Hubbry Logo
ReliefReliefMain
Open search
Relief
Community hub
Relief
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Relief
Relief
Relief
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A relief depicting Hindu goddesses (from left to right) Vaishnavi, Varahi, Indrani, and Chamunda; National Museum of India
A common mixture of high and low relief, in the Roman Ara Pacis, placed to be seen from below. Low relief background.
A face of the high-relief Frieze of Parnassus round the base of the Albert Memorial in London. Most of the heads and many feet are completely undercut, but the torsos are "engaged" with the surface behind.

Relief is a sculptural method in which the sculpted pieces remain attached to a solid background of the same material. The term relief is from the Latin verb relevare, to raise (lit. 'to lift back'). To create a sculpture in relief is to give the impression that the sculpted material has been raised above the background plane.[1] When a relief is carved into a flat surface of stone (relief sculpture) or wood (relief carving), the field is actually lowered, leaving the unsculpted areas seeming higher. The approach requires chiselling away of the background, which can be time-intensive. On the other hand, a relief saves forming the rear of a subject, and is less fragile and more securely fixed than a sculpture in the round, especially one of a standing figure where the ankles are a potential weak point, particularly in stone. In other materials such as metal, clay, plaster stucco, ceramics or papier-mâché the form can be simply added to or raised up from the background. Monumental bronze reliefs are made by casting.

There are different degrees of relief depending on the degree of projection of the sculpted form from the field, for which the Italian and French terms are still sometimes used in English. The full range includes high relief (Italian alto-rilievo, French haut-relief),[2] where more than 50% of the depth is shown and there may be undercut areas, mid-relief (Italian mezzo-rilievo), low relief (Italian basso-rilievo, French: bas-relief), and shallow-relief (Italian rilievo schiacciato),[3] where the plane is only very slightly lower than the sculpted elements. There is also sunk relief, which was mainly restricted to Ancient Egypt (see below). However, the distinction between high relief and low relief is the clearest and most important, and these two are generally the only terms used to discuss most work.

The definition of these terms is somewhat variable, and many works combine areas in more than one of them, rarely sliding between them in a single figure; accordingly some writers prefer to avoid all distinctions.[4] The opposite of relief sculpture is counter-relief, intaglio, or cavo-rilievo,[5] where the form is cut into the field or background rather than rising from it; this is very rare in monumental sculpture. Hyphens may or may not be used in all these terms, though they are rarely seen in "sunk relief" and are usual in "bas-relief" and "counter-relief". Works in the technique are described as "in relief", and, especially in monumental sculpture, the work itself is "a relief".

Reliefs are common throughout the world on the walls of buildings and a variety of smaller settings, and a sequence of several panels or sections of relief may represent an extended narrative. Relief is more suitable for depicting complicated subjects with many figures and very active poses, such as battles, than free-standing "sculpture in the round". Most ancient architectural reliefs were originally painted, which helped to define forms in low relief. The subject of reliefs is for convenient reference assumed in this article to be usually figures, but sculpture in relief often depicts decorative geometrical or foliage patterns, as in the arabesques of Islamic art, and may be of any subject.

Rock reliefs are those carved into solid rock in the open air (if inside caves, whether natural or human-made, they are more likely to be called "rock-cut"). This type is found in many cultures, in particular those of the Ancient Near East and Buddhist countries. A stele is a single standing stone; many of these carry reliefs.

Types

[edit]

The distinction between high and low relief is somewhat subjective, and the two are very often combined in a single work. In particular, most later "high reliefs" contain sections in low relief, usually in the background. From the Parthenon Frieze onwards, many single figures in large monumental sculpture have heads in high relief, but their lower legs are in low relief. The slightly projecting figures created in this way work well in reliefs that are seen from below, and reflect that the heads of figures are usually of more interest to both artist and viewer than the legs or feet. As unfinished examples from various periods show, raised reliefs, whether high or low, were normally "blocked out" by marking the outline of the figure and reducing the background areas to the new background level, work no doubt performed by apprentices (see gallery).

Low relief or bas-relief

[edit]
Low-relief on Roman sestertius, 238 AD

A low relief is a projecting image with a shallow overall depth, for example used on coins, on which all images are in low relief. In the lowest reliefs the relative depth of the elements shown is completely distorted, and if seen from the side the image makes no sense, but from the front the small variations in depth register as a three-dimensional image. Other versions distort depth much less. The term comes from the Italian basso rilievo via the French bas-relief (French pronunciation: [baʁəljɛf]), both meaning "low relief". The former is now a very old-fashioned term in English, and the latter term is becoming so.

Low relief is a technique which requires less work than high relief, and is therefore cheaper to produce, as less of the background needs to be removed in a carving, or less modelling is required. In the art of Ancient Egypt, Assyrian palace reliefs, and other ancient Near Eastern and Asian cultures, a consistent very low relief was commonly used for the whole composition. These images would usually be painted after carving, which helped define the forms; today the paint has worn off in the great majority of surviving examples, but minute, invisible remains of paint can usually be discovered through chemical means.

A low-relief dating to c. 2000 BC, from the kingdom of Simurrum, modern Iraq

The Ishtar Gate of Babylon, now in Berlin, has low reliefs of large animals formed from moulded bricks, glazed in colour. Plaster, which made the technique far easier, was widely used in Egypt and the Near East from antiquity into Islamic times (latterly for architectural decoration, as at the Alhambra), Rome, and Europe from at least the Renaissance, as well as probably elsewhere. However, it needs very good conditions to survive long in unmaintained buildings – Roman decorative plasterwork is mainly known from Pompeii and other sites buried by ash from Mount Vesuvius. Low relief was relatively rare in Western medieval art, but may be found, for example in wooden figures or scenes on the insides of the folding wings of multi-panel altarpieces.

The revival of low relief, which was seen as a classical style, begins early in the Renaissance; the Tempio Malatestiano in Rimini, a pioneering classicist building, designed by Leon Battista Alberti around 1450, uses low reliefs by Agostino di Duccio inside and on the external walls. Since the Renaissance plaster has been very widely used for indoor ornamental work such as cornices and ceilings, but in the 16th century it was used for large figures (many also using high relief) at the Chateau of Fontainebleau, which were imitated more crudely elsewhere, for example in the Elizabethan Hardwick Hall.

Shallow-relief, in Italian rilievo stiacciato or rilievo schicciato ("squashed relief"), is a very shallow relief, which merges into engraving in places, and can be hard to read in photographs. It is often used for the background areas of compositions with the main elements in low-relief, but its use over a whole (usually rather small) piece was effectively invented and perfected by the Italian Renaissance sculptor Donatello.[6]

In later Western art, until a 20th-century revival, low relief was used mostly for smaller works or combined with higher relief to convey a sense of distance, or to give depth to the composition, especially for scenes with many figures and a landscape or architectural background, in the same way that lighter colours are used for the same purpose in painting. Thus figures in the foreground are sculpted in high-relief, those in the background in low-relief. Low relief may use any medium or technique of sculpture, stone carving and metal casting being most common. Large architectural compositions all in low relief saw a revival in the 20th century, being popular on buildings in Art Deco and related styles, which borrowed from the ancient low reliefs now available in museums.[7] Some sculptors, including Eric Gill, have adopted the "squashed" depth of low relief in works that are actually free-standing.

Mid-relief

[edit]
Low relief, Banteay Srei, Cambodia; Ravana shaking Mount Kailasa, the Abode of Siva

Mid-relief, "half-relief" or mezzo-rilievo is somewhat imprecisely defined, and the term is not often used in English, the works usually being described as low relief instead. The typical traditional definition is that only up to half of the subject projects, and no elements are undercut or fully disengaged from the background field. The depth of the elements shown is normally somewhat distorted.

Mid-relief is probably the most common type of relief found in the Hindu and Buddhist art of India and Southeast Asia. The low to mid-reliefs of 2nd-century BCE to 6th-century CE Ajanta Caves and 5th- to 10th-century Ellora Caves in India are rock reliefs. Most of these reliefs are used to narrate sacred scriptures, such as the 1,460 panels of the 9th-century Borobudur temple in Central Java, Indonesia, narrating the Jataka tales or lives of the Buddha. Other examples are low reliefs narrating the Ramayana Hindu epic in Prambanan temple, also in Java, in Cambodia, the temples of Angkor, with scenes including the Samudra manthan or "Churning the Ocean of Milk" at the 12th-century Angkor Wat, and reliefs of apsaras. At Bayon temple in Angkor Thom there are scenes of daily life in the Khmer Empire.

High relief

[edit]
High relief metope from the Classical Greek Parthenon Marbles. Some front limbs are actually detached from the background completely, while the centaur's left rear leg is in low relief.

High relief (or altorilievo, from Italian) is where in general more than half the mass of the sculpted figure projects from the background. Indeed, the most prominent elements of the composition, especially heads and limbs, are often completely undercut, detaching them from the field. The parts of the subject that are seen are normally depicted at their full depth, unlike low relief where the elements seen are "squashed" flatter. High relief thus uses essentially the same style and techniques as free-standing sculpture, and in the case of a single figure gives largely the same view as a person standing directly in front of a free-standing statue would have. All cultures and periods in which large sculptures were created used this technique in monumental sculpture and architecture.

Most of the many grand figure reliefs in Ancient Greek sculpture used a very "high" version of high relief, with elements often fully free of the background, and parts of figures crossing over each other to indicate depth. The metopes of the Parthenon have largely lost their fully rounded elements, except for heads, showing the advantages of relief in terms of durability. High relief has remained the dominant form for reliefs with figures in Western sculpture, also being common in Indian temple sculpture. Smaller Greek sculptures such as private tombs, and smaller decorative areas such as friezes on large buildings, more often used low relief.

High-relief deities at Khajuraho, India
Very high relief at the Monument to the Independence of Brazil in São Paulo; derivative representation of Pedro Américo's 1888 painting Independence or Death

Hellenistic and Roman sarcophagus reliefs were cut with a drill rather than chisels, enabling and encouraging compositions extremely crowded with figures, like the Ludovisi Battle sarcophagus (250–260 CE). These are also seen in the enormous strips of reliefs that wound around Roman triumphal columns. The sarcophagi in particular exerted a huge influence on later Western sculpture. The European Middle Ages tended to use high relief for all purposes in stone, though like Ancient Roman sculpture, their reliefs were typically not as high as in Ancient Greece.[8] Very high relief re-emerged in the Renaissance, and was especially used in wall-mounted funerary art and later on Neoclassical pediments and public monuments.

In the Buddhist and Hindu art of India and Southeast Asia, high relief can also be found, although it is not as common as low to mid-reliefs. Famous examples of Indian high reliefs can be found at the Khajuraho temples, with voluptuous, twisting figures that often illustrate the erotic Kamasutra positions. In the 9th-century Prambanan temple, Central Java, high reliefs of Lokapala devatas, the guardians of deities of the directions, are found.

The largest high relief sculpture in the world is the Stone Mountain Confederate Memorial in the U.S. state of Georgia, which was cut 42 feet deep into the mountain,[9] and measures 90 feet in height, 190 feet in width,[10] and lies 400 feet above the ground.[11]

Sunk relief

[edit]
A sunk-relief depiction of Pharaoh Akhenaten with his wife Nefertiti and daughters. The main background has not been removed, merely that in the immediate vicinity of the sculpted form. Note how strong shadows are needed to define the image.

Sunk or sunken relief is largely restricted to the art of Ancient Egypt where it is very common, becoming after the Amarna period of Ahkenaten the dominant type used, as opposed to low relief. It had been used earlier, but mainly for large reliefs on external walls, and for hieroglyphs and cartouches. The image is made by cutting the relief sculpture itself into a flat surface to enhance the impression of three-dimensionality.[12] In a simpler form, the images are usually mostly linear in nature, like hieroglyphs, but in most cases the figure itself is in low relief, but set within a sunken area shaped round the image, so that the relief never rises beyond the original flat surface. In some cases the figures and other elements are in a very low relief that does not rise to the original surface, but others are modeled more fully, with some areas rising to the original surface. This method minimizes the work removing the background, while allowing normal relief modelling.

The technique is most successful with strong sunlight to emphasise the outlines and forms by shadow, as no attempt was made to soften the edge of the sunk area, leaving a face at a right-angle to the surface all around it. Some reliefs, especially funerary monuments with heads or busts from ancient Rome and later Western art, leave a "frame" at the original level around the edge of the relief, or place a head in a hemispherical recess in the block (see Roman example in gallery). Though essentially very similar to Egyptian sunk relief, but with a background space at the lower level around the figure, the term would not normally be used of such works.

It is also used for carving letters (typically om mani padme hum) in the mani stones of Tibetan Buddhism.

Counter-relief

[edit]

Sunk relief technique is not to be confused with "counter-relief" or intaglio as seen on engraved gem seals – where an image is fully modeled in a "negative" manner. The image goes into the surface, so that when impressed on wax it gives an impression in normal relief. However many engraved gems were carved in cameo or normal relief.

A few very late Hellenistic monumental carvings in Egypt use full "negative" modelling as though on a gem seal, perhaps as sculptors trained in the Greek tradition attempted to use traditional Egyptian conventions.[13]

Small objects

[edit]
French Gothic diptych, 25 cm (9.8 in) high, with crowded scenes from the Life of Christ, c. 1350–1365

Small-scale reliefs have been carved in various materials, notably ivory, wood, and wax. Reliefs are often found in decorative arts such as ceramics and metalwork; these are less often described as "reliefs" than as "in relief". Small bronze reliefs are often in the form of "plaques" or plaquettes, which may be set in furniture or framed, or just kept as they are, a popular form for European collectors, especially in the Renaissance.

Various modelling techniques are used, such repoussé ("pushed-back") in metalwork, where a thin metal plate is shaped from behind using various metal or wood punches, producing a relief image. Casting has also been widely used in bronze and other metals. Casting and repoussé are often used in concert in to speed up production and add greater detail to the final relief. In stone, as well as engraved gems, larger hardstone carvings in semi-precious stones have been highly prestigious since ancient times in many Eurasian cultures. Reliefs in wax were produced at least from the Renaissance.

Carved ivory reliefs have been used since ancient times, and because the material, though expensive, cannot usually be reused, they have a relatively high survival rate, and for example consular diptychs represent a large proportion of the survivals of portable secular art from Late Antiquity. In the Gothic period the carving of ivory reliefs became a considerable luxury industry in Paris and other centres. As well as small diptychs and triptychs with densely packed religious scenes, usually from the New Testament, secular objects, usually in a lower relief, were also produced.

These were often round mirror-cases, combs, handles, and other small items, but included a few larger caskets like the Casket with Scenes of Romances (Walters 71264) in Baltimore, Maryland, in the United States. Originally they were very often painted in bright colours. Reliefs can be impressed by stamps onto clay, or the clay pressed into a mould bearing the design, as was usual with the mass-produced terra sigillata of Ancient Roman pottery. Decorative reliefs in plaster or stucco may be much larger; this form of architectural decoration is found in many styles of interiors in the post-Renaissance West, and in Islamic architecture.

[edit]

Reliefs by modern artists

[edit]
Mohsen Semnani, The Creation story, 2000, the entrance room of amphitheatre, Isfahan

Many modern and contemporary artists such as Paul Gauguin, Ernst Barlach, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Pablo Picasso, Eric Gill, Jacob Epstein, Henry Moore, Claudia Cobizev, up to Ewald Matare have created reliefs.

In particular low reliefs were often used in the 20th century on the outsides of buildings, where they are relatively easy to incorporate into the architecture as decorative highlights.

Notable reliefs

[edit]

Notable examples of monumental reliefs include:

Smaller-scale reliefs:

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Relief

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Relief is a sculptural technique in which forms are carved from a planar background such that they project outward while remaining attached to the supporting surface, distinguishing it from fully three-dimensional freestanding . This method allows for the depiction of complex scenes in a relatively economical use of material and space, often integrating with on walls, panels, or monuments. The primary types of relief are categorized by the extent of projection: low relief, or bas-relief, features shallow where motifs rise only slightly from the background; high relief, or alto-relief, involves deeper projection approaching free-standing forms; and sunken relief, or intaglio, recesses figures into the surface, with the background at the highest plane. Sunken relief predominates in ancient Egyptian works carved into durable stone, preserving details against , while low and high reliefs characterize Mesopotamian, Greek, and Roman examples. Relief sculpture originated in the period, with the earliest known instances at in modern-day , circa 9000 BCE, where animal figures were incised and low-relieved on T-shaped pillars within monumental enclosures. It proliferated across ancient civilizations—Mesopotamian palaces featured low reliefs of royal hunts and battles, Egyptian temples employed sunken reliefs for divine and pharaonic scenes, and Greek pediments and Roman sarcophagi explored dynamic high reliefs—serving to commemorate events, propagate ideologies, and evoke religious symbolism without the full volume of in-the-round . This technique's endurance stems from its adaptability to stone, metal, and later mediums like ivory and plaster, influencing from antiquity through innovations in rilievo schiacciato to modern applications.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Definition

Relief sculpture is a sculptural technique in which forms or figures project from a supporting background, typically a flat plane, while remaining attached to it and carved or modeled from the same material. This method creates a partial three-dimensional effect, with the depth of projection varying to produce an illusion of spatial recession and volume, distinguishing it from fully freestanding viewable in the round. The background serves as the undifferentiated mass from which motifs emerge, often through subtractive in stone or wood, or additive processes like followed by in , , or other media. The degree of projection defines relief's subtypes, ranging from subtle low relief (bas-relief), where forms barely rise above the surface and rely on light and shadow for definition, to high relief (alto-relief), where elements extend nearly to full three-dimensionality and may even detach partially from the ground. Sunken relief, another variant, incises forms below the surface level, common in durable materials like granite for monumental works. Unlike painting, relief engages actual depth and tactility, yet its fixed viewpoint and material economy make it suited for architectural integration, such as friezes, panels, or coinage, where it narrates scenes or symbols without requiring space for circumferential access. This technique's causal advantage lies in its ability to convey narrative complexity on limited surfaces, conserving material while exploiting effects for visual drama, as evidenced in ancient examples where shadow enhances form without proportional depth. Empirical observation of surviving artifacts confirms that relief's attachment to the background prevents structural fragility in large-scale applications, enabling durability in public or contexts.

Key Features and Distinctions from Other Sculpture Forms

Relief sculpture is defined by its figures and forms projecting outward from a supporting or plane, with the sculpted elements remaining attached to this surface rather than being fully independent. The projection can range from minimal depth, where forms barely rise above the background, to more pronounced extensions that approach but do not achieve complete three-dimensional autonomy. This attachment distinguishes relief from fully modeled rear aspects, allowing the work to function as an extension of a , or architectural feature while conveying depth through shadow, line, and graduated height. In contrast to freestanding or in-the-round , which is detached from any background and designed for and multi-directional viewing, relief is optimized for frontal observation, limiting access to rear perspectives and emphasizing and surface modulation over volumetric . Freestanding works demand complete modeling on all sides, increasing use and to , whereas relief conserves resources by omitting the unviewed back and gains stability through its fixed integration, making it less prone to toppling or breakage. This form also facilitates sequential across expansive surfaces, such as friezes or metopes, which is impractical in isolated, rotatable freestanding pieces that typically focus on single figures or groups. Further differentiating relief from other sculptural techniques, such as sunken or intaglio relief—where forms are incised below the background plane—positive relief employs additive projection to create tangible depth, blending two- and three-dimensional qualities without the full spatial independence of kinetic or environmental installations. While both relief and in-the-round can employ subtractive or additive modeling, relief's planar constraint enhances its compatibility with painting-like composition, prioritizing illusionistic effects over tactile exploration from varied angles. These attributes have historically favored relief for monumental and decorative contexts, where and capacity outweigh the immersive presence of freestanding forms.

Advantages and Limitations

Relief sculpture offers significant economic advantages over freestanding sculpture, requiring less material and labor due to the flat background plane that eliminates the need to carve the rear or fully three-dimensional forms. This efficiency allows for the depiction of complex narratives, such as battle scenes or multi-figure compositions, which would demand numerous separate statues if rendered in the round, thereby enabling broader subject matter within limited resources. Additionally, reliefs integrate seamlessly into architectural surfaces like walls, friezes, and panels, enhancing structural decoration without protruding elements that could interfere with building functionality or aesthetics. Their attachment to a support provides greater structural stability, reducing vulnerability to breakage from earthquakes or falls compared to tall freestanding works, as evidenced by historical collapses like that of the Colossus of Rhodes around 226 BCE. Reliefs also avoid the engineering challenges of weight distribution and balance inherent in fully detached sculptures. However, relief sculpture is inherently limited in dimensionality, projecting figures only partially from the background, which restricts the conveyance of full spatial depth, movement, and form achievable in freestanding works viewable from all sides. Optimal appreciation requires a primary frontal viewpoint, precluding effective display of rear aspects or multi-angle perspectives, thus constraining dynamic interaction with the viewer. Low relief, in particular, demands advanced skill to simulate through planes, curves, and light-shadow interplay, often resulting in a flatter appearance that challenges realistic three-dimensional illusion without undercutting or higher projection. These constraints make relief less suitable for isolated sculptural emphasis, favoring contextual or roles over standalone dramatic impact.

Historical Development

Ancient Origins (Prehistory to 1000 BCE)

The origins of relief sculpture trace back to the period at in southeastern , where low-relief carvings adorn T-shaped pillars erected between approximately 9600 and 8000 BCE. These monuments feature incised and shallowly carved representations of wild animals—including , snakes, boars, cranes, and scorpions—alongside abstract symbols, likely serving or symbolic functions in a pre-agricultural society of hunter-gatherers. The site's 20-plus enclosures demonstrate organized labor and artistic skill, predating settled farming and providing the earliest evidence of large-scale figural relief in stone. Earlier Paleolithic examples in include bas-reliefs carved into rock shelters or portable media, such as the from , , dated to 25,000–23,000 BCE during the culture. This limestone block relief depicts a nude female figure raising a bison horn, possibly evoking or calendrical motifs, with the form emerging from the background through shallow techniques applied to hard stone. Similar low-relief animal figures appear in French and Spanish caves, like the engraved reindeer at Lorthet around 18,000 BCE, marking initial experiments in projecting forms from flat surfaces using flint tools. In Mesopotamia, relief sculpture advanced with the Uruk period (c. 4000–3100 BCE) through small-scale cylinder seals and proto-tablets featuring incised figures, evolving into larger works by the Early Dynastic era (c. 2900–2350 BCE). The perforated limestone relief of Ur-Nanshe, king-priest of Lagash (c. 2550 BCE), illustrates the ruler and deities in procession, with openwork apertures enhancing depth and light effects on temple dedications. Rock-cut reliefs, such as that of Iddin-Sin of Simurrum (c. 2017–1985 BCE) in the Zagros Mountains, portray the king in ritual adoration before a deity, carved directly into cliff faces to assert political and religious authority in a mountainous periphery. Ancient Egypt developed sunk relief concurrently during the Old Kingdom (c. 2686–2181 BCE), incising figures below the surface to simulate projection, as evidenced in the Step Pyramid complex at Saqqara under Djoser (c. 2630 BCE). This technique, ideal for durable tomb and temple facades exposed to intense sunlight, featured pharaohs, gods, and daily life scenes in precise, hierarchical compositions, with earliest precursors in Predynastic palette reliefs like the (c. 3100 BCE) blending low relief and engraving. By the Middle Kingdom (c. 2050–1710 BCE), such reliefs proliferated on stelae and obelisks, emphasizing eternal order and divine kingship. These Near Eastern innovations influenced contemporaneous cultures, including the Indus Valley Civilization (c. 2600–1900 BCE), where steatite seals bore intaglio reliefs of animals and mythical figures for administrative stamping, and early Anatolian and Levantine sites with rudimentary rock carvings. Relief's emergence reflects causal drivers like needs, status display, and material constraints—stone's permanence favoring flat projection over freestanding forms in early monumental contexts—setting foundations for narrative and decorative elaboration before 1000 BCE.

Classical Antiquity (1000 BCE to 500 CE)

In , relief sculpture emerged prominently during the Archaic period (c. 700–480 BCE), primarily in architectural contexts such as temple metopes and pediments, where high-relief carvings depicted mythological battles and processions, drawing from Near Eastern and Egyptian influences while developing a distinct Greek style emphasizing frontal poses and rigid forms. These early reliefs, often executed in local limestones or imported marbles, served didactic and decorative purposes on structures like the Temple of Apollo at , with metopes featuring alternating triglyphs and sculpted panels up to 0.3 meters in depth to create dramatic depth against the Doric . The Classical period (c. 480–323 BCE) marked a shift toward more naturalistic and continuous narratives in low-relief formats, exemplified by the in , carved between 447 and 432 BCE from Pentelic under Phidias's supervision, depicting the Panathenaic with over 350 figures in shallow projection (typically under 5 cm) to evoke fluid movement within the temple's inner . This innovation contrasted with the higher reliefs of metopes and pediments on the same structure, which portrayed gods and giants in deeper carving for visibility from below, highlighting Greek advancements in integrating sculpture with architecture for optical harmony and civic identity. Hellenistic reliefs (c. 323–31 BCE), as seen on the Great Altar of Pergamon (c. 180–160 BCE), introduced dynamic compositions with greater emotional expressiveness and deeper modeling, blending low and high relief to narrate epic struggles like the Gigantomachy across expansive panels. Roman relief sculpture, evolving from Republican adaptations of Greek and Etruscan models, emphasized historical and propagandistic themes, with low-relief friezes on monuments like the Ara Pacis Augustae, commissioned in 13 BCE and dedicated in 9 BCE, featuring processional scenes of imperial family members and priests in idealized, serene compositions symbolizing Augustan peace (pax). These marble carvings, averaging 0.5–1 cm in depth, combined Hellenistic fluidity with Roman portrait realism, enclosing an altar within a walled precinct to evoke fertility and divine favor through motifs like the Tellus panel. By the High Empire, continuous narrative reliefs reached monumental scale on Trajan's Column (completed 113 CE), a 35-meter marble shaft spiraling with 155 scenes and 2,662 figures illustrating the Dacian Wars (101–106 CE) in shallow bas-relief (c. 5 cm deep), employing bird's-eye perspectives and stacked figures for comprehensive storytelling without individual framing, a technique prioritizing event density over classical isolation. Late antique reliefs up to 500 CE, including sarcophagi and arches, retained these narrative conventions but incorporated Christian iconography, reflecting the empire's cultural transitions while maintaining subtractive marble carving traditions.

Medieval and Post-Classical Periods (500–1500 CE)

Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire around 476 CE, large-scale relief sculpture in Europe diminished, with production shifting to smaller-scale works in ivory, bone, and metal, often influenced by late antique models. In the Byzantine Empire, which preserved Roman traditions, relief carving flourished in diverse media including ivory diptychs, pyxides, and reliquaries, serving both secular consular purposes and religious iconography from the 5th to 15th centuries. These objects featured narrative scenes in low to mid-relief, such as consular processions or biblical events, with techniques emphasizing fine detailing and symbolic depth, continuing despite the Iconoclastic Controversy (726–843 CE) that temporarily restricted figural representation. In , early medieval reliefs were sparse, limited to decorative panels on sarcophagi and crosses, but revivals occurred under Carolingian (8th–9th centuries) and Ottonian (10th–11th centuries) patronage, drawing from illumination and fragments. A landmark example is the at , commissioned in 1015 CE by Bishop Bernward, consisting of ten bronze panels cast in high relief depicting Old and narratives, marking the first major cast bronze sculpture north of the since antiquity and demonstrating lost-wax techniques adapted for architectural integration. These doors combined didactic biblical storytelling with symbolic typology, influencing subsequent Romanesque production. The Romanesque period (c. 1000–1150 CE) saw a surge in architectural relief , primarily in stone on church portals, tympana, and capitals, aimed at instructing the largely illiterate populace through vivid biblical and moral scenes. Portals often featured tympana in high relief, such as the c. 1130 CE example at Sainte-Foy Abbey in , , where separates the saved from the damned amid grotesque demons and sinners, emphasizing eschatological themes with exaggerated expressions and dynamic compositions derived from earlier illuminations rather than classical naturalism. Capitals and friezes incorporated fantastical beasts and apostles, as in the at Moissac (c. 1100 CE), blending narrative clarity with symbolic horror to reinforce Church doctrine. Transitioning into the Gothic era (c. 1150–1500 CE), relief evolved toward greater naturalism and spatial illusion, though often subordinated to in-the-round figures on facades; low-relief friezes and historiated capitals narrated scriptural cycles with increased elegance and proportion. English alabaster relief panels, produced from c. 1350 to 1540 CE, exemplify this with over 2,400 surviving examples forming altarpieces and tomb decorations, carved in thin slabs depicting Passion scenes or saints in shallow relief for export across . Gothic tombs, like those at (14th century), integrated low-relief effigies and mourner figures, using Pleurants in arched niches to evoke through subtle modeling and folds. In the Islamic world during this period, relief techniques adapted Sasanian traditions for decoration, with early examples from (6th–8th centuries CE) featuring figural and vegetal motifs in low relief, evolving under Umayyad and Abbasid rule into geometric and arabesque patterns avoiding human forms to align with aniconic principles. (10th–12th centuries CE) excelled in rock crystal carvings, producing around 500 engraved and relief-cut vessels with intricate floral and animal designs, prized for their translucency and technical precision in hard stone. These works prioritized ornamental complexity over narrative depth, reflecting theological emphases on divine unity through abstracted forms.

Renaissance to Modern Era (1500–Present)

In the , relief sculpture experienced a revival inspired by , with artists innovating techniques to achieve greater illusionistic depth on flat surfaces. Donatello pioneered rilievo schiacciato, a shallow low-relief method involving minimal carving to suggest atmospheric perspective and spatial recession through subtle gradations of depth and line, as seen in his marble Ascension panel from the 1420s. This technique allowed sculptors to mimic painting's effects while retaining sculpture's tactile quality, influencing subsequent works like Lorenzo Ghiberti's bronze doors for the , completed in 1452, which blended varying relief depths for narrative clarity. The period emphasized dramatic tension and movement in reliefs, often employing high relief to project figures boldly from backgrounds, enhancing emotional intensity in and monumental contexts. integrated relief elements into dynamic compositions, such as decorations and panels in 17th-century , where marble reliefs on church facades and doors conveyed theatrical narratives through exaggerated foreshortening and effects. This approach suited the era's focus on sensory engagement, with reliefs serving as integral parts of larger architectural ensembles to evoke spiritual fervor. Neoclassicism in the late 18th and early 19th centuries revived low-relief techniques to emulate perceived classical purity and restraint, prioritizing linear clarity over exuberance. Sculptors like and produced bas-reliefs for funerary monuments and public buildings, drawing on Greco-Roman models to achieve harmonious proportions and idealized forms, as evidenced in decorative panels for European palaces and early American . Italian artisans introduced these methods to the around 1800 for government commissions, adapting motifs to civic symbolism. From the mid-19th century onward, relief sculpture adapted to industrial materials and nationalistic themes, appearing in Beaux-Arts facades and war memorials with narrative friezes depicting historical events. In the , modern artists shifted toward , using relief to explore spatial dynamics and materiality; Henri Matisse's bronze reliefs experimented with simplified forms to emphasize recession and contrast, paving the way for non-objective compositions. Contemporary applications include architectural integrations and tactile works for , such as bas-reliefs aiding the visually impaired by translating visual into touch-readable forms.

Types of Relief

Low Relief (Bas-Relief)

Low relief, also termed bas-relief, constitutes a sculptural method wherein motifs emerge only modestly from the substrate, typically by a protrusion shallower than half the modeled form's depth, engendering an understated volumetric illusion via nuanced contouring and effects. This approach contrasts with higher relief variants by curtailing undercutting and favoring planar expanses, thereby accommodating intricate narratives within confined spatial budgets while economizing material and mitigating fragility relative to fully three-dimensional works. Its principal limitation resides in restricted angular visibility, rendering side profiles comparatively anemic, though this is offset by enhanced suitability for replication, as in or serial architectural panels. In ancient contexts, low relief proliferated for monumental storytelling, exemplified by Neo-Assyrian gypsum slabs from Nineveh's North Palace, circa 645–635 BCE, portraying King Ashurbanipal's lion hunts with sequential action rendered in shallow incisions averaging 1–2 cm projection to evoke motion and hierarchy through graded depths. Such panels, quarried from alabaster-like stone and polished post-carving, leveraged ambient lighting to amplify dynamism, informing later traditions in and where bas-relief adorned temple walls for didactic permanence under arid climes. The elevated low relief's sophistication through Donatello's innovation of rilievo schiacciato ("flattened relief"), a hyper-shallow iteration—often mere millimeters in —pioneered around 1420–1430, as in his Madonna of the Clouds where infinitesimal gradations simulate atmospheric recession akin to painting's . This subtractive technique, executed with fine chisels on , harnessed linear perspective principles to forge illusory depth, influencing contemporaries like Desiderio da Settignano and extending to for commissions. Contemporary applications persist in facade ornamentation and digital fabrication, where low relief's minimal protrusion facilitates CNC milling in composites or metals, preserving the form's potency while adapting to industrialized production scales.

Mid-Relief

Mid-relief, also known as mezzo-rilievo or demi-relief, features sculpted figures that project from the background to approximately half their natural circumference or depth, without detached elements or undercutting. This intermediate projection distinguishes it from low relief, where forms emerge minimally, and high relief, where they approach full roundness. The technique balances planar composition with volumetric modeling, enabling greater depiction of , , and compared to bas-relief, while maintaining attachment to the support for structural integrity in architectural contexts. Figures in mid-relief often exhibit rounded contours and poses to enhance plasticity, though the form remains subordinate to the background plane. Primarily executed through subtractive carving on stone or wood, mid-relief demands precise chisel work to achieve graduated depths without compromising adhesion to the substrate. Additive methods, such as modeling in clay followed by casting in plaster or metal, are less common but possible for preparatory studies or smaller works. Historically, mid-relief appears in Persian rock carvings, exemplified by the Qajar-era panel at Tangeh Savashi, Iran, dating to the 19th century, where figures emerge moderately from cliff faces to convey narrative scenes. In Renaissance Italy, artists like Donatello employed mezzo-rilievo for enhanced three-dimensionality in bronze and marble panels, integrating it with architectural elements to bridge sculpture and painting. Such applications highlight its utility in tombs, altarpieces, and decorative friezes where moderate projection suits spatial constraints.

High Relief (Alto-Relief)

High relief, known as alto-rilievo in Italian, features sculpted forms projecting more than half their natural depth from the background, incorporating extensive undercutting to achieve near-free-standing effects while remaining attached to the plane. This depth allows for dramatic interplay of light and shadow, enhancing volume, motion, and narrative complexity beyond shallower relief types. The technique primarily employs subtractive methods, such as chiseling marble or stone, demanding precise control to avoid structural weaknesses in protruding elements. High relief sculptures often risk fragmentation due to thin connections between figures and the ground, necessitating robust materials like fine-grained marble for tensile strength. In ancient contexts, Assyrian artists utilized high relief for monumental palace decorations, carving gypsum panels where figures extended significantly to convey power and action, as in lion hunt scenes from Nineveh dating to the 7th century BCE. Greek sculptors in the classical period explored alto-relief in tomb stelai and architectural friezes, with unfinished works revealing blocking-out stages similar to full-round sculpture, evident in 5th-century BCE examples. Renaissance masters advanced high relief for expressive storytelling; Michelangelo's Battle of the Centaurs (c. 1491–1492), a panel roughly 84 cm high and 91 cm wide at , , depicts a frenzied combat with deeply carved, twisting bodies that project boldly, showcasing his early mastery of and torsion influenced by ancient sarcophagi. This work, commissioned for the Medici collection, blends high projection with subtle planar transitions, marking a shift toward naturalistic dynamism in relief art.

Sunk Relief

Sunk relief, also termed incised or sunken relief, involves carving figures and motifs below the original surface level of the material, producing a recessed where the surrounding background remains elevated. This contrasts with low relief (bas-relief), in which elements project modestly above the background, and high relief, where figures extend significantly outward, often requiring more material removal and undercutting. In sunk relief, the technique emphasizes linear and shallow incisions, enhancing visibility through rather than projection. The method proves advantageous for dense, hard materials like or , as the non-protruding forms reduce chipping risks during subtractive and demand less depth overall. Carvers outline shapes crisply before adding internal details via lines and textures, facilitating precision in durable stones where protruding elements might fracture. This approach suits exterior applications, such as temple facades, where creates dramatic contrasts in the recessed areas, making motifs prominent even from afar. Sunk relief predominates in ancient Egyptian sculpture, appearing extensively from the Old Kingdom onward in tombs, temples, and hieroglyphic inscriptions. Egyptian artisans favored it for its durability in hard stones and integration with flat surfaces, as seen in wall decorations depicting pharaohs, deities, and daily scenes to invoke eternal narratives. Notable instances include the granite carvings at , where sunk figures of gods and rulers are incised into podiums and lintels, exemplifying the technique's role in monumental architecture around 1400 BCE. Though rarer elsewhere, variants occur in Maya art, such as scenes on lintels, adapting the recession for narrative stone panels. In practice, sunk relief often combines with linear elements, as in where signs are sunk to maintain surface integrity while conveying script and . Its restraint in depth—typically under 1-2 cm—preserves structural stability on large-scale works, influencing conservation by minimizing exposure to compared to protruding types. Modern replications draw on these principles for durable public monuments, though ancient Egyptian exemplars remain the paradigmatic corpus, with over thousands of panels surviving from sites like and the Valley of the Kings.

Counter-Relief and Other Variants

Counter-relief, alternatively termed cavo-rilievo, inverts the conventional relief process by recessing the primary forms into the supporting surface, thereby elevating the background material above the motifs. This subtractive technique yields a negative sculptural effect, where the depicted elements appear sunken relative to their surroundings, contrasting sharply with protruding relief variants. Historically, counter-relief manifests in small-scale applications such as intaglio gem carving, where motifs are incised into hard stones like sardonyx or to produce seals or signets; the incised leaves a raised impression when pressed into soft material. This practice traces to ancient Near Eastern cylinder seals and Egyptian scarabs, serving both utilitarian and functions in administrative and contexts. In larger formats, it overlaps with sunk relief but extends to deeper incisions without confining outlines, as noted in certain subtractive carvings where subjects recede while preserving background integrity. Other variants encompass pierced relief, wherein openings are carved fully through the background to permit light transmission and amplify spatial depth, often in media like or ; a documented instance involves curved wooden panels with circular voids, imparting unusual dimensionality to otherwise planar works. In the early , Russian artist innovated "Counter-Reliefs" circa 1914–1915, fabricating assemblages from heterogeneous materials including iron, , and to negate traditional flatness, instead fostering tensile spatial dynamics and material dissonances exhibited in avant-garde contexts.

Techniques and Materials

Subtractive Carving Methods

Subtractive carving methods in relief sculpture involve the systematic removal of material from a solid block or slab, typically stone or wood, to form protruding figures against a receding background. This approach contrasts with additive techniques by starting with excess material and progressively revealing the design through excision, a process fundamental to achieving precise control over depth and contour. The method demands careful planning to avoid irreparable errors, as removed material cannot be replaced. The process commences with material selection, favoring stones like for its relative softness or for finer detail, while harder granites necessitate diamond-tipped tools for efficiency. A preliminary sketch is transferred to the surface, often incised lightly with a pointed tool. Roughing out follows, employing a point chisel struck with a heavy to excise large background volumes and outline major forms, establishing the relief's projection depth—shallow for bas-relief or deeper for alto-relief. Next, tooth or claw chisels refine volumes, creating faceted approximations of curves and removing material in controlled layers to prevent over-carving. Detailing progresses with flat-edged chisels for planar surfaces, followed by rasps and files to smooth transitions and articulate finer features like drapery folds or facial expressions. For texturing, serrated chisels impart patterns enhancing , as seen in ancient Egyptian works. Finishing involves abrasives—, , or modern carborundum—to polish surfaces, with depth varying by relief type: minimal removal (under 5 mm) for low relief to emphasize subtlety via light and shadow. Tools must be sequenced methodically, from coarse to fine, to maintain structural integrity and achieve the desired three-dimensional illusion on a two-dimensional plane. Safety measures, including and control, are essential due to the generation of sharp fragments and silica particles.

Additive and Casting Techniques

Additive techniques for relief entail constructing projecting forms by incrementally applying material to a foundational surface, such as a slab of clay or , rather than removing excess. Practitioners begin with a prepared base—often rolled or pressed clay—and employ methods like , pinching, or direct modeling with tools to layer and shape elements, achieving varying degrees of projection from low to high relief. This approach facilitates iterative refinement and captures fine details through manipulation of soft media, which can later be hardened via firing for ceramics or used as masters for further processes; it has been utilized since for portable plaques and persists in contemporary studio practices for its accessibility and reversibility. Casting techniques replicate relief designs by pouring liquefied material into molds derived from additive models, yielding multiples in metals or resins with consistent precision. , predominant for reliefs, involves crafting a wax positive additively over an armature, encasing it in , melting out the wax to form a void, and introducing molten under or to fill intricate undercuts and surfaces; this method, evidenced in artifacts from 3rd millennium BCE , enables complex narratives on panels and attachments unattainable in direct . offers an alternative for larger-scale reliefs, packing damp sand around a to create a mold, then pouring metal, as applied in 19th-century architectural friezes for economies in production. and casting extend these principles to non-metallic media, molding from clay originals for interior decorations or public monuments, prioritizing durability over the of .

Common Materials and Their Properties

Stone has been the predominant material for relief sculpture across civilizations due to its durability and capacity for intricate detailing. , a derived from , features a fine that allows for precise and polishing, enabling the capture of subtle textures in low and high reliefs. , sedimentary in origin, offers greater softness than marble, facilitating easier subtractive but requiring protection from . and provide alternatives with varying hardness; sandstone erodes more readily while granite's density supports deep reliefs in harsh environments, as seen in executed in as early as the BCE. Wood, valued for its fibrous composition, exhibits high tensile strength that permits thin, delicate projections in relief work without fracturing, though it demands sealing against moisture and insects. , sourced from elephant tusks or similar dentine, yields panels suitable for fine reliefs due to its smooth, workable texture and natural translucency, though supply limitations and ethical concerns have curtailed its use since the . Terracotta, fired clay, combines moldability in its unfired state with post-firing , allowing for detailed panels; its surface can be glazed for enhanced reflectivity and resistance to elements. Metals such as and silver enable additive techniques like repoussé, where malleability—particularly in copper alloys comprising about 97% , 2% tin, and 1% for —facilitates hammering from the reverse to form raised designs without cracking.
MaterialKey PropertiesTypical Use in Relief
MarbleFine grain, polishable, moderate hardness (Mohs 3-4)Low to high relief for indoor/outdoor durability
LimestoneSoft (Mohs 3), easily carved, porousArchitectural low reliefs, susceptible to
WoodTensile strength, lightweight, anisotropic grainThin, intricate panels; requires preservation
IvorySmooth, dense, carvable to fine detailSmall-scale, portable reliefs
TerracottaMoldable, fired hardness, glaze-compatibleNarrative friezes, decorative tiles
BronzeMalleable , corrosion-resistant Repoussé or cast mid-to-high reliefs

Modern Adaptations and Innovations

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, relief sculpture techniques have integrated digital design software, enabling artists to generate bas-relief models from two-dimensional images or three-dimensional scans through algorithms that map height data to surface projections. This semi-automated process, pioneered in research around 2007, allows for precise control over depth gradients and lighting simulations prior to physical production, reducing manual labor while preserving artistic intent. Digital fabrication methods, such as CNC milling and , have revolutionized subtractive techniques by automating the carving of reliefs into materials like foam, wood, or stone, with tolerances down to millimeters for intricate details. For instance, in , digitally-assisted was applied to heritage replicas, using 3D datasets to guide robotic tools that replicate classical relief profiles without direct manual intervention. Additive techniques have advanced via , where software converts images into layered relief models printable in resins or polymers, achieving sub-millimeter resolutions suitable for jewelry or architectural panels. Tools like Bambu Lab's Relief Maker, released in 2025, employ AI to transform photographs into printable bas-reliefs, democratizing access for non-experts by bypassing traditional modeling skills. Contemporary materials emphasize durability, lightness, and sustainability, including composites of , selenite, and pigments for faux-marble effects mimicking stone without its weight, and or plastics optimized for 3D printing's layer-by-layer deposition. These enable high-relief forms with embedded colors or translucency, as seen in polymer-based panels that withstand environmental exposure better than traditional plasters. Hybrid approaches combine these with for thin-sheet metals or acrylics, producing counter-relief variants for illuminated installations. Such innovations expand relief's applications to and , where computational precision enhances scalability from prototypes to large-scale facades.

Notable Examples and Artists

Ancient and Classical Masterpieces

![Assyrian low relief, Lion Hunt of Ashurbanipal, North Palace, Nineveh](./assets/Sculpted_reliefs_depicting_Ashurbanipal%252C_the_last_great_Assyrian_king%252C_hunting_lions%252C_gypsum_hall_relief_from_the_North_Palace_of_Nineveh_IrakIrak Ancient Mesopotamian reliefs represent early narrative mastery, with the Lion Hunt panels from Ashurbanipal's North Palace at Nineveh (c. 645–635 BCE) standing as exemplars of low-relief gypsum alabaster carving. These 20+ surviving slabs depict the king in staged hunts, capturing lions' ferocity through dynamic poses and detailed musculature, originally painted for enhanced realism in palace halls. The works blend royal propaganda with artistic innovation, using shallow projection to suggest depth and motion across sequential scenes. Egyptian sunk reliefs, prevalent from onward, achieved technical precision in durable materials like , as seen in Luxor Temple's panels from Ramesses II's era (c. 1279–1213 BCE). Figures and hieroglyphs are incised below the surface to minimize shadow and erosion under intense sunlight, enabling fine details in divine processions and royal offerings. This technique, contrasting raised reliefs used indoors, prioritized legibility and permanence in monumental architecture. Achaemenid Persian reliefs at (c. 515 BCE) showcase imperial through orderly low-relief processions on limestone terraces. The Apadana's staircases feature over 300 tribute-bearing delegates from 23 subject nations, rendered in standardized poses with ethnic attire to symbolize empire unity under Darius I and . These carvings, integrating and , employed subtractive methods for harmonious, non-narrative decoration. In , the (447–432 BCE), likely supervised by , exemplifies low-relief marble narrative in Pentelic stone, encircling the temple's for 160 meters. It portrays the Panathenaic with 378 human figures and 200+ animals in fluid, innovative compositions that evoke civic piety and democratic ideals. Metopes and pediments complement this with higher reliefs, achieving optical refinements for distant viewing. Roman masterpieces advanced eclecticism, as in the Augustae (commissioned 13 BCE, dedicated 9 BCE), a enclosure with processional low-relief panels blending Augustan family portraits and allegories like the Tellus figure. These carvings, 11 meters long, fuse Hellenistic fluidity with Italic solemnity to propagandize , with floral swags and sacrificial motifs enhancing symbolic depth.

Medieval and Renaissance Works

Medieval relief primarily served functions, adorning church portals and capitals to illustrate biblical stories for the largely illiterate populace. In the Romanesque era, limestone tympana featured high-relief carvings emphasizing dramatic narratives. Gislebertus, active circa 1120–1135 at Cathedral's Saint-Lazare, executed the west tympanum depicting the around 1130–1146, with elongated figures in exaggerated poses conveying and through deep carving that heightened emotional intensity. These works, carved directly into architectural elements, integrated with stone masonry to reinforce theological messages amid pilgrimage routes. Gothic reliefs evolved toward greater naturalism and intricacy, often in or on facades and altarpieces. French ivory diptychs, such as those portraying scenes from the Passion of Christ dating to the , employed fine low-relief carving on elephant to narrate sequential events in portable devotional objects. These contrasted Romanesque with subtler modeling, reflecting advances in anatomical detail and folds, while maintaining symbolic hierarchies in composition. Renaissance artists in Italy revitalized classical principles, innovating relief techniques to achieve unprecedented illusionistic depth. (c. 1386–1466) pioneered rilievo schiacciato (flattened relief) in the 1420s, using shallow incisions and linear shading to simulate atmospheric perspective, as seen in his marble "Assumption of the Virgin" relief on Cardinal Rainaldo Brancacci's tomb, where figures appear to recede into space despite minimal projection from the surface. This method influenced subsequent sculptors by bridging painting and sculpture. (1378–1455) advanced multi-level relief in the bronze "" panels for Baptistery's east doors, cast between 1425 and 1452, combining high-relief foregrounds with low-relief backgrounds to unify scenes under linear perspective, enhancing narrative continuity across ten quadrilobe frames. Ghiberti's wax models and allowed precise control over graduated projections, marking a technical leap from medieval uniformity.

Modern and Contemporary Reliefs

In the 19th century, relief sculpture persisted in neoclassical and romantic styles, particularly in monumental architecture and memorials. The Arc de Triomphe in Paris features prominent high-relief sculptures completed between 1833 and 1836, including François Rude's "Departure of the Volunteers" (La Marseillaise), which depicts a dynamic scene of revolutionary fervor on the monument's pillar. In the United States, artists like Erastus Dow Palmer advanced relief techniques through naturalistic marble portraits, such as his Sappho modeled in 1855 and carved in 1861, drawing from cameo-cutting traditions. Augustus Saint-Gaudens further innovated with bronze reliefs, introducing vertical formats and integrated inscriptions, as seen in his Rodman de Kay Gilder cast in 1880 from a 1879 model, blending sketch-like naturalism with decorative elements. Early 20th-century developments included both figurative and abstract approaches, alongside massive rock carvings. Henri Matisse's Back series of bronze bas-reliefs evolved over decades: Back I (1908–1909), Back II (1913), Back III (1913–1916), and Back IV (c. 1931), progressively simplifying forms toward abstraction while exploring volume and surface. Large-scale rock reliefs emerged as national symbols, exemplified by Gutzon Borglum's National Memorial (1927–1941), where presidential faces were blasted and chiseled into granite in a technique akin to high relief attached to the mountain face. Similarly, the Confederate Memorial carving (begun 1923, completed 1972) depicts , , and in bas-relief spanning 90 by 190 feet across three acres of granite, the world's largest such work. In the mid- to late , relief integrated into modernist and minimalist art, with artists like producing untitled wall-mounted reliefs using industrial materials to emphasize form and space. Contemporary practitioners have revitalized the medium with innovative materials and digital tools, often abstracting traditional bas-relief. Gabriel Schama employs laser-cut wood to create intricate, kaleidoscopic patterns that play with light and shadow. Goga Tandashvili carves and builds bas-reliefs directly onto walls, depicting scenes like birds and flowers in seamless integration with . Other examples include Hadieh Shafie's colorful paper reliefs incorporating Persian calligraphy and Duffy London's multilayered wooden panels evoking oceanic depths, demonstrating relief's adaptability to contemporary aesthetics.

Cultural and Artistic Impact

Narrative and Decorative Roles

![Assyrian low relief, Lion Hunt of Ashurbanipal, North Palace, Nineveh](./assets/Sculpted_reliefs_depicting_Ashurbanipal%252C_the_last_great_Assyrian_king%252C_hunting_lions%252C_gypsum_hall_relief_from_the_North_Palace_of_Nineveh_IrakIrak Relief sculptures have long functioned as visual narratives, particularly in ancient societies where they documented historical events, royal achievements, and mythological tales for both literate elites and broader audiences. In Neo-Assyrian palaces, such as those at under (r. 668–627 BCE), gypsum wall slabs formed sequential panels depicting continuous stories of military campaigns, hunts, and rituals, employing techniques like varying scales for emphasis and symbolic motifs to convey royal power and divine favor. These reliefs served propagandistic purposes, reinforcing the king's legitimacy through depictions of conquests and lion hunts that symbolized control over chaos. Egyptian temple reliefs, carved into sandstone or granite walls as in Luxor Temple (c. 1400 BCE), illustrated ritual sequences and divine interactions, with each scene representing a self-contained sacred act within larger cosmological narratives tied to pharaonic legitimacy and afterlife beliefs. Greek examples, including the Parthenon frieze (c. 447–432 BCE), portrayed processional and mythological episodes to evoke civic identity and piety, integrating narrative into architectural contexts for public edification. Roman imperial reliefs on monuments like the Arch of Titus (81 CE) commemorated victories, such as the sack of Jerusalem in 70 CE, blending historical record with ideological messaging to bridge rulers and subjects. In decorative capacities, reliefs enhanced architectural and artifact surfaces without protruding significantly, adding texture, rhythm, and symbolic depth to facades, capitals, and furnishings across eras. Medieval European builders repeated motifs like acanthus leaves on Corinthian-inspired capitals for ornamental continuity, enriching cathedrals such as (c. 1140–1220 CE) with layered visual interest that complemented structural forms. In later periods, bas-reliefs adorned public monuments, as on the (1806–1836 CE), where they provided aesthetic embellishment while evoking national heritage through stylized scenes. These applications prioritized surface integration, using low projection to balance functionality with artistry in spaces like temple lintels or interiors.

Symbolism Across Civilizations

In ancient Egyptian tomb and temple reliefs, sunk and raised carvings depicted offerings to divinities and pharaonic victories in battle, symbolizing eternal sustenance for the deceased in the and the cosmic order's triumph over chaos. These forms, often executed in hard stones like , emphasized flatness and profile views to evoke permanence and divine , with figures scaled by status rather than realism. Mesopotamian palace reliefs, particularly Assyrian examples from the 9th–7th centuries BCE, portrayed kings in lion hunts and conquests using low-relief bands, embodying royal prowess, divine mandate, and the subjugation of enemies to affirm imperial stability. Protective motifs like the —winged bulls or lions with human heads—guarded portals, representing hybrid strength that warded off evil and linked earthly rulers to celestial powers. In Achaemenid Persian reliefs at (c. 550–330 BCE), processions of tribute-bearers and equinoctial motifs like balanced bulls and lions symbolized harmonious cosmic renewal and the empire's multicultural unity under Ahura Mazda's order. Greek friezes (c. 447–432 BCE) illustrated Panathenaic processions and mythic battles, signifying communal , heroic ancestry, and the polis's endurance against . Roman imperial arches and columns, such as Trajan's (113 CE), rendered victories in spiraling or linear scenes, projecting martial glory and the extension of as extensions of divine favor. Indian temple reliefs, from 6th-century CE onward, narrated and episodes alongside mithuna (erotic couples), denoting ethical paths to and —liberation from rebirth—while the temple's cosmic layout mirrored universal creation. Borobudur's 9th-century panels () sequentially depicted Buddhist and the path to enlightenment, using narrative progression to symbolize spiritual ascent from samsara. Mesoamerican Maya and Aztec lintels and stelae (c. 250–900 CE) showed bloodletting rites and deified rulers, invoking fertility, cyclical renewal, and ancestral ties to underworld forces for political legitimacy. Across these traditions, relief's partial projection from substrate universally connoted emergence from primordial flatness—evoking creation myths where order arises from void—while its durability on monuments ensured transmission of elite ideologies to posterity, often prioritizing symbolic clarity over anatomical fidelity.

Influence on Architecture and Public Art

Relief sculpture has shaped architectural design by embedding narrative depth and symbolic ornamentation into building surfaces, from temple walls to civic facades, allowing structures to convey historical, religious, or propagandistic messages without detached freestanding forms. In ancient architecture, sunk reliefs integrated into hard stone surfaces like pylons at depicted pharaohs performing rituals, ensuring the perpetual reenactment of cosmic order through carved permanence resistant to erosion. Similarly, at the Temple of Ramses I in Abydos, bas-reliefs on interior walls illustrated royal interactions with deities, blending artistry with sacred function to affirm divine kingship. Greek architects elevated relief's role in monumental temples, as evidenced by the (447–432 BCE), where low-relief metopes and on the portrayed mythic battles and Panathenaic processions, harmonizing sculptural storytelling with Doric proportions to glorify . This integration influenced subsequent by prioritizing illusionistic depth over full sculpture, enabling expansive narratives within constrained surfaces. Roman builders adapted these techniques for public monuments, notably (113 CE), a 35-meter spiraling with 155 scenes and over 2,500 figures chronicling Dacian campaigns, serving as vertical that merged engineering with imperial history. In medieval (11th–12th centuries), reliefs proliferated on church portals and tympana, such as those at , to educate the populace through biblical vignettes carved in high relief for visibility, marking a revival of figurative sculpture tied to structural arches and lintels. and eras revived classical relief for palatial facades, like Palazzo Farnese's narrative panels, while modern employs low-relief on memorials—such as World War I monuments in Europe—to evoke with subdued dimensionality suited to urban integration. This enduring influence underscores relief's utility in architecture for balancing visibility, durability, and thematic density across eras.

Criticisms, Debates, and Preservation Challenges

Artistic and Technical Critiques

Relief sculpture has historically been critiqued for its inherent ambivalence as a medium positioned between and freestanding , often perceived as lacking the autonomy of the latter or the optical purity of the former. Art historians such as Robert Morris have argued that relief's dependence on a supporting restricts viewer circulation and engagement with gravity, confining perception to frontal views and diminishing the spatial dynamism achievable in the round. This limitation fosters a phenomenological tension, where forms emerge from a background yet resist full disclosure, creating in figure-ground relationships and challenging spatial coherence, as noted in analyses of medieval and examples like Donatello's experiments with planar depth. In American contexts, relief was valued for domestic and commemorative applications—offering an economical alternative to full statues—but early sculptors prioritized in-the-round works for prestige, viewing relief as secondary until innovations by figures like blended high and low techniques to enhance fluidity. Aesthetically, low or bas-relief faces criticism for its shallow projection, which constrains undercutting and modeling, resulting in reduced three-dimensional and a flatter appearance compared to high relief or in the round; this demands exceptional precision to convey volume and narrative depth, as seen in ancient Egyptian sunk reliefs restricted to frontal . Critics like Adolf Hildebrand contended that relief fails to guide viewers into illusory depth effectively, prioritizing surface pattern over volumetric recession, though proponents highlight its narrative strengths in sequential storytelling, such as on architectural friezes. In contemporary practice, this duality persists, with reliefs blending painterly elements to mitigate compositional weaknesses, yet often critiqued for subordinating sculptural logic to pictorial concerns, echoing Hegel's historical dismissal of relief as architecturally dependent. Technically, relief carving presents challenges rooted in material resistance and precision requirements, particularly in stone where hard substrates like limit detail without risking fracture, as evidenced in Egyptian sunk reliefs carved directly into unyielding surfaces. reliefs encounter issues with direction, which can cause splitting during undercutting or thin projection carving, necessitating adaptive techniques to maintain structural integrity and avoid breakage. High relief amplifies fragility, with protruding elements vulnerable to mechanical stress, while bas-relief's minimal depth restricts tool access for refinement, often relying on front-plane methods that compromise modeling. Modern reinforcements address adhesion failures in composite reliefs, where poor bonding leads to over time, underscoring ongoing technical demands for durable substrates and precise execution to preserve .

Historical Destruction and Iconoclasm

In , pharaohs frequently engaged in , systematically defacing reliefs and inscriptions of predecessors or rival deities to erase their legacies or assert religious dominance. (r. circa 1353–1336 BCE) ordered the widespread chiseling out of Amun's name and images from temple reliefs across Thebes and other sites, promoting his monotheistic cult; subsequent rulers like (r. circa 1319–1292 BCE) retaliated by obliterating 's own reliefs, smashing cartouches, and dismantling monuments at . Similarly, (r. circa 1479–1425 BCE) defaced numerous reliefs of his co-regent and aunt (r. circa 1479–1458 BCE) after her death, including at Deir el-Bahri and , by hacking out her cartouches and figures from wall carvings to legitimize his sole rule and restore traditional divine orders. These acts, often executed with chisels on hard stone surfaces, reflect causal motivations of political consolidation and theological revisionism rather than mere , as evidenced by the targeted nature of erasures preserving structural integrity while nullifying symbolic power. In the , extended to relief sculptures as extensions of enemy subjugation, with conquerors decapitating or mutilating carved figures on stelae and walls to parallel the treatment of living foes. Mesopotamian rulers, for instance, systematically damaged reliefs depicting defeated kings or gods, as documented in records and archaeological remnants from sites like , where Assyrian bas-reliefs were later targeted in Persian and Hellenistic conquests. This practice underscored a realist view of images as possessing agency akin to persons, warranting ritualistic destruction to neutralize perceived threats. The Byzantine Iconoclastic Controversy (730–843 CE), initiated by Emperor Leo III, mandated the destruction of religious images, including sculpted reliefs in churches and ivory panels, deeming them idolatrous and a cause of military defeats. Mosaics, frescoes, and low-relief carvings of saints and Christ were whitewashed, chipped away, or replaced with crosses and symbols, drastically reducing pre-iconoclastic survivals; for example, reliefs in Constantinople's Chalke Gate were effaced. The policy, driven by imperial edicts linking icons to and divine disfavor, stifled production until the Triumph of in 843 CE, after which reliefs reemerged in more abstract forms like ivory diptychs. During the Protestant Reformation, particularly the Beeldenstorm of 1566 in the , Calvinist mobs and authorities destroyed Catholic relief sculptures in cathedrals, targeting carved altarpieces, , and wall panels as violations of the Second Commandment against graven images. In Utrecht's Cathedral of Saint Martin and Nijmegen's St. Stevenskerk, relief statues were defaced with hammers, their faces and figures mutilated; estimates suggest up to 90% of in the region was obliterated in months-long campaigns. English reformers under (1547–1553) similarly ordered the smashing of monastic reliefs during the Dissolution, motivated by scriptural literalism and anti-papal sentiment. These episodes, often state-sanctioned, prioritized doctrinal purity over artistic heritage, leaving fragmented survivals that highlight the causal link between theological rupture and material erasure.

Contemporary Debates on Restoration and Replication

In the restoration of ancient relief sculptures, a central debate concerns the extent of intervention, with conservators weighing the risks of material incompatibility against the need to halt deterioration. Modern materials like synthetic resins or fillers, while stabilizing fragile surfaces, can introduce chemical reactions or aesthetic mismatches that alter the original appearance and structural integrity over time. For instance, the 1930s cleaning of the Parthenon frieze marbles in the British Museum employed abrasive methods that stripped away centuries of patina, sparking ongoing criticism for prioritizing visibility over historical authenticity and potentially accelerating erosion. Replication emerges as a complementary strategy, particularly through and , which allow precise copies to shield originals from environmental damage, handling, or . Proponents argue this extends access—such as producing facsimiles for educational display—without compromising the unique and of artifacts like Assyrian gypsum reliefs or Egyptian sunk reliefs. However, critics contend that replicas erode the of , potentially misleading viewers about an object's historical context and value, as seen in debates over whether such copies fulfill the ethical imperatives of conservation. Ethical tensions intensify in repatriation discussions, where museums have proposed 3D replicas as alternatives to returning originals, as in proposals for metopes or Palmyrene reliefs destroyed by conflict. While this facilitates global sharing and de-escalates ownership disputes, opponents view it as insufficient, arguing that scans and prints cannot replicate tactile authenticity or cultural sovereignty, and may entrench digital control by Western institutions through claims on 3D data. Recent projects, like the 2024 remastering of Indonesia's Sarinah high-relief panels using digital mapping, highlight successes in non-invasive replication but underscore the need for transparent methodologies to avoid speculative reconstructions. These debates reflect broader causal realities: over-restoration has demonstrably caused irreversible damage in cases like the 's, while replication technologies, though empirically effective for preservation, risk commodifying heritage if not governed by artist-intent analogs or international standards prioritizing empirical fidelity over interpretive liberties.

References

  1. https://cordair.com/art-blog/what-is-a-relief-sculpture
  2. https://www.chinamarblesculpture.com/what-are-the-three-types-of-relief-sculpture.html
  3. https://www.artsq.org/techniques/v/what-is-relief-sculpture-low-relief-high-relief-sunken-relief
  4. https://www.penn.museum/documents/publications/expedition/59-3/human-history.pdf
  5. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/art-prehistoric-to-middle-ages/historical-relief-sculptures
  6. https://katerinamorgan.art/blogs/history-of-art/the-brief-history-of-bas-relief
  7. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/r/relief
  8. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/american-relief-sculpture
  9. https://www.getty.edu/art/collection/object/10405H
  10. https://aslcore.org/art/entries/?id=high-relief
  11. https://study.com/academy/lesson/relief-carving-definition-tools-techniques.html
  12. https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/art-and-design/art-and-design-theory/freestanding-sculpture/
  13. http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/sculpture/relief.htm
  14. https://beyazgazete.com/haber/2020/9/1/?word=a-relief-sculpture-is-a-sculpture-where-the-design-projects-from-a-flat-surface-while-a-freestanding-sculpture-is-fully-three-dimensional-and-can-be-viewed-from-all-sides-the-main-benefit-of-a-relief-sculpture-is-that-it-is-often-more-economical-to-create-and-can-be-easily-incorporated-into-architectural-surfaces-while-the-drawback-is-that-it-can-only-be-fully-appreciated-from-one-primary-viewpoint-key-differences-perspective-relief-sculptures-are-designed-to-be-viewed-primarily-from-one-angle-whereas-freestanding-sculptures-can-be-viewed-from-multiple-perspectives-material-usage-due-to-the-flat-background-of-a-relief-sculpture-less-material-is-needed-compared-to-a-freestanding-sculpture-making-it-potentially-more-cost-effective-integration-with-architecture-relief-sculptures-can-be-seamlessly-integrated-into-walls-and-other-architectural-elements-creating-a-unified-decorative-scheme-benefits-of-relief-sculpture-economical-requires-less-material-and-labor-compared-to-a-freestanding-sculpture-structural-stability-attached-to-a-wall-making-it-more-secure-and-less-prone-to-damage-narrative-potential-can-effectively-depict-complex-scenes-with-multiple-figures-due-to-the-ability-to-control-the-background-plane-drawbacks-of-relief-sculpture-limited-viewing-angle-can-only-be-fully-appreciated-from-one-primary-viewpoint-less-depth-and-detail-due-to-the-flat-background-the-illusion-of-depth-and-full-form-can-be-limited-less-dynamic-may-not-capture-the-full-movement-and-form-of-a-subject-as-effectively-as-a-freestanding-sculpture-quizlet
  15. https://kids.kiddle.co/Relief
  16. https://www.nationalshrine.org/blog/guide-to-art-relief-sculptures/
  17. https://quizlet.com/808477696/relief-sculpture-practice-flash-cards/
  18. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1572/
  19. https://archaeology.org/issues/may-june-2021/features/turkey-gobekli-tepe-hunter-gatherers/
  20. http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/prehistoric/sculpture.htm
  21. https://smarthistory.org/perforated-relief-of-ur-nanshe/
  22. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/egypt-in-the-old-kingdom-ca-2649-2150-b-c
  23. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/greek-art-in-the-archaic-period
  24. https://smarthistory.org/parthenon-frieze/
  25. https://www.britishmuseum.org/about-us/british-museum-story/contested-objects-collection/parthenon-sculptures
  26. https://smarthistory.org/ara-pacis/
  27. https://smarthistory.org/column-of-trajan/
  28. https://www.worldhistory.org/Roman_Sculpture/
  29. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/byzantine-ivories
  30. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/cavestocathedrals/chapter/early-byzantine/
  31. https://smarthistory.org/reframing-art-history/medieval-materiality-mediterranean/
  32. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/medieval-european-sculpture-for-buildings
  33. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/cavestocathedrals/chapter/romanesque-sculpture/
  34. https://smarthistory.org/a-beginners-guide-to-romanesque-art/
  35. https://www.samfogg.com/exhibitions/49/
  36. https://human.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Art/Art_History_%28Boundless%29/18%253A_Gothic_Art/18.03%253A_Gothic_Sculpture
  37. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/322679
  38. https://krc.web.ox.ac.uk/article/islamic-rock-crystal-project
  39. https://islamicart.museumwnf.org/database_item.php?id=object%3BISL%3Bde%3BMus01%3B23%3Ben
  40. https://www.britannica.com/art/stiacciato-relief
  41. https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/explore-donatellos-masterpiece-the-ascension
  42. https://www.britannica.com/art/relief-sculpture
  43. https://artincontext.org/relief-sculpture/
  44. https://www.romeartlover.it/Altar.html
  45. https://www.britannica.com/art/bas-relief
  46. https://www.dkt.co.uk/blog/unveiling-the-rich-history-of-bas-relief-sculpture-with-inspiring-examples/
  47. https://www.europeana.eu/en/stories/the-evolution-of-the-bas-relief
  48. https://www.capaesculturas.com/en/relief-in-sculpture-history-and-techniques/
  49. https://smarthistory.org/ashurbanipal-hunting-lions/
  50. https://thevirtualinstructor.com/blog/low-relief-sculpture
  51. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/galleries/assyria-lion-hunts
  52. https://collections.mfa.org/objects/58904
  53. https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/donatello-a-master-at-work
  54. https://www.reliefmaker.com/blog/what-is-a-bas-relief/
  55. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02341a.htm
  56. https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/9280/1/Fehrenbach_Rilievo_schiacciato_Donatello_and_the_forces_of_sculpture_2022.pdf
  57. https://www.idesign.wiki/en/relief-sculpture-raised-and-sunk/
  58. https://nnp.wustl.edu/library/dictionarydetail/516615
  59. https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~sequin/CS285/PAPERS/SIGGRAPH_07/032-weyrich_3D_BasRelief.pdf
  60. https://www.graphicstudio.usf.edu/gs/sculpture-terms.html
  61. https://gfx.cs.princeton.edu/pubs/Weyrich_2007_DBF/relief.pdf
  62. https://www.bowdoin.edu/art-museum/pdf/Assyrian-Middle%2520School-resource-BCMA.pdf
  63. https://brittlebooks.library.illinois.edu/brittlebooks_open/Books2009-08/redfge0001mananc/redfge0001mananc.pdf
  64. https://www2.gwu.edu/~art/Temporary_SL/129%253A255/Readings/Gould.pdf
  65. https://picasso.shsu.edu/documents/20166990.pdf
  66. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=ouhonors1744034842655083&disposition=inline
  67. https://blog.stephens.edu/arh101glossary/?glossary=sunken-relief
  68. https://www.artpedagogy.com/primary_egypt.html
  69. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/ancient-mediterranean/sunk-relief
  70. https://schs-art.weebly.com/type-relief.html
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Sunken-relief-of-ancient-Egypt_fig1_228453272
  72. https://learn.ncartmuseum.org/artwork/reliefs-from-the-tomb-of-khnumti-1-and-2/
  73. https://www.veniceclayartists.com/relief-art-egypt/
  74. https://artincontext.org/types-of-sculpture/
  75. https://www.britannica.com/art/intaglio-sculpture
  76. https://precisionartblog.wordpress.com/2013/09/30/lesson-introduction-to-subtractive-sculpture-and-relief/
  77. https://sainsburycentre.ac.uk/art-and-objects/31542-curved-relief-pierced-relief/
  78. https://utopiadystopiawwi.wordpress.com/constructivism/vladimir-tatlin/counter-relief/
  79. https://www.academia.edu/3676987/A_New_Palpable_World_The_Counter_Reliefs_of_Vladimir_Tatlin
  80. https://study.com/academy/lesson/comparing-sculptural-materials-techniques.html
  81. https://benchmarkabrasives.com/blogs/stone-work/sculpting-stone-techniques-and-tools-for-stone-carving
  82. https://rockandtools.com/en/blogs/blog-rock-tools/stone-carving-bas-relief-relief-techniques-tools-artistic-evolution
  83. https://fiveable.me/sculpture-techniques/unit-4/relief-bas-relief-techniques/study-guide/chiw4d1qG5ckBoS4
  84. https://dynamicstonetools.com/blogs/news/stone-sculptures-techniques-and-famous-artists
  85. https://www.domestika.org/en/blog/11125-8-must-know-clay-modeling-techniques
  86. https://www.musee-rodin.fr/en/resources/techniques/lost-wax-bronze-casting
  87. https://www.pentapatterns.co.uk/the-art-of-creating-a-bronze-sculpture/
  88. https://dev.housing.arizona.edu/high-relief-sculpture
  89. https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/1109/report.pdf
  90. https://www.modernsculptureartists.com/2020/04/26/sculpture-materials/
  91. https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/sculpture-techniques
  92. https://www.jamesnancesculpture.com/blog/why-does-bronze-matter
  93. https://copper.org/consumers/arts/2011/january/Copper_Rose.php
  94. https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/II-5-W3/97/2015/isprsannals-II-5-W3-97-2015.pdf
  95. https://www.reliefmaker.com/
  96. https://forum.bambulab.com/t/turn-images-into-3d-reliefs-join-the-relief-sculpture-maker-beta/146526
  97. https://www.pigmentti.com/blog/bas-relief-sculpture-materials-scagliola/
  98. https://www.rmcad.edu/blog/the-future-of-sculpture-combining-traditional-techniques-with-modern-innovations/
  99. https://jaars.journals.ekb.eg/article_362729.html
  100. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20210325-the-lion-hunt-of-ashurbanipal-the-2700-year-old-fake-news
  101. https://discoveringegypt.com/luxor-temple/
  102. https://www.memphis.edu/hypostyle/reliefs_inscriptions/westwallnorthhalf.php
  103. https://isac.uchicago.edu/collections/photographic-archives/persepolis/persepolis-terrace-architecture-reliefs-and-finds
  104. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/323723
  105. https://smarthistory.org/persepolis-the-audience-hall-of-darius-and-xerxes/
  106. https://ancient-greece.org/greek-art/the-sculptures-of-the-parthenon/
  107. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ancient-art-civilizations/roman/early-empire/a/ara-pacis
  108. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/Europe/Italy/Lazio/Roma/Rome/Ara_Pacis/home.html
  109. https://smarthistory.org/last-judgment-tympanum-cathedral-of-st-lazare-autun-france/
  110. https://www.artforum.com/features/the-sculptor-of-autun-214482/
  111. https://smarthistory.org/lorenzo-ghiberti-gates-of-paradise-east-doors-of-the-florence-baptistery/
  112. https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2007/gates-of-paradise
  113. https://www.paris-arc-de-triomphe.fr/en/discover/the-sculpted-groups
  114. https://www.paristickets.com/arc-de-triomphe/
  115. https://www.moma.org/collection/works/80772
  116. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/rushmore-carving/
  117. https://stonemountainpark.org/about-us/history-of-smma/
  118. https://www.moma.org/collection/terms/relief
  119. https://mymodernmet.com/relief-sculpture-artists/
  120. https://blogs.getty.edu/iris/a-brief-introduction-to-the-art-of-ancient-assyrian-kings/
  121. https://smarthistory.org/assyrian-sculpture/
  122. https://scholarworks.indianapolis.iu.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/26087/EWThill.2022.OHRII.pdf?sequence=1
  123. https://www.architecture.org/online-resources/architecture-encyclopedia/bas-relief
  124. https://maa.missouri.edu/education/museum-in-30-objects/egyptian-tomb-relief
  125. https://fiveable.me/archaeology-of-mesopotamia/unit-10/assyrian-art-palace-reliefs/study-guide/YAX2x6tu6q73VWwu
  126. https://isac.uchicago.edu/collections/highlights/highlights-collection-mesopotamia
  127. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/classical-greek-and-roman-art/
  128. https://smarthistory.org/introduction-to-ancient-roman-art/
  129. https://smarthistory.org/lakshmana-temple/
  130. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8rw985h1
  131. https://www.ijert.org/iconography-and-symbolism-in-indian-temple-architecture
  132. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/307638
  133. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/aztec-stone-sculpture
  134. https://smarthistory.org/reframing-art-history/mesoamerica-middle-200-900/
  135. https://oi-idb-static.uchicago.edu/multimedia/1200/winlock_temple_rameses_i_1932.pdf
  136. https://smarthistory.org/reframing-art-history/roman-empire-in-a-connected-world/
  137. https://www.artforum.com/features/constructive-issues-in-relief-208218/
  138. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/a/ars/13441566.0048.006/--relief-problem-some-notes-from-an-art-historian?rgn=main;view=fulltext
  139. https://stryicarvingtools.com/blogs/news/the-art-of-relief-wood-carving-techniques-and-tools
  140. https://journals.jozacpublishers.com/index.php/jahca/article/view/204
  141. https://www.historyextra.com/period/ancient-egypt/akhenaten-facts-life-death/
  142. https://www.ees.ac.uk/resource/analysing-the-destruction-of-hatshepsut-s-monuments.html
  143. https://www.cnn.com/style/article/egyptian-statues-broken-noses-artsy
  144. https://isac.uchicago.edu/research/symposia/iconoclasm-and-text-destruction-ancient-near-east-and-beyond-0
  145. https://smarthistory.org/byzantine-iconoclasm/
  146. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/icons-and-iconoclasm-in-byzantium
  147. https://www.booksontrial.com/destroying-history-eight-types-of-iconoclasm-and-their-motives/
  148. https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2021/03/01/iconoclasm-and-unintended-consequences/
  149. https://turkisharchaeonews.net/article/perils-restoring-ancient-architecture-modern-materials
  150. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/history-magazine/article/parthenon-sculptures-british-museum-controversy
  151. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate-papers/08/tate-sculpture-replica-project
  152. https://artquest.org.uk/artlaw-article/conservation-restoration-and-replication-of-modern-sculpture/
  153. https://www.forbes.com/sites/drsarahbond/2016/09/22/does-nycs-new-3d-printed-palmyra-arch-celebrate-syria-or-just-engage-in-digital-colonialism/
  154. https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/71/12/1138/6692637
  155. https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-024-01346-7
  156. https://www.artrewards.net/editorial/the-ethics-of-art-restoration-balancing-preservation-authenticity-and-modern-techniques
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.