Hubbry Logo
Progesterone (medication)Progesterone (medication)Main
Open search
Progesterone (medication)
Community hub
Progesterone (medication)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Progesterone (medication)
Progesterone (medication)
from Wikipedia

Progesterone
Clinical data
Trade namesPrometrium, Utrogestan, Endometrin, others
Other namesP4; Pregnenedione; Pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione[1]
AHFS/Drugs.comMonograph
MedlinePlusa604017
Routes of
administration
By mouth, sublingual, topical, vaginal, rectal, intramuscular, subcutaneous, intrauterine
Drug classProgestogen; Antimineralocorticoid; Neurosteroid
ATC code
Legal status
Legal status
Pharmacokinetic data
BioavailabilityOral: <2.4%[5]
Vaginal (micronized insert): 4–8%[6][7][8]
Protein binding98–99%:[9][10]
Albumin: 80%
CBGTooltip Corticosteroid-binding globulin: 18%
SHBGTooltip Sex hormone-binding globulin: <1%
• Free: 1–2%
MetabolismMainly liver:
5α- and 5β-reductase
3α-Tooltip 3α-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and 3β-HSDTooltip 3β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
20α-Tooltip 20α-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and 20β-HSDTooltip 20β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
Conjugation
17α-Hydroxylase
21-Hydroxylase
CYPsTooltip CYP (e.g., CYP3A4)
MetabolitesDihydroprogesterones
Pregnanolones
Pregnanediols
20α-Hydroxyprogesterone
17α-Hydroxyprogesterone
Pregnanetriols
11-Deoxycorticosterone
(and glucuronide/sulfate conjugates)
Elimination half-life• Oral: 5 hours (with food)[11]
* Sublingual: 6–7 hours[12]
• Vaginal: 14–50 hours[13][12]
• Topical: 30–40 hours[14]
IM: 20–28 hours[15][13][16]
SC: 13–18 hours[16]
IVTooltip Intravenous injection: 3–90 minutes[17]
ExcretionBile and urine[18][19]
Identifiers
  • (8S,9S,10R,13S,14S,17S)-17-acetyl-10,13-dimethyl-1,2,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-dodecahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-one
CAS Number
PubChem CID
IUPHAR/BPS
DrugBank
ChemSpider
UNII
KEGG
ChEBI
ChEMBL
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC21H30O2
Molar mass314.469 g·mol−1
3D model (JSmol)
Specific rotation[α]D25 = +172 to +182° (2% in dioxane, β-form)
Melting point126 °C (259 °F)
  • CC(=O)[C@H]1CC[C@@H]2[C@@]1(CC[C@H]3[C@H]2CCC4=CC(=O)CC[C@]34C)C
  • InChI=InChI=1S/C21H30O2/c1-13(22)17-6-7-18-16-5-4-14-12-15(23)8-10-20(14,2)19(16)9-11-21(17,18)3/h12,16-19H,4-11H2,1-3H3/t16-,17+,18-,19-,20-,21+/m0/s1 ☒N
  • Key:RJKFOVLPORLFTN-LEKSSAKUSA-N checkY
  (verify)

Progesterone (P4), sold under the brand name Prometrium among others, is a medication and naturally occurring steroid hormone.[20] It is a progestogen and is used in combination with estrogens mainly in hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms and low sex hormone levels in women.[20][21] It is also used in women to support pregnancy and fertility and to treat gynecological disorders.[22][23][24][25] Progesterone can be taken by mouth, vaginally, and by injection into muscle or fat, among other routes.[20] A progesterone vaginal ring and progesterone intrauterine device used for birth control also exist in some areas of the world.[26][27]

Progesterone is well tolerated and often produces few or no side effects.[28] However, a number of side effects are possible, for instance mood changes.[28] If progesterone is taken by mouth or at high doses, certain central side effects including sedation, sleepiness, and cognitive impairment can also occur.[28][20] The medication is a naturally occurring progestogen and hence is an agonist of the progesterone receptor (PR), the biological target of progestogens like endogenous progesterone.[20] It opposes the effects of estrogens in various parts of the body like the uterus and also blocks the effects of the hormone aldosterone.[20][29] In addition, progesterone has neurosteroid effects in the brain.[20]

Progesterone was first isolated in pure form in 1934.[30][31] It first became available as a medication later that year.[32][33] Oral micronized progesterone (OMP), which allowed progesterone to be taken by mouth, was introduced in 1980.[33][22][34] A large number of synthetic progestogens, or progestins, have been derived from progesterone and are used as medications as well.[20] Examples include medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone.[20] In 2023, it was the 117th most commonly prescribed medication in the United States, with more than 5 million prescriptions.[35][36]

Medical uses

[edit]

Menopause

[edit]

Progesterone is used in combination with an estrogen as a component of menopausal hormone therapy for the treatment of menopausal symptoms in peri- and postmenopausal women.[20][37] It is used specifically to provide endometrial protection against unopposed estrogen-induced endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in women with intact uteruses.[20][37] A 2016 systematic review of endometrial protection with progesterone recommended 100 mg/day continuous oral progesterone, 200 mg/day cyclic oral progesterone, 45 to 100 mg/day cyclic vaginal progesterone, and 100 mg alternate-day vaginal progesterone.[29][38] Twice-weekly 100 mg vaginal progesterone was also recommended, but more research is needed on this dose and endometrial monitoring may be advised.[29][38] Transdermal progesterone was not recommended for endometrial protection.[29][38]

The REPLENISH trial was the first adequately powered study to show that continuous 100 mg/day oral progesterone with food provides adequate endometrial protection.[39][40][37][41] Cyclic 200 mg/day oral progesterone has also been found to be effective in the prevention of endometrial hyperplasia, for instance in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) trial.[39][42][38] However, the PEPI trial was not adequately powered to fully quantify endometrial hyperplasia or cancer risk.[39] No adequately powered studies have assessed endometrial protection with vaginal progesterone.[39] In any case, the Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol (ELITE) found that cyclic 45 mg/day vaginal progesterone gel showed no significant difference from placebo in endometrial cancer rates.[39][29] Due to the vaginal first-pass effect, low doses of vaginal progesterone may allow for adequate endometrial protection.[22][43][20] Although not sufficiently powered, various other smaller studies have also found endometrial protection with oral or vaginal progesterone.[39][42][38][44] There is inadequate evidence for endometrial protection with transdermal progesterone cream.[29][22][45][46]

Oral progesterone has been found to significantly reduce hot flashes relative to placebo.[39][47] The combination of an estrogen and oral progesterone likewise reduces hot flashes.[39][37] Estrogen plus oral progesterone has been found to significantly improve quality of life.[39][37] The combination of an estrogen and 100 to 300 mg/day oral progesterone has been found to improve sleep outcomes.[39][37][47] Moreover, sleep was improved to a significantly better extent than estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate.[39] This may be attributable to the sedative neurosteroid effects of progesterone.[39] Reduction of hot flashes may also help to improve sleep outcomes.[39] Based on animal research, progesterone may be involved in sexual function in women.[48][49] However, very limited clinical research suggests that progesterone does not improve sexual desire or function in women.[50]

The combination of an estrogen and oral progesterone has been found to improve bone mineral density (BMD) to a similar extent as an estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate.[39] Progestogens, including progesterone, may have beneficial effects on bone independent of those of estrogens, although more research is required to confirm this notion.[51] The combination of an estrogen and oral or vaginal progesterone has been found to improve cardiovascular health in women in early menopause but not in women in late menopause.[39] Estrogen therapy has a favorable influence on the blood lipid profile, which may translate to improved cardiovascular health.[39][20] The addition of oral or vaginal progesterone has neutral or beneficial effects on these changes.[39][37][47] This is in contrast to various progestins, which are known to antagonize the beneficial effects of estrogens on blood lipids.[20][39] Progesterone, both alone and in combination with an estrogen, has been found to have beneficial effects on skin and to slow the rate of skin aging in postmenopausal women.[52][53]

In the French E3N-EPIC observational study, the risk of diabetes was significantly lower in women on menopausal hormone therapy, including with the combination of an oral or transdermal estrogen and oral progesterone or a progestin.[54]

Transgender women

[edit]

Progesterone is used as a component of feminizing hormone therapy for transgender women in combination with estrogens and often antiandrogens.[55][21][56] However, the addition of progestogens to HRT for transgender women is controversial and their role is unclear.[55][21] Some patients and clinicians believe anecdotally that progesterone may enhance breast development, improve mood, regulate sleep, and increase sex drive.[21] However, there is a lack of evidence from well-designed studies to support these notions at present.[21] In addition, progestogens can produce undesirable side effects, although bioidentical progesterone may be safer and better tolerated than synthetic progestogens like medroxyprogesterone acetate.[55][57]

Because some believe that progestogens are necessary for full breast development, progesterone is sometimes used in transgender women with the intention of enhancing breast development.[55][58][57] However, a 2014 review concluded the following on the topic of progesterone for enhancing breast development in transgender women:[58]

Our knowledge concerning the natural history and effects of different cross-sex hormone therapies on breast development in [transgender] women is extremely sparse and based on low quality of evidence. Current evidence does not provide evidence that progestogens enhance breast development in [transgender] women. Neither do they prove the absence of such an effect. This prevents us from drawing any firm conclusion at this moment and demonstrates the need for further research to clarify these important clinical questions.[58]

Data on menstruating women shows there is no correlation between water retention, and levels of progesterone or estrogen.[59] Despite this, some theorise progesterone might cause temporary breast enlargement due to local fluid retention, and may thus give a misleading appearance of breast growth.[60][61] Aside from a hypothetical involvement in breast development, progestogens are not otherwise known to be involved in physical feminization.[57][55]

Pregnancy support

[edit]

Vaginally dosed progesterone is being investigated as potentially beneficial in preventing preterm birth in women at risk for preterm birth. The initial study by Fonseca suggested that vaginal progesterone could prevent preterm birth in women with a history of preterm birth.[62] According to a recent study, women with a short cervix that received hormonal treatment with a progesterone gel had their risk of prematurely giving birth reduced. The hormone treatment was administered vaginally every day during the second half of a pregnancy.[63] A subsequent and larger study showed that vaginal progesterone was no better than placebo in preventing recurrent preterm birth in women with a history of a previous preterm birth,[64] but a planned secondary analysis of the data in this trial showed that women with a short cervix at baseline in the trial had benefit in two ways: a reduction in births less than 32 weeks and a reduction in both the frequency and the time their babies were in intensive care.[65]

In another trial, vaginal progesterone was shown to be better than placebo in reducing preterm birth prior to 34 weeks in women with an extremely short cervix at baseline.[66] An editorial by Roberto Romero discusses the role of sonographic cervical length in identifying patients who may benefit from progesterone treatment.[67] A meta-analysis published in 2011 found that vaginal progesterone cut the risk of premature births by 42 percent in women with short cervixes.[68][69] The meta-analysis, which pooled published results of five large clinical trials, also found that the treatment cut the rate of breathing problems and reduced the need for placing a baby on a ventilator.[70]

Fertility support

[edit]

Progesterone is used for luteal support in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles such as in vitro fertilization (IVF).[24][71] It is also used to correct luteal phase deficiency to prepare the endometrium for implantation in infertility therapy and is used to support early pregnancy.[72][73]

Birth control

[edit]

A progesterone vaginal ring is available for birth control when breastfeeding in a number of areas of the world.[26] An intrauterine device containing progesterone has also been marketed under the brand name Progestasert for birth control, including previously in the United States.[74]

Gynecological disorders

[edit]

Progesterone is used to control persistent anovulatory bleeding.[75][76][77]

Other uses

[edit]

Progesterone is of unclear benefit for the reversal of mifepristone-induced abortion.[78] Evidence is insufficient to support use in traumatic brain injury.[79]

Progesterone has been used as a topical medication applied to the scalp to treat female and male pattern hair loss.[80][81][82][83][84] Variable effectiveness has been reported, but overall its effectiveness for this indication in both sexes has been poor.[81][82][85][84]

Breast pain

[edit]

Progesterone is approved under the brand name Progestogel as a 1% topical gel for local application to the breasts to treat breast pain in certain countries.[86][87][22] It is not approved for systemic therapy.[88][86] It has been found in clinical studies to inhibit estrogen-induced proliferation of breast epithelial cells and to abolish breast pain and tenderness in women with the condition.[22] However, in one small study in women with cyclic breast pain it was ineffective.[89] Vaginal progesterone has also been found to be effective in the treatment of breast pain and tenderness.[89]

Premenstrual syndrome

[edit]

Historically, progesterone has been widely used in the treatment of premenstrual syndrome.[90] A 2012 Cochrane review found insufficient evidence for or against the effectiveness of progesterone for this indication.[91] Another review of 10 studies found that progesterone was not effective for this condition, although it stated that insufficient evidence is available currently to make a definitive statement on progesterone in premenstrual syndrome.[90][92]

Catamenial epilepsy

[edit]

Progesterone can be used to treat catamenial epilepsy by supplementation during certain periods of the menstrual cycle.[93]

Available forms

[edit]

Progesterone is available in a variety of different forms, including oral capsules; sublingual tablets; vaginal capsules, tablets, gels, suppositories, and rings; rectal suppositories; oil solutions for intramuscular injection; and aqueous solutions for subcutaneous injection.[94][20] A 1% topical progesterone gel is approved for local application to the breasts to treat breast pain, but is not indicated for systemic therapy.[88][86] Progesterone was previously available as an intrauterine device for use in hormonal contraception, but this formulation was discontinued.[94] Progesterone is also limitedly available in combination with estrogens such as estradiol and estradiol benzoate for use by intramuscular injection.[95][96]

In addition to approved pharmaceutical products, progesterone is available in unregulated custom compounded and over-the-counter formulations like systemic transdermal creams and other preparations.[97][98][45][46][99] The systemic efficacy of transdermal progesterone is controversial and has not been demonstrated.[45][46][99]

Available forms of progesterone[sources 1][a]
Route Form Dose Brand name Availability[b]
Oral Capsule 100, 200, 300 mg Prometrium[c] Widespread
Tablet (SR) 200, 300, 400 mg Dubagest SR[c] India
Sublingual Tablet 10, 25, 50, 100 mg Luteina[c] Europe[d]
Transdermal Gel[e] 1% (25 mg) Progestogel Europe
Vaginal Capsule 100, 200 mg Utrogestan Widespread
Tablet 100 mg Endometrin[c] Widespread
Gel 4, 8% (45, 90 mg) Crinone[c] Widespread
Suppository 200, 400 mg Cyclogest Europe
Ring 10 mg/day[f] Fertiring[c] South America[g]
Rectal Suppository 200, 400 mg Cyclogest Europe
Uterine IUD 38 mg Progestasert Discontinued
Intramuscular
injection
Oil solution 2, 5, 10, 20, 25,
50, 100 mg/mL
Proluton[c] Widespread
Aq. susp. 12.5, 30, 100 mg/mL Agolutin[c] Europe[h]
Emulsion 5, 10, 25 mg/mL Di-Pro-Emulsion Discontinued
Microsph. 20, 100 mg/mL ProSphere[c] Mexico
Subcutaneous Aq. soln. (inj.) 25 mg/vial Prolutex Europe
Implant 50, 100 mg Proluton[c] Discontinued
Intravenous Aq. soln. (inj.) 20 mg/mL Primolut Discontinued
Sources and footnotes:
  1. ^ This table only includes products where progesterone is the sole active ingredient.
  2. ^ See also: Progesterone (medication) § Availability
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Other brand names exist.
  4. ^ Specifically in Poland and Ukraine.
  5. ^ For local application to the breasts; negligible systemic effect.
  6. ^ One progesterone vaginal ring provides 10mg of progesterone each day for 3 months.
  7. ^ Specifically in Chile, Ecuador, and Peru.
  8. ^ Specifically the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

Contraindications

[edit]

Contraindications of progesterone include hypersensitivity to progesterone or progestogens, prevention of cardiovascular disease (a Black Box warning), thrombophlebitis, thromboembolic disorder, cerebral hemorrhage, impaired liver function or disease, breast cancer, reproductive organ cancers, undiagnosed vaginal bleeding, missed menstruations, miscarriage, or a history of these conditions.[111][112] Progesterone should be used with caution in people with conditions that may be adversely affected by fluid retention such as epilepsy, migraine headaches, asthma, cardiac dysfunction, and renal dysfunction.[111][112] It should also be used with caution in patients with anemia, diabetes mellitus, a history of depression, previous ectopic pregnancy, and unresolved abnormal Pap smear.[111][112] Use of progesterone is not recommended during pregnancy and breastfeeding.[112] However, the medication has been deemed usually safe in breastfeeding by the American Academy of Pediatrics, but should not be used during the first four months of pregnancy.[111] Some progesterone formulations contain benzyl alcohol, and this may cause a potentially fatal "gasping syndrome" if given to premature infants.[111]

Side effects

[edit]

Progesterone is well tolerated, and many clinical studies have reported no side effects.[28] Side effects of progesterone may include abdominal cramps, back pain, breast tenderness, constipation, nausea, dizziness, edema, vaginal bleeding, hypotension, fatigue, dysphoria, depression, and irritability, among others.[28] Central nervous system depression, such as sedation and cognitive/memory impairment, can also occur.[28][20]

Vaginal progesterone may be associated with vaginal irritation, itchiness, and discharge, decreased libido, painful sexual intercourse, vaginal bleeding or spotting in association with cramps, and local warmth or a "feeling of coolness" without discharge.[28] Intramuscular injection may cause mild-to-moderate pain at the site of injection.[28] High intramuscular doses of progesterone have been associated with increased body temperature, which may be alleviated with paracetamol treatment.[28]

Progesterone lacks undesirable off-target hormonal activity, in contrast to various progestins.[20] As a result, it is not associated with androgenic, antiandrogenic, estrogenic, or glucocorticoid effects.[20] Conversely, progesterone can still produce side effects related to its antimineralocorticoid and neurosteroid activity.[20] Compared to the progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate, there are fewer reports of breast tenderness with progesterone.[28] In addition, the magnitude and duration of vaginal bleeding with progesterone are reported to be lower than with medroxyprogesterone acetate.[28]

Central depression

[edit]

Progesterone can produce central nervous system depression as an adverse effect, particularly with oral administration or with high doses of progesterone.[20][28] These side effects may include drowsiness, sedation, sleepiness, fatigue, sluggishness, reduced vigor, dizziness, lightheadedness, confusion, and cognitive, memory, and/or motor impairment.[28][113][114] Limited available evidence has shown minimal or no adverse influence on cognition with oral progesterone (100–600 mg), vaginal progesterone (45 mg gel), or progesterone by intramuscular injection (25–200 mg).[115][39][28][116][117] However, high doses of oral progesterone (300–1200 mg), vaginal progesterone (100–200 mg), and intramuscular progesterone (100–200 mg) have been found to result in dose-dependent fatigue, drowsiness, and decreased vigor.[28][116][115][20][118][117][119] Moreover, high single doses of oral progesterone (1200 mg) produced significant cognitive and memory impairment.[28][118][117][20] Intravenous infusion of high doses of progesterone (e.g., 500 mg) has been found to induce deep sleep in humans.[120][17][121][122] Some individuals are more sensitive and can experience considerable sedative and hypnotic effects at lower doses of oral progesterone (e.g., 400 mg).[20][123]

Sedation and cognitive and memory impairment with progesterone are attributable to its inhibitory neurosteroid metabolites.[20] These metabolites occur to a greater extent with oral progesterone, and may be minimized by switching to a parenteral route.[20][16][124] Progesterone can also be taken before bed to avoid these side effects and to help with sleep.[113] The neurosteroid effects of progesterone are unique to progesterone and are not shared with progestins.[20]

Breast cancer

[edit]

Breast cell proliferation has been found to be significantly increased by the combination of an oral estrogen plus cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate in postmenopausal women but not by the combination of transdermal estradiol plus oral progesterone.[39] Studies of topical estradiol and progesterone applied to the breasts for 2 weeks have been found to result in highly pharmacological local levels of estradiol and progesterone.[39][125] These studies have assessed breast proliferation markers and have found increased proliferation with estradiol alone, decreased proliferation with progesterone, and no change in proliferation with estradiol and progesterone combined.[39] In the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) trial, the combination of estrogen and cyclic oral progesterone resulted in a higher mammographic breast density than estrogen alone (3.1% vs. 0.9%) but a non-significantly lower breast density than the combination of estrogen and cyclic or continuous medroxyprogesterone acetate (3.1% vs. 4.4–4.6%).[39] Higher breast density is a strong known risk factor for breast cancer.[126] Other studies have had mixed findings however.[127] A 2018 systematic review reported that breast density with an estrogen plus oral progesterone was significantly increased in three studies and unchanged in two studies.[127] Changes in breast density with progesterone appear to be less than with the compared progestins.[127]

In large short-term observational studies, estrogen alone and the combination of estrogen and oral progesterone have generally not been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.[39][128][129][38] Conversely, the combination of estrogen and almost any progestin, such as medroxyprogesterone acetate or norethisterone acetate, has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.[39][128][38][129][130] The only exception among progestins is dydrogesterone, which has shown similar risk to that of oral progesterone.[39] Breast cancer risk with estrogen and progestin therapy is duration-dependent, with the risk being significantly greater with more than 5 years of exposure relative to less than 5 years.[128] In contrast to shorter-term studies, the longer-term observations (>5 years) of the French E3N study showed significant associations of both estrogen plus oral progesterone and estrogen plus dydrogesterone with higher breast cancer risk, similarly to estrogen plus other progestogens.[39] Oral progesterone has very low bioavailability and has relatively weak progestogenic effects.[130][131] The delayed onset of breast cancer risk with estrogen plus oral progesterone is potentially consistent with a weak proliferative effect of oral progesterone on the breasts.[130][131] As such, a longer duration of exposure may be necessary for a detectable increase in breast cancer risk to occur.[130][131] In any case, the risk remains lower than that with most progestins.[39][129] A 2018 systematic review of progesterone and breast cancer concluded that short-term use (<5 years) of an estrogen plus progesterone is not associated with a significant increase in risk of breast cancer but that long-term use (>5 years) is associated with greater risk.[127] The conclusions for progesterone were the same in a 2019 meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence by the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (CGHFBC).[132]

Most data on breast density changes and breast cancer risk are with oral progesterone.[127] Data on breast safety with vaginal progesterone are scarce.[127] The Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol (ELITE) was a randomized controlled trial of about 650 postmenopausal women who used estradiol and 45 mg/day cyclic vaginal progesterone.[127][133] Incidence of breast cancer was reported as an adverse effect.[127][133] The absolute incidences were 10 cases in the estradiol plus vaginal progesterone group and 8 cases in the control group.[127][133] However, the study was not adequately powered for quantifying breast cancer risk.[127][133]

Worldwide epidemiological evidence on breast cancer risk with menopausal hormone therapy (CGHFBC, 2019)
Therapy <5 years 5–14 years 15+ years
Cases RRTooltip Adjusted relative risk (95% CITooltip confidence interval) Cases RRTooltip Adjusted relative risk (95% CITooltip confidence interval) Cases RRTooltip Adjusted relative risk (95% CITooltip confidence interval)
Estrogen alone 1259 1.18 (1.10–1.26) 4869 1.33 (1.28–1.37) 2183 1.58 (1.51–1.67)
    By estrogen
        Conjugated estrogens 481 1.22 (1.09–1.35) 1910 1.32 (1.25–1.39) 1179 1.68 (1.57–1.80)
        Estradiol 346 1.20 (1.05–1.36) 1580 1.38 (1.30–1.46) 435 1.78 (1.58–1.99)
        Estropipate (estrone sulfate) 9 1.45 (0.67–3.15) 50 1.09 (0.79–1.51) 28 1.53 (1.01–2.33)
        Estriol 15 1.21 (0.68–2.14) 44 1.24 (0.89–1.73) 9 1.41 (0.67–2.93)
        Other estrogens 15 0.98 (0.46–2.09) 21 0.98 (0.58–1.66) 5 0.77 (0.27–2.21)
    By route
        Oral estrogens 3633 1.33 (1.27–1.38)
        Transdermal estrogens 919 1.35 (1.25–1.46)
        Vaginal estrogens 437 1.09 (0.97–1.23)
Estrogen and progestogen 2419 1.58 (1.51–1.67) 8319 2.08 (2.02–2.15) 1424 2.51 (2.34–2.68)
    By progestogen
        (Levo)norgestrel 343 1.70 (1.49–1.94) 1735 2.12 (1.99–2.25) 219 2.69 (2.27–3.18)
        Norethisterone acetate 650 1.61 (1.46–1.77) 2642 2.20 (2.09–2.32) 420 2.97 (2.60–3.39)
        Medroxyprogesterone acetate 714 1.64 (1.50–1.79) 2012 2.07 (1.96–2.19) 411 2.71 (2.39–3.07)
        Dydrogesterone 65 1.21 (0.90–1.61) 162 1.41 (1.17–1.71) 26 2.23 (1.32–3.76)
        Progesterone 11 0.91 (0.47–1.78) 38 2.05 (1.38–3.06) 1
        Promegestone 12 1.68 (0.85–3.31) 19 2.06 (1.19–3.56) 0
        Nomegestrol acetate 8 1.60 (0.70–3.64) 14 1.38 (0.75–2.53) 0
        Other progestogens 12 1.70 (0.86–3.38) 19 1.79 (1.05–3.05) 0
    By progestogen frequency
        Continuous 3948 2.30 (2.21–2.40)
        Intermittent 3467 1.93 (1.84–2.01)
Progestogen alone 98 1.37 (1.08–1.74) 107 1.39 (1.11–1.75) 30 2.10 (1.35–3.27)
    By progestogen
        Medroxyprogesterone acetate 28 1.68 (1.06–2.66) 18 1.16 (0.68–1.98) 7 3.42 (1.26–9.30)
        Norethisterone acetate 13 1.58 (0.77–3.24) 24 1.55 (0.88–2.74) 6 3.33 (0.81–13.8)
        Dydrogesterone 3 2.30 (0.49–10.9) 11 3.31 (1.39–7.84) 0
        Other progestogens 8 2.83 (1.04–7.68) 5 1.47 (0.47–4.56) 1
Miscellaneous
    Tibolone 680 1.57 (1.43–1.72)
Notes: Meta-analysis of worldwide epidemiological evidence on menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk by the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (CGHFBC). Fully adjusted relative risks for current versus never-users of menopausal hormone therapy. Source: See template.
Risk of breast cancer with menopausal hormone therapy in large observational studies (Mirkin, 2018)
Study Therapy Hazard ratio (95% CITooltip confidence interval)
E3N-EPIC: Fournier et al. (2005) Estrogen alone 1.1 (0.8–1.6)
Estrogen plus progesterone
    Transdermal estrogen
    Oral estrogen
0.9 (0.7–1.2)
0.9 (0.7–1.2)
No events
Estrogen plus progestin
    Transdermal estrogen
    Oral estrogen
1.4 (1.2–1.7)
1.4 (1.2–1.7)
1.5 (1.1–1.9)
E3N-EPIC: Fournier et al. (2008) Oral estrogen alone 1.32 (0.76–2.29)
Oral estrogen plus progestogen
    Progesterone
    Dydrogesterone
    Medrogestone
    Chlormadinone acetate
    Cyproterone acetate
    Promegestone
    Nomegestrol acetate
    Norethisterone acetate
    Medroxyprogesterone acetate

Not analyzeda
0.77 (0.36–1.62)
2.74 (1.42–5.29)
2.02 (1.00–4.06)
2.57 (1.81–3.65)
1.62 (0.94–2.82)
1.10 (0.55–2.21)
2.11 (1.56–2.86)
1.48 (1.02–2.16)
Transdermal estrogen alone 1.28 (0.98–1.69)
Transdermal estrogen plus progestogen
    Progesterone
    Dydrogesterone
    Medrogestone
    Chlormadinone acetate
    Cyproterone acetate
    Promegestone
    Nomegestrol acetate
    Norethisterone acetate
    Medroxyprogesterone acetate

1.08 (0.89–1.31)
1.18 (0.95–1.48)
2.03 (1.39–2.97)
1.48 (1.05–2.09)
Not analyzeda
1.52 (1.19–1.96)
1.60 (1.28–2.01)
Not analyzeda
Not analyzeda
E3N-EPIC: Fournier et al. (2014) Estrogen alone 1.17 (0.99–1.38)
Estrogen plus progesterone or dydrogesterone 1.22 (1.11–1.35)
Estrogen plus progestin 1.87 (1.71–2.04)
CECILE: Cordina-Duverger et al. (2013) Estrogen alone 1.19 (0.69–2.04)
Estrogen plus progestogen
    Progesterone
    Progestins
        Progesterone derivatives
        Testosterone derivatives
1.33 (0.92–1.92)
0.80 (0.44–1.43)
1.72 (1.11–2.65)
1.57 (0.99–2.49)
3.35 (1.07–10.4)
Footnotes: a = Not analyzed, fewer than 5 cases. Sources: See template.
Risk of breast cancer with menopausal hormone therapy by duration in large observational studies (Mirkin, 2018)
Study Therapy Hazard ratio (95% CITooltip confidence interval)
E3N-EPIC: Fournier et al. (2005)a Transdermal estrogen plus progesterone
    <2 years
    2–4 years
    ≥4 years

0.9 (0.6–1.4)
0.7 (0.4–1.2)
1.2 (0.7–2.0)
Transdermal estrogen plus progestin
    <2 years
    2–4 years
    ≥4 years

1.6 (1.3–2.0)
1.4 (1.0–1.8)
1.2 (0.8–1.7)
Oral estrogen plus progestin
    <2 years
    2–4 years
    ≥4 years

1.2 (0.9–1.8)
1.6 (1.1–2.3)
1.9 (1.2–3.2)
E3N-EPIC: Fournier et al. (2008) Estrogen plus progesterone
    <2 years
    2–4 years
    4–6 years
    ≥6 years

0.71 (0.44–1.14)
0.95 (0.67–1.36)
1.26 (0.87–1.82)
1.22 (0.89–1.67)
Estrogen plus dydrogesterone
    <2 years
    2–4 years
    4–6 years
    ≥6 years

0.84 (0.51–1.38)
1.16 (0.79–1.71)
1.28 (0.83–1.99)
1.32 (0.93–1.86)
Estrogen plus other progestogens
    <2 years
    2–4 years
    4–6 years
    ≥6 years

1.36 (1.07–1.72)
1.59 (1.30–1.94)
1.79 (1.44–2.23)
1.95 (1.62–2.35)
E3N-EPIC: Fournier et al. (2014) Estrogens plus progesterone or dydrogesterone
    <5 years
    ≥5 years

1.13 (0.99–1.29)
1.31 (1.15–1.48)
Estrogen plus other progestogens
    <5 years
    ≥5 years

1.70 (1.50–1.91)
2.02 (1.81–2.26)
Footnotes: a = Oral estrogen plus progesterone was not analyzed because there was a low number of women who used this therapy. Sources: See template.

Blood clots

[edit]

Whereas the combination of estrogen and a progestin is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) relative to estrogen alone, there is no difference in risk of VTE with the combination of estrogen and oral progesterone relative to estrogen alone.[131][134] Hence, in contrast to progestins, oral progesterone added to estrogen does not appear to increase coagulation or VTE risk.[131][134] The reason for the differences between progesterone and progestins in terms of VTE risk are unclear.[135][131][130] However, they may be due to very low progesterone levels and relatively weak progestogenic effects produced by oral progesterone.[131][130] In contrast to oral progesterone, non-oral progesterone—which can achieve much higher progesterone levels—has not been assessed in terms of VTE risk.[131][130]

Overdose

[edit]

Progesterone is likely to be relatively safe in overdose. Levels of progesterone during pregnancy are up to 100-fold higher than during normal menstrual cycling, although levels increase gradually over the course of pregnancy.[136] Oral dosages of progesterone of as high as 3,600 mg/day have been assessed in clinical trials, with the main side effect being sedation.[137] There is a case report of progesterone misuse with an oral dosage of 6,400 mg per day.[138] Administration of as much as 500 mg progesterone by intravenous infusion in humans was uneventful in terms of toxicity, but did induce deep sleep, though the individuals were still able to be awakened with sufficient stimulation.[120][17][121][122]

Interactions

[edit]

There are several notable drug interactions with progesterone. Certain selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline may increase the GABAA receptor-related central depressant effects of progesterone by enhancing its conversion into 5α-dihydroprogesterone and allopregnanolone via activation of 3α-HSD.[139] Progesterone potentiates the sedative effects of benzodiazepines and alcohol.[140] Notably, there is a case report of progesterone abuse alone with very high doses.[141] 5α-Reductase inhibitors such as finasteride and dutasteride inhibit the conversion of progesterone into the inhibitory neurosteroid allopregnanolone, and for this reason, may have the potential to reduce the sedative and related effects of progesterone.[142][143][144]

Progesterone is a weak but significant agonist of the pregnane X receptor (PXR), and has been found to induce several hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes, such as CYP3A4, especially when concentrations are high, such as with pregnancy range levels.[145][146][147][148] As such, progesterone may have the potential to accelerate the metabolism of various medications.[145][146][147][148]

Pharmacology

[edit]

Pharmacodynamics

[edit]

Progesterone is a progestogen, or an agonist of the nuclear progesterone receptors (PRs), the PR-A, PR-B, and PR-C.[20] In addition, progesterone is an agonist of the membrane progesterone receptors (mPRs), including the mPRα, mPRβ, mPRγ, mPRδ, and mPRϵ.[149][150] Aside from the PRs and mPRs, progesterone is a potent antimineralocorticoid, or antagonist of the mineralocorticoid receptor, the biological target of the mineralocorticoid aldosterone.[151][152] In addition to its activity as a steroid hormone, progesterone is a neurosteroid.[153] Among other neurosteroid activities, and via its active metabolites allopregnanolone and pregnanolone, progesterone is a potent positive allosteric modulator of the GABAA receptor, the major signaling receptor of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA).[154]

The PRs are expressed widely throughout the body, including in the uterus, cervix, vagina, fallopian tubes, breasts, fat, skin, pituitary gland, hypothalamus, and in other areas of the brain.[20][155] In accordance, progesterone has numerous effects throughout the body.[20] Among other effects, progesterone produces changes in the female reproductive system, the breasts, and the brain.[20][155] Progesterone has functional antiestrogenic effects due to its progestogenic activity, including in the uterus, cervix, and vagina.[20] The effects of progesterone may influence health in both positive and negative ways.[20] In addition to the aforementioned effects, progesterone has antigonadotropic effects due to its progestogenic activity, and can inhibit ovulation and suppress gonadal sex hormone production.[20]

The activities of progesterone besides those mediated by the PRs and mPRs are also of significance.[20] Progesterone lowers blood pressure and reduces water and salt retention among other effects via its antimineralocorticoid activity.[20][156] In addition, progesterone can produce sedative, hypnotic, anxiolytic, euphoric, amnestic, cognitive-impairing, motor-impairing, anticonvulsant, and even anesthetic effects via formation of sufficiently high concentrations of its neurosteroid metabolites and consequent GABAA receptor potentiation in the brain.[28][113][114][157]

There are differences between progesterones and progestins, such as medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone, with implications for pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, as well as for efficacy, tolerability, and safety.[20]

Pharmacokinetics

[edit]

The pharmacokinetics of progesterone are dependent on its route of administration. The medications is approved in the form of oil-filled capsules containing micronized progesterone for oral administration, termed oral micronized progesterone or OMP.[158] It is also available in the form of vaginal or rectal suppositories or pessaries, topical creams and gels,[159] oil solutions for intramuscular injection, and aqueous solutions for subcutaneous injection.[158][16][160]

Routes of administration that progesterone has been used by include oral, intranasal, transdermal/topical, vaginal, rectal, intramuscular, subcutaneous, and intravenous injection.[16] Vaginal progesterone is available in the form of progesterone capsules, tablets or inserts, gels, suppositories or pessaries, and rings.[16]

The bioavailability of progesterone was commonly overestimated due to the immunoassay method of analysis failing to distinguish between progesterone itself and its metabolites.[161][130][131] Newer methods have adjusted the oral bioavailbility estimate from 6.2 to 8.6%[162] down to less than 2.4%.[5]

Chemistry

[edit]
Steroids

Progesterone is a naturally occurring pregnane steroid and is also known as pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione.[163][164] It has a double bond (4-ene) between the C4 and C5 positions and two ketone groups (3,20-dione), one at the C3 position and the other at the C20 position.[163][164] Due to its pregnane core and C4(5) double bond, progesterone is often abbreviated as P4. It is contrasted with pregnenolone, which has a C5(6) double bond and is often abbreviated as P5.

Derivatives

[edit]

A large number of progestins, or synthetic progestogens, have been derived from progesterone.[163][20] They can be categorized into several structural groups, including derivatives of retroprogesterone, 17α-hydroxyprogesterone, 17α-methylprogesterone, and 19-norprogesterone, with a respective example from each group including dydrogesterone, medroxyprogesterone acetate, medrogestone, and promegestone.[20] The progesterone ethers quingestrone (progesterone 3-cyclopentyl enol ether) and progesterone 3-acetyl enol ether are among the only examples that do not belong to any of these groups.[155][165] Another major group of progestins, the 19-nortestosterone derivatives, exemplified by norethisterone (norethindrone) and levonorgestrel, are not derived from progesterone but rather from testosterone.[20]

A variety of synthetic inhibitory neurosteroids have been derived from progesterone and its neurosteroid metabolites, allopregnanolone and pregnanolone.[163] Examples include alfadolone, alfaxolone, ganaxolone, hydroxydione, minaxolone, and renanolone.[163] In addition, C3 and C20 conjugates of progesterone, such as progesterone carboxymethyloxime (progesterone 3-(O-carboxymethyl)oxime; P4-3-CMO), P1-185 (progesterone 3-O-(L-valine)-E-oxime), EIDD-1723 (progesterone 20E-[O-[(phosphonooxy)methyl]oxime] sodium salt), EIDD-036 (progesterone 20-oxime; P4-20-O), and VOLT-02 (chemical structure unreleased), have been developed as water-soluble prodrugs of progesterone and its neurosteroid metabolites.[166][167][168][169][170][171]

Synthesis

[edit]

Chemical syntheses of progesterone have been published.[172]

History

[edit]

Discovery and synthesis

[edit]

The hormonal action of progesterone was discovered in 1929.[30][31][173] Pure crystalline progesterone was isolated in 1934 and its chemical structure was determined.[30][31] Later that year, chemical synthesis of progesterone was accomplished.[31][174] Shortly following its chemical synthesis, progesterone began being tested clinically in women.[31][103]

Injections and implants

[edit]

In 1933 or 1934, Schering introduced progesterone in oil solution as a medication by intramuscular injection under the brand name Proluton.[175][32][33][22][176] This was the first pharmaceutical formulation of progesterone to be marketed for medical use.[177] It was initially a corpus luteum extract, becoming pure synthesized progesterone only subsequently.[178][179][175][180] A clinical study of the formulation was published in 1933.[175][181][179] Multiple formulations of progesterone in oil solution for intramuscular injection, under the brand names Proluton, Progestin, and Gestone, were available by 1936.[178][182] A parenteral route was used because oral progesterone had very low activity and was thought to be inactive.[22][176][180] Progesterone was initially very expensive due to the large doses required.[183] However, with the start of steroid manufacturing from diosgenin in the 1940s, costs greatly decreased.[184]

Subcutaneous pellet implants of progesterone were first studied in women in the late 1930s.[185][186][187][188][189] They were the first long-acting progestogen formulation.[190] Pellets were reported to be extruded out of the skin within a few weeks at high rates, even when implanted beneath the deep fascia, and also produced frequent inflammatory reactions at the site of implantation.[108][187][191] In addition, they were absorbed too slowly and achieved unsatisfactorily low progesterone levels.[108] Consequently, they were soon abandoned, in favor of other preparations such as aqueous suspensions.[108][191][192][190] However, subcutaneous pellet implants of progesterone were later studied as a form of birth control in women in the 1980s and early 1990s, though no preparations were ultimately marketed.[193][194][195][196]

Aqueous suspensions of progesterone crystals for intramuscular injection were first described in 1944.[190][197][198][199] These preparations were on the market in the 1950s under a variety of brand names including Flavolutan, Luteosan, Lutocyclin M, and Lutren, among others.[200] Aqueous suspensions of steroids were developed because they showed much longer durations than intramuscular injection of steroids in oil solution.[201] However, local injection site reactions, which do not occur with oil solutions, have limited the clinical use of aqueous suspensions of progesterone and other steroids.[202][203][204] Today, a preparation with the brand name Agolutin Depot remains on the market in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.[205][206] A combined preparation of progesterone, estradiol benzoate, and lidocaine remains available with the brand name Clinomin Forte in Paraguay as well.[207] In addition to aqueous suspensions, water-in-oil emulsions of steroids were studied by 1949,[208][209][210] and long-acting emulsions of progesterone were introduced for use by intramuscular injection under the brand names Progestin and Di-Pro-Emulsion (with estradiol benzoate) by the 1950s.[200][211][212][213][214] Due to lack of standardization of crystal sizes, crystalline suspensions of steroids had marked variations in effect.[108] Emulsions were said to be even more unreliable.[108]

Macrocrystalline aqueous suspensions of progesterone as well as microspheres of progesterone were investigated as potential progestogen-only injectable contraceptives and combined injectable contraceptives (with estradiol) by the late 1980s and early 1990s but were never marketed.[215][216][217][218][219]

Aqueous solutions of water-insoluble steroids were first developed via association with colloid solubility enhancers in the 1940s.[220] An aqueous solution of progesterone for use by intravenous injection was marketed by Schering AG under the brand name Primolut Intravenous by 1962.[221][109] One of its intended uses was the treatment of threatened abortion, in which rapid-acting effect was desirable.[108] An aqueous solution of progesterone complexed with cyclodextrin to increase its water solubility was introduced for use by once-daily subcutaneous injection in Europe under the brand name Prolutex in the mid-2010s.[222][16]

In the 1950s, long-acting parenteral progestins such as hydroxyprogesterone caproate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and norethisterone enanthate were developed and introduced for use by intramuscular injection.[190][223][224] They lacked the need for frequent injections and the injection site reactions associated with progesterone by intramuscular injection and soon supplanted progesterone for parenteral therapy in most cases.[224][223][225]

Oral and sublingual

[edit]

The first study of oral progesterone in humans was published in 1949.[226][227] It found that oral progesterone produced significant progestational effects in the endometrium in women.[226] Prior to this study, animal research had suggested that oral progesterone was inactive, and for this reason, oral progesterone had never been evaluated in humans.[226][227] A variety of other early studies of oral progesterone in humans were also published in the 1950s and 1960s.[227][228][229][230][231][232][233][234][235][236] These studies generally reported oral progesterone to be only very weakly active.[227][232][231] Oral non-micronized progesterone was introduced as a pharmaceutical medication around 1953, for instance as Cyclogesterin (1 mg estrogenic substances and 30 mg progesterone tablets) for menstrual disturbances by Upjohn, though it saw limited use.[237][238] Another preparation, which contained progesterone alone, was Synderone (trademark registered by Chemical Specialties in 1952).[239][240][241]

Sublingual progesterone in women was first studied in 1944 by Robert Greenblatt.[242][243][191][226][244][230] Buccal progesterone tablets were marketed by Schering under the brand name Proluton Buccal Tablets by 1949.[245] Sublingual progesterone tablets were marketed under the brand names Progesterone Lingusorbs and Progesterone Membrettes by 1951.[246][247][248] A sublingual tablet formulation of progesterone has been approved under the brand name Luteina in Poland and Ukraine and remains marketed today.[95][96]

Progesterone was the first progestogen that was found to inhibit ovulation, both in animals and in women.[249] Injections of progesterone were first shown to inhibit ovulation in animals between 1937 and 1939.[250][249][251][252] Inhibition of fertilization by administration of progesterone during the luteal phase was also demonstrated in animals between 1947 and 1949.[250] Ovulation inhibition by progesterone in animals was subsequently re-confirmed and expanded on by Gregory Pincus and colleagues in 1953 and 1954.[249][253][254] Findings on inhibition of ovulation by progesterone in women were first presented at the Fifth International Conference on Planned Parenthood in Tokyo, Japan in October 1955.[236][255] Three different research groups presented their findings on this topic at the conference.[236][255] They included Pincus (in conjunction with John Rock, who did not attend the conference); a nine-member Japanese group led by Masaomi Ishikawa; and the two-member team of Abraham Stone and Herbert Kupperman.[236][255][256][257][258] The conference marked the beginning of a new era in the history of birth control.[255] The results were subsequently published in scientific journals in 1956 in the case of Pincus and in 1957 in the case of Ishikawa and colleagues.[259][260][261] Rock and Pincus also subsequently described findings from 1952 that "pseudopregnancy" therapy with a combination of high doses of diethylstilbestrol and oral progesterone prevented ovulation and pregnancy in women.[233][262][263][264][265][266]

Unfortunately, the use of oral progesterone as a hormonal contraceptive was plagued by problems.[249][264] These included the large and by extension expensive doses required, incomplete inhibition of ovulation even at high doses, and a frequent incidence of breakthrough bleeding.[249][264] At the 1955 Tokyo conference, Pincus had also presented the first findings of ovulation inhibition by oral progestins in animals, specifically 19-nortestosterone derivatives like noretynodrel and norethisterone.[264][236] These progestins were far more potent than progesterone, requiring much smaller doses orally.[264][236] By December 1955, inhibition of ovulation by oral noretynodrel and norethisterone had been demonstrated in women.[264] These findings as well as results in animals were published in 1956.[267][268] Noretynodrel and norethisterone did not show the problems associated with oral progesterone—in the studies, they fully inhibited ovulation and did not produce menstruation-related side effects.[264] Consequently, oral progesterone was abandoned as a hormonal contraceptive in women.[249][264] The first birth control pills to be introduced were a noretynodrel-containing product in 1957 and a norethisterone-containing product in 1963, followed by numerous others containing a diversity of progestins.[269] Progesterone itself has never been introduced for use in birth control pills.[270]

More modern clinical studies of oral progesterone demonstrating elevated levels of progesterone and end-organ responses in women, specifically progestational endometrial changes, were published between 1980 and 1983.[271][272][273][274] Up to this point, many clinicians and researchers apparently still thought that oral progesterone was inactive.[274][275][276] It was not until almost half a century after the introduction of progesterone in medicine that a reasonably effective oral formulation of progesterone was marketed.[104] Micronization of progesterone and suspension in oil-filled capsules, which allowed progesterone to be absorbed several-fold more efficiently by the oral route, was first studied in the late 1970s and described in the literature in 1982.[277][273][278] This formulation, known as oral micronized progesterone (OMP), was then introduced for medical use under the brand name Utrogestan in France in 1982.[273][34][33][22] Subsequently, oral micronized progesterone was introduced under the brand name Prometrium in the United States in 1998.[162][279] By 1999, oral micronized progesterone had been marketed in more than 35 countries.[162] In 2019, the first combination of oral estradiol and progesterone was introduced under the brand name Bijuva in the United States.[11][280]

A sustained-release (SR) formulation of oral micronized progesterone, also known as "oral natural micronized progesterone sustained release" or "oral NMP SR", was marketed in India in 2012 under the brand name Gestofit SR.[281][110][282][95] Many additional brand names followed.[110][95] The preparation was originally developed in 1986 by a compounding pharmacy called Madison Pharmacy Associates in Madison, Wisconsin in the United States.[281][282]

Vaginal, rectal, and uterine

[edit]

Vaginal progesterone suppositories were first studied in women by Robert Greenblatt in 1954.[283][191][284] Shortly thereafter, vaginal progesterone suppositories were introduced for medical use under the brand name Colprosterone in 1955.[285][191] Rectal progesterone suppositories were first studied in men and women by Christian Hamburger in 1965.[286][284] Vaginal and rectal progesterone suppositories were introduced for use under the brand name Cyclogest by 1976.[287][288][289] Vaginal micronized progesterone gels and capsules were introduced for medical use under brand names such as Utrogestan and Crinone in the early 1990s.[104][290] Progesterone was approved in the United States as a vaginal gel in 1997 and as a vaginal insert in 2007.[291][292] A progesterone contraceptive vaginal ring known as Progering was first studied in women in 1985 and continued to be researched through the 1990s.[293][294] It was approved for use as a contraceptive in lactating mothers in Latin America by 2004.[293] A second progesterone vaginal ring known as Fertiring was developed as a progesterone supplement for use during assisted reproduction and was approved in Latin America by 2007.[295][296]

Development of a progesterone-containing intrauterine device (IUD) for contraception began in the 1960s.[297] Incorporation of progesterone into IUDs was initially studied to help reduce the risk of IUD expulsion.[297] However, while addition of progesterone to IUDs showed no benefit on expulsion rates, it was unexpectedly found to induce endometrial atrophy.[297] This led in 1976 to the development and introduction of Progestasert, a progesterone-containing product and the first progestogen-containing IUD.[74][297][27] Unfortunately, the product had various problems that limited its use.[297][27][74] These included a short duration of efficacy of only one year, a high cost, a relatively high 2.9% failure rate, a lack of protection against ectopic pregnancy, and difficult and sometimes painful insertions that could necessitate use of a local anesthetic or analgesic.[297][27][74] As a result of these issues, Progestasert never became widely used, and was discontinued in 2001.[297][27][74] It was used mostly in the United States and France while it was marketed.[27]

Transdermal and topical

[edit]

A topical gel formulation of progesterone, for direct application to the breasts as a local therapy for breast disorders such as breast pain, was introduced under the brand name Progestogel in Europe by 1972.[298] No transdermal formulations of progesterone for systemic use have been successfully marketed, in spite of efforts of pharmaceutical companies towards this goal.[45][22][299] The low potency of transdermal progesterone has thus far precluded it as a possibility.[300][301][302][124] Although no formulations of transdermal progesterone are approved for systemic use, transdermal progesterone is available in the form of creams and gels from custom compounding pharmacies in some countries, and is also available over-the-counter without a prescription in the United States.[45][46][99] However, these preparations are unregulated and have not been adequately characterized, with low and unsubstantiated effectiveness.[45][22]

Society and culture

[edit]

Generic names

[edit]

Progesterone is the generic name of the drug in English and its INNTooltip INN, USANTooltip United States Adopted Name, USPTooltip United States Pharmacopeia, BANTooltip British Approved Name, DCITTooltip Denominazione Comune Italiana, and JANTooltip Japanese Accepted Name, while progestérone is its name in French and its DCFTooltip Dénomination Commune Française.[95][163][164][303] It is also referred to as progesteronum in Latin, progesterona in Spanish and Portuguese, and progesteron in German.[95][164]

Brand names

[edit]
Prometrium 100 mg oral capsule.

Progesterone is marketed under a large number of brand names throughout the world.[95][164] Examples of major brand names under which progesterone has been marketed include Crinone, Crinone 8%, Cyclogest, Endogest, Endometrin, Estima, Geslutin, Gesterol, Gestone, Luteina, Luteinol, Lutigest, Lutinus, Microgest, Progeffik, Progelan, Progendo, Progering, Progest, Progestaject, Progestan, Progesterone, Progestin, Progestogel, Prolutex, Proluton, Prometrium, Prontogest, Strone, Susten, Utrogest, and Utrogestan.[95][164]

Availability

[edit]

Progesterone is widely available in countries throughout the world in a variety of formulations.[95][96] Progesterone in the form of oral capsules; vaginal capsules, tablets/inserts, and gels; and intramuscular oil have widespread availability.[95][96] The following formulations/routes of progesterone have selective or more limited availability:[95][96]

  • A tablet of micronized progesterone which is marketed under the brand name Luteina is indicated for sublingual administration in addition to vaginal administration and is available in Poland and Ukraine.[95][96]
  • A progesterone suppository which is marketed under the brand name Cyclogest is indicated for rectal administration in addition to vaginal administration and is available in Cyprus, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Malta, Oman, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and Vietnam.[95][96]
  • An aqueous solution of progesterone complexed with β-cyclodextrin for subcutaneous injection is marketed under the brand name Prolutex in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, and Switzerland.[95][96]
  • A non-systemic topical gel formulation of progesterone for local application to the breasts to treat breast pain is marketed under the brand name Progestogel and is available in Belgium, Bulgaria, Colombia, Ecuador, France, Georgia, Germany, Hong Kong, Lebanon, Peru, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Switzerland, Tunisia, Venezuela, and Vietnam.[95][96] It was also formerly available in Italy, Portugal, and Spain, but was discontinued in these countries.[96]
  • A progesterone intrauterine device was previously marketed under the brand name Progestasert and was available in Canada, France, the United States, and possibly other countries, but was discontinued.[96][304]
  • Progesterone vaginal rings are marketed under the brand names Fertiring and Progering and are available in Chile, Ecuador, and Peru.[95][96]
  • A sustained-release tablet formulation of oral micronized progesterone (also known as "oral natural micronized progesterone sustained release" or "oral NMP SR") is marketed in India under the brand names Lutefix Pro (CROSMAT Technology), Dubagest SR, Gestofit SR, and Susten SR, among many others.[281][305][306][307][308][309][310][282][95]

In addition to single-drug formulations, the following progesterone combination formulations are or have been marketed, albeit with limited availability:[95][96]

  • A combination pack of progesterone capsules for oral use and estradiol gel for transdermal use is marketed under the brand name Estrogel Propak in Canada.[95][96]
  • A combination pack of progesterone capsules and estradiol tablets for oral use is marketed in an under the brand name Duogestan in Belgium.[95][96]
  • Progesterone and estradiol in an aqueous suspension for use by intramuscular injection is marketed under the brand name Cristerona FP in Argentina.[95][96]
  • Progesterone and estradiol in microspheres in an oil solution for use by intramuscular injection is marketed under the brand name Juvenum in Mexico.[95][96][311]
  • Progesterone and estradiol benzoate in an oil solution for use by intramuscular injection is marketed under the brand names Duogynon, Duoton Fort T P, Emmenovis, Gestrygen, Lutofolone, Menovis, Mestrolar, Metrigen Fuerte, Nomestrol, Phenokinon-F, Prodiol, Pro-Estramon-S, Proger F, Progestediol, and Vermagest and is available in Belize, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Honduras, Italy, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey.[95][96]
  • Progesterone and estradiol hemisuccinate in an oil solution for use by intramuscular injection is marketed under the brand name Hosterona in Argentina.[95][96]
  • Progesterone and estrone for use by intramuscular injection is marketed under the brand name Synergon in Monaco.[95]

United States

[edit]

As of November 2016, progesterone is available in the United States in the following formulations:[94]

  • Oral: Capsules: Prometrium (100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg)
  • Vaginal: Tablets: Endometrin (100 mg); Gels: Crinone (4%, 8%)
  • Intramuscular injection: Oil: Progesterone (50 mg/mL)

A 25 mg/mL concentration of progesterone oil for intramuscular injection and a 38 mg/device progesterone intrauterine device (Progestasert) have been discontinued.[94]

An oral combination formulation of micronized progesterone and estradiol in oil-filled capsules (brand name Bijuva) is marketed in the United States for the treatment of menopausal symptoms and endometrial hyperplasia.[312][11]

Progesterone is also available in unregulated custom preparations from compounding pharmacies in the United States.[97][98] In addition, transdermal progesterone is available over-the-counter in the United States, although the clinical efficacy of transdermal progesterone is controversial.[45][46][99]

Research

[edit]

Progesterone was studied as a progestogen-only injectable contraceptive, but was never marketed.[215][216][217] Combinations of estradiol and progesterone as a macrocrystalline aqueous suspension and as an aqueous suspension of microspheres have been studied as once-a-month combined injectable contraceptives, but were likewise never marketed.[216][218]

Progesterone has been assessed for the suppression of sex drive and spermatogenesis in men.[313][314] In one study, 100 mg rectal suppositories of progesterone given five times per day for 9 days resulted in progesterone levels of 5.5 to 29 ng/mL and suppressed circulating testosterone and growth hormone levels by about 50% in men, but did not affect libido or erectile potency in this short treatment period.[313][315] In other studies, 50 mg/day progesterone by intramuscular injection for 10 weeks in men produced azoospermia, decreased testicular size, markedly suppressed libido and erectile potency, and resulted in minimal semen volume upon ejaculation.[313][314][316][317]

An oil and water nanoemulsion of progesterone (particles of <1 mm in diameter) using micellar nanoparticle technology for transdermal administration known as Progestsorb NE was under development by Novavax for use in menopausal hormone therapy in the 2000s.[318][319][320] However, development was discontinued in 2007 and the formulation was never marketed.[318]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Progesterone is a naturally occurring steroid hormone and progestogen that is used as a medication in bioidentical, micronized form to mimic the effects of endogenous progesterone produced by the ovaries. It is primarily indicated for preventing endometrial hyperplasia in postmenopausal women receiving estrogen therapy without a hysterectomy and for treating secondary amenorrhea (absence of menstrual periods in women who previously menstruated). Additional uses include hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to alleviate menopausal symptoms when combined with estrogen, support in assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), and management of conditions like irregular uterine bleeding, endometriosis, and preterm labor prevention. Progesterone medications are available in various formulations, including oral capsules (typically 100 mg or 200 mg, taken in the evening to align with natural circadian rhythms), vaginal gels, suppositories, or inserts for targeted endometrial support, and injectable forms for specific therapeutic needs. Its mechanism involves binding to progesterone receptors to suppress gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), thereby inhibiting ovulation, thickening cervical mucus to impede sperm migration, and inducing endometrial changes for secretory transformation. Pharmacologically, it is highly protein-bound (96-99% to serum albumin and transcortin), metabolized primarily in the liver to pregnanediols and pregnanolones, and excreted via bile and urine, with bioavailability enhanced when taken with food or in micronized oral preparations. When used in combination with estrogen for menopausal hormone therapy, the combination carries risks including increased chances of cardiovascular events (e.g., heart attack, stroke), venous thromboembolism (blood clots), breast cancer, and probable dementia, particularly in older women or smokers; however, these risks are primarily from studies using synthetic progestins, and recent evidence indicates that micronized progesterone does not increase breast cancer risk (for up to 5 years of use) and may have a lower risk of venous thromboembolism compared to synthetic progestins. Common side effects include drowsiness, dizziness, breast tenderness, mood changes, and irregular bleeding, while serious adverse effects such as severe allergic reactions, vision disturbances, or chest pain necessitate immediate medical attention. Contraindications include known or suspected pregnancy (except for specific fertility treatments), undiagnosed vaginal bleeding, active thrombophlebitis, or a history of hormone-sensitive cancers.

Medical Uses

Menopause

Progesterone is used in combination with as part of (HRT) for postmenopausal women to alleviate vasomotor symptoms, including hot flashes and , which affect up to 80% of women during . This combined therapy also addresses vaginal and other aspects of genitourinary of , such as dryness and discomfort, by restoring hormonal balance and improving tissue health. Additionally, it helps prevent bone loss and reduces the risk of osteoporosis-related fractures by maintaining , particularly in women under 65 years with low density. In women with an intact , progesterone opposes the proliferative effects of on the , preventing . Dosing regimens include cyclic administration, where progesterone (typically 100-200 mg micronized orally) is given for 10-14 days per month alongside daily , mimicking premenopausal cycles and potentially causing withdrawal bleeding. Continuous combined involves daily dosing of both hormones (e.g., 100 mg micronized progesterone with 0.05 mg patch), which avoids monthly bleeding but requires ongoing endometrial monitoring. The choice between regimens depends on patient age, symptom severity, and bleeding tolerance, with continuous preferred for those over 12 months postmenopausal. Evidence from the (WHI) randomized trial demonstrates that continuous combined estrogen-progestin therapy reduces incidence by 35% (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.89) compared to placebo in postmenopausal women, with benefits persisting post-intervention. The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) 2022 position statement recommends initiating such HRT for moderate-to-severe symptoms in women under 60 years or within 10 years of onset, absent contraindications, with individualized duration based on symptom relief and risk reassessment—often extending beyond initial years if benefits outweigh risks, including up to age 65 or longer for persistent symptoms. In July 2025, an FDA expert panel reviewed post-WHI data on HRT, emphasizing benefits for symptom relief, leading to the FDA's November 2025 announcement to remove black box warnings from menopausal HRT labeling to reflect age- and timing-dependent risk-benefit profiles and encourage appropriate use in symptomatic women.

Transgender Women

Progesterone serves as an adjunct to and anti-androgen therapy in for women, primarily to enhance the development of secondary sex characteristics such as maturation and possibly areolar growth. It is typically incorporated into regimens alongside and agents like to further suppress testosterone and promote , though it is not a standard component of care according to major guidelines. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) Standards of Care, Version 8, positions progesterone as an optional addition based on individualized patient goals, emphasizing its potential anecdotal benefits for while noting the need for judgment due to limited evidence. Typical dosing for progesterone in this context involves 100-200 mg of oral micronized progesterone administered daily, often at bedtime, with rectal administration as an alternative for better bioavailability. It is commonly added after 1-2 years of initial estrogen therapy to allow for baseline feminization before assessing the need for further breast enhancement. Evidence from observational studies supports improved breast maturation with progesterone addition; for instance, a 2023 study found significantly higher satisfaction with breast development at 6 months (53.8% vs. 19.6%) and 9 months among those receiving progesterone compared to controls.00252-2/fulltext) A 2025 study reported subjective improvements in breast development among 79.6% of progestogen users, alongside enhanced sense of femininity. Potential mood benefits have also been noted, with the same 2023 study observing improved mental health outcomes, including reduced depressive symptoms, in the progesterone group.00252-2/fulltext) WPATH guidelines recommend monitoring hormone levels, including progesterone if used, alongside regular assessments for efficacy and adverse effects every 3-6 months initially, then annually, with attention to lipid profiles, weight, and mood changes. Risks include potential , depressive symptoms, and alterations, though micronized progesterone may carry lower cardiometabolic risks compared to synthetic progestins; cardiovascular and risks remain a concern based on data, warranting caution in those with predisposing factors. Debates on for breast growth persist, as earlier guidelines highlighted insufficient , but 2023-2025 observational suggest benefits in maturation and satisfaction, prompting calls for randomized trials to resolve uncertainties.00252-2/fulltext)

Pregnancy Support

Progesterone plays a critical role in maintaining early by supporting the during the , particularly after when natural production may be insufficient. In assisted reproductive technologies (ART), such as fertilization, exogenous progesterone is standardly provided as support to compensate for the disruption of function caused by ovarian stimulation protocols, thereby enhancing implantation rates and ongoing outcomes. For women with a history of —typically defined as three or more prior losses of unclear —who experience in the current , progesterone supplementation starting early in the first trimester may reduce the rate, as per ESHRE 2022 guidelines (moderate-quality from randomized trials showing potential benefit in this ). This approach is supported by professional guidelines, which suggest benefit in such high-risk cases with while noting limited overall. Vaginal progesterone is the preferred route for support in both and prevention due to its targeted uterine delivery, higher endometrial , and reduced systemic side effects compared to intramuscular administration, which can cause injection-site pain, swelling, or rare severe reactions like . Common dosing involves 200–600 mg daily via micronized capsules, suppositories, or gel, administered from the time of or early confirmation through at least 8–12 weeks . Injectable forms, such as intramuscular progesterone at 25–100 mg daily, remain an option but are less favored for patient comfort. In singleton pregnancies with a short (≤25 mm) identified by midtrimester transvaginal ultrasound, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) recommend vaginal progesterone (e.g., 90 mg gel or 200 mg capsules daily) from 16–24 weeks until 36 weeks to prevent , with meta-analyses of individual patient data from randomized trials showing a 30–40% reduction in risk for delivery before 33 weeks. This intervention is particularly advised for women without prior preterm birth history when cervical length is ≤20 mm, or considered for 21–25 mm via shared decision-making. The 2023 FDA withdrawal of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate (Makena), approved in 2011 for recurrent prevention, underscores the shift toward vaginal progesterone; confirmatory post-marketing trials failed to confirm efficacy, leading to immediate removal from the market as benefits did not outweigh risks. Prior to starting progesterone, must be excluded to prevent potentially life-threatening complications like tubal rupture, using transvaginal to visualize intrauterine and serial serum beta-hCG measurements to assess discriminatory levels (>2000 mIU/mL without visible sac raises suspicion).

Fertility Support

Progesterone plays a crucial role in treatments by providing support, which helps sustain the secretory transformation of the essential for embryo implantation after in assisted reproductive technologies. This supplementation addresses the defect often induced by analogs or ovarian hyperstimulation, ensuring adequate progesterone levels to prevent early loss. In in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, progesterone luteal phase support is standardly initiated on the day of retrieval and continued to mimic natural function. Preferred routes include intramuscular administration at 50 mg daily or vaginal progesterone gel (such as 8% Crinone) at 90 mg twice daily, with treatment typically lasting 10-14 weeks or until confirmation of fetal heartbeat.02794-4/fulltext) Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials indicate that this supplementation yields 10-15% higher live birth rates compared to cycles without it, highlighting its impact on reproductive success in frozen embryo transfer protocols. Progesterone is also employed in intrauterine insemination (IUI) for women exhibiting insufficiency, where it enhances endometrial receptivity and rates in stimulated cycles using clomiphene or . Oral or vaginal formulations are commonly used post- to bolster outcomes in these less invasive procedures.00266-9/abstract) The use of progesterone for fertility support has seen increased adoption since 2024, amid rising global rates that affect approximately 1 in 6 adults, as reported by the , with market analyses projecting substantial growth in assisted reproductive services due to heightened demand.

Contraception

Bioidentical progesterone has no established role in contraception. Synthetic progestins (progestogens), such as norethindrone in progestin-only pills or in injectables like depot (DMPA), are used for by suppressing , thickening cervical mucus, and thinning the . These methods are effective but distinct from bioidentical progesterone medications.

Gynecological Disorders

Progesterone is utilized in the management of , a common gynecological disorder characterized by excessive menstrual blood loss. Oral micronized progesterone, administered at a dose of 10 mg daily from day 5 to 26 of the , helps regulate the endometrial lining and reduce bleeding volume. According to 2024 clinical guidelines, such therapies achieve a 70-80% reduction in menstrual blood loss for many patients, making it a viable option for those with ovulatory or anovulatory patterns. In cases of endometrial hyperplasia associated with anovulatory cycles, progesterone plays a key role in prevention by opposing unopposed exposure that can lead to endometrial proliferation. Cyclic regimens, such as 200 mg oral micronized progesterone daily for 12-14 days per month, are preferred for women desiring preservation, as they mimic natural support and allow for periodic withdrawal bleeding. Continuous administration at lower doses (e.g., 100 mg daily) may be considered for higher-risk patients or those with persistent , though cyclic therapy is generally favored to minimize side effects while effectively transforming the . Progesterone therapy is also indicated for secondary amenorrhea resulting from luteal phase defects, where inadequate progesterone production post- leads to irregular or absent menses. Supplementation with oral micronized progesterone, typically 200-300 mg daily during the (days 14-28 of the cycle), supports endometrial development and restores cyclic bleeding in affected women. This approach addresses the underlying progesterone insufficiency without suppressing in subsequent cycles. Compared to synthetic progestins, micronized progesterone demonstrates superior tolerability for long-term use in these gynecological conditions, with reduced risks of mood disturbances, adverse changes, and androgenic effects such as or . Studies highlight its neutral impact on and emotional , supporting its preference in extended regimens for conditions requiring ongoing therapy.

Other Uses

Progesterone is used cyclically to treat cyclical mastalgia, or premenstrual breast , at a dose of 200 mg orally from days 14 to 25 of the , helping to alleviate tenderness by counteracting during the . In premenstrual syndrome (PMS), progesterone has been employed to address mood and physical symptoms, such as and , with rectal administration at 100 mg daily showing potential benefits in some trials, though overall evidence remains mixed due to inconsistent results across randomized controlled studies. A 2025 review of oral micronized progesterone highlighted its limited efficacy for specific PMS symptom clusters, reinforcing the inconclusive data from prior meta-analyses. For catamenial epilepsy, where seizures exacerbate premenstrually, oral progesterone at 200 mg three times daily during the (days 15 to 28) stabilizes activity by modulating GABA-A receptors through its metabolite , which enhances inhibitory and reduces neuronal excitability. Progesterone exhibits neuroprotective effects as a at certain receptors, including membrane component 1, aiding in reducing inflammation and promoting neuronal survival in models of brain injury, though clinical applications remain investigational. Its use in sleep disorders is limited, primarily showing potential to reduce and improve architecture in postmenopausal women at doses of 300 mg daily, without established routine therapeutic protocols.

Available Forms and Administration

Oral and Sublingual

Oral , marketed as Prometrium in capsules containing 100 mg or 200 mg, is formulated to improve systemic absorption primarily through the , bypassing significant first-pass hepatic metabolism. This process reduces particle size to enhance dissolution and uptake in the , though overall oral remains low at approximately 8-10% relative to intramuscular administration. Dosing typically ranges from 100-200 mg daily, often taken at bedtime for (HRT) or as part of contraception regimens, with administration alongside food recommended to double absorption rates by promoting emulsification and lymphatic transport. Non-micronized forms of progesterone exhibit substantial stability and issues in the aqueous environment of the gut, leading to negligible absorption and rendering them unsuitable for oral use. In contrast, the sublingual route offers higher than oral (approximately 10-30% relative to intramuscular administration) due to direct mucosal absorption into the bloodstream, though levels can vary based on and individual factors such as production. Typical sublingual dosing involves 100 mg administered 2-3 times daily, providing more sustained progesterone exposure compared to oral capsules while minimizing hepatic first-pass effects through strategies like rapid dissolution tablets. This route is particularly favored in HRT and certain contraception protocols for its pharmacokinetic advantages.

Vaginal and Rectal

Vaginal administration of progesterone is commonly employed for its targeted delivery to the , leveraging the uterine first-pass effect to achieve significantly higher endometrial concentrations compared to systemic routes. This route minimizes systemic exposure, reducing the risk of certain side effects while supporting reproductive functions such as supplementation in treatments and maintenance. Progesterone vaginal gels, such as Crinone 8% (providing 90 mg per application), are typically administered once or twice daily for these indications. Similarly, vaginal suppositories, including micronized progesterone inserts like Endometrin (100 mg), are used at doses of 100-200 mg daily or divided into 2-3 administrations to support cycles and early . The uterine first-pass effect following vaginal progesterone administration results in endometrial tissue levels that exceed those from by more than 10-fold, despite lower serum concentrations, enabling effective local endometrial transformation with reduced systemic impact. This pharmacokinetic advantage makes vaginal progesterone a preferred option in fertilization (IVF) protocols for support, where it demonstrates comparable efficacy to intramuscular injections but with greater patient satisfaction due to the absence of injection site pain and fewer local discomforts. In assisted reproductive technologies, vaginal formulations have been shown to yield high clinical rates, often outperforming oral routes in ongoing outcomes. Rectal administration of progesterone suppositories serves as an effective alternative to vaginal or oral routes, particularly in cases of poor oral tolerance such as during , offering similar dosing regimens of 200-400 mg daily or twice daily for luteal support. This route achieves systemic absorption comparable to while bypassing first-pass hepatic metabolism, making it suitable for and support when vaginal use is impractical. Recent evidence underscores the benefits of vaginal progesterone in support, with 2024 studies demonstrating its role in reducing rates among women with a short . For instance, vaginal progesterone supplementation significantly lowered the incidence of before 32 weeks' in high-risk singleton pregnancies, with relative risks indicating up to a 45% reduction compared to . These findings highlight its prophylactic value without notable increases in adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. Vaginal administration should be used cautiously in the presence of active vaginal infections, as detailed in relative contraindications.

Injectable

Injectable progesterone is administered via intramuscular () or subcutaneous (SC) routes to provide sustained systemic absorption, primarily for support in assisted reproductive technologies such as fertilization (IVF). The standard oil-based formulation consists of progesterone suspended in at a concentration of 50 mg/mL, typically given as a 50 mg (1 mL) IM injection once daily, starting on the day of retrieval and continuing until the or early gestation. This depot effect ensures prolonged release, mimicking physiological levels to support endometrial preparation and implantation. Aqueous formulations, such as water-soluble progesterone for SC injection (e.g., 25 mg daily), have emerged as alternatives to oil-based preparations, offering reduced injection-site pain and improved patient tolerability while maintaining comparable for luteal support in IVF cycles. Long-acting esters like 17-alpha (17-OHPC) were previously used for weekly dosing in maintenance to prevent , but following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's withdrawal of approval in April 2023 due to insufficient evidence of , natural progesterone forms are now preferred for such indications. Pharmacokinetically, IM progesterone in oil achieves peak plasma concentrations of approximately 50 ng/mL (for a 50 mg dose) between 4 and 8 hours post-injection, with levels remaining elevated above baseline for at least 24 hours and an elimination half-life of 20 to 25 hours, supporting once-daily dosing. These characteristics provide reliable systemic exposure for applications, though clinical use for historical pregnancy maintenance (e.g., reducing miscarriage risk in recurrent cases) is declining in favor of less invasive vaginal alternatives, which offer similar outcomes with fewer local reactions. Oil-based injections often cause pain, irritation, or sterile abscesses at the site due to the vehicle, but these can be mitigated through techniques such as warming the vial to body temperature before administration, using the Z-track method to seal the site, applying ice packs pre- and post-injection, and rotating sites (e.g., alternating between the upper outer , thighs, or deltoids) to avoid tissue fibrosis or lumps. Aqueous SC options further minimize discomfort, with studies reporting higher patient satisfaction compared to traditional IM oil. High doses in overdose scenarios may exacerbate injection-related risks, though these are addressed separately.

Topical and Transdermal

Topical and transdermal progesterone refers to the application of progesterone formulations directly to the skin, facilitating absorption through the dermal layers into the systemic circulation or for localized effects. This route is commonly utilized in bioidentical , where micronized progesterone is compounded into creams or gels to mimic endogenous levels. Typical dosing for topical creams ranges from 20 to 40 mg daily, applied to areas such as the inner arms, thighs, or to address localized symptoms like breast tenderness or vulvar discomfort during . Systemic absorption from topical progesterone is generally low, estimated at 5-10%, with studies showing minimal increases in serum levels (e.g., approximately 0.53 ng/mL after application) despite elevated salivary concentrations, indicating primarily local or partial systemic effects. Transdermal delivery via this method bypasses hepatic first-pass , potentially reducing certain metabolic side effects associated with and allowing for steady, physiologic release. It is often combined with in (HRT) regimens to manage menopausal symptoms and support endometrial protection, though evidence for adequate systemic progestogenic activity remains limited compared to other routes. Despite these advantages, topical progesterone formulations face limitations, including highly variable absorption influenced by thickness, application site, and quality, which can lead to inconsistent therapeutic outcomes. These products, typically compounded, are not FDA-approved for systemic use in many countries, as they lack standardized data and rigorous clinical validation for preventing in HRT. Common route-specific effects include mild at the application site. As of 2025, emerging gel formulations of progesterone are gaining traction in compounded bioidentical HRT for , driven by market trends toward non-invasive, customizable options that enhance patient adherence and address symptoms like hot flashes and mood disturbances. As of February 2025, combined estradiol-progesterone gels, such as Estrogel Pro, have been added to the Australian to address menopausal shortages, offering a non-invasive option for HRT. These gels offer improved spreadability over creams, potentially optimizing , though ongoing emphasizes the need for better pharmacokinetic studies to confirm .

Contraindications

Absolute Contraindications

Progesterone medication is absolutely contraindicated in individuals with known or suspected , except in specific support indications where its use is therapeutically intended. This restriction for most formulations stems from lack of established safety and efficacy data for pregnancy support, though specific forms are used without demonstrated teratogenic effects. Undiagnosed represents another absolute , as it may signal underlying such as or other gynecological disorders that could be exacerbated by progesterone. Evaluation to determine the cause of bleeding must precede any consideration of therapy. Active or history of , , or other hormone-sensitive malignancies strictly prohibits progesterone use, due to the hormone's potential to stimulate proliferation in estrogen- or progesterone-receptor-positive tumors. Clinical guidelines emphasize avoiding progestogens in such cases to prevent disease progression or recurrence. Severe , such as , which impairs progesterone metabolism, is an absolute , as it can lead to accumulation and heightened . Hepatic function must be normal for safe administration. to progesterone itself or to formulation excipients, including in certain capsule preparations, mandates avoidance to prevent anaphylactic reactions. Alternative formulations without allergens should not be assumed safe without testing. Active or history of thromboembolic disorders, including thrombosis or , contraindicate progesterone due to its prothrombotic effects via alterations in factors. This risk is particularly elevated in individuals with prior events.

Relative Contraindications

Relative contraindications to progesterone medication involve conditions where the potential benefits may outweigh the risks, but use requires careful , close monitoring, and individualized risk-benefit assessment. These differ from absolute contraindications by allowing possible administration under specific circumstances, such as with alternative routes or lower doses, to mitigate potential harms. A history of , including prior events like or , warrants caution due to potential exacerbation of vascular risks, with or non-oral routes preferred to minimize thrombotic potential. Migraines with are considered a relative contraindication in progesterone-based therapies, especially for contraception or HRT, as they may increase risk, but non-oral estrogen-progestin combinations can be used at the lowest effective dose after neurological . Smoking in women over age 35 is a relative for progesterone-containing therapies, as it elevates cardiovascular and thrombotic risks, though progestin-only options may be acceptable with counseling on and regular monitoring. For progestin-only contraceptives, with vascular complications is category 3 (risks usually outweigh benefits) per medical eligibility criteria, necessitating assessment of glycemic control and vascular status before initiation. For the vaginal route of progesterone administration, active vaginal infections require caution or temporary avoidance to prevent irritation or dissemination of infection, while may complicate insertion and absorption, often necessitating alternative routes like oral or intramuscular. A is a relative , as progesterone may exacerbate mood changes or depressive symptoms, requiring close psychiatric monitoring and prompt discontinuation if symptoms recur. As of November 2025, the FDA has initiated removal of warnings on menopausal HRT products, prompted by the July 2025 expert panel and reanalyses of the data. This revises considerations for cardiovascular risks with progesterone-inclusive therapies, emphasizing lower absolute risks in women under 60 or within 10 years of onset, potentially allowing broader use with and monitoring. Liver function monitoring is recommended in patients with mild hepatic impairment, as progesterone occurs primarily in the liver.

Side Effects

Common Side Effects

Progesterone medication commonly causes mild adverse reactions such as breast tenderness, , mood swings, and , affecting approximately 10-20% of users based on data. These symptoms are frequently reported in doses ranging from 100 to 400 mg per day and are attributed to the hormone's influence on fluid retention and emotional regulation. Irregular or spotting occurs in up to 10% of users, particularly during the initial cycles of (HRT), as the body adjusts to cyclic progesterone exposure. This breakthrough bleeding typically diminishes as endometrial stability is achieved. Headache, dizziness, and nausea are additional common effects, with incidences of 20-30% for headache and dizziness, and these are dose-dependent, increasing with higher oral doses. Weight gain averages less than 2 kg in most users, often due to temporary fluid retention rather than fat accumulation. Acne develops in a smaller subset of users, around 1%, linked to progesterone's androgenic metabolites. Most of these side effects resolve spontaneously within 3 months of initiation, as tolerance develops. Management strategies include dose adjustment or switching routes of administration to minimize persistence.

Serious Adverse Effects

Combined (HRT) with and synthetic progestins, such as (MPA) studied in the (WHI), has been associated with an increased risk of , particularly with long-term use exceeding 5 years. In the WHI , the for breast cancer incidence was 1.45 (95% CI 1.13-1.88) for use less than 5 years, rising to higher levels with extended duration, reflecting a range of approximately 1.2 to 1.5 for prolonged exposure. Observational studies indicate that micronized progesterone combined with does not increase risk, unlike synthetic progestins. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents another serious risk with progesterone-containing HRT, with odds ratios ranging from 1.3 to 2.0 overall, though risks are notably higher with compared to routes. Systematic reviews indicate that oral estrogen-progestogen combinations, including , carry an odds ratio of 2.10 (95% CI 1.92-2.31) for VTE, whereas estrogen with micronized progesterone shows minimal elevation at 0.7 (95% CI 0.3-1.9). On November 10, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the removal of warnings on HRT products containing progesterone and , prompted by a review of emerging data demonstrating lower absolute risks, particularly in younger women initiating therapy near onset. This update better reflects age-stratified evidence, easing prior restrictions while emphasizing individualized . Cardiovascular events such as and pose elevated risks for older women using progesterone in HRT, particularly those starting more than 10 years post-menopause, with a of at 1.32 (95% CI 1.12-1.56). Monitoring of profiles and is recommended, as oral progesterone formulations may increase triglycerides by 5-15% and systolic pressure by 1-1.5 mm Hg, whereas options exert neutral effects. The Memory Study (WHIMS) found that combined with synthetic progestin (MPA) in HRT increases risk in women beginning after age 65, with a of 2.05 (95% CI 1.21-3.48) for probable among postmenopausal participants. Studies using micronized progesterone, however, show no increased risk of or .

Route-Specific Effects

Oral administration of progesterone can lead to and primarily due to its metabolite , which modulates GABA_A receptors in the . These effects manifest as drowsiness, , and mild performance deficits, often requiring bedtime dosing to mitigate daytime impairment. At higher oral doses exceeding 300 mg, such as 400 mg daily, becomes more pronounced, potentially including , depersonalization, and in severe cases, or loss of . Vaginal administration of progesterone frequently causes local effects such as , including pruritus and burning, occurring in approximately 2-7% of users depending on trimester and formulation. Increased is also common, reported in about 23% of patients, often appearing clumpy with formulations. Yeast infections arise more often with forms compared to gels, at roughly tenfold higher frequency, contributing to overall local discomfort in 5-10% of cases when considering combined and infections. Injectable progesterone commonly results in and swelling at the injection site due to local tissue reaction. These effects, including and irritation, affect a notable portion of users during assisted reproductive treatments. Sterile abscess formation is rare but can occur, sometimes presenting as requiring intervention. Topical and transdermal progesterone may provoke skin reactions such as or pruritus in 1-10% of applications, with uncommon (0.1-1%) and very rare urticaria. Adhesion issues are less documented for progesterone creams but can arise with patch-based systems, leading to inconsistent delivery and localized irritation.

Overdose and Toxicity

Acute Overdose

Overdosage of progesterone has not been evaluated in humans. Postmarketing reports during initial therapy with oral micronized progesterone include effects such as extreme , drowsiness, , slurred speech, difficulty walking, loss of , vertigo, , disorientation, feeling drunk, and . There is no specific for progesterone overdose; treatment consists of discontinuation of the medication and appropriate symptomatic and supportive care. Rare severe outcomes, such as respiratory depression or altered mental status, may occur with very high doses, necessitating monitoring of including and level of . In the context of pregnancy support, inadvertent high doses of progesterone have not been associated with teratogenicity or increased risk of birth defects, consistent with extensive use of progesterone supplementation in assisted reproduction without adverse fetal outcomes.

Management of Overdose

In cases of suspected progesterone overdose, immediate contact with a is essential for tailored guidance, as the overall lethality is low and most cases resolve without long-term complications. Treatment focuses on supportive and symptomatic measures, with no specific available. Discontinuation of the medication is the first step, followed by monitoring such as , , and respiratory status in a medical setting. For recent oral ingestion, activated charcoal may be considered if advised by poison control to reduce absorption. Hypotension, if present, is managed with intravenous fluids to maintain hemodynamic stability. Patients typically require hospital observation for 12 to 24 hours to monitor for delayed symptoms. Hemodialysis is ineffective due to progesterone's high protein binding (96% to 99%), which limits its removal from the bloodstream.

Drug Interactions

Pharmacokinetic Interactions

Progesterone, when administered orally as micronized capsules, undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism primarily via the enzyme in the liver and intestines, making it susceptible to pharmacokinetic interactions with CYP3A4 modulators. Strong CYP3A4 inducers, such as rifampin, significantly accelerate progesterone metabolism, leading to reduced plasma concentrations and area under the curve (AUC) by approximately 40-50% in studies of progestogens, potentially necessitating dose adjustments to maintain therapeutic efficacy. Conversely, strong CYP3A4 inhibitors like markedly suppress progesterone metabolism, as evidenced by an IC50 value below 0.1 μM in human liver microsomes, which may prolong its and increase systemic exposure, requiring monitoring for potential despite the clinical relevance remaining uncertain. , a mild CYP3A4 inhibitor, can modestly elevate oral progesterone levels by inhibiting intestinal metabolism, though the effect is less pronounced than with potent inhibitors and typically does not require routine dose alterations. The of oral progesterone is notably enhanced when taken with , with concomitant ingestion increasing absorption in postmenopausal women compared to conditions, as food delays gastric emptying and reduces first-pass effects. Antiepileptic drugs such as , which induce , can lower progesterone levels through accelerated hepatic clearance, potentially reducing efficacy and warranting dose adjustments or alternative strategies.

Pharmacodynamic Interactions

Progesterone exhibits pharmacodynamic interactions with depressants, primarily through its metabolite , which acts as a positive of the GABA_A receptor, enhancing inhibitory . This leads to additive effects when co-administered with benzodiazepines, as physiological doses of progesterone potentiate the behavioral and psychomotor-impairing actions of drugs like in healthy women. Similarly, progesterone can amplify the properties of alcohol, contributing to increased drowsiness and impaired coordination due to shared enhancement of GABAergic activity. In (HRT), progesterone interacts synergistically with s to oppose estrogen-induced endometrial proliferation, thereby providing protective effects against and reducing the risk of . However, this combination also results in additive prothrombotic effects, elevating the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE); for instance, estrogen plus progestin therapy approximately doubles the VTE risk compared to non-users, particularly in the first year of use. Progesterone's progestogenic activity can exert prothrombotic influences on hemostatic factors, such as reducing (TFPI) activity, which may oppose the anticoagulant effects of drugs like and necessitate closer monitoring of coagulation parameters. Antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), may mitigate progesterone-associated mood disturbances, such as irritability or depressive symptoms, in susceptible individuals, as evidenced by their efficacy in treating linked to progesterone fluctuations. In progestogen-based contraception, efficacy can be compromised by co-administration with hepatic enzyme inducers, leading to breakthrough ovulation and reduced contraceptive reliability due to diminished progestogenic suppression of gonadotropins.

Pharmacology

Pharmacodynamics

Progesterone exerts its primary genomic effects by binding to intracellular progesterone receptors (PRs), specifically the isoforms PR-A and PR-B, which are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Upon binding, progesterone induces a conformational change in these receptors, leading to their dimerization and translocation to the nucleus, where they interact with progesterone response elements on DNA to regulate gene transcription. This mechanism modulates the expression of genes involved in cellular proliferation and differentiation, particularly in reproductive tissues; for instance, in the endometrium, progesterone promotes secretory transformation and vascularization following estrogen priming, supporting implantation during the luteal phase. A key metabolite of progesterone, , contributes to non-genomic pharmacodynamic actions, particularly in the , by positively modulating GABA-A receptors. This enhancement of inhibitory increases chloride conductance, resulting in , , and effects. These pathways also underlie progesterone's tissue-specific neuroprotective properties, such as reducing neuronal and supporting myelination in response to injury or neurodegeneration. Progesterone inhibits the release of gonadotropins ( and ) by acting on the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, suppressing (GnRH) pulsatility and thereby preventing . This negative feedback mechanism is central to its contraceptive effects in progestin-only formulations. In terms of estrogen interactions, progesterone displays anti-estrogenic activity in tissue by downregulating receptors and inhibiting estrogen-induced proliferation, which may contribute to its role in modulating development. Conversely, in the , progesterone exhibits pro-estrogenic facilitation by building upon estrogen-mediated proliferation to induce secretory changes essential for maintenance.

Pharmacokinetics

Progesterone exhibits route-dependent pharmacokinetics, characterized by low oral , extensive hepatic , and primarily renal elimination. When administered orally as micronized capsules, progesterone undergoes significant first-pass in the liver, resulting in an absolute of approximately 5-10%. Peak plasma concentrations are typically achieved within 1-3 hours post-dose, with serum levels proportional to the administered dose in the range of 100-300 mg. Food intake enhances absorption by slowing gastric emptying and improving dissolution of the micronized formulation suspended in oil. Distribution of progesterone is influenced by its high affinity for plasma proteins, with 96-99% binding primarily to (50-54%) and corticosteroid-binding globulin (, 43-48%). The volume of distribution is approximately 1.8-2.4 L/kg, reflecting moderate tissue penetration beyond the vascular compartment. Progesterone readily crosses the blood-brain barrier and but achieves higher concentrations in target tissues such as the compared to systemic circulation. Metabolism occurs predominantly in the liver via enzymes, particularly , which hydroxylates progesterone to form metabolites including 6β-hydroxyprogesterone and 20α-dihydroprogesterone. Further yields pregnanediol and , which are conjugated with glucuronic or to facilitate . Some metabolites undergo enterohepatic recirculation after biliary . Elimination follows a biphasic pattern, with an initial rapid distribution phase and a terminal of 12-20 hours for oral micronized progesterone, allowing for once- or twice-daily dosing. Approximately 50-60% of metabolites are excreted renally as and conjugates, with the remainder via and , some undergoing enterohepatic recirculation. Clearance is reduced in elderly individuals due to age-related declines in hepatic function and , leading to higher plasma concentrations. Pharmacokinetic profiles vary by administration route. Vaginal progesterone achieves higher local concentrations in the (Cmax up to 10-fold greater than oral) with lower systemic exposure and a prolonged absorption phase of 25-50 hours. delivery provides steady-state plasma levels over 30-40 hours, bypassing first-pass for more consistent . results in a of 20-28 hours with peak levels at 8 hours. Recent formulations, such as effervescent vaginal inserts (as of 2025), show enhanced local delivery with altered systemic profiles.

Chemistry

Structure and Properties

Progesterone is a C21 steroid hormone classified as a pregnane derivative, with the molecular formula C₂₁H₃₀O₂ and a molecular weight of 314.46 g/mol. Its systematic IUPAC name is (8S,9S,10R,13S,14S,17S)-17-acetyl-10,13-dimethyl-1,2,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-dodecahydrocyclopentaphenanthren-3-one, commonly referred to as pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione. The molecule features a characteristic steroid nucleus consisting of four fused rings (three six-membered and one five-membered), with a Δ⁴-3-keto configuration in ring A, a ketone group at C20, and methyl groups at C10 and C13. Progesterone exhibits six chiral centers at positions 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 17, which define its specific stereochemistry essential for biological activity. Physically, progesterone appears as a white to creamy white crystalline powder. It is highly lipophilic, with an (logP) of 3.87, and exhibits poor aqueous of approximately 8.8 mg/L at 25 °C. The is 128 °C. Due to its low water , which limits dissolution and in oral formulations, reduces to less than 10 μm, thereby increasing the surface area and enhancing the aqueous dissolution rate. Progesterone shows (UV) absorption with a maximum at 240 nm, attributable to the α,β-unsaturated system in ring A. Progesterone demonstrates metabolic chirality through reduction at the Δ⁴ , yielding 5α-dihydroprogesterone (via ) and 5β-dihydroprogesterone (via 5β-reductase) as key metabolites, which further influence its clearance and activity. Regarding stability, the compound is generally stable in air but sensitive to exposure and oxidation, which can lead to degradation via photolysis or . To maintain integrity, it is recommended to store progesterone in tight, light-resistant containers at controlled (15–30 °C).

Synthesis and Derivatives

Progesterone was first synthesized in 1934 by , who converted pregnanediol into progesterone, marking a significant advancement in steroid chemistry and leading to early patents for its production. This synthesis laid the groundwork for subsequent industrial processes, though initial yields were low and not scalable for pharmaceutical use. The primary industrial synthesis of progesterone emerged in through the Marker degradation process, developed by Russell Marker, which converts diosgenin—a steroidal sapogenin extracted from Mexican yams ( species)—into progesterone via a series of chemical steps, including , , and reduction. This semisynthetic route from sterols revolutionized progesterone production by enabling large-scale, cost-effective manufacturing, as diosgenin is abundant and the process achieves high yields through side-chain cleavage and ring modifications. Modern semisynthetic approaches continue to rely on plant sterols such as or sitosterol, involving microbial or enzymatic transformations to introduce the skeleton, though these are less dominant than the Marker method historically. In recent years, recombinant yeast systems, such as engineered expressing plant-derived steroidogenic enzymes such as MtCYP150 (a P450 side-chain cleavage enzyme homolog), have been developed for de novo progesterone from simple carbon sources, yielding up to 1.06 g/L and offering sustainable alternatives to plant extraction. Key derivatives of progesterone include (MPA), a 6α-methylated and 17α-acetoxylated analog that enhances oral and progestogenic potency compared to parent progesterone. Another notable is dydrogesterone, a retro-steroid with an inverted configuration at the C9-C10 bond, designed to mimic progesterone's activity while improving metabolic stability. Among prodrugs, caproate (17-OHPC), an esterified form administered intramuscularly for sustained release, was used clinically but had its U.S. approval withdrawn by the FDA in April 2023 due to lack of demonstrated efficacy in preventing . Micronized progesterone, a with particle sizes reduced to under 10 μm, significantly improves oral —reaching approximately 10% relative to intramuscular administration—by enhancing gastrointestinal absorption and reducing first-pass .

History

Discovery and Early Development

The progestational hormone was first identified in 1929 by American researchers George W. Corner and Willard M. Allen, who demonstrated its presence in extracts from the of pigs through bioassays showing its ability to induce secretory changes in the rabbit , a key step in understanding its role in preparing the for . Building on this, the hormone was isolated in crystalline form between 1929 and 1934 from tissue, with Corner and Allen pioneering the extraction process using high-vacuum and fractional . Independently, German chemist , along with Uwe Westphal, achieved a parallel isolation from sow corpora lutea during the same period, confirming the hormone's chemical identity across multiple international teams. The first chemical synthesis of was accomplished in 1934, enabling further study and production beyond natural extraction from animal sources. Initially named "progestin" by Corner and Allen to reflect its role in , the was officially designated "progesterone"—a progestational —in 1935 following international agreement at a standardization meeting to avoid naming conflicts. Early animal studies, particularly the Corner-Allen bioassay developed in the late 1920s, focused on progesterone's effects on endometrial proliferation and in rabbits, establishing its essential function in maintaining early by supporting implantation. By the , these insights led to initial therapeutic trials in humans, primarily targeting menstrual disorders such as dysfunctional uterine bleeding and premenstrual symptoms through progesterone injections to regulate cycles. Prior to the 1950s, clinical applications emphasized treatments, including supplementation to prevent in cases of deficiency, marking progesterone's transition from laboratory curiosity to early medical intervention.

Formulation Advancements

In the , early efforts to develop oral formulations of progesterone faced significant challenges due to its poor , primarily caused by extensive first-pass in the liver, which limited systemic absorption to less than 10%. Researchers recognized that progesterone's lipophilic nature and rapid degradation necessitated innovations in reduction; preliminary studies during this decade explored to enhance dissolution and uptake, though commercial viability remained elusive until later refinements. By the late , micronized oral progesterone suspended in oil, such as the formulation that became the basis for Prometrium, was introduced to address these absorption issues, achieving peak serum levels within 3 hours and enabling effective oral administration for the first time. During the 1970s and 1980s, advancements in progesterone delivery shifted toward non-oral routes to support fertility treatments, particularly supplementation in early assisted reproductive technologies. Intramuscular injections of progesterone in oil emerged as a reliable method, providing sustained release and high for maintaining endometrial receptivity post-ovulation induction, with doses of 50-100 mg daily becoming standard in fertilization protocols. Concurrently, vaginal administration gained traction for its targeted uterine delivery via first-pass effects; initial suppositories evolved into micronized gels in the late , such as Crinone, which improved patient compliance and local endometrial exposure compared to injections while minimizing systemic side effects. The 1990s marked initial exploration of delivery for (HRT), though natural progesterone's absorption proved challenging due to its molecular weight and polarity. Compounded formulations in creams were developed alongside synthetic progestins in estrogen-progestogen patches, with limited steady release rates for natural progesterone, contributing to broader HRT options during the decade. In the , the rise of fueled demand for custom- progesterone formulations, driven by patient preferences for molecules identical to endogenous hormones and concerns over synthetic alternatives following major HRT trials. pharmacies proliferated, offering micronized progesterone in creams, troches, and sublingual forms at individualized doses (e.g., 20-100 mg daily), with usage surging over 20-fold in the U.S. by mid-decade due to advocacy from and clinician networks. also emerged as a viable alternative, particularly for patients intolerant to vaginal or oral routes, leveraging high (up to 80%) via avoidance of first-pass effects; suppositories like Cyclogest (400 mg) provided steady absorption for luteal support and HRT, supported by pharmacokinetic studies showing comparable efficacy to intramuscular options. Post-2020, global disruptions led to widespread shortages of traditional progesterone forms, prompting renewed focus on gel-based deliveries for menopausal to ensure continuity of care. Vaginal and progesterone gels, such as those combined with in products like Estrogel Pro (a pack providing estradiol gel and micronized progesterone capsules), were prioritized for their ease of use and stable absorption amid patch and capsule deficits. In response, the Australian (PBS) updated listings effective 1 March 2025 to subsidize these options, including Prometrium and standalone products, alleviating access barriers and supporting tens of thousands of women affected by shortages.

Regulatory Milestones

Progesterone, as a medication, received its initial U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval on May 11, 1978, for the injectable form (progesterone in oil) indicated for the treatment of amenorrhea and abnormal uterine bleeding. This marked a significant regulatory step for progesterone's use in addressing menstrual disorders, building on earlier approvals dating back to the 1930s for other formulations, though the 1978 decision specifically expanded access for injectable administration in clinical settings. The development of bioavailable oral formulations advanced in , when the FDA approved micronized progesterone capsules (Prometrium) on for the treatment of secondary amenorrhea in premenopausal women. This approval addressed limitations of prior oral versions, which had poor absorption, and established progesterone as a viable non-synthetic option for regulation, supported by demonstrating efficacy in inducing withdrawal bleeding. In the realm of obstetric applications, the FDA granted accelerated approval on February 3, 2011, to injection (17-OHPC, marketed as Makena) for reducing the risk of in women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of singleton spontaneous . Although vaginal progesterone has been studied and recommended in guidelines for similar indications due to evidence of risk reduction, it lacks a specific FDA-approved label for prevention, with use remaining off-label. This 2011 milestone highlighted progesterone analogs' potential in maternal-fetal medicine but faced scrutiny over subsequent confirmatory trials. Regulatory adjustments occurred in 2023 when the FDA withdrew approval for Makena and its generics effective April 6, citing lack of efficacy demonstrated in the Phase 3 PROLONG trial, which failed to confirm benefits in preventing recurrent . The decision, announced on April 5, emphasized the need for robust post-approval evidence and shifted clinical focus toward alternative progestogens like vaginal progesterone for at-risk pregnancies. More recently, on July 17, 2025, an FDA expert panel convened to reassess labeling for (HRT) products, including those containing progesterone, recommending potential revisions to warnings stemming from the 2002 Women's Health Initiative findings. The panel highlighted updated safety data showing lower risks with modern, lower-dose bioidentical formulations and called for clearer risk communication to encourage appropriate use in menopausal symptom , leading to the FDA's initiation of removal of warnings in 2025. Internationally, the (EMA) has approved bioidentical forms of progesterone, such as micronized progesterone (Utrogestan), for indications including support in assisted reproduction and adjunctive HRT in postmenopausal women with an intact . These approvals, granted through centralized procedures, emphasize the safety profile of micronized formulations over synthetic progestins, with ongoing supporting their use in since the early 2000s. Global harmonization efforts for progesterone regulations are advanced through initiatives like the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines, which promote standardized quality, safety, and efficacy assessments across regulatory bodies such as the FDA and EMA. These efforts aim to streamline approvals for bioidentical hormones, reducing duplication in clinical data requirements and facilitating cross-border access, particularly for HRT and obstetric applications.

Society and Culture

Generic and Brand Names

The (INN) for progesterone is progesterone, as designated by the . Similarly, the (USAN) is progesterone, reflecting its standardized in pharmaceutical contexts. Progesterone is marketed under various brand names depending on the formulation and . Notable examples include Prometrium, an oral micronized progesterone capsule used for and secondary amenorrhea. Crinone is a vaginal gel formulation applied for treatment and support. Endometrin provides progesterone via vaginal insert, primarily for to support implantation. Synthetic analogs of progesterone, such as marketed as Provera, are distinguished from bioidentical progesterone due to their modified and differing pharmacokinetic profiles, though both act on progesterone receptors. Regional brand variations include Utrogestan, a micronized progesterone capsule or vaginal capsule widely used in for . Gestone is an injectable progesterone formulation available in select markets for treating progesterone deficiency. Generic versions of progesterone have been available since the expiration of key patents in the , enabling widespread production of bioequivalent formulations across oral, vaginal, and injectable routes. Progesterone medication is classified as a prescription-only in most countries worldwide, including the , , , and the , due to its role in and fertility treatments requiring medical supervision. In these regions, it is not considered a with significant abuse potential, allowing for straightforward regulatory access when prescribed. Over-the-counter availability is restricted to low-dose topical creams marketed for cosmetic purposes, which are not intended or approved for therapeutic medical uses and may pose risks due to inconsistent dosing. In the United States, generic forms of progesterone, such as oral capsules and vaginal inserts, are widely available through FDA-approved manufacturers and pharmacies, with multiple bioequivalent options ensuring broad for approved indications like secondary amenorrhea and endometrial in . Compounded bioidentical progesterone preparations, often customized for menopausal , are not subject to federal FDA pre-market approval but are permitted under sections 503A and 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for state-licensed pharmacies and facilities, respectively, provided they meet specific quality standards. In Europe, the (EMA) has authorized several formulations of micronized progesterone, including oral capsules like Utrogestan for menopausal and secondary amenorrhea, as well as vaginal suppositories, all requiring a prescription from healthcare providers. Over-the-counter progesterone creams remain limited to non-therapeutic, low-concentration products, with stricter regulations emphasizing the need for prescription access to ensure safety and efficacy. Access to progesterone in developing countries faces ongoing challenges, particularly for and prevention applications, where economic barriers, limitations, and low uptake rates hinder availability despite its proven benefits. Insurance coverage for progesterone varies globally but is frequently provided for standard uses such as and assisted reproduction in high-income settings like the , where most plans including Medicare cover generics, though off-label applications may require or face denials.

Usage Statistics

The global progesterone market was valued at USD 1.72 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 5.05 billion by 2034, exhibiting a (CAGR) of 12.74%. This expansion is driven primarily by rising demand in (HRT) for management and assisted reproductive technologies (ART). In the United States, over 5.57 million prescriptions for progesterone were dispensed annually as of 2023, with a significant portion for HRT purposes in alleviating menopausal symptoms. Following updated guidelines in 2023 that reaffirmed the safety of HRT for women under 60, prescriptions for progesterone in treatment have increased, contributing to broader adoption amid growing awareness of hormonal health. On November 10, 2025, the FDA removed warnings from menopausal hormone therapies, emphasizing benefits for symptomatic women under 60, potentially driving further increases in progesterone use for HRT. Demographically, about 80% of progesterone users are women aged 40 to 60, aligning with the peak incidence of perimenopause and menopause. Usage is also increasing in transgender care, where progesterone is incorporated into gender-affirming hormone regimens to enhance breast development and support overall feminization. In the context of ART, progesterone supplementation serves as a critical component for luteal phase support in frozen embryo transfer cycles to improve implantation rates and pregnancy outcomes. In , ongoing shortages of menopausal hormone therapies, including progesterone formulations, persisted throughout 2025, leading to disrupted access and increased reliance on alternative delivery methods or imported supplies, which exacerbated treatment gaps for affected patients.

Research

Preterm Birth Prevention

Following the 2023 withdrawal of 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC), a synthetic previously approved for preventing recurrent , has shifted emphasis toward natural progesterone formulations, particularly vaginal micronized progesterone, for singleton pregnancies with a short (typically ≤25 mm). The confirmatory PROLONG trial demonstrated that 17-OHPC failed to reduce risk compared to , leading to its market removal and highlighting the role of natural progesterone in this context. Unlike synthetic analogs, natural vaginal progesterone targets local cervical and uterine effects more effectively, with meta-analyses showing benefits in reducing preterm delivery before 34 weeks in women with a short , without the systemic side effects associated with intramuscular 17-OHPC. Ongoing multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are evaluating vaginal progesterone in singleton pregnancies identified with a short via transvaginal between 18 and 24 weeks' . These studies, including those recruiting through and into 2025, aim to refine dosing regimens and confirm long-term neonatal outcomes in diverse populations. Recent 2024-2025 analyses from such trials and updated meta-analyses report a 25-30% in before 34 weeks with daily vaginal progesterone (200 mg), alongside decreased rates of neonatal respiratory distress and NICU admissions. For instance, a 2024 multicenter RCT demonstrated a of 0.70 (95% CI 0.54-0.91) for <34 weeks in women without prior preterm delivery history. However, 2024 evidence indicates no benefit for preventing recurrent in women with prior history but without a short . The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 2023 practice advisory, with 2024 updates, recommends vaginal progesterone for singleton gestations with a , emphasizing targeted midtrimester transvaginal cervical length screening in high-risk populations to identify candidates. This aligns with Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) guidance promoting screening to mitigate disparities, though universal screening in low-risk populations is not recommended. A key challenge in these regimens is patient compliance with daily vaginal administration, which requires consistent self-insertion from until 36 weeks or delivery, with studies reporting adherence rates as low as 69% due to discomfort, messiness, and lifestyle disruptions. Efforts in ongoing trials include and alternative delivery devices to improve retention and real-world .

Hormone Replacement Therapy Updates

In 2025, the U.S. (FDA) convened an expert panel to reassess the risks and benefits of menopausal (HRT), with a focus on age-specific outcomes. The panel highlighted evidence indicating lower risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and when HRT is initiated in women under 60 years old, particularly within 10 years of onset. This conclusion drew from post hoc analyses of the (WHI) and subsequent observational data, showing absolute risk increases as minimal (e.g., fewer than 1 additional case per 1,000 women annually) and no overall mortality impact for estrogen-progestogen combinations in this group. The panel emphasized that and lower-dose formulations further mitigate these risks compared to older oral regimens. Long-term cohort studies published after 2023 have reinforced the safety profile of HRT regarding cognitive health, finding no increased risk of and, in some cases, potential protective effects. For instance, analysis of data involving over 200,000 postmenopausal women showed that HRT use was associated with a reduced risk ( 0.85), particularly when initiated between ages 46 and 56. The is supported by evidence of cardiovascular benefits with early initiation, where HRT aligns more closely with endogenous hormone levels to support vascular and neural health without elevating incidence. Recent evaluations have compared bioidentical progesterone (e.g., micronized forms) to synthetic progestogens, revealing improved tolerability in HRT regimens. A 2024 consensus statement from the British Menopause Society, informed by systematic reviews, noted that bioidentical progesterone exhibits fewer progesterone-like side effects such as anxiety, , fluid retention, and , due to its lack of binding to non-progesterone receptors like or sites. Meta-analyses referenced in these guidelines, including updates to prior work like the 2019 Vinogradova study, indicate bioidentical options may confer lower VTE risk and neutral effects on and glucose metabolism, contrasting with synthetics like , which can promote . Overall, bioidentical progesterone supports better patient adherence in long-term HRT without compromising efficacy for vasomotor symptom relief. Clinical trials and observational data post-2023 have advanced the use of progesterone delivery to minimize clotting risks in HRT. A 2022 population-based of nearly 1 million postmenopausal women suggested no elevated VTE risk with estrogen-progestogen combinations ( 0.96), even at higher doses or with prolonged use beyond 5 years, unlike oral routes which carry a 1.5-fold increase. However, a 2024 BMJ analysis of similar scale reported increased VTE risk (HR 1.46-1.92) with combined menopausal . Ongoing trials, such as those evaluating micronized progesterone in or patch forms, are assessing this profile over extended durations (up to 10 years), attributing potential benefits to bypassing first-pass liver and avoiding prothrombotic protein changes. These developments inform progesterone as an option for women requiring HRT beyond the traditional 5-year limit, especially those with clotting predispositions, pending further data. In response to the 2025 FDA panel, on November 10, 2025, the FDA and HHS announced the removal of warnings on HRT products regarding risks of , , , and probable , following comprehensive review and public comments. This aligns with 20-year WHI follow-up data showing no increased breast cancer mortality with combined HRT and risk reduction with alone, as well as halved cardiovascular events in early initiators per integrated reviews. Medical societies, including the North American Menopause Society, supported these updates to reflect age-stratified evidence and reduce barriers to appropriate HRT use.

Emerging Applications

Recent preclinical and early clinical investigations have explored intravenous progesterone as a neuroprotective agent in (TBI), aiming to mitigate secondary brain damage through anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic mechanisms. A 2024 study demonstrated that progesterone administration in experimental TBI models reduced neuronal loss and modulated immune responses, suggesting potential benefits in limiting and behavioral deficits. Despite mixed results from earlier phase III studies (e.g., ProTECT III and ), which failed to show significant functional improvements, preclinical data continues to support further exploration, though no new phase II trials were confirmed as ongoing into 2025. In the management of endometriosis-associated pain, oral progesterone and progestin analogs are under investigation for their anti-inflammatory effects, which may suppress ectopic endometrial growth and alleviate and chronic . Early randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that progestins like dienogest improve pain scores and with low adverse effects, prompting further exploration of natural progesterone formulations. A 2025 meta-analysis confirmed significant pain reduction with progestin therapy compared to , highlighting its role as a potential first-line option beyond combined oral contraceptives. Historical interest in progesterone as an adjunct therapy for stemmed from its immunomodulatory properties, which could dampen storms and reduce in severe cases. However, randomized trials conducted through 2023, including those administering progesterone to hospitalized men, yielded negative results, showing no significant improvement in clinical outcomes or mortality rates compared to standard care. A 2023 review concluded that while progesterone exhibits potential in viral infections, clinical evidence does not support its routine use in management. Observational studies have linked endogenous progesterone levels to prevention, potentially through modulation of GABA_A receptors that enhance and cognitive function. Women with higher progesterone during reproductive years exhibit lower amyloid-beta accumulation in cohort analyses, suggesting a protective role against neurodegeneration. These findings have spurred interest in progesterone-based interventions for at-risk populations, though prospective trials are needed to confirm causality via pathways. Emerging indications for progesterone include sleep disorders, particularly in perimenopausal women, where declining levels contribute to and fragmented sleep. Progesterone promotes sedation via its metabolite , which potentiates GABA activity, and small studies report improved sleep architecture with supplementation. Market analyses project the progesterone sector to reach USD 5.05 billion by 2034, driven partly by expanded applications in sleep therapeutics amid rising demand for hormone-based treatments.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.