Hubbry Logo
Computer artComputer artMain
Open search
Computer art
Community hub
Computer art
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Computer art
Computer art
Computer art
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Computer art is art in which computers play a role in the production or display of the artwork. Such art can be an image, sound, animation, video, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, video game, website, algorithm, performance or gallery installation. Many traditional disciplines are now integrating digital technologies and, as a result, the lines between traditional works of art and new media works created using computers has been blurred. For instance, an artist may combine traditional painting with algorithm art and other digital techniques. As a result, defining computer art by its end product can thus be difficult. Computer art is bound to change over time since changes in technology and software directly affect what is possible.

Origin of the term

[edit]

On the title page of the magazine Computers and Automation, January 1963, Edmund Berkeley published a picture by Efraim Arazi from 1962, coining for it the term "computer art." This picture inspired him to initiate the first Computer Art Contest in 1963. The annual contest was a key point in the development of computer art up to the year 1973.[1][2]

History

[edit]
Further information: Mathematics and art
Desmond Paul Henry, picture by Drawing Machine 1, c. 1962

The precursor of computer art dates back to 1956–1958, with the generation of what is probably the first image of a human being on a computer screen, a (George Petty-inspired)[3] pin-up girl at a SAGE air defense installation.[4] Desmond Paul Henry created his first electromechanical Henry Drawing Machine in 1961, using an adapted analogue Bombsight Computer. His drawing machine-generated artwork was shown at the Reid Gallery in London in 1962 after his traditional, non-machine artwork won him the privilege of a one-man exhibition there. It was artist L.S.Lowry who encouraged Henry to include examples of his machine-generated art in the Reid Gallery exhibition. .[5][6]

By the mid-1960s, most individuals involved in the creation of computer art were in fact engineers and scientists because they had access to the only computing resources available at university scientific research labs. Many artists tentatively began to explore the emerging computing technology for use as a creative tool. In the summer of 1962, A. Michael Noll programmed a digital computer at Bell Telephone Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey to generate visual patterns solely for artistic purposes.[7] His later computer-generated patterns simulated paintings by Piet Mondrian and Bridget Riley and became classics.[8] Noll also used the patterns to investigate aesthetic preferences in the mid-1960s.

The two early exhibitions of computer art were held in 1965: Generative Computergrafik, February 1965, at the Technische Hochschule in Stuttgart, Germany, and Computer-Generated Pictures, April 1965, at the Howard Wise Gallery in New York. The Stuttgart exhibit featured work by Georg Nees; the New York exhibit featured works by Bela Julesz and A. Michael Noll and was reviewed as art by The New York Times.[9] A third exhibition was put up in November 1965 at Galerie Wendelin Niedlich in Stuttgart, Germany, showing works by Frieder Nake and Georg Nees. Analogue computer art by Maughan Mason along with digital computer art by Noll were exhibited at the AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference in Las Vegas toward the end of 1965.

In 1968, the Institute of Contemporary Arts (ICA) in London hosted one of the most influential early exhibitions of computer art called Cybernetic Serendipity. The exhibition, curated by Jasia Reichardt, included many of those often regarded as the first digital artists, Nam June Paik, Frieder Nake, Leslie Mezei, Georg Nees, A. Michael Noll, John Whitney, and Charles Csuri.[10] One year later, the Computer Arts Society was founded, also in London.[11]

At the time of the opening of Cybernetic Serendipity, in August 1968, a symposium was held in Zagreb, Yugoslavia, under the title "Computers and visual research".[12] It took up the European artists movement of New Tendencies that had led to three exhibitions (in 1961, 63, and 65) in Zagreb of concrete, kinetic, and constructive art as well as op art and conceptual art. New Tendencies changed its name to "Tendencies" and continued with more symposia, exhibitions, a competition, and an international journal (bit international) until 1973.

A computer-generated fractal landscape

Katherine Nash and Richard Williams published Computer Program for Artists: ART 1 in 1970.[13]

Xerox Corporation's Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) designed the first Graphical User Interface (GUI) in the 1970s. The first Macintosh computer was released in 1984; since then the GUI became popular. Many graphic designers quickly accepted its capacity as a creative tool.

Andy Warhol created digital art using an Amiga when the computer was publicly introduced at the Lincoln Center, New York in July 1985. An image of Debbie Harry was captured in monochrome from a video camera and digitized into a graphics program called ProPaint. Warhol manipulated the image adding colour by using flood fills.[14][15]

Output devices

[edit]

Formerly, technology restricted output and print results. Early machines used pen-and-ink plotters to produce basic hard copy.

In the early 1960s, the Stromberg Carlson SC-4020 microfilm printer was used at Bell Telephone Laboratories as a plotter to produce digital computer art and animation on 35-mm microfilm. Still images were drawn on the face plate of the cathode ray tube and automatically photographed. A series of still images were drawn to create a computer-animated movie, early on a roll of 35-mm film and then on 16-mm film as a 16-mm camera was later added to the SC-4020 printer.

In the 1970s, the dot matrix printer (which uses a print head hitting an ink ribbon somewhat like a typewriter) was used to reproduce varied fonts and arbitrary graphics. The first animations were created by plotting all still frames sequentially on a stack of paper, with motion transfer to 16-mm film for projection. During the 1970s and 1980s, dot matrix printers were used to produce most visual output while microfilm plotters were used for most early animation.[8]

In 1976, the inkjet printer was invented with the increase in the use of personal computers. The inkjet printer is now the cheapest and most versatile option for everyday digital color output. Raster Image Processing (RIP) is typically built into the printer or supplied as a software package for the computer; it is required to achieve the highest quality output. Basic inkjet devices do not feature RIP. Instead, they rely on graphic software to rasterize images. The laser printer, though more expensive than the inkjet, is another affordable output device available today.[10]

Graphic software

[edit]

Adobe Systems, founded in 1982, developed the PostScript language and digital fonts, making drawing, painting, and image manipulation software popular. Adobe Illustrator, a vector drawing program based on the Bézier curve introduced in 1987 and Adobe Photoshop, written by brothers Thomas and John Knoll in 1990 were developed for use on MacIntosh computers,[16] and compiled for DOS/Windows platforms by 1993.

Robot painting

[edit]
A robotic brush head painting on a canvas

A robot painting is an artwork painted by a robot. Raymond Auger's Painting Machine, made in 1962, was one of the first robotic painters [17] as was AARON, an artificial intelligence/artist developed by Harold Cohen beginning in the late 1960s.[18] Joseph Nechvatal began making large computer-robotic paintings in 1986. Artist Ken Goldberg created an 11' x 11' painting machine in 1992 and German artist Matthias Groebel also built his own robotic painting machine in the early 1990s.[19]

Neural style transfer

[edit]
Main article: Neural style transfer
A photo of Jimmy Wales rendered in the style of The Scream using neural style transfer

Non-photorealistic rendering (using computers to automatically transform images into stylized art) has been a subject of research since the 1990s. Around 2015, neural style transfer using convolutional neural networks to transfer the style of an artwork onto a photograph or other target image became feasible.[20] One method of style transfer involves using a framework such as VGG or ResNet to break the artwork style down into statistics about visual features. The target photograph is subsequently modified to match those statistics.[21] Notable applications include Prisma,[22] Facebook Caffe2Go style transfer,[23] MIT's Nightmare Machine,[24] and DeepArt.[25]

AI generated art

[edit]

With the rise of AI image generators such as DALL-E 2, Flux, Midjourney, and others, there is area of AI generated art. There is much controversy and debate over whether AI generated art is actual art.[26]

See also

[edit]
Further information: Category:Computer art

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Computer art

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Computer art is any artistic work in which computers play a central role in the conception, production, or display of the output, including visual images, sounds, animations, videos, interactive installations, and generative systems. This form of art leverages computational processes, such as algorithms and programming, to create outputs that often explore themes of , , and human-machine interaction, distinguishing it from traditional media by enabling precision, randomness, and real-time dynamism. Emerging primarily in the mid-1960s, computer art arose from collaborations between artists, engineers, and researchers at institutions like and amid advancements in hardware such as plotters and early programming languages like . The field's foundational decade (1965–1975) saw the production of algorithmic drawings, computer-generated films, and cybernetic sculptures, often output via pen plotters or film recorders due to limited display technologies. Pioneering exhibitions, such as Generative Computergrafik in (1965) by Georg Nees and Cybernetic Serendipity in (1968) curated by Jasia Reichardt, brought computer-generated works to public attention, showcasing graphics, interactive systems, and early . Key figures included John Whitney Sr., whose analog-computer films like Catalog (1961) prefigured digital techniques, and Frieder Nake, whose Hommage à (1965) used algorithms to mimic artistic styles. Other notables were Chuck Csuri with Sine Curve Man (1967), a plotted of a running figure, and Lillian Schwartz, who created video works like Pixillation (1970) at . By the , economic and technological progress democratized access to computers, allowing artists greater independence and leading to broader integration of digital tools in , music, and performance. Institutions like the Howard Wise Gallery in New York hosted early shows, such as Computer-Generated Pictures (), featuring works by Béla Julesz and A. Michael Noll that demonstrated computers' capacity for and abstraction. Despite initial skepticism from the —viewing it as mechanistic—computer art influenced subsequent movements, including by and by Harold Cohen with his software in the 1970s. Today, it encompasses diverse practices from AI-driven creations to , underscoring the computer's evolution as both tool and medium for artistic innovation.

Definition and Origins

Definition

Computer art encompasses artistic works created or generated through computational processes, where algorithms, software, and hardware are employed to produce visual, auditory, or interactive outputs. This form of art leverages the computer's capacity for automated processing to explore aesthetic possibilities that extend beyond traditional manual techniques, often resulting in outputs such as images, , animations, or interactive installations. Central to computer art are characteristics like , where algorithms execute repetitive or complex tasks independently; , introducing variability through probabilistic elements; , enabling the refinement of forms through successive computations; and human-computer collaboration, in which the artist designs parameters while the machine contributes generative elements. Representative examples include drawings, produced by mechanical pens guided by code to create intricate patterns, and early generative visuals, such as algorithmic abstractions that evolve dynamically from initial inputs. Unlike broader digital art, which may use computers merely as tools for editing or rendering manual creations, computer art positions the machine as an active creative agent, particularly through algorithmic generation that can produce novel outcomes unpredictable by the artist alone. This distinction underscores the emphasis on computational agency in shaping the artwork's form and content. The emergence of computer art ties to post-World War II advancements in computational aesthetics, reflecting a growing integration of technology into creative expression amid rapid developments in digital machinery.

Origin of the Term

The term "computer art" emerged in the early 1960s amid the initial experiments with digital computers for creative output, marking a shift from purely technical applications to artistic expression. The first public exhibitions featuring such works occurred in 1965, including Georg Nees's Computergrafik at the Studiengalerie der Technische Hochschule in Stuttgart, Germany, which showcased algorithmically generated graphics as art rather than mere technical demonstrations. This event, followed by a similar showing of A. Michael Noll's work at the Howard Wise Gallery in New York, introduced the concept to broader audiences, though early nomenclature often blended "computer graphics" with artistic intent. Influences from and shaped the terminology, emphasizing feedback loops and machine-human interactions as foundational to the field. The 1968 exhibition Cybernetic Serendipity: The Computer and the Arts, curated by Jasia Reichardt at London's , played a pivotal role in popularizing "computer art" as a distinct category, explicitly framing it as creative activity aided or produced by computers, often bearing a recognizable "computer signature" in its precision and patterns. The accompanying catalogue reinforced this by documenting works across , , and , drawing on cybernetic principles to highlight the computer's role in serendipitous creation. Early distinctions arose between "computer-generated art," which stressed the machine's autonomous output, and "computer art," which encompassed the artist's conceptual involvement in programming and process as the medium itself. Pioneers like Frieder Nake, in his writings, defined computer art as inherently algorithmic, rooted in theories from but realized through digital tools, prioritizing the idea and potential for infinite variations over fixed objects. Similarly, Nees's 1969 dissertation Generative Computergraphik philosophically positioned the term within information aesthetics, viewing the computer as a generative partner in aesthetic exploration. By the , "computer art" had evolved into the standard designation, reflecting the growing accessibility of computing hardware and software beyond elite institutions, which democratized its practice and distanced it from earlier, more niche labels like "electronic graphics" used in oscilloscope-based experiments. This shift underscored the field's maturation from experimental novelty to a recognized artistic domain.

Historical Development

Early Foundations (1950s-1960s)

The early foundations of computer art emerged in the 1950s and 1960s through pioneering experiments by scientists and engineers who leveraged emerging computational power to generate visual forms, challenging traditional notions of artistic creation. A. Michael Noll, working at Bell Telephone Laboratories in New Jersey, produced some of the first digital artworks in the summer of 1962 using an IBM 7090 mainframe computer programmed in FORTRAN; these included abstract patterns plotted via a Gerber plotter, such as Gaussian quadratic distributions that explored probabilistic distributions visually. Noll's work from 1962 to 1965 emphasized the computer's ability to mimic and extend human perceptual experiments, including variations on op-art patterns inspired by Bridget Riley. In , Georg Nees and Frieder Nake independently advanced algorithmic drawing during the same period, influenced by information aesthetics theorist Max Bense. Nees, an engineer at , created his initial computer-generated graphics in 1964 using the Siemens 2002 computer and a Zuse Graphomat Z64 , producing series like Schotter (1968, based on earlier experiments) that simulated random scattering of geometric shapes to evoke gravel textures through processes. Nake, a at the , began his algorithmic works in 1963 on a Siemens computer, generating drawings like Hommage à (1965) that translated geometric rules into plotted outputs, emphasizing the procedural nature of art. These efforts represented a shift from manual to programmed creation, with mainframe computers and line plotters serving as core tools for outputting abstract, non-representational forms. A. Michael Noll, Georg Nees, and Frieder Nake are often referred to as the "3N" trio of pioneering figures in early computer art. In the United States, another key pioneer was Charles Csuri, often called the father of digital art and computer animation, who created his first computer-generated works in 1963–1964. Artistic motivations during this era centered on harnessing the machine's precision and capacity for controlled chance to counter the subjective improvisation of , which dominated post-World War II art. Pioneers like Noll and Nees viewed computers as tools for objectivity and repeatability, using pseudo-random number generators to introduce variability—such as in Noll's patterns or Nees's probabilistic displacements—while maintaining geometric rigor, thus exploring "machine aesthetics" as a new paradigm of creativity. This approach responded to 's emphasis on emotional spontaneity by prioritizing algorithmic infused with computational , fostering patterns that revealed underlying orders in chaos. Milestone events solidified these foundations: Nees held the world's first solo exhibition of computer-generated art, Computergrafik, from February 5 to 19, 1965, at the Studiengalerie of the Technical University in , displaying 50 plotter drawings. Later that year, from November 5 to 20, Nake and Nees co-exhibited at Galerie Wendelin Niedlich in , marking the third public showing of such work globally. The 1968 Cybernetic Serendipity exhibition at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in , curated by Jasia Reichardt, became the first major international showcase, featuring contributions from Noll, Nees, Nake, and others alongside cybernetic sculptures and films, drawing over 54,000 visitors and broadening awareness of computer art's potential.

Growth and Diversification (1970s-1990s)

The 1970s marked a pivotal expansion in computer art through institutional frameworks that fostered collaboration among artists, scientists, and technologists. The Computer Arts Society (CAS), founded in 1968 by Alan Sutcliffe, George Mallen, and John Lansdown, became a key hub for promoting creative computing in the UK, organizing its first major exhibition, Event One, at the Royal College of Art in 1969 and continuing to support digital arts initiatives throughout the decade. Similarly, the Association for Computing Machinery's Special Interest Group on Graphics () held its inaugural annual conference in 1974 in , bringing together over 600 participants to showcase advancements in and interactive techniques, which rapidly grew into a cornerstone event for the field. These milestones provided platforms for knowledge exchange, exhibitions, and funding, shifting computer art from isolated experiments to a recognized discipline with growing academic and professional support. Prominent artists leveraged emerging algorithms to produce groundbreaking works that explored autonomy and . Harold Cohen introduced in 1973, an early AI program designed to generate autonomous line drawings and paintings without direct human intervention during execution, evolving over decades to produce thousands of original images that challenged traditional notions of artistic creation. Concurrently, Manfred Mohr began incorporating the cube as a foundational algorithmic structure in 1973, using its 12 edges as an "" to generate complex linear compositions through computational rules, as seen in his Cubic Limit series (1973–1975), which visualized multidimensional transformations in plotter-drawn works. These innovations highlighted the potential of software to not only replicate but also originate artistic forms, influencing subsequent generations of . Technological advancements in the late 1970s and 1980s democratized access to computer art, enabling broader experimentation. The release of the in 1977 introduced affordable color graphics capabilities to personal computing, facilitating vector-based and for individual artists and hobbyists who previously relied on institutional mainframes. This shift culminated in cultural milestones like the 1982 film , directed by , which featured approximately 15–20 minutes of pioneering (CGI) to depict a digital world, marking the first extensive integration of CGI into a feature-length production and inspiring visual artists to explore synthetic environments. The period also saw diversification into multimedia and interactive forms, alongside philosophical debates on creativity. Institutions like the Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique/Musique (IRCAM), founded in 1977 by Pierre Boulez in Paris, integrated computer music with visual arts through collaborative tools for real-time sound synthesis and performance, influencing hybrid works that blended auditory and visual computation. Myron Krueger's Videoplace system, developed from 1974 into the 1990s, pioneered interactive installations where participants' movements were captured via video and responded to by computer-generated graphics in real time, creating "artificial reality" environments that emphasized human-computer symbiosis. Cohen's AARON, in particular, sparked ongoing discussions about authorship, as critics questioned whether machine-generated outputs could be deemed original art or merely extensions of the programmer's intent, a debate that persisted through exhibitions and scholarly analyses in the 1980s and 1990s. These developments expanded computer art's scope, incorporating plotter-based outputs alongside emerging digital interactivity.

Contemporary Evolution (2000s-Present)

The advent of the and open-source tools profoundly democratized computer art in the 2000s, enabling broader participation in generative and interactive practices. , a programming language and environment developed by and Ben Fry at in 2001, was designed to facilitate and teach programming fundamentals through an accessible sketchbook-like interface, fostering a community of artists and designers worldwide. Building on this foundation, p5.js, a JavaScript library launched in 2013 by Lauren Lee McCarthy, Patricia Conrad, and Ally Wong under the Processing Foundation, extended these capabilities to web browsers, allowing for easy creation of without specialized software installations and promoting inclusivity in . The 2021 NFT boom further intertwined computer art with blockchain technology, as non-fungible tokens enabled artists to authenticate and monetize digital works, with global NFT sales reaching $24.9 billion that year, marking a pivotal shift toward decentralized ownership in the field. Global movements amplified computer art's reach during the 2010s, with exhibitions like in , —ongoing since 1979—reaching new heights by showcasing interdisciplinary works at the intersection of art, technology, and society, including large-scale installations on themes like repair and human-robot interaction. Prominent artists such as exemplified this evolution, employing and vast datasets to create immersive data visualizations, such as AI-driven sculptures that transform architectural spaces into dynamic, responsive environments, as seen in his public installations blending media arts with intelligence. These initiatives highlighted computer art's role in global discourse, bridging cultural boundaries through technology-driven narratives. By 2025, computer art trends increasingly integrated (VR) and (AR) for immersive, multisensory experiences, with artists leveraging mixed reality to merge physical and digital realms, as evidenced by rising adoption in exhibitions and a projected 75% of surveyed creators planning VR/AR use. Recent advancements include deeper AI-human collaborations, enabling personalized and democratized creative processes, alongside platforms like Zero 10 at Miami Beach (November 2025), which center digital media, AI, and robotics in contemporary discourse. Responses to climate challenges emerged prominently through data-driven works, such as those by Jill Pelto, who incorporates scientific metrics like glacier mass loss and sea-level rise into watercolor paintings to visualize environmental crises. Post-2020, discussions on AI in computer art surged, addressing issues like , in generative outputs, and the authenticity of machine-created works, with scholarly analyses emphasizing the need for transparency and in creative AI applications. Despite these advancements, challenges persist, particularly in accessibility gaps within the Global South, where infrastructure deficits—such as unreliable and limited device access—hinder participation in digital art creation and , exacerbating inequalities in technological adoption. Preservation of digital computer art also poses significant hurdles, including technological and the need for ongoing format migration to prevent loss, as digital files require emulation of outdated hardware and software to remain interpretable over time.

Core Technologies

Output Devices and Hardware

In the early days of computer art during the , output devices were limited to specialized hardware that translated digital instructions into visual forms, primarily through vector-based plotting and display technologies. Plotters, such as the CalComp 565 drum plotter introduced in the late 1950s and widely used by the , enabled the creation of precise line drawings on paper or film by mechanically guiding a pen along vector paths generated by computers like the IBM 7094. These devices were essential for manifesting algorithmic designs into tangible artworks, often requiring hours to complete a single piece due to their sequential operation. Cathode-ray tube (CRT) displays, adapted from oscilloscopes and systems, served as the primary visual output for real-time previews and interactive experimentation; for instance, vector CRTs in systems like the Lincoln TX-2 allowed artists to draw lines directly with light pens, influencing pioneers such as Ivan Sutherland's in 1963. The evolution of output hardware in subsequent decades expanded the possibilities for computer art by introducing raster-based printing and multidimensional fabrication. Inkjet printers, commercialized in the late 1970s and gaining prominence in the through models like the HP ThinkJet (1984), allowed for the reproduction of digital images with color and grayscale tones, enabling artists to output complex pixel-based compositions beyond simple vectors. Laser printers, introduced in 1984 by with the LaserJet, further accelerated this shift by offering high-resolution toner-based printing (up to 300 dpi initially), which supported the diversification of computer art into photorealistic and abstract raster works during the and . By the 2010s, 3D printers emerged as a transformative tool for sculptural output, with affordable desktop models like those from enabling artists to materialize generative in materials such as PLA plastic, as seen in installations exploring form and texture. Robotic arms, such as those employed by artist Patrick Tresset in his drawing machines like "Paul" (2011), extended hardware capabilities into performative automation, where computer-controlled manipulators replicate human-like mark-making on . Interactive hardware has become integral to contemporary computer art, facilitating real-time rendering and audience engagement through advanced processing and sensing technologies. Touchscreens, integrated into displays since the but widespread by the 2000s via capacitive models like those in iPads, allow direct manipulation of digital canvases, enhancing the immediacy of artistic creation and interaction. Sensors, including motion trackers and ultrasonic proximity detectors, capture environmental inputs to drive dynamic outputs, while graphics processing units (GPUs) from NVIDIA's series enable high-frame-rate rendering essential for immersive installations. As of 2023, advanced GPUs like the 40-series with real-time ray tracing and AI acceleration support complex generative art and installations. The aesthetic impact of these devices is profoundly influenced by resolution and ; for example, higher resolutions (e.g., 4K at 3840x2160 pixels) and 10-bit s (over 1 billion colors) preserve subtle gradients and spatial depth, reducing banding artifacts that can disrupt visual harmony in digital artworks. Early output systems faced significant limitations, particularly bandwidth constraints that restricted data transfer rates and thus the complexity of rendered art. In setups, frame buffers for CRTs required substantial bandwidth—often limited to 1-10 MHz—for screen refreshes, constraining artists to low-resolution displays and simple geometries to avoid or overload. Modern innovations, such as haptic feedback devices, address these by adding tactile dimensions to immersive experiences; for instance, vibrotactile gloves and force-feedback arms simulate textures and resistance, allowing users to "feel" virtual sculptures in computer art installations.

Graphic Software and Algorithms

The creation of computer art relies heavily on specialized graphic software and algorithms that enable artists to generate visual forms through code. Early foundational languages such as and were instrumental in plotting geometric patterns and simple graphics, laying the groundwork for computational aesthetics in the . For instance, artist John Whitney utilized in 1966 to produce his first digital computer-generated short film, leveraging the language's plotting capabilities to create abstract animations. Similarly, Georg Nees developed graphics extensions G1, G2, and G3 in , which included commands for pen control and to produce generative plots exhibited as early computer art in 1965. A pivotal educational tool emerged with the Logo programming language in 1967, designed by Seymour Papert, Wally Feurzeig, and Cynthia Solomon to facilitate graphics through intuitive commands. Logo introduced turtle graphics, where a virtual "turtle" executes movement instructions like forward, backward, and turn to draw shapes on screen, democratizing access to computational drawing for beginners and artists alike. In modern contexts, the Adobe Suite has evolved as a cornerstone for raster-based computer art, with Photoshop's initial release in 1990 providing tools for pixel-level manipulation, layering, and color correction that transformed digital image creation. Open-source alternatives like , introduced as a cross-platform in 1992, support by defining primitives such as vertices and shaders, enabling artists to model complex scenes programmatically. Procedural generation techniques further expanded with L-systems, or Lindenmayer systems, developed by Aristid Lindenmayer in 1968 and adapted for in the ; these use parallel string-rewriting rules to simulate organic forms like branching structures, as detailed in academic implementations for visual simulation. Core algorithms underpin these tools by providing mechanisms for variation and complexity. Pseudo-random number generation, essential for introducing unpredictability in patterns, often employs linear congruential generators (LCGs), which compute sequences via the recurrence relation: Xn+1=(aXn+c)mod  mX_{n+1} = (a X_n + c) \mod m where XnX_n is the current value, aa is the multiplier, cc the increment, and mm the modulus; this method, originating from D.H. Lehmer's work, has been analyzed for its graphical applications in producing non-repeating textures. algorithms, such as the iteration, generate intricate self-similar visuals by repeatedly applying: zn+1=zn2+cz_{n+1} = z_n^2 + c starting from z0=0z_0 = 0, where cc is a complex parameter; points where the sequence remains bounded form the set, a technique formalized by Benoit Mandelbrot in 1980 and widely used in artistic explorations of infinity. The development workflow in computer art typically progresses from conceptual coding to iterative output refinement, emphasizing aesthetic debugging over mere functionality. Artists write scripts in environments like integrated development environments (IDEs), test renders to evaluate visual harmony, and adjust parameters—such as scaling factors or iteration depths—to align emergent forms with intended expressiveness, often using bidirectional tools that link code edits directly to previews for real-time aesthetic feedback. This process, as studied in creative coding practices, treats debugging as an artistic refinement, where errors reveal unexpected beauties or guide parameter tweaks for desired outcomes.

Artistic Techniques

Algorithmic and Generative Art

Algorithmic art refers to the creation of visual works through the execution of predefined algorithms, where the output strictly follows deterministic rules programmed by the artist, emphasizing precision and reproducibility. A seminal example is A. Michael Noll's Gaussian-Quadratic (1963), produced at Bell Laboratories, which employed Gaussian probability distributions to generate abstract line patterns, demonstrating how computers could transform mathematical functions into aesthetic forms. In contrast, extends this foundation by incorporating elements of variability, such as randomness or iterative processes, to produce outcomes that evolve beyond strict , often yielding unpredictable yet constrained results that highlight and chance. Early historical examples illustrate the transition from analog to digital rule-based systems. In the , Vera Molnár pioneered algorithmic plotting with her Interruptions series (1968–1969), where she used to draw grids of straight lines subjected to random rotations and interruptions, creating dense, complex compositions that explored systematic variation within geometric constraints. Similarly, John Whitney's Permutations (1968) served as an analog precursor to digital methods, utilizing a custom-built to generate rhythmic sequences of geometric forms through parametric permutations, foreshadowing software-driven explorations of modular repetition. Key methods in algorithmic and generative art include cellular automata and evolutionary algorithms, which enable the simulation of complex behaviors from simple rules. Cellular automata, such as John Horton Conway's Game of Life (1970), operate on a grid where cells evolve according to four basic rules—underpopulation, survival, overpopulation, and reproduction—producing emergent patterns like gliders and oscillators that artists adapt for visual compositions. Evolutionary algorithms, particularly , optimize artistic forms by mimicking : populations of candidate designs (e.g., vector primitives or procedural patterns) undergo , crossover, and selection based on fitness criteria like aesthetic harmony, iteratively refining outputs toward novel configurations. These techniques underscore artistic outcomes centered on unpredictability bounded by algorithmic constraints, fostering a dialogue between control and emergence. A notable case is Paul Brown's evolutionary systems from the 1970s onward, where he employed L-systems and genetic processes to generate propagating drawings; starting from simple seed forms, these evolve through rule iterations into intricate, self-organizing structures, as seen in his works from the 1980s, which reveal the computer's capacity for autonomous creativity. Such approaches prioritize the process's revelation of hidden complexities, transforming static rules into dynamic, evolving aesthetics.

Robot Painting

Robot painting emerged in the 1970s through pioneering experiments by artist and programmer Harold Cohen, who developed , a software system that directed plotters to generate line drawings and paintings autonomously. Initially focused on black-and-white sketches, evolved to incorporate color and more complex compositions by the 1990s, marking one of the earliest instances of computational systems producing physical artwork. This foundational work laid the groundwork for integrating into artistic creation, transitioning from simple plotting devices to more sophisticated mechanical systems. In the 2010s, advancements in industrial robotics expanded these early efforts, with artists employing programmable arms such as models in immersive installations to execute precise yet expressive movements. For instance, robots have been adapted for tasks like light plotting and sculptural , leveraging their multi-axis flexibility to mimic fluid artistic gestures on large-scale canvases. These systems build on general output hardware principles, such as articulated arms with end-effectors for tool manipulation, to enable tangible artistic production. Central to robot painting are techniques involving path-planning algorithms that decompose images into sequences of , optimizing trajectories for coverage and aesthetic flow. These algorithms often employ iterative methods to simulate realistic painting processes, starting with broad strokes and refining to finer details, while incorporating sensor feedback—such as vision systems or sensors—to adapt to surface irregularities and adjust in real time. A notable example is artist Sougwen Chung's Drawing Operations Unit (DOUG), introduced in 2015, where a equipped with a collaborates with the human by mirroring and extending gestures captured via motion tracking. This setup uses real-time path planning to generate synchronized marks, blending mechanical execution with improvisational input. Artistically, robot painting explores as a performative , where machines augment rather than replace , often through live interactions that highlight the interplay of control and spontaneity. Chung's series exemplifies this by fostering mutual influence, with the robot's responses prompting the artist's adjustments, creating layered works that evolve dynamically. A recurring theme is the deliberate embrace of imperfection within machine precision, where programmed errors or material inconsistencies—such as uneven application—introduce organic qualities, challenging notions of flawless and infusing robotic output with human-like expressiveness. By , has advanced to multi-arm configurations, enabling coordinated efforts among several robotic units to tackle complex compositions simultaneously, as seen in installations where multiple arms layer colors or textures in parallel. Integration of AI for real-time further enhances these systems, allowing adaptive responses to environmental cues or performer inputs without relying on pre-scripted paths, thus expanding the scope of kinetic artistry.

Neural Style Transfer and AI-Generated Art

Neural style transfer emerged as a pioneering technique in computer art, leveraging convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to separate and recombine the content of one with the stylistic elements of another. Introduced by Leon A. Gatys, Alexander S. Ecker, and Matthias Bethge in 2015, the algorithm optimizes a generated to minimize a combined that balances content preservation from a target and style extraction from a reference artwork, typically using pre-trained CNNs like VGG-19 for feature representation. The core objective is formulated as: Ltotal=αLcontent+βLstyleL_{\text{total}} = \alpha L_{\text{content}} + \beta L_{\text{style}} where LcontentL_{\text{content}} measures squared differences in feature maps between the generated and content images, LstyleL_{\text{style}} captures Gram matrix correlations of activations to mimic texture and patterns, and α\alpha, β\beta are weighting hyperparameters. This method enabled artists to create hybrid visuals, such as applying Van Gogh's brushstrokes to photographs, democratizing stylistic experimentation without manual rendering. The evolution of AI-generated art advanced significantly with generative adversarial networks (GANs), introduced by and colleagues in 2014, which pit a generator against a discriminator in a game to produce realistic synthetic images from inputs. Building on this, (2019) by Tero Karras et al. refined GAN architectures by incorporating style-based generators that inject adaptive at multiple scales, yielding high-fidelity outputs like photorealistic faces with fine-grained control over attributes such as age or expression. These frameworks shifted computer art from rule-based generation toward data-driven synthesis, training on vast datasets to emulate artistic diversity. Text-to-image models further expanded AI's creative scope, allowing natural language prompts to guide generation. OpenAI's , released in 2021, employed a transformer-based to autoregressively model discrete tokens conditioned on text, producing surreal and conceptual artworks from descriptions like "an armchair in the shape of an avocado." , launched in 2022 as a Discord-accessible tool, utilized diffusion processes within a GAN-like framework to generate intricate illustrations and landscapes from textual inputs, fostering collaborative art communities. Prominent examples highlight AI art's cultural integration. In 2018, the Obvious collective's "Portrait of Edmond de Belamy," generated via GAN training on 14th-20th century portrait datasets, sold at Christie's for $432,500, marking the first AI artwork to achieve such auction prominence and sparking debates on authorship. Refik Anadol's "Machine Hallucinations" series (ongoing since 2019) employs GANs and autoencoders on architectural image corpora to project immersive, dreamlike visualizations, as seen in installations at MoMA and ARTECHOUSE that transform data into fluid, hallucinatory forms. By 2025, diffusion models had become dominant, with Stability AI's (2022) using denoising to efficiently generate high-resolution images from text prompts, outperforming GANs in diversity and coherence on benchmarks like FID scores. However, ethical concerns persist, particularly biases in training data—often scraped from uncurated web sources like LAION-5B—which can perpetuate racial, gender, and cultural stereotypes in outputs, as evidenced by analyses showing underrepresentation of non-Western artists. Mitigation efforts include dataset auditing and fairness constraints, yet these issues underscore the need for diverse, consented training corpora in AI art production.

Impact and Cultural Significance

Influence on Art Movements

Computer art has profoundly shaped , particularly through the emergence of in the , where artists leveraged the to create interactive, process-oriented works that emphasized digital connectivity and collaboration. For instance, Vuk Ćosić and Olia Lialina utilized hyperlinks and internet glitches in pieces like My Boyfriend Came Back from the War (1996), transforming online platforms into artistic mediums that critiqued digital culture. This influence extended to , where intentional digital errors—rooted in computer-generated imperfections—became a core aesthetic, as seen in experiments that repurposed corrupted data for expressive disruption. Similarly, post-digital aesthetics arose from these foundations, blending analog and digital elements to explore technology's failures and ubiquity, with artists like Marisa Olson coining "post-internet art" in works such as ABE AND MO SING THE BLOGS (2006), which drew on internet-sourced materials to reflect mediated experiences. In broader movements, computer art extended by incorporating algorithms and sensors for dynamic, viewer-responsive installations, evolving static motion into interactive digital systems. Rafael Lozano-Hemmer's Volumetric Solar Equation (2018), for example, uses real-time data from NASA's to simulate solar activity via a volumetric , bridging kinetic traditions with computational visualization. Computer art also contributed to data-driven , as demonstrated in the 1970 Software exhibition curated by Jack Burnham, where pieces like Hans Haacke's Visitor’s Profile employed computers for real-time data processing to interrogate art's societal role. This conceptual shift influenced immersive installations, such as those by the Japanese collective teamLab in the 2010s, whose Black Waves (2016) creates interactive digital seascapes on multi-screen setups, merging traditional East Asian motifs with algorithmic responsiveness to viewer movement. Cross-disciplinary effects are evident in , where computer art integrates via , using algorithms to generate adaptive, data-optimized structures that enhance and . Tools like CAD software enable precise parametric modeling, as in AI-assisted platforms that analyze datasets for efficient spatial forms. In , facilitates innovative prints through computational processes, allowing customizable patterns that embed artistic concepts into apparel. Furthermore, open-source tools like have democratized computer art by providing free access to and , empowering independent creators worldwide through community-driven resources and eliminating financial barriers to high-quality production. Globally, computer art's adoption in non-Western contexts surged in the 2020s, particularly in , where digital collectives leveraged online platforms for cross-border collaborations amid market digitalization. In cities like and , galleries such as Sundaram Tagore and formed hybrid exhibitions using virtual technologies, boosting sales and fostering collectives that integrate local traditions with computational innovation. teamLab exemplifies this reach, with its immersive works exhibited across , influencing regional artists to explore interactive digital ecosystems.

Ethical and Philosophical Debates

One central debate in computer art revolves around authorship, particularly the tension between human and machine contributions to creative output. Harold Cohen's , developed in the 1970s as one of the earliest AI systems for autonomous art generation, exemplifies this issue, with Cohen viewing the program as a co-creator that extended his artistic vision while raising questions about whether the machine's rule-based outputs could claim independent . Critics argue that 's reliance on Cohen's predefined parameters underscores human oversight as essential, yet the program's ability to produce novel drawings without real-time intervention challenges traditional notions of artistic agency. This debate has intensified with post-2010s advancements in generative AI, where law struggles to attribute ownership to AI outputs; for instance, in Andersen v. Stability AI (2023 onward), artists sued over unauthorized use of their works in training data for image generators like , highlighting how AI art blurs lines between derivation and originality. Similarly, the U.S. Office has rejected registrations for purely AI-generated images, such as those from , affirming that human authorship remains a prerequisite for protection. Ethical concerns in computer art further complicate its practice, notably through biases embedded in training datasets that perpetuate societal inequities. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), widely used for AI art since the mid-2010s, often amplify racial underrepresentation; studies show that when trained on imbalanced datasets like those with predominantly white faces, GANs preserve and exacerbate this skew, generating fewer non-white representations and reinforcing stereotypes in outputs. For example, analyses of facial synthesis models reveal diminished diversity in skin tones and features for underrepresented groups, leading to ethical critiques that such tools marginalize non-Western in . Additionally, the environmental toll of GPU-intensive for AI art generation has drawn scrutiny by 2025, with s powering models like those for generative visuals consuming vast energy—equivalent to the annual electricity of small countries—and requiring billions of cubic meters of water for cooling, as projected for global operations by the mid-2020s. A 2025 U.S. Government Accountability Office report estimates that AI could account for up to 20% of electricity by 2030, prompting calls for greener algorithms to mitigate impacts without curbing artistic innovation. Philosophically, computer art intersects with , drawing on Donna Haraway's 1985 Cyborg Manifesto to explore hybrid human-machine identities that dissolve boundaries between creator and tool. Haraway's framework, emphasizing cyborgs as metaphors for blurred dualisms of mind/body and , has influenced digital and bio-art practices where artists integrate AI to reimagine embodiment, as seen in works that fuse algorithmic processes with organic forms to critique anthropocentric . This perspective posits computer art as a endeavor, where technology enables multispecies collaborations that challenge human exceptionalism in . Concurrently, the infinite generativity of AI raises profound questions about , as models capable of producing endless variations from finite inputs undermine traditional concepts of uniqueness; philosophers argue this shifts art from scarce artifacts to boundless processes, potentially eroding the value ascribed to human intent while inviting new interpretations of as emergent rather than authored. Looking ahead, regulatory frameworks like the EU AI Act, adopted in 2024, are reshaping computer art by imposing transparency and risk assessments on general-purpose AI models used in creative tools, potentially requiring disclosures of training data to protect artistic integrity and curb misuse in the sector. This legislation, fully applicable by 2026, aims to foster ethical innovation in high-risk applications, including , though it spares low-risk uses while mandating compliance for EU-based providers. Such measures intersect with debates on versus , as AI tools democratize entry for non-experts but risk entrenching inequalities through dependence on costly and Western-biased datasets, thereby privileging those with technical access over diverse global voices.

References

  1. https://computerhistory.org/blog/technology-and-art/
  2. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/digital-art/
  3. https://americanart.si.edu/blog/computers-and-art
  4. https://www.mat.ucsb.edu/~g.legrady/academic/courses/24f200a/computerart.pdf
  5. https://whitney.org/essays/histories-of-the-digital-now
  6. https://monoskop.org/Computer_art
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344623317_Defining_Computer_Art_Methods_Themes_and_the_Aesthetic_Problematic
  8. https://www.academia.edu/38528933/COMPUTER_ART
  9. https://aesthetics-online.org/page/GautComputer
  10. http://dada.compart-bremen.de/item/exhibition/164
  11. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=3921
  12. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=863
  13. https://compart.uni-bremen.de/content/4-teaching/0-sommer-20/2-think-the-image-generative-art/3-material/paper-2010-nake_paragraphs.pdf
  14. https://direct.mit.edu/leon/article/51/03/277/46498/The-Pioneer-of-Generative-Art-Georg-Nees
  15. https://ethw.org/First-Hand:Early_Digital_Art_At_Bell_Telephone_Laboratories%2C_Inc
  16. https://historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=3979
  17. https://spalterdigital.com/artists/a-michael-noll/
  18. https://www.artsnova.com/Nees_Schotter_Tutorial.html
  19. https://spalterdigital.com/artists/frieder-nake/
  20. http://dada.compart-bremen.de/item/agent/68
  21. https://medium.com/the-link-art-blocks/ab-101-historical-figures-in-generative-art-a-michael-noll-5a23ea78ac41
  22. https://www.charlescsuri.com/bio
  23. https://ethw.org/First-Hand:The_Beginnings_of_Generative_Art
  24. https://www.artpapers.org/art-and-the-thinking-machine-coded-art-enters-the-computer-age-1952-1982/
  25. http://dada.compart-bremen.de/item/exhibition/171
  26. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=1089
  27. https://monoskop.org/Cybernetic_Serendipity
  28. https://www.bcs.org/articles-opinion-and-research/computer-arts-society-celebrates-50-years/
  29. https://ieeecs-media.computer.org/media/marketing/access-articles/50-acm-siggraph-conferences-article.pdf
  30. https://computerhistory.org/blog/harold-cohen-and-aaron-a-40-year-collaboration/
  31. https://www.emohr.com/ManfredMohr_50YearCelebration_TimeLine.html
  32. https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/object/nmah_334638
  33. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jul/05/tron-steven-lisberger-interview
  34. https://dam.org/museum/artists_ui/artists/krueger-myron/
  35. https://outland.art/harold-cohen-aaron/
  36. https://processing.org/overview/
  37. https://p5js.org/
  38. https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/nft-sales-hit-25-billion-2021-growth-shows-signs-slowing-2022-01-10/
  39. https://refikanadol.com/
  40. https://superagi.com/future-of-digital-art-2025-trends-and-top-ai-illustration-tools-to-watch/
  41. https://www.forbes.com/sites/rdaniel-foster/2024/12/23/ai-art-trends-for-2025-the-merging-of-humans-and-machines/
  42. https://www.artbasel.com/stories/zero-10-digital-art-ai-platform-art-basel-miami-beach-2025?lang=en
  43. https://www.jillpelto.com/climate-change-data
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393511482_The_Ethical_Implications_of_AI_in_Creative_Industries_A_Focus_on_AI-Generated_Art
  45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02681102.2022.2068492
  46. https://artsandculture.google.com/story/the-challenges-of-preserving-digital-art/jAWhVzI4SsOmJQ?hl=en
  47. https://sirismm.si.edu/EADpdfs/NMAH.AC.0929.pdf
  48. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/01/the-never-before-told-story-of-the-worlds-first-computer-art-its-a-sexy-dame/267439/
  49. https://www.shapr3d.com/history-of-cad/research-in-the-mid-to-late-1960s
  50. https://newmarketplaza.com/the-beginnings-the-birth-of-inkjet-technology/
  51. https://www.soundoflife.com/blogs/design/how-3d-printing-is-benefitting-the-art-world
  52. https://www.wired.com/story/sketching-robots/
  53. https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/ai-artist-dominic-harris/
  54. https://stevezafeiriou.com/best-sensors-for-interactive-art/
  55. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/news/rtx-40-series-launch/
  56. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.615575/full
  57. https://caseguard.com/articles/what-is-color-depth/
  58. https://ohiostate.pressbooks.pub/graphicshistory/chapter/1-1-early-hardware/
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666998624001728
  60. https://viterbischool.usc.edu/news/2022/05/virtual-textures-i-cant-believe-its-not-wood/
  61. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ph/nyit/masson/history.htm
  62. https://el.media.mit.edu/logo-foundation/what_is_logo/history.html
  63. https://el.media.mit.edu/logo-foundation/what_is_logo/logo_primer.html
  64. https://www.computerhistory.org/makesoftware/exhibit/photoshop/
  65. https://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/ehchua/programming/opengl/CG_BasicsTheory.html
  66. http://www.cs.umd.edu/class/spring2018/cmsc425/Lects/lect11-fractals.pdf
  67. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA177054.pdf
  68. https://gauss.math.yale.edu/fractals/MandelSet/welcome.html
  69. https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3411764.3445682
  70. https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O1193785/gaussian-quadratic-photograph-a-michael-noll/
  71. https://arxiv.org/html/2407.20095v1
  72. https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/vera-molnar-computer-art-dead-1234688785/
  73. https://dam.org/museum/artists_ui/artists/molnar-vera/interruptions/
  74. https://archive.org/details/permutations_201608
  75. https://history.siggraph.org/artwork/john-whitney-permutations/
  76. https://www.artnome.com/news/2020/7/12/the-game-of-life-emergence-in-generative-art
  77. https://brooklynrail.org/2020/09/artseen/The-Game-of-Life-Emergence-in-Generative-Art/
  78. https://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/acadia12_25.content.pdf
  79. https://computer-arts-society.com/exhibitions/paul-brown.html
  80. https://eprints-gro.gold.ac.uk/24888/1/arts-07-00025-v2.pdf
  81. https://history.siggraph.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/1989_Brown_ArtAndTheInformationRevolution.pdf
  82. https://whitney.org/exhibitions/harold-cohen-aaron
  83. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/first-ai-generated-art-dates-back-to-1970s-180983700/
  84. https://ars.electronica.art/aeblog/en/2016/02/05/creativerobotics/
  85. https://www.kuka.com/en-us/industries/solutions-database/2018/01/kuka-fraesroboter-im-studio-babelsberg
  86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0926580515001004
  87. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267487086_Path_Planning_for_Automated_Robot_Painting
  88. https://sougwen.com/project/drawing-operations
  89. https://waag.org/en/article/collaborations-artistic-experiments-robotics/
  90. https://sougwen.com/machinecollaboration
  91. https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3706598.3713327
  92. https://roboticsandautomationnews.com/2025/05/06/five-robotic-systems-that-can-paint-like-human-artists/90362/
  93. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-92081-x
  94. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06576
  95. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661
  96. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04948
  97. https://openai.com/index/dall-e/
  98. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.12092
  99. https://www.midjourney.com/
  100. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robsalkowitz/2022/09/16/midjourney-founder-david-holz-on-the-impact-of-ai-on-art-imagination-and-the-creative-economy/
  101. https://www.christies.com/en/stories/a-collaboration-between-two-artists-one-human-one-a-machine-0cd01f4e232f4279a525a446d60d4cd1
  102. https://news.artnet.com/market/first-ever-artificial-intelligence-portrait-painting-sells-at-christies-1379902
  103. https://refikanadol.com/works/machine-hallucination/
  104. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10752
  105. https://research.aimultiple.com/generative-ai-ethics/
  106. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/ai-generated-art
  107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355645572_Movement_Technology_From_Kinetic_Art_to_Digital_Art
  108. https://artexetra.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/shankenartinfoage.pdf
  109. https://www.middlebury.edu/museum/exhibitions/2022/screen-digital-art-teamlab
  110. https://parametric-architecture.com/the-evolution-of-architectural-practice-from-hand-drawings-to-computer-aid-design-to-ai-integration/
  111. https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/279565/1/proc.ADADA2022_21.pdf
  112. https://novedge.com/blogs/design-news/design-software-history-blender-the-open-source-revolution-in-3d-design-and-its-impact-on-the-creative-industry
  113. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/11/3/57
  114. https://yalereview.org/article/joanne-mcneil-aaron-harold-cohen
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4265294/
  116. https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/andersen-v-stability-ai-the-landmark-case-unpacking-the-copyright-risks-of-ai-image-generators/
  117. https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-asked-hear-dispute-over-copyrights-ai-creations-2025-10-10/
  118. https://www.ecva.net/papers/eccv_2022/papers_ECCV/papers/136730345.pdf
  119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0004370221002034
  120. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-19778-9_20
  121. https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117
  122. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-25-107172.pdf
  123. https://www.sfu.ca/~decaste/OISE/page2/files/HarawayCyborg.pdf
  124. https://conservancy.umn.edu/items/31a94285-862b-40d4-bd57-364c02536cc4
  125. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392043025_Not_Born_in_a_Garden_Donna_Haraway_Cyborgs_and_Posthuman_Contemporary_Art
  126. https://necsus-ejms.org/the-infinite-as-paradigm-reframing-the-limits-of-ai-art/
  127. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2025.1651354/full
  128. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/high-level-summary/
  129. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
  130. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA3243-1.html
  131. https://www.simkins.com/news/impact-of-the-eu-ai-act-on-the-creative-industries
  132. https://hyperallergic.com/772848/ai-art-is-soft-propaganda-for-the-global-north/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.