Krill
Krill
Main page
2243202

Krill

logo
Community Hub0 subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia

Krill
Northern krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Malacostraca
Superorder: Eucarida
Order: Euphausiacea
Dana, 1852
Families and genera
Euphausiidae
Bentheuphausiidae

Krill (Euphausiids)[1] (sg.: krill) are small and exclusively marine crustaceans of the order Euphausiacea, found in all of the world's oceans.[2] The name "krill" comes from the Norwegian word krill, meaning "small fry of fish",[3] which is also often attributed to species of fish.

Krill are considered an important trophic level connection near the bottom of the food chain. They feed on phytoplankton and, to a lesser extent, zooplankton, and are also the main source of food for many larger animals. In the Southern Ocean, one species, the Antarctic krill, makes up an estimated biomass of around 379 million tonnes,[4] making it among the species with the largest total biomass. Over half of this biomass is eaten by whales, seals, penguins, seabirds, squid, and fish each year. Most krill species display large daily vertical migrations, providing food for predators near the surface at night and in deeper waters during the day.

Krill are fished commercially in the Southern Ocean and in the waters around Japan. The total global harvest amounts to 150,000–200,000 tonnes annually, mostly from the Scotia Sea. Most krill catch is used for aquaculture and aquarium feeds, as bait in sport fishing, or in the pharmaceutical industry. Krill are also used for human consumption in several countries. They are known as okiami (オキアミ) in Japan and as camarones in Spain and the Philippines. In the Philippines, they are also called alamang and are used to make a salty paste called bagoong.

Krill are also the main food for baleen whales, including the blue whale.

Taxonomy

[edit]

Krill belong to the large arthropod subphylum, the Crustacea. The most familiar and largest group of crustaceans, the class Malacostraca, includes the superorder Eucarida comprising the three orders, Euphausiacea (krill), Decapoda (shrimp, prawns, lobsters, crabs), and the planktonic Amphionidacea.

The order Euphausiacea comprises two families. The more abundant Euphausiidae contains 10 different genera with a total of 85 species. Of these, the genus Euphausia is the largest, with 31 species.[5] The lesser-known family, the Bentheuphausiidae, has only one species, Bentheuphausia amblyops, a bathypelagic krill living in deep waters below 1,000 m (3,300 ft). It is considered the most primitive extant krill species.[6]

Well-known species of the Euphausiidae of commercial krill fisheries include Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), Pacific krill (E. pacifica) and Northern krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica).[7]

Phylogeny

[edit]
Proposed phylogeny of Euphausiacea[8]
Euphausiacea
Bentheuphausiidae

Bentheuphausia

Euphausiidae

Thysanopoda (♣)

Nematobrachion (♦)

Euphausiinae

Meganyctiphanes

Euphausiini (♠)(♦)
Nematoscelini (♠)
Phylogeny obtained from morphological data, (♠) names coined in,[8] (♣) possibly paraphyletic taxon due to Nematobrachion in.[8] (♦) clades differs from Casanova (1984),[9] where Pseudoeuphausia is sister to Nyctiphanes, Euphausia is sister to Thysanopoda and Nematobrachion is sister to Stylocheiron.

As of 2013, the order Euphausiacea is believed to be monophyletic due to several unique conserved morphological characteristics (autapomorphy) such as its naked filamentous gills and thin thoracopods[10] and by molecular studies.[11][12][13]

There have been many theories of the location of the order Euphausiacea. Since the first description of Thysanopode tricuspide by Henri Milne-Edwards in 1830, the similarity of their biramous thoracopods had led zoologists to group euphausiids and Mysidacea in the order Schizopoda, which was split by Johan Erik Vesti Boas in 1883 into two separate orders.[14] Later, William Thomas Calman (1904) ranked the Mysidacea in the superorder Peracarida and euphausiids in the superorder Eucarida, although even up to the 1930s the order Schizopoda was advocated.[10] It was later also proposed that order Euphausiacea should be grouped with the Penaeidae (family of prawns) in the Decapoda based on developmental similarities, as noted by Robert Gurney and Isabella Gordon.[15][16] The reason for this debate is that krill share some morphological features of decapods and others of mysids.[10]

Molecular studies have not unambiguously grouped them, possibly due to the paucity of key rare species such as Bentheuphausia amblyops in krill and Amphionides reynaudii in Eucarida. One study supports the monophyly of Eucarida (with basal Mysida),[17] another groups Euphausiacea with Mysida (the Schizopoda),[12] while yet another groups Euphausiacea with Hoplocarida.[18]

Timeline

[edit]

No extant fossil can be unequivocally assigned to Euphausiacea. Some extinct eumalacostracan taxa have been thought to be euphausiaceans such as Anthracophausia, Crangopsis—now assigned to the Aeschronectida (Hoplocarida)[8]—and Palaeomysis.[19] All dating of speciation events were estimated by molecular clock methods, which placed the last common ancestor of the krill family Euphausiidae (order Euphausiacea minus Bentheuphausia amblyops) to have lived in the Lower Cretaceous about 130 million years ago.[12]

Distribution

[edit]

Krill occur worldwide in all oceans, although many individual species have endemic or neritic (i.e., coastal) distributions. Bentheuphausia amblyops, a bathypelagic species, has a cosmopolitan distribution within its deep-sea habitat.[20]

Species of the genus Thysanoessa occur in both Atlantic and Pacific oceans.[21] The Pacific is home to Euphausia pacifica. Northern krill occur across the Atlantic from the Mediterranean Sea northward.

Species with neritic distributions include the four species of the genus Nyctiphanes.[22] They are highly abundant along the upwelling regions of the California, Humboldt, Benguela, and Canarias current systems.[23][24][25] Another species having only neritic distribution is E. crystallorophias, which is endemic to the Antarctic coastline.[26]

Species with endemic distributions include Nyctiphanes capensis, which occurs only in the Benguela Current,[22] E. mucronata in the Humboldt Current,[27] and the six Euphausia species native to the Southern Ocean.

In the Antarctic, seven species are known,[28] one in genus Thysanoessa (T. macrura) and six in Euphausia. The Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) commonly lives at depths reaching 100 m (330 ft),[29] whereas ice krill (Euphausia crystallorophias) reach depth of 4,000 m (13,100 ft), though they commonly inhabit depths of at most 300–600 m (1,000–2,000 ft).[30] Krill perform Diel Vertical Migrations (DVM) in large swarms, and acoustic data has shown these migrations to go up to 400 metres in depth.[31] Both are found at latitudes south of 55° S, with E. crystallorophias dominating south of 74° S[32] and in regions of pack ice. Other species known in the Southern Ocean are E. frigida, E. longirostris, E. triacantha and E. vallentini.[33]

Anatomy and morphology

[edit]
Krill anatomy explained, using Euphausia superba as a model
The gills of krill are externally visible

Krill are crustaceans and, like all crustaceans, they have a chitinous exoskeleton. They have anatomy similar to a standard decapod with their bodies made up of three parts: the cephalothorax is composed of the head and the thorax, which are fused, and the abdomen, which bears the ten swimming appendages, and the tail fan. This outer shell of krill is transparent in most species.

Krill feature intricate compound eyes. Some species adapt to different lighting conditions through the use of screening pigments.[34]

They have two antennae and several pairs of thoracic legs called pereiopods or thoracopods, so named because they are attached to the thorax. Their number varies among genera and species. These thoracic legs include feeding legs and grooming legs.

Krill are probably the sister clade of decapods because all species have five pairs of swimming legs called "swimmerets" in common with the latter, very similar to those of a lobster or freshwater crayfish.

In spite of having ten swimmerets, otherwise known as pleopods, krill cannot be considered decapods. They lack any true ground-based legs due to all their pereiopods having been converted into grooming and auxiliary feeding legs. In Decapoda, there are ten functioning pereiopods, giving them their name; whereas here there are no remaining locomotive pereiopods. Nor are there consistently ten pereiopods at all.

Most krill are about 1–2 centimetres (0.4–0.8 in) long as adults. A few species grow to sizes on the order of 6–15 centimetres (2.4–5.9 in). The largest krill species, Thysanopoda cornuta, lives deep in the open ocean.[35] Krill can be easily distinguished from other crustaceans such as true shrimp by their externally visible gills.[36]

Except for Bentheuphausia amblyops, krill are bioluminescent animals having organs called photophores that can emit light. The light is generated by an enzyme-catalysed chemiluminescence reaction, wherein a luciferin (a kind of pigment) is activated by a luciferase enzyme. Studies indicate that the luciferin of many krill species is a fluorescent tetrapyrrole similar but not identical to dinoflagellate luciferin[37] and that the krill probably do not produce this substance themselves but acquire it as part of their diet, which contains dinoflagellates.[38] Krill photophores are complex organs with lenses and focusing abilities, and can be rotated by muscles.[39] The precise function of these organs is as yet unknown; possibilities include mating, social interaction or orientation and as a form of counter-illumination camouflage to compensate their shadow against overhead ambient light.[40][41]

Ecology

[edit]
Processes in the biological pump
Phytoplankton convert CO2, which has dissolved from the atmosphere into the surface oceans (90 Gt yr−1) into particulate organic carbon (POC) during primary production (~ 50 Gt C yr−1). Phytoplankton are then consumed by krill and small zooplankton grazers, which in turn are preyed upon by higher trophic levels. Any unconsumed phytoplankton form aggregates, and along with zooplankton faecal pellets, sink rapidly and are exported out of the mixed layer (< 12 Gt C yr−1 14). Krill, zooplankton and microbes intercept phytoplankton in the surface ocean and sinking detrital particles at depth, consuming and respiring this POC to CO2 (dissolved inorganic carbon, DIC), such that only a small proportion of surface-produced carbon sinks to the deep ocean (i.e., depths > 1000 m). As krill and smaller zooplankton feed, they also physically fragment particles into small, slower- or non-sinking pieces (via sloppy feeding, coprorhexy if fragmenting faeces), retarding POC export. This releases dissolved organic carbon (DOC) either directly from cells or indirectly via bacterial solubilisation (yellow circle around DOC). Bacteria can then remineralise the DOC to DIC (CO2, microbial gardening). Diel vertically migrating krill, smaller zooplankton and fish can actively transport carbon to depth by consuming POC in the surface layer at night, and metabolising it at their daytime, mesopelagic residence depths. Depending on species life history, active transport may occur on a seasonal basis as well. Numbers given are carbon fluxes (Gt C yr−1) in white boxes and carbon masses (Gt C) in dark boxes.[42]

Feeding

[edit]

Many krill are filter feeders:[24] their frontmost appendages, the thoracopods, form very fine combs with which they can filter out their food from the water. These filters can be very fine in species (such as Euphausia spp.) that feed primarily on phytoplankton, in particular on diatoms, which are unicellular algae. Krill are mostly omnivorous,[43] although a few species are carnivorous, preying on small zooplankton and fish larvae.[44]

Krill are an important element of the aquatic food chain. Krill convert the primary production of their prey into a form suitable for consumption by larger animals that cannot feed directly on the minuscule algae. Northern krill and some other species have a relatively small filtering basket and actively hunt copepods and larger zooplankton.[44]

Predation

[edit]

Many animals feed on krill, ranging from smaller animals like fish or penguins to larger ones like seals and baleen whales.[45]

Disturbances of an ecosystem resulting in a decline in the krill population can have far-reaching effects. During a coccolithophore bloom in the Bering Sea in 1998,[46] for instance, the diatom concentration dropped in the affected area. Krill cannot feed on the smaller coccolithophores, and consequently the krill population (mainly E. pacifica) in that region declined sharply. This in turn affected other species: the shearwater population dropped. The incident was thought to have been one reason salmon did not spawn that season.[47]

Several single-celled endoparasitoidic ciliates of the genus Collinia can infect species of krill and devastate affected populations. Such diseases were reported for Thysanoessa inermis in the Bering Sea and also for E. pacifica, Thysanoessa spinifera, and T. gregaria off the North American Pacific coast.[48][49] Some ectoparasites of the family Dajidae (epicaridean isopods) afflict krill (and also shrimp and mysids); one such parasite is Oculophryxus bicaulis, which was found on the krill Stylocheiron affine and S. longicorne. It attaches itself to the animal's eyestalk and sucks blood from its head; it apparently inhibits the host's reproduction, as none of the afflicted animals reached maturity.[50]

Climate change poses another threat to krill populations.[51]

Plastics

[edit]

Preliminary research indicates krill can digest microplastics under 5 mm (0.20 in) in diameter, breaking them down and excreting them back into the environment in smaller form.[52]

Life history and behavior

[edit]
A nauplius of Euphausia pacifica hatching, emerging backwards from the egg

The life cycle of krill is relatively well understood, despite minor variations in detail from species to species.[15][24] After krill hatch, they experience several larval stages—nauplius, pseudometanauplius, metanauplius, calyptopsis, and furcilia, each of which divides into sub-stages. The pseudometanauplius stage is exclusive to species that lay their eggs within an ovigerous sac: so-called "sac-spawners". The larvae grow and moult repeatedly as they develop, replacing their rigid exoskeleton when it becomes too small. Smaller animals moult more frequently than larger ones. Yolk reserves within their body nourish the larvae through metanauplius stage.

By the calyptopsis stages differentiation has progressed far enough for them to develop a mouth and a digestive tract, and they begin to eat phytoplankton. By that time their yolk reserves are exhausted and the larvae must have reached the photic zone, the upper layers of the ocean where algae flourish. During the furcilia stages, segments with pairs of swimmerets are added, beginning at the frontmost segments. Each new pair becomes functional only at the next moult. The number of segments added during any one of the furcilia stages may vary even within one species depending on environmental conditions.[53] After the final furcilia stage, an immature juvenile emerges in a shape similar to an adult, and subsequently develops gonads and matures sexually.[54]

Reproduction

[edit]
The head of a female krill of the sac-spawning species Nematoscelis difficilis with her brood sac. The eggs have a diameter of 0.3–0.4 millimetres (0.012–0.016 in)

During the mating season, which varies by species and climate, the male deposits a sperm sack at the female's genital opening (named thelycum). The females can carry several thousand eggs in their ovary, which may then account for as much as one third of the animal's body mass.[55] Krill can have multiple broods in one season, with interbrood intervals lasting on the order of days.[25][56]

Krill employ two types of spawning mechanism.[25] The 57 species of the genera Bentheuphausia, Euphausia, Meganyctiphanes, Thysanoessa, and Thysanopoda are "broadcast spawners": the female releases the fertilised eggs into the water, where they usually sink, disperse, and are on their own. These species generally hatch in the nauplius 1 stage, but have recently been discovered to hatch sometimes as metanauplius or even as calyptopis stages.[57] The remaining 29 species of the other genera are "sac spawners", where the female carries the eggs with her, attached to the rearmost pairs of thoracopods until they hatch as metanauplii, although some species like Nematoscelis difficilis may hatch as nauplius or pseudometanauplius.[58]

Moulting

[edit]

Moulting occurs whenever a specimen outgrows its rigid exoskeleton. Young animals, growing faster, moult more often than older and larger ones. The frequency of moulting varies widely by species and is, even within one species, subject to many external factors such as latitude, water temperature, and food availability. The subtropical species Nyctiphanes simplex, for instance, has an overall inter-moult period of two to seven days: larvae moult on the average every four days, while juveniles and adults do so, on average, every six days. For E. superba in the Antarctic sea, inter-moult periods ranging between 9 and 28 days depending on the temperature between −1 and 4 °C (30 and 39 °F) have been observed, and for Meganyctiphanes norvegica in the North Sea the inter-moult periods range also from 9 and 28 days but at temperatures between 2.5 and 15 °C (36.5 and 59.0 °F).[59] E. superba is able to reduce its body size when there is not enough food available, moulting also when its exoskeleton becomes too large.[60] Similar shrinkage has also been observed for E. pacifica, a species occurring in the Pacific Ocean from polar to temperate zones, as an adaptation to abnormally high water temperatures. Shrinkage has been postulated for other temperate-zone species of krill as well.[61]

Lifespan

[edit]

Some high-latitude species of krill can live for more than six years (e.g., Euphausia superba); others, such as the mid-latitude species Euphausia pacifica, live for only two years.[7] Subtropical or tropical species' longevity is still shorter, e.g., Nyctiphanes simplex, which usually lives for only six to eight months.[62]

Swarming

[edit]
A krill swarm

Most krill are swarming animals; the sizes and densities of such swarms vary by species and region. For Euphausia superba, swarms reach 10,000 to 60,000 individuals per cubic metre.[63][64] Swarming is a defensive mechanism, confusing smaller predators that would like to pick out individuals. In 2012, Gandomi and Alavi presented what appears to be a successful stochastic algorithm[broken anchor] for modelling the behaviour of krill swarms. The algorithm is based on three main factors: " (i) movement induced by the presence of other individuals (ii) foraging activity, and (iii) random diffusion."[65]

Vertical migration

[edit]
Beating pleopods of a swimming Antarctic krill

Krill typically follow a diurnal vertical migration. It has been assumed that they spend the day at greater depths and rise during the night toward the surface. The deeper they go, the more they reduce their activity,[66] apparently to reduce encounters with predators and to conserve energy. Swimming activity in krill varies with stomach fullness. Sated animals that had been feeding at the surface swim less actively and therefore sink below the mixed layer.[67] As they sink they produce feces which employs a role in the Antarctic carbon cycle. Krill with empty stomachs swim more actively and thus head towards the surface.

Vertical migration may be a 2–3 times daily occurrence. Some species (e.g., Euphausia superba, E. pacifica, E. hanseni, Pseudeuphausia latifrons, and Thysanoessa spinifera) form surface swarms during the day for feeding and reproductive purposes even though such behaviour is dangerous because it makes them extremely vulnerable to predators.[68]

Experimental studies using Artemia salina as a model suggest that the vertical migrations of krill several hundreds of metres, in groups tens of metres deep, could collectively create enough downward jets of water to have a significant effect on ocean mixing.[69]

Dense swarms can elicit a feeding frenzy among fish, birds and mammal predators, especially near the surface. When disturbed, a swarm scatters, and some individuals have even been observed to moult instantly, leaving the exuvia behind as a decoy.[70]

Krill normally swim at a pace of 5–10 cm/s (2–3 body lengths per second),[71] using their swimmerets for propulsion. Their larger migrations are subject to ocean currents. When in danger, they show an escape reaction called lobstering—flicking their caudal structures, the telson and the uropods, they move backwards through the water relatively quickly, achieving speeds in the range of 10 to 27 body lengths per second, which for large krill such as E. superba means around 0.8 m/s (3 ft/s).[72] Their swimming performance has led many researchers to classify adult krill as micro-nektonic life-forms, i.e., small animals capable of individual motion against (weak) currents. Larval forms of krill are generally considered zooplankton.[73]

Biogeochemical cycles

[edit]
Role of Antarctic krill in biogeochemical cycles
Krill (as swarms and individuals) feed on phytoplankton at the surface (1) leaving only a proportion to sink as phytodetrital aggregates (2), which are broken up easily and may not sink below the permanent thermocline. Krill also release faecal pellets (3) whilst they feed, which can sink to the deep sea but can be consumed (coprophagy) and degraded as they descend (4) by krill, bacteria and zooplankton. In the marginal ice zone, faecal pellet flux can reach greater depths (5). Krill also release moults, which sink and contribute to the carbon flux (6). Nutrients are released by krill during sloppy feeding, excretion and egestion, such as iron and ammonium (7, see Fig. 2 for other nutrients released), and if they are released near the surface can stimulate phytoplankton production and further atmospheric CO2 drawdown. Some adult krill permanently reside deeper in the water column, consuming organic material at depth (8). Any carbon (as organic matter or as CO2) that sinks below the permanent thermocline is removed from subjection to seasonal mixing and will remain stored in the deep ocean for at least a year (9). The swimming motions of migrating adult krill that migrate can mix nutrient-rich water from the deep (10), further stimulating primary production. Other adult krill forage on the seafloor, releasing respired CO2 at depth and may be consumed by demersal predators (11). Larval krill, which in the Southern Ocean reside under the sea ice, undergo extensive diurnal vertical migration (12), potentially transferring CO2 below the permanent thermocline. Krill are consumed by many predators including baleen whales (13), leading to storage of some of the krill carbon as biomass for decades before the whale dies, sinks to the seafloor and is consumed by deep sea organisms.[42]

The Antarctic krill is an important species in the context of biogeochemical cycling[74][42] and in the Antarctic food web.[75][76] It plays a prominent role in the Southern Ocean because of its ability to cycle nutrients and to feed penguins and baleen and blue whales.

Cycling of nutrients by an individual krill
When krill moult they release dissolved calcium, fluoride and phosphorus from the exoskeleton (1). The chitin (organic material) that forms the exoskeleton contributes to organic particle flux sinking to the deep ocean. Krill respire a portion of the energy derived from consuming phytoplankton or other animals as carbon dioxide (2), when swimming from mid/deep waters to the surface in large swarms krill mix water, which potentially brings nutrients to nutrient-poor surface waters (3), ammonium and phosphate is released from the gills and when excreting, along with dissolved organic carbon, nitrogen (e.g., urea) and phosphorus (DOC, DON and DOP, 2 & 4). Krill release fast-sinking faecal pellets containing particulate organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus (POC, PON and POP) and iron, the latter of which is bioavailable when leached into surrounding waters along with DOC, DON and DOP (5).[42]

Human uses

[edit]
Deep-frozen plates of Antarctic krill for use as animal feed and raw material for cooking

Harvesting history

[edit]

Krill have been harvested as a food source for humans and domesticated animals since at least the 19th century, and possibly earlier in Japan, where it was known as okiami. Large-scale fishing developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and now occurs only in Antarctic waters and in the seas around Japan. Historically, the largest krill fishery nations were Japan and the Soviet Union, or, after the latter's dissolution, Russia and Ukraine.[77] The harvest peaked, which in 1983 was about 528,000 tonnes in the Southern Ocean alone (of which the Soviet Union took in 93%), is now managed as a precaution against overfishing.[78]

In 1993, two events caused a decline in krill fishing: Russia exited the industry; and the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) defined maximum catch quotas for a sustainable exploitation of Antarctic krill. After an October 2011 review, the Commission decided not to change the quota.[79]

The annual Antarctic catch stabilised at around 100,000 tonnes, which is roughly one fiftieth of the CCAMLR catch quota.[80] The main limiting factor was probably high costs along with political and legal issues.[81] The Japanese fishery saturated at some 70,000 tonnes.[82]

Although krill are found worldwide, fishing in Southern Oceans are preferred because the krill are more "catchable" and abundant in these regions. Particularly in Antarctic seas which are considered as pristine, they are considered a "clean product".[77]

In 2018 it was announced that almost every krill fishing company operating in Antarctica will abandon operations in huge areas around the Antarctic Peninsula from 2020, including "buffer zones" around breeding colonies of penguins.[83]

Human consumption

[edit]
Dried fermented krill, used to make Bagoong alamang, a type of shrimp paste from the Philippines

Although the total biomass of Antarctic krill may be as abundant as 400 million tonnes, the human impact on this keystone species is growing, with a 39% increase in total fishing yield to 294,000 tonnes over 2010–2014.[80] Major countries involved in krill harvesting are Norway (56% of total catch in 2014), the Republic of Korea (19%), and China (18%).[80]

Krill is a rich source of protein and omega-3 fatty acids which are under development in the early 21st century as human food, dietary supplements as oil capsules, livestock food, and pet food.[77][79][84] Krill tastes salty with a somewhat stronger fish flavor than shrimp. For mass consumption and commercially prepared products, they must be peeled to remove the inedible exoskeleton.[84]

In 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration published a letter of no objection for a manufactured krill oil product to be generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for human consumption.[85]

Krill (and other planktonic shrimp, notably Acetes spp.) are most widely consumed in Southeast Asia, where it is fermented (with the shells intact) and usually ground finely to make shrimp paste. It can be stir-fried and eaten paired with white rice or used to add umami flavors to a wide variety of traditional dishes.[86][87] The liquid from the fermentation process is also harvested as fish sauce.[88]

Bio-inspired robotics

[edit]

Krill are agile swimmers in the intermediate Reynolds number regime, in which there are not many solutions for uncrewed underwater robotics, and have inspired robotic platforms to both study their locomotion as well as find design solutions for underwater robots.[89]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Krill are small, shrimp-like marine crustaceans belonging to the order Euphausiacea, comprising over 85 species that inhabit oceans worldwide, though they achieve greatest abundance in nutrient-rich polar and temperate waters.[1][2] Unlike true shrimp, euphausiaceans possess thoracic legs fused into feeding structures and are holoplanktonic, spending their entire lives in the water column as adults typically measuring 1 to 6 cm in length.[1] Many species exhibit bioluminescence via photophores, facilitating communication and predator avoidance, while daily vertical migrations synchronize with diel light cycles to optimize foraging and reduce predation risk.[3] Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), the most ecologically dominant species, sustains biomass estimates exceeding 300 million metric tons in the Southern Ocean, underpinning food webs as a primary grazer of phytoplankton and prey for whales, seals, penguins, and fish.[4][5] This keystone role extends to biogeochemical cycling, where krill-mediated nutrient transport and fecal pellet export influence carbon sequestration and primary productivity across vast pelagic zones.[3] Swarms can reach densities of thousands per cubic meter, enabling efficient energy transfer but also rendering populations vulnerable to localized depletion from predators or harvesting.[5] Commercially, krill supports a targeted fishery yielding around 300,000 to 500,000 tons annually, primarily for omega-3-rich oil, meal in aquaculture feeds, and human supplements, with Antarctic stocks managed under precautionary quotas by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources to limit ecosystem impacts.[2] Despite representing less than 0.1% of estimated biomass, concentrated fishing overlaps with predator foraging grounds have raised concerns over indirect effects on recovering whale populations and seabird breeding success, prompting calls for refined spatial management to align with observed environmental variability.[6][7]

Taxonomy and Evolution

Phylogenetic Classification

Krill constitute the crustacean order Euphausiacea, positioned within the superorder Eucarida of the class Malacostraca. The complete taxonomic hierarchy follows: Kingdom Animalia, phylum Arthropoda, subphylum Crustacea, class Malacostraca, superorder Eucarida, order Euphausiacea.[8][1] Euphausiacea encompasses 86 valid species distributed across two families: Bentheuphausiidae (three deep-sea genera) and Euphausiidae (the remaining eight genera, including dominant Antarctic species like Euphausia superba).[9] Phylogenetic reconstructions from combined molecular (four markers) and morphological (168 characters) datasets affirm the monophyly of the order and both families, with Bentheuphausiidae resolved as sister to Euphausiidae.[9] Within Euphausiidae, analyses delineate three principal clades, prompting proposals for new subfamilies: Thysanopodinae (encompassing Nematobrachion and Thysanopoda), Euphausiinae (Pseudeuphausia plus Euphausia), and Nematoscelinae (all other genera, such as Meganyctiphanes and Nematoscelis).[9] These clades exhibit co-evolved traits tied to copulatory structures (e.g., petasma morphology), feeding appendages, and defensive features, supporting their robustness despite minor molecular signals of paraphyly in Thysanopoda.[9] The placement of Euphausiacea among malacostracan orders remains contentious. Consensus taxonomy embeds it in Eucarida with Decapoda, reflecting shared traits like biramous pleopods and stalked eyes.[9] However, early molecular evidence from 28S rDNA sequences posits Euphausiacea as sister to Mysida (forming a potential Schizopoda-like group), challenging Eucarida monophyly and aligning with certain morphological debates over peracarid versus eucarist affinities.[10] Subsequent studies have not fully resolved this, with morphological phylogenies variably supporting alternative positions.[11]

Evolutionary Timeline and Fossil Evidence

The fossil record of krill, comprising the order Euphausiacea, lacks unequivocal representatives, with no preserved specimens definitively attributable to the group despite extensive searches in marine sedimentary deposits.[12] [13] This scarcity is attributed to the soft-bodied, planktonic nature of krill, which favors rapid decomposition over fossilization, unlike more robust benthic crustaceans; ambiguous assignments, such as the Carboniferous eumalacostracan Pechella strongi, have been proposed but rejected due to morphological mismatches with modern euphausiaceans.[14] [15] Consequently, direct evidence of krill paleobiology, including ancestral habitats or morphological transitions, remains unavailable, compelling reliance on indirect methods like molecular clock analyses calibrated against broader crustacean phylogenies. Molecular phylogenetics provides the primary framework for reconstructing krill's evolutionary timeline. Analysis of nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA (LSU rDNA) sequences from multiple euphausiid species estimates the divergence of the family's last common ancestor around 130 million years ago in the Early Cretaceous, coinciding with the breakup of Pangaea and the expansion of epicontinental seas that may have facilitated pelagic diversification.[13] [16] Subsequent cladogenesis yielded at least two resilient lineages that endured the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction event approximately 65 million years ago, likely due to krill's opportunistic feeding and widespread oceanic distribution buffering against continental-scale disruptions.[13] By the late Paleogene, around 23 million years ago during the Oligocene-Miocene transition, the major modern genera of Euphausiacea had emerged, aligning with global cooling, the establishment of circum-Antarctic currents, and vicariant speciation driven by oceanographic barriers.[13] [17] These inferences, derived from slowly evolving genetic markers to minimize rate heterogeneity, underscore krill's ancient origins within Malacostraca—whose broader clade traces to the Devonian—but highlight post-Cretaceous radiations as key to their current dominance in marine ecosystems, with approximately 86 extant species reflecting adaptive radiation into diverse pelagic niches.[9] Such estimates carry uncertainties from calibration assumptions and substitution model choices, yet they consistently portray Euphausiacea as a relict lineage with conserved caridoid morphology since at least the Mesozoic.[13]

Physical Characteristics

Anatomy

Krill exhibit a shrimp-like body plan typical of malacostracan crustaceans, divided into a cephalothorax and a multi-segmented abdomen encased in a chitinous exoskeleton.[18] The cephalothorax results from the fusion of the head and thorax, covered dorsally and laterally by a carapace that often features a rostrum at the anterior end.[18] Adults range from 1 to 6 cm in length across species, with Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) attaining lengths of 5 to 6.5 cm and weights up to 2 g.[19] The body is semi-transparent with pinkish hues from pigment spots, facilitating camouflage in oceanic environments.[19] The head region includes paired compound eyes mounted on stalks, antennules with two flagella, and antennae with a single flagellum and scale-like exopodite for sensory detection of chemical and mechanical stimuli.[18] Mouthparts comprise a labrum, toothed mandibles with palps, paired labia, and two pairs of maxillae that assist in food manipulation.[18] The thorax bears eight pairs of biramous thoracopods, whose endopodites function in walking and feeding while exopodites aid in swimming; these form a filtering basket with plumose setae for capturing phytoplankton.[18] Respiratory gills, arborescent in posterior pairs, attach to the coxal joints of these appendages and remain exposed outside the carapace, distinguishing krill from decapods.[18] The abdomen consists of six segments, the first five each bearing a pair of biramous pleopods that serve as primary swimming appendages.[18] In males, the first two pleopod pairs are modified into copulatory structures, while females possess a specialized thelycum for sperm reception.[19] The terminal segment fuses into a telson armed with biramous uropods, forming a tail fan for propulsion and steering during escape responses.[18] Many species feature bioluminescent photophores—specialized glands producing blue light—located on eyestalks, thoracic bases, and abdominal segments for communication or predator deterrence.[18][19] Internally, krill possess an open circulatory system with a tubular heart positioned dorsally in the cephalothorax, pumping hemolymph through arteries to tissues and lacunae.[20] The digestive tract includes a foregut with grinding structures, a midgut gland for nutrient absorption, and a hindgut for waste expulsion, adapted for processing filtered particulate matter.[18] The nervous system centers on a supraesophageal ganglion connected to segmental ganglia, supporting coordinated swarming and migratory behaviors.[20]

Morphological Adaptations

Krill possess an elongated, semi-transparent body form, typically 1–6 cm in length depending on species, which facilitates hydrodynamic efficiency and visual camouflage in the water column by reducing contrast with surrounding marine light fields.[19] The chitinous exoskeleton includes a calcified carapace that fuses the head and thorax into a cephalothorax, shielding vital organs including gills while allowing flexibility for appendage movement; gills are positioned ventrally beneath the carapace and feature muscular contractions that retract them against the body wall to minimize hydrodynamic drag during sustained swimming.[21] This carapace also bears lateral pores and slits for water exchange, supporting respiratory efficiency in oxygen-variable pelagic environments.[19] Sensory structures include large, multifaceted compound eyes positioned dorsally on stalks, adapted for wide-angle vision and sensitivity to dim light, which aids in predator detection and navigation during diel migrations; in carnivorous lineages such as Nematoscelis and Stylocheiron, eyes are subdivided into distinct upper and lower lobes with enlarged ommatidia specialized for prey tracking in epi- and mesopelagic depths.[9] Antennae, comprising antennules and scala antennalis, serve dual roles in chemosensory detection of food and mates, as well as auxiliary propulsion via scaphocerite blades on the antennal scale.[19] Locomotion relies on biramous pleopods—flattened, paddle-like appendages along the abdomen—that generate thrust through metachronal waving, enabling continuous swimming against negative buoyancy and formation of dense swarms for collective defense.[19] In filter-feeding species like Euphausia superba, thoracic endopodites form a flexible "feeding basket" lined with dense setae that trap phytoplankton particles via compression-filtration, with mandibular surfaces and maxillipeds further processing aggregates; carnivorous taxa exhibit enlarged anterior thoracopods with chela-like setae for grasping evasive prey.[19][9] Defensive morphology includes ventral photophores—bioluminescent organs distributed from the mouthparts to pleopods—that emit blue-green light via luciferin-luciferase reactions, enabling counter-illumination to match downwelling irradiance and obscure silhouettes from below; this adaptation is absent only in the deep-sea Bentheuphausia amblyops.[22] Sexual dimorphism manifests in males via modified pleopods forming petasmae for spermatophore transfer and elongate antennae, while females possess a trilobed thelycum for sperm storage, supporting broadcast spawning in swarms.[19] These features collectively enhance survival in nutrient-scarce, predator-dense oceans.[9]

Distribution and Habitat

Global Ranges

Krill of the order Euphausiacea exhibit a global oceanic distribution, with over 80 species inhabiting marine environments across all latitudes from the Arctic to the Antarctic poles, though most species have restricted geographic ranges rather than being truly cosmopolitan. While some taxa are neritic and confined to coastal or shelf waters, others occupy epipelagic zones of the open ocean, with overall patterns influenced by ocean currents, temperature gradients, and productivity hotspots. High biomass concentrations are typically found in polar and subpolar regions, but species diversity decreases toward equatorial tropics, where fewer, more specialized forms persist.[23] In the Southern Ocean, Euphausia superba (Antarctic krill) dominates, with a circumpolar range south of the Antarctic Convergence (approximately 55°S), centered along the Antarctic continental shelf break where adults aggregate, while juveniles favor shallower inshore areas. This species' core habitat spans roughly 19 million km², extending from the Antarctic Peninsula across the Weddell Sea, Scotia Sea, and Ross Sea, though populations show patchiness tied to sea ice dynamics and upwelling. Recent observations indicate potential southward contraction of suitable habitat amid warming trends, with densities declining north of 60°S.[24][25][26] Northern Hemisphere distributions feature species like Meganyctiphanes norvegica (northern krill), which ranges across the boreal and Arctic North Atlantic from Cape Hatteras (approximately 35°N) northward to Fram Strait and eastward to Novaya Zemlya (52°E), including incursions into the Mediterranean Sea and Norwegian Sea. Depths typically span 100–400 m, with horizontal extent covering neritic slopes and oceanic fronts. In the North Pacific, Euphausia pacifica prevails in temperate upwelling zones off California and Japan, linking primary production to higher trophic levels. Comparable patterns occur in the Indian and equatorial Pacific Oceans with genera such as Nematoscelis and Euphausia, though these support lower biomasses and exhibit greater sensitivity to thermal variability.[27][28][29]

Environmental Preferences and Habitat Dynamics

Krill species display distinct environmental preferences shaped by temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, and depth, which vary across taxa but generally favor oxygenated, nutrient-rich marine waters. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), the most abundant species, thrive in subzero to low temperatures (-1.5°C to 3°C), with an upper thermal tolerance limit of approximately 6°C beyond which metabolic stress and reduced growth occur.[30] [31] Salinity preferences for E. superba range from 26.8 to 41.2 practical salinity units (PSU), enabling adaptation to coastal and open-ocean conditions, though higher salinities correlate with elevated trace metal uptake such as zinc and cadmium.[30] [32] Dissolved oxygen levels critically influence distribution, with krill communities declining in hypoxic zones; surface oxygen saturation near 100% at 0°C and 35 PSU supports optimal physiology.[33] [34] Depth preferences involve epipelagic zones (0-200 m) during daylight, extending to mesopelagic layers at night, modulated by temperature gradients and oxygen minima.[35] [36] Habitat dynamics for krill are driven by interactions between physical oceanography and biological needs, including advection by currents and dependence on seasonal sea ice. In the Southern Ocean, E. superba populations aggregate in frontal zones where the Antarctic Circumpolar Current converges with shelf waters, facilitating larval dispersal and access to phytoplankton blooms.[37] Sea ice extent and duration are pivotal for overwintering, as under-ice algae sustain larvae and juveniles; recruitment success correlates positively with winter ice cover, with reduced ice linked to lower summer abundances.[38] [39] Climate-driven changes exacerbate dynamics: projections indicate a 51% decline in E. superba spawning habitat by 2100 under scenarios of diminishing sea ice and warming surface temperatures (up to 1-2°C regionally), shifting suitable areas poleward or to deeper waters.[40] [41] Intraspecific and interspecific variations highlight adaptive flexibility; northern krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica) populations show genetic adaptations to regional temperature gradients in the Atlantic, enabling persistence amid multidecadal warming.[42] Temperate species like those in the California Current exhibit habitat partitioning by upwelling intensity and depth, with biomass declining under persistent warm anomalies.[43] In equatorial upwelling systems, such as the Humboldt Current, krill abundance inversely tracks oxygen minimum zone depth and temperature, underscoring hypoxia as a limiting factor.[36] These dynamics underscore krill's sensitivity to mesoscale variability, where chlorophyll availability and bathymetry further refine occupancy.[33][44]

Life Cycle and Physiology

Reproduction and Development

Krill species exhibit two primary reproductive strategies: sac-spawning, where females retain fertilized eggs in an external brood pouch until hatching, and broadcast spawning, where eggs and sperm are released into the water column for external fertilization.[45] Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), the most abundant species, employ broadcast spawning, with females releasing eggs in batches during the austral summer, often multiple times per season after gonadal maturation over at least two moults.[46] Reproductive development in females is triggered by increasing food availability, such as phytoplankton blooms in spring, leading to gonad growth and oocyte maturation.[47] Males produce spermatophores that attach to females for sperm transfer, though direct mating observations are rare.[48] Eggs of E. superba are neutrally buoyant initially but sink rapidly to depths of 500–1000 meters, where colder temperatures slow development and reduce predation risk, before hatching and larval ascent.[49] Hatching occurs after approximately 8 days at near-freezing temperatures, producing nauplius I larvae.[50] Larval development proceeds through sequential stages: a brief metanauplius (in some species), three calyptopis stages, and up to six furcilia stages, with progression to the first postlarval juvenile stage taking 2–3 months under Antarctic conditions.[50] [51] Furcilia larvae, particularly later stages, perform diel vertical migrations and feed on phytoplankton, with overwintering under sea ice critical for survival and growth into recruits the following spring.[52] Environmental factors like food supply and temperature influence larval growth rates, with winter larvae showing reduced body length and dry weight compared to autumn counterparts.[53] Fecundity in E. superba females can reach thousands of eggs per spawn, varying with body size and condition, supporting high population recruitment despite elevated early mortality.[54]

Moulting and Growth

Krill, as arthropods, undergo discontinuous growth through periodic moulting, a process essential for increasing body size and replacing the rigid chitinous exoskeleton. During each moult cycle, the animal secretes enzymes to soften and split the old exoskeleton (ecdysis), withdraws soft tissues, and rapidly calcifies a new, expanded one using stored minerals like calcium carbonate, resulting in a proportional size increase typically measured in standard length (from rostrum tip to telson end).[55] This cycle is regulated hormonally, with ecdysteroids triggering pre-moult preparation and new cuticle formation, and includes distinct stages: post-moult (A-B), inter-moult (C), pre-moult (D), and ecdysis.[56] Unlike continuous growers, krill can exhibit positive, neutral, or negative growth per moult, enabling phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental stressors such as food scarcity or temperature shifts.[56] In Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), the dominant species studied, intermoult periods average 14–20 days under optimal conditions, with laboratory observations confirming synchronous moulting in cohorts and field data showing variability tied to age, sex, and nutrition.[57] [58] Growth increments per moult range from 1–3% in body length for juveniles and subadults, with the initial laboratory moult often yielding the highest increment (up to ~3%) before stabilizing or declining; starved individuals may shrink by 1–3%.[58] Daily growth rates in wild populations vary widely (0.013–0.32 mm d⁻¹), influenced by phytoplankton availability and sea surface temperature, with higher rates in immature krill before maturity onset.[59] [60] Females generally achieve higher overall growth than males, though males mature earlier with peak pre-maturity rates; post-maturity, growth slows due to energy diversion to gonad development and spawning.[60] [61] Moulting frequency decreases with size and age across krill species, extending intermoult intervals to 20–30 days in larger adults, as seen in northern krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica), where instantaneous growth rates confirm similar patterns of increment decline post-initial moults.[55] Environmental factors modulate this: elevated pCO₂ reduces growth rates across size classes without altering moult frequency, while warmer temperatures accelerate metabolism but can induce negative growth if exceeding thermal optima (~0–5°C for Antarctic species).[62] [61] Models integrating energetics, such as the Energetics Moult-Cycle framework, predict life-history trajectories by linking moult-driven growth to carbon budgets, emphasizing that moulting exuviae contribute significantly to vertical carbon flux (up to 40% of particulate organic carbon in swarms).[60] [63] These dynamics underscore krill's adaptability, with gene expression studies revealing upregulated chitin synthesis and ion transport genes during pre-moult, facilitating rapid size adjustments.[56]

Lifespan and Natural Mortality Factors

Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), the most extensively studied species, typically exhibit a lifespan of 5 to 6 years in natural populations, though laboratory conditions have demonstrated survival up to 7 to 8 years for individuals starting at 1 to 2 years of age.[3][64] Age determination relies on counting annual growth bands in eyestalks, a method validated through mark-recapture and known-age experiments, confirming ages from 2 to 5 years in wild specimens ranging 37 to 63 mm in length.[65] Earlier estimates based on growth models suggested longer lifespans of 7 to 11 years, but recent empirical validations indicate shorter durations due to high natural turnover.[64] Natural mortality rates for E. superba vary by life stage and size, with instantaneous mortality coefficients (M) estimated at 0.52 during maturation and rising to 1.1–2.41 in later stages, reflecting cumulative risks from predation and environmental stressors.[66] Predation constitutes a primary driver, with smaller-bodied krill experiencing elevated mortality from fish, seabirds, seals, and cetaceans, which selectively target juveniles and subadults in swarms.[67] Starvation emerges as a significant factor during periods of low primary productivity, exacerbated by competition within dense populations, where mortality increases as a function of body weight and prey density decline.[68] Abiotic influences, including sea ice extent and chlorophyll a concentrations, modulate survival by affecting recruitment and overwintering condition; reduced ice cover correlates with higher juvenile mortality via disrupted habitat and food webs.[39] Length-dependent processes amplify these effects, as slower-growing or smaller individuals within cohorts face compounded risks from both predation and physiological stress, challenging assumptions of uniform mortality in population models.[69] Disease and senescence contribute minimally compared to extrinsic factors, with no dominant parasitic outbreaks documented in core populations.[66]

Behavior and Social Dynamics

Swarming Patterns

Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) are obligate swarmers, forming dense aggregations that constitute a core aspect of their post-metamorphosis life history.[70] Swarms typically range from small schools of dozens to massive patches spanning kilometers, with densities varying from 10 to over 10,000 individuals per cubic meter.[71] These formations exhibit considerable variability in shape, often described as loose clouds, tight schools, or surface layers, influenced by factors such as proximity to land, where swarms near coastal areas tend to be denser and more compact compared to those in open waters.[71] Swarm structure shows scaling patterns, with larger swarms displaying rougher surfaces and limits to maximum size around 100-500 meters in length, constrained by hydrodynamic and behavioral dynamics.[72] Swarm formation arises from self-organizing processes driven by local social interactions rather than centralized control, enabling rapid aggregation and cohesion through mechanisms like alignment and attraction to neighbors.[73] Krill within swarms maintain polarized swimming orientations, facilitating information transfer about environmental cues such as predator presence or food availability, which supports collective decision-making for evasion or foraging.[74] This decentralized coordination underpins swarm stability, with individuals responding to nearby conspecifics via sensory modalities including vision, mechanoreception, and possibly pheromones, though empirical data emphasize hydrodynamic signaling from tail beats.[73] Ecologically, swarming patterns enhance survival by diluting predation risk, as evidenced by higher predator encounter rates with denser, shallower swarms that attract species like blue whales.[75] Reproductive motivations also drive aggregation, with swarms often comprising mixed demographics but showing seasonal shifts toward higher proportions of mature individuals during spawning periods.[76] Environmental variables, including temperature fronts and upwelling, modulate swarm predictability, with hotspots forming where prey patches align with krill behavioral responses.[77] Despite these patterns, inter-annual variability persists, complicating acoustic surveys and highlighting the role of stochastic oceanographic processes in swarm dynamics.[78]

Diel Vertical Migration

Krill, particularly the Antarctic species Euphausia superba, exhibit diel vertical migration (DVM), a rhythmic pattern involving descent to deeper waters at dawn and ascent to shallower depths at dusk, synchronized primarily with the light-dark cycle.[79] [80] This behavior positions krill at depths of 100–300 meters or more during daylight hours to minimize exposure to visual predators, while nighttime migrations to surface layers (0–100 meters) facilitate access to phytoplankton-rich waters.[81] [82] Studies using acoustic surveys and net tows in the Scotia Sea confirm this flexibility, with krill adjusting migration amplitude based on local predation risks and food gradients during advection.[81] The primary drivers of DVM include predator avoidance and foraging optimization, with empirical evidence supporting both. Visual predators such as seals and fish hunt more effectively in illuminated surface waters, prompting krill to seek refuge in darker profundal zones by day; laboratory and field observations show krill descending rapidly at sunrise, often within minutes of light onset.[82] [83] Concurrently, ascent at dusk aligns with peak phytoplankton availability near the surface, as evidenced by gut content analyses revealing higher feeding rates during nocturnal phases; however, krill also exploit benthic food sources in some regions, suggesting DVM is not solely phytoplankton-driven.[84] [85] Circadian rhythms, regulated by endogenous clocks and entrained by photoperiod, underpin the timing of DVM, as demonstrated in controlled experiments where krill maintained migratory patterns under constant conditions after light-dark entrainment.[86] Seasonal and environmental plasticity modulates this behavior: in winter, migrations extend to greater depths (up to 200–400 meters) amid reduced surface productivity and ice cover, while chlorophyll a concentrations influence amplitude, with shallower migrations in high-food patches.[87] [84] Body size introduces variability, as larger krill (>40 mm) exhibit more pronounced daytime descent to evade size-selective predators like fur seals, per acoustic data from South Georgia overwintering populations.[88] [83] Intraspecific and interspecific differences highlight adaptive divergence; northern krill species like Meganyctiphanes norvegica show similar light-synchronized DVM but with shallower ranges (50–200 meters), influenced by regional predator assemblages and thermoclines.[89] [90] This behavior contributes to trophic cascading, as migrating krill transport nutrients vertically, though acoustic biases from DVM complicate biomass estimates in surveys.[91] Overall, DVM reflects a balance of selective pressures, with field validations from moored acoustics and modeling underscoring its responsiveness to dynamic oceanographic conditions rather than rigid programming.[92] [81]

Sensory Capabilities and Communication

Krill exhibit a suite of sensory modalities adapted to their pelagic environment, including vision, mechanoreception, and chemoreception, which facilitate predator avoidance, prey detection, and social coordination within swarms. Their compound eyes provide visual input for detecting light gradients and conspecifics, with studies showing positive phototaxis toward artificial LED sources under controlled conditions, enabling orientation during diel migrations.[93] Mechanoreceptors, particularly on antennules, sense hydrodynamic disturbances from nearby swimmers, allowing krill to maintain formation and respond to threats via flow field analysis.[94] Chemoreceptors detect low concentrations of amino acids signaling food availability and may perceive pheromones for reproductive signaling, though direct evidence for pheromone-mediated communication remains limited.[19] Bioluminescent photophores, numbering ten per individual in species like Euphausia superba (one per eye and pairs on thoracic segments), integrate with visual systems for counter-illumination to match downwelling light, reducing silhouette visibility to predators.[95] These organs emit light at approximately 468 nm, aligning with krill's spectral sensitivity, and can be mechanically triggered to produce flashes that startle predators or potentially signal within groups, though primary functions emphasize evasion over intraspecific communication.[96] In schooling contexts, communication integrates multiple cues: visual alignment with neighbors, hydrodynamic signaling from tailbeat-generated vortices, and possibly olfactory inputs, enabling collective regulation of speed and direction without centralized leadership.[73] Empirical observations indicate krill adjust positions based on proximal individuals' wakes, supporting self-organization in dense swarms exceeding 10,000 individuals per cubic meter.[97]

Ecological Interactions

Feeding Strategies

Krill primarily utilize a continuous filter-feeding mechanism, employing the endopodites of their thoracic appendages (thoracopods 3–8) to form a branchial basket that strains particulate matter from ingested seawater.[98] This apparatus features densely arrayed setae with intersetal distances typically ranging from 1–10 μm across euphausiid species, enabling capture of particles as small as bacteria-sized aggregates up to larger zooplankton.[99] In Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), the filter mesh achieves a particularly fine resolution of 2–3 μm, supporting efficient grazing on nanophytoplankton while excluding finer colloids.[99] Feeding involves rhythmic pumping of seawater through the basket via coordinated movements of the appendages, followed by compression to expel excess water and consolidate food into mucous-bound boluses for ingestion.[99] Unlike passive filtration in some crustaceans, krill exhibit active behavioral strategies, including area-intensive searching and intermittent bursts of filtration to target localized food patches, which enhances encounter rates in patchy marine environments.[100] Clearance rates can exceed 100 liters per individual per day under optimal conditions, with juveniles often displaying higher relative efficiencies due to their smaller body size and metabolic demands.[101] Diet composition reflects opportunistic omnivory, dominated by phytoplankton (e.g., diatoms and flagellates) but incorporating microzooplankton, mesozooplankton, detritus, and ice algae, particularly in polar species during seasonal scarcity.[102] [103] Selective ingestion favors nutrient-rich or larger particles, as evidenced by fatty acid profiles and metabarcoding analyses showing preferences for cryptophytes and prymnesiophytes over less digestible taxa.[103] Under high food abundance, krill may eject excess or contaminated material, forming compact fecal pellets that minimize nutrient loss and support rapid biogeochemical cycling.[104] Adaptations to low-food regimes include under-ice scraping with specialized setae on the second maxilla and pereiopods, allowing access to sympagic communities in Antarctic habitats.[99] Interspecific variations exist; for instance, tropical euphausiids like Nematoscelis spp. emphasize raptorial feeding on evasive prey using maxillipeds, supplementing filtration during oligotrophic conditions.[98] These strategies underpin krill's role as a trophic link, converting microbial production into biomass for higher predators while exhibiting flexibility to environmental gradients in particle flux and composition.[102]

Predation Pressures

Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), the most abundant krill species, experience substantial predation pressure from a diverse array of marine predators, serving as a foundational prey item in the Southern Ocean food web.[105] This pressure links primary production to higher trophic levels, with krill biomass estimates exceeding 300 million tonnes annually supporting predators that consume vast quantities.[106] Predation intensity varies by region and season, often concentrating in coastal and shelf areas where krill aggregations overlap with predator foraging grounds.[106] Baleen whales, including blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) and minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata), exert significant predation through filter-feeding on dense krill swarms, historically consuming up to 1.3 million tonnes daily across populations before commercial whaling depleted stocks.[107] Recovering whale populations, such as humpbacks, now compete directly with seals and fisheries for krill, potentially amplifying pressure as whale numbers rebound.[108] Crabeater seals (Lobodon carcinophagus), numbering over 15 million individuals, specialize in krill via specialized sieve-like teeth, consuming an estimated 130-200 million tonnes annually and representing the largest single predator biomass impact.[109] Leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) opportunistically prey on krill alongside penguins, adding to pinniped-driven mortality.[109] Seabirds and penguins, such as Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae) and chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarcticus), target krill during breeding seasons, with colonies relying on accessible swarms; for instance, penguin consumption can exceed 10 million tonnes yearly in key sites like the Antarctic Peninsula.[110] Fish predators, including myctophid lanternfish and notothenioids like Champsocephalus gunnari, contribute through mid-trophic predation, with studies in the South Georgia region indicating fish account for up to 20% of krill mortality in some locales.[111] Cephalopods, such as Antarctic squid, also consume krill, though quantitative data remains limited compared to vertebrate predators.[19] These pressures shape krill distribution and behavior, with schooling as the primary anti-predator strategy reducing individual encounter rates, though dense swarms paradoxically facilitate whale and seal foraging efficiency.[19] Long-term declines in krill availability, inferred from predator population shifts like southward contractions in seal foraging ranges since the 1980s, suggest predation interacts with environmental factors to influence krill dynamics.[112] In non-Antarctic species, such as Northern krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica), similar pressures from fish and whales apply but at lower biomass scales.[113]

Contributions to Biogeochemical Processes

Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) and other euphausiid species mediate key biogeochemical fluxes in marine ecosystems, particularly in the Southern Ocean, by grazing phytoplankton, producing sinking particulate matter, and excreting dissolved nutrients.[3] Their high biomass—estimated at around 400 million tonnes for Antarctic krill—and diel vertical migrations enable the vertical transport of organic carbon and elements such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and iron, influencing both short-term nutrient recycling and long-term sequestration.[3] [114] In the biological carbon pump, krill convert phytoplankton biomass into fast-sinking fecal pellets (FPs), moults, and carcasses that export particulate organic carbon (POC) from surface waters to the deep ocean, where remineralization sequesters carbon on centennial timescales.[3] Antarctic krill FPs, which sink at rates exceeding 100 meters per day, contribute substantially to this flux; in regions like the Scotia Sea, krill and salp FPs together account for up to 75% of POC flux at 300 meters depth.[115] Aggregate carbon export via Antarctic krill FPs, moults, and carcasses totals approximately 105 teragrams of carbon annually, comparable to the combined sequestration capacity of global salt marshes, mangroves, and seagrasses.[114] Continuous moulting further drives episodic POC pulses, with moults representing a significant, underappreciated vector that can exceed FP contributions during peak periods.[63] Krill excretion regenerates bioavailable nutrients in surface layers, stimulating phytoplankton growth and closing nutrient loops.[3] They release ammonium and phosphate at rates that can enhance local primary productivity by 20-50% in krill-dominated areas, while also serving as reservoirs for trace elements like iron, which predators redistribute upon consumption.[3] [116] In the iron-limited Southern Ocean, krill facilitate iron cycling by packaging and vertically transporting it, modulating the efficiency of nutrient uptake and carbon drawdown.[117] These processes underscore krill's role in sustaining ecosystem productivity and atmospheric CO₂ regulation, though their efficacy depends on population density and environmental conditions.[3]

Environmental Pressures

Climate Change Effects

Climate change manifests in the Southern Ocean through reduced sea ice extent, ocean warming, and acidification, all of which influence Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) populations and ecology. Declines in sea ice concentration, observed at rates of 15–30% over multi-year periods in key foraging regions, correlate with diminished krill recruitment, as larvae depend on ice-associated algae for overwintering survival and early development.[112] Models indicate that sea ice loss alters chlorophyll levels and primary production, driving interannual variability in krill abundance, with projections suggesting further reductions in habitat suitability under continued warming scenarios.[118] Ocean warming has prompted distributional shifts, with krill populations contracting southward by approximately 300 miles (500 km) toward Antarctic continental shelves since the mid-20th century, reflecting thermal tolerance limits rather than poleward expansion.[119] In the Scotia Sea and surrounding areas, temperature increases of 0.5–1°C over recent decades have been linked to slower growth rates and reduced biomass, potentially lowering total krill weight by 20–30% in affected zones.[120] These shifts occur in situ without compensatory range expansion, as evidenced by a 50% decline in surface krill abundance in the North Atlantic over six decades, attributed directly to warming rather than migration.[121] Ocean acidification, driven by rising CO₂ absorption, impairs krill embryogenesis, with elevated pCO₂ levels (e.g., 1000–2000 µatm) reducing egg hatch rates by up to 80% in laboratory exposures simulating future conditions.[122] While adult krill exhibit physiological resilience, maintaining growth and respiration under near-future acidification (pH ~7.8), combined stressors like warming and microplastics exacerbate developmental delays in juveniles, potentially amplifying population vulnerabilities.[123][124] Empirical data from long-term surveys underscore heterogeneous regional responses, with some krill stocks showing stability amid variability, emphasizing the role of local oceanographic factors over uniform decline narratives.[125]

Pollution Accumulation Including Plastics

Krill species, particularly Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), bioaccumulate environmental pollutants through filter-feeding on phytoplankton and particulates in the water column, which adsorb contaminants such as heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and microplastics.[126] This accumulation occurs despite the remote Southern Ocean location, as long-range atmospheric transport and ocean currents deliver pollutants globally.[127] Levels in krill remain relatively low compared to higher trophic levels but contribute to biomagnification in predators like whales and seals.[128] Microplastics, defined as particles smaller than 5 mm, have been detected in Antarctic krill digestive tracts, with abundances up to 0.03 particles per individual in samples from the Scotia Sea in 2019–2020.[129] Northern krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica) in the North Atlantic similarly contain anthropogenic particles, including fibers and fragments primarily of polyester and polyethylene, at concentrations reflecting regional plastic pollution inputs.[130] Krill ingest these via non-selective feeding, fragmenting microplastics into nanoplastics (<1 μm) through gut grinding, which may enhance bioavailability but hinders fecal pellet sinking and carbon export to deep oceans.[131] [132] Nanoplastic exposure, especially negatively charged polystyrene particles at 10 μg L⁻¹, accelerates fecal pellet degradation by up to 30%, potentially reducing krill's role in the biological carbon pump by 2024 experimental findings.[132] Heavy metals like mercury (Hg) and arsenic (As) show seasonal and spatial variability in Antarctic krill, with total Hg concentrations ranging from 9.3 to 44.5 ng g⁻¹ wet weight in Bransfield Strait samples from 2022, higher in autumn than winter due to dietary uptake from phytoplankton.[133] Methylmercury, the bioavailable form, drives accumulation, with stable levels since the 1990s at approximately 20 ng g⁻¹, influenced by sea ice melt and surface water methylation rather than direct industrial inputs.[134] Arsenic bioaccumulates via the krill food chain, reaching levels in krill oil that induce cytotoxicity in human intestinal cells at concentrations above 50 μg L⁻¹ in 2025 assays, though natural baselines in Antarctic species exceed those in temperate counterparts.[135] POPs, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine pesticides, persist in krill lipids at low ng g⁻¹ levels; for instance, ΣPCBs in eastern Antarctic krill averaged 2.1 ng g⁻¹ lipid weight in baseline surveys from 2005–2006, dominated by lower-chlorinated congeners from atmospheric deposition.[128] [126] These contaminants elicit aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity equivalent to 0.1–1 pg TEQ g⁻¹, posing minimal direct risk to krill but amplifying in harvested products like krill oil, where regulatory limits under EU standards cap PCBs at 75 ng g⁻¹ to mitigate human exposure.[136] Overall, pollutant burdens in krill underscore causal links between anthropogenic emissions and remote ecosystem contamination, with filter-feeding efficiency as a primary vector.[127]

Population Fluctuations and the Krill Paradox

Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) populations display marked interannual and regional fluctuations, with circumpolar biomass estimated at approximately 379 million tonnes as of assessments from the late 2000s to early 2020s, though regional densities vary widely due to environmental drivers such as sea ice extent, chlorophyll a concentrations, and ocean temperatures.[137] [26] Surveys in key areas like the Scotia Sea have recorded biomass ranging from 18.6 g/m² in low years to higher peaks, with a 2019 synoptic survey yielding 62.6 million tonnes, indicating relative stability in recent decades despite variability.[138] [139] These oscillations are primarily linked to larval survival rates influenced by winter sea ice, which provides habitat and food for juveniles, and large-scale climate modes like the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, which modulate recruitment success.[39] [125] Declines in krill density have been observed since the mid-1970s, coinciding with reduced sea ice coverage and poleward shifts toward the Antarctic Peninsula, potentially driven by warming-induced changes in primary productivity and predator-prey dynamics. However, age-structured models highlight that temporal variability in both mortality and recruitment—rather than solely harvesting or predation—jointly governs these patterns, with periodic booms tied to favorable ice conditions enhancing overwinter survival.[140] Commercial fishing, capped at around 1% of estimated biomass annually, exerts minimal direct pressure compared to natural factors, though cumulative effects with climate stressors remain under scrutiny in management frameworks.[6] The krill paradox encapsulates the counterintuitive decline in krill abundance following the removal of major predators—baleen whales—through 20th-century industrial whaling, which culled approximately 1.5 million large whales around Antarctica from 1900 to 1970, contrary to expectations of prey population explosions absent top-down control.[141] Recent estimates reveal that recovering whale populations consume up to three times more krill than previously modeled—around 136 million tonnes annually for Antarctic blue, fin, and humpback whales combined—suggesting whales not only deplete krill directly but also sustain them indirectly via nutrient recycling.[141] Whale feces and urine, rich in iron and nitrogen, fertilize surface waters, boosting phytoplankton blooms that form the base of the krill food web; whaling thus disrupted this bottom-up trophic cascade, leading to reduced primary production and cascading krill shortages observed in historical records.[142] This dynamic underscores the role of apex predators in maintaining ecosystem productivity, with implications for current conservation emphasizing whale recovery to bolster krill resilience amid ongoing environmental pressures.[125]

Human Utilization and Management

Harvesting Practices and History

Commercial harvesting of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) began with exploratory Soviet expeditions in the 1961/62 season, yielding initial catches of 4 and 70 metric tons (t) from two research vessels.[143] These efforts expanded in subsequent years, with the Soviet Union harvesting approximately 4,000 t in 1961 as an experimental alternative to depleted whale stocks, marking the onset of targeted krill fisheries in the Southern Ocean.[144] By the late 1960s, Japan and Norway joined, employing stern trawlers adapted for midwater operations, though catches remained modest until the 1970s when annual totals exceeded 100,000 t.[145] The fishery peaked in the 1980s under Soviet dominance, accounting for over 38% of historical catches through 2023, followed by Norway at 24.5%.[146] Establishment of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) in 1982 introduced precautionary management, setting catch limits based on biomass estimates to prevent overexploitation amid concerns over ecosystem impacts on predators like seals and penguins.[147] Historical data from 1973 onward, compiled by CCAMLR, reflect a shift from exploratory to regulated harvesting, with total catches stabilizing below precautionary thresholds equivalent to about 1% of estimated krill biomass.[148] Harvesting employs midwater trawls deployed at depths of 15–120 meters to target swarming krill schools without seabed contact, minimizing bycatch and habitat disruption.[149] Purpose-built vessels, such as those from Norway and South Korea, feature onboard processing to preserve perishable krill biomass, often using continuous pumping systems or enclosed nets to reduce mortality and energy use compared to traditional deck-hauling methods.[150] Operations concentrate in CCAMLR Subareas 48.1–48.4 in the southwest Atlantic, where krill densities support efficient sweeps of dense aggregations.[147] As of the 2023/24 season, catches reached approximately 500,000 t, primarily from Norwegian, South Korean, and Chilean fleets operating under Marine Stewardship Council certification.[108] The 2024/25 season saw 518,568 t harvested in the first seven months, approaching 84% of the 620,000 t limit for Area 48, prompting potential early closures to enforce quotas.[151] These limits, derived from pre-1980s maximum historical yields adjusted for ecosystem considerations, maintain harvests at levels deemed sustainable by CCAMLR, though debates persist on localized depletion near breeding colonies.[6]

Commercial Applications and Nutritional Value

Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) constitutes the bulk of commercial krill harvesting, with catches surpassing 500,000 metric tons in the 2023/24 and 2025 seasons, primarily processed into krill meal and oil.[152][108] Krill meal, rich in proteins and lipids, is predominantly used as an aquaculture feed additive, improving feed intake, growth rates, and fillet quality in farmed fish such as Atlantic salmon.[153][154] It also finds applications in pet foods and livestock rations, leveraging its omega-3 fatty acids and astaxanthin for nutritional enhancement.[155][148] Krill oil is extracted for human dietary supplements, aquarium feeds, and further aquaculture incorporation, valued for its marine-derived omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in phospholipid-bound forms, which demonstrate higher bioavailability than triglyceride-bound equivalents in fish oil.[156][157] This oil additionally contains astaxanthin, a carotenoid antioxidant that supports anti-inflammatory and cellular protection effects.[158] Minor direct human consumption occurs, though processing challenges limit widespread use as food.[154] Nutritionally, krill meal offers high protein content (up to 60% dry weight) with balanced essential amino acids, making it superior to some fishmeals in supporting animal growth and immunity.[159] Krill lipids comprise 10-15% of wet weight, predominantly EPA and DHA, alongside choline and trace elements that contribute to metabolic and antioxidant benefits in supplemented diets.[157][160] Studies indicate these components enhance fuel metabolism and reduce oxidative stress in vivo.[160]

Sustainability Debates and Regulatory Frameworks

The Antarctic krill fishery, primarily targeting Euphausia superba, is regulated by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), established under the 1980 Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, which entered into force in 1982. CCAMLR employs a precautionary approach to management, aiming to prevent irreversible harm to krill stocks, dependent species such as penguins, seals, and whales, and the broader Southern Ocean ecosystem, with decisions informed by scientific data on biomass estimates exceeding 300 million tonnes in key areas like Subarea 48.[147][6] Current conservation measures include a precautionary catch limit of 620,000 tonnes annually across Subareas 48.1–48.4, though actual harvests have typically ranged from 300,000 to 500,000 tonnes per year, representing less than 0.2% of estimated biomass; vessels must carry CCAMLR-appointed observers for real-time monitoring, and fishing is prohibited in certain small-scale management units (SSMUs) to protect predator foraging grounds.[147][161][6] Sustainability debates center on the tension between the fishery's low harvest intensity relative to krill abundance and potential localized ecological disruptions. Proponents, including industry representatives, argue that the operation exemplifies sustainable harvesting, as catches remain far below levels that could deplete stocks, with no evidence of overall biomass decline attributable to fishing; this view emphasizes krill's high reproductive capacity and the ecosystem's resilience, supported by acoustic surveys indicating stable or recovering populations in fished areas.[162] Critics, including conservation organizations and some researchers, contend that concentrations of fishing effort—over 80% in coastal hotspots near the Antarctic Peninsula—can reduce krill availability for predators in those locales, potentially impairing breeding success for species like Adélie penguins, where even precautionary harvests have correlated with reduced fledging rates during low-krill years.[163][161][164] These concerns are amplified by interactions with environmental stressors, including the "krill paradox," where historical whaling reduced whale populations, leading to diminished nutrient recycling via fecal plumes that fertilize phytoplankton—krill's primary food source—resulting in lower krill densities than expected from reduced predation alone; current fishing may compound this by further stressing a system already vulnerable to sea ice loss and ocean warming, which have driven observed declines of up to 80% in krill densities in some sectors since the 1970s. CCAMLR has pursued feedback management strategies since the early 2000s, incorporating predator demographics into decision rules, but implementation lags due to data gaps on krill-predator dynamics and climate variability, with a 2025 PNAS analysis recommending dynamic quotas that adjust for environmental forecasts to safeguard dependent species.[6] Ongoing CCAMLR deliberations, including the October 2025 meeting, focus on adopting predator-centric spatial closures and refined SSMU triggers to address these uncertainties, amid calls from some stakeholders for harvest reductions or moratoria in high-biodiversity areas.[163][165][6]

Research Advancements

Recent Population and Ecosystem Studies

A 2025 acoustic-trawl survey off the South Orkney Islands estimated Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) biomass at 6.16 million tonnes (CV: 0.74) across the surveyed stratum, with mean biomass density of 102.0 g/m² concentrated around the shelf edge and plateau.[166] Higher densities occurred on the shelf slope, dominated by adult females, males, and juveniles with mean body length of 42.6 mm.[166] Associated euphausiids included Euphausia triacantha and Thysanoessa macrura, while salps (Salpa thompsoni) prevailed in deeper northern stations.[166] In CCAMLR Area 48, inter-annual density analyses from acoustic data yielded a standing stock biomass of 62.6 megatonnes (CV: 13.0%), reflecting spatial heterogeneity driven by oceanographic features.[78] Global krill biomass persists at 300–500 million tonnes wet weight, with Area 48 holding approximately 63 million tonnes and supporting key predators such as penguins, seals, and whales.[6] Dynamic distribution models using 2011–2020 acoustic surveys in the south Scotia Sea identify shelf break proximity, summer sea ice extent, and salinity as primary environmental covariates shaping krill aggregation, with hotspots in canyons and banks like Discovery Bank.[167] These patterns exhibit over 90% spatial overlap with commercial fishery operations and 100% with chinstrap penguin foraging during breeding, underscoring krill's pivotal ecosystem linkage amid variable recruitment.[167] A September 2025 analysis proposes the Krill Stock Hypothesis for management, incorporating real-time recruitment and habitat data from fishing vessels to address biomass fluctuations and 2024 catches of 0.5 million tonnes—equivalent to roughly 1% of Area 48 biomass—while accounting for sea ice loss and warming impacts on predator dependencies.[6] Seasonal hot spot studies in the Weddell-Scotia confluence further reveal environmental influences on krill abundance, informing spatially explicit conservation amid rising fishery pressures.[168]

Bio-Inspired Innovations

Krill's coordinated swimming via metachronal waves of their pleopods has inspired robotic platforms for underwater locomotion. In 2023, researchers at Brown University developed Pleobot, a biomimetic robot replicating the oscillatory motion of krill swimmerets to achieve efficient propulsion in water, with potential applications in swarms for ocean exploration on Earth and extraterrestrial moons.[169] This design leverages krill's ability to generate thrust through phased leg movements, enabling low-energy navigation in fluid environments, as demonstrated in controlled tank tests where the robot mimicked krill's speed and maneuverability.[170] Earlier efforts include RoboKrill, a 2022 crustacean-inspired actuator from Newcastle University, which emulates a single krill pleopod's kinematics using a motorized linkage system to produce thrust, aiming to scale up for autonomous underwater vehicles monitoring marine ecosystems like krill swarms.[171] These prototypes highlight krill's evolutionary adaptation for endurance swimming in dense schools, where individuals maintain formation without collision, informing algorithms for multi-robot coordination in turbid or unstructured waters.[172] Krill herding behavior, involving attraction, repulsion, and foraging dynamics, has influenced computational optimization. The Krill Herd (KH) algorithm, proposed in a 2013 study, models krill as agents updating positions based on sensory inputs and group interactions to converge on global optima, outperforming particle swarm optimization in benchmark functions like multidimensional knapsack problems.[173] Applied in fields such as engineering design and machine learning, KH simulates krill's density-dependent migration and induction forces, providing a nature-derived heuristic for complex, non-linear search spaces.[173] Krill's filtration feeding mechanism, using thoracic appendages to capture particles, has inspired water treatment technologies. The Eutrofilter system, developed for Chesapeake Bay restoration, draws from krill's setae-based sieving to trap excess nutrients and algae, reducing eutrophication through biomimetic flow dynamics that mimic passive particle entrapment without chemical additives.[174] Field trials indicate efficacy in nutrient removal comparable to engineered filters, underscoring krill's role as a model for sustainable, low-maintenance environmental remediation.[174]

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.