Hubbry Logo
LandscapeLandscapeMain
Open search
Landscape
Community hub
Landscape
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Landscape
Landscape
from Wikipedia
The Aletsch Glacier, the largest glacier in the Swiss Alps
Large fields of modern farmland, Dorset, England

A landscape is the visible features of an area of land, its landforms, and how they integrate with natural or human-made features, often considered in terms of their aesthetic appeal.[1] A landscape includes the physical elements of geophysically defined landforms such as mountains, hills, water bodies such as rivers, lakes, ponds and the sea, living elements of land cover including indigenous vegetation, human elements including different forms of land use, buildings, and structures, and transitory elements such as lighting and weather conditions. Combining both their physical origins and the cultural overlay of human presence, often created over millennia, landscapes reflect a living synthesis of people and place that is vital to local and national identity.

The character of a landscape helps define the self-image of the people who inhabit it and a sense of place that differentiates one region from other regions. It is the dynamic backdrop to people's lives. Landscape can be as varied as farmland, a landscape park or wilderness. The Earth has a vast range of landscapes including the icy landscapes of polar regions, mountainous landscapes, vast arid desert landscapes, islands, and coastal landscapes, densely forested or wooded landscapes including past boreal forests and tropical rainforests and agricultural landscapes of temperate and tropical regions. The activity of modifying the visible features of an area of land is referred to as landscaping.

Definition and etymology

[edit]
Autumn landscape in Rybiniszki, Latvia, watercolor by Stanisław Masłowski, 1902 (National Museum in Warsaw, Poland)
A typical Dutch landscape in South Holland

There are several definitions of what constitutes a landscape, depending on context.[2] In common usage however, a landscape refers either to all the visible features of an area of land (usually rural), often considered in terms of aesthetic appeal, or to a pictorial representation of an area of countryside, specifically within the genre of landscape painting. When people deliberately improve the aesthetic appearance of a piece of land—by changing contours and vegetation, etc.—it is said to have been landscaped,[1] though the result may not constitute a landscape according to some definitions.

Color landscapes blend artificial elements like buildings, roads, and pavements with natural features such as mountains, forests, plants, sky, and rivers. These compositions of distant and near views can significantly impact people's emotions. As urbanization rapidly advances, urban color landscape design has become essential for cities to differentiate and symbolize their unique character and atmosphere. However, this transformation has created challenges. First, the traditional color landscapes in some cities have been heavily influenced by natural geography, climate, local materials, ethnic culture, religion, and socioeconomic factors. Second, the growing problem of "color pollution" - through bright, solid-colored buildings, billboards, and lighting clusters - adversely affects people physically and psychologically. Third, homogenization of colors between cities is causing a loss of cultural identity, as many modern buildings share similar palettes, diluting local characteristics. Researchers have proposed more unified cityscape approaches to address these color landscape issues and help cities preserve their distinctive identities and create vibrant, emotionally engaging urban environments.[3]

The word landscape (landscipe or landscaef) arrived in England—and therefore into the English language—after the fifth century, following the arrival of the Anglo-Saxons; these terms referred to a system of human-made spaces on the land. The term landscape emerged around the turn of the sixteenth century to denote a painting whose primary subject matter was natural scenery.[4] Land (a word from Germanic origin) may be taken in its sense of something to which people belong (as in England being the land of the English).[5] The suffix -scape is equivalent to the more common English suffix -ship.[5] The roots of -ship are etymologically akin to Old English sceppan or scyppan, meaning to shape. The suffix -schaft is related to the verb schaffen, so that -ship and shape are also etymologically linked. The modern form of the word, with its connotations of scenery, appeared in the late sixteenth century when the term landschap was introduced by Dutch painters who used it to refer to paintings of inland natural or rural scenery. The word landscape, first recorded in 1598, was borrowed from a Dutch painters' term.[6] The popular conception of the landscape that is reflected in dictionaries conveys both a particular and a general meaning, the particular referring to an area of the Earth's surface and the general being that which can be seen by an observer. An example of this second usage can be found as early as 1662 in the Book of Common Prayer:

Could we but climb where Moses stood,
And view the landscape over.
(General Hymns, verse 536).[7]
Pre-Pyrenees and Pyrenees

There are several words that are frequently associated with the word landscape:

  • Scenery: The natural features of a landscape considered in terms of their appearance, esp. when picturesque: spectacular views of mountain scenery.[1]
  • Setting: In works of narrative (especially fictional), it includes the historical moment in time and geographic location in which a story takes place, and helps initiate the main backdrop and mood for a story.[8]
  • Picturesque: The word literally means "in the manner of a picture; fit to be made into a picture", and used as early as 1703 (Oxford English Dictionary), and derived from an Italian term pittoresco, "in the manner of a painter". Gilpin's Essay on Prints (1768) defined picturesque as "a term expressive of that peculiar kind of beauty, which is agreeable in a picture" (p. xii).
  • A view: "A sight or prospect of some landscape or extended scene; an extent or area covered by the eye from one point" (OED).
  • Wilderness: An uncultivated, uninhabited, and inhospitable region.[1] See also Natural landscape.
  • Cityscape (also townscape): The urban equivalent of a landscape. In the visual arts a cityscape (urban landscape) is an artistic representation, such as a painting, drawing, print or photograph, of the physical aspects of a city or urban area.
  • Seascape: A photograph, painting, or other work of art which depicts the sea, in other words an example of marine art.

Physical landscape

[edit]

Geomorphology: The physical evolution of landscape

[edit]

Geomorphology is the scientific study of the origin and evolution of topographic and bathymetric features created by physical or chemical processes operating at or near Earth's surface. Geomorphologists seek to understand why landscapes look the way they do, to understand landform history and dynamics and to predict changes through a combination of field observations, physical experiments and numerical modeling. Geomorphology is practiced within physical geography, geology, geodesy, engineering geology, archaeology and geotechnical engineering. This broad base of interests contributes to many research styles and interests within the field.[9]

The surface of Earth is modified by a combination of surface processes that sculpt landscapes, and geologic processes that cause tectonic uplift and subsidence, and shape the coastal geography. Surface processes comprise the action of water, wind, ice, fire, and living things on the surface of the Earth, along with chemical reactions that form soils and alter material properties, the stability and rate of change of topography under the force of gravity, and other factors, such as (in the very recent past) human alteration of the landscape. Many of these factors are strongly mediated by climate. Geologic processes include the uplift of mountain ranges, the growth of volcanoes, isostatic changes in land surface elevation (sometimes in response to surface processes), and the formation of deep sedimentary basins where the surface of Earth drops and is filled with material eroded from other parts of the landscape. The Earth surface and its topography therefore are an intersection of climatic, hydrologic, and biologic action with geologic processes.

List of different types of landscape

[edit]

Desert, Plain, Taiga, Tundra, Wetland, Mountain, Mountain range, Cliff, Coast, Littoral zone, Glacier, Polar regions of Earth, Shrubland, Forest, Rainforest, Woodland, Jungle, Moors, Steppe, Valley.

Panorama of the Chaîne des Puys from Puy de Dôme in winter. Massif Central, France. An example of how past volcanic activity shaped a landscape
A photograph of the White Mountains

Landscape ecology

[edit]

Landscape ecology is the science of studying and improving relationships between ecological processes in the environment and particular ecosystems. This is done within a variety of landscape scales, development spatial patterns, and organizational levels of research and policy.[10][11][12]

Landscape is a central concept in landscape ecology. It is, however, defined in quite different ways. For example:[13] Carl Troll conceives of landscape not as a mental construct but as an objectively given 'organic entity', a harmonic individuum of space.[14] Ernst Neef[15] defines landscapes as sections within the uninterrupted earth-wide interconnection of geofactors which are defined as such on the basis of their uniformity in terms of a specific land use, and are thus defined in an anthropocentric and relativistic way.

According to Richard Forman and Michael Godron,[16] a landscape is a heterogeneous land area composed of a cluster of interacting ecosystems that is repeated in similar form throughout, whereby they list woods, meadows, marshes and villages as examples of a landscape's ecosystems, and state that a landscape is an area at least a few kilometres wide. John A. Wiens[17] opposes the traditional view expounded by Carl Troll, Isaak S. Zonneveld, Zev Naveh, Richard T. T. Forman/Michel Godron and others that landscapes are arenas in which humans interact with their environments on a kilometre-wide scale; instead, he defines 'landscape'—regardless of scale—as "the template on which spatial patterns influence ecological processes".[18] Some define 'landscape' as an area containing two or more ecosystems in close proximity.[19]

Landscape science

[edit]

The discipline of landscape science has been described as "bring[ing] landscape ecology and urban ecology together with other disciplines and cross-disciplinary fields to identify patterns and understand social-ecological processes influencing landscape change".[20] A 2000 paper entitled "Geography and landscape science" states that "The whole of the disciplines involved in landscape research will be referred to as landscape science, although this term was used first in 1885 by the geographers Oppel and Troll".[21] A 2013 guest editorial defines landscape science as "research that seeks to understand the relationship between people and their environment, with a focus on land use change and data pertaining to land resources at the landscape scale".[22] The Great Soviet Encyclopedia of 1979 defines landscape science as "the branch of physical geography that deals with natural territorial complexes (or geographic complexes, geosystems) as structural parts of the earth's geographic mantle" and states that "The basis of landscape science is the theory that the geographic landscape is the primary element in the physicogeo-graphical differentiation of the earth. Landscape science deals with the origin, structure, and dynamics of landscapes, the laws of the development and arrangement of landscapes, and the transformation of landscapes by the economic activity of man.", and asserts that it was founded in Russia in the early 20th century by L. S. Berg and others, and outside Russia by the German S. Passarge.[23] The conception of landscape as the relationship between various components of natural environments and geochemistry was devoted by soviet scientist Viktor Sochava, based on the ideas of American geographer George Van Dyne.[24]

Integrated landscape management

[edit]

Integrated landscape management is a way of managing a landscape that brings together multiple stakeholders, who collaborate to integrate policy and practice for their different land use objectives, with the purpose of achieving sustainable landscapes.[25][26] It recognises that, for example, one river basin can supply water for towns and agriculture, timber and food crops for smallholders and industry, and habitat for biodiversity; the way in which each one of these sectors pursues its goals can have impacts on the others. The intention is to minimise conflict between these different land use objectives and ecosystem services.[26] This approach draws on landscape ecology, as well as many related fields that also seek to integrate different land uses and users, such as watershed management.[25]

Proponents of integrated landscape management argue that it is well-suited to address complex global challenges, such as those that are the focus of the Sustainable Development Goals.[27] Integrated landscape management is increasingly taken up at the national,[28][29] local[30] and international level, for example the UN Environment Programme states that "UNEP champions the landscape approach de facto as it embodies the main elements of integrated ecosystem management".

Landscape archaeology

[edit]
Medieval Ridge and Furrow above Wood Stanway, Gloucestershire, England.

Landscape archaeology or landscape history is the study of the way in which humanity has changed the physical appearance of the environment - both present and past. Landscape generally refers to both natural environments and environments constructed by human beings.[31] Natural landscapes are considered to be environments that have not been altered by humans in any shape or form.[32] Cultural landscapes, on the other hand, are environments that have been altered in some manner by people (including temporary structures and places, such as campsites, that are created by human beings).[33] Among archaeologists, the term landscape can refer to the meanings and alterations people mark onto their surroundings.[33][34] As such, landscape archaeology is often employed to study the human use of land over extensive periods of time.[34][35] Landscape archaeology can be summed up by Nicole Branton's statement:

"the landscapes in landscape archaeology may be as small as a single household or garden or as large as an empire", and "although resource exploitation, class, and power are frequent topics of landscape archaeology, landscape approaches are concerned with spatial, not necessarily ecological or economic, relationships. While similar to settlement archaeology and ecological archaeology, landscape approaches model places and spaces as dynamic participants in past behavior, not merely setting (affecting human action), or artifact (affected by human action)".[31]

Cultural landscape

[edit]
The Batad rice terraces, The Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras, the first site to be included in the UNESCO World Heritage List cultural landscape category in 1995.[36]

The concept of cultural landscapes can be found in the European tradition of landscape painting.[37] From the 16th century onwards, many European artists painted landscapes in favor of people, diminishing the people in their paintings to figures subsumed within broader, regionally specific landscapes.[38]

The geographer Otto Schlüter is credited with having first formally used "cultural landscape" as an academic term in the early 20th century.[39] In 1908, Schlüter argued that by defining geography as a Landschaftskunde (landscape science) this would give geography a logical subject matter shared by no other discipline.[39][40] He defined two forms of landscape: the Urlandschaft (transl. original landscape) or landscape that existed before major human induced changes and the Kulturlandschaft (transl. 'cultural landscape') a landscape created by human culture. The major task of geography was to trace the changes in these two landscapes.

It was Carl O. Sauer, a human geographer, who was probably the most influential in promoting and developing the idea of cultural landscapes.[41] Sauer was determined to stress the agency of culture as a force in shaping the visible features of the Earth's surface in delimited areas. Within his definition, the physical environment retains a central significance, as the medium with and through which human cultures act.[42] His classic definition of a 'cultural landscape' reads as follows:

The cultural landscape is fashioned from a natural landscape by a cultural group. Culture is the agent, the natural area is the medium, the cultural landscape is the result.

A cultural landscape, as defined by the World Heritage Committee, is the "cultural properties [that] represent the combined works of nature and of man."[43]

The World Heritage Committee identifies three categories of cultural landscape, ranging from (i) those landscapes most deliberately 'shaped' by people, through (ii) full range of 'combined' works, to (iii) those least evidently 'shaped' by people (yet highly valued). The three categories extracted from the Committee's Operational Guidelines, are as follows:[44]

  1. "A landscape designed and created intentionally by man";
  2. an "organically evolved landscape" which may be a "relict (or fossil) landscape" or a "continuing landscape"; and
  3. an "associative cultural landscape" which may be valued because of the "religious, artistic or cultural associations of the natural element".

Human conceptions and representations of landscape

[edit]

Landscape gardens

[edit]
Stourhead garden, Wiltshire, England
Jichang Garden in Wuxi (1506–1521)

The Chinese garden is a landscape garden style which has evolved over three thousand years. It includes both the vast gardens of the Chinese emperors and members of the Imperial Family, built for pleasure and to impress, and the more intimate gardens created by scholars, poets, former government officials, soldiers and merchants, made for reflection and escape from the outside world. They create an idealized miniature landscape, which is meant to express the harmony that should exist between man and nature.[45] A typical Chinese garden is enclosed by walls and includes one or more ponds, scholar's rocks, trees and flowers, and an assortment of halls and pavilions within the garden, connected by winding paths and zig-zag galleries. By moving from structure to structure, visitors can view a series of carefully composed scenes, unrolling like a scroll of landscape paintings.[46]

The English landscape garden, also called English landscape park or simply the 'English garden', is a style of parkland garden intended to look as though it might be a natural landscape, although it may be very extensively re-arranged. It emerged in England in the early 18th century, and spread across Europe, replacing the more formal, symmetrical jardin à la française of the 17th century as the principal style for large parks and gardens in Europe.[47] The English garden (and later French landscape garden) presented an idealized view of nature. It drew inspiration from paintings of landscapes by Claude Lorraine and Nicolas Poussin, and from the classic Chinese gardens of the East,[48] which had recently been described by European travellers and were realized in the Anglo-Chinese garden,[48] and the philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712 – 1778).

The English garden usually included a lake, sweeps of gently rolling lawns set against groves of trees, and recreations of classical temples, Gothic ruins, bridges, and other picturesque architecture, designed to recreate an idyllic pastoral landscape. The work of Lancelot "Capability" Brown and Humphry Repton was particularly influential. By the end of the 18th century the English garden was being imitated by the French landscape garden, and as far away as St. Petersburg, Russia, in Pavlovsk, the gardens of the future Emperor Paul. It also had a major influence on the form of the public parks and gardens which appeared around the world in the 19th century.[49]

Landscape architecture

[edit]
Central Park, New York City, US, designed by Frederick Law Olmsted.

Landscape architecture is a multi-disciplinary field, incorporating aspects of botany, horticulture, the fine arts, architecture, industrial design, geology and the earth sciences, environmental psychology, geography, and ecology. The activities of a landscape architect can range from the creation of public parks and parkways to site planning for campuses and corporate office parks, from the design of residential estates to the design of civil infrastructure and the management of large wilderness areas or reclamation of degraded landscapes such as mines or landfills. Landscape architects work on all types of structures and external space – large or small, urban, suburban and rural, and with "hard" (built) and "soft" (planted) materials, while paying attention to ecological sustainability.

For the period before 1800, the history of landscape gardening (later called landscape architecture) is largely that of master planning and garden design for manor houses, palaces and royal properties, religious complexes, and centers of government. An example is the extensive work by André Le Nôtre at Vaux-le-Vicomte and at the Palace of Versailles for King Louis XIV of France. The first person to write of making a landscape was Joseph Addison in 1712. The term landscape architecture was invented by Gilbert Laing Meason in 1828 and was first used as a professional title by Frederick Law Olmsted in 1863. During the latter 19th century, the term landscape architect became used by professional people who designed landscapes. Frederick Law Olmsted used the term 'landscape architecture' as a profession for the first time when designing Central Park, New York City, US. Here the combination of traditional landscape gardening and the emerging field of city planning gave landscape architecture its unique focus. This use of the term landscape architect became established after Frederick Law Olmsted Jr. and others founded the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) in 1899.

Landscape and literature

[edit]

The earliest landscape literature

[edit]
The Djabugay language group's mythical being, Damarri, transformed into a mountain range, is seen lying on his back above the Barron River Gorge, looking upwards to the skies, within north-east Australia's wet tropical forested landscape

Possibly the earliest landscape literature is found in Australian aboriginal myths (also known as Dreamtime or Dreaming stories, songlines, or Aboriginal oral literature), the stories traditionally performed by Aboriginal peoples[50] within each of the language groups across Australia. All such myths variously tell significant truths within each Aboriginal group's local landscape. They effectively layer the whole of the Australian continent's topography with cultural nuance and deeper meaning, and empower selected audiences with the accumulated wisdom and knowledge of Australian Aboriginal ancestors back to time immemorial.[51]

In the West pastoral poetry represent the earliest form of landscape literature, though this literary genre presents an idealized landscape peopled by shepherds and shepherdesses, and creates "an image of a peaceful uncorrupted existence; a kind of prelapsarian world".[52] The pastoral has its origins in the works of the Greek poet Theocritus (c. 316 - c. 260 BC). The Romantic period poet William Wordsworth created a modern, more realistic form of pastoral with Michael, A Pastoral Poem (1800).[53]

An early form of landscape poetry, Shanshui poetry, developed in China during the third and fourth centuries A.D.[54]

The Vale of Blackmore, the main setting for Thomas Hardy's novel Tess of the d'Urbervilles. Hambledon Hill towards Stourton Tower

Topographical poetry

[edit]

Topographical poetry is a genre of poetry that describes, and often praises, a landscape or place. John Denham's 1642 poem "Cooper's Hill" established the genre, which peaked in popularity in 18th-century England. Examples of topographical verse date, however, to the Late Classical period, and can be found throughout the Medieval era and during the Renaissance. Though the earliest examples come mostly from continental Europe, the topographical poetry in the tradition originating with Denham concerns itself with the classics, and many of the various types of topographical verse, such as river, ruin, or hilltop poems were established by the early 17th century.[55] Alexander Pope's "Windsor Forest" (1713) and John Dyer's "Grongar Hill' (1762) are two other familiar examples. George Crabbe, the Suffolk regional poet, also wrote topographical poems, as did William Wordsworth, of which Lines written a few miles above Tintern Abbey is an obvious example.[56] More recently, Matthew Arnold's "The Scholar Gipsy" (1853) praises the Oxfordshire countryside, and W. H. Auden's "In Praise of Limestone" (1948) uses a limestone landscape as an allegory.[57]

Subgenres of topographical poetry include the country house poem, written in 17th-century England to compliment a wealthy patron, and the prospect poem, describing the view from a distance or a temporal view into the future, with the sense of opportunity or expectation. When understood broadly as landscape poetry and when assessed from its establishment to the present, topographical poetry can take on many formal situations and types of places. Kenneth Baker, in his "Introduction to The Faber Book of Landscape Poetry, identifies 37 varieties and compiles poems from the 16th through the 20th centuries—from Edmund Spenser to Sylvia Plath—correspondent to each type, from "Walks and Surveys", to "Mountains, Hills, and the View from Above", to "Violation of Nature and the Landscape", to "Spirits and Ghosts."[58]

Common aesthetic registers of which topographical poetry makes use include pastoral imagery, the sublime, and the picturesque, which include images of rivers, ruins, moonlight, birdsong, and clouds, peasants, mountains, caves, and waterscapes.

Though describing a landscape or scenery, topographical poetry often, at least implicitly, addresses a political issue or the meaning of nationality in some way. The description of the landscape therefore becomes a poetic vehicle for a political message. For example, in John Denham's "Cooper's Hill", the speaker discusses the merits of the recently executed Charles I.[59]

The Romantic era in Britain

[edit]

The Vision on Mount Snowdon

.................................and on the shore
I found myself of a huge sea of mist,
Which meek and silent rested at my feet.
A hundred hills their dusky backs upheaved
All over this still ocean, and beyond,
Far, far beyond, the vapours shot themselves
In headlands, tongues, and promontory shapes, Into the sea, the real sea, that seemed
To dwindle and give up its majesty,
Usurped upon as far as sight could reach.

from The Prelude (1805), Book 13, lines 41-51.
by William Wordsworth

One important aspect of British Romanticism – evident in painting and literature as well as in politics and philosophy – was a change in the way people perceived and valued the landscape. In particular, after William Gilpin's Observations on the River Wye was published in 1770, the idea of the picturesque began to influence artists and viewers. Gilpin advocated approaching the landscape "by the rules of picturesque beauty,"[60] which emphasized contrast and variety. Edmund Burke's A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757) was also an influential text, as was Longinus' On the Sublime (early A.D., Greece), which was translated into English from the French in 1739. From the 18th century, a taste for the sublime in the natural landscape emerged alongside the idea of the sublime in language; that is elevated rhetoric or speech.[61] A topographical poem that influenced the Romantics, was James Thomson's The Seasons (1726–30).[62] The changing landscape, brought about by the industrial and agricultural revolutions, with the expansion of the city and depopulation of the countryside, was another influences on the growth of the Romantic movement in Britain. The poor condition of workers, the new class conflicts, and the pollution of the environment all led to a reaction against urbanism and industrialisation and a new emphasis on the beauty and value of nature and landscape.[63] However, it was also a revolt against aristocratic social and political norms of the Age of Enlightenment, as well a reaction against the scientific rationalisation of nature.[64]

The poet William Wordsworth was a major contributor to the literature of landscape,[65] as was his contemporary poet and novelist Walter Scott. Scott's influence was felt throughout Europe, as well as on major Victorian novelists in Britain, such as Emily Brontë, Mrs Gaskell, George Eliot, and Thomas Hardy, as well as John Cowper Powys in the 20th-century.[66][67] Margaret Drabble in A Writer's Britain suggests that Thomas Hardy "is perhaps the greatest writer of rural life and landscape" in English.[68]

Europe

[edit]

Among European writers influenced by Scott were Frenchmen Honoré de Balzac and Alexandre Dumas and Italian Alessandro Manzoni.[69] Manzoni's famous novel The Betrothed was inspired by Walter Scott's Ivanhoe.[70]

North America

[edit]

Also influenced by Romanticism's approach to landscape was the American novelist Fenimore Cooper, who was admired by Victor Hugo and Balzac and characterized as the "American Scott."[71]

China

[edit]

Landscape in Chinese poetry has often been closely tied to Chinese landscape painting, which developed much earlier than in the West. Many poems evoke specific paintings, and some are written in more empty areas of the scroll itself. Many painters also wrote poetry, especially in the scholar-official or literati tradition. Landscape images were present in the early Shijing and the Chuci, but in later poetry the emphasis changed, as in painting to the Shan shui (Chinese: 山水 lit. "mountain-water") style featuring wild mountains, rivers and lakes, rather than landscape as a setting for a human presence.[54] Shanshui poetry traditional Chinese: 山水詩; simplified Chinese: 山水诗 developed in China during the third and fourth centuries AD[54] and left most of the varied landscapes of China largely unrepresented. Shan shui painting and poetry shows imaginary landscapes, though with features typical of some parts of South China; they remain popular to the present day.

Fields and Gardens poetry (simplified Chinese: 田园诗; traditional Chinese: 田園詩; pinyin: tiányuán shī; Wade–Giles: t'ien-yuan-shih; lit. 'fields and gardens poetry'), in poetry was a contrasting poetic movement which lasted for centuries, with a focused on the nature found in gardens, in backyards, and in the cultivated countryside. Fields and Gardens poetry is one of many Classical Chinese poetry genres. One of the main practitioners of the Fields and Gardens poetry genre was Tao Yuanming (also known as Tao Qian (365–427), among other names or versions of names).[72] Tao Yuanming has been regarded as the first great poet associated with the Fields and Gardens poetry genre.[73]

Landscape art

[edit]
The Tetons and the Snake River (1942) photograph by Ansel Adams

Landscape photography

[edit]

Many landscape photographs show little or no human activity and are created in the pursuit of a pure, unsullied depiction of nature[74] devoid of human influence, instead featuring subjects such as strongly defined landforms, weather, and ambient light. As with most forms of art, the definition of a landscape photograph is broad, and may include urban settings, industrial areas, and nature photography. Notable landscape photographers include Ansel Adams, Galen Rowell, Edward Weston, Ben Heine, Mark Gray and Fred Judge.

Landscape painting

[edit]
Salomon van Ruisdael, "View of Deventer" (1657).

The earliest forms of art around the world depict little that could really be called landscape, although ground-lines and sometimes indications of mountains, trees or other natural features are included. The earliest "pure landscapes" with no human figures are frescos from Minoan Greece of around 1500 BCE.[75] Hunting scenes, especially those set in the enclosed vista of the reed beds of the Nile Delta from Ancient Egypt, can give a strong sense of place, but the emphasis is on individual plant forms and human and animal figures rather than the overall landscape setting. For a coherent depiction of a whole landscape, some rough system of perspective, or scaling for distance, is needed, and this seems from literary evidence to have first been developed in Ancient Greece in the Hellenistic period, although no large-scale examples survive. More ancient Roman landscapes survive, from the 1st century BCE onwards, especially frescos of landscapes decorating rooms that have been preserved at archaeological sites of Pompeii, Herculaneum and elsewhere, and mosaics.[76]

The Chinese ink painting tradition of shan shui ("mountain-water"), or "pure" landscape, in which the only sign of human life is usually a sage, or a glimpse of his hut, uses sophisticated landscape backgrounds to figure subjects, and landscape art of this period retains a classic and much-imitated status within the Chinese tradition.

Both the Roman and Chinese traditions typically show grand panoramas of imaginary landscapes, generally backed with a range of spectacular mountains – in China often with waterfalls and in Rome often including sea, lakes or rivers. These were frequently used to bridge the gap between a foreground scene with figures and a distant panoramic vista, a persistent problem for landscape artists.

A major contrast between landscape painting in the West and East Asia has been that while in the West until the 19th century it occupied a low position in the accepted hierarchy of genres, in East Asia the classic Chinese mountain-water ink painting was traditionally the most prestigious form of visual art. However, in the West, history painting came to require an extensive landscape background where appropriate, so the theory did not entirely work against the development of landscape painting – for several centuries landscapes were regularly promoted to the status of history painting by the addition of small figures to make a narrative scene, typically religious or mythological.

Dutch Golden Age painting of the 17th century saw the dramatic growth of landscape painting, in which many artists specialized, and the development of extremely subtle realist techniques for depicting light and weather. The popularity of landscapes in the Netherlands was in part a reflection of the virtual disappearance of religious painting in a Calvinist society, and the decline of religious painting in the 18th and 19th centuries all over Europe combined with Romanticism to give landscapes a much greater and more prestigious place in 19th-century art than they had assumed before.

In England, landscapes had initially been mostly backgrounds to portraits, typically suggesting the parks or estates of a landowner, though mostly painted in London by an artist who had never visited the site. The English tradition was founded by Anthony van Dyck and other, mostly Flemish, artists working in England. By the beginning of the 19th century the English artists with the highest modern reputations were mostly dedicated landscapists, showing the wide range of Romantic interpretations of the English landscape found in the works of John Constable, J. M. W. Turner and Samuel Palmer. However all these had difficulty establishing themselves in the contemporary art market, which still preferred history paintings and portraits.[77]

Thomas Cole "The Course of Empire The Arcadian or Pastoral State", US, 1836.
Laurent Guétal, Lac de l'Eychauda, France, 1886, Museum of Grenoble.

In Europe, as John Ruskin said,[78] and Sir Kenneth Clark confirmed, landscape painting was the "chief artistic creation of the nineteenth century", and "the dominant art", with the result that in the following period people were "apt to assume that the appreciation of natural beauty and the painting of landscape is a normal and enduring part of our spiritual activity"[79]

The Romantic movement intensified the existing interest in landscape art, and remote and wild landscapes, which had been one recurring element in earlier landscape art, now became more prominent. The German Caspar David Friedrich had a distinctive style, influenced by his Danish training. To this he added a quasi-mystical Romanticism. French painters were slower to develop landscape painting, but from about the 1830s Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot and other painters in the Barbizon School established a French landscape tradition that would become the most influential in Europe for a century, with the Impressionists and Post-Impressionists for the first time making landscape painting the main source of general stylistic innovation across all types of painting.

In the United States, the Hudson River School, prominent in the middle to late 19th century, is probably the best-known native development in landscape art. These painters created works of mammoth scale that attempted to capture the epic scope of the landscapes that inspired them. The work of Thomas Cole, the school's generally acknowledged founder, has much in common with the philosophical ideals of European landscape paintings — a kind of secular faith in the spiritual benefits to be gained from the contemplation of natural beauty. Some of the later Hudson River School artists, such as Albert Bierstadt, created less comforting works that placed a greater emphasis (with a great deal of Romantic exaggeration) on the raw, even terrifying power of nature. The best examples of Canadian landscape art can be found in the works of the Group of Seven, prominent in the 1920s.[80] Emily Carr was also closely associated with the Group of Seven, though was never an official member. Although certainly less dominant in the period after World War I, many significant artists still painted landscapes in the wide variety of styles exemplified by Neil Welliver, Alex Katz, Milton Avery, Peter Doig, Andrew Wyeth, David Hockney and Sidney Nolan.

The term neo-romanticism is applied in British art history, to a loosely affiliated school of landscape painting that emerged around 1930 and continued until the early 1950s.[81] These painters looked back to 19th-century artists such as William Blake and Samuel Palmer, but were also influenced by French cubist and post-cubist artists such as Pablo Picasso, André Masson, and Pavel Tchelitchew.[82][83] This movement was motivated in part as a response to the threat of invasion during World War II. Artists particularly associated with the initiation of this movement included Paul Nash, John Piper, Henry Moore, Ivon Hitchens, and especially Graham Sutherland. A younger generation included John Minton, Michael Ayrton, John Craxton, Keith Vaughan, Robert Colquhoun, and Robert MacBryde.[84]

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

A landscape comprises the visible features of an area of , including natural elements such as landforms, , soils, and bodies, alongside human-altered components like buildings, roads, and agricultural fields. The term originates from the Dutch landschap, denoting a or tract of , entering English usage around 1600 to describe both actual and pictorial representations thereof. In geographical and ecological contexts, landscapes are defined as heterogeneous spatial units where patterns of structure interact with processes like disturbance, migration, and resource flow, influencing and dynamics across scales.
Landscapes vary from untouched biomes like or to culturally shaped terrains such as terraced fields or urban parks, each reflecting the interplay of geological history, , and activity. Empirical studies emphasize their role in sustaining ecological functions, with driving processes like habitat connectivity and species dispersal. Defining characteristics include patch dynamics—discrete areas of uniform cover—and corridors that facilitate movement, both critical for resilience against environmental changes. In , landscape analysis prioritizes causal mechanisms, such as how affects water flow and , over simplistic narratives, revealing how interventions can enhance or degrade natural patterns.

Definition and Conceptual Foundations

Etymology and Historical Development

The English word "landscape" derives from the Dutch "landschap," meaning a region or tract of land, combining "land" and the suffix "-schap" equivalent to English "-ship." This term entered English around 1598–1600, initially as a painters' designation for depictions of natural scenery, reflecting its origins in the visual arts rather than geographical description. Earlier, Old English used "landsċipe" to denote a shaped tract of land, often agricultural, but the word fell into disuse until reintroduced via Dutch influence during the Renaissance. Historically, the concept of landscape crystallized in the 16th and 17th centuries through Dutch and Flemish , where "landschap" described paintings prioritizing expansive views of , , and over human figures, marking a shift from symbolic to observational representation. This artistic emergence paralleled the Dutch Golden Age's emphasis on empirical depiction of familiar environments, influencing European traditions; by the 1660s, English usage extended to actual scenery viewed pictorially. In , the term was adopted in the 18th–19th centuries to describe visible earth features shaped by geological and biological processes, evolving from aesthetic to analytical frameworks with contributions from figures like , who integrated landscape observation into systematic by 1807. By the early 20th century, the concept expanded to "," formalized by geographer in 1925 as the modified environment resulting from human occupancy, emphasizing material expressions of culture over abstract ideals. This development underscored causal interactions between physical forms and societal practices, distinguishing landscapes as dynamic outcomes of natural and anthropogenic forces rather than static vistas.

Core Definitions and Scope

A landscape constitutes the visible, material characteristics of a terrestrial area, encompassing landforms, water bodies, , soils, and human modifications perceptible from a given vantage point. This definition emphasizes empirical observation of spatial patterns and their causal interrelations, such as how tectonic uplift shapes mountain topography or sculpts valleys over geological timescales. Scholarly frames landscape as a holistic unit integrating physical elements—like relief, , and biota—with dynamic processes, distinguishing it from abstract or purely perceptual constructs. The scope of landscape extends beyond static description to include both natural formations driven by endogenous forces (e.g., volcanic activity forming basaltic plateaus) and anthropogenic alterations, such as terraced reshaping slopes for and productivity. In , it delineates bounded regions for analyzing ecological connectivity, where patch dynamics—interactions between habitat fragments—influence and resilience; for instance, fragmentation in forested landscapes correlates with reduced dispersal rates, as quantified in meta-analyses of habitat loss exceeding 20% thresholds. This interdisciplinary purview incorporates geomorphological , biotic assemblages, and socio-economic imprints, rejecting narrower aesthetic or subjective interpretations in favor of verifiable causal mechanisms. Landscape studies thus delimit analysis to scalable extents—from local micro-landscapes (e.g., a 1 km² wetland) to regional macro-landscapes (e.g., a 10,000 km² basin)—facilitating on processes like rates averaging 1-10 mm/year in temperate zones or vegetation succession following disturbances. Empirical scope prioritizes data from and field surveys, such as LiDAR-derived models revealing gradients influencing runoff, over ideologically filtered narratives. This approach underscores landscapes as empirical archives of planetary history, with scope bounded by and rather than unbounded cultural symbolism.

Physical and Natural Landscapes

Geomorphological Processes and Formation

Endogenic processes, driven by internal sources of energy such as and , generate the primary topographic relief that characterizes landscapes. These include tectonic uplift associated with plate convergence, , and transform motions, which elevate crustal blocks and initiate mountain-building . Volcanic activity contributes by extruding to form edifices like shield volcanoes or stratovolcanoes, altering local topography through accumulation of lava flows and pyroclastic deposits. Exogenic processes, powered primarily by solar radiation, , and , act to denude and reshape elevated terrains created by endogenic forces. initiates breakdown of through physical mechanisms like frost wedging in cold climates—where water expansion in cracks exerts pressures up to 30 MPa—or chemical reactions such as that dissolve silicates in humid environments. follows, transporting weathered material via agents including fluvial systems, which incise valleys at rates averaging 0.1–1 mm/year in temperate zones, glaciers that scour U-shaped valleys through basal sliding and plucking, and aeolian action that deflates dunes in arid regions. The formation of distinct landscape types emerges from the spatiotemporal interplay between uplift and denudation rates. In tectonically active settings, such as convergent margins where uplift exceeds —reaching 1–10 mm/year in the of —rugged, high-relief terrains persist with steep slopes and incised canyons. Conversely, in cratonic interiors with minimal uplift (<0.01 mm/year), prolonged exogenic dominance leads to pediplanation or development, flattening surfaces over millions of years as seen in parts of the African Shield. , including landslides triggered by seismic events or heavy rainfall, further modulates this balance by rapidly redistributing material downslope. Deposition concludes the geomorphic cycle by aggrading lowlands with eroded sediments, forming features like alluvial fans, deltas, and coastal plains. Fluvial deposition, for example, builds floodplains through overbank sedimentation during high-discharge events, with particle sizes decreasing downstream per Hjulström's curve. This cyclic progression—uplift, dissection, and infilling—explains landscape evolution timelines, such as the 5–10 million-year sculpting of the from initial uplift to present subdued forms via . modulates exogenic efficacy; hyper-arid zones favor slow chemical but rapid physical breakdown, while periglacial environments amplify frost action.

Classification and Types of Landscapes

Physical landscapes are classified primarily by their geomorphic features, which arise from interactions between tectonic activity, , deposition, and processes. These classifications emphasize assemblages, , and the dominant agents shaping the , such as fluvial, glacial, aeolian, or marine forces. Physiographic systems further divide landscapes into regions defined by , , rock type, and , independent of political boundaries, to map consistent patterns globally. Major types include mountains, hills, plateaus, and plains. Mountains feature high elevation, typically over 600 meters, with steep slopes and rugged relief resulting from tectonic uplift and subsequent ; examples include like the , formed by starting around 50 million years ago. Hills possess lower relief, generally under 600 meters, often as erosional remnants or volcanic features. Plateaus are elevated, relatively flat expanses, such as the , shaped by uplift with minimal , covering about 45% of Earth's land surface when including intermontane basins. Plains, encompassing vast low-relief areas like the , form through sedimentary deposition or planation by , occupying roughly 30-40% of continental surfaces. Classifications by dominant process yield additional types: fluvial landscapes, characterized by rivers carving valleys and depositing floodplains, as in the basin; glacial landscapes with U-shaped valleys, cirques, and moraines from ice movement, evident in regions like the where Pleistocene glaciations sculpted terrain; arid or aeolian landscapes featuring dunes, yardangs, and deflation hollows due to wind erosion in low-precipitation zones, such as the Sahara Desert spanning 9.2 million square kilometers; landscapes with sinkholes, caves, and poljes from dissolution of soluble rocks like ; and coastal landscapes including cliffs, beaches, and spits formed by wave and tidal action. Volcanic landscapes, marked by craters, lava flows, and calderas, emerge from magmatic activity, as at Hawaii's active shields. Biophysical integrations, such as classifications, link to and , delineating types like (permafrost-dominated lowlands above 60°N ), (coniferous forests on glaciated shields), temperate grasslands on stable plains, and tropical rainforests in humid equatorial lowlands. These systems, developed by organizations like the World Wildlife Fund, identify 867 terrestrial s based on distributions and physiographic continuity, though they incorporate ecological data beyond pure physical traits. Such categorizations facilitate understanding of landscape evolution, with tectonic stability in cratons preserving ancient forms while active margins produce dynamic mountain belts.

Landscape Ecology and Natural Dynamics

Landscape ecology examines the interactions between spatial patterns in landscapes and ecological processes, emphasizing how heterogeneity in influences , , and . This field integrates principles from , , and to analyze landscapes as dynamic mosaics of patches—nonlinear areas of relatively homogeneous environmental conditions—rather than uniform expanses. Core tenets include the recognition that landscape structure (composition and configuration of patches) affects function, with processes operating across multiple scales from local patches to regional extents. For instance, patch size and shape determine , where boundaries between types alter microclimates, species interactions, and disturbance propagation, often reducing interior quality in fragmented systems. Natural dynamics in landscapes are driven by recurrent disturbances such as wildfires, floods, and windstorms, which create and reshape patches, preventing monotonic succession toward a single climax state and maintaining heterogeneity. In fire-adapted systems like boreal forests, disturbances recur on intervals of 50–200 years depending on fuel accumulation and climate, resetting succession and promoting seral-stage diversity; for example, (Pinus banksiana) regenerates post-fire via serotinous cones, enhancing landscape resilience to repeated events. Succession follows these disturbances in predictable phases—initial by pioneers, followed by competitive exclusion and maturation—yet outcomes vary with site conditions, seed banks, and dispersal, as modeled in frameworks like the LANDIS simulation tool, which quantifies age-class distributions and biomass shifts over centuries. dynamics illustrate fluvial processes, where channel migration erodes and deposits sediments, generating successional gradients from bare gravel bars to mature riparian forests over decades, supporting high beta-diversity through habitat turnover. Connectivity emerges as a pivotal factor in natural dynamics, defined as the landscape's capacity to facilitate movement, , and resource transport between patches, countering isolation from fragmentation. In metapopulation theory, habitat connectivity sustains viable populations by enabling dispersal; empirical studies in grasslands show that corridor-like features increase pollinator movement by 20–50% compared to isolated patches, bolstering persistence amid disturbances. Conversely, low connectivity exacerbates extinction risks in dynamic landscapes, as seen in amphibian declines where matrix resistance (e.g., cropland barriers) halves effective dispersal distances. These processes underpin ecosystem services like , where patch dynamics regulate forest carbon stocks through disturbance-recovery cycles, with global models estimating that altered fire regimes could shift terrestrial sinks by 10–20% by 2100 under warming scenarios. thus underscores causal links between pattern and process, informing predictions of resilience without assuming static equilibria.

Human Interactions with Landscapes

Agricultural and Economic Utilization

Agricultural landscapes are primarily utilized for crop cultivation and grazing, encompassing approximately 4,781 million hectares globally in 2022, of which 1,573 million hectares were cropland and 3,208 million hectares permanent meadows and pastures. This represents about half of the world's habitable land, with over three-quarters dedicated to production despite its disproportionate resource demands relative to plant-based alternatives. Modifications such as terracing, as seen in the Batad rice terraces in the , enable cultivation on steep slopes by reducing and maximizing arable area, supporting intensive farming in regions with limited flat land. Economically, these landscapes underpin global and contribute roughly 4% to world GDP, with , , and value added reaching $4.0 trillion in 2023. , the sector and related industries added $1.537 trillion to GDP in 2023, accounting for 5.5% of the total, while farm assets were valued at $3.67 trillion. Practices like integrate trees with crops and pastures, enhancing , , and yields while providing additional timber and non-timber products, as in systems that combine livestock grazing with tree cultivation. Forested landscapes serve economic purposes through timber harvesting, fuelwood, and non-timber forest products, generating over $1.3 trillion annually and employing more than 33 million people worldwide. , including selective and , sustains these outputs while mitigating depletion risks, though in some regions has led to landscape degradation. Overall, agricultural and utilization drives rural economies, with historical techniques like medieval ridge-and-furrow plowing illustrating enduring adaptations to terrain for efficient drainage and .

Urbanization, Infrastructure, and Industrial Changes

Urbanization converts expansive natural terrains—such as forests, farmlands, and wetlands—into dense built environments dominated by , asphalt, and structures, fundamentally altering permeability, , and cover. This process has accelerated globally, with urban areas encompassing less than 3% of Earth's surface yet supporting over 50% of the as of 2019. Between 2000 and 2020, global urban built-up areas expanded by approximately 313,000 square kilometers, reflecting a pattern where land consumption rates exceeded , leading to sprawl that fragments habitats and reduces hotspots. In regions like and , rates have surged, converting up to 1-2% of regional annually in high-growth areas, often at the expense of prime agricultural soils and riparian zones. Infrastructure development, including highways, railways, dams, and power lines, imposes linear barriers across landscapes, dissecting contiguous habitats and redirecting water flows that sustain ecosystems. Roads alone, totaling over 60 million kilometers worldwide by 2020, generate extending hundreds of meters into adjacent wildlands, facilitating proliferation and elevating predator access to prey populations. Dams, such as the completed in 2006, submerge vast upstream areas—over 600 square kilometers in that case—while downstream they truncate sediment delivery essential for delta formation and fertility, exemplifying hydrological regime shifts with cascading ecological consequences. Railways and pipelines similarly disrupt migratory corridors; for example, transcontinental rail networks in have historically impeded wildlife movements, contributing to population declines in species like pronghorn antelope through barrier effects persisting into the . Industrial expansion overlays landscapes with extraction sites, factories, and waste impoundments, stripping vegetation and reshaping topography through and heavy machinery. In 19th-century Britain, coal extraction in areas like the Valley and coalfields denuded thousands of hectares, leaving scarred pits and slag heaps that persisted as derelict land for decades, with rates exceeding 100 tons per hectare annually in active zones. During , intensified munitions production across amplified these alterations, as forest clearances for factories and resource harvesting degraded watersheds and accelerated soil degradation across millions of hectares. Modern examples include mining in , where operations since the 1960s have cleared over 10,000 square kilometers of tropical woodland, creating bauxite dust plumes that inhibit regrowth and alter local microclimates for generations absent remediation. These changes often yield long-term infertility, as evidenced by elevated heavy metal concentrations in post-industrial soils, necessitating engineered reclamation to restore even partial functionality.

Cultural and Historical Landscape Modifications

Human societies have long modified natural landscapes to embody cultural, religious, and symbolic values, creating enduring features such as gardens, terraces, and earthworks that reflect societal ideals and technological capabilities. In ancient Persia, the developed enclosed paradise gardens (pairidaeza) around the , featuring symmetrical layouts with central water channels, fruit trees, and shaded pavilions to symbolize fertility and divine order, as exemplified by the gardens attributed to (r. 559–530 BC). These designs influenced subsequent Islamic and European garden traditions by integrating with to transform arid terrains into oases. In , formal garden designs reached monumental scale under at Versailles, where landscape architect began redesigning the grounds in 1661, expanding terraces, carving extensive parterres, and imposing radial axes across over 2,000 acres to project royal absolutism and control over nature. Le Nôtre's modifications included for fountains and groves, altering topography and hydrology to create a geometric imposition on the landscape that symbolized political power. By the , the movement reacted against such rigidity, favoring naturalistic scenes inspired by Claude Lorrain's paintings; designers like Lancelot "Capability" Brown (1716–1783) reshaped estates by relocating earth, planting clumps of trees, and constructing artificial lakes to evoke pastoral idylls, as seen in parks covering thousands of acres across Britain. Non-European examples include the rice terraces in the Philippine Cordilleras, engineered by indigenous communities starting around and spanning over 2,000 years of continuous modification, where steep mountainsides were carved into irrigated steps using stone walls and wooden canals, fostering communal rituals and spiritual ties to the land beyond mere . In medieval , the open-field system's ridge-and-furrow plowing, emerging post-Roman era and peaking from the 11th to 14th centuries, produced undulating field patterns with ridges up to 22 yards wide by turning soil outwards from central furrows, a of communal visible today in former arable areas and indicative of adaptive agrarian traditions. These modifications, often persisting due to low in grasslands, illustrate how historical practices embedded into the terrain. Such cultural interventions highlight causal links between belief systems, technological limits, and environmental adaptation, with empirical evidence from archaeological surveys confirming their scale—for instance, terraces covering 17,000 hectares—and longevity, though modern threats like depopulation underscore vulnerabilities absent in their formative contexts.

Landscape Management and Scientific Approaches

Integrated Management and Planning

Integrated landscape management (ILM) refers to a collaborative process that coordinates across sectors to balance ecological , economic productivity, and social needs within defined spatial units, typically encompassing watersheds, biomes, or administrative regions. This approach emphasizes adaptive strategies over rigid sectoral planning, drawing on empirical evidence that siloed management—such as isolated agricultural intensification or conservation—often leads to unintended consequences like or . For instance, a analysis outlined ten principles for ILM, including stakeholder participation, recognition of multiple scales, and continuous learning through monitoring, which have been applied to reconcile , conservation, and development goals. Core to ILM planning is the integration of biophysical data with socioeconomic factors via tools like geographic information systems (GIS) for and scenario modeling. Practitioners map ecosystem services, such as water regulation and soil retention, against human activities to identify trade-offs; for example, in river basin planning, GIS enables quantification of how upstream affects downstream flood risks, informing zoning that sustains yields while mitigating . Stakeholder platforms, often termed "landscape arenas," facilitate among farmers, governments, and NGOs, with brokers mediating conflicts to co-design interventions. Empirical evaluations indicate that such inclusive processes enhance resilience, as seen in projects where diversified land uses reduced to climate variability by 20-30% in targeted metrics like crop failure rates. Successful ILM frameworks prioritize measurable outcomes over ideological prescriptions, incorporating cycles: baseline assessments, intervention implementation, monitoring via indicators (e.g., vegetation cover indices from satellite data), and iterative adjustments. In , a 2020-2025 project integrated control with , using to restore 10,000 hectares of degraded land while boosting smallholder productivity through and techniques. Similarly, Mozambique's World Bank-supported portfolio since 2018 coordinates , , and across 1.5 million hectares, yielding documented increases in sustainable yields and reduced via joint patrols and benefit-sharing agreements. Challenges persist, however, including institutional silos and short-term funding horizons, which studies attribute to inadequate and power imbalances among stakeholders, underscoring the need for binding multi-stakeholder compacts. Monitoring in ILM relies on verifiable metrics, such as (NDVI) trends from Landsat imagery, to track progress against baselines; a 2020 review found that landscapes under ILM exhibited 15% higher resilience to droughts compared to conventional , based on longitudinal from 20 global sites. Policy integration involves aligning incentives, like payments for services, which empirical trials in have shown to increase by 5-10% when tied to verifiable compliance. Despite advocacy from bodies like the FAO and UNDP, real-world adoption lags due to gaps and resistance from vested interests, with meta-analyses revealing that only 40% of initiatives achieve sustained multi-objective gains without external enforcement.

Technological Tools and Recent Innovations

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) serve as core technological tools in landscape management, facilitating the , mapping, and modeling of terrain features, land cover changes, and ecological interactions to support decision-making in conservation and . , utilizing satellite and aerial imagery, enables large-scale monitoring of vegetation dynamics, , and by capturing multispectral data that reveals biophysical properties not visible to the naked eye. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, have revolutionized fine-scale landscape assessment through and integration, generating orthomosaics and digital elevation models with centimeter-level accuracy superior to traditional for detecting micro-topographic features and vegetation structure. For example, drone-based surveys have been applied to quantify terrace degradation in agricultural landscapes, combining UAV data with GIS to evaluate risks and inform restoration strategies in regions like northeastern . These tools bridge gaps between ground-level observations and broader coverage, enhancing precision in inventories and land-use change detection. Recent innovations from 2020 onward incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to automate the processing of vast remote sensing datasets, enabling predictive modeling of landscape patterns such as habitat connectivity and ecosystem service valuation. ML algorithms, for instance, classify land cover types and forecast fragmentation impacts with higher efficiency than manual methods, as demonstrated in analyses of global landscape shifts using datasets like HILDA+ from 1992 to 2020 extended into recent projections. In landscape architecture, AI-driven tools optimize design schemes by simulating environmental responses, with applications in urban green space planning that integrate climatic data for resilience against biodiversity loss. These advancements, while promising, require validation against empirical field data to mitigate biases in training datasets derived from unevenly sampled regions.

Governance, Policy, and Economic Valuation

Governance of landscapes involves multi-level frameworks that integrate , conservation, and to balance ecological integrity with human needs. At the international level, the European Landscape Convention, adopted by the in 2000 and ratified by over 40 countries, defines landscape as an area shaped by natural and human factors, emphasizing its protection, management, and planning as a shared responsibility across sectors. This convention promotes policies that consider landscapes in all territorial decisions, including urban and rural planning, without limiting focus to exceptional areas. Complementing this, the (CBD), through its Aichi Targets and post-2020 framework, encourages landscape-scale approaches for biodiversity conservation, as seen in integrated initiatives like those supported by the World Bank for resource management and economic growth in developing regions. National policies often operationalize these principles through specific legislation. In the European Union, the network, established under the Birds Directive (1979) and (1992), designates over 27,000 sites covering 18% of EU land to protect habitats and species, influencing landscape governance by requiring impact assessments for developments. The EU's Nature Restoration Law, adopted in 2024, mandates restoration of at least 20% of EU land and sea by 2030, targeting degraded ecosystems to enhance landscape resilience. In the United States, while lacking a unified landscape convention, the (1969) requires environmental impact statements for federal actions affecting landscapes, guiding land-use decisions in public domains like national forests. These policies reflect causal links between governance structures and outcomes, such as reduced , though implementation varies due to jurisdictional overlaps and enforcement challenges. Economic valuation quantifies landscapes' contributions beyond market commodities, informing policy by assigning monetary values to ecosystem services like , water regulation, and . Common methods include revealed preference techniques, such as hedonic pricing, which estimates values from property price variations linked to landscape features, and stated preference methods like , where surveys elicit willingness-to-pay for non-market benefits. For instance, agricultural landscapes provide multifunctionality, yielding private goods (e.g., crops) alongside public goods (e.g., ), with global valuations highlighting 's role; nature-based tourism generates billions annually, stabilizing rural economies in areas like regions where it offsets declining farm incomes. Value transfer methods adapt site-specific estimates to broader scales, aiding cost-benefit analyses for policies; a 2018 study mapped ecosystem services in Italian landscapes, revealing recreational values often exceeding agricultural output. Such valuations underscore landscapes' role in economic resilience, though critics note methodological limitations like subjectivity in stated preferences, necessitating empirical validation from diverse datasets.

Representations and Perceptions in Culture

Landscape in Art, Photography, and Media

originated as background elements in and Roman frescoes depicting gardens and natural scenes, with the earliest known Western example from the settlement of Akrotiri around 1600 BCE. In Eastern traditions, Chinese artists developed landscape as an independent genre by the 4th century CE, emphasizing harmony between humans and nature through ink monochrome styles often created by Buddhist monks. Western landscape gained autonomy during the in the 17th century, when economic prosperity from trade enabled artists like Salomon van Ruysdael to specialize in detailed depictions of flat terrains, rivers, and skies reflecting and Calvinist views of divine order in nature. The 19th century saw landscape art flourish in , prioritizing emotional responses to nature's grandeur, as in American works that celebrated wilderness as a symbol of national . This shifted toward realism and later, influencing modern abstract interpretations analyzed through compositional proportions in frameworks applied to historical canvases. Landscape photography emerged post-1839 invention of the , but matured in the with (1902–1984), whose black-and-white images of and employed the for precise tonal control, capturing dramatic contrasts to advocate environmental preservation. Adams' work, including iconic views like The Tetons and the Snake River (1942), elevated photography to while documenting threats to natural landscapes, aligning with his activism. In film and television, landscapes function beyond backdrops as narrative drivers, embodying isolation or vastness in genres like Westerns, where influences plot and character arcs, as analyzed in cinematic studies of spatial dynamics. Video games integrate for expansive, interactive landscapes, evolving from pixelated 8-bit in the to photorealistic open worlds in titles like The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild (2017), where shapes exploration and environmental storytelling. These digital representations contest traditional notions of fixed landscapes, treating them as dynamic spaces constructed in real-time viewing.

Landscape in Literature and Philosophical Thought

In literature, landscapes often function as active elements that shape narrative mood, character development, and thematic depth, particularly from historical perspectives where settings reflect human internal states and broader ideologies. Authors have utilized descriptive landscapes to encode cultural messages, as seen in analyses of American Western literature where terrain influences identity and conflict. Similarly, in English literature, rural and urban landscapes in works by and highlight geographic influences on social dynamics and personal fate. The Romantic period marked a pivotal shift, elevating natural landscapes to symbols of the sublime, evoking awe, terror, and emotional transcendence amid industrialization's encroachment. Writers like integrated scenery into poetry to convey nature's restorative power, portraying it as a counterforce to urban alienation and a catalyst for moral insight. This depiction emphasized dramatic elements such as mountains, storms, and vast vistas to mirror subjective human experiences, diverging from neoclassical order toward experiential immersion. Philosophically, landscapes have been interrogated through aesthetic lenses, contrasting objectivist paradigms—positing inherent environmental qualities as sources of value—with subjectivist ones prioritizing perceptual responses. Edmund Burke's 1757 Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful categorized rugged, obscure terrains as sublime, inducing pleasurable fear, while smoother vistas evoked beauty, influencing subsequent views on nature's psychological impact. In , reframed landscape not as passive scenery but as a relational mode of human dwelling, embedded in everyday practices and revealing being-in-the-world. Later thinkers like conceptualized landscape as a dynamic "taskscape," emerging from inhabited activities rather than static forms, challenging visual dominance in favor of embodied engagement. Such perspectives underscore causal links between perceptual habits, cultural practices, and environmental valuation, informing ethical considerations in landscape interpretation without presupposing universal moral prescriptions.

Controversies and Debates

Natural vs. Anthropogenic Dominance

The extent to which natural processes—such as geological , climatic variations, and —dominate landscapes compared to anthropogenic factors like , , and resource extraction remains a central debate in . Empirical mapping reveals that human modifications have affected the vast majority of Earth's ice-free land, with over 50% directly transformed and 83% showing some influence from activities including cropland expansion, pastoralism, and infrastructure development. Comprehensive global assessments, such as those by , estimate that 95% of terrestrial surfaces excluding exhibit human modification, with 84% impacted by multiple stressors like roads, buildings, and altered . These findings underscore a shift from natural dominance in pre-agricultural eras to widespread anthropogenic control, particularly in temperate and tropical regions where correlates with intensified . Historical analyses further challenge notions of pristine natural landscapes, demonstrating that many areas perceived as untouched have been shaped by activities for millennia. Archaeological syntheses indicate repeated interventions, including fire management by indigenous groups and early , have molded ecosystems across continents long before industrial eras, rendering truly baselines rare. For instance, European woodlands and North American prairies often maintain their current forms through ongoing practices like and selective harvesting, rather than autonomous ecological dynamics. Quantitative indices of impact, derived from satellite data and field surveys, show strong negative correlations between modification levels and intact proportions, with heavily altered zones comprising about 16% of land but exerting outsized effects on and . In contrast, remote polar and montane terrains retain greater dominance, where glacial and periglacial processes prevail over direct interference, though indirect influences like atmospheric persist. Proponents of natural dominance argue that approximately 50% of global land remains relatively low-impact, supporting viable native biomes where endogenous disturbances like wildfires and floods primarily dictate form and function. However, this view is contested by evidence of pervasive footprints even in ostensibly areas, including loading from fertilizers and introductions, which amplify anthropogenic signals over local natural variability. The debate informs , as overemphasizing natural baselines can overlook the adaptive resilience of anthropogenically shaped systems, while understating roles risks ineffective restoration efforts that fail to account for historical contingencies. Peer-reviewed syntheses emphasize that causal attribution requires disentangling synergistic effects, where natural events like droughts interact with human-induced changes to accelerate landscape shifts.

Preservation, Development, and Land Use Conflicts

Land use conflicts often stem from the competing priorities of maintaining landscapes for ecological preservation—such as , , and watershed protection—and converting them for development purposes including , , and resource extraction. Globally, has driven approximately 90% of forest cover changes between 2000 and 2018, primarily through conversion to cropland and pasture, which undermines preservation efforts aimed at halting loss. Permanent alone accounted for 35% of global loss from 2001 to 2022, exacerbating tensions in regions where commodity production, such as soy and ranching, clashes with designations. Despite some progress, net loss persisted at 4.7 million hectares annually from 2010 to 2020, with gross rates higher due to ongoing pressures from these activities. In protected areas, development pressures frequently manifest as encroachment by surrounding communities seeking economic opportunities, leading to direct conflicts over resource access. For instance, national parks in Ghana and Tanzania experience significant threats from poverty and high population densities in adjacent areas, resulting in illegal logging, poaching, and agricultural incursions that degrade core preservation zones. Similarly, in Indonesia, the human footprint—measured by infrastructure, population density, and land conversion—increased markedly around 43 terrestrial national parks between 2012 and 2017, driven by palm oil plantations and mining, which fragment habitats and challenge enforcement of preservation boundaries. These cases highlight how local development needs, often tied to subsistence or export-driven economies, conflict with international preservation goals, sometimes resulting in weakened park management or policy reversals. Urban and infrastructural expansion further intensifies land use disputes, particularly in developed regions where sprawl converts natural landscapes into fragmented developments. In the United States, dispersed suburban growth patterns have contributed to habitat loss and increased impervious surfaces, straining preservation initiatives by altering hydrological cycles and promoting invasive species proliferation. Such conflicts extend to economic valuations, where preservation restricts high-value uses like real estate or extractive industries; for example, farmland preservation programs in rural areas face opposition from developers citing rising land costs and urbanization trends, as seen in U.S. Department of Agriculture analyses of competing rural development versus conservation policies. Systematic reviews of land-use change conflicts underscore that commodity frontiers, including soy and timber zones, amplify these tensions, with outcomes depending on governance strength rather than preservation rhetoric alone. Effective resolution requires integrated planning that acknowledges causal drivers like population growth and market demands, rather than relying solely on expansion of protected areas amid persistent development imperatives.

Climate Impacts and Attribution Challenges

Climate change has been associated with various landscape alterations, including degradation in regions, where thawing has accelerated since the late , releasing stored carbon and equivalent to an estimated 1.5 billion tons of CO2 annually in recent decades. This process contributes to ground instability, lake formation, and altered , with observations from data and ground measurements indicating widespread active layer deepening by 10-20 cm per decade in parts of and . However, global vegetation trends show net rather than uniform degradation, with observations from 1982 to 2015 revealing a 14% increase in , primarily driven by CO2 fertilization enhancing in and forests, offsetting effects in some areas. Wildfire regimes in temperate landscapes have intensified in frequency and extent in regions like the , with burned area increasing by factors of 2-6 times since the mid-1980s, linked to warmer, drier conditions exacerbating fuel aridity. thaw and shifting patterns also influence and , as evidenced by increased riverine sediment loads in basins by up to 30% over the past three decades. migrations, such as poleward shifts in tree lines at rates of 1-2 meters per year in alpine regions, reflect temperature-driven responses, though empirical indicate less than half of documented range shifts align strictly with warming predictions. Attributing these changes specifically to anthropogenic forcing faces significant hurdles, as natural variability from oscillations like the and can mimic or amplify observed trends, complicating isolation of signals in short-term records. Detection-attribution frameworks require robust baselines, yet landscape data often suffer from sparse historical coverage, land-use confounders such as fire suppression increasing fuel loads, and model discrepancies in simulating non-linear feedbacks like vegetation-climate interactions. For instance, while some studies attribute 20-50% of recent wildfire increases to anthropogenic warming via fuel dryness, critics highlight over-reliance on equilibrium assumptions ignoring episodic natural droughts and policy-driven ignitions, with global burned area actually declining 25% since 1998 due to and fire management. CO2 fertilization's role in greening, responsible for up to 70% of observed enhancements, further challenges narratives of pervasive degradation, as it demonstrates beneficial physiological effects countering stress in many ecosystems. These attribution difficulties underscore the need for multi-driver analyses, as single-forcing claims risk overstating influence amid inherent climatic variability.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.