Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Sniper
View on Wikipedia
French and British (center) snipers equipped with FR F2, Accuracy International AWM and PGM Hécate II rifles (left to right, 2012) and camouflage Ghillie suits | |
| Occupation | |
|---|---|
Occupation type | Military/Law enforcement |
Activity sectors | Use of high-precision rifles and special reconnaissance |


| Part of a series on |
| War (outline) |
|---|
A sniper is a military or paramilitary marksman who engages targets from positions of concealment or at distances exceeding the target's detection capabilities.[1] Snipers generally have specialized training and are equipped with telescopic sights. Modern snipers use high-precision rifles and high-magnification optics. They often also serve as scouts/observers feeding tactical information back to their units or command headquarters.
In addition to long-range and high-grade marksmanship, military snipers are trained in a variety of special operation techniques: detection, stalking, target range estimation methods, camouflage, tracking, bushcraft, field craft, infiltration, special reconnaissance and observation, surveillance and target acquisition. Snipers need to have complete control of their bodies and senses in order to be effective. They also need to have the skill set to use data from their scope and monitors to adjust their aim to hit targets that are extremely far away. In training, snipers are given charts that they're drilled on to ensure they can make last-minute calculations when they are in the field.
Etymology
[edit]The name sniper comes from the verb to snipe, which originated in the 1770s among soldiers in British India in reference to shooting snipes,[2][3] a wader that was considered an extremely challenging game bird for hunters due to its alertness, camouflaging color and erratic flight behavior. Snipe hunters therefore needed to be stealthy in addition to being good trackers and marksmen.[2][3] In the 18th century, letters sent home by English officers in India referred to a day's rough shooting as "going sniping",[2] as it took a skilled flintlock sportsman a lot of patience and endurance to wing-shoot a snipe in flight.[2] Accomplishing such a shot was regarded as exceptional. During the late 18th century, the term snipe shooting was simplified to sniping. This evolved to the agent noun sniper, first appearing by the 1820s.[3] The term sniper became commonplace in the First World War.[2]
The older term sharpshooter comes from the calque of German word Scharfschütze, in use by British newspapers as early as 1801.[3][4] The word alludes to good marksmanship, itself descendent of the shooting competitions (Schützenfeste)[5] that took place throughout the year in Munich in the 15th century.[5] Small companies of shooters (Schützenfähnlein)[5] from the German states and Swiss cantons would form teams of Scharfschützen[6] for such popular competitions; proudly carrying flags depicting a crossbow on one side and a target musket on the other.[5] The earliest known date for the creation of a shooting club formed specifically for the use of firearms comes from Lucerne, Switzerland, where one club has a charter dating from 1466.[5] During the American Civil War, Confederate marksmen equipped with the imported Whitworth rifles were known as the Whitworth Sharpshooters.
Snipers are also called "hunters" in many languages, due to the nature of the craft (with the hunting horn also being a symbol of marksmanship), being called caçadores, chasseurs and Jäger. Other words for sniper include franc-tireur, tireur d'élite and atirador de escol. Completely different and peculiar is the Italian term cecchino [tʃekˈkiːno], in common use since First World War. The term cecchino is derived from Cecco (Beppe), familiarly and mockingly referring to the Austro-Hungarian Emperor Franz Joseph I (in Italian Francesco Giuseppe I; Cecco and Beppe are nicknames for Francesco and Giuseppe respectively).[citation needed]
Modern warfare
[edit]

Military doctrine
[edit]Different countries use different military doctrines regarding snipers in military units, settings, and tactics.
A sniper's primary function in modern warfare is to stay concealed at all times and avoid detection. Then from long range, to provide detailed surveillance from a concealed position and, if necessary, to reduce the enemy's combat ability by shooting high-value targets (especially officers and other key personnel), and in the process, cause disruption, pinning down and demoralizing the enemy.[7][page needed][8][page needed] Typical sniper missions include managing intelligence information they gather during reconnaissance, target acquisition and impact feedback for air strikes and artillery, assisting employed combat force with accurate fire support and counter-sniper tactics, killing enemy commanders, selecting targets of opportunity, and even destruction of military equipment, which tend to require use of anti-materiel rifles in the larger calibers such as the .50 BMG, like the Barrett M82, McMillan Tac-50, and Denel NTW-20.[8][page needed]
Soviet- and Russian-derived military doctrines include squad-level snipers. Snipers have increasingly been demonstrated as useful by US and UK forces in the recent Iraq campaign in a fire support role to cover the movement of infantry, especially in urban areas.[8][page needed]
Military snipers from the US, UK and other countries that adopt their military doctrine are typically deployed in two-man sniper teams consisting of a shooter and a spotter.[9][page needed] A common practice is for a shooter and a spotter to take turns to avoid eye fatigue.[8][page needed] In most recent combat operations occurring in large densely populated towns, such as Fallujah, Iraq, two teams would be deployed together to increase their security and effectiveness in an urban environment. A sniper team would be armed with a long-range weapon and a rapid-firing shorter-ranged weapon in case of close quarter combat.
The German doctrine of largely independent snipers and emphasis on concealment, developed during the Second World War, has been most influential on modern sniper tactics, and is currently used throughout Western militaries (examples are specialized camouflage clothing, concealment in terrain and emphasis on coup d'œil).[10][page needed][11][12]
Sniper teams
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2019) |

Sniper rifles are classified as crew-served in the United States military. A sniper team (or sniper cell) consists of a combination of at least one primary weapon operator, (i.e.: the shooter), with other support personnel and force protection elements, such as a spotter or a flanker. Within the Table of Organization and Equipment for both the United States Army and Marine Corps, the shooter does not operate alone, but has a backup shooter trained to fulfill multiple roles in addition to being sniper-qualified in the operation of the main weapon.[13]
The shooter focuses mainly on firing the shot, while the spotter assists in observation of targets, accounts for atmospheric conditions and handles ancillary tasks such as immediate security of their location, communication with other parties (e.g. directing artillery fire and close air support). A flanker is an extra teammate who is tasked to act as a sentry observing areas not immediately visible to the sniper and spotter, assisting with the team's rear security and perimeter defense, and therefore are usually armed with a faster-firing weapon such as an assault rifle, battle rifle or designated marksman rifle. Both the spotter and flanker carry additional ammunition and associated equipment.[14]
The spotter is responsible for detecting, identifying and assigning priority of targets for the shooter, as well as assessing the outcome of the shot. Using a spotting scope and/or a rangefinder, the spotter will predict the external ballistics and read the wind speed using an anemometer or physical indicators like the mirage caused by ground heat. Also, in conjunction with the shooter, the spotter will calculate the distance, shooting angle (slant range), mil-related correction, interference by atmospheric factors and the required leads for moving targets. It is not unusual for the spotter to be equipped with a ballistic table, a notebook or a tablet computer specifically for performing these calculations.
Law enforcement applications
[edit]
Law enforcement snipers, commonly called police snipers, and military snipers differ in many ways, including their areas of operation and tactics. A police sharpshooter is part of a police operation and usually takes part in relatively short missions. Police forces typically deploy such sharpshooters in hostage scenarios. This differs from a military sniper, who operates as part of a larger army, engaged in warfare. Sometimes as part of a SWAT team, police snipers are deployed alongside negotiators and an assault team trained for close quarters combat. As policemen, they are trained to shoot only as a last resort, when there is a direct threat to life; the police sharpshooter has a well-known rule: "Be prepared to take a life to save a life."[15] Police snipers typically operate at much shorter ranges than military snipers, generally under 100 meters (109 yd) and sometimes even less than 50 meters (55 yd). Both types of snipers do make difficult shots under pressure, and often perform one-shot kills.

Police units that are unequipped for tactical operations may rely on a specialized SWAT team, which may have a dedicated sniper.[15] Some police sniper operations begin with military assistance.[16] Police snipers placed in vantage points, such as high buildings, can provide security for events.[17] In one high-profile incident commonly referred to as "The Shot Seen Around the World" due to going viral online, Mike Plumb, a SWAT sniper in Columbus, Ohio, prevented a suicide by shooting a revolver out of the individual's hand, leaving him unharmed.[18][19]

The need for specialized training for police sharpshooters was made apparent in 1972 during the Munich massacre when the German police could not deploy specialized personnel or equipment during the standoff at the airport in the closing phase of the crisis, and consequently all of the Israeli hostages were killed. While the German army did have snipers in 1972, the use of army snipers in the scenario was impossible due to the German constitution's explicit prohibition of the use of the military in domestic matters. This lack of trained snipers who could be used in civilian roles was later addressed with the founding of the specialized police counter-terrorist unit GSG 9.
Longest recorded sniper kill
[edit]
The longest confirmed sniper kill in combat was achieved by an undisclosed member of the Security Service of Ukraine in November 2023, hitting a Russian soldier at a distance of 3,800 m (4,156 yd) during the Russian invasion of Ukraine.[20]
The previous record holder was a member of the Canadian JTF2 special forces who in June 2017 achieved a hit at a distance of 3,540 m (3,871 yd).[21]

In November 2009, Craig Harrison, a Corporal of Horse (CoH) in the Blues and Royals RHG/D of the British Army struck two Taliban machine gunners consecutively south of Musa Qala in Helmand Province in Afghanistan at a range of 2,475 m (2,707 yd) or 1.54 miles using a L115A3 Long Range Rifle.[22][23] The QTU Lapua external ballistics software,[24] using continuous doppler drag coefficient (Cd) data provided by Lapua,[25] predicts that such shots traveling 2,475 m (2,707 yd) would likely have struck their targets after nearly 6.0 seconds of flight time, having lost 93% of their kinetic energy, retaining 255 m/s (840 ft/s) of their original 936 m/s (3,070 ft/s) velocity, and having dropped 121.39 m (398 ft 3 in) or 2.8° from the original bore line. Due to the extreme distances and travel time involved, even a light cross-breeze of 2.7 m/s (6.0 mph) would have diverted such shots 9.2 m (360 in) off target, which would have required compensation.
The calculation assumes a flat-fire scenario (a situation where the shooting and target positions are at equal elevation), using British military custom high-pressure .338 Lapua Magnum cartridges, loaded with 16.2 g (250 gr) Lapua LockBase B408 bullets, fired at 936 m/s (3,071 ft/s) muzzle velocity[26] under the following on-site (average) atmospheric conditions: barometric pressure: 1,019 hPa (30.1 inHg) at sea-level equivalent or 899 hPa (26.5 inHg) on-site, humidity: 25.9%, and temperature: 15 °C (59 °F) in the region for November 2009,[27] resulting in an air density ρ = 1.0854 kg/m3 at the 1,043 m (3,422 ft) elevation of Musa Qala. Harrison mentions in reports that the environmental conditions were perfect for long range shooting, "... no wind, mild weather, clear visibility."[23] In a BBC interview, Harrison reported it took about nine shots for him and his spotter to initially range the target successfully.[28]
Military history
[edit]Before the development of rifling, firearms were smoothbore and inaccurate over long distance. Barrel rifling was invented at the end of the fifteenth century, but was only employed in large cannons. Over time, rifling, along with other gunnery advances, has increased the performance of modern firearms.
1543–1600
[edit]Long range marksmanship occurred as early as the mid-sixteenth century.
One example is the Ise-no-kami school of gunnery. It was founded by the Christian feudal lord of the Saiki Domain, Mori Takamasa (毛利高政, 1559–1628). Takamasa had aspired to become a marksman from a young age, and in his prime, he used up a 10-tan sailboat's worth of ammunition in just a few years, showing his considerable passion. He is said to have always told people, "You won't improve your skills unless you fire that much ammunition." During the battle of Ulsan Castle in Korea, he was a master of guns, firing at the enemy from a distance of seven cho (about 770 meters) with a 278 cm long "焔魔王 - Flaming Demon King" O-zutsu (Matchlock Cannon) throwing the enemy camp into confusion with his accurate shots.[29]
1701–1800
[edit]Later "sharpshooting" or "sniping" became implemented in shooting terminology.
For example: in the 1752 Appin Murder, Colin Roy Campbell of Glenure was shot in the back near Duror by an unknown sniper, most likely from within Clan Stewart of Appin, in retaliation for Campbell's role in an early version of the Highland Clearances; the mass eviction of Stewart clansmen and their replacement by members of Clan Campbell.
Hunting terminology was quickly adapted to warfare by British soldiers. In a 1772 letter, a soldier described enemies firing very accurately:[30]
… in erecting our batteries, the people frequently play tricks, by putting a hat with a cockade in it on a spunge staff, which the enemy fire at and often hit, to the diversion of the soldiery, who humorously call it sniping, and watch the flash to return the fire.
On 11 September 1777, during the Battle of Brandywine, British Captain Patrick Ferguson had a tall, distinguished American officer in his rifle's iron sights. Ferguson did not take the shot, as he considered shooting anyone in the back dishonourable. Only later, did Ferguson learn that George Washington had been on the battlefield that day.[31]
At the Battles of Saratoga, Morgan's Riflemen hid in the trees and used early model rifles to shoot senior British officers. Most notably, Timothy Murphy shot and killed General Simon Fraser of Balnain on 7 October 1777 at a distance of about 400 yards.[32][33][34]
In early 1800, Colonel Coote Manningham and Lieutenant-Colonel the Hon. William Stewart of the British Army proposed using what they had learned while leading light infantry to establish a special unit of marksmen. Subsequently raised as the "Experimental Corps of Riflemen", they were armed with the formidable Baker rifle rather than the inaccurate smoothbore muskets used by most troops at that time.[35] Through the combination of a leather wad and tight grooves on the inside of the barrel (rifling), this weapon was far more accurate, though slower to load. On 25 August 1800, three companies, under the command of Stewart, spearheaded an amphibious landing at Ferrol, Spain.
1801–1900
[edit]The term, "sharp shooter" was in use in British newspapers as early as 1801. In the Edinburgh Advertiser, 23 June 1801, can be found the following quote in a piece about the North British Militia; "This Regiment has several Field Pieces, and two companies of Sharp Shooters, which are very necessary in the modern Stile of War". The term appears even earlier, around 1781, in Continental Europe, translated from the German Scharfschütze. Scouts in the Ashanti army were made up of professional hunters who used their skill as marksmen to snipe at advancing enemy forces in response to detection by the enemy. They executed this often from a perch high in trees.[36] The Whitworth rifle was arguably the first long-range sniper rifle in the world.[37] A muzzleloader designed by Sir Joseph Whitworth, a prominent British engineer, it used polygonal rifling instead, which meant that the projectile did not have to bite into grooves as was done with conventional rifling. The Whitworth rifle was far more accurate than the Pattern 1853 Enfield, which had shown some weaknesses during the recent Crimean War. At trials in 1857 which tested the accuracy and range of both weapons, Whitworth's design outperformed the Enfield at a rate of about three to one. The Whitworth rifle was capable of hitting the target at a range of 2,000 yards, whereas the Enfield could only manage it at 1,400 yards.[38]
During the Crimean War, the first optical sights were designed to fit onto rifles. Much of this pioneering work was the brainchild of Colonel D. Davidson, using optical sights produced by Chance Brothers of Birmingham. This allowed a marksman to observe and target objects more accurately at a greater distance than ever before.[39] The telescopic sight, or scope, was originally fixed and could not be adjusted, which therefore limited its range.
Despite its success at the trials, the rifle was not adopted by the British Army. However, the Whitworth Rifle Company was able to sell the weapon to the French army, and also to the Confederacy during the American Civil War,[40] where both the Union and Confederate armies employed sharpshooters. The most notable incident was during the Battle of Spotsylvania Court House, where on 9 May 1864, Union General John Sedgwick was killed by a Confederate Whitworth sharpshooter at a range of about 1,000 yards (910 meters) after saying the enemy "couldn't hit an elephant at this distance".[41][42][43][44]
Second Boer War
[edit]
During the Boer War the latest breech-loading rifled guns with magazines and smokeless powder were used by both sides. The British were equipped with the Lee–Metford rifle, while the Boers had received the latest Mauser rifles from Germany. In the open terrain of South Africa the marksmen were a crucial component to the outcome of the battle.
The first British sniper unit began life as the Lovat Scouts, a Scottish Highland regiment formed in 1899, that earned high praise during the Second Boer War (1899–1902).[8][page needed] The unit was formed by Lord Lovat and reported to an American, Major Frederick Russell Burnham, the British Army Chief of Scouts under Lord Roberts. Burnham fittingly described these scouts as "half wolf and half jackrabbit.".[45] Just like their Boer scout opponents, these scouts were well practised in the arts of marksmanship, field craft, map reading, observation, and military tactics.[46] They were skilled woodsmen and practitioners of discretion: "He who shoots and runs away, lives to shoot another day." They were also the first known military unit to wear a ghillie suit.[47] Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard said of them that "keener men never lived",[48] and that "Burnham was the greatest scout of our time."[49] Burnham distinguished himself in wars in South Africa, Rhodesia, and in Arizona fighting the Apaches, and his definitive work, Scouting on Two Continents, provides a dramatic and enlightening picture of what a sniper was at the time and how he operated.[46]
After the war, this regiment went on to formally become the first official sniper unit, then better known as sharpshooters.[45]
World War I
[edit]
During World War I, snipers appeared as deadly sharpshooters in the trenches. At the start of the war, only Imperial Germany had troops that were issued scoped sniper rifles. Although sharpshooters existed on all sides, the Germans specially equipped some of their soldiers with scoped rifles that could pick off enemy soldiers showing their heads out of their trench.[10][page needed] At first the French and British believed such hits to be coincidental hits, until the German scoped rifles were discovered.[10][page needed] During World War I, the German army received a reputation for the deadliness and efficiency of its snipers, partly because of the high-quality lenses that German industry could manufacture.[10][page needed]
During the First World War, the static movement of trench warfare and a need for protection from snipers created a requirement for loopholes both for discharging firearms and for observation.[50] Often a steel plate was used with a "key hole", which had a rotating piece to cover the loophole when not in use.[50]

Soon the British army began to train their own snipers in specialized sniper schools. Major Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard was given formal permission to begin sniper training in 1915, and founded the First Army School of Sniping, Observation, and Scouting at Linghem in France in 1916.[51] Starting with a first class of only six, in time he was able to lecture to large numbers of soldiers from different Allied nations, proudly proclaiming in a letter that his school was turning out snipers at three times the rate of any such other school in the world.[52]
He also devised a metal-armoured double loophole that would protect the sniper observer from enemy fire. The front loophole was fixed, but the rear was housed in a metal shutter sliding in grooves. Only when the two loopholes were lined up—a one-to-twenty chance—could an enemy shoot between them.[53] Another innovation was the use of a dummy head to find the location of an enemy sniper.[54] The papier-mâché figures were painted to resemble soldiers to draw sniper fire. Some were equipped with rubber surgical tubing so the dummy could "smoke" a cigarette and thus appear realistic. Holes punched in the dummy by enemy sniper bullets then could be used for triangulation purposes to determine the position of the enemy sniper, who could then be attacked with artillery fire. He developed many of the modern techniques in sniping, including the use of spotting scopes and working in pairs, and using Kim's Game to train observational skills.[55]
In 1920, he wrote his account of his war time activities in his book Sniping in France, to which reference is still made by modern authors regarding the subject.[56][57][58]

The main sniper rifles used during the First World War were the German Mauser Gewehr 98; the British Pattern 1914 Enfield[59] and Lee–Enfield SMLE Mk III, the Canadian Ross rifle, the American M1903 Springfield,[60] the Italian M1891 Carcano, and the Russian M1891 Mosin–Nagant.
The Ottoman Empire initiated very effective sniper tactics against the British and ANZAC troops. The Allied forces on the Gallipoli Campaign come to believe that the Ottoman forces employed women snipers as well.[61]
World War II
[edit]
During the interbellum, most nations dropped their specialized sniper units, notably the Germans. Effectiveness and dangers of snipers once again came to the fore during the Spanish Civil War. The only nation that had specially trained sniper units during the 1930s was the Soviet Union. Soviet snipers were trained in their skills as marksmen, in using the terrain to hide themselves from the enemy and the ability to work alongside regular forces. This made the Soviet sniper training focus more on "normal" combat situations than those of other nations.
Snipers reappeared as important factors on the battlefield from the first campaign of World War II. During Germany's 1940 campaigns, lone, well-hidden French and British snipers were able to halt the German advance for a considerable amount of time. For example, during the pursuit to Dunkirk, British snipers were able to significantly delay the German infantry's advance. This prompted the British once again to increase training of specialized sniper units. Apart from marksmanship, British snipers were trained to blend in with the environment, often by using special camouflage clothing for concealment. However, because the British Army offered sniper training exclusively to officers and non-commissioned officers, the resulting small number of trained snipers in combat units considerably reduced their overall effectiveness.[11]
During the Winter War, Finnish snipers took a heavy toll of the invading Red Army. Simo Häyhä is credited with 505 confirmed kills,[62][63] most with the Finnish version of the iron-sighted bolt-action Mosin–Nagant. The most successful German sniper was Matthäus Hetzenauer with 345 confirmed kills. In Germany, kills are only confirmed in the presence of an officer, so Hetzenauer's estimated kills are many times higher. His longest confirmed kill was reported at 1,100 meters (1,200 yards).[64] Hetzenauer received the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross on 17 April 1945.[65]

One of the best known battles involving snipers, and the battle that made the Germans reinstate their specialized sniper training, was the Battle of Stalingrad. Their defensive position inside a city filled with rubble meant that Soviet snipers were able to inflict significant casualties on the Wehrmacht troops. Because of the nature of fighting in city rubble, snipers were very hard to spot and seriously dented the morale of the German attackers. The best known of these snipers was probably Vasily Zaytsev, featured in the novel War of the Rats and the subsequent film Enemy at the Gates.
German Scharfschützen were prepared before the war, equipped with Karabiner 98 and later Gewehr 43 rifles, but there were often not enough of these weapons available, and as such some were armed with captured scoped Mosin–Nagant 1891/30, SVT, Czech Mauser rifles or scoped Gewehr 98 from WW1. The Wehrmacht re-established its sniper training in 1942, drastically increasing the number of snipers per unit with the creation of an additional 31 sniper training companies by 1944. German snipers were at the time the only snipers in the world issued with purpose-manufactured sniping ammunition, known as the 'effect-firing' sS round.[66] The 'effect-firing' sS round featured an extra carefully measured propellant charge and seated a heavy 12.8 gram (198 gr) full-metal-jacketed boat-tail projectile of match-grade build quality, lacking usual features such as a seating ring to improve the already high ballistic coefficient of .584 (G1) further.[67] For aiming optics German snipers used the Zeiss Zielvier 4x (ZF39) telescopic sight which had bullet drop compensation in 50 m increments for ranges from 100 m up to 800 m or in some variations from 100 m up to 1000 m or 1200 m. There were ZF42, Zielfernrohr 43 (ZF 4), Zeiss Zielsechs 6x, Zeiss Zielacht 8x and other telescopic sights by various manufacturers like the Ajack 4x, Hensoldt Dialytan 4x and Kahles Heliavier 4x with similar features employed on German sniper rifles. Several different mountings produced by various manufacturers were used for mounting aiming optics to the rifles. In February 1945 the Zielgerät 1229 active infrared aiming device was issued for night sniping with the StG 44 assault rifle.
A total of 428,335 individuals received Red Army sniper training, including Soviet and non-Soviet partisans, with 9,534 receiving the sniping 'higher qualification'. During World War ІІ, over 100,000 women went through sniper training, of which more than two thousand later served in the army.[68] Some used the PTRD anti-tank rifle with an adapted scope as an early example of an anti-materiel rifle.

In the United States Armed Forces, sniper training was only very elementary and was mainly concerned with being able to hit targets over long distances. Snipers were required to be able to hit a body over 400 meters away, and a head over 200 meters away. There was almost no instruction in blending into the environment. Sniper training varied from place to place, resulting in wide variation in the qualities of snipers. The main reason the US did not extend sniper training beyond long-range shooting was the limited deployment of US soldiers until the Normandy Invasion. During the campaigns in North Africa and Italy, most fighting occurred in arid and mountainous regions where the potential for concealment was limited, in contrast to Western and Central Europe.[citation needed]

The U.S. Army's lack of familiarity with sniping tactics proved disastrous in Normandy and the campaign in Western Europe where they encountered well trained German snipers.[10][page needed] In Normandy, German snipers could remain hidden in the dense vegetation and were able to encircle American units, firing at them from all sides. The American and British forces were surprised by how near the German snipers could approach in safety and attack them, as well as by their ability to hit targets at up to 1,000m. A notable mistake made by inexperienced American soldiers was to lie down and wait when targeted by German snipers, allowing the snipers to pick them off one after another.[10][page needed] German snipers often infiltrated Allied lines, and when the front-lines moved, they would sometimes continue fighting from their sniping positions, refusing to surrender until their rations and munitions were exhausted.
Those tactics were also a consequence of changes in German enlistment. After several years of war and heavy losses on the Eastern Front, the German army was forced to rely more heavily on enlisting teenage soldiers. Due to lack of training in more complex group tactics, and thanks to rifle training provided by the Hitlerjugend, those soldiers were often used as autonomous left-behind snipers. While an experienced sniper would take a few lethal shots and retreat to a safer position, those young boys, due both to a disregard for their own safety and to lack of tactical experience would frequently remain in a concealed position and fight until they ran out of ammunition or were killed or wounded. While this tactic generally ended in the demise of the sniper, giving rise to the nickname "Suicide Boys" that was given to those soldiers, this irrational behavior proved quite disruptive to the Allied forces' progress. After World War II, many elements of German sniper training and doctrine were copied by other countries.[10]
In the Pacific War, the Empire of Japan also trained snipers. In the jungles of Asia and the Pacific Islands, snipers posed a serious threat to U.S., British, and Commonwealth troops. Japanese snipers were specially trained to use the environment to conceal themselves, using foliage on their uniforms and digging well-concealed hide-outs that often connected to small trenches. There was no need for long range accuracy because most combat in the jungle took place within a few hundred meters. Japanese snipers were known for their patience and ability to remain hidden for long periods, almost never leaving their carefully camouflaged sniping spots. This meant that whenever a sniper was in the area, the location of the sniper could sometimes only be determined after the sniper had fired a few shots. The Allies also used their own snipers in the Pacific, notably the U.S. Marines, who used M1903 Springfield rifles.
Common sniper rifles used during the Second World War include: the Soviet M1891/30 Mosin–Nagant and, to a lesser extent, the SVT-40; the German Mauser Karabiner 98k and Gewehr 43; the British Lee–Enfield No. 4 and Pattern 1914 Enfield; the Japanese Arisaka 97; the American M1903A4 Springfield and M1C Garand. The Italians trained few snipers and supplied them with a scoped Carcano Model 1891.
Training
[edit]
Military sniper training aims to teach a high degree of proficiency in camouflage and concealment, stalking, observation and map reading as well as precision marksmanship under various operational conditions. Trainees typically shoot thousands of rounds over a number of weeks, while learning these core skills.
Snipers are trained to squeeze the trigger straight back with the ball of their finger, to avoid jerking the gun sideways.[8][page needed] The most accurate position is prone, with a sandbag supporting the stock, and the stock's cheek-piece against the cheek.[8][page needed] In the field, a bipod can be used instead. Sometimes a sling is wrapped around the weak arm (or both) to reduce stock movement.[8] Some doctrines train a sniper to breathe deeply before shooting, then hold their lungs empty while they line up and take their shot.[8][page needed] Other doctrines assert that exhausting the lungs results in an accelerated heart rate and suggest only a partial exhale before firing. Some go further, teaching their snipers to shoot between heartbeats to minimize barrel motion.[8][page needed]
Accuracy
[edit]
| Cartridge | Maximum effective range (m)[69] |
|---|---|
| 5.56×45mm NATO (.223 Remington) |
300–500
|
| 7.62×51mm (.308 Winchester) |
800–1,000
|
| 7.62×54mmR | 800–1,000
|
| 7 mm Remington Magnum | 900–1,100
|
| .300 Winchester Magnum | 900–1,200
|
| .338 Lapua Magnum | 1,300–1,600
|
| .50 BMG (12.7×99mm NATO) |
1,500–2,000
|
| 12.7×108mm (Russian) | 1,500–2,000
|
| 14.5×114mm (Russian) | 1,900–2,300
|
| .408 Cheyenne Tactical | 1,500–2,400
|
The key to sniping is considered to be accuracy, which applies to both the weapon and the shooter. The weapon should be able to consistently place shots within tight tolerances.[8][page needed] The sniper in turn must use the weapon to accurately place shots under varying conditions.[8][page needed]
A sniper must have the ability to accurately estimate the various factors that influence a bullet's trajectory and point of impact, such as range to the target, wind direction, wind velocity, altitude and elevation of the sniper, and the target and ambient temperature. Mistakes in estimation compound over distance and can decrease lethality or cause a shot to miss completely.[8][page needed]
Snipers zero their weapons at a target range or in the field. This is the process of adjusting the scope so that the bullets' points-of-impact are at the point-of-aim (centre of scope or scope's cross-hairs) for a specific distance.[8][page needed] A rifle and scope should retain its zero as long as possible under all conditions to reduce the need to re-zero during missions.[8][page needed]
A sandbag can serve as a useful platform for shooting a sniper rifle, although any soft surface such as a rucksack will steady a rifle and contribute to consistency.[8][page needed] In particular, bipods help when firing from a prone position, and enable the firing position to be sustained for an extended period of time. Many police and military sniper rifles come equipped with an adjustable bipod.[8][page needed] Makeshift bipods known as shooting sticks can be constructed from items such as tree branches or ski poles.[8][page needed] Some military snipers use three-legged shooting sticks.
U.S. military
[edit]Servicemen volunteer for the rigorous sniper training and are accepted on the basis of their aptitude, physical ability, marksmanship, patience and mental stability. Military snipers may be further trained as forward air controllers (FACs) to direct air strikes or forward observers (FOs) to direct artillery or mortar fire.[70]
Russian Army
[edit]From 2011, the Russian armed forces have run newly developed sniper courses in military district training centres. In place of the Soviet practice of mainly squad sharpshooters, which were often designated during initial training (and of whom only few become snipers per se), these new army snipers are trained intensively for three months (for conscripts) or longer (for contract soldiers). The training program includes theory and practice of countersniper engagements, artillery spotting, and coordination of air support.[14] The first instructors are the graduates of the Solnechnogorsk sniper training centre.
The method of sniper deployment, according to the Ministry of Defence, is likely to be one three-platoon company at the brigade level, with one of the platoons acting independently and the other two supporting the battalions as needed.[71]
Targeting, tactics, and techniques
[edit]

Range finding
[edit]The range to the target is measured or estimated as precisely as conditions permit and correct range estimation becomes absolutely critical at long ranges, because a bullet travels with a curved trajectory and the sniper must compensate for this by aiming higher at longer distances.[8][page needed] If the exact distance is not known the sniper may compensate incorrectly and the bullet path may be too high or low. As an example, for a typical military sniping cartridge such as 7.62×51mm NATO (.308 Winchester) M118 Special Ball round this difference (or "drop") from 700 to 800 meters (770–870 yd) is 200 millimetres (7.9 in). This means that if the sniper incorrectly estimated the distance as 700 meters when the target was in fact 800 meters away, the bullet will be 200 millimeters lower than expected by the time it reaches the target.[8][page needed]
Laser rangefinders may be used, and range estimation is often the job of both parties in a team.[72] One useful method of range finding without a laser rangefinder is comparing the height of the target (or nearby objects) to their size on the mil dot scope, or taking a known distance and using some sort of measure (utility poles, fence posts) to determine the additional distance. The average human head is 150 millimeters (5.9 in) in width, average human shoulders are 500 millimeters (20 in) apart and the average distance from a person's pelvis to the top of their head is 1,000 millimeters (39 in).
To determine the range to a target without a laser rangefinder, the sniper may use the mil dot reticle on a scope to accurately find the range. Mil dots are used like a slide rule to measure the height of a target, and if the height is known, the range can be as well. The height of the target (in yards) ×1000, divided by the height of the target (in mils), gives the range in yards; alternatively in metric the height of the target in centimeters ×10, divided by the height of the target in mils, gives the range in meters.[73] It is important to note that angular mil (mil) is only an approximation of a milliradian and different organizations use different approximations. This can vary as mil dot sizing and spacing changes. The USMC standard mil dot is sized at .25 mil based on a definition of 1 mil (that is, 1 milliradian) equals 3.438 MOA (minute of arc, or, equivalently, minute of angle) which is typically rounded off to 3.44 MOA for ease of use; this format facilitates estimating a target's height in inches and providing the resulting distance in yards. In comparison, the US Army standard mil dot is sized at .22 (often rounded to .2 for ease of use) mil based on a definition of 1 mil equals 3.6 MOA, which facilitates estimating a target's height in inches and providing the resulting distance in meters.[73]
At longer ranges, bullet drop plays a significant role in targeting.[8][page needed] The effect can be estimated from a chart, which may be memorized or taped to the rifle, although some scopes come with Bullet Drop Compensator (BDC) systems that only require the range be dialed in. These are tuned to both a specific class of rifle and specific ammunition. Every bullet type and load will have different ballistics. .308 Federal 175 grain (11.3 g) BTHP match shoots at 2,600 ft/s (790 m/s). Zeroed at 100 yards (100 m), a 16.2 MOA adjustment would have to be made to hit a target at 600 yards (500 m). If the same bullet was shot with 168 grain (10.9 g), a 17.1 MOA adjustment would be necessary.[8][page needed]
Shooting uphill or downhill is confusing for many because gravity does not act perpendicular to the direction the bullet is traveling. Thus, gravity must be divided into its component vectors. Only the fraction of gravity equal to the cosine of the angle of fire with respect to the horizon affects the rate of fall of the bullet, with the remainder adding or subtracting negligible velocity to the bullet along its trajectory. To find the correct zero, the sniper multiplies the actual distance to the range by this fraction and aims as if the target were that distance away. For example, a sniper who observes a target 500 meters away at a 45-degree angle downhill would multiply the range by the cosine of 45 degrees, which is 0.707. The resulting distance will be 353 meters. This number is equal to the horizontal distance to the target. All other values, such as windage, time-to-target, impact velocity, and energy will be calculated based on the actual range of 500 meters. Recently, a small device known as a cosine indicator has been developed.[8][page needed] This device is clamped to the tubular body of the telescopic sight, and gives an indicative readout in numerical form as the rifle is aimed up or down at the target.[8][page needed] This is translated into a figure used to compute the horizontal range to the target.
Windage plays a significant role, with the effect increasing with wind speed or the distance of the shot. The slant of visible convections near the ground can be used to estimate crosswinds, and correct the point of aim. All adjustments for range, wind, and elevation can be performed by aiming off the target, called "holding over" or Kentucky windage.[8][page needed] Alternatively, the scope can be adjusted so that the point of aim is changed to compensate for these factors, sometimes referred to as "dialing in". The shooter must remember to return the scope to zeroed position. Adjusting the scope allows for more accurate shots, because the cross-hairs can be aligned with the target more accurately, but the sniper must know exactly what differences the changes will have on the point-of-impact at each target range.[8][page needed]
For moving targets, the point-of-aim is ahead of the target in the direction of movement. Known as "leading" the target, the amount of "lead" depends on the speed and angle of the target's movement as well as the distance to the target. For this technique, holding over is the preferred method.[8][page needed] Anticipating the behavior of the target is necessary to accurately place the shot.[8][page needed]
Hide sites and hiding techniques
[edit]
The term "hide site" refers to a covered and concealed position from which a sniper and his team can conduct surveillance or fire at targets. A good hide conceals and camouflages the sniper effectively, provides cover from enemy fire and allows a wide view of the surrounding area.
The main purpose of ghillie suits and hide sites is to break up the outline of a person with a rifle.
Many snipers use ghillie suits to hide and stay hidden. Ghillie suits vary according to the terrain into which the sniper wishes to blend. For example, in dry grassland the sniper will typically wear a ghillie suit covered in dead grass.
Shot placement
[edit]Shot placement, which is where on the body the sniper is aiming, varies with the type of sniper. Military snipers, who generally do not shoot at targets at less than 300 m (330 yd), usually attempt body shots, aiming at the chest. These shots depend on tissue damage, organ trauma, and blood loss to kill the target. Body shots are used because the chest is a larger target.
Police snipers, who generally shoot at much shorter distances, may attempt a more precise shot at particular parts of body or particular devices: in one incident in 2007 in Marseille, a GIPN sniper took a shot from 80 m (87 yd) at the pistol of a police officer threatening to commit suicide, destroying the weapon and preventing the police officer from killing himself.[74]
In high-risk or hostage situations where a suspect is threatening to imminently kill a hostage, police snipers may take head shots to ensure an instant kill. The snipers aim for the medulla oblongata to sever the spine from the brain. While this is believed to prevent the target from reflexively firing their weapon, there is evidence that any brain-hit is sufficient.[75]
Target acquisition
[edit]Snipers are trained for the detection, identification, and location of a targeted soldier in sufficient detail to permit the effective employment of lethal and non-lethal means. Since most kills in modern warfare are by other crew-served weapons, reconnaissance is one of the most effective uses of snipers.[citation needed] They use their aerobic conditioning, infiltration skills and excellent long-distance observation equipment (optical scopes) and tactics to approach and observe the enemy. In this role, their rules of engagement typically let them shoot at high-value targets of opportunity, such as enemy officers.
The targets may be personnel or high-value materiel (military equipment and weapons) but most often they target the most important enemy personnel such as officers or specialists (e.g. communications operators) so as to cause maximum disruption to enemy operations. Other personnel they might target include those who pose an immediate threat to the sniper, like dog handlers, who are often employed in a search for snipers. A sniper identifies officers by their appearance and behavior such as symbols of rank, talking to radio operators, sitting as a passenger in a car, sitting in a car with a large radio antenna, having military servants, binoculars/map cases or talking and moving position more frequently. If possible, snipers shoot in descending order by rank, or if rank is unavailable, they shoot to disrupt communications.
Some rifles, such as the Denel NTW-20 and Vidhwansak, are designed for a purely anti-materiel (AM) role, e.g. shooting turbine disks of parked aircraft, missile guidance packages, expensive optics, and the bearings, tubes or wave guides of radar sets. A sniper equipped with the correct rifle can target radar dishes, water containers, the engines of vehicles, and any number of other targets. Other rifles, such as the .50 caliber rifles produced by Barrett and McMillan, are not designed exclusively as AM rifles, but are often employed in such a way, providing the range and power needed for AM applications in a lightweight package compared to most traditional AM rifles. Other calibers, such as the .408 Cheyenne Tactical and the .338 Lapua Magnum, are designed to be capable of limited AM application, but are ideally suited as long range anti-personnel rounds.
Relocating
[edit]Often in situations with multiple targets, snipers will use relocation. After firing a few shots from a certain position, snipers move unseen to another location before the enemy can determine where they are and mount a counter-attack. Snipers will frequently use this tactic to their advantage, creating an atmosphere of chaos and confusion. In other, rarer situations, relocation is used to eliminate the factor of wind.
Sound masking
[edit]As sniper rifles are often extremely powerful and consequently very loud, it is common for snipers to use a technique known as sound masking. When employed by a highly skilled marksman, this tactic can be used as a substitute for a noise suppressor. In this technique, very loud sounds in the environment, such as artillery shells air bursting or claps of thunder, are used to mask the sound of the shot. This technique is frequently used in clandestine operations, infiltration tactics, and guerrilla warfare.
Psychological warfare
[edit]
Due to the surprise nature of sniper fire, high lethality of aimed shots and frustration at the inability to locate and counterattack snipers, sniper tactics have a significant negative effect on morale. Extensive use of sniper tactics can be used to induce constant stress and fear in opposing forces, making them afraid to move about or leave cover. In many ways, the psychological impact imposed by snipers is quite similar to those of landmines, booby-traps, and IEDs (constant threat, high "per event" lethality, inability to strike back).[76][77][78]
Historically, captured snipers are often summarily executed. This happened during World War I[79] and World War II;[80] for example, the second Biscari Massacre was when 36 suspected snipers were lined up and executed on 14 July 1943.
As a result, if a sniper is in imminent danger of capture, he may discard any items (sniper rifle, laser rangefinder, etc.) which might indicate his status as a sniper. The risk of captured snipers being summarily executed is explicitly referred to in Chapter 6 of US Army doctrine document FM 3-060.11 entitled "SNIPER AND COUNTERSNIPER TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES":
Historically, units that suffered heavy and continual casualties from urban sniper fire and were frustrated by their inability to strike back effectively often have become enraged. Such units may overreact and violate the laws of land warfare concerning the treatment of captured snipers. This tendency is magnified if the unit has been under the intense stress of urban combat for an extended time. It is vital that commanders and leaders at all levels understand the law of land warfare and understand the psychological pressures of urban warfare. It requires strong leadership and great moral strength to prevent soldiers from releasing their anger and frustration on captured snipers or civilians suspected of sniping at them.[citation needed]
The negative reputation and perception of snipers can be traced back to the American Revolution, when American "Marksmen" intentionally targeted British officers, an act considered uncivilized by the British Army at the time (this reputation was cemented during the Battle of Saratoga, when Benedict Arnold allegedly ordered his marksmen to target British General Simon Fraser, an act that won the battle and French support).[9][page needed] The British side used specially selected sharpshooters as well, often German Hessians.[9][page needed]
Counter-sniper tactics
[edit]The occurrence of sniper warfare has led to the evolution of many counter-sniper tactics in modern military strategies. These aim to reduce the damage caused by a sniper to an army, which can often be harmful to both combat capabilities and morale.
The risk of damage to a chain of command can be reduced by removing or concealing features that would otherwise indicate an officer's rank. Modern armies tend to avoid saluting officers in the field, and eliminate rank insignia on battle dress uniforms. Officers can seek cover through mundane actions such as reading maps or using radios.
Friendly snipers can be used to hunt the enemy sniper. Besides direct observation, defending forces can use other techniques. These include calculating the trajectory of a bullet by triangulation. Traditionally, triangulation of a sniper's position was done manually, though radar-based technology recently became available. Once located, the defenders can attempt to approach the sniper from cover and overwhelm them. The United States military is funding a project known as RedOwl (Robot Enhanced Detection Outpost With Lasers), which uses laser and acoustic sensors to determine the exact direction from which a sniper round has been fired.[81]
The more rounds fired by a sniper, the greater the chance the target has of locating him. Thus, attempts to draw fire are often made, sometimes by offering a helmet slightly out of concealment, a tactic successfully employed in the Winter War by the Finns known as "Kylmä-Kalle" (Cold Charlie).[82] They used a shop mannequin or other doll dressed as a tempting target, such as an officer. The doll was then presented as if it were a real man sloppily covering himself. Usually, Soviet snipers were unable to resist the temptation of an apparently easy kill. Once the angle where the bullet came from was determined, a large caliber gun, such as a Lahti L-39 "Norsupyssy" ("Elephant rifle") anti-tank rifle was fired at the sniper to kill him.
Other tactics include directing artillery or mortar fire onto suspected sniper positions, the use of smoke screens, placing tripwire-operated munitions, mines, or other booby-traps near suspected sniper positions. Even dummy trip-wires can be placed to hamper sniper movement. If anti-personnel mines are unavailable, it is possible to improvise booby-traps by connecting trip-wires to hand grenades, smoke grenades or flares. Though these may not kill a sniper, they will reveal their location. Booby-trap devices can be placed near likely sniper hides, or along the probable routes to and from positions. Knowledge of sniper field-craft will assist in this task.
The use of canine units had been very successful, especially during the Vietnam War.[83]
Irregular and asymmetric warfare
[edit]
The use of sniping (in the sense of shooting at relatively long range from a concealed position) to murder came to public attention in a number of sensational U.S. criminal cases, including the Austin sniper incident of 1966 (Charles Whitman), the John F. Kennedy assassination (Lee Harvey Oswald), and the Beltway sniper attacks of late 2002 (Lee Boyd Malvo). However, these incidents usually do not involve the range or skill of military snipers; in all three cases the perpetrators had U.S. military training, but in other specialties. News reports will often (inaccurately) use the term sniper to describe anyone shooting with a rifle at another person.[84]
Sniping has been used in asymmetric warfare situations, for example in the Northern Ireland Troubles, where in 1972, the bloodiest year of the conflict, the majority of the soldiers killed were shot by concealed IRA riflemen.[85] There were some instances in the early 1990s of British soldiers and RUC personnel being shot with .50 caliber Barrett rifles by sniper teams collectively known as the South Armagh sniper.[86]
The sniper is particularly suited to combat environments where one side is at a disadvantage. A careful sniping strategy can use a few individuals and resources to thwart the movement or other progress of a much better equipped or larger force. Sniping enables a few persons to instil terror in a much larger regular force – regardless of the size of the force the snipers are attached to. It is widely accepted that sniping, while effective in specific instances, is much more effective as a broadly deployed psychological attack or as a force-multiplier.[87][88][89]
War in Iraq
[edit]In 2003, the U.S.-led multinational coalition composed of primarily U.S. and UK troops occupied Iraq and attempted to establish a new government in the country. However, shortly after the initial invasion, violence against coalition forces and among various sectarian groups led to asymmetric warfare with the Iraqi insurgency and civil war between many Sunni and Shia Iraqis.

Through to November 2005 the Army had attributed 28 of 2,100 U.S. deaths to enemy snipers.[90] In 2006, it was claimed that one insurgent sniper, "Juba", had shot up to 37 American soldiers.[91]
Training materials obtained by U.S. intelligence had among its tips for shooting U.S. troops, "Killing doctors and chaplains is suggested as a means of psychological warfare.", suggesting that those casualties would demoralize entire units.[90][92]
Arab Spring
[edit]Sniper activity was reported during the Arab Spring civil unrest in Libya in 2011, both from anti-governmental[93] and pro-governmental[94] supporters, and in Syria at least from pro-government[95][96] forces.
Notable military marksmen and snipers
[edit]
Even before firearms were available, soldiers such as archers were specially trained as elite marksmen.
17th century
[edit]- Lord Brooke, who represented the Parliamentarians in the English Civil War, was the first recorded British sniper victim, killed by a Royalist soldier hiding in a bell tower in Lichfield.
18th century
[edit]- Timothy Murphy (American Revolutionary War) – killed British General Simon Fraser during the pivotal Battles of Saratoga, hampering the British advance which resulted in their defeat.[9][page needed]
- Patrick Ferguson (American Revolutionary War) – developer of the world's first breech-loaded military rifle (which advanced sniping and sharpshooting tactics), fought with his Corps of Riflemen (recruited from the 6th and 14th Foot) at the Battle of Brandywine, where he may have passed up a chance to shoot George Washington.[97]
19th century
[edit]- Napoleonic Wars – Use of Marine sharpshooters in mast tops was common in navies of the period, and Admiral Nelson's death at Trafalgar is attributed to the actions of French sharpshooters. The British Army developed the concept of directed fire (as opposed to massive unaimed volleys) and formed Rifle regiments, notably the 95th and the 60th who wore green jackets instead of the usual redcoats. Fighting as Skirmishers, usually in pairs, and trusted to choose their own targets, they wrought havoc amongst the French during the Peninsular War.
- British Rifleman Thomas Plunkett (Peninsular War) – shot French General Colbert and one of his aides at a range of between 200 and 600 metres (219 and 656 yd) using a Baker rifle.[98]
- Colonel Hiram Berdan (American Civil War) – commanded 1st and 2nd US Sharpshooters, who were Union marksmen trained and equipped with the .52 caliber Sharps Rifle. It has been claimed that Berdan's units killed more enemies than any other in the Union Army.[9][page needed]
- Jack Hinson (American Civil War) recorded 36 "kills" on his custom-made .50 caliber Kentucky long rifle with iron sights.[99]
- During the American Civil War, an unidentified Confederate sniper shot Major General John Sedgwick during the Battle of Spotsylvania Court House probably with a British Whitworth target rifle at the then-incredible distance of minimum 730 metres (798 yd). Ben Powell of the 12th South Carolina claimed credit, although his account has been discounted because the general he shot at with a Whitworth rifled musket was mounted, probably Brig Gen. William H. Morris. Union troops from the 6th Vermont claim to have shot an unidentified sharpshooter as they crossed the fields seeking revenge.[100] The shooting of Sedgewick caused administrative delays in the Union's attack and led to Confederate victory. Sedgwick ignored advice to take cover, his last words according to urban legend being, "They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist-", whereupon he was shot. In reality, he was shot a few minutes later.[9][page needed]
- Major Frederick Russell Burnham – assassinated Mlimo, the Ndebele religious leader, in his cave in Matobo Hills, Rhodesia, effectively ending the Second Matabele War (1896).[101] Burnham started as a cowboy and Indian tracker in the American Old West, but he left the United States to scout in Africa and went on to command the British Army Scouts in the Second Boer War. For his ability to track, even at night, the Africans dubbed him, He-who-sees-in-the-dark,[102] but in the press he became more widely known as England's American Scout.[103]
20th century
[edit]
- Billy Sing (World War I) – An Australian sniper with at least 150 confirmed kills during the Gallipoli Campaign; he may have had close to 300 kills in total at Gallipoli,[107] and went on to fight at the Western Front.
- Francis Pegahmagabow (World War I) – Native Canadian sniper credited with 378 kills, and an unknown number of unconfirmed kills. He only took credit for kills when they were verified by an officer.[108]
- Finnish Lance Corporal Simo Häyhä, nicknamed "White Death",[104] was a sniper during the Winter War and is regarded by many as the most effective sniper in the history of warfare, being credited with killing up to 705 Soviet soldiers (505 sniper kills, and estimated 200 sub-machine gun kills) in fewer than 100 days.[104][105][106] Häyhä used a White Guard M/28 "Pystykorva" or "Spitz", variant of the Russian Mosin–Nagant rifle.[104]
- Mikhail Ilyich Surkov has been said to have killed 702 enemy troops, Vladimir Gavrilovich Salbiev had 601 confirmed kills, Vasilij Kvachantiradze had 534, Akhat Akhmetyanov and Ivan Sidorenko had around 500.[109]
- Lieutenant Lyudmila Pavlichenko (World War II) was a female Soviet sniper with 309 confirmed kills, making her the most successful female sniper in history.[110]
- Junior Lieutenant Vasily Zaytsev (World War II) was credited with killing about 200 German soldiers during the Battle of Stalingrad;[111] he is portrayed in the film Enemy at the Gates and in the book War of the Rats. Both are fictionalized accounts.
- Semyon Nomokonov killed 367 persons, including a general.[109]
- Gefreiter (Private) Matthäus Hetzenauer of the 3rd Mountain Division (German: 3. Gebirgs-Division) was an Austrian sniper in World War II who was credited with 345 confirmed kills[112] on the Eastern Front, the most successful in the Wehrmacht.
- Helmut Wirnsberger – Austrian sniper, who has served in 3. Gebirgs-Division during WW II and credited 64 confirmed kills.[113]
- Chinese Sergeant Tung Chih Yeh claimed to have shot and killed over 100 Imperial Japanese Army (IJA) soldiers using a Chiang Kai-Shek rifle around Yangtze during the Second Sino-Japanese War.[114]
- Zhang Taofang (Chinese: 张桃芳; Traditional Chinese: 張桃芳; Wade–Giles: Zhang Tao-fang) was a Chinese soldier during the Korean War. He is credited with 214 confirmed kills in 32 days without using a sniper magnifying scope.[citation needed]
- Clive Hulme was a New Zealand recipient of the Victoria Cross, the highest and most prestigious award for gallantry in the face of the enemy that can be awarded to British and Commonwealth forces. He is credited with stalking and killing 33 German snipers in the Battle of Crete.[115]
- Ian Robertson served as a sniper with Australia's 3RAR after World War II. He became one of the most effective snipers during the Korean War, during which in one instance he killed 30 soldiers in a single morning.[116]
- Roza Shanina was a Soviet sniper during World War II credited with 59 confirmed kills, including twelve soldiers during the Battle of Vilnius.[117]
- Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock achieved 93 confirmed kills during the Vietnam War but believed to have over 200 unconfirmed kills. With a telescopic-scoped .50 caliber M2 Browning heavy machine gun, he set a world record for the longest recorded sniper kill at 2,286 m (2,500 yd) which stood for 35 years until 2002.[118][119]
- Chuck Mawhinney (Vietnam War) – 103 confirmed and 216 probable kills.[120]
- Adelbert Waldron (Vietnam War) – achieved 109 confirmed kills.[121]
- Master Sgt. Gary Gordon and Sgt. First Class Randy Shughart (Somalia: Operation Gothic Serpent) – were Delta Force snipers who were awarded the Medal of Honor for their attempt to protect the injured crew of a downed helicopter during the Battle of Mogadishu.[122] This action was later dramatized in the film Black Hawk Down.
21st century
[edit]- British Army CoH Craig Harrison of the Household Cavalry successfully killed two Taliban machine gunners south of Musa Qala in Helmand Province in Afghanistan in November 2009 at a range of 2,475 m (2,707 yd), using an L115A3 Long Range Rifle rifle chambered in .338 Lapua Magnum. These were the longest recorded and confirmed sniper kills to that time.[123][124]
- Canadian Master Corporal Arron Perry, formerly of the PPCLI (Operation Anaconda, Afghanistan) – briefly held the record for the longest recorded and confirmed sniper kill at 2,310 m (2,526 yd) in 2002, eclipsing U.S. Marine Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock's previous record established in 1967. Perry used a .50 caliber (12.7 mm) McMillan TAC-50 rifle. A few days later, a new record was achieved by his teammate during the same operation.[125]
- Canadian Corporal Rob Furlong, formerly of the PPCLI (Operation Anaconda, Afghanistan) – achieved a recorded and confirmed sniper kill at 2,430 m (2,657 yd) in 2002 using a .50 caliber (12.7 mm) McMillan TAC-50 rifle.[125]
- U.S. Navy Chief Chris Kyle of SEAL Team Three, during four deployments to Iraq between 2003 and 2009, had 255 kills, 160 of which are confirmed by the United States Department of Defense, making him the deadliest marksman in US military history. During the Second Battle of Fallujah alone, when U.S. Marines fought running battles in the streets with several thousand insurgents, he killed 40 enemy personnel. For his deadly record as a marksman during his deployment to Ramadi, the insurgents named him 'Al-Shaitan Ramad' – the Devil of Rahmadi – and put a $20,000 bounty on his head. Kyle was honorably discharged in 2009, and on 2 February 2013, was murdered at a shooting range along with another victim in Texas by a Marine veteran suffering from post traumatic stress disorder. Subject of the movie American Sniper.
- U.S. Marine Corps Staff Sergeant Steve Reichert – Killed an Iraqi insurgent and possibly injured two more hiding behind a brick wall with a shot from 1 mile in Lutayfiyah, Iraq on 9 April 2004. Reichert was using a Barrett M82A3 .50 BMG rifle loaded with Raufoss Mk 211 multipurpose rounds. During the same engagement Reichert killed an Iraqi machine gunner pinning down a squad of Marines from a distance of 1,614 m (1,765 yd).[126]
- U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Jim Gilliland – Previously held the record for the longest recorded confirmed kill with a 7.62×51mm NATO rifle at 1,250 m (1,367 yd) with a M24, killing an Iraqi insurgent sniper in Ramadi, Iraq on 27 September 2005.[127]
- U.S. Army SGT Christopher Dale Abbott: As part of a U.S. Army counter-IED team in Iraq in 2007–2008, Abbott recorded 22 confirmed kills with an M24 7.62×51mm rifle for a period of only 7 months before being injured and sent out of theater. He and his team were tasked with seeking out insurgents placing IEDs along frequently used supply routes.[citation needed]
- U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Timothy L. Kellner – As of 2010[update], Kellner is still active as a sniper in the U.S. Army, with 78 confirmed kills during the Iraq War and 3 in Haiti.[128]
- Canadian Master Corporal Graham Ragsdale, using a 7.62mm C-3, registered 20 confirmed kills over ten days during Operation Anaconda.
- Sri Lankan Army sniper Corporal I.R. Premasiri, alias "Nero", of the 5th Battalion in the Gajaba Regiment has 180 confirmed Tamil Tigers kills.[129]
- Iraqi insurgent "Juba", a sniper who features in several propaganda videos. Juba has allegedly shot 37 American soldiers, although whether Juba is a real individual is unknown. He may be a constructed composite of a number of insurgent snipers.[130]
- Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG of the Australian Special Air Service Regiment was awarded the Medal of Gallantry for his actions in 2006 during Operation Perth in the Chora Valley of Oruzgan Province, Afghanistan. In that action, patrol sniper Roberts-Smith prevented an outnumbered patrol from being overrun by anti-coalition militia with sniper fire.[131] Subsequently, in early 2011, he became the second Australian to be awarded the Victoria Cross on Operation Slipper in Afghanistan. During the Shah Wali Kot Offensive in June 2010, having provided sniper over-watch for ground forces from a helicopter with an M14 EBR rifle, Roberts-Smith was placed into a firefight by helicopter and subsequently eliminated machine gun positions.[132]
- U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Justin Morales – As part of the U.S. Army CIST (Counter Insurgent Sniper Team) in Iraq, he recorded 27 confirmed kills with an M24 7.62×51mm NATO rifle. From 2005 to 2006, Morales and his team in Balad, Iraq were tasked with seeking out insurgents placing IEDs along supply routes.[citation needed]
- During May 2017 in Iraq, a Canadian Special Operations Forces Command Joint Task Force 2 sniper, using a McMillan Tac-50 sniper rifle set a new world record for the longest confirmed kill shot at a distance of 3,540 m (3,871 yd).[133] The shot was fired from a high-rise building and the bullet travelled for "under 10 seconds" before hitting the target, an ISIS insurgent.[133]
- Popular Mobilization Forces volunteer Abu Tahsin al-Salhi was a Shia Iraqi veteran sniper with 350 claimed ISIS kills.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "What is a Sniper in the Army & Other Military Branches? What is the Longest Sniper Rifle Shot? – Shooting Range Industries". Shooting Range Industries. 31 July 2017. Retrieved 23 November 2017.
- ^ a b c d e Pegler, Martin (2004). Out of nowhere : a history of the military sniper. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. p. 16. ISBN 1-84176-854-5. OCLC 56654780.
- ^ a b c d "Snipe". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
- ^ In the Edinburgh Advertiser, 23 June 1801, can be found the following quote in a piece about the North British Militia; "This Regiment has several Field Pieces, and two companies of Sharp Shooters, which are very necessary in the modern Stile of War".
- ^ a b c d e Pegler, Martin (2004). Out of nowhere : a history of the military sniper. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. p. 30. ISBN 1-84176-854-5. OCLC 56654780.
- ^ Pegler, Martin (2004). Out of nowhere : a history of the military sniper. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. p. 14. ISBN 1-84176-854-5. OCLC 56654780.
- ^ Plaster 2007
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab Plaster 1993
- ^ a b c d e f Senich 1988
- ^ a b c d e f g Senich 1982
- ^ a b Shore 1988, p. 316
- ^ Freigegeben ab 12 Jahren (2 January 2008). "Snipers during the First and Second World Wars": info taken from: Zeitgeschichte – Spezialeinheiten im Zweiten Weltkrieg: Scharfschützen (Documentary film) (in German). EMS GmbH. Event occurs at 57mins. EAN: 4020974153959.
- ^ Valdes, Robert (11 June 2004). "How Military Snipers Work". HowStuffWorks.
- ^ a b Shah, Hiren (12 September 2016). "The Sniper and the Spotter". Fast Times in Tech | Blog by Hiren Shah. Retrieved 24 March 2019.
- ^ a b "The Sniper, SWAT Teams Grow in Number". CBS News. 25 January 2001. Archived from the original on 4 November 2012. Retrieved 4 May 2008.
- ^ "Gastonia Police Department – Sniper School". Archived from the original on 22 July 2012. Retrieved 4 May 2008.
- ^ "Police sniper watches from roof, Sydney". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 6 September 2007. Retrieved 4 May 2008.
- ^ Owens, Bob (3 February 2015). "Remembering "The Shot Seen 'Round The World"". bearingarms.com.
- ^ Scanlon, James J. (2010). "The Columbus Ohio Police S.W.A.T. Platoon 28th Anniversary". Archived from the original on 6 December 2003. Retrieved 7 May 2010.
- ^ Luo, Lance (19 November 2023). "SBU sniper claims world record after successful 3.8 km shot". Yahoo News. Retrieved 19 November 2023.
- ^ Fife, Robert (21 June 2017). "Canadian elite special forces sniper sets record-breaking kill shot in Iraq". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
- ^ Smith, Michael (2 May 2010) "Hotshot sniper in one-and-a-half mile double kill". The Sunday Times. (subscription required)
- ^ a b Arnold, Adam (3 May 2010). "Super sniper kills Taliban 1.5 miles away". Sky News. Sky UK. Archived from the original on 14 May 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
Conditions were perfect, no wind, mild weather, clear visibility.
- ^ "QuickTarget Unlimited Lapua Edition exterior ballistics software". 29 June 2009. Archived from the original on 29 June 2009. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
- ^ "Lapua: Downloads". 29 June 2009. Archived from the original on 29 June 2009.
- ^ "L96 Sniper Rifle and L115A3 Long Range Rifle". Mod.uk. 20 February 2007. Archived from the original on 7 June 2011. Retrieved 1 June 2011.
- ^ "Weather Underground History for Kandahar, Afghanistan – Month of November 2009". Wunderground.com. 21 May 2011. Retrieved 1 June 2011.
- ^ "Brit sniper makes double-kill at 1.54 miles with .338 Lapua Mag". accurateshooter.com. 3 May 2010. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
- ^ Minoru Anzai. 砲術 その秘伝と達人. Japan: 雄山閣出版. p. 51. ASIN B000JACPJK.
- ^ E. C. B. M. (October–December 1925). "Sniping". Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research. 4 (18): 213. JSTOR 44227525.
- ^ Robert Leckie (24 August 2010). George Washington's War: The Saga of the American Revolution. New York: HarperCollins. p. 513. ISBN 978-0-06-201536-5. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ Gregory Mast; Hans Halberstadt (January 2007). To Be a Military Sniper. Zenith Imprint. p. 18. ISBN 978-0-7603-3002-9. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ Alexander Rose (21 October 2008). American Rifle: A Biography. New York: Random House Publishing Group. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-440-33809-3. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ Andy Dougan (1 June 2006). Through the Crosshairs: A History of Snipers. Da Capo Press, Incorporated. p. 47. ISBN 978-0-7867-1773-6. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ "1800 The Forming of the Regiment". Green Jackets. Archived from the original on 9 April 2016. Retrieved 18 June 2016.
- ^ Edgerton, Robert B. (2010). The Fall of the Asante Empire: The Hundred-Year War For Africa's Gold Coast. Simon and Schuster. p. 54. ISBN 9781451603736.
- ^ "Whitworth Rifle". American Civil War Stories.
- ^ "Minutes of proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Volume 19" By Institution of Civil Engineers (Great Britain)
- ^ Pegler, Martin (2011). Out of Nowhere: A history of the military sniper, from the Sharpshooter to Afghanistan. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 9781849088756. Retrieved 18 November 2013.[permanent dead link]
- ^ "Minutes of proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers". Institution of Civil Engineers (Great Britain), 1860, p.12
- ^ Rhea, Gordon C. (1997). The Battles for Spotsylvania Court House and the Road to Yellow Tavern, May 7–12, 1864. Louisiana: Louisiana State University Press. p. 94. ISBN 978-0-8071-2136-8. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ David Eicher (14 March 2005). Civil War Battlefields: A Touring Guide. Taylor Trade Publications. pp. 73–75. ISBN 978-1-58979-181-7. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ John F. Cummings III (June 2011). Spotsylvania County. Arcadia Publishing. p. 36. ISBN 978-0-7385-8246-7. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ Gallagher, Gary (1 February 2010). Spotsylvania Campaign. North Carolina: UNC Press Books. p. 297. ISBN 978-0-8078-9837-6. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ a b Plaster 2007, p. 5
- ^ a b Copper, Jeff (July 1994). "Cooper's Scout rifle a gun for all reasons: whether it be for hunting or individual combat, this concept may just be the ultimate dual-purpose rifle". Guns & Ammo. 38 (7): 74. ISSN 0017-5684.
- ^ WARD, Thomas (9 August 2010). Incomplete Works of an Incomplete Soul. THOMAS WARD. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-557-51127-3.
- ^ "Lovat Scouts, Sharpshooters – United Kingdom". 20 March 2020.
- ^ Hesketh-Prichard, H.V. (1994). Sniping in France. Leo Cooper. pp. Chapter XI. ISBN 0-85052-426-1.
- ^ a b "Trench Loopholes, Le Linge". 16 March 2014.
- ^ Parker 1924, pp. 211–212
- ^ Parker, Eric. Hesketh Prichard. p. 212.
- ^ Hesketh-Prichard, H.V. (1994). Sniping in France. Leo Cooper. pp. Chapter 5. ISBN 0-85052-426-1.
- ^ Hesketh-Prichard, H.V. (1994). Sniping in France. Leo Cooper. pp. Chapter 2. ISBN 0-85052-426-1.
- ^ Prichard & Vernon 2004, pp. 10, 19
- ^ Prichard, Hesketh Vernon Hesketh (19 April 1920). "Sniping in France : with notes on the scientific training of scouts, observers, and snipers". New York : E.P. Dutton – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Gilbert, Adrian (1996). Sniper : the skills, the weapons, and the experiences (St. Martin's ed.). New York: St. Martin's Paperbacks. p. 45. ISBN 0-312-95766-1. OCLC 34124115.
- ^ Brookesmith, Peter (2006). Sniper : training, techniques and weapons (2nd ed.). New York: Thomas Dunne Books. p. 77. ISBN 0-312-36290-0. OCLC 122381816.
- ^ "Sniping in France by Major H. Hesketh-Prichard (1920) p. 239" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 November 2011.
- ^ "Doughboy Sniper Rifles". www.americanrifleman.org.
- ^ "Turks Introduce Battlefied Innovation – Sniping |".
- ^ "The Sniper Log Book—World War II". Snipercentral.com. Retrieved 1 June 2011.
- ^ Rayment, Sean (30 April 2006). "The long view". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 30 March 2009.
- ^ Yee, Gary (4 May 2022). World War II Snipers: The Men, Their Guns, Their Stories. Casemate. p. 112. ISBN 978-1-63624-099-2.
- ^ Scherzer, Veit (2007). Die Ritterkreuzträger: die Inhaber des Ritterkreuzes des Eisernen Kreuzes 1939 von Heer, Luftwaffe, Kriegsmarine, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm sowie mit Deutschland verbündeter Streitkräfte nach den Unterlagen des Bundesarchivs (2. Aufl. mit Berichtigungen, Erg. und Neueinträgen ed.). Ranis/Jena: Scherzers Militaer-Verl. p. 388. ISBN 978-3-938845-17-2.
- ^ Peter R. Senich: German Sniper 1914–45, Page 91
- ^ "Geschoß s.S. Beschuß". Archived from the original on 19 February 2012. Retrieved 6 February 2011.
- ^ Forty, Simon (4 January 2024). The Soviet Infantryman on the Eastern Front. Casemate. pp. 46–7. ISBN 978-1-63624-364-1.
- ^ "ATK.com" (PDF). ATK.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 August 2007. Retrieved 1 June 2011.
- ^ Neville, Leigh (25 August 2016). Modern Snipers. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 67. ISBN 978-1-4728-1535-4.
- ^ Gavrilov, Yuri "Take a bead: Army gets sniper schools" Rossiiskaya gazeta 19 October 2011.
- ^ Plaster 2006, p. 346
- ^ a b "Mastering Mildots". Sniper Central. 17 March 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2025.
- ^ Pardini, Sèverine (2 August 2007). "J'ai fait mouche sur son arme à 80 mètres pour le sauver (ENG:I hit his weapon at 80 meters to save him)". laprovence.com. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- ^ Martin J Dougherty (2012). Sniper: SAS and Elite Forces Guide. Amber Books. ISBN 9781909160385. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
- ^ Gregory Mast; Hans Halberstadt (January 2007). To Be a Military Sniper. Zenith Imprint. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-7603-3002-9. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ Hans Halberstadt (18 March 2008). Trigger Men: Shadow Team, Spider-Man, the Magnificent Bastards, and the American Combat Sniper. St. Martin's Press. p. 29. ISBN 978-0-312-35472-5. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ Martin Pegler (20 September 2011). Out of Nowhere: A history of the military sniper, from the Sharpshooter to Afghanistan. Osprey Publishing. p. 21. ISBN 978-1-84908-875-6. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ Duffy, Michael (22 August 2009). "Encyclopedia – Snipers". firstworldwar.com. Retrieved 10 May 2010.
- ^ Page, Lewis (28 November 2008). "Snipers – Cowardly assassins, or surgical soldiers?". The Register. Retrieved 10 May 2010.
- ^ Bray, Hiawatha (4 October 2005). "Robotic-vacuum maker, BU team up on anti-sniper device". The Boston Globe.
- ^ Petri Sarjanen (1998). Valkoinen kuolema: Talvisodan legendaarisen tarkka-ampujan Simo Häyhän tarina. ISBN 952-5170-05-5
- ^ "K-9 History: Vietnam, 1960 – 1975". www.k9history.com. Archived from the original on 14 January 2018. Retrieved 10 November 2017.
- ^ Dockery, Kevin (3 July 2007). Stalkers and Shooters: A History of Snipers. New York: Penguin Group US. pp. 170–171. ISBN 978-1-4406-2890-0. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
- ^ Taylor 1997, p. 132 – "In 1971, the Provisional IRA shot dead forty-two British soldiers. In 1972, this figure rose to sixty-four, most of them killed by snipers."
- ^ Jackson, Mike (2006). Operation Banner: An Analysis of Military Operations in Northern Ireland Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine. MoD, Army Code 71842
- ^ Craig Roberts; Charles W. Sasser (1 July 2004). Crosshairs on the Kill Zone: American Combat Snipers, Vietnam through Operation Iraqi Freedom. Pocket Books. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-4165-0362-0.
- ^ Pat Farey; Mark Spicer (1 May 2009). Sniping: An Illustrated History. MBI Publishing Company. pp. 225–227. ISBN 978-0-7603-3717-2.
- ^ Gilbert, Adrian (1996). "The Sniper Today". Sniper: Master of Terrain, Technology, And Timing, He Is A Hunter of Human Prey and the Military's Most Feared Fighter. St. Martin's Press. pp. 245–247. ISBN 978-0-312-95766-7.
- ^ a b Diamond, John (27 July 2006). "Insurgent snipers sent after troops". USA Today. Retrieved 21 March 2008.
- ^ Holmes, Paul (29 October 2006). "U.S. military probes sniper threat in Baghdad". Reuters. Archived from the original on 13 March 2009. Retrieved 21 March 2008.
- ^ Ponder, Jon (25 October 2006). "Iraqi Insurgent Snipers Target U.S. Medics, Engineers and Chaplains". Pensito Review. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2008.
- ^ Laessing, Ulf (24 August 2011). "Rebels share firepower as snipers menace Tripoli". Reuters. Archived from the original on 24 August 2011. Retrieved 25 February 2019.
- ^ "International News | World News". Abcnews.go.com. ABC News Network. ABC News Internet Ventures. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
- ^ Electron Libre. "Snipers are still a threat in Syria". France 24. Archived from the original on 31 January 2012. Retrieved 30 January 2012.
- ^ "Violence kills 29 across Syria: activists". AFP. 30 January 2012. Archived from the original on 25 January 2013. Retrieved 1 April 2013 – via Google News.
- ^ Plaster 2007, pp. 39–45, 53–55.
- ^ Stuart Hadaway Rifleman Thomas Plunkett: 'A Pattern for the Battalion.'
- ^ McKenney, Tom (23 September 2010). Jack Hinson's One-man War: A civil war sniper. Pelican Publishing. p. 79. ISBN 978-1-4556-0646-7.
- ^ Rhea, Gordon C. The Battles for Spotsylvania Court House and the Road to Yellow Tavern 7–12 May 1864. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1997. ISBN 0-8071-3067-2 pp 93–96
- ^ "Killed the Matabele God: Burnham, the American scout, may end uprising". The New York Times. 25 June 1896. ISSN 0093-1179.
- ^ West, James E.; Lamb, Peter O. (1932). He-who-sees-in-the-dark; the Boys' Story of Frederick Burnham, the American Scout. illustrated by Lord Baden-Powell. Brewer, Warren and Putnam.
- ^ "England's American Scout". The New York Times (London Chronicle). 5 May 1901. ISSN 0362-4331.
- ^ a b c d Valle, Orvelin. "This sniper, known as 'The White Death,' is credited with more than 500 kills". Business Insider.
- ^ a b "How a Finnish farmer became the world's deadliest sniper". Foreigner.fi. 10 January 2020.
- ^ a b Serena, Katie (27 March 2018). "How "White Death" Simo Häyhä Became The Deadliest Sniper In History". All That's Interesting.
- ^ Hamilton, J. C. M. (2008): Gallipoli Sniper: The life of Billy Sing. Sydney: Pan Macmillan Australia. (ISBN 978-1-4050-3865-2)
- ^ Brownlie, Robin (2003). A Fatherly Eye: Indian Agents, Government Power, and Aboriginal Resistance in Ontario, 1918–1939. University of Toronto Press. p. 63. ISBN 978-0-19-541784-5.
- ^ a b "top WWII snipers". Archived from the original on 1 January 2016. Retrieved 13 October 2008.
- ^ Sakaida & Hook 2003, pp. 31–32
- ^ (in Russian)Biography at the website on Heroes of the Soviet Union and Russia
- ^ "Matthäus Hetzenauer, Austrian sniper with 345 confirmed kills, 1944". rarehistoricalphotos.com. 26 December 2013. Retrieved 28 March 2017.
- ^ Storr, Jim (2009). The human face of war. New York: Continuum. p. 159. ISBN 9781847065230.
- ^ "Osprey Men-at-Arms 424: The Chinese Army 1937–1949 : World War II and Civil War". Militaryfocus.com. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
- ^ Taonga, New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage Te Manatu. "Hulme, Alfred Clive". teara.govt.nz.
- ^ "A sniper's tale". The Sydney Morning Herald. 26 April 2004.
- ^ Евгений Овсянкин (2010). Когда Родина в опасности [When the Motherland is in danger] (in Russian). Nord.pomorsu.ru. Archived from the original on 17 April 2013. Retrieved 25 March 2013.
- ^ Lance Cpl. George J. Papastrat (29 March 2007). "Range complex named after famous Vietnam sniper". Marine Corps News. Retrieved 24 March 2008.
...famous Hathcock shot that killed an enemy from more than 2,500 yards (2,300 m) away...
[dead link] - ^ Sgt. Grit (2006). "Marine Corps Sniper Carlos N. Hathcock II". Archived from the original on 4 September 2012. Retrieved 24 March 2008.
Viet Cong shot dead by a round fired from a scope-mounted Browning M-2 .50 caliber machine gun at the unbelievable range of 2,500 yards (2,300 m).
- ^ "Chuck Mawhinney". www.chuckmawhinney.com. Retrieved 28 March 2017.
- ^ "Adelbert F. Waldron III – Sniper Central". Sniper Central. 10 October 2014. Retrieved 28 March 2017.
- ^ "Medal of Honor recipients: Somalia Campaign". United States Army Center of Military History. 3 August 2009. Archived from the original on 22 December 2012. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
- ^ Smith 2010
- ^ Alpert 2010
- ^ a b Friscolanti, Michael (15 May 2006). "We were abandoned". Maclean's. Archived from the original on 21 August 2010. Retrieved 3 May 2010.
- ^ "Marine Sniper Receives Bronze Star Medal for Valor". Defense.gov. Retrieved 1 June 2011.
- ^ The Washington Times, U.S. Army sniper nails record shot, 11:16 pm, Sunday, 15 January 2006
- ^ "The Sniper Log Book". snipercentral.com. 2010. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
- ^ Army told no heavy weapons, not Prabha Archived 15 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine By Tissa Ravindra Perera. Retrieved 9 February 2010.
- ^ "U.S. military probes sniper threat in Baghdad". alertnet.org. Reuters. 29 October 2006. Archived from the original on 13 March 2009. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
- ^ Nicholson, Brendan (23 April 2011). "You think I'm brave? Meet my mates: Ben Roberts-Smith". The Australian. Retrieved 11 February 2012.
- ^ Nicholson, Brendan (24 January 2011). "Battlefield mateship worthy of VC". The Australian. Retrieved 11 February 2012.
- ^ a b Fife, Robert (21 June 2017). "Canadian elite special forces sniper makes record-breaking kill shot in Iraq". The Globe and Mail.
Further reading
[edit]- Alpert, Lukas (2 May 2010). "Sniper kills Qaeda-from 1½ mi. away". New York Post. Archived from the original on 26 May 2012. Retrieved 3 May 2010.
- Bartlett, Derrick (12 April 2005). "Sniper Tactics: Going for the Gun". Archived from the original on 16 June 2019. Retrieved 26 January 2006.
- Brookesmith, Peter (2007). Sniper: training, techniques and weapons (2007 ed.). St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-36290-4. - Total pages: 192
- Dougan, Andy (2016). One Shot, One Kill: A History of the Sniper. William Collins. ISBN 978-0-00-818940-2.
- Gilbert, Adrian (1996). Sniper: The Skills, the Weapons, and the Experiences (1996 ed.). St. Martin's Paperbacks. ISBN 978-0-312-95766-7. 352 pages
- Law, Clive M. (2005). Without Warning: Canadian Sniper Equipment of the 20th Century. Service Publications. ISBN 1-894581-16-4.
- Neville, Leigh (2016). Modern Snipers. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4728-1534-7.
- Pegler, Martin (2006). Out of Nowhere: A History of the Military Sniper (2006 ed.). Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84603-140-3.
- Parker, Eric (1924). Hesketh Prichard, D.S.O., M.C.: hunter: explorer: naturalist: cricketer: author: soldier; a memoir (1924 ed.). T. F. Unwin ltd. 261 pages
- Plaster, Maj. John L. (1993). The Ultimate Sniper: an advanced training manual for military & police snipers (1993 ed.). Paladin Press. ISBN 978-0-87364-704-5. - Total pages: 453
- Plaster, Maj. John L. (2006). The ultimate sniper: an advanced training manual for military & police snipers (2006 ed.). Paladin Press. ISBN 978-1-58160-494-8. - Total pages: 584
- Plaster, Maj. John L. (2007). The History of Sniping and Sharpshooting (2007 ed.). Paladin Press. ISBN 978-1-58160-632-4. - Total pages: 704
- Prichard, Hesketh; Vernon, Hesketh (2004). Sniping in France 1914-18: With Notes on the Scientific Training of Scouts, Observers, and Snipers (2004 ed.). Helion & Company Limited. ISBN 978-1-874622-47-5. - Total pages: 143
- Sakaida, Henry; Hook, Christa (2003). Heroines of the Soviet Union 1941-45 (2003 ed.). Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84176-598-3. - Total pages: 64
- Senich, Peter R. (1982). The German sniper, 1914-1945 (1982 ed.). Paladin Press. ISBN 978-0-87364-223-1. - Total pages: 445
- Senich, Peter R. (1988). The Complete Book of U.S. Sniping (1988 ed.). Paladin Press. ISBN 978-0-87364-460-0. - Total pages: 280
- Shore, C. (1988). With British Snipers to the Reich (1988 ed.). Desert Pubns. ISBN 978-0-87947-122-4. - Total pages: 351
- Strong, Charles (2011). Kill Shot: The Deadliest Snipers of All Time (2011 ed.). Ulysses Press. ISBN 978-1-56975-862-5. - Total pages: 192
- Smith, Michael (2 May 2010). "Hotshot sniper in one-and-a-half-mile double kill". The Sunday Times. London. Archived from the original on 28 May 2010. Retrieved 3 May 2010.
- Taylor, Peter (1997). Behind the mask: the IRA and Sinn Féin (1997 ed.). TV Books. ISBN 978-1-57500-061-9. - Total pages: 431
- Walter, John. (2017) Snipers at war: And equipment and operations, history (US Naval Institute Press, 2017)
External links
[edit]Sniper
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Origins
Definition
A sniper is a specialized marksman, typically in military or paramilitary units, trained to engage selected enemy targets with precise rifle fire from concealed or camouflaged positions at extended ranges, often beyond 300 meters, prioritizing accuracy, stealth, and minimal detection risk over volume of fire.[2] This role demands exceptional proficiency in ballistics, environmental factors such as wind and elevation, and fieldcraft including infiltration, observation, and evasion, enabling the sniper to deliver discriminatory shots against high-value individuals while supporting broader tactical objectives like intelligence gathering or disruption of enemy leadership.[9][10] In contrast to general riflemen or squad-designated marksmen, who operate within unit formations at shorter to intermediate ranges for suppressive or direct support roles, snipers function semi-independently or in small teams—usually comprising a shooter and spotter—to execute missions requiring prolonged observation and selective engagement, often with customized bolt-action rifles chambered for high-ballistic-coefficient cartridges like .308 Winchester or .338 Lapua Magnum.[11] The spotter's responsibilities include target identification, range estimation, and security overwatch, enhancing the team's effectiveness in denying enemy mobility or confirming kills without compromising position.[10] This operational doctrine traces to empirical necessities in asymmetric warfare, where long-range precision reduces friendly casualties and amplifies psychological impact on adversaries.[9]Etymology and Early Concepts
The term "sniper" derives from the verb "to snipe," which emerged in the 1770s among British soldiers stationed in India, referring to the practice of shooting snipe—a small, long-billed wading bird renowned for its rapid, zigzag flight that demanded exceptional marksmanship and stealth to hit from concealed positions.[12] [13] The noun form "sniper," an agent noun denoting one who engages in sniping, first appeared in print around 1824, initially applied to hunters or shooters skilled at such precise, hidden engagements.[13] [14] This etymology reflects the bird's elusiveness, as snipe hunts required patience, camouflage in marshy terrain, and accurate long-range shots, qualities later transposed to human targets.[15] Early concepts of sniping in military contexts built on this hunting analogy, portraying it as the art of a specialized marksman who, like a snipe hunter, operated from cover to strike distant or unsuspecting foes with minimal exposure.[6] By the early 19th century, British forces in colonial India reportedly designated particularly adept riflemen as "snipers" for harassing enemy pickets or scouts at extended ranges, emphasizing ballistic precision over volley fire typical of line infantry.[16] [17] These proto-snipers relied on rifled firearms for superior accuracy compared to smoothbore muskets, which limited effective ranges to under 100 yards, while rifles enabled hits beyond 300 yards under favorable conditions.[18] The approach prioritized individual initiative, fieldcraft, and observation—fundamentals derived from game stalking—over massed formations, though it remained ad hoc without dedicated training until later technological and doctrinal shifts.[6]Equipment and Technology
Sniper Rifles and Calibers
Sniper rifles are precision firearms engineered for consistent accuracy at extended ranges, often exceeding 800 meters, with features such as free-floating heavy barrels, match-grade triggers, and modular chassis systems to reduce shooter-induced variables. Bolt-action mechanisms predominate in military applications due to their mechanical simplicity, which minimizes moving parts that could introduce inconsistencies in bullet alignment and gas system disturbances, enabling sub-minute-of-angle precision under controlled conditions.[19][20] Semi-automatic sniper rifles, while offering faster follow-up shots for multiple targets, generally exhibit slightly reduced inherent accuracy from cycling actions and increased recoil impulses, though modern designs like gas-piston systems mitigate these effects for effective use up to 600-800 meters.[21][22] Caliber selection balances ballistic performance, including muzzle velocity, bullet weight, and terminal ballistics, against factors like recoil manageability, ammunition portability, and barrel life. The 7.62×51mm NATO cartridge, equivalent to .308 Winchester, serves as a baseline for many sniper systems due to its moderate recoil, widespread availability, and sufficient energy for engagements out to 800 meters, as employed in rifles like the U.S. Army's legacy M24 Sniper Weapon System.[23][24] For enhanced long-range capability, the .300 Winchester Magnum extends effective range to approximately 1,200 meters with superior wind resistance and energy retention, powering upgraded systems such as the XM2010 Enhanced Sniper Rifle adopted by U.S. forces in 2011 for improved hit probability beyond 1,000 meters.[25][24] Larger calibers address anti-materiel roles and extreme distances. The .338 Lapua Magnum, standardized in platforms like the British L115A3 and U.S. MK13 Mod 7, delivers effective anti-personnel performance to 1,500 meters and beyond, with heavy bullets maintaining supersonic speeds and penetration superior to smaller rounds, though at the cost of higher recoil and reduced ammunition capacity.[25][26] The .50 BMG (12.7×99mm), utilized in semi-automatic rifles such as the Barrett M107, provides anti-vehicle and long-range interdiction up to 1,800 meters effective range, with maximum reaches exceeding 2,000 meters under optimal conditions, but its substantial weight and recoil limit it to specialized applications where destructive power outweighs mobility.[27][28]| Caliber | Typical Effective Range | Key Advantages | Primary Drawbacks | Example Rifles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.62×51mm NATO | 800 m | Low recoil, high availability, logistics ease | Limited energy at long range | M24, M110 |
| .300 Winchester Magnum | 1,200 m | Better ballistics than 7.62mm, versatile | Increased recoil over 7.62mm | XM2010, MK13 Mod 5 |
| .338 Lapua Magnum | 1,500+ m | Excellent wind bucking, penetration | Heavier ammo, barrel wear | L115A3, MK22 (multi-cal) |
| .50 BMG | 1,800 m | Anti-materiel capability, extreme range | High weight, severe recoil | M107, M82 |
Optics, Ballistics, and Support Gear
Sniper optics primarily consist of variable-power telescopic sights designed for precision targeting at extended ranges, often featuring magnifications from 3x to 20x or higher to balance field of view and detail resolution. These scopes incorporate reticles such as mil-dot or grid systems for rangefinding and holdover adjustments without mechanical turret manipulation.[31] For instance, the U.S. Army's Mil-Grid Reticle, introduced in the Precision Sniper Rifle program, uses a grid of horizontal crosshairs with an offset vertical line to facilitate rapid range estimation and corrections across calibers like 7.62×51mm NATO and .300 Norma Magnum.[31] Illumination via tritium or fiber optics enhances low-light visibility, while parallax adjustment ensures focus at varying distances.[32] Ballistics in sniper operations focuses on external factors affecting projectile trajectory, including gravity-induced drop, aerodynamic drag quantified by the bullet's ballistic coefficient (typically 0.4-0.7 for common sniper rounds), muzzle velocity (around 2,500-3,000 fps), and environmental variables like wind, temperature, and altitude.[33] Snipers compute minute-of-angle (MOA) or milliradian adjustments using "dope" charts derived from empirical firing data, accounting for Coriolis effect at extreme ranges beyond 1,000 meters.[34] Modern aids include integrated ballistic calculators that incorporate drag models (e.g., G1 or G7) to predict drift and drop, often trued against real-world shots for accuracy.[35] Military snipers maintain modular data books to log elevation come-ups, wind holds, and environmental readings from devices like anemometers.[36] Support gear enhances stability, concealment, and signature reduction. Bipods, such as swivel models with adjustable legs, provide prone firing support to minimize shooter movement, commonly mounted via Picatinny rails.[37] Suppressors attach to reduce muzzle blast and flash, aiding position concealment; U.S. forces have standardized them on sniper systems to mitigate audible and visual detection.[38] Camouflage includes ghillie suits constructed from netting and local vegetation for visual breakup in terrain, complemented by tripod mounts for spotters' optics during extended overwatch.[39] Ancillary items like laser rangefinders and environmental sensors integrate with gear for precise data input into ballistic solutions.[11]Recent Technological Advancements
In the past decade, sniper systems have increasingly incorporated digital fire control and artificial intelligence to enhance accuracy under dynamic conditions, such as countering drones or engaging moving targets at extended ranges. The U.S. Army adopted the Israeli-developed SMASH 2000L smart scope in June 2025 under a $13 million contract, equipping infantry units with AI-driven optics that use real-time image processing, automatic target recognition, and predictive algorithms to lock onto threats and cue firing solutions, achieving near-guaranteed hits on small, fast-moving aerial targets like drones.[40][41] This system mounts on standard rifles, integrating cameras and sensors to compensate for variables like wind and target motion without manual adjustment, marking a shift from passive optics to active, semi-autonomous aiming aids.[42] Advanced ballistic computing has become standard in modern sniper setups, with integrated rangefinders and apps like Applied Ballistics providing environmental data inputs—such as atmospheric pressure, temperature, and Coriolis effects—for precise dope calculations at ranges exceeding 2,000 meters.[43] Devices like the XM157 Next Generation Squad Weapon Fire Control optic, fielded by the U.S. military since 2022, combine laser rangefinders, environmental sensors, and onboard processors to deliver instant firing solutions, reducing shot-to-shot variability in contested environments.[44] These systems draw on gyroscopes, accelerometers, and digital ballistic engines to automate corrections traditionally handled by spotters, enabling solo operations with sub-MOA precision.[45] Material innovations have yielded lighter, more durable rifles, with carbon fiber stocks and chassis replacing traditional metals, as seen in modular platforms like the Barrett MRAD adopted by U.S. special forces in 2019 for its quick-caliber swaps between .308 Winchester and .338 Norma Magnum.[46] High-performance calibers continue to evolve, with the .338 Lapua Magnum refined for better velocity retention and reduced recoil through improved propellants, supporting confirmed kills beyond 2,500 meters in operational tests.[47] Augmented reality overlays in emerging scopes further project ballistic arcs and wind holds directly into the eyepiece, fusing data from wearable sensors for real-time adjustments, though vulnerabilities to electronic warfare remain a noted limitation in peer conflicts.[48]Historical Evolution
Pre-20th Century Developments
The concept of specialized marksmen capable of precise long-range fire predated the formal term "sniper," emerging with the adoption of rifled firearms in the 18th century, which imparted spin to bullets for improved accuracy over smoothbore muskets. These early riflemen operated as skirmishers or irregulars, targeting enemy officers and artillery to disrupt command without engaging in massed volleys.[49][50] During the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783), Continental Army riflemen exemplified proto-sniping tactics. Daniel Morgan's corps of Virginia and Pennsylvania riflemen, armed with long rifles accurate to 200–300 yards, sniped British officers at the Battles of Saratoga in 1777, contributing to the surrender of General John Burgoyne's army. Timothy Murphy, a noted marksman in Morgan's unit, allegedly killed two British officers—General Simon Fraser and Major Sir Francis Clerke—from over 300 yards using a rifled barrel, though accounts vary in precision. These actions leveraged terrain for concealment and aimed fire to compensate for the rifle's slow reload rate compared to muskets.[51][52][50] In the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), British Army rifle regiments formalized such roles with the Baker rifle, a .625-caliber weapon effective to 200–300 yards. The 95th Regiment of Foot (Rifle Brigade) and King's German Legion riflemen employed green uniforms for camouflage in skirmishes, targeting French commanders and pickets to sow disorder before line infantry assaults. Rifleman Thomas Plunket of the 95th famously shot French General Auguste de Colbert-Chabanais at approximately 600 yards during the Battle of Cacabelos in 1809, then killed an observing officer, demonstrating exceptional ballistics with patched balls despite no telescopic sights. These units prioritized individual initiative over rigid formations, influencing later sniper doctrine.[53][54][55] The term "sniper" originated in the late 18th century among British forces in India, deriving from "snipe" hunting—a challenging pursuit of erratic birds requiring concealed, precise shots from blinds—and entered military parlance by 1824 to describe marksmen hunting tigers or enemies similarly.[6][14] In the American Civil War (1861–1865), sharpshooting evolved into semi-organized sniper employment amid static sieges. Union Berdan's United States Sharpshooters, equipped with Sharps rifles, conducted reconnaissance and targeted Confederate positions from elevated or concealed spots, though many operated as elite skirmishers rather than pure snipers. Confederates imported Whitworth rifles—hexagonal-bore weapons accurate to 1,000 yards—for assassinating Union generals, with documented kills including Major General John Sedgwick at 800 yards in 1864. Partisan Jack Hinson, using a custom .50-caliber Kentucky rifle, reportedly killed about 100 Union personnel in Tennessee ambushes, embodying guerrilla sniping driven by personal vendetta after his family's execution. These efforts highlighted rifles' potential for psychological impact but were limited by black powder fouling and lack of optics.[56][57][49]World War I
In the static conditions of trench warfare on the Western Front following the onset of stalemate in late 1914, snipers emerged as a critical element of infantry tactics, exploiting elevated positions and telescopic sights to dominate no-man's land and inflict casualties from concealed positions. German forces, having anticipated such warfare, entered the conflict with pre-war preparations including scoped Mauser Gewehr 98 rifles fitted with optics from manufacturers like Zeiss and Goerz, enabling precise long-range engagements that initially overwhelmed unprepared Allied troops. This technological and doctrinal edge allowed German Zielfernrohrschützen (scoped rifle marksmen) to operate from fortified loopholes and camouflaged posts, contributing to thousands of British casualties in the war's early phases by restricting movement and reconnaissance.[58][59][60] ![Periscope rifle used at Gallipoli, 1915][float-right] British and French forces initially lacked comparable equipment and training, relying on iron-sighted rifles like the Lee-Enfield SMLE, which proved inadequate against German snipers; this disparity prompted urgent adaptations, including the importation of limited scopes and the development of counter-sniper measures. In response, British officer Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard, appointed as a sniping expert in 1915, advocated for systematic training and founded the First Army School of Sniping, Observation, and Scouting in August 1916 near Linghem, France, where recruits learned camouflage, observation, and marksmanship under field conditions. By 1917, this program had trained over 1,000 snipers, equipping them with Pattern 1914 Enfield rifles retrofitted with Winchester A or Periscopic Prism telescopes, significantly reducing German sniper effectiveness and enabling British forces to reclaim dominance in no-man's land.[61] Tactics evolved rapidly to counter the sniper threat, with both sides employing periscope rifles—devices allowing firing over trench parapets without exposure—and decoys such as dummy heads on poles fitted with cigarettes to lure enemy fire for spotting. German snipers favored static, heavily camouflaged positions with interlocking fields of fire, while British innovations under Hesketh-Prichard emphasized mobility, rapid relocation after shots, and integration with spotters using trench periscopes for target acquisition up to 400 yards. French snipers, similarly adapting, used Berthier rifles with scoped variants and focused on alpine-trained marksmen for mountain sectors, though their program lagged behind the British in scale. These methods, combined with the proliferation of scoped rifles—Germany producing over 15,000 by war's end—underlined sniping's psychological impact, fostering a culture of caution that minimized patrols but preserved manpower amid the attritional nature of the front.[62][63][64]World War II
Snipers achieved significant tactical impact during World War II, particularly on the Eastern Front and in the Finnish Winter War, where harsh terrain and static positions favored long-range precision fire. In the Winter War (November 1939–March 1940), Finnish sniper Simo Häyhä amassed 505 confirmed kills against Soviet forces using a Mosin-Nagant M/28-30 rifle with iron sights, relying on snow camouflage and sub-zero temperatures to conceal positions; his total unconfirmed kills exceeded 700 in under 100 days, disrupting Soviet advances through attrition and psychological terror.[65][66] On the Eastern Front, Soviet and German snipers engaged in intense duels amid urban ruins and forests, with bolt-action rifles like the Soviet Mosin-Nagant PU-scoped variant and German Karabiner 98k with ZF39 scopes enabling engagements beyond 300 meters. Vasily Zaitsev, a Soviet sniper at Stalingrad from September 1942, recorded 225 confirmed kills by December 1942, training others in observation, camouflage, and patience-based tactics that emphasized waiting for high-value targets like officers; his methods contributed to Red Army sniper schools producing over 2,500 operatives by war's end. German counterparts, such as Matthäus Hetzenauer of the 3rd Mountain Division, achieved 345 confirmed kills from 1943–1945 through systematic scouting and scoped fire, often in defensive positions against Soviet offensives.[67] In Western theaters, Allied snipers employed similar equipment but with less doctrinal emphasis initially; British and Canadian forces used No. 4 Mk I (T) Lee-Enfield rifles with telescopic sights for scoped shots up to 800 yards in North Africa and Italy, while U.S. Marines in the Pacific adapted M1903A4 Springfields for jungle scouting, as seen in Guadalcanal (1942) where snipers like those in the 1st Marine Division provided overwatch and reconnaissance. Tactics focused on counter-sniping Japanese infiltrators, with ghillie suits and periscopes aiding concealment in varied environments, though confirmed kill tallies remained lower due to mobile warfare and denser foliage limiting visibility.[68][69] Overall, WWII snipers inflicted disproportionate casualties relative to numbers deployed—estimated at thousands across fronts—by targeting leaders and suppressing movement, influencing battles like Stalingrad where urban sniping delayed German advances; however, high kill claims often relied on spotter verification amid chaos, with actual figures potentially inflated by propaganda on both sides.[70]Post-WWII Conflicts
In the Korean War (1950–1953), snipers played a limited but tactical role, primarily in urban recapture operations and defensive positions. U.S. Marine Corps units established early sniper schools, such as the one formed by the 2nd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment in April 1951, equipping marksmen with scoped M1C Garand rifles for counter-sniping and targeting enemy machine gunners during battles like Incheon, Seoul, and the Chosin Reservoir. Chinese forces employed snipers effectively, with Zhang Taofang credited by official accounts with 214 confirmed kills or wounds using a Mosin-Nagant rifle over 32 days in 1951, relying on iron sights and patient observation in rugged terrain. These engagements highlighted snipers' utility in static warfare but revealed doctrinal gaps, as U.S. forces initially underutilized dedicated sniper teams compared to World War II precedents.[71][6][72] The Vietnam War (1955–1975) marked a resurgence in sniper employment, adapting to jungle environments through improved optics and unconventional tactics. U.S. Marine Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock achieved 93 confirmed kills with the Winchester Model 70 and M2 .50-caliber machine gun, including a record 2,500-yard shot in 1967 that disrupted North Vietnamese supply lines and morale. Snipers operated in two-man teams for reconnaissance and targets of opportunity, countering enemy ambushes and reducing U.S. casualties by neutralizing snipers and commanders; Marine programs alone accounted for over 600 confirmed kills by war's end, influencing the establishment of formal scout sniper schools. North Vietnamese and Viet Cong snipers, often using captured or Soviet-supplied rifles, inflicted psychological terror but suffered higher losses due to inferior training and equipment. This conflict demonstrated snipers' asymmetric impact, prioritizing stealth over volume fire in dense foliage.[73][74][75] In subsequent conflicts, snipers adapted to varied terrains and urban settings. During the 1982 Falklands War, British Royal Marines used L42A1 rifles to engage Argentine positions, including disabling a corvette's guns at range and supporting assaults on Mount Kent and Goose Green, where precision fire suppressed enemy defenses in open moorland. The 1991 Gulf War saw U.S. Marine sniper platoons deploy two-man teams with M40A1 rifles and early Barrett M82 .50 BMG systems for observation and selective engagements, minimizing collateral damage in desert advances. In the Soviet-Afghan War (1979–1989), Soviet paratroopers wielded Dragunov SVD rifles for mountain overwatch, though mujahideen snipers with captured weapons contested routes effectively.[76][77][78][79] Post-2001 operations in Iraq and Afghanistan emphasized snipers' roles in counterinsurgency, urban clearance, and force protection. U.S. Navy SEAL Chris Kyle recorded 160 confirmed kills across four Iraq tours using the McMillan TAC-50, targeting insurgents in Fallujah and Ramadi to protect convoys and disrupt IED teams. In Afghanistan, Army Ranger Sergeant Nicholas Irving achieved 33 confirmed kills in under four months with the M110, leveraging elevated positions for overwatch in Helmand Province. Iraqi sniper Abu Tahsin al-Salhi claimed over 320 kills against ISIS using a locally modified rifle, underscoring snipers' precision in prolonged urban fights. These wars integrated snipers as sensors and communicators, with teams providing real-time intelligence via advanced optics, amplifying their disruptive effect on enemy cohesion beyond direct kills.[80][81][82] Overall, post-WWII sniper doctrine evolved from opportunistic counter-sniping to systematic integration in combined arms, with technological aids like night vision and ballistics computers enhancing lethality while emphasizing ethical target selection to avoid civilian risks. Confirmed kill tallies, often verified by observers or after-action reviews, reflect operational effectiveness but vary by conflict due to differing verification standards; psychological deterrence frequently outweighed raw numbers, as isolated shots eroded enemy willingness to maneuver.[83]Training and Selection
Physical and Psychological Requirements
Snipers must meet stringent physical standards to withstand the rigors of extended field operations, including prolonged immobility in prone positions, ruck marches with loads exceeding 50 pounds, and environmental exposure. In the U.S. Army, candidates require a current Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) score without waivers, adherence to height and weight standards per AR 600-9, and a physical profile permitting full live-fire training participation.[84] U.S. Marine Corps prerequisites demand a First Class Physical Fitness Test (PFT) score on the course convene date.[85] Visual acuity is a core requirement, with eyesight correctable to 20/20 in both eyes via glasses or contacts, alongside normal red-green color vision to distinguish targets and terrain effectively.[84] [86] Medical screening, including a periodic health assessment, excludes conditions like severe motion sickness susceptibility or profiles limiting endurance activities.[84] [86] Psychological screening ensures emotional stability, with no history of mental disorders or issues risking early dismissal, often verified through evaluations like the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) or California Psychological Inventory (CPI) within the prior year.[86] [87] Successful snipers demonstrate resilience to isolation and stress, scoring lower on post-traumatic stress measures and higher on job satisfaction than conventional infantry personnel in empirical studies.[88] [89] Key traits include exceptional patience for hours of stillness, sustained focus amid distractions, and disciplined decision-making under pressure, cultivated through mental skills training emphasizing cognitive control and stress inoculation.[90] These attributes enable tolerance for the psychological toll of detached precision engagements, where hesitation can compromise mission outcomes.[91]Marksmanship and Tactical Instruction
Marksmanship training for military snipers emphasizes precision fundamentals, including proper body positioning, natural point of aim, trigger squeeze without disturbance, and controlled breathing to minimize shooter-induced errors. Trainees must achieve consistent grouping at short ranges before advancing to distances exceeding 1,000 meters, where environmental factors such as wind drift, elevation drop, and atmospheric conditions demand precise ballistic computations.[1] In the U.S. Army Sniper Course, this involves live-fire exercises from 300 to 1,500 meters, requiring hits on man-sized targets under simulated combat stress.[1] Rifles selected for sniper use typically meet standards of 1-2.5 minutes of angle (MOA) accuracy, meaning groups no larger than 1-2.5 inches at 100 yards under benchrest conditions, enabling effective first-round hits at extended ranges.[92] Advanced marksmanship drills incorporate moving targets, unknown distance estimation, and alternate firing positions like supported prone or urban barricades, fostering adaptability beyond static ranges. Qualification often mandates expert-level performance on service rifles prior to sniper-specific training, with ongoing requalification to maintain proficiency amid weapon wear and skill degradation.[93] Spotter integration is critical, providing real-time calls for mirage reading, doping wind via vegetation or terrain cues, and confirming impacts to refine subsequent shots. Tactical instruction extends marksmanship into operational contexts, teaching target discrimination, engagement prioritization based on threat level, and adherence to rules of engagement to avoid non-combatant casualties. Snipers train in team dynamics, where the observer handles surveillance via optics, maps enemy movements, and relays intelligence while the shooter maintains overwatch. Principles include rapid setup in concealed positions, shot discipline to preserve stealth, and post-engagement relocation to evade counter-detection, emphasizing that a sniper's value lies not in volume of fire but in decisive, unobserved influence on the battlefield.[94] Courses culminate in field exercises simulating asymmetric scenarios, integrating marksmanship with evasion and communication under fatigue.[1]Variations Across Militaries
Sniper selection processes vary significantly across militaries, often reflecting doctrinal priorities such as precision in NATO forces versus offensive integration in former Warsaw Pact structures. In the United States Army, candidates must first complete infantry training and achieve a combat arms ASVAB score of at least 87 before attending the 29-day Sniper Course at Fort Benning, which emphasizes marksmanship from 300 to 1,500 meters and fieldcraft skills like stalking and observation.[1] Special Forces variants extend to seven weeks, incorporating urban operations and advanced surveillance.[95] The British Army requires infantry soldiers to serve 2-3 years prior to a 10-week Sniper Operator's Course, focusing on temperate and urban sniping with additional post-course training for specialized environments.[96] This contrasts with the Canadian Armed Forces' approach, where motivated infantry undergo a two-week sniper selection familiarization before advancing to the full Basic Sniper Course, prioritizing physical fitness and dedication alongside marksmanship.[97] Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) selection occurs during basic training for soldiers demonstrating superior shooting, leading to a five-week Basic Sniper Course covering camouflage, range estimation, and position setup, with specialized tracks for commanders and counter-terrorism emphasizing urban threats.[98][99] Russian Spetsnaz training integrates snipers into broader special operations regimens, starting with intensive physical conditioning like 9-km daily runs and 65-70 km marches, followed by marksmanship and camouflage akin to Western models but with greater emphasis on offensive employment and massed fire support rather than isolated precision shots.[100][101] Soviet-era doctrines, influencing modern Russian practices, prioritized sniper teams for suppression in advances, differing from NATO's focus on selective, morale-disrupting engagements.[100] These differences stem from operational contexts: NATO programs stress individual autonomy and long-range accuracy for defensive or asymmetric roles, while Russian methods align with maneuver warfare, embedding snipers in forward units for volume fire. Pass rates remain low universally, often below 50%, due to demands for psychological resilience and technical proficiency.[100]Tactics and Techniques
Target Acquisition and Engagement
Target acquisition in sniper operations encompasses the systematic detection, location, and identification of potential threats, enabling precise long-range engagement while adhering to rules of engagement (ROE). This process relies on visual perception elements such as shape, contrast, color, texture, light, movement, and rhythm to discern targets amid environmental clutter.[4] Snipers employ scan-and-search techniques—rapid scans for overview, slow detailed examinations, and patterned horizontal or vertical sweeps—using optics like binoculars, spotting scopes, thermal imagers, and night vision devices to extend detection beyond small-arms effective ranges.[4] Observation sessions are limited to 30 minutes to 1 hour per observer to mitigate eye fatigue, with team rotation across roles including security and rest.[4] Once detected, targets are acquired by confirming signatures like irregular shapes, disturbed earth, or heat emissions, followed by positive identification via the SALUTE report framework (size, activity, location, unit/uniform, time, equipment).[4] Identification distinguishes combatants from noncombatants, incorporating contextual factors such as urban baselines or equipment specifics to minimize fratricide risks.[4] Range estimation integrates multiple methods for accuracy, including the mil-relation formula—(target height in meters × 1,000) / angular size in mils = range in meters—laser range finders (LRF), map measurements, and bracketing, with errors minimized through cross-verification (e.g., a 0.1 mil reading error at 1,181 meters yields a 77-meter discrepancy).[4][102] Ballistic adjustments account for elevation, wind (direction and velocity via Kestrel meters or mirage observation), humidity, and terrain, inputted into computers or holdover reticles.[4] Engagement follows the Detect-Identify-Decide-Engage-Assess (DIDA) cycle, prioritizing high-threat targets per commander directives or ROE, such as free-fire zones versus no-fire areas.[4] The shot process sequences stability (bipod, sling, or sandbag support for consistent firing platform), aiming (sight alignment on target with lead for movers), control (breath suspension midway out, smooth trigger squeeze), and follow-through (recoil management and trace observation).[102][4] Spotters provide real-time corrections via dialogue, confirming hits through splash, strike, or tracer burn, while snipers log data in DA Form 7639 for after-action refinement.[4] Environmental mitigations include mirage reading for wind (up to 12 mph in heat layers), urban gusts, and glass-defeat angles (near 90 degrees to reduce deflection), ensuring first-shot efficacy at distances exceeding 1,000 meters.[4]Concealment and Relocation Strategies
Sniper concealment relies on three primary methods: hiding, blending, and deceiving, as outlined in U.S. Army field manuals. Hiding involves positioning the sniper in locations where natural or artificial cover completely obscures the body from view, such as dense vegetation or depressions in terrain, minimizing exposure to enemy observation.[103] Blending requires matching the sniper's outline, colors, and textures to the surrounding environment to reduce visibility, often achieved through site selection that aligns with background patterns like shadows or foliage.[103] Deceiving employs decoys or false positions to mislead enemies, drawing fire away from the actual hide site.[103] Ghillie suits enhance blending by incorporating local vegetation and materials into a loose-fitting garment that disrupts the human silhouette, proven effective in foliage-heavy environments for breaking up the sniper's form against visual detection.[104] The U.S. Army has tested improved ghillie suits to replace older flame-resistant models, focusing on better integration with modern camouflage patterns while maintaining low infrared signatures against thermal imaging.[105] Additional concealment techniques include avoiding skylining—positioning against horizons or light backgrounds—and minimizing secondary signatures such as shine from equipment, dust displacement, or movement that could reveal the position.[4] Relocation strategies emphasize rapid displacement after firing to evade counter-sniper response and artillery, commonly termed "shoot and scoot" tactics adapted from sniper doctrine. U.S. Special Forces manuals stress preparing multiple alternate and supplementary firing positions in advance, allowing the team to shift 100-200 meters or more post-engagement while using covered routes.[106] The spotter often confirms the hit before initiating movement, with the team crawling or low-crawling if necessary to maintain low profiles during relocation, exploiting terrain features like folds in the ground for security.[103] This approach counters enemy triangulation of the shot origin, as prolonged occupation of a single site increases detection risk from return fire or spotting teams.[107] Effective relocation preserves operational tempo by enabling re-engagement from new hides without compromising the team's survival.[106]Counter-Sniper and Defensive Tactics
Counter-sniper tactics focus on detecting, locating, and neutralizing enemy snipers to mitigate their impact on troop movements and morale. Acoustic sensor networks exploit the muzzle blast and supersonic shockwave of a sniper's shot to triangulate the shooter's position through time-difference-of-arrival calculations, enabling rapid response. Thermal imaging systems detect infrared signatures from weapon barrels or human heat, particularly effective in low-light or obscured conditions, though limited by atmospheric interference and countermeasures like thermal blankets. Laser-based detectors identify aiming optics via backscatter from rangefinders or scopes.[108][109][110] Upon detection, engagement prioritizes overmatching firepower to suppress or eliminate the threat. Dedicated counter-sniper teams, often equipped with precision rifles and spotters, mirror sniper tactics to outrange or outmaneuver the enemy. Vehicle-mounted weapons, such as 25-mm autocannons on Bradley Fighting Vehicles or helicopter systems like the 30-mm cannon and HELLFIRE missiles, deliver high-volume suppressive fire against suspected positions. Indirect fire from artillery or mortars can saturate areas, though precision-guided munitions reduce collateral damage in urban settings. In the 2003 Iraq War, U.S. forces used such combined arms approaches to counter urban snipers effectively.[111][112][111] Defensive tactics for infantry emphasize risk reduction through disciplined movement and environmental exploitation. Soldiers advance using bounding overwatch, where one element provides covering fire while another relocates, minimizing static exposure to long-range observation. Hard cover—such as walls or vehicles—is preferred over mere concealment to stop bullets, with troops avoiding silhouetting against skylines or predictable paths that allow windage and ballistic adjustments. Smoke and obscurants temporarily deny line-of-sight, forcing relocation or abandonment of firing positions. Decoy techniques, like elevating dummy targets to draw fire and reveal sniper locations via periscopes or spotters, have historical precedents in trench warfare and remain viable for baiting responses.[112][112][112] Advanced technologies enhance defenses, including vehicle-integrated systems like DARPA's C-Sniper, which uses radar and optics for real-time detection from moving platforms, cueing operators for engagement. Anti-sniper dazzlers emit high-intensity light to disorient optics without permanent blinding, compliant with protocols restricting eye-targeted lasers. In asymmetric conflicts, such as urban counterinsurgency, integrating unmanned aerial vehicles for overhead reconnaissance supplements ground tactics, identifying elevated positions before shots are fired. These methods collectively shift the initiative, compelling snipers to expend ammunition prematurely or withdraw.[113][110][111]Operational Applications
Military Doctrine and Team Structures
In military doctrine, snipers are employed to deliver precision direct fires against high-value targets, provide overwatch and intelligence collection, and disrupt enemy command and control through selective engagement, as outlined in U.S. Army Training Circular 3-22.10, which emphasizes their role in enhancing situational awareness and force multiplication at the tactical level.[4] This integration prioritizes independent operation within larger units, allowing snipers to exploit terrain for standoff engagements while minimizing exposure, a principle rooted in post-World War II refinements to counter massed infantry formations.[114] Sniper teams are doctrinally structured as two-person units consisting of a shooter and a spotter, where the shooter focuses on target engagement and the spotter manages observation, ballistic calculations, communication with higher command, and security.[11] The spotter, often serving as team leader, uses tools like laser rangefinders and anemometers to compute firing solutions, enabling engagements beyond 800 meters with adjusted probability of hit, while the shooter maintains weapon proficiency under stress.[10] In U.S. Army infantry battalions, these teams are organized into sniper sections of 4-6 personnel under the battalion commander, providing redundancy and sustained operations, though teams deploy in pairs to preserve stealth and reduce logistical footprints.[114] Special operations forces adapt this structure for missions requiring extended reconnaissance, employing three- to four-person teams that include additional roles for force protection or heavy weapons support, as detailed in FM 3-05.222, which stresses modular composition for infiltration, harassment, and exfiltration in denied areas. NATO allies, including the UK and Canada, mirror the two-person core team for interoperability, with spotters handling multi-spectral observation to counter enemy countermeasures, though U.S. doctrine uniquely positions snipers as a transitional role from scout elements in large-scale combat operations.[115] ![Royal Marines snipers displaying their L115A1 rifles][center] This team-centric approach ensures mutual support, with empirical data from operations indicating that paired teams achieve higher first-round hit probabilities—up to 70% at 600 meters under ideal conditions—compared to solo operations, due to divided responsibilities and real-time corrections.[82] Doctrine mandates rigorous selection for both roles, emphasizing marksmanship, fieldcraft, and psychological resilience to sustain prolonged hides, often exceeding 48 hours without resupply.[116]Conventional Warfare Roles
In conventional warfare, snipers function as force multipliers within infantry and combined-arms units, delivering selective, long-range precision fire to neutralize high-value targets such as enemy commanders, radiomen, and crew-served weapon operators, thereby disrupting command, control, and suppressive fire capabilities.[117] This role emphasizes selective engagement over volume of fire, allowing maneuver elements to advance under reduced enemy observation and retaliation. Snipers typically operate in two-man teams—a shooter and spotter—positioned in overwatch to provide reconnaissance, adjust indirect fires, and interdict enemy reinforcements or retreats.[67] During World War I's trench stalemates, snipers were pivotal in denying enemy exposure, using improvised periscopes and camouflage to target heads appearing over parapets, which forced adversaries into minimized activity and contributed to the attrition of exposed personnel.[118] In World War II, Axis and Allied forces deployed snipers forward of defensive lines to engage reconnaissance patrols, artillery spotters, and advancing infantry leaders, delaying assaults and imposing psychological costs through unpredictable lethality; for instance, Soviet snipers at Stalingrad in late 1942 targeted German officers to erode offensive momentum in urban and open engagements.[117][119] In the 1991 Gulf War, U.S. Marine snipers supported rapid mechanized advances by engaging Iraqi defensive positions from concealed vantage points, often at ranges exceeding 500 meters, while .50 BMG rifles like the Barrett M82 were employed to disable armored vehicles and optics, extending the weapon's utility beyond personnel targets.[77][78] Such applications underscore snipers' integration into maneuver doctrine, where their fire suppresses enemy anti-tank teams and observation posts, facilitating armored breakthroughs in open desert terrain. Empirical assessments indicate snipers achieved disproportionate impact relative to team size, though vulnerability to counter-sniper fire and massed artillery in symmetric exchanges necessitated rapid relocation post-shot.[117]Asymmetric and Irregular Warfare
In asymmetric and irregular warfare, snipers enable weaker or non-state actors to impose costs on superior conventional forces through precision engagements from concealed positions, often disrupting logistics, command structures, and morale without requiring direct confrontation. This capability stems from the sniper's ability to operate independently or in small teams, leveraging terrain for standoff advantage and forcing adversaries to expend resources on area denial or protective measures. Empirical data from post-conflict analyses indicate that sniper fire, while accounting for a small fraction of overall casualties—typically under 10% in urban insurgencies—amplifies psychological effects by compelling troops to alter movement patterns, such as avoiding open routes or clustering for cover, thereby slowing operational tempo.[82][120] During the Vietnam War (1955–1975), Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army irregulars employed snipers with captured or modified rifles to harass U.S. and allied patrols, targeting exposed sentries and leaders to erode unit cohesion; U.S. forces responded by institutionalizing sniper programs, with Marine Corps teams achieving over 600 confirmed kills by 1969 through adaptive tactics like ghillie suits and spotter integration, demonstrating how snipers can neutralize guerrilla advantages in dense jungle environments. In Iraq (2003–2011), insurgent groups, including former Ba'athist military personnel, used Soviet-era Dragunov rifles for urban sniping against coalition convoys, with incidents peaking in 2004–2006 around Baghdad and Fallujah, where sniper attacks contributed to convoy attrition rates exceeding 20% in high-threat areas and prompted U.S. adoption of armored vehicles with elevated gunner positions. Similarly, in Afghanistan (2001–2021), Taliban fighters integrated snipers into ambushes along supply routes like Highway 1, employing PKM machine guns adapted for precision fire; a 2018 assessment noted that such tactics delayed NATO resupply by up to 50% in contested districts, underscoring snipers' role in attrition warfare against technologically superior opponents.[75][121][122] Counterinsurgency doctrines emphasize that while insurgent snipers excel in hit-and-run operations, their effectiveness diminishes against forces with robust intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets, as evidenced by U.S. programs in Iraq that reduced sniper incidents by 70% through drone overwatch and acoustic detection by 2008. However, in prolonged irregular conflicts, snipers sustain low-intensity pressure, with studies attributing 15–25% of non-combat operational delays to the need for anti-sniper sweeps, highlighting a causal asymmetry where minimal insurgent investment yields outsized conventional force adaptations. This dynamic persists in hybrid threats, as seen in Ukraine since 2014, where snipers provide overwatch for maneuver elements in contested urban zones, adapting commercial optics for extended engagements beyond 1,000 meters.[123][124]Law Enforcement and Civilian Uses
Law enforcement agencies employ snipers primarily within special weapons and tactics (SWAT) teams to neutralize high-risk threats in scenarios such as hostage situations, barricaded suspects, and active shooter incidents, where precision fire minimizes collateral damage and risk to officers and civilians.[125] These operations often involve engagements at distances averaging 50 to 100 yards, though surveys indicate variability based on urban environments and tactical needs.[126] A 2023 study by the American Sniper Association compiled data from police sniper engagements, revealing common use of bolt-action rifles chambered in .308 Winchester or similar calibers, with shots focused on incapacitation through head or center-mass placement under time-sensitive conditions.[127] Notable examples include a February 2022 incident in St. George, Utah, where a police sniper's intervention during a cross-state hostage crisis contributed to resolving the threat without additional casualties.[128] In 2023, a San Jose Police Department sniper lawfully neutralized a hostage-taker, as determined by district attorney review, highlighting the role of overwatch in de-escalating armed standoffs.[129] Techniques emphasize observation, target isolation, and rules of engagement compliant with legal standards for deadly force, with training focusing on environmental factors like wind and obscuration.[130] Disarming shots targeting weapons are occasionally attempted but deemed high-risk due to physiological variables and legal scrutiny.[130] Civilian applications of precision rifles—functionally analogous to sniper systems—involve hunting, competitive marksmanship, and recreational long-range shooting, where legal ownership in the United States permits acquisition of semi-automatic or bolt-action models without military-specific restrictions for most calibers.[131] These rifles, such as those chambered in 6.5 Creedmoor or .308, are used for varmint control and big-game hunting at ranges exceeding 500 yards, prioritizing ethical one-shot kills to prevent animal suffering.[132] In competitions like the Precision Rifle Series, participants engage targets up to 1,200 yards, fostering skills in ballistics calculation and positional shooting transferable to practical marksmanship.[133] Self-defense uses remain uncommon, as typical threats occur at shorter ranges unsuitable for scoped long-range setups, though hunting rifles have been employed in rural defensive scenarios.[134] Federal regulations under the National Firearms Act impose no blanket bans on civilian .50 BMG rifles in most states, though California and others prohibit them due to concerns over armor penetration, requiring background checks and compliance with general firearm laws.[135] Ownership emphasizes responsibility, with no empirical evidence linking legal precision rifles to elevated crime rates, as data from the National Shooting Sports Foundation attributes their prevalence to sporting and hunting pursuits.[132]Records and Notable Figures
Longest Confirmed Kills
The longest confirmed sniper kill officially recognized by Guinness World Records is 3,540 meters (3,871 yards), achieved by an unnamed member of Canada's Joint Task Force 2 in Iraq during May or June 2017. The shot targeted an Islamic State fighter using a McMillan TAC-50 .50 BMG rifle, with the bullet taking approximately 10 seconds to reach the target after accounting for wind and ballistic calculations.[136] This surpassed the prior record of 2,475 meters (2,707 yards) set by British Army Corporal of Horse Craig Harrison in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, on November 2, 2009. Harrison, serving with the Household Cavalry, engaged two Taliban machine gunners using an L115A3 Long Range Rifle chambered in .338 Lapua Magnum; the second shot neutralized the gunner after the first missed due to a faulty sight, with the bullet flight time exceeding 6 seconds.[8] Earlier, Master Corporal Rob Furlong of the Canadian Forces holds a confirmed kill at 2,430 meters (2,657 yards) on March 22, 2002, in the Shah-i-Kot Valley, Afghanistan, using a McMillan TAC-50 .50 BMG rifle against an Al-Qaeda fighter. This engaged a target moving across a ridgeline, confirmed by spotter observation and subsequent patrol verification.[7] In the Russo-Ukrainian War, Ukrainian sniper Viacheslav Kovalskyi of the Security Service of Ukraine reportedly achieved a 3,800-meter (4,156 yards) kill in November 2023 near Kherson, using a domestically produced Horizon's Lord (Volodar Obriyu) rifle. The claim, sourced from Ukrainian military announcements, has been cited in multiple analyses but lacks independent verification equivalent to prior records.[137][7] A further claim emerged in August 2025, when an unnamed Ukrainian sniper unit allegedly recorded a 4,000-meter engagement in the Pokrovsk sector using a Snipex Alligator rifle, reportedly eliminating two Russian soldiers with assistance from drone spotting. Reported by Ukrainian sources and Western media, this awaits broader confirmation amid the ongoing conflict's challenges in verifying distant engagements.[138][139]| Sniper | Distance | Date | Conflict | Weapon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Canadian JTF2 | 3,540 m | May/June 2017 | Iraq War (vs. ISIS) | McMillan TAC-50[136] |
| Craig Harrison (UK) | 2,475 m | November 2, 2009 | War in Afghanistan | L115A3 (.338 Lapua)[8] |
| Rob Furlong (Canada) | 2,430 m | March 22, 2002 | War in Afghanistan | McMillan TAC-50[7] |
| Viacheslav Kovalskyi (Ukraine, reported) | 3,800 m | November 2023 | Russo-Ukrainian War | Horizon's Lord[137] |
| Unnamed Ukrainian (reported) | 4,000 m | August 2025 | Russo-Ukrainian War | Snipex Alligator[138] |
Influential Snipers by Historical Period
In the 18th century, during the American Revolutionary War, riflemen functioning as proto-snipers disrupted conventional line tactics through precision fire. Timothy Murphy, serving in Daniel Morgan's Rifle Corps, achieved a critical kill on British Major General Simon Fraser at the Battle of Saratoga on October 7, 1777, from approximately 300 yards using a long rifle, which broke enemy momentum and contributed to the decisive American victory that secured French alliance.[140][51] The American Civil War (1861–1865) saw organized sharpshooter units emerge, equipped with telescopic sights and target rifles for ranges exceeding 500 yards. Colonel Hiram Berdan commanded the 1st and 2nd United States Sharpshooters, green-clad regiments that inflicted targeted casualties on Confederate officers and pickets, demonstrating the tactical value of specialized marksmen in entrenchment-heavy battles like Yorktown and Gettysburg.[141][142] World War I (1914–1918)Trench stalemate warfare formalized sniping with scoped rifles and periscopes, elevating it to a psychological and tactical weapon. Australian machine gunner Billy Sing, operating from Gallipoli in 1915–1916, amassed over 150 confirmed German kills, earning the Distinguished Conduct Medal for his concealment and fire discipline amid Ottoman counter-sniping.[64] Canadian Ojibwa soldier Francis Pegahmagabow, with the 1st Canadian Battalion, recorded 378 kills across multiple fronts including Ypres and Passchendaele, utilizing innate tracking skills from hunting to outmaneuver German spotters, and received three Distinguished Conduct Medals for his effectiveness.[143] World War II (1939–1945)
The Winter War (1939–1940) showcased Finnish sniper Simo Häyhä, who achieved 505 confirmed kills—plus over 200 with a submachine gun—against Soviet forces in sub-zero conditions, relying on iron-sighted Mosin-Nagant rifles and snow camouflage without optics, forcing enemy adaptations like artillery barrages that highlighted individual marksmanship's force multiplier effect.[144][145] In the Battle of Stalingrad (1942–1943), Soviet Navy reservist Vasily Zaytsev tallied 225 confirmed kills, training over 30 snipers and popularizing urban stalk-and-ambush tactics, though some accounts inflate figures amid wartime reporting discrepancies.[117] German mountain trooper Matthäus Hetzenauer recorded 345 kills on the Eastern Front, emphasizing "one shot, one kill" discipline with scoped Karabiner 98ks, influencing Wehrmacht sniper doctrine despite overall Axis losses.[70] Soviet sniper Lyudmila Pavlichenko confirmed 309 kills, including 36 enemy snipers, during defenses of Odessa and Sevastopol, her feats documented in U.S. tours but scrutinized for potential propaganda enhancement in official tallies.[145] Vietnam War and Later Conflicts (1960s–Present)
U.S. Marine Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock recorded 93 confirmed kills from 1966–1970, including a 2,500-yard shot through enemy optics and the elimination of a key Viet Cong unit commander, pioneering ghillie suits and stalk techniques that shaped Marine Corps sniper training manuals.[80][146] Marine sniper Charles "Chuck" Mawhinney holds the Corps record with 103 confirmed kills and 216 probables in 16 months, utilizing M40 rifles in jungle ambushes that disrupted North Vietnamese supply lines.[147] In Iraq (2003–2009), Navy SEAL Chris Kyle achieved 160 confirmed kills with the McMillan TAC-338, providing overwatch in urban fights like Fallujah and influencing special operations integration of snipers for force protection, though his totals faced post-war verification debates.[148]