Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
This article possibly contains original research. (July 2016) |




A lawn (/lɔːn/) is an area of soil-covered land planted with grasses and other durable plants such as clover which are maintained at a short height with a lawn mower (or sometimes grazing animals) and used for aesthetic and recreational purposes—it is also commonly referred to as part of a garden. Lawns are usually composed only of grass species, subject to weed and pest control, maintained in a green color (e.g., by watering), and are regularly mowed to ensure an acceptable length.[1] Lawns are used around houses, apartments, commercial buildings and offices. Many city parks also have large lawn areas. In recreational contexts, the specialised names turf, parade, pitch, field or green may be used, depending on the sport and the continent.
The term "lawn", referring to a managed grass space, dates to at least the 16th century. With suburban expansion, the lawn has become culturally ingrained in some areas of the world as part of the desired household aesthetic.[2] However, awareness of the negative environmental impact of this ideal is growing.[3] In some jurisdictions where there are water shortages, local government authorities are encouraging alternatives to lawns to reduce water use. Researchers in the United States have noted that suburban lawns are "biological deserts" that are contributing to a "continental-scale ecological homogenization."[4] Lawn maintenance practices also cause biodiversity loss in surrounding areas.[5][6] Some forms of lawn, such as tapestry lawns, are designed partly for biodiversity and pollinator support.
Etymology
[edit]Lawn derives from Middle English launde, a borrowing from Old French lande (meaning "heath", "clearing"), of either Germanic or Gaulish origin. The word shares an origin with land, and its first recorded use with the meaning of "ground with mown grass" was in the 18th century.[7][8]
History
[edit]Origins
[edit]
Areas of grass grazed regularly by rabbits, horses or sheep over a long period often form a very low, tight sward similar to a modern lawn. This was the original meaning of the word "lawn", and the term can still be found in place names. Some forest areas where extensive grazing is practiced still have these seminatural lawns. For example, in the New Forest, England, such grazed areas are common, and are known as lawns, for example Balmer Lawn.[citation needed]
Lawns may have originated as grassed enclosures within early medieval settlements used for communal grazing of livestock, as distinct from fields reserved for agriculture.[citation needed] Low, mown-meadow areas may also have been valued because they allowed those inside an enclosed fence or castle to view those approaching. The early lawns were not always distinguishable from pasture fields. The damp climate of maritime Western Europe in the north made lawns possible to grow and manage. They were not a part of gardens in most other regions and cultures of the world until contemporary influence.[9]
In 1100s Britain, low-growing area of grasses and meadow flowers were grazed or scythed to keep them short, and used for sport.[10] Lawn bowling, which began in the 12th or 13th century, required short turf.[10]
The first known documentation of establishing grass using sod instead of seed comes from a Japanese text of 1159.[10]
Lawns became popular with the aristocracy in northern Europe from the Middle Ages onward. In the fourteen hundreds, open expanses of low grasses appear in paintings of public and private areas; by the fifteen hundreds, such areas were found in the gardens of the wealthy across northern and central Europe. Public meadow areas, kept short by sheep, were used for new sports such as cricket, soccer, and golf.[10] The word "laune" is first attested in 1540 from the Old French lande "heath, moor, barren land; clearing".[11] It initially described a natural opening in a woodland.[10] In the sixteen hundreds, "lawn" came to mean a grassy stretch of untilled land, and by mid-century, there were publications on seeding and transplanting sod. In the seventeen hundreds, "lawn" came to mean specifically a mown stretch of meadow.[10]

Lawns similar to those of today first appeared in France and England in the 1700s when André Le Nôtre designed the gardens of the Palace of Versailles that included a small area of grass called the tapis vert, or "green carpet", which became a common feature of French gardens. Large, mown open spaces became popular in Europe and North America.[10] The lawn was influenced by later seventeen-hundreds trends replicating the romantic aestheticism of grassy pastoralism from Italian landscape paintings.[12]
Before the invention of mowing machines in 1830, lawns were managed very differently. They were an element of wealthy estates and manor houses, and in some places were maintained by labor-intensive scything and shearing (for hay or silage). They were also pasture land maintained through grazing by sheep or other livestock.[citation needed]
The English lawn
[edit]
It was not until the 17th and 18th century that the garden and the lawn became a place created first as walkways and social areas. They were made up of meadow plants, such as camomile, a particular favourite (see camomile lawn). In the early 17th century, the Jacobean epoch of gardening began; during this period, the closely cut "English" lawn was born. By the end of this period, the English lawn was a symbol of status of the aristocracy and gentry.[citation needed]
In the early 18th century, landscape gardening for the aristocracy entered a golden age, under the direction of William Kent and Lancelot "Capability" Brown. They refined the English landscape garden style with the design of natural, or "romantic", estate settings for wealthy Englishmen.[13] Brown, remembered as "England's greatest gardener", designed over 170 parks, many of which still endure. His influence was so great that the contributions to the English garden made by his predecessors Charles Bridgeman and William Kent are often overlooked.[14]
His work still endures at Croome Court (where he also designed the house), Blenheim Palace, Warwick Castle, Harewood House, Bowood House, Milton Abbey (and nearby Milton Abbas village), in traces at Kew Gardens and many other locations.[15] His style of smooth undulating lawns which ran seamlessly to the house and meadow, clumps, belts and scattering of trees and his serpentine lakes formed by invisibly damming small rivers, were a new style within the English landscape, a "gardenless" form of landscape gardening, which swept away almost all the remnants of previous formally patterned styles. His landscapes were fundamentally different from what they replaced, the well-known formal gardens of England which were criticised by Alexander Pope and others from the 1710s.[16]

The open "English style" of parkland first spread across Britain and Ireland, and then across Europe, such as the garden à la française being replaced by the French landscape garden. By this time, the word "lawn" in England had semantically shifted to describe a piece of a garden covered with grass and closely mown.[17]
In North America
[edit]Wealthy families in America during the late 18th century also began mimicking English landscaping styles. British settlers in North America imported an affinity for landscapes in the style of the English lawn. However, early in the colonization of the continent, environments with thick, low-growing, grass-dominated vegetation were rare in the eastern part of the continent, enough so that settlers were warned that it would be difficult to find land suitable for grazing cattle.[18] In 1780, the Shaker community began the first industrial production of high-quality grass seed in North America, and a number of seed companies and nurseries were founded in Philadelphia. The increased availability of these grasses meant they were in plentiful supply for parks and residential areas, not just livestock.[17]
Thomas Jefferson has long been given credit for being the first person to attempt an English-style lawn at his estate, Monticello, in 1806, but many others had tried to emulate English landscaping before he did. Over time, an increasing number towns in New England began to emphasize grass spaces. Many scholars link this development to the romantic and transcendentalist movements of the 19th century. These green commons were also heavily associated with the success of the Revolutionary War and often became the homes of patriotic war memorials after the Civil War ended in 1865.[17]
Middle class pursuit
[edit]
Before the mechanical lawn mower, the upkeep of lawns was possible only for the extremely wealthy estates and manor houses of the aristocracy. Labor-intensive methods of scything and shearing the grass were required to maintain the lawn in its correct state, and most of the land in England was required for more functional, agricultural purposes.[citation needed]
This all changed with the invention of the lawn mower by Edwin Beard Budding in 1830. Budding had the idea for a lawn mower after seeing a machine in a local cloth mill which used a cutting cylinder (or bladed reel) mounted on a bench to trim the irregular nap from the surface of woolen cloth and give a smooth finish.[19] Budding realised that a similar device could be used to cut grass if the mechanism was mounted in a wheeled frame to make the blades rotate close to the lawn's surface. His mower design was to be used primarily to cut the lawn on sports grounds and extensive gardens, as a superior alternative to the scythe, and he was granted a British patent on 31 August 1830.[20]
Budding went into partnership with a local engineer, John Ferrabee, who paid the costs of development and acquired rights to manufacture and sell lawn mowers and to license other manufacturers. Together they made mowers in a factory at Thrupp near Stroud.[21] Among the other companies manufacturing under license the most successful was Ransomes, Sims & Jefferies of Ipswich which began mower production as early as 1832.[22]

However, his model had two crucial drawbacks. It was immensely heavy (it was made of cast iron) and difficult to manoeuvre in the garden, and did not cut the grass very well. The blade would often spin above the grass uselessly.[22] It took ten more years and further innovations, including the advent of the Bessemer process for the production of the much lighter alloy steel and advances in motorization such as the drive chain, for the lawn mower to become a practical proposition. Middle-class families across the country, in imitation of aristocratic landscape gardens, began to grow finely trimmed lawns in their back gardens.[citation needed]
In the 1850s, Thomas Green of Leeds introduced a revolutionary mower design called the Silens Messor (meaning silent cutter), which used a chain to transmit power from the rear roller to the cutting cylinder. The machine was much lighter and quieter than the gear driven machines that preceded them, and won first prize at the first lawn mower trial at the London Horticultural Gardens.[22] Thus began a great expansion in the lawn mower production in the 1860s. James Sumner of Lancashire patented the first steam-powered lawn mower in 1893.[23] Around 1900, Ransomes' Automaton, available in chain- or gear-driven models, dominated the British market. In 1902, Ransomes produced the first commercially available mower powered by an internal combustion gasoline engine. JP Engineering of Leicester, founded after World War I, invented the first riding mowers.[citation needed]

This went hand-in-hand with a booming consumer market for lawns from the 1860s onward. With the increasing popularity of sports in the mid-Victorian period, the lawn mower was used to craft modern-style sporting ovals, playing fields, pitches and grass courts for the nascent sports of football, lawn bowls, lawn tennis and others.[24] The rise of Suburbanisation in the interwar period was heavily influenced by the garden city movement of Ebenezer Howard and the creation of the first garden suburbs at the turn of the 20th century.[25] The garden suburb, developed through the efforts of social reformer Henrietta Barnett and her husband, exemplified the incorporation of the well manicured lawn into suburban life.[26] Suburbs dramatically increased in size. Harrow Weald went from just 1,500 to over 10,000 while Pinner jumped from 3,00 to over 20,000. During the 1930s, over 4 million new suburban houses were built and the 'suburban revolution' had made England the most heavily suburbanized country in the world by a considerable margin.[27]
Lawns began to proliferate in America from the 1870s onwards. As more plants were introduced from Europe, lawns became smaller as they were filled with flower beds, perennials, sculptures, and water features.[28] Eventually the wealthy began to move away from the cities into new suburban communities. In 1856, an architectural book was published to accompany the development of the new suburbia that placed importance on the availability of a grassy space for children to play on and a space to grow fruits and vegetables that further imbued the lawn with cultural importance.[17] Lawns began making more appearances in development plans, magazine articles, and catalogs.[29] The lawn became less associated with being a status symbol, instead giving way to a landscape aesthetic. Improvements in the lawn mower and water supply enabled the spread of lawn culture from the Northeast to the South, where the grass grew more poorly.[17] This in combination with setback rules, which required all homes to have a 30-foot gap between the structure and the sidewalk meant that the lawn had found a specific place in suburbia.[28] In 1901, the United States Congress allotted $17,000 to the study of the best grasses for lawns, creating the spark for lawn care to become an industry.[30]
The chemical boom
[edit]After World War II, a surplus of synthetic nitrogen in the United States led to chemical firms such as DuPont seeking to expand the market for fertilizers.[31] The suburban lawn offered an opportunity to market fertilizers, previously only used by farmers, to homeowners. In 1955, DuPont released Uramite, a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer specifically marketed for lawns. The trend continued throughout the 1960s, with chemical firms such as DuPont and Monsanto utilizing television advertising and other forms of advertisement to market pesticides, fertilizers, and herbicides.[32] The environmental impacts of this widespread chemical use were noticed as early as the 1960s, but suburban lawns as a source of pollution were largely ignored.[33]
Organic lawns
[edit]Due to the harmful effects of excessive pesticide use, fertilizer use, climate change and pollution, a movement developed in the late 20th century to require organic lawn management. By the first decade of the 21st century, American homeowners were using ten times more pesticides per acre than farmers, poisoning an estimated 60 to 70 million birds yearly.[34] Lawn mowers are a significant contributor to pollution released into Earth's atmosphere, with a riding lawn mower producing the same amount of pollution in one hour of use as 34 cars.[34]
In recent years,[when?] some municipalities have banned synthetic pesticides and fertilizers and required organic land care techniques be used.[35] There are many locations with organic lawns that require organic landscaping.[citation needed]
United States
[edit]Prior to European colonization, the grasses on the East Coast of North America were mostly broom straw, wild rye, and marsh grass. As Europeans moved into the region, it was noted by colonists in New England, more than others, that the grasses of the New World were inferior to those of England and that their livestock seemed to receive less nutrition from it. In fact, once livestock brought overseas from Europe spread throughout the colonies, much of the native grasses of New England disappeared, and an inventory list from the 17th century noted supplies of clover and grass seed from England. New colonists were even urged by their country and companies to bring grass seed with them to North America. By the late 17th century, a new market in imported grass seed had begun in New England.[17]
Much of the new grasses brought by Europeans spread quickly and effectively, often ahead of the colonists. One such species, Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), became the most important pasture grass for the southern colonies.[citation needed]
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) is a grass native to Europe or the Middle East. It was likely carried to Midwestern United States in the early 1600s by French missionaries and spread via the waterways to the region around Kentucky. However, it may also have spread across the Appalachian Mountains after an introduction on the east coast.[citation needed]
Farmers at first continued to harvest meadows and marshes composed of indigenous grasses until they became overgrazed. These areas quickly fell to erosion and were overrun with less favorable plant life. Soon, farmers began to purposefully plant new species of grass in these areas, hoping to improve the quality and quantity of hay to provide for their livestock as native species had a lower nutritive value. While Middle Eastern and Europeans species of grass did extremely well on the East Coast of North America, it was a number of grasses from the Mediterranean that dominated the Western seaboard. As cultivated grasses became valued for their nutritional benefits to livestock, farmers relied less and less on natural meadows in the more colonized areas of the country. Eventually even the grasses of the Great Plains were overrun with European species that were more durable to the grazing patterns of imported livestock.[17]
A pivotal factor in the spread of the lawn in America was the passage of legislation in 1938 of the 40-hour work week. Until then, Americans had typically worked half days on Saturdays, leaving little time to focus on their lawns. With this legislation and the housing boom following the Second World War, managed grass spaces became more commonplace.[28] The creation in the early 20th century of country clubs and golf courses completed the rise of lawn culture.[17]
According to study based on satellite observations by Cristina Milesi, NASA Earth System Science, its estimates: "More surface area in the United States is devoted to lawns than to individual irrigated crops such as corn or wheat.... area, covering about 128,000 square kilometers in all."[36]
Lawn monoculture was a reflection of more than an interest in offsetting depreciation, it propagated the homogeneity of the suburb itself. Although lawns had been a recognizable feature in English residences since the 19th century, a revolution in industrialization and monoculture of the lawn since the Second World War fundamentally changed the ecology of the lawn. Money and ideas flowed back from Europe after the U.S. entered WWI, changing the way Americans interacted with themselves and nature, and the industrialization of war hastened the industrialization of pest control.[37] Intensive suburbanization both concentrated and expanded the spread of lawn maintenance which meant increased inputs in not only petrochemicals, fertilizers, and pesticides, but also natural resources like water.[2][17][28]
Lawns became a means of performing class values for the urban middle class, in which the condition of the lawn becomes representative of moral character and social reliability. The social values associated with lawns are promoted and upheld by social pressure, laws, and chemical producers. Social pressure comes from neighbors or homeowner associations who think that the unkempt lawns of neighbors may affect their own property values or create eyesores. Pressures to maintain a lawn are also legal; there are often local or state laws against letting weeds get too tall or letting a lawn space be especially unkempt, punishable by fees or litigation. Chemical producers unwilling to lose business propagate the ideal of a lawn, making it seem unattainable without chemical aid.[12]

Front lawns became standardized in the 1930s when, over time, specific aspects such as grass type and maintenance methods became popular. The lawn-care industry boomed, but the Great Depression of the 1930s and in the period prior to World War II made it difficult to maintain the cultural standards that had become heavily associated with the lawn due to grass seed shortages in Europe, America's main supplier. Still, seed distributors such as Scotts Miracle-Gro Company in the United States encouraged families to continue to maintain their lawns, promoting it as a stress-relieving hobby. During the war itself, homeowners were asked to maintain the appearances of the home front, likely as a show of strength, morale, and solidarity. After World War II, the lawn aesthetic once again became a standard feature of North America, bouncing back from its minor decline in the decades before with a vengeance, particularly as a result of the housing and population boom post-war.[17]
The VA loan in the United States let American ex-servicemen buy homes without providing a down payment, while the Federal Housing Administration offered lender inducements that aided the reduction of down payments for the average American from 30% to as little as 10%. These developments made owning your own home cheaper than renting, further enabling the spread of suburbia and its lawns.[28]
Levittown, New York, was the beginning of the industrial suburb in the 20th century, and by proxy the industrial lawn. Between 1947 and 1951, Abraham Levitt and his sons built more than seventeen thousand homes, each with its own lawn. Abraham Levitt wrote "No single feature of a suburban residential community contributes as much to the charm and beauty of the individual home and the locality as well-kept lawns". Landscaping was one of the most important factors in Levittown's success – and no feature was more prominent than the lawn. The Levitts understood that landscaping could add to the appeal of their developments and claimed that, "increase in values are most often found in neighborhoods where lawns show as green carpets" and that, over the years, "lawns trees and shrubs become more valuable both aesthetically and monetarily".[38] During 1948, the first spring that Levittown had enjoyed, Levitt and Sons fertilized and reseeded all of the lawns free of charge.[28]
The economic recession that began in 2008 has resulted in many communities worldwide to dig up their lawns and plant fruit and vegetable gardens.[citation needed] This has the potential to greatly change cultural values attached to the lawn, as they are increasingly viewed as environmentally and economically unviable in the modern context.[39]
Australia
[edit]The appearance of the lawn in Australia followed closely after its establishment in North America and parts of Europe. Lawn was established on the so-called "nature strip" (a uniquely Australian term) by the 1920s and was common throughout the developing suburbs of Australia. By the 1950s, the Australian-designed Victa lawn mower was being used by the many people who had turned pastures into lawn and was also being exported to dozens of countries.[40] Prior to the 1970s, all brush and native species were stripped from a development site and replaced with lawns that utilized imported plant species. Since the 1970s there has been an interest in using indigenous species for lawns, especially considering their lower water requirements.[41] Lawns are also established in garden areas as well as used for the surface of sporting fields.[citation needed]
Over time, with consideration to the frequency of droughts in Australia, the movement towards "naturalism", or the use of indigenous plant species in yards, was beneficial. These grasses were more drought resistant than their European counterparts, and many who wished to keep their lawns switched to these alternatives or allowed their green carpets to revert to the indigenous scrub in an effort to reduce the strain on water supplies.[39] However, lawns remain a popular surface and their practical and aesthetically pleasing appearance reduces the use of water-impervious surfaces such as concrete. The growing use of rainwater storage tanks has improved the ability to maintain them.[citation needed]
Following recent droughts,[when?] Australia has seen a change to predominately warm-season turfgrasses, particularly in the southern states like New South Wales and Victoria which are predominately temperate climates within urban regions. The more drought tolerant grasses have been chosen by councils and homeowners for the choice of using less water compared to cool-season turfgrasses like fescue and ryegrass. Mild dormancy seems to be of little concern when high-profile areas can be oversown for short periods or nowadays, turf colourants (fake green) are very popular.[citation needed]
Uses
[edit]Lawns are a common feature of private gardens, public landscapes and parks in many parts of the world. They are created for aesthetic pleasure, as well as for sports or other outdoor recreational use. Lawns are useful as a playing surface both because they mitigate erosion and dust generated by intensive foot traffic and because they provide a cushion for players in sports such as rugby, football, soccer, cricket, baseball, golf, tennis, field hockey, and lawn bocce.[citation needed]
Lawns and the resulting lawn clipping waste can be used as an ingredient in making compost and is also viewed as fodder, used in the production of lawn clipping silage which is fed to livestock[42][43] as a sustainable feed source.
Types of lawn plants
[edit]Lawns need not be, and have not always been, made up of grasses alone. There exist, for instance, moss lawns, clover lawns, thyme lawns, and tapestry lawns (made from diverse forbs). Sedges, low herbs and wildflowers, and other ground covers that can be walked upon are also used.[citation needed]
Thousands of varieties of grasses and grasslike plants are used for lawns, each adapted to specific conditions of precipitation and irrigation, seasonal temperatures, and sun/shade tolerances. Plant hybridizers and botanists are constantly creating and finding improved varieties of the basic species and new ones, often more economical and environmentally sustainable by needing less water, fertilizer, pest and disease treatments, and maintenance. The three basic categories are cool season grasses, warm season grasses, and grass alternatives.[citation needed]
Grasses
[edit]Many different species of grass are currently used, depending on the intended use and the climate. Coarse grasses are used where active sports are played, and finer grasses are used for ornamental lawns for their visual effects. Some grasses are adapted to oceanic climates with cooler summers, and others to tropical and continental climates with hotter summers. Often, a mixture of grass or low plant types is used to form a stronger lawn when one type does better in the warmer seasons and the other in the colder ones. This mixing is taken further by a form of grass breeding which produces what are known as cultivars. A cultivar is a cross-breed of two different varieties of grass and aims to combine certain traits taken from each individual breed. This creates a new strain which can be very specialised, suited to a particular environment, such as low water, low light or low nutrient.[citation needed]

Cool season grasses
[edit]Cool season grasses start growth at 5 °C (41 °F), and grow at their fastest rate when temperatures are between 10 °C (50 °F) and 25 °C (77 °F), in climates that have relatively mild/cool summers, with two periods of rapid growth in the spring and autumn.[44] They retain their color well in extreme cold and typically grow very dense, carpetlike lawns with relatively little thatch.[citation needed]
- Bluegrass (Poa spp.)
- Bentgrass (Agrostis spp.)
- Ryegrasses (Lolium spp.)
- Fescues (Festuca spp.)
- Feather reed grass (Calamagrostis spp.)
- Tufted hair grass (Deschampsia spp.)
Warm season grasses
[edit]Warm season grasses only start growth at temperatures above 10 °C (50 °F), and grow fastest when temperatures are between 25 °C (77 °F) and 35 °C (95 °F), with one long growth period over the spring and summer (Huxley 1992). They often go dormant in cooler months, turning shades of tan or brown. Many warm season grasses are quite drought tolerant, and can handle very high summer temperatures, although temperatures below −15 °C (5 °F) can kill most southern ecotype warm season grasses. The northern varieties, such as buffalograss and blue grama, are hardy to 45 °C (113 °F).
- Zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp.)
- Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.)
- St. Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum)
- Bahiagrass (Paspalum spp.)
- Centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides)
- Carpet grass (Axonopus spp.)
- Buffalograss (Bouteloua dactyloides)
- Grama grass (Bouteloua spp.)
- Kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum)
Grass seed for shade
[edit]Grass seed mixes have been developed to include only grass seed species that grow will in low sunlight conditions. These seed mixes are designed to deal with light shade caused by trees that can create patchiness, or slightly heavier shade that prevents the full growth of grass. Most lawns will experience shade in some shape or form due to surrounding fences, furniture, trees or hedges and these grass seed species' are especially useful in the Northern Hemisphere and Northwestern Europe.[45]
- Festuca rubra subsp. commutata (Chewings Fescue)
- Poa pratensis (Smooth Stalked Meadow Grass)
- Festuca ovina (Sheeps Fescue)
- Festuca trachyphylla (hard fescue)
- Festuca rubra (Strong Creeping Red Fescue)
Sedges
[edit]Carex species and cultivars are well represented in the horticulture industry as 'sedge' alternatives for 'grass' in mowed lawns and garden meadows. Both low-growing and spreading ornamental cultivars and native species are used in for sustainable landscaping as low-maintenance and drought-tolerant grass replacements for lawns and garden meadows. Wildland habitat restoration projects and natural landscaping and gardens also use them for 'user-friendly' areas. The J. Paul Getty Museum has used Carex pansa (meadow sedge) and Carex praegracilis (dune sedge) expansively in the Sculpture Gardens in Los Angeles.[46]
- Some lower sedges used are:
- Carex caryophyllea (cultivar 'The Beatles')
- C. divulsa (Berkeley sedge)[46]
- C. glauca (blue sedge) (syn. C. flacca)
- C. pansa (meadow sedge)[46]
- C. praegracilis (dune sedge)[46]
- C. subfusca (mountain sedge)[46]
- C. tumulicola (foothill sedge) (cultivar 'Santa Cruz Mnts. selection')[46]
- C. uncifolia (ruby sedge)
Other ground-cover plants
[edit]

Moss lawns do well in shaded areas under trees, and require only about 1% of the water of a traditional grass lawn once established.[48][47][49] Clover lawns do especially well in damp, alkaline soils. Yarrow lawns are drought resistant, can be mowed to form a soft, comfortable turf; common yarrow is native throughout Europe, North America, and parts of Asia, and spreads vegetatively to cover the ground.[50][51][52] Camomile lawns and thyme lawns are fragrant (and native to Europe and North Africa). Soleirolia soleirolii favours shaded, damp spaces (and is often used in tsubo-niwas); it is native to the European side of the Mediterranean, and can be invasive elsewhere.[53]
Other low ground covers suitable for lawns include Corsican mint (native to three mediterranean islands, invasive), Ophiopogon planiscapus (native to Japan),[53] Lippia[54] and lawnleaf,[55] (native to Central America and southern North America),[55][54] purple flowering Mazus (native to East Asia), grey Dymondia (native to South Africa), creeping sedums (various species native to various continents),[54] Cotula species (ditto),[55] and creeping jenny (native to Europe).[54]
Eastern North America
[edit]The examples and perspective in this section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (October 2024) |
Some plants native to Eastern North America that can be used as alternatives to grass lawns or incorporated into lawns are:[56][57][58][59]
- Common yarrow
- Virginia springbeauty[60]
- Wild strawberry
- Dwarf cinquefoil
- Moss phlox
- Creeping phlox
- Sensitive fern
- Canadian wild ginger
- Cinnamon fern
- Lyreleaf sage[61]
- Allegheny pachysandra
- Woodland stonecrop
- Green-and-gold
- Beetleweed
- Blue-eyed grass
- Common blue violet
- Dwarf crested iris
- Wild pink
- Purple wood sorrel
- Spotted cranesbill
Alternatives to lawns
[edit]Alternatives to lawns include meadows, drought-tolerant xeriscape gardens, natural landscapes, native plant habitat gardens, paved Spanish courtyard and patio gardens, butterfly gardens, rain gardens, and kitchen gardens. Trees and shrubs in close proximity to lawns provide habitat for birds in traditional, cottage and wildlife gardens.[62][citation needed]
Lawn care and maintenance
[edit]Seasonal lawn establishment and care varies depending on the climate zone and type of lawn grown.[citation needed]
Planting and seeding
[edit]

Early autumn, spring, and early summer are the primary seasons to seed, lay sod (turf), plant 'liners', or 'sprig' new lawns, when the soil is warmer and air cooler. Seeding is the least expensive, but may take longer for the lawn to be established. Aerating just before planting/seeding may promote deeper root growth and thicker turf.[63]
Sodding (American English), or turfing (British English), provides an almost instant lawn, and can be undertaken in most temperate climates in any season, but is more expensive and more vulnerable to drought until established. Hydroseeding is a quick, less expensive method of planting large, sloped or hillside landscapes. Some grasses and sedges are available and planted from 'liner' and 4-inch (100 mm) containers, from 'flats', 'plugs' or 'sprigs', and are planted apart to grow together.[citation needed]
Lawn growth, 20-hour time lapse |
Fertilizers and chemicals
[edit]Various organic and inorganic or synthetic fertilizers are available, with instant or time-release applications. Pesticides, which includes biological and chemical herbicides, insecticides and fungicides, treating diseases like gray leaf spot, are available. Consideration for their effects on the lawn and garden ecosystem and via runoff and dispersion on the surrounding environment, inform laws constraining their use. For example, the Canadian province of Quebec and over 130 municipalities prohibit the use of synthetic lawn pesticides.[64] The Ontario provincial government promised in September 2007 to also implement a province-wide ban on the cosmetic use of lawn pesticides, for protecting the public. Medical and environmental groups supported such a ban.[65]
On 22 April 2008, the Provincial Government of Ontario announced that it would pass legislation that would prohibit, province-wide, the cosmetic use and sale of lawn and garden pesticides.[66] The Ontario legislation would also echo Massachusetts law requiring pesticide manufacturers to reduce the toxins they use in production.[67] Experts[who?] advise that a healthy lawn contains at least some "weeds" and insects, discouraging indiscriminate use of potentially harmful chemicals.[34]
Sustainable gardening uses organic horticulture methods, such as organic fertilizers, biological pest control, beneficial insects, and companion planting, among other methods, to sustain an attractive lawn in a safe garden. An example of an organic herbicide is corn gluten meal, which releases an 'organic dipeptide' into the soil to inhibit root formation of germinating weed seeds. An example of an organic alternative to insecticide use is applying beneficial nematodes to combat soil-dwelling grubs, such as the larvae of chafer beetles. The Integrated Pest Management approach is a coordinated low impact approach.[68]
Mowing and other maintenance practices
[edit]


Maintaining a rough lawn requires only occasional cutting with a suitable machine, or grazing by animals. Maintaining a smooth and closely cut lawn, be it for aesthetic or practical reasons or because social pressure from neighbors and local municipal ordinances requires it,[69] necessitates more organized and regular treatments. Usually once a week is adequate for maintaining a lawn in most climates. However, in the hot and rainy seasons of regions contained in hardiness zones greater than 8, lawns may need to be maintained up to two times a week.[70]
Low-maintenance alternatives to traditional turfgrass lawns reduce the need for frequent mowing, watering and chemical inputs.[71]
Social impacts
[edit]The prevalence of the lawns in films such as Pleasantville (1998) and Edward Scissorhands (1990) alludes to the importance of the lawn as a social mechanism that gives great importance to visual representation of the American suburb as well as its practised culture. It is implied that a neighbor whose lawn is not in pristine condition is morally corrupt, emphasizing the role a well-kept lawn plays in neighborly and community relationships. In both of these films, green space surrounding a house in the suburbs becomes an indicator of moral integrity as well as of social and gender norms – lawn care has long been associated[by whom?] with men. These lawns also reinforce class and societal norms by subtly excluding those who may not have been able to afford a house with a lawn.[72]
The lawn as a reflection of someone's character and the neighborhood at large is not restricted to films; the same theme appears in The Great Gatsby (1925), by American novelist F. Scott Fitzgerald.[73] Character Nick Carraway rents the house next to Gatsby's and fails to maintain his lawn according to West Egg standards. The rift between the two lawns troubles Gatsby to the point that he dispatches his gardener to mow Carraway's grass and thereby establish uniformity.[citation needed]
Most lawn-care equipment over the decades has been advertised to men, and companies have long associated good lawn-care with good citizenship in their marketing campaigns. The appearance of a healthy lawn was meant[by whom?] to imply the health of the man taking care of it; controlled weeds and strict boundaries became a practical application of the desire to control nature, as well as an expression of control over personal lives once working full-time became central to suburban success. Women were encultured over time to view the lawn as part of the household, as an essential furnishing, and to encourage their husbands to maintain a lawn for the family and community reputation.[17]
During World War II (1939–1945), women became the focus of lawn-care companies in the absence of their husbands and sons. These companies promoted lawn care as a necessary means by which women could help support their male family-members and American patriotism as a whole. The image of the lawn changed from focusing on technology and manhood to emphasizing aesthetic pleasure and the health benefits derived from its maintenance; advertisers at lawn care companies assumed that women would not respond positively to images of efficiency and power. The language of these marketing campaigns still intended to imbue the female population with notions of family, motherhood, and the duties of a wife; it has been argued[by whom?] that this was done so that it would be easier for men returning from war to resume the roles which their wives had taken over in their absence. This was especially apparent in the 1950s and 1960s, when lawn-care rhetoric emphasized the lawn as a husband's responsibility and as a pleasurable hobby when he retired.[17]
There are differences in the particulars of lawn maintenance and appearance, such as the length of the grass, species (and therefore its color), and mowing.[41][74]
Environmental concerns
[edit]On average, greater amounts of chemical fertilizer, herbicide and pesticide are used to maintain a given area of lawn than on an equivalent area of cultivated farmland.[75][28] The use of these products causes environmental pollution, disturbance in the lawn ecosystem, and health risks to humans and wildlife.[76]
In response to environmental concerns, organic landscaping and organic lawn management systems have been developed and are mandated in some municipalities and properties. In the United Kingdom, the environmental group Plantlife has encouraged gardeners to refrain from mowing in the month of May to encourage plant diversity and provide nectar for insects.[77]
Other concerns, criticisms, and ordinances regarding lawns arise from wider environmental consequences:
- Lawns can reduce biodiversity, especially when the lawn covers a large area.[78] Traditional lawns often replace plant species that feed pollinators, requiring bees and butterflies to cross "wastelands" to reach food and host plants.[79] Lawns promote homogenization and are normally cleared of unwanted plant and animal species, typically with synthetic pesticides, which can also kill unintended target species. They may be composed of introduced species not native to the area, particularly in the United States. This can produce a habitat that supports a reduced number of wildlife species.[80]
- Lawn maintenance commonly involves use of fertilizers and synthetic pesticides, which can cause great harm. Some are carcinogens and endocrine disruptors. They may permanently linger in the environment and negatively affect the health of potentially all nearby organisms. The United States Environmental Protection Agency estimated in 2012 that nearly 32,000,000 kilograms (71,000,000 lb) of active pesticide ingredients are used on suburban lawns each year in the United States.[81] There are indications of an emerging regulatory response to this issue. For example, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Kuwait, and Belize have placed restrictions on the use of the herbicide 2,4-D.
- It has been estimated that nearly 64,000,000 litres (14,000,000 imp gal; 17,000,000 US gal) of gasoline are spilled each summer while re-fueling garden and lawn-care equipment in the United States: approximately 50% more than that spilled during the Exxon Valdez incident.[28]
- The use of pesticides and fertilizers, requiring fossil fuels for manufacturing, distribution, and application, has been shown to contribute to global warming. (Sustainable organic techniques have been shown to help reduce global warming.)[82] A hectare of lawn in Nashville, Tennessee, produces greenhouse gases equivalent to 697 to 2,443 kg of carbon dioxide a year. The higher figure is equivalent to a flight more than halfway around the world. Lawn mowing is one element of lawn culture that causes a great amount of emissions (which can be mitigated by replacing lawn mowers with grazing livestock).[83]

Water conservation
[edit]Maintaining a green lawn sometimes requires large amounts of water. While natural rainfall is usually sufficient to maintain a lawn's health in the temperate British Isles- the birthplace of the concept of the lawn- in times of drought hosepipe bans may be implemented by the water suppliers.[84] Conversely, exportation of the lawn ideal to more arid regions (e.g. U.S. Southwest and Australia) strains water supply systems when water supplies are already scarce. This necessitates upgrades to larger, more environmentally invasive equipment to deal with increased demand due to lawn watering. Grass typically goes dormant during periods of cold or heat outside of its preferred temperature ranges; dormancy reduces the grasses' water demand. Most grasses typically recover quite well from a drought, but many property owners become concerned about the brown appearance and increase watering during the summer months. Water in Australia observed 1995 data that up to 90% of the water used in Canberra during summer drought periods was used for watering lawns.[85]
In the United States, 50 to 70% of residential water is used for landscaping, with most used to water lawns.[81] A 2005 NASA study estimated conservatively 128,000 square kilometres (49,000 sq mi; 32,000,000 acres) of irrigated lawn in the US, three times the area of irrigated corn.[86] That translates to about 200 US gallons (760 L; 170 imp gal) of drinking-quality fresh water per person per day is required to keep up United States' lawn surface area.[citation needed]
In 2022, the state of Nevada pass a bill that not only banned the installation of new lawns in the state, but also mandated the removal of any lawn deemed "nonfunctional." This was in response to a years-long drought in the state.[87]
Chemicals
[edit]An increased concern from the general public over pesticide and fertilizer use and their associated health risks, combined with the implementation of the legislation, such as the US Food Quality Protection Act, has resulted in the reduced presence of synthetic chemicals, namely pesticides, in urban landscapes such as lawns in the late 20th century.[88] Many of these concerns over the safety and environmental impact of some of the synthetic fertilizers and pesticides has led to their ban by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and many local governments.[76] The use of pesticides and other chemicals to care for lawns has also led to the death of nearly 7 million birds each year, a topic that was central to the novel Silent Spring by the conservationist Rachel Carson.[28]
The use of lawn chemicals made its first appearance in the 18th century through the introduction of "English garden" fads. These types of lawns put precise hedging, clean cut grass, and extravagant plants on display. Following the initial introduction of lawn chemicals, they have still been continually used throughout North America. Because many of the turf-grass species in North America are not native to our ecosystems, they require extensive maintenance. According to the United States Geological Survey, 99% of the urban water samples that were tested contained one or more types of pesticides. In addition to water contamination, chemicals are making their way into houses which can lead to chronic exposure. Currently, standards for pesticide management practices have been put in place through the Food Quality Protection Act.[12]
Environmental impact
[edit]In the United States, lawn heights are generally maintained by gasoline-powered lawn mowers, which contribute to urban smog during the summer months.[89] The EPA found, in some urban areas, up to 5% of smog was due to small gasoline engines made before 1997, such as are typically used on lawn mowers. Since 1997, the EPA has mandated emissions controls on newer engines in an effort to reduce smog.[90]
A 2010 study seemed to show lawn care inputs were balanced by the carbon sequestration benefits of lawns, and they may not be contributors to anthropogenic global warming.[91][92] Lawns with high maintenance (mowing, irrigation, and leaf blowing) and high fertilization rates have a net emission of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide that have large global warming potential.[93] Lawns that are fertilized, irrigated, and mowed weekly have a lower species diversity.[94]
Replacing turf grass with low-maintenance groundcovers or employing a variety of low-maintenance perennials, trees and shrubs[80] can be a good alternative to traditional lawn spaces, especially in hard-to-grow or hard-to-mow areas, as it can reduce maintenance requirements, associated pollution and offers higher aesthetic and wildlife value.[95][71] Growing a mixed variety of flowering plants instead of turfgrass is sometimes referred to as meadowscaping.[96]
Non-productive space
[edit]Lawns take up space that could otherwise be used more productively, such as for urban agriculture or home gardening. This is the case in many cities and suburbs in the United States, where open or unused spaces are "not generally a result of a positive decision to leave room for some use, but rather is an expression of a pastoral aesthetic norm that prizes spacious lawns and the zoning restrictions and neighborhood covenants that give these norms the force of law."[97]
In urban and suburban spaces, growing food in front yards and parking strips can not only provide fresh produce but also be a source of neighborhood pride.[98] While converting lawn space into strictly utilitarian farms is not common, incorporating edible plants into front yards with sustainable and aesthetically pleasing design is of growing interest in the United States.[99]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Encyclopedia of Urban Studies. SAGE. 2010. pp. 441–45. ISBN 9781412914321.
- ^ a b Robbins, Paul. Lawn People: How Grasses, Weeds, and Chemicals Make Us Who We Are. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2007. ISBN 1592135781
- ^ Shern, Lois C.; Sloan, Ann C. (1996). "The Impact of the American Lawn Ideal on Environmental Liveability". Human Ecology Review. 3 (1): 102–107.
- ^ "Are our lawns biological deserts?". beta.nsf.gov. National Science Foundation. 11 July 2018. Retrieved 14 July 2022.
- ^ Proske, Anja; Lokatis, Sophie; Rolff, Jens (2022). "Impact of mowing frequency on arthropod abundance and diversity in urban habitats: A meta-analysis". Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 76 127714. Bibcode:2022UFUG...7627714P. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127714. ISSN 1618-8667.
- ^ Hostetler, Mark E.; Main, Martin B. "Native Landscaping vs. Exotic Landscaping: What Should We Recommend?". wec.ifas.ufl.edu. University of Florida. Retrieved 14 July 2022.
- ^ "Online Etymology Dictionary". Etymonline.com. 10 June 1927. Retrieved 11 June 2013.
- ^ "laund". Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved 27 March 2013.
- ^ Hostetler, Mark E. (2012). The Green Leap: A Primer for Conserving Biodiversity in Subdivision Development. University of California Press. ISBN 9780520271104.
- ^ a b c d e f g Mitchell, Shelley (November 2020). "Plants in the Classroom: The Story of Oklahoma Turfgrass". Oklahoma State University. Retrieved 28 June 2022.
- ^ "Etymology for "lawn"". Etymonline. Retrieved 5 June 2015.
- ^ a b c Robbins, Paul; Sharp, Julie (November 2003). "The Lawn-Chemical Economy and Its Discontents". Antipode. 35 (5): 955–979. Bibcode:2003Antip..35..955R. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00366.x. ISSN 0066-4812. S2CID 154002130.
- ^ "Lancelot Brown". Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. 2007. Retrieved 12 March 2012.
- ^ Walpole, Horace (1905) [1780]. On Modern Gardening. Canton, Pa.: Kirgate Press. at Internet Archive
- ^ "Lancelot 'Capability' Brown (1716–1783)". Kew History & Heritage. Kew Gardens. Archived from the original on 8 October 2012. Retrieved 16 March 2012.
- ^ Peter Willis, "Capability Brown in Northumberland" Garden History 9.2 (Autumn, 1981, pp. 157–183)
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Jenkins, Virginia S. The Lawn: A History of an American Obsession. Smithsonian Institution, 1994. ISBN 1588345165
- ^ Bormann, F. Herbert; Balmori, Diana; Geballe, Gordon T. (1995). Redesigning the American Lawn. Yale University Press. p. 19.
- ^ "History of British Gardening Series – Georgian and Regency era". BBC. Archived from the original on 16 February 2010. Retrieved 9 November 2018.
- ^ US 87268, Passmore Jr., Everett G., "Lawn Mower", published 23 February 1869; see pg 1, col 2. For a copy, see Google Patents copy Archived 1 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine. This source indicates the patent number as "6,080". According to "British patent numbers 1617–1852 (old series) Archived 17 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine", the patent number was assigned sometime after 1852 and took the form of "6080/1830".
- ^ "People at the cutting edge: lawnmower designers". Parks & Gardens UK (University of York/Association of Gardens Trusts). Archived from the original on 26 February 2012. Retrieved 24 May 2009.
- ^ a b c The Old Lawnmower Club. "Mower History". The Old Lawnmower Club. Retrieved 23 April 2011.
- ^ "The History of the LawnMower". Thelawnmower.info. Archived from the original on 22 July 2011. Retrieved 23 April 2011.
- ^ Australian Broadcasting Corporation's Radio National Ockham's Razor, first broadcast 6 June 2010.
- ^ Clapson, Mark (2000). "The suburban aspiration in England since 1919". Contemporary British History. 14: 151–174. doi:10.1080/13619460008581576. S2CID 143590157.
- ^ "Henrietta Barnett and the Beginnings of the Suburb". Archived from the original on 6 December 2013.
- ^ Hollow, Matthew (26 May 2012). "Suburban Ideals on England's Interwar Council Estates". Retrieved 17 December 2012.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Steinberg, T. (2006). American Green, The Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Lawn. W.W. Norton & Co. ISBN 0-393-06084-5
- ^ Influence of catalogs: See America’s Romance with the English Garden by Thomas J. Mickey, 2013. Cited at [1]
- ^ Bormann, F. Herbert; Balmori, Diana; Geballe, Gordon T. (1995). Redesigning the American Lawn. Yale University Press. p. 64.
- ^ Whitney, Kristoffer (2010). "Living Lawns, Dying Waters: The Suburban Boom, Nitrogenous Fertilizers, and the Nonpoint Source Pollution Dilemma". Technology and Culture. 51 (3): 662–663. doi:10.1353/tech.2010.0033. PMID 20973447. S2CID 34329009.
- ^ Whitney, Kristoffer (2010). "Living Lawns, Dying Waters: The Suburban Boom, Nitrogenous Fertilizers, and the Nonpoint Source Pollution Dilemma". Technology and Culture. 51 (3): 664–666. doi:10.1353/tech.2010.0033. PMID 20973447. S2CID 34329009.
- ^ Whitney, Kristoffer (2010). "Living Lawns, Dying Waters: The Suburban Boom, Nitrogenous Fertilizers, and the Nonpoint Source Pollution Dilemma". Technology and Culture. 51 (3): 666–672. doi:10.1353/tech.2010.0033. PMID 20973447. S2CID 34329009.
- ^ a b c Palliser, Janna (2010). "How green is your lawn?". Science Scope. 33 (9): 8–12.
- ^ Land, Leslie (12 April 2007). "Are Bugs the Pests, or Humans? Organic Lawns Take Hold". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 17 September 2021.
- ^ NASA Earth Observatory, 2003 [2].
- ^ Steen-Adams, Michelle (2002). "Russell, E. 2001. War and Nature: Fighting Humans and Insects with Chemicals from World War I to Silent Spring. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, New York, USA". Conservation Ecology. 6 (2) art1. doi:10.5751/es-00407-060201. ISSN 1195-5449.
- ^ Teysott, Georges (1 June 1999). The American Lawn. Princeton Architectural Press. p. 18. ISBN 978-1568981604.
- ^ a b Trudgill, Stephan; Jeffery, Angus; Parker, John (2010). "Climate Change and the Resilience of the Domestic Lawn". Applied Geography. 30 (1): 177–190. Bibcode:2010AppGe..30..177T. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.08.002.
- ^ Wood, Richard V. (2002). "Richardson, Mervyn Victor (1894 - 1972)". Australian Dictionary of Biography. National Centre of Biography, Australian National University. ISBN 978-0-522-84459-7. ISSN 1833-7538. OCLC 70677943. Retrieved 25 August 2007.
- ^ a b Hogan, Trevor (2003). "'Nature Strip': Australian Suburbia and the Enculturation of Nature". Thesis Eleven. 74: 54–75. doi:10.1177/07255136030741005. S2CID 145780003.
- ^ "Making Silage from Lawn Clippings". Grit. 23 October 2014. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
- ^ Logsdon, Gene (2004). All Flesh Is Grass. Ohio: Swallow Press. pp. Chapter 20. ISBN 978-0-8040-1068-9.
- ^ Huxley, A., ed. (1992). Lawns. In New RHS Dictionary of Gardening 3: 26–33. Macmillan. ISBN 0-333-47494-5
- ^ "How to grow grass seed in shade". icanlawn.com Blog. 24 August 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f Bornstein, Carol, Fross, David, and O'Brien, Bart; 'California Native Plants for the Garden;' Cachuma Press, Los Olivos, CA; 2005; ISBN 0-9628505-8-6, 0-9628505-9-4. pp. 74–5.
- ^ a b Bender, Steve. "Plant a Moss Lawn". Southern Living.
- ^ Dunn, Jancee (May 2008). "Moss Makes a Lush, No-Care Lawn". The New York Times. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
- ^ Higgins, Adrian. "Moss is no weed. It's a brilliant addition to the garden". Washington Post.
- ^ Singer, Carolyn (3 May 2015). "Rethinking lawn with native yarrow". theunion.com.
- ^ Kleinrock, Scott. "If Not Lawn, Then What?". The Huntington.
- ^ "Creeping Yarrow (Achillea millefolium) for Lawn". patwelsh.com.
- ^ a b Marsh, Sheena (28 February 2022). "Alternative Lawn Ideas". Oxford Garden Design. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- ^ a b c d Lunn, Matthew (7 September 2004). "Fact Sheet: Lawn Alternatives". Gardening Australia. Archived from the original on 3 September 2009. Retrieved 16 September 2009.
- ^ a b c "Non-Grass Lawns". www.intergardening.co.uk. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- ^ "Groundcover List". University of Maryland Extension. Archived from the original on 26 February 2024. Retrieved 25 May 2023.
- ^ "Beauty and Biodiversity: Native Ground Covers for Shade". Direct Native Plants. 8 July 2022.
- ^ "Recommended Native Groundcovers for North Carolina". Gardenia.net.
- ^ "Plant Native Ground Covers & Make America Green Again". choosenatives.org.
- ^ "Spring Beauty (Claytonia virginica)". illinoiswildflowers.info.
- ^ "Salvia lyrata". wildflower.org.
- ^ Mimet, Anne; Kerbiriou, Christian; Simon, Laurent; Julien, Jean-Francois; Raymond, Richard (1 January 2020). "Contribution of private gardens to habitat availability, connectivity and conservation of the common pipistrelle in Paris". Landscape and Urban Planning. 193 103671. Bibcode:2020LUrbP.19303671M. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103671. ISSN 0169-2046.
- ^ "Autumn lawn care". Royal Horticultural Society. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
- ^ Christie, Mike (13 March 2007). "Private Property Pesticide By-laws In Canada" (PDF). The Coalition for a Healthy Ottawa. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 19 August 2007.
- ^ "Why We Support a Province-wide Ban on Cosmetic Pesticides" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 December 2008. Retrieved 4 April 2008.
- ^ Mittelstaedt, Martin (22 April 2008). "Ontario to prohibit cosmetic-use pesticides". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 28 August 2008.
- ^ Benzie, Robert (22 April 2008). "Pesticide ban set to grow". Toronto Star.
- ^ UC Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program. access date: 25 May 2010
- ^ "High Weed/Grass Complaint Process". City of Akron, Ohio. Archived from the original on 9 August 2010.
- ^ Trapp, Sara Jane Von (1997). Landscaping from the Ground Up. Taunton Press. pp. 112. ISBN 9781561581856.
- ^ a b "How scientists are rethinking lawns—and how you can, too". www.chicagobotanic.org. 15 March 2023. Retrieved 11 March 2025.
- ^ Dickinson, Greg (2006). "The Pleasantville Effect: Nostalgia and the Visual Framing of (White) Suburbia". Western Journal of Communication. 70 (3): 212–233. doi:10.1080/10570310600843504. S2CID 144339746.
- ^ Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1925.
- ^ Sedgman, K (1997). "Cutting Grass: In Search of the Australian Male". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 18 (3): 143–147. doi:10.1002/j.1467-8438.1997.tb00284.x.
- ^ Coates, Peter (2004). "Emerging from the Wilderness: (or, From Redwoods to Bananas): Recent Environmental History in the United States and the Rest of the Americas". Environment and History. 10 (4): 407–38. Bibcode:2004EnHis..10..407C. doi:10.3197/0967340042772676.
- ^ a b Alumai, Alfred. "Urban Lawn Management: Addressing the Entomological, Agronomic, Economic, and Social Drivers." PhD., Ohio State University, 2008.
- ^ Horton, Helena (29 April 2022). "Mow problem: gardeners encouraged not to cut lawns in May". www.theguardian.com. Retrieved 30 April 2022.
- ^ Bergman, Megan Mayhew (9 April 2020). "Born to rewild: why now is the perfect time to make your lawn an eco-paradise". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 10 February 2025.
- ^ Arvidson, Adam (2013). "Lawn Gone". Landscape of Architecture Magazine. 103 (9).
- ^ a b "Rebecca Pineo. Susan Barton. Turf Grass Madness: Reasons to Reduce the Lawn in Your Landscape" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 August 2017. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
- ^ a b "Cut Your Lawn - In Half!". National Wildlife Federation. Archived from the original on 9 February 2012.
- ^ Sayre, Laura. "Organic farming combats global warming--big time". Rodale Institute. Archived from the original on 12 June 2009.
- ^ Gu, Guanhui; Crane, Johne; Hornberger, George; Caricco, Amanda (2015). "The effects of household management practices on the global warming potential of urban lawns" (PDF). Journal of Environmental Management. 151: 233–242. Bibcode:2015JEnvM.151..233G. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.008. PMID 25585139.
- ^ "Hosepipe ban". Retrieved 21 January 2015.
- ^ Smith, David Ingle (1998). Water in Australia: Resources and Management. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195537048.
- ^ Milesi, Cristina; S.W. Running; C.D. Elvidge; J.B. Dietz; B.T. Tuttle; R.R. Nemani (8 November 2005). "Mapping and modeling the biogeochemical cycling of turf grasses in the United States". Environmental Management. 36 (3): 426–438. Bibcode:2005EnMan..36..426M. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0316-2. PMID 16086109. S2CID 22507948. Archived from the original on 16 March 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
- ^ Fountain, Henry (3 May 2022). "Where Lawns Are Outlawed (and Dug Up, and Carted Away)". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
- ^ Alumai, Alfred; Salminen, Seppo O.; Richmond, Douglas S; Cardina, John; Grewal, Parwinder S. (2009). "Comparative Evaluation of Aesthetic, Biological, and Economic Effectiveness of Different Lawn Management Programs". Urban Ecosyst. 12 (2): 127–144. Bibcode:2009UrbEc..12..127A. doi:10.1007/s11252-008-0073-8. S2CID 13204219.
- ^ Willon, Phil (10 October 2021). "California moves toward ban on gas lawnmowers and leaf blowers". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 10 October 2021.
- ^ "Answers to Commonly Asked Questions from Dealers and Distributors" (PDF). U.S. EPA. August 1998. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 August 2000.
- ^ "Lawns may contribute to global warming" by Judy Lowe, Christian Science Monitor, 22 January 2010.
- ^ "Retrieved 17 May 2010". sciencedaily.com.
- ^ Townsend-Small, Amy; Czimczik, Claudia (March 2010). "Correction to "Carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions in urban turf"". Geophysical Research Letters. 37 (6) 2010GL042735: n/a. Bibcode:2010GeoRL..37.6707T. doi:10.1029/2010GL042735. Retrieved 15 March 2012.[permanent dead link]
- ^ Falk, John H. (1980). "The Primary Productivity of Lawns in a Temperate Environment". Journal of Applied Ecology. 17 (3): 689–695. Bibcode:1980JApEc..17..689F. doi:10.2307/2402647. ISSN 0021-8901. JSTOR 2402647.
- ^ "Rebecca Pineo, Botanic Gardens Intern Susan Barton, Extension Specialist. Groundcover Alternatives to Turf Grass" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 12 May 2016.
- ^ Readel, Anne. "Meadowscaping is a Trendy Lawn Alternative- Here's How to Try It in Your Yard". bhg.com. Better Homes and Gardens.
- ^ Korsunsky, Alex (7 July 2019). "From vacant land to urban fallows: a permacultural approach to wasted land in cities and suburbs". Journal of Political Ecology. 26 (1): 282–304. Bibcode:2019JPolE..2622949K. doi:10.2458/v26i1.22949. ISSN 1073-0451. S2CID 199175607.
- ^ Cogger, Craig George (2019). "Growing food on parking strips and in front yard gardens". Washington State University. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
- ^ Soler, Ivette. The Edible Front Yard: The Mow-Less, Grow-More Plan for a Beautiful, Bountiful Garden. Timber Press, 2011. pg. 8.
Further reading
[edit]- Making a Lawn by Luke Joseph Doogue
- Hessayon, D. G. (1997). The Lawn Expert. Expert. ISBN 978-0-903505-48-2.
- Huxley, A., ed. (1992). New RHS Dictionary of Gardening. Lawns: Ch. 3: pp. 26–33. Macmillan. ISBN 0-333-47494-5.
- Jenkins, V. S. (1994). The Lawn: A History of an American Obsession. Smithsonian Books. ISBN 1-56098-406-6.
- Steinberg, T. (2006). American Green, The Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Lawn. W.W. Norton & Co. ISBN 0-393-06084-5.
- Wasowski, Sally and Andy (2004). Requiem for a Lawnmower.
External links
[edit]- "Planting and care of Lawns" from the UNT Govt. Documents Dept.
- Integrated Pest Management Program: website & search-engine
- How to look after your Lawn
- Lawn Care University at Michigan State University
- "EPA Management of Polluted Runoff: Nonpoint Source Pollution" (includes mismanagement of lawns problems.)
Etymology
Linguistic Origins and Evolution
The English word lawn derives from Middle English launde (attested from circa 1250–1300), denoting a glade or open space in a wooded area.[9] This term was borrowed from Old French lande, meaning "heath," "moor," or "clearing," which itself traces to a pre-Roman Celtic substrate, likely Gaulish or Common Brittonic landa, cognate with Breton lann ("heath") and Welsh llan ("enclosure" or "open land").[10] [11] Linguistically, the root reflects Indo-European patterns associating open, uncultivated land with terms for flat or cleared terrain, distinct from forested or enclosed spaces; comparative evidence from Celtic languages supports a Gaulish origin for lande, introduced into Vulgar Latin and thence to Old French via Roman contact with Celtic-speaking regions.[10] In early English usage, launde emphasized natural or semi-natural clearings rather than cultivated turf, as seen in medieval texts describing wooded glades suitable for grazing or passage.[12] By Early Modern English (circa 1540 onward), the form shifted to lawn or laune, evolving semantically to denote short, even turf or grassy plots, influenced by emerging landscape practices that transformed natural clearings into maintained open grounds for aesthetic or recreational purposes.[13] This transition paralleled broader linguistic developments in English horticultural vocabulary, where terms for wild land (e.g., heath-derived words) adapted to describe human-modified environments, distinguishing lawn from rougher pastures (leasow) or meadows.[14] The fabric sense of lawn (thin linen) is unrelated, stemming separately from the town of Laon in France, and represents a homonym rather than an etymological overlap.[10]History
Ancient and Pre-Modern Origins
The earliest known precursors to managed grass areas appeared in ancient civilizations, though they differed markedly from modern mown lawns. In the Achaemenid Persian Empire around 550 BCE, royal paradises such as those at Pasargadae featured irrigated green enclosures symbolizing an earthly paradise, with grass-like turf integrated into formal layouts alongside trees, water channels, and flowers; these served elite recreational and symbolic functions but were not extensively cropped open swards.[15] Similarly, in ancient Rome, turf was employed practically in villa gardens for shaded seats or pathways, as described by Pliny the Younger in his letters (c. 100 CE), where grass provided a soft, green surface amid more dominant features like colonnades and statuary; however, Roman horticulture favored gravel or mosaics over large grass expanses due to maintenance challenges in Mediterranean climates.[16] These ancient examples prioritized enclosure and symbolism over uniform turf, with grass often ungrazed or unmown. Medieval Europe marked a shift toward more recognizable lawn-like features, emerging from functional necessities rather than pure aesthetics. From the 12th century onward, European nobility and monasteries cultivated low-growing grass swards in cloisters, castle grounds, and manorial pleasure areas, kept short primarily by sheep grazing or manual scything to ensure visibility for defense, deter ambushes, and provide spaces for games such as archery, jousting, or early bowling.[17] [18] Village commons and monastic garths similarly featured communal turf for livestock and recreation, with records from the 1100s indicating perennial grasses selected for durability under foot traffic.[2] Maintenance required significant labor, affordable only to elites, positioning these areas as status symbols of control over nature. By the late medieval and early modern periods (14th–16th centuries), these turf spaces evolved into deliberate aesthetic elements in Northern European gardens, particularly in England and France, where they formed open "pleasaunces" for leisure activities like pall-mall or croquet precursors.[17] The practice spread via monastic influences and aristocratic emulation, with grass chosen for its verdant resilience in temperate climates, though still irregular compared to later manicured versions; scythes and sickles remained the primary tools until mechanical innovations.[19] This pre-industrial phase laid causal foundations for lawns as markers of wealth, tying resource-intensive upkeep to social hierarchy and land stewardship.European Manor Lawns and Aesthetic Development
In medieval Europe, grassy areas surrounding manor houses primarily served defensive and utilitarian functions, providing unobstructed views for detecting intruders and pastures for livestock grazing that naturally cropped the turf short.[20] [21] These enclosures, often created by leveling soil and laying turf, appeared in both monastic and aristocratic settings as early as the 12th century, with maintenance relying on sheep, cattle, and occasional scything by laborers.[22] [23] By the 16th century, as feudal conflicts diminished, manor lawns transitioned toward recreational and ornamental roles, enabling activities such as bowls, archery, and early forms of croquet, which necessitated smoother surfaces achieved through intensified manual labor including frequent scything and the use of heavy rollers to flatten irregularities.[24] [14] This shift marked lawns as status symbols among the aristocracy, signifying the owner's capacity to divert resources from agriculture to aesthetic upkeep in northern European estates.[24] [25] The 17th century brought formalized aesthetic refinement in France, where André Le Nôtre (1613–1700) pioneered expansive, meticulously clipped lawns as integral elements of grand gardens, exemplified by the paraxial turf vistas at Vaux-le-Vicomte (designed 1656–1661) and Versailles (expanded from 1661 onward), where grass expanses contrasted with sculpted topiary and water features to evoke controlled majesty.[26] [27] These designs influenced European manor landscaping, prioritizing visual symmetry and scale over natural irregularity.[21] [25] In 18th-century England, landscape architect Lancelot "Capability" Brown (1716–1783) further evolved lawn aesthetics toward a picturesque naturalism, redesigning over 170 estates with sweeping, undulating greenswards that merged with parklands, employing ha-has to contain grazing animals while preserving panoramic illusions of wilderness tamed by human artifice.[28] [29] Maintenance involved teams of scythe-wielding workers and horse-drawn rollers to achieve the desired velvety texture, underscoring lawns' role as emblems of enlightened prosperity.[14] [25]Colonial Spread and Adaptation
European colonists, particularly from Britain, introduced the concept and practice of manicured grass lawns to North America in the 17th and 18th centuries, replicating the aesthetic of English manor grounds as symbols of wealth and leisure. Immigrants from England, Scotland, and northern Europe carried grass seeds, establishing small turf areas around settlements and elite estates despite the challenges of unfamiliar soils and climates. By the late 18th century, figures such as George Washington at Mount Vernon and Thomas Jefferson at Monticello incorporated lawns into their landscapes, with Jefferson actively experimenting with European styling as early as 1806 to create smooth, open green expanses for visual appeal and recreation.[30][31][32] In the American colonies, lawns initially remained a privilege of the affluent, requiring manual scything and imported European varieties like fescues and ryegrasses, which struggled in the varied regional conditions from the humid East to the arid West. Adaptation involved gradual selection of hardier species; for instance, Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), inadvertently introduced via contaminated hay and livestock feed, naturalized and proliferated across the continent ahead of settlement patterns, forming resilient swards in cooler climates. In southern regions, warm-season grasses such as Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), also brought by Europeans, proved more suitable and aggressively spread, often displacing native vegetation through superior competitiveness in disturbed soils. By 1780, the Shakers in New England initiated the first large-scale production of grass seed in America, facilitating broader dissemination and cultivation beyond elite gardens.[33][34][35] The lawn tradition extended to other British colonies, including Australia, where English settlers imposed turf on public spaces and private properties from the early 19th century onward, viewing it as an extension of imperial cultural norms despite the continent's predominantly arid conditions and native ecosystems lacking extensive grasslands. Adaptations there emphasized drought-tolerant exotic species like couch grass (Cynodon dactylon variants) and kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum), imported for their vigor in Mediterranean-like climates, often necessitating irrigation and soil amendments to mimic temperate European models. This colonial imposition prioritized aesthetic conformity over ecological fit, leading to widespread replacement of indigenous flora with monocultural lawns that required ongoing inputs for sustainability.[36][37]Industrialization and Suburban Expansion
The industrialization of lawn maintenance began with the invention of the mechanical cylinder mower in 1830 by British engineer Edwin Budding, who patented a device inspired by textile shearing machines used in cloth mills, enabling the efficient cutting of uniform grass heights over larger areas than manual scything or animal grazing permitted.[38][39] This innovation democratized lawn care, shifting it from labor-intensive practices suitable only for estates to more scalable methods aligned with industrial efficiency, as push mowers proliferated in the mid-19th century across Europe and North America.[40] By the early 20th century, powered variants emerged, including Ransomes' 1902 commercial gasoline-engine mower and Colonel Edwin George's 1919 introduction of gas-powered models to the United States, further reducing physical effort and facilitating the upkeep of expansive grass surfaces amid urban growth.[41][40] Suburban expansion in the United States, fueled by 19th-century transportation advancements like streetcars and railroads, transformed lawns into standard features of middle-class residences by the 1890s, as commuters sought pastoral escapes from dense cities while maintaining proximity to urban centers.[42] This development was amplified post-World War II, when federal policies such as the GI Bill and highway construction spurred massive suburbanization, with developments like Levittown, New York—launched in 1947—encompassing over 17,000 homes by 1951, each requiring a meticulously maintained front lawn to enforce neighborhood uniformity and symbolize prosperity.[43][44] The resultant proliferation of single-family homes on quarter-acre lots standardized the American lawn, covering an estimated 40 million acres by the late 20th century, driven by cultural norms equating verdant turf with social status and civic pride rather than agricultural utility.[30][33] Mechanized tools and suburban sprawl intertwined causally, as affordable mowers enabled homeowners to sustain the expansive, weed-free grass plots integral to suburban aesthetics, while seed companies and chemical firms marketed resilient varieties and fertilizers to match the era's demands for low-maintenance conformity.[43] This period marked a pivot from ornamental elite gardens to ubiquitous functional landscapes, where lawns served as buffers between private homes and public streets, reinforcing property demarcation amid population booms from 50 million suburban residents in 1950 to over 100 million by 2000.[45][46]Post-War Boom and Chemical Integration
The post-World War II era in the United States marked a surge in suburban development, fueled by the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944 (GI Bill), which provided low-interest home loans to veterans, and a post-war economic boom that expanded the middle class. This led to the rapid construction of planned communities, exemplified by Levittown, New York, where developers William Levitt and Sons built over 17,000 homes between 1947 and 1951, each including a front lawn as a standard feature.[47] [48] Homeowners' covenants in these developments mandated lawn maintenance, including weekly mowing from April to November, reinforcing the lawn as a symbol of conformity and prosperity in suburban life.[49] By the 1950s, this suburban expansion had created extensive turfgrass areas, with lawns becoming ubiquitous in new housing tracts across the country.[43] [30] Parallel to this spatial proliferation, the integration of synthetic chemicals into lawn care accelerated, drawing from wartime agricultural innovations repurposed for consumer use. The herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), initially synthesized in the early 1940s and tested during World War II, emerged commercially in 1945 as the first selective broadleaf weed killer, allowing targeted control without harming grasses.[50] [51] In the late 1940s, over 100 new pesticide chemicals were developed, expanding options for insecticides and fungicides suited to residential turf.[51] Chemical fertilizers, such as those containing nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, gained prominence to promote lush green growth on the often nutrient-poor soils of new subdivisions, with companies like the Scotts Company—established in 1868 but expanding its lawn seed and fertilizer lines post-war—marketing products tailored for homeowners.[52] [53] This chemical era transformed lawn maintenance from labor-intensive manual practices to systematic applications via spreaders and sprayers, enabling the "perfect lawn" ideal propagated through advertising and suburban norms. By the 1950s and 1960s, routine use of these inputs became standard for achieving uniform, weed-free turf, though initial grass varieties were often better adapted to golf courses than home lawns, necessitating heavier reliance on amendments.[30] The lawn care industry capitalized on this demand, with expenditures on fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides reflecting widespread adoption among suburban households.[54] This integration not only supported aesthetic standards but also embedded chemical dependency into the cultural expectation of manicured landscapes.[44]Late 20th to Early 21st Century Shifts
Growing environmental awareness from the 1970s onward, spurred by events like Earth Day 1970, led to scrutiny of traditional lawn maintenance practices, particularly the heavy reliance on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides that contributed to water pollution and ecosystem degradation.[55] In response, the late 1980s and 1990s saw the promotion of integrated pest management (IPM) techniques by agricultural extensions and the EPA, emphasizing biological controls and targeted applications to reduce chemical inputs by up to 50-70% in some cases while maintaining turf health.[56] Local regulations emerged, such as restrictions on phosphorus-based fertilizers to curb algal blooms in waterways; for instance, Dane County, Wisconsin, implemented such limits in the early 2000s, serving as a model for broader adoption.[57] Water scarcity in arid regions drove the popularization of xeriscaping, a landscaping approach designed to minimize irrigation needs through drought-tolerant plants and efficient designs. The term "xeriscape" was coined in 1981 by the Denver Water Department amid Colorado's water conservation efforts, gaining traction during the 1980s droughts and expanding nationally by the 1990s as municipal rebates incentivized replacing high-water grass lawns with native or adapted species.[58] This shift addressed lawns' substantial water consumption—estimated at 9 billion gallons daily in the U.S. by the early 2000s—while promoting biodiversity and reducing maintenance costs.[59] Concurrently, advocacy for native plant lawns intensified in the 1990s and 2000s, highlighting benefits like enhanced pollinator habitats and lower fertilizer demands, though adoption remained limited due to aesthetic preferences and homeowners' association restrictions.[60] Technological innovations complemented these ecological adjustments, with robotic lawn mowers emerging as a labor-saving alternative to manual or powered mowing. Husqvarna introduced the world's first commercial robotic mower, the Solar Mower, in 1995, powered by solar energy and capable of autonomous operation on slopes up to 35 degrees, marking the start of automated turf management that reduced fuel emissions and human effort.[61] By the early 2000s, models from competitors like Friendly Robotics' Robomow expanded market availability, with global sales reaching one million units by 2017, reflecting broader integration of electronics in residential landscaping amid suburban demands for convenience.[62] These developments aligned with sustainability goals by enabling precise, infrequent cuts that promoted healthier grass roots, though traditional manicured lawns persisted as cultural norms in many areas.[63]Functions and Benefits
Recreational and Social Uses
Lawns facilitate a range of recreational activities due to their even, resilient surfaces that support physical play without excessive damage to participants. Common uses include informal sports such as soccer and flag football, as well as games like badminton, croquet, and horseshoes, which rely on the turf's ability to allow ball rolling and player movement.[64][65] These activities are prevalent in residential backyards and public parks, where lawns provide accessible spaces for exercise and leisure.[66] Picnicking and casual gatherings on lawns date back to their design for social recreation, offering shaded or open areas for relaxation and outdoor meals. In modern contexts, such uses extend to children's play, with turf providing a safe, soft surface for running and falling, reducing injury risk compared to hardscapes.[64][67] Surveys indicate that 76% of Americans plan to host an average of three outdoor cookouts or dinner parties annually, frequently utilizing lawn areas for barbecues that accommodate grilling and seating.[68] Socially, lawns in suburban and community settings promote interaction by serving as visible, shared spaces that encourage neighborhood cohesion and family bonding. Well-maintained lawns act as gathering points for events, reinforcing community norms through their uniformity and upkeep, which signals adherence to collective standards.[20][66] In public venues like capitol grounds or parks, expansive lawns host large-scale events such as concerts and memorials, accommodating crowds for passive recreation and social assembly.[69] This function persists despite debates over lawn maintenance costs, as empirical use patterns demonstrate their role in enabling low-barrier social and recreational access across demographics.[70]Aesthetic and Property Value Enhancements
Well-maintained lawns contribute to the aesthetic appeal of properties by offering a uniform, verdant surface that complements architectural features and creates a sense of order and tranquility. The lush green color and textured uniformity of grass provide visual contrast to built structures, softening hard lines and integrating homes with their natural surroundings, which enhances overall curb appeal—the initial visual impression that influences perceptions of property quality.[71][72] This aesthetic enhancement translates into tangible property value increases, as evidenced by empirical studies on landscaping impacts. Research from the American Society of Landscape Architects indicates that professional landscaping, including manicured lawns, can elevate a home's resale value by 15 to 20 percent compared to unlandscaped properties.[73] A Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University study conducted in 1996–1997 in Greenville, South Carolina, quantified that homes with landscapes rated good to excellent, featuring well-kept lawns, garnered price premiums of 6 to 7 percent over those with fair or poor conditions.[74] Conversely, neglected lawns diminish aesthetic value and can reduce property appraisals significantly; surveys of U.S. real estate agents reveal that poor landscaping, such as overgrown or patchy grass, correlates with an average 10 percent drop in home value.[75] These effects stem from buyer preferences for properties signaling ongoing care and maintenance, where a pristine lawn acts as a proxy for interior condition and homeowner diligence.[76]Ecosystem Services Provided
Lawns contribute to ecosystem services primarily through regulating functions such as carbon sequestration, air purification, and stormwater infiltration, though these benefits vary with management intensity and are often offset by maintenance inputs like fertilization and mowing. Peer-reviewed analyses indicate that turfgrass-soil systems can sequester carbon at rates comparable to or exceeding some agricultural lands, with newly established lawns achieving an average of 5.3 Mg CO₂ ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ in the first decade.[77] Over longer periods, well-managed residential and institutional lawns maintain soil organic carbon accumulation, potentially storing 0.23–0.69 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ depending on grass species and soil conditions.[78] This sequestration occurs via root biomass accumulation and organic matter inputs from clippings, though emissions from equipment and synthetic fertilizers can reduce net gains in high-input scenarios.[79] Through photosynthesis, lawns produce oxygen and mitigate air pollution by absorbing carbon dioxide and trapping particulate matter. A healthy turfgrass canopy can filter pollutants at rates up to 10 times higher than bare soil, with dense root systems aiding in volatile organic compound uptake.[80] Oxygen output from lawns is substantial due to high leaf surface area; estimates suggest an acre of turfgrass generates sufficient daily oxygen for dozens of people, surpassing per-area rates of mature forests in some models, though total biomass limits absolute contributions compared to woodlands.[81] These services enhance urban air quality, particularly in densely populated areas where lawns cover 20–30% of land in suburbs.[82] Lawns provide hydrological regulation by facilitating stormwater infiltration and reducing runoff. Their root networks and soil structure promote water retention, with studies showing turfgrass systems infiltrating up to 100 mm of rainfall per event while minimizing erosion and nutrient leaching into waterways.[83] In urban settings, this service mitigates flood risks and recharges groundwater, though compacted soils from heavy traffic can diminish efficacy, necessitating aeration practices.[82] Additionally, lawns stabilize soils against erosion, supporting habitat for soil microbes and select invertebrates, albeit with limited plant diversity—often dominated by one or two grass species—yielding lower biodiversity than native meadows.[84] Management allowing for occasional forbs or reduced mowing can enhance pollinator and arthropod support without sacrificing turf integrity.[85] Thermal regulation represents another key service, as evapotranspiration from lawns cools local microclimates by 2–5°C compared to impervious surfaces, countering urban heat islands.[80] This effect stems from high evapotranspiration rates, which also contribute to humidity moderation. Overall, while lawns deliver these regulating and supporting services empirically demonstrated in field studies, their net ecological value hinges on low-input practices that minimize chemical dependencies and foster incidental biodiversity.[86]Economic Contributions and Industry Scale
The turfgrass industry in the United States, encompassing managed lawns for residential, commercial, and institutional uses, exerts an economic impact exceeding $60 billion annually as of recent estimates, supporting over 820,000 jobs across production, maintenance, and related sectors.[87] This figure derives from direct expenditures on sod, seed, fertilizers, equipment, and labor, with residential lawns constituting a primary driver due to widespread suburban coverage and homeowner investments.[88] The sector's scale reflects causal linkages to housing development and property aesthetics, where lawns enhance land values and sustain demand for ongoing services; for instance, the U.S. lawn care market alone reached approximately $58 billion in 2024, projected to grow at a compound annual rate of nearly 5% through the decade.[89] Contributions extend to upstream and downstream industries, including manufacturing of lawn equipment valued at over $22 billion in output and agricultural inputs like turfgrass seed production, which added $3.7 billion to markets in recent years.[90][91] Landscaping services tied to lawn maintenance form a subset of the broader $184 billion U.S. industry in 2025, employing workers in mowing, fertilization, and irrigation while generating multiplier effects through supply chains for fuels, machinery, and chemicals.[92] These activities bolster local economies via tax revenues and indirect employment, though data from university-affiliated studies like those from Texas A&M emphasize verifiable input-output models over potentially inflated self-reported industry figures.[93] Globally, the lawn care and turfgrass market scales to around $130 billion in 2024, with projections nearing $280 billion by 2035, driven by urbanization in regions like North America and Europe where residential and recreational lawns predominate.[94] Equipment manufacturing for lawn and garden tools contributes an additional $43 billion in 2025, underscoring the industry's integration with mechanized agriculture and consumer goods sectors.[95] While broader landscaping encompasses $669 billion worldwide, lawn-specific segments highlight efficient resource allocation in maintained green spaces, with empirical assessments prioritizing peer-reviewed economic modeling over anecdotal reports.[96]Types of Lawn Vegetation
Dominant Grass Species
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) ranks among the most prevalent turfgrass species for lawns in cool-season climates across North America and Europe, valued for its fine texture, rhizomatous spread that enables self-repair, and vibrant green color during active growth periods from spring to fall.[97][98] This species originated in Eurasian steppes but has been extensively cultivated since the 17th century, comprising up to 80% of seed mixtures in northern U.S. sod production as of 2025.[99] Its dominance stems from tolerance to moderate foot traffic and cold winters, though it requires irrigation and fertilization to maintain density in drier summers.[100] Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) frequently serves as a companion species in Kentucky bluegrass blends or as a standalone option, prized for rapid establishment from seed—germinating in 5-10 days—and fine leaves that provide quick green-up for overseeding dormant warm-season lawns.[101][102] It covers significant portions of transitional zone lawns in the U.S., where its bunch-type growth habit supports wear resistance but demands reseeding every 2-3 years due to shorter persistence compared to spreading types.[103] Tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea, now often classified as Lolium arundinaceum) has surged in popularity for its deep root system—extending up to 3 feet—conferring drought tolerance and reduced maintenance needs, making it dominant in over 30 million U.S. acres of lawns by the early 21st century.[104] Endophyte-enhanced cultivars further bolster resistance to pests like billbugs, contributing to its widespread adoption in mid-Atlantic and transition zones since the 1980s.[105] In warmer regions, bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) emerges as the preeminent species, occupying vast expanses in the southern U.S. and subtropical areas globally due to aggressive stoloniferous and rhizomatous propagation that forms dense mats resistant to heavy use.[106] Hybrid cultivars like Tifway 419, developed in the 1950s, dominate golf and sports turf for their fine texture and recuperative potential, though common types spread invasively beyond managed areas.[107] Zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp.) trails as a secondary dominant in humid subtropics, noted for shade tolerance and low water use once established, but slower initial growth limits its seeding prevalence.[108] These warm-season grasses collectively underpin over 50% of U.S. southern residential turf as of recent surveys, reflecting adaptation to high temperatures above 90°F (32°C) where cool-season alternatives falter.[109]Cool-Season Grasses
Cool-season grasses constitute a category of turfgrasses adapted to temperate climates, with optimal shoot growth occurring at air temperatures between 60°F and 75°F (15°C to 24°C), though root development peaks at soil temperatures of 50°F to 65°F (10°C to 18°C).[110][111] These species exhibit primary growth flushes in spring and fall, tolerate frost, and retain green coloration during mild winters, rendering them suitable for northern regions of the United States, Canada, and parts of Europe where average summer highs rarely exceed 85°F (29°C).[112][113] In transition zones with variable summers, they may require supplemental irrigation and fertilization to mitigate heat stress, as prolonged temperatures above 85°F can induce dormancy or decline.[114] Prominent species include Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass), a rhizomatous, sod-forming grass that produces fine-textured, dark green foliage with excellent self-repair via underground stems, though it demands fertile, well-drained soils and shows vulnerability to diseases like necrotic ring spot and summer patch.[115][99] Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass), a bunch-type grass, germinates in 5 to 10 days and withstands heavy foot traffic, providing rapid coverage in mixtures, but its shallow roots limit drought resistance, necessitating reseeding every 2 to 3 years in high-wear areas.[99][116] Festuca arundinacea (tall fescue), characterized by coarse leaves and deep roots extending up to 3 feet (0.9 m), offers superior tolerance to shade, drought, and poor soils compared to finer-textured cool-season types, suitable for moderate shade conditions, with modern turf-type cultivars achieving densities suitable for lawns since selective breeding advancements in the 1980s.[116][117] Fine fescues, encompassing Festuca rubra subsp. rubra (creeping red fescue), Festuca rubra subsp. commutata (Chewings fescue), Festuca ovina (hard fescue), and sheep fescue, feature narrow blades and low nutrient requirements, thriving in low-maintenance, shady sites with minimal mowing heights of 2 to 3 inches (5 to 7.6 cm); blends including these species are the most shade-tolerant among cool-season grasses according to university extensions, though they exhibit slower establishment but excel in acidic, infertile conditions where other species falter.[99][100][118] Secondary species like Poa trivialis (rough bluegrass) provide wet-soil tolerance and are highly recommended for moist shade conditions but succumb to drying and heat, limiting their standalone use.[99][119]| Species | Growth Habit | Key Tolerances | Limitations | Typical Mowing Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky bluegrass | Rhizomatous | Wear recovery, cold | Shade, drought, diseases | 2–2.5 in (5–6.4 cm) [115] |
| Perennial ryegrass | Bunch | Traffic, quick establishment | Heat, longevity without reseed | 1.5–2.5 in (3.8–6.4 cm)[99] |
| Tall fescue | Bunch | Drought, shade, low fertility | Coarse texture, clumping | 2.5–3.5 in (6.4–8.9 cm)[116] |
| Fine fescues | Bunch/rhizomatous | Shade, low maintenance | Slow establishment, wear | 2–3 in (5–7.6 cm) [117] |
Warm-Season Grasses
Warm-season grasses are turfgrass species adapted to high-temperature environments, achieving optimal growth when soil temperatures range from 75°F to 95°F (24°C to 35°C), primarily through efficient C4 photosynthesis that minimizes photorespiration under heat stress.[122] These grasses thrive in USDA Plant Hardiness Zones 7 through 11, encompassing the southern United States, Gulf Coast, and Southwest regions, where they provide persistent green cover during summer peaks when cool-season alternatives succumb to heat and drought.[123] Unlike cool-season grasses, warm-season varieties enter dormancy—turning straw-colored—when soil temperatures fall below 50°F (10°C), limiting their vigor to a single annual growth cycle from late spring through early fall.[113] Key advantages of warm-season grasses in lawn applications include superior heat and drought tolerance, often requiring 30-50% less irrigation than cool-season types once established, due to deeper root systems and physiological adaptations like stomatal closure during water scarcity.[124] They also exhibit resilience to heavy foot traffic and wear, making them suitable for recreational lawns, though they demand full sun exposure for peak performance and can be invasive via vegetative spread in some cases.[106] Establishment typically occurs via seed, sod, or plugs in spring, with fertilization focused on nitrogen during active growth to support recovery from mowing and stress.[105] The following table summarizes characteristics of predominant warm-season lawn grasses:| Species | Scientific Name | Key Traits | Suitability and Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bermudagrass | Cynodon dactylon | Aggressive spread via stolons and rhizomes; high drought and wear tolerance; fine to medium texture; establishes quickly (4-6 weeks). | Full sun; frequent mowing (1-2 inches); ideal for high-traffic southern lawns; invasive potential in landscapes.[105][101] |
| Zoysiagrass | Zoysia spp. | Dense, carpet-like turf; moderate shade and drought tolerance; slow growth rate; good cold hardiness for transition zones. | Full to partial sun; infrequent mowing (1-2 inches); wear-resistant but slower recovery; suited to medium-maintenance lawns.[106][125] |
| St. Augustinegrass | Stenotaphrum secundatum | Coarse texture; excellent shade tolerance among warm-season types; spreads by stolons; prefers fertile, moist soils. | Partial shade to full sun; mowing at 2-4 inches; susceptible to chinch bugs and fungal diseases; common in humid southeastern lawns.[126][127] |
| Centipedegrass | Eremochloa ophiuroides | Low-maintenance; apple-green color; tolerant of acidic, infertile soils; moderate drought resistance; slow establishment. | Full sun; mowing at 1.5-2 inches; avoids high-nitrogen fertilizers to prevent decline; best for low-input southern lawns.[128][129] |
Non-Grass Ground Covers in Lawn Contexts
Non-grass ground covers consist of low-growing broadleaf plants, perennials, and succulents used to supplant or augment turfgrass in lawn settings, particularly where grass struggles due to shade, drought, or soil limitations. Common examples include white clover (Trifolium repens), which forms dense mats and tolerates compaction better than many grasses in low-fertility soils; creeping thyme (Thymus serpyllum), a mat-forming herb suited to sunny, dry areas; and sedum species, such as Sedum acre, which provide evergreen coverage with minimal irrigation needs.[131][132][133] Mosses, like Sphagnum varieties, thrive in acidic, moist shade without requiring mowing or fertilizers, while dichondra (Dichondra repens) offers a grass-like appearance in mild climates but demands protection from heavy traffic.[134][135] These covers often demand less upkeep than turfgrass; for example, clover's nitrogen-fixing root nodules supply up to 100-150 pounds of nitrogen per acre yearly, diminishing reliance on commercial fertilizers that contribute to runoff pollution.[136] Creeping thyme withstands drought by reducing evapotranspiration compared to Kentucky bluegrass, conserving 30-50% more water in arid regions, and suppresses weeds through allelopathic compounds.[137] Sedum and similar succulents exhibit crassulacean acid metabolism, enabling daytime CO2 storage and nighttime fixation, which enhances water-use efficiency by 2-3 times over C3 grasses like fescue.[138] Ecologically, polycultures incorporating these plants boost pollinator habitat and soil microbial diversity, with studies showing 20-40% higher invertebrate abundance than monoculture lawns.[139]| Ground Cover | Key Adaptations | Maintenance Reduction |
|---|---|---|
| White Clover (Trifolium repens) | Nitrogen fixation; shade and drought tolerance | No fertilizer; infrequent mowing[131][136] |
| Creeping Thyme (Thymus serpyllum) | Low water needs; foot traffic resistance up to moderate levels | Minimal irrigation; no pesticides in suitable soils[137] |
| Sedum spp. | Succulent storage; poor soil endurance | Rare watering; weed suppression via density[138] |
| Moss (e.g., Sphagnum) | Acidic, wet shade preference | Zero mowing or fertilizing[133] |
Maintenance Practices
Establishment and Planting Techniques
Establishing a lawn requires meticulous soil preparation to ensure optimal conditions for grass root development and long-term vigor. Soil testing for pH, nutrient levels, and texture is essential, with most turfgrasses thriving in slightly acidic to neutral soils (pH 6.0-7.0); amendments like lime or sulfur adjust pH as needed based on test results.[142] [143] The site must be cleared of debris, weeds, and existing vegetation, followed by tilling or rototilling to a depth of 4-6 inches to loosen compacted soil and incorporate organic matter such as compost at rates of 1-2 inches layered over the surface.[144] [143] Fine grading levels the surface to eliminate low spots that could lead to water pooling, while avoiding over-compaction that impedes root penetration; a firm seedbed is achieved by raking and rolling lightly.[144] Primary planting methods include seeding, sodding, and vegetative techniques like plugging or sprigging, selected based on grass species, site conditions, and desired establishment speed. Seeding suits most cool-season grasses such as Kentucky bluegrass or tall fescue and is performed in late summer to early fall (August-September in temperate regions) to leverage cooler temperatures and reduce weed competition; seed is broadcast at rates of 5-10 pounds per 1,000 square feet depending on species, then lightly raked in and covered with straw mulch at 1-2 bales per 1,000 square feet to retain moisture and protect against erosion. For optimal results, it is generally best to seed before light to moderate forecasted rain, which helps settle seeds into the soil, provides natural moisture for germination, and reduces the need for immediate manual watering; avoid seeding right before heavy rain to prevent seed washout or erosion, while seeding after rain is possible if soil is moist but not saturated or muddy.[143] [142] [145] Hydroseeding, a variant involving a slurry of seed, water, fertilizer, and mulch applied via hose, accelerates germination on larger or sloped areas but demands specialized equipment.[144] Sodding transplants mature grass rolls for rapid coverage, ideal for erosion-prone sites or immediate use, with installation best in early fall or spring for cool-season types; sod must be laid tightly without overlapping, rolled for soil contact, and watered immediately to promote rooting within 10-14 days.[142] [143] Vegetative methods like plugging—planting small grass plugs on 6-12 inch centers—are used for spreading species such as zoysiagrass, filling in over 1-2 seasons with irrigation and fertilization, while sprigging involves broadcasting stems or stolons of warm-season grasses like bermudagrass at 10-20 bushels per 1,000 square feet and covering lightly with soil.[146] [147]| Method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Seeding | Lower cost; wider grass variety selection; stronger initial root development[148] | Slower establishment (weeks to months); higher weed risk; erosion potential on slopes[143] |
| Sodding | Instant turf; immediate erosion control; reduced initial weeds[142] | Higher expense; limited to available sod varieties; requires precise installation to avoid poor rooting[143] [148] |
| Plugging/Sprigging | Suitable for vegetative grasses; cost-effective for expansion[146] | Very slow fill-in (1-2 years); labor-intensive; best for specific warm-season species[147] |
