in the Western Addition's Alamo Square district, although not true "terraced", are a symbol of the city. Some ornate, intricately detailed Victorian-style homes labelled as "painted ladies" around the city are terraced, but most again are semi-detached and not true "terraced".

Washington, D.C.

[edit]
Historic rowhouses in Foggy Bottom, Washington, D.C.

Several neighborhoods in Washington, D.C. feature rowhouses, often composing the majority or a large plurality of the local housing stock. As in other American cities, rowhouses in D.C. span a wide range of architectural styles and building materials. Neighborhoods known for high concentrations of rowhouses include Capitol Hill, Dupont Circle, Logan Circle, Shaw, LeDroit Park, Columbia Heights, Petworth, and Bloomingdale. Many neighborhoods with rowhouses are located in the city's Northwest quadrant, in the densely populated area east of Rock Creek Park, except for Capitol Hill and its sub-neighborhoods, which occupy the areas of the Northeast and Southeast quadrants directly east of the United States Capitol Building. Because many D.C. rowhouses are historic structures, dating back as far as the early 1800s, they are especially common within the city's original boundaries, as laid out in the 1791 L'Enfant Plan. Outside of Washington DC many townhomes have been built in the last 50 years to encourage density especially around Metro stations and other areas of interest.[30]

Other cities

[edit]
Townhomes in suburban Fox River Grove, Illinois

In other cities throughout the United States, such as Albany, New York; Cincinnati; Cleveland; Covington, Kentucky; Detroit; Hoboken, New Jersey; Jersey City; Lancaster, Pennsylvania; Norfolk; Pittsburgh; Reading, Pennsylvania; Richmond; Troy; and Wilmington, Delaware, row houses and terraced housing are also common, with row housing more focused on the center of the city, and later changing over to dense detached housing in outer neighborhoods. Scattered row homes and apartment rows can often be found in other eastern and Midwestern U.S. cities, specifically Minneapolis and St. Paul. The F. Scott Fitzgerald House in St. Paul is likely the most notable example of a row home in the Twin Cities. Columbus, Ohio has scattered row homes, along with smaller Midwest cities like Dubuque, Duluth, and Toledo. There are also scattered row homes and apartment rows in the oldest neighborhoods of Denver, Colorado.

South America

[edit]

Uruguay and Argentina

[edit]
'Standard Houses' in Montevideo, Uruguay

Montevideo and Buenos Aires during the last decades of the 19th century developed a type of terraced house called the Standard House or informally 'Chorizo' House.

Southeast Asia

[edit]
Shophouses in George Town, Penang, Malaysia
Pre-World War II terraced houses refurbished into restaurants and bars along Tengkat Tong Shin in Bukit Bintang, Kuala Lumpur

Introduced around the beginning of the twentieth century, terraced houses (also known as shophouses or linear linkhouses) have been adopted in both Malaysia and Singapore since the countries' early British colonial rule.

Based on British terraced home designs, the Southeast Asian variations are similar to their British counterparts (in which the living quarters are located on the front and top floor and the kitchen at the back) and were adapted to accommodate the area's tropical weather, which is primarily warm throughout the year and receives heavy rainfall. Earlier versions were more open, designed to better circulate air and features inner courtyards, with a frontal yard, rear yard, or both. A typical Malaysian and Singaporean terraced house is usually one or two floors high, but a handful of three or four storey terraced homes exist, especially newer terraced houses. Earlier variations followed traditional Western, Malay, India and Chinese architecture, as well as Art Deco and International stylings between the 1930s and 1950s.

The manner in which the buildings were designed varies by their location in an urban area. Derivatives located within city centres may also utilize their space for both commercial on the ground floor and residential use on the first floor and above (accurately known as shophouses, also similar to Lingnan buildings). Inner city terrace house design tended to lack any frontal yard at all, with narrow street frontages, hence the building's structure directly erected in front of the road. One of the reasons behind this was the taxing according to street frontage rather than total area, thereby creating an economic motivation to build narrow and deeply. A five foot way porch was usually laid out at the ground floor for use by both the residents and pedestrians. Alternatively, the porch may be sealed from the rest of the walkway to serve as personal space. Such designs became less common after the 1960s.

Terrace houses located on the outskirts of city centres were less restrictive, although the design of the building itself was not unlike those in the city. Certain homes tend to feature longer front yards, enough to accommodate cars. Others strictly serve as a small garden. This design remained in demand throughout the twentieth century, and a construction boom of the house design occurred in Malaysia since the 1940s, with numerous housing estates consisting of terrace homes sprouting in and around cities and towns. In the process, the design of the building began to diversify, with various refinements and style changes. Generally, the building's floor space and yards become larger and more elaborate through time, as is the modernisation of exterior construction and façade.

Certain older terrace houses tend to be converted for various new roles; some are converted into shophouses or business premises (including clubs, hotels and boarding homes–especially pre-independence houses–and kindergartens). Others have remained in use as residential units, are abandoned, neglected, or razed. Significant expansions are also common on all terrace homes; roofs and additional rooms may be added within the floorspace of the house's lot. Concerns are also raised with the limited maintenance and monitoring of deserted terrace homes, which potentially become hiding places for rodents and snakes (in yards with overgrown grass), and drug addicts.

Earlier variations of the terrace house were constructed with wood, later replaced with a masonry shell holding wooden beams to form foundations for the upper floors and tiled roof. Contemporary variations are primarily held together with reinforced concrete beams, which are later completed with concrete slabs, brick walls and tiled roofs.

See also

[edit]

References and notes

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A terraced house consists of a continuous row of attached dwellings sharing party walls between adjacent units, enabling efficient in urban settings. This form emerged in during the late as towns expanded, initially serving affluent residents in planned developments that emulated rural estates. By the , terraced houses proliferated during the to house the influx of workers into cities, with builders constructing vast numbers of uniform, two- or three-story structures featuring front doors directly onto the and small rear yards. Their design prioritized density over individual privacy, sharing load-bearing walls that reduced construction costs but transmitted noise and limited to end units. Today, terraced houses remain prevalent in the , particularly in , comprising a significant portion of the stock due to their durability and adaptability, though they face challenges like poor insulation in older examples.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Features and Design Principles

Terraced houses consist of a continuous row of three or more dwellings attached laterally via shared party walls, which serve as fire separations and structural elements in traditional builds. This configuration reduces external wall surface area per unit, enabling denser urban development while maintaining individual property boundaries through distinct front entrances. Design principles emphasize uniformity in materials, plan forms, and elevations to facilitate economical , as seen in historical examples where standardized and placements minimized material waste and time. The narrow and elongated depth of plots—typically oriented to the —optimize in constrained city environments, with rear access providing private yards separate from communal frontages. Party walls, often constructed from or modern cavity systems, inherently promote and sound attenuation due to reduced exposure to external elements, though effectiveness depends on build quality and maintenance. These features collectively support that balances affordability with privacy, as internal layouts direct living spaces away from shared boundaries.

Terminology and Nomenclature

A terraced house, also known simply as a in some contexts, refers to a unit in a continuous row of identical or uniform houses that share party walls with adjacent units on at least one side, typically both sides except for end units. This emphasizes the stepped or leveled uniformity of the facade, akin to garden terraces, a adopted by British architects in the late to describe such developments. The term's earliest recorded use dates to 1817, as evidenced in Jane Austen's writings, though the architectural form predates this linguistic application. Etymologically, "terrace" derives from the Old French terrasse (12th century), rooted in Latin terra meaning "earth," originally denoting a raised, flat earthen platform or balcony for viewing or walking. By the Georgian era in Britain, this evolved to characterize linear streets of conjoined houses with aligned elevations, distinguishing them from detached or semi-detached structures. In British usage, subtypes include "mid-terrace" for internal units fully bounded by neighbors and "end-terrace" for corner units with exposure on one additional side, reflecting positional nomenclature within the row. Regionally, terminology diverges while describing analogous structures. , the equivalent is often termed a "row house," particularly for uniform, historical rows sharing walls on both sides with consistent styling, as seen in cities like or since the . "," by contrast, in American parlance frequently denotes multi-story attached dwellings that may vary in design, height, or width, and often implies modern strata-titled ownership with shared amenities, distinguishing it from strictly uniform row houses. In , "" mirrors the British form for two-story attached homes, while "" applies to contemporary complexes of three or more units, sometimes freestanding within a development. These variations arise from local building traditions and legal ownership models, with "terraced" retaining a stronger association with pre-20th-century European in nations.

Historical Development

Early Origins in Europe

The practice of constructing attached houses sharing party walls emerged in medieval Europe due to urban land scarcity, with many towns featuring organic rows of timber-framed dwellings. A notable early planned example is Vicars' Close in Wells, Somerset, England, built between 1348 and 1430 to house the vicars choral of Wells Cathedral. This row of 27 two-story terraced houses, connected by a bridge over a central cobbled path, exemplifies organized residential development for a specific clerical community, preserving much of its original Gothic architecture. By the , terraced housing evolved into more uniform, aesthetically coherent designs integrated into . In the , terraced forms appeared in the late 1500s, influencing broader European practices. A landmark continental example is the in , , developed from 1605 to 1612 under King Henry IV as the Place Royale. This square enclosure features 36 symmetrical pavilions of identical red-brick facades with stone , arcades, and slate roofs, originally housing nobility and setting a precedent for standardized terraced ensembles around public spaces. These early European terraces emphasized structural efficiency through shared walls, which reduced costs and material use while providing mutual support against and weather. Italian influences, evident in facade uniformity and proportion, facilitated the style's adoption in by the 1630s, predating widespread industrialization. Such developments prioritized communal harmony and land optimization over isolated villas, reflecting causal pressures of growing urban populations.

Expansion During Industrialization

The prompted a surge in terraced house construction in Britain as accelerated, drawing rural migrants to factory towns and cities for . This period, roughly spanning the late 18th to early 20th centuries, saw England's population expand from approximately 9 million in 1801 to 36 million by 1911, necessitating efficient housing solutions to accommodate workers near industrial sites. Terraced designs, with shared party walls, minimized material costs and land use while enabling rapid speculative building by developers targeting lower socio-economic groups. Construction boomed in northern industrial hubs including , , , and mill towns in and , as well as coalfields in and London's docklands. The total number of dwellings in rose from 1.6 million in to 7.6 million by , with terraced houses dominating urban expansions due to their scalability. Early examples, such as back-to-back terraces, prioritized density over ventilation and sanitation, often resulting in overcrowded conditions that exacerbated crises like outbreaks. Reforms under the addressed these deficiencies by requiring local byelaws for minimum standards, including through-lots for rear access, back alleys, and basic sanitation provisions like outdoor toilets. This led to the widespread adoption of "byelaw terraced houses," typically uniform two-story red-brick rows with small front gardens and rear yards, built primarily between 1875 and the early . These structures featured gridiron street layouts to ensure light and air circulation, marking a shift toward more habitable worker amid ongoing industrialization. Employer-initiated model villages, such as established in 1853 by , exemplified improved terraced designs with integrated community facilities, though such initiatives were exceptions rather than the norm.

20th-Century Adaptations and Global Spread

In the early , terraced houses in the sustained their prominence as a form, with builders integrating emerging architectural influences while preserving the core row configuration for efficient . This era marked adaptations such as enhanced ventilation and light through varied window placements, responding to evolving standards for worker and middle-class dwellings amid continued industrialization. The design persisted into the interwar years, though alternatives gained traction due to automobile prevalence and preferences for private gardens; terraced variants remained viable in dense city cores where land scarcity demanded compact builds. Post-World War II reconstruction initially favored high-rise and prefabricated structures for rapid housing output, yet terraced forms reemerged in later developments, valued for cost-effectiveness and reduced . By the late 20th century, renovations emphasized restoring original facades with lime render and slim glazing to counter mid-century deteriorations like concrete overlays. Globally, terraced housing disseminated through British colonial and imperial networks, with substantial adoption in where it functioned as a land-efficient analogue to high-density apartments, constructed extensively in and suburbs across the 19th and 20th centuries to accommodate investor returns and population influx. In the United States, equivalent row houses adapted to industrial urban expansion, exemplified by early 20th-century "daylight" models in that deepened floor plans to two rooms while recessing rear sections for natural illumination, addressing prior light deficiencies in narrower predecessors. Such innovations supported middle-class rentals, though regulatory pushback emerged, as in Washington, D.C.'s 1920 zoning ordinance prohibiting row houses to promote detached styles amid perceptions of . This diffusion underscored terraced forms' resilience in medium-density contexts worldwide, evolving from European precedents to suit local economic and spatial pressures.

Architectural and Construction Aspects

Structural Elements and Materials

Terraced houses rely on shared party walls as their defining structural element, which are load-bearing masonry divisions typically 225 mm (9 inches) thick, formed by double brick construction where each adjoining property owns half the wall thickness, providing lateral stability and acting as firebreaks under building regulations such as the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. These walls extend continuously from foundations to roof level, often without cavities in pre-20th-century builds, relying on solid brick or stone for compressive strength. External facades and enclosing walls are predominantly load-bearing , with historical examples using handmade or machine-pressed laid in English bond patterns for durability against vertical loads from multiple stories. Internal partition walls, where not party walls, employ timber stud framing infilled with brick nogging or , supporting timber floor joists that span between party walls at intervals of approximately 400 mm. Foundations consist of strip footings, typically 600-900 mm wide and 1-1.5 m deep in Victorian-era constructions on clay soils, overlaid on , , and bases to distribute loads and mitigate settlement. Roofs are generally pitched with timber rafters tied into party walls, covered in or clay tiles for weatherproofing and to shed rainwater away from shared boundaries, with spans limited to 3-4 m to avoid excessive deflection. Materials emphasize local and economical options: (fired clay) for walls due to its high (around 10-20 MPa) and fire resistance; lime-based mortars for in older stock to prevent damp; and softwood timber (e.g., joists) for floors and roofs, treated against rot in modern retrofits. Post-1945 developments incorporate blocks for internal walls and cavity insulation, enhancing thermal performance while maintaining exteriors for aesthetic continuity.

Stylistic Variations Over Time

![Victorian terrace on Canterbury Road, Middle Park][float-right]
Terraced houses initially appeared in late 17th-century following the in 1666, featuring simple brick facades with minimal ornamentation to facilitate rapid urban rebuilding and efficient . These early examples emphasized uniformity and practicality, with shared party walls and pitched roofs, reflecting economic necessities rather than aesthetic elaboration.
By the Georgian period (roughly 1714–1830), terraced designs incorporated classical symmetry, including evenly spaced sash windows, pedimented doorways, and with rubbed headers for subtle decoration, as seen in developments like those in Bath and . This style drew from Palladian influences, prioritizing proportion and restraint to suit middle-class urban dwellers. In , similar Federal-style row houses emerged around the late , adapting Georgian elements with and cornices for emerging cities like . Victorian terraced houses (1837–1901) marked a shift toward and revivalism, incorporating Gothic, Italianate, and Queen Anne motifs such as windows, detailing, and iron railings to accommodate industrial-era working-class housing demands while allowing for builder expression. Byelaw terraces, mandated from the 1870s onward by public health acts, featured larger rear extensions and improved sanitation but retained ornate frontages until the early 20th century. Edwardian variants (1901–1910) softened these with lighter and simpler and Crafts influences, reflecting rising standards for suburban-style density. Post-World War II adaptations introduced modernist , with and simplified geometries in social housing projects, though traditional styles persisted in private developments; by the late , neo-Georgian revivals emphasized energy-efficient updates while preserving historical facades. In and , contemporary terraced designs often blend sustainable materials like insulated with open-plan interiors, prioritizing functionality over historical ornament.

Technical Advantages in Efficiency

Terraced houses demonstrate enhanced relative to detached houses owing to shared party walls, which substantially reduce conductive heat loss by limiting external surface area exposure. This design inherently insulates interior units, promoting better heat retention in colder climates and cooler interiors in warmer conditions, thereby lowering overall energy demands for heating and cooling. For instance, the compact form minimizes the ratio of surface area to volume, a key factor in reducing bridging compared to standalone structures. Empirical analyses confirm measurable savings, with interior row units exhibiting improved thermal resilience—defined as the capacity to maintain comfortable indoor temperatures under fluctuating external conditions—following passive optimizations like enhanced wall insulation. End units may realize higher absolute reductions due to their partial exposure, but middle units benefit most from adjacency effects, potentially cutting heating needs by leveraging neighboring . Such advantages align with building principles, where shared envelopes decrease infiltration and exfiltration rates. In , terraced layouts enable streamlined processes through repetitive modular assembly, optimizing labor, , and site . Shared walls eliminate redundant framing and foundations between units, reducing overall volume—such as or —by up to 20-30% per dwelling in linear rows, while continuous and mechanized workflows accelerate build times. This supports efficient , lowering per-unit costs without compromising structural integrity, as party walls distribute loads laterally across the row. These efficiencies extend to operational sustainability, as denser configurations facilitate district-level utilities like combined heat and power systems, further amplifying rates over isolated buildings. However, realization depends on quality of and , with poorly insulated party walls potentially undermining gains through or transmission.

Regional Variations


Terraced houses, consisting of contiguous dwellings sharing party walls, represent a foundational element of European urban , originating in the and adapting to industrial-era demands for dense, efficient accommodation. In the , they constitute a major share of the , while continental variants exhibit regional stylistic and terminological differences, such as Dutch rijtjeshuizen or French maisons mitoyennes. These structures prioritize land efficiency in compact cities, with historical examples spanning elite Georgian ensembles to working-class Victorian rows.

United Kingdom and Ireland

In the , terraced houses account for 26.3% of the national dwelling stock, equating to 6.93 million properties as of 2021, predominantly in where urban expansion during the drove their proliferation. Emerging in the late from classical and Italian influences, they addressed rapid ; for example, Cardiff's inhabitants increased from 1,800 in 1801 to 164,000 by 1901, spurring widespread terraced construction for workers. Georgian terraces, like those forming Bath's Circus (completed 1768), featured symmetrical brick facades and uniform designs for affluent residents, whereas 19th-century Victorian variants in industrial centers provided basic, back-to-back or bye-law compliant housing to mitigate . Ireland mirrors this trajectory, with Georgian terraced developments in , such as (laid out circa 1760s), showcasing elegant brick rows around communal greens for the professional class. Post-Great Famine urbanization in the mid-19th century amplified Victorian terraced building, evident in dense rows like those in Derry's , which housed working populations amid economic shifts. These forms persist, valued for their durability and community cohesion despite periodic slum clearances.

Continental Europe

Continental Europe features analogous attached housing, though less uniformly rowed than British models, with early unified examples like Paris's (1605–1612), where Henry IV commissioned matching red-brick pavilions around a square to symbolize royal symmetry and . In , maisons mitoyennes—attached homes sharing walls—prevalently occur in both urban terraces and rural semis, emphasizing practical adjacency over extensive rows. The Netherlands boasts a deep tradition of terraced forms, rooted in 15th-century hofjes (enclosed courtyard rows for the elderly or poor) and evolving into 17th-century canal houses with distinctive gables; industrial growth from the prompted worker rijtjeshuizen, compact and scalable for dense populations. In , Reihenhäuser typically manifest as post-1945 suburban terraces, often prefabricated for efficiency on plots from square meters, prioritizing modern functionality over historical . Across the , these adaptations reflect local materials, regulations, and socio-economic needs, contrasting the UK's mass Victorian output.

United Kingdom and Ireland

Terraced houses emerged in the in the late , with early examples appearing in to accommodate expanding urban populations amid growing trade and commerce. By the 19th century, during the , their construction accelerated dramatically to house factory workers migrating to cities; for instance, Cardiff's population surged from 1,800 in 1801 to 164,000 by 1901, necessitating rapid, efficient housing solutions like terraces. Initial designs included cramped back-to-back terraces lacking through ventilation, but Acts from 1875 onward mandated improvements such as bye-law terraces with rear yards, front gardens, and better , enhancing habitability. These houses constitute a major share of the UK's housing stock, comprising about 24% of properties in regions like the South East as of 2021 data, reflecting their enduring role in dense urban and suburban areas. Victorian terraces, characterized by facades, bay windows, and uniform rhythms, dominate in industrial cities such as and , while Georgian precedents from the feature more refined proportions and detailing in places like Bath. Their shared party walls provide thermal efficiency and structural stability, though post-World War II bombing destroyed many, particularly in where an estimated 70,000 buildings were lost. In Ireland, terraced parallels developments but includes distinctive Georgian examples from the , developed under the Wide Streets Commission to alleviate medieval congestion in . Elegant red-brick terraces encircle squares like , built between 1760 and 1800 with fanlights, pediments, and iron railings symbolizing Anglo-Irish prosperity. terraces followed in the , addressing post-Famine with modest row houses in areas like Belfast's mill districts and Dublin's suburbs, often featuring two-story designs for working-class residents. Northern Ireland's terraces, such as those in Derry's , similarly catered to industrial labor from the onward.

Continental Europe

Terraced housing in traces its origins to early initiatives, with the in serving as one of the earliest examples. Constructed between 1605 and 1612 under King Henry IV, this square features uniform pavilions forming continuous rows around a central plaza, representing an initial attempt at standardized attached residential for and affluent residents. The design emphasized symmetry and shared walls to maximize space within the city's confines, influencing subsequent developments in French urbanism. In the , particularly the and , terraced houses—known as rijtjeshuizen in Dutch—became a dominant form due to land scarcity and post-industrial expansion. In the , terraced houses constitute 42% of all dwellings as of 2022, defined as blocks of at least three attached units, typically two to three stories high with front entrances and rear gardens for privacy. This prevalence stems from 19th-century origins, accelerating after to accommodate population growth efficiently on limited terrain. mirrors this pattern, especially in , where terraced structures integrate into eclectic urban fabrics alongside and modernist elements, supporting dense yet individualized living. Germany features Reihenhäuser (row houses) primarily in northwestern regions, resembling Dutch styles with gabled roofs and attached facades, though they represent a smaller share of the stock compared to apartments, which dominate urban areas. These structures gained traction in suburban developments from the mid-20th century, offering affordable single-family options with shared walls for , but official statistics indicate and terraced forms comprise under 15% of dwellings, with variations by federal state. In , maisons mitoyennes—attached or terraced single-family houses—form part of the broader category of individual dwellings, which account for over half of main residences, though precise terraced proportions are lower than in the north, emphasizing historic urban rows over widespread modern blocks. This typology persists in regions like the north and , balancing density with private outdoor spaces, but yields to collective apartments in major cities.

North America

In North America, terraced houses—commonly termed row houses or townhouses—emerged as an adaptation of European models, particularly English terraces developed post-1666 for fire-resistant urban density. Introduced by colonial settlers, they gained traction in the late 18th and 19th centuries amid rapid and industrial growth, providing efficient housing for workers, immigrants, and the in dense port cities. Unlike detached suburban homes that later dominated, row houses emphasized shared party walls, uniform facades, and narrow lots to maximize in constrained urban grids. In the United States, the form originated in , where the first speculative row houses were constructed between 1799 and 1820 by builder Thomas Carstairs, reflecting English influences with brick construction and uniform elevations to promote and aesthetic cohesion. By the mid-19th century, during the , row houses proliferated in cities like , , New York, and , often built as speculative developments for immigrant laborers; for instance, Federal-style rows in 's and Greek Revival variants in featured stoops, cornices, and ironwork for ventilation and ornamentation. These structures, typically 15-20 feet wide and two to three stories tall, housed multiple families after changes in 1919 permitted conversions, though they symbolized middle-class stability before widespread automobile-driven reduced new construction post-1920s. In , row houses appeared in the mid-19th century, aligned with Victorian-era urban expansion in English-influenced cities. Montreal's Plateau Mont-Royal district features preserved 19th-century Victorian row houses with stone or brick facades, mansard roofs, and wrought-iron details, originally built for working-class residents during the city's industrial boom. examples include the Richard West Houses (1869), a Gothic Revival row at 104 John Street, and Victorian terraces in Cabbagetown, while City's Cox Terrace (1884) exemplifies with cast-iron balconies amid prosperity-driven growth. Less ubiquitous than in the U.S. due to vast land availability and detached housing preferences, Canadian rows often incorporated local adaptations like steeper roofs for snow loads, but faced similar declines until recent heritage revivals for urban infill.

United States

Row houses in the , akin to terraced houses elsewhere, consist of narrow, multi-story dwellings built in continuous rows with shared party walls, typically constructed from brick to facilitate efficient urban development. These structures proliferated during the as speculative housing for working-class populations in growing cities, adapting European models—particularly from Dutch and British influences—to American contexts with features like front stoops for entry and rear alleys for and outbuildings. The earliest documented row houses appeared in Philadelphia around 1691 with Budd's Row in Old City, marking the introduction of this typology to the colonies, followed by developments like Carstairs Row between 1799 and 1820. By the 19th century, row houses became hallmarks of cities such as Philadelphia, Baltimore, Boston, New York, and Washington, D.C., where uniform blocks of Federal-style (1780–1820) and Greek Revival (post-1820) facades defined neighborhoods, often spanning entire street fronts with consistent rooflines and modest ornamentation. In Philadelphia alone, these form extensive residential landscapes, while Baltimore's versions frequently feature applied formstone cladding from the mid-20th century, and D.C.'s incorporate Federal and later eclectic styles like Queen Anne. Architecturally, American row houses differ from British terraced houses in their emphasis on block uniformity for speculative building, narrower widths (often 12–15 feet), and adaptations for local climates, such as higher stoops to elevate entrances above street level flooding risks in coastal cities. While comprising only about 5–8% of the national housing stock, they remain concentrated in Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic urban cores, valued for but critiqued historically for limited light and air in dense configurations before reforms. Recent interest has surged for their role in sustainable development, countering sprawl in high-demand areas.

Canada

Row housing in Canada developed primarily in the 19th century within expanding urban centers such as Montreal and Toronto, where rapid industrialization and population growth necessitated efficient medium-density accommodations. Influenced by British terraced house designs, Canadian examples adapted to local materials and climates, often featuring red brick construction and styles like Second Empire with mansard roofs. In Toronto, endless rows of these red-brick houses lined gridded streets east and west of downtown, exemplifying practical responses to urban expansion post-Confederation. Montreal's row houses, frequently termed townhouses, emerged in the mid-19th century along streets like Saint-Antoine West, initially serving as private residences before some repurposing. These structures often incorporated clapboard siding and mansard roofs, particularly after events like the 1892 fire, reflecting Second Empire influences prevalent in architecture. Preservation efforts continue, with architects these heritage buildings to integrate modern interiors while maintaining facades, as seen in historical neighborhoods transformed for contemporary living. Beyond these hubs, rarer examples include Calgary's Fairey Terrace, an Edwardian-era row inspired by Victorian and Edwardian precedents, built in the early and now seeking heritage protection for its architectural significance. In , the Jellybean Row on Wellington Row dates to 1860, featuring colorful Victorian-style terraced homes that became the city's first lending library site and symbolize early urban development. These instances highlight row housing's role in providing affordable, unified streetscapes amid Canada's 19th-century , though less ubiquitous than detached homes due to suburban preferences.

Other Regions

Oceania and Southeast Asia

In Australia, terraced houses emerged in the early , primarily in , modeled after British urban designs to address housing shortages during colonial expansion. These structures proliferated in inner-city suburbs of and between 1855 and the 1890s, serving both working-class and middle-class residents through speculative development that maximized . Victorian-era terraces typically feature narrow facades, multi-story layouts with ornate balconies, and party walls, reflecting adaptations to local with verandas for shade. New Zealand saw limited historical adoption of terraced housing, with early colonial settlements favoring detached bungalows; however, examples exist in , such as the two-story Stuart Street terraces built in the late , characterized by classical balustraded balconies and symmetrical facades. Contemporary terraced designs in New Zealand emphasize , often incorporating modern materials for energy efficiency while maintaining shared-wall efficiency in areas with access. In , particularly and , shophouses represent a prevalent form of terraced , combining ground-floor commercial spaces with upper residential levels, developed from the 1820s under British colonial planning in initiated by . These narrow, elongated two- to three-story buildings, constructed mainly between the and , feature shared walls, air wells for ventilation, and covered five-foot walkways to mitigate tropical heat and rain. Iconic clusters in Penang's George Town, recognized as a since 2008, showcase eclectic Peranakan and Straits Chinese styles with colorful facades and intricate tilework, preserving pre-independence urban fabric amid modernization pressures.

South America

Terraced housing in appears in select urban settings, often as compact row units adapted to local topography and materials, though it lacks the widespread historical prevalence seen in or colonial outposts. In regions like , , modern row house projects employ modular designs to optimize land in challenging climates, featuring aligned single- or two-story structures with shared walls for communal efficiency. Broader Latin American contexts include single-floor terraced variants in denser neighborhoods of cities such as and , where they facilitate incremental urban growth but integrate indigenous construction techniques like or over uniform brick facades. These forms prioritize affordability and density amid rapid , contrasting with more spacious colonial estates, yet face challenges from informal expansions in informal settlements.

Oceania and Southeast Asia

In , terraced houses emerged in the mid-19th century, influenced by British and designed to maximize land use in growing urban centers like and . These structures, often featuring Victorian-era details such as iron lace balconies and Boom-style facades, were built from the 1850s onward to provide efficient housing for the working and middle classes amid rapid population growth during the gold rush era. Architectural styles evolved from Georgian and Regency to Early Victorian and , with terraces in areas like Surry Hills and exemplifying investor-driven development akin to contemporary high-density apartments. In , historical terraced was uncommon, with limited examples in colonial , but modern terraced houses have gained prominence since the early to address needs, particularly in . These contemporary designs emphasize medium-density living with shared party walls, often incorporating features like private rear yards while minimizing road-facing windows for and energy efficiency. In , terraced houses manifest prominently as shophouses in and , where they combine ground-floor commercial spaces with upper residential levels in continuous rows dating from the late 18th to early 20th centuries. In Penang's George Town, these UNESCO-listed structures blend Chinese, Malay, Indian, and European influences across six stylistic periods, featuring elements like five-foot ways for pedestrian shelter and ornate facades that supported multicultural trade economies. 's pre-war terraces, built between the 1920s and 1940s in areas like and Petain Road, reflect eclectic designs initiated by local landlords, while public terrace houses constructed by the Singapore Improvement Trust in the 1950s, such as those in Queenstown, marked early efforts in affordable urban housing. This terraced form facilitated dense, walkable communities resilient to tropical climates through natural ventilation and adaptable layouts.

South America

In South America, terraced houses trace their origins to Iberian colonial , where attached dwellings were built in compact rows to optimize limited space in port cities and administrative centers established from the onward. These early structures, typically featuring shared party walls, facades, and patios for ventilation in tropical climates, appear in preserved historic neighborhoods, such as those in , and Salvador, , reflecting adaptations of Spanish casa patio and Portuguese row forms to local materials like and roofing. Contemporary terraced housing remains a dominant typology in the region, particularly in middle-income urban expansions of countries like , , and , where narrow units—often 3 meters wide by 10 meters deep, with two stories and two bedrooms—facilitate efficient amid rapid rates exceeding 80% continent-wide as of 2024. This form supports densities rivaling Asian megacities, prioritizing affordability over spaciousness, though informal self-built variants in peripheries deviate from formal row alignments. In modern developments, such as gated enclaves in , terraced houses incorporate small private gardens and security features, addressing crime concerns while maintaining shared-wall efficiency; however, prevalence varies, with higher adoption in nations like compared to Andean regions favoring standalone or blocks. Empirical data from surveys indicate these units comprise a significant share of formal low- to mid-rise stock, though challenges like seismic risks in countries such as prompt retrofits with .

Advantages and Criticisms

Economic and Practical Benefits

Terraced houses provide economic benefits through lower per-unit construction costs relative to detached dwellings, as shared party walls reduce the quantity of materials required for exterior walls, , and roofing. This design efficiency also decreases labor needs during building, with estimates indicating substantial savings from fewer windows and simplified structural elements per unit. In urban contexts, these cost reductions enable developers to allocate resources toward higher-quality finishes or amenities while maintaining affordability for buyers, often allowing access to desirable locations near transport and services that might otherwise exceed budgets for standalone homes. From a practical standpoint, terraced houses enhance energy efficiency by leveraging shared walls for , which minimizes heat loss in winter and heat gain in summer compared to isolated structures. Empirical data from monitored Swedish terrace houses equipped with solar collectors demonstrate delivered demands as low as 68 kWh/m² annually, including domestic hot water provision. This configuration supports lower ongoing utility expenses and aligns with passive design principles, reducing reliance on mechanical heating or cooling systems. Additionally, terraced layouts optimize by accommodating greater on finite urban plots, thereby curbing sprawl and preserving green spaces without sacrificing single-family living standards. Maintenance practicality is further aided by reduced exterior surfaces per , which lowers long-term upkeep costs for painting, repairs, and landscaping relative to detached alternatives. These attributes collectively promote sustainable urban development, as evidenced by their prevalence in compact European and North American cities where efficient has historically supported .

Drawbacks and Social Challenges

Terraced houses, due to their shared walls and close proximity, facilitate greater transmission between adjoining , leading to reduced acoustic for residents. Empirical surveys of urban dwellers indicate that shared walls amplify disturbances such as footsteps, conversations, and music, with complaints rising by up to % in terraced configurations compared to detached homes. Maintenance challenges arise from interdependent structures, including disputes over party wall repairs and risks of damp migration or subsidence propagating from neighboring properties. In the UK, party wall agreements under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 often lead to legal conflicts, with costs for shared repairs—such as roof or boundary work—potentially doubling due to coordination failures between owners. Fire safety poses a heightened , as inadequately maintained party walls may fail to contain flames, allowing spread to adjacent units; a 2011 analysis of Irish terraced fires documented multiple instances where defective separations accelerated damage across rows. building regulations require fire-resistant barriers extending into roofs, yet retrofitting older stock (pre-1980s) reveals compliance gaps in approximately 15-20% of surveyed Victorian terraces. Socially, the high of terraced layouts correlates with elevated invasions and interpersonal tensions, including overlooking from rear gardens or windows, which studies link to increased stress and reduced among residents lacking private open spaces. While not causally deterministic, in such types shows associations with higher reported antisocial behaviors, such as waste dumping or minor disturbances, in empirical assessments of mixed-tenure neighborhoods, though outcomes vary by socioeconomic factors and maintenance quality. Limited and outdoor areas exacerbate frustrations, contributing to community strains in densely packed streets where on-street competition averages 1.5 vehicles per household in cities.

Urban Planning Debates

In urban planning, terraced houses are debated as a medium-density typology that optimizes land use while avoiding the infrastructure demands of high-rise developments, accommodating 20-21.9 units per acre in well-designed blocks compared to lower yields from detached homes. Advocates emphasize their role in curbing urban sprawl and housing shortages, as restrictive zoning favoring single-family detached houses—prevalent on 75% of residential land in many U.S. cities—limits such forms, inflating costs and reducing supply. Empirical analyses of zoning reforms show that permitting row houses increases construction without proportionally displacing existing residents, supporting affordability in dense contexts. Sustainability debates highlight terraced houses' thermal efficiency from shared party walls, which reduce heat loss and per-unit demand relative to detached structures, though outcomes depend on and occupant practices rather than alone. Case studies, such as in , reveal that open-layout terraced dwellings minimize reliance on air-conditioning through natural ventilation, contrasting with sealed units that amplify consumption via urban heat islands. Planners argue this form enables walkable neighborhoods and for low-carbon , yet critics note that poor execution—evident in monotonous facades or inadequate open spaces—can entrench higher use and social disconnection. Social and adaptability concerns fuel further contention, with terraced houses praised for street-level access fostering neighborly interaction and over elevated apartments, as seen in estate regenerations replacing low-density slabs with terraced blocks to boost community cohesion. However, drawbacks include sound transmission through thin walls and limited expansion potential, rendering older narrow units (under 16 feet) obsolete for modern families and contributing to perceptions of uniformity that deter variety in urban fabric. While regeneration projects demonstrate adaptability through mixed-tenure integrations, debates persist on whether such typology adequately scales for rapid amid car-dependent suburbs eroding traditional social benefits.

Modern Developments and Sustainability

Retrofitting Initiatives

Retrofitting initiatives for terraced houses focus on upgrading insulation, glazing, heating systems, and ventilation to improve energy performance while addressing structural and heritage constraints inherent to these densely packed, often historic dwellings. In the United Kingdom, where terraced homes represent about 30% of the housing stock and many predate 1919, social housing providers have led targeted programs; for example, MSV Housing Group allocated over £8 million in 2025 to retrofit 1,800 pre-1919 terraced properties, incorporating cavity wall insulation, loft upgrades, and low-carbon heating to reduce energy use and enhance occupant health. Government-backed efforts, including Historic England's guidance on retrofitting heritage buildings, emphasize fabric-first approaches—prioritizing airtightness and thermal efficiency over invasive changes—to balance net-zero goals with preservation, as outlined in 2024 assessments showing viability for emissions reductions without compromising architectural integrity. Peer-reviewed evaluations underscore the potential returns: a 2024 study on a representative pre-1930s mid-terrace in the UK found that combining measures like and heat pumps achieved payback periods of 15-25 years under current energy prices, with annual heating demand dropping by up to 60%. Similarly, a of 69 historical building retrofits, including terraced types, reported average reductions of 70% post-intervention, though outcomes varied by climate zone and initial building condition, highlighting the need for site-specific modeling over generalized assumptions. In the United States, initiatives for row houses—analogous to terraced homes—have adopted standards for deep retrofits; a 2025 case study of a historic four-unit rowhouse in Climate Zone 4C demonstrated near-zero heating loads through super-insulated envelopes and with heat recovery, maintaining compliance with local preservation codes while cutting operational emissions by over 80%. Across Europe, national incentives like Italy's Superbonus 110% program, active since 2020, have subsidized retrofits for terraced and attached dwellings, enabling upgrades such as solar-integrated roofs and efficient boilers, though audits revealed uneven implementation with some projects exceeding budgets due to issues. The UK's parliamentary response in 2025 called for extended funding beyond 2026 to scale such efforts, noting that area-based schemes in terraced-dense neighborhoods yield efficiencies through shared and bulk , potentially accelerating adoption amid rising retrofit costs estimated at £40,000-£60,000 per home. Challenges persist, including tenant disruption and heritage restrictions limiting interventions like external cladding, as evidenced in Dutch collaborative deals targeting row housing clusters since 2018, which prioritize communal to mitigate cold bridging in party walls. In recent years, terraced house construction has increasingly incorporated prefabricated and modular techniques to address urban housing shortages and environmental concerns, particularly in the UK where demand for efficient building methods has surged amid the . Modular systems allow for off-site fabrication, reducing by up to 90% compared to traditional methods and enabling faster assembly, as demonstrated in projects using (CLT) panels erected in as little as five days. These approaches align with broader goals, with modular terraced homes achieving top performance ratings that can lower household bills by approximately £800 annually through superior insulation and airtightness. A key trend involves low-embodied-carbon materials like CLT, sourced from managed forests, which sequesters significant CO2—up to 37 tonnes in a single 118 m² terraced house prototype completed in in 2023—while keeping overall embodied carbon at 336 kgCO2e/m², below the 2030 target of 625 kgCO2e/m². This contrasts with conventional and methods, prioritizing renewable timber for structural elements and exposed finishes to minimize environmental impact on constrained urban sites. Design-wise, contemporary terraces often feature flexible layouts with open-plan ground floors, full-height glazing for , and stepped roofs or terraces to enhance ventilation and spatial efficiency, echoing Victorian precedents but adapted for modern needs like home offices. Government-backed initiatives, such as plans for 12 new towns announced in 2025, promote "gentle density" terraced housing with walkable layouts, local materials, and integrated green spaces to foster community while embedding from the outset, drawing on precedents like . In Europe and the , back-to-back terraced configurations, as seen in south London's Place project completed in 2020, utilize durable brick exteriors with private roof terraces and pedestrian to optimize light, , and urban integration without high-rise forms. These trends reflect a causal emphasis on : modular cuts site disruption and labor costs, enabling reproducible designs that support denser, resilient urban fabrics amid climate pressures.

Social and Economic Impact

Role in Urbanization and Housing Markets

Terraced houses facilitated rapid during the in the , where urban populations surged due to migration for factory employment, necessitating high-density solutions. From the mid-19th century, developers constructed extensive rows of terraced houses to provide affordable accommodation for the , often located near industrial sites to minimize costs and support labor mobility. This model enabled cities like and to expand residential capacity without sprawling into rural areas, accommodating demographic shifts that saw England's urban population grow from about 20% in 1801 to over 50% by 1851. In North America, particularly Philadelphia, row houses—equivalent to terraced houses—played a similar role in urban development from the early 19th century, allowing construction on narrow urban lots and earning the city the nickname "City of Homes" by the late 1800s through widespread homeownership among working families. By sharing party walls, these structures reduced per-unit construction costs and land consumption, comprising up to 70% of Philadelphia's housing stock and promoting dense, walkable neighborhoods that supported economic productivity during industrialization. This efficiency extended to other U.S. cities like Baltimore, where row houses minimized land use while providing multi-story living space, fostering urban density that underpinned commercial and industrial growth. In housing markets, terraced and row houses have historically enhanced affordability by leveraging in construction, delivering more living space per dollar compared to detached homes in constrained urban environments. Their prevalence contributed to higher homeownership rates in row-house dominant cities versus those reliant on tenements, as seen in early 20th-century where they offered economical alternatives to overcrowded rentals. Today, they influence markets by enabling higher residential densities that sustain urban economies, though modern supply restrictions via can limit their affordability benefits, with studies showing that easing such barriers increases supply by up to 0.8% within years.

Cultural Perceptions and Empirical Outcomes

In the , terraced houses were initially constructed en masse during the 19th-century to accommodate urban workers, fostering perceptions of them as symbols of proletarian drudgery and substandard living—often labeled "s" due to inadequate , minimal space, and that exacerbated transmission in densely packed rows. This view persisted into the mid-20th century amid clearances, yet widespread renovations from the onward, coupled with rising urban property demand, reframed many as resilient cultural artifacts; by 2016, desirable examples in cities like and commanded premiums for their historical charm and proximity to amenities, signaling a shift from stigma to aspirational inner-city ownership. In , perceptions lean toward pragmatic equilibrium, with terraced forms in nations like the viewed as "noble" compromises enabling solitary households within cohesive streetscapes, historically appealing to middle-class buyers for their efficient blend of independence and neighborly oversight since the . Empirical assessments of resident well-being in terraced reveal that proximity to private gardens or shared courtyards correlates with heightened satisfaction, as occupants in studies (circa 2015) rated such features as vital for psychological restoration and social interaction, mitigating the constraints of compact footprints averaging 80-100 square meters per unit. Malaysian case studies on double-storey terraces similarly document resident contentment with spatial layouts, where optimized indoor-outdoor transitions supported daily routines and elevated perceived indices, though expansions for added rooms often reflected initial inadequacies in storage or family adaptability. Conversely, shared party walls amplify acoustic disturbances, with systematic reviews of dense (2022) identifying noise privacy as a primary dissatisfaction driver, potentially reducing quality and interpersonal tolerance compared to detached alternatives. Thermal performance data underscores mixed outcomes: UK prototypes tested in 2019 simulations showed terraced configurations prone to summer overheating—exceeding 25°C indoors for over 100 hours annually under current climates—due to reduced natural ventilation from contiguous structures, necessitating retrofits like or insulation to align with occupant comfort thresholds. Broader European surveys indicate terraced-inclusive sustains viability in , comprising 53% of dwellings versus apartments in 2021 EU data, with ownership rates favoring such types for cost efficiency (average €2,500/m² build costs versus higher for semis), though intergenerational patterns reveal preferences skewing toward gardened variants for long-term family stability. These findings highlight causal trade-offs in density: enhanced land efficiency (up to 40 dwellings per ) versus amplified externalities like heat retention, informed by engineering metrics rather than idealized narratives of communal harmony.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.