Hubbry Logo
Bengali–Assamese scriptBengali–Assamese scriptMain
Open search
Bengali–Assamese script
Community hub
Bengali–Assamese script
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bengali–Assamese script
Bengali–Assamese script
Bengali–Assamese script
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Bengali–Assamese
বাংলা-অসমীয়া
Image 1: The text, from the 18th-century Hastividyārnava, commissioned by Ahom king Siva Singha, reads: sri sri mot xivo xingho moharaja. The modern Bengali glyph "র" currently used for ra is used in this pre-modern Assamese/Sanskrit manuscript for va, the modern form of which is "ৱ". Though the modern Assamese alphabet does not use this glyph for any letter, modern Tirhuta continues to use this for va.
Image 2: The native names, in Bengali–Assamese, of the three scheduled languages of India that commonly use this script, followed by their standard English names and a Latin transliteration of the native name in parentheses.
Script type
Period
c. 1100–present
DirectionLeft-to-right Edit this on Wikidata
Official scriptfor Bengali language, Assamese language and Meitei language (constitutionally termed as Manipuri)[1][2]
LanguagesBengali, Assamese, Bishnupriya, Maithili, Meitei, Sylheti, Santali, Kokborok, Garo, Hajong, Chakma, Mizo, Khasi, Chittagonian, Kudmali, Ho, Kamtapuri, Noakhali, and others.
Related scripts
Parent systems
Child systems
Bengali, Assamese, Tirhuta
ISO 15924
ISO 15924Beng (325), ​Bengali (Bangla)
Unicode
Unicode alias
Bengali
U+0980–U+09FF (Bengali),
U+011480–U+0114DF (Tirhuta)
 This article contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. For the distinction between [ ], / / and ⟨ ⟩, see IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters.
Bengali
This article contains Bengali text. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols.
This article contains Tirhuta text. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols.
Brahmic scripts
The Brahmi script and its descendants
Northern Brahmic
Southern Brahmic
Part of a series on
Writing systems in India
Overview
Brahmic scripts
Arabic-derived scripts
Alphabetical scripts

The Bengali–Assamese script,[7] sometimes also known as Eastern Nagri,[8] is an eastern Brahmic script, primarily used today for the Bengali and Assamese language spoken in eastern South Asia. It evolved from Gaudi script, also the common ancestor of the Odia and Trihuta scripts.[9][10] It is commonly referred to as the Bengali script by Bengalis[11] and the Assamese script by the Assamese,[12] while in academic discourse it is sometimes called Eastern-Nāgarī.[13] Three of the 22 official languages of the Indian Republic—Bengali, Assamese, and Meitei[a][14]—commonly use this script in writing;[15][16][2] Bengali is also the official and national language of Bangladesh.

Besides, Bengali and Assamese languages, it is also used to write Bishnupriya Manipuri, Meitei, Chakma, Santali and numerous other smaller languages spoken in eastern South Asia.[17][18] Historically, it was used to write various Old and Middle Indo-Aryan languages, and, like many other Brahmic scripts, is still used for writing Sanskrit.[19] Other languages, such as Bodo, Karbi, Maithili and Mising were once written in this script.[20] The two major alphabets in this script – Assamese and Bengali – are virtually identical, except for two characters — Assamese differs from Bengali in one letter for the /r/ sound, and an extra letter for the /w/ or /v/ sound.[21][22][23]

History

[edit]
Places where the Eastern Nagari script (Purva Nagari) is used

The Bengali–Assamese script was originally not associated with any particular regional language, but was prevalent as the main script in the eastern regions of Medieval India for Old- and Middle-Indo-Aryan including Sanskrit.[19] All of these eastern Magadhan scripts are based on a system of characters historically related to, but distinct from, Devanagari. Brahmi, an ancient Indian syllabary, is the source of most native Indian scripts including the South Indian languages and Devanagari, the script associated with classical Sanskrit and other Indo-Aryan languages.[22]

The modern eastern scripts (Bengali-Assamese, Odia, and Maithili) became clearly differentiated around the 14th and 15th centuries from the predecessor Gaudi.[7] While the scripts in Bengal, Assam and Mithila remained similar to each other the Odia script developed a curved top in the 13th–14th century and became increasingly different.[24] Old Maithili also used a script similar to the Bengali–Assamese script, and Maithili scholars (particularly of the older generation) still write Sanskrit in that script.[21][25]

According to d'Hubert (2014) manuscripts written in the 17th–18th century from eastern Bihar in the west to Manipur in the east followed related scripts, that could be classed largely into three on the basis of the letter ro: (1) western - with the current Bengali ro; (2) northern - with the current Assamese ro; and (3) eastern - largely lost today with a ro not seen today.[26]

Modern Bengali–Assamese script saw further standardisations following the introduction of printing.

Printing

[edit]

Though there were early attempts to cut Bengali types[27] it was the East India Company's interest in propagating the Bengali language[28] that ultimately prevailed. It first commissioned William Bolts, a Dutch adventurer, to create a grammar for Bengali, but he had to leave India after he ran into trouble with the company.[29][30] The first significant book with Bengali typography was Halhed's 1778 "A Grammar of the Bengal Language"[31] which he compiled from a meagre set of six Bengali manuscripts.[32] When Halhed turned to Warren Hastings for publishing, he was referred to Charles Wilkins, the type-founder at the Company press at Hoogly. Learned in Sanskrit and Persian, Wilkins singlehandedly cut the most complete set. He was assisted by the Bengali blacksmith, Panchanan Karmakar, who is often erroneously credited as the father of the Bengali type.[33]

Script

[edit]
Further information: Bengali alphabet, Assamese alphabet, and Tirhuta
Evolution of Bengali-Assamese script
Inscription from Valavarman III from 9th-10th century, Nagaon, Assam. Modern forms of letters and matras are already discernible.
Early 13th century rock inscription near Guwahati, Assam
The text, from the 18th-century Hastividyārnava, commissioned by Ahom king Siva Singha, reads: sri sri mot xivo xingha moharaja. The modern Bengali glyph "র" currently used for ra is used in this pre-modern Assamese/Sanskrit manuscript for va, the modern form of which is "ৱ". Though the modern Assamese alphabet does not use this glyph for any letter, modern Tirhuta continues to use this for va.
Halhed's script, 1778, as designed by Charles Wilkins, was the first significant type for printing. As can be clearly seen, not all the glyphs have achieved their modern forms yet. Though the chart sports the Assamese ৰ, the Bengali র was used interchangeably in the text.

In this and other articles on Wikipedia dealing with the Assamese and Bengali languages, a Romanization scheme used by linguists specialising in Bengali phonology and a separate Assamese transliteration table used by linguists specialising in Assamese phonology are included along with IPA transcription.

Alphabets

[edit]

There are three major modern alphabets in this script: Bengali, Assamese, and Tirhuta. Modern Assamese is very similar to modern Bengali. Assamese has at least one extra letter, ৱ, that Bengali does not. It also uses a separate letter for the sound 'ro' ৰ different from the letter used for that sound in Bengali র and the letter ক্ষ is not a conjunct as in Bengali, but a letter by itself. The alphabetical orders of the two alphabets also differ, in the position of the letter ক্ষ, for example. Languages like Meitei and Bishnupriya use a hybrid of the two alphabets, with the Bengali র and the Assamese ৱ. Tirhuta is more different and carries forward some forms used in medieval Assamese.[citation needed]

Vowels and diacritics

[edit]

The script presently has a total of 11 vowel letters, used to represent the seven vowel sounds of Bengali and eight vowel sounds of Assamese, along with a number of vowel diphthongs. All of these vowel letters are used in both Assamese and Bengali. Some of the vowel letters have different sounds depending on the word, and a number of vowel distinctions preserved in the writing system are not pronounced as such in modern spoken Bengali or Assamese. For example, the script has two symbols for the vowel sound [i] and two symbols for the vowel sound [u]. This redundancy stems from the time when this script was used to write Sanskrit, a language that had a short [i] and a long [iː], and a short [u] and a long [uː]. These letters are preserved in the script with their traditional names of "short i" and "long i", etc., despite the fact that they are no longer pronounced differently in ordinary speech.

Some language-specific usages

[edit]

In the Bengali alphabet, অ্যা is used when the intended pronunciation would otherwise be ambiguous.[clarification needed] Some other languages use a vowel অৗ to denote /ɯ/ which is not found in either Bengali or Assamese; and though the vowel diacritic (matra, ৗ) is found in Tirhuta the vowel letter itself is absent. Assamese alphabet uses an additional "matra" (ʼ) that is used to represent the phonemes অʼ and এʼ.

Vowel Table
Vowels Vowel Diacritic
symbol		 Assamese Bengali Meitei (Manipuri)[34] Sylheti Hajong Rabha Rajbongsi
অ – ô ô/o ô/a o o ô ô
অʼ ʼ o – – – – – –
আ া a a a꞉ a a a a
অ্যা/এ্যা ্যা – æ – – – – –
অৗ ৗ – – – – â â –
ই ি i i i i i i i
ইʼ িʼ – – – – – î –
ঈ ী i i – ī – – (i)
উ ু u u u u u u u
উʼ ুʼ – – – – – â –
ঊ ূ u u – ū – – (u)
ঋ ৃ ri ri – ri – – ri
ৠ ৄ rii rii – – – – –
ঌ ৢ li li – – – – –
ৡ ৣ lii lii – – – – –
এ ে ê e/ê e ê e e ê
এʼ েʼ e – – – – – –
ঐ ৈ ôi ôi ei oi oi – ôi
ও ো û o o/ô – ô o o
ঔ ৌ ôu ôu ou ou ôu – ôu

Vowel signs can be used in conjunction with consonants to modify the pronunciation of the consonant (here exemplified by ক, kô). When no vowel Diacritic symbol is written, then the vowel "অ" (ô) is the default inherited vowel for the consonant. To specifically denote the absence of a vowel, a hôsôntô (্) may be written underneath the consonant.

Consonants

[edit]

The names of the consonant letters in Eastern Nagari are typically just the consonant's main pronunciation plus the inherent vowel "অ" ô. Since the inherent vowel is assumed and not written, most letters' names look identical to the letter itself (e.g. the name of the letter "ঘ" is itself ঘ ghô, not gh). Some letters that have lost their distinctive pronunciation in Modern Assamese and Bengali are called by a more elaborate name. For example, since the consonant phoneme /n/ can be written ন, ণ, or ঞ (depending on the spelling of the particular word), these letters are not simply called nô; instead, they are called "dental nô", "cerebral nô" and niô. Similarly, the phoneme /ʃ/ in Bengali and /x/ in Assamese can be written as "palatal shô/xhô" শ, "cerebral shô/xhô" ষ, or "dental sô/xô" স, depending on the word.

Consonant Table
Consonant Assamese Bengali Meitei (Manipuri)[34] Chittagonian Sylheti Hajong Maithili
ক kô kô kô xô xô ko ka
খ khô khô khô xô xo kho kha
গ gô gô gô gô go go ga
ঘ ghô ghô ghô gô go gho gha
ঙ umô umô ngô ngô – ngo nga
চ sô cô cô sô so co ca
ছ sô chô – sô so so -
𑒕 – – – – – – cha
জ zô jô jô zô zo jo ja
ঝ zhô jhô jhô zô zo jho -
𑒗 – – – – – – jha
ঞ niô nô – – – – nia
ট tô ţô – tô to – –
𑒙 – – – – – – ţa
ঠ thô ţhô – tô to – ţha
ড dô đô – dô do – da
ড় rô ŗô – rô ŗo – –
ঢ dhô đhô – dô do - da
ঢ় rhô ŗhô – rô ro – –
ণ nô nô – nô no - -
ত tô tô tô tô ṭo to ta
থ thô thô thô tô ṭo tho tha
দ dô dô dô dô ḍo do da
ধ dhô dhô dhô dhô ḍo dho dha
ন nô nô nô nô no no na
প pô pô pô fô fo po pa
ফ phô phô/fô fô fô fo fo –
𑒤 – – – – – – pha
ব bô bô bô vô vo bo ra
ভ bhô bhô vô vô vo vo bha
ম mô mô mô mô mo mo ma
য zô jô – zô zo - ya
য় yô yô yô yô – yo –
র (wô) rô rô rô ro wõ va
ৰ rô (rô) ro – rô – ra
ল lô lô lô lô lo – –
𑒪 – – – – – – la
ৱ wô – wo wô – – –
শ xô şô – shô – - sha
ষ xô şşô – shô – - ssha
স xô şô sô shô şo - sa
হ hô hô hô ô ho ho -
𑒯 – – – – – – ha

Digits

[edit]
Digits
Arabic numerals 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Bengali-Assamese numerals ০ ১ ২ ৩ ৪ ৫ ৬ ৭ ৮ ৯
Assamese names xuinnô ek dui tini sari pãs sôy xat ath nô
শূন্য এক দুই তিনি চাৰি পাঁচ ছয় সাত আঠ ন
Bengali names shunnô æk dui tin char pãch chhôy shat aţ nôy
শূন্য এক দুই তিন চার পাঁচ ছয় সাত আট নয়
Meitei names phoon ama ani ahum mari manga taruk taret nipa꞉n ma꞉pan
ফুন অমা অনি অহুম মরি মঙা তরূক তরেৎ নীপান মাপন
Sylheti names shuinno ex dui tin sair fas soy shat/hat aţ noy
শূইন্য এক (খ) দুই তিন ছাইর পাচ ছয় সাত/হাত আট নয়
Maithili names shūnya ek du tīn chari pãch chhau sat aţh nau
শূন্য এক দু তীন চাৰি পাঁচ ছৌ সাত আঠ নৌ
Kamtapuri names shuinno ek/aak dui tin chair pãch chhôy sat aat nôy/nôo
শূইন্য এক/আক দুই তিন চাইর/চাইৰ পাঁচ ছয় সাত আট নয়/নও
Hajong names xuinnô ek dui tin câr pas soy sat at noy
শূন্য এক দুই তিন চাৰ/চার পাচ ছয় সাত আট নয়
Rabha names tha sa niŋ tham bri bwŋ kröb sin gin suku
থা ছা নিং থাম ব্ৰি বৗং ক্ৰোব ছিন গিন ছুকু
Chittagonian names shúinnô ek dui tin sair/sér fañs só śat añshtô nô
শূইন্য এক দুই তিন ছাইর/ছের পাঁচ ছ সাত আঁশ্ট ন

In Unicode

[edit]
Main articles: Bengali (Unicode block) and Tirhuta (Unicode block)

There are two Unicode blocks for Bengali–Assamese script, called Bengali and Tirhuta. The Bengali block is U+0980–U+09FF:

Bengali[1][2]
Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF)
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
U+098x ঀ ঁ ং ঃ অ আ ই ঈ উ ঊ ঋ ঌ এ
U+099x ঐ ও ঔ ক খ গ ঘ ঙ চ ছ জ ঝ ঞ ট
U+09Ax ঠ ড ঢ ণ ত থ দ ধ ন প ফ ব ভ ম য
U+09Bx র ল শ ষ স হ ় ঽ া ি
U+09Cx ী ু ূ ৃ ৄ ে ৈ ো ৌ ্ ৎ
U+09Dx ৗ ড় ঢ় য়
U+09Ex ৠ ৡ ৢ ৣ ০ ১ ২ ৩ ৪ ৫ ৬ ৭ ৮ ৯
U+09Fx ৰ ৱ ৲ ৳ ৴ ৵ ৶ ৷ ৸ ৹ ৺ ৻ ৼ ৽ ৾
Notes
1.^ As of Unicode version 17.0
2.^ Grey areas indicate non-assigned code points

The Tirhuta block is U+11480–U+114DF:

Tirhuta[1][2]
Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF)
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
U+1148x 𑒀‎ 𑒁‎ 𑒂‎ 𑒃‎ 𑒄‎ 𑒅‎ 𑒆‎ 𑒇‎ 𑒈‎ 𑒉‎ 𑒊‎ 𑒋‎ 𑒌‎ 𑒍‎ 𑒎‎ 𑒏‎
U+1149x 𑒐‎ 𑒑‎ 𑒒‎ 𑒓‎ 𑒔‎ 𑒕‎ 𑒖‎ 𑒗‎ 𑒘‎ 𑒙‎ 𑒚‎ 𑒛‎ 𑒜‎ 𑒝‎ 𑒞‎ 𑒟‎
U+114Ax 𑒠‎ 𑒡‎ 𑒢‎ 𑒣‎ 𑒤‎ 𑒥‎ 𑒦‎ 𑒧‎ 𑒨‎ 𑒩‎ 𑒪‎ 𑒫‎ 𑒬‎ 𑒭‎ 𑒮‎ 𑒯‎
U+114Bx 𑒰‎ 𑒱‎ 𑒲‎ 𑒳‎ 𑒴‎ 𑒵‎ 𑒶‎ 𑒷‎ 𑒸‎ 𑒹‎ 𑒺‎ 𑒻‎ 𑒼‎ 𑒽‎ 𑒾‎ 𑒿‎
U+114Cx 𑓀‎ 𑓁‎ 𑓂‎ 𑓃‎ 𑓄‎ 𑓅‎ 𑓆‎ 𑓇‎
U+114Dx 𑓐‎ 𑓑‎ 𑓒‎ 𑓓‎ 𑓔‎ 𑓕‎ 𑓖‎ 𑓗‎ 𑓘‎ 𑓙‎
Notes
1.^ As of Unicode version 17.0
2.^ Grey areas indicate non-assigned code points

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bengali–Assamese script

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Bengali–Assamese script, also known as Eastern Nagari, is a Brahmic writing system derived from eastern variants of the ancient Brahmi script, such as Kutilalipi, and primarily employed to write the Bengali and Assamese languages of the Indian subcontinent in regions encompassing Bangladesh, West Bengal, Assam, and neighboring areas of eastern India. Emerging prominently in eastern India by the 6th to 7th centuries CE through intermediate forms like the Kamrupi or Gaudi scripts, it represents a cursive evolution suited to the phonetics of Indo-Aryan tongues spoken in medieval Kamarupa and Bengal kingdoms. While sharing a unified structure as an abugida—wherein consonants inherently include a vowel sound modifiable by diacritics or matras—the script exhibits minor glyphic differences, such as distinct forms for the letter "ro" in Assamese and additional characters accommodating Assamese-specific phonemes absent in standard Bengali. This adaptability has sustained its role in literature, administration, and printing since early modern adaptations, including the first typeset forms in the late 18th century, despite phonetic divergences between the languages it serves.

Origins and Evolution

Proto-Brahmic Roots

The Bengali–Assamese script traces its origins to the , which emerged in the 3rd century BCE as evidenced by Ashokan edicts and subsequent epigraphic records across the . This ancestral script provided the abugida structure—consonant-based syllables with optional vowel diacritics—that forms the core of all Brahmic descendants, including the eastern lineage leading to Eastern Nagari. Paleographic analysis of inscriptions confirms a gradual evolution through the (circa 4th–6th centuries CE), a late Brahmi variant characterized by more angular forms that later softened in eastern branches. In the eastern regions, particularly and , adaptations for palm-leaf writing introduced curved, rounded letter shapes to minimize tearing during stylus engraving, a practical modification supported by comparative study of regional script morphologies. The horizontal top bar, stabilizing vertical strokes and unifying syllable heads, also developed in this proto-eastern phase, as seen in transitional Gupta-derived forms. This structural inheritance is causally linked via epigraphic continuity rather than abrupt invention, with no verifiable for indigenous mythological origins predating dated artifacts. The Kamarupi script (5th–13th centuries CE) marks a key intermediary in Assam, evolving directly from Gupta Brahmi and featuring distinct eastern traits in rock and copper-plate inscriptions, such as those from the . The Nidhanpur copperplate inscription of , dated circa 610 CE, exemplifies this stage with its Kutila-style characters—proto-Nagari precursors showing elongated curves and early matra placements—establishing empirical continuity to the Bengali–Assamese lineage. These artifacts, analyzed through paleography, refute unsubstantiated claims of isolated development by demonstrating shared graphemes with contemporaneous eastern inscriptions.

Medieval Gaudi and Eastern Nagari Forms

The , emerging as a distinct variant of the eastern Brahmic family by the , marked a pivotal maturation phase for the ancestor of modern Eastern Nagari, with evidence from copper-plate inscriptions in the and regions. Inscriptions such as the plate of Mahipala I (c. 988–1038 CE) and the Badal plate of Narayanapala (c. 917 CE) demonstrate proto-forms with increasingly and rounded shapes, transitioning from the angular Siddham script of the 7th–8th centuries. These developments standardized adaptations for palm-leaf manuscripts, where rounded letterforms minimized tearing from stylus incisions and facilitated even ink distribution on perishable media prevalent in medieval eastern . By the 11th–12th centuries, Eastern Nagari forms solidified, as seen in the Anulia plate of Lakshmanasena (c. 1178 CE) and the Sundarban plate of Dommanapala (1196 CE), featuring refined vowel diacritics and matras positioned above or below base consonants to denote phonetic qualities. Manuscripts from the 13th century, including the Laghukalacakratika and Pancaraksa (c. 1289 CE), provide further attestation of these forms in , with horizontal headlines emerging on some letters for conjunct stability. In , parallel evolution occurred in royal grants and early literary works, reflecting shared Gaudi roots but with nascent regional tweaks for local phonology. Regional divergences between Bengali and Assamese manifestations arose from underlying phonetic shifts, particularly in the treatment of , aspirates, and retroflex consonants. Assamese varieties retained distinct glyphs for archaic sounds like the uvular /x/ (derived from Proto-Indo-Aryan ks), often innovating conjuncts absent in Bengali, as evidenced in 13th–15th-century Assam inscriptions adapting Eastern Nagari to accommodate retroflex emphases and qualities influenced by Austroasiatic substrates. The corpus, with verses datable to the 10th–12th centuries and preserved in medieval manuscripts, illustrates early usage for modulations, hinting at patterns where front-back correspondences affected placement, though script forms remained largely undifferentiated across regions until the late medieval period. By the 15th–16th centuries, figures like Srimanta employed matured Eastern Nagari in Assamese devotional texts, solidifying script variants tied to linguistic drift.

Pre-Colonial Variations

In the 16th to 18th centuries, manuscript traditions of the Bengali–Assamese script, known as Eastern Nagari, exhibited regional and stylistic diversity across palm-leaf puthis, bark manuscripts, and inscriptions, reflecting localized scribal practices rather than a standardized form. In , Vaishnava texts composed under figures like Srimanta Sankardeva (1449–1568) employed the Kaitheli (or Kāitheli) style, characterized by artistic, wavy lines and clean curves suited for devotional literature on xaansi () bark. This contrasted with the simpler, straight-lined Gadgānyā style used in some contemporaneous copies, highlighting empirical variations in stroke fluidity and legibility driven by scribal guilds and material constraints. Royal decrees and chronicles further diversified forms, particularly in Assam's Ahom kingdom, where the Garhgaya style emerged around the for official copper plates and silver coins under kings like Rudra Singha (r. 1696–1714) and Siva Singha (r. 1714–1744). This style featured symmetric letter shapes with sharp angles, pronounced curves, and extended strokes at intersections for enhanced durability and readability in administrative texts like Buranjis, which chronicled events in prose from the 13th century onward but adopted Assamese-language variants by the 16th. Bamuniya and other sub-styles coexisted, often tailored to priestly or secular contexts, underscoring a lack of uniformity influenced by from Vaishnavite reformers and Ahom rulers rather than imperial . Bengali manuscripts from the same era showed analogous but less documented divergence, with puthis for Vaishnava padavali songs varying in angularity and conjunct forms across eastern Bengal's rural scriptoria, distinct from Assamese cursive tendencies. Key phonological distinctions persisted in orthography, such as Assamese manuscripts' separate glyphs for the aspirated retroflex 'ro' (ৰ) versus the alveolar 'ra' (র), reflecting retained medieval phonemic contrasts absent in later Bengali simplifications. The core abugida structure remained intact, with vowel diacritics and matras adapted to regional dialects, despite administrative Persian overlay in Mughal Bengal (post-1576), where Nagari numerals predominated in vernacular religious and literary works over Perso-Arabic alternatives. These variations arose from empirical scribal evolution, not deliberate innovation, yielding a mosaic of forms preserved in over 200 surviving Assamese manuscripts cataloged by early 20th-century surveys.

Script Characteristics

Consonant Inventory

The Bengali–Assamese script employs a syllabic inventory rooted in the Brahmic system, where each base inherently carries the /ɔ/ (a rounded schwa-like ), which can be suppressed using the (halant, ্ ) to form consonant clusters or pure stops. The core inventory consists of 35 primary letters arranged in traditional vargas (articulatory classes), spanning from velar ka to glottal ha, with additional forms for retroflex and bringing the total to around 39 in common usage across Bengali and Assamese variants. This structure preserves distinctions between aspirated and unaspirated stops, as well as dental (ta-varga) versus retroflex (Ṭa-varga) articulations, reflecting phonetic realities in without conflating them under simplified modern norms. Assamese implementations extend the inventory slightly with unique letters such as rô (ৰ, a vocalic flap distinct from Bengali ra) and wô (ৱ, for labial-velar ), while maintaining compatibility with the shared Eastern Nagari base; these additions address phonological needs like the preservation of proto-Indo-Aryan r and w sounds lost or merged in standard Bengali. The script's design prioritizes visual economy in clusters, where the triggers subscript forms or ligatures rather than linear stacking, ensuring readability in cursive historical manuscripts. Consonant conjuncts form through implicit or explicit application, yielding over 100 common ligatures via fusion rules: the trailing typically reduces to a shortened "phala" (matra-like subscript), as in kt (ক্ত, where ta curls below ka) or pr (প্র, with ra as a right-attached ). A specialized rule governs post-consonantal ya, rendered as ya-phala ( ্য , a diagonal ), as seen in kya (ক্য); this convention, documented in medieval treatises on Nagari , avoids full stacking to mimic spoken in Sanskrit-derived loans. Such formations emphasize causal phonetic mapping over arbitrary standardization, with empirical variation in shapes across pre-19th-century inscriptions versus printed forms. The following table enumerates the primary consonants by varga, with IPA approximations for phonetic accuracy (noting Assamese shifts, e.g., voiceless aspirates as fricatives in some dialects):
VargaUnaspiratedAspirated VoicelessVoicedAspirated VoicedNasal
Velar (ka)ক /k/খ /kʰ/গ /ɡ/ঘ /ɡʱ/ঙ /ŋ/
Palatal (ca)চ /tɕ/ছ /tɕʰ/জ /dʑ/ঝ /dʑʱ/ঞ /ɲ/
Retroflex (Ṭa)ট /ʈ/ঠ /ʈʰ/ড /ɖ/ঢ /ɖʱ/ণ /ɳ/
Dental (ta)ত /t̪/থ /t̪ʰ/দ /d̪/ধ /d̪ʱ/ন /n̪/
Labial (pa)প /p/ফ /pʰ/ or /f/ব /b/ভ /bʱ/ or /βʱ/ম /m/
Additional standalone approximants and include য /dʑɔ/ (or য় /jɔ/ variant), র /rɔ/, ল /lɔ/, শ /ʃɔ/, ষ /ʂɔ/, স /sɔ/, and হ /ɦɔ/.

Vowel System and Diacritics

The , an derived from Brahmic traditions, employs 11 independent letters to denote syllable-initial vowels, systematically encoding distinctions in quality, duration, and occasionally al form. These include অ (/ɔ/, inherent short ), আ (/aː/, long open central), ই (/i/, short high front), ঈ (/iː/, long high front), উ (/u/, short high back), ঊ (/uː/, long high back), ঋ (/ri/, vocalic r), এ (/e/, mid front), ঐ (/oi/, ), ও (/o/, mid back), and ঔ (/ou/, ). This inventory reflects first-principles phonetic categorization, prioritizing oral cavity positions and length contrasts to approximate the phonological systems of , where affects and prosody. Dependent vowel forms, known as matras, modify the inherent vowel of a consonant base, attaching in positions optimized for the script's left-to-right, semi-cursive flow: pre-consonantal (leftward, e.g., া for /aː/), post-consonantal (rightward, e.g., ও for /o/), superscript (above, e.g., ী for /iː/, ৈ for /oi/), or subscript (below, e.g., ূ for /uː/). This spatial arrangement minimizes vertical interruptions to the primary horizontal baseline, facilitating fluid handwriting and reducing in connected text production, as observed in analyses of script rendering and recognition challenges. Nasality is encoded via the diacritic (ঁ), a superscript with dot placed above vowels or syllables to indicate (e.g., transforming /a/ to /ã/), distinct from the (ং), which denotes a homorganic or alternative . These modifiers derive from Proto-Brahmic and conventions, adapted to preserve phonetic nasality without altering core graphemes. A key empirical limitation arises from the script's failure to mark schwa deletion, where the inherent vowel (অ, phonetically /ɔ/ or reduced to schwa-like /ə/) is often elided in spoken forms following consonants, particularly in non-initial syllables, yielding homographs with multiple pronunciations (e.g., লিকল /likl/ vs. /likɔl/). This orthographic opacity, rooted in historical morphophonemic , complicates grapheme-to-phoneme mapping and has fueled linguistic analyses proposing phonetic alignment, though no widespread reforms have been implemented. Such ambiguities underscore the script's etymological fidelity over strict phonemic transparency, prioritizing morphological in derivationally rich languages.

Numerals and Punctuation

The Bengali–Assamese script features a set of ten digits (0–9) with Brahmic-derived glyphs, including the rod-like vertical stroke for ১ (one), a downward hook for ৩ (three), and a looped form for ২ (two), which contrast with the more circular contours of prevalent in Western usage. These forms evolved from Gupta-era numerals (c. 4th–6th centuries CE) through regional adaptations in eastern , appearing in inscriptions and manuscripts by the Pala (8th–12th centuries) and Sena (11th–12th centuries) dynasties. In practical applications, such as arithmetic computations, these digits supported place-value notation in medieval treatises translating works like Lilavati, with evidence of their utility in regional mathematical texts persisting into later periods. Punctuation relies on the (।, U+0964), a single signifying sentence closure, and the double danda (॥, U+0965) for denoting verse endings or major divisions, conventions rooted in Vedic and that emphasize rhythmic and metrical boundaries over semantic pauses. These marks, shared across Eastern Nagari variants, appear in both Bengali and Assamese literary traditions, including religious and poetic compositions. Modern adaptations integrate them with Western symbols—such as the (,) for lists and the (?)—while retaining the danda for formal to preserve script-specific readability in printed and .

Language-Specific Adaptations

Bengali Implementations

The standard Bengali script forms emerged prominently in the , as evidenced by lexicographical works such as William Carey's A Dictionary of the (1826), which codified consonant and vowel representations tailored to . These implementations distinguish Bengali from related scripts by employing the single glyph র for both the consonant ra and its variants in clusters, eschewing the dedicated ro form ৰ used in Assamese orthography. This simplification reflects phonetic priorities in standard Bengali, where intervocalic and post-vocalic r sounds merge without requiring additional characters. Vowel diacritics in Bengali implementations include specialized marks for sounds like ô, often rendered through combinations of base o-forms with modifiers to denote length or nasalization, aligning with 19th-century print conventions. The script's early adoption in printing, beginning with Nathaniel Brassey Halhed's A Grammar of the Language (1778) using , established its prevalence in literary and journalistic media. By the , these forms dominated Bengali print production, supporting a vast body of literature and newspapers that catered to growing readerships in and beyond. Today, the Bengali script serves over 265 million speakers worldwide, primarily as the orthographic standard for printed materials in , , and diaspora communities. Despite its widespread use, the script faces critique for its dependence on conjunct ligatures—fused clusters that generate hundreds of unique glyphs—resulting in heightened visual and challenges for , particularly in dense texts. Linguistic analyses highlight this conjunct proliferation as a key factor in the script's complexity, complicating both manual writing and early typesetting processes.

Assamese Distinctions

The Assamese variant of the Eastern Nagari script incorporates distinct graphemes ৰ (ro-phala, representing a retroflex or rolled 'r' sound) and ৱ (wa or vo, for the bilabial /w/), which are not present in the and reflect Assamese phonology's retention of sounds merged or absent in Bengali. These letters enable precise orthographic representation of archaic phonemes, such as the distinct /ɹɔ/ and /wɔ/, preserving linguistic features traceable to early Indo-Aryan dialects in the region. Inscriptional evidence from the kingdom supports claims of an independent evolutionary lineage for Assamese forms, with copper plates like the grant of the 5th century exhibiting proto-forms derived from Gupta-era scripts that predate standardized Bengali developments. This antiquity, rooted in Kamarupi script usage from the 5th to 13th centuries, underscores parallel divergence from shared Brahmic origins rather than derivation from Bengali norms, as early epigraphs demonstrate rounded character shapes and ligatures unique to eastern variants. These distinctions contribute to Assamese orthography's strength in conserving phonetic fidelity, including voiceless velar fricatives and diphthongs lost in Bengali evolution, allowing texts to encode regional sound systems without reliance on modifications common in Bengali. However, the script's underrepresentation in digital ecosystems persists, as Unicode's shared Bengali-Assamese block often defaults to Bengali rendering, marginalizing ৰ and ৱ in fonts and input methods, which has prompted demands for separate encoding to support Assamese-specific keyboards handling these eight-letter differences from Bengali's inventory. Despite the common base of approximately 90% shared characters, these graphemic variances necessitate dedicated tools for accurate Assamese input, evident in the development of region-specific layouts since the early .

Usages in Other Languages

The Sylheti Nagri script, a specialized variant of Eastern Nagari, has been employed for writing the , an Eastern Indo-Aryan tongue spoken primarily in the region of and adjacent areas of . This script facilitated literary production from at least the medieval period, with significant usage documented in manuscripts and inscriptions tied to local Bengali idioms, though its distinct forms diverged from standard Bengali orthography to accommodate Sylheti phonology. Peak literary output occurred in the , supported by printing presses in and that produced religious texts, poetry, and folklore, reflecting a corpus estimated in thousands of pages across preserved works, though precise digitization remains limited. Bishnupriya Manipuri, a blending Indo-Aryan and Tibeto-Burman elements spoken by communities in and surrounding regions, adopted a modified Eastern Nagari script in the mid-20th century onward, adapting diacritics and letter forms to represent its unique phonemes absent in standard Bengali or Assamese. This adaptation supports a modest modern corpus including periodicals, educational materials, and folk literature, with orthographic reforms emphasizing etymological spellings derived from roots. Similar extensions appear in other minority languages, such as Hajong and Garo dialects in , where Eastern Nagari serves as an auxiliary script for religious and cultural texts despite primary use of Latin or alternatives. Historically, Eastern Nagari and its precursors were utilized for and compositions in eastern from the medieval era, as evidenced by inscriptions in Gauḍī-derived forms dating to the 8th–13th centuries, often in Buddhist and Hindu contexts before standardization in dominated. Contemporary revivals among minority groups, such as Bishnupriya efforts to standardize since the 1950s, aim to preserve linguistic identity amid assimilation pressures, yielding small but growing corpora in community publications. These usages frequently encounter encoding hurdles, as adaptations rely on the Bengali block, leading to rendering discrepancies and font incompatibilities that distort non-standard characters in .

Standardization Processes

Introduction of Printing

The introduction of mechanical printing to the Bengali–Assamese script, or Eastern Nagari, marked a pivotal shift from manuscript traditions to reproducible texts, beginning in colonial Bengal. The earliest known instance occurred in 1778 with Nathaniel Brassey Halhed's A Grammar of the Bengal Language, the first book printed using Bengali types, which Charles Wilkins engraved and cast at a press in Hooghly. Wilkins' innovation addressed the technical difficulties of producing metal types for the script's rounded, cursive forms and intricate conjunct consonants, which resisted conventional European casting methods due to their non-linear alignments and ligature complexity. These early efforts necessitated adaptations, such as simplified representations of conjuncts to facilitate type alignment and justify lines, diverging from the fluid variability of handwritten manuscripts. extended to Assamese adaptations of the script with the 1813 of Dharmapustak, an Assamese translation by Atmaram Sarma, produced at the under William Carey. This work represented the first mechanically reproduced Assamese text, leveraging similar type designs despite regional orthographic differences. By the early 1800s, proliferation of presses in and , including missionary establishments like Sibsagar in 1836, disseminated standardized forms through fixed typefaces, reducing scribal variations and promoting uniformity across printed materials in both regions. This mechanical fixation influenced script , embedding printed conventions into and administration, though initial type limitations constrained full fidelity to traditional conjunct renderings.

Colonial-Era Reforms

During the colonial period, the introduction of printing technology prompted significant orthographic adjustments to the Bengali–Assamese script, particularly for Assamese usage, as sought to adapt it for religious texts and periodicals. American Baptist , including Nathan Brown, initiated printed Assamese materials in the early , with the first printed book being a translation by Atmar Ram Sarma published in 1813 at the , which employed types aligned with Bengali conventions but incorporated Assamese phonetic elements to better represent local sounds like the /x/ . By the and 1840s, efforts intensified to promote phonetic spelling, emphasizing script forms that distinguished Assamese from Bengali, such as consistent use of characters for aspirated consonants and matras tailored to regional pronunciation, as seen in publications aiming for and evangelistic accessibility. These pushes prioritized orthographic efficiency for mass printing over traditional manuscript variability, leading to a more standardized, linear script layout suitable for . The launch of the periodical in 1846 by the American Baptist Mission marked a pivotal reform, utilizing refined Assamese graphemes in print to foster modern literacy and public discourse, thereby embedding phonetic consistency into everyday usage. This era's initiatives, driven by colonial administrative needs and goals, often imposed a degree of uniformity by favoring printed Bengali-influenced typesets, which some contemporaries criticized for overshadowing Assamese script's pre-colonial antiquity and regional variations evident in inscriptions dating back to the . A key administrative reform occurred in 1873, when British authorities reinstated Assamese as the language of courts and in the Assam Valley, reversing the 1836 imposition of Bengali and thereby influencing script norms to prioritize Assamese orthographic distinctions within the shared system. This shift affected legal and educational printing, enforcing Assamese-specific conventions like the 'ro' (ৰ) and 'wa' (ঋ) forms to reflect vernacular speech, though it drew criticism for potentially enforcing a homogenized colonial standard that undervalued historical Assamese traditions. Such changes enhanced administrative efficiency but highlighted tensions between imposed practicality and indigenous script evolution.

Post-Independence Adjustments

In , following independence in 1947, orthographic committees in continued pre-existing standardization efforts, focusing on consistent representation of forms including the ya-phala (the subscript ya used in clusters like ক্যা for /kya/). These adjustments aimed to streamline handwriting and printing for Bengali, building on 1930s reforms but adapting to national linguistic policies under the Indian Constitution's Eighth Schedule recognition of Bengali in 1950. In (formerly until 1971), the , founded in 1955, spearheaded script rationalization and orthographic reforms, emphasizing uniform application of elements like ya-phala in standard conjuncts to reduce variability in educational materials and publications. This culminated in the Academy's 1992 Standard Bangla Spelling Rules, which codified script usage, pronunciation alignments, and conjunct formations for modern Bengali orthography. Assamese script adjustments post-1947 involved revival initiatives by the to restore and emphasize distinct glyphs, such as the looped ৰ (ro) and ৱ (wo), differentiating it from Bengali while retaining shared ya-phala conventions in conjuncts. These changes supported Assamese as Assam's from 1960, improving typewriter adaptations in the 1960s–1970s for regional publishing, though disputes over conjunct precedence (e.g., ya-phala vs. full ya forms) persisted between Assamese and Bengali variants, hindering full uniformity.

Digital and Modern Encoding

Unicode Implementation

The Bengali Unicode block, designated U+0980–U+09FF, allocates 128 code points to encode the core repertoire of the Bengali–Assamese script, including 11 vowels, 39 consonants, 11 vowel signs (matras), and various diacritics, digits, and punctuation marks essential for composition via OpenType rendering rules. For instance, the independent vowel "a" is encoded at U+0985 (অ), the consonant "ka" at U+0995 (ক), and the vowel sign "i" at U+09BF (ি), which combines with consonants to form ligatures like কি (ki). This block supports over 96 assigned characters, enabling the representation of conjunct forms through logical reordering and glyph substitution rather than precomposed code points, aligning with the script's abugida structure. Collation and sorting in implementations for this script often tailor the default order to approximate ISCII standards, which distinguish phonetic sequences for Bengali and Assamese by prioritizing matras before consonants in sorting keys to reflect linguistic conventions. However, practical algorithms may require revisions, as the order—optimized for Bengali prominence—can produce errors in Assamese sorting, such as misplacing characters like ৰ (U+09F0) due to their later assignment. Unicode version 8.0, released June 17, 2015, incorporated specific additions for Assamese distinctions, including U+09F0 (ৰ, ra with middle diagonal), U+09F1 (ৱ, wa), and related forms to accommodate phonetic needs not fully covered in prior versions. In response to proposals, the ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 in endorsed renaming the block from "Bengali" to "Bengali-Assamese" to acknowledge dual usage, though this did not alter code points or introduce a separate block. These implementations have facilitated cross-platform text processing, input methods, and display consistency across operating systems via standardized fonts like Noto Sans Bengali, reducing legacy encoding dependencies like ISCII. Nonetheless, criticisms persist regarding incompleteness for regional variants, such as insufficient support for historical or dialectal conjuncts without custom rendering, and persistent discrepancies that hinder full Assamese linguistic fidelity in search and indexing.

Nomenclature and Identity Controversies

The nomenclature of the shared script used for Bengali and Assamese languages has sparked debates centered on whether it should be designated primarily as "Bengali," reflecting the larger speaker base of Bengali (over 250 million speakers globally as of 2020 estimates), or recognized distinctly to acknowledge Assamese historical precedence and phonological distinctions. Proponents of unity argue that the script's core glyph set and encoding efficiency in standards like favor a single block, avoiding fragmentation for digital rendering and interoperability, as the differences—such as Assamese-specific characters for retroflex ṝ (ঋ) and additional vowel signs—are minor extensions rather than a separate system. Critics from Assamese perspectives contend this subsumes a script with roots traceable to 5th-century Kamrupi inscriptions, predating the standardized Bengali form that emerged later under colonial influences, potentially erasing cultural precedence in favor of Bengali demographic dominance. In 2012 Unicode Consortium discussions, Assamese advocates petitioned for renaming the block from "Bengali" to "Eastern Nagari" or a neutral term, highlighting how Bengali-centric character names (e.g., descriptors in the code chart) compelled Assamese users to adopt incompatible nomenclature, exacerbating input method and font rendering issues. These efforts, including submissions from Assamese linguists, emphasized the script's shared Eastern Brahmic origins but stressed Assamese innovations like distinct orthographic conventions for aspirated consonants, rooted in phonological needs rather than political invention. Despite proposals for compromise names acceptable to both communities, the Consortium retained "Bengali" as the primary alias, citing stability for existing implementations, though aliases like "Assamese" were noted in . By 2018, the (ISO) advanced a recommendation following a technical meeting in , proposing dual naming as "Bengali/Assamese" to reflect mutual usage while addressing Assamese claims of antiquity and independent from proto-forms like the Nagari variants used in ancient . This step aimed to mitigate rendering disparities, where Assamese-specific glyphs often default to Bengali fonts lacking full support, but implementation lagged due to Unicode's conservative update cycles, perpetuating debates over identity erasure. Assamese stakeholders, including computational linguists, argue that phonological fidelity—such as precise representation of Assamese /x/ (খ) versus Bengali approximations—justifies distinct recognition without splitting the code block, balancing efficiency with historical accuracy. Conversely, unified script advocates, often from Bengali-majority contexts, view such pushes as unnecessary fragmentation, given empirical overlap in over 90% of base characters and shared typographic traditions. These tensions underscore a causal divide: script unity aids practical digital adoption, yet overlooks Assamese evidentiary precedence in , where early forms diverge from later Bengali reforms.

References

  1. https://www.isical.ac.in/~rc_bangla/bangla.html
  2. https://www.typoday.in/2019/spk_papers/abhijit_padun_typoday_2019.pdf
  3. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2004600.pdf
  4. https://www.tamilheritage.org/kidangku/DrSwaminathan/scripts/07_Indian_Scripts2_Brahmi_to_Devanagari.pdf
  5. https://ijrhs.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/IJRHS0625080015_Historical%2520Development%2520of%2520Indian%2520Language%2520Scripts%2520and%2520Their%2520Regional%2520Influence.pdf
  6. http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2011/11338-assamese-input.pdf
  7. https://en.banglapedia.org/index.php/Bangla_Script
  8. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/kamarupi.htm
  9. https://westbengal.pscnotes.com/west-bengal-history/development-of-bengali-language-and-script/
  10. http://www.atributetosankaradeva.org/manuscripts.htm
  11. https://rupkatha.com/v14n2ne01/
  12. https://indianlanguages.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-the-Assamese-language-and-the-Bengali-language
  13. https://www.scribd.com/document/629142221/1930-Descriptive-Catalogue-of-Assamese-Manuscripts-by-Goswami-s
  14. https://www.unicode.org/charts/nameslist/n_0980.html
  15. https://www.scriptsource.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=script_detail&key=Beng
  16. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/assamese.htm
  17. https://bangla.la.utexas.edu/resources/the-bangla-script/
  18. https://www.fluentin3months.com/bengali-alphabet/
  19. https://14637521145759383548.googlegroups.com/attach/7e8d0ae69e21bcb/AssameseCodeChartOct02.pdf?part=0.1&vt=ANaJVrFe0th-KhK1p97YyOwKAPkDkZY-Lcn8WicV1awgSyiPaGckfZch_GEJmLtHhHM_WNoy4rEGXZG1TUxbwZlsumJMKkXXP41Bn5Or3nMJDf0d3o5X2-U
  20. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/script-development/bengali
  21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44163-025-00251-7
  22. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:264cdb8e-1d4b-4f1d-83e0-34ca3f616e3f/files/rpc289j98m
  23. https://research.google/pubs/brahmic-schwa-deletion-with-neural-classifiers-experiments-with-bengali/
  24. https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0980.pdf
  25. https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/Indian_numerals/
  26. https://www.unicode.org/notes/tn33/
  27. https://www.w3.org/International/ilreq/bengali/
  28. https://r12a.github.io/scripts/beng/bn.html
  29. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.31090
  30. https://www.berlitz.com/blog/most-spoken-languages-world
  31. https://www.languageinindia.com/jan2006/language_in_india_sent4publication.pdf
  32. https://designregression.com/review/character-complexity-and-redundancy-in-writing-systems-over-human-history
  33. https://drsatyakamphukan.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/asm-uni.pdf
  34. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/guwahati/ancient-stone-inscription-confirms-assamese-languages-classical-status/articleshow/113952252.cms
  35. https://www.indianetzone.com/origin_assamese_script
  36. https://indianexpress.com/article/north-east-india/assam/fight-independent-digital-identity-assamese-script-continues-5456189/
  37. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EI3O/COM-25653.xml?language=en
  38. https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2002/02388-syloti-proposal.pdf
  39. https://sylots.com/a-brief-history-of-syloti-nagri-the-script-of-sylheti-identity/
  40. https://cla.berkeley.edu/collection/?collid=11301=Bishnupriya%2520Manipuri%2520Language%2520Documentation%2520Materials
  41. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/bishnupriyamanipuri.htm
  42. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04688170v1/document
  43. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/manipuri.htm
  44. https://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m07/0078.html
  45. https://historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=4939
  46. https://en.banglapedia.org/index.php/Wilkins%2C_Sir_Charles
  47. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004535800/B9789004535800_s004.pdf
  48. https://www.thedailystar.net/in-focus/news/the-early-history-bengali-printing-1976265
  49. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/guwahati/replica-of-1st-printed-assamese-book-to-be-showcased-in-jorhat-literary-museum/articleshow/106464739.cms
  50. https://researchscholar.co.in/downloads/25-ms.-aradhana-saikia-bora.pdf
  51. http://lisindia.ciil.org/Assamese/Assa_script.html
  52. https://partitionstudiesquarterly.org/article/orunodoi-print-media-modernity-and-public-discourse/
  53. https://assamtribune.com/antiquity-of-assamese-script-older-than-previously-thought
  54. https://serendipityarts.org/writing_initiatives/jonaki-the-birth-of-assamese-nationalism/
  55. https://oxfordre.com/asianhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277727-e-123
  56. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bengali-language
  57. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposal-bangla-lgr-02mar20-en.pdf
  58. https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/block/U%2B0980
  59. https://unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/Archives-Old/UML009/0597.html
  60. https://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m07/0034.html
  61. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/why-assamese-script-wants-its-own-slot-and-what-it-has-got-instead-5236249/
  62. https://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m07/0023.html
  63. https://scispace.com/pdf/a-revised-unicode-based-sorting-algorithm-for-bengali-texts-1rffbxgqtq.pdf
  64. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-the-east-a-war-of-words/articleshow/16417273.cms
  65. https://www.timesofassam.com/technology/assamese-and-bengali-controversy-in-unicode-standard/
  66. https://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m07/0112.html
  67. https://indianexpress.com/article/north-east-india/assam/the-older-than-bengali-assamese-script-now-a-step-closer-to-getting-digital-recognition/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.