Hubbry Logo
DecapitationDecapitationMain
Open search
Decapitation
Community hub
Decapitation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Decapitation
Decapitation
from Wikipedia
Decapitation
The Beheading of Saint Paul. Painting by Enrique Simonet in 1887, Málaga Cathedral
CausesDeliberate (executions, murder or homicide, suicide); unintended (accidents)
PrognosisInvariably fatal
Beheadings in an illumination from Froissart's Chronicles from the beginning of the 15th century – the execution of Guillaume Sans and his secretary in Bordeaux on the orders of Thomas Felton
Perseus using the severed head of Medusa to turn King Polydectes to stone
Depiction of an Ethiopian emperor executing people, 18th century

Decapitation is the total separation of the head from the body. Such an injury is always fatal to humans and all vertebrate animals, since it deprives the brain of oxygenated blood by way of severing through the jugular vein and common carotid artery, while all other organs are deprived of the involuntary functions that are needed for the body to function. The term beheading refers to the act of deliberately decapitating a person, either as a means of murder or as an execution; it may be performed with an axe, sword, or knife, or by mechanical means such as a guillotine. An executioner who carries out executions by beheading is sometimes called a headsman.[1] Accidental decapitation can be the result of an explosion,[2] a car or industrial accident, improperly administered execution by hanging or other violent injury. The national laws of Saudi Arabia and Yemen[3] permit beheading. Under Sharia, which exclusively applies to Muslims, beheading is also a legal punishment in Zamfara State, Nigeria.[4] In practice, Saudi Arabia is the only country that continues to behead its offenders regularly as a punishment for capital crimes. Cases of decapitation by suicidal hanging,[5] suicide by train decapitation[6][7] and by guillotine[8] are known.

Less commonly, decapitation can also refer to the removal of the head from a body that is already dead. This might be done to take the head as a trophy, as a secondary stage of an execution by hanging, for public display, to make the deceased more difficult to identify, for cryonics, or for other, more esoteric reasons.[9][10]

Etymology

[edit]

The word decapitation has its roots in the Late Latin word decapitare. The meaning of the word decapitare can be discerned from its morphemes de- (down, from) + capit- (head).[11] The past participle of decapitare is decapitatus[12] which was used to create decapitatio, the noun form of decapitatus, in Medieval Latin, whence the French word décapitation was produced.[12]

History

[edit]
Odin finding Mímir's beheaded body – an episode of Norse mythology
Beheading – facsimile of a miniature on wood in the Cosmographia of Sebastian Münster (1488–1552), Basel, Switzerland, 1552
"The beheading of St. Barbara" by Giulio Quaglio the Younger (1721–1723)
Depiction of a public execution in Brueghel's The Triumph of Death, 1562–1563
Depiction of the public execution of pirates (namely Klein Henszlein and his crew) in Hamburg, Germany, 10 September 1573

Humans have practiced capital punishment by beheading for millennia. The Narmer Palette (c. 3000 BCE) shows the first known depiction of decapitated corpses. The terms "capital offence", "capital crime", "capital punishment", derive from the Latin caput, "head", referring to the punishment for serious offences involving the forfeiture of the head; i.e. death by beheading.[13]

Some cultures, such as ancient Rome and Greece, regarded decapitation as the most honorable form of death.[14] In the Middle Ages, many European nations continued to reserve the method only for nobles and royalty.[15] In France, the French Revolution made it the only legal method of execution for all criminals regardless of class, one of the period's many symbolic changes.[14]

Others have regarded beheading as dishonorable and contemptuous, such as the Japanese troops who beheaded prisoners during World War II.[14] In recent times, it has become associated with terrorism.[14]

If a headsman's axe or sword is sharp and his aim is precise, decapitation is quick and thought to be a relatively painless form of death. If the instrument is blunt or the executioner is clumsy, repeated strokes might be required to sever the head, resulting in a prolonged and more painful death. Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex,[16] and Mary, Queen of Scots[17] required three strikes at their respective executions. The same could be said for the execution of Johann Friedrich Struensee, favorite of the Danish queen Caroline Matilda of Great Britain. Margaret Pole, 8th Countess of Salisbury, is said to have required up to 10 strokes before decapitation was achieved.[18] This particular story may, however, be apocryphal, as highly divergent accounts exist. Historian and philosopher David Hume, for example, relates the following about her death:[19]

She refused to lay her head on the block, or submit to a sentence where she had received no trial. She told the executioner, that if he would have her head, he must win it the best way he could: and thus, shaking her venerable grey locks, she ran about the scaffold; and the executioner followed her with his axe, aiming many fruitless blows at her neck before he was able to give the fatal stroke.

The Beheading of Cosmas and Damian, by Fra Angelico

To ensure that the blow would be fatal, executioners' swords usually were blade-heavy two-handed swords. Likewise, if an axe was used, it almost invariably was wielded with both hands.

Physiological aspects

[edit]

Physiology of death by decapitation

[edit]

Decapitation is quickly fatal to humans and most animals. Unconsciousness occurs within seconds without circulating oxygenated blood (brain ischemia).[20] Cell death and irreversible brain damage occur after 3–6 minutes with no oxygen, due to excitotoxicity. Some anecdotes suggest more extended persistence of human consciousness after decapitation,[21] but most doctors consider this unlikely and consider such accounts to be misapprehensions of reflexive twitching rather than deliberate movement, since deprivation of oxygen must cause nearly immediate coma and death ("[Consciousness is] probably lost within 2–3 seconds, due to a rapid fall of intracranial perfusion of blood").[22]

A laboratory study testing for humane methods of euthanasia in awake animals used EEG monitoring to measure the time duration following decapitation for rats to become fully unconscious, unable to perceive distress and pain. It was estimated that this point was reached within 3–4 seconds, correlating closely with results found in other studies on rodents (2.7 seconds, and 3–6 seconds).[23][24][25] The same study also suggested that the massive wave which can be recorded by EEG monitoring approximately one minute after decapitation ultimately reflects brain death. Other studies indicate that electrical activity in the brain has been demonstrated to persist for 13 to 14 seconds following decapitation (although it is disputed as to whether such activity implies that pain is perceived),[26] and a 2010 study reported that decapitation of rats generated responses in EEG indices over a period of 10 seconds that have been linked to nociception across a number of different species of animals, including rats.[27]

Some animals (such as cockroaches) can survive decapitation and die not because of the loss of the head directly, but rather because of starvation.[28] A number of other animals, including snakes, and turtles, have also been known to survive for some time after being decapitated, as they have slower metabolisms and their nervous systems can continue to function at some capacity for a limited time even after connection to the brain is lost, responding to any nearby stimulus.[29][30] In addition, the bodies of chickens and turtles may continue to move temporarily after decapitation.[31]

Although head transplantation by the reattachment of blood vessels has seen some very limited success in animals,[32] a fully functional reattachment of a severed human head (including repair of the spinal cord, muscles, and other critically important tissues) has not yet been achieved.

Technology

[edit]

Guillotine

[edit]
Aristocratic heads on pikes – a cartoon from the French Revolution

Early versions of the guillotine included the Halifax Gibbet, which was used in Halifax, England, from 1286 until the 17th century, and the "Maiden", employed in Edinburgh from the 16th through the 18th centuries.

The modern form of the guillotine was invented shortly before the French Revolution with the aim of creating a quick and painless method of execution requiring little skill on the part of the operator. Decapitation by guillotine became a common mechanically assisted form of execution.

The French observed a strict code of etiquette surrounding such executions. For example, a man named Legros, one of the assistants at the execution of Charlotte Corday, was imprisoned for three months and dismissed for slapping the face of the victim after the blade had fallen in order to see whether any flicker of life remained.[33] The guillotine was used in France during the French Revolution and remained the normal judicial method in both peacetime and wartime into the 1970s, although the firing squad was used in certain cases. France abolished the death penalty in 1981.

The guillotine was also used in Algeria before the French relinquished control of it, as shown in Gillo Pontecorvo's film The Battle of Algiers.

Fallbeil

[edit]
French anarchist Auguste Vaillant just before being guillotined in 1894

Many German states had used a guillotine-like device known as a Fallbeil ("falling axe") since the 17th and 18th centuries, and decapitation by guillotine was the usual means of execution in Germany until the abolition of the death penalty in West Germany in 1949. It was last used in communist East Germany in 1966.

In Nazi Germany, the Fallbeil was reserved for common criminals and people convicted of political crimes, including treason. Members of the White Rose resistance movement, a group of students in Munich that included siblings Sophie and Hans Scholl, were executed by decapitation.

Contrary to popular myth, executions were generally not conducted face-up, and chief executioner Johann Reichhart was insistent on maintaining "professional" protocol throughout the era, having administered the death penalty during the earlier Weimar Republic. Nonetheless, it is estimated that some 16,500 persons were guillotined in Germany and Austria between 1933 and 1945, a number that includes resistance fighters both within Germany itself and in countries occupied by Nazi forces. As these resistance fighters were not part of any regular army, they were considered common criminals and were in many cases transported to Germany for execution. Decapitation was considered a "dishonorable" death, in contrast to execution by firing squad.[citation needed]

A fresco by Ambrogio Lorenzetti

Historical practices by nation

[edit]

Africa

[edit]

Congo

[edit]

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the conflict and ethnic massacre between local army and Kamuina Nsapu rebels has caused several deaths and atrocities such as rape and mutilation. One of them is decapitation, both a fearsome way to intimidate victims as well as an act that may include ritualistic elements. According to a UN report from Congolese refugees, they believed the Bana Mura and Kamuina Nsapu militias have "magical powers" as a result of drinking the blood of decapitated victims, making them invincible.[34]

Besides the massive decapitations (like the beheading of 40 members of the State Police), a globally notorious case happened in March 2017 to Swedish politician Zaida Catalán and American UN expert Michael Sharp, who were kidnapped and executed during a mission near the village of Ngombe in Kasaï Province. The UN was reportedly horrified when video footage of the executions surfaced in April that same year, where some grisly details led to assume ritual components of the beheading: the perpetrators first cut the hair of both victims, and then one of them beheaded Catalán only, because it would "increase his power",[35] which may be linked to the fact that Congolese militias are particularly brutal in their acts of violence toward women and children.[36]

In the trial that followed investigations after the bodies were discovered, and according to a testimony of a primary school teacher from Bunkonde, near the village of Moyo Musuila where the executions took place, he witnessed a teenage militant carrying the young woman's head,[37] but despite the efforts of the investigation, the head was never found. According to a report published on 29 May 2019, the Monusco peacekeeping military mission led by Colonel Luis Mangini, in the search for the missing remains, arrived to a ritual place in Moyo Musila where "parts of bodies, hands and heads" were cut and used for rituals,[38] where they lost track of the victim's head.

Asia

[edit]

Azerbaijan

[edit]

During the 2016 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes, Yazidi-Armenian serviceman Kyaram Sloyan was decapitated by Azerbaijani servicemen.[39][40][41]

Several reports of decapitation, along with other types of mutilation of Armenian POWs by Azerbaijani soldiers, emerged in 2020 during the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War.[42]

China

[edit]
Ranked beheaded bodies on the ground, in Caishikou, Beijing, China, 1905

In traditional China, decapitation was considered a more severe form of punishment than strangulation, although strangulation caused more prolonged suffering. This was because in Confucian tradition, a person's body was a gift from their parents, and so it was therefore disrespectful to their ancestors to return their bodies to the grave dismembered. The Chinese, however, had other punishments, such as dismembering the body into multiple pieces (similar to the English quartering). In addition, there was also a practice of cutting the body at the waist, which was a common method of execution before being abolished in the early Qing dynasty due to the lingering death it caused. In some tales, people did not die immediately after decapitation.[43][44][45][46]

India

[edit]

The British officer John Masters recorded in his autobiography that Pathans in British India during the Anglo-Afghan Wars would behead enemy soldiers who were captured, such as British and Sikh soldiers.[47][48][49][50]

The Execution of Sambhaji was a significant event in 17th-century Deccan India, where the second Maratha King was put to death by order of the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb. The conflicts between the Mughals and the Deccan Sultanates, which resulted in the downfall of the Sultanates, paved the way for tensions between the Marathas and the Mughals. Aurangzeb was drawn to Southern India due to the vanquished rebel Akbar fleeing to the Maratha monarch, Sambhaji. The Maratha King was then captured by the Mughal general Muqarrab Khan. Sambhaji and his minister Kavi Kalash were then taken to Tulapur, where they were tortured to death.

Japan

[edit]
Japanese illustration depicting the beheading of Chinese captives. First Sino-Japanese War
Sgt. Leonard Siffleet, an Australian POW captured in New Guinea, about to be beheaded by a Japanese soldier with a shin guntō sword, 1943

In Japan, decapitation was a common punishment, sometimes for minor offences. Samurai were often allowed to decapitate soldiers who had fled from battle, as it was considered cowardly. Decapitation was historically performed as the second step in seppuku (ritual suicide by disembowelment). After the victim had sliced his own abdomen open, another warrior would strike his head off from behind with a katana to hasten death and to reduce the suffering. The blow was expected to be precise enough to leave intact a small strip of skin at the front of the neck—to spare invited and honored guests the indelicacy of witnessing a severed head rolling about, or towards them; such an occurrence would have been considered inelegant and in bad taste. The sword was expected to be used upon the slightest sign that the practitioner might yield to pain and cry out—avoiding dishonor to him and to all partaking in the privilege of observing an honorable demise. As skill was involved, only the most trusted warrior was honored by taking part. In the late Sengoku period, decapitation was performed as soon as the person chosen to carry out seppuku had made the slightest wound to his abdomen.

Decapitation (without seppuku) was also considered a very severe and degrading form of punishment. One of the most brutal decapitations was that of Sugitani Zenjubō [ja] (杉谷善住坊), who attempted to assassinate Oda Nobunaga, a prominent daimyō, in 1570.[disputeddiscuss] After being caught, Zenjubō was buried alive in the ground with only his head out, and the head was slowly sawn off with a bamboo saw by passers-by for several days (punishment by sawing; nokogiribiki [ja] (鋸挽き).[51] These unusual punishments were abolished in the early Meiji era. A similar scene is described in the last page of James Clavell's book Shōgun[dubiousdiscuss].

Korea

[edit]

Historically, decapitation had been the most common method of execution in Korea, until it was replaced by hanging in 1896. Professional executioners were called mangnani (망나니) and they were volunteered from death rows.[citation needed]

Thailand

[edit]

Decapitation was the main method of execution in Thailand, until it was replaced by shooting in 1934.

Vietnam

[edit]
Illustration of the beheading of a prisoner of the Nguyễn dynasty in the book Mechanics and Crafts of the People of Annam
Guillotine under Ngô Đình Diệm, South Vietnam

Execution by beheading was one of the most common forms of execution in Vietnam under the feudal system. This form of execution still existed in the South Vietnam regime until 1962.

Europe

[edit]

Bosnia and Herzegovina

[edit]

During the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992–1995) there were a number of ritual beheadings of Serbs and Croats who were taken as prisoners of war by mujahideen members of the Bosnian Army. At least one case is documented and proven in court by the ICTY where mujahedin, members of 3rd Corps of Army BiH, beheaded Bosnian Serb Dragan Popović.[52][53]

Britain

[edit]
A contemporary German print depicting the beheading of King Charles I[54]

In British history, beheading was typically used for noblemen, while commoners would be hanged; eventually, hanging was adopted as the standard means of non-military executions. The last actual execution by beheading was of Simon Fraser, 11th Lord Lovat on 9 April 1747, while a number of convicts were beheaded posthumously up to the early 19th century.[55] (Typically traitors were sentenced to be hanged, drawn and quartered, a method which had already been discontinued.) Beheading was degraded to a secondary means of execution, including for treason, with the abolition of drawing and quartering in 1870 and finally abolished by the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1973.[56][57] One of the most notable executions by decapitation in Britain was that of King Charles I of England, who was beheaded outside the Banqueting House in Whitehall in 1649, after being captured by parliamentarians during the English Civil War and tried for treason.[58][59]

In England, a bearded axe was used for beheading, with the blade's edge extending downwards from the tip of the shaft.[citation needed]

Celts

[edit]

The Celts of western Europe long pursued a "cult of the severed head", as evidenced by both Classical literary descriptions and archaeological contexts.[60] This cult played a central role in their temples and religious practices and earned them a reputation as head hunters among the Mediterranean peoples. Diodorus Siculus, in his 1st-century Historical Library (5.29.4) wrote the following about Celtic head-hunting:

They cut off the heads of enemies slain in battle and attach them to the necks of their horses. The blood-stained spoils they hand over to their attendants and striking up a paean and singing a song of victory; and they nail up these first fruits upon their houses, just as do those who lay low wild animals in certain kinds of hunting. They embalm in cedar oil the heads of the most distinguished enemies, and preserve them carefully in a chest, and display them with pride to strangers, saying that for this head one of their ancestors, or his father, or the man himself, refused the offer of a large sum of money. They say that some of them boast that they refused the weight of the head in gold.

Both the Greeks and Romans found the Celtic decapitation practices shocking and the latter put an end to them when Celtic regions came under their control.

The Corleck Head, Irish, 1st or 2nd century AD

According to Paul Jacobsthal, "Amongst the Celts the human head was venerated above all else, since the head was to the Celt the soul, centre of the emotions as well as of life itself, a symbol of divinity and of the powers of the other-world."[61] Arguments for a Celtic cult of the severed head include the many sculptured representations of severed heads in La Tène carvings, and the surviving Celtic mythology, which is full of stories of the severed heads of heroes and the saints who carry their own severed heads, right down to Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, where the Green Knight picks up his own severed head after Gawain has struck it off in a beheading game, just as Saint Denis carried his head to the top of Montmartre.[62][63]

A further example of this regeneration after beheading lies in the tales of Connemara's Saint Féchín, who after being beheaded by Vikings carried his head to the Holy Well on Omey Island and on dipping it into the well placed it back upon his neck and was restored to full health.[64]

Classical antiquity

[edit]
Beheading of John the Baptist by Julius Schnorr von Karolsfeld, 1860

Pothinus matched Mark Antony in crime:
They slew the noblest Romans of their time.
The helpless victims they decapitated,
An act of infamy with shame related.
One head was Pompey's, who brought triumphs home,
The other Cicero's, the voice of Rome.

Martial, Epigram I:60 (Trans. by Garry Wills)

The ancient Greeks and Romans regarded decapitation as a comparatively honorable form of execution for criminals. The traditional procedure, however, included first being tied to a stake and whipped with rods. Axes were used by the Romans, and later swords, which were considered a more honorable instrument of death. Those who could verify that they were Roman citizens were to be beheaded, rather than undergoing crucifixion. In the Roman Republic of the early 1st century BC, it became the tradition for the severed heads of public enemies—such as the political opponents of Marius and Sulla—to be publicly displayed on the Rostra in the Forum Romanum after execution. Perhaps the most famous beheading was that of Cicero who, on instructions from Mark Antony, had his hands (which had penned the Philippicae against Antony) and his head cut off and nailed up for display in this manner.

Archaeological evidence of Roman-period executions by decapitation has also been found in the provinces. In Israel, seven cases of decapitation have been discovered, all dating to the Roman period and involving Jewish individuals.[65] An additional case, uncovered in Jerusalem, appears to date from the early 1st century BCE and may be linked to the Judean Civil War during the reign of Alexander Jannaeus.[65]

France

[edit]

In France, until the abolition of capital punishment in 1981, the main method of execution had been by beheading by means of the guillotine. Other than a small number of military cases in which a firing squad was used (including that of Jean Bastien-Thiry), the guillotine was the only legal method of execution from 1791, when it was introduced by the Legislative Assembly during the last days of the kingdom French Revolution, until 1981. Before the revolution, beheading had typically been reserved for noblemen and carried out manually. In 1981, President François Mitterrand abolished capital punishment and issued commutations for those whose sentences had not been carried out.

The first person executed by the guillotine in France was highwayman Nicolas Jacques Pelletier in April 1792. The last execution was of murderer Hamida Djandoubi, in Marseille, in 1977.[66] Throughout its extensive overseas colonies and dependencies, the device was also used, including on St Pierre in 1889 and on Martinique as late as 1965.[67]

Nordic countries

[edit]

In Nordic countries, decapitation was the usual means of carrying out capital punishment. Noblemen were beheaded with a sword, and commoners with an axe. The last executions by decapitation in Finland in 1825, Norway in 1876, Faroe Islands in 1609, and in Iceland in 1830 were carried out with axes. The same was the case in Denmark in 1892. Sweden continued the practice for a few decades, executing its second to last criminal—mass murderer Johan Filip Nordlund—by axe in 1900. It was replaced by the guillotine, which was used for the first and only time on Johan Alfred Ander in 1910.

Finland's official beheading axe resides today at the Museum of Crime in Vantaa. It is a broad-bladed two-handed axe. It was last used when murderer Tahvo Putkonen was executed in 1825, the last execution in peacetime in Finland.[68]

Spain

[edit]
The beheading of the 15th Century Castilian Royal favorite, Don Álvaro de Luna. Painting by José María Rodríguez de Losada (1826–1896).

In Spain executions were carried out by various methods including strangulation by the garrotte. In the 16th and 17th centuries, noblemen were sometimes executed by means of beheading. Examples include Anthony van Stralen, Lord of Merksem, Lamoral, Count of Egmont and Philip de Montmorency, Count of Horn. They were tied to a chair on a scaffold. The executioner used a knife to cut the head from the body. It was considered to be a more honourable death if the executioner started with cutting the throat.[69]

Middle East

[edit]

Iran

[edit]

Iran, since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, has alleged it uses beheading as one of the methods of punishment.[70][71]

Iraq

[edit]
Assyrian military campaign in southern Mesopotamia, beheaded enemies, 7th century BC, from Nineveh, Iraq. The British Museum.

Though not officially sanctioned, legal beheadings were carried out against at least 50 prostitutes and pimps under Saddam Hussein as late as 2000.[72]

Beheadings have emerged as another terror tactic especially in Iraq since 2003.[73] Civilians have borne the brunt of the beheadings, although U.S. and Iraqi military personnel have also been targeted. After kidnapping the victim, the kidnappers typically make some sort of demand of the government of the hostage's nation and give a time limit for the demand to be carried out, often 72 hours. Beheading is often threatened if the government fails to heed the wishes of the hostage takers. Sometimes, the beheadings are videotaped and made available on the Internet. One of the most publicized of such executions was that of Nick Berg.[74]

Judicial execution is practiced in Iraq, but is generally carried out by hanging.

Saudi Arabia

[edit]

Saudi Arabia has a criminal justice system based on Shari'ah law reflecting a particular state-sanctioned interpretation of Islam. Crimes such as rape, murder, apostasy, and sorcery[75] are punishable by beheading.[76] It is usually carried out publicly by beheading with a sword.

A public beheading will typically take place around 9am. The convicted person is walked into the square and kneels in front of the executioner. The executioner uses a sword to remove the condemned person's head from their body at the neck with a single strike.[77] After the convicted person is pronounced dead, a police official announces the crimes committed by the beheaded alleged criminal and the process is complete. The official might announce the same before the actual execution. This is the most common method of execution in Saudi Arabia.[78]

According to Amnesty International, at least 79 people were executed in Saudi Arabia in 2013.[79] Foreigners are not exempt, accounting for "almost half" of executions in 2013.[79]

In 2015 Ashraf Fayadh (born 1980), a Saudi Arabian poet, was sentenced to be beheaded, but his sentence was later reduced to eight years in prison and 800 lashes, for apostasy.

Syria

[edit]

The Syrian government employs hanging as its method of capital punishment. However, the terrorist organisation known as the Islamic State, which controlled territory in much of eastern Syria, had regularly carried out beheadings of people.[80] Syrian rebels attempting to overthrow the Syrian government have been implicated in beheadings too.[81][82][83]

North America

[edit]

Mexico

[edit]
Panel showing ballplayer being beheaded, Classic Veracruz culture, Mexico

Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla, Ignacio Allende, José Mariano Jiménez and Juan Aldama were tried for treason, executed by firing squad and beheaded during the Mexican independence in 1811. Their heads were on display on the four corners of the Alhóndiga de Granaditas, in Guanajuato.

During the Mexican Drug War, some Mexican drug cartels turned to decapitation and beheading of rival cartel members as a method of intimidation.[84] This trend of beheading and publicly displaying the decapitated bodies was started by the Los Zetas, a criminal group composed by former Mexican special forces operators, trained in the infamous US Army School of the Americas, in torture techniques and psychological warfare.[85][86][87][88][89][90]

United States

[edit]

The United States government has never employed beheading as a legal method of execution. However, beheading has sometimes been used in mutilations of the dead, particularly during the time of slavery, such as Nat Turner, who led a rebellion against slavery. When caught, he was publicly hanged, flayed, and beheaded. This was a technique used by many enslavers to discourage the "frequent bloody uprisings" that were carried out by "kidnapped Africans". While bodily dismemberment of various kinds was employed to instill terror, Dr. Erasmus D. Fenner noted postmortem decapitation was particularly effective.[91]

During the Vietnam War, as a terror tactic, "some American troops hacked the heads off... dead [Vietnamese] and mounted them on pikes or poles".[92] Correspondent Michael Herr noted "thousands" of photo-albums made by US soldiers "all seemed to contain the same pictures": "the severed head shot, the head often resting on the chest of the dead man or being held up by a smiling Marine, or a lot of the heads, arranged in a row, with a burning cigarette in each of the mouths, the eyes open". Some of the victims were "very young".[93]

General George Patton IV, son of the famous WWII general George S. Patton, was known for keeping "macabre souvenirs", such as "a Vietnamese skull that sat on his desk." Other Americans "hacked the heads off Vietnamese to keep, trade, or exchange for prizes offered by commanders."[94]

Although the Utah Territory permitted a person sentenced to death to choose beheading as a means of execution, no person chose that option, and it was dropped when Utah became a state.[95]

In July 2025, Florida enacted legislation that further expands the state's already extensive capital punishment laws to allow "any execution method not explicitly deemed unconstitutional," which includes beheading. This makes the United States the only country outside of the Islamic world that currently allows executions via beheading.[96][97]

Notable people who have been beheaded

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Decapitation is the complete severance of the head from the body, typically achieved through mechanical using instruments such as axes, swords, or guillotines, resulting in immediate cessation of cerebral flow and rapid via ischemia. This physical disruption deprives the of oxygenated , leading to loss of within seconds in cases of clean separation, as residual oxygen sustains neural activity only briefly before irreversible hypoxia sets in. Empirical observations from historical executions and indicate that while a precise cut minimizes prolonged agony, botched attempts—common with manual tools—can cause extended due to partial severance of vascular and neural structures. Historically, decapitation served as a primary method of across civilizations, valued for its capacity to deliver what was perceived as a dignified or efficient end compared to slower alternatives like or burning, though executioners' skill varied widely and often led to multiple strikes. In medieval and , it was reserved for or high-status criminals, with the guillotine's adoption in during the aiming to standardize and accelerate the process amid demands for egalitarian . Beyond punishment, the practice facilitated public deterrence through the display of severed heads on pikes or city gates, exploiting visceral horror to reinforce . In contexts, decapitation extended to tactics and post-combat rituals, where enemy heads were harvested as proof of kills, trophies, or psychological weapons to demoralize foes, a custom documented from ancient onward. Physiologically, the method's lethality stems from the severance of the carotid arteries and jugular veins, causing a precipitous drop in and neural shutdown, though debates persist on exact timelines of awareness based on limited forensic data from human cases and controlled experiments showing EEG activity for up to 15 seconds post-severance. Today, literal decapitation persists rarely in judicial or extrajudicial killings in select regions, while its metaphorical extension to targeting in modern underscores enduring recognition of head removal's disruptive potential.

Definition and Terminology

Definition

Decapitation is the complete separation of the head from the body through severance of the neck, encompassing the transection of , major vessels such as the carotid arteries and jugular veins, , trachea, , and associated musculature including the sternocleidomastoid and muscles. This process deprives the of oxygenated supply, causing rapid cerebral ischemia and neuronal , rendering it invariably fatal in humans and other vertebrates within seconds to minutes due to the 's high metabolic demands and limited tolerance for hypoxia. Medically, decapitation is characterized as a traumatic or induced detachment of the head from the , distinct from partial injuries or cephalic fractures, and has been employed historically in executions, warfare, accidents, or experimental contexts, though modern forensic analysis emphasizes the precision required for total separation, often occurring between the second and fifth depending on flexion or extension. In non-human applications, such as veterinary , it serves as a physical method to halt function without chemical residue, but ethical and practical constraints limit its use.

Etymology

The term decapitation derives from the French décapitation, which entered English in the mid-17th century, with the earliest attested use in 1650 referring to the act of beheading. This French noun stems from the verb decapitare, meaning "to cut off the head," formed by combining the prefix de- (indicating removal or "off" from) with caput (head). The Latin roots reflect a literal description of severing the head from the body, distinct from the Germanic beheading, which originated in behēafdian and emphasizes the directional action of removing the head. In modern usage, decapitation retains its primary sense of physical beheading but has extended metaphorically to denote abrupt removal from or position, as in political slang since the 19th century.

Physiological Aspects

Anatomy and Mechanism

Decapitation entails the complete separation of the head from the , typically transecting the between the second (C2) and fifth (C5) , where osseous protection is minimal and soft tissues predominate. The 's anatomy includes the cervical spinal cord, which transmits neural signals between and body; paired common carotid arteries supplying oxygenated blood to the ; internal jugular veins draining deoxygenated blood; the trachea for airflow; the for swallowing; and critical nerves such as the vagus (for parasympathetic control) and phrenic (for diaphragmatic innervation). The lethal mechanism centers on immediate cerebral ischemia from severed vascular structures, halting arterial inflow via the carotids and vertebrals while permitting rapid venous outflow, causing profound and oxygen-glucose deprivation to the . This triggers anaerobic , , glutamate , and collapse of neuronal membrane potentials. Concurrent transection disrupts all supraspinal motor commands and sensory afferents, eliminating reflexive or volitional body responses below the cut. Unconsciousness arises within 3–8 seconds as cerebral perfusion ceases, far below the brain's tolerance for even brief global hypoxia. Electroencephalographic activity may linger 5–15 seconds in animal models, decaying to isoelectricity by 30 seconds, reflecting residual ATP-dependent firing before irreversible damage. Death manifests as global brain failure from prolonged anoxia, with exsanguination accelerating hypovolemic shock, though cerebral events predominate. Human extrapolations from rodent data and historical guillotine observations affirm rapid loss of integrated consciousness, with anecdotal reports of brief ocular or facial movements attributable to subcortical reflexes rather than awareness.

Consciousness, Pain, and Time to Death

Decapitation causes rapid cerebral ischemia by severing the carotid and vertebral arteries, leading to a precipitous drop in blood flow and oxygen delivery. The , consuming approximately 20% of the body's oxygen despite comprising 2% of body weight, experiences hypoxia within seconds, resulting in loss of typically estimated at 2 to 7 seconds post-severance based on animal models extrapolating to . Animal studies provide the primary empirical data, with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings in decapitated rats showing low-voltage fast activity persisting for 8 to 29 seconds, though this reflects residual neural firing rather than sustained . In these models, oxygen tension in the declines to levels inducing around 2.7 seconds after decapitation, with no evidence of organized cortical processing beyond initial hypoxic surges. inferences rely on similar vascular dynamics, though historical anecdotes suggest possible brief retained consciousness, such as the 1905 observation by Dr. Gabriel Beaurieux of executed criminal Henri Languille's severed head, where the eyes opened and focused upon hearing his name called, accompanied by intentional blinking lasting 25-30 seconds; and French Revolution accounts of heads attempting speech, eyes following crowds, blushing (e.g., Charlotte Corday's head reddening after being slapped), and reactions to medical tests like shouting or pricking. These reports are anecdotal, debated, and generally dismissed as spinal reflexes or muscular twitches devoid of conscious control rather than evidence of awareness; modern science attributes post-decapitation head reactions primarily to nervous reflexes rather than sustained consciousness, though brief awareness is not entirely ruled out, potentially allowing for fleeting perception of pain or disorientation upon severance. Pain perception during decapitation is limited by the brevity of neural transmission to the . Nociceptors in the and transmit signals via ascending pathways, but severance disrupts these before full processing, with the isolated head anatomically unable to register substantial trauma-related due to disconnected sensory integration. Any initial nociceptive volley would occur in the 100-200 range of the blade's transit, followed by immediate hypoperfusion curtailing further sensation; studies conclude that conscious experience, if any, endures no longer than the window to . Death follows irreversibly within seconds to minutes, defined by cessation of brainstem function and global cerebral anoxia. While isolated neural activity may flicker briefly, clinical —marked by absent pupillary response, corneal reflexes, and EEG flatline—occurs rapidly, with full somatic demise ensuing from in the body and neuronal in the head. Peer-reviewed analyses affirm decapitation's physiological in terminating viability, countering unsubstantiated claims of prolonged survival.

Methods and Technologies

Manual Techniques

Manual decapitation employs handheld edged weapons, principally swords or axes, to separate the head from the body through a targeted strike at the . This method, ancient in origin, relies on the executioner's physical prowess to deliver sufficient force for severance, typically positioning the victim kneeling with the extended over a block or held prone. Swords, favored for nobility in regions like and , feature broad, two-handed designs optimized for a sweeping slice rather than thrusting, enabling penetration through flesh, muscle, and bone when sharpened acutely. Axes, conversely, predominate in English practice for commoners, utilizing a heavier head for chopping impact but risking glancing blows if misaimed. The ideal strike targets the intervertebral space between the first and second to disrupt the and major vasculature instantaneously. Proficiency markedly influences outcomes; expert executioners could achieve decapitation in one blow, minimizing suffering, yet historical records document frequent failures due to dull blades, tremors, or inexperience, necessitating repeated hacks. Notable instances include the 1540 execution of , requiring five blows, and Margaret Pole's 1541 beheading, which demanded eleven strikes amid her resistance and the axeman's youth. In modern application, Saudi Arabian authorities perform beheadings with a , often succeeding in a solitary, vertical following ritual preparation, underscoring the technique's viability with rigorous training. Improvised manual decapitations, such as those using knives in wartime contexts, prove less efficacious, frequently prolonging the process owing to the tool's limited cutting leverage. Overall, manual methods' efficacy hinges on biomechanical precision, with variability in results reflecting the executioner's skill over inherent weapon superiority.

Mechanical Devices

Mechanical decapitation devices emerged in medieval as alternatives to manual beheading, employing gravity-driven weighted blades to ensure more consistent severance of the head from the body. The , used in Halifax, , from the onward, featured a heavy iron blade suspended between two vertical wooden posts and released to fall into a , targeting thieves under local . Its last documented execution occurred on April 30, 1650, against coin clippers. In , the Maiden operated similarly from the mid-16th century, constructed primarily of with a steel-edged iron weighted by lead, designed for use on to avoid the perceived dishonor of axe executions. The earliest recorded use was in 1564, with notable executions including that of the on June 2, 1581, for alleged involvement in Lord Darnley's murder; it remained in service until 1710. The guillotine, refined in late 18th-century , represented an advanced iteration with two upright posts connected by a horizontal crossbar, guiding an oblique-edged blade—typically weighing 70-90 kg—down greased grooves via a counterweighted system for rapid descent at speeds up to 7 meters per second. Proposed by physician in 1789 to standardize humane across social classes, its prototype was developed by surgeon and executed by German engineer Tobias Schmidt, with official adoption on March 29, 1792, following tests on cadavers and live animals. The first human execution took place on April 25, 1792, against in , initiating its widespread application during the , where it severed approximately 17,000 heads in the city alone by 1794. These devices prioritized mechanical reliability over manual skill, reducing variability in execution time and force compared to swords or axes, though early models like the Gibbet occasionally malfunctioned due to blade dulling or misalignment. The guillotine's design influenced variants across Europe, including in , , and , persisting into the ; France's final use was on September 10, 1977, for the decapitation of .

Historical Development

Ancient and Classical Periods

Decapitation served as a method of execution and warfare tactic in ancient , particularly among the Assyrians from the 9th to 7th centuries BCE, where reliefs depict soldiers presenting severed heads of enemies to kings as proof of victory, emphasizing psychological terror and trophy collection. Assyrian annals, such as those of (r. 883–859 BCE), record stacking enemy heads into pyramids during campaigns to demoralize populations. In Hittite texts from the 14th–13th centuries BCE, beheading appears in legal codes as punishment for crimes like or , often involving public display of the head. In , decapitation was rare for humans but documented in animal sacrifices and mythological contexts; human executions more commonly involved or , though tomb reliefs from the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BCE) show beheading of prisoners in Nubian campaigns. Greek practices in the Archaic and Classical periods (c. 800–323 BCE) included decapitation primarily in warfare, as described by in accounts of Persian conflicts where heads were displayed on spears, but judicial executions favored hemlock poisoning for citizens, reserving beheading for slaves or foreigners. Mythologically, decapitation featured prominently, such as Perseus severing around the 8th century BCE in Hesiod's , symbolizing heroic triumph over chaos. Roman adoption of decapitation intensified during the and (509 BCE–476 CE), using the secari gladio (beheading by sword) for freeborn citizens convicted of capital crimes like treason, distinguishing it from crucifixion reserved for slaves and provincials. The (c. 450 BCE) specified decapitation for certain thefts, and emperors like (r. 37–41 CE) ordered it for political rivals, with heads often exhibited on the in the Forum. In military contexts, Roman legions collected enemy heads during Gallic and , as noted by , to count kills and claim rewards, though mass decapitation declined with professionalization under (27 BCE–14 CE). Celtic tribes encountered by Romans practiced , venerating severed heads as talismans, evidenced by archaeological finds like the 1st-century BCE Corleck heads from .

Medieval and Early Modern Eras

![Froissart Chronicles execution][float-right] In medieval , decapitation served as a primary method of , particularly reserved for and high-status offenders due to its perceived rapidity and relative mercy compared to prolonged methods like or burning. This practice reflected social hierarchies in judicial proceedings, where commoners typically faced less "honorable" executions. Executions were often spectacles intended to deter crime and reinforce , with the condemned frequently kneeling before the block. The procedure relied on manual implements, primarily axes in and swords on the , with executioners required to demonstrate proficiency through practice on animals before application. A single, clean stroke was ideal for instantaneous , but botched attempts—requiring multiple blows—occurred due to dull blades, poor technique, or victim movement, prolonging suffering. Swords, designed for two-handed swings and broader blades, allowed the executioner to stand behind the victim for better leverage, while axes demanded a forward stance and were more prone to inaccuracy. Archaeological , such as cut marks on skeletal remains from medieval Irish sites, confirms decapitation's prevalence and occasional post-mortem for traitors. During the early modern period (c. 1500–1800), decapitation persisted as the standard for elite criminals across , maintaining its association with privilege amid broader punitive innovations like drawing and quartering for . In German states, specialized executioner's swords evolved for efficiency, emphasizing judicial over combat utility. Public beheadings continued to draw crowds, serving both punitive and communal functions, though criticisms of inconsistency foreshadowed mechanical alternatives. For instance, in , the 1649 execution of King Charles I by axe underscored the method's symbolic weight in political upheavals, with the blow delivered on a scaffold before witnesses. Regional variations endured, but the era saw growing emphasis on "humane" execution, setting the stage for 18th-century reforms.

Enlightenment to 20th Century

During the Enlightenment, penal reformers advocated for more humane execution methods, emphasizing swift and painless death over prolonged suffering. Influenced by Cesare Beccaria's 1764 treatise , which criticized torturous punishments, European thinkers pushed for standardized decapitation to ensure equality and efficiency in . In , prior to the Revolution, executions varied by class—nobles often received sword beheading, while commoners faced axe or botched manual methods—leading to inconsistent and sometimes agonizing deaths. The guillotine emerged as a mechanical solution in late 18th-century . On October 10, 1789, physician proposed to the a device for decapitation that would be quick, painless, and applicable to all classes, aiming to replace arbitrary methods. The apparatus, designed by surgeon and constructed by German engineer Tobias Schmidt, featured an angled blade dropping between upright posts onto a restrained . It underwent testing in early 1792, with the first human execution occurring on April 25, 1792, when highwayman was decapitated in . The device was decreed the sole method of on October 16, 1792, symbolizing revolutionary equality. The guillotine's prominence escalated during the French Revolution, particularly the Reign of Terror (1793–1794), where an estimated 17,000 individuals were executed by it, including King Louis XVI on January 21, 1793. Executions, often public spectacles in Place de la Révolution (now Place de la Concorde), numbered over 1,000 in Paris alone by 1795, with machines deployed across provinces to meet demand. Beyond the Revolution, France retained the guillotine through the 19th and 20th centuries, conducting thousands more executions; public beheadings ended after Eugen Weidmann's in 1939, with the last private one in 1977. Other European nations adopted similar falling-blade devices in the , inspired by France's model. Germany employed the Fallbeil ( variant) widely, executing approximately 16,500 people between 1933 and 1945 under the Nazi regime alone. , , , , and parts of integrated guillotines or equivalents for , prioritizing mechanical precision over manual beheading to reduce errors and perceived cruelty. In , decapitation became mandatory in 1866, shifting to guillotine use by the late . These adoptions reflected broader Enlightenment-influenced reforms favoring deterministic, efficient state violence over feudal variability, though manual or axe beheadings persisted in some regions for ceremonial or practical reasons until the early .

Regional and Cultural Practices

Europe

![Execution of King Charles I by beheading][float-right]
In medieval , decapitation served as a form of primarily reserved for and those convicted of high , regarded as more honorable and less painful than methods like or and quartering applied to commoners. Executioners typically used a or axe, with the sword preferred in for its precision, aiming for a single swift blow to sever the neck. In , beheading followed for traitors, as seen in the 1605 conspirators who were hanged before decapitation. Archaeological evidence from sites like late , though predating the medieval focus, indicates decapitation's continuity as a punitive measure, with prone burials and cut marks suggesting judicial enforcement.
During the , practices persisted with regional variations; in and , executioner's swords—broad, two-handed blades—were employed for beheadings until the , symbolizing the gravity of offenses like or . Noblewomen such as faced axe beheading in as late as 1935 for financial crimes, marking one of the final manual decapitations in the region. transitioned from manual beheading to the in 1792, following physician Joseph-Ignace Guillotin's proposal for a mechanized device to ensure egalitarian and humane execution regardless of class. The 's oblique blade dropped via a weighted mechanism, severing the head rapidly, and was first used on on April 25, 1792. The guillotine became emblematic during the French Revolution's (1793–1794), executing approximately 16,594 individuals, including King Louis XVI on January 21, 1793, to deter counter-revolutionary activity through spectacle. Its use extended into the , with executions ending after Eugen Weidmann's beheading on June 17, 1939, in Versailles, after which concerns prompted indoor proceedings. conducted the last execution in on , convicted of , on September 10, 1977, in , prior to capital punishment's abolition in 1981. Across , decapitation declined with the shift to shooting or , reflecting evolving views on execution's efficacy and impact, though manual methods lingered in isolated cases until mid-century.

Asia

Decapitation served as a prominent method of execution, warfare trophy-taking, and ritual sacrifice across civilizations, particularly in , where it symbolized ultimate dishonor or power assertion. Archaeological evidence reveals its antiquity, with mass decapitations documented in at the Honghe site in province, dating to approximately 4100 years ago, involving the severed heads of at least 35 individuals likely from raids or . In the Late (c. 1250–1046 BCE), decapitated heads featured in elite and visual culture at , escalating as sacrificial offerings to ancestors or deities, with hundreds of skulls evidencing organized violence and symbolic isolation of the head. In imperial , beheading (known as zhǎn or decapitation) ranked among the most severe capital punishments, hierarchically inferior to strangulation in terms of familial honor preservation, as it mutilated the body and prevented proper ancestral rites. From the onward, it often followed (slow slicing) for heinous crimes, with executioners using a heavy knife to sever the head at public sites like Beijing's Caishikou, where condemned criminals were processed in batches, their bodies displayed as deterrents. persisted in ancient contexts as a marker of prowess, embedding psychological terror in interpersonal violence. Japanese practices emphasized ritual precision, especially among samurai, where decapitation (kubi-iri) concluded seppuku—self-disembowelment—performed by a second (kaishakunin) with a single sword stroke to minimize suffering and preserve dignity. Medieval forensic analysis of skulls confirms techniques aimed at clean severance through the upper cervical vertebrae, reflecting honed executioner skills. During the Edo period (1603–1868), beheading formed one of several death penalties for serious offenses like murder or treason, often public to enforce social order, though less common than crucifixion or sawing. In Korea, under the Joseon dynasty (1392–1897), beheading (japcham) was a standard execution for capital crimes, alongside strangulation, with the method chosen based on offense severity and conducted publicly to exemplify Confucian deterrence. Historical records indicate its application in suppressing rebellions or punishing officials, where the severed head might be displayed on poles. South and Southeast Asian traditions diverged toward headhunting in tribal warfare rather than state executions; premodern communities in regions like Borneo or Nagaland practiced ritual decapitation to acquire enemy heads as spiritual trophies or status symbols, feeding them to guardian spirits or incorporating into ancestor cults. In India, while not a primary punitive tool, artistic depictions in hero stones (viragallu) commemorate self-decapitation (channapataka) by devotees, such as in Shaivite or Jaina legends, symbolizing ultimate devotion through bodily sacrifice. These practices underscore decapitation's role in enforcing hierarchy, ritual purity, and martial ideology across diverse Asian contexts.

Middle East and Islamic World

In ancient , particularly under the (911–609 BCE), decapitation served as a common method for executing enemies and demonstrating military dominance. Assyrian reliefs depict soldiers collecting severed heads from battlefields, often piling them for royal inspection or counting to record victories and exact . These practices underscored the empire's emphasis on terror as a tool of conquest, with heads displayed to intimidate subdued populations. Under Islamic , derived from Quranic injunctions and prophetic traditions, beheading with a became the prescribed method for capital punishments known as , including offenses like highway robbery (), , and . Historical executions followed this swiftly after judicial confirmation, aiming for (retaliation) in cases of . In the (1299–1922), beheading was reserved for higher-status offenders as a relatively honorable form of execution, contrasting with for common criminals, and was carried out publicly to enforce order. Contemporary state practices persist in Saudi Arabia, where beheading remains the primary execution method under for crimes such as , drug trafficking, and . Performed by in public squares like in , executions numbered at least 198 in 2024, marking one of the highest tolls in decades despite international criticism from groups. By mid-2025, the pace continued with surges reported, including for dissent-related charges, reflecting limited curbs on the death penalty. Yemen also retains legal decapitation, though irregularly applied amid conflict. Non-state actors, notably the (ISIS) from 2014 onward, revived beheading as a propaganda tool, staging executions with knives or swords in videos to terrorize adversaries and recruit followers. Justified through selective Salafi-jihadist interpretations of Islamic texts, these acts targeted hostages, perceived apostates, and enemies, with dozens documented publicly to amplify psychological impact beyond traditional warfare. Such methods echo historical precedents but prioritize media dissemination for global reach.

Africa and Americas

![Beheading panel from South Ballcourt, Tajín, Mexico][float-right] In precolonial Dahomey (present-day ), decapitation held significant political and ritual importance, with warriors presenting severed heads of enemies to the king as demonstrations of loyalty and prowess, often during annual customs involving mass executions to honor ancestors. These practices reinforced royal authority, as the phrase "my head belongs to the king" symbolized submission, and heads were displayed on walls or used in rituals to invoke spiritual power. Headhunting occurred in various West African societies, including among the Ashanti, where trophy heads signified victory in warfare and were sometimes incorporated into funerary or divinatory rites. Decapitation featured in ritual killings across West African kingdoms, transforming historical practices amid shifts from to executions, with victims' heads serving as symbols of good or bad death in ancestral . Colonial authorities in adapted execution methods, avoiding decapitation for Muslim populations due to cultural sensitivities, opting instead for other forms perceived as less insulting. In , such as among Ethiopian highland communities, traditional depictions illustrate beheadings in judicial or punitive contexts, though empirical records remain sparse compared to West African examples. In pre-Columbian , decapitation formed a core element of ritual sacrifice, warfare, and cosmology among the Maya and , with severed heads displayed on racks to honor deities like the rain god Tlaloc. Maya ballgames frequently culminated in the decapitation of the losing team's captain, symbolizing cosmic renewal and to sustain the world, as depicted in ceramic vessels and codices. Among , decapitation linked to agricultural fertility, with rituals invoking myths of beheaded gods like , and archaeological finds including over 170 skulls at attesting to its scale in state ceremonies. In the , Nasca culture (circa 100–800 CE) practiced decapitation for temple offerings, with headless burials suggesting rebirth motifs, as evidenced by heads in art and mummified remains. Inca rituals included beheadings during child sacrifices on high peaks, though heart extraction predominated; reliefs at sites like Tajín depict such acts in ballcourt contexts tied to elite competitions. The earliest known ritual decapitation in the dates to approximately 9000 years ago at Lapa do Santo, , where a buried under slabs with amputated hands indicates perimortem and possible use among early hunter-gatherers. Among North American indigenous groups, beheadings occurred in intertribal warfare for trophies, paralleling , though less ritualized than in .

Modern and Contemporary Uses

State-Sponsored Executions

In the , employed the for until its formal abolition in 1981, with decapitation occurring via the device's weighted blade. The final such execution took place on September 10, 1977, at in , where , a 29-year-old Tunisian national convicted of kidnapping, torturing, and murdering 22-year-old Élisabeth Bousquet in 1974, was beheaded. Djandoubi's case involved binding and abusing Bousquet before strangling her, leading to a unanimous death sentence by the Aix-en-Provence Assizes Court despite appeals for clemency from President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing. This marked the end of mechanized decapitation in , as the guillotine—introduced in 1792 for egalitarian executions—had claimed an estimated 17,000 lives during the and thousands more thereafter, though post-1900 usage declined sharply amid humanitarian critiques of its spectacle. Saudi Arabia stands as the sole contemporary state routinely applying decapitation through manual beheading with a , prescribed under Sharia-based for crimes such as , , robbery, and , as well as ta'zir offenses like drug trafficking and . Executions are typically public, performed by trained executioners in urban squares like Riyadh's , where the condemned kneels and the blade severs the neck in a single stroke, often followed by of the body for deterrence. In 2020, Saudi authorities beheaded at least 27 individuals, primarily for and narcotics offenses. By 2024, executions escalated to 198—the highest toll in three decades—with 53 linked to drugs, averaging one every two days in July alone, reflecting a policy shift under Crown Prince to enforce stricter controls amid Vision 2030 reforms. As of May 2025, over 100 beheadings had occurred, including foreign nationals like convicted of , underscoring reliance on confessions extracted under coercive interrogation, which monitors criticize for procedural flaws despite official claims of judicial rigor. No other states verifiably employ decapitation as a standard modern execution method; reports from opaque regimes like cite public spectacles via firing squad or hanging for political crimes, but beheading lacks consistent, independent confirmation amid defector testimonies of ad hoc brutality rather than codified practice. has sporadically beheaded convicts under tribal-influenced , such as two in for murder, but civil war disrupts systematic data. Elsewhere, guillotine-like devices persisted briefly post-colonial, as in until the 1990s shift to firing squads, yet these represent transitional holdovers rather than ongoing policy. Saudi's persistence aligns with interpretations of Islamic prioritizing retributive justice and public exemplarity, though international pressure from bodies like the UN has prompted rare amnesties, such as pardons for migrant workers in high-profile cases.

Terrorism, Warfare, and Non-State Actors

Decapitation has been employed by terrorist organizations as a method of execution and , particularly by jihadist groups seeking to instill fear and propagate their ideology through graphic videos. The (ISIS) conducted a series of high-profile beheadings of Western hostages starting in 2014, including American journalist James Foley on August 19, 2014, and shortly thereafter in September 2014, with videos disseminated online to coerce policy changes and recruit supporters. These acts, numbering at least several dozen documented cases against foreigners and locals, including 51 Ethiopian and Coptic Christians in in early 2015, served to amplify ISIS's territorial claims during its phase in and . In , has utilized beheadings against military personnel, civilians, and religious minorities to assert dominance and punish perceived apostates. The group released a video in March 2015 showing the decapitation of multiple captives, including soldiers, as part of its against the Nigerian state. More recently, in 2024, militants beheaded four individuals on camera in , targeting communities in ongoing attacks that have displaced millions since 2009. Such tactics align with 's strategy of targeting and security forces, as seen in the 2014 beheading of officers captured during operations. Non-state actors in , including insurgents and militias, have adopted decapitation to demoralize opponents and enforce control. In , fighters beheaded a U.S. interpreter, Sohail Pardis, in July 2021 near , amid reprisals against those associated with Western forces following the U.S. withdrawal. This method echoes broader patterns in intra-group conflicts, where beheadings signal retribution and deter collaboration with adversaries. Mexican drug cartels have increasingly resorted to decapitation since the mid-2000s to eliminate rivals, intimidate communities, and advertise territorial dominance amid escalating violence. Beheadings rose steadily during President Felipe Calderón's term (2006–2012), becoming a hallmark of cartel warfare, with groups like pioneering gruesome displays such as severed heads placed in public view. Recent incidents include the discovery of five decapitated bodies in in October 2024, attributed to inter-cartel rivalries, and 20 bodies, several decapitated, in in June 2025 during factional infighting within the . These acts, often filmed and shared, function as both punishment and propaganda in the cartels' competition for routes, contributing to over 100,000 homicides linked to since 2006.

Debates on Efficacy and Impacts

Physiological Humanity vs. Gruesomeness

Decapitation involves the severance of the head from the body, immediately disrupting the flow of oxygenated blood to the via the carotid arteries and jugular veins, while also transecting the and interrupting neural pathways. This results in cerebral ischemia, with typically occurring within 2 to 7 seconds due to the abrupt drop in intracranial . , such as those on , confirm rapid loss of post-decapitation, with electroencephalogram (EEG) activity ceasing shortly after the procedure, supporting its classification as a humane method in veterinary contexts when performed cleanly. In human executions using mechanisms like the , the blade's velocity—exceeding 100 km/h—ensures near-instantaneous severance, minimizing potential nociceptive input to the as signals require intact pathways that are destroyed in the process. Historical medical observations have fueled debate over retained , with anecdotal reports from executions, such as Dr. Jacques-Louis-Tristan Jugert's 1836 account of facial movements persisting for up to 30 seconds, or Dr. Beaurieux's 1905 examination noting eye and mouth responses in for several seconds. However, these are limited by observer subjectivity and lack of controlled measurement; modern physiological analysis attributes such reflexes to residual neural firing or decapitation convulsions rather than sustained awareness, as brain function deteriorates irreversibly without circulation after 3-6 minutes, but lapses far earlier. Claims of prolonged lucidity remain unsubstantiated by empirical data, with no verifiable evidence of beyond the initial anticipation, as the severance precludes further sensory processing. This positions decapitation as physiologically efficient compared to methods like or , where variable factors can extend suffering. Despite this physiological rapidity, decapitation evokes profound gruesomeness due to its visceral mechanics: massive arterial hemorrhage, bodily convulsions from , and the stark separation of head from torso, which amplify psychological horror for witnesses. Historical public executions, such as those during the , underscored this duality, promoting the as egalitarian and humane in intent yet fostering spectacles that desensitized or traumatized crowds, contributing to its abolition in by 1981 amid ethical revulsion rather than proven physiological flaws. The method's barbaric optics—evident in accounts of blood sprays and head displays—contrast its causal efficacy, rendering it incompatible with modern sensibilities prioritizing invisibility in state killing, even as lethal injection failures highlight that no execution is devoid of potential distress. Thus, while empirically defensible as minimally protracted in suffering, decapitation's perceptual savagery perpetuates its stigma as an archaic brutality.

Deterrence and Societal Effects

Public beheadings have historically been employed by states as a visible deterrent against and , with the gruesome spectacle intended to evoke fear and reinforce social norms. In medieval and , decapitated heads displayed on pikes or city gates served to warn potential offenders, as seen in practices following battles or executions where enemy or criminal heads were exhibited to symbolize state dominance and discourage defiance. Similarly, in contemporary , where beheading remains the primary method of for offenses like and trafficking, authorities conduct executions in public squares to maximize visibility and claimed deterrent impact, with at least 17 executions reported in early 2013 alone, many tied to poles post-decapitation. However, empirical evidence for decapitation's superior deterrent effect over other execution methods remains scant and contested; while some econometric analyses of broadly estimate each execution averts 3 to 18 s through rational fear, these models often fail robustness tests and do not isolate beheading's role, with the concluding that research neither confirms nor refutes general deterrence. Critics invoke the "brutalization hypothesis," positing that executions, particularly violent ones like beheading, may increase rather than reduce homicides by desensitizing society to violence or modeling aggressive behavior. Studies examining U.S. execution data find executions correlate with short-term homicide spikes, challenging deterrence claims and attributing any null effects to methodological flaws in pro-deterrence models, such as sensitivity to minor data adjustments yielding estimates from -429 to +429 lives affected per execution. In Saudi contexts, a 2016 mass execution of 47 terrorists temporarily reduced attack frequency, but this pertained to terrorism rather than general crime, and beheading's public nature lacks causal isolation from other factors like heightened security. Historical French guillotine use during the Revolution and beyond aimed for egalitarian deterrence via swift decapitation, yet crime rates did not demonstrably decline, and spectacles often incited riots or sympathy for the condemned, suggesting limited marginal efficacy. Societally, public decapitations exert profound psychological and cultural influences, often amplifying state authority while risking communal trauma and normative erosion. Witnessing such events, especially by children, correlates with elevated anxiety, diminished trust in systems, and long-term desensitization, as observed in reports from regions with ongoing public executions. In premodern , ritualistic displays beyond mere deterrence—incorporating cadavers or effigies—reinforced communal and moral order but frequently provoked backlash, underscoring how overt can undermine legitimacy rather than solidify it. Modern analyses indicate public executions project superiority over dissenters but may spur or copycat , with Iranian data showing post-execution homicide upticks, implying a net brutalizing effect over deterrence. Overall, while proponents attribute low crime rates in beheading-practicing regimes to punitive severity, confounding variables like cultural homogeneity and strict policing preclude attribution to decapitation alone, with critiques highlighting risks of miscarriages exacerbating societal distrust. Decapitation as an execution method is legally prescribed under law in for capital offenses including , , and drug trafficking, with the kingdom conducting hundreds of such beheadings annually, such as 81 in a single day in March 2022. also permits beheading for similar crimes applicable to , though executions are less frequent. These practices contravene international human rights standards, including the UN Convention Against Torture, which many nations interpret as prohibiting methods causing severe suffering, leading to widespread diplomatic condemnation from Western governments and organizations like , which document cases of coerced confessions and trials lacking . In , controversies have intensified over executions of juveniles and individuals convicted of non-homicide drug offenses, as in the April 2019 beheading of 37 men, including minors, following what described as sham proceedings. Ethically, opponents argue that decapitation inflicts unnecessary terror through its ritualistic and public spectacle, often performed by in open squares, which human rights advocates classify as degrading and incompatible with dignity, citing to witnesses and reinforcement of authoritarian control. Proponents, including Saudi officials, counter that it aligns with retributive principles of (equality in punishment), ensuring proportionality for heinous acts, and may deter crime more effectively than concealed methods like , which have recorded failure rates exceeding 7% in the U.S. due to vein access issues or chemical reactions causing prolonged agony. Physiological evidence supports claims of relative swiftness: studies on animal models and historical human cases indicate loss of consciousness within 2-7 seconds from cerebral anoxia after arterial severance, faster than the 10-20 minutes of potential awareness in some or injection scenarios, though residual reflexes can mimic , fueling debates over pain perception. Critics from secular human rights bodies, often rooted in Western liberal frameworks, emphasize evolving global norms against visible violence, yet overlook empirical data on deterrence—such as Saudi Arabia's reported decline in certain violent crimes post-public executions—while exhibiting selective outrage compared to tolerance for drone strikes or abortion procedures involving dismemberment. In jurisdictions like Iran, where hanging predominates but beheading is Sharia-permissible, ethical scrutiny extends to gender disparities, with women rarely facing decapitation despite equal culpability under law, highlighting tensions between religious doctrine and universalist ethics. These controversies underscore broader clashes between cultural sovereignty and imposed international standards, with no consensus on whether decapitation's gruesomeness outweighs its mechanical efficiency in terminating life.

Notable Cases

Prominent Historical Victims

Prominent historical victims of decapitation include European royalty and statesmen executed for treason or religious defiance. , second wife of King of England, was beheaded with a sword on May 19, 1536, at in following conviction for , , and . The executioner, a skilled French swordsman, delivered a single blow after Henry VIII specifically ordered beheading over burning at the stake. Sir Thomas More, Henry VIII's former and author of , was decapitated by axe on July 6, 1535, on for refusing to swear the acknowledging the king as head of the . More's sentence was commuted from full drawing and quartering to beheading alone, and he reportedly declared from the scaffold that he died "the king's good servant, but God's first." Mary, Queen of Scots, faced a botched decapitation by axe on February 8, 1587, at , convicted of complicity in the to assassinate Queen Elizabeth I. The inexperienced required three strikes to sever her head fully, with the final cut made by sawing through remaining tissue, after the first blow missed the neck and struck the back of her head. King Charles I of England was beheaded on January 30, 1649, outside the at following trial for high treason by Parliament after the . The execution, performed by axe with a single efficient stroke, marked the only in British history by parliamentary decree and led to the short-lived under . Louis XVI, King of , underwent decapitation by on , 1793, at the Place de la Révolution in during the , convicted of treason by the . The blade fell after a botched initial positioning due to the king's thick neck, severing his head cleanly and prompting immediate public display of it to the crowd.

Recent and Symbolic Instances

In , decapitation remains a primary method of state execution under law, with a marked increase in 2025, reaching over 100 executions by May, many involving beheading for offenses including drug trafficking, , and . These public acts, often carried out by in city squares, aim to enforce deterrence but have drawn international for their application to non-violent crimes and juveniles. Jihadist groups have employed decapitation symbolically to project power and inspire followers, notably the (ISIS), which from 2014 produced high-production videos of beheading Western hostages, such as journalists James Foley and , to disseminate globally via and instill among adversaries. These acts drew on historical Islamic warfare tactics but were amplified for modern psychological impact, mimicking tactics from while targeting recruitment and enemy morale. Similar symbolic beheadings persisted post-caliphate, including the 2020 decapitation of French teacher Samuel Paty by an Islamist assailant, who cited offense at classroom discussions of free speech, with the act filmed and shared online to echo ISIS methods. In non-state criminal violence, Mexican drug cartels have used decapitation for territorial intimidation, often displaying with written threats to rivals or authorities. In state, June 2025 saw 20 mutilated bodies, several decapitated, dumped near highways amid factional warfare following the arrest of cartel leaders; similar displays, including six found on a road in August 2025 accompanied by revenge messages, underscore the tactic's role in narco-signaling. During the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, militants conducted beheadings of Israeli civilians, as evidenced by a Hamas-released video depicting such acts, which served propagandistic purposes akin to jihadist precedents by combining brutality with ideological justification. While initial reports of mass infant decapitations were unverified and later contested, confirmed instances targeted adults to maximize terror and narrative impact.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.