Hubbry Logo
Völkisch movementVölkisch movementMain
Open search
Völkisch movement
Community hub
Völkisch movement
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Völkisch movement
Völkisch movement
Völkisch movement
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Magazine advocating for Völkisch politics (1919)

The Völkisch movement (German: Völkische Bewegung [ˌfœlkɪʃə bəˈveːɡʊŋ], English: Folkist movement, also called Völkism) was a Pan-German ethno-nationalist movement active from the late 19th century through the dissolution of the Third Reich in 1945, with remnants in the Federal Republic of Germany afterwards. Erected on the idea of "blood and soil", inspired by the one-body-metaphor (Volkskörper, "ethnic body"; literally "body of the people"), and by the idea of naturally grown communities in unity, it was characterized by organicism, racialism, populism, agrarianism, romantic nationalism and – as a consequence of a growing exclusive and ethnic connotation – by antisemitism from the 1900s onward.[1][2] Völkisch nationalists generally considered the Jews to be an "alien people" who belonged to a different Volk ("race" or "folk") from the Germans.[3] After World War II, the Völkisch movement became viewed as a proto-fascist or proto-Nazi phenomenon in the context of German society.[4]

The Völkisch movement was not a homogeneous set of beliefs, but rather a "variegated sub-culture" that rose in opposition to the socio-cultural changes of modernity.[5] The "only denominator common" to all Völkisch theorists was the idea of a national rebirth, inspired by the traditions of the Ancient Germans which had been "reconstructed" on a romantic basis by the adherents of the movement. This proposed rebirth entailed either "Germanizing" Christianity or the comprehensive rejection of Christian heritage in favor of a reconstituted pre-Christian Germanic paganism.[6] In a narrow definition, the term is used to designate only groups that consider human beings essentially preformed by blood, or by inherited characteristics.[7]

The Völkischen are often encompassed in a wider Conservative Revolution by scholars, a German national conservative movement that rose in prominence during the Weimar Republic (1918–1933).[8][9] During the period of the Third Reich, Adolf Hitler and the Nazis believed in and enforced a definition of the German Volk which excluded Jews, the Romani people, Jehovah's Witnesses, homosexuals, and other "foreign elements" living in Germany.[10] Their policies led to these "undesirables" being rounded up and murdered in large numbers, in what became known as the Holocaust.

Translation

[edit]

The adjective Völkisch (pronounced [ˈfœlkɪʃ]) is derived from the German word Volk (cognate with the English "folk"), which has overtones of "nation", "race" or "tribe".[11] While Völkisch has no direct English equivalent, it could be loosely translated as "ethno-nationalist", "ethnic-chauvinist", "ethnic-popular",[12][page needed] or, closer to its original meaning, as "bio-mystical racialist".[1]

If Völkisch writers used terms like Nordische Rasse ("Nordic race") and Germanentum ("Germanic peoples"), their concept of Volk could, however, also be more flexible, and understood as a Gemeinsame Sprache ("common language"),[13] or as an Ausdruck einer Landschaftsseele ("expression of a landscape's soul"), in the words of geographer Ewald Banse.[14]

The defining idea which the Völkisch movement revolved around was that of a Volkstum, literally the "folkdom" or the "culture of the Volk".[15] Other associated German words include Volksboden (the "Volk's essential substrate"), Volksgeist (the "spirit of the Volk"),[5] Volksgemeinschaft (the "community of the Volk"),[16] as well as Volkstümlich ("folksy" or "traditional")[17] and Volkstümlichkeit (the "popular celebration of the Volkstum").[15]

Definition

[edit]

The Völkisch movement was not unified, instead, according to Petteri Pietikäinen, it was "a cauldron of beliefs, fears and hopes that found expression in various movements and were often articulated in an emotional tone".[18] According to historian Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Völkisch denoted the "national collectivity inspired by a common creative energy, feelings and sense of individuality. These metaphysical qualities were supposed to define the unique cultural essence of the German people."[19] Journalist Peter Ross Range writes that "Völkisch is very hard to define and almost untranslatable into English. The word has been rendered as popular, populist, people's, racial, racist, ethnic-chauvinist, nationalistic, communitarian (for Germans only), conservative, traditional, Nordic, romantic – and it means, in fact, all of those. The völkisch political ideology ranged from a sense of German superiority to a spiritual resistance to 'the evils of industrialization and the atomization of modern man,' wrote military historian David Jablonsky. But its central component, said Harold J. Gordon, was always racism.[20]

Völkisch thinkers tended to idealize the myth of an "original nation", that still could be found at that time in the rural regions of Germany, a form of "primitive democracy freely subjected to their natural elites."[9] The notion of "people" (Volk) subsequently turned into the idea of a "racial essence",[5] and Völkisch thinkers referred to the term as a birth-giving and quasi-eternal entity—in the same way as they would write on "the Nature"—rather than a sociological category.[21]

The movement combined sentimental patriotic interest in German folklore, local history and a "back-to-the-land" anti-urban populism. "In part this ideology was a revolt against modernity", Nicholls remarked.[22] As they sought to overcome what they felt was the malaise of a scientistic and rationalistic modernity, Völkisch authors imagined a spiritual solution in a Volk's essence perceived as authentic, intuitive, even "primitive", in the sense of an alignment with a primordial and cosmic order.[5]

History

[edit]

Origins in the 19th century

[edit]
Part of a series on
Conservatism in Germany
Ideologies
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Literature
Commentators
Politicians
Jurists
Activists
Parties
Active
Defunct
Organizations
Defunct
Media
Related topics

The Völkisch movement emerged in the late 19th century, drawing inspiration from German Romanticism and the history of the Holy Roman Empire, and what many saw as its harmonious hierarchical order.[1] The delayed unification of the German-speaking peoples under a single German Reich in the 19th century is cited as conducive to the emergence of the Völkisch movement.[19] The Volk were convinced that they were renouncing the ideals of the Enlightenment.[23]

Despite the previous lower-class connotation associated to the word Volk, the Völkisch movement saw the term with a noble overtone suggesting a German ascendancy over other peoples.[5] Thinkers led by Arthur de Gobineau (1816–1882), Georges Vacher de Lapouge (1854–1936), Houston Stewart Chamberlain (1855–1927), Ludwig Woltmann (1871–1907) and Alexis Carrel (1873–1944) were inspired by Charles Darwin's theory of evolution in advocating a "race struggle" and a hygienist vision of the world. They had conceptualized a racialist and hierarchical definition of the peoples of the world where Aryans (or Germans) had to be at the summit of the white race. The purity of the bio-mystical and primordial nation theorized by the Völkisch thinkers then began to be seen as having been corrupted by foreign elements, Jewish in particular.[1]

Before World War I

[edit]
Flag of the Order of the New Templars designed 1907 with a swastika used as völkisch (German ethno-nationalist) symbol

The same word Volk was used as a flag for new forms of ethnic nationalism, as well as by international socialist parties as a synonym for the proletariat in the German lands. From the left, elements of the folk-culture spread to the parties of the middle classes.[24]

Although the primary interest of the Germanic mystical movement was the revival of native pagan traditions and customs (often set in the context of a quasi-theosophical esotericism), a marked preoccupation with purity of race came to motivate its more politically oriented offshoots, such as the Germanenorden (the Germanic or Teutonic Order), a secret society founded at Berlin in 1912 which required its candidates to prove that they had no "non-Aryan" bloodlines and required from each a promise to maintain purity of his stock in marriage. Local groups of the sect met to celebrate the summer solstice, an important neopagan festivity in völkisch circles (and later in Nazi Germany), and more regularly to read the Eddas as well as some of the German mystics.[25][better source needed]

Not all folkloric societies with connections to Romantic nationalism were located in Germany. The Völkisch movement was a force as well in Austria.[26] Meanwhile, the community of Monte Verità ('Mount Truth') which emerged in 1900 at Ascona, Switzerland is described by the Swiss art critic Harald Szeemann as "the southernmost outpost of a far-reaching Nordic lifestyle-reform, that is, alternative movement".[27]

Weimar Republic

[edit]

The political agitation and uncertainty that followed World War I nourished a fertile background for the renewed success of various Völkisch sects that were abundant in Berlin at the time,[9] but if the Völkisch movement became significant by the number of groups during the Weimar Republic,[28] they were not so by the number of adherents.[9] A few Völkische authors tried to revive what they believed to be a true German faith (Deutschglaube), by resurrecting the cult of the ancient Germanic gods.[29] Various occult movements such as ariosophy were connected to Völkisch theories,[30] and artistic circles were largely present among the Völkischen, like the painters Ludwig Fahrenkrog (1867–1952) and Fidus (1868–1948).[9] By May 1924, essayist Wilhelm Stapel perceived the movement as capable of embracing and reconciling the whole nation: in his view, Völkisch had an idea to spread instead of a party programme and were led by heroes — not by "calculating politicians".[31] Scholar Petteri Pietikäinen also observed Völkisch influences on Carl Gustav Jung.[18]

A major political vehicle for the Völkisch movement during this era was the German Völkisch Freedom Party (Deutschvölkische Freiheitspartei, DVFP), founded in December 1922 when key antisemitic figures split from the conservative German National People's Party. The DVFP openly called for a "völkisch dictatorship" and briefly formed a major electoral alliance with the banned National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) in 1924. Campaigning together as the National Socialist Freedom Movement, the alliance won 32 seats in the Reichstag, demonstrating that Völkisch ideology had a significant electoral presence independent of the early NSDAP.[32]

Influence on Nazism

[edit]
Part of a series on
Nazism
Organizations
History

Final Solution

Ideology
Politicians
Ideologues

Pre-Machtergreifung

Post-Machtergreifung

Literature
Religion
Outside Germany
Parties
Lists
Related topics

The völkisch ideologies were influential in the development of Nazism.[33] Indeed, Joseph Goebbels publicly asserted in the 1927 Nuremberg rally that if the populist (völkisch) movement had understood power and how to bring thousands out in the streets, it would have gained political power on 9 November 1918 (the outbreak of the SPD-led German Revolution of 1918–1919, end of the German monarchy).[34] Nazi racial understanding was couched in völkisch terms, as when Eugen Fischer delivered his inaugural address as Nazi rector, The Conception of the Völkisch state in the view of biology (29 July 1933).[35] Karl Harrer, the Thule Society member most directly involved in the creation of the DAP in 1919, was sidelined at the end of the year when Hitler drafted regulations against conspiratorial circles, and the Thule Society was dissolved a few years later.[36] The völkisch circles handed down one significant legacy to the Nazis: In 1919, Thule Society member Friedrich Krohn designed the original version of the Nazi swastika.[37]

In January 1919, the Thule Society was instrumental in the foundation of the German Workers' Party (DAP), which later became the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), commonly called the Nazi Party. Thule Society members or visiting guests of the Thule Society who would later join the Nazi Party included Rudolf Hess, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Gottfried Feder, Dietrich Eckart and Karl Harrer. Notably, Adolf Hitler was never a member of the Thule Society and Rudolf Hess and Alfred Rosenberg were only visiting guests of the Thule Society in the early years before they came to prominence in the Nazi movement.[38] After being appointed Chairman of the NSDAP in 1921, Hitler moved to sever the party's link with the Thule Society, expelling Harrer in the process; the Society subsequently fell into decline and was dissolved in 1925.[39]

Post-war legacy

[edit]

Material from the major völkisch writers such as Herman Wirth, Wilhelm Teudt and Bernhard Kummer has continued to appear in some post-war groups in German-speaking Europe, notably occult and modern pagan far-right groups, such as Artgemeinschaft, and green-alternative groups interested in völkisch theses about Germanic matriarchy and ecology. There have been some supporters of völkisch material among the European New Right. A few völkisch motifs have appeared among British and American modern pagans.[40] The literary scholar Stefanie von Schnurbein argues that patterns reminiscent of völkisch thinking appear in some fantasy literature.[41]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Völkisch movement

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Völkisch movement was an ideological and social current in late 19th- and early 20th-century that sought to foster a racially homogeneous Germanic folk community () through the revival of pre-Christian traditions, rural lifestyles, and ethnic purity, while rejecting urban modernity, , and foreign cultural influences. Emerging amid the Wilhelmine era's nationalist ferment, with roots in the 1880s language societies and organized , the movement coalesced around the term völkisch, first coined in 1875 by Hermann von Pfister-Schwaighusen and gaining prominence by the as a banner for cultural and racial renewal. Central to its worldview was the notion of (blood and soil), linking racial essence to the land and advocating eugenic practices, lifestyle reforms, and a völkisch religion detached from Christianity's Roman influences, often envisioning "one , one , one ." Influential precursors included and Julius Langbehn, whose writings critiqued contemporary society and called for a spiritual-national awakening, alongside figures like and who amplified antisemitic and racial themes. The movement manifested in diverse organizations, from youth groups and settlement societies to pagan-inspired sects, promoting anti-urbanism, anti-Romanism, and opposition to . Though fragmented and lacking unified leadership, the Völkisch ideology profoundly shaped National Socialism by supplying its pagan-religious undertones, racial doctrines, and antisemitic framework, with many early Nazis emerging from völkisch circles and incorporating its modernist-pagan elements into and church infiltration efforts. Its emphasis on ethnic exclusivity and cultural authenticity resonated amid post-World War I disillusionment, contributing to broader far-right mobilization, yet it also sparked internal rivalries and tensions with established conservatism.

Terminology and Core Ideology

Etymology and Translation

The adjective völkisch originates from the German noun Volk, denoting "people," "folk," or "nation" in a collective ethnic sense, combined with the adjectival suffix -isch, which indicates pertinence or resemblance and traces to Indo-European -isk (as in Gothic -isks or Old High German -isc). The root Volk itself derives from Proto-Germanic *fulką, encompassing meanings of populace, tribe, or army, akin to English "folk." Initially appearing in the mid-19th century as a rendering of Latin popularis to signify "popular" or "of the " in a populist vein, the term gained ideological weight by the 1870s amid rising , shifting toward connotations of organic, blood-based ethnic community bound to soil and tradition. In English, völkisch lacks a precise equivalent due to its fusion of cultural, racial, and mystical elements, and is commonly left untranslated or rendered as "folkish," "ethnic," or "völkisch" to retain specificity, avoiding dilutions like mere "nationalist" that overlook its emphasis on primordial folk essence.

Definition and Key Concepts

The Völkisch movement constituted a German ethno-nationalist ideological and cultural phenomenon that originated in the Wilhelmine around the mid-1890s, seeking the rebirth of the German Volkstum through a synthesis of racial purity and indigenous spirituality. At its core lay the concept of the , understood as an organic, racially homogeneous community defined by shared blood (Blut), historical destiny, and cultural essence, which demanded a corresponding racial state to preserve its vitality against perceived threats of degeneration. This worldview rejected liberal and urban industrialization, favoring instead an agrarian, nature-bound existence that mirrored the holistic of the folk community. A pivotal principle was (blood and soil), which asserted an intrinsic, mystical bond between the racial lineage of the and its ancestral territory, positing that true national strength derived from this unsevered connection rather than abstract political constructs. Racial ideology formed the foundational axis, drawing from Arthur de Gobineau's theories of Aryan superiority and social Darwinist interpretations, while emphasizing Nordic or Germanic racial traits and decrying miscegenation as a cause of cultural decline. Many völkisch groups enforced membership via "" to affirm racial loyalty, and they often critiqued as alien due to its Judeo-Semitic origins, advocating alternatives like Deutschchristentum or outright pagan revivals to cultivate a faith aligned with Germanic racial identity. Intellectual progenitors such as and Julius Langbehn advanced these ideas by framing national regeneration around racial and cultural purification, influencing a broader of modernity's corrosive effects on ethnic cohesion. The term "völkisch" was first coined in by Hermann von Pfister-Schwaighusen and gained organizational traction by with publications like the journal; prior to , the movement encompassed roughly 10,000 dedicated adherents, mainly consisting of male professionals such as teachers and journalists. Slogans encapsulating its triad of imperatives included "One People, One , One ," underscoring the inseparability of racial, political, and religious dimensions in forging an authentic German existence.

Philosophical Foundations

The Völkisch movement's philosophy centered on an organicist view of the as a living entity defined by inherited racial essence, linguistic heritage, and inseparable ties to the ancestral homeland. Drawing from , this conception echoed Johann Gottfried Herder's early formulation of Volksgeist, the unique cultural and spiritual character of each people, which emphasized particularist development over Enlightenment universalism and . Völkisch interpreters radicalized Herder's ideas by biologizing them, positing the not merely as a cultural-linguistic community but as a blood-bound racial threatened by modern and foreign influences. This framework rejected abstract in favor of intuitive, folk-derived authority rooted in soil and tradition, viewing historical progress as a degeneration from primordial Germanic vitality. Influential thinkers like (1827–1891) provided intellectual scaffolding by urging a national-religious awakening that subordinated to a purified Germanic , decrying as a corrosive, rootless force alien to organic community. Lagarde's writings, which blended orientalist scholarship with calls for cultural , inspired Völkisch anti-Semitism and the quest for an authentic "völkisch " beyond institutionalized . Similarly, Julius Langbehn's 1890 tract as Educator idealized the artist as a symbol of Germanic intuitive genius, advocating for a messianic leader to combat intellectualism, , and racial dilution through renewed ties to nature and . Langbehn's anti-modern critique framed the as a mystical whole requiring hierarchical guidance to reclaim its creative essence from democratic and cosmopolitan decay. Central to this worldview was the (blood and soil) principle, which asserted that racial purity—embodied in "" blood—derived vitality solely from generational attachment to specific territories, rendering migration or mixing detrimental to national health. This agrarian mysticism opposed industrial capitalism and parliamentary liberalism as symptoms of spiritual alienation, promoting instead a return to peasant lifestyles, , and pre-Christian customs as antidotes to mechanized existence. While later systematized under National , these foundations reflected a causal logic wherein environmental rootedness causally sustained racial vigor, with empirical appeals to and purportedly validating Germanic superiority over "nomadic" Semitic or Slavic elements.

Historical Development

19th-Century Origins

The Völkisch movement originated in the cultural and intellectual currents of 19th-century German Romantic nationalism, which sought to forge a unified national identity amid the fragmentation following the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806 and the Napoleonic invasions. This period saw intellectuals respond to perceived threats of cultural dilution by emphasizing the organic unity of the Volk—understood as the ethnic German people bound by shared blood, language, and customs—contrasting it with abstract, state-centered patriotism. Early influences included Johann Gottlieb Fichte's Addresses to the German Nation (1808), which called for spiritual regeneration through Germanic heritage, and Friedrich Jahn's promotion of physical education as a means to cultivate national vigor starting in the 1810s. These efforts laid groundwork for viewing the Volk as a living organism rooted in pre-Christian Germanic traditions, rather than Roman or Enlightenment models. Parallel developments in collection reinforced this ethnic focus, with the publishing Kinder- und Hausmärchen in 1812 to preserve purportedly authentic peasant tales as expressions of the German soul. By the mid-19th century, amid the 1848 revolutions and Bismarck's unification in 1871, völkisch precursors shifted toward anti-urban sentiments, decrying industrialization and as corrosive to rural, folkish purity. Thinkers like (1827–1891) advocated for a hierarchical, racially conscious Germanic revival, influencing associations that promoted Heimatschutz (homeland protection) from the onward. This era marked the infusion of into , drawing on linguistic scholarship positing Indo-European kinship to prioritize "" lineage over civic inclusion. In the and 1880s, völkisch ideas coalesced in groups like the Bayreuth Circle around , whose operas from 1876 idealized mythic Germanic heroism while critiquing modern cosmopolitanism. These origins reflected a causal reaction to rapid modernization and external pressures, such as French cultural dominance, fostering a that privileged empirical ties of descent and soil over universalist ideals—though early expressions remained more cultural than explicitly political. By the century's close, this framework had evolved to encompass antisemitic undertones, as articulated by figures like Lagarde, who in works from the urged purging "alien" elements to restore vital .

Pre-World War I Expansion

The völkisch movement expanded intellectually in the decades before through publications promoting racial mysticism, anti-urbanism, and Germanic revivalism. Houston Stewart Chamberlain's Die Grundlagen des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts (1899), which posited the Teutonic race as the creative force of European while decrying Jewish influence as corrosive, became a cornerstone text, influencing völkisch circles by synthesizing racial theory with . This built on earlier works like Julius Langbehn's Rembrandt als Erzieher (1890), which idealized rural German folk life against modern industrialization and . Such texts circulated widely among intellectuals and nationalists, fostering a that prioritized Blut und Boden () over liberal individualism. Organizational growth paralleled this ideological diffusion, with groups like the (Alldeutscher Verband), founded in 1891 from colonial advocacy networks, emerging as a key vehicle for völkisch . Under leaders such as Ernst Hasse until 1908 and Heinrich Claß thereafter, the league promoted ethnic homogenization, Social Darwinist racism, and territorial demands in and overseas, opposing Slavic and Jewish "elements" within . By 1914, membership reached approximately 17,000, drawn primarily from the educated (Bildungsbürgertum), reflecting broader appeal amid fears of national dilution post-unification. The league's activities included lobbying for naval expansion and anti-Polish policies, linking völkisch racialism to geopolitical aggression. Youth movements amplified völkisch themes among the younger generation, emphasizing nature communion and rejection of . The , formalized on November 4, 1901, by Hermann Hoffmann and others in Berlin-Steglitz, started with about 100 members but expanded to 25,000–40,000 adherents by 1913 across affiliated hiking groups, promoting folk songs, peasant attire, and anti-materialist ethos that aligned with völkisch . These groups, while initially apolitical, increasingly incorporated racial purity ideals and Germanic pagan motifs, serving as incubators for nationalist sentiment among bourgeois disillusioned with Wilhelmine . Esoteric and secret societies further institutionalized völkisch occultism, culminating in the Germanenorden's founding around 1911–1912 as a blending , Nordic mythology, and anti-Semitic ritualism. With branches in major cities, it attracted elites seeking spiritual renewal through racial esotericism, prefiguring post-war groups like the . This proliferation of völkisch associations—numbering dozens by 1914—reflected the movement's penetration into cultural and fringe political spheres, though it remained marginal compared to mainstream parties.

World War I and Weimar Republic

The Völkisch movement initially supported Germany's entry into in 1914, framing the conflict as an existential struggle for the preservation of the Germanic against perceived racial threats from Slavic peoples, French influences, and internal enemies. Organizations affiliated with völkisch ideology, such as the , advocated aggressive war aims including territorial annexations in to secure and ethnic homogenization. Völkisch publications emphasized themes of blood sacrifice and national regeneration, aligning with state to foster unity around ethnic and cultural purity rather than liberal or internationalist ideals. Germany's defeat in and the imposition of the in intensified völkisch radicalism, as movement adherents rejected the armistice and republican government as betrayals orchestrated by , Marxists, and profiteers in the "stab-in-the-back" . This narrative, propagated through völkisch networks, portrayed the war's outcome not as a military failure but as the result of domestic subversion, eroding faith in parliamentary institutions and fueling demands for authoritarian renewal based on racial hierarchy. The war's aftermath thus shifted völkisch focus from cultural romanticism to political activism, with groups forming paramilitary units like the to combat perceived Bolshevik threats in the early revolutionary period. In the (1919–1933), völkisch organizations rejected the democratic constitution as an illegitimate imposition by Allied powers, advocating instead for a grounded in ethnic exclusivity, anti-urbanism, and opposition to Versailles reparations. Numerous völkisch leagues and parties emerged, including antisemitic associations that agitated against "Eastern Jewish" immigration and cultural "Judaization." By 1923, amid and occupation crises, völkisch radicals coordinated with nationalist factions in attempts to overthrow regional governments, as seen in the Munich Beer Hall Putsch on November 8–9, 1923, where a coalition including völkisch nationalists sought to spark a national uprising against the republic. These efforts, though suppressed, underscored the movement's role in fostering extraparliamentary violence and ideological opposition to Weimar's pluralistic framework, drawing support from disaffected veterans, students, and rural conservatives. Despite fragmentation, völkisch influence permeated right-wing discourse, promoting and as responses to perceived national decline post-1918.

Integration with National Socialism

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) originated from the German Workers' Party (DAP), founded in January 1919 amid the völkisch nationalist milieu of post-World War I Munich, and was reorganized as the NSDAP in February 1920 with the adoption of the Twenty-Five Point Program, which incorporated core völkisch elements such as racial anti-Semitism, rejection of the Treaty of Versailles, and emphasis on Volk unity. Dietrich Eckart, a prominent völkisch ideologue, facilitated the party's acquisition of the Völkischer Beobachter newspaper in December 1920, transforming it into the NSDAP's primary organ for disseminating völkisch-nationalist propaganda. Alfred Rosenberg, another key figure, contributed völkisch concepts of a racially homogeneous state, which became foundational to Nazi governance ideology. Following the failed in November 1923, the NSDAP was banned, prompting völkisch and Nazi-aligned elements to form electoral alliances like the Völkisch-Social Block in , which secured seats in the Reichstag and state parliaments while maintaining ideological continuity with the banned party. Upon the party's refounding in February 1925, assumed unchallenged leadership, capitalizing on Erich Ludendorff's defeat in the that year to monopolize the fragmented völkisch movement, absorbing its traditionalist and revolutionary factions into the party's Munich and northern wings. This consolidation integrated völkisch blood-and-soil nationalism, anti-capitalist rhetoric from figures like , and agrarian into the NSDAP's platform, positioning it as the dominant vehicle for völkisch aspirations. After the NSDAP's electoral breakthrough and seizure of power in , remaining independent völkisch organizations were systematically subsumed under Nazi control, with the regime enforcing ideological conformity through state institutions. the Long Knives on June 30, 1934, eliminated internal rivals, including Strasserite elements that had incorporated revolutionary völkisch , thereby centralizing power and purging deviations from Hitler's synthesis of völkisch traditionalism with authoritarian racial policy. By , structures like the German Labor Front (DAF), which enrolled approximately 87% of the workforce, blended völkisch communal ideals with corporatist organization, exemplifying the movement's operational absorption into the Nazi state apparatus.

Cultural and Social Manifestations

Youth Movements and Lifestyle Reforms

The Wandervogel movement, emerging in 1896 among Berlin schoolboys, represented a foundational youth initiative aligned with völkisch ideals of escaping urban industrialization through communal hiking and immersion in nature. Participants, primarily middle-class males aged 14 to 18, rejected bourgeois materialism by organizing group treks in the countryside, singing folk songs, and cultivating a romantic attachment to Germanic landscapes as embodiments of national vitality and spiritual renewal. This back-to-nature ethos fostered anti-modern sentiments, emphasizing physical endurance, self-reliance, and a rejection of mechanized society, which resonated with völkisch notions of racial purity through direct contact with the "soil" (Boden) and ancestral heritage. By the early 1900s, the had expanded into a network of over 25,000 members across dozens of local groups, officially formalized in , and influenced subsequent formations like the Bündische Jugend in the , which infused more explicit völkisch , including , rituals, and opposition to Jewish influences in . These groups promoted gender-segregated camaraderie, with boys' bands prioritizing martial-like discipline and girls' counterparts focusing on domestic folk crafts, all aimed at regenerating a purportedly degenerate through nature-based rather than formal education or sports. Empirical observations from the era, such as participant memoirs, document reduced urban vices like smoking and drinking, alongside heightened group loyalty, though critics noted the movement's potential for fostering insular over broader . Parallel to youth initiatives, völkisch adherents embraced practices—originating in the mid-19th century—as holistic lifestyle overhauls to reclaim pre-industrial vitality, including , raw food diets, and from alcohol and to purify the body as a vessel for racial essence. Proponents like Heinrich Pudor, a völkisch writer active from the , advocated nudism () as a means to liberate the body from artificial constraints, harden it against weakness, and reconnect with primal Germanic strength, establishing over 100 nudist clubs by 1913 that blended health reform with nationalist mythology. These reforms extended to , such as and herbalism, rejecting synthetic pharmaceuticals in favor of "natural" therapies tied to folk traditions, with völkisch settlements like those inspired by experimenting in communal living, fasting, and soil-based to embody blood-and-soil (Blut und Boden) principles. Such practices, while empirically linked to improved in adherents—evidenced by lower disease rates in reform colonies—often served ideological ends, positing lifestyle purity as causal to national resurgence against perceived Jewish-urban , though from the Wilhelmine shows mixed adoption rates, limited to niche urban intellectuals rather than mass appeal. Völkisch reformers critiqued mainstream medicine's , favoring empirical self-experimentation in diets and exposures, yet overlooked risks in unpasteurized foods or outdoor living, reflecting a romantic prioritization of over scientific caution.

Literary and Artistic Expressions


The Völkisch movement manifested in literature through authors who emphasized ethnic purity, rural idylls, and opposition to modernism, often drawing on romantic nationalism to idealize Germanic folk heritage. Key figures included Hans Grimm, whose 1926 novel Volk ohne Raum depicted overpopulated Germans seeking territorial expansion abroad, selling over 450,000 copies by 1933 and influencing Lebensraum ideology. Erwin Guido Kolbenheyer contributed historical novels like the Paracelsus trilogy (1926–1930), portraying heroic Germanic geniuses in conflict with alien influences, aligning with Völkisch anti-urban and racial themes. Börries Freiherr von Münchhausen produced ballads and poetry collections such as Germania (1910), celebrating medieval chivalry and peasant virtues as antidotes to contemporary decay. In , Völkisch expressions favored symbolic depictions of nature, nudes in harmonious landscapes, and mythic Germanic motifs, rejecting abstract modernism for organic, folk-inspired realism. Hugo Höppener, known as , became a prominent artist with works like Tänzerin (1896), featuring idealized nude figures embodying life reform and racial vitality, widely reproduced in Völkisch periodicals and influencing youth movements. Artistic circles intertwined with occult , producing runes-inspired graphics and blood-and-soil imagery that romanticized agrarian life and ethnic rootedness. Musical expressions involved the revival of folk songs and Germanic choral traditions, aiming to foster communal ethnic against cosmopolitan influences. Collections like those promoted in Völkisch journals emphasized peasant melodies and Wagnerian operas as expressions of innate folk spirit, with groups performing at festivals to reinforce cultural purity. These efforts paralleled literary and visual outputs in prioritizing intuitive, soil-bound creativity over intellectual abstraction.

Pagan and Heathen Revivals

The Völkisch movement incorporated elements of Germanic pagan revival as a means to reclaim an imagined pre-Christian spiritual heritage, viewing as a Semitic import that diluted native vitality. Proponents argued for a return to heathen practices rooted in , , and , often blending these with racial to foster ethnic unity and opposition to . This strand emerged prominently in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, influenced by and occultism, though it remained a minority pursuit within the broader Völkisch spectrum. Central to this revival was , an esoteric ideology developed by figures like (1848–1919) and (1874–1954), who promoted a racialized form of Germanic Heathenry. List, after temporary blindness from in 1902, claimed a divine revelation of the 18 , which he interpreted as keys to an ancient wisdom tradition in his 1906 publication Das Geheimnis der Runen. He advocated Armanism as a hierarchical, rune-based evoking a lost of supremacy. Lanz von Liebenfels coined the term "Ariosophy" in 1915, framing it as the "wisdom of the " and establishing the (Order of the New Templars) in 1907 at Burg Werfenstein, where members conducted rituals emphasizing , blood purity, and pagan symbolism like the . These efforts sought to reconstruct heathen deities and myths from Eddas and sagas, attributing to them causal powers in preserving racial essence against perceived degeneration. Practices included solstice festivals, rune divinations, and communal rites honoring ancestral gods such as Wotan, often integrated into Völkisch youth groups and secret societies like the (founded 1912) and (established 1919), which used symbols to ritualize ethnic rebirth. Mathilde Ludendorff advanced a related "Deutsche Gotterkenntnis" (German God-Knowledge) through writings in the and her husband's Tannenbergbund organization formed in 1925, promoting anti-Christian heathenry focused on innate German spiritual perception over institutionalized religion. These revivals prioritized empirical ties to and —such as interpreting prehistoric sites as sacred groves—while causal claims of paganism's superiority rested on unverified assertions of historical continuity, later critiqued for fabricating traditions amid romantic idealization.

Relationship to Nazism and Political Impact

Ideological Influences and Parallels

The Völkisch movement exerted significant ideological influence on National Socialism through its core tenets of , racial purity, and organic ties to the land, which Nazis adapted into state doctrine. Central to this was the (blood and soil) concept, emphasizing the inseparability of racial heritage and rural German soil as the foundation of national vitality; this idea, popularized by völkisch agrarian romantics in the late 19th century, was systematized by Nazi Reich Food Estate leader in his 1930 book Das Bauerntum als Lebensquell der nordischen Rasse, which framed peasant life as essential to racial health and informed policies like the 1933 Reichserbhofgesetz hereditary farm law restricting land inheritance to "pure" German families. Racial antisemitism, a hallmark of völkisch thought from thinkers like and Julius Langbehn in the 1880s–1890s, paralleled Nazi views by portraying not merely as religious outsiders but as biological threats to the Volk's organic unity, laying groundwork for the of 1935 that codified citizenship by blood descent. This völkisch racialism, infused with pseudoscientific mysticism, influenced Nazi ideologues like , whose 1930 Myth of the Twentieth Century echoed völkisch rejection of "degenerate" urban modernism and in favor of mythic folk revival. Parallels extended to anti-liberalism and nature-oriented , where both ideologies critiqued industrial and parliamentary as corrosive to communal bonds, promoting instead a hierarchical (people's community) rooted in , virtues, and rejection of "un-German" influences—evident in Nazi cultural purges like the May 10, 1933, book burnings targeting Jewish and modernist authors. Yet National Socialism diverged by politicizing völkisch into a mass-mobilizing apparatus, blending it with pragmatic and absent in the often diffuse, apolitical völkisch circles; historians note this synthesis transformed romantic ethnocentrism into totalitarian praxis, as seen in the NSDAP's 1920 program incorporating völkisch exclusion of from the while adding economic appeals.

Causal Role versus Broader Context

The Völkisch movement contributed key ideological elements to National Socialism, including emphases on racial purity, (blood and soil), and a romanticized Germanic folk community, which resonated with early Nazi propagandists and helped shape the party's anti-urban, anti-Semitic worldview. However, this influence was not a direct causal chain; Nazi leaders, including , selectively appropriated Völkisch motifs while rejecting the movement's often apolitical, esoteric, or agrarian focus, integrating them instead into a pragmatic political program that emphasized , state centralization, and . In causal terms, the Völkisch movement prepared a receptive cultural soil through its dissemination of ethnonationalist ideas in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but it lacked the or mass appeal to independently generate the Nazi breakthrough; the party's rise from 2.6% of the vote in the 1928 Reichstag election to 37.3% in 1932 stemmed more from the Great Depression's economic devastation—unemployment peaking at 30% in 1932—and the perceived failures of the than from Völkisch ideology alone. Historians note that while Völkisch thinkers influenced Nazi racial theory, the regime's policies, such as the 1935 codifying citizenship by blood descent, represented a beyond Völkisch precedents, driven by Hitler's personal synthesis of influences including and geopolitical opportunism. Broader contextual factors, including the trauma of Germany's 1918 defeat and the ' territorial losses and reparations (totaling 132 billion gold marks), fostered widespread that amplified but transcended Völkisch currents, drawing in conservative nationalists, monarchists, and even some socialists disillusioned with internationalism. The Nazis' absorption of Völkisch splinter groups, such as the 1920 merger with the , monopolized these ideas without being determined by them, as evidenced by the regime's suppression of independent Völkisch figures like after 1933. This distinction underscores that Völkisch thought was a contributory vector in a multifaceted causal web, where immediate triggers like the 1930 banking crisis and elite maneuvering (e.g., Franz von Papen's chancellorship collapse) proved decisive for Nazi accession to power on , 1933.

Post-1945 Suppression and Reevaluation

Following the defeat of in May 1945, Allied occupation authorities pursued policies that encompassed the suppression of völkisch ideology, classified as integral to National Socialist and racial doctrines. Directives explicitly prohibited the dissemination of völkisch ideas, including those promoting , , or anti-modern sentiments, with violations punishable under regulations. Publications, periodicals, and books espousing völkisch themes—such as those by pre-war authors like Erwin Guido Kolbenheyer—were systematically removed from libraries and banned from reprinting, as part of broader purges targeting over 30,000 titles deemed ideologically hazardous. Organizations linked to völkisch groups were dissolved, and public advocacy of their core tenets, like blood-and-soil , was equated with to , leading to internments and professional disqualifications during the initial occupation phase ending in 1949. In the Federal Republic of Germany (), völkisch thought faced ongoing legal and social ostracism under the 1949 and subsequent anti-extremism laws, with courts upholding bans on materials reviving ethnic purity narratives as threats to democratic order. The German Democratic Republic () similarly condemned völkisch ideology as fascist residue, integrating its critique into state that portrayed it as a bourgeois imperialist deviation suppressed by socialist reconstruction. Despite this, pockets of persistence emerged among the 12 million ethnic from , where völkisch-nationalist literature circulated semi-clandestinely in communities, framing displacement as a defense of against Slavic dominance. Historiographical reevaluation gained traction from the 1970s onward, as scholars dissected völkisch origins independent of Nazi synthesis, attributing its emergence to late-19th-century rather than solely post-1918 crisis. Works by Uwe Puschner, for instance, documented over 500 völkisch associations by , emphasizing internal diversity—from agrarian to anti-Semitic esotericism—while cautioning against retrospective conflation with . Empirical analyses, including archival reviews of pre-1933 periodicals, reveal causal links to Nazi adoption of elements like , yet underscore völkisch resistance to Hitler's centralization, with factions viewing the NSDAP as diluting authentic folk revivalism. This scholarship, often peer-reviewed and drawing on primary sources like the records, challenges earlier Allied-era dismissals but notes persistent academic framing of völkisch as a vector for , potentially amplified by post-war institutional emphases on collective guilt.

Controversies and Alternative Perspectives

Criticisms of Racism and Anti-Modernism

The Völkisch movement's core tenet of ethnic and racial homogeneity, defining the German Volk through blood ties and excluding groups like and as inherent threats, faced contemporary and historical rebukes for embodying pseudoscientific devoid of empirical validation. Ideologues such as and Julius Langbehn propagated views of superiority and Jewish "alienness," which critics including Jewish defense groups like the Centralverein deutscher Staatsbürger jüdischen Glaubens condemned in the 1890s–1910s as baseless conspiratorial myths that eroded civic equality and rational discourse. These racial exclusions, extending beyond to cultural incompatibility, were later analyzed by historians as ideologically flexible yet consistently discriminatory, enabling policies of segregation and violence without rigorous genetic or anthropological support. Socialist and liberal opponents during the Weimar era, such as members of the Social Democratic Party (SPD), critiqued Völkisch as a diversionary tactic by agrarian conservatives and nationalists to obscure class antagonisms and economic inequalities, attributing societal ills to fabricated racial scapegoats rather than structural causes. Post-1945 scholarly assessments, while sometimes influenced by imperatives, substantiated these charges by tracing how Völkisch racial mysticism—evident in publications like those of the from 1918 onward—provided causal precursors to and anti-Semitic legislation, though not all Völkisch strains were uniformly genocidal in intent. The movement's anti-modernism, manifesting in denunciations of industrial capitalism, urban "degeneracy," and parliamentary democracy as corrosive to organic folk life, elicited critiques for romanticizing pre-industrial existence at the expense of technological advancement and individual agency. Thinkers like in the 1880s lambasted Völkisch as ahistorical fantasy that ignored the adaptive benefits of , such as expanded and economic evidenced by Germany's 1871–1914 GDP growth rates exceeding 2.5% annually. Historians have argued this rejection of Enlightenment universalism in favor of intuitive, soil-bound impeded causal understanding of social progress, fostering cultural insularity; for instance, Völkisch advocacy for communes overlooked empirical data on urban health improvements, like declining infant mortality from 1900–1920 due to reforms. Such positions were seen by progressive contemporaries as causally linked to political , prioritizing mythic rebirth (Erweckung) over verifiable policy outcomes.

Defenses from Nationalist Viewpoints

Nationalists portray the Völkisch movement as an essential cultural bulwark against the fragmentation and instability afflicting German-speaking territories between and , when the dissolution of the and Napoleonic upheavals eroded traditional structures. By drawing on , Romantic literature, and agrarian customs, Völkisch thinkers sought to cultivate a unified ethnic identity centered on a shared racial essence—what they termed "Germanness"—as a cohesive spiritual force binding the . This approach, proponents argue, countered the disorienting rise of abstract state mechanisms and ideological abstractions, offering instead a grounded affirmation of collective heritage during economic and political turmoil. From this standpoint, the movement's critique of modernity's encroachments—industrialization's dehumanizing factories, liberalism's atomizing individualism, and influxes of alien cultural elements such as and —represented a realistic of threats to organic community. Advocates highlight its promotion of a nature-attuned ethos, reviving pre-Christian (e.g., Wotanism as articulated by figures like ) to reclaim an unadulterated ancestral vitality, thereby shielding the folk spirit from perceived corrosive external forces and fostering resilience through rooted traditions. Nationalist defenses further commend the Völkisch emphasis on (blood and soil) as a prescient framework for sustainable group cohesion, rooted in a romantic rejection of urban rationalism and in favor of earthy folk practices, mythology, and a return to the land. This worldview, they contend, appealed by contrasting the authentic, practical vitality of the indigenous against detached cosmopolitan influences, providing a model for ethnic that prioritized biological and cultural continuity over universalist ideals. Such arguments frame the movement not as mere reactionism but as a forward-looking assertion of kin-based , aligning with observable historical dynamics where cohesive peoples outlasted those diluted by internal diversity or external imposition.

Empirical Assessments of Social Effects

The Völkisch movement's diffuse ideological influence complicates direct empirical measurement of its social effects, as it lacked centralized policy implementation prior to its partial absorption into National Socialism. Quantitative assessments are thus largely proxied through Nazi-era outcomes where Völkisch concepts like racial purity, agrarian rootedness, and organic community informed state actions, though causal attribution remains contested due to factors such as economic recovery and wartime mobilization. Demographic policies drawing on Völkisch racial and familial ideals yielded short-term gains in s but at significant human cost. Germany's crude rose from 14.7 per 1,000 population in 1933 to 20.3 per 1,000 by 1939, attributed to pronatalist measures including marriage loans (repaid via child allowances), maternity grants, and the program, which facilitated over 20,000 "" births by 1945 through state-supported maternity homes and incentives for "racially valuable" women. These aligned with Völkisch emphases on blood purity and folk regeneration, yet the increase reversed post-1939 amid war losses, with total fertility rates remaining below replacement levels long-term, and policies enabled coercive including the sterilization of approximately 400,000 individuals deemed "hereditarily unfit" under the 1933 Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring. No sustained population health benefits are evidenced; declined modestly from 54.6 per 1,000 live births in 1933 to 39.0 by 1938, but this mirrored broader European trends driven by investments rather than Völkisch ideology alone. Agrarian reforms inspired by "" (Blut und Boden) rhetoric, a Völkisch staple popularized by , aimed to foster rural self-sufficiency and hereditary estates but produced mixed economic results with limited social uplift. The Reichserbhofgesetz restricted farm sales and inheritance to preserve family holdings, affecting over 700,000 estates under 125 hectares, yet it constrained market flexibility, contributing to agricultural inefficiencies and food shortages by 1939 despite initial output gains from and drives. Empirical analyses indicate no broad improvement in rural living standards; farm incomes stagnated relative to urban wages, and rural depopulation persisted, with Völkisch failing to reverse trends that saw urban population share rise from 75% in to higher wartime peaks. Claims of enhanced social cohesion via Völkisch-derived Volksgemeinschaft ideals lack robust quantitative support and are undermined by evidence of enforced conformity over organic unity. Nazi organizations like the and German Labor Front achieved near-universal nominal membership (e.g., 8 million youth by 1939), correlating with short-term reductions in reported class-based strikes (from 4,000 in to near zero post-1933), but surveys and records reveal pervasive surveillance and mutual suspicion, with over 1.5 million files by 1945 indicating fragmented trust rather than genuine solidarity. Longitudinal studies of postwar German society show no enduring cohesion legacy from these efforts; instead, the exclusionary framework exacerbated divisions, culminating in the displacement and of 6 million and millions of others, with societal trauma persisting in elevated burdens documented in 1950s refugee cohorts. Overall, while isolated metrics suggest tactical successes, causal realism points to net destructive effects, as Völkisch exclusionism precluded inclusive formation evidenced in comparative analyses of non-authoritarian interwar states.

Modern Neo-Völkisch Adaptations

Contemporary Far-Right and Ecological Groups

In , neo-Völkisch groups have revived ideology through rural settlements that blend ethno-nationalism with ecological self-sufficiency, establishing around 163 sites involving approximately 1,000 activists as documented in 2021 investigations. These communities practice organic agriculture, husbandry of indigenous animal breeds, and neo-pagan rituals to enact hierarchical, racially homogeneous living, echoing the 1920s Artaman League's agrarian experiments. Sites are concentrated in eastern and northern regions, such as with 39 locations and Mecklenburg-Western with 19, where participants organize youth camps, traditional crafts, and cultural theater to subordinate individuals to collective ethnic identity. These settlements prefigure authoritarian sustainability by framing environmental resilience as dependent on racial purity and anti-democratic structures, rejecting globalist solutions in favor of ethno-securitized responses to pressures. Proponents integrate Völkisch —emphasizing Heimat (homeland) and organic unity of people and land—with modern concerns, positioning the German Volk as natural guardians against ecological disorder caused by migration and . This ecological manifests in land reclamation (Landnahme) practices over the past three decades, particularly in , where far-right networks, including AfD affiliates, adapt agrarian ideals to envision racially exclusive futures. Transnationally, Folkish or neo-Völkisch paganism within far-right circles extends these themes, fusing Germanic Heathenry with racial exclusivity and nature-based traditionalism. Groups like the , refounded in 1996, limit membership to those of European descent and promote spiritual ties to ancestral soil through rituals and . Similarly, , established in 1995, links pagan cosmology to white nationalist ecology, advocating organic lifestyles and anti-modern purity. Online propagators, such as Hearth and Helm, normalize these ideas via digital media, aestheticizing , , and folk vitality to merge Völkisch heritage with wellness and .

Global Extensions and Heathenry Debates

The Völkisch movement's romanticization of pre-Christian Germanic contributed to the foundations of modern Heathenry, a neopagan reconstruction that spread internationally from its German origins in the early 20th century, particularly to and following the revival. This extension occurred through immigrant communities and cultural interest in , leading to organizations such as the Icelandic , established in 1972 and granted official recognition in 1973, which emphasized ancestral customs without strict ethnic barriers. In the United States, early groups like the Viking Brotherhood, founded by in 1969, promoted Asatru as a folk-based tied to European heritage, influencing later formations such as the in 1994. These developments reflect a causal link to Völkisch , where ethnic mysticism blended with , though post-war suppressions shifted focus toward reconstructionist practices detached from overt political . Central to global Heathenry are debates over "folkish" versus "universalist" orientations, with folkish adherents arguing for ethnic as essential to authentic practice—mirroring Völkisch blood-and-soil —while universalists contend that spiritual efficacy transcends ancestry, prioritizing inclusivity to repudiate racialist connotations. Folkish positions, as articulated by figures like McNallen, posit that non-European practitioners cannot fully access ancestral (metagenetic inheritance), a concept rooted in Völkisch esotericism but defended as cultural preservation rather than supremacy. Critics within and outside Heathenry, including universalist groups like (founded 1987), view folkish exclusivity as empirically unsubstantiated and prone to attracting neo-Völkisch extremists, citing historical Völkisch anti-Semitism and Nazi appropriations as causal warnings. These debates manifest in organizational schisms and public statements, such as the Asatru Folk Assembly's 2016 ethics code emphasizing European ancestral ties, which drew accusations of despite denials of supremacist intent. Universalist responses, prevalent in European and American kindreds, invoke archaeological and textual evidence of pre-Christian Germanic inclusivity toward thralls and outsiders to argue against inherited racial , though empirical data on ancient practices remains interpretive and contested. Globally, Scandinavian Heathen groups often lean universalist, integrating with secular societies, while U.S. folkish factions face scrutiny for overlaps with identitarian movements, highlighting ongoing tensions between Völkisch causal legacies and modern adaptations seeking legitimacy. Efforts to purge Nazi symbology, such as rejecting the despite its pre-Völkisch runic origins, underscore meta-awareness of source biases in romantic nationalist historiography.

References

  1. https://perspectivia.net/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/ploneimport_derivate_00001023/puschner_people.pdf
  2. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00156.x
  3. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/21eb5ed5-ca8d-449c-9b6d-acb5e7cfc3dd/650073.pdf
  4. https://publicseminar.org/2017/07/volkisch-and-uberfremdung/
  5. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/volkisch_adj
  6. https://theworld.org/stories/2017/09/17/one-german-word-defines-germans-germans-dont-agree-what-it-means
  7. https://william-winslows-world.fandom.com/wiki/Volkisch_Movement
  8. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/german-english/volkisch
  9. https://en.langenscheidt.com/german-english/voelkisch
  10. https://www.thecollector.com/volksgeist-who-was-johann-gottfried-herder/
  11. https://www.dizerega.com/2020/09/05/strange-bedfellows-neopaganism-the-volk-and-the-contemporary-neopagan-right/
  12. https://academic.oup.com/book/47490/chapter/422414331
  13. https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-680
  14. https://germanhistory-intersections.org/en/germanness/ghis:document-225
  15. https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=750
  16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-the-holocaust/racethinking-volkischnationalism-and-eugenics/81050E973E9748C976304CE25B0F9761
  17. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft6q2nb3wh&chunk.id=d0e766&toc.depth=100&toc.id=d0e575&brand=ucpress
  18. https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/fear-white-genocide
  19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1433324
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336508739_The_Idea_of_Volk_and_the_Origins_of_Volkisch_Research_1800-1930s
  21. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1067502
  22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21567689.2022.2091548
  23. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/christianity-in-hitlers-ideology/hitlers-religious-teachers/05C749AAB2EAE6F7565F28E357B11203
  24. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/pan-german-league/
  25. http://wandervogel.com/history.html
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41411641
  27. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/40697/chapter/348423904
  28. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/beer-hall-putsch-munich-putsch
  29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/259985
  30. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2052&context=etd
  31. https://deepgreenresistance.net/en/resistance/culture/wandervogel-lebensreform-nazi-germany/
  32. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110817188-007/html
  33. https://kampfzeit.com/organizations/the-volkisch-youth-movements/
  34. https://histclo.com/youth/youth/org/nat/ger/wander.htm
  35. https://www.berghahnbooks.com/downloads/intros/AdriaansenRhythm_intro.pdf
  36. https://doinghistoryinpublic.org/2025/05/12/steel-their-bodies-and-minds-how-the-wandervogel-reconciled-nature-with-modernity/
  37. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004720701/BP000012.xml
  38. https://academic.oup.com/gh/article-pdf/27/1/173/2208452/ghn100.pdf
  39. https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=hist_fac
  40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2t4f2g
  41. https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/kb/article/view/97258/94600
  42. https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=history_facpubs
  43. https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-681
  44. https://www.manchesterhive.com/downloadpdf/display/9781526179487/9781526179487.00013.pdf
  45. https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/bib209175
  46. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/culture-in-the-third-reich-disseminating-the-nazi-worldview
  47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43965085
  48. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/central-european-history/article/were-the-national-socialists-a-volkisch-party-paganism-christianity-and-the-nazi-christmas/C1CBB1170357D162E61B7764E45F57E9
  49. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945Berlinv01/d347
  50. https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/denazified-library
  51. https://www.alliiertenmuseum.de/en/thema/denazification/
  52. https://journals.openedition.org/transtexts/262?lang=en
  53. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/beyond-the-racial-state/antisemitism-beyond-race/325CD4DD690AF5C9BBF8D92E29BC8E1C
  54. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/beyond-the-racial-state/ideologys-logic/B16E590FBF73554D5F399E9ECAF08F51
  55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1876419
  56. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/beyond-the-racial-state/comparative-and-historical-perspectives/6F5287482A7217EF6FE85E52E564BD27
  57. https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/american-volkisch
  58. https://www.milbank.org/wp-content/uploads/mq/volume-20/issue-02.1/20-2-The-Relations-of-Employment-Levels-to-Births-in-Germany.pdf
  59. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/lebensborn-program
  60. https://nazigermany.lmu.build/exhibits/show/jacobsen/eugenics
  61. https://www.fabianwahl.de/uploads/5/9/4/5/59455913/origins_main.pdf
  62. https://www.ruralhistory.at/de/publikationen/rhwp/Melk_Langthaler.pdf
  63. https://academic.oup.com/book/6246/chapter/149873955
  64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3180722
  65. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/volksgemeinschaft-peoples-or-national-community
  66. https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5906&context=etd
  67. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15487733.2023.2175468
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016718523001495
  69. https://gnet-research.org/2023/03/22/granola-nazis-digital-traditionalism-the-folkish-movement-the-normalisation-of-the-far-right/
  70. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004309517/B9789004309517-s004.pdf
  71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/nr.2013.16.3.52
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.