Hubbry Logo
GuanoGuanoMain
Open search
Guano
Community hub
Guano
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Guano
Guano
Guano
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The nest of the Peruvian booby is made of almost pure guano.
Human-made Guano Island near Walvis Bay in Namibia

Guano (Spanish from Quechua: wanu) is the accumulated excrement of seabirds or bats. Guano is a highly effective fertiliser due to the high content of nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium, all key nutrients essential for plant growth. Guano was also, to a lesser extent, sought for the production of gunpowder and other explosive materials.

The 19th-century seabird guano trade played a pivotal role in the development of modern input-intensive farming. The demand for guano spurred the human colonisation of remote bird islands in many parts of the world.

Unsustainable seabird guano mining processes can result in permanent habitat destruction and the loss of millions of seabirds.[1]

Bat guano is found in caves throughout the world. Many cave ecosystems are wholly dependent on bats to provide nutrients via their guano which supports bacteria, fungi, invertebrates, and vertebrates. The loss of bats from a cave can result in the extinction of species that rely on their guano. Unsustainable harvesting of bat guano may cause bats to abandon their roost.

Demand for guano rapidly declined after 1910 with the development of the Haber–Bosch process for extracting nitrogen from the atmosphere.

Guano mining continues in Chile with the annual guano production in Chile ranging from 2,091 to 4,601 metric tons per year in the 2014–2023 period.[2]

Composition and properties

[edit]
The guanay cormorant has historically been the most important producer of guano.

Seabird guano

[edit]

Seabird guano is the fecal excrement from marine birds and has an organic matter content greater than 40%, and is a source of nitrogen (N) and available phosphate (P2O5).[3] Unlike most mammals, birds do not excrete urea, but uric acid, so that the amount of nitrogen per volume is much higher than in other animal excrement.

Seabird guano contains plant nutrients including nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium and potassium.

Bat guano

[edit]
Insectivorous bats, such as this Mexican free-tailed bat, have historically been the most important producers of bat guano.

Bat guano is partially decomposed bat excrement and has an organic matter content greater than 40%; it is a source of nitrogen, and may contain up to 6% available phosphate (P2O5).[3][4]

Raw Bat Guano
Raw insectivorous bat guano

The feces of insectivorous bats consists of fine particles of insect exoskeleton, which are largely composed of chitin. Elements found in large concentrations include nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and trace elements needed for plant growth. Bat guano is slightly alkaline with an average pH of 7.25. "The pH of the bat guano varies not only with age and storage conditions but also with the diet of bats": frugivorous bats have neutral to alkaline guano; insectivorous bats have acid guano.[5]

Bat guano largely consists of chitin
Bat guano under a microscope reveals tiny particles of insect exoskeletons, which are mostly chitin.

Chitin from insect exoskeletons is an essential compound needed by soil fungi to grow and expand. Chitin is a major component of fungal cell wall membranes. The growth of beneficial fungi adds to soil fertility.[6]

Bat guano composition varies between species with different diets. Insectivorous bats are the only species that congregate in large enough numbers to produce sufficient guano for sustainable harvesting. 

History of human use

[edit]
Chincha Islands where guano was found in abundance. Mining was done on site and ships transported it to Europe.

Bird guano

[edit]

American Indians

[edit]

The word "guano" originates from the Andean language Quechua, in which it refers to any form of dung used as an agricultural fertiliser.[7] Archaeological evidence suggests that Andean people collected seabird guano from small islands and points off the desert coast of Peru for use as a soil amendment for well over 1,500 years,[8] and perhaps as long as 5,000 years.[9] Spanish colonial documents suggest that the rulers of the Inca Empire greatly valued guano, restricted access to it, and punished any disturbance of the birds with death.[9] The guanay cormorant is historically the most abundant and important producer of guano.[10] Other important guano-producing bird species off the coast of Peru are the Peruvian pelican and the Peruvian booby.[11]

Western discovery (1548–1800)

[edit]

The earliest European records noting the use of guano as fertiliser date back to 1548.[12]

Although the first shipments of guano reached Spain as early as 1700, it did not become a popular product in Europe until the 19th century.[13]

The Guano Age (1802–1884)

[edit]
Advertisement for guano, 1884
Main article: Guano Era

In November 1802, Prussian geographer and explorer Alexander von Humboldt first encountered guano and began investigating its fertilising properties at Callao in Peru, and his subsequent writings on this topic made the subject well known in Europe.[14] Although Europeans knew of its fertilising properties, guano was not widely used before this time.[14] Cornish chemist Humphry Davy delivered a series of lectures which he compiled into an 1813 bestselling book about the role of nitrogenous manure as a fertiliser, Elements of Agricultural Chemistry. It highlighted the special efficacy of Peruvian guano, noting that it made the "sterile plains" of Peru fruitful.[15] Though Europe had marine seabird colonies and thus, guano, it was of poorer quality because its potency was leached by high levels of rainfall and humidity.[15] Elements of Agricultural Chemistry was translated into German, Italian, and French; American historian Wyndham D. Miles said that it was likely "the most popular book ever written on the subject, outselling the works of Dundonald, Chaptal, Liebig..."[16] He also said that "No other work on agricultural chemistry was read by as many English-speaking farmers."[16]

The arrival of commercial whaling on the Pacific coast of South America contributed to scaling of its guano industry. Whaling vessels carried consumer goods to Peru such as textiles, flour, and lard; unequal trade meant that ships returning north were often half empty, leaving entrepreneurs in search of profitable goods that could be exported. In 1840, Peruvian politician and entrepreneur Francisco Quirós y Ampudia [es] negotiated a deal to commercialise guano export among a merchant house in Liverpool, a group of French businessmen, and the Peruvian government. This agreement resulted in the abolition of all preexisting claims to Peruvian guano; thereafter, it was the exclusive resource of the State.[17] By nationalising its guano resources, the Peruvian government could collect royalties on their sale, which became the country's largest source of revenue.[18] Some of this income was used by the State to free its more than 25,000 black slaves and to abolish the head tax on its Indians.[19] This export of guano from Peru to Europe has been suggested as the vehicle that brought a virulent strain of potato blight from the Andean highlands that began the Great Famine of Ireland.[20]

Soon guano was sourced from regions besides Peru. By 1846, 462,057 tonnes (509,331 short tons) of guano had been exported from Ichaboe Island, off the coast of Namibia, and surrounding islands to Great Britain. Guano pirating took off in other regions as well, causing prices to plummet and more consumers to try it. The biggest markets for guano from 1840–1879 were in Great Britain, the Low Countries, Germany, and the United States.[21]

By the late 1860s, it became apparent that Peru's most productive guano site, the Chincha Islands, was nearing depletion. This caused guano mining to shift to other islands farther north and south. Despite this near exhaustion, Peru achieved its greatest ever export of guano in 1870 at more than 700,000 tonnes (770,000 short tons).[22] Concern of exhaustion was ameliorated by the discovery of a new Peruvian resource: sodium nitrate, also called Chile saltpetre. After 1870, the use of Peruvian guano as a fertiliser was eclipsed by Chile saltpetre in the form of caliche (a sedimentary rock) extraction from the interior of the Atacama Desert, close to the guano areas.[23]

The Guano Age ended with the War of the Pacific (1879–1883), which saw Chilean marines invade coastal Bolivia to claim its guano and saltpetre resources. Knowing that Bolivia and Peru had a mutual defense agreement, Chile mounted a preemptive strike on Peru, resulting in its occupation of the Tarapacá, which included Peru's guano islands. With the Treaty of Ancón of 1884, the War of the Pacific ended. Bolivia ceded its entire coastline to Chile, which also gained half of Peru's guano income from the 1880s and its guano islands. The conflict ended with Chilean control over the most valuable nitrogen resources in the world.[24] Chile's national treasury grew by 900% between 1879 and 1902 thanks to taxes coming from the newly acquired lands.[23]

Imperialism

[edit]
Islands claimed by U.S. via the 1856 Guano Islands Act in the Atlantic
  1. Arenas Keys
  2. Alacranes Island
  3. Swan Islands
  4. Serranilla Keys
  5. Quita Sueño Island
  6. Roncador Island
  7. Serraña Key
  8. Petrel Island
  9. Morant Keys
  10. Navassa Island
  11. Alta Vela Island
  12. Aves Island
  13. Verd Key
Islands claimed by U.S. via the 1856 Guano Islands Act in the Pacific
  1. Enderbury Island
  2. McKean Island
  3. Howland Island
  4. Baker Island
  5. Canton Island
  6. Phoenix Islands
  7. Dangerous Islands
  8. Swains Atoll
  9. Flint Island
  10. Caroline Island
  11. Maidens Island
  12. Jarvis Island
  13. Christmas Atoll
  14. Starbuck Island
  15. Fanning Island
  16. Palmyra Island
  17. Kingman Reef
  18. Johnston Atoll
  19. Clipperton Island

The demand for guano led the United States to pass the Guano Islands Act in 1856, which gave U.S. citizens discovering a source of guano on an unclaimed island exclusive rights to the deposits.[25] In 1857, the U.S. began annexing uninhabited islands in the Pacific and Caribbean, totaling nearly 100, though some islands claimed under the Act did not end up having guano mining operations established on them.[26] Several of these islands remain U.S. territories.[25] Conditions on annexed guano islands were poor for workers, resulting in a 1889 rebellion on Navassa Island, where black workers killed their white overseers. In defending the workers, lawyer Everett J. Waring argued that the men could not be tried by U.S. law because the guano islands were not legally part of the country. The case went to the Supreme Court of the United States where it was decided in Jones v. United States (1890). The Court decided that Navassa Island and other guano islands were legally part of the U.S. American historian Daniel Immerwahr claimed that by establishing these land claims as constitutional, the Court laid the "basis for the legal foundation for the U.S. empire".[26]

Other countries also used their desire for guano as a reason to expand their empires. The United Kingdom claimed Kiritimati and Malden Island for the British Empire. Others nations that claimed guano islands included Australia, France, Germany, Hawaii, Japan, and Mexico.[27]

Decline and resurgence

[edit]

In 1913, a factory in Germany began the first large-scale synthesis of ammonia using German chemist Fritz Haber's catalytic process. The scaling of this energy-intensive process meant that farmers could cease practices such as crop rotation with nitrogen-fixing legumes or the application of naturally derived fertilisers such as guano.[28] The international trade of guano and nitrates such as Chile saltpetre declined as artificially synthesised fertilisers became more widely used.[29] With the rising popularity of organic food in the twenty-first century, the demand for guano has started to rise again.[30]

Bat guano

[edit]
Aerial view of Guano Point. Old tramway headhouse is at the end of dirt road (right). Second tramway tower is more clearly visible, on skyline to right. Bat Cave mine is 760 m (2,500 ft) below, across the canyon.

In the U.S., bat guano was harvested from caves as early as the 1780s to manufacture gunpowder.[31] During the American Civil War (1861–1865), the Union's blockade of the southern Confederate States of America forced the Confederacy to rely on guano mined from caves to produce saltpetre. One Confederate guano kiln in New Braunfels, Texas, had a daily output of 100 lb (45 kg) of saltpetre, produced from 2,500 lb (1,100 kg) of guano from two area caves.[32]

From the 1930s, Bat Cave mine in Arizona was used for guano extraction, though it cost more to develop than it was worth. U.S. Guano Corporation bought the property in 1958 and invested $3.5 million to make it operational; actual guano deposits in the cave were 1% of predicted and the mine was abandoned in 1960.[33]

In Australia, the first documented claim on Naracoorte's Bat Cave guano deposits was in 1867. Guano mining in the country remained a localised and small industry.[34] In modern times, bat guano is used in low levels in developed countries. It remains an important resource in developing countries,[35] particularly in Asia.[36]

Paleoenvironment reconstruction

[edit]

Coring accumulations of bat guano can be useful in determining past climate conditions. The level of rainfall, for example, impacts the relative frequency of nitrogen isotopes. In times of higher rainfall, 15N is more common.[37] Bat guano also contains pollen, which can be used to identify prior plant assemblages. A layer of charcoal recovered from a guano core in the U.S. state of Alabama was seen as evidence that a Woodlands tribe inhabited the cave for some time, leaving charcoal via the fires they lit.[38] Stable isotope analysis of bat guano was also used to support that the climate of the Grand Canyon was cooler and wetter during the Pleistocene epoch than it is now in the Holocene. Additionally, the climatic conditions were more variable in the past.[39]

Mining

[edit]
Workers load guano onto a cart in 1865

Process

[edit]

Mining seabird guano from Peruvian islands has remained largely the same since the industry began, relying on manual labour. First, picks, brooms, and shovels are used to loosen the guano. The use of excavation machinery is not only impractical due to the terrain but also prohibited because it would frighten the seabirds. The guano is then placed in sacks and carried to sieves, where impurities are removed.[40]

Similarly, harvesting bat guano in caves was and is manual. In Puerto Rico, cave entrances were enlarged to facilitate access and extraction. Guano was freed from the rocky substrate by explosives. Then, it was shoveled into carts and removed from the cave. From there, the guano was taken to kilns to dry. The dried guano would then be loaded into sacks, ready for transport via ship.[41] Today, bat guano is usually harvested in the developing world, using "strong backs and shovels".[35]

Ecological impacts and mitigation

[edit]
A large colony of guanay cormorants on South Chincha Island of Peru in 1907

Bird guano

[edit]
A herring gull (Larus argentatus) excreting waste near Île-de-Bréhat.

Peru's guano islands experienced severe ecological effects as a result of unsustainable mining. In the late 1800s, approximately 53 million seabirds lived on the twenty-two islands. As of 2011, only 4.2 million seabirds lived there.[42] After realising the depletion of guano in the Guano Age, the Peruvian government recognised that it needed to conserve the seabirds. In 1906, American zoologist Robert Ervin Coker was hired by the Peruvian government to create management plans for its marine species, including the seabirds. Specifically, he made five recommendations:[43]

  1. That the government turn its coastal islands into a state-run bird sanctuary. Private use of the island for hunting or egg collecting should be prohibited.
  2. To eliminate unhealthy competition, each island should be assigned only one state contractor for guano extraction.
  3. Guano mining should be entirely ceased from November to March so that the breeding season for the birds was undisturbed.
  4. In rotation, each island should be closed to guano mining for an entire year.
  5. The Peruvian government should monopolise all processes related to guano production and distribution. This recommendation was made with the belief that a single entity with a vested interest in the long-term success of the guano industry would manage the resource most responsibly.

Despite these policies, the seabird population continued to decline, which was exacerbated by the 1911 El Niño–Southern Oscillation.[43] In 1913, Scottish ornithologist Henry Ogg Forbes authored a report on behalf of the Peruvian Corporation focusing on how human actions harmed the birds and subsequent guano production. Forbes suggested additional policies to conserve the seabirds, including keeping unauthorised visitors a mile away from guano islands at all times, eliminating all the birds' natural predators, maintaining armed patrols on the islands, and decreasing the frequency of harvest on each island to once every three to four years.[44] In 2009, these conservation efforts culminated in the establishment of the Guano Islands, Isles, and Capes National Reserve System, which consists of twenty-two islands and eleven capes. This Reserve System was the first marine protected area in South America, encompassing 140,833 hectares (348,010 acres).[42]

Bat guano

[edit]

Unlike bird guano which is deposited on the surface of islands, bat guano can be deep within caves. Cave structure is often altered via explosives or excavation[35] to facilitate extraction of the guano, which changes the cave's microclimate.[36] Bats are sensitive to cave microclimate, and such changes can cause them to abandon the cave as a roost, as happened when Robertson Cave in Australia had a hole opened in its ceiling for guano harvesting.[45] Guano harvesting may also introduce artificial light into caves; one cave in the U.S. state of New Mexico was abandoned by its bat colony after the installation of electric lights.[36]

In addition to harming bats by necessitating they find another roost, guano harvesting techniques can ultimately harm human livelihood as well. Harming or killing bats means that less guano will be produced, resulting in unsustainable harvesting practices.[35] In contrast, sustainable harvesting practices do not negatively impact bat colonies nor other cave fauna. The International Union for Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) 2014 recommendations for sustainable guano harvesting include extracting guano when the bats are not present, such as when migratory bats are gone for the season or when non-migratory bats are out foraging at night.[46]

Work conditions

[edit]
Chinese labourers stand on a partially extracted guano deposit in the Chincha Islands in 1865

Guano mining in Peru was at first done with black slaves.[47] After Peru abolished slavery, it sought another source of cheap labour. In the 1840s and 1850s, thousands of men were blackbirded (coerced or kidnapped) from the Pacific islands and southern China.[47] Thousands of coolies from South China worked as "virtual slaves" mining guano.[19] By 1852, Chinese labourers comprised two-thirds of Peru's guano miners;[48] others who mined guano included convicts and forced labourers paying off debts.[19] Chinese labourers agreed to work for eight years in exchange for passage from China, though many were misled that they were headed to California's gold mines.[48] Conditions on the guano islands were very poor, commonly resulting in floggings, unrest, and suicide. Workers experienced lung damage by inhaling guano dust, were buried alive by falling piles of guano, and risked falling into the ocean.[19] After visiting the guano islands, U.S. politician George Washington Peck wrote:

I observed Coolies shoveling and wheeling as if for dear life and yet their backs were covered with great welts...It is easy to distinguish Coolies who have been at the islands a short time from the new comers. They soon become emaciated and their faces have a wild desparing expression. That they are worked to death is as apparent as that the hack horses in our cities are used up in the same manner.[48]

Hundreds or thousands of Pacific Islanders, especially Native Hawaiians, traveled or were blackbirded to the U.S.-held and Peruvian guano islands for work, including Howland Island, Jarvis Island, and Baker Island. While most Hawaiians were literate, they could usually not read English; the contract they received in their own language lacked key amendments that the English version had. Because of this, the Hawaiian language contract was often missing key information, such as the departure date, the length of the contract, and the name of the company for which they would be working. When they arrived at their destination to begin mining, they learned that both contracts were largely meaningless in terms of work conditions. Instead, their overseer (commonly referred to as a luna), who was usually white, had nearly unlimited power over them. Wages varied from lows of $5/month to highs of $14/month. Native Hawaiian labourers of Jarvis Island referred to the island as Paukeaho, meaning "out of breath" or "exhausted", due to the strain of loading heavy bags of guano onto ships. Pacific Islanders also risked death: one in thirty-six labourers from Honolulu died before completing his contract.[49] Slaves blackbirded from Easter Island in 1862 were repatriated by the Peruvian government in 1863; only twelve of 800 slaves survived the journey.[47]

On Navassa Island, the guano mining company switched from white convicts to largely black labourers after the American Civil War. Black labourers from Baltimore claimed that they were misled into signing contracts with stories of mostly fruit-picking, not guano mining, and "access to beautiful women". Instead, the work was exhausting and punishments were brutal. Labourers were frequently placed in stocks or tied up and dangled in the air. A labour revolt ensued, where the workers attacked their overseers with stones, axes, and even dynamite, killing five overseers.[50]

Although the process for mining guano is mostly the same today, worker conditions have improved. As of 2018, guano miners in Peru made US$750 per month, which is more than twice the average national monthly income of $300. Workers also have health insurance, meals, and eight-hour shifts.[40]

Human health

[edit]
Histoplasmosis endemism map for the U.S.

Guano is one of the habitats of the fungus Histoplasma capsulatum, which can cause the disease histoplasmosis in humans, cats, and dogs.[51] H. capsulatum grows best in the nitrogen-rich conditions present in guano.[52] In the United States, histoplasmosis affects 3.4 adults per 100,000 over age 65, with higher rates in the Midwestern United States (6.1 cases per 100,000).[53] In addition to the United States, H. capsulatum is found in Central and South America, Africa, Asia, and Australia.[54] Of 105 outbreaks in the U.S. from 1938–2013, seventeen occurred after exposure to a chicken coop while nine occurred after exposure to a cave.[55] Birds or their droppings were present in 56% of outbreaks, while bats or their droppings were present in 23%.[55] Developing any symptoms after exposure to H. capsulatum is very rare; less than 1% of those infected develop symptoms.[55] Only patients with more severe cases require medical attention, and only about 1% of acute cases are fatal.[55] It is a much more serious illness for the immunocompromised, however. Histoplasmosis is the first symptom of HIV/AIDS in 50–75% of patients, and results in death for 39–58% of those with HIV/AIDS.[52] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that the immunocompromised avoid exploring caves or old buildings, cleaning chicken coops, or disturbing soil where guano is present.[51]

Rabies, which can affect humans who have been bitten by infected mammals including bats, cannot be transmitted through bat guano.[56] A 2011 study of bat guano viromes in the U.S. states of Texas and California recovered no viruses that are pathogenic to humans, nor any close relatives of pathogenic viruses.[57] It is hypothesised that Egyptian fruit bats, which are native to Africa and the Middle East, can spread Marburg virus to each other through contact with infected secretions such as guano, but a 2018 review concluded that more studies are necessary to determine the specific mechanisms of exposure that cause Marburg virus disease in humans. Exposure to guano could be a route of transmission to humans.[58]

As early as in the 18th century there are reports of travellers complaining about the unhealthy air of Arica and Iquique resulting from abundant bird spilling.[59]

Ecological importance

[edit]
The Ozark cavefish, a species that depends on bat guano as a source of food.
Cave cockroaches on guano

Colonial birds and their guano deposits have an outsized role on the surrounding ecosystem. Bird guano stimulates productivity, though species richness may be lower on guano islands than islands without the deposits.[60] Guano islands have a greater abundance of detritivorous beetles than islands without guano. The intertidal zone is inundated by the guano's nutrients, causing algae to grow more rapidly and coalesce into algal mats. These algal mats are in turn colonised by invertebrates.[61] The abundance of nutrients offshore of guano islands also supports coral reef ecosystems.[62]

Cave ecosystems are often limited by nutrient availability. Bats bring nutrients into these ecosystems via their excretions, however, which are often the dominant energy resource of a cave. Many cave species depend on bat guano for sustenance, directly or indirectly.[63] Because cave-roosting bats are often highly colonial, they can deposit substantial quantities of nutrients into caves. The largest colony of bats in the world at Bracken Cave (about 20 million individuals) deposit 50,000 kg (110,000 lb) of guano into the cave every year. Even smaller colonies have relatively large impacts, with one colony of 3,000 gray bats annually depositing 9 kg (20 lb) of guano into their cave.[64]

Invertebrates inhabit guano piles, including fly larvae, nematodes, springtails, beetles, mites, pseudoscorpions, thrips, silverfish, moths, harvestmen, spiders, isopods, millipedes, centipedes, and barklice. The invertebrate communities associated with the guano depends on the bat species' feeding guild: frugivorous bat guano has the greatest invertebrate diversity. Some invertebrates feed directly on the guano, while others consume the fungi that use it as a growth medium. Predators such as spiders depend on guano to support their prey base.[65] Vertebrates consume guano as well, including the bullhead catfish and larvae of the grotto salamander.[63]

Bat guano is integral to the existence of endangered cave fauna. The critically endangered Shelta Cave crayfish feeds on guano and other detritus.[66] The Ozark cavefish, a U.S. federally listed species, also consumes guano.[63] The loss of bats from a cave can result in declines or extinctions of other species that rely on their guano. A 1987 cave flood resulted in the death of its bat colony; the Valdina Farms salamander is now likely extinct as a result.[67]

Bat guano also has a role in shaping caves by making them larger. It has been estimated that 70–95% of the total volume of Gomantong cave in Borneo is due to biological processes such as guano excretion, as the acidity of the guano weathers the rocky substrate. The presence of high densities of bats in a cave is predicted to cause the erosion of 1 metre (3 ft) of rock over 30,000 years.[68]

Cultural significance

[edit]

There are several references to guano in the arts. In his 1845 poem "Guanosong", German author Joseph Victor von Scheffel used a humorous verse to take a position in the popular polemic against Hegel's Naturphilosophie. The poem starts with an allusion to Heinrich Heine's Lorelei and may be sung to the same tune.[69] The poem ends, however, with the blunt statement of a Swabian rapeseed farmer from Böblingen who praises the seagulls of Peru as providing better manure even than his fellow countryman Hegel. This refuted the widespread Enlightenment belief that nature in the New World was inferior to the Old World. The poem has been translated by, among others, Charles Godfrey Leland.[70]

English author Robert Smith Surtees parodied the obsession of wealthy landowners with the "religion of progress" in 1843.[69][71] In one of his works featuring the character John Jorrocks, Surtees has the character develop an obsession with trying all the latest farming experiments, including guano. In an effort to impress the upper class around him and disguise his low-class origins, Jorrocks references guano in conversation at every chance he can.[69] At one point, he exclaims, "Guano!" along with two other varieties of fertiliser, to which the Duke replies, "I see you understand it all!"[72]

Guano is also the namesake for one of the nucleobases in RNA and DNA: guanine, a purine base, consisting of a fused pyrimidine-imidazole planar ring system with conjugated double bonds. Guanine was first obtained from guano by Julius Bodo Unger [de], who incorrectly first described it as xanthine, a closely related purine, in 1844. After he was corrected by Einbrodt two years later,[73] Bodo Unger agreed and published it with the new name of "guanine" in 1846.[73][74]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Guano

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Guano consists of the accumulated excrement, along with remains such as eggshells and carcasses, primarily from seabirds or bats, forming mineral-rich deposits in arid environments like coastal islands or caves. These deposits are valued as due to their elevated levels of , , and , essential nutrients that enhance plant growth and . In the mid-19th century, seabird guano from Peru's emerged as a pivotal global resource, exporting millions of tons annually to replenish depleted soils in and the , thereby boosting amid the demands of industrializing economies. The intense demand prompted the U.S. Congress to pass the in 1856, empowering American citizens to claim uninhabited islands containing guano deposits on behalf of the , resulting in nearly 100 such acquisitions across the Pacific and Atlantic. Extraction operations, often conducted under grueling conditions with indentured laborers including Chinese workers, generated substantial revenues for but led to rapid depletion of deposits by the 1870s, accelerating the shift toward synthetic fertilizers like those derived from the Haber-Bosch process. Today, bat guano continues to be utilized in organic agriculture for its rapid nutrient release, though handling requires precautions against fungal pathogens such as , which can cause respiratory illness in humans.

Definition and Composition

Seabird Guano

Seabird guano refers to the accumulated excretions of seabirds, primarily from large colonies of piscivorous species such as cormorants (Phalacrocorax bougainvillii), boobies (Sula spp.), and pelicans, deposited on arid coastal islands and promontories where rainfall is minimal, preventing nutrient leaching. These deposits form through repeated layering over centuries, with historical accumulations reaching depths of up to 60 meters on islands off Peru's coast, sustained by the birds' fish-based diet that concentrates marine-derived nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus in their waste. In such environments, guano hardens into stratified beds, with fresher layers atop older, weathered ones altered by exposure to air, sea spray, or limited precipitation. The chemical composition of seabird guano varies by age and environmental exposure but is dominated by nitrogen compounds from uric acid metabolism, including ammonium urate (C5H7N5O3), ammonium oxalate (C2H8N2O4), and ammonium phosphates ((NH4)3PO4), alongside potassium and trace elements. Unleached, recent guano ("nitrogen guano" or "red guano") retains high soluble nitrogen (up to 10-15% as ammonia and nitrates) and organic matter exceeding 40%, providing both quick-release and slow-release nutrients. Older, leached deposits ("phosphate guano" or "white guano") lose much of the nitrogen to hydrolysis and oxidation, concentrating phosphoric acid (P2O5) at 20-30%, rendering them primarily phosphorus fertilizers with reduced nitrogen content. Relative to guano, guano derives from a marine protein diet, yielding higher content and availability suited for and bloom development, whereas guano from insectivorous diets features more chitin-derived organics and variable levels. Both types share elevated density compared to terrestrial manures, but guano's rapid mineralization supports immediate uptake, though overapplication risks imbalance due to its alkaline nature ( 7-8). Empirical soil studies on guano-influenced islands confirm elevated and correlating with enhanced herbaceous productivity and in arid ecosystems.

Bat Guano

Bat guano consists of the accumulated feces from , primarily collected from caves and other roosting sites where large colonies deposit layers over time. Unlike guano, which derives from a fish-based diet, bat guano originates from an insectivorous diet, resulting in higher content and the presence of from insect exoskeletons. This composition makes it a potent , with levels ranging from 5% to 10%, often primarily as , alongside and . Specific analyses report at up to 23.1 g/kg dry matter, at 9.52 g/kg, and beneficial microbes that enhance . As a fertilizer, bat guano promotes rapid plant growth due to its quick mineralization, with apparent nitrogen recovery approaching 100% in tropical soils during crop cycles, attributed to its low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. One ounce of powdered bat guano contains billions of beneficial microorganisms, aiding nutrient uptake and soil fertility without the need for synthetic additives. Studies demonstrate its superiority over farmyard manure in increasing soil nitrogen and improving tomato growth parameters when applied at rates like 3 tons per hectare. Harvesting occurs mainly in regions with abundant bat caves, such as parts of and the , through manual collection to minimize disturbance to bat populations amid threats like . In , value chain analyses highlight its role in local economies, with extraction focusing on sustainable practices to support crop yields. However, handling poses health risks, as dried guano can harbor fungus, leading to upon inhalation of spores during disturbance. This respiratory infection has caused fatalities in cases linked to guano exposure in cultivation settings, emphasizing the need for protective measures like masks and ventilation.
The chitin content from contributes to bat guano's unique structure, differentiating it from guano's higher mineral density from marine diets. Bat guano's faster breakdown supports vegetative growth phases, while variants favor phosphorus-heavy flowering.

Chemical Properties and Variations

Guano consists primarily of -derived nitrogen compounds, phosphates, and organic matter, with nitrogen levels typically ranging from 8% to 21% by mass, of which approximately 80% is , 10% protein, 7% , and 0.5% . These components arise from the incomplete of protein-rich diets, leading to accumulation of ammonium salts, urates, and oxalates such as (C₂H₈N₂O₄) and ammonium urate (C₅H₇N₅O₃). Upon exposure to moisture and microbes, hydrolyzes into and , increasing alkalinity and forming more soluble nitrates and phosphates over time. Seabird guano exhibits higher phosphorus content due to the fish-based diet of marine birds, with typical compositions including 11–17% nitrogen, 6–13% phosphoric acid (P₂O₅), 42–70% organic matter, 8–22% water, and 3–11% lime (CaO). Its NPK ratios often favor phosphorus, such as 6-12-0 or 0-12-0, reflecting mineralization on phosphate-accumulating substrates like calcareous soils. This guano is generally alkaline (pH >7), promoting rapid nutrient release but risking ammonia volatilization if not managed. In contrast, bat guano, primarily from insectivorous species, contains 3–8.5% and 2–19% (P₂O₅), with NPK ratios around 7-3-1 or 10-3-1, emphasizing nitrogen for vegetative growth. It maintains a near-neutral of about 7.5 and includes higher chitin residues from undigested insect exoskeletons, contributing to slower and sustained (>40%). Variations in composition depend on factors including guano age, storage depth, climate, and origin: fresh deposits retain more and organic , while aged layers mineralize into phosphates and nitrates, with arid conditions preserving guano and humid or environments yielding phosphate-dominant forms. guano from coastal islands shows greater elemental diversity (e.g., elevated Ca, Mg, and trace micronutrients like Fe, Al), whereas guano varies by colony diet, with insectivorous types richer in micronutrients such as , Cl, and Si. These differences influence solubility and agronomic value, with variants excelling in bioavailability and in balanced, slow-release .

Historical Development and Trade

Pre-Modern and Indigenous Uses

Indigenous Andean peoples, including the (c. 1438–1533 CE), harvested seabird guano from coastal islands off , such as the , as a potent to support in arid regions. The term "guano" derives from the Quechua word huanu, reflecting its central role in pre-Columbian farming practices, where it enriched terrace fields (andenes) for crops like , potatoes, and , enabling high yields despite limited rainfall. Isotopic analysis of ancient crop remains from the confirms guano application as dating back to at least 1000 CE, predating Inca expansion and indicating broader prehispanic use among coastal and highland communities. The Incas regulated guano collection through state-controlled labor systems, transporting deposits inland via extensive road networks to fertilize imperial lands, which contributed to food surpluses capable of sustaining populations for three to seven years during shortages. To preserve bird populations—primarily cormorants, boobies, and pelicans whose excrement formed the deposits—they enforced conservation measures, including seasonal bans on island access during breeding periods and penalties for , practices that predated European awareness of such . Spanish chroniclers upon arrival in the 1530s observed these uses, noting guano's superiority over other manures in promoting growth. Evidence for pre-modern indigenous use of bat guano as remains sparse and unverified in primary archaeological records, with most documented applications emerging post-contact or in modern contexts; Andean focus remained on deposits due to their abundance and accessibility.

European Exploration and Early Commercialization (1548–1800)

Spanish colonizers in Peru first documented the indigenous use of guano as a in 1548–1549, observing how locals harvested accumulations of droppings from arid coastal islands to enrich soils for crops such as and potatoes. These early records, drawn from post-conquest ethnohistorical accounts, noted guano's efficacy in restoring nutrient-depleted lands, a practice inherited from Inca traditions that emphasized regulated harvesting to avoid disturbing colonies. Spanish explorers, including those under viceregal oversight, began limited extraction primarily for sustaining colonial agriculture in the region, recognizing guano's high , , and content through empirical field trials rather than chemical analysis. To maintain control over this resource, Spanish authorities imposed export bans starting in the mid-16th century, mirroring Inca restrictions on access to protect bird populations and ensure steady supplies for Peruvian viceregal estates and missions. Harvesting was confined to state-supervised operations on islands like those off the Chincha archipelago, with labor often drawn from indigenous communities under the system, though yields remained modest due to rudimentary tools and seasonal bird migrations. Violations of these prohibitions were penalized to prevent depletion, as overharvesting risked collapsing the fragile supporting the deposits, which formed over centuries in hyper-arid conditions with minimal rainfall to leach nutrients. Early attempts at transatlantic commercialization were negligible before 1800, with sporadic small shipments reaching around 1700 for testing in royal gardens and experimental farms, but these failed to stimulate broader adoption owing to shipping hazards, unfamiliarity with application rates, and competition from established manures like stable dung. European agronomists of the era, lacking Humboldt's later chemical validations, viewed guano as a rather than a staple, with records indicating quantities under a few hundred tons annually at most, insufficient for market disruption. This pre-1800 phase thus represented exploratory adaptation confined to the , laying groundwork for recognition of guano's potential without yielding significant trade volumes or technological innovations in processing.

The Guano Boom and Global Trade (1802–1884)

In November 1802, Alexander von Humboldt arrived at Callao, Peru, where he investigated guano deposits and noted their exceptional fertilizing properties due to high nitrogen content, subsequently transporting samples to Europe for analysis by chemists including Justus von Liebig, who confirmed their superiority over other manures. This scientific validation laid the groundwork for international interest, though widespread commercialization awaited Peru's independence from Spain in 1821. Commercial exports initiated in 1841 with approximately 2,000 tons shipped from to , marking the onset of the guano trade under contracts with British merchants like Antony Gibbs & Sons, who purchased at $15 per ton and resold internationally for $50 per ton. The boom accelerated in the and amid surging demand from and the for nutrient-rich fertilizers to counter soil depletion in intensive ; Britain emerged as the primary market, importing up to 300,000 tons annually by 1858, while U.S. imports peaked at 176,000 tons in 1855. By 1860, the alone yielded about 350,000 tons exported via 433 ships, underscoring the scale of maritime logistics in the trade, which extended to markets in , the , and . Over the period from the to the 1870s, exported 10 to 20 million tons total, generating roughly $500 million in revenue, with the government securing a majority share through initial merchant contracts and in 1861. The trade's global reach prompted supplementary sourcing, exemplified by the U.S. of 1856, enabling claims on Pacific and Atlantic islets to bolster domestic supplies. Depletion of prime deposits by the early 1880s elevated prices and reduced volumes, signaling the boom's end as natural rock phosphate and early synthetic fertilizers gained traction, though guano remained viable until 1884.

International Conflicts and Imperial Expansion

The demand for guano as a fertilizer prompted the United States to enact the Guano Islands Act on August 18, 1856, authorizing American citizens to claim uninhabited islands or keys rich in guano deposits for annexation by the U.S. government. This legislation enabled the U.S. to assert sovereignty over approximately 94 such islands, primarily in the Pacific Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Atlantic, with Baker Island claimed in 1857 as the first under the act. These claims represented an early instance of American extraterritorial expansion beyond the continental United States, establishing a precedent for overseas imperialism by securing resource access amid fears of foreign monopolization. The act facilitated naval expeditions to survey and occupy remote atolls, often leading to disputes with European powers, particularly Britain, over overlapping territorial pretensions in the Pacific. In , Peru's dominance in guano production, centered on the , which yielded up to 13 million tons exported between the and , became a flashpoint for conflict. The erupted in 1864 when , demanding reparations related to Peru's war of independence, dispatched a squadron that seized the islands on April 14, 1864, aiming to leverage control over Peru's primary economic asset. This occupation disrupted Peru's guano trade, which funded much of its government revenue, prompting alliances with , , and against . The conflict involved naval blockades and skirmishes, including the Battle of Abtao on February 7, 1866, but ended inconclusively with the Treaty of Paris on March 3, 1879, after Spanish withdrawal in 1866, underscoring guano's centrality to imperial resource rivalries. Guano's strategic value extended European colonial efforts into remote oceanic territories, including Pacific atolls and African coastal islands, where powers like Britain, , and established outposts. In the Pacific, the guano rush intensified great power competition, with overlapping claims fostering diplomatic tensions and occasional armed standoffs over exploitation rights. Along Africa's southwest coast, guano deposits on islands near drew German and British interests in the late , contributing to broader imperial partitioning without major warfare but through assertive resource extraction that displaced local ecosystems and indigenous access. These episodes collectively illustrate how guano trade dynamics propelled naval power projections and territorial annexations, reshaping global prior to the decline of natural deposits.

Decline, Innovation, and Legacy (Post-1884)

The international guano trade collapsed by 1884 following the near-total exhaustion of Peru's primary seabird deposits, which had fueled exports peaking at over 10 million tons sold between the 1840s and 1870s. This decline was accelerated by falling prices amid the , Peru's 1876 default on £32 million in British loans tied to guano revenues, and the loss of nitrate-rich territories after defeat in the (1879–1884). By 1880, most oceanic islands were scraped beyond economic viability, with seabird colonies disrupted and global imports plummeting as Chilean sodium nitrates provided a cheaper alternative from the 1830s onward. The shift intensified after 1910 with the Haber-Bosch process enabling scalable synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, rendering guano's high-cost extraction obsolete for mass agriculture. Post-decline innovations focused on alternative sources and to sustain niche viability. Bat guano expanded in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, particularly in and Pacific caves, where altered deposits yielded high-phosphate ; for instance, approximately 150,000 metric tons were extracted from Isla de Mona's caves between the 1880s and 1920s due to their elevated content suitable for processing. guano harvesting evolved toward regulated cycles in , where 20th-century bans on exports (e.g., post-1909) allowed deposits to regenerate, preventing total and enabling annual sustainable yields today under government oversight to protect nesting birds like the . These practices prioritize bird population recovery—limiting harvests to every few years—and integrate with modern , contrasting the unrestrained 19th-century scraping that halved Peru's seabird numbers. The guano era's legacy endures in economic, geopolitical, and agricultural domains. In , the boom-bust cycle exemplified dynamics, generating fleeting wealth (e.g., 70% of state revenue in 1859) but fostering corruption, debt, and vulnerability that prolonged post-independence instability. Geopolitically, the U.S. (1856) authorized claims on 103 uninhabited islands, establishing precedents for extraterritorial expansion and influencing maritime law, though few claims persisted beyond the due to depletion. Agriculturally, guano pioneered high-nutrient inputs that boosted yields—demonstrating nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium —and indirectly spurred the synthetic , while its modern organic variants (priced at ~USD 250 per ton versus ~USD 600 for synthetics) support sustainable farming, employing thousands in regulated coastal operations. Environmentally, the era's highlighted causal links between disturbance and , informing contemporary conservation in guano reserves.

Modern Production Methods

Seabird Guano Extraction

Seabird guano extraction primarily occurs on coastal islands off , where seabird colonies deposit nutrient-rich excrement due to the arid climate and abundant marine food sources like anchovies. The main species contributing include the (Leucocarbo bougainvillii), (Sula variegata), and (Pelecanus thagus), which historically numbered around 4 million individuals across Peru's islands. Extraction methods remain manual to avoid disturbing breeding birds, employing tools such as picks, scrapers, and brooms to loosen and gather deposits from rock crevices and surfaces. Collected material is then sifted through devices like the locally designed "El Elefante" sieve to remove debris including feathers, eggshells, and bones, before being bagged for transport via small boats. Harvesting follows a rotational schedule, typically conducted after the breeding season when birds migrate northward, allowing time for deposits to accumulate—often every 3 to 7 years per site—to sustain yields without depleting layers entirely. In , operations fall under the Guano Islands, Islets, and Capes National Reserve System, managed by the government to protect , with prohibitions on heavy machinery and limits on worker presence to prevent nest disruption or . As of , annual production from the alone exceeded 21,000 metric tons, supporting organic agriculture exports. Recent environmental pressures, including of and El Niño-induced scarcity, have caused populations to plummet by over 75% since around 2022, reaching approximately 500,000 birds by mid-2025, which threatens long-term extraction viability despite ongoing regulated harvests benefiting over 22,500 farmers in 2025. Smaller-scale extraction persists in , yielding 2,000 to 4,600 metric tons annually from 2014 to 2023, using comparable manual techniques on islands hosting similar assemblages. Limited production also occurs in and other arid coastal regions, but dominates global seabird guano supply due to its unique ecological conditions.

Bat Guano Harvesting

Bat guano harvesting primarily targets accumulated droppings in roosted by large colonies of insectivorous bats, such as the Mexican free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis), which deposit nutrient-rich excrement on cave floors. Collection methods emphasize minimal disturbance to avoid causing bats to abandon roosts, typically occurring at night when bats forage or during migration periods when caves are empty. Harvesters use headlamps, respirators filtering to 1 micron for protection against fungal spores like those causing , and hand tools such as shovels to scrape guano from high-ceiling areas away from active roosting zones; loud machinery, fire, or smoke is avoided. Commercial operations have historically included sites in the United States, such as Carlsbad Caverns in where guano was mined by the ton until the early , and the in Arizona's during the 1950s, though low yields led to abandonment. In , harvesting from northern caves supplied high-nitrogen guano for , with sustainable practices feasible in caves used seasonally by migratory bats. Current production persists in regions like Kenya's lava tunnel caves at Mt. Suswa and North , where commercial mining for fertilizer began following discoveries in the early and continued through 1984. Sustainable practices, as outlined in 2014 IUCN guidelines, require pre-harvest assessments of ecology, bat populations via exit counts and echolocation surveys, and invertebrate communities dependent on guano. Ongoing monitoring of colony size, harvest volumes, and is mandatory, with harvesting halted if declines occur; permits, typically 1-2 years renewable, enforce compliance under national laws. In , commercial production balances conservation through standards developed by groups like Bat Conservation International, preventing pup mortality and habitat loss observed in overharvested Southeast Asian sites like Thailand's Khao Chon Pran . ![Mexican free-tailed bat](./assets/Mexican_free-tailed_bat_(8006856842)

Processing and Quality Control

Guano harvested from colonies or caves requires to transform raw accumulations into a stable, usable product, primarily through , grinding, and optional sterilization steps to reduce , eliminate pathogens, and achieve uniform for application. content in raw guano typically ranges from 10-20%, which must be lowered to 5-10% or less to prevent spoilage, microbial growth, and during transport; this is achieved via sun for guano in arid environments or mechanical using rotary drum systems for guano, where heated air circulates through tumbling material to evaporate water efficiently. Following drying, the material undergoes crushing and milling to produce a fine , often with sizes of 100-200 for optimal nutrient release and blendability with other amendments; grinding also breaks down chitinous remains in guano, enhancing of nitrogen compounds. Bat guano processing emphasizes pathogen mitigation due to risks from fungi like Histoplasma capsulatum, which thrives in moist, nitrogen-rich deposits; commercial operations often employ conveyor-fed heating tubes or kilns operating at 60-80°C to pasteurize the guano without degrading nutrients, separating batches by cave origin to maintain traceability and quality variance. Seabird guano, naturally lower in organic volatiles and pathogens from marine diets, focuses more on mechanical screening to remove rocks or debris post-grinding, yielding products with standardized nutrient profiles such as 0-12-0 (N-P-K) for phosphorus-dominant variants. In both cases, post-processing may include blending with inert carriers for granulation in some markets, as seen in Cambodian bat guano value chains where drying and grinding facilitate export-grade uniformity. Quality control protocols verify nutrient guarantees, safety, and consistency through standardized laboratory assays for total (often 5-10% in bat guano, lower in weathered seabird types), available , , (typically 6.5-8.0), and moisture, alongside screening for (e.g., , lead below 10-50 ppm thresholds) and biological contaminants. Compliance adheres to guidelines from the Association of American Plant Food Control Officials (AAPFCO), which mandates label accuracy for guaranteed analysis, while organic certifications like those from the Organic Materials Review Institute () require additional tests for synthetic residues and pathogen absence; for instance, studies on organic s including guano recommend ammonia- and total carbon/ ratios to assess stability and efficacy. Bat guano lots are particularly scrutinized for spore viability via culture tests, with rejection if exceeding safe thresholds to avert risks during handling or application.

Agricultural and Industrial Applications

Fertilizer Efficacy and Nutrient Benefits

Guano serves as an due to its high concentrations of essential macronutrients, including (N), (P), and (K), alongside trace elements and beneficial microorganisms that enhance . Seabird guano typically exhibits an NPK ratio of approximately 11-16% , 8-12% (as P₂O₅), and 2-3% (as K₂O), providing readily available phosphorus for root development and flowering while nitrogen supports vegetative growth. guano, in contrast, often contains 5-10% with lower levels (around 3%), emphasizing nitrogen-rich benefits for foliage and overall biomass accumulation, and includes chitin-derived compounds that promote microbial activity in soil. Both types supply over 60 trace minerals, such as calcium, magnesium, and micronutrients like and iron, which address soil deficiencies and improve plant resilience without the risks of chemical imbalances from synthetic fertilizers. The efficacy of guano in stems from its slow-release nutrient profile and content, which fosters , water retention, and microbial ecosystems that facilitate nutrient cycling and uptake. Field trials on (Trigonella foenum-graecum) demonstrated that soil amended with 50% guano achieved 99% rates and significantly higher fresh and dry compared to controls, attributing gains to enhanced availability and microbial stimulation. In sunflower ( annuus) hybrids, guano applications increased plant height, head diameter, and seed yield by promoting robust vegetative and reproductive growth phases, outperforming untreated plots in nutrient-poor soils. Similarly, ( esculentus) studies showed guano elevating total and recovery efficiency, with yield increases linked to improved solubilization and reduced nutrient leaching. Beyond macronutrients, guano's benefits include nematocidal properties from guano's high and organic compounds, which suppress soil pathogens, and its carbon content that builds layers for long-term . Comparative research on ( lycopersicum) growth parameters revealed bat guano yielding comparable or superior results to chemical fertilizers in height and set, due to sustained nutrient delivery and avoidance of buildup. Seabird guano excels in phosphorus-heavy applications, accelerating flowering and fruiting in crops like tomatoes and peppers, with documented enhancements in flower robustness and overall productivity from its -forming qualities. These attributes collectively position guano as a versatile amendment that boosts crop yields by 20-30% in organic systems while maintaining ecological balance through natural processes.

Comparison to Synthetic Alternatives

Guano fertilizers, derived from or excretions, typically exhibit lower but more balanced macronutrient profiles compared to synthetic alternatives, with guano averaging 6-12% (P₂O₅), 6% (N), and minimal (K₂O) at 0-2%, while guano often ranges from 7-10% N, 3% , and 1% K₂O. In contrast, synthetic fertilizers like provide up to 46% N in rapid-release form with no accompanying phosphorus or potassium, and (DAP) delivers 18% N and 46% , enabling precise, high-concentration dosing but lacking guano's inherent micronutrients such as calcium, magnesium, and trace elements like iron and . This organic matrix in guano, comprising over 40% , supports microbial for gradual nutrient availability, reducing volatilization losses observed in synthetics.
Fertilizer TypeTypical NPK (N-P₂O₅-K₂O)Key Additional Components
Guano6-12-0>40% , micronutrients (Ca, Mg)
Guano7-3-1Chitin-derived N, beneficial fungi
(Synthetic)46-0-0None; water-soluble salts
DAP (Synthetic)18-46-0None; acidifying salts
In terms of crop efficacy, guano promotes sustained growth through slow-release mechanisms, with studies on bat guano showing enhanced fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) and root development comparable to or exceeding synthetic inputs in sustainable systems, attributed to chitin's role in stimulating defenses and microbial activity. Synthetic fertilizers yield quicker initial responses—often within days—due to immediate , but repeated use can diminish long-term by depleting organic carbon and fostering dependency, whereas guano applications maintain or increase by 10-20% over multiple seasons via precursor carbon inputs. Field trials with bat guano and combinations on demonstrated yield benefits from nutrient release alongside improved enzyme activity, contrasting synthetics' tendency to acidify soils (pH drops of 0.5-1.0 units) and reduce microbial diversity. Environmentally, guano avoids the energy-intensive Haber-Bosch process required for synthetic (consuming 1-2% of global energy) and minimizes runoff risks through binding in organic fractions, potentially lowering compared to synthetics, which contribute to 50-70% of non-point source in agricultural watersheds. However, guano's variable potency and slower action necessitate higher application rates (e.g., 1-2 tons/ha vs. 100-200 kg/ha for synthetics), raising costs in , though its role in enhancing and water retention offers resilience against , a benefit absent in synthetic-only regimes. Overall, guano excels in holistic vitality for organic systems, while synthetics dominate high-yield monocultures prioritizing speed over longevity.

Non-Agricultural Uses

Guano, especially guano, has historically served as a source of nitrates for and explosives production, leveraging its (saltpeter) content as the essential oxidizer in black powder mixtures. During the and the , Confederate forces extracted nitrates from guano-enriched cave soils, including those in , , where millennia of accumulations provided viable deposits; this effort supplemented imported supplies disrupted by blockades. In , a dedicated guano was built in New Braunfels in 1863 to leach nitrates from local deposits, yielding ingredients amid acute munitions shortages. These operations highlighted guano's strategic value beyond , though extraction yields varied due to guano's variable composition and processing inefficiencies.

Economic Significance

Historical Revenue and Market Dynamics

The Peruvian guano trade, which began in earnest in the , generated substantial revenues for the Peruvian through exports primarily to and the , where demand surged due to soil nutrient depletion from intensive agriculture. From 1840 to 1870, Peru exported approximately 12 million tons of guano, valued at around USD 500 million at the time. By the late and early , guano sales accounted for up to 80% of Peru's national revenue, transforming the commodity into the country's primary economic driver and funding , expenditures, and foreign servicing. Market dynamics were characterized by Peru's near-monopoly on high-quality seabird guano from the and other coastal deposits, which commanded premium prices due to its superior and content compared to alternatives like Chilean . Initial export prices reached as high as £10-£12 per ton in the , but oversupply and quality degradation from rushed mining led to price volatility, dropping to around £3-£5 per ton by the 1860s as buyers sought cheaper substitutes. The trade spurred international competition, including the U.S. of , which authorized American claims on uninhabited Pacific islands to secure domestic supplies amid fears of Peruvian dominance. The boom's unsustainability arose from rapid depletion of deposits through aggressive extraction—often exceeding 500,000 tons annually at peak—coupled with environmental damage to bird colonies, reducing natural replenishment rates. By the early , accessible reserves on major islands were exhausted, causing export volumes to plummet and revenues to shift toward , though the guano market's collapse contributed to Peru's fiscal crisis and involvement in the (1879–1884). This cycle exemplified dynamics, where short-term windfalls fostered dependency and inefficient allocation rather than diversified economic development.

Modern Industry Scale and Trade

The global guano market was valued at approximately USD 643 million in 2024, reflecting demand primarily for organic fertilizers derived from and excrement, with projections indicating growth to USD 1.07 billion by 2032 at a (CAGR) of 6.6%. This expansion is driven by increasing consumer preference for natural nutrient sources amid rising organic , though production remains concentrated in limited geographic areas due to natural accumulation constraints. guano dominates commercial output, sourced from coastal islands, while guano constitutes a smaller but growing niche segment valued at around USD 512 million in 2024 for applications. Peru maintains the position of the world's leading producer of guano, harvesting over 21,000 metric tons annually from the alone as of recent assessments, though output faces pressures from declining bird populations—estimated to have dropped by more than 75% to around 500,000 individuals in coastal colonies by mid-2025 due to environmental factors like El Niño events and of prey species. In , annual production has stabilized at 2,091 to 4,601 metric tons between 2014 and 2023, extracted from protected colonies under regulated quotas to balance ecological sustainability with export revenues. Namibia contributes modestly through sites like Bird Island in , where guano from Cape cormorants supports localized trade, though specific volume data remains limited and integrated into broader African organic export channels. Bat guano harvesting, prevalent in (e.g., and ), operates on a smaller artisanal scale, with value chains emphasizing collection during low-bat-activity seasons to minimize wildlife disruption, but global trade volumes are not comprehensively quantified beyond niche markets. International trade in guano is predominantly export-oriented from producing nations to , , and , where it commands premiums as a slow-release and nitrogen source compliant with standards. and facilitate shipments via bulk carriers to ports in the United States and , with trade volumes correlating closely to market valuations—implying annual global exchanges in the tens of thousands of metric tons, though exact figures are obscured by aggregation with other organic amendments. Quality grading influences pricing, with high-purity guano fetching up to several hundred USD per ton, while bat variants are marketed for specialty at similar rates adjusted for processing costs. Regulatory frameworks, including export licenses tied to population monitoring, ensure , but challenges persist from fluctuating supply due to climatic variability and from synthetic alternatives.

Incentives for Innovation and Resource Management

The economic value of guano as a nutrient-rich has driven incentives for sustainable and technological innovations, particularly in guano operations where historical led to population crashes in the late 19th century. In , which controls the world's largest guano reserves, the government's monopoly through entities like PROABONOS has implemented rotation-based harvesting—limiting extraction to surface layers every 6-8 months during non-breeding periods—to allow colonies to rebuild deposits, sustaining annual outputs of approximately 20,000-30,000 tons while preventing the collapses seen in the 1870s guano crisis. These practices, informed by early 20th-century conservation science, revived the industry from near-collapse in 1909-1965 by integrating ornithological monitoring and supplementation for birds, directly tying resource yields to colony health and incentivizing ongoing investments in surveillance technologies like for bird counts. Market dynamics further propel innovation, as rising global demand for organic alternatives amid synthetic fertilizer volatility—exemplified by the guano market's projected growth from USD 642.75 million in 2024 to USD 1,071.77 million by 2032—encourages efficiency gains such as mechanized scraping tools and impurity filtration to enhance purity and reduce transport costs. In Namibia's offshore islands, where guano production historically peaked at thousands of tons annually in the , economic pressures from export revenues have prompted , including seasonal harvesting quotas to mitigate and avian disturbance, though enforcement challenges persist due to remote locations. For guano, primarily from cave deposits in regions like and the , profit motives from commercial sales—valued for high and nutrient content—have spurred guidelines for timed extractions during bat absences, permit systems limiting harvester numbers, and ventilation innovations to minimize fungal risks, ensuring persistence for renewable yields estimated at 10-20% annual replenishment rates. Government and international funding reinforces these incentives; for instance, World Bank-supported projects in since 2019 have allocated resources for and pilot management plans, yielding measurable recoveries in populations and guano stocks through data-driven quotas. Such strategies underscore a causal link between conservation enforcement and economic viability, as unchecked harvesting historically depleted Peruvian reserves by over 90% in the mid-1800s, prompting regulatory frameworks that prioritize long-term productivity over short-term gains. Overall, these mechanisms reflect first-principles resource : finite deposits necessitate innovations in yield optimization to avert bust cycles, with empirical evidence from demonstrating that balanced extraction sustains both ecological integrity and industry revenues exceeding millions annually.

Environmental and Ecological Dynamics

Natural Role in Nutrient Cycling

Guano, the accumulated excrement of s and bats, serves as a critical vector for transfer and cycling in ecosystems where it accumulates, concentrating elements like (N), (P), and (K) derived from the animals' diets. In coastal and island environments, guano subsidizes nutrient-poor terrestrial habitats by importing marine-derived s, enhancing soil fertility and supporting higher plant productivity and . For instance, on arid islands in the , guano deposition increases soil N and P concentrations up to sixfold, directly elevating foliar levels in vegetation and mitigating limitations in otherwise oligotrophic soils. This allochthonous input fosters cascading effects, bolstering communities and overall ecosystem function in systems reliant on external subsidies. In marine-terrestrial interfaces, seabirds facilitate a bidirectional nutrient flux: guano enriches land, while rainfall and runoff export these nutrients back to adjacent waters, stimulating blooms and sustaining populations that, in turn, support the birds. Globally, seabird and anadromous movements transport approximately 150 million kilograms of annually from oceans to land, underscoring guano's scale in cross-ecosystem coupling. In ecosystems, seabird-derived nutrients alleviate P limitation, enhance plant growth, and propagate through detrital food webs to , demonstrating guano's role in alleviating stoichiometric imbalances. Excessive deposition, however, can create localized , altering and suppressing vegetation under colony cores, though peripheral zones benefit from moderated enrichment. Within subterranean habitats, guano dominates nutrient and energy cycling in , providing in otherwise barren environments. bats concentrate chitin-rich remains and into guano deposits high in N (often exceeding 10% by dry weight), which decompose to fuel microbial communities, fungi, and detritivorous arthropods. This supports specialized food webs, including coprophagous salamanders and that rely on guano-derived carbon and nutrients, preventing energy deficits in aphotic systems. Decomposition releases soluble ions that percolate through cave sediments, influencing downstream aquatic ecosystems via subterranean streams, thus linking epigean to hypogean . In nutrient-scarce , guano's pulsed inputs drive temporal dynamics in microbial activity and invertebrate abundance, highlighting its foundational role in sustaining below ground.

Harvesting Impacts on Wildlife and Habitats

Harvesting of seabird guano, particularly from Peru's coastal islands like the , has historically caused severe disruptions to avian populations and nesting habitats through mechanical scraping that removes accumulated droppings layers essential for breeding sites. In the , intensive extraction depleted guano deposits to depths of up to 50 meters in some areas, leading to the direct mortality of seabirds via trampling during operations and indirect effects such as nest destruction and that rendered islands less suitable for recolonization. This overexploitation contributed to population crashes among like the (Phalacrocorax bougainvillii), with estimates of millions of birds lost across Peruvian islands by the late 1800s due to combined harvesting pressures and El Niño events exacerbating starvation. Modern regulated harvesting in continues to impact , including the (Spheniscus humboldti), by altering colony structures and increasing vulnerability to predators through habitat modification, as extraction removes protective guano barriers and exposes nests. guano islands support unique ecosystems where droppings provide nutrient-rich substrates for and plants, and their removal can cascade to reduced , with studies noting diminished communities and altered soil chemistry post-harvest. Disturbance from worker presence during off-season collections has led to temporary colony abandonments, particularly affecting ground-nesting species sensitive to human activity. For bat guano extraction in caves, primary impacts stem from physical disturbance during , which can cause roost abandonment and energy depletion in insectivorous as they are startled into flight, reducing foraging efficiency and . In Southeast Asian , unregulated harvesting has been linked to localized declines in bat colonies by altering microhabitats—guano piles serve as thermal regulators and nutrient sources for cave —and introducing vibrations or lights that disrupt or maternity roosts. Cave-dependent , such as springtails and mites that rely on guano as a food base, experience population reductions following extraction, potentially destabilizing subterranean food webs. Sustainable guidelines recommend timing harvests to bat absences, yet enforcement gaps in regions like have resulted in persistent habitat degradation and secondary effects on bat health from accumulated stress.

Sustainability Practices and Recovery Evidence

Sustainable guano harvesting in Peru's seabird colonies, primarily managed by PROABONOS, incorporates timed extraction campaigns limited to the upper layers of deposits to avoid disturbing nesting birds, with hand labor and constructed barriers separating workers from breeding areas. A 1998 agreement for Punta San Juan established disturbance mitigation protocols, including regulated access and monitoring, while national efforts through the Guano Islands, Islets, and Capes National Reserve System emphasize against unauthorized extraction and integration with broader protection. These practices recognize guano as a , replenished annually by populations dependent on upwelling-driven fish stocks like anchoveta. For guano in caves, guidelines advocate harvesting only accumulated surface material without excavating deep layers or during roosting periods, particularly for migratory species, to prevent disruption and maintain colony productivity. Protocols include avoiding direct contact with bats to minimize stress and mortality, as killing colonies halts guano production, and restricting access to non-breeding seasons where feasible. Empirical assessments of harvesting effects on Peruvian s, including Humboldt penguins and guanay cormorants, found no detectable population declines attributable to extraction in monitored sites from 1998 onward, though broader trends show irregular fluctuations and overall reductions linked to variability rather than harvesting. Post-disturbance recovery in guano layers occurs through seasonal deposition, with undisturbed deposits demonstrating accumulation rates sufficient for renewal over decades if upper harvests are capped, as evidenced by layered profiles preserving millennia-scale records. Following historical and collapses, such as the 1970s anchoveta crash, seabird numbers and associated guano volumes partially rebounded under regulated regimes, supporting ongoing yields without evident long-term depletion from sustainable practices.

Health and Safety Considerations

Occupational Hazards in Mining

Guano mining has historically involved strenuous manual labor under harsh conditions, leading to risks of exhaustion and accidents among workers, who were often coerced or indentured. In guano operations on remote islands, laborers faced dangers from scaling cliffs and navigating unstable terrains, contributing to high injury rates. Modern guano collection in caves similarly entails physical hazards, including slips and falls on wet rocks, particularly during rainy seasons, with documented fatalities from such incidents or oxygen deprivation. Respiratory hazards arise from inhaling fine guano generated during extraction and handling, which irritates the eyes, , and lungs, often limiting work sessions to 15-20 minutes. The pungent ammonia-like odor of decomposing guano exacerbates these issues, causing irritation and symptoms such as sore throats and colds. Chemical exposures, primarily from ammonia released by guano, pose risks of burns to the , eyes, and skin, with historical accounts noting agues and linked to prolonged contact. Additional environmental threats in settings include encounters with like snakes and mites, leading to bites and skin irritations. Workers historically mitigated some exposure with rudimentary respirators, but overall measures remained inadequate, underscoring the perilous nature of the trade.

Pathogen Risks (e.g., Histoplasmosis)

Guano deposits, especially from bats and certain birds, serve as reservoirs for fungal pathogens that pose respiratory risks when aerosolized during disturbance. The primary concern is , a thriving in nitrogen-rich environments like accumulated droppings, which grows in or guano and releases infectious spores upon disruption. Inhalation of these microconidia, typically 2-5 micrometers in size, allows deposition in the alveoli, where they convert to yeast forms at body temperature, potentially causing acute pulmonary . Most infections are asymptomatic or mild, resolving without treatment in immunocompetent individuals, but dissemination occurs in 1-5% of cases, particularly among those with weakened immunity, leading to severe outcomes like acute respiratory distress or chronic cavitary disease. Outbreaks have been documented in settings with high guano exposure, such as caves or structures contaminated by colonies, where spore concentrations can exceed 10^6 per gram of . Bat guano represents a heightened risk due to its association with H. capsulatum in endemic regions, including the and valleys in the United States, where soil pH and organic content favor fungal proliferation. A 2024 case series reported two fatalities from disseminated linked to inhaling from guano used as in indoor , highlighting even indirect exposure risks without direct entry. Workers handling raw guano, such as miners or spelunkers, face elevated odds; for instance, a study of cave explorers found seropositivity rates up to 50% post-exposure compared to <1% in unexposed controls. Bird guano, particularly from pigeons or starlings, similarly harbors H. capsulatum but also Cryptococcus neoformans or C. gattii, encapsulated yeasts causing cryptococcosis, which manifests as meningitis in 70-90% of disseminated cases among immunocompromised persons. Bacterial pathogens like Salmonella spp. can contaminate guano via fecal-oral routes, though respiratory aerosolization is less common than for fungi. Risk quantification varies by guano type and activity: bat guano in enclosed yields higher spore viability due to stable humidity (60-80%), persisting for years post-colonization, whereas surface bird guano dries faster, reducing but not eliminating infectivity. Endemicity maps indicate prevalence in areas with historic guano mining, such as Midwest U.S. states, correlating with 500,000 annual infections, though underreported due to subclinical presentations. Vulnerable populations include HIV/AIDS patients (relative risk >100-fold) and transplant recipients, where mortality from untreated disseminated disease approaches 90%. Diagnostic confirmation relies on detection in /serum (sensitivity 92% for disseminated cases) or , underscoring the need for pre-exposure testing in high-risk occupations. While peer-reviewed analyses confirm guano's role in ecology, non-fungal risks like nontuberculous mycobacteria in guano samples warrant further scrutiny, with isolation rates up to 58% in cave deposits versus 21% in buildings.

Regulatory and Mitigation Measures

The (MSHA), under the U.S. Department of Labor, regulates guano mining operations classified as mining activities, requiring inspections of surface mines at least twice annually and underground mines at least four times annually to ensure safe working conditions, including control of dust and airborne contaminants that may carry pathogens like . coordinates with the (OSHA) for non-mining aspects at mine sites, applying OSHA standards for general industry hazards such as respiratory protection under 29 CFR 1910.134 when bioaerosol exposure risks are present. These regulations emphasize hazard assessments for occupational exposures during guano extraction, particularly in bat caves or bird colonies where fungal spores proliferate. For pathogen mitigation, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and (NIOSH) recommend a prioritizing elimination, such as excluding bats or birds from structures to prevent guano accumulation before harvesting or cleanup begins. include wetting guano deposits with low-pressure sprays to suppress dust prior to removal, using HEPA-filtered vacuums for dry sweeping avoidance, and ventilating enclosed spaces to dilute airborne spores, measures validated in occupational settings like cave exploration and building remediation. Administrative controls mandate worker training on risks, limiting exposure time in high-contamination areas, and designating professional remediation firms for large-scale guano accumulations exceeding individual handling capacity, as self-cleanup of substantial volumes increases inhalation risks. Personal protective equipment (PPE) forms the final control layer, with NIOSH approving N95 or higher-rated respirators for routine tasks and powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) for heavy exposure scenarios, alongside disposable gloves, coveralls, and to prevent dermal or contact. Post-exposure protocols require by sealing contaminated gear in plastic bags for disposal and medical monitoring for symptoms in endemic regions, where Histoplasma prevalence informs site-specific risk assessments. In jurisdictions like , employers must implement exposure control plans under boards, integrating these federal guidelines with local surveillance for cases linked to guano handling. For bird guano harvesting in operational colonies, similar suppression and PPE protocols apply, supplemented by permits to minimize disturbance and secondary during collection.

Scientific and Research Applications

Paleoenvironmental and Climate Reconstruction

Bat guano deposits in caves serve as stratified archives for reconstructing past environmental conditions, with layers accumulating over millennia from insectivorous bats that forage locally and deposit fecal matter containing undigested remains such as pollen, chitin, and isotopes reflective of regional climate and vegetation. Radiocarbon dating of these organic-rich layers enables chronological frameworks spanning thousands of years, as demonstrated in a 12,000-year core from Cave Springs Cave, Alabama, which integrates signals from stable isotopes of carbon (δ¹³C), nitrogen (δ¹⁵N), and hydrogen (δ²H). Stable carbon isotope ratios (δ¹³C) in bat guano primarily track shifts in composition and , as s consume feeding on C₃-dominated (, higher δ¹³C depletion) versus C₄-dominated (, lower δ¹³C depletion) , with drier conditions favoring C₄ expansion; for instance, elevated δ¹³C values in guano cores indicate abrupt arid events like the (circa 12,900–11,700 years ago) and an 82,000-year-old cold snap. isotopes (δ¹⁵N) correlate with precipitation and through intensified nitrogen cycling under water-limited conditions, where evaporation enriches ¹⁵N; studies show δ¹⁵N increases during dry phases in eastern caves, linking to reduced rainfall and ecosystem stress. isotopes (δ²H) in guano further proxy past precipitation sources and intensity, as bat water intake mirrors signatures. Pollen grains preserved in guano, extracted via chemical processing to remove matrices, provide direct evidence of past within bats' radii (typically 10–50 km), supplementing data; in regions lacking lake sediments, such as tropical caves in the ' Tabon Cave, guano pollen reveals forest expansions tied to wetter monsoons. guano, while less commonly layered in caves, has been analyzed for isotopic shifts responding to marine variability, as in a 400-year record from Ecuador's Galápagos indicating seabird diet changes during El Niño-Southern Oscillation cycles. Diagenetic alterations, including formation, can bias proxies if unaccounted for, necessitating corrections via . These proxies enable high-resolution reconstructions unattainable from sparse continental records, revealing causal links like aridity-driven vegetation shifts influencing ecology, though interpretations require validation against independent proxies to mitigate guano-specific effects. Ongoing refinements, such as multi-isotope modeling, enhance reliability for pre-Anthropocene baselines, as in eastern European guano indicating impacts on winter over centuries.

Archaeological and Forensic Uses

Bat guano deposits in caves serve as stratigraphic markers for archaeological dating, particularly through radiocarbon analysis of organic fractions within the guano, which provides chronological frameworks for associated human artifacts and remains in tropical and subtropical sites. Layers of accumulated guano, often exceeding several meters in depth, accumulate over millennia from bat colonies and can be cored for sequential dating, with accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) applied to humin or collagen-like fractions to minimize contamination from modern carbon inputs. For instance, in the Great Cave of Niah, Borneo, optical dating of guano-rich sediments has refined timelines for early human occupation, associating deposits with the Deep Skull find dated to approximately 40,000 years ago. The taphonomic effects of guano on archaeological preservation are dual: its acidic decomposition ( often below 4) dissolves and organic materials, while phosphatic forms authigenic s like that encase and alter surviving remains, enabling reconstruction of past microenvironments. Experimental studies confirm that guano-driven acidity accelerates recrystallization and mineral replacement, with implications for interpreting site formation processes in guano-heavy s, such as those in where heated guano variants preserve and artifacts differently from acidic norms. These processes inform via stratigraphic integrity, distinguishing human activity layers from natural guano accumulation phases during cave abandonment. In forensic contexts, guano's taphonomic signatures extend to remains recovery in roosts, where phosphatic alterations mimic or confound indicators, requiring microarchaeological analysis to differentiate biogenic phosphates from diagenesis. DNA metabarcoding of guano has been adapted for forensics to identify species from fecal residues at disturbance sites, aiding investigations into illegalities or impacts on preservation, though applications remain experimental and focused on non-invasive sampling. Such techniques parallel archaeological methods but emphasize rapid, order-wide Chiroptera identification from degraded guano, with potential for timestamping via associated isotopes in controlled forensic scenarios.

Emerging Analytical Techniques

Recent developments in guano analysis have focused on non-invasive, high-resolution methods to extract paleoenvironmental, ecological, and contaminant data, leveraging advances in molecular biology, spectrometry, and isotopic geochemistry. These techniques capitalize on guano's layered deposition in caves and roosts, enabling chronologies that span thousands of years without disturbing living populations. Metagenomic sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool for profiling bacterial communities in bat guano, providing taxonomic and functional insights into microbial diversity, ecosystem dynamics, and potential zoonotic risks. A 2025 study applied shotgun metagenomics to guano from diverse cave sites, identifying dominant taxa like Bacillus and Pseudomonas and linking community shifts to environmental stressors such as humidity and nutrient availability. This approach surpasses traditional culturing by capturing unculturable microbes and functional genes, with sequencing depths exceeding 10 million reads per sample for robust assemblies. Stable multi-isotope analysis (δ¹³C, δ¹⁵N, and δ²H) integrates dietary, vegetative, and hydrological signals preserved in guano, offering integrated paleoclimate proxies. Research from 2024 demonstrated that these isotopes in guano from arid-region caves correlate with variability and C3/C4 shifts over millennia, with δ²H values reflecting regional sources more reliably than single-isotope systems due to ranges averaging 20-50 km. Calibration against modern samples confirms accuracy within 1-2‰ for δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N, enabling reconstructions of past without relying on less precise proxies like speleothems. Charcoal morphotype analysis in guano cores has proven effective for reconstructing regimes, distinguishing anthropogenic prescribed burns from wildfires via and shape distributions. A 2024 investigation of North American deposits showed guano influx peaks aligning with historical fire records, with >80% of particles <125 μm indicating local, low-intensity events; this method extends fire proxies beyond sediment charcoal by incorporating bat mobility, which filters regional signals. Tandem mass spectrometry techniques, including GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS, enable multiresidue detection of emerging pollutants like pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and UV filters in guano matrices. A 2024 GC-MS/MS protocol extracted over 100 compounds from 1 g samples using liquid-liquid partitioning with acetonitrile, achieving limits of quantification below 1 ng/g and recoveries of 70-120% for recalcitrant analytes; applied to wild bat populations, it revealed benzophenone accumulation reflecting aquatic contamination. These methods support biomonitoring by quantifying bioaccumulation without euthanasia, with matrix-matched standards addressing guano's high organic interference. Advanced pollen extraction from detritus-rich guano combines lyophilization, acid digestion, and fine sieving (e.g., 10-20 μm meshes), yielding viable assemblages for vegetation history. A 2023 procedure recovered >500 grains/cm³ from layers, preserving delicate types like and , and linked assemblages to regional floristic shifts with 90% identification success via reference libraries. This refines paleoecological records by mitigating guano's chemical degradation, previously limiting pollen yields to <10%. DNA metabarcoding and eDNA amplification from guano facilitate prey identification, colony stress assessment via cortisol proxies, and non-invasive genotyping. Molecular protocols since 2020 amplify arthropod COI barcodes from fecal chitin remnants, reconstructing diets with >95% genus-level resolution, while qPCR detects pathogens like fungi at part-per-billion sensitivities. These extend to , extracting from subfossil layers for timelines.

Controversies and Debates

Labor Conditions and Exploitation Claims

During the mid-19th century guano boom in , particularly on the , labor shortages prompted the importation of approximately 90,000 Chinese workers between 1847 and 1874 under contract labor systems often characterized as semi-slavery or trade. These workers endured grueling conditions, including digging through hardened ammonia-rich guano layers under intense sun exposure, leading to widespread physical exhaustion, respiratory issues from dust and fumes, and high mortality rates from disease, malnutrition, and abuse. Historical accounts, such as those from former worker Chan Kwei, detail beatings, inadequate rations, and psychological trauma, with many laborers resorting to to escape the toil. Exploitation claims center on deceptive recruitment practices in , where impoverished individuals were lured with false promises of wages and repatriation, only to face indefinite bondage enforced by overseers and Peruvian authorities. U.S. Yung Wing's 1870s reports to documented systemic abuses, including flogging on transport ships and islands, corroborating eyewitness testimonies of conditions akin to despite formal contracts. While some academic narratives frame this as part of broader imperial metabolic rifts involving resource and human extraction, primary evidence from consular investigations and survivor accounts supports the prevalence of coerced labor, with limited avenues for complaint resolution. Resistance occurred through mutinies, such as the 1852 cargo rebellion en route to guano sites, highlighting worker agency against entrapment. In other guano locales, like the Ichaboe Islands off in the 1840s-1850s, transient diggers—often former sailors or convicts—faced similar marginalization, including wage theft and hazardous work without protections, prompting active resistance and desertions. These patterns reflect causal pressures of rapid export-driven extraction, where prioritized output over worker welfare, though contract terms nominally differentiated from chattel slavery. Modern Peruvian guano operations, regulated by the government since the , involve fewer such claims, with contemporary reports emphasizing mechanized harvesting and formal , albeit with ongoing concerns over environmental impacts rather than labor abuses. toward exaggerated exploitation narratives is warranted, as some sources derive from ideological critiques rather than granular , yet verifiable historical records affirm severe conditions driven by economic imperatives.

Imperialism Narratives vs. Trade Benefits

Historians have often framed the 19th-century guano trade as an early manifestation of , particularly through the ' of August 18, 1856, which authorized American citizens to claim uninhabited islands rich in guano deposits for U.S. sovereignty, resulting in over 100 such claims across the Pacific and . This legislation has been described as the nation's first extraterritorial expansion beyond the continent, enabling resource extraction without immediate military conquest and setting precedents for later territorial ambitions. Scholars like and Brett Clark have termed it "ecological imperialism," arguing it exemplified unequal ecological exchange where core nations drained peripheral environments, contributing to a global in nutrient cycles. Similarly, conflicts such as the (1864–1866), involving Spain's blockade of Peruvian guano ports over unpaid reparations from independence struggles, are cited as evidence of European powers seeking to control vital trade routes and resources. However, these narratives tend to overemphasize coercive elements while understating the voluntary commercial dynamics and mutual economic gains of the guano trade. , holding a near-monopoly on high-quality guano from the , exported approximately 12 million tons between 1840 and 1870, generating around $500 million in state revenue—equivalent to 60% of sales proceeds—which funded , modernization, and partial repayment, helping stabilize the after independence turmoil. By the , guano accounted for up to 80% of Peru's fiscal income, enabling investments that boosted national productivity despite later mismanagement and overexploitation leading to a bust by the 1870s. For importing nations, guano's high , , and content revolutionized ; promoted by chemist , it increased crop yields for grains, , and root vegetables in and the U.S., supporting and elevating living standards through enhanced food availability before the rise of synthetic fertilizers like the Haber-Bosch process. Under the , while claims proliferated, actual exploitation was limited; most deposits proved uneconomical or logistically challenging, with few islands yielding significant output, and many claims lapsed without sustained U.S. control or displacement of populations, as the law explicitly targeted uninhabited territories to secure fertilizer supplies amid British dominance in Peruvian trade. Labor conditions on Peruvian islands involved harsh practices, including the importation of over 90,000 Chinese contract workers by 1874 under often exploitative terms, but these were managed by Peruvian authorities and private firms, not direct foreign imperial oversight, reflecting internal policy choices rather than extrinsic domination. Academic interpretations invoking frequently draw from frameworks emphasizing systemic exploitation, yet empirical records indicate the trade operated within global market incentives, where Peru's state leveraged its resource endowment for revenue maximization, albeit with fiscal profligacy contributing to long-term vulnerabilities like the (1879–1884). Ultimately, the guano era underscores causal trade dynamics over unidirectional : demand from industrializing agricultures drove prices from $12 per ton in 1830 to peaks exceeding $50 by 1850, incentivizing supply from and remote islands without necessitating conquest, as commercial contracts with Peruvian exporters sufficed for major volumes until depletion. This period's legacy lies in demonstrating how resource booms can yield short-term prosperity—evident in Peru's revenue surge and importers' yield gains—while highlighting risks of dependency and overharvesting, rather than inherent imperial predation.

Environmental Overexploitation vs. Economic Necessity

The guano trade in the exemplified a conflict between immediate economic imperatives and long-term environmental , as surging global demand for fertilizers drove intensive extraction from Pacific islands, particularly Peru's . European and North American agriculture faced soil nutrient depletion from continuous cropping without rotation, necessitating high-nitrogen and phosphate inputs that guano uniquely provided as a natural, concentrated source superior to alternatives like or . Between 1840 and 1870, exported approximately 12 million tons of guano, generating revenues that stabilized the post-independence economy and funded , while enabling yield increases that supported in importing nations. This economic boon, however, relied on exploiting finite deposits accumulated over centuries by seabird colonies, with mining rates far exceeding annual replenishment from bird excretions. At its peak, Peru's coastal islands supported around 53 million s, whose guano layers reached depths of up to 50 meters on the Chinchas, but unchecked digging stripped islands bare, destroying nesting habitats and prompting direct bird culling to facilitate operations. Ecosystem disruptions extended beyond birds, as , introduced invasives via mining traffic, and nutrient imbalances altered island flora and marine interfaces, contributing to localized losses that persisted post-extraction. By the 1870s, primary Chincha deposits were exhausted, precipitating an economic bust for and shifting reliance to Chilean nitrates, underscoring the unsustainability of the extractive model. Proponents of the trade's necessity argue that guano's role in averting agricultural collapse justified short-term ecological costs, as depleted soils threatened in densely farmed regions, and the revenue influx modernized despite later mismanagement. Critics, drawing from ecological records, contend that ignored natural renewal cycles—seabirds require stable s and abundant fish prey like anchovies—and inflicted irreversible damage, with bird populations crashing due to habitat loss rather than solely overharvesting guano itself. The eventual Haber-Bosch process for synthetic in 1910 alleviated such dependencies, highlighting how , rather than moderated extraction, resolved the tension by decoupling production from biotic limits. This historical episode illustrates causal trade-offs: economic gains from enabled broader societal advances, yet at the expense of localized environmental capital that ecosystems could not rapidly restore.

References

  1. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/62618
  2. https://cameo.mfa.org/wiki/Guano
  3. https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/stories/smithsonian-and-19th-century-guano-trade-poop-crap
  4. https://datazone.birdlife.org/articles/seabird-guano-especially-from-peru-transformed-western-agriculture-in-the-nineteenth-century
  5. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/48/chapter-8
  6. https://www.agweb.com/news/business/farmland/how-fertilizer-madness-sparked-turd-war-and-turned-guano-gold
  7. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/when-the-western-world-ran-on-guano
  8. https://www.audubon.org/news/holy-crap-trip-worlds-largest-guano-producing-islands
  9. https://www.batcon.org/the-scoop-on-bat-poop/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7845282/
  11. https://taylorandfrancis.com/knowledge/Engineering_and_technology/Chemical_engineering/Guano/
  12. https://www.guanorojo.cl/home-seabird-guano/
  13. https://rutoms.com/seabird-guano-for-plants/
  14. https://trueorganic.earth/whats-so-great-about-seabird-guano/
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014019630400134X
  16. https://www.planetnatural.com/guano/
  17. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2020/9872532
  18. https://www.jeeng.net/pdf-181158-104454
  19. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/5/1367
  20. https://gardenculturemagazine.com/guano-from-the-bat-cave-to-your-gardens/
  21. http://www.agriculturejournal.org/volume13number3/bat-guano-as-an-alternative-fertilizer-comparative-effects-with-farmyard-manure-and-chemical-fertilizer-on-tomato-solanum-lycopersicum-growth-parameters/
  22. https://www.epicgardening.com/bat-guano/
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394926085_Value_Chain_Analysis_of_Bat_Guano_Harvesting_Industry_-A_Case_Study_of_Cambodia
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11651158/
  25. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/histoplasmosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20373495
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372034912_A_Brief_Review_of_the_Nutritive_Value_and_Chemical_Components_of_Bat_Guano_and_Its_Potential_Use_as_a_Natural_Fertiliser_in_Agriculture
  27. https://earthcrew.com/bat-and-seabird-guano/
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3316503/
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Percent-elemental-share-in-the-guano-of-different-species-of-insectivorous-bats-and_fig1_330849224
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327449209_Guano_The_White_Gold_of_the_Seabirds
  31. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.12867
  32. https://www.peru.travel/yourperfectperu/articulo?n=the-incas-pioneers-in-conservation
  33. http://natureecoevocommunity.nature.com/posts/seabird-s-poop-was-a-fertiliser-during-prehispanic-times-in-the-atacama-desert
  34. https://www.forbes.com/sites/grrlscientist/2020/08/30/did-guano-make-the-inca-the-worlds-first-conservationists/
  35. https://ushistoryscene.com/article/guano-islands-bird-turds/
  36. https://bou.org.uk/blog-jo-the-rise-of-the-inca-empire/
  37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-020-00835-4
  38. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/guano-mining-a-deadly-obsession.html
  39. https://thebreakthrough.org/articles/remember-the-guano-wars
  40. https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/dirty-business/
  41. https://www.dhm.de/blog/2022/07/19/whats-that-for-a-humboldt-penguin-and-a-packet-of-guano-dung/
  42. https://yaffle53.wordpress.com/2014/05/22/a-history-of-the-peruvian-guano-industry/
  43. https://coha.org/the-great-peruvian-guano-bonanza-rise-fall-and-legacy/
  44. https://digital-exhibits.library.nd.edu/3df879828f/in-a-civilized-nation-newspapers-magazines-and-the-print-revolution-in-nineteenth-century-peru/showcases/ad87a6facb/print-culture-in-perus-guano-age/sections/304d8d2294
  45. https://mises.org/mises-daily/great-guano-boom-and-bust
  46. https://www.vox.com/2014/7/31/5951731/bird-shit-imperialism
  47. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23780231241274187
  48. https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/the-guano-wars-how-the-world-almost-went-to-blows-over-crap-d68482983514
  49. https://www.environmentandsociety.org/tools/keywords/guano-war-perus-chincha-islands
  50. https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/chincha-islands-war
  51. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/guano-and-the-opening-of-the-pacific-world/guano-age/26EFFD8DE83355B370D88C713E0EABFD
  52. https://climateandcapitalism.com/2021/12/20/guano-and-the-opening-of-the-pacific-world/
  53. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/us-empire-built-bird-dung
  54. https://www.caves.org/pub/journal/PDF/V60/V60N2-Frank-History.pdf
  55. https://www.audubon.org/magazine/waste-management-peruvian-style
  56. https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2020/05/07/protecting-and-managing-a-unique-resource-conserving-the-guano-islands-islets-and-capes-of-perus-coast
  57. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/perus-guano-coastal-birds-face-crisis-population-drops-over-75-scientists-say-2025-07-25/
  58. https://www.tridge.com/news/they-develop-a-plan-to-recover-guano-birds-a-zesldq
  59. https://www.nature.org/en-us/get-involved/how-to-help/places-we-protect/jornada-bat-caves-in-new-mexico/
  60. https://defenders.org/blog/2011/06/conservation-action-harvesting-bat-guano
  61. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/Rep-2014-002.pdf
  62. https://www.lcsun-news.com/story/news/2022/03/28/carlsbad-caverns-bat-guano-mining-history-revealed-explosive-mission-nm-new-mexico-blasting-caps/7133812001/
  63. https://worldheritagesite.org/connections/guano-mining/
  64. https://www.dev.batcon.org/pdfs/nmexico/MexicoCaveBatsENGLISHb.pdf
  65. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/ijs/vol27/iss1/4/
  66. https://www.cargohandbook.com/Guano
  67. https://fair888.en.made-in-china.com/product/anhrqPSvHpYZ/China-Cheap-Price-Rotary-Drum-Bat-Guano-Chicken-Manure-Dryer-Machine.html
  68. https://ringorganic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Ring-Organic-Bat-Guano-Processing-Flow-Chartv.v2.pdf
  69. https://farmonaut.com/blogs/bat-guano-fertilizer-risk-7-key-safety-facts
  70. https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/is/ffldrs/frep/pdfs/completedprojects/09-0582Horwath.pdf
  71. https://www.omri.org/sites/default/files/app_materials/16CanStanMan-pub-version4F.pdf
  72. https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/is/ffldrs/fertilizer.html
  73. https://www.gkvsociety.com/control/uploads/34560816.pdf
  74. https://journaljaeri.com/index.php/JAERI/article/view/648
  75. https://openaccesspub.org/agronomy-research/article/1535
  76. https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/7/728
  77. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386183422_Efficacy_of_Bat_Guano_as_a_Plant_Fertiliser_on_Growth_of_Fenugreek_Trigonella_foenum-graecum_L_in_Sustainable_Agriculture
  78. https://www.greenhousemegastore.com/products/true-organic-seabird-guano-6-12-0
  79. https://downtoearthfertilizer.com/products/single-ingredients/bat-guano/
  80. https://eos.com/blog/organic-vs-synthetic-fertilizers/
  81. https://www.organic-center.org/research/using-manure-improves-soil-health-compared-synthetic-fertilizer
  82. https://www.ijeas.org/download_data/IJEAS0808001.pdf
  83. https://juniperpublishers.com/gjpps/GJPPS.MS.ID.555804.php
  84. https://www.quora.com/How-do-modern-petrochemical-fertilizers-compare-to-bird-guano-in-terms-of-crop-yields
  85. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/saltpetre-mining.htm
  86. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/confederate-bat-guano-kiln-new-braunfels
  87. https://open.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3798&context=all_theses
  88. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-economic-history/article/guano-credible-commitments-and-sovereign-debt-repayment-in-nineteenthcentury-peru/8CEF0E4672A6F004E154F8874E6CEF7A
  89. https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-guano-market
  90. https://marketintelo.com/report/bat-guano-fertilizer-market
  91. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249293196_The_Most_Valuable_Birds_in_the_World_International_Conservation_Science_and_the_Revival_of_Peru%27s_Guano_Industry_1909-1965
  92. https://wildlifeleaders.org/sites/default/files/documents/Bat%2520Group%2520SE%2520Asia%2520Bat%2520Guano%2520Harvesting%2520Guidelines.pdf
  93. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/environmental-sciences/guano-renewable-resource
  94. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/939631570157039883/pdf/Peru-Strengthening-Sustainable-Management-of-the-Guano-Islands-Isles-and-Capes-National-Reserve-System-Project.pdf
  95. https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/ocrd/119846.pdf
  96. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1502549112
  97. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28307276/
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10952037/
  99. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-41030-6
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9324971/
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1560199/
  102. https://phys.org/news/2017-10-poop-reliable-source-climate.html
  103. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346061306_The_Life_Hidden_Inside_Caves_Ecological_and_Economic_Importance_of_Bat_Guano
  104. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00248-024-02483-z
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989422003535
  106. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277921008_Harvesting_the_guano_of_insectivorous_bats_is_it_sustainable
  107. https://www.yorkshire.com/news/guano-harvesting-peru-humboldt-penguins-conservation/
  108. https://trueorganic.earth/get-to-know-seabird-guano/
  109. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.929220/full
  110. https://www.aljazeera.com/video/risking-it-all/2019/6/11/perilous-jobs-in-peru
  111. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-18597-4
  112. https://hec.lrfoundation.org.uk/whats-on/stories/guano-the-perilous-cargo-of-flammable-and-noxious-fertiliser
  113. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0018-229X2013000100004
  114. https://www.cdc.gov/histoplasmosis/index.html
  115. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39691285/
  116. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/histoplasmosis/related-risks/index.html
  117. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.01802-22
  118. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/9/11/2236
  119. https://webapps.dol.gov/elaws/elg/msha.htm
  120. https://www.osha.gov/enforcement/directives/cpl-02-00-042-0
  121. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/histoplasmosis/prevention/elimination-and-engineering-controls.html
  122. https://www.cdc.gov/histoplasmosis/prevention/index.html
  123. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/histoplasmosis/prevention/personal-protective-equipment.html
  124. https://www.worksafebc.com/en/health-safety/injuries-diseases/infectious-diseases/types/histoplasmosis
  125. https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/safety-and-prevention/hazards/hazardous-exposures/biological-hazards/diseases-from-animals/work-with-bird-and-bat-droppings
  126. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/ijs/vol53/iss1/5/
  127. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/Bat_guano_isotope_systems_13C_15N_and_2H_integrate_environmental_climatic_and_ecological_signals/25970383
  128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252140571_Stable_carbon_and_hydrogen_isotopes_from_bat_guano_in_the_Grand_Canyon_USA_reveal_Younger_Dryas_and_82_ka_events
  129. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S003101821630757X
  130. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379124002129
  131. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10565863/
  132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618215014287
  133. https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geo2.11
  134. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-14488-5
  135. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/radiocarbon/article/protocol-for-radiocarbon-dating-tropical-subfossil-cave-guano/F7BC9DD94DAB4F27B816211E717552E8
  136. https://caves.org/pub/journal/PDF/v83/83_4_141.pdf
  137. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871101406000252
  138. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440304000251
  139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X21001590
  140. https://phys.org/news/2021-04-guano-archaeologists-ancient.html
  141. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440304000251
  142. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0162342
  143. https://environmentalmicrobiome.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40793-025-00782-7
  144. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12482572/
  145. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL112045
  146. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11068669/
  147. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11003676/
  148. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026265X23001042
  149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016123004016
  150. https://journals.indianapolis.iu.edu/index.php/ias/article/download/16659/16777
  151. https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1542&context=allfaculty-peerpub
  152. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23251042.2024.2425644
  153. https://read.dukeupress.edu/labor/article/20/3/6/381819/Contesting-Chinese-Contract-Labor-Yung-Wing-s
  154. https://oxfordre.com/latinamericanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.001.0001/acrefore-9780199366439-e-1023
  155. https://blog.pmpress.org/2023/04/07/the-cargo-rebellion-in-1852-on-way-to-guano-islands-400-indentured-chinese-workers-mutinied/
  156. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255997368_Discontented_scoundrels_who_crowd_the_mercantile_marine_today_Labour_relations_regimes_of_the_Cape_and_Ichaboe_guano_trade_c_1843_-_1898
  157. https://agencevu.com/en/serie/les-forcats-du-guano-au-perou-iles-chincha-2014/
  158. https://globalextractionnetworks.com/guano-and-indigeneity/
  159. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/price-of-empire/birds-and-bases/BAD3B594F11B6A3CFDDED54135835FAF
  160. https://roseannechambers.com/the-guano-rush-and-american-imperialism/
  161. https://johnbellamyfoster.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Foster-Clark-Ecological-Imperialism-Guano.pdf
  162. https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/guano-industry
  163. https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/dam-migration/primnm-guano-lesson-plan.pdf
  164. http://globalextractionnetworks.com/guano-and-indigeneity/
  165. https://paulshapiro.medium.com/when-synthetizing-nitrogen-saved-the-seabirds-fdca537ffe6e
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.