Hubbry Logo
Radiant heating and coolingRadiant heating and coolingMain
Open search
Radiant heating and cooling
Community hub
Radiant heating and cooling
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Radiant heating and cooling
Radiant heating and cooling
Radiant heating and cooling
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Section view of room with internally cooled and heated concrete slab ceiling
Section view of room with internally cooled and heated concrete slab ceiling

Radiant heating and cooling is a category of HVAC technologies that exchange heat by both convection and radiation with the environments they are designed to heat or cool. There are many subcategories of radiant heating and cooling, including: "radiant ceiling panels",[1] "embedded surface systems",[1] "thermally active building systems",[1] and infrared heaters. According to some definitions, a technology is only included in this category if radiation comprises more than 50% of its heat exchange with the environment;[2] therefore technologies such as radiators and chilled beams (which may also involve radiation heat transfer) are usually not considered radiant heating or cooling. Within this category, it is practical to distinguish between high temperature radiant heating (devices with emitting source temperature >≈300 °F), and radiant heating or cooling with more moderate source temperatures. This article mainly addresses radiant heating and cooling with moderate source temperatures, used to heat or cool indoor environments. Moderate temperature radiant heating and cooling is usually composed of relatively large surfaces that are internally heated or cooled using hydronic or electrical sources. For high temperature indoor or outdoor radiant heating, see: Infrared heater. For snow melt applications see: Snowmelt system.

History

[edit]

Radiant heating and cooling originated as separate systems but now share a similar form. Radiant heating has a long history in Asia and Europe. The earliest systems, from as early as 5000 BC, were found in northern China and Korea. Archaeological findings show kang and dikang, heated beds and floors in ancient Chinese homes. Kang originated in the 11th century BC as “to dry” later evolving into a heated bed, while dikang expanded this concept to a heated floor. In Korea, the ondol system, meaning "warm stone," used flues beneath the floor to channel smoke from a kitchen stove, heating flat stones that radiated heat into the room above. Over time, the ondol system adapted to use coal and later transitioned to water-based systems in the 20th century, remaining a common heating system in Korean buildings.[3]

In Europe, the Roman hypocaust system, developed around the 3rd century BC, was an early radiant heating method using a furnace connected to underfloor and wall flues to circulate hot air in public baths and villas. This technology spread across the Roman Empire but declined after its fall, replaced by simpler fireplaces in the Middle Ages. In this period, systems like the Kachelofen from Austria and Germany used thermal masses for efficient heat storage and distribution. During the 18th century, radiant heating gained renewed use in Europe, driven by advancements in thermal storage techniques, such as heated flues for efficient heat distribution and a better understanding of how materials retain and transfer heat. In the early 19th century, developments in water-based systems with embedded hot water pipes paved the way for modern radiant heating, providing indoor comfort through heat transfer.[4]

Radiant cooling also has ancient roots. In the 8th century, Mesopotamian builders used snow-packed walls to cool indoor space. The concept resurfaced in the 20th century with hydronic cooling systems in Europe, embedding cool water pipes in structures to absorb and dissipate heat, meeting cooling loads.[4][5] Radiant cooling became more widely adopted in the 1990s, with the implementation of floor cooling.[6] Today, modern radiant systems typically use water as a thermal medium for efficient heat transfer and are widely adopted in residential, commercial, and industrial buildings. While valued for its potential to enhance energy efficiency, quiet operation, and thermal comfort,[7] their performance varies with design and application, leading to ongoing discussions.[8]

Radiant Heating

[edit]
Frico IH Halogeninfra
Gas burning patio heater

Radiant heating is a technology for heating indoor and outdoor areas. Heating by radiant energy is observed every day, the warmth of the sunshine being the most commonly observed example. Radiant heating as a technology is more narrowly defined. It is the method of intentionally using the principles of radiant heat to transfer radiant energy from an emitting heat source to an object. Designs with radiant heating are seen as replacements for conventional convection heating as well as a way of supplying confined outdoor heating.

Indoor

[edit]

The heat energy is emitted from a warm element, such as a floor, wall or overhead panel, and warms people and other objects in rooms rather than directly heating the air. The internal air temperature for radiant heated buildings may be lower than for a conventionally heated building to achieve the same level of body comfort, when adjusted so the perceived temperature is actually the same. One of the key advantages of radiant heating systems is a much decreased circulation of air inside the room and the corresponding spreading of airborne particles.

Radiant heating systems can be divided into:

Underfloor and wall heating systems often are called low-temperature systems. Since their heating surface is much larger than other systems, a much lower temperature is required to achieve the same level of heat transfer. This provides an improved room climate with healthier humidity levels. The lower temperatures and large surface area of underfloor heating systems make them ideal heat emitters for air source heat pumps, evenly and effectively radiating the heat energy from the system into rooms within a home.

The maximum temperature of the heating surface can vary from 29–35 °C (84–95 °F) depending on the room type. Radiant overhead panels are mostly used in production and warehousing facilities or sports centers; they hang a few meters above the floor and their surface temperatures are much higher.

Outdoors

[edit]

In the case of heating outdoor areas, the surrounding air is constantly moving. Relying on convection heating is in most cases impractical, the reason being that, once you heat the outside air, it will blow away with air movement. Even in a no-wind condition, the buoyancy effects will carry away the hot air. Outdoor radiant heaters allow specific spaces within an outdoor area to be targeted, warming only the people and objects in their path. Radiant heating systems may be gas-fired or use electric infrared heating elements. An example of the overhead radiant heaters are the patio heaters often used with outdoor serving. The top metal disc reflects the radiant heat onto a small area.

Radiant cooling

[edit]

Radiant cooling is the use of cooled surfaces to remove sensible heat primarily by thermal radiation and only secondarily by other methods like convection. Radiant systems that use water to cool the radiant surfaces are examples of hydronic systems. Unlike “all-air” air conditioning systems that circulate cooled air only, hydronic radiant systems circulate cooled water in pipes through specially-mounted panels on a building's floor or ceiling to provide comfortable temperatures. There is a separate system to provide air for ventilation, dehumidification, and potentially additionally cooling.[9] Radiant systems are less common than all-air systems for cooling, but can have advantages compared to all-air systems in some applications.[10][11][12]

Since the majority of the cooling process results from removing sensible heat through radiant exchange with people and objects and not air, occupant thermal comfort can be achieved with warmer interior air temperatures than with air based cooling systems. Radiant cooling systems potentially offer reductions in cooling energy consumption.[10] The latent loads (humidity) from occupants, infiltration and processes generally need to be managed by an independent system. Radiant cooling may also be integrated with other energy-efficient strategies such as night time flushing, indirect evaporative cooling, or ground source heat pumps as it requires a small difference in temperature between desired indoor air temperature and the cooled surface.[13]

Passive daytime radiative cooling uses a material that fluoresces in the infrared atmospheric window, a frequency range where the atmosphere is unusually transparent, so that the energy goes straight out to space. This can cool the heat-fluorescent object to below ambient air temperature, even in full sun.[14][15][16]

Advantages

[edit]

Radiant cooling systems offer lower energy consumption than conventional cooling systems based on research conducted by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Radiant cooling energy savings depend on the climate, but on average across the US savings are in the range of 30% compared to conventional systems. Cool, humid regions might have savings of 17% while hot, arid regions have savings of 42%.[10] Hot, dry climates offer the greatest advantage for radiant cooling as they have the largest proportion of cooling by way of removing sensible heat. While this research is informative, more research needs to be done to account for the limitations of simulation tools and integrated system approaches. Much of the energy savings is also attributed to the lower amount of energy required to pump water as opposed to distribute air with fans. By coupling the system with building mass, radiant cooling can shift some cooling to off-peak night time hours. Radiant cooling appears to have lower first costs[17] and lifecycle costs compared to conventional systems. Lower first costs are largely attributed to integration with structure and design elements, while lower life cycle costs result from decreased maintenance. However, a recent study on comparison of VAV reheat versus active chilled beams & DOAS challenged the claims of lower first cost due to added cost of piping[18]

Limiting factors

[edit]

Because of the potential for condensate formation on the cold radiant surface (resulting in water damage, mold and the like), radiant cooling systems have not been widely applied. Condensation caused by humidity is a limiting factor for the cooling capacity of a radiant cooling system. The surface temperature should not be equal or below the dew point temperature in the space. Some standards suggest a limit for the relative humidity in a space to 60% or 70%. An air temperature of 26 °C (79 °F) would mean a dew point between 17 and 20 °C (63 and 68 °F).[13] There is, however, evidence that suggests decreasing the surface temperature to below the dew point temperature for a short period of time may not cause condensation.[17] Also, the use of an additional system, such as a dehumidifier or DOAS, can limit humidity and allow for increased cooling capacity.

Classification of Radiant Systems

[edit]

Radiant systems, encompassing both heating and cooling, transfer heat or coolness directly through surfaces, such as floors, ceilings, or walls, instead of relying on forced-air systems. These systems are broadly categorized into three types:[19] thermally activated building systems (TABS),[20] embedded surface systems, and radiant ceiling panels.

Chilled slabs

[edit]

Radiant cooling from a slab can be delivered to a space from the floor or ceiling. Since radiant heating systems tend to be in the floor, the obvious choice would be to use the same circulation system for cooled water. While this makes sense in some cases, delivering cooling from the ceiling has several advantages.

First, it is easier to leave ceilings exposed to a room than floors, increasing the effectiveness of thermal mass. Floors offer the downside of coverings and furnishings that decrease the effectiveness of the system.

Second, greater convective heat exchange occurs through a chilled ceiling as warm air rises, leading to more air coming in contact with the cooled surface.

Cooling delivered through the floor makes the most sense when there is a high amount of solar gain from sun penetration, because the cool floor can more easily remove those loads than the ceiling.[13]

Chilled slabs, compared to panels, offer more significant thermal mass and therefore can take better advantage of outside diurnal temperatures swings. Chilled slabs cost less per unit of surface area, and are more integrated with structure.

Partial radiant systems

[edit]

Chilled beams are hybrid systems that combine radiant and convective heat transfer. While not purely radiant, they are suited for spaces with varying thermal loads and integrate well with ceilings for flexible placement and ventilation.[9]

Thermal comfort

[edit]

The operative temperature is an indicator of thermal comfort which takes into account the effects of both convection and radiation. Operative temperature is defined as a uniform temperature of a radiantly black enclosure in which an occupant would exchange the same amount of heat by radiation plus convection as in the actual nonuniform environment.

With radiant systems, thermal comfort is achieved at warmer interior temp than all-air systems for cooling scenario, and at lower temperature than all-air systems for heating scenario.[21] Thus, radiant systems can helps to achieve energy savings in building operation while maintaining the wished comfort level.

Thermal comfort in radiant vs. all-air buildings

[edit]

Based on a large study performed using Center for the Built Environment's Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) occupant survey to compare occupant satisfaction in radiant and all-air conditioned buildings, both systems create equal indoor environmental conditions, including acoustic satisfaction, with a tendency towards improved temperature satisfaction in radiant buildings.[22]

Radiant temperature asymmetry

[edit]

The radiant temperature asymmetry is defined as the difference between the plane radiant temperature of the two opposite sides of a small plane element. As regards occupants within a building, thermal radiation field around the body may be non-uniform due to hot and cold surfaces and direct sunlight, bringing therefore local discomfort. The norm ISO 7730 and the ASHRAE 55 standard give the predicted percentage of dissatisfied occupants (PPD) as a function of the radiant temperature asymmetry and specify the acceptable limits. In general, people are more sensitive to asymmetric radiation caused by a warm ceiling than that caused by hot and cold vertical surfaces. The detailed calculation method of percentage dissatisfied due to a radiant temperature asymmetry is described in ISO 7730.

Design considerations

[edit]

While specific design requirements will depend on the type of radiant system, a few issues are common to most radiant systems.

  • For cooling application, radiant systems can lead condensation issues. Local climate needs to be evaluated and taken into account in the design. Air dehumidification can be necessary for humid climate.
  • Many types of radiant systems incorporate massive building elements. The thermal mass involved will have a consequence on the thermal response of the system. The operation schedule of a space and the control strategy of the radiant system play a key role in the proper functioning of the system.
  • Many types of radiant systems incorporate hard surfaces which influence indoor acoustics. Additional acoustic solutions may need to be considered.
  • A design strategy to reduce acoustical impacts of radiant systems is using free-hanging acoustical clouds. Cooling experiments on free-hanging acoustical clouds for an office room showed that for 47% cloud coverage of the ceiling area, 11% reduction in cooling capacity was caused by the cloud coverage. Good acoustic quality can be achieved with only minor reduction of cooling capacity.[23] Combining acoustical clouds and ceiling fans can offset the modest reduction in cooling capacity from a radiant cooled ceiling caused by the presence of the clouds, and results in increase in cooling capacity.[23][24]

Control Strategies and Considerations

[edit]

Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems require a control system to supply heating or cooling to a space. The control strategies applied depend on the type of HVAC system used, and these strategies ultimately determine the system's energy consumption.[25] Radiant systems differ from other HVAC systems in terms of heat transfer mechanisms and the potential risk of condensation, requiring tailored control strategies to address these unique characteristics.

High Thermal Mass Considerations

[edit]

Radiant systems transfer heat by heating or cooling structural elements, such as concrete slabs or ceilings, rather than directly delivering hot or cold air. These elements primarily release heat through radiation. The response time—the time it takes for the system to reach the setpoint temperature—depends on the material's thermal mass: low thermal mass materials, such as metal panels, respond quickly, while high thermal mass materials, such as concrete slabs, adjust more slowly.
When integrated with high thermal mass elements, radiant systems face challenges due to delayed temperature adjustments. This delay can lead to over-adjustments, resulting in increased energy consumption and reduced thermal comfort.[26]
To address this problem, model Predictive Control (MPC) is often employed to predict future thermal demands and adjust heat supply proactively. For instance, MPC leverages the thermal mass of radiant systems by storing heat during off-peak times, before it is needed. This allows operations to start at night, when electricity costs and urban electricity grid loads are lower. Additionally, cooler nighttime air improves the efficiency of cooling equipment, such as air-source heat pumps, further optimizing energy use. By employing these strategies, radiant systems effectively overcome thermal mass challenges while reducing daytime electricity demand, enhancing grid stability, and lowering operational costs.[27]

Condensation Risks and Mitigation Strategies

[edit]

Radiant cooling systems can experience condensation when the surface temperature drops below the dew point of the surrounding air. This may cause occupant discomfort, promote mold growth, and damage radiant surfaces.[28] The risk is particularly high in humid climates, where warm, moist air enters through open windows and contacts cold radiant cooling surfaces. To prevent this, radiant cooling systems must be paired with effective ventilation strategies to control indoor humidity levels.

Hydronic radiant systems

[edit]

Radiant cooling systems are usually hydronic, cooling using circulating water running in pipes in thermal contact with the surface. Typically the circulating water only needs to be 2–4 °C below the desired indoor air temperature.[13] Once having been absorbed by the actively cooled surface, heat is removed by water flowing through a hydronic circuit, replacing the warmed water with cooler water.

Depending on the position of the pipes in the building construction, hydronic radiant systems can be sorted into 4 main categories:

  • Embedded Surface Systems: pipes embedded within the surface layer (not within the structure)
  • Thermally Active Building Systems (TABS): the pipes thermally coupled and embedded in the building structure (slabs, walls)[29]
  • Capillary Surface Systems: pipes embedded in a layer at the inner ceiling/wall surface
  • Radiant Panels: metal pipes integrated into panels (not within the structure); heat carrier close to the surface

Types (ISO 11855)

[edit]

The norm ISO 11855-2[30] focuses on embedded water based surface heating and cooling systems and TABS. Depending on construction details, this norm distinguishes 7 different types of those systems (Types A to G)

  • Type A with pipes embedded in the screed or concrete (“wet” system)
  • Type B with pipes embedded outside the screed (in the thermal insulation layer, “dry” system)
  • Type C with pipes embedded in the leveling layer, above which the second screed layer is placed
  • Type D include plane section systems (extruded plastic / group of capillary grids)
  • Type E with pipes embedded in a massive concrete layer
  • Type F with capillary pipes embedded in a layer at the inner ceiling or as a separate layer in gypsum
  • Type G with pipes embedded in a wooden floor construction
Section diagram of a radiant embedded surface system (ISO 11855, type A)
Section diagram of a radiant embedded surface system (ISO 11855, type B)
Section diagram of a radiant embedded surface system (ISO 11855, type G)
Section diagram of thermally activated building system (ISO 11855, type E)
Section diagram of radiant capillary system (ISO 11855, type F)
Section diagram of a radiant panel

Energy sources

[edit]

Radiant systems are associated with low-exergy systems. Low-exergy refers to the possibility to utilize ‘low quality energy’ (i.e. dispersed energy that has little ability to do useful work). Both heating and cooling can in principle be obtained at temperature levels that are close to the ambient environment. The low temperature difference requires that the heat transmission takes place over relative big surfaces as for example applied in ceilings or underfloor heating systems.[31] Radiant systems using low temperature heating and high temperature cooling are typical example of low-exergy systems. Energy sources such as geothermal (direct cooling / geothermal heat pump heating) and solar hot water are compatible with radiant systems. These sources can lead to important savings in terms of primary energy use for buildings.

Commercial buildings using radiant cooling

[edit]

Some well-known buildings using radiant cooling include Bangkok's Suvarnabhumi Airport,[32] the Infosys Software Development Building 1 in Hyderabad, IIT Hyderabad,[33] and the San Francisco Exploratorium.[34] Radiant cooling is also used in many zero net energy buildings.[35][36]

Buildings and Systems Information
Building Year Country City Architect Radiant system design Radiant system category
Kunsthaus Bregenz 1997 Austria Bregenz Peter Zumthor Meierhans+Partner Thermally activated building systems
Suvarnabhumi Airport 2005 Thailand Bangkok Murphy Jahn Transsolar and IBE Embedded surface systems
Zollverein School 2006 Germany Essen SANAA Transsolar Thermally activated building systems
Klarchek Information Commons, Loyola University Chicago 2007 United States Chicago, IL Solomon Cordwell Buenz Transsolar Thermally activated building systems
Lavin-Bernick Center, Tulane University 2007 United States New Orleans, LA VAJJ Transsolar Radiant panels
David Brower Center 2009 United States Berkeley, CA Daniel Solomon Design Partners Integral Group Thermally activated building systems
Manitoba Hydro 2009 Canada Winnipeg, MB KPMB Architects Transsolar Thermally activated building systems
Cooper Union 2009 United States New York, NY Morphosis Architects IBE / Syska Hennessy Group Radiant panels
Exploratorium (Pier 15–17) 2013 United States San Francisco, CA EHDD Integral Group Embedded surface systems
Federal Center South 2012 United States Seattle, WA ZGF Architects WSP Flack+Kurtz Radiant Panels
Bertschi School Living Science Building Wing 2010 United States Seattle, WA KMD Architects Rushing Thermally activated building systems
UW Molecular Engineering Building 2012 United States Seattle, WA ZGF Architects Affiliated Engineers Embedded surface systems
First Hill Streetcar Operations 2014 United States Seattle, WA Waterleaf Architecture LTK Engineering Thermally activated building systems
Bullitt Center 2013 United States Seattle, WA Miller Hull Partnership PAE Engineering Embedded surface systems
John Prairie Operations Center 2011 United States Shelton, WA TCF Architecture Interface Embedded surface systems
University of Florida Lake Nona Research Center 2012 United States Orlando, FL HOK Affiliated Engineers Radiant Panels
William Jefferson Clinton Presidential Library 2004 United States Little Rock, AR Polshek Partnership WSP Flack+Kurtz / Cromwell Thermally activated building systems
Hunter Museum of Art 2006 United States Chattanooga, TN Randall Stout IBE Embedded surface systems
HOK St Louis Office 2015 United States St. Louis, MO HOK HOK Radiant panels
Carbon Neutral Energy Solutions Laboratory, Georgia Tech 2012 United States Atlanta, GA HDR Architecture HDR Architecture Thermally activated building systems
City Hall, London (Newham), The Crystal. 2012 United Kingdom London WilkinsonEyre Arup
Ewha Campus Complex, Ewha Woman's University 2008 South Korea Seoul Dominique Perrault, BAUM Architects HIMEC Thermally activated building systems

Physics

[edit]

Heat radiation is the energy in the form of electromagnetic waves emitted by a solid, liquid, or gas as a result of its temperature.[37] In buildings, the radiant heat flow between two internal surfaces (or a surface and a person) is influenced by the emissivity of the heat emitting surface and by the view factor between this surface and the receptive surface (object or person) in the room.[38] Thermal (longwave) radiation travels at the speed of light, in straight lines.[9] It can be reflected. People, equipment, and surfaces in buildings will warm up if they absorb thermal radiation, but the radiation does not noticeably heat up the air it is traveling through.[9] This means heat will flow from objects, occupants, equipment, and lights in a space to a cooled surface as long as their temperatures are warmer than that of the cooled surface and they are within the direct or indirect line of sight of the cooled surface. Some heat is also removed by convection because the air temperature will be lowered when air comes in contact with the cooled surface.

The heat transfer by radiation is proportional to the power of four of the absolute surface temperature.

The emissivity of a material (usually written ε or e) is the relative ability of its surface to emit energy by radiation. A black body has an emissivity of 1 and a perfect reflector has an emissivity of 0.[37]

In radiative heat transfer, a view factor quantifies the relative importance of the radiation that leaves an object (person or surface) and strikes another one, considering the other surrounding objects. In enclosures, radiation leaving a surface is conserved, therefore, the sum of all view factors associated with a given object is equal to 1. In the case of a room, the view factor of a radiant surface and a person depend on their relative positions. As a person is often changing position and as a room might be occupied by many persons at the same time, diagrams for omnidirectional person can be used.[39]

Thermal response time

[edit]

Response time (τ95), aka time constant, is used to analyze the dynamic thermal performance of radiant systems. The response time for a radiant system is defined as the time it takes for the surface temperature of a radiant system to reach 95% of the difference between its final and initial values when a step change in control of the system is applied as input.[40] It is mainly influenced by concrete thickness, pipe spacing, and to a less degree, concrete type. It is not affected by pipe diameter, room operative temperature, supply water temperature, and water flow regime. By using response time, radiant systems can be classified into fast response (τ95< 10 min, like RCP), medium response (1 h<τ95<9 h, like Type A, B, D, G) and slow response (9 h< τ95<19 h, like Type E and Type F).[40] Additionally, floor and ceiling radiant systems have different response times due to different heat transfer coefficients with room thermal environment, and the pipe-embedded position.

Other HVAC systems that exchange heat by radiation

[edit]

Fireplaces and woodstoves

A fireplace provides radiant heating, but also draws in cold air. A: Air for the combustion, in drafty rooms pulled from the outdoors. B: Hot exhaust gas heats building by convection as it leaves by chimney. C: Radiant heat, mostly from the high temperature flame, heats as it is absorbed

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Radiant heating and cooling

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Radiant heating and cooling refers to a class of (HVAC) technologies that primarily exchange heat with building occupants and the environment through and from large surfaces, such as floors, walls, or ceilings, rather than directly heating or cooling the air. These systems typically circulate heated or chilled water through embedded tubing—often made of materials like PEX or PE-RT—or use electric elements to warm or cool the surfaces, achieving by maintaining surface temperatures close to the desired room setpoint. Unlike systems, radiant methods provide even, draft-free conditioning and can integrate with diverse energy sources, including boilers, heat pumps, solar thermal, or geothermal. The principles of radiant heating and cooling leverage the body's natural heat exchange, where up to 60% of thermal sensation comes from , allowing these systems to maintain comfort at lower air temperatures—typically 4°F (2°C) cooler than with convective systems—while reducing use. In heating mode, hydronic systems, the most common type, distribute water heated to around 100–140°F (38–60°C) through loops connected to manifolds for zoned control, often embedded in concrete slabs for that stores and slowly releases heat. Electric radiant systems use resistive cables or mats for faster response but higher operating costs unless paired with off-peak . For cooling, chilled water at 55–65°F (13–18°C) circulates through panels, primarily in ceilings to avoid floor , absorbing heat directly from occupants and furnishings. These systems offer key advantages in and comfort, with hydronic radiant setups using 75–90% less energy for distribution than air-based HVAC due to water's superior , potentially saving up to 30% on heating costs. They eliminate duct losses, reduce noise and allergen circulation, and support integration with renewable sources, making them suitable for high-performance buildings like the in , which achieved certification, or the NREL Research Support Facility, which achieved LEED Platinum certification, through radiant designs. However, challenges include higher upfront installation costs, slower response times in massive installations, and the need for dehumidification in humid climates to prevent condensation during cooling. Radiant systems are most effective in dry or moderate climates for cooling and heating-dominant regions for floors, with applications spanning residential homes, commercial offices, and institutional facilities.

History

Early developments

The earliest known radiant heating systems emerged in ancient civilizations, where underfloor and wall-based methods harnessed heat from fires or flues to warm interiors. In , the system, developed around 100 BCE, utilized a network of underfloor channels and hollow walls connected to a central furnace, allowing hot air to circulate and radiate warmth primarily through floors and walls in public baths and villas. Similarly, in Korea, the ondol system originated during the , approximately the 5th century BCE, and evolved through the period (57 BCE–668 CE); it involved channeling smoke and heat from a wood-fired hearth beneath raised stone or clay floors, providing even radiant warmth to living spaces. Radiant heating concepts saw a resurgence in the amid industrialization and advancements in . In the , early hot-water systems for radiant distribution were introduced in the 1840s, building on British engineer Angier March Perkins' 1831 high-pressure hot-water patent, with American installers Joseph Nason and James Walworth adapting it for using embedded pipes to circulate heated water beneath floors. In Europe, mid-19th-century hot-air systems employed flues and wood-burning stoves with ducts along floors, inspired by ancient designs, to maintain stable temperatures for exotic plant cultivation in structures like those at the Royal Botanic Gardens. Pre-20th-century radiant cooling efforts were rudimentary and often indirect, relying on natural processes rather than mechanical distribution. In ancient Persia, underground aqueducts, constructed from the early BCE, facilitated evaporative cooling by channeling cool to the surface, where it interacted with wind catchers (badgirs) to lower ambient temperatures and inspired later slab-based cooling concepts through moisture-laden air and surfaces. By the early , radiant heating gained traction in institutional settings. In , embedded pipe systems using hot water were installed in notable buildings in the United States, including the S.C. Johnson Wax Administration Building in , designed by , which provided uniform floor warmth and reduced drafts compared to convective radiators. Initial radiant cooling experiments in followed , integrated into post-war reconstruction projects like office and residential slabs chilled via or early mechanical means, addressing energy shortages while leveraging concrete's for passive temperature control.

Modern advancements

Following , radiant heating experienced a significant boom in the United States and during the , driven by postwar housing expansions and the adoption of embedded systems in concrete slabs for efficient, uniform heat distribution in suburban homes. In the U.S., developers like incorporated radiant heating pipes into concrete slab foundations for mass-produced homes, such as those in , to eliminate basements and reduce construction costs while providing comfortable floor-level warmth. European countries, including and , similarly integrated hydronic radiant systems into concrete floors for residential and institutional buildings, leveraging wartime material efficiencies and growing demand for modern heating solutions. Material innovations in the mid-20th century shifted radiant systems from rigid steel pipes, which were prone to and installation challenges, to flexible plastic alternatives like (PEX). Developed in during the late , PEX tubing addressed durability issues in hot water applications and enabled easier embedding in floors and walls; the first PEX-based radiant heating installations occurred in in 1972, marking a pivotal advancement in system reliability and cost-effectiveness. By the , this transition facilitated broader adoption, as PEX's flexibility reduced labor and allowed for tighter loops without joints, improving . Standardization efforts culminated in the (ISO) publishing ISO 11855 in 2007, which classified and provided guidelines for the , dimensioning, installation, and control of embedded hydronic radiant heating and cooling systems. This standard defined criteria, including heat output calculations under varying conditions, and supported uniform application across residential, commercial, and industrial settings, enhancing and globally. For radiant cooling, the introduction of capillary tube mats in the represented a key innovation, enabling finer temperature control and reduced condensation risks compared to larger pipe systems. Pioneered in with funding, these mats consist of densely spaced thin tubes (typically 3-4 mm ) embedded in panels for ceilings or walls, allowing low-temperature circulation for efficient cooling without drafts. Early installations in the demonstrated their viability for combined heating and cooling, with subsequent refinements improving response times and energy use in variable climates. Recent technological advancements from 2020 to 2025 have integrated smart controls and AI into radiant systems, enhancing energy efficiency and adaptability. In 2020, Uponor launched the Smatrix Pulse wireless zoning , enabling seamless integration of radiant heating and cooling with HVAC for multi-zone management and up to 30% energy savings through app-based scheduling. REHAU introduced the NEA SMART 2.0 in 2020, an upgraded generation of smart radiant controls incorporating sensors for real-time optimization of hydronic flows. By 2024-2025, AI-driven predictive controls emerged in hybrid radiant setups paired with heat pumps, using algorithms to forecast occupancy and weather, dynamically adjusting temperatures for energy savings of up to 13%; for instance, models, such as decision trees, predict thermal loads in radiant floor systems, minimizing overshoot in office environments. These developments have fueled market growth, with the global radiant heating and cooling systems sector valued at USD 4.2 billion in and projected to reach USD 8.7 billion by 2034, at a of 7.6%, primarily driven by mandates and demand for low-carbon buildings.

Fundamentals of Radiant Heat Transfer

Principles and mechanisms

Radiant heat transfer involves the emission of , primarily in the spectrum, from surfaces due to their temperature, enabling direct energy exchange between objects without relying on an intervening medium like air. This process is governed by the Stefan-Boltzmann law, which quantifies the radiative from a surface. The net heat flux qq (in W/m²) between a surface and its surroundings is expressed as: q=ϵσ(T4−Tsur4)q = \epsilon \sigma (T^4 - T_{\text{sur}}^4) where ϵ\epsilon is the surface emissivity (a dimensionless factor between 0 and 1 indicating how effectively the surface emits radiation compared to a blackbody), σ=5.67×10−8\sigma = 5.67 \times 10^{-8} W/m²K⁴ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, and TT and TsurT_{\text{sur}} are the absolute temperatures of the emitting surface and surroundings in Kelvin, respectively. For real materials, emissivity values are typically high for common construction surfaces; for example, painted concrete has an emissivity of approximately 0.9, enhancing its effectiveness in radiative systems. In (HVAC) applications, plays a dominant role in indoor environments, accounting for approximately 50% of the loss from the to the surroundings, with accounting for much of the remainder. Unlike short-wave from high-temperature sources (wavelengths < 3 μm, often associated with visible light or near-infrared), systems primarily utilize long-wave infrared (wavelengths > 3 μm, peaking around 8-13 μm for room-temperature surfaces), which is efficiently absorbed by and building materials without significant atmospheric interference indoors. During heating, warmer surfaces emit long-wave that is absorbed by cooler bodies, such as occupants or walls, directly warming them and reducing reliance on air elevation. In cooling, chilled surfaces achieve a net gain by absorbing long-wave emitted from warmer surroundings, including people and equipment, thereby lowering the mean perceived by occupants. The efficiency of radiative exchange between surfaces in enclosed spaces depends on geometric factors, particularly view factors, which represent the fraction of leaving one surface that directly intercepts another. View factors range from 0 (no direct visibility) to 1 (complete ) and are calculated based on surface orientations, sizes, and separations; for instance, in a room with parallel floor and ceiling, the view factor approaches 1 for opposing surfaces. These factors, combined with , determine the overall radiative rate, making surface properties and layout critical for system design.

Comparison to other HVAC systems

Radiant heating and cooling systems differ fundamentally from conventional convective and HVAC systems, which rely on circulating heated or cooled air through ducts and vents. In radiant systems, occurs primarily through and conduction via surfaces like floors, ceilings, or walls, eliminating the need for extensive air movement. This direct transfer approach results in 20-30% lower compared to systems, as it avoids duct losses, fan energy, and the inefficiencies of air-based distribution. For heating, radiant systems are typically more efficient than due to the absence of duct leakage and reduced pumping requirements in hydronic setups. In cooling applications, radiant systems achieve approximately 22% energy savings over all-air HVAC by operating at higher chilled water temperatures (15-18°C versus 6-8°C), which improves (COP) and minimizes fan power. Additionally, radiant systems produce lower fan noise and eliminate drafts, enhancing occupant comfort by avoiding the air currents and circulation common in setups. Regarding temperature distribution, radiant systems provide more uniform indoor conditions, reducing vertical stratification where warmer air rises in all-air systems, leading to cooler floors and hotter ceilings. This uniformity prevents overcooling or overheating near vents, a frequent issue in convective systems that can cause discomfort and uneven use. In contrast, forced-air HVAC often results in hot or cold spots and higher fluctuations due to air velocity variations. Radiant systems are frequently integrated into hybrid configurations with air-based ventilation to address needs, serving as the primary mode for conditioning while dedicated outdoor air systems () handle dehumidification and airflow. This combination optimizes efficiency, as radiant panels manage sensible loads with minimal air volume, and examples include pairings with displacement ventilation, where low-velocity cool air is supplied at floor level to complement radiant cooling without disrupting plumes. Such hybrids can yield additional 15% energy savings by replacing fan coil units with heat recovery wheels in . From a lifecycle perspective, radiant systems incur higher initial costs, often 20-50% more than installations due to specialized piping, panels, and integration needs. However, lower operating expenses from reduced use—such as annual savings equivalent to JPY4 million in a simulated office building—lead to payback periods of 5-10 years in moderate climates, particularly when architectural benefits like reduced floor heights offset upfront premiums. In heating-dominated regions, hydronic radiant setups further enhance long-term economics by pairing efficiently with heat pumps.

Radiant Heating Systems

Indoor applications

Radiant heating systems are commonly implemented indoors through , , or surfaces that emit to warm occupants and objects directly. The most prevalent type is hydronic heating, where tubing—typically PEX or PE-RT—is embedded in concrete slabs, lightweight gypcrete, or poured under subflooring, circulating hot water at 100–140°F (38–60°C) to achieve surface temperatures of 80–85°F (27–29°C) and heating capacities of 20–50 W/ in residential settings or up to 100 W/ in commercial spaces with higher loads. Wall-based radiant heating uses embedded tubing or electric panels mounted vertically, particularly in retrofits or perimeter zones to counter cold drafts from windows. These systems operate at similar temperatures but with closer tube spacing (4–6 inches) for outputs of 30–60 /, providing targeted warmth without reducing usable floor space and integrating well with furniture layouts. Ceiling radiant heating employs panels or hydronic coils suspended or integrated into drop ceilings, radiating downward for uniform distribution in large open areas like offices or atriums. Supply temperatures are kept lower, around 90–120°F (32–49°C), to avoid discomfort from direct overhead , with capacities typically 40–80 /; electric options use resistive elements for quick response in zoned applications. Hydronic radiant heating has been widely adopted in since the mid-20th century, especially in for energy-efficient homes, while in the United States, growth accelerated post-2000 with incentives for high-efficiency systems, common in new constructions and renovations for residential, commercial, and educational buildings.

Outdoor applications

Radiant heating systems find significant application in outdoor environments to mitigate and accumulation on pavements and prevent structural damage from . Hydronic snow and ice melting systems typically embed PEX tubing, such as 5/8-inch diameter, within or asphalt slabs at depths of 3 to 4 inches from the surface, with on-center spacing of 6 to 12 inches depending on the required performance class—closer spacing for high-exposure areas like entrances and wider for residential driveways. These systems circulate a heated glycol-water mixture to maintain surface temperatures above freezing, achieving snow-free ratios as defined by guidelines. Activation of these systems relies on automated controls integrating aerial and pavement sensors that detect and outdoor air temperatures below 32°F (0°C), triggering operation only during relevant conditions to optimize energy use; idle modes maintain readiness at 28–36°F (-2.2 to 2.2°C). Standard 90.1 specifies that such controls link embedded heating elements with moisture and temperature sensors to prevent unnecessary runtime, classifying under miscellaneous loads modeled to match operational schedules. Perimeter heating employs hydronic trench systems installed along building foundations to counteract heave by warming and preventing ice lens formation beneath slabs. These linear loops, often using 3/4- to 1-inch tubing in shallow trenches, deliver targeted at rates of 200–300 / to maintain ground temperatures above critical freezing points in cold climates. Such setups reduce energy demands compared to full-area by focusing on vulnerable edges, with glycol mixtures ensuring freeze protection during intermittent operation. Outdoor radiant heating serves diverse settings, including airports for de-icing runways and taxiways, urban sidewalks to enhance pedestrian safety, and sports fields to extend usability in winter. At , hydronic slabs tested since 2017 demonstrated effective without plowing, using embedded tubing powered by boilers to achieve clear surfaces during storms. Similarly, in , integrates radiant systems in its turf field to prevent freezing, circulating warmed glycol through hoses for consistent playability. Sidewalk applications, common in commercial districts, prioritize Class 2 performance for reliable melting under moderate snowfall. Key design factors emphasize efficiency in direction and operation. Insulation, typically 2 inches of high-density rigid board (R-10 minimum), is placed beneath slabs and along edges to minimize downward losses and channel upward, essential in areas with high tables or conductive soils. Systems operate intermittently via sensor-driven cycles, with supply temperatures up to 140°F (60°C) and flow velocities limited to 5.5–8 ft/s to balance melt rates against energy costs, often incorporating variable-speed pumps for precise control. Electric alternatives, such as cable mats, offer simpler installation for smaller areas but higher operational costs than hydronic options.

Radiant Cooling Systems

Indoor applications

Radiant cooling systems are commonly implemented indoors through chilled ceiling panels, which consist of metal or boards integrated with tubes or pipes circulating chilled water. These panels typically operate with supply water temperatures between 14°C and 18°C to maintain surface temperatures above the and prevent , providing cooling capacities of 50-100 W/m² depending on the design and load conditions. Floor cooling via radiant systems is less common due to thermal stratification effects, where cool air accumulates near the , potentially causing discomfort in occupied zones. To mitigate this, floor cooling is often paired with displacement ventilation to handle sensible loads and maintain air distribution, with capacities limited to 20-30 W/m² to minimize condensation risks on the floor surface. Wall-based radiant cooling employs vertical panels, particularly effective in perimeter zones exposed to solar gains and envelope . These systems can be integrated into curtain walls, where chilled panels or embedded tubing in facade elements absorb heat directly from the , enhancing overall thermal control without drafts. Radiant cooling has seen widespread adoption in , notably in Swiss office buildings since the , where thermally active building systems leverage concrete mass for efficient cooling. , while research dates to the and commercial products were introduced around 2011, widespread implementation has grown post-2020, driven by market expansion and energy efficiency incentives in commercial sectors. As of 2023, the global radiant cooling systems market was valued at $2.0 billion and is projected to grow at a (CAGR) of 4.5% from 2024 to 2034.

Advantages and limitations

Radiant cooling systems offer several advantages over conventional air-based systems, primarily due to their reliance on and from chilled surfaces rather than circulation. These systems operate silently without fans or blowers, eliminating noise associated with traditional HVAC equipment. Additionally, they produce no drafts, as cooling is delivered directly to occupants via surface and natural , enhancing overall . Studies indicate that radiant systems can achieve comparable or improved per the predicted mean vote (PMV) index compared to all-air systems under similar conditions, reducing local discomfort from air movement. In low-humidity climates, radiant cooling demonstrates savings of up to 30% compared to all-air systems, attributed to higher efficiency in and reduced fan requirements. Despite these benefits, radiant cooling has notable limitations, particularly in performance and applicability. The systems exhibit low in humid environments, where surface temperatures must be maintained above the , typically at a minimum of 16–20°C for panels, to avoid , constraining output to sensible cooling loads only. Initial installation costs are approximately 30% higher than those for traditional air systems, owing to the need for extensive piping, panels, and often supplementary dehumidification equipment. Radiant cooling is best suited to dry climates, such as Mediterranean regions, where low ambient minimizes condensation risks and supports effective operation without extensive dehumidification. In tropical areas with high , however, dedicated outdoor air systems () or separate dehumidifiers are essential to handle latent loads, increasing system complexity. Recent analyses of integrated radiant systems, including geothermal-assisted designs, report up to 36% reductions in CO2 emissions compared to traditional over their lifecycle, driven by lower operational energy use in suitable climates.

System Classification

Hydronic systems

Hydronic radiant heating and cooling systems utilize water as the medium, circulating it through embedded pipes or panels to exchange with building surfaces such as floors, walls, or ceilings. These systems are classified under ISO 11855, which defines embedded radiant systems based on their and integration method. The standard distinguishes between wet and dry configurations for pipe-based systems, with variants using finer tubing, while electrical systems are noted for comparison but operate without water circulation. In wet systems, pipes are embedded within a carrier layer such as or , allowing direct through the structural mass for uniform heat distribution. Dry systems, by contrast, integrate pipes into panels or plates without additional embedding medium, often placed in layers to minimize thickness and facilitate retrofits. systems employ small-diameter tubes, typically arranged in mats, embedded similarly in wet or dry setups to enhance surface contact and precision control. Electrical systems use resistive elements instead of fluid for direct heating, offering simpler installation but lower compared to water-based options. Key components include manifolds for distributing and balancing water flow across multiple loops, circulation pumps to maintain velocity, and heat sources such as boilers for heating or chillers for cooling. Pipe spacing typically ranges from 10 to 30 cm, influencing heat output density, with closer intervals used in high-demand areas to achieve even temperatures. Flow rates per loop are generally set between 0.5 and 2 L/min, ensuring low velocity to reduce noise and pumping energy while optimizing heat transfer. For dual-mode operation, reversible chillers or heat pumps enable switching between heating and cooling by inverting flow, providing year-round climate control in a single . These systems operate with a typical difference (Delta-T) of 5-10°C between supply and return , supporting low-grade sources and minimizing stratification. Hydronic systems offer high efficiency, with coefficients of performance (COP) reaching 4-5 when integrated with heat pumps, due to their reliance on radiant transfer and reduced fan or blower needs. Their scalability suits large-area applications, from residential floors to commercial ceilings, allowing modular expansion without proportional efficiency losses. For underfloor heating applications, hydronic systems provide advantages such as lower long-term operating costs, particularly when paired with heat pumps or gas boilers, even heat distribution, and compatibility with renewable energy sources. However, they entail drawbacks including expensive and disruptive installation due to embedding requirements, slower response times from thermal mass, risks of leaks or system failures, and higher maintenance such as boiler servicing. These systems are best suited for whole-home or larger areas where long-term benefits outweigh initial challenges.

Electric and other systems

Electric radiant heating systems utilize thin mats or films embedded with resistive heating elements, such as carbon-based films or metallic wires, installed beneath flooring surfaces to provide direct . These systems typically operate at power outputs of 10-20 W/m² for low-temperature comfort heating in residential applications, ensuring even heat distribution without hot spots. Carbon films, in particular, offer a flexible, ultra-thin alternative (often less than 0.5 mm thick) that converts electricity into far-infrared radiation for efficient warmth, while resistive wires provide durable, series-connected heating in customizable layouts. Such electric options are particularly suited for retrofits in existing structures, as they require minimal floor height increase (typically 1-3 mm) and can be installed over subfloors without major renovations. Beyond floor-based installations, other non-hydronic radiant systems include gas-fired heaters and panels incorporating phase-change materials (PCMs). Gas-fired heaters, often used for spot heating in industrial or outdoor settings like warehouses and patios, emit short- and medium-wave from ceramic or metal emitters fueled by or , targeting objects and occupants directly rather than heating the air. These units achieve efficiencies of 20-50% over conventional systems by minimizing loss in high-ceiling spaces. PCM-integrated radiant panels, meanwhile, embed materials like paraffin or salt hydrates within ceiling or wall assemblies to store and release during phase transitions, enhancing thermal stability in variable climates; for instance, PCMs with melting points around 28-30°C can absorb excess during the day and radiate it evenly at night. A key advantage of electric and gas-fired radiant systems is their rapid thermal response, achieving full output in 30-60 minutes compared to several hours for fluid-based alternatives, allowing precise and quick adjustments to . However, operating costs are higher for electric variants, typically ranging from 0.1-0.2 kWh/ per hour of use due to direct resistance heating and reliance on rates, which can exceed those of gas options in large-scale applications. Gas-fired systems mitigate this through lower fuel consumption but require venting and may produce minor emissions. Recent innovations in non-hydronic radiant technologies include flexible film systems introduced around 2023, which enable ceiling-mounted installations for downward , covering up to 85% of surface areas with minimal structural impact and outputs suited for retrofits in commercial spaces. Hybrid electric-hydronic approaches combine electric elements for rapid supplemental heating with hydronic bases for efficiency, allowing seamless integration in zoned systems where electric mats handle peak loads in smaller areas. These developments prioritize adaptability and energy savings, with flexible films demonstrating up to 30% improved uniformity in heat distribution over traditional panels.

Design and Installation Considerations

Sizing and layout

Sizing and layout of radiant heating and cooling systems require precise calculations to match system capacity to building thermal loads while ensuring uniform distribution across surfaces. Load calculations begin with determining heat loss for heating or heat gain for cooling, following guidelines such as those in the Handbook—Fundamentals, which emphasize the heat balance method accounting for conduction, , and through building envelopes. For radiant heating, typical design loads range from 30 to 50 W/m² in residential and light commercial applications, depending on and insulation levels, as exemplified in studies of systems where outputs are calibrated to maintain surface temperatures around 25–29°C. For cooling, loads are often lower, around 40–80 W/m², but must consider latent gains and dehumidification needs to avoid , with Standard 90.1 providing benchmarks for energy-efficient sizing. Software tools like EnergyPlus facilitate these calculations by simulating transient effects and radiant asymmetries, enabling designers to predict peak demands with integrated weather data and building geometry. Layout principles focus on tubing configuration to achieve even without hotspots or cold zones. In hydronic systems, individual loop lengths are typically limited to 80–120 meters (250–400 feet) for common PEX tubing diameters like 1/2 inch or 5/8 inch, balancing (2–5 ft/s) and to prevent excessive pumping energy. Tube spacing varies by load intensity: closer intervals of 15 cm (6 inches) on are recommended for high-load areas such as perimeters or spaces with exterior exposure, while 20–30 cm (8–12 inches) suffices for uniform interior zones, ensuring output rates of 50–100 W/m² without exceeding surface temperature limits. Patterns like counterflow or spiral layouts enhance coverage, with manifolds distributing supply to multiple parallel loops for balanced delivery. Zoning enhances adaptability by dividing the system into independent circuits connected to a single manifold, allowing tailored responses to varying loads across rooms or building sections. For instance, a manifold might supply 4–12 circuits per zone, with each handling 20–50 m² based on activity levels, integrating actuators for isolation during low-demand periods. This approach, aligned with recommendations for multi-zone hydronic distribution, supports variable flow and reduces energy use by 20–30% in dynamic environments like offices. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations validate layouts by modeling airflow, temperature gradients, and across surfaces, predicting coverage uniformity with error margins below 10% when calibrated against experimental data. Tools like or integrated modules in EnergyPlus allow iteration of spacing and loop density to minimize stratification, ensuring deviations in mean radiant temperature stay within 1–2°C of design targets.

Material and component selection

In radiant heating and cooling systems, the selection of pipe materials is crucial for ensuring efficient , longevity, and system integrity. (PEX) and polyethylene of raised temperature resistance (PE-RT) are the most commonly used tubing materials due to their flexibility, resistance to , and ability to withstand the thermal stresses of hydronic applications. These materials typically feature an oxygen diffusion barrier, such as an (EVOH) layer, which prevents oxygen permeation into the system, thereby reducing in ferrous components like boilers and pumps. Pipe diameters generally range from 12 mm to 20 mm (approximately 1/2 inch to 3/4 inch), with 1/2-inch (13-16 mm) being standard for residential radiant floor installations to balance flow rates and coverage. For embedding the tubing, slab types must be chosen based on structural needs, thermal mass requirements, and installation context. Concrete slabs provide high , storing and slowly releasing heat for stable indoor temperatures, and are typically poured to a thickness of 100-150 mm (4-6 inches) to encase the pipes adequately while supporting loads; however, this installation method is disruptive and expensive, particularly in existing structures where retrofitting requires significant demolition and reconstruction. In contrast, lightweight gypsum concrete (gypcrete) offers a lower-mass alternative, ideal for retrofits or wood-framed floors, with pours usually 25-38 mm (1-1.5 inches) thick to minimize weight while still facilitating heat distribution. Regardless of slab type, a minimum insulation layer with an R-value of 5 (often achieved with 1-2 inches of extruded polystyrene) is required beneath the slab to minimize downward heat loss and enhance system efficiency. Hydronic systems also involve risks of leaks or system failures, which can lead to water damage, though proper installation, quality materials, and maintenance mitigate these concerns. Key components in hydronic radiant systems include expansion tanks, air vents, and inhibitors to maintain operational reliability. Expansion tanks accommodate water volume changes due to fluctuations, preventing over-pressurization and potential damage. Air vents automatically remove trapped air from loops, ensuring consistent flow and reducing noise or inefficiency. For closed-loop hydronic setups, inhibitors—such as phosphate-based formulations—are added to the fluid to protect metal elements from oxidation and scaling, extending overall system life. Material standards and durability ratings guide selections to ensure performance. PEX and PE-RT tubing must comply with ASTM F876, which specifies requirements for dimensions, pressure ratings, and long-term hydrostatic strength at elevated temperatures up to 82°C (180°F). These materials exhibit proven durability, with expected service lives exceeding 50 years under typical radiant operating conditions of 40-60°C (104-140°F) supply temperatures.

Control Strategies

Basic controls

Basic controls in radiant heating and cooling systems ensure stable operation by maintaining desired temperatures while preventing inefficiencies or damage. Thermostatic controls form the core of these mechanisms, typically using room air sensors or floor-mounted sensors to monitor conditions and regulate heat transfer. These sensors respond to temperature within individual zones, adjusting the system to achieve setpoints commonly between 20°C and 24°C for optimal occupant comfort in both heating and cooling modes. Control valves play a key role in thermostatic regulation, with options including on-off valves for simple and modulating valves for precise flow adjustment. On-off valves fully open or close to supply heated or cooled , suitable for basic setups but potentially leading to fluctuations due to abrupt changes. In contrast, modulating valves vary the flow rate proportionally to the input, providing smoother , reduced energy use, and better system efficiency in radiant applications. Pump and flow regulation further supports system stability, often employing variable speed pumps to match circulation needs dynamically and minimize energy consumption. These pumps adjust speed based on demand, ensuring consistent flow through hydronic circuits without excessive . For heating, outdoor reset controls are a standard feature, where the supply water temperature is automatically lowered as outdoor ambient temperatures rise, typically following a predefined curve to optimize efficiency while meeting indoor setpoints. Safety features are integral to basic controls, particularly high-limit sensors that monitor supply water or surface temperatures to prevent overheating. These sensors activate shutdowns or alarms if temperatures exceed safe design thresholds, protecting materials, , and occupants from damage or fire risks. Basic automation enhances reliability through simple scheduling and feedback mechanisms, including timers that activate or deactivate zones based on patterns to avoid unnecessary operation. For instance, programmable timers can align heating or cooling with daily routines, reducing energy waste during unoccupied periods. Additionally, simple proportional-integral-derivative (PID) loops provide temperature stability by continuously adjusting positions or speeds in response to sensor data, minimizing deviations from setpoints without complex digital integration.

Advanced strategies including smart integration

Advanced strategies in radiant heating and cooling systems leverage digital technologies and to optimize performance beyond basic , enabling dynamic responses to , , and building dynamics. Smart thermostats, such as the Ecobee Smart Thermostat Premium and Google Nest Thermostat, integrate connectivity for remote control and features like geofencing, which uses location data to automatically adjust temperatures when occupants leave or return, thereby reducing energy use in unoccupied spaces. These devices are compatible with radiant systems, including hydronic underfloor setups, allowing precise and scheduling that maintains comfort while minimizing operational costs. Predictive controls employ algorithms to forecast thermal loads and optimize system operation, integrating seamlessly with systems (BMS) for real-time adjustments. For instance, decision tree-based models predict indoor and outdoor influences on radiant floor heating, enabling optimized start-stop cycles that achieve up to 29.7% savings compared to manual regulation while improving by 26.4%. Similarly, deep learning-enhanced (MPC) for radiant cooling coupled with fresh air systems uses convolutional neural networks and to anticipate and fluctuations, reducing consumption by 16% over traditional rule-based methods and preventing discomfort from thermal inertia. Advancements reported in 2025 highlight ML-driven forecasting for improved efficiency in systems by processing historical and inputs within BMS frameworks. Hybrid strategies coordinate radiant systems with ventilation to handle both sensible and latent loads, particularly in cooling modes where control is critical. Dedicated outdoor air systems () dehumidify incoming air to manage latent loads, allowing radiant panels to focus on sensible cooling without risking surface temperatures dropping below levels. monitoring sensors continuously track ambient and temperature to maintain chilled water supply above the threshold, averting moisture buildup on panels or floors; for example, controllers like the Chiltrix CXRC1 adjust supply temperatures dynamically based on real-time data. This integration enhances overall system reliability in humid climates, with studies showing improved comfort and up to 20% lower energy use when ventilation and radiant operations are synchronized via predictive algorithms. REHAU's NEA SMART 2.0 system exemplifies app-based in radiant applications, enabling control of multiple zones through a mobile interface for individualized room adjustments in buildings up to 60 rooms, contributing to optimized distribution and reported gains through precise modulation.

Thermal Comfort and Performance

Comfort metrics in radiant environments

The Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD) model provides a standardized framework for assessing overall in radiant heating and cooling environments. PMV estimates the average thermal sensation on a seven-point scale ranging from -3 (cold) to +3 (hot), based on factors including metabolic rate, , air , mean radiant , air speed, and . PPD, derived from PMV, quantifies the of occupants expected to find conditions unacceptable, with values below 10% indicating high satisfaction levels corresponding to PMV within -0.5 to +0.5. In radiant systems, this model highlights the potential for PPD under 10% at operative temperatures around 24°C, as the radiant component allows lower air temperatures in cooling or higher air temperatures in heating while maintaining neutral sensations. Operative temperature integrates the influences of air and radiant heat, defined as to=0.5(ta+tr)t_o = 0.5 (t_a + t_r), where tat_a is air temperature and trt_r is mean radiant temperature. This metric better represents the thermal environment perceived by occupants in radiant systems than air temperature alone, as it accounts for up to 50% of heat exchange via . For comfort in moderate indoor settings, ISO 7730:2025 recommends operative temperatures of 22–26°C during cooling periods and 20–24°C during heating, enabling radiant systems to achieve balanced conditions with reduced convective airflow. Local discomfort from thermal asymmetries is addressed through specific limits in ISO 7730:2025 to ensure even conditions across the body. The standard permits a maximum vertical air temperature difference of 4 between 0.1 m and 1.1 m above the for category C environments (acceptable for general ), preventing sensations of or warm head. Radiant temperature asymmetry, such as from a cold wall, is limited to 5 in category A, 7 in category B, and 10 in category C (for <5% dissatisfied in A/B, <10% in C), with limits for warm ceilings at 10 (A), 13 (B), and 18 (C). These constraints guide radiant system design to minimize uneven radiation exposure. User surveys in office buildings demonstrate superior satisfaction with radiant systems over all-air alternatives, attributed to uniform distribution without drafts. In a study of 60 buildings, radiant installations reported slightly higher and satisfaction scores. Such findings underscore the perceptual benefits of radiant environments, with over 75% satisfaction rates in well-designed cases. In a separate study of nine radiant buildings, occupants reported a 66% lower rate of temperature-related complaints.

Thermal response and asymmetry

Radiant heating and cooling systems exhibit distinct response characteristics depending on their mass configuration, influencing their dynamic performance in maintaining indoor conditions. Low-mass systems, typically featuring lightweight panels or thin toppings, achieve relatively quickly, often within 1-2 hours, due to reduced that allows rapid from the fluid to the room surface. In contrast, high-mass systems, such as those embedded in slabs, require longer response times of 4-8 hours to reach steady-state conditions, as the substantial material volume absorbs and releases heat more slowly. These differences arise from the inherent thermal storage capacity, making low-mass setups suitable for applications with frequent setpoint adjustments, while high-mass configurations excel in steady or slowly varying loads. The thermal response of these systems can be quantified using the time constant τ, which represents the duration for the system to reach approximately 63% of its final temperature change following a step input. This parameter is given by the formula τ=mcphA\tau = \frac{m c_p}{h A} where mm is the mass of the radiant surface, cpc_p is the specific heat capacity of the material, hh is the convective heat transfer coefficient, and AA is the surface area exposed to the room. In radiant floor applications, τ typically ranges from tens of minutes in low-mass setups to several hours in high-mass slabs, enabling predictive control strategies that account for delayed effects during transient operations. Radiant asymmetry, the difference in mean radiant temperature between opposing surfaces, poses a of local discomfort in radiant environments, particularly from walls that create uneven fields. According to ISO 7730:2025, discomfort due to radiant temperature asymmetry from cool walls is limited to 5 K (A), 7 K (B), 10 K (C) to maintain low dissatisfied percentages. Mitigation involves designing balanced surface temperatures across walls, floors, and ceilings to minimize gradients, often achieved through uniform conditioning or supplementary insulation on peripheral elements. Lumped parameter models provide an effective approach for simulating the transient behavior of radiant systems, representing the slab or panel as a single node with aggregated and resistance for computational . These models facilitate analysis of heat storage and release dynamics, revealing how high-mass radiant systems enable peak load shifting by storing excess during off-peak periods and releasing it during demand spikes. In variable climates, such systems can reduce indoor temperature fluctuations by up to 50% compared to low-mass alternatives, stabilizing conditions against diurnal outdoor variations through enhanced buffering.

Applications and Case Studies

Residential and light commercial

Radiant heating systems, particularly heating, have seen increasing adoption in residential settings across the . According to 2024 U.S. Census data, 42% of American households utilize as their primary heating , with radiant heating emerging as a preferred option within this category due to its efficiency and comfort benefits. This trend is particularly evident in new constructions, where radiant systems are integrated to enhance energy performance from the outset. For retrofitting existing homes, installation costs typically range from $8 to $15 per square foot for electric systems, encompassing materials, labor, and integration with existing flooring, making it a viable upgrade for older residences seeking improved without major structural changes. In light commercial applications, such as retail spaces, radiant ceiling panels provide even distribution of heat and cooling, minimizing drafts and hot spots while maintaining aesthetic appeal. These panels are especially effective in mild climates, where they can achieve savings of approximately 20-30% compared to traditional systems by directly radiating warmth to occupants and surfaces rather than heating the air. This efficiency stems from the panels' ability to operate at lower temperatures, reducing overall demand in environments with moderate seasonal variations. A notable case study involves Uponor's involvement in net-zero prefab residential projects completed in 2023, where radiant heating and cooling systems were paired with high-efficiency HVAC to significantly lower . These installations demonstrated reductions in energy bills by optimizing heat distribution and minimizing losses, with reported efficiencies contributing to overall project goals of reduced operational costs. Similarly, small office integrations using Uponor radiant solutions have shown comparable benefits, enabling precise for different areas and enhancing occupant satisfaction without excessive energy use. Post-2020, the adoption of radiant heating has grown in tandem with technologies, driven by incentives like those in the and rising demand for efficient . installations, often coupled with radiant systems, have increased by about 15% annually from 2020 to 2024, supporting lower heating costs and improved performance in residential and light commercial settings. This integration allows radiant floors or panels to leverage heat pumps' high , further promoting their use in smaller-scale applications.

Large-scale commercial and industrial

In large-scale commercial applications, radiant cooling systems, particularly chilled ceilings, have been successfully implemented in high-traffic environments such as airports and buildings to manage substantial cooling loads efficiently. For instance, at Xi’an International Airport Terminal 3, a radiant floor cooling system covers over 280,000 m² and handles cooling loads up to 150 W/m² in areas with high solar radiation, using chilled at 14°C supply and 19°C return temperatures to maintain floor surface temperatures of 22-23°C. Similarly, the Edith Green Wendell Wyatt Federal Building in , a 47,600 m² structure, employs radiant panels integrated with a (DOAS), achieving an score of 98 and demonstrating top-tier energy performance for cooling in a large open layout. These systems typically provide cooling capacities around 60 W/m² in commercial settings, balancing radiant and convective while minimizing needs. In industrial settings, radiant heating via floor systems is commonly used in warehouses to prevent frost damage and maintain operational integrity in cold-prone areas. For example, hydronic radiant floor heating at Belmont Farm Supply in keeps floor temperatures between 57°F and 60°F (14-16°C) across a large storage facility, protecting sensitive materials like fertilizers from moisture-induced degradation without excessive energy use. Recent case studies highlight the integration of radiant systems with (VAV) in European towers, yielding significant energy reductions. In a 2025 analysis of sustainable designs, hybrid radiant-VAV configurations in multi-story buildings achieved approximately 30% lower compared to conventional all-air systems, attributed to optimized chilled water temperatures and reduced fan power. Despite these advantages, large-scale deployments over 10,000 m² face scalability challenges, including higher upfront costs—up to $9.30/ft² more than VAV systems—and difficulties in irregular layouts due to limited adaptability of radiant mats. Maintenance issues are prominent in high-traffic areas, where sensor drift can reduce control precision by 15%, blocked tubes in systems demand regular inspections, and risks necessitate ongoing dehumidification monitoring to prevent microbial growth. These factors underscore the need for and advanced controls to ensure long-term reliability in commercial and industrial contexts.

Energy Sources and Sustainability

Traditional energy sources

Traditional energy sources for radiant heating and cooling systems primarily rely on fossil fuels and grid , providing reliable performance in conventional setups. Natural gas boilers serve as a common heating source, achieving efficiencies of 80% to 95% (AFUE) depending on whether they are mid-efficiency non-condensing or high-efficiency condensing models. These systems heat water or air that circulates through radiant panels or tubing, offering consistent output for residential and commercial applications. Electric resistance heating, often used in embedded floor or ceiling systems, converts 100% of electrical input to heat with no losses, though its high operational costs stem from electricity rates that are typically 2-3 times those of on an energy-equivalent basis. For cooling, vapor-compression chillers predominate, utilizing refrigerants in a compression-expansion cycle to produce chilled water with coefficients of performance (COP) ranging from 3 to 4 under standard operating conditions, where COP represents the ratio of cooling output to electrical input. These chillers supply low-temperature fluid (typically 7-12°C) to radiant surfaces, enabling without excessive dehumidification needs in low-humidity environments. District cooling loops extend this capability by distributing centrally produced chilled water through insulated pipes to multiple buildings, reducing on-site equipment demands and achieving system-wide efficiencies comparable to individual chillers. Propane serves as a versatile for radiant heating in remote or off-grid sites where infrastructure is unavailable, with modern boilers reaching up to 95% through condensing and precise burner modulation. acts as a reliable backup for primary boilers in radiant heating setups, providing seamless switching during or supply disruptions, with oil-fired boilers offering AFUE ratings of 82-87% in non-condensing configurations. In temperate climate zones, such as much of and , radiant heating systems powered by these traditional sources typically consume 50-100 kWh/ per year for space heating, varying with insulation levels, outdoor design temperatures, and system . This baseline consumption highlights the potential for savings through optimized controls and future transitions to lower-carbon alternatives.

Renewable and low-carbon integration

Air-to-water heat pumps are highly compatible with radiant heating systems due to their ability to deliver low-temperature hot , typically achieving a (COP) of 4 or higher at supply temperatures around 35°C, which aligns with the optimal operating range for hydronic radiant floors. These units extract heat from ambient air to preheat or fully supply the circulating through radiant panels, significantly lowering compared to traditional boilers. Ground-source heat pumps, utilizing buried geothermal loops, extend this efficiency to radiant cooling by maintaining stable ground temperatures for heat rejection. Solar thermal collectors provide a direct renewable pairing for radiant heating by pre-heating in hydronic loops, capturing to raise temperatures by 10–20°F before distribution to or panels, often supplemented by storage tanks for consistent supply. Photovoltaic (PV) systems integrate with electric radiant heating or electrically driven heat pumps, where generated electricity powers the system and offsets 40–60% of operational through hybrid configurations that prioritize self-consumption during peak solar hours. Geothermal loops, as part of ground-source setups, further amplify this by enabling bidirectional heating and cooling with minimal electrical input, while biomass boilers offer a carbon-neutral alternative for larger radiant installations by burning sustainable wood pellets or chips to heat circuits. For radiant cooling, chillers increasingly employ low (GWP) refrigerants, such as those with GWP below 700, in compliance with post-2020 regulations including the EU F-Gas Regulation and the U.S. AIM Act, which phase down high-GWP hydrofluorocarbons to curb emissions from cooling equipment. These integrations yield substantial benefits, including carbon emission reductions of 50–70% relative to fuel-based systems, driven by the high of renewables in low-exergy radiant applications. As of 2023, renewables accounted for 26.2% of the EU's heating and cooling energy use, bolstered by incentives under the EU Green Deal, such as grants covering up to 50% of costs for and solar thermal projects. As of 2024, this share reached 25.4%.

Challenges and Mitigations

Condensation and moisture control

In radiant cooling systems, condensation forms when the temperature of chilled surfaces, such as panels or ceilings, drops below the of the surrounding air, causing to condense into liquid droplets. This risk arises because radiant surfaces typically operate at 16–18°C, and if indoor air is high, the can exceed this threshold, leading to moisture accumulation that may cause mold growth, reduced , or structural damage. To mitigate this, the supply water is generally maintained above 15°C, ensuring the emitting surface stays warmer than the . Indoor relative is controlled within 50–60% to keep below safe surface temperatures, as higher levels (e.g., above 60% at 26°C ) increase condensation potential. Key mitigations focus on preventing exceedance through integrated management. Dedicated dehumidifiers remove excess moisture from the air before it contacts cooled surfaces, often achieving supply air below 8 g/kg to support radiant operation. Surface treatments, such as hydrophilic coatings, promote even spreading and drainage of any incidental condensate, reducing retention and carryover risks in HVAC-integrated radiant systems. Supply is dynamically controlled using sensors that monitor conditions and adjust chilled flow, maintaining a 1–2 safety margin above the . Advanced strategies decouple sensible cooling from latent load handling to enhance reliability in humid environments. Dedicated Outdoor Air Systems (DOAS) provide conditioned ventilation air, handling dehumidification separately from the radiant panels' sensible cooling, which optimizes energy use and prevents overcooling of surfaces. Desiccant wheels adsorb moisture from incoming air, regenerating via low-grade heat sources, and integrate effectively with radiant setups to maintain low humidity without excessive refrigeration. Continuous monitoring with hygrometers or sensors enables real-time adjustments, ensuring proactive control. Proper implementation of these controls significantly reduces risks, with studies showing effective systems operate with minimal incidents across diverse climates when is managed below design limits.

Thermal mass and system inefficiencies

High in radiant heating and cooling systems, such as those embedded in slabs, provides thermal stability by absorbing and releasing slowly, which reduces variance in occupied spaces during steady-state conditions. However, this leads to slow times, often requiring several hours to achieve desired temperatures, causing systems to lag behind peak heating or cooling demands in dynamic environments. In variable weather, the retained energy in high-mass structures can lead to prolonged emission after input is reduced, though their slower response generally results in lower overheating risks compared to low-mass systems. Operational inefficiencies arise from these thermal mass characteristics, particularly in oversizing scenarios where systems are designed with excess capacity to compensate for slow response, leading to energy waste through short cycling and suboptimal load matching. For instance, inertia in high-mass radiant setups can reduce control precision by more than 15%, amplifying energy penalties in buildings with fluctuating loads. In radiant cooling slabs, air stratification exacerbates inefficiencies, as cooled air pools near the floor and fails to convect effectively to upper zones, diminishing overall cooling distribution and requiring higher energy inputs to maintain comfort. Mitigations focus on balancing thermal mass benefits with responsive design, such as adopting low-mass alternatives like suspended panels, which enable rapid temperature adjustments without the lag of concrete cores. Predictive controls, including (MPC) algorithms, optimize operation by forecasting loads and pre-charging thermal mass during off-peak periods, achieving up to 42.6% savings in pumping energy and 16% in cooling energy while minimizing oversizing needs. Insulation adjustments around slabs further tweak response times by limiting unwanted heat gain or loss, enhancing system efficiency in hybrid configurations. Recent studies on optimized hybrid radiant systems highlight how integrating low-mass panels with predictive controls and hybrids reduces energy variance while curbing startup demands, yielding 27–38% overall savings in sustainable applications. High stabilizes indoor conditions but can increase startup energy requirements in intermittent operation compared to low-mass counterparts, underscoring the value of these targeted optimizations.

References

  1. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/radiant-heating
  2. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/radiant-cooling
  3. https://plasticpipe.org/EnergyPipingSystems/BuildingConstruction/-Applications-/Radiant-HeatingCooling-Systems.aspx
  4. https://newbuildings.org/resource/radiant-cooling-and-heating-systems/
  5. https://depts.washington.edu/hrome/Authors/kjw2/BathsBathinginAncientRome/pub_zbarticle_view_printable.html
  6. https://asiasociety.org/korea/ondol-korean-traditional-heating-system
  7. https://www.achrnews.com/articles/87035-an-early-history-of-comfort-heating
  8. https://journals.ashs.org/view/journals/hortsci/57/2/article-p239.xml
  9. https://www.waterhistory.org/histories/qanats/
  10. http://anthony.sogang.ac.kr/transactions/VOL95/01Robert%20Fouser.pdf
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289542007_Part_2_History_of_Radiant_Heating_Cooling_Systems
  12. http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s10547.pdf
  13. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/44427/research.pdf?sequence=1
  14. https://www.pmmag.com/articles/91874-a-brief-history-of-radiant-heating
  15. https://www.plasticpipe.org/TR-56
  16. https://aspe.org/pipeline/new-technical-document-describes-the-history-of-pex/
  17. https://www.rehva.eu/rehva-journal/chapter/iso-11855-the-international-standard-on-the-design-dimensioning-installation-and-control-of-embedded-radiant-heating-and-cooling-systems
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778819311211
  19. https://www.beka-klima.de/en/more-beka/
  20. https://www.uponor.com/en-us/solutions/smatrix-pulse-control-system
  21. https://www.rehau.com/uk-en/news-new-smart-controls-for-underfloor-heating
  22. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-media/press-releases/2024/ai-controlled-heat-pumps-increase-efficiency.html
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360132325001489
  24. https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/radiant-cooling-heating-system-market
  25. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/radiation-heat-transfer-d_431.html
  26. https://www.thermoworks.com/emissivity-table/
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8319807/
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10937893/
  29. https://www.aivc.org/sites/default/files/airbase_4534.pdf
  30. https://tanyaeeclcourse.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/cen58933_ch12.pdf
  31. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=ihpbc
  32. https://publications.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs/2015/papers/bs2015_2737.pdf
  33. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1265268
  34. https://cbe.berkeley.edu/research/optimizing-radiant-systems-energy-efficiency-comfort/
  35. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/13h9z4gg
  36. https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/technical%20resources/ashrae%20journal/april-2023-additional-material.pdf
  37. https://inspectapedia.com/heat/Radiant_Heat_Temperatures.php
  38. https://files.zurn.com/design-guide/radiantinstructions.pdf
  39. https://www.indeeco.com/products/hvac/radiant-heaters/as-series/
  40. https://www.uponor.com/getmedia/50a684b6-091d-4044-b8f7-c06f7705668c/snow-and-ice-melting-design-and-installation-manual.pdf?sitename=USA
  41. https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/standards-and-guidelines/standards-interpretations
  42. https://www.energycodes.gov/sites/default/files/2023-12/90_1_2019_Appendix_G_PRM_2023.11.pdf
  43. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/bitstreams/d8c8cab5-7a4b-49dc-930d-1115f9c52742/download
  44. https://www.news.iastate.edu/news/iowa-state-engineers-test-heated-pavement-technology-des-moines-international-airport
  45. https://landscapearchitect.com/landscape-articles/turf-heating-systems-popular-in-stadiums-not-private-residencesturf-heating-systems-popular-in-stadiums-not-private-residences-3867
  46. https://www.warmlyyours.com/en-US/snow-melting
  47. https://www.grundfos.com/content/dam/global/page-assets/learn/ecademy/pdfs/module-3-high-efficiency-hydronic-systems-optimising-radiant-cooling-applications-master.pdf
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710225002876
  49. https://publications.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs/2013/papers/bs2013_2356.pdf
  50. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/152076/energies-16-06160.pdf?sequence=1
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032115012800
  52. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1633223
  53. https://fairconditioning.org/knowledge/sustainable-cooling-technologies/radiant-cooling/
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360132324003305
  55. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/7757908/F5901d01.pdf
  56. https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/radiant-cooling-systems-market.html
  57. https://messana.tech/blog/the-history-of-radiant-cooling/
  58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.10.020
  59. https://www.uponor.com/en-en/planner-support/sustainable-radiant-heating-and-cooling/pros-and-cons-of-radiant-cooling-in-humid-climates
  60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110847
  61. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/74836/38fb19965f55435791a9a48242eed508/SIST-EN-ISO-11855-1-2021-oprA1-2023.pdf
  62. https://www.rehau.com/downloads/497804/radiantheatingsystemsdesignguide-855601-rehau.pdf
  63. https://www.caleffi.com/sites/default/files/media/external-file/Idronics_12_NA_Hydronic%2520fundamentals%2520.pdf
  64. https://www.h2xengineering.com/blogs/underfloor-heating-design-guide-radiant/
  65. https://global.purmo.com/en/the-indoors/underfloor-heating/radiant-heating-and-cooling-one-system-two-functions
  66. https://www.h2xengineering.com/blogs/category/heat-pumps/feed/
  67. https://messana.tech/blog/3-advantages-that-hydronic-systems-have-over-forced-air-systems/
  68. https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/article/radiant-heating-and-cooling
  69. https://www.firstsupply.com/Knowledge-Center/pros-and-cons-of-hydronic-heating
  70. https://noritz.com/post/pros-cons-hydronic-radiant-floor-heating
  71. https://www.carbon-film.com/
  72. https://www.amazon.com/FloorHeatElectric-Underfloor-Radiant-Heating-Carbon/dp/B07CNDWDJY
  73. https://www.warmup.com/blog/electric-vs-hydronic-radiant-floor-heating
  74. https://www.csemag.com/the-basics-of-gas-fired-infrared-heating/
  75. https://spaceray.com/commercial-industrial-heaters/benefits-of-radiant-heating/
  76. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2600/6/062002
  77. https://www.warmlyyours.com/en-US/posts/Electric-vs-Hydronic-Floor-Heating-2930
  78. https://www.prolineradiant.com/radiant-heat/heated-floors.php
  79. https://www.floorheatingsystemsinc.com/radiant-electric-vs-hydronic-underfloor-heating/
  80. https://morelectricheating.com/manufacturers/calorique
  81. https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/reports/ceiling-heating-film-246727
  82. https://www.radiantwayinc.com/
  83. https://www.legalett.ca/FPSF-Radiant-Floor-Heating-PDFs/Legalett-Article-ASHRAE-Journal-Radiant-Floor-Heating-In-Theory-And-Practice.pdf
  84. https://www.iesve.com/discoveries/view/10017/ashrae-heating-and-cooling-load-calculations
  85. https://cbe.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Radiant-tool-ASHRAE-ATL-2019-presentation.pdf
  86. https://www.uponor.com/getmedia/bec3b574-5c49-4f3e-be6e-2b7c1410998e/cdam-chapter-8-radiant-floor-system-design.pdf?sitename=USA
  87. https://azaranstore.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/238-Radiant-Cooling-Design-Manual.pdf
  88. https://www.viega.us/content/dam/viegadm/download-assets/en_us/tech-marketing/heating-and-cooling/installation-manuals/IM-HC_566442_Heating_and_Cooling_Solutions_Design_Manual.pdf
  89. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0205875/19989117/070035_1_5.0205875.pdf
  90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333183955_A_review_of_the_surface_heat_transfer_coefficients_of_radiant_heating_and_cooling_systems
  91. https://plasticpipe.org/HydrostaticStressBoard/BuildingConstruction/-Applications-/Hydronic-Piping---Distribution.aspx
  92. https://www.sharkbite.com/us/en/resources/applications/radiant-heating
  93. https://nordikradiant.com/blogs/news/most-suitable-pex-tube-pipe-size-for-radiant-floor-heating-project
  94. https://www.radiantmadesimple.com/concrete-floor-radiant-heating
  95. https://infloor.com/products/hydronic-systems/therma-floor/
  96. https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/question/is-there-such-a-thing-as-too-much-under-slab-insulation
  97. https://waterworkerdiy.com/radiant-heating-system-expansion-tanks/
  98. https://nordikradiant.com/collections/components
  99. https://www.astm.org/f0876-23.html
  100. https://www.flairit.com/blog/tubing-fittings/pe-rt-tubing-in-the-usa-applications-and-benefits/
  101. https://www.academia.edu/18994339/Field_Measurements_of_Thermal_Comfort_Conditions_in_Buildings_with_Radiant_Surface_Cooling_Systems
  102. https://www.hotowell.com/news/en/modulating-valve-vs-on-off-valve.html
  103. https://forum.heatinghelp.com/discussion/108108/modulating-valves-vs-circulator-control
  104. https://www.pmmag.com/articles/105922-the-dos-and-donts-of-hydronic-system-design
  105. https://www.heat-timer.com/how-outdoor-reset-works-in-heating-systems/
  106. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB8365.pdf
  107. https://www.performanceengineering.com/cm/dpl/downloads/content/585/Controls.pdf
  108. https://www.watlow.com/en/blog/posts/best-safety-practices-for-high-limit-sensors
  109. https://www.solairaheaters.com/products/controls/smart-occupancy/
  110. https://www.plctalk.net/forums/threads/pid-software-real-time-tuning.101106/
  111. https://www.controleng.com/tuning-thermal-pid-loops/
  112. https://www.ecobee.com/en-us/smart-thermostats/smart-thermostat-premium/
  113. https://store.acpro.com/parts/thermostats-accessories/programmable-thermostats/wi-fi
  114. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391338568_Model_Predictive_Control_Strategy_for_a_Radiant_Cooling_System_Coupled_with_a_Fresh_Air_System_Based_on_Deep_Learning
  115. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110831
  116. https://www.hpacmag.com/features/considerations-for-operating-hybrid-radiant-doas-systems/
  117. https://www.chiltrix.com/radiant-cooling/CXRC1-Radiant-cooling-controller-Gen2.pdf
  118. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/8/5/69
  119. https://bs.rehau.com/uk-en/solutions-for-building-technology/underfloor-heating/heating-and-cooling/nea-smart-2-0-smart-control
  120. https://thermairsystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Olesen-radiant-heating-and-cooling.pdf
  121. https://www.iso.org/standard/85803.html
  122. https://www.krantz.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/layout-specifications-for-thermal-comfort-.pdf
  123. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320574585_Comparing_temperature_and_acoustic_satisfaction_in_60_radiant_and_all-air_buildings
  124. https://cbe.berkeley.edu/centerline/nine-radiant-buildings-demonstrate-energy-efficiency-and-occupant-satisfaction/
  125. https://www.warmboard.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/FastRadiant.pdf
  126. https://radiant.cbe.berkeley.edu/doc/add_resources/cbe_rad_soo.htm
  127. https://escholarship.org/content/qt2j75g92w/qt2j75g92w.pdf
  128. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778813000315
  129. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/128203508/filestore_2_.pdf
  130. https://www.warmlyyours.com/en-US/posts/electric-heating-42-of-homes-choose-radiant-floor-heating
  131. https://solartechonline.com/blog/is-radiant-floor-heating-efficient/
  132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325007140
  133. https://www.achrnews.com/articles/153535-net-zero-prefab-homes-feature-radiant-systems-high-efficiency-hvac
  134. https://www.emergenresearch.com/ru/industry-report/radiant-cooling-heating-system-market
  135. https://www.rehva.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Radiant_Floor_Cooling__Tsinghua_Univ._.pdf
  136. https://www.rehva.eu/rehva-journal/chapter/improved-cooling-performance-testing-of-radiant-ceiling-panels
  137. https://www.pmmag.com/articles/103581-growing-demand-for-warehouses-is-fertile-ground-for-radiant-heating
  138. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/furnaces-and-boilers
  139. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/electric-resistance-heating
  140. https://www.bpa.gov/-/media/Aep/energy-efficiency/emerging-technologies/ET-Documents/BPA-Final-Low-Lift-Report-03-08-10.pdf
  141. https://plasticpipe.org/BuildingConstruction/BuildingConstruction/-Applications-/DistrictEnergy-Heating-Cooling.aspx
  142. https://propane.com/2023/10/18/plumbers-custom-home-is-a-testament-to-radiant-heat-efficiency-bwp/
  143. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2019-BT-STD-0036-0001
  144. https://forum.heatinghelp.com/discussion/162532/backup-oil-boiler-choice
  145. https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/wang2020_article_tradeoffbetweenheatingenergyde.pdf
  146. https://www.spacepak.com/solstice-air-to-water-heat-pumps
  147. https://www.pmmag.com/articles/106687-geothermal-and-radiant-an-energy-efficient-powerhouse
  148. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/active-solar-heating
  149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778824010818
  150. https://www.wbdg.org/resources/biomass-heat
  151. https://www.epa.gov/climate-hfcs-reduction/technology-transitions-hfc-restrictions-sector
  152. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3255
  153. https://www.green-forum.eu/energy/20250305/eu-renewable-energy-share-in-heating-and-cooling-hits-26-1735
  154. https://www.ehpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Subsidies-for-industrial-heat-pumps-in-Europe-EHPA-August-2025-update.pdf
  155. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/share-of-energy-consumption-from
  156. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1236589
  157. https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/bookstore/standard-55-thermal-environmental-conditions-for-human-occupancy
  158. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1376508
  159. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/167944/deokoh_1.pdf
  160. http://doas-radiant.psu.edu/iaq_doas_sa_cond_sp_08.pdf
  161. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy01osti/26131.pdf
  162. https://www.uponor.com/en-en/planner-support/sustainable-radiant-heating-and-cooling/the-4-differences-between-low-and-high-mass-radiant-systems
  163. https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/question/radiant-floor-cooling
  164. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223001858
  165. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/16/2908
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.