Hubbry Logo
God in IslamGod in IslamMain
Open search
God in Islam
Community hub
God in Islam
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
God in Islam
God in Islam
from Wikipedia

In Islam, God (Arabic: ٱللَّٰه, romanizedAllāh, contraction of ٱلْإِلَٰه al-’ilāh, lit.'the god', or Arabic: رب, romanizedRabb, lit.'lord')[1][2] is seen as the creator and sustainer of the universe,[3][1][4][5][6] who lives eternally.[7] God is conceived as a perfect, singular, immortal, omnipotent, and omniscient deity, completely infinite in all of his attributes.[1][4][6][8] Islam further emphasizes that God is most merciful.[9][10][11] The Islamic concept of God is variously described as monotheistic, panentheistic,[12][13][14] and monistic.[15][16]

In Islamic theology, anthropomorphism (tashbīh) and corporealism (tajsīm) refer to beliefs in the human-like (anthropomorphic) and materially embedded (corporeal) form of God, an idea that has been classically described assimilating or comparing God to the creatures created by God.[17] By contrast, belief in the transcendence of God is called tanzih, which also rejects notions of incarnation and a personal god. Tanzih is widely accepted in Islam today, although it stridently competed for orthodox status until the tenth century, especially during the Mihna.[18] In premodern times, corporealist views were said to have been more socially prominent among the common people, with more abstract and transcendental views more common for the elite.[19]

The Islamic concept of tawhid (oneness) emphasises that God is absolutely pure and free from association with other beings, which means attributing the powers and qualities of God to his creation, and vice versa. In Islam, God is never portrayed in any image. The Quran specifically forbids ascribing partners to share his singular sovereignty, as he is considered to be the absolute one without a second, indivisible, and incomparable being, who is similar to nothing, and nothing is comparable to him. Thus, God is absolutely transcendent, unique and utterly other than anything in or of the world as to be beyond all forms of human thought and expression.[20][21] The briefest and the most comprehensive description of God in the Quran is found in Surat al-Ikhlas.[22]

According to mainstream Muslim theologians, God is described as Qadim [ar][20][23] ('ancient'), having no first, without beginning or end; absolute, not limited by time or place or circumstance, nor is subject to any decree so as to be determined by any precise limits or set times, but is the First and the Last. He is not a formed body, nor a substance circumscribed with limits or determined by measure; neither does he resemble bodies as they are capable of being measured or divided. Neither do substances exist in him; neither is he an accident, nor do accidents exist in him. Neither is he like to anything that exists, nor is anything like to him; nor is he determinate in quantity, nor comprehended by bounds, nor circumscribed by differences of situation, nor contained in the heavens, and transcends spatial and temporal bounds, and remains beyond the bounds of human comprehension and perceptions.[24][25][22]

Etymology

[edit]

Allāh is the Arabic word referring to God in Abrahamic religions.[26][27][28] In the English language, the word generally refers to God in Islam. The Arabic word Allāh is thought to be derived by contraction from al-ʾilāh, which means "the god",[1] (i.e., the only god) and is related to El and Elah, the Hebrew and Aramaic words for God.[29][30] It is distinguished from ʾilāh (Arabic: إِلَٰه), the Arabic word meaning deity, which could refer to any of the gods worshipped in pre-Islamic Arabia or to any other deity.[31] Allah is God's most unique Name, grandly referred to as Lafẓ al-Jalālah (The Word of Majesty). It occurs in the Qur’an 2,697 times in 85 of its 114 suras.[32]

Other names

[edit]

God is described and referred to in the Quran and hadith by 99 names that reflect his attributes.[33] The Quran refers to the attributes of God as "most beautiful names".[34][35] According to Gerhard Böwering,

They are traditionally enumerated as 99 in number to which is added as the highest Name (al-ism al-ʾaʿẓam), the Supreme Name of God. The locus classicus for listing the Divine Names in the literature of Qurʾānic commentary is 17:110[36] "Call upon Allah, or call upon The Merciful; whichsoever you call upon, to Allah belong the most beautiful Names," and also 59:22-24,[37] which includes a cluster of more than a dozen Divine epithets."

— Gerhard Böwering, God and God's Attributes[38]

Some Muslims may use different names as much as Allah, for instance "God" in English. Whether or not Allah can be considered as the personal name of God became disputed in contemporary scholarship.[39] In earlier times, Jahm bin Safwan claimed that Allah is a name God created for himself and that names belong to the things God created.[40]

Attributes

[edit]

Oneness

[edit]

Islam's most fundamental concept is a strict monotheism called tawhid, affirming that God is one and Tanzih (wāḥid). The basic creed of Islam, the Shahada[41] (recited under oath to enter the religion), involves لَا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا ٱللَّٰهُ أَشْهَدُ أنَّ (āšhadu ānnā lā ʾilāha ʾilla llāh), or "I testify there is no deity other than Allah (God)."

Though Muslims believe Jesus to be a prophet, the Trinity and divinity doctrine of normative Christianity concerning Jesus is rejected and often compared to polytheism.[42]

Tawhid constitutes the foremost article of the Muslim profession.[13] The deification or worship of anyone or anything other than God (shirk) is the greatest sin in Islam. The entirety of the Islamic teaching rests on the principle of Tawhid.[43][better source needed] Associating partners in divinity of God is known as shirk and is the antithesis of Tawhid. Although the term is usually translated as "polytheism" into English, the sin is thought to be more complex.[44][45] The translation 'associating [with God]' has been suggested instead.[46] The term includes denial of attributing any form of divinity to any other thing but God. This includes the self by elevating oneself above others[45] and associating attributes of God with a created being.[47]

According to Vincent J. Cornell,[48] the Quran also provides a monist image of God by describing the reality as a unified whole, with God being a single concept that would describe or ascribe all existing things: "He is the First and the Last, the Evident and the Immanent: and He has full knowledge of all things."[49]

Uniqueness

[edit]

Islam emphasises the absolute uniqueness and singularity of God in his essence, attributes, qualities, and acts.[50] As stated in Surat al-Ikhlas: God is Ahad[51] (the unique one of absolute oneness, who is indivisible in nature, and there can be no other like him); God is As-Samad[52](the ultimate source of all existence, the uncaused cause who created all things out of nothing, who is eternal, absolute, immutable, perfect, complete, essential, independent, and self-sufficient; who needs nothing while all of creation is in absolute need of him; the one eternally and constantly required and sought, depended upon by all existence and to whom all matters will ultimately return); he begets not, nor is he begotten (He is Unborn and Uncreated, has no parents, wife or offspring); and comparable/equal to him, there is none.[53]

God's absolute transcendence over his creation, as well as his unlimited individuality were asserted and emphasized with support from appropriate quotations from the Qur'an as follows:

(He is) the Lord of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them; so worship Him alone, and be constant and patient in His worship. Do you know of any whose name is worthy to be mentioned along with His (as Deity and Lord to worship)?

The Qur'anic verse (19:65), "Do you know of any that can be named with His Name?" emphasizes that as Allah is Unique, His name is shared by none other.[54]

To those who do not believe in the Hereafter applies the most evil of attributes, and to God applies the most sublime attribute, and He is the All-Glorious with irresistible might, the All-Wise.

Such as that described in the previous three verses (16:57-59). For the disbelievers in the Hereafter, there is an evil description, or in other words, the most evil attribute (i.e., the most vile), which is their ignorance and ingratitude, and their burying alive of newborn girls, despite the fact that they are needed for the purposes of marriage and not allowing women to even inherit property, and their ascribing female gender to angels and claiming that the angels are the daughters of God while so preferring sons for themselves (this is also mentioned in the verses 37:149-155); whereas to God belong the highest attribute, namely, that there is no deity except him, immensely exalted beyond and above all comparison and likeness.[55][56]

So, do not invent similitudes for God (do not liken Him to others to associate partners with Him, for there is nothing similar to Him). Surely God knows and you do not know (the exact truth about Him and the exact nature of things).

The Originator of the heavens and the earth (each with particular features and on ordered principles): He has made for you, from your selves, mates, and from the cattle mates (of their own kind): by this means He multiplies you (and the cattle). There is nothing whatever like Him. He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing.

The Qur'anic verse (42:11) emphasizes that there is no similarity whatsoever between the creator and his creation in essence, in attributes or in actions, and therefore, God is beyond all human concepts of him. So he has no mates and nothing is like him, nor does he beget, nor is he begotten. Nothing – neither matter, nor space, nor time – can restrict or contain him. And this is why his Attributes – his hearing, seeing, knowledge, will, power, creating, and so on – are also beyond anything we can conceive.[57]

The same sentiment is expressed in the Qur'anic verse (6:103) which states:[53] "Vision perceives/comprehends Him not, and He perceives/comprehends (evaluates) all vision." In some interpretations, this verse also asserts that the senses and intellects cannot fully comprehend God.[58] Likewise, the Qur'an also says: "whereas they cannot comprehend Him with their knowledge."[Quran 20:110 (Translated by Ali Ünal)]

The Hanafi jurist and theologian, al-Tahawi (d. 321/933), wrote in his treatise on theology, commonly known as al-'Aqida al-Tahawiyya:[59][20]

"Whoever describes Allah even with a single human quality/attribute, has disbelieved/blasphemed. So whoever understands this, will take heed and refrain from such statements as those of disbelievers, and knows that Allah in His attributes is utterly unlike human beings."

Al-Tahawi also stated that:[59][20]

"He is exalted/transcendent beyond having limits, ends, organs, limbs and parts (literally: tools). The six directions do not encompass/contain Him like the rest of created things."

The six directions are: above, below, right, left, front and back. The above statement of al-Tahawi refutes the anthropomorphist's dogmas that imagine Allah has a physical body and human form, and being occupied in a place, direction or trajectory.[59]

Creator

[edit]

According to the teachings of Islam, God is the creator of the worlds and all the creatures therein. He has created everything in the worlds in accordance with a definite plan and for a particular purpose. There is no shortcoming or defect of any sort in any of his creations.[60] The Qur'an confirms this in the following verses:

God is the Creator of all things, and He is the Guardian (with power of disposition) over all things.

Surely, We have created each and every thing by (precise) measure.

Do those who disbelieve ever consider that the heavens and the earth were at first one piece, and then We parted them as separate entities; and that We have made every living thing from water? Will they still not come to believe?

The Qur'an also says in verse (25:2): "and He has created everything and designed it in a perfect measure (and ordained its destiny in a precise manner)." And in another verse (25:59) it is emphasized: "It is He who created the heavens and the earth, and all that is between them."

The Qur'an states that God is the Rabb al-'Alamin. When referring to God, the Arabic term "Rabb" is usually translated as "Lord" and can include all of the following meanings:[61][62] "owner, master, ruler, controller, creator, upbringer, trainer, sustainer, nourisher, cherisher, provider, protector, guardian and caretaker." The same term, Rabb, is used in a limited sense for humans as in the "head" of the family, "master" of the house, or "owner" of the land or cattle. The Arabic word "al-'Alamin" can be translated as the "Worlds" or "Universes".[63] There are many worlds, astronomical and physical worlds, worlds of thought, spiritual worlds, everything in existence including angels, jinn, devils, humans, animals, plants, and so on.[64] The "Worlds" may also be taken to refer to different domains or kingdoms within this earthly world, or other worlds beyond this earth. Thus, the Qur'anic expression Rabb al-'Alamin really means the "Creator of the Worlds",[65] the "Ruler of the Universes",[66] the "Creator and Sustainer of all the peoples and Universes".[67]

Mercy

[edit]

The most commonly used names in the primary sources are Al-Rahman, meaning "Most Compassionate" and Al-Rahim, meaning "Most Merciful".[68] The former compasses the whole creation, therefore applying to God's mercy in that it gives every necessary condition to make life possible. The latter applies to God's mercy in that it gives favor for good deeds. Thus Al-Rahman includes both the believers and the unbelievers, but Al-Rahim only the believers.[69][70] God is said to love forgiving, with a hadith stating God would replace a sinless people with one who sinned but still asked repentance.[71]

God's mercy, according to Islamic theology, is what gets a person into paradise. According to a hadith in Sahih Al Bukhari "No one's deeds will ever admit him to Paradise." They said, "Not even you, O Messenger of Allah?" He said, "No, not even me unless Allah showers me with His Mercy. So try to be near to perfection. And no one should wish for death; he is either doing good so he will do more of that, or he is doing wrong so he may repent."[72]

Omniscience

[edit]

God's omniscience is the knowledge of all things,[73] whether they are actual or possible or whether they are past, present, or future. It also includes his knowledge of people, places, events, circumstances, etc. God has full knowledge of everything, everywhere, always and from eternity past, and he is fully aware of whatever one thinks, intends, and does, and the reins of all things and events are in his power. He knows whatever happens in the universe, down to the fall of a leaf, and he knows all the deeds, thoughts, and intentions of humankind. His appointed angels record these, and people will be called to account for these acts in the other world.[74] His knowledge is eternal in the sense of being timeless, i.e., atemporal. So, since God's knowledge is eternal and unchanging, it is likewise self‐existent and infinite. It is self‐existent in that it is not dependent on anything, not even time. According to the Qur'an, God (Allah) is omniscient; he eternally knows whatever comes into being, be it universal or particular in character. He has known all things from before the creation of the world. His knowledge of things before their coming into existence and afterwards is exactly the same. Hence, there is no discovery or surprise with God. Muslim theologians therefore considered that "omniscience" is a necessary and "ignorance" is an impossible property for God. Various Qur'anic verses designate this basic intuition, such as: 3:5, 6:59, 65:12, and 24:35.[75]

Relationship with creation

[edit]

Muslims believe that God is the sole source of all creation, and that everything, including its creatures, are just a derivative reality created out of love and mercy by God's command,[76] "..."Be," and it is."[77] and that the purpose of existence is to worship or to know God.[78][79][80] The Qur'an states that God is transcendent over his creation.[81] It is believed that God created everything for a divine purpose; the universe governed by fixed laws that ensure the harmonious working of all things. Everything within the universe, including inanimate objects, praises God, and is in this sense understood as a Muslim.[82] Humans and jinn have to live voluntarily in accordance with these laws to find peace and reproduce God's benevolence in their own society to live in accordance with the nature of all things, known as surrender to God in the Islamic sense.[82][83]

As in the other Abrahamic religions, God is believed to be the creator of the universe.[79] Unique to Islam, there are no intermediaries between God and people.[79] God is not part of the universe (i.e. there is no incarnation of God, no "Son of God", etc.) but a power behind all aspects of the universe, only knowable through his creation, signs in nature, metaphorical stories of the prophets, and communicating with his creation via revelations given to prophets.[79][84]

The Qur'an in particular is believed by Muslims to be the verbatim word of God as revealed to Muhammad. Hadith are the records of Muhammad's sayings and example, and Hadith Qudsi is a sub-category of hadith, which Muslims regard as the words of God repeated by Muhammad. According to al-Sharif al-Jurjani (d. 816/1413), the Hadith Qudsi differ from the Qur'an in that the former are "expressed in Muhammad's words", whereas the latter are the "direct words of God".[85]

Thus, Muslims address/contact God directly in their prayers, supplications and dhikr, and also seek forgiveness and repentance from sins directly from God, as the Qur'an states: "And when (O Messenger) My servants ask you about Me, then surely I am near: I answer the prayer of the suppliant when he prays to Me."[Quran 2:186 (Translated by Ali Ünal)] Therefore, according to this verse, God answers all the prayers done sincerely. However, he answers sometimes by giving whatever is asked for, sometimes by giving what is better, sometimes by postponing giving to the afterlife, and sometimes by not giving at all, since it will not turn out in favor of the one who prays. The way that God answers a prayer depends on his wisdom.[86]

Al-Bukhari, in his Ṣaḥīḥ Bukhārī, narrates a hadith qudsi that God says, "I am as My servant thinks (expects) I am."[87][88] When Sufis claim union with God, it is not that they become one in essence, rather the will of the Sufi is fully congruent to God.[89] The Sufis are in fact careful to say, no matter what degree of union is realized, "the slave remains the slave, and the Lord remains the Lord".[90]

The Qur'an affirms that God does not stand in need of anything outside him, and nothing external to him can affect or influence him in any way. All his creatures are responsible to him and dependent on him. There is no other being to whom he can be responsible or on whom he can be dependent.[91] He has the right to do whatever he wants with his possessions/creatures – it is under God's own total sovereignty. Accordingly, he is not answerable for his actions, due to his wisdom and justice, greatness and uniqueness of Divinity, while all others (jinn, humans, or false deities)[92] are accountable for what they do (and don't do), as God says in the Qur'an:[93] "He shall not be questioned about what He does, but they shall be questioned."[Quran 21:23 (Translated by Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute)]

While the existence of the creation is dependent, contingent, temporal, and received from beyond itself, the existence or reality of God is eternal, independent, self-sufficient, and self-existent being who needs no other being for his existence, and consequently exists by and through himself alone. The divine name al-Samad (the supremely independent, self-sufficient being endowed with all the attributes of perfection to which all else turns in need for existence, life, guidance, help, forgiveness, etc.) implies that there is a blessed linkage between the creator and his creation where the one creator will sustain the creation by looking after it. This relationship also signifies that since God is the sustainer, he is in need of nothing, and even as he gives, nothing is diminished from his treasury.[94][95]

Many Muslim communities emphasize the "transcendence of God" over local traditions and "allow...little room for mythological stories", although tales about jinn exist in all of them.[81]

Creation theories

[edit]

Muslim theologians and philosophers, with only a few exceptions, agree that God is the origin of the cosmos' existence. However, there is disagreement about how God creates the cosmos and what types of causalities exist. There are three competing models. Most philosophers adhered to a theory of emanation (fayaḍān).[96] Most Theologians preferred occasionalism (iḥdāth). The third theory, often represented in Islamic mysticism, understands the world as the manifestation of a single reality (maẓhir).[97]

The emanation theory states that 1) the universe has emanated from God since eternity 2) there is a causal mediation between the lower and the higher things (i.e. the lower things do not come directly from God, but from the higher things). God is considered the only necessary existence, the rest of creation as contingent. Since God is described as "knowing" and "perfect," God must know Himself perfectly and know that He is the cause of all existence. But in order to have perfect knowledge of a cause, one must also know the effect of the cause. Therefore, God knows every form of existence in past, future, and present. Based on the model of ibn Sina, God knows about the existence of x because of x, whereas humans know about a thing x from another thing x'. Therefore, God would create the universe in eternity. To further support this argument, emanationists point out against Creation ex Nihilo, that, if God were to decide to create the universe at a certain point in time, God would have a change of mind, affected by something external. Since God is the source of everything, something external could not have affected God.[97]

Theologians found the emanation theory to be unconvincing, because the theory equates God to much with nature, by that, restricting God's freedom. Instead, they propose, God created the world from nothing at a certain point t in time. In response to the emanationists' objection, that for Creation ex Nihilo, a change in the will of God would be required, al-Ghazali explains that God has willed from all eternity, to create the world at a certain time t. Additionally, God would not only have created the universe at a time t, but also continues to create the universe in any following moment.

A variant of the theory of the manifestation of a single reality can be found particularly in Mulla Sadra, who was inspired by Muhyī d-Dīn Ibn ʿArabī. According to Mulla Ṣadra, only God is eternal and perfect, the universe, including its inhabitants, is constantly changing. Because of that, everything is in a constant process of growth and decay. The prophets and the angels were also integrated into this universalistic understanding of God. According to Heydar Amuli, who also builds on Ibn Arabi's metaphysics, the angels are the representatives of God's beautiful names (and devils of the imperious names of God).[98]

Eternity

[edit]

Islam asserts that God is eternal (qadim) and thus timeless. Islamic theology defines time as the subsequent change of things, making a contradiction between an originated "world" (dunya) which is subject to change, and God, who is without change.[99] Ghazali explains in his response to the question "what was God doing before creation?" that time does not coexist with God or the world. A contemporary of ibn Hanbal asserts an even more strict position, claiming that God transcends time, thus it cannot be said that God is "before things" or "the first cause".[99]

Concepts in Islamic theology

[edit]

Sunnis

[edit]

Atharis

[edit]

For Atharis the names and attributes of God are to be understood with the formula of bila kayfa (lit. "without how", i.e., "without modality",[100][101] "without further enquiry"[102] or "without further specifying their manner or modality"),[103][104] which is to unquestioningly accept the Divine attributes of God without ta'wil (allegorical interpretation), or ta'til (lit. "suspension", i.e., "divesting God of His attributes"), or tashbih (anthropomorphism, immanence or comparison, which is to believe that God resembles his creations, or attributing the attributes of human beings to God).[105] Any anthropomorphic expressions of these names and attributes is negated using the admission that their meanings can never be known. The meaning is left to the knowledge of God himself, and they simply say that the meaning is as befits his majesty and perfection. This method of tafwid is that of Ahmad ibn Hanbal (eponymous founder of Atharism), al-Ash'ari, Ibn Qudama, and Ibn Kathir.[106]

Usually Atharis are vehemently opposed to engaging in ta'wil (allegorical interpretations) and reject batin (inner meaning) or hidden/esoteric (Sufi) interpretations of the Qur'an and God's divine attributes.[107] In maintaining that one is not permitted to interpret the meaning of the Qur'anic verses or the Prophetic traditions that mention various attributes of God, Ibn Qudama (d. 620/1223) in his work Lum'at al-I'tiqad [ar] ("The Luminance of Creed") is endorsing the principle of bila kayfa ('without [asking or knowing] how') in Islamic theology.[108] According to this principle, one has to accept the sacred text as it is, indissolubly linked with tanzih (God's incomparability and transcendence), without trying to interpret its meaning. In other words, one must accept the sacred texts that refer to God without positively ascribing corporeal features to him.[109][110]

Ibn al-Jawzi (d. 597/1201) took the question of people associating anthropomorphism with Hanbalism so seriously that he wrote a book, Daf' Shubah al-Tashbih bi-Akaff al-Tanzih ("Rebuttal of the Insinuations of Anthropomorphism at the Hands of Divine Transcendence"), with the aim of refuting anthropomorphic views and arguing that Ahmad ibn Hanbal was not an anthropomorphist.[Note 1] According to him, such words whose meanings could give the impression that God resembles his creations should not be understood literally, such as God's face, hands, eyes, and the like.[111][112][113]

Another book was written by the Shafi'i scholar, Taqi al-Din al-Hisni [ar] (d. 829/1426), titled Daf' Shubah man Shabbaha wa Tamarrad wa Nasaba dhalik ila al-Sayyid al-Jalil al-Imam Ahmad [ar] ("Rebuttal of the Insinuations of him who makes Anthropomorphisms and Rebels, and Ascribes that to the Noble Master Imam Ahmad"), defending Ahmad ibn Hanbal against the innovated beliefs later ascribed to him by Ibn Taymiyya and those who claimed to follow his school.[114][115]

Ibn Kathir (d. 774/1373) appears to offer a definition similar to that of al-Ash'ari (d. 324/936) when he discusses tafwid in his exegesis of the Qur'anic verse (7:54) pertaining to God's istiwa'. He states:[106][116]

People have said a great deal on this topic, and this is not the place to expound on what they have said. On this matter, we follow the good ancestors (i.e., the way of the earliest Muslims, dubbed the pious ancestors, in Arabic, al-salaf al-salih[Note 2]): Malik, al-Awza'i, al-Thawri, al-Layth ibn Sa'd, al-Shafi'i, Ahmad, Ishaq ibn Rahwayh, and others among the imams of the Muslims, both ancient and modern—that is: to let it (the verse in question) pass as it has come, without saying how it is meant (min ghayr takyif), without likening it to created things (wa la tashbih), and without nullifying it (wa la ta'til). The external, literal meaning (zahir)[Note 3] that occurs to the minds of anthropomorphists (al-mushabbihīn) is negated of Allah, for nothing from his creation resembles him: "There is nothing whatsoever like unto Him, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing" [Qur'an 42:11].

Here Ibn Kathir is diverting the meaning of the text from its apparent meaning, and implicitly affirming that one valid definition of the term zahir is its literal linguistic meaning, which is anthropomorphic. Nevertheless, some modern followers of Ibn Taymiyya claim that bi lā takyīf would only mean tafwid of modality but not of meaning (ma'na), but Ash'aris/Maturidis assert that modality (kayfiyya) is a part of meaning, and without detailing which aspect of meaning remains after de-anthropomorphizing a term, one ends up with tafwid. In addition to that the imams of the salaf (the righteous early generations of Muslims) used to say bila kayf (without how or modality at all). On the other hand, both Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728/1328) and his student Ibn al-Qayyim (d. 751/1350) argued that the anthropomorphic references to God, such as God's hands or face, are to be understood literally and affirmatively according to their apparent meanings.[106][117][118] In their footsteps and following them come the Salafi groups of modern times such as the followers of Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab (d. 1201/1787) who closely follow Ibn Taymiyya's approach regarding the Divine names and attributes.[119]

The doctrine of the Salaf[Note 4] that Ibn Taymiyya derives from his traditionalist sources consists in describing God as he describes himself and as his messenger describes him, neither stripping the attributes away (ta'til) in the fashion of kalam (rational or speculative theology), nor likening (tamthil) them to the attributes of creatures because there is nothing like God [Q. 42:11]. For Ibn Taymiyya, this means that the Salaf knew the meanings of the Divine attributes, and they do not merely delegate them to God. However, certain formulaic statements attributed to them do not appear to support his position unequivocally. Ibn Taymiyya notes that al-Awza'i (d. 157/774), Sufyan al-Thawri (d. 161/778), and others said concerning the attributes, "Let them pass by as they came", and "Let them pass by as they came, without how". He explains that letting the attributes pass by (imrār) means leaving them intact and not stripping away their meanings, while affirming the attributes "without how" or "without modality" (bi-lā kayf) means not assimilating them to the attributes of creatures. With this, Ibn Taymiyya holds affirmation of the meanings of God's attributes together with denial of their likeness to creatures in a double perspective by drawing a distinction between the known meanings of the attributes and their inscrutable modalities.[122][118]

Ibn Taymiyya does not clarify how modality (kayfiyya) and meaning (ma'na) relate to each other semantically. Rather, he deploys the two terms in tandem to maintain the seemingly paradoxical conviction that God is completely different and beyond human experience on the one hand while God's attributes do signify something real and meaningful in human language on the other. In denying knowledge of the modality and affirming knowledge of the meaning, Ibn Taymiyya does not resolve the paradox, nor even acknowledge it, but simply holds its two sides together in the conviction that this is the most faithful and rational set of beliefs.[122]

It is often assumed that the question of God's nature has occupied the minds of early Muslims, and as such Muhammad forbade them from thinking about it, as he said: "Think about God's bounties, but do not think about God's essence (dhat). Otherwise, you will vanish/perish." Accordingly, Muslims should not think about what God is, but about his attributes and his blessings granted to humanity, because God's essence (dhat) cannot be understood by the limited human capacity.[123] In this regard it has been mentioned in some narrations that are ascribed to Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 241/855),[124][125] it has been reported that he said:[Note 5] "Whatever comes to your mind (i.e., regarding God and His nature), God is different than that."[126] Or in the words: "God is completely different from whatever comes to your mind concerning Him."

According to al-Shahrastani (d. 548/1154) in his al-Milal wa al-Nihal ("Religious Sects and Divisions"), Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Dawud al-Zahiri (d. 270/884) and a group of imams of the Salaf, they followed the way of the early traditionalists (ashab al-hadith), such as Malik ibn Anas (d. 179/795). They took a safe path, saying "We believe in whatever is reported from the Book and the Sunna, and we do not try to interpret it, knowing for certain that God does not resemble any created things, and that all the images we form of Him are created by Him and formed by Him". They avoided anthropomorphism (tashbih) to such an extent that they said that if a man moved his hand while reading the Qur'anic verse that speaks of God's creating Adam using his own "hands" [Q. 38:75]; or if he pointed with his two fingers while reporting the hadith: "The heart of the believer is between the two fingers of al-Rahman (the Most Compassionate)", his hand must be cut off and the two fingers torn out.[127][128]

These early scholars were often called the People of Tradition (Ahl al-Hadith), or Salaf such as Abu Hanifa, Malik, al-Shafi'i and Ahmad ibn Hanbal. They left the verses of the Qur'an in question as well as the related hadiths simply as they were, accepting the poetical statements just as they occurred, without applying much reason either to criticize or expand upon them. Their position was that these ambiguous verses must be understood in light of the Qur'anic dictum that, "There is nothing whatever like Him" [Q. 42:11] hence negating all possibilities of anthropomorphism. At the same time, they used and maintained the same phrases or terminology implied by the Qur'an with regards to God such as God's face without looking further into their meaning or exegesis. And this is what is being referred to by use of their phrase bila kayfa wa la tashbih, meaning without inquiring how and without anthropomorphism or comparison.[105]

However, according to some scholars, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, like the other early Muslims, also gave some figurative interpretations (ta'wil) to scriptural expressions that might otherwise have been misinterpreted anthropomorphically, which is what neo-Salafis condemn the Ash'ari and Maturidi schools for doing. For example, Ibn Kathir reports that al-Bayhaqi (d. 458/1066) related from al-Hakim (d. 405/1014), from Abu 'Amr ibn al-Sammak (d. 344/955), from Hanbal [ibn Ishaq al-Shaybani] (d. 273/886), the son of the brother of Ahmad ibn Hanbal's father, that "Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 241/855) figuratively interpreted the word of Allah Most High, ‘And your Lord comes...’ [Q. 89:22], as meaning ‘His recompense (thawab) shall come’." Al-Bayhaqi then said, "This chain of narrators has absolutely nothing wrong in it".[129] Ibn Hazm (d. 456/1064) in his book al-Fasl fi al-Milal wa al-Ahwa' wa al-Nihal [ar] ("The Distinction Concerning Religions, Heresies, and Sects") said also that Ahmad ibn Hanbal figuratively interpreted ‘And your Lord comes...’ [Q. 89:22], but as meaning "And your Lord's command/decree has come."[130]

Among the most significant Athari theological works are:

  • Naqd ‘Uthman ibn Sa’id Ad-Darimi 'ala Al-Marisi al Jahmi al 'aneed fi ma iftara 'ala Allah fit tawheed by Uthman ibn Sa'id al-Darimi (d. 280/815).
  • Kitaab at-Tawheed by Ibn Khuzayma (d. 311/924).
  • Kitaab al-'Uluww al-'Aliyy al-Ghafaar and Kitaab al-'Arsh by Al-Dhahabi (d. 748/1348).
  • Lawami' al-Anwar al-Bahiyya wa Sawati' al-Asrar al-Athariyya by Al-Saffarini (d. 1188/1774).
  • Bahjat al-Nazirin wa Ayat al-Mustadillin (The Delight of Onlookers and the Signs for Investigators) by Mar'i al-Karmi (d. 1033/1624), on cosmology and the affairs of the Last Judgment and the Afterlife.[131]

Ash'aris and Maturidis

[edit]
A rock carved with the text of "al-'Aqida al-Murshida" (the Guiding Creed) by Ibn Tumart (d. 524/1130) — the student of al-Ghazali (d. 505/ 1111) and the founder of the Almohad dynasty — praised and approved by Fakhr al-Din Ibn 'Asakir (d. 620/1223), located at al-Salah Islamic secondary school in Baalbek, Lebanon.

Ash'aris and Maturidis are in agreement that God's attributes are eternal and are to be held to be metaphorically.[132] References to anthropomorphic attributes can probably not be understood correctly by humans.[133] Although God's existence is considered to be possibly known by reason, human mind can not fully understand God's attributes. Ash'ari and Maturidi scholars have two positions regarding the Mutashabihat texts (ambiguous passages in the Qur'an and Hadith) related to God's attributes:[134] Tafwid (affirming the attributes of God, but consigning/entrusting both their meaning and modality to God, or in other words, leaving the interpretation of anthropomorphic expressions to God) and Ta'wil (metaphorical interpretation). The two positions disregard the literal meaning of the texts due to the definitive evidences denoting the transcendence of God above the attributes of his created beings as per his words: "There is nothing whatever like Him."[Quran 42:11 (Translated by Ali Ünal)] and "And comparable to Him there is none."[Quran 112:4 (Translated by Ali Ünal)] For example, when believers in paradise see God, they do not see God in the way humans are able to see on Earth.[133] Ash'aris and Maturidis asserts, since God is the creator of everything that exists and creation neither affects nor alters God, the Throne of God is not a dwelling place for God.[135]

Abu Mansur al-Baghdadi (d. 429/1037) in his al-Farq bayn al-Firaq (The Difference between the Sects) reports that 'Ali ibn Abi Talib, the fourth Caliph, said: "Allah created the Throne as an indication of His power, not for taking it as a place for Himself."[136] Accordingly, expressions such as God's istiwa' on the Throne means by ta'wil or figurative interpretation, exercise of his power upon the universe, this denotes his assumption of authority of his created world, the throne being a symbol of authority and dominion, while in tafwid, they just say: Allahu A'lam (God knows best), together with their understanding of Tanzih (God's incomparability and transcendence), which means that his istiwa' upon the throne, in the manner which he himself has described, and in that same sense which he himself means, which is far removed from any notion of contact, or resting upon, or local situation. It is impermissible to say that he established himself with a contact or a meeting with it. Because God is not subject to change, substitution, nor limits, whether before or after the creation of the throne.[137]

Ash'aris and Maturidis are in general agreement that God is free from all imperfections and flaws. He has Divine attributes. Divine attributes are characteristics or qualities that God alone possesses. The Divine attributes are classified into: negative and positive. By the "Negative Attribute" they mean the negation of the negative, i.e. negation of imperfection. Among the most important are the following:[138]

  • The negative divine attributes are of two kinds; firstly those which are meant to deny all imperfections in God's Being, e.g., that he has no equal and no rival, no parents and no children; secondly those which indicate his beyondness, e.g., that he is not body or physical, is neither substance nor attribute, is not space or spatial, is not limited or finite, has neither dimensions nor relations, i.e., he is above the application of our categories of thought.
  • The positive divine attributes are such as life, knowledge, power, will, hearing, seeing, and speaking.[139]

The Ash'ari and Maturidi scholars emphasise that the Qur'an expresses that God does not need any of his creation as he is perfect.[140] He is immutable (does not change), self-subsisting and self-sufficient, without figure, form, colour or parts. His existence has neither beginning nor end. He is not a body composed of substances or elements. He is not an accident inherent in a body or dwelling in a place.[141] He is unique, unlike anything in his creation. He is ineffable, beyond human understanding, comprehension and therefore human description,[142] as per his words: "There is nothing whatever like Him."[Quran 42:11 (Translated by Ali Ünal)]

He is omnitemporal in the way that he is omnipresent, as per his words: "And He is with you, wherever you may be."[Quran 57:4 (Translated by Ali Ünal)] He is everywhere by his knowledge and power, and nowhere, without being in a place, direction or location, because He existed eternally before all the creations (including time and space) and is clear from change. He is always in the present, yet transcends time. God is not within time; time is one of his creations and does not affect him, so for him there is no past, present and future.

The Hanafi-Maturidi scholar, 'Ali al-Qari (d. 1014/1606) in his Sharh al-Fiqh al-Akbar states: "Allah the Exalted is not in any place or space, nor is He subject to time, because both time and space are amongst His creations. He the Exalted was present in pre-existence and there was nothing of the creation with Him".[59]

Thus, according to Maturidis and Ash'aris, God is beyond time and space, and is transcendent, infinite (not limited) and eternal, without beginning or end, as per his words: "He is the First, the Last, the All-Outward, and the All-Inward."[Quran 57:3 (Translated by Ali Ünal)] A hadith mentioned in Sahih Muslim explains this part of the verse as follows:[143][144]

O Allah, You are the First, there is none that precedes You. You are the Last, there is none that will outlive You. You are al-Zahir (the Manifest or the Most High), and there is nothing above You. You are al-Batin (the Hidden or the Most Near), and there is nothing below You (or nearer than You).

At the same time, he is near to everything that has being; nay, he is nearer to men than their jugular veins (this is alluded to in the verse 50:16), and is witness to everything —though his nearness is not like the nearness of bodies, as neither is his essence like the essence of bodies. Neither does he exist in anything or does anything exist in him; but he is beyond space and time; for he is the creator of space and time, and was before space and time were created, and is now after the same manner as He always was (i.e., without place nor time).

He is also distinct from the creatures in his attributes, neither is there anything besides himself in his essence, nor is his essence in any other besides him. He is too holy to be subject to change or any local motion; neither do any accidents dwell in him, nor any contingencies before him; but he abides with his glorious attributes, free from all danger of dissolution. As to the attribute of perfection, he wants no addition. As to being, he is known to exist by the apprehension of the understanding; and he is seen as he is by immediate intuition, which will be vouchsafed out of his mercy and grace to the believers in the paradise, completing their joy by the vision of his glorious presence.[145]

The possibility of seeing God in the afterlife became a pillar of the Ash'ari and the Maturidi schools. Al-Ash'ari holds that God will be seen in the next world by sight. Al-Maturidi also accepts the visibility of God, however his explanation is qualified: people will see God in way that it is incomprehensible to humans in this life and is not like the normal sight that we use to sense light and distance. Al-Ghazali promised that people would enjoy the pleasure of looking on God's noble face.[146]

Ash'aris and Maturidis insisted on the reality of that vision even if they admitted their inability to fully explain how it will happen. According to them, God can be seen even if he cannot be perceived through vision. Al-Ghazali in his al-Iqtisad fi al-I'tiqad (Moderation in Belief) explains the Ash'ari position that God will be seen in the afterlife despite the fact that he has no physical body, nor any location or direction.[147]

Mu'tazilis and Shi'is deny that God can be seen for the simple reason that visibility, as man understands it requires the object of vision to be in place and this is inconceivable in reference to God. Ash'aris and Maturidis agree with this proposition, but only if they are talking of vision here on Earth and within the physical laws applicable here. However, if it is going to happen somewhere else and under a different set of laws, visibility is possible, for whatever exists can be seen under proper conditions.[148]

Ash'aris and Maturidis unanimously agree that it is only in the Hereafter that God will be seen. Among the evidences that have been used by them in establishing the permissibility of seeing God are the following:

22. Some faces on that Day will be radiant (with contentment), 23. Looking up toward their Lord.

— translated by Ali Ünal, Quran, Al-Qiyama 75:22-23[149]

For those who do good is the greatest good, and even more.

— translated by Nureddin Uzunoğlu, Quran, Yunus 10:26

Goodness (or ihsan, husna) is to act in accordance with the wise commandments of God. Muhammad defined it as being a servant to God as though one saw him. The greatest good shall be for them (i.e., Paradise), and also "even more"; the delight of gazing upon the ineffable and blessed Countenance of God.[150]

It was narrated that Suhayb said:[151]

"The Messenger of Allah recited this verse: 'For those who have done good is the best (reward) and even more.' Then he said: 'When the people of Paradise enter Paradise, and the people of the Fire enter the Fire, a caller will cry out: "O people of Paradise! You have a covenant with Allah and He wants to fulfill it." They will say: "What is it?" Has Allah not made the Balance (of our good deeds) heavy, and made our faces bright, and admitted us to Paradise and saved us from Hell?" Then the Veil will be lifted and they will look upon Him, and by Allah, Allah will not give them anything that is more beloved to them or delightful, than looking upon Him.'"

— Narrated by Ibn Majah, al-Tirmidhi, and Muslim.

During the lifetime of Muhammad some people asked:[152]

"O Allah's Messenger! Shall we see our Lord on the Day of Resurrection?" The Prophet said: "Do you have any difficulty in seeing the moon on a full moon night?" They said: "No, O Allah's Messenger." He said: "Do you have any difficulty in seeing the sun when there are no clouds?" They said: "No, O Allah's Messenger." He said: "So verily, you would see Him like this (i.e., as easy as you see the sun and the moon in the world when it is clear)."

— Narrated by Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud, and Ibn Majah.

Muhammad said also in an authentic hadith mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Jami' al-Tirmidhi, Sunan Abi Dawud, and Sunan ibn Majah: "Certainly, you will see your Rubb (on the Day of Resurrection) as you see this (full) moon, and you will have no difficulty (or trouble) in seeing Him."[153][154]

In addition, the Qur'an also confirms in 83:15 that: "No! Indeed, from (the sight and mercy of) their Lord, that Day, they will be veiled/blocked (i.e., on the Day of Judgment, the disbelievers will not be able to see Him)."[Quran 83:15]

Among the most significant Ash'ari-Maturidi theological works are:

Mu'tazilis

[edit]

The Mu'tazilis reject the anthropomorphic attributes of God because an eternal being "must be unique" and attributes would make God comparable. The descriptions of God in the Quran are considered to be allegories.[155] Nevertheless, the Muʿtazilites thought God contains oneness (tawhid) and justice. Other characteristics like knowledge are not attributed to God; rather they describe his essence. Otherwise eternal attributes of God would give rise to a multiplicity entities existing eternal besides God.[156]

Among the most significant Mu'tazili theological works are:

  • Sharh al-Usul al-Khamsa (Explaining the Five Principles) by al-Qadi 'Abd al-Jabbar (d. 415/1025).
  • Al-Minhaj fi Usul al-Din (The Curriculum/Method in the Fundamentals of Religion) by al-Zamakhshari (d. 538/1144).

Jahmism

[edit]

The Jahmites were an early Islamic denomination who insisted on the absolute incomparablity of God and favored Natural theology. The founder Jahm bin Safwan was a major opponent of the Murjite and anthropomoprhist theologian Muqatil ibn Sulayman.

For the Jahmites, God is wholly other and imcomparable, removed from every conceptualization or description by humans. Jahmi derives his doctrine from his epistemology: since all conceptualization are derived from the created world, there is no way to envision God. The lack of attributes to God brought him the accusation of denial of God. However, because everything what happens in this world – including what is done by living beings – are God's actions, Jahmite's concept of God is pervading everything. Still, God is not mixed with creation and the object of worship remains transcendent. Jahms did not deny that the attributes of God are real or a thing, but argues that God is not a thing.[157] Furthermore, Jahm's epistemology is empiricistic not rationalistic. The created world is, for the Jahmites, ultimately unreal, as only God can be considered real.[158] This also sets them apart from the Mu'tazilites.

Due to God's absoluteness, Jahmites adhere to predestination and reject the view that a person has free will and insist that actions are determined by God. The Jahmiyya believed this because they thought that human free will would entail a limitation on God's power, and so must be rejected.[159] Since there is no essence and no self-existence in Jahmite's thought, except for God, the Jahmites also denied the eternity of paradise and hell.[160]

Shi'is

[edit]

The Shi'is agreed with the Mu'tazilis and deny that God will be seen with the physical eyes either in this world or in the next.[161][162][163]

Isma'ilis

[edit]

According to Isma'ilism, God is absolutely transcendent and unknowable;[164] beyond matter, energy, space, time, change, imaginings, intellect, positive as well as negative qualities. All attributes of God named in rituals, scriptures or prayers refers not to qualities God possesses, but to qualities emanated from God, thus these are the attributes God gave as the source of all qualities, but God does not consist on one of these qualities.[165] One philosophical definition of the world Allah is " The Being Who concentrates in Himself all the attributes of perfection "[166] or "the Person Who is the Essential Being, and Who encompasses all the attributes of perfection".[166] Since God is beyond all wordings, Isma'ilism also denies the concept of God as the first cause.[167]

In Ismailism, assigning attributes to God as well as negating any attributes from God (via negativa) both qualify as anthropomorphism and are rejected, as God cannot be understood by either assigning attributes to him or taking attributes away from him. The 10th-century Ismaili philosopher Abu Yaqub al-Sijistani suggested the method of double negation; for example: "God is not existent" followed by "God is not non-existent". This glorifies God from any understanding or human comprehension.[168]

Twelvers

[edit]

The Twelver Shi'is believe that God has no shape, no physical hand, no physical leg, no physical body, no physical face. They believe God has no visible appearance. God does not change in time, nor does he occupy a physical place. Under no circumstances, the Shi'is argues, does God change. There is also no time frame regarding God. As support for their view, Shi'i scholars often point to the Qur'anic verse 6:103 which states: "Eyes comprehend Him not, but He comprehends all eyes. He is the All-Subtle (penetrating everything no matter how small), the All-Aware." Thus one fundamental difference between Sunnis and Shi'is that the former believes that followers will "see" their Lord on the Day of Resurrection, while the latter holds that God cannot be seen because he is beyond space and time.[169]

Ibn 'Abbas says that a bedouin once came to the Messenger of Allah and said, "O Messenger of Allah! Teach me of the most unusual of knowledge!" He asked him, "What have you done with the peak of knowledge so that you now ask about its most unusual things?!" The man asked him, "O Messenger of Allah! What is this peak of knowledge?!" He said, "It is knowing Allah as He deserves to be known." The bedouin then said, "And how can He be known as He ought to be?" The Messenger of Allah answered, "It is that you know Him as having no model, no peer, no antithesis, and that He is Wahid (One, Single) and Ahad (Unique, Absolutely One): Apparent yet Hidden, the First and the Last, having no peer nor a similitude; this is the true knowledge about Him."[170]

Among the most significant Shi'i theological works are:

Sufism

[edit]

The majority of Sufis adhere to the same beliefs and practices of orthodox theology of Sunni Islam,[172] both the Ash'ari and Maturidi schools, the essential difference in theology being that Sufis believe Ma'iyyat Allah (God's presence, togetherness, companionship) – derived from the Qur'anic verse 4 in Surat al-Hadid which states: "and He is with you wheresoever you may be."[Quran 57:4 (Translated by Nureddin Uzunoğlu)] – is not only by knowledge, comprehension and power, but also by nature and essence, which is God himself, being everywhere by presence. According to Ahmad ibn 'Ajiba (d. 1224/1809) in his al-Bahr al-Madid:[173] Ahl al-Batin (people of the inner knowledge who follow the esoteric interpretation, i.e., the Sufis) have a consensus on that God is everywhere by presence and essence (in all places at once with his entire being despite his spacelessness), but without Hulul (God's indwelling, fusion/infusion, incarnation in creation) and without Ittihad (God's identification, unification, union with creation),[174] unlike Ahl al-Zahir (people of the outward observance; the uninitiated), who are unanimously agreed that God is omnipresent only by knowledge and power.[173]

Among the verses that Sufis rely on to prove God's omnipresence are:[174] 2:115; 2:255 (Ayat al-Kursi); 6:3; 43:84; 57:4; and 58:7. Based on these Qur'anic verses, God's omnipresence is not limited to certain areas, but is present everywhere, all-pervasive, and all-knowing.[175][176]

According to Muhammad Metwalli al-Sha'rawi (d. 1419/1998) in his interpretation (better known as Tafsir al-Sha'rawi [ar]) of the Qur'anic verses 56:83-85, which are mentioned in Surat al-Waqi'ah: "83. Why then (are you helpless) when it (i.e., the soul of a dying person at the moment of death) reaches the throat, 84. While you are looking on, 85. And We (i.e., God and/or His angels) are nearer/closer to him (the dying human) than you are, but you do not see."

Al-Sha'rawi stated that God's statement in verse 56:85 "but you do not see" proves clearly and unequivocally that Ma'iyyatullah (meaning 'companionship of God', literally: 'togetherness with God') is true/real with his essence (dhat), which is not like the essence of created beings, and his companionship is not only with knowledge, if so, then God wouldn't say "but you do not see".[177]

Since God in Islam is transcendental and sovereign but also immanent and omnipresent, the Sufi view holds that in reality, only God exists. Thus everything in creation is reflecting an attribute of God's names. Yet these forms are not God themselves.[178] The Sufi Saint Ibn Arabi stated: There is nothing but God. This statement was mistakenly equalized to Pantheism by critics; however, Ibn Arabi always made a clear distinction between the creation and the creator.[179] Since God is the Absolute Reality,[180] the created worlds and their inhabitants are merely illusions. They just exist because of God's command Kun, but everything that would be, was already known by God.[181]

Both beliefs Hulul (incarnation) and Ittihad (unification) had been severely denounced by moderate Sunni Sufis, such as 'Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulsi (d. 1143/1731), which he described as heresies.[182]

Among the most significant Sufi theological works are:

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In Islam, God is designated as Allāh (Arabic: الله‎), the singular, indivisible, and eternal entity who serves as the sole creator, sustainer, and sovereign of the universe, with —the doctrine of His absolute oneness—constituting the foundational principle of the faith. Allāh is affirmed in the as possessing no associates, progeny, or equivalents, transcending all creation while embodying perfect attributes including (al-Qadīr), (al-ʿAlīm), and mercy (al-Raḥmān). This monotheistic conception rejects any form of (shirk) or , positioning Allāh as utterly unique and incomparable to anything in existence. The Quran delineates Allāh's essence through 99 names (asmāʾ al-ḥusnā) that encapsulate His majesty and benevolence, such as Al-Malik (The Sovereign) and Al-Khāliq (The Creator), underscoring His unchallenged authority over all affairs without intermediaries or rivals. Islamic theology further emphasizes Allāh's transcendence (tanzīh), prohibiting anthropomorphic interpretations while allowing for His intimate knowledge and providence in human affairs, as evidenced in prophetic traditions (hadith) that reinforce submission (islām) to His will as the path to divine favor. Belief in Allāh's oneness demands exclusive worship and obedience, forming the bedrock against idolatry and doctrinal deviations observed in other traditions.

Terminology and Names

Etymology and Linguistic Origins

The Arabic term Allāh (الله‎), denoting God in Islam, derives etymologically from the contraction of al-ilāh (الْإِلَٰهُ), meaning "the deity" or "the god," wherein the definite article al- assimilates with the initial alif of ilāh, resulting in the fused form Allāh. This derivation is detailed in classical Arabic lexicons, including Ibn Manẓūr's Lisān al-ʿArab (completed circa 1290 CE), which traces ilāh to roots signifying worship or awe toward a divine entity. The process reflects standard Arabic morphological patterns for emphatic proper nouns, distinguishing Allāh as a unique designator rather than a generic term. Linguistically, ilāh originates from the Proto-Semitic biliteral root ʔ-L (or ʾil-), connoting or a god-like figure, with cognates across such as Hebrew ʾēl (אֵל), /Syriac ʾalāhā (ܐܠܗܐ), and Akkadian ilum. This root appears in pre-Islamic North Arabian inscriptions, such as those from the BCE, where variants like lh denote a high god. Some scholars propose influence on the Arabic form, given Syriac Christian usage of Allāhā for the monotheistic among Arabic-speaking communities in the by the 6th century CE. In , Allāh functioned as a proper name for a supreme among polytheistic tribes, invoked in pagan poetry and oaths as the lord of the , though subordinated to tribal idols like or al-Lāt. Nabataean and South Arabian from the 1st century CE to the 4th CE attests Allāh or Allāha in both pagan and monotheistic (Jewish/Christian) contexts, indicating its established role as a trans-local term for the divine before Islam's emergence in 610 CE. Islamic usage, beginning with the Quran's revelations, repurposed the term exclusively for the singular, incomparable God, rejecting pre-Islamic associations.

The Ninety-Nine Names and Their Implications

The doctrine of the Ninety-Nine Names of , termed Al-Asma al-Husna (the Most Beautiful Names), originates from authentic prophetic tradition wherein Abu Hurairah reported the Prophet Muhammad as saying: " has ninety-nine Names, one-hundred less one; and he who memorized them all by heart will enter Paradise." This , graded sahih (authentic), appears in collections such as and , emphasizing enumeration as a means to spiritual reward. The Qur'an corroborates the concept by directing believers to invoke by His finest names, stating in Surah Al-A'raf (7:180): "And to belong the best names, so invoke Him by them," and in Surah Ta-Ha (20:8): "—there is no god ˹worthy of worship˺ except Him. To Him belong the best names." These names are not arbitrary but derive primarily from Qur'anic descriptions of divine qualities, with Al-Hashr (59:23-24) exemplifying several: "He is Allah, the Creator (Al-Khaliq), the Inventor (Al-Bari'), the Fashioner (Al-Musawwir); to Him belong the best names." Traditional compilations, such as those by scholars like , aggregate them into categories reflecting God's essence, actions, and relations to creation, including attributes like (The Most Gracious), denoting universal mercy extended to all beings, and Al-Jabbar (The Compeller), signifying irresistible power without coercion in a tyrannical sense. While the exact list varies slightly across early sources due to interpretive differences in Qur'anic terms, core names consistently highlight perfections such as omniscience (Al-Aleem), omnipotence (Al-Qadir), and justice (Al-Adl), avoiding any implication of deficiency or resemblance to created entities. Theologically, the Ninety-Nine Names underscore tawhid al-asma wa al-sifat (the oneness of names and attributes), affirming God's transcendence (tanzih) while permitting affirmation of described qualities without anthropomorphic interpretation, as excessive literalism risks tashbih (likening to creation) and denial risks ta'til (negation of attributes). This framework counters polytheistic or idolatrous conceptions by portraying a singular, self-sufficient whose names reveal causal primacy in , mercy as the foundational motivator for creation, and as the balancer of divine will—principles rooted in first-order observations of order in the and moral intuition rather than abstract alone. Scholars interpret the memorization promise not as mechanical recitation but as internalizing implications for conduct, such as emulating through benevolence or recognizing sovereignty to submit willfully, thereby fostering ethical realism aligned with observable flourishing under divine governance. In practice, these names inform (du'a), where invoking Al-Ghafur (The Forgiving) during leverages specific attributes for psychological and spiritual efficacy, as evidenced in prophetic examples of targeted invocation yielding reported outcomes like relief from distress. The limitation to ninety-nine signifies completeness without exhaustive enumeration, as Allah's names exceed comprehension, per the hadith's phrasing implying additional undisclosed perfections.

Scriptural Foundations

Descriptions in the Quran

The Quran presents God, referred to as , as the singular, absolute deity without partners or equals, emphasizing His transcendence and uniqueness in multiple passages. This description forms the foundation of Islamic monotheism (), rejecting any form of or . Surah (Quran 112) provides a concise declaration of God's essence: "Say, 'He is , [who is] One, , the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, Nor is there to Him any equivalent.'" This surah, revealed in , underscores God's indivisible oneness (ahad), self-sufficiency, and incomparability, equating to one-third of the in reward for recitation according to traditions, though the focus here remains on its textual content. Ayat al-Kursi (Quran 2:255) elaborates on God's eternal life and sustenance: "Allah—there is no god except Him, the Ever-Living, the Sustainer of [all] existence. Neither drowsiness overtakes Him nor sleep. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the ." It further describes His encompassing —"He knows what is [presently] before them and what will be after them"—and supreme authority, portraying Him as the guardian over creation without fatigue or limitation. In Surah Al-Hashr (59:22-24), the Quran lists attributes affirming God's sovereignty and perfection: "He is , other than whom there is no , Knower of the unseen and the witnessed. He is the Entirely Merciful, the Especially Merciful. He is , other than whom there is no , the , the Pure, the Perfection, the Bestower of , the Overseer, the Almighty, the Compeller, the Superior." These verses conclude by identifying Him as "the Creator, the Inventor, the Fashioner; to Him belong the best names," reinforcing His role as originator of all forms while maintaining incomparability. Throughout the , God is depicted as the Creator of the heavens and (e.g., 6:102: "That is , your Lord; there is no except Him, the Creator of all things, so Him"), just and merciful yet holding over . Descriptions avoid physical likeness, emphasizing transcendence (tanzih), as in warnings against ascribing partners or human traits to Him.

Affirmations in the and

The , encompassing the Muhammad's practices and approvals, and the , his recorded sayings and actions, reinforce the Quranic affirmations of God's absolute oneness () and attributes through direct teachings on faith (Iman). A foundational narration, known as the Hadith of Jibril, records the defining Iman as beginning with affirmation of 's existence and uniqueness, followed by belief in His angels, scriptures, messengers, the Last Day, and divine decree—establishing as the bedrock of Islamic creed. This hadith, transmitted in , underscores that true faith originates in recognizing as the sole worthy of , without partners or equals. Specific emphasize Tawhid's salvific power. The Prophet stated that whoever sincerely testifies "There is no god but , is the Messenger of " enters a covenant protecting from Hellfire, as forbids the Fire from touching such a person, provided the testimony aligns with heart and action. This is echoed in narrations where even minimal weighted by "La ilaha illallah" suffices to extract one from Hell, highlighting its causal primacy in . The Prophet's repeated exhortations to renew this , as in his advice to Mu'adh ibn Jabal during travel, affirm it as a perpetual safeguard against (shirk). On divine attributes, the taught that possesses ninety-nine names, each encapsulating essential qualities like the Merciful (), the All-Knowing (Al-Alim), and the Compeller (Al-Qahhar), and memorizing and acting upon them guarantees Paradise. This from links comprehension of these attributes to eternal reward, affirming their reality without likening to creation. The 's practices, such as invoking these names in supplications and prayers—like concluding sessions with "Subhanallah," "," and "Allahu Akbar"—model habitual glorification of 's transcendence and power. Sunnah rituals embed these affirmations daily. In the five obligatory prayers (), the Prophet incorporated the in the , testifying to 's oneness and Muhammad's prophethood as a pillar of . He warned against associating partners with , equating shirk to the gravest , as in his statement that the final words on will be "La ilaha illallah" for salvation. These elements collectively demonstrate the Prophet's life as a lived affirmation of , prioritizing empirical adherence over speculative theology.

Core Principles of Tawhid

Absolute Oneness and Rejection of Shirk

The principle of tawhid (oneness) in Islam posits that God possesses absolute unity in essence, precluding any composition, division, or multiplicity within His being. This doctrine maintains that God is singular, self-subsistent, and independent of all creation, with no partners, offspring, or counterparts sharing in His divinity. The Quran articulates this in Surah Al-Ikhlas (revealed circa 613 CE in Mecca), declaring: "Say, He is Allah, [who is] One; Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, nor is there to Him any equivalent." This succinct chapter refutes pre-Islamic Arabian polytheism, which attributed progeny to deities, and Christian Trinitarianism by denying eternal generation or co-equality. Complementing the Quran, prophetic traditions reinforce as the bedrock of faith. The Prophet Muhammad stated in a hadith narrated by Muslim: "The right of Allah upon His slaves is that they worship Him alone and do not associate anything with Him," underscoring exclusivity in worship. Another narration in Sahih Bukhari records the Prophet identifying shirk (associationism) as the most severe sin, equating it to a farmer's partner devouring his crop undetected, symbolizing insidious compromise of divine unity. Shirk constitutes the direct antithesis of tawhid, defined as ascribing any partner, rival, or intermediary to in His lordship, , or attributes, thereby violating absolute oneness. The deems major shirk unforgivable without , stating: "Indeed, does not forgive association with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whom He wills." This prohibition extends to , deification of prophets or saints, and reliance on created beings for divine aid, as seen in Quranic critiques of Meccan pagans who associated angels or as intercessors without God's permission ( 39:3). Islamic classifies shirk into major (akbar), which expels one from the —such as prostrating to idols or invoking the dead—and minor (asghar), which diminishes faith without nullifying it, like oath-swearing by entities other than God. Hidden shirk (khafiyy), involving insincere intentions in (e.g., ostentation), further erodes purity of devotion. The rejection of shirk manifests in doctrinal imperatives: Muslims must direct all acts of worship ('ibadah)—prayer, sacrifice, vows—exclusively to , without dilution through saints, amulets, or celestial bodies. This stance, rooted in first-century AH (7th-8th CE) exegeses like those of , counters syncretic tendencies by emphasizing causal dependence solely on the Creator, not intermediaries. Theological works, such as Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab's Kitab al-Tawhid (18th century), systematize this by cataloging over 60 Quranic proofs against shirk, arguing that any perceived partnership undermines God's transcendence and sovereignty. Observance of thus demands vigilance against cultural accretions, as evidenced by historical purist movements like the 18th-century Wahhabi revival, which demolished shrines to restore unadulterated .

Categories of Tawhid: Rububiyyah, Uluhiyyah, and Asma wa Sifat

Tawhid, the doctrine of God's absolute oneness, is systematically categorized by Sunni scholars into three interconnected aspects to elucidate its comprehensive scope: Tawhid al-Rububiyyah (oneness of lordship), Tawhid al-Uluhiyyah (oneness of worship or divinity), and Tawhid al-Asma wa al-Sifat (oneness of names and attributes). This division, emphasized in works by scholars such as Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (d. 1792 CE), serves to affirm God's uniqueness across creation, adoration, and self-description without implying fragmentation of the singular reality of divine unity. Failure to uphold all three constitutes incomplete monotheism, as each builds upon the others; for instance, acknowledging God's lordship without exclusive worship equates to the polytheism (shirk) rejected in the Quran. Tawhid al-Rububiyyah entails affirming as the sole Creator (khaliq), Sustainer (rabb), Provider (razzaq), and sovereign Controller of all affairs in the , encompassing origination, sustenance, , , and decree without partners or intermediaries. This belief aligns with Quranic declarations such as " is the Creator of all things, and He is, over all things, Disposer of affairs" ( 39:62), and is universally acknowledged even by pre-Islamic who attributed creation to yet deviated in . While foundational, mere affirmation of this category insufficiently combats shirk if not paired with the others, as historical polytheists concurred on divine creation but directed devotion elsewhere. Tawhid al-Uluhiyyah demands directing all acts of worship—encompassing (du'a), , vows, , , and obedience—exclusively to , rejecting any rival deities or saints as objects of adoration. This category, central to prophetic missions, counters the primary Quranic of associating partners (shirk) in , as in "And most of them believe not in except while they associate others with Him" ( 12:106). Scholars note that even those affirming Rububiyyah fall into by invoking intermediaries, a practice condemned in such as the Muhammad's statement: "Whoever dies calling upon something besides as a rival to Allah will enter the Fire" ( 1236). Thus, Uluhiyyah operationalizes in practice, distinguishing true faith from nominal acknowledgment. Tawhid al-Asma wa al-Sifat requires affirming Allah's names and attributes exactly as enumerated in the Quran and authentic Sunnah—such as the Merciful (al-Rahman), the All-Knowing (al-Alim), and the All-Hearing (as-Sami)—without distortion (tahrif), negation (ta'til), resemblance to creation (tashbih), or speculative inquiry into their modality (kayfiyyah). This involves positive affirmation (ithbat) coupled with declaration of transcendence (tanzih), as in "There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing" (Quran 42:11). Deviations include anthropomorphic literalism or allegorical denial, both rejected by orthodox creeds; for example, the Athari approach upholds textual descriptions without "how," preserving divine uniqueness. This category integrates with the prior two by grounding lordship and worship in God's self-revealed essence, ensuring conceptual purity.

Divine Attributes and Transcendence

Essential Attributes: Eternity, Omniscience, Omnipotence

In Islamic , the essential attributes of (al-bāqī and al-qayyūm), (al-ʿalīm), and (al-qādir and al-muqtadir) define God's intrinsic nature as unchanging, all-encompassing in knowledge, and unlimited in power, distinct from created beings. These attributes are affirmed directly from the and without likening God to His creation or speculating on their modality (bilā kayf), emphasizing transcendence (tanzīh). They form the basis for understanding God's self-sufficiency and independence, as articulated in foundational creeds like that of Imam al-Tahawi (d. 933 CE), which states God is "the Everlasting, the Eternal, who does not perish," knows all concealed and manifest matters, and has power over everything. Eternity denotes God's without temporal origin or termination, pre-eternal (qadīm) and everlasting, uncaused by any prior entity. The describes God as "the Everlasting Refuge" (aṣ-Ṣamad), who "neither begets nor is born, nor is there to Him any equivalent," underscoring absolute independence from time or contingency. This attribute refutes any notion of God entering into or undergoing change, as affirmed in where the Prophet Muhammad (d. 632 CE) taught that God is "the First and the Last, the Ascendant and the Intimate," existing before creation and persisting after its potential annihilation. Classical scholars like Ibn Qudamah (d. 1223 CE) in Lumʿat al-Iʿtiqād explain this as God's essence being free from inception or cessation, contrasting with philosophical views that might impose Aristotelian necessities, prioritizing scriptural affirmation over rational constructs. Omniscience encompasses God's comprehensive knowledge of all realities—past, present, future, apparent, and hidden—including the unseen (ghayb) such as thoughts, intentions, and future events, without acquisition or forgetfulness. The states, "Unseen to you is what is in the night and the day; but We know what people earn in it, and He knows best what they hoard," and "He knows what is before them and what will be after them, but they do not comprehend Him in knowledge." In the , the reported God saying, "I know what is hidden and what is revealed," linking this to (qadar), where divine knowledge precedes and determines events without implying . Orthodox theologians, such as those in the Athari tradition, affirm this as an eternal attribute co-subsisting with God's essence, rejecting Mu'tazilite reductions to alone, as it aligns with observed patterns of accurately foretelling events like the (624 CE). Omnipotence signifies God's absolute power to effect any possible act aligned with His will, creating from nothing and sustaining existence instantaneously. The asserts, "Indeed, is over all things competent," and "When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, 'Be,' and it is," exemplified in miracles like splitting the sea for (circa 13th century BCE). collections record the emphasizing, " is Able to do all things," including resurrecting the dead, as demonstrated in Quranic narratives of past prophets. This excludes logical impossibilities (e.g., creating a square circle), not as limitation but as non-realities, per Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1328 CE), who argued in Majmūʿ al-Fatāwā that true power pertains to what accords with wisdom and justice, evidenced by the universe's fine-tuned constants like the gravitational force, which Islamic scholars historically attributed to divine rather than chance. Sunni creeds uniformly reject anthropomorphic constraints, affirming as eternal and unshared, countering any delegation (tafwīḍ) that might imply deficiency.

Relational Attributes: Creator, Sustainer, Merciful, Just

In Islamic , relational attributes denote God's active engagement with creation, emphasizing His roles in originating, preserving, and governing the in accordance with divine wisdom. These attributes underscore tawhid al-rububiyyah (the oneness of lordship), where God alone initiates existence, upholds it, extends benevolence, and enforces equity without partners or intermediaries. Unlike essential attributes such as , relational ones manifest through observable cosmic order and human experience, affirming from a singular, transcendent cause. As Creator (Al-Khaliq), God brings into being from non-existence, decreeing their forms and purposes without precedent or defect. The states: " is the Creator of , and He is, over , Disposer of affairs" (39:62), highlighting origination as an exclusive divine act repeated across 11 verses to refute polytheistic claims of multiple creators. This attribute implies purposeful design, as in the creation of heavens and in six stages (7:54), countering naturalistic explanations by attributing contingency to divine will rather than chance. God functions as Sustainer (Ar-Rabb), nurturing and maintaining creation's continuity through provision and regulation. Described as "Lord of the worlds" (1:2), Rabb encompasses fostering growth, from celestial orbits to biological sustenance, as evidenced in verses like "It is who created the heavens and the earth and sent down rain from the and produced thereby fruits as provision for you" (14:32). This role extends to metaphysical preservation, ensuring existence moment by moment, distinct from deistic detachment, and is affirmed in orthodox creeds as integral to recognizing divine sovereignty over natural laws. The attribute of Merciful ( and Ar-Rahim) portrays as source of universal compassion, with denoting all-encompassing and Ar-Rahim specific grace to believers. These names preface 113 , including "In the name of , the Entirely Merciful, the Especially Merciful" (1:1), and appear 57 and 114 times respectively, framing revelation as merciful guidance. (55:1-2) exemplifies this by enumerating bounties like human creation and cosmic balance as tokens of , outweighing wrath in divine economy (7:156: "My encompasses all things"). Such emphasis prioritizes benevolence in , though conditioned by response to divine commands. As Just (Al-Adl or embodiment of ), God upholds perfect equity, rewarding deeds proportionally and prohibiting oppression, without caprice or favoritism. The asserts: "Indeed, does not do , [even] as much as an atom's weight" (4:40), and mandates as a creational norm: "Indeed, orders and good conduct" (16:90). While Al-Adl is invoked in rationalist schools like Mu'tazila to affirm reason-aligned judgment, Sunni traditions derive from actions rather than a fixed name, rejecting anthropomorphic bias in adjudication yet affirming accountability on . This attribute reconciles mercy with retribution, ensuring moral causality in a theocentric framework.

Tanzih: Incomparability and Avoidance of

Tanzih, a core doctrine in Islamic theology, affirms God's absolute transcendence (tanzih al-asma' wa al-sifat), declaring Him exalted above any resemblance to creation and free from human-like limitations or forms. This emphasizes that God possesses no body, organs, or spatial direction, maintaining His utter incomparability (laysa ka-mithlihi shay') while upholding the reality of His attributes as described in . The Qur'an establishes tanzih as foundational, stating explicitly in Surah Ash-Shura 42:11, "There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing," which combines affirmation of sensory attributes with negation of similitude. Al-Ikhlas reinforces this by declaring, "And there is none comparable unto Him" (112:4), rejecting any equivalence between the divine essence and contingent existence. These verses counter (tashbih or tajsim), which involves likening to creatures—such as ascribing literal physical hands or descent—and is viewed as heretical by orthodox scholars for implying corporeality and compromising (). In application, tanzih accompanies tathbit (affirmation of attributes) without delving into modality (bi-la kayf), as practiced by early and codified in creeds like (c. 933 CE). Attributes such as God's "hand" (Qur'an 48:10) or "descent" (Sahih al-Bukhari, 1145) are accepted as they occur in texts but purified of human connotations, preventing ta'til (denial) or excessive rationalization. This method, echoed in classical exegeses by figures like (d. 1373 CE), balances scriptural fidelity with transcendence, distinguishing Sunni from literalist anthropomorphists (e.g., early Jahmiyya opponents) and negationist groups like the Mu'tazila. Debates on tanzih versus tashbih dominated early discourse, with transcendence prioritized to avert while affirming God's active relation to creation through will and power, not essence.

Theological Schools and Interpretations

Sunni Orthodox Perspectives

Sunni orthodox perspectives on God maintain that divine unity () is indivisible, encompassing oneness in essence, attributes, and actions, as articulated in foundational texts like al-Aqidah al-Tahawiyyah, compiled by Abu Ja'far al-Tahawi (d. 933 CE), which declares Allah's oneness without partners and affirms His attributes as revealed without resemblance to creation or speculative inquiry into their modality. These views, shared across Athari, Ash'ari, and Maturidi schools, derive exclusively from the and , rejecting rationalist negations (ta'til) by groups like the Mu'tazila or anthropomorphic literalism that implies spatial limitation. All three schools affirm core attributes—eternal life, knowledge, power, will, hearing, sight, and speech—as real and distinct from God's essence yet inseparable, while upholding transcendence (tanzih) to preclude tashbih (likening to the created). Methodological differences arise in defending these doctrines: Atharis prioritize textual affirmation without (speculative theology), whereas Ash'aris and Maturidis integrate rational arguments to refute philosophical deviations, though all concur on 's categories and avoid () in .

Athari Creed: Literal Affirmation Without Modality

The Athari , tracing to the (pious predecessors) and associated with scholars like (d. 855 CE), mandates ithbat (affirmation) of divine attributes (sifat) precisely as in , encompassing both essential (e.g., , power) and descriptive (khabariyyah, e.g., hand in 48:10, face in 55:27) without ta'wil (figurative reinterpretation), tamthil (analogy to creation), or bi-la kayf negation that implies doubt. Attributes like istiwa (rising over the , 20:5) are accepted as real, befitting divine majesty, without inquiring "how" (kaifiyyah) or positing directionality, thus preserving textual integrity over rational harmonization. This approach, exemplified in works like Ibn Qudamah's (d. 1223 CE) al-Lumah fi , critiques for potential distortion, insisting suffices against Jahmi or Mu'tazili denials.

Ash'ari and Maturidi Kalam: Interpretive Approaches and Tafwid

Ash'ari theology, founded by (d. 936 CE) after his shift from , and Maturidi theology by (d. 944 CE), employ to dialectically affirm attributes while safeguarding transcendence, often via tafwid (delegating modality to ) for mutashabihat (ambiguous texts) like "hand" (Quran 39:67) or "descent" (Sahih Bukhari 6:60:332), entrusting their meaning to divine wisdom without human delimitation. Essential attributes (sifat ma'nawiyyah, e.g., will, speech as eternal) are affirmed as neither identical to nor separate from essence, rejecting composition; some descriptive attributes receive ta'wil (e.g., istiwa as dominion, not literal position) to counter literalist excesses, though tafwid predominates in orthodox Ash'ari texts like al-Ibana. Maturidis, prevalent among Hanafis, similarly emphasize rational evidence for faith's acquisition but align closely with Ash'aris on attributes, diverging minimally (e.g., greater stress on human reason in ethics) while upholding the Tahawiyyah as authoritative. Both schools, comprising the majority of Sunni scholars historically, refute Aristotelian essence-accident binaries as inapplicable to , prioritizing scriptural fidelity.

Athari Creed: Literal Affirmation Without Modality

The Athari creed, representing the traditionalist approach within , mandates the affirmation (ithbat) of all divine attributes (sifat) explicitly mentioned in the and authentic , accepting their textual meanings without inquiring into or imposing a modality (kayfiyyah) upon them. This position, encapsulated in the formula bila kayf ("without how"), preserves the attributes' reality while negating any resemblance to created beings (tashbih) or delving into their existential "how" or essence, which is deemed beyond human comprehension and a potential source of (bid'ah). Proponents argue this mirrors the understanding of the (pious predecessors, including the Companions and early Successors), who recited verses on attributes such as Allah's Hand (, e.g., 48:10) or Face (wajh, e.g., 28:88) as they appear, affirming them as befitting Allah's majesty without spatial or corporeal implications. Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (780–855 CE), a foundational figure in Athari thought and founder of the , exemplified this by rejecting Mu'tazili demands during the (inquisition, 833–848 CE) to interpret or negate attributes like the 's eternity and divine descent (nuzul, e.g., Quran 70:3–4), insisting instead on unqualified affirmation coupled with transcendence (tanzih). He stated that attributes like the two Hands are real divine qualities, not limbs or composites, thereby avoiding both and denial (ta'til). Similarly, Ibn Qudamah al-Maqdisi (1147–1223 CE), in his Lum'at al-I'tiqad, asserts that the affirmed attributes such as rising over the (istawa, Quran 20:5) and coming on the Day of (Quran 89:22) literally yet without modality, as any speculative "how" risks likening Allah to creation or nullifying the texts. This literalism extends to all categories of attributes—essential (e.g., life, , power) and action-based (e.g., speaking, grasping, anger)—requiring in their and perfection without temporal origination or deficiency. Atharis criticize interpretive methods (ta'wil) as in Ash'ari for potentially altering apparent meanings to metaphors, viewing such as influenced by rationalist excesses akin to , while upholding tafwid al-ma'na (delegation of meaning) only to without suspending affirmation. Historical texts like those of the emphasize recitation and submission over philosophical probing, warning that modality questions lead to invalidation of scriptural proofs. In practice, this prioritizes textual fidelity, as seen in fatwas affirming attributes like (dahik) or (ghadab) from (e.g., Sahih Bukhari 7553), accepted as divine realities distinct from human analogs. Critics from schools contend this risks latent , but Atharis counter that true tanzih arises from affirming without likening, substantiated by the Salaf's consensus against both exaggeration and diminution.

Ash'ari and Maturidi Kalam: Interpretive Approaches and Tafwid

The Ash'ari school of kalam, established by Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari (c. 874–936 CE), emerged as a response to Mu'tazili rationalism, employing dialectical reasoning to uphold Sunni orthodoxy while safeguarding divine transcendence (tanzih). Ash'aris affirm God's attributes (sifat) as eternally subsistent with His essence, neither identical to nor separate from it, rejecting both anthropomorphism (tashbih) and negation (ta'til). For unambiguous attributes (sifat salba and sifat salim), they grant straightforward affirmation; however, for revealed attributes (sifat khabariyyah) in mutashabihat verses—such as God's "hand" (Quran 48:10) or "descent" (Quran 32:16)—they prioritize interpretations that preclude corporeal implications, often through ta'wil (figurative exegesis) or tafwid. Ta'wil involves reinterpreting terms metaphorically based on linguistic and contextual evidence, such as construing 's "hand" as power or "face" as essence, to align with rational demonstrations of 's incorporeality and dissimilarity to creation (Quran 42:11). This approach, systematized by later Ash'aris like (d. 1013 CE) and (d. 1085 CE), allows reconciliation of scriptural texts with philosophical proofs against spatiality or composition in , though early Ash'aris like al-Ash'ari himself inclined toward affirmation without modality (ithbat bi-la kayf) before fully endorsing interpretive flexibility. Tafwid, in contrast, entails affirming the textual wording while delegating its precise meaning (ma'na) or modality (kayfiyya) to God alone, avoiding speculative intrusion into divine realities. Ash'aris apply tafwid al-ma'na selectively for particularly opaque mutashabihat, preserving literal wording without human-imposed meanings that might imply resemblance to creatures, as articulated by al-Ghazali (d. 1111 CE) in Ihya' Ulum al-Din. This method underscores epistemic humility, recognizing human limitations in grasping divine essence, while rejecting unqualified literalism that risks tashbih. The Maturidi school, founded by (d. 944 CE) in , parallels in affirming divine attributes as real and eternal but places greater emphasis on rational intuition (fitra) and human accountability, viewing reason as a divine gift complementary to . Maturidis categorize attributes into essential (dhatiyyat), such as and , and active (fi'liyyat), like creating, affirming seven core attributes indispensable for God's existence: life, knowledge, will, power, hearing, seeing, and speech. On interpretation, Maturidis favor tafwid more consistently than Ash'aris for mutashabihat, consigning meanings to God to evade rational overreach, though they permit ta'wil when scriptural clarity or analogy demands it, such as interpreting "istawa 'ala al-'arsh" (Quran 20:5, "rose over the Throne") as dominion rather than literal ascent. This predilection for tafwid reflects al-Maturidi's Kitab al-Tawhid, which prioritizes textual fidelity while employing reason defensively against extremes, differing from Ash'ari proclivity for proactive ta'wil in kalam debates. Key distinctions between the schools on tafwid and ta'wil lie in methodological nuance: Ash'aris, influenced by Baghdad's philosophical milieu, integrate Aristotelian logic more extensively, justifying ta'wil via proofs of God's non-locality; Maturidis, rooted in Hanafi , stress ethical implications, using tafwid to affirm human in acquiring actions without compromising divine will. Both, however, converge as orthodox Sunni positions, endorsed by major jurists like (d. 1277 CE) and comprising the creed of most Sunni madhhabs today, countering literalist or negationist deviations.

Shia Doctrinal Variations

In , the doctrine of (divine unity) remains foundational, asserting God's absolute oneness in essence, attributes, and actions, but it is elaborated through the principle of , which posits the Imams as infallible, divinely designated successors to the who serve as authoritative interpreters of God's will without sharing in . This integration distinguishes Shia conceptions from Sunni views, where authority derives from communal consensus rather than direct divine appointment, though both affirm God's transcendence and reject . Shia , particularly in Twelver and Ismaili branches, further emphasizes (divine justice) as a core attribute, entailing that God acts only in accordance with wisdom and equity, influencing interpretations of and human responsibility.

Twelver Imami Views on Divine Unity

Twelver Shia (Ithna Ashariyya), comprising approximately 85-90% of Shia Muslims, uphold tawhid through three interconnected levels: unity of essence (tawhid al-dhat), where God's being is singular and indivisible, beyond composition or multiplicity; unity of attributes (tawhid al-sifat), affirming eternal qualities like omniscience and omnipotence as identical to the essence without modality; and unity of actions (tawhid al-af'al), where all events trace to God's sole agency, reconciled with human free will via divine justice. The Imamate, belief in twelve infallible Imams culminating in the occulted twelfth Imam (Muhammad al-Mahdi, born circa 869 CE and entered major occultation in 941 CE), functions as a manifestation of divine guidance, with Imams possessing ilm ladunni (divinely granted knowledge) to elucidate God's attributes and commands, yet remaining created servants (abd) subordinate to God. This doctrine counters accusations of shirk (associationism) by framing the Imams' authority as proof (hujjah) of God's unity, not partnership, drawing from hadiths like those in Kitab al-Kafi compiled by al-Kulayni (d. 941 CE). Twelver theologians, such as Allamah Tabatabai (d. 1981), integrate rationalist kalam methods akin to Mu'tazila influences, negating literal anthropomorphism (tashbih) while affirming attributes via tafwid (delegation of meaning to God) or interpretive equivalence (ta'til avoided).

Ismaili and Esoteric Interpretations

Ismaili Shia, including Nizari and Musta'li branches, interpret tawhid esoterically (batini), transcending exoteric (zahiri) personalist depictions of God as a anthropomorphic sovereign, instead positing God as the supreme, ineffable Intellect ('aql awwal) beyond categorical being, attributes, or temporality, with creation emanating hierarchically through spiritual entities ('awalim) without compromising absolute unity. This view, articulated in Fatimid-era texts like those of Nasir-i Khusraw (d. 1088 CE), employs ta'wil (allegorical exegesis) to reveal Qur'anic verses as symbols of metaphysical realities, where the living Imam (e.g., Aga Khan IV since 1957) embodies the prophetic light (nur) as God's proof, enabling esoteric gnosis (irfan) of divine oneness. Unlike Twelver emphasis on juridical and ethical tawhid, Ismaili doctrine risks monistic interpretations—criticized by orthodox Sunnis as blurring creator-creation distinctions—but maintains strict transcendence, rejecting incarnation or pantheism; God remains utterly other (tanzih), with emanations as necessary effects, not co-eternal partners. Scholarly analyses, such as those by Khalil Andani, highlight this as the most uncompromising Islamic affirmation of divine simplicity, harmonizing with philosophical influences like Neoplatonism while rooted in Qur'an 112 (Surah al-Ikhlas). Ismaili practice integrates tawhid with cyclical prophetic history, where each Imam unveils deeper layers of unity, adapting to contemporary contexts like scientific rationalism.

Twelver Imami Views on Divine Unity

In Twelver Imami theology, divine unity, or tawhid, constitutes the foundational principle of faith, asserting the absolute oneness of God in essence, attributes, and actions, without partners, composition, or multiplicity. This doctrine, derived from Quranic verses such as "Say: He is Allah, the One" (Quran 112:1), emphasizes God's indivisible simplicity (ahadiyyah al-dhat), rejecting any division into parts or associates that would imply dependency or limitation. Twelver scholars, drawing on narrations from the Imams, maintain that true monotheism requires affirming God's self-sufficiency, as any plurality in divinity leads to logical contradictions, such as an infinite regress of creators necessitating one another. Tawhid al-dhat, the unity of , holds that 's being is singular, eternal, and beyond categorization or limitation, as articulated by Imam : the divine admits no multiplicity or separation. This view precludes anthropomorphic interpretations, insisting transcends created modalities while remaining the necessary existent (wajib al-wujud). Twelvers refute polytheistic implications by citing proofs like the unified order of the , which evidences a single originator rather than competing forces. Tawhid al-sifat, unity of attributes, posits that God's qualities—such as knowledge, power, and will—are not distinct entities added to His but identical with it, preserving simplicity and avoiding the notion of multiple eternal realities. Unlike certain Sunni interpretations that affirm separate eternal attributes, Twelvers, following Ali's statements in , reject such distinctions as implying composition, which would undermine God's transcendence (tanzih). Attributes thus subsist as necessary implications of the , not accidents or additions. Tawhid al-af'al, unity of actions, asserts that all events and creations originate solely from God's will and power, with no independent agents or intermediaries in causation. While human actions are morally attributable to individuals for accountability, they occur through divine enablement, as Imam al-Sadiq explained that multiple creators would entail endless dependency. This reconciles with responsibility, emphasizing God's sole agency without negating secondary causes. The , central to Twelver doctrine, reinforces rather than compromises tawhid, as s are infallible human guides appointed by God, not divine shares or creators.

Ismaili and Esoteric Interpretations

In Ismaili , the doctrine of asserts 's absolute unity and transcendence beyond all categorical descriptions, surpassing anthropomorphic or personalist conceptions prevalent in other Islamic traditions. is deemed utterly incomparable (tanzīh), devoid of attributes, names, or modalities that could limit divine essence to created realities, as affirmed in foundational texts like those of early Ismaili philosophers who describe the divine as transcending both being and non-being. This view positions Ismaili as the most uncompromising affirmation of among Islamic schools, rejecting any composition or multiplicity in 's nature. Esoteric interpretation (ta'wil) plays a central role in Ismaili understandings of , unveiling the inner (bāṭin) dimensions of Quranic verses that exoteric (ẓāhir) readings might literalize. Through ta'wil, guided by the Imam's , apparent references to divine actions or attributes—such as "hand" or "speech"—are allegorized to denote emanative processes from the divine command (amr), preserving 's ineffability while explaining creation's origination via intermediaries like the Universal (ʿaql kullī). This hermeneutic, rooted in the teachings of Imams like Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq, posits that true of requires initiation beyond rational limits, emphasizing the Imam's role in revealing esoteric truths inaccessible to unaided . Ismaili doctrine thus frames God's relationship to creation not as direct intervention but through a hierarchical of intellects and souls emanating from the divine essence, ensuring transcendence while accounting for cosmic order and prophetic . Thinkers like Naṣīr-i Khusraw elaborated this in works such as Zād al-musāfir, interpreting Quranic esoterically as cycles of divine manifestation rather than temporal events. Such interpretations maintain causal realism by attributing observable phenomena to secondary causes, avoiding both and .

Mu'tazila and Rationalist Challenges

The Mu'tazila emerged as a rationalist theological school in early Abbasid around 748 CE, founded by (d. 748 CE), who emphasized the application of human reason to religious texts alongside revelation. Their approach prioritized (divine unity) and 'adl (divine justice) as foundational principles, arguing that God's absolute oneness precludes any eternal attributes distinct from His essence, as such distinctions would imply plurality or composition in the divine nature. This stance directly challenged traditionalist interpretations that affirmed Quranic descriptions of God's attributes—such as speech, knowledge, and power—literally, without qualification, viewing them as risking (tashbih) by suggesting similarity to created beings. Central to Mu'tazili thought on God was the that divine attributes are identical to God's simple, indivisible , denying any real distinction to preserve transcendence (tanzih). For instance, they interpreted references to God's "hand" or "face" in the as metaphorical, denoting power or rather than physical limbs, to avoid ascribing corporeality or locality to the divine. God's justice ('adl) further implied that He acts only in accordance with wisdom and goodness, incapable of or ; thus, human was essential, as predestining would contradict divine equity by making God the author of . This rationalist framework, influenced by Hellenistic logic, positioned reason as a criterion for validating , asserting that truths—like the intrinsic of —are knowable independently of scripture. A pivotal challenge arose from their assertion of the Quran's createdness, maintaining that the Quran, as God's speech, must be temporal and contingent to uphold tawhid, lest an uncreated eternal Quran imply a co-eternal entity alongside God. This view gained state enforcement during the mihna (inquisition) under Caliph al-Ma'mun (r. 813–833 CE), who compelled scholars to affirm it, leading to persecution of dissenters like Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 855 CE), who upheld the Quran's uncreated eternity as integral to divine speech. Mu'tazili rationalism extended to rejecting intercession (shafa'a) for sinners without repentance, emphasizing accountability over unmerited divine favor, and critiquing deterministic views in schools like the Jabriyya that attributed all actions to God. Later rationalist extensions, building on Mu'tazili foundations, appeared in (falsafa), where thinkers like (d. 950 CE) and Ibn Sina (, d. 1037 CE) employed Aristotelian categories to conceptualize as the Necessary Existent, whose essence entails existence without composition or change. These efforts intensified challenges to literalist by analogizing divine causation to abstract necessity rather than willful acts akin to human agency, though they faced accusations of introducing emanationist hierarchies that diluted direct divine volition. Despite their decline post-10th century amid Sunni orthodox consolidation, Mu'tazili principles influenced Shia theology and ongoing debates on reconciling reason with scriptural literalism.

Sufi Conceptions: Mystical Union and Risks of Monism

Sufism, the esoteric dimension of Islam, conceives of God as the object of intimate, experiential knowledge (ma'rifah), attained through spiritual purification, remembrance (dhikr), and ascetic practices rather than solely intellectual or legalistic means. Sufi theology upholds tawhid (divine oneness) but emphasizes God's nearness (qurb) and manifestation (tajalli) in the heart of the seeker, viewing the divine essence as beyond rational comprehension yet accessible via love ('ishq) and annihilation of the ego. Central to this is the progression toward mystical union, where the seeker's self (nafs) undergoes fana' (annihilation or passing away), a state of ego dissolution in divine reality, followed by baqa' (subsistence or abiding), wherein the individual persists in God while retaining awareness of divine transcendence. This union is not literal fusion but a realized dependence on God, echoing Qur'anic imagery of the servant's return to the Lord (e.g., Quran 89:27-28). Prominent Sufis like Abu Yazid al-Bistami (d. 874 CE) described fana' through ecstatic utterances, portraying the self's obliteration before divine majesty, while later figures such as Jalaluddin Rumi (d. 1273 CE) used poetic metaphors of the lover's merger with the Beloved to evoke this state without ontological identity. In orthodox Sufi orders (tariqas), such as the Qadiriyya founded by Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani (d. 1166 CE), union maintains strict distinction between Creator and creation, aligning with tawhid by subordinating human experience to Sharia compliance. However, advanced doctrines like wahdat al-wujud (unity of being), articulated by Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi (d. 1240 CE), posit that existence is singular and divine, with creation as modalities or manifestations of God's reality, aiming to resolve the paradox of divine unity amid multiplicity. This conception carries risks of monism, where the absolute unity of being may blur essential distinctions between God and the world, potentially implying pantheism—the erroneous equation of the contingent with the Necessary Existent—or incarnation (hulul), as seen in Mansur al-Hallaj's (d. 922 CE) declaration "I am the Truth" (ana al-haqq), interpreted by critics as self-deification. Orthodox scholars, including Taqi al-Din Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1328 CE), critiqued such views for undermining tanzih (divine incomparability) and fostering illusions of unity that contradict Qur'anic affirmations of God's otherness (e.g., Quran 42:11), arguing they lead to theological errors like denying real creation ex nihilo or excusing moral responsibility under deterministic oneness. In response, reformers like Ahmad Sirhindi (d. 1624 CE) advanced wahdat al-shuhud (unity of witnessing), preserving tawhid by emphasizing perceptual unity in the observer rather than existential monism, thus mitigating risks while retaining mystical depth. These critiques highlight how unchecked esoteric interpretations can deviate from prophetic orthodoxy, prompting mainstream Sufism to subordinate mysticism to exoteric revelation.

Relationship to Creation and Humanity

Act of Creation Ex Nihilo

In Islamic theology, the doctrine of creation ex nihilo—from absolute nothing—asserts that (Allah) brought the heavens, , and all into being without any pre-existing material or cause, solely through His divine will and command. This view underscores 's absolute sovereignty and , distinguishing it from Aristotelian or Neoplatonic notions of an eternal universe or emanation from divine essence. The describes as the "Originator" (Badi') of the heavens and the earth, emphasizing origination without precedent or intermediary substance. The primary scriptural basis is found in verses such as Al-Baqarah 2:117, which states: "Originator of the heavens and the . When He decrees a , He only says to it, 'Be,' and it is," indicating instantaneous creation by fiat from non-existence. Similar affirmations appear in 16:40: "Our word to a thing when We intend it is only that We say to it, 'Be,' and it is," and Ya-Sin 36:82, reinforcing that God's command alone suffices for existence to emerge from nothingness. qudsi, such as those narrated in collections like , portray God declaring, "I was a Treasure, but it was not known, so I loved to be known; thus I created creation to be known," implying prior non-existence of created things while affirming God's eternal . Orthodox theologians, including Ash'ari and Maturidi scholars, defended this doctrine against rationalist philosophers like (Ibn Sina), who posited an eternal world emanating necessarily from , arguing instead that the has a temporal beginning to preserve divine and avoid implying compulsion in God's act. , in works like , critiqued eternalism as incompatible with scriptural evidence of origination and divine volition, positing that God's creative act is free, instantaneous, and uncaused by any substrate. This perspective integrates atomistic occasionalism, where continuously re-creates the world anew at each moment from potentiality to actuality, ensuring no independent causal power resides in creation. The doctrine implies profound implications for divine attributes: God's contrasts with the contingent, originated status of the cosmos, refuting any co-eternal entities and affirming (divine unity) by excluding primordial matter as a rival. While some Mu'tazili rationalists emphasized over pure will, potentially allowing interpretive leeway on , Sunni consensus, as codified in creeds like Al-Tahawi's, upholds ex nihilo creation as essential to affirming God's role as sole, unoriginated Creator. Shia traditions similarly affirm this through Imami texts, viewing creation as God's manifestation of hidden treasures without material precondition.

Divine Decree, Predestination, and Human Responsibility

In Islamic , qadar (divine decree) refers to God's eternal knowledge, will, and creation of all events, encompassing both as part of His absolute sovereignty. This doctrine is affirmed in the , such as in Surah Al-Qamar 54:49, which states, "Indeed, all things We created with qadar," indicating predetermination from eternity. Belief in qadar constitutes one of the six articles of (iman) in Sunni , as narrated in a reported by Muslim: " is to believe in , His angels, His books, His messengers, the Last Day, and to believe in the divine decree, both the good and the thereof." The divine decree operates in four stages—Allah's knowledge, writing in the Preserved Tablet (al-Lawh al-Mahfuz), His will, and creation—ensuring nothing occurs outside His plan. Despite this predestination, Islam upholds human responsibility (taklif), asserting that individuals are accountable for their choices and actions on the Day of Judgment. The Quran repeatedly emphasizes moral agency, as in Surah Al-Isra 17:15: "And never would We punish until We sent a messenger," linking punishment to willful rejection after clear guidance. Humans possess a faculty of discernment (tamyiz) and volition, enabling them to choose between obedience and sin, though all acts are ultimately created by God. This avoids the fatalism (jabr) of early groups like the Jabariyya, who denied human input, and the negation of decree by the Qadariyya, who prioritized autonomy over divine power; orthodox scholars rejected both extremes. Theological schools reconcile qadar with responsibility through concepts like kasb (acquisition). In Ash'ari thought, prevalent among Shafi'is and Malikis, God creates the act, but the human "acquires" it via their intention, preserving accountability without impugning divine causation. Maturidi theology, dominant in Hanafis, grants greater emphasis to human will as a secondary cause empowered by God, arguing that encompasses foreknowledge of choices rather than compulsion. A in Sahih Bukhari illustrates this balance: the Prophet Muhammad stated that striving (sa'y) determines one's provision, lifespan, and fate, urging effort despite decree. Thus, qadar motivates reliance on God () alongside action, as contradicts prophetic injunctions to enjoin good and forbid evil. Critics from rationalist traditions like Mu'tazila argued that true justice requires unaided human to exonerate from authoring evil, but this view was marginalized for undermining . Mainstream Sunni consensus, as in the creed of (d. 933 CE), affirms: "We believe in the divine decree... and that the servant has no excuse before " for sins, attributing evil to human misuse of -given faculties. This framework underscores causal realism: divine foreknowledge, being timeless, does not negate sequential human deliberation, akin to knowing a free choice without forcing it. Empirical observance in Muslim practice shows believers invoking qadar for consolation in calamity while pursuing ethical striving, rejecting passive .

God's Interaction with the World: Miracles and Providence

In Islamic , God interacts with the world through , which are deliberate suspensions of natural laws to affirm prophetic missions, and providence, the continuous sustenance and orchestration of creation under divine will. , termed muʿjizāt, occur exclusively by God's permission and serve as signs (āyāt) of His power, challenging disbelievers to produce equivalents. The Qurʾān recounts numerous such events, emphasizing their role in evidencing divine support for messengers rather than inherent prophetic power. Prophetic miracles include Moses' staff transforming into a serpent and parting of the sea (Qurʾān 7:107-117, 26:63), Jesus' creation of a bird from clay, healing the blind and lepers, and raising the dead (Qurʾān 5:110), and 's splitting of the moon (Qurʾān 54:1-2). For , the Qurʾān itself constitutes the primary enduring miracle, cited for its linguistic inimitability and challenge to humanity and to replicate it (Qurʾān 17:88, 2:23). These acts underscore God's over , occurring only when prophets face denial, as in the case of the moon's cleavage witnessed by Meccans around 614 CE. Providence, linked to God's attribute of (Lord and Sustainer), entails the perpetual renewal of creation's existence and provision of sustenance (rizq) to all beings (Qurʾān 11:6, 51:22). In Ashʿarī and Māturīdī kalām, this manifests through occasionalism, wherein God directly originates every event and motion at each instant, negating enduring secondary causes to ensure absolute dependence on divine agency. Human actions acquire moral weight via kasb (acquisition), where individuals intend and God creates the act, reconciling with (qadar). Atharī perspectives affirm God's direct intervention without interpretive modalities, viewing providence as unfolding His eternal decree while upholding human accountability. This framework posits no autonomous natural order apart from God's will, with as intensified expressions of providential control, as providence governs routine affairs like rainfall and harvests (Qurʾān 14:32) while override them for evidentiary purposes. Theological consensus holds that such interactions affirm tawḥīd (divine unity) by demonstrating God's transcendence and without or delegation.

Controversies and External Perspectives

Internal Debates on Divine Attributes and Sifat

The debates on divine attributes (sifat) within Islamic theology primarily concern reconciling explicit Quranic descriptions—such as God's "hand" (Quran 48:10), "face" (Quran 55:27), and "speech"—with the doctrine of tawhid (divine unity) and transcendence (tanzīh), avoiding both anthropomorphism (tashbīh or tajsīm) and outright negation (taʿṭīl). These discussions emerged in the 8th-10th centuries CE amid responses to Hellenistic influences and internal schisms, with key contention over whether attributes imply multiplicity in God's essence or are merely verbal predicates. The Mu'tazila, prominent under Abbasid patronage from the early , prioritized rational inference to safeguard unity, positing that attributes like and power are identical to God's rather than distinct realities, lest they suggest composition (tarkīb). They interpreted descriptive texts metaphorically (taʾwīl), equating God's "hand" with power, and extended this to viewing divine speech as created acts, as enforced during the miḥna (833-848 CE) under Caliphs and . This stance, critiqued for excessive that bordered on negating textual literalism, aimed to eliminate any eternal distinctions that could imply (shirk) but was rejected by traditionalists for undermining scriptural authority. Athari traditionalists, exemplified by (780-855 CE), countered by insisting on unqualified affirmation (ithbāt) of attributes as per prophetic reports (aṯār) and , without speculative inquiry into "how" (bi-lā kayf) or likening to creation. Ibn Hanbal's resistance during the miḥna, where he endured imprisonment and flogging for refusing to deem the created (as an attribute of speech), solidified this approach, emphasizing delegation of meaning (tafwīḍ) to God and warning against innovation (bidʿa) in creed. Atharis distinguished "essential" attributes (e.g., eternal life, knowledge) from "relational" or "actional" ones (e.g., creating), rejecting Mu'tazilite identification to preserve divine otherness without denial. Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari (874-936 CE), initially Mu'tazilite but later a critic, forged a mediating Ash'ari synthesis dominant in Sunni orthodoxy: attributes are real, subsistent (qāʾim), and eternal yet neither identical to nor separable from the essence, affirmed without modality or resemblance. Employing kalām (dialectical theology) to refute Mu'tazila via proofs like the eternity of divine acts implying eternal will, Ash'aris categorized attributes as seven core ones (life, knowledge, will, power, hearing, seeing, speech) plus others, interpreting ambiguous texts via tafwīḍ al-maʿnā wa-l-ṣifah (delegating both wording and meaning). The Maturidi school, founded by Abu Mansur al-Maturidi (d. 944 CE), aligned closely but leaned more on rational compatibility with revelation, viewing attributes as necessary concomitants (lāzim) of essence. These positions, while resolving early polarities, persist in tensions with Salafi revivals emphasizing Athari literalism.

Critiques from Christian Theology: Differences in Love and Trinity

Christian theologians contend that the Islamic conception of God as strictly unitary under tawhid—affirming absolute oneness without internal distinctions—undermines the relational essence of divinity central to Trinitarian doctrine, where God eternally exists as three co-equal persons (Father, Son, and ) in one substance, as defined at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE. This intra-Trinitarian communion allows for perpetual love and fellowship within God's being, independent of creation, reflecting the biblical assertion that "God is love" (1 John 4:8). In critiques, figures like argue that tawhid's monadic view portrays God as solitary prior to the world's existence, lacking inherent relationality and thus rendering divine love extrinsic or contingent rather than intrinsic to God's nature. A key difference highlighted is the eternality of divine love: Trinitarian theology posits that the Father's love for the Son, exemplified in events like the baptism of Jesus (Matthew 3:17), demonstrates self-sufficient, overflowing love that motivates creation and redemption without need for recipients outside God. Islamic theology, by rejecting such distinctions, is critiqued for implying that Allah's attributes like mercy (rahma) and love (hubb or mawadda) become fully actualized only through interaction with creation, as Allah commands love in response to obedience (Quran 3:31, 3:32). Christian apologists such as those from the Christian Research Institute emphasize that this makes Islamic divine love volitional and selective—extended to believers but withheld from disbelievers (Quran 2:276, 3:57)—contrasting with Christianity's unconditional, sacrificial agape manifested in the cross. Furthermore, the is defended as resolving philosophical issues of divine and perfection: a purely unitary risks isolation, potentially motivating creation out of loneliness rather than gratuitous abundance, whereas Trinitarian relationality ensures 's self-sufficiency and models human community (e.g., , the mutual indwelling of persons). Early critiques, such as those by in De Haeresibus (c. 730 CE), framed Islamic rejection of the as a misunderstanding of divine unity, equating it to or while ignoring hypostatic distinctions. Modern scholars like Kenneth Cragg echo this, arguing that prioritizes numerical oneness over ontological richness, limiting 's capacity for eternal self-giving love. These differences lead some Christian thinkers to question whether the Islamic fully embodies the personal, loving relationality revealed in Christ.

Non-Muslim and Secular Criticisms: Conditionality of Mercy and Sovereignty Claims

Critics from Christian theology contend that the Islamic depiction of divine mercy is inherently conditional, requiring human faith, submission, and good deeds as prerequisites, in contrast to the Christian portrayal of God's love as unconditional and extending even to enemies and sinners. Philosopher William Lane Craig argues that the Qur'an portrays Allah's love as partial, reserved for those who first demonstrate piety or belief, such as in statements that God does not love unbelievers or certain transgressors, thereby making mercy something earned rather than an intrinsic, impartial attribute. This framework, critics assert, diminishes the moral depth of divine benevolence, positioning Allah as a reciprocal patron whose forgiveness hinges on obedience, potentially fostering a relationship of transaction over grace. Secular and philosophical critiques extend this to the broader implications of absolute sovereignty, particularly in Ash'arite voluntarism, where moral good and evil derive exclusively from God's commands rather than any independent rational or ethical standard. This doctrine, emphasizing omnipotence without constraint, is faulted for rendering divine actions potentially arbitrary, as sovereignty overrides necessity or inherent justice, allowing outcomes like eternal punishment for finite disbelief irrespective of moral conduct. Thinkers such as Franz Rosenzweig have described this as portraying a despotic creator whose arbitrary will governs creation without losing control, undermining claims of principled mercy by subordinating it to unbridled power. Such views raise concerns about causal realism in divine-human relations, where mercy's conditionality reflects not benevolence but the sovereign's prerogative to withhold it, challenging secular notions of equitable governance or universal human dignity unbound by doctrinal fealty.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.