Hubbry Logo
Slow-scan televisionSlow-scan televisionMain
Open search
Slow-scan television
Community hub
Slow-scan television
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Slow-scan television
Slow-scan television
Slow-scan television
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
SSTV transmissions often include station call signs, RST reception reports, and amateur radio jargon.

Slow-scan television (SSTV) is a picture transmission method, used mainly by amateur radio operators, to transmit and receive static pictures via radio in monochrome or color.

A literal term for SSTV is narrowband television. Analog broadcast television requires at least 6 MHz wide channels, because it transmits 25 or 30 picture frames per second (see ITU analog broadcast standards), but SSTV usually only takes up to a maximum of 3 kHz of bandwidth. It is a much slower method of still picture transmission, usually taking from about eight seconds to a couple of minutes, depending on the mode used, to transmit one image frame.

Since SSTV systems operate on voice frequencies, amateurs use it on shortwave (also known as HF by amateur radio operators), VHF and UHF radio.

History

[edit]

Concept

[edit]

The concept of SSTV was introduced by Copthorne Macdonald[1] in 1957–58.[2] He developed the first SSTV system using an electrostatic monitor and a vidicon tube. It was deemed sufficient to use 120 lines and about 120 pixels per line to transmit a black-and-white still picture within a 3 kHz telephone channel. First live tests were performed on the 11-meter ham band – which was later given to the CB service in the US. In the 1970s, two forms of paper printout receivers were invented by hams.

Early usage in space exploration

[edit]
Astronaut Gordon Cooper, SSTV transmission from Faith 7

SSTV was used to transmit images of the far side of the Moon from Luna 3.[3]

The first space television system was called Seliger-Tral-D and was used aboard Vostok. Vostok was based on an earlier videophone project which used two cameras, with persistent LI-23 iconoscope tubes. Its output was 10 frames per second at 100 lines per frame video signal.

  • The Seliger system was tested during the 1960 launches of the Vostok capsule, including Sputnik 5, containing the space dogs Belka and Strelka, whose images are often mistaken for the dog Laika, and the 1961 flight of Yuri Gagarin, the first man in space on Vostok 1.
  • Vostok 2 and thereafter used an improved 400-line television system referred to as Topaz.
  • A second generation system (Krechet, incorporating docking views, overlay of docking data, etc.) was introduced after 1975.

A similar concept, also named SSTV, was used on Faith 7,[4] as well as on the early years of the NASA Apollo program.

  • The Faith 7 camera transmitted one frame every two seconds, with a resolution of 320 lines.[4]
NASA slow-scan image from the Moon

The Apollo TV cameras used SSTV to transmit images from inside Apollo 7, Apollo 8, and Apollo 9, as well as the Apollo 11 Lunar Module television from the Moon. NASA had taken all the original tapes and erased them for use on subsequent missions; however, the Apollo 11 Tape Search and Restoration Team formed in 2003 tracked down the highest-quality films among the converted recordings of the first broadcast, pieced together the best parts, then contracted a specialist film restoration company to enhance the degraded black-and-white film and convert it into digital format for archival records.[5]

  • The SSTV system used in NASA's early Apollo missions transferred 10 frames per second with a resolution of 320 frame lines in order to use less bandwidth than a normal TV transmission.[6]
  • The early SSTV systems used by NASA differ significantly from the SSTV systems currently in use by amateur radio enthusiasts today.

Progression

[edit]

Commercial systems started appearing in the United States in 1970, after the FCC had legalized the use of SSTV for advanced level amateur radio operators in 1968.

SSTV originally required quite a bit of specialized equipment. Usually there was a scanner or camera, a modem to create and receive the characteristic audio howl, and a cathode-ray tube from a surplus radar set. The special cathode-ray tube would have "long persistence" phosphors that would keep a picture visible for about ten seconds.

The modem would generate audio tones between 1,200 and 2,300 Hz from picture signals, and picture signals from received audio tones. The audio would be attached to a radio receiver and transmitter.

Current systems

[edit]

A modern system, having gained ground since the early 1990s, uses a personal computer and special software in place of much of the custom equipment. The sound card of a PC, with special processing software, acts as a modem. The computer screen provides the output. A small digital camera or digital photos provide the input.

1
2
3
4
A spectrogram of the beginning of an SSTV transmission
1
Calibration header
2
VIS code
3
RGB scanlines
4
Sync pulses

Modulation

[edit]

Like the similar radiofax mode, SSTV is an analog signal. SSTV uses frequency modulation, in which every different value of brightness in the image gets a different audio frequency. In other words, the signal frequency shifts up or down to designate brighter or darker pixels, respectively. Color is achieved by sending the brightness of each color component (usually red, green and blue) separately. This signal can be fed into an SSB transmitter, which in part modulates the carrier signal.

There are a number of different modes of transmission, but the most common ones are Martin M1 (popular in Europe) and Scottie S1 (used mostly in the USA).[7] Using one of these, an image transfer takes 114 (M1) or 110 (S1) seconds. Some black and white modes take only 8 seconds to transfer an image.

[edit]

A calibration header is sent before the image. It consists of a 300-millisecond leader tone at 1,900 Hz, a 10 ms break at 1,200 Hz, another 300-millisecond leader tone at 1,900 Hz, followed by a digital VIS (vertical interval signaling) code, identifying the transmission mode used. The VIS consists of bits of 30 milliseconds in length. The code starts with a start bit at 1,200 Hz, followed by 7 data bits (LSB first; 1,100 Hz for 1, 1,300 Hz for 0). An even parity bit follows, then a stop bit at 1,200 Hz. For example, the bits corresponding the decimal numbers 44 or 32 imply that the mode is Martin M1, whereas the number 60 represents Scottie S1.

Scanlines

[edit]
Slow-scan test card

A transmission consists of horizontal lines, scanned from left to right. The color components are sent separately one line after another. The color encoding and order of transmission can vary between modes. Most modes use an RGB color model; some modes are black-and-white, with only one channel being sent; other modes use a YC color model, which consists of luminance (Y) and chrominance (R–Y and B–Y). The modulating frequency changes between 1,500 and 2,300 Hz, corresponding to the intensity (brightness) of the color component. The modulation is analog, so even though the horizontal resolution is often defined as 256 or 320 pixels, they can be sampled using any rate. The image aspect ratio is conventionally 4:3. Lines usually end in a 1,200 Hz horizontal synchronization pulse of 5 milliseconds (after all color components of the line have been sent); in some modes, the synchronization pulse lies in the middle of the line.

Modes

[edit]

Below is a table of some of the most common SSTV modes and their differences.[7] These modes share many properties, such as synchronization and/or frequencies and grey/color level correspondence. Their main difference is the image quality, which is proportional to the time taken to transfer the image and in the case of the AVT modes, related to synchronous data transmission methods and noise resistance conferred by the use of interlace.

Family Developer Name Color Time Lines
AVT Ben Blish-Williams, AA7AS / AEA 8 BW or 1 of R, G, or B 8 s 128×128
16w BW or 1 of R, G, or B 16 s 256×128
16h BW or 1 of R, G, or B 16 s 128×256
32 BW or 1 of R, G, or B 32 s 256×256
24 RGB 24 s 128×128
48w RGB 48 s 256×128
48h RGB 48 s 128×256
104 RGB 96 s 256×256
Martin Martin Emmerson - G3OQD M1 RGB 114 s 240¹
M2 RGB 58 s 240¹
Robot Robot SSTV 8 BW or 1 of R, G or B 8 s 120
12 YUV 12 s 128 luma, 32/32 chroma × 120
24 YUV 24 s 128 luma, 64/64 chroma × 120
32 BW or 1 of R, G or B 32 s 256 × 240
36 YUV 36 s 256 luma, 64/64 chroma × 240
72 YUV 72 s 256 luma, 128/128 chroma × 240
Scottie Eddie Murphy - GM3SBC S1 RGB 110 s 240¹
S2 RGB 71 s 240¹
DX RGB 269 s 320 x 256
¹ Martin and Scottie modes actually send 256 scanlines, but the first 16 are usually grayscale.

The mode family called AVT (for Amiga Video Transceiver) was originally designed by Ben Blish-Williams (N4EJI, then AA7AS) for a custom modem attached to an Amiga computer, which was eventually marketed by AEA corporation.

The Scottie and Martin modes were originally implemented as ROM enhancements for the Robot Research Corporation SSTV unit. The exact line timings for the Martin M1 mode are given in this reference.[8]

The Robot SSTV modes were designed by Robot Research Corporation for their own SSTV units.

All four sets of SSTV modes are now available in various PC-resident SSTV systems and no longer depend upon the original hardware.

AVT

[edit]

AVT is an abbreviation of "Amiga Video Transceiver", software and hardware modem originally developed by "Black Belt Systems" (USA) around 1990 for the Amiga home computer popular all over the world before the IBM PC family gained sufficient audio quality with the help of special sound cards. These AVT modes differ radically from the other modes mentioned above, in that they are synchronous, that is, they have no per-line horizontal synchronization pulse but instead use the standard VIS vertical signal to identify the mode, followed by a frame-leading digital pulse train which pre-aligns the frame timing by counting first one way and then the other, allowing the pulse train to be locked in time at any single point out of 32 where it can be resolved or demodulated successfully, after which they send the actual image data, in a fully synchronous and typically interlaced mode.

Interlace, no dependence upon sync, and interline reconstruction gives the AVT modes a better noise resistance than any of the other SSTV modes. Full frame images can be reconstructed with reduced resolution even if as much as 1/2 of the received signal was lost in a solid block of interference or fade because of the interlace feature. For instance, first the odd lines are sent, then the even lines. If a block of odd lines are lost, the even lines remain, and a reasonable reconstruction of the odd lines can be created by a simple vertical interpolation, resulting in a full frame of lines where the even lines are unaffected, the good odd lines are present, and the bad odd lines have been replaced with an interpolation. This is a significant visual improvement over losing a non-recoverable contiguous block of lines in a non-interlaced transmission mode. Interlace is an optional mode variation, however without it, much of the noise resistance is sacrificed, although the synchronous character of the transmission ensures that intermittent signal loss does not cause loss of the entire image. The AVT modes are mainly used in Japan and the United States. There is a full set of them in terms of black and white, color, and scan line counts of 128 and 256. Color bars and grayscale bars may be optionally overlaid top and/or bottom, but the full frame is available for image data unless the operator chooses otherwise. For receiving systems where timing was not aligned with the incoming image's timing, the AVT system provided for post-receive re-timing and alignment.

Other modes

[edit]
Family Developer Name Time [sec] Resolution Color VIS VIS+P
PD[9] Paul Turner, G4IJE
Don Rotier, K0HEO-SK 		PD50 50.000000 320 x 256 G, R-Y, B-Y
PD90 89.989120 320 x 256 99 99
PD120 126.103040 640 x 496 95 95
PD160 160.883200 512 x 400 98 226
PD180 187.051520 640 x 496 96 96
PD240 248.000000 640 x 496 97 225
PD290 289.000000 800 x 616

Frequencies

[edit]

Using a receiver capable of demodulating single-sideband modulation, SSTV transmissions can be heard on the following frequencies:

Band Frequency Sideband
80 meters 3.845 MHz (3.73 in Europe) LSB
43 meters 6.925 MHz (pirate radio) USB
40 meters 7.171 MHz (7.165 in Europe) LSB
40 meters 7.181 MHz (New suggested frequency to include General Class licensees) LSB
40 meters 7.214 MHz Australian digital SSTV frequency (Easypal and DIGTRX) LSB
20 meters 14.23 MHz Frequency 1 analog USB
20 meters 14.227 and 14.233 MHz Frequency 2 analog to alleviate crowding on 14.23 USB
15 meters 21.34 MHz USB
11 meters 27.700 international SSTV calling +/- 30khz USB
10 meters 28.68 MHz USB

Media

[edit]
External videos
video icon Video showing images and the sound generated when sending them as SSTV audio. on YouTube
A sample SSTV transmission
An image of a sunset sent as Martin M1.
Problems playing this file? See media help.
  • Encoded image in B/W 8 system.
    Encoded image in B/W 8 system.
  • An SSTV image received by an amateur station transmitted from the ISS using the PD-120 mode.
    An SSTV image received by an amateur station transmitted from the ISS using the PD-120 mode.
  • The resulting picture following decoding of the sample SSTV transmission.
    The resulting picture following decoding of the sample SSTV transmission.
  • A Spectral Analysis of the sample SSTV transmission
    A Spectral Analysis of the sample SSTV transmission
[edit]

In Valve's 2007 video game Portal, there was an internet update of the program files on 3 March 2010. This update gave a challenge to find hidden radios in each test chamber and bring them to certain spots to receive hidden signals. The hidden signals became part of an ARG-style analysis by fans of the game hinting at a sequel of the game – some sounds were of Morse code strings that implied the restarting of a computer system, while others could be decoded as purposefully low-quality SSTV images. When some of these decoded images were put together in the correct order, it revealed a decodable MD5 hash for a bulletin-board system phone number (425)822-5251. It provides multiple ASCII art images relating to the game and its potential sequel.[10][11][12] The sequel, Portal 2, was later confirmed. According to a hidden commentary node SSTV image from Portal 2, the BBS is running from a Linux-based computer and is linked to a 2,400 bit/s modem from 1987. It is hooked up in an unspecified Valve developer's kitchen. They kept spare modems in case one failed, and one did. The BBS only sends about 20 megabytes of data in total.

In the aforementioned sequel, Portal 2, there are four SSTV images. One is broadcast in a Rattman den. When decoded, this image is a very subtle hint towards the game's ending. The image is of a Weighted Companion Cube on the Moon. The other three images are decoded from a commentary node in another Rattman den. These 3 images are slides with bullet points on how the ARG was done, and what the outcome was, such as how long it took the combined internet to solve the puzzle (the average completion time was 71⁄2 hours).[13]

In another video game, Kerbal Space Program, there is a small hill in the southern hemisphere on the planet "Duna", which transmits a color SSTV image in Robot 24 format. It depicts four astronauts standing next to what is either the Lunar Lander from the Apollo missions, or an unfinished pyramid. Above them is the game's logo and three circles.[14] It emits sound if an object is near the hill.[citation needed] As of the latest version of the game (1.12), the hill no longer transmits the signal.[15]

Caparezza, an Italian songwriter, inserted an image on the ghost track of his album Prisoner 709.

The Aphex Twin release 2 Remixes by AFX contains a track that displays an SSTV image that has text about the programs used to make the release as well as a picture of Richard sitting on a couch.

The survival horror video game Signalis contains multiple SSTV radio transmissions which, when decoded, can be used to find hidden keys and unlock a secret ending.[16]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Slow-scan television

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Slow-scan television (SSTV), also known as narrow-band television, is a communication method developed for transmitting still images over radio frequencies using a narrow bandwidth of approximately 3 kHz, compatible with standard voice channels. Unlike fast-scan television, which requires wide bandwidth for real-time video, SSTV scans and encodes images line by line at a reduced , typically taking 8 seconds or more per frame, to fit within HF and VHF bands. This technique enables long-distance image exchange via ionospheric , making it popular among operators for sharing photographs and graphics without specialized high-bandwidth equipment. Invented in 1957 by Canadian-American engineer Copthorne Macdonald while at the , SSTV was motivated by a Bell System Technical Journal article on low-bandwidth picture transmission over telephone lines, leading Macdonald to adapt the concept for ham radio use. Early prototypes used surplus cathode-ray tubes and audio modulation, with the first on-air tests conducted in 1958 on the 11-meter band; the (FCC) officially authorized SSTV on HF bands in 1968 after extensive experimentation. By the late 1970s, SSTV gained widespread adoption among amateurs, evolving from monochrome formats to color modes in the 1980s, and further simplified in the with personal computers replacing dedicated hardware. Notable applications include the 1981 transmission of images of Saturn by radio amateurs and ongoing use by the for educational SSTV events, including a November 2025 commemoration of 25 years of amateur radio on the ISS. Technically, SSTV systems encode image data as within an audio spectrum: synchronization pulses at 1,200 Hz, levels at 1,500 Hz, and white at 2,300 Hz, supporting resolutions from 120 to 256 lines per frame. Common standards include the Robot (8-second ), Martin, Scottie, and AVT modes for color, all fitting within 1–2.5 kHz bandwidth to avoid interference on voice frequencies like 14.230 MHz (20 meters) or 7.035 MHz (40 meters). Today, software such as MMSSTV or QSSTV on computers interfaces with sound cards for encoding/decoding, democratizing access and integrating SSTV with digital modes like for hybrid operations.

Overview

Definition and basic principles

Slow-scan television (SSTV) is a communication system designed for transmitting still images over radio channels, typically occupying 3 kHz or less of bandwidth, which allows it to operate within standard voice-grade audio frequencies used in . This method enables the sending of low-resolution images at frame rates ranging from 8 to 120 seconds per frame, making it suitable for long-distance propagation via ionospheric reflection without requiring equipment. The core principles of SSTV involve sequential line-by-line scanning of an image, akin to facsimile transmission, where the picture is divided into a grid of typically 120 to 256 horizontal lines, each scanned from left to right and assembled from top to bottom to form a complete frame with a 1:1 . , representing brightness levels, is encoded using (FM) of an audio subcarrier, with frequencies shifting from approximately 1500 Hz for black to 2300 Hz for white, while in color modes is handled by sequentially transmitting red, green, and blue components in separate passes or combined signals. Some implementations employ (FSK) variants for discrete pixel values, but the analog FM approach dominates traditional SSTV for its simplicity in encoding continuous tone gradients. The "slow" aspect of SSTV arises from deliberately reducing the scanning speed to compress the high-bandwidth requirements of standard video—typically several megahertz—into the constrained 3 kHz audio channel, allowing transmission over HF or VHF links without distortion. relies on mechanisms, including short line-sync pulses (about 5 ms) and longer frame-sync pulses (around 30 ms) at a fixed like 1200 Hz, which align the receiver's scan to the transmitter's, ensuring pixels are reconstructed accurately as the modulated is demodulated and displayed on a monitor or computer screen. These sync elements, often termed "blacker than black," do not appear in the visible but are essential for timing and preventing drift during reception.

Differences from fast-scan television

Slow-scan television (SSTV) fundamentally differs from fast-scan television (FSTV), also known as or ATV, in its approach to bandwidth utilization, making it suitable for constrained transmission environments such as high-frequency (HF) bands. SSTV signals typically occupy a narrow bandwidth of 300 to 3,000 Hz, akin to single-sideband (SSB) voice communications, which allows transmission over narrowband channels like HF radio links or even early lines without requiring specialized equipment. In contrast, FSTV demands a much wider bandwidth of approximately 6 MHz to accommodate real-time video signals, necessitating higher-frequency allocations in the very high frequency () or ultra high frequency () bands. A key distinction lies in the handling of motion and frame rates, where SSTV prioritizes static over dynamic video. SSTV transmits individual frames over durations ranging from 8 to 120 seconds, depending on the mode and resolution, resulting in still pictures rather than continuous motion, which aligns with its low-data-rate design. FSTV, however, operates at standard broadcast rates of 25 to 30 frames per second, enabling fluid real-time video but at the cost of significantly higher data throughput. The nature of the signals further underscores these differences: SSTV encodes images as an audio-like frequency-modulated within the , often using tones to represent and levels, which can be demodulated with standard voice receivers. FSTV, by comparison, employs a radiofrequency (RF) video carrier modulated in or frequency to carry full-spectrum broadcast-compatible signals, requiring dedicated television transmitters and receivers. These technical variances yield practical implications for deployment in contexts. SSTV's narrowband, low-power characteristics provide greater tolerance to and interference prevalent in HF amateur bands, allowing reliable long-distance via ionospheric reflection without excessive signal degradation beyond added visual "snow." FSTV, conversely, is highly sensitive to such noise and typically requires clear line-of-sight paths or wired connections for effective transmission, limiting its use to local VHF/UHF operations or networks.

History

Conceptual origins

The conceptual origins of slow-scan television (SSTV) trace back to the early 20th-century development of radiofacsimile (radiofax) technology, which enabled the transmission of still images, such as weather maps and documents, over narrow radio bandwidths similar to voice channels. Radiofax systems, pioneered in the 1920s, used frequency-shift keying to modulate analog signals representing image brightness, allowing reception on simple equipment without requiring high-speed scanning. This laid the groundwork for SSTV by demonstrating that visual information could be serialized and sent sequentially over low-bandwidth links, prioritizing fidelity over real-time motion. In the post-World War II era, amateur radio operators began experimenting with adapting television scanning principles to even tighter bandwidth constraints, driven by the limitations of shortwave frequencies where standard fast-scan TV signals (requiring several megahertz) were impractical. These efforts focused on slowing the scan rate to fit within a 3 kHz voice channel, typically taking seconds per frame rather than the thirtieth-of-a-second of broadcast TV, thus enabling still-image transmission without excessive noise or interference. The core innovation addressed the trade-off between resolution and speed: by reducing the frame rate, SSTV achieved usable image quality using existing single-sideband voice modulation, evolving radiofax's static imagery into a more dynamic, television-like format while remaining compatible with gear. The seminal prototype emerged in 1957 from the work of Canadian-American and engineering student Copthorne Macdonald (then WA2BCW), who designed a practical SSTV system as part of his studies at the . Macdonald's approach involved scanning images line-by-line at a deliberate pace—initially approximately 120 lines over 8 seconds per frame—using to encode brightness levels, directly inspired by bandwidth limitations in high-frequency amateur bands. His system, detailed in a prize-winning paper presented to the in 1958, marked the transition from theoretical experiments to a viable technology, emphasizing synchronization via tones and the use of oscilloscope-like displays for reconstruction. First on-air tests were conducted in 1958 on the 11-meter band. This foundational design prioritized conceptual simplicity, allowing operators to transmit black-and-white stills of moderate resolution (around 120 lines vertically) without specialized hardware beyond modified audio equipment.

Early space exploration applications

Slow-scan television (SSTV) found its initial practical applications in the demanding environment of 1960s , where limited bandwidth necessitated low-rate image transmission from spacecraft to Earth. The Soviet mission in 1966 marked the first use of such a system for lunar surface imaging, employing an optical-mechanical scanner with a to generate views. This facsimile-like setup produced images with approximately 6000 vertical lines over a 360-degree panorama, scanned at a rate of about 1 line per second, allowing transmission of the full panorama in roughly 100 minutes via frequency-modulated analog signals on a subcarrier within the spacecraft's telemetry channel. In the United States, the Ranger program utilized vidicon television cameras to capture high-resolution images of the lunar surface during terminal approach before impact. While earlier Block II missions (such as Ranger 3) featured a slow-scan mode with 10 seconds per frame, the Block III missions (Ranger 7 in 1964, Ranger 8 in 1965, and Ranger 9 in 1965) employed faster scan rates, including 1 second per full frame and 0.2 seconds for partial scans of 40 lines, to maximize image return over the 2.25 MHz channel under bandwidth constraints and high-temperature conditions affecting the vidicon target. The system featured six cameras—two full-scan and four partial-scan—yielding resolutions down to 0.5 meters per pixel near impact. The subsequent , beginning with in 1966, incorporated dedicated slow-scan television cameras on lunar landers to provide real-time surface views and engineering data. Each carried a single vidicon camera scanning 600-line frames every 3.6 seconds in standard mode (or 200-line frames every 60.8 seconds in a lower-rate mode), using a 220 kHz bandwidth for transmission to . This approach allowed over 11,000 images from alone, despite challenges like cosmic noise degrading signal-to-noise ratios and the need for ground-based scan converters to display the non-standard format on conventional monitors. SSTV's role culminated in the Apollo 11 mission of 1969, where astronauts deployed a Westinghouse slow-scan camera on the lunar surface, transmitting black-and-white video at 320 lines per frame and 10 frames per second. The system's low bandwidth (500 kHz) fit within the Lunar Module's S-band link, but long-distance propagation introduced noise and required real-time conversion at ground stations from the non-interlaced SSTV format to broadcast-compatible . Engineering adaptations, such as hybrid analog preprocessing to mitigate signal attenuation and one-way light-time delays of about 1.3 seconds, ensured viable imagery despite the constraints of early deep-space communication.

Evolution in amateur radio

In the 1970s, slow-scan television (SSTV) transitioned from experimental use to broader adoption among operators, facilitated by publications such as QST magazine, which featured articles promoting the mode and its potential for image transmission over HF bands. The introduction of affordable commercial equipment by Robot Research in 1970, including cameras and monitors priced around $300–$500, made SSTV accessible beyond elite experimenters, enabling widespread local and regional contacts. Early modes like Robot 36, an 8-second black-and-white format with 128 lines and 16 grayscale levels, became a staple due to its simplicity and compatibility with voice bandwidths, as detailed in the 1972 ARRL SSTV Handbook co-authored by Ralph Taggart (WB8DQT) and Don Miller (W9NTP). This period saw the first two-way color SSTV contacts in 1969, further boosting enthusiasm through QST coverage of scan converters and hybrid systems. The (FCC) had officially authorized SSTV on HF bands in 1968 after extensive experimentation. Standardization efforts gained momentum in the late 1970s, with the (IARU) Region 1 issuing technical recommendations for SSTV parameters, including a 4:3 , 120- or 240-line resolutions, and frequency shifts around 1,500–2,300 Hz for compatibility across international amateur bands. The 1978 protocol emphasized to reduce mode fragmentation, building on earlier FCC authorization in 1968 and promoting VIS (Vertical Interval Signaling) codes for automatic synchronization, as outlined in IARU guidelines. These standards, adopted by amateur societies like the ARRL, helped solidify SSTV as a recognized mode, with QST articles in 1975 detailing conversions to fast-scan TV to demonstrate practical applications. During the and , SSTV proliferated as equipment costs dropped with the rise of digital scan converters and PC interfaces, such as the Robot 1200 system in 1984, which supported color modes like Martin and Scottie at around $1,000 initially but fell to under $200 by the mid- through homebrew alternatives. Affordable scanners and software, including Signalink interfaces at $90 and programs like WinPix 32 for $79, enabled integration with personal computers, peaking participation at events like ARRL conventions where SSTV demonstrations drew crowds and fostered nets on 14.230 MHz. By the , PC-based systems with soundcards reduced setup costs to under $500, leading to a surge in activity, including the 1998 transmissions coordinated by AMSAT, which highlighted SSTV's role in amateur satellite imaging. SSTV experienced a decline in the 2000s as digital alternatives like PSK31 and over offered faster, error-corrected image transfer, diminishing traditional analog use amid the shift to broadband and software-defined radios. However, a revival occurred through like MMSSTV and high-resolution modes, sustaining SSTV in contests such as the ARRL International Digital Contest and DXpeditions, where it remains valued for its low-bandwidth efficiency on HF paths like 20 meters. Community nets, including the International Visual Communications Association schedules, and integrations with modern transceivers like the Kenwood VC-H1 at $400, preserved its niche in long-distance image exchanges despite competition.

Technical Fundamentals

Signal modulation techniques

In analog slow-scan television (SSTV), (FSK), more precisely implemented as (FM) of an audio subcarrier, encodes information by varying the instantaneous frequency of the transmitted signal to represent different brightness levels. The subcarrier is typically centered around 1900 Hz, with the frequency deviating between 1500 Hz for black and 2300 Hz for white, spanning an 800 Hz range to map the . This linear mapping ensures that each pixel's value corresponds to a unique frequency, allowing the receiver to reconstruct the image by demodulating and converting frequencies back to brightness levels, often in 128 discrete steps of approximately 6.25 Hz each. For color transmission in analog SSTV, information is encoded using signals (such as R-Y and B-Y components) transmitted sequentially on alternate lines or in specific patterns, frequency-modulated in a similar manner to avoid overlap with the band. The for can be calculated as Δf=L×(W−B)255\Delta f = \frac{L \times (W - B)}{255}, where LL is the level (0 for to 255 for white), BB is the black frequency (1500 Hz), and WW is the white frequency (2300 Hz); this formula provides the offset from the black frequency to achieve proportional deviation across the full . Digital SSTV modes employ (PSK) techniques, such as 8-PSK or quadrature PSK (QPSK), to achieve higher by encoding multiple bits per symbol on multiple subcarriers, enabling bit rates up to approximately 2 kbps in robust configurations like RDFT or DSSTV. In 8-PSK, eight phase states represent three bits per symbol, while QPSK uses four states for two bits, often combined with (OFDM) to mitigate on HF channels. Hybrid analog-digital SSTV systems enhance noise resilience through , notably Reed-Solomon codes, which detect and correct symbol errors in the decoded ; for instance, outer RS(306, k) and inner RS(8,4) codes in RDFT modes can recover images from signals with up to several percent error rates. This approach leverages the block-coding properties of Reed-Solomon to maintain image integrity over noisy links without requiring retransmission.

Frame format and synchronization

In slow-scan television (SSTV), the frame format is structured to ensure reliable transmission and decoding of static images over channels, primarily using analog within a 3 kHz bandwidth. The frame begins with a vertical interval that includes the VIS (Vertical Interval Signaling) code header, followed by sequential scan lines of video data, and concludes with elements to delineate the end of the transmission. This layout allows receivers to automatically identify the transmission mode and synchronize their display without manual intervention. The VIS code header is a 30-bit sequence transmitted at the start of each frame to identify the specific SSTV mode, such as Martin M1, Scottie S1, or Robot 36. It consists of three repeated 10-bit codes, each comprising a 30 ms start bit at 1200 Hz, seven data bits (least significant bit first) using with 1100 Hz for a logical 1 and 1300 Hz for a 0, an even , and a 30 ms stop bit at 1200 Hz, resulting in a total duration of approximately 300 ms per code or 900 ms for the full header. This repetition enhances robustness against noise, enabling automatic mode detection in compatible receivers. For example, the 0x55 (binary 01010101) is commonly used for pulses within the VIS. Synchronization is achieved through distinct pulses embedded in the intervals. The occurs during the VIS header at Hz, providing frame-level timing, while horizontal line uses short Hz tones of 4.8 to 9 ms duration (e.g., 4.862 ms in Martin modes, 9 ms in Scottie modes) at the end of each scan line to mark line boundaries and prevent drift. These pulses, representing "blacker-than-black," blank the display during retrace periods and are generated via phase-locked loops in receivers to maintain alignment. Guard bands of black-level tones (1500 Hz) separate color components or lines, ensuring clean transitions without overlap. SSTV frames typically comprise 120 to 496 lines, depending on the mode, with each line including video data modulated between 1500 Hz (black) and 2300 Hz (white), followed by the horizontal sync and optional end-of-line tones for added stability. In color modes like line-sequential (e.g., Martin or Scottie), frames cycle through red, green, and blue lines across multiple transmissions, while frame-sequential modes (e.g., early Robot) send complete monochrome frames for each primary color. The overall frame duration varies from 8 seconds for basic 128-line modes to about 110 seconds for higher-detail transmissions (e.g., 496 lines at ≈60 ms/line), incorporating brief guard bands to mitigate interference. Error detection in SSTV frames relies on parity bits integrated into the VIS code header, where the eighth bit per code provides even parity to verify during reception. In digital-hybrid modes like AVT or MP (Martin P), additional mechanisms include inverted bit transmission in headers for comparison or checksums in 16-bit VIS variants, allowing receivers to discard corrupted frames. These methods, while simple, are effective for the low-data-rate environment of , prioritizing detection over correction to maintain transmission efficiency.

Scan lines and image resolution

In slow-scan television (SSTV), images are constructed line by line through a raster scanning process, where each horizontal scan line represents a row of transmitted sequentially over the radio signal. A typical scan line lasts 60 to 67 milliseconds, depending on the regional power grid (50 Hz or 60 Hz), and consists of a pulse followed by the video signal encoding the pixel intensities. The video portion of each line accommodates 320 to 640 in standard configurations, maintaining an aspect ratio of 4:3 to mimic conventional proportions. SSTV supports a range of resolution modes defined by the number of scan lines per frame, balancing image quality against transmission duration. Low-resolution modes use 120 lines per frame, completing transmission in approximately 8 seconds, suitable for basic black-and-white or low-color images under bandwidth constraints. Higher-resolution modes scale up to 496 lines per frame, which can take up to about 110 seconds to transmit, providing enhanced vertical detail for more complex scenes while still fitting within audio channels. These modes prioritize still-image fidelity over motion, with horizontal resolution determined by the pixel count per line and vertical resolution by the total lines, often resulting in effective resolutions from 120×120 to 640×496 pixels. Color information in SSTV is encoded sequentially, either using RGB components transmitted line by line or ( and ) separation for more efficient bandwidth use. In RGB sequential encoding, each color channel (, , ) occupies successive lines or frames, with intensity levels quantized to 16 to 128 discrete steps per channel to represent or color gradients. encoding, common in early standards, transmits brightness (Y) on every line and color differences (U, V) on alternate lines, supporting similar quantization levels while reducing data for color reproduction. This approach enables 16-level for or up to thousands of colors in full modes, though actual visual quality depends on precise between 1500 Hz (black) and 2300 Hz (white). Transmission artifacts, such as image skew or slant, arise from timing errors in scan line or variations in signal propagation, causing lines to misalign and distort the rectangular image geometry. These issues are mitigated through techniques, including the use of test patterns with known bars to adjust receiver timing and phase, ensuring accurate line reconstruction. Proper also involves verifying pulses to align the overall image structure, preventing cumulative errors across multiple lines.

Operating Modes and Standards

Analog modes

Analog slow-scan television (SSTV) modes transmit still images using (FM) of an audio carrier, typically within a 3 kHz bandwidth compatible with single-sideband voice channels in . These modes encode and information as varying audio tones, with pulses ensuring proper image reconstruction at the receiver. The signal consists of a vertical sync interval, followed by sequential scan lines representing the image data, and often a vertical interval signaling (VIS) code for automatic mode identification. Common tone frequencies include 1200 Hz for sync pulses, 1500 Hz for black, and 2300 Hz for white, allowing representation between these extremes. The Robot modes, originating from early commercial equipment like the Robot Research 1200 series, form one of the foundational analog SSTV families. These modes support both black-and-white and color transmissions, using a composite format where each scan line begins with (Y) data, followed by interleaved signals (R-Y and B-Y). Black-and-white versions operate at frequencies of 1500 Hz for black and 2300 Hz for white, while color adds color sync tones at similar levels. Resolutions vary from 120 to 240 lines, with transmission times ranging from 12 seconds for low-resolution color (Robot 12) to 72 seconds for high-resolution color (Robot 72), balancing detail against conditions in HF radio.
ModeLinesPixels per LineFrame Time (s)Color Format
Robot 36 (B&W)24032036Grayscale
Robot 12 (Color)12016012Y + CrCb (4:2:0)
Robot 72 (Color)24032072Y + CrCb (4:2:2)
Scottie modes, developed in the 1980s by Scottish amateur Andy Povey, employ a line-sequential color system transmitting full lines of green, blue, and red (G-B-R order) successively for each image row. This approach simplifies decoding but requires precise synchronization, with a 9 ms horizontal sync pulse preceding each color line. Available in four variants plus a high-resolution DX mode, Scottie supports 128 or 256 vertical lines, with frame times from 36 seconds (S4, 160 × 128 pixels) to 269 seconds (DX, 320 × 256 pixels), using the standard 1200/1500/2300 Hz tones. The modes' variable speeds allow adaptation to signal quality, with S1 being particularly prevalent in amateur transmissions for its balance of resolution and duration. Additional variants like Scottie S5 provide further options for modern use.
ModeLinesPixels per LineFrame Time (s)Color Format
Scottie S1256320110G-B-R Sequential
Scottie S225616071G-B-R Sequential
Scottie S312832055G-B-R Sequential
Scottie S412816036G-B-R Sequential
Scottie DX256320269G-B-R Sequential
Martin modes, named after Czech developer Martin Distel, mirror the Scottie structure but use a G-B-R sequence with a single 4.862 ms sync pulse per full color line set, reducing overhead compared to Scottie's per-color sync. This design enhances efficiency, particularly in noisy conditions, and includes a brief color burst for phase locking the receiver's color oscillator, improving synchronization robustness. Like Scottie, Martin offers four speeds for 128 or 256 lines, with frame times from 29 seconds (M4, 160 × 128 pixels) to 114 seconds (M1, 320 × 256 pixels), maintaining the 1200/1500/2300 Hz frequency scheme. M1 remains a staple for high-fidelity amateur images due to its detailed resolution.
ModeLinesPixels per LineFrame Time (s)Color Format
Martin M1256320114G-B-R Sequential w/ Burst
Martin M225616058G-B-R Sequential w/ Burst
Martin M312832057G-B-R Sequential w/ Burst
Martin M412816029G-B-R Sequential w/ Burst
Compatibility among these analog modes posed challenges in early implementations, as differing sync durations, color sequencing, and line timings required operators to manually select the correct mode on transceivers and monitors, often leading to garbled images if mismatched. For instance, Robot's composite Y/Cr/Cb format is incompatible with the line-sequential RGB of Scottie and Martin without specialized decoding. In the , the advent of affordable personal computers and interfaces facilitated a transition toward for SSTV, enabling software-based mode detection and error correction, though analog modes continued to dominate legacy ham radio equipment and off-grid operations.

Digital and hybrid modes

Digital and hybrid modes in slow-scan television (SSTV) represent advancements developed primarily after , addressing the limitations of traditional analog systems by incorporating digital compression, error correction, and modulation techniques to enhance image quality and transmission reliability over radio channels. These modes enable the transmission of still images using voice-frequency bandwidths, typically 2-3 kHz, while leveraging computational encoding to reduce data volume and mitigate noise-induced errors. Unlike purely analog approaches, which suffer from due to imprecise tuning or interference, digital and hybrid variants prioritize robustness and higher , often achieving near-perfect reception under marginal conditions through (FEC) mechanisms like Reed-Solomon coding. The PD-120, PD-160, and PD-180 modes exemplify hybrid SSTV techniques, blending analog transmission principles with digital-inspired color encoding for efficient color image delivery. Developed in the late 1990s by Paul Turner (G4IJE) and Don Rotier (K0HEO), these modes employ for (Y) and components (R-Y and B-Y), supporting resolutions of 640×496 pixels for PD-120 and PD-180 and 512×400 for PD-160. Frame times are 126 seconds for PD-120 and 187 seconds for PD-180, achieved through YCrCb subsampling that halves vertical color resolution relative to , mimicking JPEG-like compression to minimize bandwidth without significant perceptual loss. This approach allows for sharper images than earlier analog modes while maintaining compatibility with standard single-sideband (SSB) transceivers. Hybrid systems like EasyPal integrate SSTV with broader digital networking protocols, enabling seamless image exchange via radio and internet gateways. Released around 2008 by Erik Sundstrup (VK4AES), EasyPal employs (DRM) encoding—a multicarrier modulation scheme—to transmit compressed files (e.g., images) over 2.5 kHz channels, with built-in handshaking for reliable delivery. In hybrid operation, stations without direct radio contact can forward images via through internet-linked , combining over-the-air SSTV with store-and-forward protocols for global reach. This mode supports diverse file types beyond images, enhancing versatility in amateur communications. Overall, these digital and hybrid modes offer key advantages, including resolutions up to 640x480 pixels—far exceeding legacy analog limits—and superior immunity via FEC, which corrects bit errors without retransmission, ensuring distortion-free images even at low signal-to- ratios. Additional modes like AVT90 provide further options for high-resolution transmissions. Such innovations have revitalized SSTV for modern , particularly in challenging HF propagation scenarios.

Frequency allocations and regulations

Slow-scan television (SSTV) operations in are primarily conducted within designated sub-bands of the (HF) and (VHF) allocations, as recommended by the (IARU) and aligned with national regulations. Internationally recognized calling frequencies for SSTV on HF bands include 3.845 MHz on the (using upper sideband, USB), 7.171 MHz on the (USB), and 14.230 MHz on the (USB), where operators establish contact before moving to nearby frequencies for transmission. These frequencies facilitate global interoperability while adhering to shared spectrum use. On VHF bands, 145.500 MHz serves as a calling frequency for SSTV in the 2-meter allocation, commonly used in Regions 2 and 3. The (ITU) oversees global frequency allocations through its Radio Regulations, assigning amateur service bands across Regions 1 (, , ), 2 (), and 3 () with varying sub-band structures to minimize interference. SSTV, classified as an image emission mode, is permitted within phone/image sub-bands but subject to a maximum occupied bandwidth of 3 kHz to ensure compatibility with voice communications and prevent spillover into adjacent services. Sub-band restrictions differ by region; for example, Region 1 limits image modes to narrower segments on 80 meters (3.600–3.800 MHz) compared to Region 2's broader 3.800–4.000 MHz allowance, requiring operators to consult regional IARU band plans for precise placement. National regulations impose additional constraints on SSTV use. In the United States, the (FCC) governs operations under 47 CFR Part 97, which authorizes image emissions like SSTV in specified sub-bands but prohibits any encoding or encryption intended to obscure message meaning, ensuring all transmissions remain openly intelligible to the amateur community. Similar prohibitions apply internationally under ITU guidelines, with variations such as power limits or encryption bans in countries like those in the , where compliance with local spectrum authorities is mandatory. Operators must verify local band plans to avoid violations, as SSTV's typical 2–3 kHz bandwidth aligns with these limits when using standard analog modes.

Implementations and Equipment

Hardware transceivers and interfaces

Early slow-scan television (SSTV) hardware relied on specialized transceivers and monitors developed in the 1970s, with the Robot Research Model 70 serving as a seminal receive-only unit. This device featured a long-persistence P7 cathode-ray tube (CRT) for displaying images at resolutions of 128 lines in 8 seconds or 256 lines in 34 seconds, with an of approximately 8 seconds to accommodate the slow scan rate. It incorporated 36 transistors, 12 integrated circuits, and 31 diodes to process frequency-modulated (FM) audio inputs ranging from 40 mV to 10 V, using a limiter-discriminator circuit to convert the signal to amplitude-modulated (AM) video and a for horizontal synchronization. The Robot 70 paired with electromechanical camera systems, such as the Robot 80A, which employed a 7735A vidicon tube for image capture and an electromagnetic focus coil for scanning, enabling output of both SSTV FM signals (1200-2300 Hz) and fast-scan video. These setups used voltage-controlled oscillators (VCOs) in modulators, like the , to generate (FSK)-like tones for transmission, with sync pulses at 1200 Hz, black at 1500 Hz, and white at 2300 Hz—referencing the vestigial analog modulation techniques without delving into their specifics. Power for these components came from ±15 V DC regulated supplies, and the systems required careful audio interfacing with standard single-sideband (SSB) transceivers via shielded cables to minimize RF interference. In contemporary SSTV operations, hardware has shifted toward integration with personal computers, utilizing interfaces to bridge transceivers and processing units. These interfaces, often low-cost external devices connecting via or headphone jacks, perform analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion of audio tones from HF/VHF SSB transceivers, supporting bandwidths of at least 2.5 kHz for reliable signal handling. Examples include dedicated units like the Tasco TSC-70U receiver, which demodulates incoming audio to video signals, and PC-compatible adapters that enable transmission from standard transceivers without internal modifications, limited to about 20 minutes of continuous keying to avoid overheating. Modern cameras and modulators leverage adapters for input, where (CCD) sensors capture images under low light (3-4 ) and feed them into VCO-based modulators for FSK output, typically generating 1200-2300 Hz tones adjustable via attenuators. Receivers employ digital scan converters, such as updated 1200C models with control and automatic tuning (±150 Hz), which use A/D converters to digitize demodulated audio into 128- or 256-line frames for display on standard monitors, supporting both (16 gray levels) and color modes with RAM storage for persistent viewing. These components, often powered by 12 V DC, interface directly with transceivers like the Heathkit SB-100 for seamless operation in bands.

Software tools and protocols

Software tools for slow-scan television (SSTV) primarily consist of computer programs that encode and decode images using soundcard interfaces to transmit audio signals over radio frequencies. One of the most widely used applications on Windows is MMSSTV, a free program developed by Makoto Noda, JE3HHT, that supports transmission and reception of SSTV images in various analog modes via the computer's soundcard. An updated version, YONIQ (version 1.13), released in 2020 by Eugenio Fernández, EA1ADA, modernizes the interface with features like progress indicators for image transmission and reception, while maintaining compatibility with original MMSSTV modes. For users, QSSTV provides similar functionality as an open-source application under the GPL-3.0 license, enabling reception and transmission of both analog SSTV and digital HAMDRM modes, with compatibility to MMSSTV and EasyPal protocols. , a multi-mode software, integrates SSTV operations through external plugins or companion tools like Flrig for rig control, allowing seamless switching between SSTV and other digital modes such as PSK31 or RTTY. These tools commonly incorporate features such as real-time encoding of images into audio tones, filtering to improve reception quality under poor signal conditions, and support for multiple SSTV modes including Martin M1, Scottie, and Robot standards. For instance, QSSTV includes built-in debugging tools and external program interfaces for enhanced logging, while MMSSTV offers calibration aids for soundcard timing to ensure accurate synchronization. Communication protocols in SSTV software extend beyond direct radio transmission to include network-based methods for local collaboration. UDP/IP is employed for sharing SSTV images and audio streams over local networks, as seen in applications like , which uses UDP port 6667 to facilitate SSTV exchanges in virtual radio environments. Additionally, integration allows SSTV images to be packetized and forwarded via amateur networks, such as bulletin board systems (BBS) for relaying images during satellite passes or remote operations. Open-source developments have proliferated since the 2010s, with numerous repositories enabling custom SSTV modes and enhancements. Examples include pySSTV for Python-based image generation in various formats and slowrx for decoding of analog SSTV signals from audio files, fostering community-driven innovations in and mode compatibility. These projects often build on core libraries from established tools, promoting interoperability with hardware interfaces like soundcard-to-radio cables.

Integration with modern digital systems

In the 2020s, slow-scan television (SSTV) has increasingly integrated with platforms, enabling portable encoding and decoding without dedicated hardware. Android applications such as SSTV Encoder facilitate the conversion of images into SSTV signals, utilizing the device's built-in and speaker for direct transmission through handheld transceivers in field operations. This approach supports modes like Martin, PD, Robot, Scottie, and Wraase, allowing amateur operators to generate and send images on-the-go by positioning the near a radio's audio output. Similarly, decoding apps like Robot36 process received SSTV audio via the phone's , reconstructing images from signals captured during events such as passes. Hybrid network integrations have extended SSTV's reach by combining it with internet-based protocols and weak-signal digital modes. For instance, EchoLink, a VoIP system for amateur radio, supports SSTV transmission by routing audio signals over the internet, enabling global relays where operators connect remotely to repeaters or nodes for image exchange without direct RF propagation. In parallel, experimental hybrids like FT8-IMG leverage the FT8 protocol's error-correcting capabilities to transmit SSTV images in fragmented packets, reassembled via FTP servers, which enhances reliability over long distances compared to pure analog SSTV. This mode, implemented as a modification to the WSJT-X software, operates within FT8's narrow bandwidth, making it suitable for low-power, high-noise environments. Recent advancements in technology have incorporated SSTV for low-Earth orbit imaging, particularly in amateur-led projects. The Russian UmKA-1 (RS40S) , launched in 2022 and active as of 2025, transmitted SSTV images of and educational content receivable by ground stations worldwide, demonstrating SSTV's viability in space-constrained payloads for outreach. These integrations highlight SSTV's adaptability to digital architectures, where low-data-rate imaging complements without exceeding power budgets. SSTV transmissions from UmKA-1 continued into late 2025, including events in October and November.

Applications

Amateur radio communications

Slow-scan television (SSTV) plays a significant role in by enabling operators to exchange still images over narrowband voice channels, facilitating during routine contacts and special events. This mode allows hams to transmit photographs, maps, or other graphics worldwide using standard single-sideband (SSB) transceivers, typically on high-frequency (HF) bands where propagation supports long-distance paths. SSTV's low bandwidth requirement—around 3 kHz—makes it accessible for without specialized beyond a computer interface, fostering a unique form of QSO (contact) that combines voice conversation with visual elements. In DX (long-distance) operations and , SSTV sees heightened activity on the (14 MHz), particularly during solar peaks when ionospheric enhances global reach. Operators engage in image QSOs around the international calling frequency of 14.230 MHz USB, exchanging greeting cards, station views, or maps to confirm distant contacts. Annual events like the Japan Slow Scan Television Association (JASTA) SSTV Activity Contest, held in across HF bands including 20 meters, encourage participants to log multiple image transmissions, often on frequencies near 14.330 MHz, promoting international participation and skill-building in mode-specific operating techniques. Such contests peak during high solar flux periods, as improved conditions on 20 meters enable reliable DX paths from to and the . SSTV also supports emergency applications within , where it transmits visual situation reports, such as damage assessments or resource maps, to aid when voice or text modes are insufficient. These transmissions occur on allocated HF frequencies, adhering to regulations that prioritize emergency traffic. Scheduled SSTV nets operate regularly on 14.230 MHz, serving as organized gatherings for operators to practice mode protocols, share images, and build operating proficiency. These nets, often announced via amateur radio bulletins, rotate through calling and working frequencies to avoid interference, with international activity peaking in evenings and weekends. The amateur community recognizes SSTV contributions through awards from the (ARRL), such as the DX Century Club (DXCC) and Worked All States (WAS), where confirmed SSTV contacts count toward phone endorsements, incentivizing global and domestic image exchanges.

Space and satellite imagery

Slow-scan television (SSTV) has played a significant role in space communications, particularly through integrations on orbital platforms for engagement and educational . In contemporary orbital operations, SSTV continues to facilitate engagement and scientific through transmissions from the (ISS). The on the (ARISS) program has conducted numerous SSTV events, including special activations in that featured unique image series to commemorate milestones like . For instance, the event from August 1 to 4, , transmitted 12 images on 145.800 MHz in PD120 mode, drawing over 3,200 global participants who decoded and submitted receptions. Another activation in February, coordinated with the National Orientation Training Academy (NOTA), ran from February 8 to 10 and introduced experimental modes to test reception under varying conditions. These events, operated from the ISS's Russian Service Module, highlight SSTV's reliability for broadcasting educational content, such as crew portraits and space-themed graphics, to operators worldwide. Amateur satellite projects, particularly those supported by organizations like AMSAT, have integrated SSTV for and visualization in low-Earth orbit s. Recent missions explicitly use SSTV for image transmission, such as Japan's FSI-SAT1, which planned to downlink 320x240 Earth photographs in FM-SSTV mode upon DTMF command activation, though its 2022 launch failed. A suite of Russian educational s deployed from the ISS in 2022, including RS10S through RS12S operating on frequencies around 437 MHz, routinely transmit SSTV images of and onboard experiments to engage operators. In the 2020s, advancements in low-power SSTV have expanded its viability for resource-constrained space platforms, including simulations for future missions. The ARISS Fram2Ham experiment in 2025 tested 5-watt SSTV transmissions on 437.550 MHz in PD120 mode from a simulated polar orbit, mimicking challenges like antenna orientation variations and short mission durations to prepare for deep-space amateur radio applications. This low-power approach, reduced from typical 25-watt ISS events, underscores ongoing efforts to adapt SSTV for interplanetary distances, where signal attenuation demands efficient, narrowband imaging without high transmitter demands. As of November 2025, ARISS initiated another SSTV event on November 5 from the ISS, transmitting 12 images on 145.800 MHz in PD120 mode to celebrate the ISS's 25th anniversary and Scouting involvement, further promoting global amateur participation.

Artistic and experimental uses

Slow-scan television (SSTV) has found innovative applications in artistic contexts, where its inherent signal distortions and low-bandwidth constraints produce glitch-like effects that artists exploit for aesthetic purposes. In the 1979 Pacific Rim / Slow Scan project, organized by the Western Front in , participants used NASA's ATS-1 to transmit SSTV images between remote locations in , , and the , creating collaborative visual artworks that emphasized the medium's and artifacts as elements of real-time . More recently, the 2022 New Satellite & SSTV Art Project utilized a (NORAD ID 44909) to broadcast SSTV signals, generating unique, noise-infused images that participants decoded worldwide via the SatNOGS network; these glitches from atmospheric interference were intentionally incorporated as core artistic features, turning the transmission process into a distributed, participatory . The Ghosts in the Air Glow project, supported by the Council for the Arts, integrated SSTV imagery into ionospheric transmissions via the HAARP facility in , blending slow-scan visuals with narrow-band television and to explore themes of atmospheric boundaries and human-technology interaction; artists like Amanda Dawn Christie employed these methods to produce ethereal, distorted depictions of the body and environment, receivable by global shortwave listeners. Such uses highlight SSTV's role in telematic art, where the technology's limitations foster emergent , as seen in early experimental works from the that combined SSTV with computer networking to simulate spatial simulations in architectural . In educational settings, SSTV serves as an accessible tool for teaching radio communication and STEM concepts through hands-on projects. The on the International Space Station (ARISS) program regularly incorporates SSTV transmissions from the ISS, allowing students in schools worldwide to receive and decode images during educational contacts, thereby illustrating principles of signal propagation and image encoding. For instance, the Fram2Ham mission in 2025 transmitted SSTV images to high school and university students as part of ARISS outreach, enabling participants to analyze received visuals and submit them to an online gallery for global sharing. SSTV has also been employed in youth-oriented initiatives to transmit children's artwork over radio waves, fostering and international . The Space-Pi project's satellites, such as UmKA-1 (RS40S), broadcast children's drawings in Robot36 mode on frequencies like 437.625 MHz, with events in 2024 and 2025 allowing young participants to contribute images that are then decoded by operators worldwide. Similarly, the Mars on Earth Project's KG-STV activity in 2023 involved children painting Mars-themed artwork, which was encoded and transmitted via SSTV on the QO-100 satellite; over 1,100 images were received by stations in 16 countries, promoting awareness of among youth. Experimental applications of SSTV extend to hybrid systems in extreme environments, particularly acoustic adaptations for underwater imaging. In 1977, the U.S. Navy's Subsea Slow-Scan Acoustic Television (SUBSAT) tests demonstrated the feasibility of transmitting SSTV signals acoustically over underwater channels, achieving reception from depths up to 3,720 feet using narrow-band hydrophones, which proved effective for real-time subsea visual data relay despite multipath distortions. The Underwater Multipath Propagator (BUMP) system, detailed in IEEE proceedings, further advanced this by acoustically broadcasting SSTV from deep-sea locations off , enabling low-data-rate imaging for oceanographic experiments. These prototypes underscored SSTV's adaptability to non-electromagnetic media, paving the way for subsea monitoring where traditional radio fails.

Cultural and Media Aspects

Representations in media

Slow-scan television (SSTV) has been featured in several documentaries that highlight its role in space exploration, particularly through archival footage from missions. The 1989 documentary For All Mankind, directed by Al Reinert, incorporates original slow-scan television transmissions from the , showcasing the black-and-white imagery captured by astronauts on the lunar surface and transmitted back to using SSTV technology. This compiles footage from multiple Apollo missions to narrate the broader human endeavor of the Moon landings, with SSTV sequences demonstrating the low-bandwidth video system's pioneering application in real-time space communication. In technical media, SSTV is extensively covered in publications and online instructional content. The American Radio Relay League's QST magazine has published numerous articles on SSTV since its early adoption in the community, including foundational pieces in the and 1958 issues that introduced the to hams, as well as later tutorials on equipment and operation in editions like April 1973 and 1993. These articles emphasize practical implementations, such as building SSTV adapters and decoding signals over HF bands, serving as key references for enthusiasts. Complementing print resources, reputable channels offer tutorials on SSTV decoding; for instance, the Ham Radio DX channel's video "SSTV for Beginners | Slow Scan TV Setup & Operation" (2022) provides step-by-step guidance on using software like MMSSTV for receiving and decoding SSTV signals from transmissions or passes. SSTV's visual outputs are preserved in online archives hosted by ham radio organizations, which maintain galleries of decoded images to document transmissions. The Amateur Radio on the International Space Station (ARISS) program features an SSTV gallery on its U.S. website, displaying images received during events like the Expedition 73 series in 2025, including educational motifs transmitted from the International Space Station. Similarly, the CQ SSTV website aggregates user-submitted slow-scan images from global amateur contacts, organized by mode and date, forming a dynamic archive of SSTV activity. These repositories not only illustrate SSTV's ongoing use in amateur radio but also reference its historical applications, such as in early space imagery transmissions. Slow-scan television (SSTV) has left a niche but enduring mark on , particularly within electronic music, video games, and hacker communities, where it symbolizes retro-futuristic technology and creative signal manipulation. In the realm of music, British electronic artist (Richard D. James) incorporated SSTV into his 2001 EP 2 Remixes by AFX, embedding an untitled track that consists entirely of high-frequency audio tones encoding a decodable image; this hidden visual element, revealed through SSTV software, exemplifies the artist's penchant for embedding cryptic data in soundscapes, blending analog radio aesthetics with digital experimentation. In video games, SSTV features prominently as an interactive in Valve's Portal (2007) and (2011), where players can position portable radios in specific locations to receive beeping signals that decode into static images, such as the companion cube or Aperture Science logos; these transmissions pay homage to real-world radio hobbyism while enhancing the games' themes of hidden messages and technological intrigue, encouraging players to engage with decoding tools outside the game. Within hacker and maker culture, SSTV has evolved into a tool for playful, low-tech creativity, often used to transmit memes, selfies, and custom graphics over radio frequencies, evoking 1970s amateur radio antics in a modern digital context; for instance, enthusiasts repurpose vintage SSTV monitors to "send memes" via audio tones, bridging ham radio traditions with contemporary hacking projects like Raspberry Pi-based receivers. This resurgence in the positions SSTV as a symbol of accessible espionage-like tech, appealing to communities that value signal decoding as both technical challenge and cultural .

References

  1. https://batc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Slow-Scan-Television-Explained.pdf
  2. http://www.arrl.org/sstv-slow-scan-television
  3. https://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/sstv.html
  4. http://www.wisdompage.com/EarlySSTV.html
  5. https://www.ariss.org/
  6. https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/ham_radio/sstv/slow-scan-television-tv.php
  7. https://www.sigidwiki.com/wiki/Slow-Scan_Television_%28SSTV%29
  8. https://www.arrl.org/sstv-slow-scan-television
  9. https://www.sstv-handbook.com/download/sstv-handbook.pdf
  10. http://arrl.org/files/file/Technology/pdf/an-55a-atv-handbook-1.pdf
  11. https://www.wavecom.ch/content/ext/MonitoringSystemOnlineHelp/worddocuments/sstv.htm
  12. https://www.kb6nu.com/2020-extra-class-study-guide-e2b-television-practices-fast-scan-television-standards-and-techniques-slow-scan-television-standards-and-techniques/
  13. https://www.arrl.org/files/file/Technology/tis/info/pdf/99753.pdf
  14. https://faxauthority.com/glossary/radiofax-weatherfax-hf-fax/
  15. https://radiojove.gsfc.nasa.gov/library/multimedia/audio/rfi/wefax.txt
  16. http://www.va3rom.com/docs/ATD020.pdf
  17. https://bruxy.regnet.cz/hamradio/SSTV_Library/Ralph_Taggart_WB8DQT%2C_Don_C._Miller_W9NTP_-_Slow_Scan_Television_Handbook_1972.pdf
  18. http://mentallandscape.com/V_Cameras.htm
  19. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19650001800/downloads/19650001800.pdf
  20. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5217649/
  21. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/static/history/alsj/ApolloTV-Acrobat5.pdf
  22. https://bruxy.regnet.cz/hamradio/SSTV_Library/Ralph_Taggart%2C_WB8DQT_-_The_ARRL_Image_Communications_Handbook.pdf
  23. https://www.iaru-r1.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/hf_managers_handbook_v9.pdf
  24. https://www.qsl.net/ta2mbd/help/sysop/other_docs/Technical_Recommendation.pdf
  25. https://hamstudy.org/browse/E4_2024/E2B
  26. https://vu2nsb.com/cw-digital-radio/slow-scan-tv-sstv/
  27. https://www.sstv-handbook.com/download/sstv_03.pdf
  28. https://wa9tt.com/Research_SSTV/Transmission_process/tutorial_SSTV_transmission_methodology.pdf
  29. https://www.sstv-handbook.com/download/sstv_10.pdf
  30. https://www.sstv-handbook.com/download/sstv_04.pdf
  31. https://www.digigrup.org/ccdd/sstv.htm
  32. https://www.qsl.net/k/k6eag/library/The_HRC_SSTV_Notebook.pdf
  33. https://www.sstv-handbook.com/download/sstv_09.pdf
  34. https://www.classicsstv.com/pdmodes.php
  35. http://wasstv.net/wasstv.net/index.php/pages.html
  36. https://www.arrl.org/band-plan-1
  37. https://www.iaru.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/R2-Band-Plan-2016.pdf
  38. https://www.iaru-r1.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/VHF-Bandplan.pdf
  39. https://www.iaru-r1.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/hf_r1_bandplan.pdf
  40. https://bruxy.regnet.cz/hamradio/SSTV_Library/Dave_Ingram%2C_K4TWJ_-_The_Complete_Handbook_of_Slow-Scan_TV._1977.pdf
  41. https://www.sstv-handbook.com/download/sstv_06.pdf
  42. https://hamsoft.ca/pages/mmsstv.php
  43. https://www.arrl.org/news/new-sstv-software-now-available
  44. https://github.com/ON4QZ/QSSTV
  45. http://www.w1hkj.com/FldigiHelp/fsq_page.html
  46. https://www.pa7lim.nl/peanut/
  47. https://www.sstv-handbook.com/download/sstv_08.pdf
  48. https://github.com/dnet/pySSTV
  49. https://github.com/windytan/slowrx
  50. https://f-droid.org/en/packages/om.sstvencoder/
  51. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=om.sstvencoder
  52. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=xdsopl.robot36
  53. https://www.arrl.org/files/file/VoIP.pdf
  54. https://github.com/AB4EJ-1/WSJTX_image
  55. https://hamsci.org/sites/default/files/publications/2018_HamSCI/20180224_180_HamSCI2018_Engelke_AB4EJ_FT8Image.PDF
  56. https://www.rtl-sdr.com/receiving-sstv-from-the-russian-umka-1-rs40s-cubesat/
  57. https://db.satnogs.org/satellite/SDUV-9624-5611-1090-5908/
  58. https://community.libre.space/t/umka-1-telescope-satellite-mission/10572?page=26
  59. http://sstv.image.coocan.jp/english/e_activ/active20.htm
  60. https://vk6ysf.com/sstvfrequ.htm
  61. https://www.slaarc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Amateur_Radio_SSTV_Presentation-10Jan24a.pdf
  62. http://www.arrl.org/dxcc-award-information
  63. https://www.facebook.com/ARISSIntl/posts/sstv-series-29-from-the-iss-was-a-busy-one-more-than-3200-people-submitting-a-to/1247210187211810/
  64. http://ariss-sstv.blogspot.com/2019/
  65. https://amsat-uk.org/2019/02/03/ariss-nota-iss-sstv/
  66. https://www.nanosats.eu/sat/fsi-sat1.html
  67. https://amsat-uk.org/2022/07/21/ten-amateur-radio-cubesats-deployed-from-iss/
  68. https://www.ariss.org/press-releases/fram2ham-sstv-simulation-on-iss
  69. https://westernfront.ca/archives/get/ca_occurrences/1302
  70. https://community.libre.space/t/new-satellite-sstv-art-project/9837
  71. https://ghostsintheairglow.space/about-project
  72. https://www.curiousart.org/early_digital.html
  73. https://www.nasa.gov/stem-content/amateur-radio-on-the-international-space-station/
  74. https://www.reddit.com/r/RTLSDR/comments/1cohblq/new_satellite_sstv_event_912_may/
  75. https://marsonearthproject.org/kg-stv-activity-result/
  76. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA061384.pdf
  77. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1151300/
  78. https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article-pdf/45/4/1060/18763897/1060_2_online.pdf
  79. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UJSMfdajV4
  80. https://ariss-usa.org/ARISS_SSTV/
  81. https://www.cqsstv.com/
  82. https://www.spaceflightsoftware.com/ARISS_SSTV/bycallsign.php
  83. https://www.journaldulapin.com/2022/10/24/aphex-twin-hid-an-sstv-image-on-an-ep/
  84. https://strategywiki.org/wiki/Portal/Transmission_Received
  85. https://hackaday.com/2023/11/11/ham-radio-memes-in-the-1970s/
  86. https://hackaday.com/2025/01/04/pi-pico-makes-sstv-reception-a-snap/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.