Hubbry Logo
AutomatonAutomatonMain
Open search
Automaton
Community hub
Automaton
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Automaton
Automaton
Automaton
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Pinocchio automaton

An automaton (/ɔːˈtɒmətən/ ⓘ; pl.: automata or automatons) is a relatively self-operating machine, or control mechanism designed to automatically follow a sequence of operations, or respond to predetermined instructions.[1] Some automata, such as bellstrikers in mechanical clocks, are designed to give the illusion to the casual observer that they are operating under their own power or will, like a mechanical robot. The term has long been commonly associated with automated puppets that resemble moving humans or animals, built to impress and/or to entertain people.

Animatronics are a modern type of automata with electronics, often used for the portrayal of characters or creatures in films and in theme park attractions.

Etymology

[edit]

The word automaton is the latinization of the Ancient Greek automaton (αὐτόματον), which means "acting of one's own will". It was first used by Homer to describe an automatic door opening,[2] or automatic movement of wheeled tripods.[3] It is more often used to describe non-electronic moving machines, especially those that have been made to resemble human or animal actions, such as the jacks on old public striking clocks, or the cuckoo and any other animated figures on a cuckoo clock.

History

[edit]

Ancient

[edit]
The book About automata by Hero of Alexandria (1589)

There are many examples of automata in Greek mythology: Hephaestus created automata for his workshop;[4][5] Talos was an artificial man of bronze; King Alkinous of the Phaiakians employed gold and silver watchdogs.[6][7] According to Aristotle, Daedalus used quicksilver to make his wooden statue of Aphrodite move.[8][9] In other Greek legends he used quicksilver to install voice in his moving statues.

The automata in the Hellenistic world were intended as tools, toys, religious spectacles, or prototypes for demonstrating basic scientific principles. Numerous water-powered automata were built by Ktesibios, a Greek inventor and the first head of the Great Library of Alexandria; for example, he "used water to sound a whistle and make a model owl move. He had invented the world's first 'cuckoo clock'".[a] This tradition continued in Alexandria with inventors such as the Greek mathematician Hero of Alexandria (sometimes known as Heron), whose writings on hydraulics, pneumatics, and mechanics described siphons, a fire engine, a water organ, the aeolipile, and a programmable cart.[10][11] Philo of Byzantium was famous for his inventions.

The Antikythera mechanism from c. 200–80 BC was designed to calculate the positions of astronomical objects.

Complex mechanical devices are known to have existed in Hellenistic Greece, though the only surviving example is the Antikythera mechanism, the earliest known analog computer.[12] The clockwork is thought to have come originally from Rhodes, where there was apparently a tradition of mechanical engineering; the island was renowned for its automata; to quote Pindar's seventh Olympic Ode:

The animated figures stand
Adorning every public street
And seem to breathe in stone, or
move their marble feet.

However, the information gleaned from recent scans of the fragments indicate that it may have come from the colonies of Corinth in Sicily and implies a connection with Archimedes.

According to Jewish legend, King Solomon used his wisdom to design a throne with mechanical animals which hailed him as king when he ascended it; upon sitting down an eagle would place a crown upon his head, and a dove would bring him a Torah scroll. It is also said that when King Solomon stepped upon the throne, a mechanism was set in motion. As soon as he stepped upon the first step, a golden ox and a golden lion each stretched out one foot to support him and help him rise to the next step. On each side, the animals helped the King up until he was comfortably seated upon the throne.[13]

In ancient China, a curious account of automata is found in the Lie Zi text, believed to have originated around 400 BCE and compiled around the fourth century CE. Within it there is a description of a much earlier encounter between King Mu of Zhou (1023–957 BCE) and a mechanical engineer known as Yan Shi, an 'artificer'. The latter proudly presented the king with a very realistic and detailed life-size, human-shaped figure of his mechanical handiwork:

The king stared at the figure in astonishment. It walked with rapid strides, moving its head up and down, so that anyone would have taken it for a live human being. The artificer touched its chin, and it began singing, perfectly in tune. He touched its hand, and it began posturing, keeping perfect time...As the performance was drawing to an end, the robot winked its eye and made advances to the ladies in attendance, whereupon the king became incensed and would have had Yen Shih [Yan Shi] executed on the spot had not the latter, in mortal fear, instantly taken the robot to pieces to let him see what it really was. And, indeed, it turned out to be only a construction of leather, wood, glue and lacquer, variously coloured white, black, red and blue. Examining it closely, the king found all the internal organs complete—liver, gall, heart, lungs, spleen, kidneys, stomach and intestines; and over these again, muscles, bones and limbs with their joints, skin, teeth and hair, all of them artificial...The king tried the effect of taking away the heart, and found that the mouth could no longer speak; he took away the liver and the eyes could no longer see; he took away the kidneys and the legs lost their power of locomotion. The king was delighted.[14]

Other notable examples of automata include Archytas' dove, mentioned by Aulus Gellius.[15] Similar Chinese accounts of flying automata are written of the 5th century BC Mohist philosopher Mozi and his contemporary Lu Ban, who made artificial wooden birds (ma yuan) that could successfully fly according to the Han Fei Zi and other texts.[16]

Medieval

[edit]

The manufacturing tradition of automata continued in the Greek world well into the Middle Ages. On his visit to Constantinople in 949 ambassador Liutprand of Cremona described automata in the emperor Theophilos' palace, including

"lions, made either of bronze or wood covered with gold, which struck the ground with their tails and roared with open mouth and quivering tongue," "a tree of gilded bronze, its branches filled with birds, likewise made of bronze gilded over, and these emitted cries appropriate to their species" and "the emperor's throne" itself, which "was made in such a cunning manner that at one moment it was down on the ground, while at another it rose higher and was to be seen up in the air."[17]

Similar automata in the throne room (singing birds, roaring and moving lions) were described by Luitprand's contemporary the Byzantine emperor Constantine Porphyrogenitus, in his book De Ceremoniis (Perì tês Basileíou Tákseōs).

In the mid-8th century, the first wind powered automata were built: "statues that turned with the wind over the domes of the four gates and the palace complex of the Round City of Baghdad". The "public spectacle of wind-powered statues had its private counterpart in the 'Abbasid palaces where automata of various types were predominantly displayed."[18] Also in the 8th century, the Muslim alchemist, Jābir ibn Hayyān (Geber), included recipes for constructing artificial snakes, scorpions, and humans that would be subject to their creator's control in his coded Book of Stones. In 827, Abbasid caliph al-Ma'mun had a silver and golden tree in his palace in Baghdad, which had the features of an automatic machine. There were metal birds that sang automatically on the swinging branches of this tree built by Muslim inventors and engineers.[19][page needed] The Abbasid caliph al-Muqtadir also had a silver and golden tree in his palace in Baghdad in 917, with birds on it flapping their wings and singing.[20] In the 9th century, the Banū Mūsā brothers invented a programmable automatic flute player and which they described in their Book of Ingenious Devices.[21]

Automaton in the Swiss Museum CIMA
An automaton writing a letter in Swiss Museum CIMA

Al-Jazari described complex programmable humanoid automata amongst other machines he designed and constructed in the Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices in 1206.[22] His automaton was a boat with four automatic musicians that floated on a lake to entertain guests at royal drinking parties.[23] His mechanism had a programmable drum machine with pegs (cams) that bump into little levers that operate the percussion. The drummer could be made to play different rhythms and drum patterns if the pegs were moved around.[24]

Al-Jazari constructed a hand washing automaton first employing the flush mechanism now used in modern toilets. It features a female automaton standing by a basin filled with water. When the user pulls the lever, the water drains and the automaton refills the basin.[25] His "peacock fountain" was another more sophisticated hand washing device featuring humanoid automata as servants who offer soap and towels. Mark E. Rosheim describes it as follows: "Pulling a plug on the peacock's tail releases water out of the beak; as the dirty water from the basin fills the hollow base a float rises and actuates a linkage which makes a servant figure appear from behind a door under the peacock and offer soap. When more water is used, a second float at a higher level trips and causes the appearance of a second servant figure—with a towel!"[26]

Al-Jazari thus appears to have been the first inventor to display an interest in creating human-like machines for practical purposes such as manipulating the environment for human comfort.[27] Lamia Balafrej has also pointed out the prevalence of the figure of the automated slave in al-Jazari's treatise.[28] Automated slaves were a frequent motif in ancient and medieval literature but it was not so common to find them described in a technical book. Balafrej has also written about automated female slaves, which appeared in timekeepers and as liquid-serving devices in medieval Arabic sources, thus suggesting a link between feminized forms of labor like housekeeping, medieval slavery, and the imaginary of automation.[29]

In 1066, the Chinese inventor Su Song built a water clock in the form of a tower which featured mechanical figurines which chimed the hours.[30]

Samarangana Sutradhara, a Sanskrit treatise by Bhoja (11th century), includes a chapter about the construction of mechanical contrivances (automata), including mechanical bees and birds, fountains shaped like humans and animals, and male and female dolls that refilled oil lamps, danced, played instruments, and re-enacted scenes from Hindu mythology.[31][32][33] [better source needed]

Villard de Honnecourt, in his 1230s sketchbook, depicted an early escapement mechanism in a drawing titled How to make an angel keep pointing his finger toward the Sun with an angel that would perpetually turn to face the sun. He also drew an automaton of a bird with jointed wings, which led to their design implementation in clocks.[34][35]

At the end of the thirteenth century, Robert II, Count of Artois, built a pleasure garden at his castle at Hesdin that incorporated several automata as entertainment in the walled park. The work was conducted by local workmen and overseen by the Italian knight Renaud Coignet. It included monkey marionettes, a sundial supported by lions and "wild men", mechanized birds, mechanized fountains and a bellows-operated organ. The park was famed for its automata well into the fifteenth century before it was destroyed by English soldiers in the sixteenth century.[36][37][38]

The Chinese author Xiao Xun wrote that when the Ming dynasty founder Hongwu (r. 1368–1398) was destroying the palaces of Khanbaliq belonging to the previous Yuan dynasty, there were—among many other mechanical devices—automata found that were in the shape of tigers.[39]

Renaissance and early modern

[edit]
First Strasbourg clock rooster, worked from 1352 to 1789
A cuckoo clock with a built-in automaton of a cuckoo that flaps its wings and opens its beak in time to the sounds of the cuckoo call to mark the number of hours on the analogue dial
Clockwork crayfish automaton, made in Augsburg in 1589, Technical Instrument Museum, Dresden

The Renaissance witnessed a considerable revival of interest in automata. Hero's treatises were edited and translated into Latin and Italian. Hydraulic and pneumatic automata, similar to those described by Hero, were created for garden grottoes.

Giovanni Fontana, a Paduan engineer in 1420, developed Bellicorum instrumentorum liber[b] which includes a puppet of a camelid driven by a clothed primate twice the height of a human being and an automaton of Mary Magdalene.[41] He also created mechanical devils and rocket-propelled animal automata.[42][43]

Bell-ringing Death on Prague astronomical clock

While functional, early clocks were also often designed as novelties and spectacles which integrated features of automata. Many big and complex clocks with automated figures were built as public spectacles in European town centres. One of the earliest of these large clocks was the Strasbourg astronomical clock, built in the 14th century which takes up the entire side of a cathedral wall. It contained an astronomical calendar, automata depicting animals, saints and the life of Christ. The mechanical rooster of Strasbourg clock was active from 1352 to 1789.[44][45] The clock still functions to this day, but has undergone several restorations since its initial construction. The Prague astronomical clock was built in 1410, animated figures were added from the 17th century onwards.[46] Numerous clockwork automata were manufactured in the 16th century, principally by the goldsmiths of the Free Imperial Cities of central Europe. These wondrous devices found a home in the cabinet of curiosities or Wunderkammern of the princely courts of Europe.

In 1454, Duke Philip created an entertainment show named The extravagant Feast of the Pheasant, which was intended to influence the Duke's peers to participate in a crusade against the Ottomans but ended up being a grand display of automata, giants, and dwarves.[47]

A banquet in Camilla of Aragon's honor in Italy, 1475, featured a lifelike automated camel.[48] The spectacle was a part of a larger parade which continued over days.

Leonardo da Vinci sketched a complex mechanical knight, which he may have built and exhibited at a celebration hosted by Ludovico Sforza at the court of Milan around 1495. The design of Leonardo's robot was not rediscovered until the 1950s. A functional replica was later built that could move its arms, twist its head, and sit up.[49]

Da Vinci is frequently credited with constructing a mechanical lion, which he presented to King Francois I in Lyon in 1515. Although no record of the device's original designs remain, a recreation of this piece is housed at the Château du Clos Lucé.[50]

The Smithsonian Institution has in its collection a clockwork monk, about 15 in (380 mm) high, possibly dating as early as 1560. The monk is driven by a key-wound spring and walks the path of a square, striking his chest with his right arm, while raising and lowering a small wooden cross and rosary in his left hand, turning and nodding his head, rolling his eyes, and mouthing silent obsequies. From time to time, he brings the cross to his lips and kisses it. It is believed that the monk was manufactured by Juanelo Turriano, mechanician to the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V.[51]

The first description of a modern cuckoo clock was by the Augsburg nobleman Philipp Hainhofer in 1629.[52] The clock belonged to Prince Elector August von Sachsen. By 1650, the workings of mechanical cuckoos were understood and were widely disseminated in Athanasius Kircher's handbook on music, Musurgia Universalis. In what is the first documented description of how a mechanical cuckoo works, a mechanical organ with several automated figures is described.[53] In 18th-century Germany, clockmakers began making cuckoo clocks for sale.[46] Clock shops selling cuckoo clocks became commonplace in the Black Forest region by the middle of the 18th century.[54]

A Japanese automata theater in Osaka, drawn in 18th century. The Takeda family opened their automata theater in 1662.

Japan adopted clockwork automata in the early 17th century as "karakuri" puppets. In 1662, Takeda Omi completed his first butai karakuri and then built several of these large puppets for theatrical exhibitions. Karakuri puppets went through a golden age during the Edo period (1603–1867).[55]

A new attitude towards automata is to be found in René Descartes when he suggested that the bodies of animals are nothing more than complex machines – the bones, muscles and organs could be replaced with cogs, pistons, and cams. Thus mechanism became the standard to which Nature and the organism was compared.[56] France in the 17th century was the birthplace of those ingenious mechanical toys that were to become prototypes for the engines of the Industrial Revolution. Thus, in 1649, when Louis XIV was still a child, François-Joseph de Camus designed for him a miniature coach, complete with horses and footmen, a page, and a lady within the coach; all these figures exhibited a perfect movement. According to Labat, General de Gennes constructed, in 1688, in addition to machines for gunnery and navigation, a peacock that walked and ate. Athanasius Kircher produced many automata to create Jesuit shows, including a statue which spoke and listened via a speaking tube.

All three of Vaucanson's Automata: The Flute Player, The Tambourine Player, and Digesting Duck
A postulated interior of the Duck of Vaucanson (1738–1739)

The world's first successfully-built biomechanical automaton is considered to be The Flute Player, which could play twelve songs, created by the French engineer Jacques de Vaucanson in 1737. He also constructed The Tambourine Player and the Digesting Duck, a mechanical duck that – apart from quacking and flapping its wings – gave the false illusion of eating and defecating, seeming to endorse Cartesian ideas that animals are no more than machines of flesh.[57]

In 1769, a chess-playing machine called the Turk, created by Wolfgang von Kempelen, made the rounds of the courts of Europe purporting to be an automaton.[58]: 34  The Turk beat Benjamin Franklin in a game of chess when Franklin was ambassador to France.[58]: 34–35  The Turk was actually operated from inside by a hidden human director, and was not a true automaton.

Maillardet's automaton is drawing a picture.
Tipu's Tiger made for Tipu Sultan of Mysore, featuring a European soldier being mauled by a tiger

Other 18th century automaton makers include the prolific Swiss Pierre Jaquet-Droz (see Jaquet-Droz automata) and his son Henri-Louis Jaquet-Droz, and his contemporary Henri Maillardet. Maillardet, a Swiss mechanic, created an automaton capable of drawing four pictures and writing three poems. Maillardet's Automaton is now part of the collections at the Franklin Institute Science Museum in Philadelphia. Belgian-born John Joseph Merlin created the mechanism of the Silver Swan automaton, now at Bowes Museum.[59] A musical elephant made by the French clockmaker Hubert Martinet in 1774 is one of the highlights of Waddesdon Manor.[60] Tipu's Tiger is another late-18th century example of automata, made for Tipu Sultan, featuring a European soldier being mauled by a tiger. Catherine the Great of Russia was gifted a very large and elaborate Peacock Clock created by James Cox in 1781 now on display in the Hermitage Museum in Saint Petersburg.

According to philosopher Michel Foucault, Frederick the Great, king of Prussia from 1740 to 1786, was "obsessed" with automata.[61] According to Manuel de Landa, "he put together his armies as a well-oiled clockwork mechanism whose components were robot-like warriors".

In 1801, Joseph Jacquard built his loom automaton that was controlled autonomously with punched cards.

Automata, particularly watches and clocks, were popular in China during the 18th and 19th centuries, and items were produced for the Chinese market. Strong interest by Chinese collectors in the 21st century brought many interesting items to market where they have had dramatic realizations.[62]

Modern

[edit]

The famous magician Jean-Eugène Robert-Houdin (1805–1871) was known for creating automata for his stage shows.[63][58]: 33  Automata that acted according to a set of preset instructions were popular with magicians during this time.[58]: 33 

The flute-player by Innocenzo Manzetti (1840)

In 1840, Italian inventor Innocenzo Manzetti constructed a flute-playing automaton, in the shape of a man, life-size, seated on a chair. Hidden inside the chair were levers, connecting rods and compressed air tubes, which made the automaton's lips and fingers move on the flute according to a program recorded on a cylinder similar to those used in player pianos. The automaton was powered by clockwork and could perform 12 different arias. As part of the performance, it would rise from the chair, bow its head, and roll its eyes.

Alexander Pushkin automaton (2010) by Swiss automaton maker François Junod

The period between 1860 and 1910 is known as "The Golden Age of Automata". Mechanical coin-operated fortune tellers were introduced to boardwalks in Britain and America.[64] In Paris during this period, many small family based companies of automata makers thrived. From their workshops they exported thousands of clockwork automata and mechanical singing birds around the world. Although now rare and expensive, these French automata attract collectors worldwide. The main French makers were Bontems, Lambert, Phalibois, Renou, Roullet & Decamps, Theroude and Vichy.

Abstract automata theory started in mid-20th century with finite automata;[65] it is applied in branches of formal and natural science including computer science, physics, biology, as well as linguistics.

Contemporary automata continue this tradition with an emphasis on art, rather than technological sophistication. Contemporary automata are represented by the works of Cabaret Mechanical Theatre in the United Kingdom, Thomas Kuntz,[66] Arthur Ganson, Joe Jones and Le Défenseur du Temps by French artist Jacques Monestier.

Since 1990 Dutch artist Theo Jansen has been building large automated PVC structures called strandbeest (beach animal) that can walk on wind power or compressed air. Jansen claims that he intends them to automatically evolve and develop artificial intelligence, with herds roaming freely over the beach.

British sculptor Sam Smith (1908–1983) was a well-known maker of automata.[67][68][69]

Proposals

[edit]

In 2016, the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts program studied a rover, the Automaton Rover for Extreme Environments, designed to survive for an extended time in Venus' environmental conditions. Unlike other modern automata, AREE is an automaton instead of a robot for practical reasons—Venus's harsh conditions, particularly its surface temperature of 462 °C (864 °F), make operating electronics there for any significant time impossible. It would be controlled by a mechanical computer and driven by wind power.[70]

Clocks

[edit]
Main article: Automaton clock

Automaton clocks are clocks which feature automatons within or around the housing and typically activate around the beginning of each hour, at each half hour, or at each quarter hour. They were largely produced from the 1st century BC to the end of the Victorian times in Europe. Older clocks typically featured religious characters or other mythical characters such as Death or Father Time. As time progressed, however, automaton clocks began to feature influential characters at the time of creation, such as kings, famous composers, or industrialists. Examples of automaton clocks include chariot clocks and cuckoo clocks. The Cuckooland Museum exhibits autonomous clocks. While automaton clocks are largely perceived to have been in use during medieval times in Europe, they are largely produced in Japan today.

In Automata theory, clocks are regarded as timed automatons, a type of finite automaton. Automaton clocks being finite essentially means that automaton clocks have a certain number of states in which they can exist.[71] The exact number is the number of combinations possible on a clock with the hour, minute, and second hand: 43,200. The title of timed automaton declares that the automaton changes states at a set rate, which for clocks is 1 state change every second. Clock automata only takes as input the time displayed by the previous state. The automata uses this input to produce the next state, a display of time 1 second later than the previous. Clock automata often also use the previous state's input to 'decide' whether or not the next state requires merely changing the hands on the clock, or if a special function is required, such as a mechanical bird popping out of a house like in cuckoo clocks.[72] This choice is evaluated through the position of complex gears, cams, axles, and other mechanical devices within the automaton.[73]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Automaton

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An automaton is a relatively self-operating or control mechanism designed to automatically follow a predetermined sequence of instructions or respond to encoded instructions, often simulating lifelike behaviors or computational processes. The term derives from the word αὐτόματον (automaton), meaning "self-acting" or "acting of one's own will," reflecting its historical connotation of autonomous motion. Historically, automata emerged as mechanical devices in ancient civilizations, powered by , , or weights to perform repetitive or theatrical actions. A prominent early example is the work of , a 1st-century CE Greek engineer who constructed steam- and water-powered automata, including theatrical machines that simulated mythological scenes, as detailed in his treatise Automata. During the medieval and periods, Islamic and European scholars advanced these inventions, incorporating clockwork mechanisms for more precise movements, such as automated clocks and figures in cathedrals. By the 18th century, Enlightenment-era automata reached new levels of sophistication; French inventor created the "" in 1739, a mechanical bird that appeared to flap its wings, peck grain, and excrete digested material, showcasing early biomechanical simulation. Similarly, the Maillardet Automaton, built around 1800, was a and writing figure capable of producing four illustrations and three poems from internal memory stored on rotating cylinders, representing one of the most complex pre-industrial automata. In the 20th century, the concept of automata evolved into abstract mathematical models within computer science and mathematics, forming the foundation of , which explores the logic of computation through idealized machines. A finite automaton (FA), a basic type, is formally defined as a 5-tuple (Q, Σ, q₀, A, δ), where Q is a of states, Σ is the input , q₀ is the initial state, A is the set of accepting states, and δ is the transition function; it processes input strings to determine membership in regular languages. More powerful variants, such as pushdown automata for context-free languages and Turing machines for undecidable problems, extend this framework to analyze and limits, influencing fields from design to algorithm verification. Today, automata concepts underpin modern technologies, including finite state machines in software protocols, cellular automata in simulations like , and architectures inspired by self-operating systems.

Terminology

Etymology

The term "automaton" originates from the ancient Greek word automatos (αὐτόματος), meaning "self-acting" or "self-moved," derived from autos ("self") and -matos ("thinking, animated, willing"), from the PIE root men- ("to think"), implying self-motivated or animated motion without external agency. This word first appears in Homer's Iliad around the 8th century BCE, where it describes the self-propelled golden tripods crafted by the god Hephaestus, which could move autonomously to serve the gods during assemblies. In this mythic context, automatos evoked wondrous, independent animation, often attributed to divine craftsmanship. In philosophical usage, employed automaton in his Physics (circa 350 BCE) to denote spontaneous or accidental motion occurring without deliberate purpose, distinguishing it from tyche (chance within purposeful contexts) as a broader category of random events. Here, the term shifted toward explaining natural phenomena as self-generated actions, contrasting with intentional causes, though it retained connotations of unexpected self-motion in the physical world. By the , the concept evolved from mythical and philosophical notions to describe tangible mechanical devices, reflecting renewed interest in and . The Latinized form "automaton" gained prominence in the , notably through René Descartes, who in works like L'Homme (published posthumously in 1662) portrayed animals as intricate automata—purely mechanical entities operating via physical principles without souls. This usage marked a pivotal semantic transition, emphasizing programmable, self-operating machines and influencing later theoretical models of automata as abstract, self-regulating systems.

Definition and Scope

An automaton is defined as a relatively self-operating or control mechanism designed to automatically follow a predetermined of operations or respond to encoded instructions, without requiring continuous external intervention beyond initial setup. This core concept encompasses both tangible devices and abstract models, rooted in the idea of self-motion through internal rules or mechanisms. Physical automata refer to mechanical constructs, often powered by or similar hidden mechanisms, that simulate lifelike actions or movements to create the of spontaneity. In contrast, theoretical automata are abstract mathematical models used in to study computation, represented as state-based machines that transition between configurations in response to inputs, processing symbolic data according to fixed rules. These distinctions highlight the evolution from engineered artifacts to foundational tools in , where physical forms emphasize and , while theoretical forms focus on logical limits of computation. The scope of this article includes historical mechanical devices, such as automata from antiquity to the industrial era, alongside theoretical models ranging from simple finite-state systems to more powerful constructs like Turing machines, which are Turing-complete abstract devices capable of simulating any algorithmic computation. It excludes coverage of fully autonomous systems or contemporary robots unless they explicitly derive from classical automaton principles, such as state-transition logics, to maintain focus on predetermined, rule-based operation rather than adaptive learning.

Historical Development

Ancient and Classical Era

In ancient Greek mythology, automata were envisioned as divine inventions that blurred the line between the inanimate and the animate, often crafted by the god to assist in his forge. Homer's (c. 8th century BCE) describes golden handmaidens wrought by , resembling living women with intelligence, speech, and the ability to move autonomously while supporting their master. The epic also features self-moving tripods that roll into assembly on golden wheels without external aid, embodying early notions of mechanical self-sufficiency. These mythical constructs highlighted automata as symbols of craftsmanship and wonder, influencing later philosophical inquiries into motion and agency. Philosophers in drew on such s to model natural phenomena, using automata as analogies for internal causation. In his Physics (c. 350 BCE), references automatic devices, like temple models or puppets, to illustrate how natural bodies possess an inherent principle of motion akin to the hidden mechanisms driving apparent self-movement in automata. Similarly, in De Anima, he compares the soul's role in to the internal forces in automata, emphasizing that both exhibit purposeful activity without visible external pushes. These discussions positioned automata as conceptual tools for understanding life and mechanism, distinct from mere . Practical automata emerged in the Hellenistic period through engineering innovations, particularly those of Hero of Alexandria in the 1st century CE. In his Pneumatica, Hero detailed steam-powered devices, including the aeolipile—a hollow sphere mounted on a boiler that rotated via steam jets escaping tangential nozzles, demonstrating early principles of jet propulsion and continuous motion. He also described automated theaters, compact hydraulic and pneumatic systems that staged miniature mythological scenes with moving figures, doors, and sound effects, powered by water flow and weights for theatrical performances in temples or private settings. These inventions marked a shift from conceptual to functional automata, relying on pneumatics for realistic simulation. Parallel developments in Eastern civilizations featured rudimentary automata tied to timekeeping and spectacle. The Chinese Liezi (c. 4th century BCE) narrates the artificer Yan Shi presenting with a mechanical bird that flew, perched, and mimicked bird calls through internal and , showcasing advanced and simulation of life. In ancient , from the 4th–3rd centuries BCE describe legendary accounts of "bhuta vahana yantrah" (spirit-movement machines), including automated guardians of Buddha's relics that moved and wielded weapons, as well as water clocks (ghati-yantra) using floating bowls to measure ritual times precisely via calibrated vessel outflow. These Eastern examples emphasized automata in philosophical and religious contexts, complementing Greek hydraulic traditions.

Medieval and Early Modern Periods

During the Islamic Golden Age, the polymath Ismail al-Jazari (c. 1136–1206) advanced the field of automata through his detailed designs in The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices (1206), which described over 50 mechanical devices powered by water, weights, and gears. Among these, al-Jazari's elephant clock exemplified intricate automation, featuring a life-sized elephant with an automaton bird that chirped every half-hour, a humanoid figure that struck a cymbal on the hour, and additional mechanisms like a dragon's mouth releasing a ball to simulate time passage, all synchronized via a water-driven escapement. He also pioneered programmable humanoid automata, such as a waitress figure that detected a cup beneath its mouth via a sensor mechanism and poured liquid until full, stopping automatically, and a hand-washing servant that sequentially dispensed water, offered a towel, mirror, and comb using a flushing tank system. These inventions demonstrated early concepts of feedback control and sequencing, influencing later mechanical engineering. In medieval Europe, automata appeared in elaborate timepieces, notably Richard of Wallingford's (designed 1327, completed c. 1354) at St. Albans Abbey, which integrated automated striking figures—known as jacks—that chimed the hours and quarters using mechanical levers and weights. This clock not only tracked celestial positions but employed these humanoid figures to visually and audibly mark time, representing a fusion of horology and driven by verge-and-foliot escapements. Such devices highlighted the era's growing sophistication in geared mechanisms for public and monastic use. The saw further innovation with Leonardo da Vinci's mechanical knight (c. 1495), a humanoid automaton clad in full armor, designed to perform chivalric demonstrations through a system of pulleys, cables, and gears that enabled it to sit down, stand up, wave its arms, lift its , and move its head on a flexible neck. Intended for a pageant honoring the Duke of Milan, this robot emphasized anatomical accuracy in its jointed limbs, drawing on Leonardo's studies of to achieve lifelike motion without external power beyond winding. In the , Jacques de Vaucanson's (1739) marked a pinnacle of biomechanical simulation, a life-sized automaton constructed from with over 1,000 moving parts that flapped its wings, pecked at , simulated through internal grinding mechanisms, and excreted processed material, all powered by . Exhibited publicly in , it blurred lines between machine and organism by mimicking avian physiology, influencing debates on and mechanism in the Enlightenment.

Industrial and Modern Eras

The marked a pivotal shift in the development of automata, transitioning from artisanal craftsmanship to mass-produced mechanical entertainments showcased at public exhibitions. Automata like Pierre Jaquet-Droz's 1774 writing automaton, capable of producing custom messages on paper using a complex system of cams and levers, continued to captivate audiences into the through touring displays across , symbolizing the era's fascination with mechanical ingenuity amid growing industrialization. These devices, originally crafted as promotional tools for watchmaking, were adapted for broader , reflecting the integration of into public amusement. Similarly, steam-powered figures emerged as innovations powered by the era's dominant energy source, with Zadock Dederick's 1868 Steam Man of Newark—a seven-foot-tall, boiler-driven humanoid that walked at 2 mph while pulling a —patented and demonstrated at fairs, highlighting early attempts at autonomous mechanical locomotion. In the , automata evolved through hybridization with and sound technology, particularly in . Walt Disney's , introduced in the 1960s, represented a breakthrough by combining , , and synchronized audio to create lifelike figures. The first public deployment occurred in Disneyland's Enchanted Tiki Room in 1963, featuring over 150 animatronic birds, flowers, and tiki statues that performed songs and movements coordinated by custom computers, blending mechanical precision with immersive storytelling. This technology scaled automata from curiosities to mass attractions, influencing theme parks worldwide and paving the way for more dynamic, responsive systems. Modern proposals have extended automata concepts to nanoscale and kinetic realms, envisioning self-replicating machines for advanced applications. In his 2005 book , outlined a vision of nanoscale automata—molecular assemblers capable of building structures atom by atom—driven by exponential technological growth, potentially enabling molecular manufacturing by the through self-replicating nanobots that mimic biological replication. Complementing this theoretical frontier, artist Theo Jansen's Strandbeests, wind-powered kinetic sculptures first developed in the , use PVC tubes and sails to create beach-walking "beasts" that evolve via computational design, embodying automata principles in autonomous, environmentally responsive art. Recent developments up to 2025 have drawn on automata traditions in , emphasizing compliant materials for mesoscale machines without integrating full AI autonomy. Harvard researchers in the 2010s pioneered examples like the 2016 octobot, an untethered, pneumatic molded from that autonomously inflates and deflates for octopus-like crawling, powered by a rather than rigid components. These mesoscale devices, often 10-100 mm in scale, prioritize biomimetic movement inspired by historical mechanical figures, with ongoing NSF-funded advances in 2025 focusing on resilient, fluidic actuators for tasks like delicate manipulation in unstructured environments.

Mechanical Automata

Design Principles

Mechanical automata are engineered using fundamental mechanical components to produce lifelike motion without electrical power. Central to their design are for transmitting and controlling speed, cams for converting rotary motion into linear or oscillatory movements, levers for amplifying , and springs for storing and releasing energy. These elements interconnect to form precise systems, often concealed within the automaton's structure to enhance the illusion of . Clockwork mechanisms, featuring a wound by a key, provide the primary power source, gradually releasing stored energy through an to regulate operation over a set duration. To achieve programmed sequences of actions, designers employ methods such as pegged cylinders or cam systems, which dictate the timing and order of movements. In pegged cylinder designs, pins or pegs protruding from a rotating barrel engage levers or pins to trigger specific actions, similar to the mechanisms in music boxes where pins pluck tuned tines to produce melodies. Cam systems, by contrast, use irregularly shaped discs to push or pull connected rods at predetermined intervals, enabling repetitive or complex routines. These approaches allow for "programming" without digital controls, relying solely on mechanical interference patterns. Biomechanical simulation in automata often incorporates weights, balances, and to replicate organic processes. For instance, Jacques de Vaucanson's flute-playing automaton of used a series of to simulate , with adjustable pressures and valves directing through artificial lungs and a movable tongue to produce notes on a real . Weights and counterbalances governed the figure's arm and finger motions, mimicking human articulation through interconnected levers and cables. Early conceptual designs, such as those by in the late , explored similar principles with and cams to animate humanoid figures. Despite their ingenuity, mechanical automata face inherent limitations from energy constraints and material wear. Clockwork springs store only finite energy, typically powering a device for minutes to hours before requiring rewinding, precluding continuous operation without manual intervention. Friction between moving parts—gears meshing, cams sliding, and levers pivoting—leads to gradual degradation, necessitating and eventual repairs to prevent seizing or breakdown. These factors confined automata to short performances and ornamental roles, distinct from modern battery-powered devices.

Notable Examples

One of the most celebrated 18th-century mechanical automata is the Silver Swan, crafted around 1773 by jeweler and entrepreneur James Cox. This life-sized silver bird, now housed in the , features a clockwork mechanism that activates to make the swan arch its neck, appear to swallow a silver fish, and produce a flute-like melody, all powered by hidden and rods. The device captivated audiences in Cox's Mechanical and Clockwork Museum, exemplifying the era's fascination with illusionary realism in automata as symbols of technological wonder and luxury. In the early 19th century, Swiss mechanician Maillardet created the Draughtsman-Writer, an automaton dating to approximately 1800 that demonstrates advanced programmable motion through a large with dozens of adjustable cams. When activated, the seated child-like figure uses pencils to produce four distinct drawings—including a , a Chinese landscape, a double portrait, and a ship—followed by three poems inscribed in French and English, showcasing the precision of cam-driven linkages for artistic replication. Preserved at the in after surviving a 19th-century , it highlights the period's innovations in mechanical drawing and writing as entertainment for elite audiences in and America. In contemporary , Dutch artist Theo Jansen's Strandbeests, initiated in 1990, form a series of wind-powered walking sculptures constructed from PVC tubes and sails that autonomously traverse beaches. These biomimetic automata employ linkage systems inspired by evolutionary algorithms to simulate legged locomotion, adapting to through flexible joints and pneumatic "muscles" made from recycled bottles for buoyancy. Evolving over decades into complex, self-sustaining forms, the Strandbeests embody artistic exploration of life-like movement, blending engineering with philosophical inquiries into artificial evolution and environmental interaction.

Theoretical Automata

Finite Automata

A finite automaton is the simplest abstract model of computation, featuring a finite set of states and transitions driven by discrete input symbols, serving as a foundational concept in computability theory for recognizing patterns in strings. Formally, a deterministic finite automaton (DFA) is defined as a 5-tuple (Q,Σ,δ,q0,F)(Q, \Sigma, \delta, q_0, F), where QQ is a finite set of states, Σ\Sigma is a finite input alphabet, δ:Q×Σ→Q\delta: Q \times \Sigma \to Q is the transition function specifying a unique next state for each state-symbol pair, q0∈Qq_0 \in Q is the initial state, and F⊆QF \subseteq Q is the set of accepting states. The automaton processes an input string by starting at q0q_0 and following transitions via δ\delta; it accepts the string if it ends in a state from FF. Finite automata come in two primary variants: deterministic and nondeterministic. A DFA, as described, has a single deterministic path for any input, making its behavior predictable and efficient for implementation. In contrast, a (NFA) generalizes this by allowing the transition function δ:Q×(Σ∪{ϵ})→2Q\delta: Q \times (\Sigma \cup \{\epsilon\}) \to 2^Q to map to a set of possible next states (a subset of QQ), including empty-string (ϵ\epsilon) transitions without consuming input, which can lead to branching computations. Although NFAs appear more powerful due to nondeterminism, they recognize exactly the same languages as DFAs; this equivalence is proven via the subset construction method, which simulates NFA nondeterminism by constructing a DFA whose states are subsets of the NFA's states, with transitions aggregating all possible NFA moves. The class of languages accepted by finite automata is known as the regular languages, which Kleene's theorem characterizes as precisely those definable by regular expressions—concise notations for patterns using union, concatenation, and (repetition). This establishes a deep equivalence: regular expressions can be converted to NFAs, NFAs to DFAs, and DFAs back to regular expressions, providing multiple ways to specify and verify regular languages. In practical applications, finite automata underpin in compilers, where DFAs generated from regular expressions efficiently scan to tokenize keywords, identifiers, and operators by matching input against predefined patterns. A classic example illustrating finite automata is a model that dispenses a product after receiving either one quarter (25 cents) or two dimes (10 cents each). The states Q={q0,q10,q20,q25}Q = \{ q_0, q_{10}, q_{20}, q_{25} \} represent accumulated value (in cents), with q0q_0 as the start state and q25q_{25} as the sole accepting state (F={q25}F = \{ q_{25} \}); the Σ={d,q}\Sigma = \{ d, q \} denotes dime and quarter inputs. The transition function δ\delta is defined as: δ(q0,d)=q10\delta(q_0, d) = q_{10}, δ(q0,q)=q25\delta(q_0, q) = q_{25}, δ(q10,d)=q20\delta(q_{10}, d) = q_{20}, δ(q10,q)=q25\delta(q_{10}, q) = q_{25}, δ(q20,d)=q25\delta(q_{20}, d) = q_{25}, and δ(q20,q)=q25\delta(q_{20}, q) = q_{25} (with resets to q0q_0 or error handling for excess, simplified here). This DFA accepts sequences like "q" or "dd" but rejects "d" alone, modeling real-world sequential with finite memory.

Advanced Models

Pushdown automata extend the capabilities of finite automata by incorporating an unbounded stack, which serves as auxiliary to recognize context-free languages. This model, formalized in the context of generative grammars, allows the automaton to push symbols onto the stack during computation and pop them as needed, enabling the handling of dependencies and nesting that exceed the memory limitations of finite-state devices. Nondeterministic pushdown automata, in particular, play a crucial role in context-free languages, as their ability to into multiple computational paths facilitates the exploration of ambiguous derivations, determining acceptance by reaching an accepting state with the stack potentially empty or in a designated configuration after the input. Turing machines provide a foundational , introduced by in as an abstract device consisting of an infinite, bidirectional tape divided into cells, a read/write head that moves left or right, a finite control with states, and a transition function dictating actions based on the current state and scanned symbol. This setup allows the machine to simulate any step-by-step mechanical procedure, defining the limits of what is computable. The Church-Turing thesis asserts that every effectively calculable function is computable by a , linking intuitive notions of to this formal model and underscoring its universality in . Chomsky's hierarchy organizes formal languages by increasing generative complexity: Type-3 (regular languages, generated by regular grammars), Type-2 (context-free languages, by context-free grammars), Type-1 (context-sensitive languages, by context-sensitive grammars), and Type-0 (recursively enumerable languages, by unrestricted grammars). Each level corresponds to the expressive power of associated automata, with pushdown automata accepting Type-2 languages and Turing machines handling Type-0, while intermediate levels like context-sensitive require more restricted Turing variants such as linear-bounded automata. This classification highlights inherent limitations, as no single model captures all language classes without exceeding the next in the , establishing a strict inclusion of language families. Multi-tape Turing machines variant augments the with multiple infinite tapes, each with its own independent head, permitting parallel access to different streams for enhanced of complex algorithms. Although they offer asymptotic efficiency gains—such as reducing in certain simulations from cubic to quadratic compared to single-tape equivalents—they recognize precisely the same class of recursively enumerable languages, preserving the core computational power of the original design.

Applications and Impact

In Computing and Engineering

In computing, finite state machines (FSMs) form the backbone of network protocol design, enabling the modeling of sequential behaviors in communication systems. For instance, the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is specified using an FSM with 11 states, such as LISTEN, SYN-SENT, and ESTABLISHED, which dictate transitions based on events like packet receipt or timeouts to ensure reliable data transfer. This state-based approach allows protocols to handle concurrency and error recovery systematically, as seen in the three-way handshake process that establishes connections. Regular expression (regex) engines in programming languages and tools like or rely on nondeterministic finite automata (NFAs) for efficient in text processing. The seminal converts a regex into an NFA by composing smaller automata for operators like , union, and , resulting in a graph with ε-transitions that simulates matching without . This method ensures linear-time performance in the length of the input string for many practical patterns, powering applications from search engines to lexical analyzers in compilers. In , particularly , finite automata underpin control systems for tasks requiring sequential , such as path in dynamic environments. Finite state automata model behaviors by defining states like "searching," "obstacle avoidance," and "goal approach," with transitions triggered by inputs to generate collision-free trajectories. For example, in autonomous mobile s, these automata integrate localization data with topological maps to enable adaptive , reducing computational overhead compared to continuous control methods. As of 2025, proposals for quantum automata extend classical models to leverage and entanglement for accelerated computation in specific domains. Quantum finite automata, which process inputs using quantum states instead of classical bits, promise exponential speedups for promise problems like language recognition where classical NFAs require many states. These models are being explored for applications including language recognition, with experimental demonstrations achieved using optical systems. Recent proposals as of 2025 suggest implementations on near-term hardware like superconducting qubits. In hardware design, languages like incorporate FSMs to describe digital circuits, using always blocks and case statements to encode state transitions for synthesizable modules in field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). This facilitates the creation of controllers, such as traffic light sequencers, where states evolve on clock edges to manage timing and inputs. Cellular automata serve as powerful simulation tools in and for modeling emergent complex behaviors from simple local rules, applicable to phenomena like or biological . John Conway's Game of Life, introduced in , exemplifies this with a 2D grid where cells evolve based on four rules—underpopulation, survival, overpopulation, and reproduction—yielding self-replicating structures like gliders and oscillators that mimic computational universality. Stephen Wolfram's classification of cellular automata into four classes highlights how Class IV rules, akin to Life, generate persistent, complex patterns suitable for simulating physical systems without explicit programming. These simulations inform designs, such as optimizing or predicting material behaviors under stress.

Cultural and Philosophical Dimensions

In , automata have served as profound metaphors for human creation and the boundaries of life. Mary Shelley's (1818) portrays the creature as an artificial being animated through scientific , symbolizing the perils of playing god and the quest for divine-like creation, which echoes earlier automaton motifs in exploring themes of isolation and monstrosity. Similarly, Karel Čapek's play R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots, 1920) introduced the term "" for synthetic workers who rebel against their makers, drawing on automaton imagery to critique industrialization and the of labor. In art and mythology, automata have influenced creative expressions of the uncanny and the artificial. Ancient myths, such as the Jewish legend of the —a clay figure brought to life by mystical incantations to protect the community—and the Greek tale of , a giant forged by to guard , prefigure modern notions of constructed beings with limited agency. These archetypes resonated in 20th-century , where incorporated mechanical figures in works like (1931), blending human forms with clockwork elements to evoke the dreamlike fusion of organic and machine. Philosophically, automata have sparked debates on consciousness and agency since the 17th century. René Descartes argued in his (1637) that animals operate as soulless automata, governed by mechanical principles without true sensation or reason, a view that extended mechanistic philosophy to question the uniqueness of human minds. This perspective fueled ongoing discussions in , where deterministic models of computation—such as finite state machines—raise tensions between and predetermination, suggesting human behavior might resemble programmable sequences devoid of genuine choice. In contemporary discourse, the legacy of automata informs ethical concerns surrounding in the , particularly illusions of that blur lines between tool and agent. As AI systems exhibit behaviors mimicking , debates trace back to automaton precedents, highlighting risks of over-attribution of agency and the moral implications of deploying entities that simulate but lack true volition.

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/automaton
  2. https://people.ohio.edu/williams/html/PDF/HistoryOfMechanisms.pdf
  3. https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-ancient-history-of-intelligent-machines/
  4. https://gyre.umeoce.maine.edu/physicalocean/Tomczak/science%2Bsociety/lectures/illustrations/lecture35/hero.html
  5. https://shc.stanford.edu/arcade/publications/rofl/issues/volume-1-issue-2/machines-garden
  6. http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/NatureandArtifice/lecture13.html
  7. https://fi.edu/en/science-and-education/collection/maillardets-automaton
  8. https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/soco/projects/2004-05/automata-theory/basics.html
  9. https://www.cs.odu.edu/~zeil/cs390/latest/Public/fsa/index.html
  10. https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~ear/cs341/automatabook/AutomataTheoryBook.pdf
  11. https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/automaton
  12. https://www.etymonline.com/word/automaton
  13. https://academic.oup.com/book/36637/chapter/321630674
  14. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/aristotle-physics/1934/pb_LCL228.157.xml
  15. https://escholarship.org/content/qt7416q0c6/qt7416q0c6_noSplash_cd1e81789281226812202b459840f09d.pdf
  16. https://themadmuseum.co.uk/history-of-automata/
  17. https://goclenius.net/pdf/deschene-automata-munich-2010-07-r2.pdf
  18. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-intellectual-history/article/mechanical-daughter-of-rene-descartes-the-origin-and-history-of-an-intellectual-fable/14518C7D691F1B35B7504418B935D8A1
  19. https://cs.lmu.edu/~ray/notes/automatatheory/
  20. https://thebritishclockmaker.com/automata/
  21. https://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/cs4820/2015sp/notes/kozen-computability-sp13.pdf
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236751672_Dunamis_and_the_Science_of_Mechanics_Aristotle_on_Animal_Motion
  23. https://www.thehopkinthomasproject.com/TheHopkinThomasProject/TimeLine/Wales/Steam/URochesterCollection/Hero/index-2.html
  24. https://theconversation.com/robots-guarded-buddhas-relics-in-a-legend-of-ancient-india-110078
  25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-royal-asiatic-society/article/xii-the-ancient-indian-waterclock/967F666B71590D20523E20478B0AF429
  26. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=237
  27. https://artsandculture.google.com/story/al-jazari-s-elephant-clock-an-amazing-feat-of-early-engineering-1001-inventions/pAXRB_VVgvZHKw?hl=en
  28. https://cs4fn.blog/2023/05/26/al-jazari-the-father-of-robotics/
  29. https://resources.metmuseum.org/resources/metpublications/pdf/European_Clocks_and_Watches_in_the_Metropolitan_Museum_of_Art.pdf
  30. https://www.nicholaswhyte.info/row.htm
  31. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/memagazineselect/article/120/02/80/369077/A-Renaissance-RobotLeonardo-da-Vinci-Designed-a
  32. https://www.da-vinci-inventions.com/robotic-knight
  33. https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/canard-digerateur-de-vaucanson-vaucansons-digesting-duck
  34. https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Online/100-FYS-F15/Readings/Riskin%2C%2520DefecatingDuck.pdf
  35. https://www.christies.com/en/stories/the-history-of-the-automaton-mechanical-miracles-191ab3c1b3c94bde9118321e83ae9537
  36. https://www.strandbeest.com/
  37. https://wyss.harvard.edu/news/the-first-autonomous-entirely-soft-robot/
  38. https://www.nsf.gov/science-matters/robotics-gymnastics-new-flexible-soft-robots-transform
  39. http://www.figuresinthefourthdimension.com/html/Automata-clockwork.html
  40. https://www.explainthatstuff.com/how-clockwork-works.html
  41. https://michaelkrzyzaniak.com/Research/PrehistoryMusicalRobots.pdf
  42. https://www.aps.org/archives/publications/apsnews/201802/history.cfm
  43. https://www.medievalists.net/2015/09/renaissance-robotics-leonardo-da-vincis-lost-knight-and-enlivened-materiality/
  44. https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=art_con_projects
  45. https://thebowesmuseum.org.uk/the-silver-swan-story/
  46. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/robotic-silver-swan-has-fascinated-fans-nearly-250-years-180962024/
  47. https://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld/objects/AreEK44HSZ6RxRR0Gcytow
  48. https://blog.sciencemuseum.org.uk/introducing-the-draughtsman-writer-automaton/
  49. http://www.computer-timeline.com/timeline/henri-maillardet/
  50. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=4351
  51. https://sculpturemagazine.art/dream-machines-a-conversation-with-theo-jansen/
  52. https://www.openculture.com/?p=1121190
  53. https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/1196416
  54. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5392601
  55. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1056813
  56. https://www-igm.univ-mlv.fr/~berstel/Mps/Travaux/A/1963-7ChomskyAlgebraic.pdf
  57. https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/Turing_Paper_1936.pdf
  58. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/church-turing/
  59. https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~watrous/ToC-notes/ToC-notes.13.pdf
  60. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9293
  61. https://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html
  62. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1729881419853182
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0952197613002406
  64. https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.3870
  65. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41534-019-0163-x
  66. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1860&context=ece_fac
  67. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/programmable/683082/22-1/verilog-hdl-state-machines.html
  68. https://content.wolfram.com/sw-publications/2020/07/cellular-automata-models-complexity.pdf
  69. https://iro.uiowa.edu/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=01IOWA_INST&filePid=13730819600002771&download=true
  70. https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/origin-word-robot-rur/
  71. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/was-talos-the-bronze-automaton-who-guarded-the-island-of-crete-in-greek-myth-an-early-example-of-artificial-intelligence-180986467/
  72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2220217
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039368123000912
  74. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/10/ethical-concerns-mount-as-ai-takes-bigger-decision-making-role/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.