Hubbry Logo
PrajnaparamitaPrajnaparamitaMain
Open search
Prajnaparamita
Community hub
Prajnaparamita
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Prajnaparamita
Prajnaparamita
Prajnaparamita
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A Tibetan painting with a Prajñāpāramitā sūtra at the center of the mandala
Prajñāpāramitā Devi, a personification of Transcendent Wisdom, Folio from a Tibetan 100,000 line Prajñāpāramitā manuscript
Tibetan Painting of Mañjuśrī bodhisattva with the sword of wisdom and a sūtra manuscript, which are common symbols of Prajñāpāramitā in Buddhist art
Translations of
Prajñāpāramitā
EnglishPerfection of
Transcendent Wisdom
Sanskritप्रज्ञापारमिता
(IAST: Prajñāpāramitā)
Burmeseပညာပါရမီတ
(MLCTS: pjɪ̀ɰ̃ɲà pàɹəmìta̰)
Chinese般若波羅蜜多
(Pinyin: bōrě bōluómìduō)
Japanese般若波羅蜜多
(Rōmaji: hannya-haramitta)
Khmerប្រាជ្ញាបារមី
(UNGEGN: prachnhéabarômi)
Korean반야바라밀다
(RR: Banyabaramilda)
MongolianТөгөлдөр билгүүн
Sinhalaප්‍රඥා පාරමිතා
Tibetan་ཤེས་རབ་ཀྱི་ཕ་རོལ་ཏུ་ཕྱིན་པ་
(shes rab kyi pha rol tu chin pa)
Thaiปรัชญาปารมิตา
VietnameseBát-nhã-ba-la-mật-đa
Glossary of Buddhism
Part of a series on
Mahāyāna Buddhism
A Lotus, one of the eight auspicious symbols in Mahāyāna
Teachings
Buddhas and Bodhisattvas
Mahayana sutras
Main traditions
Key figures
Regional traditions

Prajñāpāramitā means "the Perfection of Wisdom" or "Transcendental Knowledge" in Mahāyāna. Prajñāpāramitā refers to a perfected way of seeing the nature of reality, as well as to a particular body of Mahāyāna scriptures (sūtras), known as the Prajñāpāramitā sutras, which includes such texts as the Heart Sutra and Diamond Sutra.

The word Prajñāpāramitā combines the Sanskrit words prajñā "wisdom" (or "knowledge") with pāramitā, "excellence," "perfection," "noble character quality," or "that which has gone beyond," "gone to the other side," "transcending."[1] Prajñāpāramitā is a central concept in Mahāyāna Buddhism and is generally associated with ideas such as emptiness (śūnyatā), 'lack of svabhāva' (essence), the illusory (māyā) nature of things, how all phenomena are characterized by "non-arising" (anutpāda, i.e. unborn) and the Madhyamaka thought of Nāgārjuna.[2][3] Its practice and understanding are taken to be indispensable elements of the Bodhisattva path.

According to Edward Conze, the Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras are "a collection of about forty texts ... composed somewhere on the Indian subcontinent between approximately 100 BC and AD 600."[4] Some Prajnāpāramitā sūtras are thought to be among the earliest Mahāyāna sūtras.[5][6]

History

[edit]
Prajñāpāramitā illustrated manuscript cover, circa 15th century
Prajñāpāramitā personified. From the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra, a Sanskrit Manuscript of the 8,000 line PP sutra, Nalanda, Bihar, India. Circa 700–1100 CE.

Earliest texts

[edit]

Western scholars have traditionally considered the earliest sūtra in the Prajñāpāramitā class to be the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra or "Perfection of Wisdom in 8,000 Lines", which was probably put in writing in the 1st century BCE.[7] This chronology is based on the views of Edward Conze, who largely considered dates of translation into other languages. This text also has a corresponding version in verse format, called the Ratnaguṇasaṃcaya Gāthā, which some believe to be slightly older because it is not written in standard literary Sanskrit. However, these findings rely on late-dating Indian texts, in which verses and mantras are often kept in more archaic forms.[8]

According to Edward Conze, the PP literature developed in nine stages: (1) An urtext similar to the first two chapters of the Sanskrit Ratnagunasaṃcaya Gāthā; (2) Chapters 3 to 28 of the Ratnagunasaṃcaya are composed, along with the prose of the Aṣṭasāhasrikā. This base text was further expanded with (3) material from the Abhidharma, and (4) concessions to the "Buddhism of Faith" (referring to Pure Land references in the sūtra). This process led to (5) further expansion into larger PP sūtras as well as (6) contraction into the shorter sūtras (i.e. Diamond Sūtra, Heart Sūtra, down to the Prajñāpāramitā in One Letter). This expanded corpus formed the basis for the (7) Indian PP Commentaries, (8) Tantric PP works and (9) Chinese Chan texts.[9] Jan Nattier also defends the view that the Aṣṭasāhasrikā developed as various layers were added over time.[8] However, Matthew Orsborn has recently argued, based on the chiastic structures of the text that the entire sūtra may have been composed as a single whole (with a few additions added on the core chapters).[10]

A number of scholars have proposed that the Mahāyāna Prajñāpāramitā teachings were first developed by the Caitika subsect of the Mahāsāṃghikas. They believe that the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra originated amongst the southern Mahāsāṃghika schools of the Āndhra region, along the Kṛṣṇa River.[11] These Mahāsāṃghikas had two famous monasteries near Amarāvati Stupa and Dhānyakataka, which gave their names to the Pūrvaśaila and Aparaśaila schools.[12] Each of these schools had a copy of the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra in Prakrit.[12] Guang Xing also assesses the view of the Buddha given in the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra as being that of the Mahāsāṃghikas.[12] Edward Conze estimates that this sūtra originated around 100 BCE.[12]

In 2012, Harry Falk and Seishi Karashima published a damaged and partial Kharoṣṭhī manuscript of the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā.[13] It is very similar to the first Chinese translation of the Aṣṭasāhasrikā by Lokakṣema (ca. 179 CE) whose source text is assumed to be in the Gāndhārī language; Lokakṣema's translation is also the first extant translation of the Prajñāpāramitā genre into a non-Indic language. Comparison with the standard Sanskrit text shows that it is also likely to be a translation from Gāndhāri as it expands on many phrases and provides glosses for words that are not present in the Gāndhārī. This points to the text being composed in Gāndhārī, the language of Gandhara (the region now called the Northwest Frontier of Pakistan, including Peshawar, Taxila and Swat Valley). The "Split" manuscript is evidently a copy of an earlier text, though Falk and Karashima do not give an estimate on how old the original may be.

In contrast to western scholarship, Japanese scholars have traditionally considered the Diamond Sūtra (Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra) to be from a very early date in the development of Prajñāpāramitā literature.[14] The usual reason for this relative chronology which places the Vajracchedikā earlier is not its date of translation, but rather a comparison of the contents and themes.[15] Some western scholars also believe that the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra was adapted from the earlier Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra.[14]

Examining the language and phrases used in both the Aṣṭasāhasrikā and the Vajracchedikā, Gregory Schopen also sees the Vajracchedikā as being earlier than the Aṣṭasāhasrikā.[16] This view is taken in part by examining parallels between the two works, in which the Aṣṭasāhasrikā seems to represent the later or more developed position.[16] According to Schopen, these works also show a shift in emphasis from an oral tradition (Vajracchedikā) to a written tradition (Aṣṭasāhasrikā).[16]

Larger PP sutras

[edit]
Illustration from a 100,000 line PP sutra manuscript

The Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (T. Shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa stong phrag nyi shu lnga pa; C. Mohe bore boluomi jing, 摩訶般若波羅蜜經) is one of the largest PP sutras, comprising three volumes of the Tibetan Kangyur (26-28). It was also one of the most important and popular PP sutras in India, seeing as how there are numerous Indian commentaries on this text, including commentaries by Vimuktisena, Haribhadra, Smṛtijñānakīrti, and Ratnakarashanti. The sutra also survives in the original Sanskrit, which was found in Gilgit. It also exists in four Chinese translations.[17]

According to Nattier, the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā is basically the Aṣṭasāhasrikā base text which has been "sliced" up and filled with other material, increasing the length of the text considerably.[8] This process of expansion continued, culminating in the massive Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (100,000 lines), the largest of the PP sutras.

According to Joseph Walser, there is evidence that the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (25,000 lines) and the Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (100,000 lines) have a connection with the Dharmaguptaka sect, while the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (8,000 lines) does not.[18]

Other PP texts were also composed which were much shorter and had a more independent structure from the Aṣṭasāhasrikā. Regarding the shorter PP texts, Conze writes, "two of these, the Diamond Sūtra and the Heart Sūtra are in a class by themselves and deservedly renowned throughout the world of Northern Buddhism. Both have been translated into many languages and have often been commented upon.".[19] Jan Nattier argues the Heart Sutra to be an apocryphal text composed in China from extracts of the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā and other texts c. 7th century.[20] Red Pine, however, does not support Nattiers argument and believes the Heart Sutra to be of Indian origin.[21]

Esoteric Prajñāpāramitā texts

[edit]

During the later phase of Indian Buddhism, Tāntric Prajñāpāramitā texts were produced from the 8th century up to the 11th century CE. These later esoteric Prajñāpāramitā sutras are generally short texts which contain mantras and/or dhāraṇīs and also reference esoteric Buddhist (Mantrayana) ideas.[22] They often promote simple practices based on recitation which lead to the accumulation of merit and help one reach awakening.[22]

Esoteric Prajñāpāramitā sutras include texts such as the Adhyardhaśatikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (150 lines), the famous Heart Sutra (Prajñāpāramitāhṛdaya), the Ekaślokikā prajñāpāramitā, Svalpākṣarā Prajñāpāramitā, Kauśikā Prajñāpāramitā, Saptaślokikā Prajñāpāramitā, the *Prajñāpāramitānāmāṣṭaśataka and the Candragarbha Prajñāpāramitā.[23] Some of these sources, like the Svalpākṣarā, claim that simply reciting the dharanis found in the sutras are as beneficial as advanced esoteric Buddhist practices (with the full ritual panoply of mandalas and abhiseka).[24] These scriptures may have been recited in esoteric rituals and two of them remain in widespread use today: Prajñāpāramitāhṛdaya (commonly recited throughout Asia by Buddhists) and the Adhyardhaśatikā (an widely recited text in Shingon Buddhism).[25]

Prajñāpāramitā in Central Asia

[edit]
See also: Buddhism in Central Asia

By the middle of the 3rd century CE, it appears that some Prajñāpāramitā texts were known in Central Asia, as reported by the Chinese monk Zhu Zixing, who brought back a manuscript of the Prajñāpāramitā of 25,000 lines:[26]

When in 260 AD, the Chinese monk Zhu Zixing chose to go to Khotan in an attempt to find original Sanskrit sūtras, he succeeded in locating the Sanskrit Prajñāpāramitā in 25,000 verses, and tried to send it to China. In Khotan, however, there were numerous Hīnayānists who attempted to prevent it because they regarded the text as heterodox. Eventually, Zhu Zixing stayed in Khotan, but sent the manuscript to Luoyang where it was translated by a Khotanese monk named Mokṣala. In 296, the Khotanese monk Gītamitra came to Chang'an with another copy of the same text.

China

[edit]
Chinese Buddhist Canon
Sections
Sections

In China, there was extensive translation of many Prajñāpāramitā texts beginning in the second century CE. The main translators include: Lokakṣema (支婁迦讖), Zhī Qīan (支謙), Dharmarakṣa (竺法護), Mokṣala (無叉羅), Kumārajīva (鳩摩羅什, 408 CE), Xuánzàng (玄奘), Făxián (法賢) and Dānapāla (施護).[27] These translations were very influential in the development of East Asian Mādhyamaka and on Chinese Buddhism.

Xuanzang (fl. c. 602–664) was a Chinese scholar who traveled to India and returned to China with three copies of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra which he had secured from his extensive travels.[28] Xuanzang, with a team of disciple translators, commenced translating the voluminous work in 660 CE using the three versions to ensure the integrity of the source documentation.[28] Xuanzang was being encouraged by a number of the disciple translators to render an abridged version. After a suite of dreams quickened his decision, Xuanzang determined to render an unabridged, complete volume, faithful to the original of 600 fascicles.[29]

An important PP text in East Asian Buddhism is the Dazhidulun (大智度論, T no. 1509), a massive commentary on the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā translated by Kumārajīva (344–413 CE).[30] There are also later commentaries from Zen Buddhists on the Heart and Diamond sutra and Kūkai's commentary (9th century) is the first-known Tantric commentary.

Tibet

[edit]

The PP sutras were first brought to Tibet in the reign of Trisong Detsen (742-796) by scholars Jinamitra and Silendrabodhi and the translator Ye shes De.[31] Tibetan Buddhist scholasticism generally studies the PP sutras through the Abhisamayālaṅkāra and its numerous commentaries. The focus on the Abhisamayālaṅkāra is particularly pronounced in the Gelug school, who according to Georges Dreyfus "take the Ornament as the central text for the study of the path" and "treat it as a kind of Buddhist encyclopedia, read in the light of commentaries by Je Dzong-ka-ba, Gyel-tsap Je, and the authors of manuals [monastic textbooks]."[32]

Texts

[edit]
Manuscript of the Perfection of Wisdom in 8,000 lines

The Main Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras

[edit]
The world's earliest printed book is a Chinese translation of the Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (Vajra Cutter Sutra) from Dunhuang (circa 868 CE).

An Indian commentary on the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, entitled Vivṛtaguhyārthapiṇḍavyākhyā (A Condensed Explanation of the Revealed Secret Meaning, Derge No. 4052), lists eight Prajñāpāramitā sūtras which were "taught to bodhisattvas" and are seen as superior (from the Sravakayana sutras) because they are superior "in eliminating conceptually imaged forms".[33]

The eight texts are listed according to length and are the following:[33]

  1. Triśatikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra: 300 lines, alternatively known as the Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (Diamond Sūtra)
  2. Pañcaśatikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra: 500 lines
  3. Saptaśatikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra: 700 lines, the bodhisattva Mañjuśrī's exposition of Prajñāpāramitā
  4. Sārdhadvisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra: 2,500 lines, from the questions of Suvikrāntavikrāmin Bodhisattva
  5. Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra: 8,000 lines
  6. Aṣṭadaśasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra: 18,000 lines
  7. Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra: 25,000 lines.
  8. Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra: 100,000 lines.

Xuanzang's Prajñāpāramitā Library

[edit]
Illustrated frontispiece to the Great Perfection of Wisdom Sutra, Japan, Heian period, late 12th century, handscroll, gold on blue paper, Honolulu Museum of Art

The Chinese scholar and translator Xuanzang (玄奘, 602-664) is known for his translation of a massive Sanskrit collection of Prajñāpāramitā sutras called "the Xuánzàng Prajñāpāramitā Library" or "The Great Prajñāpāramitāsūtra" (般若 波羅蜜 多 經, pinyin: bōrě bōluómì duō jīng).[34]

Xuanzang returned to China with three copies of this Sanskrit work which he obtained in South India and his translation is said to have been based on these three sources.[35] In total it includes 600 scrolls, with 5 million Chinese characters.

This collection consists of 16 Prajñāpāramitā texts:[36]

  • Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 100,000 verses (scrolls 1-400)
  • Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 25,000 verses (scrolls 401-478)
  • Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 18,000 verses (scrolls 479-537)
  • Prajñāpāramitā sutra in 8,000 verses (scrolls 538-555)
  • An abridged version of the Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 8,000 verses (scrolls 556-565)
  • Devarājapravara prajñāpāramitā sūtra - a part of the Questions of Suvikrānta (scrolls 566-573)
  • Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 700 verses (scrolls 574-575)
  • Nāgaśripa-priccha Prajñāpāramitā (scroll 576)
  • The Diamond Sutra (scroll 577)
  • Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 150 verses (scroll 578)
  • Ārya pañcapāramitānirdeśa nāma mahāyāna sūtra (bokrull 579-592)
  • The Questions of Suvikrānta (scroll 593-600)

A modern English translation: The Great Prajna Paramita Sutra (vols. 1 to 6) translated by Naichen Chen (Tucson: Wheatmark).

In the Tibetan Kangyur

[edit]
Tibetan prajñāpāramitā manuscript depicting Sakyamuni Buddha and Prajñāpāramitā devi, 13th century
Tibetan Buddhist canon
1. Kangyur
Kangyur
1. Vinaya
2. Prajnaparamita
3. Buddhavatamsaka
4. Ratnakuta
5. Sutra
6. Late translated Sutras
6. Tantra
2. Tengyur
Tengyur
1. Stava
2. Tantra

In the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, the Abhisamayālaṅkāra is traditionally said to be a commentary to seventeen Prajñāpāramitā (PP) source texts. These are seen as the most important PP sutras and they collectively known as the "Seventeen Mothers and Sons" (Wyl. yum sras bcu bdun).[37]

The Six Mothers are:[37][38]

  1. The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines (Sanskrit: śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, Wylie: sher phyin stong phrag brgya pa/ \('bum/\)), Tohoku (Toh) Catalogue # 8.
  2. The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-five Thousand Lines (Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, sher phyin stong phrag nyi shu lnga pa/ \(nyi khri/\)), Toh 9.
  3. The Perfection of Wisdom in Eighteen Thousand Lines (Aṣṭādaśasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, sher phyin khri brgyad stong pa), Toh 10.
  4. The Transcendent Perfection of Wisdom in Ten Thousand Lines (Daśasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, shes phyin khri pa), Toh 11.
  5. The Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines (Aṣṭasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, sher phyin brgyad stong pa/), Toh 12.
  6. The Verses that Summarize the Perfection of Wisdom (Prajñāpāramitāsaṃcayagāthā, shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa sdud pa tshigs su), Toh 13.

The Eleven Sons are:[37][38]

  1. The Perfection of Wisdom in Seven Hundred Lines (saptaśatikāprajñāpāramitā), Toh 24.
  2. The Perfection of Wisdom in Five Hundred Lines (pañcaśatikāprajñāpāramitā), Toh 15.
  3. The Illustrious Perfection of Wisdom in Fifty Lines (bhagavatīprajñāpāramitāpañcāśatikā), Toh 18.
  4. The Principles of the Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred and Fifty Lines (prajñāpāramitānayaśatapañcaśatikā), Toh 17.
  5. The Twenty-five Entrances to the Perfection of Wisdom (pañcaviṃśatikāprajñāpāramitāmukha), Toh 20.
  6. The Perfection of Wisdom in a Few Syllables (svalpākṣaraprajñāpāramitā), Toh 22.
  7. The Perfection of Wisdom Mother in One Syllable (ekākṣarīmātāprajñāpāramitā), Toh 23.
  8. The Perfection of Wisdom for Kauśika (kauśikaprajñāpāramitā), Toh 19
  9. The Perfection of Wisdom Teachings “The Questions of Suvikrāntavikrāmin” (suvikrāntavikrāmiparipṛcchāprajñāpāramitānirdeśa), Toh 14.
  10. The Sūtra on the Perfection of Wisdom "The Diamond Cutter" (vajracchedikā), Toh 16.
  11. The Heart of the Perfection of Wisdom, the Blessed Mother (Bhagavatīprajñāpāramitāhṛdaya), Toh 21.

In the Prajñāpāramitā section of the Kangyur, there are also other Prajñāpāramitā sutras besides the seventeen Mothers and Sons:[38]

  • The Hundred and Eight Names of the Perfection of Wisdom (prajñāpāramitānāmāṣṭaśataka), Toh 25.
  • The Perfection of Wisdom for Sūryagarbha (sūryagarbhaprajñāpāramitā), Toh 26.
  • The Perfection of Wisdom for Candragarbha (candragarbhaprajñāpāramitā), Toh 27.
  • The Perfection of Wisdom for Samantabhadra (samantabhadraprajñāpāramitā), Toh 28.
  • The Perfection of Wisdom for Vajrapāṇi (vajrapāṇiprajñāpāramitā), Toh 29.
  • The Perfection of Wisdom for Vajraketu (vajraketuprajñāpāramitā), Toh 30.

Commentaries

[edit]

There are various Indian and later Chinese commentaries on the Prajñāpāramitā sutras, some of the most influential commentaries include:

  • Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa (大智度論, T no. 1509) a massive and encyclopedic text translated into Chinese by the Buddhist scholar Kumārajīva (344–413 CE). It is a commentary on the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā. This text claims to be from the Buddhist philosopher Nagarjuna (c. 2nd century) in the colophon, but various scholars such as Étienne Lamotte have questioned this attribution. This work was translated by Lamotte as Le Traité de la Grande Vertu de Sagesse and into English from the French by Gelongma Karma Migme Chodron.[30]
  • Abhisamayālaṅkāra (Ornament of clear realization), the central Prajñāpāramitā shastra in the Tibetan tradition. It is traditionally attributed as a revelation from the Bodhisattva Maitreya to the scholar Asanga (fl. 4th century CE), known as a master of the Yogachara school. The Indian commentary on this text by Haribadra, the Abhisamayalankaraloka, has also been influential on later Tibetan texts. There is also another Indian commentary to the AA by Vimuktisena.
  • Śatasāhasrikā-pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikāṣṭādaśasāhasrikā-prajñāpāramitā-bṛhaṭṭīkā, often attributed to Vasubandhu (4th century).[39]
  • Satasahasrika-paramita-brhattika, attributed to Daṃṣṭrāsena.
  • Dignāga's Prajnaparamitarthasamgraha-karika.
  • Ratnākaraśānti's Prajñāpāramitopadeśa.

Themes in Prajñāpāramitā sutras

[edit]

Core themes

[edit]
A Tibetan illustration of Subhuti (Tib. Rabjor), a major character in the Prajñāpāramitā literature, who is proclaimed as the foremost "dweller in non-conflict" (araṇavihārīnaṃ) and "of those worthy of offering" (dakkhiṇeyyānaṃ)

The Bodhisattva and Prajñāpāramitā

[edit]

A key theme of the Prajñāpāramitā sutras is the figure of the Bodhisattva (literally: awakening-being) which is defined in the 8,000-line Prajñāpāramitā sutra as:

"One who trains in all dharmas [phenomena] without obstruction [asakti, asaktatā], and also knows all dharmas as they really are."[40]

A Bodhisattva is then a being that experiences everything "without attachment" (asakti) and sees reality or suchness (Tathātā) as it is. The Bodhisattva is the main ideal in Mahayana (Great Vehicle), which sees the goal of the Buddhist path as becoming a Buddha for the sake of all sentient beings, not just yourself:

They make up their minds that 'one single self we shall tame ... one single self we shall lead to final Nirvana.'
A Bodhisattva should certainly not in such a way train himself.
On the contrary, he should train himself thus: "My own self I will place in Suchness [the true way of things], and, so that all the world might be helped,
I will place all beings into Suchness, and I will lead to Nirvana the whole immeasurable world of beings."[41]

A central quality of the Bodhisattva is their practice of Prajñāpāramitā, a most deep (gambhīra) state of knowledge which is an understanding of reality arising from analysis as well as meditative insight. It is non-conceptual and non-dual (advaya) as well as transcendental.[42] Literally, the term could be translated as "knowledge gone to the other (shore)",[43] or transcendental knowledge. The Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra says:

This is known as the Prajñāpāramitā of the bodhisattvas; not grasping at form, not grasping at sensation, perception, volitions and cognition.[44]

A further passage in the 8,000-line Prajñāpāramitā sutra states that Prajñāpāramitā means that a Bodhisattva stands in emptiness (shunyata) by not standing (√sthā) or supporting themselves on any dharma (phenomena), whether conditioned or unconditioned. The dharmas that a Bodhisattva does "not stand" on include standard listings such as: the five aggregates, the sense fields (ayatana), nirvana, Buddhahood, etc.[45] This is explained by stating that Bodhisattvas "wander without a home" (aniketacārī); "home" or "abode" meaning signs (nimitta, meaning a subjective mental impression) of sensory objects and the afflictions that arise dependent on them. This includes the absence, the "not taking up" (aparigṛhīta) of even "correct" mental signs and perceptions such as "form is not self", "I practice Prajñāpāramitā", etc. To be freed of all constructions and signs, to be signless (animitta) is to be empty of them and this is to stand in Prajñāpāramitā.[46] The Prajñāpāramitā sutras state that all Buddhas and Bodhisattvas in the past have practiced Prajñāpāramitā. Prajñāpāramitā is also associated with Sarvajñata (all-knowledge) in the Prajñāpāramitā sutras, a quality of the mind of a Buddha which knows the nature of all dharmas.

Gandharan depiction of the Bodhisattva (the future Buddha Shakyamuni) prostrating at the feet of the past Buddha Dipankara

According to Karl Brunnhölzl, Prajñāpāramitā means that "all phenomena from form up through omniscience being utterly devoid of any intrinsic characteristics or nature of their own."[47] Furthermore, "such omniscient wisdom is always nonconceptual and free from reference points since it is the constant and panoramic awareness of the nature of all phenomena and does not involve any shift between meditative equipoise and subsequent attainment."[48]

Edward Conze outlined several psychological qualities of a Bodhisattva's practice of Prajñāpāramitā:[49]

  • Non-apprehension (anupalabdhi)
  • No settling down or "non-attachment" (anabhinivesa)
  • No attainment (aprapti). No person can "have," or "possess," or "acquire," or "gain" any dharma.
  • Non-reliance on any dharma, being unsupported, not leaning on any dharma.
  • "Finally, one may say that the attitude of the perfected sage is one of non-assertion."

Other Bodhisattva qualities

[edit]
Avalokiteśvara. Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra manuscript. Nālandā, Bihar, India.

The Prajñāpāramitā sutras also teach of the importance of the other pāramitās (perfections) for the Bodhisattva such as Ksanti (patience): "Without resort to this patience (kṣānti) they [bodhisattvas] cannot reach their respective goals".[50]

Another quality of the Bodhisattva is their freedom from fear (na vtras) in the face of the seemingly shocking doctrine of the emptiness of all dharmas which includes their own existence. A good friend (kalyanamitra) is useful in the path to fearlessness. Bodhisattvas also have no pride or self-conception (na manyeta) of their own stature as Bodhisattvas.[51] These are important features of the mind of a bodhisattva, called bodhicitta. The Prajñāpāramitā sutras also mention that bodhicitta is a middle way, it is neither apprehended as existent (astitā) or non-existent (nāstitā) and it is "immutable" (avikāra) and "free from conceptualization" (avikalpa).[52]

The Bodhisattva is said to generate "great compassion" (maha-karuṇā) for all beings on their path to liberation and yet also maintain a sense of equanimity (upekṣā) and distance from them through their understanding of emptiness, due to which, the Bodhisattva knows that even after bringing countless beings to nirvana, "no living being whatsoever has been brought to nirvana."[53] Bodhisattvas and Mahāsattvas are also willing to give up all of their meritorious deeds for sentient beings and develop skillful means (upaya) in order to help abandon false views and teach them the Dharma. The practice of Prajñāpāramitā allows a Bodhisattva to become:

"a saviour of the helpless, a defender of the defenceless, a refuge to those without refuge, a place to rest to those without resting place, the final relief of those who are without it, an island to those without one, a light to the blind, a guide to the guideless, a resort to those without one and....guide to the path those who have lost it, and you shall become a support to those who are without support."[54]

Tathātā

[edit]
Illustration of Bodhisattva Sadāprarudita (Ever weeping), a character in the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra Avadana section, which is used by the Buddha as an exemplar of those who seek Prajñāpāramitā

Tathātā (Suchness or Thusness) and the related term Dharmatā (the nature of Dharma), and Tathāgata are also important terms of the Prajñāpāramitā texts. To practice Prajñāpāramitā means to practice in accord with 'the nature of Dharma' and to see the Tathāgata (i.e. the Buddha). As the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra states, these terms are generally used equivalently: "As the suchness (tathatā) of dharmas is immovable (acalitā), and the suchness (tathatā) of dharmas is the Tathāgata."[55] The Tathāgata is said in the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra to "neither come nor go". Furthermore, the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra includes a list of synonyms associated with Tathāgata as also being "beyond coming and going", these include: 1. Suchness (tathatā); 2. Unarisen (anutpāda); 3. Reality limit (bhūtakoṭi); 4. Emptiness ("Śūnyatā"); 5. Division (yathāvatta); 6. Detachment (virāga); 7. Cessation (nirodha); 8. Space element (ākāśadhātu). The sutra then states:

Apart from these dharmas, there is no Tathāgata. The suchness of these dharmas, and the suchness of the Tathāgatas, is all one single suchness (ekaivaiṣā tathatā), not two, not divided (dvaidhīkāraḥ). ... beyond all classification (gaṇanāvyativṛttā), due to non-existence (asattvāt).[55]

Suchness then does not come or go because like the other terms, it is not a real entity (bhūta, svabhāva), but merely appears conceptually through dependent origination, like a dream or an illusion.

Edward Conze lists six ways in which the ontological status of dharmas is considered by the Prajñāpāramitā:[49]

  1. Dharmas are non-existent because they have no own-being (svabhava).
  2. Dharmas have a purely nominal existence. They are mere words, a matter of conventional expression.
  3. Dharmas are "without marks, with one mark only, ie., with no mark." A mark (laksana) being a distinctive property which separates it from other dharmas.
  4. Dharmas are isolated (vivikta), absolutely isolated (atyantavivikta).
  5. Dharmas have never been produced, never come into existence; they are not really ever brought forth, they are unborn (ajata).
  6. Non-production is illustrated by a number of similes, i.e., dreams, magical illusions, echoes, reflected images, mirages, and space.

It is through seeing this Tathātā that one is said to have a vision of the Buddha (the Tathāgata), seeing this is called seeing the Buddha's Dharmakaya (Dharma body) which is a not his physical body, but none other than the true nature of dharmas.[56]

Negation and emptiness

[edit]

Most modern Buddhist scholars such as Lamotte, Conze and Yin Shun have seen Śūnyatā (emptiness, voidness, hollowness) as the central theme of the Prajñāpāramitā sutras.[57] Edward Conze writes:

It is now the principal teaching of Prajñāpāramitā with regard to own-being that it is "empty." The Sanskrit term is svabhāva-śūnya. This is a tatpuruṣa compound (one in which the last member is qualified by the first without losing its grammatical independence), in which svabhava may have the sense of any oblique case. The Mahayana understands it to mean that dharmas are empty of any own-being, i.e., that they are not ultimate facts in their own right, but merely imagined and falsely discriminated, for each and every one of them is dependent on something other than itself. From a slightly different angle this means that dharmas, when viewed with perfected gnosis, reveal an own-being which is identical with emptiness, i.e in their own-being they are empty.[49]

The Prajñāpāramitā sutras commonly use apophatic statements to express the nature of reality as seen by Prajñāpāramitā. A common trope in the Prajñāpāramitā sutras is the negation of a previous statement in the form 'A is not A, therefore it is A', or more often negating only a part of the statement as in, "XY is a Y-less XY".[58] Japanese Buddhologist, Hajime Nakamura, calls this negation the 'logic of not' (na prthak).[59] An example from the Diamond Sutra of this use of negation is:

As far as 'all dharmas' are concerned, Subhuti, all of them are dharma-less. That is why they are called 'all dharmas.'[53]

The rationale behind this form is the juxtaposition of conventional truth with ultimate truth as taught in the Buddhist two truths doctrine. The negation of conventional truth is supposed to expound the ultimate truth of the emptiness (Śūnyatā) of all reality - the idea that nothing has an ontological essence and all things are merely conceptual, without substance.

The Prajñāpāramitā sutras state that dharmas should not be conceptualized either as existent, nor as non existent, and use negation to highlight this: "in the way in which dharmas exist (saṃvidyante), just so do they not exist (asaṃvidyante)".[60]

Māyā

[edit]
Main article: Maya (religion) § Buddhism

The Prajñāpāramitā sutras commonly state that all dharmas (phenomena), are in some way like an illusion (māyā), like a dream (svapna) and like a mirage.[61] The Diamond Sutra states:

"A shooting star, a clouding of the sight, a lamp, An illusion, a drop of dew, a bubble, a dream, a lightning's flash, a thunder cloud—this is the way one should see the conditioned."[62]

Even the highest Buddhist goals like Buddhahood and Nirvana are to be seen in this way, thus the highest wisdom or prajña is a type of spiritual knowledge which sees all things as illusory. As Subhuti in the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra states:

"Even if perchance there could be anything more distinguished, of that also I would say that it is like an illusion, like a dream. For not two different things are illusions and Nirvāṇa, are dreams and Nirvāṇa."[63]

This is connected to the impermanence and insubstantial nature of dharmas. The Prajñāpāramitā sutras give the simile of a magician (māyākāra: 'illusion-maker') who, when seemingly killing his illusory persons by cutting off their heads, really kills nobody and compare it to the bringing of beings to awakening (by 'cutting off' the conceptualization of self view; Skt: ātmadṛṣṭi chindati) and the fact that this is also ultimately like an illusion, because their aggregates "are neither bound nor released".[64] The illusion then, is the conceptualization and mental fabrication of dharmas as existing or not existing, as arising or not arising. Prajñāpāramitā sees through this illusion, being empty of concepts and fabrications.

Perceiving dharmas and beings like an illusion (māyādharmatā) is termed the "great armor" (mahāsaṃnaha) of the Bodhisattva, who is also termed the 'illusory man' (māyāpuruṣa).[65]

Sutra worship

[edit]

According to Paul Williams, another major theme of the Prajñāpāramitā sutras is "the phenomenon of laudatory self reference—the lengthy praise of the sutra itself, the immense merits to be obtained from treating even a verse of it with reverence, and the nasty penalties which will accrue in accordance with karma to those who denigrate the scripture."[66]

Later developments

[edit]

According to Edward Conze, later Prajñāpāramitā sutras added much new doctrinal material. Conze lists the later accretions as:[67]

  1. Increasing sectarianism, with all the rancor, invective and polemics that that implies
  2. Increasing scholasticism and the insertion of longer and longer Abhidharma lists
  3. Growing stress on skill in means, and on its subsidiaries such as the Bodhisattva's Vow and the four means of conversion, and its logical sequences, such as the distinction between provisional and ultimate truth
  4. A growing concern with the Buddhist of faith, with its celestial Buddhas and Bodhisattva and their Buddha-fields;
  5. A tendency towards verbosity, repetitiveness and overelaboration
  6. Lamentations over the decline of the Dharma
  7. Expositions of the hidden meaning which become the more frequent the more the original meaning becomes obscured
  8. Any reference to the Dharma body of the Buddha as anything different from a term for the collection of his teachings
  9. A more and more detailed doctrine of the graded stages (bhūmi) of a Bodhisattva's career.

Selected English translations

[edit]
Larger and smaller Prajnaparamita Sutras

Scholarly

  • Edward Conze (1978), Selected Sayings from the Perfection of Wisdom', Buddhist Society, London, ISBN 978-0-87773-709-4. Portions of various Perfection of Wisdom sutras
  • Edward Conze (1985), The Large Sutra on Perfect Wisdom, University of California, ISBN 0-520-05321-4. Mostly the version in 25,000 lines, with some parts from the versions in 100,000 and 18,000 lines
  • Edward Conze (1994), The Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines and its Verse Summary, Four Seasons Foundation, ISBN 81-7030-405-9. The earliest text in a combination of strict translation and summary
  • Lex Hixon (1993), Mother of the Buddhas: Meditation on the Prajnaparamita Sutra, Quest, ISBN 0-8356-0689-9. Selected verses from the Prajnaparamita in 8,000 lines
  • R.C. Jamieson (2000), The Perfection of Wisdom, Extracts from the Aṣṭasahāsrikāprajñāpāramitā, Penguin Viking, ISBN 978-0-670-88934-1. Foreword by H.H. the Dalai Lama; illustrated with Cambridge University Library Manuscript Add.1464 & Manuscript Add.1643
  • Naichen Chen (2017), The Great Prajna Paramita Sutra, Volume 1, Wheatmark, ISBN 978-1-62787-456-4. Unabridged English translation of Xuanzang's Chinese rendition (fascicles 1-20)
  • Naichen Chen (2018), The Great Prajna Paramita Sutra, Volume 2, Wheatmark, ISBN 978-1-62787-582-0. Unabridged English translation of Xuanzang's Chinese rendition (fascicles 21-40)
  • Naichen Chen (2019), The Great Prajna Paramita Sutra, Volume 3, Wheatmark, ISBN 978-1-62787-747-3. Unabridged English translation of Xuanzang's Chinese rendition (fascicles 41-60)
  • Huifeng Shi (Matthew Osborn) (2018), Annotated English Translation of Kumārajīva's Xiaǒpǐn Prajnāpāramitā Sūtra, Asian Literature and Translation. Critically annotated translation of the first two chapters of Kumarajiva's 5th century translation of the Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines.
  • Stefano Zacchetti (2005), In Praise of the Light: a critical synoptic edition with an annotated translation of chapters 1-3 of Dharmarakṣa's Guang zan jing 光讚經, being the earliest Chinese translation of the Larger Prajñāpāramitā, The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology, Soka University, Bibliotheca philologica et philosophica buddhica, v. 8.

Buddhist translators/commentators

Heart Sutra and Diamond Sutra

Scholarly

  • Edward Conze (1988), Buddhist Wisdom Books, Unwin, ISBN 0-04-440259-7. The Heart Sutra and the Diamond Sutra with commentaries
  • Edward Conze (2003, Perfect Wisdom; The Short Prajnaparamita Texts, Buddhist Publishing Group, Totnes. (Luzac reprint), ISBN 0-946672-28-8. Most of the short sutras: Perfection of Wisdom in 500 Lines, 700 lines, The Heart Sutra and The Diamond Sutra, one word, plus some Tantric sutras, all without commentaries.
  • Richard H. Jones (2012), The Heart of Buddhist Wisdom: Plain English Translations of the Heart Sutra, the Diamond-Cutter Sutra, and other Perfection of Wisdom Texts, Jackson Square Books, ISBN 978-1-4783-8957-6. Clear translations and summaries of the most important texts with essays
  • Lopez, Donald S. (1998), Elaborations on Emptiness, Princeton, ISBN 0-691-00188-X. The Heart Sutra with eight complete Indian and Tibetan commentaries
  • Lopez, Donald S. (1987), The Heart Sutra Explained, SUNY, ISBN 0-88706-590-2. The Heart Sutra with a summary of Indian commentaries
  • Red Pine (2001), The Diamond Sutra: The Perfection of Wisdom; Text and Commentaries Translated from Sanskrit and Chinese, Counterpoint, ISBN 1-58243-256-2. The Diamond Sutra with Chán/Zen commentary
  • Red Pine (2004), The Heart Sutra: the Womb of Buddhas, Counterpoint, ISBN 978-1-59376-009-0. Heart Sutra with commentary
  • Paul Harrison (2006), Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā: A New English Translation of the Sanskrit Text Based on Two Manuscripts from Greater Gandhāra, Hermes Publishing, Oslo. Translation of the Diamond Sūtra from the Sanskrit based on the two oldest manuscripts (the Gilgit and the Schøyen collection manuscripts)
  • Gregory Schopen (2004), The Perfection of Wisdom, in D. S. Lopez Jr., ed., Buddhist Scriptures (London, 2004), pp. 450–463. Translation of the Diamond Sutra
  • Kazuaki Tanahashi (2015), The Heart Sutra: A Comprehensive Guide to the Classic of Mahayana Buddhism, Shambhala Publications, ISBN 978-1-61180-096-8. English translation of the Heart Sutra with history and commentary

Buddhist translators/commentators

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Prajnaparamita

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Prajñāpāramitā (: प्रज्ञापारमिता, "Perfection of Wisdom") constitutes a foundational genre of Mahāyāna Buddhist scriptures that expound the paramount spiritual perfection of insight into the true nature of reality, emphasizing the doctrine of (emptiness) as the key to liberation from suffering and the cycle of rebirth. These texts, which represent the earliest major development in Mahāyāna literature, portray wisdom not as conventional knowledge but as a transformative realization that all phenomena lack inherent existence, transcending dualistic perceptions and enabling bodhisattvas to attain while benefiting all sentient beings. Composed anonymously in primarily between the 1st century BCE and the 5th century CE, the Prajñāpāramitā sutras evolved from concise proto-forms to expansive treatises, with the (Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines), dating to approximately the 1st century CE, serving as the seminal work that established core themes. The historical development of the Prajñāpāramitā literature reflects a gradual expansion within Indian Buddhist communities, transitioning from oral recitations to written manuscripts as early as the CE, as evidenced by Gāndhārī fragments and Chinese translations like Lokakṣema's rendition in 179 CE. Scholars identify multiple phases: an initial concise phase around the turn of the , followed by elaborations such as the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (Twenty-Five Thousand Lines) in the 2nd–3rd centuries CE, and later versified summaries like the Heart Sūtra (Prajñāpāramitāhṛdaya) in the CE. This progression underscores the texts' adaptability, incorporating meditative practices such as the three samādhis—concentrations on , signlessness, and wishlessness—as direct embodiments of prajñāpāramitā itself, which integrate insight with profound meditative absorption to realize non-conceptual wisdom. Philosophically, prajñāpāramitā reorients Buddhist toward an epistemic approach, where wisdom arises from dwelling in the "absence" (suññatāvihāra) through cessation of sensory experience in , aligning closely with early Buddhist practices while innovating Mahāyāna ideals of universal . The sutras assert that this perfection surpasses other paramitas (such as or ) by revealing the insubstantiality of all dharmas, thereby dismantling attachments and fostering non-dual awareness essential for the path. Over time, prajñāpāramitā was personified as a in tantric traditions, symbolizing the mother of all buddhas, and the literature profoundly influenced through translations into Chinese, Tibetan, and other languages, shaping schools like and Tibetan Vajrayāna.

Overview

Definition and Etymology

Prajñāpāramitā is a compound term in Mahāyāna , formed from prajñā, denoting "wisdom" or "insight," and pāramitā, signifying "perfection" or "transcendence." The element pāramitā derives from the verbal root √pā, meaning "to cross over" or "to traverse," evoking the of reaching the far shore beyond samsaric and ordinary perception. This underscores the term's connotation of supreme accomplishment in discerning reality's true nature. The core meaning of prajñāpāramitā is "Perfection of Wisdom" or "Transcendent Wisdom," representing the profound, non-dual insight into the empty (śūnya) nature of all phenomena, free from inherent existence or extremes of existence and non-existence. This wisdom transcends conceptual thought, enabling the to navigate the path to enlightenment while benefiting sentient beings. Among the perfections (pāramitās), prajñāpāramitā holds the position of the sixth and culminating virtue in the standard set of six, following (), (śīla), (kṣānti), (vīrya), and meditative concentration (dhyāna). In expanded Mahāyāna frameworks, it remains central within ten pāramitās, integrating skillful means (upāya) and other qualities, as the crowning insight that unifies and perfects them all. The term's earliest appearances occur in Mahāyāna Buddhist literature dating from approximately the BCE to the CE, marking the emergence of this in early sūtra compositions.

Significance in Mahāyāna Buddhism

In Mahāyāna Buddhism, Prajñāpāramitā occupies a position of doctrinal centrality as the foundational perfection that elucidates (emptiness) and non-dual wisdom, serving as the essential path to for bodhisattvas. It represents the transcendent into the lack of inherent existence in all phenomena, enabling practitioners to realize the beyond conceptual dualities. This wisdom is depicted as boundless and all-encompassing, forming the source of all buddhas' knowledge and guiding the integration of the six perfections (, śīla, kṣānti, , dhyāna, and prajñā). The Prajñāpāramitā literature profoundly influenced the school, particularly through Nāgārjuna's philosophy, where these sūtras provide the scriptural basis for the doctrine of the two truths—conventional (saṃvṛti-satya) and ultimate (paramārtha-satya). Nāgārjuna draws on the sūtras' emphasis on to argue that all dharmas are empty of self-nature (svabhāva), like illusions or dreams, thereby establishing non-dual wisdom as the means to transcend reification and attachment. This connection underscores Prajñāpāramitā's role in systematizing Mahāyāna's critique of inherent existence, with Nāgārjuna's (MMK) explicitly referencing the sūtras to support the non-obstruction between the two truths. Soteriologically, Prajñāpāramitā functions as the key insight that empowers bodhisattvas to liberate all sentient beings through compassionate action untainted by ego-clinging, allowing them to delay personal nirvāṇa while maturing others toward enlightenment. By cultivating this , bodhisattvas develop skill in means (upāya-kauśalya) to benefit infinite beings without attachment to forms or concepts, surpassing the paths of śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas. This non-dual awareness ensures the bodhisattva's efficacy in guiding others, rooted in past wholesome roots and the sūtras' teachings on non-apprehension. Prajñāpāramitā is personified as the "Mother of the Buddhas" (Buddhamātā), symbolizing how gives birth to enlightenment and all tathāgatas, past, present, and future, much like a mother nurtures her children. This originates in the sūtras, where she is hailed as the begetter of buddhas' all-knowledge, emerging from the ocean of perfect to reveal the . As mother and guide to bodhisattvas, she embodies the generative power of , fostering the arising of without duality.

Historical Development

Origins and Earliest Texts

The Prajñāpāramitā literature emerged in ancient during the early centuries of the , likely originating in southern regions such as the Andhra area associated with communities. Scholarly estimates place the initial composition between approximately 100 BCE and 100 CE, marking a transitional phase from pre-Mahāyāna Buddhist thought toward distinctly Mahāyāna doctrines. This development reflects an evolution within monastic circles seeking to emphasize transcendent insight over conventional practices. The earliest and most foundational text in this corpus is the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (Perfection of Wisdom in 8,000 Lines), a concise scripture that prioritizes the perfection of wisdom (prajñāpāramitā) as the paramount spiritual attainment, diminishing the role of ritualistic observance. Composed in a relatively compact form compared to later expansions, it served as the nucleus for subsequent elaborations, encapsulating core Mahāyāna ideals in verse and prose. The compositional context of these early texts points to oral traditions within nascent Mahāyāna monastic groups, where teachings were recited and memorized before being committed to writing. Physical evidence includes Gandhāran birch-bark manuscripts from the 1st to 2nd centuries CE, such as fragments of Prajñāpāramitā material radiocarbon-dated to around 47–147 CE, attesting to the circulation of these scriptures in northwestern shortly after their inception. A defining feature of these initial texts is the introduction of the doctrine of (śūnyatā), presented as a method of negation that deconstructs inherent existence in phenomena without endorsing or the annihilation of ethical or soteriological frameworks. This approach underscores a middle path, affirming conventional reality while transcending it through insightful discernment.

Expansion of Sutras and Regional Transmissions

The Prajñāpāramitā sutras underwent significant expansion in during the 2nd to 4th centuries CE, evolving from the foundational Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā of approximately 8,000 lines into more elaborate recensions. This growth included the Daśasāhasrikā (10,000 lines), Aṣṭādaśasāhasrikā (18,000 lines), Pañcavimśatisāhasrikā (25,000 lines), and the comprehensive Śatasāhasrikā (100,000 lines), each building on the core teachings of and the path while incorporating repetitive elaborations and additional narratives to emphasize doctrinal points. These expansions reflect a deliberate literary strategy to propagate Mahāyāna ideas across diverse audiences, with the larger versions often repeating phrases for mnemonic and meditative purposes. Central Asia served as a vital conduit for the dissemination of these expanded sutras via the Silk Road trade routes, where Buddhist monasteries preserved and copied manuscripts from the 3rd to 7th centuries CE. Key archaeological finds include birch-bark fragments of the Pañcavimśatisāhasrikā from , dated to the 6th–7th centuries CE, and earlier evidence of circulation in Khotan from the onward, underscoring the region's role in bridging Indian origins with eastern transmissions. These manuscripts, often in or local scripts like Brahmi, facilitated the texts' adaptation to multicultural contexts along caravan paths, ensuring their survival and spread amid nomadic and mercantile networks. The arrival of Prajñāpāramitā literature in began in the late 2nd century CE with Lokakṣema's translations of early versions, such as a rendition around 179 CE, followed by significant expansions in the early CE with Kumārajīva's translation of the Pañcavimśatisāhasrikā, rendered into accessible Chinese prose to suit imperial patronage and monastic study under the Later . By the 7th century, Xuanzang's pilgrimage and subsequent revisions culminated in his of the Śatasāhasrikā, integrated into the vast Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra compilation spanning 600 fascicles, which standardized the corpus for Tang-era scholarship. These efforts addressed linguistic barriers between and Chinese, as well as cultural differences in scriptural length and ritual use, prompting adaptations like the concise , an extract distilling the essence of for easier recitation and integration into daily practice.

Esoteric and Later Developments

During a later phase of Indian Mahāyāna , from the 5th century CE onward with significant tantric integrations from the 8th to the 12th centuries, esoteric Prajñāpāramitā texts emerged, integrating tantric elements such as mantras, visualizations, and into the core teachings on transcendent wisdom. These developments marked a shift toward ritualistic practices, where Prajñāpāramitā was invoked not only as philosophical insight into but also as a dynamic force for enlightened realization through meditative and mantra-based methods. Key examples include the Prajñāpāramitā-nāma-aṣṭaśataka, a text featuring mantras for manifesting the goddess Prajñāpāramitā, and later manuals like the Sādhanamālā and Niṣpannayogāvalī (11th–12th centuries), which provided detailed instructions for visualizing her in tantric mandalas to cultivate wisdom alongside ritual efficacy. This blending transformed Prajñāpāramitā from a primarily sutric into a foundational support for Vajrayāna paths, emphasizing her role as the "mother of the buddhas" in generating enlightened qualities through esoteric means. The introduction of Prajñāpāramitā to Tibet occurred during the Imperial period in the late 8th century, under King Trisong Detsen (r. 742–797), when Indian scholars Jinamitra and Silendrabodhi collaborated with Tibetan translators, including Ye shes sde, to render key sutras into Tibetan. These efforts, part of broader canon-building initiatives, ensured the inclusion of major Prajñāpāramitā texts in the emerging Kangyur, the Tibetan Buddhist scriptural collection, where they occupy a dedicated section spanning multiple volumes. By the early 9th century, under King Ral pa can (r. 805–838), further translations solidified Prajñāpāramitā's place in Tibetan exegesis, influencing monastic curricula and meditative practices across emerging schools like the Nyingma. In later Indian Vajrayāna developments, particularly from the onward, Prajñāpāramitā was synthesized with tantric systems, serving as the doctrinal basis for enlightened activity in texts like the Tantra. Here, the perfection of wisdom underpins the tantra's intuitive teachings, linking realization to the transformative rituals of and consort practices, where Prajñāpāramitā embodies the non-dual wisdom that enables swift . This integration positioned her as a supportive in Anuttarayoga tantras, facilitating the union of method and wisdom in enlightened deeds, as seen in the Hevajra's references to Prajñāpāramitā sutras for demonstrating the bodhisattva's profound insight. Post-13th century adaptations of Prajñāpāramitā appeared in Mongol and Himalayan contexts, influenced by the Yuan Dynasty's patronage of under Mongol rulers like (r. 1260–1294). In Mongol territories, including regions of the former Xi Xia kingdom, Prajñāpāramitā manuscripts and adopted Tibetan stylistic modes, blending with local artistic traditions to emphasize her as a wisdom in imperial rituals and monastic art. Himalayan variants, particularly in Tibetan-influenced areas like and from the 13th–14th centuries, featured illustrated manuscripts that incorporated regional motifs, such as localized forms and protective invocations, while preserving core teachings on for yogic practice. These adaptations facilitated Prajñāpāramitā's transmission into Mongol Gelugpa lineages and Himalayan traditions, adapting her esoteric visualizations to diverse cultural and geographical settings.

Canonical Texts

Principal Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras

The principal Prajñāpāramitā sūtras form the core of the genre, encompassing texts of varying lengths that elaborate on the perfection of wisdom through dialogues, repetitions, and philosophical expositions. These sūtras, while attributed to , reflect a development by anonymous monastic authors over several centuries. The , or "Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines," serves as the foundational text, comprising approximately 8,000 ślokas organized into 32 chapters of prose interspersed with a verse summary of 302 stanzas known as the Prajñāpāramitā-ratnagunasamcayagāthā. Its structure features narrative dialogues primarily between the Buddha and the disciple , alongside other figures like and Ananda, which introduce key teachings on emptiness () through similes such as illusions and dreams. This sūtra's unique attribute lies in its role as the earliest comprehensive exposition, emphasizing the non-production of dharmas and the Bodhisattva's realization of wisdom as the mother of all Buddhas. Larger versions expand upon this foundation with repetitive elaborations to aid memorization and . The Pañcavimśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra, or "Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines," extends the content through extensive repetitions and additional dialogues, filling three volumes in the Tibetan Degé and focusing on the Bodhisattva's practices across multiple realms. Similarly, the Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra, or "Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines," represents the most encyclopedic compilation, the longest in the genre at 100,000 ślokas, systematically compiling teachings on the six perfections and in a vast, repetitive format to encompass all aspects of Mahāyāna doctrine. These expansions maintain the dialogic style but amplify the scope, serving as comprehensive manuals for advanced study. In contrast, shorter forms distill the essence into concise summaries suitable for recitation and contemplation. The Prajñāpāramitāhṛdaya, or Heart Sūtra, is a remarkably brief text of about 260 words in , structured as a dialogue between and , culminating in the "gate gate pāragate pārasaṃgate bodhi svāhā," and encapsulating the non-duality of form and as the core of prajñāpāramitā. The Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra, known as the Diamond Sūtra, comprises around 300 ślokas divided into 32 chapters, featuring dialogues between and that stress non-attachment to concepts, views, and even the teachings themselves, using paradoxes to cut through illusions like a diamond cutter. These short sūtras prioritize mnemonic accessibility while preserving the profound insights of the longer texts. Scholarly consensus dates the Aṣṭasāhasrikā to the 1st-2nd centuries CE, with larger sūtras emerging in the 2nd-4th centuries CE and shorter ones crystallizing by the 5th century CE, all composed anonymously by monastic communities rather than a single author, evolving through oral and written traditions.

Major Collections and Translations

The most influential collection of Prajñāpāramitā sūtras in is the Da banre boluomi jing (Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra), translated into Chinese by in the 7th century CE and comprising 600 scrolls across 16 sections that encompass key texts such as the Aṣṭasāhasrikā and Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā. This monumental work, completed around 663 CE, totals approximately 600,000 lines and serves as the standard reference for Prajñāpāramitā studies in , , and Korea, integrating shorter and longer sūtras into a cohesive corpus. 's precise and literal rendering, based on Sanskrit originals obtained during his pilgrimage to , preserved doctrinal nuances like the concept of central to these sūtras. In , the Prajñāpāramitā texts form a dedicated section in the , the translated words of , with the Derge edition (completed in 1733) comprising 21 volumes for the Prajñāpāramitā section, including multiple recensions of the Aṣṭasāhasrikā, Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā, and Śatasāhasrikā, among others. These translations were undertaken primarily between the 8th and 14th centuries by Indian and Tibetan scholars such as Ye shes sde and Rin chen bzang po, adapting the texts for Vajrayāna contexts while retaining their Mahāyāna philosophical core. The Derge woodblock prints, known for their accuracy and wide dissemination, have greatly influenced Tibetan exegetical traditions. Surviving Sanskrit manuscripts of Prajñāpāramitā sūtras are fragmentary but significant, with key examples from dating to the 11th century, such as palm-leaf copies of the Aṣṭasāhasrikā commissioned by patrons and preserved in archives like the Kaiser Library in . Earlier fragments from , discovered in birch-bark scrolls dating to the 6th–7th centuries CE, include portions of larger sūtras such as the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā across 308 folios, offering insights into pre-tantric recensions from the northwestern . These manuscripts, often illuminated and written in or Śāradā scripts, represent the primary Indic sources before the decline of in . Other notable collections include the Japanese Taishō Shinshū Daizōkyō, a modern edition of the Chinese canon compiled between 1924 and 1932, where Prajñāpāramitā texts occupy volumes 5–8 (T. 220–261), prominently featuring Xuanzang's translations alongside earlier versions by and others. For critical scholarship, P.L. Vaidya's 1960 edition of the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā (Buddhist Texts No. 4) provides a standardized text based on Nepalese manuscripts from the 11th–12th centuries, divided into 32 chapters and essential for philological analysis.

Commentaries and Treatises

In early Indian Buddhist scholarship, Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, composed around the 2nd century CE, serves as a foundational philosophical treatise that elucidates the doctrine of emptiness central to the Prajñāpāramitā sūtras, establishing as the interpretive framework for these texts. By analyzing phenomena through dialectical reasoning, Nāgārjuna demonstrates how all entities lack inherent existence, aligning directly with the sūtras' emphasis on non-dual wisdom. Later, in the 8th century, Haribhadra's Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā provides an extensive auto-commentary on Maitreya's Abhisamayālaṃkāra, systematically unpacking the (the 8,000-line version) into eight chapters that outline the progressive realization of wisdom. Haribhadra's work integrates exegetical analysis with meditative instructions, clarifying the sūtra's implicit structure for practitioners. In , Kumārajīva's 5th-century translations of Prajñāpāramitā texts, such as the Xiaǒpǐn Bānruòbōluómì Jīng (the Small Section, corresponding to the 8,000 lines), include annotations that adapt Indian concepts for East Asian audiences, emphasizing clarity in the sūtras' non-conceptual teachings. These annotations influenced subsequent interpreters by rendering the sūtras' paradoxical language more accessible, facilitating their integration into Chan and other schools. Building on this, Fazang (643–712 CE), a pivotal figure in the school, incorporated Prajñāpāramitā insights into his syntheses of and interdependence, as seen in works like the Huayan wǔjiào zhāng, where he harmonizes the sūtras' wisdom with the Avataṃsaka Sūtra's vision of interpenetration. Fazang's approach treats Prajñāpāramitā as a doctrinal foundation for Huayan's mutual identity of phenomena, promoting a holistic understanding of enlightenment. Tibetan commentaries further systematize these traditions, with Maitreya's Abhisamayālaṃkāra (attributed to the CE) functioning as a root text that distills the Prajñāpāramitā sūtras into 273 verses, serving as the basis for later expositions on the path to . This text outlines the "eight clear realizations" derived from the sūtras, providing a concise map for practitioners. In the , Tsongkhapa's Legs bshad gser phreng (Golden Rosary of Excellent Explanations) offers a comprehensive Gelug-school commentary on the Prajñāpāramitā, drawing on Indian sources to resolve interpretive debates and emphasize ethical and meditative applications. A recurring theme across these commentaries is the progressive stages of , particularly the ten bhūmis (grounds) of development, which map the gradual cultivation of wisdom from initial faith to full non-dual realization. Commentators like Haribhadra and Tsongkhapa detail how into emptiness unfolds across these bhūmis, integrating śamatha (calm abiding) and vipaśyanā (superior ) to advance from conventional understanding to ultimate prajñā. This framework underscores the sūtras' role in guiding practitioners through layered realizations, culminating in the irreversible stage of non-abiding nirvāṇa.

Philosophical Themes

Perfection of Wisdom and Emptiness

The perfection of wisdom (prajñāpāramitā) in Mahāyāna Buddhism centers on the profound insight (prajñā) into śūnyatā (emptiness), which reveals that all phenomena lack inherent existence (svabhāva). This doctrine, articulated in the Prajñāpāramitā sūtras, posits that phenomena do not possess an independent, self-sufficient essence but arise interdependently, free from the extremes of permanence or annihilation. Emptiness is thus an absolute negation of intrinsic reality, serving as the ultimate nature of all dharmas (phenomena), as exemplified in the Heart Sūtra's declaration that "form is emptiness, emptiness is form," underscoring the identity between apparent phenomena and their empty essence. This insight negates reified views of existence through prasanga (reductio ad absurdum), a dialectical method that exposes contradictions in assuming inherent nature, leading to the realization that emptiness conceals no true being but prompts discernment of what truly exists. Central to this framework is the doctrine of the two truths: the conventional truth (saṃvṛti-satya), which describes dependently arisen phenomena in everyday experience, and the ultimate truth (paramārtha-satya), which discloses their of intrinsic reality. Prajñā realizes the non-duality of these truths, recognizing that conventional appearances are not illusory fabrications but manifestations of itself, enabling causal efficacy without substantiality. In the interpretation of Prajñāpāramitā, this non-dual realization liberates from conceptual extremes, as prajñā discerns the ultimate as the of all dharmas, including itself. Negation in the Prajñāpāramitā tradition employs the catuskoṭi (fourfold negation), systematically refuting assertions about dharmas: they neither exist inherently, nor do they not exist, nor both, nor neither in an absolute sense. This tetralemma, refined in , applies to all phenomena to demonstrate their lack of svabhāva, as seen in Nāgārjuna's analysis of nirvāṇa, which transcends these positions through . By exhausting these logical corners, prajñā uncovers the , avoiding attachment to any view of inherent identity or difference. Emptiness relates intimately to dependent origination (), the principle that phenomena arise conditionally without a foundational essence, positioning as the middle path between eternalism (positing enduring substances) and (denying causal consequences). In the Prajñāpāramitā sūtras, this equivalence—emptiness as dependent origination—affirms the conventional functionality of the world while revealing its ultimate vacuity, as Nāgārjuna states: "We call it precisely because it is dependently arisen." This synthesis ensures ethical practice remains viable, grounding the bodhisattva's path in the non-dual insight of conditioned yet empty reality. In the Prajñāpāramitā literature, the Bodhisattva path is structured around the cultivation of six perfections (pāramitās), which integrate practical virtues with transcendent wisdom to guide practitioners toward full enlightenment for the benefit of all beings. These perfections—dāna (generosity), śīla (morality or ethics), kṣānti (patience), vīrya (vigor or effort), dhyāna (concentration or meditation), and prajñā (wisdom)—form the core practices of the Bodhisattva, with prajñā serving as the culminating and guiding force that ensures the others lead to non-dual realization rather than mundane achievements. As described in the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra, a Bodhisattva courses in these perfections by dedicating them to all-knowledge (sarvajñatā), such that generosity cuts off rebirth in lower realms, morality perfects patience, and concentration supports the insight of wisdom, all unified under prajñā's oversight to avoid attachment to forms or results. Central to this path is the (praṇidhāna), a solemn commitment to attain not for personal liberation but to liberate all sentient beings from , sustained by prajñā to prevent clinging to the notion of or others. In the Aṣṭasāhasrikā, the vow manifests as an aspiration to lead immeasurable beings to nirvāṇa while comprehending the of beings themselves, exemplified by figures like Sadāprarudita who offer their bodies in dedication to wisdom without dualistic discrimination. This vow propels the through endless rebirths, with prajñā ensuring the resolve remains free from egoic motives, transforming into a non-referential force that upholds the welfare of all without exhaustion. The path unfolds across ten stages (bhūmis), progressive grounds where prajñā deepens alongside the other perfections, marking the 's maturation from initial resolve to near-buddhahood. As outlined in the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Śāstra, these stages begin with the pramuditā (joyful) bhūmi, where the generates the mind of enlightenment amid joy from initial insights into and ; progress through vimalā (immaculate), prabhākarī (luminous), arciṣmatī (radiant), and sudurjayā (difficult to conquer) bhūmis, refining , effort, and concentration; continue via abhimukhī (facing), dūraṅgamā (far-reaching), and acalā (immovable) bhūmis, integrating advanced to overcome subtle obstacles; and culminate in sādhumatī (of good intelligence) and dharmameghā (cloud of ) bhūmis, where prajñā rains down teachings like a cloud, fully ripening all perfections for ultimate awakening. At each bhūmi, prajñā illuminates the underlying actions, ensuring ethical conduct and effort align with non-attachment. This integration is balanced by karuṇā (compassion), which provides the motivational foundation for the path while prajñā offers the discerning method to enact it without delusion. The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Śāstra emphasizes that great compassion arises from pitying beings ensnared in saṃsāra, but it must pair with prajñāpāramitā's understanding of dharmas' emptiness to avoid reification of suffering or self; thus, the Bodhisattva practices skillful means (upāya) rooted in this duality, protecting beings through non-abandonment even as wisdom reveals no inherent entities to save. In the Aṣṭasāhasrikā, compassion engenders actions like teaching the dharma and renouncing possessions, all guided by prajñā to foster impartiality and sympathetic joy, ensuring the Bodhisattva's efforts yield boundless benefit without personal gain.

Key Concepts and Metaphors

In the Prajñāpāramitā literature, tathatā, often translated as "suchness," denotes the that underlies all phenomena, characterized as unchanging, immutable, and beyond conceptual description or linguistic grasp. This concept emerges prominently in early texts like the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra, where tathatā is equated with the essence of dharmas and the true nature of the , emphasizing its stability as "immovable" (acalitā) and identical with enlightenment itself. Through tathatā, the sutras convey that reality is not a constructed entity but an inherent, non-dual ground that transcends dualistic perceptions of existence and non-existence. The metaphor of māyā, or , serves as a central device in the Prajñāpāramitā to elucidate the doctrine of () without implying or reification of phenomena. Phenomena are likened to illusions, such as dreams, mirages, or echoes, which appear vividly yet lack inherent substance, thereby illustrating how form and are inseparable—like an illusion that is neither existent nor entirely non-existent. This imagery evolves across the corpus, from similes in shorter sutras like the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā to more direct metaphors in later texts, such as "form is ," reinforcing the of independent reality while preserving the conventional functionality of the world. Reverence for the Prajñāpāramitā s extends beyond study to ritual , viewing the texts as physical embodiments of (prajñā) that generate merit for practitioners. Narratives like that of the Sadāprarudita exemplify this, where offerings to the sutra—such as bathing, anointing, and with flowers and incense—accrue immense spiritual benefits, equating the text's veneration with honoring the itself. Such practices, detailed in Mahāyāna treatises on pustaka pūjā ( ), underscore the sutras' role as sacred objects that bridge the mundane and the transcendent, fostering devotion and ethical conduct. The notion of non-abiding nirvāṇa (apratiṣṭhita-nirvāṇa) distinguishes the bodhisattva's realization in the Prajñāpāramitā, where enlightenment does not entail withdrawal from saṃsāra but an unhindered engagement driven by . Bodhisattvas, having penetrated , neither cling to nirvāṇa nor abide in saṃsāra's afflictions, remaining active in the world to benefit sentient beings without dualistic attachment. This state, as articulated in expansive sutras like the Daśabhūmika, embodies wisdom's freedom, allowing compassionate action to flow effortlessly amid cyclic existence.

Personification and Iconography

Prajñāpāramitā as

The anthropomorphic personification of Prajñāpāramitā as a feminine emerged in the tantric phase of Indian Mahāyāna during the 6th–7th centuries CE, marking a shift from her abstract representation as transcendent to a worshipable form. This development is evident in early texts and the earliest known images, such as a 7th-century statue from in , where she is depicted as the "Great " (Skt. buddhamātā) responsible for birthing all buddhas through her embodiment of . The concept of her as the maternal source of buddhas traces back to earlier Mahāyāna literature, such as Nāgārjuna's Mahāprajñāpāramitāśāstra (ca. 2nd century CE), which describes prajñā () as the engendering the enlightenment of all tathāgatas by illuminating the nature of reality. In her iconic form, Prajñāpāramitā is typically portrayed as a serene, golden-yellow goddess seated in the lotus posture (padmāsana), symbolizing purity and enlightenment. She is often depicted with four arms to signify her multifaceted qualities: the upper right hand wields a sword (khaḍga) to sever ignorance and delusions, the upper left holds the Prajñāpāramitā scripture (pustaka) representing the sūtras of perfect wisdom, while the lower hands form the gesture of teaching the Dharma (vitarkamudrā) or meditation (dhyānamudrā). These attributes underscore her role in guiding practitioners toward insight, with the lotus base evoking her emergence from the enlightened mind, free from defilements. Doctrinally, the deity Prajñāpāramitā embodies the perfection of wisdom (prajñāpāramitā), the non-dual realization of emptiness (śūnyatā) that transcends conceptual extremes and forms the foundation of the bodhisattva path. In Vajrayāna traditions, she manifests as a yidam (Tib. yi dam, meditation deity), serving as the focus for visualization practices that integrate wisdom with method, enabling practitioners to actualize the sambhogakāya (enjoyment body) of enlightenment. Her feminine form highlights the dynamic, generative aspect of wisdom, contrasting with male deities and emphasizing the union of emptiness and compassion in non-dual awareness. Worship of Prajñāpāramitā involves tantric rituals outlined in texts like the Sādhanamālā (ca. 12th century), a compilation of nine sādhanas detailing her invocation through visualization, offerings, and to cultivate profound . Practitioners recite mantras such as oṃ vajra-prajñāpāramitā hūṃ to invoke her blessings, aligning the mind with her radiant wisdom and dissolving dualistic perceptions. These sādhanas aim at realizing non-dual awareness, where the meditator merges with the to experience the inseparability of form and , fostering the direct perception of .

Artistic Representations Across Regions

In the Indian and Nepalese traditions, artistic representations of Prajñāpāramitā emerged prominently during the Pāla period (8th–12th centuries CE) in , where bronze sculptures captured her as the embodiment of transcendent wisdom with a serene, contemplative expression and elegant, slender proportions. These works, cast using the lost-wax technique in an eight-metal alloy, often depicted her in multi-armed forms symbolizing her multifaceted attributes, seated in a meditative posture on a lotus base, holding a or teaching emblem to signify the sūtras she personifies. In Chinese and Japanese , Prajñāpāramitā appeared during the (618–907 CE), where she was integrated into esoteric as a of wisdom, often with a gentle, symmetrical form adorned in flowing robes and holding a lotus or scripture. By the in , following the introduction of Shingon esoteric by Kūkai, Prajñāpāramitā—known as Hannya Bosatsu—became a key protector deity in paintings and ritual art, integrated into the Ryōkai Mandara sets at temples like Tōji, where she occupies central or peripheral positions amid cosmic diagrams of the Diamond and Womb Realms. These Heian-period (early ) works, designated as National Treasures, depict her with four arms in dynamic teaching mudras, surrounded by attendant figures, highlighting her integration into meditative visualization practices. Tibetan representations of Prajñāpāramitā in the tradition often feature her in vibrant paintings, where she is portrayed as a central white or golden female deity with four arms, seated on a , embodying the perfection of wisdom through her teaching gesture and book attribute. These 15th–18th-century scroll paintings, produced in eastern under patronage, use rich mineral pigments to convey her serene yet radiant presence, frequently surrounded by lineage masters like Tsongkhapa to underscore her doctrinal importance in the school's philosophical curriculum. In sculpture, 13th-century examples from the Ngari region (western ), associated with the Kingdom, include gilt copper or brass figures of her four-armed form, approximately 20–30 cm tall, with intricate repoussé details on her crown and jewelry, reflecting the fusion of Kashmiri and local styles in monastic art. Southeast Asian depictions, particularly in 13th-century Java under the Singhasari Kingdom, manifest Prajñāpāramitā in monumental stone statues at temple complexes like Candi Singosari, carved from to symbolize enduring wisdom and royal devotion. The iconic statue from around 1300 CE, standing 126 cm tall and housed in the Museum Nasional Indonesia, portrays her in a serene, upright posture with hands in contemplative , elaborate headdress, and sari-like drapery featuring intricate brocaded patterns inspired by imported Chinese textiles, underscoring the kingdom's patronage of Mahāyāna Buddhism by queens like Ken Dedes. These diorite-like carvings, integrated into candi shrines, served as focal points for rituals, blending Indian iconographic influences with Javanese realism to affirm the ruler's spiritual authority.

Influence and Legacy

Impact on Buddhist Schools

The Prajñāpāramitā literature profoundly shaped the Madhyamaka school, serving as the foundational scriptural basis for Nāgārjuna's (c. 150–250 CE) philosophical exegesis of śūnyatā (emptiness). Nāgārjuna, regarded as the founder of Madhyamaka, drew directly from these sūtras to articulate emptiness as the absence of inherent existence (svabhāva) in all phenomena, emphasizing dependent origination as their true nature. In his seminal Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way), particularly chapter 24, Nāgārjuna aligns his analysis with the Prajñāpāramitā's paradoxical teachings on non-conceptual wisdom, thereby using emptiness to refute extremes of existence and non-existence. This reliance is echoed in commentaries like Candrakīrti's Prasannapadā, which interprets Nāgārjuna's work through the lens of Prajñāpāramitā's insight into the uniformity of reality as unconditioned and non-dual. In the school, Prajñāpāramitā's emphasis on was integrated by Asaṅga (c. CE) to balance it with the mind-only (cittamātra) doctrine, creating a synthesis that views all phenomena as manifestations of devoid of independent reality. Asaṅga's Abhisamayālaṃkāra, a versified summary of the Prajñāpāramitā sūtras attributed to him or , outlines the stages of realization where is realized as the perfected nature (pariniṣpanna-svabhāva), free from the imagined (parikalpita) and dependent (paratantra) natures of mind. This integration addresses potential misinterpretations of as by grounding it in the transformative potential of , as elaborated in Asaṅga's Mahāyānasaṃgraha, which harmonizes Prajñāpāramitā's non-dual wisdom with 's analysis of the ālaya-vijñāna (). Scholars note that this approach refines earlier views, presenting as the ultimate absence of duality within the mind's projections. Chinese Mahāyāna schools like and Chan (Zen) adapted Prajñāpāramitā, particularly the Heart Sūtra, to develop doctrines of interpenetration and sudden enlightenment. In , founded by figures like Dushun (557–640 CE) and systematized by Fazang (643–712 CE), the Heart Sūtra's declaration that "form is , is form" underpins the principle of mutual non-obstruction (wú ài), where principle (li, ) and phenomena (shi, form) interpenetrate without hindrance, as illustrated in Fazang's "Rafter Dialogue" using a building's rafters to show how parts and wholes are ontologically identical. This draws on Prajñāpāramitā to interpret as dynamic interdependence, central to 's vision of reality as "one is all, all is one." In Chan, the Heart Sūtra supports the rhetoric of sudden enlightenment (dùn wù), emphasizing direct insight into non-dual beyond gradual stages, as seen in the teachings of (638–713 CE) in the Platform Sūtra, where Prajñāpāramitā's wisdom dissolves conceptual barriers to innate . Vajrayāna traditions elevate Prajñāpāramitā as a core element of anuttarayoga tantras, where it manifests as the wisdom consort (prajñā-mudrā) in deity yoga practices, symbolizing the union of method (upāya, compassion) and wisdom (prajñā, emptiness). In tantras like the Hevajra Tantra and Cakrasaṃvara Tantra, the female consort—often embodying Prajñāpāramitā—represents the blissful realization of emptiness, facilitating the practitioner's non-dual awareness through visualization of yab-yum (father-mother) unions that transform ordinary perception into enlightened activity. This integration, as detailed in the Kālacakra Tantra, positions Prajñāpāramitā not merely as doctrine but as an active force in highest yoga practices, where the consort's role generates the clear light of mahāmudrā, aligning tantric soteriology with Mahāyāna emptiness.

Spread to Southeast Asia and Beyond

The dissemination of Prajñāpāramitā teachings to occurred prominently through the Śrīvijaya kingdom, a maritime empire centered in from the 7th to the 13th century that served as a hub for Mahāyāna Buddhist scholarship, including the study and translation of Sanskrit Prajñāpāramitā texts by monks and scholars influenced by Indian traditions. This kingdom facilitated the spread of these sutras across the region via trade routes and monastic exchanges, with evidence of Prajñāpāramitā manuscripts and commentaries preserved in palm-leaf formats that reflected ongoing textual transmission. In , under the Śailendra dynasty allied with Śrīvijaya, the 9th-century temple complex exemplifies this influence through its extensive bas-reliefs on the upper terraces, which depict scenes from the Gaṇḍavyūha Sūtra—a Mahāyāna text intertwined with Prajñāpāramitā themes of wisdom and the bodhisattva path—guiding pilgrims in contemplative progression toward enlightenment. These carvings, numbering over 1,460 panels, integrate Prajñāpāramitā motifs such as the perfection of wisdom in symbolic narratives of Sudhana's quest, underscoring the sutra's role in Javanese temple architecture as a visual for . The Prajñāpāramitā tradition reached in the early 9th century through the transmission of Esoteric Buddhism, particularly via the monk Kūkai, who founded the Shingon school after studying in and incorporated key Prajñāpāramitā texts like the Prajñāpāramitā-naya-śatapañcāśatikā into its ritual practices as a foundational scripture for realizing non-dual wisdom. This esoteric adoption emphasized the sutra's role in visualizations and recitations, influencing Shingon rituals that invoke Prajñāpāramitā as the mother of buddhas to attain rapid enlightenment. Similarly, the school, established by Saichō around the same period, integrated Prajñāpāramitā teachings from Chinese traditions into its comprehensive curriculum, using texts like the Diamond Sūtra for meditative contemplation on within mountain-based ascetic practices at . In Korea and , the Diamond Sūtra (Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra), a concise epitome of Prajñāpāramitā wisdom, became integral to monastic curricula, where it is recited daily and studied for meditation to cultivate insight into the non-substantiality of phenomena in Seon (Korean Zen) and Thiền (Vietnamese Zen) lineages. Korean monasteries, such as those in the , include the Diamond Sūtra in novice training and advanced study, emphasizing its teachings on signlessness to deepen meditative awareness beyond conceptual attachments. In , Thiền practitioners incorporate the sutra into communal chanting and personal reflection sessions, viewing it as a core text for realizing the illusory nature of self and world, as highlighted in commentaries by figures like Thích Nhất Hạnh. Following the decline of Buddhist kingdoms in Java after the 15th-century rise of , which led to the abandonment of sites like and the suppression of Prajñāpāramitā practices amid conversion to the new faith, the tradition experienced a revival through 20th-century archaeological efforts that uncovered and restored artifacts, reigniting scholarly and cultural interest in the sutra's legacy. Dutch colonial excavations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, followed by UNESCO-led restorations starting in the , revealed Prajñāpāramitā statues and inscriptions, such as the 13th-century goddess figure, prompting modern n Buddhist communities to reclaim these elements in contemporary rituals and education. This rediscovery has fostered a niche revival, with Prajñāpāramitā iconography influencing Balinese-influenced and interfaith dialogues in post-colonial .

Modern Scholarship and Interpretations

Modern scholarship on the Prajñāpāramitā literature has been profoundly shaped by key English translations that made these texts accessible to Western audiences. Edward Conze's translations, produced between the mid-1950s and mid-1970s, include the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (The Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines, first published 1958 and revised 1973) and the multi-volume The Large Sutra on Perfect Wisdom (covering the 25,000-line version, issued 1961–1975), which drew from and Tibetan sources to elucidate the core doctrines of and non-duality. More recently, Red Pine's 2004 translation of the (Prajñāpāramitā Hṛdaya Sūtra), titled The Heart Sutra: The Womb of Buddhas, provides a poetic rendering accompanied by commentaries from various traditions, emphasizing its meditative and philosophical depth. Contemporary research continues to explore the textual origins and doctrinal evolution of Prajñāpāramitā. Analayo's 2025 monograph, The Perfection of Wisdom in First Bloom: Relating Early Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā to Āgama Literature, examines parallels between the earliest Prajñāpāramitā sūtras and Āgama collections, arguing for shared roots in early Buddhist discourses on and liberation, with a foreword by the . Studies on gender dynamics have highlighted Prajñāpāramitā's as a feminine , positioning her as a feminist icon who embodies transcendent wisdom and challenges patriarchal norms in , as seen in analyses of her role as the "Mother of All Buddhas." Interpretations in modern contexts often bridge Prajñāpāramitā with and . Comparative studies draw analogies between the sūtras' teachings on emptiness () and quantum physics' notions of interdependence and observer effects, as in explorations of the 's implications for non-local reality in . In Tibetan exile communities, Prajñāpāramitā teachings have seen revivals through monastic education and public empowerments, preserving and adapting the tradition amid , as evidenced by curricula at institutions like the Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies. Recent scholarship has addressed longstanding gaps, particularly in regional and textual preservation. Investigations into Southeast Asian representations, such as Khmer stone sculptures from the 10th–13th centuries, reveal localized adaptations of Prajñāpāramitā's , blending Indian Mahāyāna forms with esoteric elements like multi-armed figures symbolizing wisdom's multifaceted nature. Digital initiatives, including the International Project's scans of Prajñāpāramitā manuscripts from the 2020s, have enhanced access to Silk Road-era fragments, such as those of the , facilitating comparative and conservation efforts.

References

  1. https://philarchive.org/archive/ATTTCO-3
  2. https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/oralitywriting.pdf
  3. https://huntingtonarchive.org/resources/downloads/sutras/02Prajnaparamita/Astasahasrika.pdf
  4. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10781-015-9279-2
  5. https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/prajnaparamita
  6. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/paramita
  7. https://www.lionsroar.com/buddhism/six-perfections-paramitas/
  8. https://www.shambhala.com/six-paramitas-readers-guide/
  9. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/madhyamaka/
  10. https://academic.oup.com/book/7337/chapter/152092312
  11. https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-760
  12. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:95b48237-5ed3-4114-984e-34e48d995211
  13. https://philpapers.org/archive/NELENA.pdf
  14. https://maitripa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/The-Perfection-of-Wisdom-in-8000-verses.pdf
  15. https://84000.co/kb-articles/perfection-of-wisdom-kangyur-section
  16. http://jayarava.blogspot.com/2017/10/red-pines-vagaries-of-sanskrit-grammar.html
  17. https://www.academia.edu/61874684/The_Transmission_of_the_Buddhadharma_from_India_to_China
  18. https://philarchive.org/archive/ATTPNO
  19. https://encyclopediaofbuddhism.org/wiki/Buddhist_tantric_literature
  20. https://84000.co/translation/toh8/UT22084-014-001-introduction
  21. https://www.wisdomlib.org/buddhism/essay/hevajra-tantra-analytical-study/d/doc1455721.html
  22. https://www.wisdomlib.org/buddhism/essay/hevajra-tantra-analytical-study/ocr/1455713/35
  23. https://www.asianart.com/articles/xi-xia/
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392644060_The_Heritage_Buddhist_Manuscripts_of_Ladakh_Tibetan_Buddhist_Canons_and_the_Perfection_of_Wisdom_Sutra
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1453kp2
  26. https://84000.co/translation/toh9
  27. https://huntingtonarchive.org/resources/downloads/sutras/02Prajnaparamita/heartsutra.pdf
  28. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/ENBO/COM-0017.xml
  29. https://www.academia.edu/23701379/An_Analysis_of_the_Astasahasrikaprajnaparamita_sutra_from_the_Chinese
  30. https://adarshah.org/kangyur/
  31. https://rubinmuseum.org/projecthimalayanart/essays/illuminated-pages-of-the-prajnaparamita-sutra-manuscript/
  32. http://www.chinaknowledge.org/Literature/Religion/tripitaka.html
  33. https://alt.cardiffuniversitypress.org/articles/42/files/submission/proof/42-1-152-1-10-20210723.pdf
  34. https://iep.utm.edu/nagarjun/
  35. https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-608
  36. https://alt.cardiffuniversitypress.org/articles/10.18573/alt.26
  37. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/buddhism-huayan/
  38. https://studybuddhism.com/en/tibetan-buddhism/spiritual-teachers/tsongkhapa/elaboration-of-the-life-of-tsongkhapa
  39. https://www.tsadra.org/2008/10/03/karls-presentation-of-the-abhisamayalamkara/
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364503949_The_concept_of_emptiness_in_the_Prajnaparamite_tradition
  41. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/twotruths-india/
  42. https://iep.utm.edu/madhyamaka-buddhist-philosophy/
  43. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1032&context=comparativephilosophy
  44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23438780
  45. https://www.wisdomlib.org/buddhism/book/maha-prajnaparamita-sastra/d/doc226013.html
  46. https://www.wisdomlib.org/buddhism/book/maha-prajnaparamita-sastra/d/doc226384.html
  47. https://www.wisdomlib.org/buddhism/book/maha-prajnaparamita-sastra/d/doc225857.html
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321097492_Form_is_Not_Emptiness_The_Enigma_at_the_Heart_of_the_Heart_Sutra
  49. https://discourse.suttacentral.net/t/analayo-prajnaparamita-chapter-summaries-notes/41005
  50. https://philarchive.org/archive/ATTFIN
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369401593_The_Story_of_Sadaprarudita%27s_Search_for_Dharma_and_the_Worship_of_the_Prajnaparamita_Sutra_from_India_to_Sixth-Century_China
  52. https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/53c02dab-f486-47d9-bafe-0e8a736e4769/content
  53. https://www.wisdomlib.org/buddhism/book/maha-prajnaparamita-sastra/d/doc225988.html
  54. https://84000.co/translation/toh11
  55. https://www.lotsawahouse.org/tibetan-masters/khenpo-pema-vajra/prajnaparamita-overview
  56. https://www.wisdomlib.org/buddhism/book/maha-prajnaparamita-sastra/d/doc226380.html
  57. https://www.academia.edu/24388942/Praj%C3%B1%C4%81p%C4%81ramit%C4%81_from_Concept_to_Icon
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357426413_Motherhood_in_the_Realm_of_Eastern_Indian_and_Himalayan_Art_An_Iconographic_Study_of_Visual_Forms_of_Prajnaparamita_from_the_National_Museum_Delhi
  59. https://www.indica.today/long-reads/female-deities-vajrayana-buddhism/
  60. http://www.visiblemantra.org/prajnaparamita.html
  61. https://mapacademy.io/article/pala-bronze-sculptures/
  62. https://www.onmarkproductions.com/html/mandala1.shtml
  63. https://asiasociety.org/new-york/exhibitions/unknown-tibet-tucci-expeditions-and-buddhist-painting
  64. https://www.himalayanart.org/search/set.cfm?setID=3919
  65. https://www.academia.edu/41336954/Prajn_%C4%81p%C4%81ramit%C4%81_in_thirteenth_century_Java_and_Sumatra_two_sculptures_disconnected_by_textile_designs
  66. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/yogacara/
  67. https://www.academia.edu/44525330/Vajray%C4%81na_Art_and_Iconography
  68. https://www.persee.fr/doc/befeo_0336-1519_2016_num_102_1_6231
  69. https://www.academia.edu/104733890/The_SRIBHOJA_Empire_of_Sumatra
  70. https://www.academia.edu/94117185/THE_SECRETS_OF_BOROBUDUR
  71. https://escholarship.org/content/qt16f914tm/qt16f914tm.pdf
  72. https://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/journal/6/article/703/pdf/download
  73. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/acerp2020/ACERP2020_55388.pdf
  74. http://www.acmuller.net/articles/ogahae-oxford.html
  75. https://www.leidenspecialcollectionsblog.nl/articles/reading-a-korean-edition-of-the-diamond-sutra
  76. https://plumvillage.org/library/sutras/the-diamond-that-cuts-through-illusion
  77. https://www.academia.edu/121978483/Explaining_the_Hindu_Kingdoms_of_Eastern_Java
  78. http://resolve.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/913EAA5D215DCD474554519A926C0A51/9781108499026c2_61-96.pdf/exchange_protection_and_the_social_life_of_javas_antiquities_1860s1910s.pdf
  79. https://fsartanddesign.org/research/performing-prowess.pdf
  80. https://www.counterpointpress.com/books/the-heart-sutra/
  81. https://wisdomexperience.org/product/the-perfection-of-wisdom-in-first-bloom/
  82. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/02576430221124487
  83. https://www.lionsroar.com/tara-the-first-feminist/
  84. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4539856
  85. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311590680_Buddhism_and_Quantum_Physics_A_strange_parallelism_of_two_concepts_of_reality
  86. https://www.buddhistinquiry.org/blog/bhikkhu-analayos-new-book/
  87. https://idp.bl.uk/learning/buddhism-on-the-silk-roads/articles/buddhism-on-the-ground/buddhist-texts-the-diamond-sutra/
  88. https://idp.bl.uk/blog/tag/prajnaparamita-sutra/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.