Hubbry Logo
Perspective (graphical)Perspective (graphical)Main
Open search
Perspective (graphical)
Community hub
Perspective (graphical)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Perspective (graphical)
Perspective (graphical)
Perspective (graphical)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Perspectives (right column) are a subclass of graphical projections
How linear or point-projection prospective works: Rays of light travel from the object (cube), through the picture plane, and to the viewer's eye (O). Vanishing points emitting straightly lines coincident with the edges the cube drawn on the picture plane are located at the left and right of the plane.
Part of a series on
Graphical projection
Planar projections
Views
Topics
External videos
video icon Linear Perspective: Brunelleschi's Experiment, Khan Academy[1]
video icon How One-Point Linear Perspective Works, Smarthistory[2]
video icon Empire of the Eye: The Magic of Illusion: The Trinity-Masaccio, Part 2, National Gallery of Art[3]

Linear or point-projection perspective (from Latin perspicere 'to see through') is one of two types of graphical projection perspective in the graphic arts; the other is parallel projection.[citation needed][dubious – discuss] Linear perspective is an approximate representation, generally on a flat surface, of an image as it is seen by the eye. Perspective drawing is useful for representing a three-dimensional scene in a two-dimensional medium, like paper. It is based on the optical fact that for a person an object looks N times (linearly) smaller if it has been moved N times further from the eye than the original distance was.

The most characteristic features of linear perspective are that objects appear smaller as their distance from the observer increases, and that they are subject to foreshortening, meaning that an object's dimensions parallel to the line of sight appear shorter than its dimensions perpendicular to the line of sight. All objects will recede to points in the distance, usually along the horizon line, but also above and below the horizon line depending on the view used.

Italian Renaissance painters and architects including Filippo Brunelleschi, Leon Battista Alberti, Masaccio, Paolo Uccello, Piero della Francesca and Luca Pacioli studied linear perspective, wrote treatises on it, and incorporated it into their artworks.

A figure explaining point-projection prospective. S is the distance between an observer's eye and an observation point on an object that is a long rectangular wall facing to the observer at a tilted angle. If the observation distance becomes N times longer, then the apparent height of the wall at the observation point is roughly N times smaller. As a result, the apparent shape of the wall over a wide angle roughly becomes a triangle which right vertex is located to the far right.

Overview

[edit]

Linear or point-projection perspective works by putting an imaginary flat plane that is close to an object under observation and directly facing an observer's eyes (i.e., the observer is on a normal, or perpendicular line to the plane). Then draw straight lines from every point in the object to the observer. The area on the plane where those lines pass through the plane is a point-projection prospective image resembling what is seen by the observer.

Examples of one-point perspective

[edit]

Examples of two-point perspective

[edit]
  • A cube drawing using two-point perspective
    A cube drawing using two-point perspective

Examples of three-point perspective

[edit]
  • A cube in three-points perspective where, compared with the above cube in two-points prospective, there is an additional vanishing point far below the cube, from which straight lines come that are coincident with vertical edges of the cube.
    A cube in three-points perspective where, compared with the above cube in two-points prospective, there is an additional vanishing point far below the cube, from which straight lines come that are coincident with vertical edges of the cube.
  • Staircase in multi-points perspective. Each point is a vanishing point from which straight lines come, and these lines are a guide to draw 3-dimensional object.
    Staircase in multi-points perspective. Each point is a vanishing point from which straight lines come, and these lines are a guide to draw 3-dimensional object.

Examples of curvilinear perspective

[edit]
Main article: Curvilinear perspective

Additionally, a central vanishing point can be used (just as with one-point perspective) to indicate frontal (foreshortened) depth.[4]

History

[edit]

Early history

[edit]

The earliest art paintings and drawings typically sized many objects and characters hierarchically according to their spiritual or thematic importance, not their distance from the viewer, and did not use foreshortening. The most important figures are often shown as the highest in a composition, also from hieratic motives, leading to the so-called "vertical perspective", common in the art of Ancient Egypt, where a group of "nearer" figures are shown below the larger figure or figures; simple overlapping was also employed to relate distance.[6] Additionally, oblique foreshortening of round elements like shields and wheels is evident in Ancient Greek red-figure pottery.[7]

Systematic attempts to evolve a system of perspective are usually considered to have begun around the fifth century BC in the art of ancient Greece, as part of a developing interest in illusionism allied to theatrical scenery. This was detailed within Aristotle's Poetics as skenographia: using flat panels on a stage to give the illusion of depth.[8] The philosophers Anaxagoras and Democritus worked out geometric theories of perspective for use with skenographia. Alcibiades had paintings in his house designed using skenographia, so this art was not confined merely to the stage. Euclid in his Optics (c. 300 BC) argues correctly that the perceived size of an object is not related to its distance from the eye by a simple proportion.[9] In the first-century BC frescoes of the Villa of P. Fannius Synistor, multiple vanishing points are used in a systematic but not fully consistent manner.[5]

Chinese artists made use of oblique projection from the first or second century until the 18th century. It is not certain how they came to use the technique; Dubery and Willats (1983) speculate that the Chinese acquired the technique from India, which acquired it from Ancient Rome,[10] while others credit it as an indigenous invention of Ancient China.[11][12][13] Oblique projection is also seen in Japanese art, such as in the Ukiyo-e paintings of Torii Kiyonaga (1752–1815).[10][a]

By the later periods of antiquity, artists, especially those in less popular traditions, were well aware that distant objects could be shown smaller than those close at hand for increased realism, but whether this convention was actually used in a work depended on many factors. Some of the paintings found in the ruins of Pompeii show a remarkable realism and perspective for their time.[14] It has been claimed that comprehensive systems of perspective were evolved in antiquity, but most scholars do not accept this. Hardly any of the many works where such a system would have been used have survived. A passage in Philostratus suggests that classical artists and theorists thought in terms of "circles" at equal distance from the viewer, like a classical semi-circular theatre seen from the stage.[15] The roof beams in rooms in the Vatican Virgil, from about 400 AD, are shown converging, more or less, on a common vanishing point, but this is not systematically related to the rest of the composition.[16]

Medieval artists in Europe, like those in the Islamic world and China, were aware of the general principle of varying the relative size of elements according to distance, but even more than classical art were perfectly ready to override it for other reasons. Buildings were often shown obliquely according to a particular convention. The use and sophistication of attempts to convey distance increased steadily during the period, but without a basis in a systematic theory. Byzantine art was also aware of these principles, but also used the reverse perspective convention for the setting of principal figures. Ambrogio Lorenzetti painted a floor with convergent lines in his Presentation at the Temple (1342), though the rest of the painting lacks perspective elements.[17]

Renaissance

[edit]
Detail of Masolino da Panicale's St. Peter Healing a Cripple and the Raising of Tabitha (c. 1423), the earliest extant artwork known to use a consistent vanishing point.[18]

It is generally accepted that Filippo Brunelleschi conducted a series of experiments between 1415 and 1420, which included making drawings of various Florentine buildings in correct perspective.[19] According to Vasari and Antonio Manetti, in about 1420, Brunelleschi demonstrated his discovery of perspective by having people look through a hole on his painting from the backside. Through it, they would see a building such as the Florence Baptistery for which the painting was made. When Brunelleschi lifted a mirror between the building and the painting, the mirror reflected the painting to an observer looking through the hole, so that the observer can compare how similar the building and the painting of it are. (The vanishing point is centered from the perspective of an experiment participant.)[20] Brunelleschi applied this new system of perspective to his paintings around 1425.[21]

This scenario is indicative, but faces several problems that are still debated. First of all, nothing can be said for certain about the correctness of his perspective construction of the Baptistery of San Giovanni because Brunelleschi's panel is lost. Second, no other perspective painting or drawing by Brunelleschi is known. (In fact, Brunelleschi was not known to have painted at all.) Third, in the account written by Antonio Manetti in his Vita di Ser Brunellesco at the end of the 15th century on Brunelleschi's panel, there is not a single occurrence of the word "experiment". Fourth, the conditions listed by Manetti are contradictory with each other. For example, the description of the eyepiece sets a visual field of 15°, much narrower than the visual field resulting from the urban landscape described.[22][23]

Melozzo da Forlì's use of upward foreshortening in his frescoes, Basilica dei Santi Apostoli, Rome, c. 1480

Soon after Brunelleschi's demonstrations, nearly every interested artist in Florence and in Italy used geometrical perspective in their paintings and sculpture,[24] notably Donatello, Masaccio,[25]Lorenzo Ghiberti, Masolino da Panicale, Paolo Uccello,[25] and Filippo Lippi. Not only was perspective a way of showing depth, it was also a new method of creating a composition. Visual art could now depict a single, unified scene rather than a combination of several. Early examples include Masolino's St. Peter Healing a Cripple and the Raising of Tabitha (c. 1423), Donatello's The Feast of Herod (c. 1427), as well as Ghiberti's Jacob and Esau and other panels from the east doors of the Florence Baptistery.[26] Masaccio (d. 1428) achieved an illusionistic effect by placing the vanishing point at the viewer's eye level in his Holy Trinity (c. 1427),[27] and in The Tribute Money, it is placed behind the face of Jesus.[28][b] In the late 15th century, Melozzo da Forlì first applied the technique of foreshortening (in Rome, Loreto, Forlì and others).[30]

This overall story is based on qualitative judgments, and would need to be faced against the material evaluations that have been conducted on Renaissance perspective paintings. Apart from the paintings of Piero della Francesca, which are a model of the genre, the majority of 15th century works show serious errors in their geometric construction. This is true of Masaccio's Trinity fresco[31][32] and of many works, including those by renowned artists like Leonardo da Vinci.[33][34]

As shown by the quick proliferation of accurate perspective paintings in Florence, Brunelleschi likely understood (with help from his friend the mathematician Toscanelli),[35] but did not publish the mathematics behind perspective. Decades later, his friend Leon Battista Alberti wrote De pictura (c. 1435), a treatise on proper methods of showing distance in painting. Alberti's primary breakthrough was not to show the mathematics in terms of conical projections, as it actually appears to the eye. Instead, he formulated the theory based on planar projections, or how the rays of light, passing from the viewer's eye to the landscape, would strike the picture plane (the painting). He was then able to calculate the apparent height of a distant object using two similar triangles. The mathematics behind similar triangles is relatively simple, having been long ago formulated by Euclid.[c] Alberti was also trained in the science of optics through the school of Padua and under the influence of Biagio Pelacani da Parma who studied Alhazen's Book of Optics.[36] This book, translated around 1200 into Latin, had laid the mathematical foundation for perspective in Europe.[37]

Pietro Perugino's use of perspective in Delivery of the Keys (1482), a fresco at the Sistine Chapel

Piero della Francesca elaborated on De pictura in his De Prospectiva pingendi in the 1470s, making many references to Euclid.[38] Alberti had limited himself to figures on the ground plane and giving an overall basis for perspective. Della Francesca fleshed it out, explicitly covering solids in any area of the picture plane. Della Francesca also started the now common practice of using illustrated figures to explain the mathematical concepts, making his treatise easier to understand than Alberti's. Della Francesca was also the first to accurately draw the Platonic solids as they would appear in perspective. Luca Pacioli's 1509 Divina proportione (Divine Proportion), illustrated by Leonardo da Vinci, summarizes the use of perspective in painting, including much of Della Francesca's treatise.[39] Leonardo applied one-point perspective as well as shallow focus to some of his works.[40]

Two-point perspective was demonstrated as early as 1525 by Albrecht Dürer, who studied perspective by reading Piero and Pacioli's works, in his Unterweisung der Messung ("Instruction of the Measurement").[41]

Limitations

[edit]
Satire on False Perspective by William Hogarth, 1753
Example of a painting that combines various perspectives: The Frozen City (Museum of Art Aarau, Switzerland) by Matthias A. K. Zimmermann

Perspective images are created with reference to a particular center of vision for the picture plane. In order for the resulting image to appear identical to the original scene, a viewer must view the image from the exact vantage point used in the calculations relative to the image. When viewed from a different point, this cancels out what would appear to be distortions in the image. For example, a sphere drawn in perspective will be stretched into an ellipse. These apparent distortions are more pronounced away from the center of the image as the angle between a projected ray (from the scene to the eye) becomes more acute relative to the picture plane. Artists may choose to "correct" perspective distortions, for example by drawing all spheres as perfect circles, or by drawing figures as if centered on the direction of view. In practice, unless the viewer observes the image from an extreme angle, like standing far to the side of a painting, the perspective normally looks more or less correct. This is referred to as "Zeeman's Paradox".[42]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Perspective (graphical)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Perspective (graphical) is a technique in and for representing three-dimensional objects and scenes on a two-dimensional surface, creating the illusion of depth, distance, and spatial relationships by simulating how the perceives the world. This method relies on principles of , where parallel lines in appear to converge at vanishing points on the picture plane, and objects diminish in size as they recede from the viewer. In the , graphical perspective, particularly linear perspective, emerged during the as a revolutionary system for achieving realistic spatial representation. is credited with inventing linear perspective around 1420 through experiments demonstrating the mathematical projection of architectural scenes onto flat panels using mirrors and peepholes. This innovation was later formalized in Leon Battista Alberti's 1435 treatise Della pittura, which described constructing perspective using a central and orthogonals aligned with the viewer's . Linear perspective encompasses several variants based on the number of principal vanishing points: one-point perspective for frontal views with a single on the ; two-point perspective for angled views of objects like , using two vanishing points; and three-point perspective for dramatic upward or downward angles, incorporating a third vanishing point for vertical lines. Complementary to linear methods, aerial (or atmospheric) perspective uses gradations in color, clarity, and tone to suggest depth, with distant objects appearing hazier and cooler in hue. In , perspective projection mathematically transforms 3D world coordinates into 2D screen coordinates, preserving the foreshortening effect where distant objects appear smaller and parallel lines converge, thus mimicking human . Unlike , which maintains parallel lines without convergence for technical drawings, perspective projection is the standard for realistic rendering in video games, animations, and , implemented via matrices in graphics pipelines like . The center of projection is typically placed behind the view plane to simulate a camera or eye, ensuring accurate depth cues in digital scenes.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Graphical perspective is a technique for representing on a two-dimensional surface by simulating the optical effects observed by the , thereby creating an of depth and . This method relies on principles derived from the of vision, where lines of sight from the observer converge on a flat plane, contrasting with that preserves parallel lines without convergence and ignores distance-based size changes. At its core, perspective operates through key principles such as the convergence of toward vanishing points, which appear on a to suggest recession into depth, and the of object sizes with increasing from the viewer, reflecting how images form on the . These elements mimic depth cues in human vision, including linear perspective, which allows using a single eye by interpreting converging lines and relative sizes, while complementing binocular cues like for more accurate spatial judgment. The foundational setup for applying these principles in includes the picture plane, a vertical transparent surface acting as the projection medium; the station point, the fixed location of the observer's eye perpendicular to the picture plane; and the , the horizontal reference surface intersecting the picture plane along the ground line, upon which objects are positioned to establish scale and orientation. Rudimentary uses of such principles date back to , though systematic codification occurred later.

Key Components

In graphical perspective, the fundamental elements include the , vanishing points, picture plane, and orthogonal lines, which together enable the illusion of three-dimensional depth on a two-dimensional surface. These components, formalized in the , structure the representation of space by simulating how the perceives recession and convergence. The represents the apparent boundary where the earth meets the sky, corresponding to the viewer's and serving as the reference plane for distant elements in a scene. It establishes the vertical position from which the perspective is constructed, influencing the placement of all other components. In practice, the horizon line is drawn as a horizontal line across the picture, adjustable based on the assumed viewpoint height. Vanishing points are specific locations on the where in the viewed scene appear to converge, creating the visual effect of depth. These points simulate optical convergence; for instance, in setups with a single primary direction of recession, one suffices. Multiple vanishing points can be used for more complex orientations, but they always lie on the . The picture plane acts as a theoretical transparent or flat surface positioned between the viewer and the scene, upon which the projected image is traced to mimic direct observation. As conceptualized by in his 1435 treatise Della pittura, it intersects the cone of vision, defining the boundary of the represented space and ensuring proportional accuracy. This plane is perpendicular to the , analogous to a or viewing screen. Orthogonal lines are those that recede into the toward a , typically parallel to the viewer's in the real scene but converging in the to convey depth. In contrast, transversals are lines parallel to the picture plane, rendered as in the image to maintain their true proportions without convergence. Orthogonals form the structural framework for elements like roads or building edges, while transversals define surfaces such as floors or walls facing the viewer. These lines are essential in one-point perspective configurations.

Types

Linear Perspectives

Linear perspective is a graphical technique in which parallel lines in three-dimensional space appear to converge at one or more vanishing points on a horizon line, creating the illusion of depth and spatial recession on a two-dimensional surface. This method relies on the observer's eye level, represented by the horizon line, and assumes a fixed viewpoint to maintain consistent proportions and alignments. It forms the foundation for representational drawing in art, architecture, and design, distinguishing it from curvilinear perspectives used in wide-angle scenes.

One-Point Perspective

One-point perspective employs a single on the , suitable for frontal views where the picture plane is parallel to the primary face of the subject, such as or receding directly away from the viewer. Vertical lines remain parallel to the edges of the drawing surface, horizontal lines stay parallel, and depth lines converge to the . To construct a cube in one-point perspective, begin by drawing a horizontal horizon line and placing a single on it. Draw a square below or above the horizon to represent the front face of the cube, ensuring its vertical and horizontal edges are parallel to the drawing's sides. From each corner of the square, draw lines converging to the to form the receding edges; then, connect the endpoints with parallel lines to complete the back face, adjusting for depth. For a , extend this process by adding floor and ceiling lines from the , incorporating doors and windows along vertical guides to maintain alignment, and using diagonal lines from a station point to measure equal intervals for tiling or furniture placement. This approach ensures proportional scaling, with objects farther from the viewer appearing smaller as they approach the .

Two-Point Perspective

Two-point perspective uses two vanishing points on the , ideal for angular views where the subject is seen from a corner, such as or objects rotated relative to the viewer. Vertical lines remain parallel, but the two sets of horizontal lines converge separately to each , capturing the structure's breadth and depth. Construction for a building starts with a horizontal horizon line and two vanishing points spaced apart on it, typically at the edges of the page. Draw a vertical line intersecting the horizon to form the building's front corner, then project lines from its top and bottom to both vanishing points to outline the side faces. Connect parallel verticals to define the building's height, and use diagonal measuring lines from a station point below the horizon to scale widths and depths consistently across floors or windows. This method aligns architectural elements like roofs and ledges by ensuring all corresponding edges meet at the respective vanishing points, preserving realistic proportions even at oblique angles.

Three-Point Perspective

Three-point perspective incorporates two vanishing points on the and a third above or below it, typically for dramatic low-angle (worm's-eye) or high-angle (bird's-eye) views of tall structures like skyscrapers or towers. No lines remain fully parallel; verticals converge to the third , emphasizing height and distortion in elevation. To draw a tall building, establish the with two side vanishing points and position the vertical vanishing point far above or below for extreme angles. Begin with a vertical line for the nearest edge, then draw converging lines from its endpoints to all three vanishing points to form the structure's outline. Scale heights using vertical guides that taper toward the third point, and align windows or balconies with horizontal projections to the side points, ensuring the building's mass appears to recede dynamically. This variant heightens the sense of scale in urban scenes, as seen in depictions of towering edifices where the vertical convergence exaggerates loftiness.

Construction Methods

Across linear perspectives, measuring points—located off the drawing surface, often at a 45-degree from the station point—facilitate scaling by creating diagonal lines that intersect the receding orthogonals to mark equal divisions, such as floor heights or object widths. Scaling involves selecting a unit size on the front plane and transferring it rearward via these measuring lines to the vanishing points, ensuring objects diminish proportionally with distance. Aligning objects requires consistent guides from the horizon, with all parallel elements sharing the same vanishing point to avoid distortion and maintain spatial coherence in compositions.

Curvilinear Perspectives

, also known as , represents an advanced graphical projection technique that extends traditional methods by incorporating curved lines, particularly elliptical arcs, to depict three-dimensional scenes on two-dimensional surfaces. Unlike rectilinear approaches limited to narrower fields of view, accommodates up to 180-degree panoramic vistas, aligning more closely with the natural of the human . This method replaces straight converging lines with arcs, allowing artists to render expansive environments without the severe distortions that occur when forcing wide-angle scenes into linear frameworks. Key types of curvilinear perspective include two-point curvilinear, which applies gentle horizontal arcs for moderate wide-angle compositions typically spanning 90 to 120 degrees, and multi-point curvilinear, designed for fuller spherical representations that encompass nearly 360 degrees by employing multiple curved vanishing loci. In two-point curvilinear setups, the primary axes curve symmetrically around a central viewpoint, preserving proportional accuracy for subjects like building facades viewed obliquely. Multi-point variants, often involving four to six focal curves, facilitate immersive depictions of enclosed or hemispherical spaces, such as domed interiors or panoramic landscapes. Construction techniques for curvilinear perspectives rely on geometric aids like concentric circles or ellipses to establish the horizon and guide vertical alignments, with scene elements projected as radial arcs intersecting these forms. For instance, in architectural sketches of , artists draw an elliptical and overlay concentric arcs to map parallel walls and floors, ensuring that receding lines bow naturally outward rather than pinching inward at the edges. This begins with a central viewpoint, from which elliptical templates radiate to trace horizontals, while verticals remain straight unless the viewpoint elevates dramatically, promoting a integration of forms in wide compositions. The advantages of curvilinear perspectives lie in their capacity to generate highly immersive scenes, such as panoramas, by minimizing perceptual distortions and enhancing spatial realism for broad fields of view beyond the constraints of linear systems. This approach proves especially effective for conveying the enveloping quality of environments like vast halls or circular vistas, where straight-line projections would otherwise produce unnatural barreling or compression.

Historical Development

Ancient and Medieval Periods

In ancient Egyptian wall paintings, figures were depicted using hierarchical scale, where size reflected social or divine importance rather than spatial distance, creating a two-dimensional composition that prioritized symbolic over realistic depth. This approach is evident in tomb paintings from , such as those in chapels, where pharaohs and deities appear disproportionately larger than subordinates to emphasize their status in the . Greek vase paintings introduced rudimentary depth through overlapping figures and basic , suggesting spatial relationships without systematic convergence. For instance, in red-figure vases from the fifth century BCE, warriors or mythological scenes feature partial overlaps to imply foreground and background layering, marking an early intuitive grasp of occlusion for narrative clarity. The friezes (c. 447–432 BCE) demonstrate Greek sculptural efforts at depth in low- processions, where overlapping figures and varying relief depths (up to 5.6 cm) suggest forward and backward movement along the Ionic frieze. Roman contributions advanced these techniques in mosaics and Pompeian frescoes, employing isometric views and approximate convergence of lines to simulate depth, though without a single vanishing point. In the Second Style wall paintings from Pompeii and (c. first century CE), architectural elements like columns and porticos recede toward implied horizons using skenographia, a stage-inspired method that created illusory spatial extensions. The frescoes exemplify this, with layered scenes of ritual processions achieving a sense of recession through aligned orthogonals and shading gradients, predating formalized linear systems. During the medieval period, Byzantine and Gothic art largely reverted to flat, symbolic representations that de-emphasized perspectival depth in favor of narrative and spiritual messaging. Byzantine mosaics and icons, such as those in Ravenna's San Vitale (c. sixth century CE), featured elongated figures against gold backgrounds with compressed space, using minimal recession to evoke an ethereal, divine realm over earthly realism. Gothic illuminated manuscripts and panel paintings maintained this two-dimensionality, arranging figures hierarchically to convey moral or religious stories, as seen in the hierarchical scaling of saints and donors to highlight theological importance. However, transitional works like Giotto's frescoes in the Scrovegni Chapel (c. 1305) began introducing proto-perspectival elements, such as foreshortening and architectural orthogonals, to enhance spatial coherence and emotional narrative in scenes from the Life of Christ. These intuitive approaches laid groundwork for later systematic innovations. Non-Western traditions offered alternative approaches, prioritizing symbolic and hierarchical depth over unified optical perspective. Chinese landscape painting, from the onward, utilized oblique with multiple horizons and shifting viewpoints, avoiding a single to evoke infinite spatial expanses and philosophical harmony, as in Fan Kuan's Travelers Among Mountains and Streams (c. 1000), where parallel lines maintain clarity across vast terrains without convergence. Similarly, Islamic miniature painting eschewed Renaissance-style central vanishing points, employing multiple horizons and discontinuous spaces to symbolize divine infinity and narrative multiplicity, evident in Persian manuscripts like the Shahnameh illustrations (14th–16th centuries), where figures occupy layered planes for spiritual rather than mimetic depth.

Renaissance Innovations

The marked a pivotal shift in the representation of space in art, with Filippo Brunelleschi's experiments around 1415 laying the groundwork for systematic linear perspective. Brunelleschi, an architect and engineer, conducted demonstrations in using a peepshow device: a painted panel depicting the Baptistery of San Giovanni, viewed through a small hole with a mirror to reflect the real scene for comparison, achieving a precise projection of architectural forms onto a flat surface. These experiments, described by biographer Antonio Manetti, drew on ancient Roman stage designs for inspiration but innovated by integrating and to create verifiable illusions of depth. Building on Brunelleschi's practical innovations, provided the first theoretical codification in his 1435 treatise Della pittura (On Painting). Alberti described the "velum" method—a grid-like placed between the artist and subject to divide the view into measurable sections, allowing proportional translation onto a picture plane with converging lines to a central . This approach formalized linear perspective as a mathematical construct, emphasizing the eye's position as the origin of rays intersecting at a , and influenced generations of artists by treating as a rational . Artists rapidly applied these principles, with Masaccio's Holy Trinity fresco (c. 1427) in , , exemplifying the first major use of one-point linear perspective in a monumental work. The composition employs orthogonal lines converging to a at the viewer's eye level, creating an architectural that recedes convincingly into space and integrates donors illusionistically below. advanced this geometric precision in The (c. 1455), where tiled flooring and colonnades demonstrate exact mathematical perspective, with lines meticulously aligned to enhance spatial clarity and symbolic depth. The technique soon spread northward, as seen in Jan van Eyck's The Arnolfini Portrait (1434), an early Flemish approximation of linear perspective amid Northern Europe's emphasis on optical realism. While not strictly geometric—featuring compressed space and tilted orthogonals—the painting uses converging lines in the furnishings and convex mirror reflections to suggest depth, bridging Italian innovations with local traditions.

Modern Extensions

In the 19th century, Western artists expanded perspective techniques beyond strict linear constructions, incorporating atmospheric effects to evoke depth and mood. Impressionists like Claude Monet and Alfred Sisley employed atmospheric perspective—reducing contrast, saturation, and detail in distant elements while shifting hues toward cooler tones—to capture the transient qualities of light and air, as seen in Monet's Impression, Sunrise (1872), where hazy blues blur the horizon for a sense of immediacy and environmental immersion. Concurrently, Japanese ukiyo-e artists developed "floating perspective," a flexible system avoiding fixed vanishing points to allow multiple viewpoints within a single composition, emphasizing impermanence and viewer engagement. Katsushika Hokusai's Under the Wave off Kanagawa (c. 1831) exemplifies this through its dynamic wave dominating the foreground against a receding Mount Fuji, blending European linear influences with traditional Japanese spatial fluidity to create optical tension and narrative surprise. The 20th century saw radical innovations, beginning with Cubism's deliberate rejection of traditional single-point perspective in favor of fragmented, multi-viewpoint representations that flattened space and emphasized geometric abstraction. Pioneered by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque around 1907–1914, works like Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon (1907) shattered illusionistic depth, presenting objects from simultaneous angles to convey conceptual totality over optical realism, influencing subsequent modernist experiments. Surrealism later revived and subverted linear perspective for dream-like irrationality, using precise, illusionistic rendering to heighten the uncanny; René Magritte's The Treachery of Images (1929) and Salvador Dalí's The Persistence of Memory (1931) employed accurate vanishing points and horizons to depict impossible scenarios, juxtaposing everyday rationality with subconscious disruption. In popular media, comics introduced four-point perspective around the mid-20th century to depict extreme angles and dynamic motion, extending beyond three-point systems for immersive, narrative-driven scenes in works by artists like Jack Kirby, enhancing spatial drama in urban or action sequences. Post-2000 developments integrated perspective with digital technologies, enabling photorealistic rendering in through software tools that simulate accurate projections. Programs like and incorporate real-time perspective grids and ray-tracing for hyper-realistic , allowing artists such as Beeple () to create immersive, illusionistic environments in NFTs and installations, bridging traditional optical principles with computational precision for scalable, interactive depth. This fusion addresses gaps in analog methods, facilitating global collaborations and virtual exhibitions that extend perspective's role in .

Mathematical Basis

Geometric Projections

In perspective projection, the central projection model simulates the formation of a visual image by tracing rays from points on a three-dimensional object through a fixed center of projection—typically representing the observer's eye—to their intersection with a two-dimensional picture plane. This setup positions the picture plane perpendicular to the , often between the eye and the scene, ensuring that the projected image captures depth through convergence rather than uniform scaling. The similar triangles principle underpins this model's realism, particularly in explaining why distant objects appear smaller than nearer ones. Consider two in space, such as the edges of a receding plane, intercepted by transversals from the eye to the picture plane; by the intercept theorem (also known as Thales' theorem), the ratios of corresponding segments on these transversals are equal, yielding similar . For a specific derivation, imagine a formed by the eye and a segment of length LL at depth Z1Z_1 from the eye, projecting to length l1l_1 on the picture plane at dd from the eye; a similar for the same segment at greater depth Z2>Z1Z_2 > Z_1 projects to l2<l1l_2 < l_1. The similarity ratio gives l1L=dZ1\frac{l_1}{L} = \frac{d}{Z_1} and l2L=dZ2\frac{l_2}{L} = \frac{d}{Z_2}, demonstrating that projected size diminishes inversely with from the eye, since l=dLZl = \frac{d L}{Z}, so l∝1Zl \propto \frac{1}{Z}. This leads to the fundamental equations for coordinate mapping in central projection. For a point at coordinates (X,Y,Z)(X, Y, Z) in a right-handed system where the eye is at the origin and the picture plane is at Z=fZ = f (with f>0f > 0 as the , or eye-to-plane distance), the projected 2D coordinates are: x=fXZ,y=fYZx = \frac{f X}{Z}, \quad y = \frac{f Y}{Z} These formulas arise directly from the similar triangles ratios xX=fZ\frac{x}{X} = \frac{f}{Z} and yY=fZ\frac{y}{Y} = \frac{f}{Z}, normalizing the projection onto the plane. In contrast to parallel projections like axonometric, where all projectors are parallel rays perpendicular or oblique to the picture plane—preserving relative sizes regardless of depth and avoiding convergence—central projection employs non-parallel rays that converge at the eye, producing natural foreshortening but distorting measurements. This geometry inherently generates vanishing points as the apparent convergence of parallel lines in the projected image.

Vanishing Points and Horizon

In perspective projection, the represents the projection of the line at infinity within the horizontal plane of the scene onto the . This line corresponds to the viewer's and serves as the locus of vanishing points for all sets of lying in horizontal directions. The position of the horizon line varies with the viewer's height relative to the ; for instance, a higher viewpoint elevates the horizon in the image, while a lower viewpoint depresses it. For a set of parallel lines in three-dimensional space with a given direction vector d=(dx,dy,dz)\mathbf{d} = (d_x, d_y, d_z), the vanishing point is the intersection on the image plane of their projected lines, equivalent to the perspective projection of the point at infinity in that direction, represented in homogeneous coordinates as (dx,dy,dz,0)(d_x, d_y, d_z, 0). This projection yields a point whose coordinates depend on the camera's intrinsic parameters, such as the focal length ff, and the orientation of d\mathbf{d} relative to the optical axis. In the pinhole camera model, the vanishing point coordinates can be computed by applying the projection matrix to this infinite point, resulting in a location that captures the apparent convergence of the lines. When considering multiple sets of parallel lines in different directions within the horizontal plane, their corresponding vanishing points all lie along the horizon line, with positions determined by the angle θ\theta each direction makes with the viewing direction. For a direction at angle θ\theta, the horizontal coordinate xx of the vanishing point on the image plane is given by x=ftan⁡(θ)x = f \tan(\theta), where ff is the focal length; directions orthogonal to the viewing axis (θ=90∘\theta = 90^\circ) project to points at infinity, parallel to the image edges. This relation arises from the geometry of the projection, where the tangent function accounts for the angular deviation. Changes in the viewpoint, particularly tilting the picture plane relative to the horizontal, modify the orientation of the in the resulting image. A tilt introduces a to the horizon, shifting vanishing points accordingly and altering the perceived geometry; for example, an upward tilt (as in a ) causes the horizon to slope downward across the image, while a downward tilt raises it. This effect stems from the altered between the projection rays and the plane at infinity.

Applications

In Visual Arts

In visual arts, perspective serves as a foundational technique for creating the illusion of on a two-dimensional surface, enabling artists to convey depth, volume, and spatial relationships in , , and . One key method involves step-by-step grid techniques, where artists overlay a proportional grid on a reference image and the working surface to map out elements accurately, ensuring consistent scaling and alignment. This approach is particularly effective for rendering foreshortening, the visual contraction of forms when viewed at an , which adds dynamism and realism to figures and objects. Shading follows systematically, employing or cross-hatching to model light and shadow gradients that accentuate depth, with darker tones applied to receding areas and lighter ones to advancing forms. Perspective significantly shapes artistic composition by directing the viewer's gaze and organizing narrative elements within a scene. In Leonardo da Vinci's The Last Supper (1498), one-point perspective masterfully converges architectural lines—such as the ceiling beams and wall panels—at the behind Christ's head, funneling attention to the central figure and unifying the apostles' reactions around him. This creates a harmonious flow that draws the eye from the periphery inward, enhancing emotional and dramatic impact while simulating an extension of the space into the viewer's world. Over time, perspective's application has shifted from strict realism in photorealist works, which rely on linear and atmospheric cues to replicate photographic precision and optical accuracy, to more interpretive uses in , where distortions challenge conventional viewing. Photorealists, emerging in the , employ meticulous vanishing points and to achieve hyper-detailed depth, mimicking camera lenses for lifelike scenes. In contrast, abstract modern artists often subvert these rules for expressive purposes, using fragmented or inverted perspectives to evoke psychological depth, as in Richard Diebenkorn's aerial views that blend with subtle spatial recession. A notable early example of perspectival play is the anamorphic illusion in Hans Holbein's The Ambassadors (1533), where a distorted at the foreground resolves into clear form only when viewed obliquely, symbolizing mortality amid worldly symbols and demonstrating perspective's potential for hidden meanings. To master these elements, artists engage in structured exercises targeting depth cues like relative size, overlap, and linear convergence. Beginners often start with one-point perspective room drawings, sketching simple interiors to practice horizon lines and vanishing points, gradually incorporating objects to observe how scale diminishes with distance. Advanced drills include foreshortened figure studies from live models, emphasizing contour adjustments and to capture angular compression, alongside overlap exercises where layered forms reinforce foreground dominance. These repetitive practices, often using reference grids initially, cultivate an intuitive grasp of spatial dynamics essential for expressive realism.

In Digital and Technical Fields

In computer graphics, perspective projection is implemented through matrices that simulate depth and realism in 3D rendering pipelines. The projection matrix transforms 3D coordinates into a two-dimensional screen space, creating a viewing frustum that defines the visible volume for rendering. In OpenGL, the glFrustum function establishes this perspective by specifying the near and far clipping planes, left, right, bottom, and top boundaries, enabling efficient culling of objects outside the view. This approach, foundational since the 1990s, ensures that distant objects appear smaller, mimicking human vision in real-time applications like video games and simulations. Architectural rendering leverages perspective techniques in software to visualize building designs with accurate spatial depth. supports two-point perspective views by allowing users to define camera positions and targets, generating elevations where converge to two vanishing points on the . Post-2010 developments in (VR) and (AR) have extended these capabilities, enabling immersive walkthroughs of architectural models where users experience first-person perspectives in real-time. For instance, VR platforms integrate perspective projections to simulate natural locomotion and in virtual environments, enhancing client presentations and design validation. In applications, perspective drawings contrast with isometric projections in technical illustrations, where the former provides a realistic view for visualization while the latter preserves true dimensions without distortion. Perspective is preferred in simulations requiring perceptual accuracy, such as (CGI) in , where it facilitates dynamic scene compositions. In the 2010 film Inception, CGI sequences manipulated perspective to depict impossible architectures, like folding cityscapes, blending practical sets with digital extensions for seamless visual continuity. Recent advancements in the have introduced AI-driven real-time perspective correction in applications, automatically detecting and adjusting distortions in images captured from angled viewpoints. Tools like Autoenhance.ai employ algorithms to analyze vanishing lines and straighten horizons, producing balanced compositions without manual intervention. Similarly, Adobe Lightroom's AI features, powered by , offer guided corrections that warp images to simulate ideal viewpoints, improving efficiency for professionals in mobile and desktop workflows. These innovations extend graphical perspective principles into accessible, automated tools, broadening their utility beyond specialized fields.

Limitations and Alternatives

Perspectival Constraints

One key limitation of linear perspective in graphical representation is its restricted , where distortions become prominent beyond approximately 60 degrees, leading to unnatural stretching of objects at the periphery. This arises because linear perspective simulates a optimized for central vision, akin to the human eye's effective angular range, but fails to accurately depict wider scenes without introducing barrel-like or fisheye effects. Graphical perspective enforces a single fixed viewpoint, constraining depictions to a static eye position and prohibiting seamless multi-angle views without redrawing or recomputing the projection. This rigidity stems from the geometric assumption of parallel rays converging to one point, making it impossible to capture dynamic observer movement in a single static image. Perspective systems are susceptible to perceptual paradoxes, such as the , where converging lines create illusory depth cues that cause misperception of object sizes based on contextual perspective. In this effect, identical lines appear unequal in length due to the brain's interpretation of linear perspective as indicating distance, highlighting how graphical perspective can exploit but also mislead human . Practical implementation faces challenges, including measuring inaccuracies in freehand drawing, where artists struggle to precisely align vanishing points and proportions without aids, often resulting in skewed representations. In computational rendering, real-time applications incur overhead from the perspective divide—a division by depth (z-coordinate) operation required after matrix transformation—which is more resource-intensive than orthographic projections lacking this step.

Non-Perspectival Methods

Non-perspectival methods provide alternative ways to represent depth and spatial relationships in graphical depictions, eschewing the convergence of lines to vanishing points characteristic of linear perspective. These techniques prioritize symbolic, technical, or perceptual cues to suggest three-dimensionality, often from cultural traditions or practical needs in visualization. By maintaining or manipulating other visual elements like color and scale, they achieve clarity or emotional resonance without optical illusionism. Atmospheric perspective, also known as , conveys depth through gradations in color, tonal value, and detail rather than geometric convergence. In this approach, distant objects are rendered with cooler, lighter hues, reduced contrast, and minimized details to mimic the effects of atmospheric , creating a sense of recession. This method has been prominently employed in traditional Chinese , where artists like those of the used subtle washes of ink and color to layer mountains and mists, emphasizing over precise measurement. For instance, in works such as by Huang Gongwang, foreground elements retain sharp details and warm tones, while background forms fade into hazy blues and grays, fostering an immersive, infinite spatial flow. Isometric and oblique projections represent depth using parallel lines that do not converge, ensuring undistorted proportions and technical accuracy in two-dimensional renderings of three-dimensional forms. In , all three principal axes are equally foreshortened at 120-degree angles, preserving equal scale along each dimension without vanishing points, which enhances clarity for measuring and understanding object . This technique is widely used in diagrams to depict machinery or structures, such as in layouts or architectural plans, where precise dimensions must be conveyed without . , by contrast, aligns the front face parallel to the picture plane in true proportion while receding axes extend at a fixed angle, typically 45 degrees, allowing visible surfaces to appear undistorted for quick visualization. Both methods prioritize functional readability over realism, as seen in technical illustrations for assembly instructions or CAD outputs. Reverse perspective, prevalent in Eastern Orthodox iconography, inverts conventional spatial logic by having lines diverge outward from the image toward the viewer, symbolically integrating the observer into the sacred scene. Rather than a single receding into infinity, this polycentric approach assigns multiple visual centers to elements, with parallel forms expanding to encompass the beholder, evoking a theophanic encounter. Theologically, it nullifies human ego-centrism, directing focus from material imitation to divine reality and grace, as articulated by in his analysis of iconographic space. In icons like Andrei Rublev's The Trinity, architectural lines radiate outward, drawing the faithful into the depicted mystery and emphasizing spiritual participation over naturalistic depth. Modern hybrids adapt these principles for contemporary media, blending perceptual tricks with non-convergent geometries to simulate depth in and digital environments. Forced in theme park manipulates relative scale and positioning—placing smaller elements closer to the camera—to create illusory depth without true line convergence, as exemplified in Disney's , where upper stories are scaled down to appear taller from afar. Similarly, axonometric views, particularly isometric implementations, dominate video games for their distortion-free representation of 3D worlds in 2D, using parallel projections to maintain consistent sizing and navigation clarity. Titles like and employ this to build intricate, explorable spaces that prioritize gameplay intuition over photorealistic recession. These approaches occasionally supplement linear perspective in mixed scenes for enhanced visual impact.

References

  1. https://www.getty.edu/art/collection/exhibition/103NFA
  2. https://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~matc/math5.geometry/unit11/unit11.html
  3. https://www.graphics.cornell.edu/academic/art2907/secure/02_HANDOUT_Linear_Perspective_from_Brunelleschi_to_Leonardo.pdf
  4. https://www.csun.edu/sites/default/files/Media03--Renaissance.pdf
  5. https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/arch1110fall2013/files/2011/06/Fundamentals-of-Perspective.pdf
  6. https://blog.academyart.edu/fundamentals-of-perspective-drawing/
  7. https://math.hws.edu/graphicsbook/c3/s3.html
  8. https://www.cs.umd.edu/~zwicker/courses/computergraphics/03_Projection.pdf
  9. https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/csep557/14au/lectures/projections.pdf
  10. https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2013/EECS-2013-152.pdf
  11. https://courses.byui.edu/art110_new/art110/week01/basic.html
  12. https://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/knowledge_base/virtual-worlds/EVE/III.A.1.c.DepthCues.html
  13. https://pressbooks.cuny.edu/sensationandperception/chapter/oculomotor-and-monocular-depth-cues/
  14. https://www.essentialvermeer.com/technique/perspective/about-perspective.html
  15. https://nelson-atkins.org/gates/gaining-perspective.html
  16. https://www.artistsnetwork.com/art-mediums/learn-to-draw-perspective/
  17. https://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~tony/whatsnew/column/alberti-0102/alberti1.html
  18. https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/design-foundation-i-fall15/files/2011/06/Week-10_Yee.-Architectural-Drawing.pdf
  19. https://www.coloradomesa.edu/oer/documents/2d_design_handbook_v1.8small_fall-2021-accessibilityupdate-for-website.pdf
  20. https://lemoorecollege.edu/oer/documents/2024-drawing-perspectives-art-005b-oer-textbook.pdf
  21. https://courses.byui.edu/art110_new/art110/glossary/glossary.html
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6835594/
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308629243_The_Hauck-Panofsky_Conjecture_Regarding_Curvilinear_Perspective
  24. https://www.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/curved-line-perspective-drawing-video/how-to-draw-using-perspective-dick-termes/
  25. https://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/faculty/documents/RothLittleWomen.pdf
  26. https://www.getty.edu/publications/resources/virtuallibrary/0892361840.pdf
  27. https://www.academia.edu/4945811/2009_The_Parthenon_Frieze_Degrees_of_Visibility_
  28. https://www.academia.edu/41989537/Ancient_Roman_Wall_Fresco_Perspective_Technique_at_Herculaneum_and_Pompeii
  29. https://open.byu.edu/history_of_the_fine_arts_music/byzantine_art
  30. https://ww2.jacksonms.gov/Resources/4HfL5C/3OK070/artists-from__the-middle-ages.pdf
  31. https://ww2.jacksonms.gov/scholarship/gSE4ec/8OK159/arena-chapel__ap-art__history.pdf
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369825204_3_THE_OBLIQUE_PARALLEL_PERSPECTIVE_OF_ASIAN_ART
  33. https://jfa.arch.metu.edu.tr/uploads/docs/sayilar/sayi-16-1-2/45-57.pdf
  34. https://smarthistory.org/linear-perspective-brunelleschis-experiment/
  35. https://www.essentialvermeer.com/technique/perspective/history.html
  36. https://smarthistory.org/albertis-revolution-in-painting/
  37. https://smarthistory.org/masaccio-holy-trinity/
  38. https://smarthistory.org/piero-della-francescas-flagellation-of-christ/
  39. https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/jan-van-eyck-the-arnolfini-portrait
  40. https://news.cnrs.fr/articles/van-eyck-was-a-precursor-of-augmented-reality
  41. https://www.virtualartacademy.com/atmospheric-perspective/
  42. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10147
  43. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/south-east-se-asia/japan-art/a/hokusai-under-the-wave-off-kanagawa-the-great-wave
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4880092/
  45. https://smarthistory.org/cubism-and-multiple-perspectives/
  46. https://smarthistory.org/surrealist-techniques-subversive-realism/
  47. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/student-resource/exam-help/perspective
  48. https://www.hoodedutilitarian.com/2010/12/through-space-through-time-four-dimensional-perspective-and-the-comics-by-eric-berlatsky/
  49. https://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/ijac201210202.pdf
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386161452_The_Evolution_of_Digital_Art_From_Early_Experiments_to_Contemporary_Practices
  51. https://www.tourboxtech.com/en/news/how-to-draw-perspective.html
  52. https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/ramesh/teaching/course/48-175/lectures/11.CentralProjections.pdf
  53. https://www.scratchapixel.com/lessons/3d-basic-rendering/perspective-and-orthographic-projection-matrix/building-basic-perspective-projection-matrix.html
  54. https://www.math.utah.edu/~treiberg/Perspect/Perspect.htm
  55. https://www.cse.unr.edu/~bebis/CS791E/Notes/PerspectiveProjection.pdf
  56. https://gabrielgambetta.com/computer-graphics-from-scratch/09-perspective-projection.html
  57. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-graphics/difference-between-parallel-and-perspective-projection-in-computer-graphics/
  58. https://zenodo.org/records/15307538/files/TAFPS%25200835.pdf?download=1
  59. https://web.njit.edu/~kappraff/Module1.pdf
  60. https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse457/10sp/lectures/projections.pdf
  61. https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jepson/csc420/notes/imageProjection.pdf
  62. https://www.cs.jhu.edu/~ayuille/JHUcourses/VisionAsBayesianInference2020/17/ManhattanWorld.pdf
  63. https://www.handprint.com/HP/WCL/perspect2.html
  64. https://cs.gmu.edu/~zduric/cs482/Slides/Perspective.pdf
  65. https://wardnasse.org/perspective-guide/
  66. https://www.art-is-fun.com/photorealist-painting-techniques-and-methods
  67. https://www.italianrenaissance.org/a-closer-look-leonardo-da-vincis-last-supper/
  68. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/photorealism/
  69. https://www.famsf.org/stories/diebenkorn-and-the-aerial-view
  70. https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/hans-holbein-the-younger-the-ambassadors
  71. https://wardnasse.org/perspective-practice/
  72. https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Coordinate-Systems
  73. https://www.songho.ca/opengl/gl_projectionmatrix.html
  74. https://help.autodesk.com/view/ACD/2024/ENU/?guid=GUID-1D7A6607-62B0-4DA4-B733-BC9876446469
  75. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15502724.2017.1404918
  76. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-021-00658-8
  77. https://workforce.libretexts.org/Courses/Sacramento_City_College/Blueprint_Reading_and_Technical_Sketching_%28Gentry%29/01%253A_Introduction_to_Blueprints_and_Technical_Sketches/1.02%253A_Types_drawings
  78. https://www.wired.com/2010/07/inception-visual-effects/
  79. https://autoenhance.ai/features/perspective-correction
  80. https://www.pixelshouters.com/perspective-correction/
  81. https://drawabox.com/lesson/1/10/distortion
  82. https://www.opticsforhire.com/blog/types-of-projections-in-wide-angle-lenses-part-1/
  83. https://aaronhertzmann.com/2022/02/28/how-does-perspective-work.html
  84. http://generativeart.com/on/cic/papersGA2003/b02.htm
  85. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.166.3909.1174
  86. https://isle.hanover.edu/Ch07DepthSize/Ch07Ponzo.html
  87. https://www.artistic-designers.com/common-mistakes-in-perspective/
  88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43472830
  89. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/133862/1/133862.pdf
  90. https://www.technostructacademy.com/blog/isometric-projection/
  91. https://eng.libretexts.org/Courses/Illinois_Institute_of_Technology/Introduction_to_Engineering_Drawing_and_Design/03%253A_Module_C_-__Auxiliary_views_section_views_isometric_and_oblique_projections/3.04%253A_Oblique_projections
  92. https://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/Files/17/41-50Cristescu.pdf
  93. https://orthodoxartsjournal.org/designing-icons-pt-8-perspective-systems-in-icons/
  94. https://duchessofdisneyland.com/tips-trivia/forced-perspective/
  95. https://pikuma.com/blog/isometric-projection-in-games
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.