Hubbry Logo
WildlifeWildlifeMain
Open search
Wildlife
Community hub
Wildlife
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Wildlife
Wildlife
Wildlife
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A lion (Panthera leo)
A lion (Panthera leo). Lions are an example of charismatic megafauna, a group of wildlife species that are especially popular in human culture.

Wildlife refers to undomesticated animals and uncultivated plant species which can exist in their natural habitat, but has come to include all organisms that grow or live wild in an area without being introduced by humans. Wildlife was also synonymous to game, birds and mammals hunted for sport. Wildlife can be found in all ecosystems, both wild and most developed urban areas, forming distinct groups. While the term in popular culture usually refers to animals that are untouched by human existence, most scientists agree that much wildlife is affected by humans. Some wildlife threaten human safety, health, property and quality of life, but many wild animals have value to humans, whether economic, educational, or sentimental.

Humans have historically tended to separate civilization from wildlife in a number of ways, including the legal, social and moral senses. Some animals, however, have adapted to suburban environments. This includes urban wildlife such as feral cats, dogs, mice, and rats. Some religions declare certain animals to be sacred, and in modern times, concern for the natural environment has provoked activists to protest against the exploitation of wildlife for human benefit or entertainment.

The annual international trade may be worth billions of dollars and affects hundreds of millions of individual specimens. Global wildlife populations have decreased significantly, by 68% since 1970, as a result of human activity, with identified causes including overconsumption, population growth, and intensive farming. This is cited as evidence that humans have unleashed a sixth mass extinction event.

Definition

[edit]

Wildlife refers to undomesticated animals and uncultivated plant species which can exist in their natural habitat, but has come to include all organisms that grow or live wild in an area without being introduced by humans.[1] Wildlife was also synonymous to game, birds and mammals hunted for sport. Wildlife can be found in all ecosystems. Deserts, plains, grasslands, woodlands, forests, and other areas including the most developed urban areas, all have distinct forms of wildlife. While the term in popular culture usually refers to animals that are untouched by human behavior, most scientists agree that much wildlife is affected by it.[2]

Humans have historically tended to separate civilization from wildlife in a number of ways, including the legal, social and moral senses. Some animals, however, have adapted to suburban environments. This includes urban wildlife such as feral cats, dogs, mice, and rats. Some religions declare certain animals to be sacred, and in modern times, concern for the natural environment has provoked activists to protest against the exploitation of wildlife for human benefit or entertainment.

Different countries have various legal definitions.[3]

Interactions with humans

[edit]

Trade

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Wildlife trade.[edit]
Assorted seashells, coral, shark jaws and dried blowfish on sale in Greece
Framed butterflies, moths, beetles, bats, Emperor scorpions and tarantula spiders on sale in Rhodes, Greece

Wildlife trade refers to the exchange of products derived from non-domesticated animals or plants usually extracted from their natural environment or raised under controlled conditions. It can involve the trade of living or dead individuals, tissues such as skins, bones or meat, or other products. Legal wildlife trade is regulated by the United Nations' Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which currently has 184 member countries called Parties.[4] Illegal wildlife trade is widespread and constitutes one of the major illegal economic activities, comparable to the traffic of drugs and weapons.[5]

Wildlife trade is a serious conservation problem, has a negative effect on the viability of many wildlife populations and is one of the major threats to the survival of vertebrate species.[6] The illegal wildlife trade has been linked to the emergence and spread of new infectious diseases in humans, including emergent viruses.[7][8] Global initiatives like the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 15 have a target to end the illegal supply of wildlife.[9]

Despite various regional legal definitions for "wildlife",[3] according to CITES, the annual international wildlife trade is likely worth billions of dollars and affects hundreds of millions of individual animals and plants.[10]

For food

[edit]
A ground pangolin
A ground pangolin

Stone Age people and hunter-gatherers relied on wildlife, both plants and animals, for their food. In fact, some species may have been hunted to extinction by early human hunters. Today, hunting, fishing, and gathering wildlife is still a significant food source in some parts of the world. In other areas, hunting and non-commercial fishing are mainly seen as a sport or recreation. Meat sourced from wildlife that is not traditionally regarded as game is known as bushmeat. The increasing demand for wildlife as a source of traditional food in East Asia is decimating populations of sharks, primates, pangolins and other animals, which they believe have aphrodisiac properties.

Malaysia is home to a vast array of amazing wildlife. However, illegal hunting and trade poses a threat to Malaysia's natural diversity.

— Chris S. Shepherd[11]

Many Amazon species, including peccaries, agoutis, turtles, turtle eggs, anacondas, armadillos are sold primarily as food.

Media

[edit]
A Douglas squirrel (Tamiasciurus douglasii)
A Douglas squirrel (Tamiasciurus douglasii)
See also: Nature documentary

Wildlife has long been a common subject for educational television shows. National Geographic Society specials appeared on CBS since 1965, later moving to American Broadcasting Company and then Public Broadcasting Service. In 1963, NBC debuted Wild Kingdom, a popular program featuring zoologist Marlin Perkins as host. The BBC natural history unit in the United Kingdom was a similar pioneer, the first wildlife series LOOK presented by Sir Peter Scott, was a studio-based show, with filmed inserts. David Attenborough first made his appearance in this series, which was followed by the series Zoo Quest during which he and cameraman Charles Lagus went to many exotic places looking for and filming elusive wildlife—notably the Komodo dragon in Indonesia and lemurs in Madagascar.[12] Since 1984, the Discovery Channel and its spinoff Animal Planet in the US have dominated the market for shows about wildlife on cable television, while on Public Broadcasting Service the NATURE strand made by WNET-13 in New York and NOVA by WGBH in Boston are notable. Wildlife television is now a multimillion-dollar industry with specialist documentary film-makers in many countries including UK, US, New Zealand, Australia, Austria, Germany, Japan, and Canada.[citation needed] There are many magazines and websites which cover wildlife including National Wildlife, Birds & Blooms, Birding, wildlife.net, and Ranger Rick for children.

Religion

[edit]

Many animal species have spiritual significance in different cultures around the world, and they and their products may be used as sacred objects in religious rituals. For example, eagles, hawks and their feathers have great cultural and spiritual value to Native Americans as religious objects. In Hinduism the cow is regarded as sacred.[13]

Muslims conduct sacrifices on Eid al-Adha, to commemorate the sacrificial spirit of Ibrāhīm in Islam ( Arabic-Abraham) in love of God. Camels, sheep, goats may be offered as sacrifice during the three days of Eid.[14]

In Christianity the Bible has a variety of animal symbols, the Lamb is a famous title of Jesus. In the New Testament the Gospels Mark, Luke and John have animal symbols: "Mark is a lion, Luke is a bull and John is an eagle."[15]

Tourism

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Wildlife tourism.[edit]
Animals can be viewed in their native or similar environments, from vehicles or on foot. This elephant in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, was quite undisturbed by the people and vehicle.
Elephant-mounted safari to view one-horned rhinoceros in Chitwan National Park, Nepal

Wildlife tourism is an element of many nations' travel industry centered around observation and interaction with local animal and plant life in their natural habitats. While it can include eco- and animal-friendly tourism, safari hunting and similar high-intervention activities also fall under the umbrella of wildlife tourism. Wildlife tourism, in its simplest sense, is interacting with wild animals in their natural habitat, either actively (e.g. hunting/collection) or passively (e.g. watching/photography). Wildlife tourism is an important part of the tourism industries in many countries including many African and South American countries, Australia, India, Canada, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Maldives among many. It has experienced a dramatic and rapid growth in recent years worldwide and many elements are closely aligned to eco-tourism and sustainable tourism.

According to United Nations World Tourism Organization, with an annual growth about 3%, 7% of world tourism industry relates to wildlife tourism.[16] They also estimate that the growth is much more significant in places like UNESCO World Heritage Sites.[16] Wildlife tourism currently employs 22 million people worldwide directly or indirectly, and contributes more than $120 billion to global GDP.[17] As a multimillion-dollar international industry, wildlife tourism is often characterized by the offering of customized tour packages and safaris to allow close access to wildlife.

Suffering

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Wild animal suffering.[edit]
Juvenile red-tailed hawk eating a California vole

Wild animal suffering is suffering experienced by non-human animals living in the wild, outside of direct human control, due to natural processes. Its sources include disease, injury, parasitism, starvation, malnutrition, dehydration, weather conditions, natural disasters, killings by other animals, and psychological stress.[18][19] An extensive amount of natural suffering has been described as an unavoidable consequence of Darwinian evolution,[20] as well as the pervasiveness of reproductive strategies, which favor producing large numbers of offspring, with a low amount of parental care and of which only a small number survive to adulthood, the rest dying in painful ways, has led some to argue that suffering dominates happiness in nature.[18][21][22] Some estimates suggest that the total population of wild animals, excluding nematodes but including arthropods, may be vastly greater than the number of animals killed by humans each year. This figure is estimated to be between 1018 and 1021 individuals.[23]

The topic has historically been discussed in the context of the philosophy of religion as an instance of the problem of evil.[24] More recently, starting in the 19th century, a number of writers have considered the subject from a secular standpoint as a general moral issue, that humans might be able to help prevent.[25] There is considerable disagreement around taking such action, as many believe that human interventions in nature should not take place because of practicality,[26] valuing ecological preservation over the well-being and interests of individual animals,[27] considering any obligation to reduce wild animal suffering implied by animal rights to be absurd,[28] or viewing nature as an idyllic place where happiness is widespread.[21] Some argue that such interventions would be an example of human hubris, or playing God, and use examples of how human interventions, for other reasons, have unintentionally caused harm.[29] Others, including animal rights writers, have defended variants of a laissez-faire position, which argues that humans should not harm wild animals but that humans should not intervene to reduce natural harms that they experience.[30][31]

Advocates of such interventions argue that animal rights and welfare positions imply an obligation to help animals suffering in the wild due to natural processes. Some assert that refusing to help animals in situations where humans would consider it wrong not to help humans is an example of speciesism.[19] Others argue that humans intervene in nature constantly—sometimes in very substantial ways—for their own interests and to further environmentalist goals.[32] Human responsibility for enhancing existing natural harms has also been cited as a reason for intervention.[33] Some advocates argue that humans already successfully help animals in the wild, such as vaccinating and healing injured and sick animals, rescuing animals in fires and other natural disasters, feeding hungry animals, providing thirsty animals with water, and caring for orphaned animals.[34] They also assert that although wide-scale interventions may not be possible with our current level of understanding, they could become feasible in the future with improved knowledge and technologies.[35][36] For these reasons, they argue it is important to raise awareness about the issue of wild animal suffering, spread the idea that humans should help animals suffering in these situations, and encourage research into effective measures, which can be taken in the future to reduce the suffering of these individuals, without causing greater harms.[21][32]

Loss and extinction

[edit]
See also: Biodiversity loss
World map of prehistoric human migrations
Map of early human migrations according to mitochondrial population genetics (millennia BP)

This subsection focuses on anthropogenic forms of wildlife destruction. The loss of animals from ecological communities is also known as defaunation.[37]

Exploitation of wild populations has been a characteristic of humanity since its exodus from Africa 130,000–70,000 years ago. The rate of extinctions of entire species of plants and animals across the planet has been so high in the last few hundred years that it is widely believed that a sixth mass extinction event is currently ongoing.[38][39][40][41] The 2019 Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, published by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, says that roughly one million species of plants and animals face extinction within decades as the result of human actions.[42][43] Subsequent studies have discovered that the destruction of wildlife is "significantly more alarming" than previously believed, with some 48% of 70,000 monitored animal species experiencing population declines as the result of human industrialization.[44][45] According to a 2023 study published in PNAS, "immediate political, economic, and social efforts of an unprecedented scale are essential if we are to prevent these extinctions and their societal impacts."[46][47]

Global wildlife populations have decreased significantly by 68% since 1970 as a result of human activity, particularly overconsumption, population growth, and intensive farming, according to a 2020 World Wildlife Fund's Living Planet Report and the Zoological Society of London's Living Planet Index measure, which is further evidence that humans have unleashed a sixth mass extinction event.[48][49]

The four most general reasons that lead to destruction of wildlife include overkill, habitat destruction and fragmentation, impact of introduced species and chains of extinction.[50]

Overkill

[edit]

Overkill happens whenever hunting occurs at rates greater than the reproductive capacity of the population is being exploited. The effects of this are often noticed much more dramatically in slow-growing populations such as many larger species of fish. Initially when a portion of a wild population is hunted, an increased availability of resources (food, etc.) is experienced increasing growth and reproduction as density dependent inhibition is lowered. Hunting, fishing and so on, have lowered the competition between members of a population. However, if this hunting continues at rate greater than the rate at which new members of the population can reach breeding age and produce more young, the population will begin to decrease in numbers.[51]

Populations that are confined to islands, whether literal islands or just areas of habitat that are effectively an "island" for the species concerned, have also been observed to be at greater risk of dramatic population rise of deaths declines following unsustainable hunting.

Habitat destruction and fragmentation

[edit]
Main articles: Habitat destruction and Habitat fragmentation
Amazon Rainforest deforestation
Deforestation and increased road-building in the Amazon Rainforest are a significant concern because of increased human encroachment upon wild areas, increased resource extraction and further threats to biodiversity.

The habitat of any given species is considered its preferred area or territory. Many processes associated with human habitation of an area cause loss of this area and decrease the carrying capacity of the land for that species. In many cases these changes in land use cause a patchy break-up of the wild landscape. Agricultural land frequently displays this type of extremely fragmented, or relictual habitat. Farms sprawl across the landscape with patches of uncleared woodland or forest dotted in-between occasional paddocks.

Examples of habitat destruction include grazing of bushland by farmed animals, changes to natural fire regimes, forest clearing for timber production and wetland draining for city expansion. This is particularly challenging since wild animals cannot drink tap water, which means they cannot autonomously survive in those habitats where there is no surface water access.

Impact of introduced species

[edit]
Main article: Introduced species
See also: Invasive species

Mice, cats, rabbits, dandelions and poison ivy are all examples of species that have become invasive threats to wild species in various parts of the world. Frequently species that are uncommon in their home range become out-of-control invasions in distant but similar climates. The reasons for this have not always been clear and Charles Darwin felt it was unlikely that exotic species would ever be able to grow abundantly in a place in which they had not evolved. The reality is that the vast majority of species exposed to a new habitat do not reproduce successfully. Occasionally, however, some populations do take hold and after a period of acclimation can increase in numbers significantly, having destructive effects on many elements of the native environment of which they have become part.

Chains of extinction

[edit]

This final group is one of secondary effects. All wild populations of living things have many complex intertwining links with other living things around them. Large herbivorous animals such as the hippopotamus have populations of insectivorous birds that feed off the many parasitic insects that grow on the hippo. Should the hippo die out, so too will these groups of birds, leading to further destruction as other species dependent on the birds are affected. Also referred to as a domino effect, this series of chain reactions is by far the most destructive process that can occur in any ecological community.

Another example is the black drongos and the cattle egrets found in India. These birds feed on insects on the back of cattle, which helps to keep them disease-free. Destroying the nesting habitats of these birds would cause a decrease in the cattle population because of the spread of insect-borne diseases.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Wildlife

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
![A lion PantheraleoPanthera leo](./assets/Wildlife_at_Maasai_Mara_LionLion
Wildlife consists of undomesticated animals, , fungi, and other organisms that exist independently of human cultivation, primarily in habitats where they form integral components of ecosystems. This collective encompasses vertebrates such as mammals and birds, alongside , , and microorganisms, all interacting through predator-prey dynamics, , and nutrient cycling to sustain . Wildlife's defining characteristics include adaptive behaviors honed by , population fluctuations driven by environmental pressures, and roles in , such as and soil aeration. Biodiversity within wildlife systems underpins , including that supports more than 75% of global food crops and contributes substantially to agricultural output. Earth's wildlife diversity, estimated at around 8.7 million , concentrates in hotspots like rainforests and coral reefs, fostering that enhances resilience against perturbations. Notable examples include apex predators like lions regulating populations, preventing and maintaining vegetation structure. Since 1970, however, monitored wildlife populations have declined sharply on average, reflecting disruptions from anthropogenic expansion. Empirical assessments identify as the predominant threat, impacting 88.3% of with available threat data, primarily through land conversion for and that fragments ecosystems and reduces . , affecting 26.6% of such via and , compounds this, as does and introduction, with over 77% of terrestrial land altered by human activity. Approximately 1 million face risk, driven by these causal factors rather than isolated climatic shifts, underscoring the primacy of direct encroachment in erosion. Conservation efforts, informed by population modeling and establishment, have yielded successes in select cases, such as recovering certain populations, yet systemic pressures persist amid ongoing human demographic growth.

Definition and Scope

Core Definition

Wildlife refers to undomesticated animals that live and reproduce independently of direct management in natural or semi-natural habitats, encompassing such as mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, , and select that have not been selectively bred for human use. This excludes domesticated , defined as genetically adapted through millennia of human-directed to thrive in association with people, including dogs ( familiaris), cats ( catus), ( taurus), and (Equus caballus), which exhibit traits like reduced flight responses and dependence on human-provided resources. In and , the term primarily emphasizes free-ranging animal populations whose behaviors, distributions, and survival are governed by natural ecological processes rather than artificial selection or confinement. While some definitions extend wildlife to include undomesticated , fungi, or microorganisms existing without cultivation, usage in conventionally prioritizes animals, particularly vertebrates, due to their visibility, mobility, and direct interactions with activities. The boundary between wildlife and non-wildlife hinges on domestication status, with feral populations—escaped or released descendants of domesticated animals, such as wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in —often classified separately as they retain domesticated genetic traits but adapt to wild conditions. This distinction informs legal and conservation frameworks, where wildlife is subject to protections aimed at preserving natural evolutionary lineages rather than managed breeds. Wildlife lacks a formal taxonomic rank in biological classification systems, which organize organisms hierarchically from domain to species based on shared evolutionary ancestry. Instead, it functionally denotes undomesticated animals—species and populations within the kingdom Animalia that persist in natural or semi-natural habitats without reliance on human provisioning or selective breeding. This boundary excludes domesticated taxa, such as the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) or cattle (Bos taurus), which exhibit genetic adaptations like reduced flight responses and altered morphology resulting from millennia of human-directed evolution. Wildlife thus includes diverse phyla, primarily Chordata (encompassing mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish) and certain invertebrates (e.g., arthropods and mollusks), though practical focus often prioritizes vertebrates due to their visibility and ecological roles in hunting and conservation data. Microorganisms, fungi, and most plants fall outside core wildlife designations, treated instead as microbiota or wild flora, despite occasional broader usage in ecological discussions. Legal boundaries of wildlife are jurisdiction-specific, crafted to enforce conservation, trade, and land-use policies, often aligning with but extending beyond taxonomic concepts. In the United States, the specifies "fish or wildlife" as any wild animal—alive or dead—including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, mollusks, crustaceans, and other , explicitly excluding domestic species but incorporating parts, eggs, and offspring. This definition underpins statutes like the , which protects native wild at risk of . Internationally, the , adopted in 1973 and binding on 184 parties as of 2024, regulates commerce in specimens from listed wild animals and plants, defining "specimens" to include live individuals, readily recognizable parts or derivatives (e.g., , skins), thereby encompassing both and to prevent . These legal frameworks establish practical boundaries by listing species (e.g., Appendices I-III, prohibiting commercial trade in over 1,000 animal and 500 plant species as of 2023) and distinguishing wild from captive-bred or populations based on phenotypic traits and . animals, descended from escapees (e.g., mustangs in ), may qualify as wildlife if self-sustaining in wild conditions, though management varies—protected in some contexts, culled as invasives in others. Jurisdictional differences persist; for example, the European Union's Birds Directive (2009/147/EC) safeguards all naturally occurring wild bird species, while some national laws limit wildlife to game animals harvestable under quotas, reflecting utilitarian rather than purely biological criteria.

Biological and Ecological Foundations

Evolutionary Origins

The evolutionary origins of wildlife, encompassing undomesticated animals within the Metazoa, lie in the development of multicellularity from eukaryotic precursors. Single-celled eukaryotes emerged around 1.8 to 2 billion years ago, with molecular evidence indicating the last common ancestor of and fungi (Opisthokonta) diverging approximately 1 billion years ago. Multicellularity evolved independently in various lineages by about 1 billion years ago, but the metazoan lineage specifically gave rise to animals through innovations such as proteins and developmental regulatory networks like , enabling tissue differentiation and body plan complexity. Molecular clock estimates place the origin of crown-group Metazoa between 613 and 593 million years ago in the mid- period, with basal lineages like sponges (Porifera) potentially predating this based on lipid biomarkers (steranes) preserved in rocks over 640 million years old, suggesting demosponge-grade organisms occupied ancient seafloors. The fossil record substantiates this with the biota from 575 to 541 million years ago, featuring soft-bodied, macroscopic forms such as rangeomorphs and , some interpreted as early metazoans including possible stem-group cnidarians or bilaterians, though their exact phylogenetic placement remains debated due to enigmatic morphologies lacking clear bilaterian traits. These organisms thrived in marine benthic environments, reflecting initial ecological roles in mat-ground communities before widespread metazoan radiation. The , spanning roughly 541 to 530 million years ago, marked the abrupt diversification of metazoan phyla, with over 20 major groups—including arthropods, annelids, echinoderms, and early chordates—appearing in the fossil record alongside biomineralized hard parts like exoskeletons and shells. This event, evidenced in lagerstätten such as the Chengjiang and deposits, coincided with rising oxygen levels, enhanced nutrient cycling from glaciations' aftermath, and evolutionary arms races involving predation and motility, driving ecological tiering and complexity. While some analyses suggest a more protracted prelude extending 20-40 million years prior, the core explosion reflects accelerated morphological disparity rather than total origination, setting the stage for animal dominance.

Ecosystem Functions and Services

Wildlife species, encompassing undomesticated animals, underpin key ecosystem functions by regulating trophic structures, facilitating nutrient cycling, and promoting biodiversity maintenance. Predators exert top-down control on herbivore populations, mitigating overgrazing and fostering vegetation recovery, as evidenced in systems where large carnivores stabilize food webs. Herbivores accelerate nutrient turnover by consuming and redistributing plant biomass, enhancing soil fertility in arid and temperate biomes where microbial decomposition is limited. Scavengers and detritivores further contribute by breaking down carrion and waste, recycling organic matter and reducing disease transmission risks within populations. These functions translate into ecosystem services that support human well-being, including regulating services like via natural predation and by wild and birds, which sustain agricultural yields. by frugivorous animals ensures forest regeneration and , bolstering resilience against disturbances such as or . Provisioning services from wildlife include wild-harvested foods and medicinal resources, while cultural services encompass recreational opportunities like wildlife viewing, which generate economic value through without direct extraction. Globally, biodiversity-dependent services, including those reliant on wildlife interactions, underpin economic activities valued at trillions annually, though precise attribution to animal contributions remains challenging due to interconnected processes. Disruptions to wildlife populations, such as through poaching or habitat loss, impair these services; for instance, declines in large herbivores diminish nutrient cycling efficiency, altering carbon sequestration dynamics. Restoration efforts, including trophic rewilding, demonstrate potential to reinstate these functions, as reintroduced megafauna enhance biotic interactions and ecosystem productivity. Empirical studies emphasize that functional diversity among wildlife species, rather than species richness alone, drives service delivery, highlighting the need for conserving keystone taxa like apex predators and migratory species.

Biodiversity and Global Distribution

Patterns of Diversity

Wildlife diversity exhibits a pronounced latitudinal , characterized by increasing from the poles toward the , a pattern observed across terrestrial and marine animal taxa including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, insects, and . This manifests in higher numbers of in tropical regions, where environmental conditions support greater proliferation, contrasting with sparser assemblages at higher latitudes. For terrestrial vertebrates, tropical forests alone encompass 62% of global (21,092 documented) while covering just 18% of land area. Among mammals, tropical zones dominate, with rates higher and rates lower compared to temperate areas, resulting in roughly twice the in equatorial versus polar or temperate bands. records 777 species and 776, both exceeding counts in higher-latitude nations like (710 species), underscoring the tropical peak. Birds display a parallel trend, with functional and phylogeographic diversity correlating positively with proximity to the and declining poleward. , comprising the bulk of animal diversity, amplify this gradient, as tropical ecosystems sustain elevated richness and abundance relative to polar regions, where niche availability limits proliferation. Marine wildlife patterns mirror terrestrial ones, with species richness for 13 major groups—from zooplankton to marine mammals—peaking equatorially, though modulated by bathymetric and habitat factors like unimodal diversity-depth relationships in deep-sea invertebrates and fishes. Exceptions occur, such as certain warm-blooded marine mammals achieving viability in polar waters despite the overall decline, but the equatorial concentration remains dominant. Across realms, these spatial distributions highlight tropics as primary reservoirs of animal diversity, with temperate and polar zones featuring fewer, often more specialized species.

Geographic Hotspots and Endemism

Biodiversity hotspots represent geographic regions with exceptionally high concentrations of wildlife and , where a significant proportion of taxa, including , are unique to those areas due to isolation-driven and heterogeneity. These hotspots correlate strongly with plant-based criteria established by , requiring at least 1,500 endemic species and 70% loss of primary , yet they encompass 35% of global land species, with elevated endemic animal diversity in taxa like amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Covering under 3% of Earth's terrestrial surface, the 36 recognized hotspots sustain nearly 60% of terrestrial endemics, underscoring their role as irreplaceable reservoirs for global faunal diversity. Endemism in wildlife arises primarily from biogeographic barriers such as oceanic isolation, elevational gradients, and climatic refugia, which restrict and promote ; empirical analyses reveal that island regions exhibit 8.1 times greater endemism richness than continental areas, harboring 23.2% of all global vertebrate endemics across a fraction of the landmass. Montane and tropical zones further amplify this pattern, with high and stable paleoclimates correlating to elevated rates in groups like amphibians (up to 80% endemism in Andean hotspots) and , where endemism gradients increase southward, reflecting historical stability in southern latitudes. Mainland hotspots like the host over 1,700 endemic , including the highest avian endemics (more than 1,500 , ~600 endemic), driven by orographic and microhabitat variation. Island archipelagos exemplify extreme , as in , where 90-95% of native mammals, birds, and reptiles are endemic, resulting from 88 million years of separation from and subsequent radiations in lemurs (over 100 species, all endemic) and (nearly 300 species, ~70% endemic). Similarly, the region and hotspot feature high faunal uniqueness, with alone supporting 222 endemic mammals and 730 birds as of 2020 assessments. These patterns persist despite data limitations in under-surveyed , where empirical richness estimates from IUCN databases confirm hotspots' outsized contribution to global vertebrate uniqueness.
Hotspot RegionKey Endemic Wildlife ExamplesEstimated Vertebrate Endemics
Tropical AndesSpectacled bear, poison dart frogs>1,700 total
Madagascar and Indian Ocean IslandsLemurs, fossa, 90%+ native vertebrates~500 mammals/birds/reptiles
Indo-BurmaSaola, Indochinese tiger subspecies222 mammals, 730 birds
Such concentrations highlight causal links between geographic isolation and evolutionary novelty, informing prioritization for faunal preservation amid ongoing .

Human-Wildlife Interactions

Resource Utilization and Harvesting

Humans harvest wildlife for food, materials, medicines, and other products, encompassing both subsistence practices and commercial operations. Subsistence harvesting, such as consumption, provides protein in rural areas of , where approximately 4.5 to 4.9 million tonnes are extracted annually from around 500 species. In Asia and the Pacific, wild meat persists as a biodiversity threat, often involving , ungulates, and birds for local markets. Commercial utilization includes hides, furs, and trophies from regulated hunts, as well as live animals for pets and breeding. Legal wildlife trade under frameworks like involves over 21,000 and more than 2.85 billion individuals traded from 2000 to 2022, with direct animal exports valued at an average of USD 1.8 billion annually. Regulated harvesting, such as sport hunting, employs quotas to maintain populations; for African elephants, sustainable quotas are set at about 5% of the hunted subpopulation, funding conservation in range countries. In the United States, managed deer hunts control overabundant populations, with millions harvested yearly under state licenses to prevent habitat damage. Illegal harvesting and trade, however, undermine these efforts, valued between USD 7 and 23 billion annually and involving seizures of nearly 6,000 fauna and flora species from 1999 to 2018 across most countries. Poaching targets high-value species like (over 20,000 killed yearly for ) and rhinos (586 in 2023), driven by demand for traditional medicines and status symbols, with data showing persistent trafficking trends into 2024. Enforcement challenges persist, as illegal activities often exceed legal volumes by 10% or more in monitored markets.

Cultural, Recreational, and Economic Roles

Wildlife has featured prominently in human cultural narratives, often embodying spiritual, symbolic, or totemic significance across societies. In many Indigenous cultures, animals serve as deities or ancestral intermediaries; for instance, certain Amazonian groups view the pink dolphin (Inia geoffrensis) as a mythical entity in tied to riverine ecosystems and human origins. Similarly, in various animist traditions, wildlife is attributed cultural agency, influencing rituals and worldview formation through observed behaviors rather than anthropomorphic projection. These representations extend to and mythology, where predators like eagles or lions symbolize power and sovereignty, as evidenced in ancient Egyptian depictions of wild linked to divine protection, predating widespread . Recreational engagement with wildlife encompasses non-consumptive activities such as and , which dominate participation rates. In the United States, the 2022 National Survey reported 146.5 million individuals engaging in wildlife viewing at home and 73 million traveling for it, including by 96 million people aged 16 and older—representing 37% of that demographic and contributing $250 billion to the through expenditures on , , and fees. Globally, wildlife watching outpaces , with 57.2% of U.S. adults over 16 participating in observation-based pursuits compared to 5.5% in , reflecting a preference for experiential rather than extractive driven by accessibility and minimal barriers to entry. persists as a regulated recreational pursuit, generating $145 billion in U.S. economic activity alongside in 2022, often justified by population management data from wildlife agencies showing controlled harvests sustaining herd health. Economically, wildlife underpins tourism sectors yielding substantial revenue, with global valued at $168.2 billion in 2024 and projected to reach $264.11 billion by 2030 at a 7.81% CAGR, supporting 21.8 million jobs through habitat-linked experiences like safaris and park visits. In , wildlife viewing tourism accounts for 7% of international arrivals, bolstering local economies via entrance fees and guiding services that exceed operational costs in protected areas. Legal trade in wildlife products, including trophies and traditional medicines, contributes to rural livelihoods, with high-value species like or rhino horn sustaining markets despite regulatory scrutiny; cumulative legal exports from 1997–2016 totaled $2.9–4.4 trillion, dwarfing illegal flows. Illegal , estimated at $7.8–10 billion annually, distorts markets by undercutting legal operations and funding , though its scale remains smaller than tourism revenues—five times less per some analyses—highlighting challenges over inherent economic dominance.

Conflicts and Coexistence Challenges

Human-wildlife conflicts arise when wildlife activities negatively impact human safety, livelihoods, or property, often through crop raiding, livestock predation, or direct attacks, while human responses such as retaliatory killings further threaten animal populations. These interactions are driven by competition for shared resources like , , and , exacerbated by expanding human populations and . Globally, such conflicts are intensifying, with projections indicating that spatial overlap between human populations and over 22,000 terrestrial vertebrate species will increase across approximately 56.6% of Earth's land by 2070, heightening encounter risks. Prominent examples include crop raiding in and , where herds destroy agricultural fields leading to substantial economic losses for farmers, and incursions in causing similar damage alongside livestock threats from antelope. predation by large carnivores, such as lions in Cameroon's Waza or wolves and bears in and , results in direct financial burdens on pastoralists, prompting illegal or culling. In , greater one-horned rhinos raid crops, while baboons in target young , illustrating how species-specific behaviors intersect with human to generate recurrent disputes. Human injuries or fatalities, though less common from , occur via defensive encounters with big cats or bears, with broader zoonotic disease transmission from wildlife like bats adding indirect health risks. Coexistence challenges stem from the uneven distribution of conflict costs, disproportionately affecting rural, low-income communities who bear economic and safety burdens without adequate compensation or alternatives. Mitigation efforts, such as community-based projects in Uganda's Budongo Forest, have failed due to poor stakeholder identification, inadequate evaluation, and lack of sustained funding, leading to persistent crop losses from primates. Physical barriers like fences often underperform long-term owing to governance lapses, maintenance neglect, and circumvention by animals, rather than inherent technical flaws. Climate-induced resource scarcity further amplifies these issues by altering wildlife foraging patterns and human settlement expansions into marginal habitats. Effective strategies require integrating local knowledge with evidence-based interventions, yet policy frameworks in regions like Africa, where 38% of national biodiversity plans reference conflicts, often prioritize conservation over addressing root human development needs.

Threats and Population Dynamics

Natural Predators and Environmental Factors

Natural predation serves as a key regulator of wildlife population sizes, preventing and maintaining ecosystem balance through density-dependent mechanisms. In predator-prey systems, apex predators like wolves exert limiting effects on herbivores such as , where sustained predation pressure curbs rates without corresponding declines in predator numbers. Empirical studies demonstrate that predation rates vary by predator type; for instance, impose a impact elasticity of -0.157 on prey populations, stronger than that of wolves (-0.056) or foxes (-0.031), highlighting species-specific influences on demographics. Beyond direct consumption, non-consumptive effects—such as fear-induced behavioral changes—further suppress prey and , reducing by altering and patterns in free-living . However, the regulatory role of predation is context-dependent and not universally dominant, as evidenced by systems where predators adapted to co-evolved prey fail to stabilize densities, allowing prey dynamics to persist independently. In northern ecosystems, cyclic fluctuations in small populations, like voles preyed upon by red foxes, illustrate linked predator-prey oscillations driven by seasonal prey abundance rather than strict top-down control. These interactions underscore predation's integration with bottom-up factors, such as resource availability, in shaping long-term population trajectories. Environmental factors, including climatic variability and natural disturbances, impose additional pressures on wildlife populations through direct mortality and indirect habitat alterations. Extreme weather events, such as droughts and floods, disrupt and breeding, with historical data showing mass die-offs in herds during prolonged dry spells in African savannas. Natural disasters like wildfires and landslides reset local populations by destroying cover and food sources, as observed in forest ecosystems where post-fire declines reach 50-90% before recovery. Disease outbreaks represent biotic environmental stressors, cyclically culling susceptible individuals and altering community structures without human intervention. For example, in colonies periodically reduces densities by over 90%, indirectly affecting dependent predators like black-footed ferrets. Climatic shifts exacerbate these by expanding vector ranges, though baseline natural variability—such as El Niño-driven temperature anomalies—has historically triggered epizootics in marine mammals, with strandings correlating to ocean warming events since the . Collectively, these factors interact with predation to enforce population , though their intensity varies by and locale.

Human-Induced Pressures

Human activities exert profound pressures on wildlife populations through direct and indirect mechanisms, primarily habitat alteration, resource overexploitation, pollution, introduction of invasive species, and anthropogenic climate change. These factors have driven a 69% average decline in monitored vertebrate populations since 1970, according to the World Wildlife Fund's Living Planet Report. Habitat loss remains the dominant threat, responsible for the majority of biodiversity erosion, as it fragments ecosystems and reduces available ranges for species survival. Habitat destruction, chiefly via for and urban expansion, accounts for significant wildlife declines. Between 2015 and 2025, global net loss averaged 4.12 million hectares annually, slowing from higher rates in prior decades but still exacerbating hotspots' vulnerability. In tropical regions, such as the Amazon, fires and contributed to record-breaking loss in 2024, with non-fire-related rising 13% from 2023 levels. This has imperiled 38% of the 47,282 assessed tree species through loss combined with and effects, underscoring causal links between land-use change and risks. Overexploitation, including , , and unregulated harvesting, threatens numerous taxa, particularly large mammals. Overharvesting, alongside and development, imperils 72% of assessed by exceeding reproductive capacities. For instance, has declined over the past decade, yet persists as a key driver of population reductions. Black rhino numbers rose modestly by 12% from 5,495 in 2018 to 6,195 in 2021, but and illegal trade continue to pose critical risks despite enforcement efforts. Studies on recreational indicate population-level impacts on over half of examined large African mammals, with 89% of assessments focusing on mammals. Pollution from industrial, agricultural, and plastic sources inflicts physiological harm across wildlife. Mercury causes reproductive and neurological impairments in diverse , from to birds. ingested by lead to thousands of annual deaths among seabirds, sea turtles, and mammals through entanglement or internal blockages. Chemical pollutants disrupt endocrine systems and immunity in terrestrial and aquatic animals, with recent analyses linking them to developmental abnormalities and reduced fertility. Human-facilitated invasions compound native wildlife declines by altering food webs and resource competition. contribute to 40% of U.S. listings and rank among the top five global biodiversity loss drivers. They degrade habitats, transmit diseases, and drive extinctions, with economic and ecological costs amplified by unchecked spread via trade and transport. Anthropogenic , through , shifts habitats and intensifies pressures on wildlife. Over 3,500 animal face threats from warming, with impacts including reduced from heat stress, altered migration, and habitat mismatches. Rising temperatures have lowered reproduction success and availability for many taxa, while extreme events like droughts exacerbate declines in pollinators and other ecosystem-dependent . These effects interact synergistically with other human pressures, accelerating overall erosion. The Living Planet Index (LPI), compiled by the and featured in the World Wildlife Fund's Living Planet Report 2024, indicates an average 73% decline in the sizes of 34,836 monitored populations of 5,495 species from 1970 to 2020, with sharper drops in regions like (94%) and freshwater systems (83%). This metric aggregates geometric mean trends from time-series data on mammals, birds, , amphibians, and reptiles, attributing declines primarily to loss, , and . However, the LPI's focus on populations excludes , which comprise the majority of animal species, and relies on non-randomly selected datasets that may overrepresent accessible or high-profile taxa, potentially skewing global inferences. Critiques of the LPI highlight mathematical and statistical flaws, including aggregation methods that amplify detected declines while underweighting increases, leading to a downward in the index's trajectory; a 2024 analysis in Nature Communications demonstrated that these issues create an imbalance where equivalent numbers of rising and falling populations do not net to zero change. Similarly, the index's geometric averaging assumes uniform importance across populations, ignoring ecological differences in species roles or baseline abundances, which can exaggerate trends for small or recovering groups. Proponents argue it provides a directional signal of pressure on , but detractors, including analyses from , note it measures abundance changes in studied subsets rather than overall or rates, rendering it unrepresentative of unmonitored taxa like or deep-sea organisms. These limitations stem partly from data scarcity—only about 4% of described species have reliable population time-series—prompting calls for Bayesian hierarchical models to better account for . The , assessing extinction risk for over 150,000 as of 2024, tracks trends via categories from Least Concern to Extinct, with the (RLI) showing aggregate risk worsening for groups like birds and mammals since 1980, driven by degradation and . Yet, methodological debates persist: criteria emphasize quantitative thresholds (e.g., population reductions >30% over 10 years for Vulnerable status) but falter for cryptic or data-poor , often failing to flag extinctions promptly, as evidenced by post-listing discoveries of vanished populations in amphibians and . National adaptations introduce political influences, such as underlisting transboundary to align with global assessments, potentially misallocating resources in hotspots. The list's bias—63% of threatened assessments versus 37% for —further limits its scope, as declines (e.g., 75% in some since 1989) outpace data but lack comparable global indices. Alternative metrics, such as the Biodiversity Intactness Index, estimate remaining functional diversity and report 10-20% losses in terrestrial systems since pre-industrial times, offering a complementary view less prone to sampling biases but reliant on modeled extrapolations. Debates underscore the need for standardized, multi-taxa monitoring like eDNA and camera traps to resolve discrepancies, as current indices often conflate local declines with global trends, influenced by uneven in developing regions where pressures are acute. Despite these challenges, convergent evidence from satellite-derived loss (e.g., 10 million hectares annually) and harvest records supports directional declines in many exploited populations, though recoveries in managed species like European deer illustrate context-specific dynamics.

Conservation and Management

Historical Practices and Shifts

In pre-industrial societies, wildlife practices often relied on customary regulations, such as seasonal hunting restrictions and communal resource sharing, to maintain populations for subsistence needs, though empirical evidence indicates periodic overexploitation in densely populated or trade-oriented regions, contributing to local extinctions like the dodo in the 17th century. Formal shifts toward organized conservation emerged in the 19th century amid industrialization and habitat loss from agriculture and logging, which reduced wildlife numbers by up to 90% for some North American species through market-driven harvesting. The creation of Yellowstone National Park in 1872 by the U.S. Congress established the world's first national park, prioritizing preservation over exploitation and influencing global models for protected areas. The late 19th and early 20th centuries marked a transition to regulatory frameworks grounded in emerging scientific understanding of . The U.S. prohibited interstate commerce in illegally taken wildlife, curbing unregulated trade that had driven declines in species like , whose numbers fell from tens of millions in the early 1800s to fewer than 1,000 by 1890. Under President (1901–1909), executive actions expanded federal refuges and forests, protecting over 230 million acres while promoting "wise use" principles that balanced utilization with sustainability, a causal response to documented overhunting evidenced by empty markets and failed hunts reported in contemporary surveys. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 implemented bilateral agreements with to enforce bag limits and seasons, reducing illegal market hunting that had previously claimed millions of waterfowl annually. Mid-20th-century practices shifted toward science-based management and international collaboration, recognizing that passive protection insufficiently addressed degradation and . The Pittman-Robertson Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act of redirected excise taxes from firearms and —generating over $ by 2020—toward restoration and research, funding projects that restored species like from near-extinction lows of under 500,000 in 1900 to over 30 million by mid-century. Aldo Leopold's 1933 Game Management formalized ecological interventions, such as controlled burns and predator control, influencing policies that viewed wildlife as dynamic systems requiring active stewardship rather than mere exclusion. Globally, the International Union for Conservation of Nature's founding in 1948 and the 1973 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species () extended these principles, regulating trade in over 38,000 species and averting extinctions through quotas that, for instance, stabilized populations after ivory bans reduced by 80% in key ranges post-1989. Subsequent decades saw critiques of "fortress conservation"—strict exclusionary reserves often displacing local communities—and a pivot to integrated approaches emphasizing sustainable use and incentives. The U.S. mandated recovery plans based on viability data, recovering 99 by 2023, though implementation debates highlighted tensions between regulatory rigidity and economic costs exceeding $1.5 billion annually. By the , community-based models in and incorporated indigenous knowledge with monitoring, as in Namibia's conservancies established in 1996, which increased wildlife numbers on communal lands by 150% through revenue-sharing from and , demonstrating causal links between local incentives and reduced rates. This evolution reflects empirical adaptations to evidence that purely prohibitive measures often fail against human pressures, favoring hybrid strategies validated by population rebounds in managed systems.

Contemporary Strategies and Policies

Contemporary wildlife conservation strategies emphasize integrated international frameworks, expanded protected areas, regulated trade, community involvement, and technological innovations to address . The , adopted in December 2022 under the , sets four long-term goals for 2050 and 23 targets for 2030, including halting human-induced extinction of known threatened species and maintaining . Key targets mandate protecting at least 30% of terrestrial, inland water, and coastal/marine areas by 2030 through ecologically representative, well-connected, and equitably governed systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs). This "30x30" initiative builds on prior commitments like Aichi Targets but incorporates stricter monitoring via national reports and a monitoring framework, with implementation supported by enhanced financial flows estimated at $200-700 billion annually by 2030 from public and private sources. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), marking its 50th anniversary in 2023, regulates international commercial trade in over 40,000 species through appendices listing species for varying protection levels, with recent CoPs (e.g., CoP19 in 2022) introducing stricter controls on high-risk trades like queen conch and sharks. In 2024, the World Wildlife Crime Report highlighted trends in illegal trade, noting seizures of over 100 million CITES-listed specimens annually from 2018-2022, prompting policies for demand reduction and forensic tools to trace origins. Compliance reviews, such as the 2025 Review of Significant Trade, assess sustainability for 19 species-country combinations, enforcing export quotas and zero-trade recommendations where populations decline, as seen in African grey parrots where trade suspensions correlated with population stabilization in some ranges. Protected area expansion policies, guided by IUCN standards, prioritize high-integrity sites covering critical habitats, with global coverage reaching 17% of land and 10% of oceans by 2023 but requiring acceleration to meet GBF targets amid debates over effectiveness. Multiple-use designations allow sustainable resource extraction in IUCN Categories V-VI, balancing conservation with local livelihoods, while transboundary parks like the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (established 2011, expanded post-2020) demonstrate coordinated enforcement reducing by 50-70% in rhino populations through joint patrols. National policies, such as the U.S. and Wildlife Service's recovery plans under the Endangered Species Act (updated 2023), integrate habitat restoration with anti-, achieving delistings like the American via targeted protections. Community-based conservation (CBC) policies shift from top-down approaches to local , with successes in Namibia's communal conservancies (covering 20% of land by 2023) generating $10-15 million annually in tourism revenue while increasing and black rhino numbers by 300-500% since 1990 through incentive structures like benefit-sharing. Frameworks like IUCN's guidelines emphasize equitable , incorporating indigenous , as in Australia's Indigenous Protected Areas (covering 25% of protected lands by 2024), where co-management reduced impacts and boosted native mammal recoveries. Challenges persist, with meta-analyses showing CBC outcomes vary by socioeconomic resilience, succeeding where external threats like are curtailed via policy enforcement. Technological integration enhances monitoring and , with camera traps deployed in over 100,000 installations globally by 2023 enabling non-invasive estimates, as in where AI-processed imagery tracked 1.5 million migrations with 95% accuracy. Drones facilitate rapid surveys, covering 10-50 km² per flight for in , detecting human intrusions 80% faster than ground teams, while AI algorithms analyze eDNA and satellite data for change detection, informing policies like real-time quota adjustments under . These tools, scaled via public-private partnerships, address data gaps in remote areas but require ethical guidelines to minimize disturbance, as evidenced by IUCN recommendations limiting drone altitudes below 100m near nesting sites.

Outcomes, Successes, and Critiques

Conservation efforts for wildlife have yielded measurable recoveries in certain , particularly through legal protections and targeted interventions, though broader trends indicate persistent declines in many taxa. The U.S. Endangered Act (ESA) of 1973 has prevented the of approximately 291 and averted for over 99% of listed to date, demonstrating efficacy in halting immediate losses via habitat safeguards and recovery plans. However, only a fraction of listed —around 2%—have achieved full recovery and delisting, with many remaining under protection for decades due to ongoing threats like . Notable successes include the (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), whose U.S. breeding pairs rebounded from fewer than 500 in the 1960s to over 316,000 by 2019, attributed to bans, habitat restoration, and ESA enforcement. Similarly, the (Alligator mississippiensis) recovered from near-extinction to sustainable populations exceeding 1 million by the , enabling downlisting from endangered to threatened in 1987 and commercial harvesting resumption. In , private conservancies have driven rhino population increases; South Africa's black rhino (Diceros bicornis) numbers rose from under 100 in the to over 6,500 by 2023, fueled by landowner investments in and revenues rather than state-led initiatives alone. These cases underscore causal links between property rights incentives, enforcement, and demographic rebounds, contrasting with state-managed areas where persists. Critiques of conservation strategies emphasize empirical shortcomings, including insufficient integration of best available and overreliance on regulatory prohibitions without addressing root economic drivers. Federal agencies administering the ESA have been accused of deviating from statutory mandates for data-driven decisions, leading to politically influenced listings and delays in . Wildlife management policies in often lack rigorous evidence for population targets, with claims of "science-based" approaches undermined by inconsistent harvest data and failure to account for environmental variability. Moreover, recreational under conservation frameworks has introduced secondary harms, such as lead poisoning ecosystems and non-target , with studies documenting elevated mortality in scavengers like California condors. In regions like , community opposition to protected areas stems from exclusionary policies that limit local benefits, fostering negative attitudes toward wildlife and undermining long-term compliance. These issues highlight systemic barriers, including funding shortages for monitoring and mismatches between policy timelines and ecological realities, which hinder scalable successes.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320723004408
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/wildlife-species
  3. https://dc.statelibrary.sc.gov/bitstreams/7070ca48-d63f-496e-aae4-58c35a537f20/download
  4. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/zoology/wildlife-biology
  5. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/biodiversity
  6. https://rolleatusa.com/30-biodiversity-facts/
  7. https://www.worldwildlife.org/resources/explainers/what-is-biodiversity/
  8. https://ourworldindata.org/biodiversity
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359483420_The_Greatest_Threats_to_Species
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590332221005273
  11. https://gaiacompany.io/biodiversity-facts-statistics/
  12. https://www.fishwildlife.org/landing/north-american-model-wildlife-conservation
  13. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/wildlife
  14. https://www.oipa.org/international/wildlife/
  15. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/domesticated-animals
  16. https://study.com/academy/lesson/wild-vs-domestic-animals.html
  17. https://novascotia.ca/natr/wildlife/wns/wns2.asp
  18. https://opensanctuary.org/domestic-feral-or-wild-whats-the-difference/
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/wild-animal
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3099174/
  21. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/50/10.12
  22. https://cites.org/eng/disc/what.php
  23. https://www.fws.gov/international-affairs/cites
  24. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-50/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-23
  25. https://naturalhistory.si.edu/education/teaching-resources/life-science/early-life-earth-animal-origins
  26. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2015.0036
  27. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adp7161
  28. https://news.ucr.edu/articles/2018/10/15/oldest-evidence-animals-found-ucr-researchers
  29. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2023-06-28-new-oxford-study-sheds-light-origin-animals
  30. https://evolution.berkeley.edu/the-cambrian-explosion/
  31. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/General_Biology_%28Boundless%29/27%253A_Introduction_to_Animal_Diversity/27.04%253A_The_Evolutionary_History_of_the_Animal_Kingdom/27.4B%253A_The_Cambrian_Explosion_of_Animal_Life
  32. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/news/2019/february/the-cambrian-explosion-was-far-shorter-than-thought.html
  33. https://www.sfu.ca/biology/faculty/jwmoore/teaching/BIO473/Vanni_2002.pdf
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982222001014
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5516125/
  36. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/usg/statements/mr-wu/2014/03/world-wildlife-day.html
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982224002197
  38. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/74/6/352/7679290
  39. https://files.ipbes.net/ipbes-web-prod-public-files/inline/files/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers.pdf
  40. https://www.oneearth.org/animating-the-carbon-cycle-animals-key-allies-in-solving-climate-crisis/
  41. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2100275118
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534713002358
  43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20668450/
  44. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/5/334
  45. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2420
  46. https://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/bionumber.aspx?s=n&v=2&id=103929
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3904837/
  48. https://worldrainforests.com/03mammals.htm
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5390966/
  50. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.0745
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4320694/
  52. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13780
  53. https://www.un.org/depts/los/global_reporting/WOA_RPROC/Chapter_34.pdf
  54. https://news.unm.edu/news/unm-researchers-find-warm-blooded-marine-mammals-thrive-in-polar-regions
  55. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-06631-4
  56. https://www.conservation.org/priorities/biodiversity-hotspots
  57. https://www.cepf.net/our-work/biodiversity-hotspots/hotspots-defined
  58. https://www.ifaw.org/journal/what-are-biodiversity-hotspots
  59. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/biodiversity-hotspots/
  60. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0810306106
  61. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2023.2773
  62. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61477-8
  63. https://gaiacompany.io/biodiversity-hotspots/
  64. https://earth.org/data_visualization/mapping-the-african-bushmeat-crisis/
  65. https://www.ilri.org/news/forests-forks-addressing-wild-meat-trade-and-health-risks-across-africa-and-asia-pacific
  66. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2410774121
  67. https://www.unep-wcmc.org/en/news/new-assessment-of-global-wildlife-trade-trends-sets-benchmark-for-future-monitoring
  68. https://www.instagram.com/p/CcDp3p8lrrG/
  69. https://www.rmef.org/how-we-conserve/hunting-is-conservation/
  70. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/wildlife/2020/World_Wildlife_Report_2020_9July.pdf
  71. https://www.thegef.org/what-we-do/topics/illegal-wildlife-trade
  72. https://worldanimalfoundation.org/advocate/poaching-statistics/
  73. https://cites.org/eng/news/launch-of-world-wildlife-crime-report-2024
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960982225008784
  75. https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol27/iss4/art23/
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11959325/
  77. https://rootandseed.com/blogs/the-root-and-seed-blog/animals-with-cultural-significance
  78. https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Final_2022-National-Survey_101223-accessible-single-page.pdf
  79. https://www.birds.cornell.edu/landtrust/2022-national-survey-of-fishing-hunting-and-wildlife-associated-recreation/
  80. https://wildlifeforall.us/resources/the-rise-of-wildlife-watching/
  81. https://www.fishwildlife.org/landing/blog/2022-national-survey-fishing-hunting-and-wildlife-watching-shows-economic-contribution-395-billion-us-economy
  82. https://www.techsciresearch.com/report/wildlife-tourism-market/21572.html
  83. https://researchhub.wttc.org/product/economic-impact-of-global-wildlife-tourism
  84. https://www.untourism.int/asia/unwto-chimelong-why-wildlife
  85. https://www.grida.no/resources/7309
  86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421000056
  87. https://www.ice.gov/features/wildlife
  88. https://wttc.org/news/global-wildlife-tourism-generates-five-times-more-revenue-than-illegal-wildlife-trade-annually
  89. https://www.worldwildlife.org/resources/explainers/what-is-human-wildlife-conflict-and-why-is-it-more-than-just-a-conservation-concern/
  90. https://www.ifaw.org/journal/human-wildlife-conflict-terms-definitions
  91. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adp7706
  92. https://tci.cornell.edu/?blog=the-battle-for-space-human-vs-animal
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9950466/
  94. https://wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/wildlife_practice/problems/human_animal_conflict
  95. https://www.ifaw.org/journal/what-is-human-wildlife-conflict
  96. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231873716_Assessing_the_failure_of_a_community-based_human-wildlife_conflict_mitigation_project_in_Budongo_Forest_Reserve_Uganda
  97. https://www.storre.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/33155/1/LucHoffmannInstitute-humanwildlifeconflict-web.pdf
  98. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01608-5
  99. https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/global-wildlife-program/brief/human-wildlife-conflict-global-policy-and-perception-insights
  100. https://pubs.nmsu.edu/_circulars/CR688/index.html
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3440569/
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8851447/
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1146609X13001471
  104. https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/dynamics-of-predation-13229468/
  105. https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife-Guide/Threats-to-Wildlife/Climate-Change/Extreme-Weather
  106. http://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/disturbances-and-stressors
  107. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2781848/
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8742803/
  109. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/news/2022/october/wildlife-populations-crashed-by-69-within-less-than-a-lifetime.html
  110. https://ourworldindata.org/deforestation
  111. https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/global-deforestation-slows--but-forests-remain-under-pressure--fao-report-shows/en
  112. https://gfr.wri.org/latest-analysis-deforestation-trends
  113. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/biodiversity/
  114. https://iucn.org/news/secretariat/201608/three-quarters-world%25E2%2580%2599s-threatened-species-are-imperiled-agriculture-land-conversion-overharvesting
  115. https://www.unodc.org/cofrb/uploads/documents/ECOS/World_Wildlife_Crime_Report_2024.pdf
  116. https://iucn.org/press-release/202208/rhino-poaching-and-illegal-trade-decline-remain-critical-threats-new-report
  117. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590332221000609
  118. https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife-Guide/Threats-to-Wildlife/Pollution
  119. https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/campaigns/ocean_plastics/
  120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405665024000702
  121. https://www.mcsuk.org/news/chemical-pollutions-animal-impacts/
  122. https://defenders.org/blog/2023/08/how-do-invasive-species-affect-biodiversity-and-how-can-they-be-controlled
  123. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/people-and-invasive-species/
  124. https://news.oregonstate.edu/news/thousands-animal-species-threatened-climate-change-novel-analysis-finds
  125. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/wildlife-climateimpact.htm
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9058818/
  127. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adq2853
  128. https://livingplanet.panda.org/
  129. https://www.livingplanetindex.org/latest_results
  130. https://www.worldwildlife.org/news/press-releases/catastrophic-73-decline-in-the-average-size-of-global-wildlife-populations-in-just-50-years-reveals-a-system-in-peril/
  131. https://ourworldindata.org/living-planet-index-decline
  132. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-49070-x
  133. https://communities.springernature.com/posts/the-living-planet-index-is-not-a-reliable-measure-of-population-changes
  134. https://ourworldindata.org/2024-living-planet-index
  135. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/2041-210X.13277
  136. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724004427
  137. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320725005543
  138. https://journals.lww.com/coas/fulltext/2025/04000/politics_of_national_red_list_classifications_.3.aspx
  139. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/48943/
  140. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-021-01542-9
  141. https://www.vox.com/down-to-earth/2022/10/12/23399105/biodiversity-loss-wwf-living-planet-index
  142. https://www.statista.com/chart/22845/decline-in-monitored-vertebrate-species-populations/
  143. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2688-8319.70048
  144. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208755/
  145. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/nineteenth-century-trends-in-american-conservation.htm
  146. https://polkswcdiowa.gov/us-timeline-of-conservation/
  147. https://www.fws.gov/history-of-fws
  148. https://ncwf.org/blog/americas-top-10-federal-conservation-laws/
  149. https://www.nps.gov/mabi/learn/historyculture/conservation-timeline-1901-2000.htm
  150. https://www.ducks.org/conservation/national/the-birth-of-wildlife-conservation
  151. https://www.environmentalscience.org/conservation
  152. https://www.worldwildlife.org/about/history/
  153. https://www.fws.gov/esa50/our-history/pre-1973
  154. https://www.doi.gov/blog/endangered-species-act-celebrating-50-years-success-wildlife-conservation
  155. https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22584
  156. https://www.cbd.int/gbf
  157. https://www.cbd.int/gbf/targets
  158. https://www.unep.org/resources/kunming-montreal-global-biodiversity-framework
  159. https://cites.org/eng/pr/review-of-trade-sustainability-and-conservation-progress-upcoming-sc78-meeting-2025
  160. https://iucn.org/news/202311/guide-expanding-protected-conserved-areas-under-un-global-biodiversity-framework
  161. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590332223003901
  162. https://www.fws.gov
  163. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10087706/
  164. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016953472300037X
  165. https://techhub.wwf.ca/technology/camera-traps/
  166. https://basc.org.uk/from-drones-to-data-the-role-of-technology-in-wildlife-conservation/
  167. https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/9/7/455
  168. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347225000740
  169. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6482936/
  170. https://www.resources.org/archives/endangered-species-act-under-threat/
  171. https://www.fws.gov/story/2021-03/americas-bald-eagle-population-continues-soar
  172. https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/united-states/endangered-species-success-stories/
  173. https://theoriginsfoundation.org/proof/the-quota-conundrum-a-science-based-approach-to-wildlife-conservation-in-south-africa/
  174. https://artintanzania.org/wildlife-conservation-in-africa-challenges-successes-and-future-directions/
  175. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/695562
  176. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/is-wildlife-conservation-policy-based-in-science
  177. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1940082920915603
  178. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6473637/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.