Concrete
View on Wikipedia

Concrete is a composite material composed of aggregate bound together with a fluid cement that cures to a solid over time. It is the second-most-used substance (after water),[1] the most–widely used building material,[2] and the most-manufactured material in the world.[3]
When aggregate is mixed with dry Portland cement and water, the mixture forms a fluid slurry that can be poured and molded into shape. The cement reacts with the water through a process called hydration,[4] which hardens it after several hours to form a solid matrix that binds the materials together into a durable stone-like material with various uses.[5] This time allows concrete to not only be cast in forms, but also to have a variety of tooled processes performed. The hydration process is exothermic, which means that ambient temperature plays a significant role in how long it takes concrete to set. Often, additives (such as pozzolans or superplasticizers) are included in the mixture to improve the physical properties of the wet mix, delay or accelerate the curing time, or otherwise modify the finished material. Most structural concrete is poured with reinforcing materials (such as steel rebar) embedded to provide tensile strength, yielding reinforced concrete.
Before the invention of Portland cement in the early 1800s, lime-based cement binders, such as lime putty, were often used. The overwhelming majority of concretes are produced using Portland cement, but sometimes with other hydraulic cements, such as calcium aluminate cement.[6][7] Many other non-cementitious types of concrete exist with other methods of binding aggregate together, including asphalt concrete with a bitumen binder, which is frequently used for road surfaces, and polymer concretes that use polymers as a binder.
Concrete is distinct from mortar.[8] Whereas concrete is itself a building material, and contains both coarse (large) and fine (small) aggregate particles, mortar contains only fine aggregates and is mainly used as a bonding agent to hold bricks, tiles and other masonry units together.[9] Grout is another material associated with concrete and cement. It also does not contain coarse aggregates and is usually either pourable or thixotropic, and is used to fill gaps between masonry components or coarse aggregate which has already been put in place. Some methods of concrete manufacture and repair involve pumping grout into the gaps to make up a solid mass in situ.
Etymology
[edit]The word concrete comes from the Latin word "concretus" (meaning compact or condensed),[10] the perfect passive participle of "concrescere", from "con-" (together) and "crescere" (to grow).
History
[edit]Ancient times
[edit]Concrete floors were found in the royal palace of Tiryns, Greece, which dates roughly to 1400 to 1200 BC.[11][12] Lime mortars were used in Greece, such as in Crete and Cyprus, in 800 BC. The Assyrian Jerwan Aqueduct (688 BC) made use of waterproof concrete.[13] Concrete was used for construction in many ancient structures.[14]
Mayan concrete at the ruins of Uxmal (AD 850–925) is referenced in Incidents of Travel in the Yucatán by John L. Stephens. "The roof is flat and had been covered with cement". "The floors were cement, in some places hard, but, by long exposure, broken, and now crumbling under the feet." "But throughout the wall was solid, and consisting of large stones imbedded in mortar, almost as hard as rock."
Small-scale production of concrete-like materials was pioneered by the Nabatean traders who occupied and controlled a series of oases and developed a small empire in the regions of southern Syria and northern Jordan from the 4th century BC. They discovered the advantages of hydraulic lime, with some self-cementing properties, by 700 BC. They built kilns to supply mortar for the construction of rubble masonry houses, concrete floors, and underground waterproof cisterns. They kept the cisterns secret as these enabled the Nabataeans to thrive in the desert.[15] Some of these structures survive to this day.[15]
In the Roman era, builders discovered that adding volcanic ash to lime allowed the mix to set underwater. They discovered the pozzolanic reaction.[16]
Classical era
[edit]

The Romans used concrete extensively from 300 BC to AD 476.[18] During the Roman Empire, Roman concrete (or opus caementicium) was made from quicklime, pozzolana and an aggregate of pumice.[19] Its widespread use in many Roman structures, a key event in the history of architecture termed the Roman architectural revolution, freed Roman construction from the restrictions of stone and brick materials. It enabled revolutionary new designs in terms of both structural complexity and dimension.[20] The Colosseum in Rome was built largely of concrete, and the Pantheon has the world's largest unreinforced concrete dome.[21]
Concrete, as the Romans knew it, was a new and revolutionary material. Laid in the shape of arches, vaults and domes, it quickly hardened into a rigid mass, free from many of the internal thrusts and strains that troubled the builders of similar structures in stone or brick.[22]
Modern tests show that opus caementicium had a similar compressive strength to modern Portland-cement concrete (c. 200 kg/cm2 [20 MPa; 2,800 psi]).[23] However, due to the absence of reinforcement, its tensile strength was far lower than modern reinforced concrete, and its mode of application also differed:[24]
Modern structural concrete differs from Roman concrete in two important details. First, its mix consistency is fluid and homogeneous, allowing it to be poured into forms rather than requiring hand-layering together with the placement of aggregate, which, in Roman practice, often consisted of rubble. Second, integral reinforcing steel gives modern concrete assemblies great strength in tension, whereas Roman concrete could depend only upon the strength of the concrete bonding to resist tension.[25]
The long-term durability of Roman concrete structures was found to be due to the presence of pyroclastic (volcanic) rock and ash in the concrete mix. The crystallization of strätlingite (a complex calcium aluminosilicate hydrate)[26] during the formation of the concrete and its merging with similar calcium–aluminium-silicate–hydrate structures helped give the Roman concrete a greater degree of fracture resistance compared to modern concrete.[27] In addition, Roman concrete is significantly more resistant to erosion by seawater than modern concrete; the aforementioned pyroclastic materials react with seawater to form Al-tobermorite crystals over time.[28][29] The use of hot mixing in preparation of concrete, leading to the formation of lime clasts in the final product, has been proposed to give the Roman concrete a self-healing ability.[30][31]
The widespread use of concrete in many Roman structures ensured that many survive to the present day. The Baths of Caracalla in Rome are just one example. Many Roman aqueducts and bridges, such as the magnificent Pont du Gard in southern France, have masonry cladding on a concrete core, as does the dome of the Pantheon.
Middle Ages
[edit]After the Roman Empire, the use of burned lime and pozzolana was greatly reduced. Low kiln temperatures in the burning of lime, lack of pozzolana, and poor mixing all contributed to a decline in the quality of concrete and mortar. From the 11th century, the increased use of stone in church and castle construction led to an increased demand for mortar. Quality began to improve in the 12th century through better grinding and sieving. Medieval lime mortars and concretes were non-hydraulic and were used for binding masonry, "hearting" (binding rubble masonry cores) and foundations. Bartholomaeus Anglicus in his De proprietatibus rerum (1240) describes the making of mortar. In an English translation from 1397, it reads "lyme ... is a stone brent; by medlynge thereof with sonde and water sement is made". From the 14th century, the quality of mortar was again excellent, but only from the 17th century was pozzolana commonly added.[32]
The Canal du Midi was built using concrete in 1670.[33]
Industrial era
[edit]
Perhaps the greatest step forward in the modern use of concrete was Smeaton's Tower, built by British engineer John Smeaton in Devon, England, between 1756 and 1759. This third Eddystone Lighthouse pioneered the use of hydraulic lime in concrete, using pebbles and powdered brick as aggregate.[34]
A method for producing Portland cement was developed in England and patented by Joseph Aspdin in 1824.[35] Aspdin chose the name for its similarity to Portland stone, which was quarried on the Isle of Portland in Dorset, England. His son William continued developments into the 1840s, earning him recognition for the development of "modern" Portland cement.[36]
Reinforced concrete was invented in 1849 by Joseph Monier.[37] and the first reinforced concrete house was built by François Coignet[38] in 1853. The first concrete reinforced bridge was designed and built by Joseph Monier in 1875.[39]
Prestressed concrete and post-tensioned concrete were pioneered by Eugène Freyssinet, a French structural and civil engineer. Concrete components or structures are compressed by tendon cables during, or after, their fabrication in order to strengthen them against tensile forces developing when put in service. Freyssinet patented the technique on 2 October 1928.[40]
Composition
[edit]Concrete is an artificial composite material, comprising a matrix of cementitious binder (typically Portland cement paste or asphalt) and a dispersed phase or "filler" of aggregate (typically a rocky material, loose stones, and sand). The binder "glues" the filler together to form a synthetic conglomerate.[41] Many types of concrete are available, determined by the formulations of binders and the types of aggregate used to suit the application of the engineered material. These variables determine strength and density, as well as chemical and thermal resistance of the finished product.

Construction aggregates consist of large chunks of material in a concrete mix, generally a coarse gravel or crushed rocks such as limestone, or granite, along with finer materials such as sand.
Cement paste, most commonly made of Portland cement, is the most prevalent kind of concrete binder. For cementitious binders, water is mixed with the dry cement powder and aggregate, which produces a semi-liquid slurry (paste) that can be shaped, typically by pouring it into a form. The concrete solidifies and hardens through a chemical process called hydration. The water reacts with the cement, which bonds the other components together, creating a robust, stone-like material. Other cementitious materials, such as fly ash and slag cement, are sometimes added—either pre-blended with the cement or directly as a concrete component—and become a part of the binder for the aggregate.[42] Fly ash and slag can enhance some properties of concrete such as fresh properties and durability.[42] Alternatively, other materials can also be used as a concrete binder: the most prevalent substitute is asphalt, which is used as the binder in asphalt concrete.
Admixtures are added to modify the cure rate or properties of the material. Mineral admixtures use recycled materials as concrete ingredients. Conspicuous materials include fly ash, a by-product of coal-fired power plants; ground granulated blast furnace slag, a by-product of steelmaking; and silica fume, a by-product of industrial electric arc furnaces.
Structures employing Portland cement concrete usually include steel reinforcement because this type of concrete can be formulated with high compressive strength, but always has lower tensile strength. Therefore, it is usually reinforced with materials that are strong in tension, typically steel rebar.
The mix design depends on the type of structure being built, how the concrete is mixed and delivered, and how it is placed to form the structure.
Cement
[edit]Portland cement is the most common type of cement in general usage. It is a basic ingredient of concrete, mortar, and many plasters.[43] It consists of a mixture of calcium silicates (alite, belite), aluminates and ferrites—compounds, which will react with water. Portland cement and similar materials are made by heating limestone (a source of calcium) with clay or shale (a source of silicon, aluminium and iron) and grinding this product (called clinker) with a source of sulfate (most commonly gypsum).
Cement kilns are extremely large, complex, and inherently dusty industrial installations. Of the various ingredients used to produce a given quantity of concrete, the cement is the most energetically expensive. Even complex and efficient kilns require 3.3 to 3.6 gigajoules of energy to produce a ton of clinker and then grind it into cement. Many kilns can be fueled with difficult-to-dispose-of wastes, the most common being used tires. The extremely high temperatures and long periods of time at those temperatures allows cement kilns to efficiently and completely burn even difficult-to-use fuels.[44] The five major compounds of calcium silicates and aluminates comprising Portland cement range from 5 to 50% in weight.
Curing
[edit]Combining water with a cementitious material forms a cement paste by the process of hydration. The cement paste glues the aggregate together, fills voids within it, and makes it flow more freely.[45]
As stated by Abrams' law, a lower water-to-cement ratio yields a stronger, more durable concrete, whereas more water gives a freer-flowing concrete with a higher slump.[46] The hydration of cement involves many concurrent reactions. The process involves polymerization, the interlinking of the silicates and aluminate components as well as their bonding to sand and gravel particles to form a solid mass.[47] One illustrative conversion is the hydration of tricalcium silicate:
- Cement chemist notation: C3S + H → C-S-H + CH + heat
- Standard notation: Ca3SiO5 + H2O → CaO・SiO2・H2O (gel) + Ca(OH)2 + heat
- Balanced: 2 Ca3SiO5 + 7 H2O → 3 CaO・2 SiO2・4 H2O (gel) + 3 Ca(OH)2 + heat
- (approximately as the exact ratios of CaO, SiO2 and H2O in C-S-H can vary)[47]
The hydration (curing) of cement is irreversible.[48]
Aggregates
[edit]Fine and coarse aggregates make up the bulk of a concrete mixture. Sand, natural gravel, and crushed stone are used mainly for this purpose. Recycled aggregates (from construction, demolition, and excavation waste) are increasingly used as partial replacements for natural aggregates, while a number of manufactured aggregates, including air-cooled blast furnace slag and bottom ash are also permitted.[49]
The size distribution of the aggregate determines how much binder is required. Aggregate with a very even size distribution has the biggest gaps whereas adding aggregate with smaller particles tends to fill these gaps. The binder must fill the gaps between the aggregate as well as paste the surfaces of the aggregate together, and is typically the most expensive component. Thus, variation in sizes of the aggregate reduces the cost of concrete.[50] The aggregate is nearly always stronger than the binder, so its use does not negatively affect the strength of the concrete.
Redistribution of aggregates after compaction often creates non-homogeneity due to the influence of vibration. This can lead to strength gradients.[51]
Decorative stones such as quartzite, small river stones or crushed glass are sometimes added to the surface of concrete for a decorative "exposed aggregate" finish, popular among landscape designers.
Admixtures
[edit]Admixtures are materials in the form of powder or fluids that are added to the concrete to give it certain characteristics not obtainable with plain concrete mixes. Admixtures are defined as additions "made as the concrete mix is being prepared".[52] The most common admixtures are retarders and accelerators. In normal use, admixture dosages are less than 5% by mass of cement and are added to the concrete at the time of batching/mixing.[53] (See § Production below.) The common types of admixtures[54] are as follows:
- Accelerators speed up the hydration (hardening) of the concrete. Typical materials used are calcium chloride, calcium nitrate and sodium nitrate. However, use of chlorides may cause corrosion in steel reinforcing and is prohibited in some countries, so that nitrates may be favored, even though they are less effective than the chloride salt. Accelerating admixtures are especially useful for modifying the properties of concrete in cold weather.
- Air entraining agents add and entrain tiny air bubbles in the concrete, which reduces damage during freeze-thaw cycles, increasing durability. However, entrained air entails a tradeoff with strength, as each 1% of air may decrease compressive strength by 5%.[55] If too much air becomes trapped in the concrete as a result of the mixing process, defoamers can be used to encourage the air bubble to agglomerate, rise to the surface of the wet concrete and then disperse.
- Bonding agents are used to create a bond between old and new concrete (typically a type of polymer) with wide temperature tolerance and corrosion resistance.
- Corrosion inhibitors are used to minimize the corrosion of steel and steel bars in concrete.
- Crystalline admixtures are typically added during batching of the concrete to lower permeability. The reaction takes place when exposed to water and un-hydrated cement particles to form insoluble needle-shaped crystals, which fill capillary pores and micro-cracks in the concrete to block pathways for water and waterborne contaminates. Concrete with crystalline admixture can expect to self-seal as constant exposure to water will continuously initiate crystallization to ensure permanent waterproof protection.
- Pigments can be used to change the color of concrete, for aesthetics.
- Plasticizers increase the workability of plastic, or "fresh", concrete, allowing it to be placed more easily, with less consolidating effort. A typical plasticizer is lignosulfonate. Plasticizers can be used to reduce the water content of a concrete while maintaining workability and are sometimes called water-reducers due to this use. Such treatment improves its strength and durability characteristics.
- Superplasticizers (also called high-range water-reducers) are a class of plasticizers that have fewer deleterious effects and can be used to increase workability more than is practical with traditional plasticizers. Superplasticizers are used to increase compressive strength. It increases the workability of the concrete and lowers the need for water content by 15–30%.
- Pumping aids improve pumpability, thicken the paste and reduce separation and bleeding.
- Retarders slow the hydration of concrete and are used in large or difficult pours where partial setting is undesirable before completion of the pour. Typical retarders include sugar, sodium gluconate, citric acid, and tartaric acid.[56]
Mineral admixtures and blended cements
[edit]| Property | Portland cement |
Siliceous[b] fly ash |
Calcareous[c] fly ash |
Slag cement |
Silica fume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proportion by mass (%)
|
SiO2 | 21.9 | 52 | 35 | 35 | 85–97 |
| Al2O3 | 6.9 | 23 | 18 | 12 | — | |
| Fe2O3 | 3 | 11 | 6 | 1 | — | |
| CaO | 63 | 5 | 21 | 40 | < 1 | |
| MgO | 2.5 | — | — | — | — | |
| SO3 | 1.7 | — | — | — | — | |
| Specific surface (m2/kg)[d] | 370 | 420 | 420 | 400 | 15,000 – 30,000 | |
| Specific gravity | 3.15 | 2.38 | 2.65 | 2.94 | 2.22 | |
| General purpose | Primary binder | Cement replacement | Cement replacement | Cement replacement | Property enhancer | |
| ||||||
Inorganic materials that have pozzolanic or latent hydraulic properties, these very fine-grained materials are added to the concrete mix to improve the properties of concrete (mineral admixtures),[53] or as a replacement for Portland cement (blended cements).[60] Products which incorporate limestone, fly ash, blast furnace slag, and other useful materials with pozzolanic properties into the mix, are being tested and used. These developments are ever growing in relevance to minimize the impacts caused by cement use, notorious for being one of the largest producers (at about 5 to 10%) of global greenhouse gas emissions.[61] The use of alternative materials also is capable of lowering costs, improving concrete properties, and recycling wastes, the latest being relevant for circular economy aspects of the construction industry, whose demand is ever growing with greater impacts on raw material extraction, waste generation and landfill practices.
- Fly ash: A by-product of coal-fired electric generating plants, it is used to partially replace Portland cement (by up to 60% by mass). The properties of fly ash depend on the type of coal burnt. In general, siliceous fly ash is pozzolanic, while calcareous fly ash has latent hydraulic properties.[62]
- Ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS or GGBS): A by-product of steel production is used to partially replace Portland cement (by up to 80% by mass). It has latent hydraulic properties.[63]
- Silica fume: A by-product of the production of silicon and ferrosilicon alloys. Silica fume is similar to fly ash, but has a particle size 100 times smaller. This results in a higher surface-to-volume ratio and a much faster pozzolanic reaction. Silica fume is used to increase strength and durability of concrete, but generally requires the use of superplasticizers for workability.[64]
- High reactivity metakaolin (HRM): Metakaolin produces concrete with strength and durability similar to concrete made with silica fume. While silica fume is usually dark gray or black in color, high-reactivity metakaolin is usually bright white in color, making it the preferred choice for architectural concrete where appearance is important.
- Carbon nanofibers can be added to concrete to enhance compressive strength and gain a higher Young's modulus, and also to improve the electrical properties required for strain monitoring, damage evaluation and self-health monitoring of concrete. Carbon fiber has many advantages in terms of mechanical and electrical properties (e.g., higher strength) and self-monitoring behavior due to the high tensile strength and high electrical conductivity.[65]
- Carbon products have been added to make concrete electrically conductive, for deicing purposes.[66]
- New research from Japan's University of Kitakyushu shows that a washed and dried recycled mix of used diapers can be an environmental solution to producing less landfill and using less sand in concrete production. A model home was built in Indonesia to test the strength and durability of the new diaper-cement composite.[67]
Production
[edit]

Concrete production is the process of mixing together the various ingredients—water, aggregate, cement, and any additives—to produce concrete. Concrete production is time-sensitive. Once the ingredients are mixed, workers must put the concrete in place before it hardens. In modern usage, most concrete production takes place in a large type of industrial facility called a concrete plant, or often a batch plant. The usual method of placement is casting in formwork, which holds the mix in shape until it has set enough to hold its shape unaided.
Concrete plants come in two main types, ready-mix plants and central mix plants. A ready-mix plant blends all of the solid ingredients, while a central mix does the same but adds water. A central-mix plant offers more precise control of the concrete quality. Central mix plants must be close to the work site where the concrete will be used, since hydration begins at the plant.
A concrete plant consists of large hoppers for storage of various ingredients like cement, storage for bulk ingredients like aggregate and water, mechanisms for the addition of various additives and amendments, machinery to accurately weigh, move, and mix some or all of those ingredients, and facilities to dispense the mixed concrete, often to a concrete mixer truck.
Modern concrete is usually prepared as a viscous fluid, so that it may be poured into forms. The forms are containers that define the desired shape. Concrete formwork can be prepared in several ways, such as slip forming and steel plate construction. Alternatively, concrete can be mixed into dryer, non-fluid forms and used in factory settings to manufacture precast concrete products.
Interruption in pouring the concrete can cause the initially placed material to begin to set before the next batch is added on top. This creates a horizontal plane of weakness called a cold joint between the two batches.[68] Once the mix is where it should be, the curing process must be controlled to ensure that the concrete attains the desired attributes. During concrete preparation, various technical details may affect the quality and nature of the product.
Design mix
[edit]Design mix ratios are decided by an engineer after analyzing the properties of the specific ingredients being used. Instead of using a 'nominal mix' of 1 part cement, 2 parts sand, and 4 parts aggregate, a civil engineer will custom-design a concrete mix to exactly meet the requirements of the site and conditions, setting material ratios and often designing an admixture package to fine-tune the properties or increase the performance envelope of the mix. Design-mix concrete can have very broad specifications that cannot be met with more basic nominal mixes, but the involvement of the engineer often increases the cost of the concrete mix.
Concrete mixes are primarily divided into nominal mix, standard mix and design mix.
Nominal mix ratios are given in volume of . Nominal mixes are a simple, fast way of getting a basic idea of the properties of the finished concrete without having to perform testing in advance.
Various governing bodies (such as British Standards) define nominal mix ratios into a number of grades, usually ranging from lower compressive strength to higher compressive strength. The grades usually indicate the 28-day cure strength.[69]
Mixing
[edit]Thorough mixing is essential to produce uniform, high-quality concrete.
Separate paste mixing has shown that the mixing of cement and water into a paste before combining these materials with aggregates can increase the compressive strength of the resulting concrete.[70] The paste is generally mixed in a high-speed, shear-type mixer at a w/c (water to cement ratio) of 0.30 to 0.45 by mass. The cement paste premix may include admixtures such as accelerators or retarders, superplasticizers, pigments, or silica fume. The premixed paste is then blended with aggregates and any remaining batch water and final mixing is completed in conventional concrete mixing equipment.[71]
Resonant acoustic mixing has also been found effective in producing ultra-high performance cementitious materials, as it produces a dense matrix with lowc porosity.[72]
Sample analysis—workability
[edit]

Workability is the ability of a fresh (plastic) concrete mix to fill the form/mold properly with the desired work (pouring, pumping, spreading, tamping, vibration) and without reducing the concrete's quality. Workability depends on water content, aggregate (shape and size distribution), cementitious content and age (level of hydration) and can be modified by adding chemical admixtures, like superplasticizer. Raising the water content or adding chemical admixtures increases concrete workability. Excessive water leads to increased bleeding or segregation of aggregates (when the cement and aggregates start to separate), with the resulting concrete having reduced quality. Changes in gradation can also affect workability of the concrete, although a wide range of gradation can be used for various applications.[73][74] An undesirable gradation can mean using a large aggregate that is too large for the size of the formwork, or which has too few smaller aggregate grades to serve to fill the gaps between the larger grades, or using too little or too much sand for the same reason, or using too little water, or too much cement, or even using jagged crushed stone instead of smoother round aggregate such as pebbles. Any combination of these factors and others may result in a mix which is too harsh, i.e., which does not flow or spread out smoothly, is difficult to get into the formwork, and which is difficult to surface finish.[75]
Workability can be measured by the concrete slump test, a simple measure of the plasticity of a fresh batch of concrete following the ASTM C 143 or EN 12350-2 test standards. Slump is normally measured by filling an "Abrams cone" with a sample from a fresh batch of concrete. The cone is placed with the wide end down onto a level, non-absorptive surface. It is then filled in three layers of equal volume, with each layer being tamped with a steel rod to consolidate the layer. When the cone is carefully lifted off, the enclosed material slumps a certain amount, owing to gravity. A relatively dry sample slumps very little, having a slump value of one to two inches (25 to 51 mm) out of one foot (300 mm). A relatively wet concrete sample may slump as much as eight inches (200 mm). Workability can also be measured by the flow table test.
Slump can be increased by addition of chemical admixtures such as plasticizer or superplasticizer without changing the water-cement ratio.[76] Some other admixtures, especially air-entraining admixture, can increase the slump of a mix.
High-flow concrete, like self-consolidating concrete, is tested by other flow-measuring methods. One of these methods includes placing the cone on the narrow end and observing how the mix flows through the cone while it is gradually lifted.
After mixing, concrete is a fluid and can be pumped to the location where needed.
Curing
[edit]
Maintaining optimal conditions for cement hydration
[edit]Concrete must be kept moist during curing in order to achieve optimal strength and durability.[77] During curing hydration occurs, allowing calcium-silicate hydrate (Ca-S-H) to form. Over 90% of a mix's final strength is typically reached within four weeks, with the remaining 10% achieved over years or even decades.[78] The conversion of calcium hydroxide in the concrete into calcium carbonate from absorption of CO2 over several decades further strengthens the concrete and makes it more resistant to damage. This carbonation reaction, however, lowers the pH of the cement pore solution and can corrode the reinforcement bars.
Hydration and hardening of concrete during the first three days is critical. Abnormally fast drying and shrinkage due to factors such as evaporation from wind during placement may lead to increased tensile stresses at a time when it has not yet gained sufficient strength, resulting in greater shrinkage cracking. The early strength of the concrete can be increased if it is kept damp during the curing process. Minimizing stress prior to curing minimizes cracking. High-early-strength concrete is designed to hydrate faster, often by increased use of cement that increases shrinkage and cracking. The strength of concrete changes (increases) for up to three years. It depends on cross-section dimension of elements and conditions of structure exploitation.[51] Addition of short-cut polymer fibers can improve (reduce) shrinkage-induced stresses during curing and increase early and ultimate compression strength.[79]
Properly curing concrete leads to increased strength and lower permeability and avoids cracking where the surface dries out prematurely. Care must also be taken to avoid freezing or overheating due to the exothermic setting of cement. Improper curing can cause spalling, reduced strength, poor abrasion resistance and cracking.
Curing techniques avoiding water loss by evaporation
[edit]During the curing period, concrete is ideally maintained at controlled temperature and humidity. To ensure full hydration during curing, concrete slabs are often sprayed with "curing compounds" that create a water-retaining film over the concrete. Typical films are made of wax or related hydrophobic compounds. After the concrete is sufficiently cured, the film is allowed to abrade from the concrete through normal use.[80]
Traditional conditions for curing involve spraying or ponding the concrete surface with water. The adjacent picture shows one of many ways to achieve this, ponding—submerging setting concrete in water and wrapping in plastic to prevent dehydration. Additional common curing methods include wet burlap and plastic sheeting covering the fresh concrete.
For higher-strength applications, accelerated curing techniques may be applied to the concrete. A common technique involves heating the poured concrete with steam, which serves to both keep it damp and raise the temperature so that the hydration process proceeds more quickly and more thoroughly.
Alternative types
[edit]Asphalt
[edit]Asphalt concrete (commonly called asphalt,[81] blacktop, or pavement in North America, and tarmac, bitumen macadam, or rolled asphalt in the United Kingdom and Ireland) is a composite material commonly used to surface roads, parking lots, airports, as well as the core of embankment dams.[82] Asphalt mixtures have been used in pavement construction since the beginning of the twentieth century.[83] It consists of mineral aggregate bound together with asphalt, laid in layers, and compacted. The process was refined and enhanced by Belgian inventor and U.S. immigrant Edward De Smedt.[84]
The terms asphalt (or asphaltic) concrete, bituminous asphalt concrete, and bituminous mixture are typically used only in engineering and construction documents, which define concrete as any composite material composed of mineral aggregate adhered with a binder. The abbreviation, AC, is sometimes used for asphalt concrete but can also denote asphalt content or asphalt cement, referring to the liquid asphalt portion of the composite material.
Graphene enhanced concrete
[edit]Graphene enhanced concretes are standard designs of concrete mixes, except that during the cement-mixing or production process, a small amount of chemically engineered graphene (typically < 0.5% by weight) is added.[85][86] These enhanced graphene concretes are designed around the concrete application.
Microbial
[edit]Bacteria such as Bacillus pasteurii, Bacillus pseudofirmus, Bacillus cohnii, Sporosarcina pasteuri, and Arthrobacter crystallopoietes increase the compression strength of concrete through their biomass. Bacillus sp. CT-5. can reduce corrosion of reinforcement in reinforced concrete by up to four times. Sporosarcina pasteurii reduces water and chloride permeability. B. pasteurii increases resistance to acid.[87] Bacillus pasteurii and B. sphaericuscan induce calcium carbonate precipitation in the surface of cracks, adding compression strength.[88] However some forms of bacteria can also be concrete-destroying.[89]
Nanoconcrete
[edit]
Nanoconcrete (also spelled "nano concrete"' or "nano-concrete") is a class of materials that contains Portland cement particles that are no greater than 100 μm[90] and particles of silica no greater than 500 μm, which fill voids that would otherwise occur in normal concrete, thereby substantially increasing the material's strength.[91] It is widely used in foot and highway bridges where high flexural and compressive strength are indicated.[88]
Pervious
[edit]Pervious concrete is a mix of specially graded coarse aggregate, cement, water, and little-to-no fine aggregates. This concrete is also known as "no-fines" or porous concrete. Mixing the ingredients in a carefully controlled process creates a paste that coats and bonds the aggregate particles. The hardened concrete contains interconnected air voids totaling approximately 15 to 25 percent. Water runs through the voids in the pavement to the soil underneath. Air entrainment admixtures are often used in freeze-thaw climates to minimize the possibility of frost damage. Pervious concrete also permits rainwater to filter through roads and parking lots, to recharge aquifers, instead of contributing to runoff and flooding.[92]
Polymer
[edit]Polymer concretes are mixtures of aggregate and any of various polymers and may be reinforced. The cement is costlier than lime-based cements, but polymer concretes nevertheless have advantages; they have significant tensile strength even without reinforcement, and they are largely impervious to water. Polymer concretes are frequently used for the repair and construction of other applications, such as drains.
Plant fibers
[edit]Plant fibers and particles can be used in a concrete mix or as a reinforcement.[93][94][95] These materials can increase ductility but the lignocellulosic particles hydrolyze during concrete curing as a result of alkaline environment and elevated temperatures[96][97][98] Such process, that is difficult to measure,[99] can affect the properties of the resulting concrete.
Sulfur concrete
[edit]Sulfur concrete is a special concrete that uses sulfur as a binder and does not require cement or water.
Volcanic
[edit]Volcanic concrete substitutes volcanic rock for the limestone that is burned to form clinker. It consumes a similar amount of energy, but does not directly emit carbon as a byproduct.[100] Volcanic rock/ash are used as supplementary cementitious materials in concrete to improve the resistance to sulfate, chloride and alkali silica reaction due to pore refinement.[101] Also, they are generally cost effective in comparison to other aggregates,[102] good for semi and light weight concretes,[102] and good for thermal and acoustic insulation.[102]
Pyroclastic materials, such as pumice, scoria, and ashes are formed from cooling magma during explosive volcanic eruptions. They are used as supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) or as aggregates for cements and concretes.[103] They have been extensively used since ancient times to produce materials for building applications. For example, pumice and other volcanic glasses were added as a natural pozzolanic material for mortars and plasters during the construction of the Villa San Marco in the Roman period (89 BC – 79 AD), which remain one of the best-preserved otium villae of the Bay of Naples in Italy.[104]
Waste light
[edit]Waste light is a form of polymer modified concrete. The specific polymer admixture allows the replacement of all the traditional aggregates (gravel, sand, stone) by any mixture of solid waste materials in the grain size of 3–10 mm to form a low-compressive-strength (3–20 N/mm2) product[105] for road and building construction. One cubic meter of waste light concrete contains 1.1–1.3 m3 of shredded waste and no other aggregates.
Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC)
[edit]Recycled aggregate concretes are standard concrete mixes with the addition or substitution of natural aggregates with recycled aggregates sourced from construction and demolition wastes, disused pre-cast concretes or masonry. In most cases, recycled aggregate concrete results in higher water absorption levels by capillary action and permeation, which are the prominent determiners of the strength and durability of the resulting concrete. The increase in water absorption levels is mainly caused by the porous adhered mortar that exists in the recycled aggregates. Accordingly, recycled concrete aggregates that have been washed to reduce the quantity of mortar adhered to aggregates show lower water absorption levels compared to untreated recycled aggregates.
The quality of the recycled aggregate concrete is determined by several factors, including the size, the number of replacement cycles, and the moisture levels of the recycled aggregates. When the recycled concrete aggregates are crushed into coarser fractures, the mixed concrete shows better permeability levels, resulting in an overall increase in strength. In contrast, recycled masonry aggregates provide better qualities when crushed in finer fractures. With each generation of recycled concrete, the resulting compressive strength decreases.
Properties
[edit]Concrete has relatively high compressive strength, but much lower tensile strength.[106] Therefore, it is usually reinforced with materials that are strong in tension (often steel). The elasticity of concrete is relatively constant at low stress levels but starts decreasing at higher stress levels as matrix cracking develops. Concrete has a very low coefficient of thermal expansion and shrinks as it matures. All concrete structures crack to some extent, due to shrinkage and tension. Concrete that is subjected to long-duration forces is prone to creep.
Tests can be performed to ensure that the properties of concrete correspond to specifications for the application.

The ingredients affect the strengths of the material. Concrete strength values are usually specified as the lower-bound compressive strength of either a cylindrical or cubic specimen as determined by standard test procedures.
The strengths of concrete is dictated by its function. Very low-strength—14 MPa (2,000 psi) or less—concrete may be used when the concrete must be lightweight.[107] Lightweight concrete is often achieved by adding air, foams, or lightweight aggregates, with the side effect that the strength is reduced. For most routine uses, 20 to 32 MPa (2,900 to 4,600 psi) concrete is often used. 40 MPa (5,800 psi) concrete is readily commercially available as a more durable, although more expensive, option. Higher-strength concrete is often used for larger civil projects.[108] Strengths above 40 MPa (5,800 psi) are often used for specific building elements. For example, the lower floor columns of high-rise concrete buildings may use concrete of 80 MPa (11,600 psi) or more, to keep the size of the columns small. Bridges may use long beams of high-strength concrete to lower the number of spans required.[109][110] Occasionally, other structural needs may require high-strength concrete. If a structure must be very rigid, concrete of very high strength may be specified, even much stronger than is required to bear the service loads. Strengths as high as 130 MPa (18,900 psi) have been used commercially for these reasons.[109]
Energy efficiency
[edit]The cement produced for making concrete accounts for about 8% of worldwide CO2 emissions per year (compared to, e.g., global aviation at 1.9%).[111] The two largest sources of CO2 are produced by the cement manufacturing process, arising from (1) the decarbonation reaction of limestone in the cement kiln (T ≈ 950 °C), and (2) from the combustion of fossil fuel to reach the sintering temperature (T ≈ 1450 °C) of cement clinker in the kiln. The energy required for extracting, crushing, and mixing the raw materials (construction aggregates used in the concrete production, and also limestone and clay feeding the cement kiln) is lower. Energy requirement for transportation of ready-mix concrete is also lower because it is produced nearby the construction site from local resources, typically manufactured within 100 kilometers of the job site.[112] The overall embodied energy of concrete at roughly 1 to 1.5 megajoules per kilogram is therefore lower than for many structural and construction materials.[113]
Once in place, concrete offers a great energy efficiency over the lifetime of a building.[114] Concrete walls leak air far less than those made of wood frames.[115] Air leakage accounts for a large percentage of energy loss from a home. The thermal mass properties of concrete increase the efficiency of both residential and commercial buildings. By storing and releasing the energy needed for heating or cooling, concrete's thermal mass delivers year-round benefits by reducing temperature swings inside and minimizing heating and cooling costs.[116] While insulation reduces energy loss through the building envelope, thermal mass uses walls to store and release energy. Modern concrete wall systems use both external insulation and thermal mass to create an energy-efficient building. Insulating concrete forms (ICFs) are hollow blocks or panels made of either insulating foam or rastra that are stacked to form the shape of the walls of a building and then filled with reinforced concrete to create the structure.
Fire safety
[edit]Concrete buildings are more resistant to fire than those constructed using steel frames, since concrete has lower heat conductivity than steel and can thus last longer under the same fire conditions. Concrete is sometimes used as a fire protection for steel frames, for the same effect as above. Concrete as a fire shield, for example Fondu fyre, can also be used in extreme environments like a missile launch pad.
Options for non-combustible construction include floors, ceilings and roofs made of cast-in-place and hollow-core precast concrete. For walls, concrete masonry technology and Insulating Concrete Forms (ICFs) are additional options. ICFs are hollow blocks or panels made of fireproof insulating foam that are stacked to form the shape of the walls of a building and then filled with reinforced concrete to create the structure.
Concrete also provides good resistance against externally applied forces such as high winds, hurricanes, and tornadoes owing to its lateral stiffness, which results in minimal horizontal movement. However, this stiffness can work against certain types of concrete structures, particularly where a relatively higher flexing structure is required to resist more extreme forces.
Earthquake safety
[edit]As discussed above, concrete is very strong in compression, but weak in tension. Larger earthquakes can generate very large shear loads on structures. These shear loads subject the structure to both tensile and compressional loads. Concrete structures without reinforcement, like other unreinforced masonry structures, can fail during severe earthquake shaking. Unreinforced masonry structures constitute one of the largest earthquake risks globally.[117] These risks can be reduced through seismic retrofitting of at-risk buildings, (e.g. school buildings in Istanbul, Turkey).[118]
Construction
[edit]
Concrete is one of the most durable building materials. It provides superior fire resistance compared with wooden construction and gains strength over time. Structures made of concrete can have a long service life.[119] Concrete is used more than any other artificial material in the world.[120] As of 2006, about 7.5 billion cubic meters of concrete are made each year, more than one cubic meter for every person on Earth.[121]
Reinforced
[edit]The use of reinforcement, in the form of iron was introduced in the 1850s by French industrialist François Coignet, and it was not until the 1880s that German civil engineer G. A. Wayss used steel as reinforcement. Concrete is a relatively brittle material that is strong under compression but less in tension. Plain, unreinforced concrete is unsuitable for many structures as it is relatively poor at withstanding stresses induced by vibrations, wind loading, and so on. Hence, to increase its overall strength, steel rods, wires, mesh or cables can be embedded in concrete before it is set. This reinforcement, often known as rebar, resists tensile forces.[123]
Reinforced concrete (RC) is a versatile composite and one of the most widely used materials in modern construction. It is made up of different constituent materials with very different properties that complement each other. In the case of reinforced concrete, the component materials are almost always concrete and steel. These two materials form a strong bond together and are able to resist a variety of applied forces, effectively acting as a single structural element.[124]
Reinforced concrete can be precast or cast-in-place (in situ) concrete, and is used in a wide range of applications such as; slab, wall, beam, column, foundation, and frame construction. Reinforcement is generally placed in areas of the concrete that are likely to be subject to tension, such as the lower portion of beams. Usually, there is a minimum of 50 mm cover, both above and below the steel reinforcement, to resist spalling and corrosion which can lead to structural instability.[123] Other types of non-steel reinforcement, such as Fibre-reinforced concretes are used for specialized applications, predominately as a means of controlling cracking.[124]
Precast
[edit]Precast concrete is concrete which is cast in one place for use elsewhere and is a mobile material. The largest part of precast production is carried out in the works of specialist suppliers, although in some instances, due to economic and geographical factors, scale of product or difficulty of access, the elements are cast on or adjacent to the construction site.[125] Precasting offers considerable advantages because it is carried out in a controlled environment, protected from the elements, but the downside of this is the contribution to greenhouse gas emission from transportation to the construction site.[124]
Advantages to be achieved by employing precast concrete:[125]
- Preferred dimension schemes exist, with elements of tried and tested designs available from a catalogue.
- Major savings in time result from manufacture of structural elements apart from the series of events which determine overall duration of the construction, known by planning engineers as the 'critical path'.
- Availability of Laboratory facilities capable of the required control tests, many being certified for specific testing in accordance with National Standards.
- Equipment with capability suited to specific types of production such as stressing beds with appropriate capacity, moulds and machinery dedicated to particular products.
- High-quality finishes achieved direct from the mould eliminate the need for interior decoration and ensure low maintenance costs.
Mass structures
[edit]
Due to cement's exothermic chemical reaction while setting up, large concrete structures such as dams, navigation locks, large mat foundations, and large breakwaters generate excessive heat during hydration and associated expansion. To mitigate these effects, post-cooling[126] is commonly applied during construction. An early example at Hoover Dam used a network of pipes between vertical concrete placements to circulate cooling water during the curing process to avoid damaging overheating. Similar systems are still used; depending on volume of the pour, the concrete mix used, and ambient air temperature, the cooling process may last for many months after the concrete is placed. Various methods also are used to pre-cool the concrete mix in mass concrete structures.[126]
Another approach to mass concrete structures that minimizes cement's thermal by-product is the use of roller-compacted concrete, which uses a dry mix which has a much lower cooling requirement than conventional wet placement. It is deposited in thick layers as a semi-dry material then roller compacted into a dense, strong mass.
Surface finishes
[edit]
Raw concrete surfaces tend to be porous and have a relatively uninteresting appearance. Many finishes can be applied to improve the appearance and preserve the surface against staining, water penetration, and freezing.
Examples of improved appearance include stamped concrete where the wet concrete has a pattern impressed on the surface, to give a paved, cobbled or brick-like effect, and may be accompanied with coloration. Another popular effect for flooring and table tops is polished concrete where the concrete is polished optically flat with diamond abrasives and sealed with polymers or other sealants.
Other finishes can be achieved with chiseling, or more conventional techniques such as painting or covering it with other materials.
The proper treatment of the surface of concrete, and therefore its characteristics, is an important stage in the construction and renovation of architectural structures.[127]
Prestressed
[edit]
Prestressed concrete is a form of reinforced concrete that builds in compressive stresses during construction to oppose tensile stresses experienced in use. This can greatly reduce the weight of beams or slabs, by better distributing the stresses in the structure to make optimal use of the reinforcement. For example, a horizontal beam tends to sag. Prestressed reinforcement along the bottom of the beam counteracts this. In pre-tensioned concrete, the prestressing is achieved by using steel or polymer tendons or bars that are subjected to a tensile force prior to casting, or for post-tensioned concrete, after casting.
There are two different systems being used:[124]
- Pretensioned concrete is almost always precast, and contains steel wires (tendons) that are held in tension while the concrete is placed and sets around them.
- Post-tensioned concrete has ducts through it. After the concrete has gained strength, tendons are pulled through the ducts and stressed. The ducts are then filled with grout. Bridges built in this way have experienced considerable corrosion of the tendons, so external post-tensioning may now be used in which the tendons run along the outer surface of the concrete.
More than 55,000 miles (89,000 km) of highways in the United States are paved with this material. Reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete and precast concrete are the most widely used types of concrete functional extensions in modern days. For more information see Brutalist architecture.
Placement
[edit]
Once mixed, concrete is typically transported to the place where it is intended to become a structural item. Various methods of transportation and placement are used depending on the distances involve, quantity needed, and other details of application. Large amounts are often transported by truck, poured free under gravity or through a tremie, or pumped through a pipe. Smaller amounts may be carried in a skip (a metal container which can be tilted or opened to release the contents, usually transported by crane or hoist), or wheelbarrow, or carried in toggle bags for manual placement underwater.
Cold weather placement
[edit]
Extreme weather conditions (extreme heat or cold; windy conditions, and humidity variations) can significantly alter the quality of concrete. Many precautions are observed in cold weather placement.[128] Low temperatures significantly slow the chemical reactions involved in hydration of cement, thus affecting the strength development. Preventing freezing is the most important precaution, as formation of ice crystals can cause damage to the crystalline structure of the hydrated cement paste. If the surface of the concrete pour is insulated from the outside temperatures, the heat of hydration will prevent freezing.
The American Concrete Institute (ACI) definition of cold weather placement, ACI 306,[129] is:
- A period when for more than three successive days the average daily air temperature drops below 40 °F (~ 4.5 °C), and
- Temperature stays below 50 °F (10 °C) for more than one-half of any 24-hour period.
In Canada, where temperatures tend to be much lower during the cold season, the following criteria are used by CSA A23.1:
- When the air temperature is ≤ 5 °C, and
- When there is a probability that the temperature may fall below 5 °C within 24 hours of placing the concrete.
The minimum strength before exposing concrete to extreme cold is 500 psi (3.4 MPa). CSA A 23.1 specified a compressive strength of 7.0 MPa to be considered safe for exposure to freezing.
Underwater placement
[edit]
Concrete may be placed and cured underwater. Care must be taken in the placement method to prevent washing out the cement. Underwater placement methods include the tremie, pumping, skip placement, manual placement using toggle bags, and bagwork.[130]
A tremie is a vertical, or near-vertical, pipe with a hopper at the top used to pour concrete underwater in a way that avoids washout of cement from the mix due to turbulent water contact with the concrete while it is flowing. This produces a more reliable strength of the product. The toggle bag method is generally used for placing small quantities and for repairs. Wet concrete is loaded into a reusable canvas bag and squeezed out at the required place by the diver. Care must be taken to avoid washout of the cement and fines.
Underwater bagwork is the manual placement by divers of woven cloth bags containing dry mix, followed by piercing the bags with steel rebar pins to tie the bags together after every two or three layers, and create a path for hydration to induce curing, which can typically take about 6 to 12 hours for initial hardening and full hardening by the next day. Bagwork concrete will generally reach full strength within 28 days. Each bag must be pierced by at least one, and preferably up to four pins. Bagwork is a simple and convenient method of underwater concrete placement which does not require pumps, plant, or formwork, and which can minimise environmental effects from dispersing cement in the water. Prefilled bags are available, which are sealed to prevent premature hydration if stored in suitable dry conditions. The bags may be biodegradable.[131]
Grouted aggregate is an alternative method of forming a concrete mass underwater, where the forms are filled with coarse aggregate and the voids then completely filled from the bottom by displacing the water with pumped grout.[130]
Roads
[edit]Concrete roads are more fuel efficient to drive on,[132] more reflective and last significantly longer than other paving surfaces, yet have a much smaller market share than other paving solutions. Modern-paving methods and design practices have changed the economics of concrete paving, so that a well-designed and placed concrete pavement will be less expensive on initial costs and significantly less expensive over the life cycle. Another major benefit is that pervious concrete can be used, which eliminates the need to place storm drains near the road, and reducing the need for slightly sloped roadway to help rainwater to run off. No longer requiring discarding rainwater through use of drains also means that less electricity is needed (more pumping is otherwise needed in the water-distribution system), and no rainwater gets polluted as it no longer mixes with polluted water. Rather, it is immediately absorbed by the ground.[citation needed]
Tube forest
[edit]Cement molded into a forest of tubular structures can be 5.6 times more resistant to cracking/failure than standard concrete. The approach mimics mammalian cortical bone that features elliptical, hollow osteons suspended in an organic matrix, connected by relatively weak "cement lines". Cement lines provide a preferable in-plane crack path. This design fails via a "stepwise toughening mechanism". Cracks are contained within the tube, reducing spreading, by dissipating energy at each tube/step.[133]
Environment, health and safety
[edit]This section may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints. (January 2024) |
The manufacture and use of concrete produce a wide range of environmental, economic and social impacts.
Health and safety
[edit]
Grinding of concrete can produce hazardous dust. Exposure to cement dust can lead to issues such as silicosis, kidney disease, skin irritation and similar effects. The U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in the United States recommends attaching local exhaust ventilation shrouds to electric concrete grinders to control the spread of this dust. In addition, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has placed more stringent regulations on companies whose workers regularly come into contact with silica dust. An updated silica rule, which OSHA put into effect 23 September 2017 for construction companies, restricted the amount of breathable crystalline silica workers could legally come into contact with to 50 micro grams per cubic meter of air per 8-hour workday. That same rule went into effect 23 June 2018 for general industry, hydraulic fracturing and maritime. That deadline was extended to 23 June 2021 for engineering controls in the hydraulic fracturing industry. Companies which fail to meet the tightened safety regulations can face financial charges and extensive penalties. The presence of some substances in concrete, including useful and unwanted additives, can cause health concerns due to toxicity and radioactivity. Fresh concrete (before curing is complete) is highly alkaline and must be handled with proper protective equipment.
Cement
[edit]A major component of concrete is cement, a fine powder used mainly to bind sand and coarser aggregates together in concrete. Although a variety of cement types exist, the most common is "Portland cement", which is produced by mixing clinker with smaller quantities of other additives such as gypsum and ground limestone. The production of clinker, the main constituent of cement, is responsible for the bulk of the sector's greenhouse gas emissions, including both energy intensity and process emissions.[134]
The cement industry is one of the three primary producers of carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas – the other two being energy production and transportation industries. On average, every tonne of cement produced releases one tonne of CO2 into the atmosphere. Pioneer cement manufacturers have claimed to reach lower carbon intensities, with 590 kg of CO2eq per tonne of cement produced.[135] The emissions are due to combustion and calcination processes,[136] which roughly account for 40% and 60% of the greenhouse gases, respectively. Considering that cement is only a fraction of the constituents of concrete, it is estimated that a tonne of concrete is responsible for emitting about 100–200 kg of CO2.[137][138] Every year more than 10 billion tonnes of concrete are used worldwide.[138] In the coming years, large quantities of concrete will continue to be used, and the mitigation of CO2 emissions from the sector will be even more critical.
Concrete is used to create hard surfaces that contribute to surface runoff, which can cause heavy soil erosion, water pollution, and flooding, but conversely can be used to divert, dam, and control flooding. Concrete dust released by building demolition and natural disasters can be a major source of dangerous air pollution. Concrete is a contributor to the urban heat island effect, though less so than asphalt.
Climate change mitigation
[edit]Reducing the cement clinker content might have positive effects on the environmental life-cycle assessment of concrete. Some research work on reducing the cement clinker content in concrete has already been carried out. However, there exist different research strategies. Often replacement of some clinker for large amounts of slag or fly ash was investigated based on conventional concrete technology. This could lead to a waste of scarce raw materials such as slag and fly ash. The aim of other research activities is the efficient use of cement and reactive materials like slag and fly ash in concrete based on a modified mix design approach.[139]
The embodied carbon of a precast concrete facade can be reduced by 50% when using the presented fiber reinforced high performance concrete in place of typical reinforced concrete cladding.[140] Studies have been conducted about commercialization of low-carbon concretes. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of low-carbon concrete was investigated according to the ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) and fly ash (FA) replacement ratios. Global warming potential (GWP) of GGBS decreased by 1.1 kg CO2 eq/m3, while FA decreased by 17.3 kg CO2 eq/m3 when the mineral admixture replacement ratio was increased by 10%. This study also compared the compressive strength properties of binary blended low-carbon concrete according to the replacement ratios, and the applicable range of mixing proportions was derived.[141]
Climate change adaptation
[edit]High-performance building materials will be particularly important for enhancing resilience, including for flood defenses and critical-infrastructure protection.[142] Risks to infrastructure and cities posed by extreme weather events are especially serious for those places exposed to flood and hurricane damage, but also where residents need protection from extreme summer temperatures. Traditional concrete can come under strain when exposed to humidity and higher concentrations of atmospheric CO2. While concrete is likely to remain important in applications where the environment is challenging, novel, smarter and more adaptable materials are also needed.[138][143]
End-of-life: degradation and waste
[edit]
Recycling
[edit]There have been concerns about the recycling of painted concrete due to possible lead content. Studies have indicated that recycled concrete exhibits lower strength and durability compared to concrete produced using natural aggregates.[148][149][150][151] This deficiency can be addressed by incorporating supplementary materials such as fly ash into the mixture.[152]
Recygenie has built a 220-unit housing complex out of 100% recycled concrete, strengthening the concrete by adding recycled sand, steel slag, and other byproducts.[153]
World records
[edit]The world record for the largest concrete pour in a single project is the Three Gorges Dam in Hubei Province, China by the Three Gorges Corporation. The amount of concrete used in the construction of the dam is estimated at 16 million cubic meters over 17 years. The previous record was 12.3 million cubic meters held by Itaipu hydropower station in Brazil.[154][155][156]
The world record for concrete pumping was set on 7 August 2009 during the construction of the Parbati Hydroelectric Project, near the village of Suind, Himachal Pradesh, India, when the concrete mix was pumped through a vertical height of 715 m (2,346 ft).[157][158]
The Polavaram dam works in Andhra Pradesh on 6 January 2019 entered the Guinness World Records by pouring 32,100 cubic metres of concrete in 24 hours.[159] The world record for the largest continuously poured concrete raft was achieved in August 2007 in Abu Dhabi by contracting firm Al Habtoor-CCC Joint Venture and the concrete supplier is Unibeton Ready Mix.[160][161] The pour (a part of the foundation for the Abu Dhabi's Landmark Tower) was 16,000 cubic meters of concrete poured within a two-day period.[162] The previous record, 13,200 cubic meters poured in 54 hours despite a severe tropical storm requiring the site to be covered with tarpaulins to allow work to continue, was achieved in 1992 by joint Japanese and South Korean consortiums Hazama Corporation and the Samsung C&T Corporation for the construction of the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.[163]
The world record for largest continuously poured concrete floor was completed 8 November 1997, in Louisville, Kentucky by design-build firm EXXCEL Project Management. The monolithic placement consisted of 225,000 square feet (20,900 m2) of concrete placed in 30 hours, finished to a flatness tolerance of FF 54.60 and a levelness tolerance of FL 43.83. This surpassed the previous record by 50% in total volume and 7.5% in total area.[164][165]
The record for the largest continuously placed underwater concrete pour was completed 18 October 2010, in New Orleans, Louisiana by contractor C. J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC of Grove City, Ohio. The placement consisted of 10,251 cubic yards of concrete placed in 58.5 hours using two concrete pumps and two dedicated concrete batch plants. Upon curing, this placement allows the 50,180-square-foot (4,662 m2) cofferdam to be dewatered approximately 26 feet (7.9 m) below sea level to allow the construction of the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Sill & Monolith Project to be completed in the dry.[166]
Art
[edit]Concrete is used as an artistic medium.[167] Its appearance is also imitated in other media: for example Congolese artist Sardoine Mia creates canvases that look like concrete surfaces.[168]
See also
[edit]- Concrete leveling – Process to level concrete by levelling its underlying foundation
- Concrete mixer – Device that combines cement, aggregate, and water to form concrete
- Concrete masonry unit – Standard-sized block used in construction
- Concrete plant – Equipment that combines various ingredients to form concrete
- Concrete Calculator and Slab
- Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures
- Heavy metals – Loosely defined subset of elements that exhibit metallic properties
- Hempcrete – Biocomposite material used for construction and insulation
- List of tools for concrete and masonry
- Particulates – Microscopic solid or liquid matter suspended in the Earth's atmosphere
- Schmidt hammer – Type of measuring instrument
- Syncrete – Synthetic form of concrete
- Thermal integrity profiling – Method used to test concrete
References
[edit]- ^ Gagg, Colin R. (May 2014). "Cement and concrete as an engineering material: An historic appraisal and case study analysis". Engineering Failure Analysis. 40: 114–140. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.02.004.
- ^ Crow, James Mitchell (March 2008). "The concrete conundrum" (PDF). Chemistry World: 62–66. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- ^ "Cement Statistics and Information". usgs.gov. United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 21 March 2025.
- ^ "Scientific Principles". matse1.matse.illinois.edu. Retrieved 24 May 2023.
- ^ Li, Zongjin (2011). Advanced concrete technology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-90243-1.
- ^ Industrial Resources Council (2008). "Portland Cement Concrete". www.industrialresourcescouncil.org. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
- ^ National Highway Institute. "Portland Cement Concrete Materials" (PDF). Federal Highway Administration. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- ^ Limbachiya, Mukesh C.; Kew, Hsein Y. (3 September 2008). Excellence in Concrete Construction through Innovation: Proceedings of the conference held at the Kingston University, United Kingdom, 9 - 10 September 2008. CRC Press. p. 115. ISBN 978-0-203-88344-0.
- ^ Allen, Edward; Iano, Joseph (2013). Fundamentals of building construction: materials and methods (Sixth ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. p. 314. ISBN 978-1-118-42086-7. OCLC 835621943.
- ^ "concretus". Latin Lookup. Archived from the original on 12 May 2013. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
- ^ Heinrich Schliemann; Wilhelm Dörpfeld; Felix Adler (1885). Tiryns: The Prehistoric Palace of the Kings of Tiryns, the Results of the Latest Excavations. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 190, 203–204, 215.
- ^ Sparavigna, Amelia Carolina (2011). "Ancient concrete works". arXiv:1110.5230 [physics.pop-ph].
- ^ Jacobsen T and Lloyd S, (1935) "Sennacherib's Aqueduct at Jerwan," Oriental Institute Publications 24, Chicago University Press
- ^ Stella L. Marusin (1 January 1996). "Ancient Concrete Structures". Concrete International. 18 (1): 56–58.
- ^ a b Gromicko, Nick; Shepard, Kenton (2016). "The History of Concrete". International Association of Certified Home Inspectors, Inc. Retrieved 27 December 2018.
- ^ "Riddle solved: Why was Roman concrete so durable?". MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 6 January 2023. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
- ^ Moore, David (6 October 2014). "Roman Concrete Research". Romanconcrete.com. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "The History of Concrete". Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Archived from the original on 27 November 2012. Retrieved 8 January 2013.
- ^ Chiu, Y. C. (2010). An Introduction to the History of Project Management: From the Earliest Times to A.D. 1900. Eburon Uitgeverij B.V. p. 50. ISBN 978-90-5972-437-2.
- ^ Lancaster, Lynne (2005). Concrete Vaulted Construction in Imperial Rome. Innovations in Context. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-511-16068-4.
- ^ Moore, David (1999). "The Pantheon". romanconcrete.com. Archived from the original on 1 October 2011. Retrieved 26 September 2011.
- ^ D.S. Robertson (1969). Greek and Roman Architecture, Cambridge, p. 233
- ^ Cowan, Henry J. (1977). The master builders: a history of structural and environmental design from ancient Egypt to the nineteenth century. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-02740-5. OCLC 2896326.
- ^ "CIVL 1101". www.ce.memphis.edu. Archived from the original on 27 February 2017.
- ^ Robert Mark, Paul Hutchinson: "On the Structure of the Roman Pantheon", Art Bulletin, Vol. 68, No. 1 (1986), p. 26, fn. 5
- ^ Kwan, Stephen; Larosa, Judith; Grutzeck, Michael W. (1995). "29Si and27Al MASNMR Study of Stratlingite". Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 78 (7): 1921–1926. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08910.x.
- ^ Jackson, Marie D.; Landis, Eric N.; Brune, Philip F.; Vitti, Massimo; Chen, Heng; Li, Qinfei; Kunz, Martin; Wenk, Hans-Rudolf; Monteiro, Paulo J. M.; Ingraffea, Anthony R. (30 December 2014). "Mechanical resilience and cementitious processes in Imperial Roman architectural mortar". PNAS. 111 (52): 18484–18489. Bibcode:2014PNAS..11118484J. doi:10.1073/pnas.1417456111. PMC 4284584. PMID 25512521.
- ^ Marie D. Jackson; Sean R. Mulcahy; Heng Chen; Yao Li; Qinfei Li; Piergiulio Cappelletti; Hans-Rudolf Wenk (3 July 2017). "Phillipsite and Al-tobermorite mineral cements produced through low-temperature water-rock reactions in Roman marine concrete". American Mineralogist. 102 (7): 1435–1450. Bibcode:2017AmMin.102.1435J. doi:10.2138/am-2017-5993CCBY. S2CID 53452767.
- ^ Knapton, Sarah (3 July 2017). "Secret of how Roman concrete survived tidal battering for 2,000 years revealed". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 4 July 2017.
- ^ Seymour, Linda M.; Maragh, Janille; Sabatini, Paolo; Di Tommaso, Michel; Weaver, James C.; Masic, Admir (6 January 2023). "Hot mixing: Mechanistic insights into the durability of ancient Roman concrete". Science Advances. 9 (1) eadd1602. Bibcode:2023SciA....9D1602S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.add1602. PMC 9821858. PMID 36608117.
- ^ Starr, Michelle (1 February 2024). "We Finally Know How Ancient Roman Concrete Was Able to Last Thousands of Years". ScienceAlert. Retrieved 1 February 2024.
- ^ Peter Hewlett and Martin Liska (eds.), Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, 5th ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2019), pp. 3–4.
- ^ Rassia, Stamatina Th; Pardalos, Panos M. (15 August 2013). Cities for Smart Environmental and Energy Futures: Impacts on Architecture and Technology. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 58. ISBN 978-3-642-37661-0.
- ^ Nick Gromicko & Kenton Shepard. "the History of Concrete". The International Association of Certified Home Inspectors (InterNACHI). Archived from the original on 15 January 2013. Retrieved 8 January 2013.
- ^ Herring, Benjamin. "The Secrets of Roman Concrete" (PDF). Romanconcrete.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 September 2012. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
- ^ Courland, Robert (2011). Concrete planet: the strange and fascinating story of the world's most common man-made material. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-61614-481-4. Archived from the original on 4 November 2015. Retrieved 28 August 2015.
- ^ "The History of Concrete and Cement". ThoughtCo. 9 April 2012. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "Francois Coignet – French house builder". Retrieved 23 December 2016.
- ^ « Château de Chazelet » [archive], notice no PA00097319, base Mérimée, ministère français de la Culture.
- ^ Billington, David (1985). The Tower and the Bridge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-02393-X.
- ^ "Concrete: Scientific Principles". matse1.matse.illinois.edu. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
- ^ a b Askarian, Mahya; Fakhretaha Aval, Siavash; Joshaghani, Alireza (22 January 2019). "A comprehensive experimental study on the performance of pumice powder in self-compacting concrete (SCC)". Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials. 7 (6): 340–356. doi:10.1080/21650373.2018.1511486. S2CID 139554392.
- ^ Melander, John M.; Farny, James A.; Isberner, Albert W. Jr. (2003). "Portland Cement Plaster/Stucco Manual" (PDF). Portland Cement Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 13 July 2021.
- ^ Evelien Cochez; Wouter Nijs; Giorgio Simbolotti & Giancarlo Tosato. "Cement Production" (PDF). IEA ETSAP – Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 January 2013. Retrieved 9 January 2013.
- ^ Gibbons, Jack (7 January 2008). "Measuring Water in Concrete". Concrete Construction. Archived from the original on 11 May 2013. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
- ^ "Chapter 9: Designing and Proportioning Normal Concrete Mixtures" (PDF). PCA manual. Portland Concrete Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 May 2012. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
- ^ a b "Cement hydration". Understanding Cement. Archived from the original on 17 October 2012. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
- ^ Beaudoin, James; Odler, Ivan (2019). "Hydration, Setting and Hardening of Portland Cement". Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete. pp. 157–250. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-100773-0.00005-8. ISBN 978-0-08-100773-0.
- ^ Oikonomou, Nik. D. (1 February 2005). "Recycled concrete aggregates". Cement and Concrete Composites. Cement and Concrete Research in Greece. 27 (2): 315–318. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.020. ISSN 0958-9465.
- ^ "The Effect of Aggregate Properties on Concrete". www.engr.psu.edu. Engr.psu.edu. 25 December 2012. Archived from the original on 25 December 2012. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ a b Veretennykov, Vitaliy I.; Yugov, Anatoliy M.; Dolmatov, Andriy O.; Bulavytskyi, Maksym S.; Kukharev, Dmytro I.; Bulavytskyi, Artem S. (2008). "Concrete Inhomogeneity of Vertical Cast-in-Place Elements in Skeleton-Type Buildings". AEI 2008. pp. 1–10. doi:10.1061/41002(328)17. ISBN 978-0-7844-1002-8.
- ^ Gerry Bye; Paul Livesey; Leslie Struble (2011). "Admixtures and Special Cements". Portland Cement: Third edition. doi:10.1680/pc.36116.185 (inactive 11 July 2025). ISBN 978-0-7277-3611-6.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link) - ^ a b U.S. Federal Highway Administration (14 June 1999). "Admixtures". Archived from the original on 27 January 2007. Retrieved 25 January 2007.
- ^ Cement Admixture Association. "Admixture Types". Archived from the original on 3 September 2011. Retrieved 25 December 2010.
- ^ Hamakareem, Madeh Izat (14 November 2013). "Effect of Air Entrainment on Concrete Strength". The Constructor. Retrieved 13 November 2020.
- ^ Bensted, John (1 January 1998), Hewlett, Peter C. (ed.), "14 - Special Cements", Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete (Fourth Edition), Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 783–840, doi:10.1016/b978-075066256-7/50026-6, ISBN 978-0-7506-6256-7, retrieved 3 November 2024
- ^ Holland, Terence C. (2005). "Silica Fume User's Manual" (PDF). Silica Fume Association and United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Technical Report FHWA-IF-05-016. Retrieved 31 October 2014.
- ^ Kosmatka, S.; Kerkhoff, B.; Panerese, W. (2002). Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures (14 ed.). Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois.
- ^ Gamble, William. "Cement, Mortar, and Concrete". In Baumeister; Avallone; Baumeister (eds.). Mark's Handbook for Mechanical Engineers (Eighth ed.). McGraw Hill. Section 6, page 177.
- ^ Kosmatka, S.H.; Panarese, W.C. (1988). Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures. Skokie, IL: Portland Cement Association. pp. 17, 42, 70, 184. ISBN 978-0-89312-087-0.
- ^ "Paving the way to greenhouse gas reductions". MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 28 August 2011. Archived from the original on 31 October 2012. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ U.S. Federal Highway Administration (14 June 1999). "Fly Ash". Archived from the original on 21 June 2007. Retrieved 24 January 2007.
- ^ U.S. Federal Highway Administration. "Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag". Archived from the original on 22 January 2007. Retrieved 24 January 2007.
- ^ U.S. Federal Highway Administration. "Silica Fume". Archived from the original on 22 January 2007. Retrieved 24 January 2007.
- ^ Mullapudi, Taraka Ravi Shankar; Gao, Di; Ayoub, Ashraf (September 2013). "Non-destructive evaluation of carbon nanofibre concrete". Magazine of Concrete Research. 65 (18): 1081–1091. doi:10.1680/macr.12.00187.
- ^ Tuan, Christopher; Yehia, Sherif (1 July 2004). "Evaluation of Electrically Conductive Concrete Containing Carbon Products for Deicing". ACI Materials Journal. 101 (4): 287–293.
- ^ Kloosterman, Karin (23 May 2023). "Tiny house built from diapers and concrete". Green Prophet. Retrieved 6 October 2024.
- ^ "Cold Joints". www.concrete.org.uk. The Concrete Society. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
- ^ "Grades of Concrete with Proportion (Mix Ratio)". 26 March 2018.
- ^ "Concrete International". concrete.org. 1 November 1989. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "ACI 304R-00: Guide for Measuring, Mixing, Transporting, and Placing Concrete (Reapproved 2009)".
- ^ Vandenberg, Aileen; Wille, Kay (2 June 2019). "The Effects of Resonant Acoustic Mixing on the Microstructure of UHPC". Second International Interactive Symposium on UHPC: The Effects of Resonant Acoustic Mixing on the Microstructure of UHPC. Vol. 2. doi:10.21838/uhpc.9636. ISSN 0000-0000.
{{cite book}}:|journal=ignored (help) - ^ Sarviel, Ed (1993). Construction Estimating Reference Data. Craftsman Book Company. p. 74. ISBN 978-0-934041-84-3.
- ^ Cook, Marllon Daniel; Ghaeezadah, Ashkan; Ley, M. Tyler (1 February 2018). "Impacts of Coarse-Aggregate Gradation on the Workability of Slip-Formed Concrete". Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 30 (2) 04017265. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002126.
- ^ "Aggregate in Concrete – the Concrete Network". Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 15 January 2017.
- ^ Ferrari, L.; Kaufmann, J.; Winnefeld, F.; Plank, J. (October 2011). "Multi-method approach to study influence of superplasticizers on cement suspensions". Cement and Concrete Research. 41 (10): 1058–1066. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.010.
- ^ "Curing Concrete" Peter C. Taylor CRC Press 2013. ISBN 978-0-415-77952-4. eBook ISBN 978-0-203-86613-9
- ^ "Concrete Testing". technology.calumet.purdue.edu. Archived from the original on 24 October 2008. Retrieved 10 November 2008.
- ^ ""Admixtures for Cementitious Applications."" (PDF). www.minifibers.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 October 2016.
- ^ "Home" (PDF). www.daytonsuperior.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 December 2015. Retrieved 12 November 2015.
- ^ The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 2011. p. 106. ISBN 978-0-547-04101-8.
- ^ "Asphalt concrete cores for embankment dams". International Water Power and Dam Construction. Archived from the original on 7 July 2012. Retrieved 3 April 2011.
- ^ Polaczyk, Pawel; Huang, Baoshan; Shu, Xiang; Gong, Hongren (September 2019). "Investigation into Locking Point of Asphalt Mixtures Utilizing Superpave and Marshall Compactors". Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 31 (9) 04019188. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002839. S2CID 197635732.
- ^ Reid, Carlton (2015). Roads Were Not Built for Cars: How Cyclists Were the First to Push for Good Roads & Became the Pioneers of Motoring. Island Press. p. 120. ISBN 978-1-61091-689-9.
- ^ Dalal, Sejal P.; Dalal, Purvang (March 2021). "Experimental Investigation on Strength and Durability of Graphene Nanoengineered Concrete". Construction and Building Materials. 276 122236. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122236. S2CID 233663658.
- ^ Dalal, Sejal P.; Desai, Kandarp; Shah, Dhairya; Prajapati, Sanjay; Dalal, Purvang; Gandhi, Vimal; Shukla, Atindra; Vithlani, Ravi (January 2022). "Strength and feasibility aspects of concrete mixes induced with low-cost surfactant functionalized graphene powder". Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 23 (1): 39–52. doi:10.1007/s42107-021-00407-7. S2CID 257110774.
- ^ Metwally, Gehad A. M.; Mahdy, Mohamed; Abd El-Raheem, Ahmed El-Raheem H. (August 2020). "Performance of Bio Concrete by Using Bacillus Pasteurii Bacteria". Civil Engineering Journal. 6 (8): 1443–1456. doi:10.28991/cej-2020-03091559.
- ^ a b Raju, N. Krishna (2018). Prestressed Concrete, 6e. McGraw-Hill Education. p. 1131. ISBN 978-93-87886-25-4.
- ^ Falkow, Stanley; Rosenberg, Eugene; Schleifer, Karl-Heinz; Stackebrandt, Erko (13 July 2006). The Prokaryotes: Vol. 2: Ecophysiology and Biochemistry. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 1005. ISBN 978-0-387-25492-0.
- ^ Tiwari, AK; Chowdhury, Subrato (2013). "An over view of the application of nanotechnology in construction materials". Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering under Uncertainty: Safety Assessment and Management (ISEUSAM-2012). Cakrabartī, Subrata; Bhattacharya, Gautam. New Delhi: Springer India. p. 485. ISBN 978-81-322-0757-3. OCLC 831413888.
- ^ Thanmanaselvi, M; Ramasamy, V (2023). "A study on durability characteristics of nano-concrete". Materials Today: Proceedings. 80: 2360–2365. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.349. ISSN 2214-7853.
- ^ "Ground Water Recharging Through Pervious Concrete Pavement". ResearchGate. Retrieved 26 January 2021.
- ^ Onuaguluchi, Obinna; Banthia, Nemkumar (1 April 2016). "Plant-based natural fibre reinforced cement composites: A review". Cement and Concrete Composites. 68: 96–108. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.02.014. ISSN 0958-9465.
- ^ Wu, Hansong; Shen, Aiqin; Cheng, Qianqian; Cai, Yanxia; Ren, Guiping; Pan, Hongmei; Deng, Shiyi (20 September 2023). "A review of recent developments in application of plant fibers as reinforcements in concrete". Journal of Cleaner Production. 419 138265. Bibcode:2023JCPro.41938265W. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138265. ISSN 0959-6526.
- ^ Yan, Libo; Kasal, Bohumil; Huang, Liang (1 May 2016). "A review of recent research on the use of cellulosic fibres, their fibre fabric reinforced cementitious, geo-polymer and polymer composites in civil engineering". Composites Part B: Engineering. 92: 94–132. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.002. ISSN 1359-8368.
- ^ Li, Juan; Kasal, Bohumil (July 2023). "Degradation Mechanism of the Wood-Cell Wall Surface in a Cement Environment Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy". Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 35 (7) 04023164. doi:10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-14910. ISSN 0899-1561.
- ^ Li, Juan; Kasal, Bohumil (10 August 2022). "The immediate and short-term degradation of the wood surface in a cement environment measured by AFM". Materials and Structures. 55 (7): 179. doi:10.1617/s11527-022-01988-8. ISSN 1871-6873.
- ^ Li, Juan; Kasal, Bohumil (11 April 2022). "Effects of Thermal Aging on the Adhesion Forces of Biopolymers of Wood Cell Walls". Biomacromolecules. 23 (4): 1601–1609. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01397. ISSN 1525-7797. PMC 9006222. PMID 35303409.
- ^ Li, Juan; Bohumil, Kasal (5 February 2021). "Repeatability of Adhesion Force Measurement on Wood Longitudinal Cut Cell Wall Using Atomic Force Microscopy". Wood and Fiber Science. 53 (1): 3–16. doi:10.22382/wfs-2021-02. ISSN 0735-6161.
- ^ Lavars, Nick (10 June 2021). "Stanford's low-carbon cement swaps limestone for volcanic rock". New Atlas. Archived from the original on 10 June 2021. Retrieved 11 June 2021.
- ^ Celik, K.; Jackson, M.D.; Mancio, M.; Meral, C.; Emwas, A.-H.; Mehta, P.K.; Monteiro, P.J.M. (January 2014). "High-volume natural volcanic pozzolan and limestone powder as partial replacements for portland cement in self-compacting and sustainable concrete". Cement and Concrete Composites. 45: 136–147. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.003. hdl:11511/37244. S2CID 138740924.
- ^ a b c Lemougna, Patrick N.; Wang, Kai-tuo; Tang, Qing; Nzeukou, A.N.; Billong, N.; Melo, U. Chinje; Cui, Xue-min (October 2018). "Review on the use of volcanic ashes for engineering applications". Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 137: 177–190. Bibcode:2018RCR...137..177L. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.031. S2CID 117442866.
- ^ Brown, R.J.; Calder, E.S. (2005). "Pyroclastics". Encyclopedia of Geology. pp. 386–397. doi:10.1016/b0-12-369396-9/00153-2. ISBN 978-0-12-369396-9.
- ^ Izzo, Francesco; Arizzi, Anna; Cappelletti, Piergiulio; Cultrone, Giuseppe; De Bonis, Alberto; Germinario, Chiara; Graziano, Sossio Fabio; Grifa, Celestino; Guarino, Vincenza; Mercurio, Mariano; Morra, Vincenzo; Langella, Alessio (August 2016). "The art of building in the Roman period (89 B.C. – 79 A.D.): Mortars, plasters and mosaic floors from ancient Stabiae (Naples, Italy)". Construction and Building Materials. 117: 129–143. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.101. hdl:10481/104379.
- ^ "MASUKO light concrete". Archived from the original on 15 November 2020. Retrieved 13 November 2020.
- ^ "Relation Between Compressive and Tensile Strength of Concrete". Archived from the original on 6 January 2019. Retrieved 6 January 2019.
- ^ "Structural lightweight concrete" (PDF). Concrete Construction. The Aberdeen Group. March 1981. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 May 2013.
- ^ "Ordering Concrete by PSI". American Concrete. Archived from the original on 11 May 2013. Retrieved 10 January 2013.
- ^ a b Henry G. Russel, PE. "Why Use High Performance Concrete?" (PDF). Technical Talk. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 May 2013. Retrieved 10 January 2013.
- ^ "Concrete in Practice: What, Why, and How?" (PDF). NRMCA-National Ready Mixed Concrete Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 August 2012. Retrieved 10 January 2013.
- ^ "Making Concrete Change: Innovation in Low-carbon Cement and Concrete". Chatham House. 13 June 2018. Archived from the original on 19 December 2018. Retrieved 17 December 2018.
- ^ Rubenstein, Madeleine (9 May 2012). "Emissions from the Cement Industry". State of the Planet. Earth Institute, Columbia University. Archived from the original on 22 December 2016. Retrieved 13 December 2016.
- ^ "Concrete and Embodied Energy – Can using concrete be carbon neutral". 22 February 2013. Archived from the original on 16 January 2017. Retrieved 15 January 2017.
- ^ Gajda, John (2001). "Energy Use of Single-Family Houses with Various Exterior Walls" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- ^ Green Building with Concrete. Taylor & Francis Group. 2015. ISBN 978-1-4987-0411-3.[page needed]
- ^ "Features and Usage of Foam Concrete". Archived from the original on 29 November 2012.
- ^ "Unreinforced Masonry Buildings and Earthquakes: Developing Successful Risk Reduction Programs FEMA P-774". Archived from the original on 12 September 2011.
- ^ Simsir, C.C.; Jain, A.; Hart, G.C.; Levy, M.P. (12–17 October 2008). Seismic Retrofit Design Of Historic Century-Old School Buildings In Istanbul, Turkey (PDF). 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 January 2012.
- ^ Nawy, Edward G. (2008). Concrete Construction Engineering Handbook. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4200-0765-7.
- ^ Lomborg, Bjørn (2001). The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. Cambridge University Press. p. 138. ISBN 978-0-521-80447-9.
- ^ "Minerals commodity summary – cement – 2007". US United States Geological Survey. 1 June 2007. Archived from the original on 13 December 2007. Retrieved 16 January 2008.
- ^ Murray, Lorraine. "Christ the Redeemer (last updated 13 January 2014)". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 5 November 2022.
- ^ a b "Reinforced concrete". www.designingbuildings.co.uk. Archived from the original on 11 July 2016. Retrieved 26 October 2025.
- ^ a b c d Claisse, Peter A. (2016), "Composites", Civil Engineering Materials, Elsevier, pp. 431–435, doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100275-9.00038-3, ISBN 978-0-08-100275-9, retrieved 5 October 2021
- ^ a b Richardson, John (2003). "Precast concrete structural elements". Advanced Concrete Technology. pp. 3–46. doi:10.1016/B978-075065686-3/50307-4. ISBN 978-0-7506-5686-3.
- ^ a b "Mass Concret" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2011.
- ^ Sadowski, Łukasz; Mathia, Thomas (2016). "Multi-scale Metrology of Concrete Surface Morphology: Fundamentals and specificity". Construction and Building Materials. 113: 613–621. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.099.
- ^ "Winter is Coming! Precautions for Cold Weather Concreting". FPrimeC Solutions. 14 November 2016. Archived from the original on 13 January 2017. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
- ^ "306R-16 Guide to Cold Weather Concreting". Archived from the original on 15 September 2017.
- ^ a b Larn, Richard; Whistler, Rex (1993). "17 – Underwater concreting". Commercial Diving Manual (3rd ed.). Newton Abbott, UK: David and Charles. pp. 297–308. ISBN 0-7153-0100-4.
- ^ Prefilled lined underwater hand-placed bagwork product datasheet (PDF). www.soluform.co.uk (Report). Soluform. Retrieved 8 September 2024.
- ^ "Mapping of Excess Fuel Consumption". Archived from the original on 2 January 2015.
- ^ Paul, Andrew (17 September 2024). "Bone-like, hollow concrete design makes it 5.6 times stronger". Popular Science. Retrieved 11 October 2024.
- ^ Akerman, Patrick; Cazzola, Pierpaolo; Christiansen, Emma Skov; Heusden, Renée Van; Iperen, Joanna Kolomanska-van; Christensen, Johannah; Crone, Kilian; Dawe, Keith; Smedt, Guillaume De; Keynes, Alex; Laporte, Anaïs; Gonsolin, Florie; Mensink, Marko; Hebebrand, Charlotte; Hoenig, Volker; Malins, Chris; Neuenhahn, Thomas; Pyc, Ireneusz; Purvis, Andrew; Saygin, Deger; Xiao, Carol; Yang, Yufeng (1 September 2020). "Reaching Zero with Renewables".
- ^ "Leading the way to carbon neutrality" (PDF). HeidelbergCement. 24 September 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- ^ "Cement Clinker Calcination in Cement Production Process". AGICO Cement Plant Supplier. 4 April 2019.
- ^ "Carbon footprint" (PDF). Portland Cement Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- ^ a b c Lehne, Johanna; Preston, Felix (13 June 2018). "Making Concrete Change: Innovation in Low-carbon Cement and Concrete".
- ^ Proske, Tilo; Hainer, Stefan; Rezvani, Moien; Graubner, Carl-Alexander (September 2013). "Eco-friendly concretes with reduced water and cement contents – Mix design principles and laboratory tests". Cement and Concrete Research. 51: 38–46. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.04.011.
- ^ O'Hegarty, Richard; Kinnane, Oliver; Newell, John; West, Roger (November 2021). "High performance, low carbon concrete for building cladding applications". Journal of Building Engineering. 43 102566. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102566.
- ^ Lee, Jaehyun; Lee, Taegyu; Jeong, Jaewook; Jeong, Jaemin (January 2021). "Sustainability and performance assessment of binary blended low-carbon concrete using supplementary cementitious materials". Journal of Cleaner Production. 280 124373. Bibcode:2021JCPro.28024373L. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124373. S2CID 224849505.
- ^ Sabry, Fouad (17 January 2022). Translucent Concrete: How-to see-through walls? Using nano optics and mixing fine concrete and optical fibers for illumination during day and night time. One Billion Knowledgeable.
- ^ Mehta, P. Kumar (1 February 2009). "Global Concrete Industry Sustainability". Concrete International. 31 (2): 45–48.
- ^ Luis Emilio Rendon Diaz Miron; Dessi A. Koleva (2017). Concrete Durability: Cementitious Materials and Reinforced Concrete Properties, Behavior and Corrosion Resistance. Springer. pp. 2–. ISBN 978-3319554631.
- ^ "Home". ConcreteRecycling.org. Archived from the original on 12 April 2010. Retrieved 5 April 2010.
- ^ "Urbanite - Reusing Old Concrete - The Concrete Network". ConcreteNetwork.com. Retrieved 24 May 2020.
- ^ "Urbanite Construction". www.ecodesignarchitects.co.za. Archived from the original on 7 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2020.
- ^ Abdo, Ayman; El-Zohairy, Ayman; Alashker, Yasser; Badran, Mohamed Abd El-Aziz; Ahmed, Sayed (1 January 2024). "Effect of Treated/Untreated Recycled Aggregate Concrete: Structural Behavior of RC Beams". Sustainability. 16 (10): 4039. Bibcode:2024Sust...16.4039A. doi:10.3390/su16104039. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ "Khoan Cắt Bê Tông". Retrieved 25 October 2024.
- ^ Abdelfatah, Akmal S.; Tabsh, Sami W. (2011). "Review of Research on and Implementation of Recycled Concrete Aggregate in the GCC". Advances in Civil Engineering. 2011: 1–6. doi:10.1155/2011/567924. ISSN 1687-8086.
- ^ Lu, Linfeng (July 2024). "Optimal Replacement Ratio of Recycled Concrete Aggregate Balancing Mechanical Performance with Sustainability: A Review". Buildings. 14 (7): 2204. doi:10.3390/buildings14072204. ISSN 2075-5309.
- ^ Rao, Akash; Jha, Kumar N.; Misra, Sudhir (1 March 2007). "Use of aggregates from recycled construction and demolition waste in concrete". Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 50 (1): 71–81. Bibcode:2007RCR....50...71R. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.010. ISSN 0921-3449.
- ^ Peters, Adele (14 May 2024). "This sleek Paris housing complex was made from the rubble of a 1960s building". Fast Company.
- ^ "Itaipu Web-site". 2 January 2012. Archived from the original on 9 February 2012. Retrieved 2 January 2012.
- ^ Sources, Other News (14 July 2009). "China's Three Gorges Dam, by the Numbers". Probe International. Archived from the original on 29 March 2017. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "Concrete Pouring of Three Gorges Project Sets World Record". People's Daily. 4 January 2001. Archived from the original on 27 May 2010. Retrieved 24 August 2009.
- ^ "Concrete Pumping to 715 m Vertical – A New World Record Parbati Hydroelectric Project Inclined Pressure Shaft Himachal Pradesh – A case Study". The Masterbuilder. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 21 October 2010.
- ^ "SCHWING Stetter Launches New Truck mounted Concrete Pump S-36". NBM&CW (New Building Materials and Construction World). October 2009. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011. Retrieved 21 October 2010.
- ^ Janyala, Sreenivas (7 January 2019). "Andhra Pradesh: Polavaram project enters Guinness Book of World Record for concrete pouring". The India Express. Retrieved 7 January 2020.
- ^ "Concrete Supplier for Landmark Tower". Construction Week Online. 19 April 2011. Archived from the original on 15 May 2013.
- ^ "The world record Concrete Supplier for Landmark Tower Unibeton Ready Mix". Archived from the original on 24 November 2012.
- ^ "Abu Dhabi – Landmark Tower has a record-breaking pour" (PDF). Al Habtoor Engineering. September–October 2007. p. 7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 March 2011.
- ^ National Geographic Channel International / Caroline Anstey (2005), Megastructures: Petronas Twin Towers
- ^ "Continuous cast: Exxcel Contract Management oversees record concrete pour". concreteproducts.com. 1 March 1998. Archived from the original on 26 May 2010. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
- ^ Exxcel Project Management – Design Build, General Contractors Archived 28 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine. Exxcel.com. Retrieved 19 February 2013.
- ^ "Contractors Prepare to Set Gates to Close New Orleans Storm Surge Barrier". www.construction.com. 12 May 2011. Archived from the original on 13 January 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ Rider, Alistair (3 July 2015). "The Concreteness of Concrete Art". Parallax. 21 (3): 340–352. doi:10.1080/13534645.2015.1058887. hdl:10023/10329. ISSN 1353-4645.
- ^ "Distinction: Sardoine Mia, lauréate du prix " Faces of peace and art " | Le Courrier de Kinshasa". www.lecourrierdekinshasa.com. Retrieved 16 February 2025.
Further reading
[edit]- "The world's growing problem with concrete, the world's most destructive material". BBC Reel. 6 March 2023. Archived from the original (Video) on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 8 March 2023.
- Does dry pouring concrete hold up? — CostOfConcrete.com
External links
[edit]- Advantage and Disadvantage of Concrete
- Dunning, Brian (4 January 2022). "Skeptoid #813: Why You Need to Care About Concrete". Skeptoid. Retrieved 14 May 2022.
- Getting Buried in Concrete to Explain How It Works on YouTube
- Release of ultrafine particles from three simulated building processes
- Concrete: The Quest for Greener Alternatives
Concrete
View on GrokipediaHistory
Ancient and Pre-Roman Uses
The earliest known use of lime-based plasters, precursors to mortar and concrete binders, dates to approximately 7500 BC in Neolithic settlements such as Ain Ghazal in Jordan and Çatalhöyük in Turkey, where unslaked lime was mixed with crushed limestone aggregate to create durable coatings for walls and floors.[8] These materials hardened through carbonation rather than hydraulic setting, providing weather resistance but limited structural strength in wet conditions.[9] In ancient Egypt, lime mortar—produced by burning limestone to quicklime, slaking it with water, and mixing with sand—emerged around 4000 BC and was applied for plastering interior and exterior surfaces of structures, including the pyramids constructed from circa 2630 BC onward.[9] This non-hydraulic binder facilitated adhesion between quarried stone blocks and offered a smooth finish, though it lacked the water-resistant properties needed for submerged or high-exposure applications.[10] Similar lime mortars appear in Mesopotamian brickwork from the third millennium BC, emphasizing their role in early urban construction across the Fertile Crescent.[11] A key pre-Roman innovation in hydraulic-setting materials occurred among the Phoenicians around 725 BC, as archaeological evidence from the site of Tell el-Burak in southern Lebanon reveals the intentional addition of crushed ceramics to lime plasters, creating pozzolanic reactions that enabled hardening underwater.[12] This recycling of pottery shards as an artificial pozzolan enhanced durability for water-related infrastructure, such as wine presses and cisterns, predating Roman adaptations by centuries and demonstrating early empirical experimentation with reactive additives.[13] In the Eastern Mediterranean, including Greek contexts like Santorini, volcanic earths were incorporated into lime mortars from 500–400 BC, yielding rudimentary pozzolanic effects for cistern linings and hydraulic structures. These ancient applications remained localized and primarily mortar- or plaster-based, without the scalable, aggregate-filled formulations that enabled Roman mass construction; their effectiveness stemmed from regional resource availability and trial-based refinements rather than systematic chemistry.[14] Nabataean builders in Petra, active from the fourth century BC, employed lime-cement composites for water conduits and reservoirs, leveraging local gypsum and hydraulic principles to manage arid environments, though evidence points more to advanced waterproofing than true poured concrete.[15] Overall, pre-Roman uses prioritized binding and protection over monolithic structural elements, laying foundational techniques later amplified by volcanic pozzolans in the Roman era.[4]Roman Era Innovations
Roman engineers developed opus caementicium, a form of hydraulic concrete, during the second century BCE, enabling the construction of durable structures that could set underwater.[16] This innovation involved mixing slaked lime with pozzolana, a volcanic ash sourced from deposits near Pozzuoli, along with aggregates such as tuff, pumice, or broken bricks.[17] The pozzolanic reaction between the lime and volcanic ash produced a cementitious material resistant to seawater and capable of self-healing cracks through crystallization of lime clasts.[18] The architect Vitruvius documented these techniques in De Architectura around 15 BCE, recommending specific proportions: one part lime to three parts pozzolana for structures exposed to water, emphasizing the material's strength over time compared to purely lime-based mortars.[17] This allowed Romans to build extensive infrastructure, including aqueducts, harbors like those at Caesarea Maritima, and the Cloaca Maxima sewer system in Rome, dating back to the 7th century BCE but enhanced with concrete linings by the 1st century BCE.[19] The concrete's layered application in forms, often faced with brick or opus reticulatum, facilitated the creation of vaults and domes without extensive wooden centering. A pinnacle of this technology is the Pantheon in Rome, completed in 126 CE under Emperor Hadrian, featuring the world's largest unreinforced concrete dome at 43.3 meters in diameter and height.[20] The dome's construction incorporated progressively lighter aggregates—starting with heavy travertine at the base and transitioning to lighter pumice near the oculus—to distribute weight and achieve structural integrity, demonstrating advanced understanding of material properties and load management.[21] This innovation supported the empire's monumental architecture, with many structures enduring over two millennia due to the concrete's chemical stability and low permeability.[22]Post-Roman Decline and Medieval Developments
Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire around 476 AD, the advanced production of hydraulic concrete, reliant on pozzolana volcanic ash mixed with lime to achieve underwater setting properties, largely ceased in Europe due to disrupted supply chains from Italian volcanic regions, the breakdown of specialized engineering guilds, and a broader economic contraction that favored simpler, smaller-scale construction.[23] Western builders reverted to non-hydraulic lime mortars, produced by burning limestone and slaking with water, which required air exposure to carbonate and harden but lacked durability in moist environments, limiting applications to above-ground masonry like castle walls and early churches.[24] This shift contributed to the abandonment of large vaulted structures and hydraulic works, such as aqueducts and harbors, as evidenced by the decay of Roman infrastructure without comparable replacements until the Renaissance.[10] In medieval Western Europe, from roughly the 5th to 15th centuries, construction emphasized lime-based mortars often infilled with rubble in stonework, as seen in Gothic cathedrals like Notre-Dame de Paris (construction began 1163), where mortar served primarily as a binder rather than a structural element, achieving compressive strengths typically below 2 MPa compared to Roman opus caementicium's 10-20 MPa.[24] Limited hydraulic properties emerged locally through impure "cementitious" limes containing clay impurities, which partially set in water via weak pozzolanic-like reactions, but these were inconsistent and site-specific, such as in regions with argillaceous limestones, and did not replicate Roman formulations requiring precise pozzolana sourcing.[25] Brick dust or crushed ceramics occasionally served as rudimentary pozzolanic additives in some regions, enhancing tensile strength modestly, yet overall mortar quality remained inferior, prioritizing breathability for timber-framed buildings over Roman-style mass concreting.[26] Meanwhile, in the Byzantine East, elements of Roman concrete persisted longer; Emperor Justinian I (r. 527-565) employed lime-pozzolan mixes for repairs and new works like the Hagia Sophia's foundations (completed 537), as documented by Procopius, sustaining hydraulic capabilities amid continuity of imperial administration and access to eastern volcanic materials.[27] However, this knowledge transfer to the Latin West was minimal, hampered by cultural and political divides, with no widespread revival of true pozzolanic cement until the 18th century, when natural cements from calcined argillaceous rocks were systematically exploited.[23] Medieval innovations thus focused on refining lime burning techniques and aggregate selection for cohesion, but causal factors like resource scarcity and reduced demand for monumental engineering precluded a full return to Roman durability.[24]Industrial Revolution and Modern Formulation
John Smeaton's reconstruction of the Eddystone Lighthouse, completed in 1759, marked an early Industrial Revolution advancement in hydraulic binders, where he developed a pozzolanic lime mortar using argillaceous limestone and pozzolan to achieve underwater setting strength for the structure's foundation.[28] This innovation addressed the limitations of non-hydraulic limes, enabling durable marine constructions essential for expanding trade and infrastructure like canals and harbors during Britain's industrialization from the 1760s onward.[10] The pivotal breakthrough came in 1824 when British bricklayer Joseph Aspdin patented Portland cement (British Patent GB 5022), produced by calcining a finely ground mixture of limestone and clay at high temperatures in a kiln, then grinding the resulting clinker, yielding a hydraulic binder that hardens via hydration and resembles Portland stone in appearance and durability.[29] This material's superior strength and resistance to water surpassed earlier cements, facilitating widespread use in railways, bridges, and factories as industrial demands surged, with initial commercial production starting near Leeds, England, around 1825.[30] Refinements by Aspdin's son William in the 1840s, including higher kiln temperatures for denser clinker, enhanced consistency and load-bearing capacity, while parallel French developments by Louis Vicat from 1812 introduced systematic artificial cements, converging on formulations that became the basis for modern Portland cement.[31] The modern concrete formulation emerged as a composite of approximately 10-15% Portland cement binder, 25% sand, 50-60% coarse aggregates, and 15-20% water by volume, where cement hydration forms calcium silicate hydrates that bind aggregates into a monolithic mass with compressive strengths typically exceeding 20 MPa.[32] Standardization accelerated post-1870s with national specifications, such as Germany's 1878 Portland cement standard defining test methods and properties, enabling scalable production via rotary kilns by the late 19th century.[29]20th Century Scaling and Standardization
The 20th century marked a period of exponential growth in concrete production, driven by industrialization, mechanized manufacturing, and the rise of large-scale infrastructure projects. Global cement output expanded from approximately 10 million metric tons in 1900 to over 500 million metric tons by 1970, enabling widespread use in dams, highways, and urban development.[33] This scaling was underpinned by innovations like Thomas Edison's high-capacity rotary kilns introduced in 1902, which increased production efficiency by extending kiln lengths to 46 meters from prior 18-24 meters, facilitating higher volumes of Portland cement.[33] A key enabler of distribution scaling was the advent of ready-mix concrete, first commercially delivered in Baltimore, Maryland, on August 27, 1913, by mixing batches off-site for truck transport to sites.[10] This method ensured uniform quality, minimized waste, and supported remote or high-volume pours; by 1925, 25 ready-mix plants operated in the U.S., rising to over 100 by 1929.[34] Standardization efforts paralleled this growth, with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) issuing its inaugural Portland cement specification in 1904, defining chemical and physical requirements for types I through V to promote consistency across producers.[35] The American Concrete Institute (ACI), founded in 1904, advanced uniform design and construction practices through research and codes, contributing to reliable performance in engineered structures.[36] Advancements in material science and quality control further refined concrete properties, with compressive strengths rising steadily due to improved chemical understanding and testing protocols established in the early 1900s.[37] Systematic compressive and tensile tests, refined from 1835-1850 methodologies, became routine, enabling higher-strength mixes for demanding applications like prestressed concrete, patented by Eugène Freyssinet in 1928 for enhanced load-bearing capacity.[10][38] These developments supported iconic projects, such as the Hoover Dam (1931-1936), which poured over 3 million cubic yards of concrete, demonstrating scalable mass production and standardized curing techniques to manage heat and cracking.[10] By mid-century, national building codes incorporating ASTM and ACI standards ensured interoperability, reducing variability and failures in global construction.[39]Post-2000 Advancements and Global Expansion
Global cement production expanded dramatically in the early 21st century, rising from approximately 1.8 billion metric tons in 2000 to over 4 billion metric tons by 2013, before plateauing around 4.1 billion metric tons annually through the 2020s.[40] [41] This growth was propelled by rapid urbanization and infrastructure development in emerging economies, with China accounting for nearly half of global output by 2024, producing about 2 billion metric tons yearly to support projects like high-speed rail networks and megacities.[42] In contrast, production in OECD countries declined from 34% of the global share in 2000 to under 10% by 2020, reflecting a shift toward Asia and Africa where demand for affordable housing and roads surged.[43] Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), with compressive strengths exceeding 150 MPa, saw expanded adoption post-2000 following initial developments in the 1990s, enabling thinner, more durable structures such as bridges and precast elements that resist corrosion and fatigue.[44] For instance, Caltrans implemented UHPC mixes achieving 5,900 psi in bridge projects by 2000, enhancing longevity in seismic zones.[45] Self-compacting concrete, refined in the 2000s, improved workability and reduced labor needs by flowing into forms without vibration, widely applied in densely reinforced elements like high-rise columns.[46] Sustainability efforts intensified after 2000 amid concerns over cement's 8% share of global CO2 emissions, leading to greater use of supplementary cementitious materials like fly ash and slag, which can replace up to 50% of Portland cement while maintaining strength and reducing emissions by 20-40%.[47] Innovations in low-carbon binders, including alkali-activated materials and calcium sulfoaluminate cements, emerged to minimize clinker content, with geopolymer concrete demonstrating viability in pilot projects by the 2010s for its lower energy footprint.[48] Recycled aggregates from demolished concrete gained traction, comprising up to 30% of mixes in some regions, supported by standards ensuring comparable performance.[49] Emerging technologies like bacterial self-healing concrete, incorporating microbes such as Bacillus subtilis to precipitate calcium carbonate and seal cracks up to 1 mm wide, advanced through lab-scale trials in the 2010s, potentially extending structure lifespans by 50% and cutting maintenance costs.[50] [51] 3D concrete printing, operationalized post-2010, enables layer-by-layer extrusion for complex geometries with 30-50% material savings and reduced waste, as demonstrated in full-scale housing in Europe and Dubai by 2019.[52] [53] These developments, while promising, face scalability challenges, including higher initial costs and regulatory hurdles, yet they align with demands for resilient infrastructure in expanding urban centers.[54]Composition
Binders Including Portland Cement
In concrete mixtures, binders serve as the active components that react chemically with water to form a hardened paste capable of encapsulating and adhering aggregates. Portland cement functions as the predominant hydraulic binder in contemporary concrete formulations, typically comprising 7-15% of the total mass depending on design strength requirements.[55] This hydraulic property enables setting and hardening through hydration reactions, independent of atmospheric moisture.[56] Portland cement derives from the calcination of limestone (calcium carbonate) and argillaceous materials like clay or shale at temperatures exceeding 1400°C to produce clinker nodules, which are then finely ground with 3-5% gypsum to regulate setting time.[32] The resulting powder's chemical composition adheres to standards such as ASTM C150, featuring principal oxides including 60-67% lime (CaO), 17-25% silica (SiO₂), 3-8% alumina (Al₂O₃), and 0.5-4% ferric oxide (Fe₂O₃), which form key clinker minerals: tricalcium silicate (C₃S, 45-60%), dicalcium silicate (C₂S, 15-30%), tricalcium aluminate (C₃A, 5-10%), and tetracalcium aluminoferrite (C₄AF, 5-15%).[57] [58] Variations across ASTM Types I through V adjust these proportions to optimize traits like sulfate resistance (Type V, low C₃A <5%) or low heat of hydration (Type IV, minimized C₃S and C₃A).[59] Upon hydration, Portland cement's silicates and aluminates dissolve and recombine with water, primarily yielding calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel—responsible for 70-80% of ultimate strength—and portlandite (calcium hydroxide), with the process evolving exothermically and continuing for years under saturated conditions.[1] [56] This binding mechanism achieves initial set within hours and compressive strengths exceeding 20 MPa at 28 days for standard mixes.[55] Blended hydraulic cements incorporating Portland clinker with supplementary materials, such as up to 15% limestone (ASTM C595 Type IL) or pozzolans, enhance durability, reduce permeability, and lower carbon emissions while maintaining hydraulic setting.[57] These formulations leverage Portland cement's core reactivity augmented by diluents or reactives that consume excess portlandite, mitigating alkali-silica reactions in aggregates.[60] Though alternatives like calcium sulfoaluminate cements exist for specialized low-CO₂ applications, Portland-inclusive binders dominate global production, exceeding 4 billion metric tons annually as of 2023.[61]Aggregates and Inert Materials
Aggregates constitute the inert skeletal framework of concrete, occupying 60-80% of its volume and serving as economical fillers that enhance compressive strength through mechanical interlocking while minimizing cement paste volume to control shrinkage and cost.[62][63] These granular materials, primarily sand, gravel, or crushed rock, are deemed inert because they exhibit negligible chemical reactivity with the cementitious binder in typical exposures, though certain lithologies containing reactive silica phases can trigger expansive alkali-silica reactions (ASR) when pore solutions are alkaline, necessitating petrographic and mortar-bar testing for mitigation.[64] Aggregates influence fresh concrete workability via particle grading and shape, as well as hardened properties like modulus of elasticity, abrasion resistance, and thermal expansion, with denser gradations reducing voids and optimizing paste efficiency.[65] Fine aggregates, comprising particles passing a 4.75 mm sieve (typically 0.075-4.75 mm), such as natural sands or crushed stone fines, fill interstices between coarser particles to improve homogeneity and reduce bleeding in the mix.[65] Coarse aggregates, retained on the 4.75 mm sieve with nominal maximum sizes from 9.5 mm to 40 mm or larger for mass concrete, provide bulk rigidity and load-bearing capacity, limited in practice to one-third the member thickness or three-quarters the minimum reinforcement spacing per ACI guidelines.[66] Well-graded combinations of both types achieve maximum packing density, with fine aggregate fineness modulus ideally 2.3-3.1 to balance cohesion and flowability as per ASTM C33 specifications.[65] Essential properties include angularity and texture for enhanced paste bond—angular particles yield 10-20% higher flexural strength than rounded ones but demand more water for workability—along with low absorption (<2-3% for durability against freeze-thaw cycles) and resistance to degradation, assessed via Los Angeles abrasion tests targeting <40% loss.[65] Deleterious substances like friable particles, coal, or sulfates must not exceed 1-5% thresholds to prevent strength loss or efflorescence, with aggregate selection prioritizing local availability and compliance with ASTM C33 or equivalent standards for chemical stability and soundness.[67] In sustainable practices, recycled aggregates from demolished concrete can substitute up to 30% of natural ones if processed to limit adhered mortar and maintain grading, though they often require adjusted water-cement ratios due to higher absorption.[68] Typical volumetric proportions illustrate aggregates' dominance, with ratios like 1:2:4 (cement:sand:gravel) common for general-purpose mixes yielding 20-25 MPa strength, adjustable via ACI 211 methods based on slump targets (e.g., 75-100 mm) and exposure conditions. Empirical data from mix designs confirm that optimized aggregate blends can reduce cement content by 10-15% without compromising performance, underscoring their role in resource-efficient concrete production.Water and Hydration Chemistry
Water serves as the reactant and medium for the hydration reactions in Portland cement, enabling the formation of binding phases that impart strength to concrete. Upon mixing cement with water, the primary clinker minerals—tricalcium silicate (C₃S), dicalcium silicate (C₂S), tricalcium aluminate (C₃A), and tetracalcium aluminoferrite (C₄AF)—undergo exothermic dissolution and precipitation processes. These reactions consume water stoichiometrically while requiring excess for paste workability, with the water-to-cement ratio (w/c) typically ranging from 0.4 to 0.6 in practice to balance fluidity and density.[56][69] The dominant hydration product, calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H), forms primarily from C₃S and C₂S reactions, constituting 50-70% of the hydrated paste volume and governing compressive strength through its gel-like, nanoscale structure that densifies the matrix. Simplified reactions include: C₃S + (5.3-6)H → C₁.₇SH (C-S-H) + 1.7CH (calcium hydroxide), where C-S-H exhibits a calcium-to-silica ratio of approximately 1.7 and incorporates water in interlayer spaces, contributing to early strength via nucleation and growth. C₂S hydrates more slowly, following a similar pathway but generating less heat and CH, with full reaction extending over years. Calcium hydroxide (CH), a crystalline byproduct, fills pores but offers limited binding and can lead to alkali-aggregate reactions if reactive siliceous aggregates are present.[70][71][56] Aluminate phases hydrate rapidly: C₃A + 3(CaSO₄·2H₂O) + 26H → 3CaO·Al₂O₃·3CaSO₄·32H₂O (ettringite), which transitions to monosulfate under sulfate depletion, influencing setting time and early stiffness but consuming minimal water relative to silicates. Hydration proceeds in stages—initial rapid dissolution (minutes), dormant period (hours), acceleration (peak heat at 10-12 hours for C₃S-dominated pastes), and deceleration—as products coat unreacted grains, reducing permeability. Empirical models, such as Powers' gel-space ratio, link degree of hydration (α) to strength, where α ≈ 1 - exp(-k t^n) for time t, with water availability limiting α to 70-80% in sealed pastes due to chemical shrinkage.[69][72] The w/c ratio critically determines porosity and durability: stoichiometric hydration requires ~0.23 w/c by mass, but excess water (>0.4) evaporates or forms capillary voids (10-50 nm), inversely correlating with 28-day compressive strength per Abram's law (f_c ≈ K / (w/c)^n, n≈4 for typical mixes), where strengths drop from ~60 MPa at w/c=0.4 to ~20 MPa at w/c=0.7. Lower w/c enhances impermeability and resistance to ingress but demands admixtures for workability; empirical data confirm a 20-30% strength gain per 0.05 w/c reduction in well-cured specimens. Temperature accelerates kinetics (doubling rate every 10°C rise), while insufficient water halts reactions, underscoring curing's role in sustaining hydration.[73][74][75]Admixtures and Supplementary Materials
Admixtures are materials incorporated into concrete mixtures in dosages typically ranging from 0.1% to 5% by mass of cement to modify the properties of fresh or hardened concrete, such as workability, setting time, strength development, and durability.[76] These additions enable optimization for specific environmental conditions or performance requirements without altering the fundamental binder-aggregate-water system.[77] The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard C494 classifies chemical admixtures into eight types based on their primary effects: Type A for water reduction, Type B for set retardation, Type C for acceleration, Type D for combined water reduction and retardation, Type E for water reduction with acceleration, Type F for high-range water reduction (superplasticizers), Type G for high-range water reduction with retardation, and Type S for specific performance enhancements.[76] Water-reducing admixtures, including lignosulfonates and polycarboxylates, decrease the water-cement ratio by 5-12% for Types A/D/E or up to 30% for high-range Types F/G, thereby enhancing compressive strength and reducing permeability while maintaining slump.[77] Accelerating admixtures, often containing calcium chloride or triethanolamine, shorten initial and final set times by promoting early hydration, useful in cold weather to achieve 28-day strengths faster, though chloride-based variants are restricted in reinforced concrete to avoid corrosion risks exceeding 0.1% chloride by mass of cement.[76][78] Retarding admixtures, such as sugars or gluconates, delay setting by 1-3 hours per dosage increment, aiding hot-weather placement or long-haul transport by preventing premature stiffening.[77] Air-entraining admixtures, governed by ASTM C260, introduce microscopic air bubbles (4-7% by volume) to improve freeze-thaw resistance by accommodating ice expansion, reducing scaling and spalling in exposed structures. Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) are finely divided residues, such as fly ash, ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), and silica fume, added in larger proportions (10-50% replacement of portland cement by mass) to contribute to the hydration process through pozzolanic reactions, forming additional calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel that densifies the matrix.[79] Fly ash, classified as Class F (low-calcium, from bituminous coal) or Class C (high-calcium, self-cementing from sub-bituminous/lignite) per ASTM C618, reduces water demand, enhances workability, and refines pore structure for lower permeability, though it delays early strength gain while boosting long-term compressive strength beyond 28 days.[80][81] GGBS, standardized under ASTM C989, reacts slowly with calcium hydroxide to yield lower heat of hydration, improved sulfate resistance, and higher later-age strengths, with replacement levels up to 50% common in mass concrete to mitigate thermal cracking.[79][82] Silica fume, a highly reactive byproduct of silicon alloy production per ASTM C1240, consists of amorphous SiO2 particles (average 0.1-0.2 μm diameter) that accelerate pozzolanic activity, increasing strength by 20-50% at 5-10% dosages but requiring high-range water reducers due to increased cohesiveness and water demand from its surface area exceeding 20,000 m²/kg.[80][83] SCMs collectively reduce cement content, lowering CO2 emissions from clinker production (responsible for ~8% of global anthropogenic CO2), while enhancing durability against chloride ingress and alkali-silica reaction through refined microstructure.[84][85] Compatibility testing is essential, as admixtures and SCMs can interact; for instance, fly ash may amplify retardation from certain superplasticizers, necessitating adjustments in mix design per ASTM guidelines.[79]Production
Mix Design and Proportioning
Concrete mix design, also known as proportioning, involves selecting and optimizing the relative quantities of cementitious materials, aggregates, water, and admixtures to produce concrete meeting specified performance criteria, including compressive strength, workability, durability, and economy.[86] This process balances competing requirements, such as minimizing the water-cementitious materials ratio (w/cm) to enhance strength while ensuring sufficient workability for placement and compaction.[87] The American Concrete Institute's ACI 211.1 provides a standardized procedure for normal-density concrete, emphasizing empirical data from trial batches and field experience to refine initial estimates.[86] Key steps include specifying slump for workability (typically 25-100 mm for most applications), selecting maximum aggregate size based on structural elements (e.g., 20-40 mm for beams), estimating water demand influenced by aggregate properties and air content (4-6% for freeze-thaw resistance), and determining w/cm from durability and strength needs using established curves or tables.[66] Cementitious content is then calculated as water quantity divided by w/cm, followed by estimating aggregate volumes via the absolute volume method, which ensures the sum of ingredient volumes equals 1 m³ by accounting for specific gravities and avoiding weight-based assumptions that ignore voids.[87] Fine aggregate fills remaining space after coarse aggregate and paste volumes are set, with adjustments for aggregate moisture to prevent segregation or honeycombing.[88] The w/cm ratio fundamentally governs hydration and porosity; values below 0.42 limit complete cement reaction but yield higher strengths (e.g., 0.4 w/cm achieving 40-50 MPa at 28 days), while ratios above 0.5 increase capillary pores, reducing strength by 20-30% per 0.1 increment and compromising durability against ingress of chlorides or sulfates.[89] [90] Workability, measured by slump or flow, improves with higher w/cm or finer aggregate gradation but risks bleeding if aggregates are poorly shaped; admixtures like plasticizers allow lower w/cm without stiffness.[91] Durability factors, such as exposure to deicing salts, demand lower w/cm (≤0.45) and supplementary cementitious materials like fly ash to densify the matrix and mitigate alkali-silica reaction.[86] Aggregate selection—favoring well-graded, angular particles for interlocking—optimizes packing density, reducing cement needs by up to 10-15% while enhancing modulus of elasticity.[92] Trial mixes validate designs, with compressive tests at 7 and 28 days guiding adjustments for variability in material quality.[87]Batching, Mixing, and Quality Testing
Batching of concrete entails the precise measurement and proportioning of raw materials—primarily cementitious binders, aggregates, water, and admixtures—according to a predetermined mix design to ensure consistent quality and performance. Weigh batching, which measures materials by mass using calibrated scales, is the industry standard due to its superior accuracy compared to volumetric methods, achieving tolerances typically within ±2% for cement and ±1% for aggregates and water, as specified in state department of transportation guidelines. Accurate batching is critical because deviations in proportions directly affect hydration, strength development, and durability; for instance, excess water reduces compressive strength by increasing porosity, while aggregate inaccuracies lead to non-uniform distribution and potential segregation. Automatic batch plants on large projects further enhance precision through electronic controls and verification, minimizing human error and enabling scalability. Mixing follows batching to achieve homogeneous dispersion of ingredients, preventing inconsistencies that could compromise structural integrity. Common methods include stationary mixing in drum or pan mixers at batch plants or in-transit mixing via truck mixers, with required mixing times varying by equipment—typically 1-2 minutes per cubic yard after all materials are added—to ensure uniformity, as determined by tests showing variations in air content below 1.0% and slump below 1.0 inch across a batch. Uniformity is verified through standards like those in ASTM C94, which mandate sampling from mixer discharge points to confirm even distribution of cement paste and aggregates; inadequate mixing results in weak zones due to poor binder-aggregate bonding, increasing risks of cracking and reduced load-bearing capacity. For ready-mix concrete, truck rotation at low speeds (2-6 rpm) during transit maintains workability without over-mixing, which can entrain excess air or degrade admixtures. Quality testing encompasses assessments of both fresh and hardened concrete to validate compliance with specifications and predict long-term performance. For fresh concrete, the slump test per ASTM C143 measures workability by assessing the cone-shaped sample's subsidence under gravity, with acceptable ranges of 1-4 inches for most applications indicating proper consistency without excessive water demand. Additional fresh tests include air content (ASTM C231) for freeze-thaw resistance and temperature monitoring to control hydration rates. Hardened concrete undergoes compressive strength testing via ASTM C39, compressing 6x12-inch cylinders at 28 days to verify target strengths, such as 3000-5000 psi for general structural use, with acceptance based on average results from multiple specimens exceeding design values by statistical criteria. These tests, rooted in empirical correlations between mix proportions and mechanical properties, enable causal identification of production flaws, such as batching errors manifesting as low strength, ensuring only verified concrete is placed in service.[93]Transportation, Placement, and Forming
Transportation of freshly mixed concrete from batching plants to construction sites primarily occurs via ready-mix trucks equipped with rotating drums to maintain homogeneity and prevent premature setting or segregation of aggregates. These transit mixer trucks agitate the mix during transit, typically limiting haul distances to ensure discharge within specified time constraints governed by standards such as ASTM C94, which mandates completion of discharge no later than 1.5 hours after initial mixing or after 300 drum revolutions, whichever occurs first, to preserve workability and strength potential.[94] Temperature influences these limits, with shorter durations required in hot weather—such as 1 hour at 80–90°F (27–32°C) or 45 minutes above 90°F (32°C)—to mitigate hydration acceleration and slump loss.[95] Alternative transport methods include volumetric mobile mixers for on-site proportioning and pumping systems for direct delivery over long distances or elevations, reducing reliance on trucks for large-scale pours like high-rises.[96] Placement involves discharging the concrete into prepared forms or substrates using techniques tailored to the structural element, such as direct pouring for slabs, chutes or buggies for horizontal spreads, or pumps and tremie pipes for vertical or underwater applications to minimize segregation.[97] Consolidation follows immediately to eliminate entrapped air voids and ensure full contact with reinforcement and forms, primarily achieved through vibration—internal poker vibrators for deep embeds or external form vibrators for walls—until a uniform mortar sheen appears on the surface and no further bubbles emerge.[98] ACI 309R outlines that effective consolidation depends on vibrator insertion spacing (typically 1.5–2 times the vibrator radius apart) and duration (5–15 seconds per spot), preventing honeycombing while avoiding over-vibration that could cause aggregate separation.[99] For self-consolidating concrete, placement relies on flowability without mechanical aid, though light tapping may assist in complex molds.[100] Forming employs temporary molds, or formwork, to contain and shape the plastic concrete until it achieves sufficient rigidity, typically designed to withstand hydrostatic pressures up to 1500–4000 psf (72–192 kPa) for vertical pours depending on height and rate.[101] Common materials include timber or plywood for custom, one-off applications due to their adaptability and low initial cost, though they offer limited reusability; steel or aluminum systems provide durability and precision for repetitive pours like columns and walls, supporting faster cycles in precast or high-volume construction.[102] Specialized types encompass slip forms for continuous vertical elements like silos, which advance incrementally as concrete sets, and insulated concrete forms (ICFs) combining forming with thermal barriers for energy-efficient walls.[103] Formwork must be braced, aligned within tolerances (e.g., ±1/4 inch over 10 feet per ACI standards), and stripped after minimum curing periods—often 1–3 days for sides, 7–28 days for supports—to avoid surface defects or structural compromise.[104]Curing and Strength Development
Curing refers to the process of maintaining sufficient moisture and temperature in concrete immediately after placement to ensure adequate hydration of cementitious materials. This process facilitates the chemical reactions that form binding compounds, primarily calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel, which contribute to strength and durability.[105] Inadequate curing leads to reduced compressive strength, increased permeability, and higher risk of cracking due to drying shrinkage.[106] Proper curing can achieve up to 28% higher strength compared to uncured concrete after 28 days.[107] Common curing methods include water-based techniques such as ponding, sprinkling, or fogging, which directly supply moisture to the surface; covering with wet burlap or cotton mats; and applying liquid membrane-forming compounds that seal the surface to retain internal moisture.[5] For accelerated curing, steam methods elevate temperature to 60-80°C, promoting faster hydration but requiring control to avoid thermal gradients that induce stress.[108] Internal curing, using pre-wetted lightweight aggregates or superabsorbent polymers as reservoirs, supplies additional water for hydration in low water-to-cement ratio mixes, particularly beneficial for high-performance concrete.[109] For moist curing of slabs (such as foundation slabs), watering can typically begin as soon as the surface is firm enough to avoid damage, often 2-4 hours after finishing or safely the day after pouring. Specialists commonly recommend spraying or misting the surface 5 to 10 times per day for the first seven days to maintain continuous moisture, preventing rapid evaporation and shrinkage cracks. This can result in concrete up to 50% stronger than if allowed to dry prematurely. Ponding—flooding the slab with water inside temporary berms—is an efficient alternative, achieving similar results in about three days what takes seven days of intermittent moist curing. Unlike excess water in the original mix (which weakens concrete by increasing porosity and reducing strength), excessive surface water during curing rarely harms the concrete itself; the primary risk is insufficient moisture leading to weaker, cracked concrete. However, avoid very early watering on soft surfaces or prolonged ponding that could affect subgrade stability in poorly drained sites. Strength development in concrete arises from the progressive hydration kinetics of cement phases, where tricalcium silicate (C3S) drives early strength gain through rapid formation of C-S-H, while dicalcium silicate (C2S) contributes to later strength.[110] Under standard curing conditions at 23°C, compressive strength gains follow a typical pattern for ordinary Portland cement concrete: approximately 16% (10–20% range) of 28-day strength at 1 day, 40% (30–50% range) at 3 days, 65% (60–70% range) at 7 days, 90% (85–95% range) at 14 days, and 99–100% at 28 days, with full potential realized over months as hydration continues, albeit slowly thereafter.[111][112][113] The maturity method quantifies strength gain by integrating time and temperature effects, using an equivalent age formula to predict performance under non-standard conditions.[114] \n Although concrete reaches only about 10–20% of its 28-day compressive strength after one day, the surface typically hardens enough to support light foot traffic after approximately 24 hours under normal conditions (moderate temperature, standard mix). Industry guidelines recommend waiting at least 24 hours before walking on new concrete slabs, patios, driveways, or sidewalks to avoid leaving imprints, scuffs, or compromising the finish. Waiting 48 hours provides a safer margin, especially for repeated or heavier foot traffic, stamped/decorative concrete, or less favorable weather. For vehicle traffic or heavy loads, delay until at least 7 days (when ~65% strength is achieved) to prevent cracking or rutting. These timelines assume proper curing; premature loading can reduce long-term durability. Factors like temperature (warmer accelerates, colder delays), mix type (rapid-set allows sooner), and slab thickness influence exact times—consult the concrete supplier for project-specific advice. Key factors influencing curing efficacy and strength include ambient temperature, which accelerates hydration rates above 20°C but can reduce ultimate strength if excessive; relative humidity below 80% increases evaporation risks; and water-cement ratio, where lower ratios demand meticulous curing to prevent self-desiccation.[113] [115] Admixtures like accelerators enhance early strength, while mineral additions such as fly ash may delay initial gains but improve long-term performance.[116] Compressive strength is verified through standardized cylinder tests per ASTM C39, with results guiding structural acceptance.[106] Airflow plays a critical role in surface evaporation rates during the early curing period. Excessive airflow, such as from fans or strong winds, accelerates moisture loss from the concrete surface, which can lead to rapid drying, plastic shrinkage cracking (fine, shallow cracks forming while the concrete remains plastic), reduced surface strength, and increased risk of durability issues. Industry guidelines, including those from the American Concrete Institute (ACI 308) and manufacturers like Sakrete, stress the importance of retaining moisture through methods such as moist coverings, ponding, or curing compounds rather than using fans to promote drying. In controlled indoor environments like garages, forced air circulation should be avoided during the initial curing stages; gentle, still air is preferable to support uniform hydration and prevent premature drying. In addition to strength development, the curing phase can produce visible effects on the concrete surface. In flatwork applications such as driveways and slabs, uneven moisture evaporation often results in temporary blotchy, mottled, or splotchy discoloration, with darker areas that may resemble oil stains. These patterns arise from differential drying rates across the surface, influenced by factors like wind, sun exposure, or variations in finishing and curing methods. Such discolorations are primarily cosmetic and do not affect structural integrity. They generally fade or blend as the concrete reaches full hydration and is exposed to weathering cycles, often resolving significantly by the end of the standard 28-day curing period or shortly thereafter, though in some cases full uniformity may take additional weeks or months.Types
Conventional and Reinforced Variants
Conventional concrete, also referred to as plain or ordinary concrete, is a composite material formed by mixing Portland cement, water, fine and coarse aggregates, and optional admixtures, without the inclusion of tensile reinforcement such as steel bars.[117] [118] It hardens through the hydration of cement, developing high compressive strength typically in the range of 20 to 40 MPa after 28 days of curing under standard conditions, but exhibits low tensile strength, approximately 10% of its compressive capacity, rendering it brittle under bending or pulling forces.[119] [120] This variant is employed in applications where structural demands are primarily compressive and tensile stresses are negligible, including sidewalks, building foundations, retaining walls, dams, and precast elements like blocks or pipes.[121] Its simplicity and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for mass concrete pours, though it requires careful design to avoid cracking from shrinkage or thermal expansion.[122] Reinforced concrete addresses the tensile weakness of plain concrete by embedding steel reinforcement—typically deformed bars (rebar) with diameters from 6 to 40 mm—within the fresh concrete mixture, which bonds to the hardened matrix through adhesion and mechanical interlock.[123] [124] The steel, yielding at stresses around 400-500 MPa, carries tensile loads, while the surrounding concrete, with its 20-40 MPa compressive strength, protects the reinforcement from corrosion and fire while distributing compressive forces.[119] [125] This synergy creates a composite system capable of withstanding combined axial, flexural, and shear stresses, enabling slender, efficient designs in beams, slabs, columns, and frames.[126] Originating in the mid-19th century with early patents for reinforced garden tubs by Joseph Monier in 1867 and systematic structural applications by François Hennebique in 1892, it revolutionized construction by allowing multistory buildings, bridges, and tunnels with reduced material use compared to masonry or steel alone.[127] In practice, reinforced concrete variants include cast-in-place forms for complex structures and precast elements for modular assembly, with reinforcement ratios typically 0.5-4% by cross-sectional area to optimize ductility and crack control.[123] Design follows standards like those from the American Concrete Institute (ACI 318), specifying cover depths of 40-75 mm over rebar to ensure durability against environmental exposure.[128] While plain concrete suffices for low-load scenarios, reinforced variants dominate structural engineering due to empirical evidence of superior performance in seismic zones and under dynamic loads, as validated by decades of field data and laboratory testing.[126] Limitations include potential corrosion at bar-concrete interfaces if chloride ingress occurs, necessitating quality control in mix proportions and curing.[122]High-Performance and Specialized Concretes
High-performance concrete (HPC) refers to concrete engineered to achieve superior combinations of strength, durability, and uniformity beyond conventional mixes, often through optimized mix designs incorporating low water-to-cementitious materials ratios below 0.4, high-range water reducers, and supplementary cementitious materials such as silica fume or fly ash.[129][130] According to the American Concrete Institute (ACI), HPC is defined by performance criteria rather than solely compressive strength, including enhanced resistance to abrasion, chemical attack, and chloride penetration, with typical 28-day compressive strengths exceeding 40 MPa (5,800 psi).[131] These properties arise from denser microstructures formed by pozzolanic reactions and reduced porosity, enabling applications in demanding environments like bridges and high-rise structures where longevity exceeds 75 years under aggressive exposure.[132][129] Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) represents an advanced subset of HPC, characterized by compressive strengths of 120-250 MPa (17,400-36,000 psi) and tensile ductility enhanced by steel or organic fibers, achieved via water-to-cementitious ratios under 0.25 and optimized particle packing of fine aggregates, cement, and quartz powder.[133][134] UHPC's low permeability—often below 10^{-12} m/s for chloride ions—and high tensile strain capacity up to 3% post-cracking stem from fiber bridging and a quasi-homogeneous matrix, reducing crack widths to under 0.1 mm even under flexural loads.[135][136] This enables thinner sections, such as 50 mm bridge deck overlays, extending service life by mitigating corrosion and fatigue; for instance, FHWA-tested UHPC overlays demonstrated over 90% strength retention after 300 freeze-thaw cycles.[137][133] Applications include precast bridge girders and blast-resistant panels, with documented use in over 100 U.S. bridges by 2020 for spans up to 50 m.[138][139] Self-compacting concrete (SCC), a specialized HPC variant, exhibits slump flows of 500-750 mm without segregation, allowing vibration-free placement in congested reinforcement via high powder content (typically 400-600 kg/m³ cementitious materials) and viscosity-modifying admixtures.[140] This flowability, driven by balanced yield stress and plastic viscosity per EFNARC guidelines, reduces labor by 30-50% in complex formwork while maintaining compressive strengths of 40-80 MPa and air permeability coefficients under 10^{-16} m².[141] SCC's durability benefits from self-leveling, minimizing voids; tests show it achieves 20-30% lower chloride diffusion rates than vibrated concretes due to uniform compaction.[140] Commonly used in tunnel linings and architectural elements, SCC has been deployed in projects like Japan's 1990s high-rise developments, where it facilitated pours up to 100 m³/hour.[134] Lightweight concrete, tailored for density reductions to 1,200-1,850 kg/m³ using expanded clay, shale, or foam aggregates, sacrifices some compressive strength (20-60 MPa) for 20-40% weight savings, improving seismic performance and insulation with thermal conductivities as low as 0.2 W/m·K.[142] Heavyweight variants, incorporating barite or magnetite aggregates, achieve densities over 3,500 kg/m³ for radiation shielding, with strengths up to 50 MPa and gamma-ray attenuation coefficients 2-5 times higher than ordinary concrete.[143] Pervious concrete, with 15-25% void content from coarse aggregates and minimal fines, permits water infiltration rates of 100-500 mm/h, reducing runoff by 70-90% in parking lots while supporting loads up to 20 MPa via single-sized stones and polymer binders.[144] These specialized formulations prioritize functionality over universality, with empirical data from ASTM C1693 confirming pervious mixes' freeze-thaw durability when porosity is controlled below 25%.[145] Fast-setting concrete, also referred to as quick-setting or rapid-set concrete, incorporates accelerating admixtures or specialized cements to significantly reduce initial setting time compared to conventional Portland cement concrete. These mixes typically achieve final set in 20 to 40 minutes, enabling rapid placement and early loading in applications such as fence post installation, slab repairs, and emergency fixes. For example, QUIKRETE Fast-Setting Concrete Mix sets in 20 to 40 minutes per ASTM C191 and allows waiting only 4 hours before subjecting posts to strain. Its compressive strength development includes approximately 1,000 psi (6.8 MPa) at 24 hours, 2,500 psi (17.2 MPa) at 7 days, and 4,000 psi (27.6 MPa) at 28 days.[146] Similar products from other brands, like Rapid Set Cement All, can set in as little as 15 minutes with structural strength in 1 hour.[147] While initial setting and early strength gain are accelerated, full curing and maximum strength still require about 28 days, akin to standard concrete, though early strengths are notably higher. Setting times vary with temperature, humidity, mix proportions, and specific formulation. These concretes are popular for DIY and time-sensitive projects but require prompt working due to the short working time.Alternative and Low-Impact Formulations
Geopolymer concrete represents a class of alkali-activated binders produced by reacting aluminosilicate materials, such as fly ash or ground granulated blast-furnace slag, with alkaline activators like sodium hydroxide or silicate solutions, bypassing the energy-intensive clinkering process of Portland cement. This formulation can achieve compressive strengths exceeding 40 MPa and reduce CO2 emissions by 60-90% relative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC), primarily through utilization of industrial byproducts that would otherwise require disposal. [148] [149] However, the environmental benefits depend on the sourcing of activators, as their production involves caustic chemicals with potential sodium emissions and higher energy use in some cases, necessitating life-cycle assessments to verify net gains over OPC. [150] Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) consists of approximately 50% clinker, 30% calcined low-grade clay, 15% limestone, and 5% gypsum, enabling a 30-40% reduction in CO2 emissions compared to OPC by minimizing clinker content and leveraging clays abundant in regions like India and Africa. [151] [152] LC3 mortars and concretes exhibit early-age strengths similar to OPC, with 28-day compressive strengths around 40-50 MPa, and improved durability against sulfate attack due to the pozzolanic reaction of calcined clay. [153] Commercial pilots, such as those in Cuba and Switzerland since 2016, demonstrate scalability, though widespread adoption is limited by the need for clay calcination at 700-900°C, which still consumes energy albeit less than clinker production at 1450°C. [154] Magnesium oxide (MgO)-based cements, including reactive MgO formulations hydrated with water and CO2 for carbonation curing, offer potential for low-carbon or even carbon-negative concrete by sequestering atmospheric or industrial CO2 during hardening, with emissions reducible by over 50% versus OPC when using brine-derived MgO. [155] [156] These cements achieve strengths up to 50 MPa and enhanced fire resistance, but their higher material costs—often 2-3 times that of OPC—and slower curing kinetics pose commercialization barriers, as evidenced by limited deployments in niche applications like foamed blocks since the early 2010s. [157] Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) substitutes natural aggregates with crushed construction and demolition waste, typically at 20-100% replacement levels, conserving virgin resources and diverting landfill waste while reducing transportation emissions in urban settings. [158] RAC compressive strengths are generally 10-25% lower than natural aggregate concrete due to adhered mortar porosity and weaker interfacial transition zones, but treatments like carbonation or acid washing can mitigate this, yielding viable mixes for non-structural uses with up to 20% CO2 savings from aggregate reuse. [159] [160] Sustainability gains are empirically supported by reduced virgin gravel extraction, though full life-cycle impacts vary with recycling processes' energy demands. [161]Emerging Engineered Types
Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) represents a class of engineered cementitious materials achieving compressive strengths exceeding 150 MPa and enhanced ductility through optimized particle packing, low water-to-binder ratios below 0.2, and incorporation of steel fibers or nanomaterials.[162] Recent advancements include machine learning models for predicting UHPC's workability and mechanical properties, facilitating data-driven mix designs that improve thermal performance and reduce variability in production.[163] UHPC's superior resistance to abrasion, impact, and chemical attack supports applications in bridge repairs and precast elements, with ongoing research addressing rheological challenges like increased yield stress at lower water contents to enable pumpability.[164] Self-healing concrete incorporates mechanisms such as bacterial spores or microcapsules to autonomously repair cracks, mitigating degradation from water ingress and corrosion. Bacterial variants, utilizing microbes like Bacillus subtilis to precipitate calcium carbonate, demonstrate healing efficiencies up to 90% for cracks under 0.5 mm wide within days under moist conditions.[50] Autonomous systems with embedded healing agents outperform autogenous healing reliant on ongoing hydration, extending service life by factors of two in lab tests and reducing maintenance costs in infrastructure.[165] Field applications remain limited as of 2025, with challenges in scalability and agent viability over decades, though 2025 studies highlight potential for sustainable overlays in pavements and tunnels.[166] Engineered cementitious composites (ECC) are micromechanically tailored, fiber-reinforced matrices exhibiting tensile strain capacities of 3-7%, far surpassing ordinary concrete's 0.01%, due to strain-hardening behavior and multiple microcracking.[167] With approximately 2% volume fraction of polyvinyl alcohol or polyethylene fibers and no coarse aggregates, ECC prioritizes ductility for seismic retrofitting and thin repairs, showing crack widths below 0.1 mm even under flexural loads.[168] Life-cycle assessments indicate ECC's eco-friendliness through reduced material use and enhanced durability, with 2025 research confirming its suitability for high-ductility overlays in bridges and pavements.[169] Three-dimensional (3D) printed concrete leverages extrusion-based additive manufacturing to fabricate complex geometries layer-by-layer, minimizing formwork and waste while accelerating construction by up to 50% compared to traditional casting.[53] Formulations incorporate rheology modifiers for extrudability and early strength, with recent innovations like bendable ECC variants enabling reinforcement-free printing of curved walls.[170] Deployments as of 2024 include multi-story residential prototypes and Walmart facility walls reaching heights over 10 meters, though anisotropic layering demands fiber alignment to mitigate interlayer weaknesses.[171] Other frontiers include AI-optimized mixes curing 30% faster with 20-40% lower carbon emissions via precise admixture dosing, and carbon-negative concretes sequestering CO₂ through reactive aggregates during hydration.[172] These engineered types prioritize performance metrics like resilience and sustainability, yet commercialization hinges on standardized testing and cost reductions below $500 per cubic meter.[173]Properties
Mechanical Strength and Elasticity
Concrete exhibits high compressive strength but low tensile strength, making it suitable for compression-dominated applications while requiring reinforcement for tension. Compressive strength, the maximum compressive stress concrete can withstand, is typically measured at 28 days of curing using standard cylinder tests per ASTM C39, with normal structural concrete ranging from 20 to 40 MPa (2,900 to 5,800 psi).[119] Higher-strength concretes exceed 40 MPa, while ultra-high-performance variants can reach 193 MPa.[133][174] Tensile strength, assessed via splitting tensile or flexural tests, is approximately 10% of compressive strength, generally 2 to 5 MPa for normal concrete, due to the material's inherent brittleness and microcrack propagation under tension.[119] The water-cement ratio critically influences strength; lower ratios (e.g., 0.3-0.5) reduce porosity and increase compressive strength by enhancing cement hydration density, while higher ratios weaken the matrix by introducing excess voids.[175][176] Aggregate quality, cement type, and curing conditions also affect outcomes, with empirical relations like Abram's law quantifying the inverse proportionality of strength to water-cement ratio.[175] Elasticity in concrete is characterized by its modulus of elasticity (Young's modulus), which quantifies stiffness as the ratio of stress to strain in the linear elastic range, typically up to 40-50% of ultimate compressive strength. The modulus for normal-weight concrete is calculated as $ E_c = 4700 \sqrt{f'_c} $ MPa, where $ f'_c $ is compressive strength in MPa, yielding values of 20 to 40 GPa for standard mixes.[177][178] In ACI 318, the formula is $ E_c = 57,000 \sqrt{f'_c} $ psi for normal density concrete, adjusted for density variations.[179] Beyond the elastic limit, behavior becomes nonlinear due to microcracking, with Poisson's ratio around 0.15-0.20. Fibers or high-performance additives can enhance modulus and ductility, as discrete fibers increase elastic modulus in composites.[180] Aggregate stiffness dominates the modulus, often comprising 70-80% of its value.[181]Durability and Degradation Mechanisms
Concrete durability encompasses the material's capacity to resist environmental exposures such as weathering, chemical ingress, and mechanical wear without significant loss of structural integrity or serviceability.[182] This resistance depends primarily on the concrete's low permeability, achieved through a water-to-cement ratio below 0.45, dense microstructure from proper compaction, and incorporation of pozzolanic materials like fly ash or slag that refine pores and bind free alkalis.[183] In reinforced concrete, durability also hinges on maintaining an alkaline environment (pH > 11) around embedded steel to preserve its passive oxide layer, with minimum cover depths specified by codes such as 50-75 mm in aggressive exposures to delay ion diffusion.[184] Empirical data from field studies indicate that well-designed concretes can achieve service lives exceeding 100 years in moderate conditions, though coupled degradation accelerates failure in harsh environments like marine or deiced settings.[185] Physical degradation mechanisms, notably freeze-thaw cycles, arise from water saturation in capillary pores expanding by approximately 9% upon freezing, generating hydraulic and cryostatic pressures that surpass the concrete's tensile strength of 2-5 MPa, initiating microcracks.[186] Damage accumulates with each cycle, as cracks facilitate further water ingress; laboratory tests per ASTM C666 show relative dynamic modulus dropping below 60% after 300 cycles for vulnerable mixes, correlating with surface scaling and spalling in field structures exposed to >50 annual cycles.[187] Abrasion from traffic or waves erodes the cement paste and aggregates, with wear rates quantified by ASTM C779 at 0.1-1 mm depth per million wheel passes on high-strength surfaces, exacerbated by poor aggregate hardness.[182] Chemical degradation includes alkali-silica reaction (ASR), a deleterious process first systematically documented in the 1940s, where hydroxyl ions react with reactive silica in aggregates to form an alkali-silica gel that imbibes water and expands, inducing tensile stresses and map cracking.[188] Expansion rates in accelerated mortar bar tests (ASTM C1260) exceed 0.1% within 14 days for reactive aggregates, leading to up to 20-30% compressive strength loss over decades in affected dams and pavements; mitigation via low-alkali cements (<0.6% Na2O equivalent) or lithium admixtures reduces gel formation by altering silica dissolution kinetics.[189] [190] Sulfate attack involves external sulfates from soils or groundwater (concentrations >1500 mg/L) penetrating and reacting with calcium hydroxide and aluminates to form expansive ettringite or gypsum, causing volume increases of 2-5 times and softening, with strength reductions of 10-50% after 6-12 months immersion in severe exposures.[191] [192] Internal sulfate from excess gypsum in cement can mimic external effects, though Type V sulfate-resistant cements limit C3A to <5% to curb ettringite precipitation.[193] Corrosion of reinforcement represents the dominant durability threat in chloride-laden or carbonated environments, initiating when protective passivation fails, leading to localized pitting that expands rust products volumetrically by 2-6 times, cracking surrounding concrete at rates of 0.1-1 mm/year.[194] Chloride-induced corrosion occurs via diffusion of Cl- ions (threshold 0.4-1% by cement mass at steel depth) from deicing salts or seawater, depassivating steel at pH 11-13; Fick's second law models ingress with diffusion coefficients of 10^-12 to 10^-14 m²/s for quality concretes, predicting initiation times of 20-50 years under 1% surface chloride loading.[184] [195] Carbonation progresses as CO2 diffuses into unsaturated concrete (optimal at 50-70% RH), reacting with portlandite to form calcite and drop pH to 8-9 over depths governed by sqrt(Dt) where D is the diffusion coefficient (10^-8 m²/s initially), halving cover effectiveness every 4-fold time increase; urban CO2 levels of 400-500 ppm accelerate fronts by 20-50% versus rural sites.[196] [197] Coupled mechanisms, such as sulfate attack amplifying freeze-thaw damage via microcrack propagation or chlorides enhancing carbonation rates, compound losses, with field data showing 2-3 times faster propagation in multifactor exposures.[198] Durability enhancement strategies emphasize probabilistic modeling for service life prediction, integrating these mechanisms to specify mix designs yielding diffusion resistances >10^12 ohm-m for corrosion immunity.[195]Thermal, Fire, and Seismic Resistance
Concrete exhibits low thermal conductivity, typically ranging from 0.8 to 2.0 W/(m·K) for normal-weight mixes, which provides inherent thermal insulation and resistance to rapid heat transfer compared to metals like steel (around 50 W/(m·K)).[199] This property arises from the composite nature of concrete, where the cement paste and aggregates limit phonon conduction, with denser aggregates like quartz increasing conductivity while lightweight ones like expanded clay reduce it to below 0.5 W/(m·K).[200] The coefficient of thermal expansion for concrete is approximately 10 × 10^{-6}/°C, varying with aggregate type (e.g., 7-13 × 10^{-6}/°C), which influences dimensional stability under temperature fluctuations but can lead to cracking if mismatched with reinforcement materials.[201] Empirical data confirm that moisture content significantly affects these values, as saturated concrete shows up to 20-30% higher conductivity due to water's role in heat transfer.[202] In fire exposure, concrete's non-combustible composition and high specific heat capacity (around 0.8-1.0 kJ/(kg·K)) enable it to absorb and dissipate heat slowly, maintaining structural integrity for extended periods under standard fire curves like ISO 834.[203] Load-bearing elements such as columns and slabs can achieve fire resistance ratings of 1-4 hours, with performance governed by cover depth to reinforcement (minimum 20-50 mm per codes like Eurocode 2) and aggregate type—siliceous aggregates degrade faster above 600°C due to quartz phase transitions, while calcareous ones perform better up to 800°C.[204] However, explosive spalling occurs in high-strength concretes (>C50/60) under rapid heating from moisture vapor pressure buildup in the pore structure, mitigated by incorporating polypropylene fibers (0.1-0.2% by volume) that melt and create escape paths for steam.[205] Compressive strength reduces by 15-20% per 100°C rise initially, dropping sharply beyond 500°C due to dehydration of calcium silicate hydrate, but residual capacity post-cooling can retain 40-60% for moderate exposures if no spalling occurs.[206] For seismic resistance, plain concrete's brittleness limits it to low-ductility applications, but reinforced concrete frames and shear walls achieve high performance through steel's tensile yielding, providing energy dissipation via plastic hinges in beams rather than brittle column failures.[207] Ductility is enhanced by dense transverse reinforcement (e.g., hoops at 100-150 mm spacing) for confinement, preventing shear failures, as evidenced in cyclic loading tests where well-detailed RC members exhibit drift capacities of 2-5% before collapse.[208] Case studies from the 1985 Mexico City earthquake (magnitude 8.0) showed prestressed and moment-resisting RC buildings surviving if designed with continuous reinforcement and avoiding soft stories, though many failed due to inadequate lap splices and pounding effects. Modern standards like those from NIST emphasize capacity design, ensuring beams yield before columns, with base shear coefficients scaled to site-specific spectra; numerical models predict that corroded or under-reinforced structures in soft soils amplify collapse risk by 2-3 times under MCE-level events.[209] High-performance variants with fiber reinforcement further improve post-crack toughness, reducing residual drifts in shake-table simulations.[210]Applications
Structural and Building Uses
Concrete forms the backbone of modern building structures through its application in load-bearing elements such as foundations, columns, beams, slabs, and shear walls, leveraging its superior compressive strength typically ranging from 20 to 40 MPa in standard mixes.[211] Foundations, including spread footings, mat slabs, and pile caps, distribute building loads to the soil, with mat foundations used where soil capacity is low to support multiple columns via a continuous thickened slab.[212] Columns and beams, often cast as reinforced concrete members, handle vertical and horizontal forces; for instance, columns in multi-story frames can achieve heights over 3 meters with diameters of 0.3 to 1 meter, reinforced with longitudinal steel bars to counter buckling.[213] Reinforced concrete slabs serve as floor and roof systems, spanning between beams or directly over columns in flat-slab designs that eliminate intermediate beams for open interior spaces, with typical thicknesses of 125 to 200 mm for spans up to 10 meters.[214] Shear walls provide lateral stability against wind and seismic loads, commonly integrated into high-rise cores. Precast concrete elements, such as beams and panels produced off-site, accelerate construction; for example, the Pentagon incorporated 410,000 cubic yards of concrete in its 1943 frame, demonstrating scalability for large-scale buildings.[215] The advent of reinforced concrete enabled vertical expansion in urban settings, with the Ingalls Building in Cincinnati (completed 1903) marking the first 16-story reinforced concrete skyscraper, proving concrete's fire resistance and structural viability over masonry.[216] In contemporary practice, high-strength concretes exceeding 60 MPa support supertall structures, as seen in Chicago's early 20th-century innovations where concrete frames allowed spans and heights previously limited by steel alone.[217] This combination of cast-in-place and precast methods ensures durability, with properly designed elements lasting over 50 years under standard exposure, though reinforcement corrosion remains a key degradation factor requiring protective measures like adequate cover depths of 40-75 mm.[124]Infrastructure and Civil Engineering
Concrete forms the backbone of modern infrastructure, including highways, bridges, dams, tunnels, and ports, owing to its high compressive strength, moldability, and ability to withstand environmental loads when reinforced or prestressed.[218] In highway and pavement applications, Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are designed for heavy traffic loads, offering longevity exceeding 30-40 years with proper jointing and curing, as evidenced by performance data from U.S. interstate systems where concrete slabs resist rutting better than asphalt under equivalent volumes.[219] Prestressed concrete, involving high-strength steel tendons tensioned before or after pouring, is standard for bridge girders and beams, minimizing tensile cracks and enabling longer spans up to 150 feet in bulb-tee sections, per American Concrete Institute (ACI) standards that specify load factors and material properties for such elements.[220][221] Dams represent massive concrete applications, with gravity and arch designs relying on the material's mass to resist water pressure; the Hoover Dam, completed in 1936, incorporated 3.25 million cubic yards of concrete poured at peak rates of 10,462 cubic yards per day, incorporating cooling pipes to manage heat from hydration and prevent cracking.[222] Similarly, China's Three Gorges Dam, operational since 2003, utilized 28 million cubic meters of concrete and 463,000 metric tons of steel, forming a structure 181 meters high that generates 22,500 megawatts while controlling Yangtze River flooding, though long-term microstructural studies highlight ongoing challenges like alkali-aggregate reactions in aged dam concrete.[223][224] In tunnels and substructures, reinforced concrete linings provide segmental support, as in urban metro projects where high-performance mixes achieve early strengths over 50 MPa to expedite construction timelines.[225] Civil engineering projects increasingly integrate fiber-reinforced or high-performance concretes for seismic resilience in bridges and overpasses, with ACI guidelines emphasizing ductility through partial prestressing to balance economy and safety under dynamic loads.[226] Globally, annual concrete production surpasses 14 billion cubic meters, a significant portion allocated to infrastructure renewal, such as U.S. bridge decks where corrosion-resistant overlays extend service life by 20-30 years compared to untreated surfaces.[227] These applications underscore concrete's causal advantages in load distribution and durability, though maintenance data reveal degradation from deicing salts and freeze-thaw cycles necessitates periodic repairs to sustain infrastructure integrity.[218]Specialized and Non-Structural Uses
Non-structural concrete encompasses low-strength mixes employed in applications requiring minimal compressive capacity or temporary support, such as blinding layers, sidewalks, and curbs, where reinforcement is typically absent to prioritize workability and cost efficiency over tensile strength.[228][229] Blinding concrete, often with compressive strengths below 10 MPa, serves to provide a stable, level substrate that prevents moisture loss and contamination in overlying structural pours, commonly applied in foundation preparations at thicknesses of 50-100 mm.[230] Plain concrete, lacking embedded reinforcement, finds use in pavements, walkways, and non-load-bearing slabs where environmental exposure demands basic durability but not high tensile resistance; for instance, it supports pedestrian traffic in urban settings with mix designs yielding 15-25 MPa after 28 days.[231][229] Curbs, gutters, and median barriers represent standard non-structural deployments, utilizing formulations resistant to deicing salts and abrasion, with placement volumes exceeding millions of cubic meters annually in highway maintenance programs. Specialized non-structural applications leverage tailored formulations for aesthetic, functional, or niche purposes, including decorative flatwork and precast elements. Decorative concrete incorporates pigments, aggregates, or stamping to enhance visual appeal in patios, driveways, and facade panels, achieving surface finishes that mimic stone or tile while maintaining low structural demands.[5] Polished concrete, ground and sealed post-curing, is applied in interior flooring and countertops for its reflectivity and durability against wear, with diamond abrasives used in progressive grits from 50 to 3000 to yield gloss levels up to 70-90% as measured by light reflectance.[5] Precast non-structural components, such as agricultural troughs, fencing, and cladding panels, enable off-site fabrication for rapid assembly, reducing on-site labor by up to 50% in farm infrastructure projects.[232] Rapid-set concrete variants, activating within 10-30 minutes, suit non-structural repairs like pothole filling or temporary barriers, minimizing downtime in traffic-heavy areas; these mixes rely on calcium sulfoaluminate cements to achieve initial set times under 15 minutes at standard temperatures.[229] In architectural contexts, exposed-aggregate finishes expose gravel or quartz surfaces via retarders and washing, applied to non-structural walls or benches for textural contrast, with aggregate sizes typically 5-20 mm to balance aesthetics and skid resistance.[231] Such uses prioritize surface performance over bulk strength, often incorporating admixtures for color stability or efflorescence resistance in outdoor exposures.[5]Environmental Impacts
Emissions and Resource Consumption
Cement production, the primary driver of concrete's emissions, releases approximately 0.6 to 0.9 metric tons of CO₂ per metric ton of cement, with process emissions from limestone calcination accounting for about 60% and fuel combustion for the remainder.[233][234] Globally, cement manufacturing contributed around 2.4 billion metric tons of CO₂ equivalent in 2023, representing roughly 6-8% of anthropogenic emissions, depending on the dataset and inclusion of indirect factors.[235][236] These figures stem from the chemical decomposition of calcium carbonate in clinker production, which inherently liberates CO₂ regardless of energy source, compounded by fossil fuel use in high-temperature kilns reaching 1450°C.[233] Concrete's total emissions are scaled by cement content, typically 10-15% of its mass, making cement responsible for nearly 80% of concrete's carbon footprint despite aggregates and water contributing minimally to greenhouse gases.[237] With global cement output at about 4.05 billion metric tons in 2023, corresponding concrete production exceeds 14 billion cubic meters annually, amplifying emissions through scaled manufacturing and transport.[238][239] Emissions intensity has stabilized or slightly increased since 2015 due to rising production in developing regions, outpacing efficiency gains from alternative fuels or kiln optimizations.[240] Resource consumption in concrete production is dominated by aggregates, with an estimated 20 billion metric tons of virgin sand, gravel, and crushed stone extracted yearly to meet demand, often leading to localized depletion of riverbeds and quarries.[241] Cement requires limestone and clay, with global extraction tied to 4 billion metric tons of production, while water usage averages 120-200 liters per cubic meter of concrete, totaling around 2 billion metric tons annually for batching alone, excluding processing losses.[241][242] Aggregate mining disrupts ecosystems through habitat loss and sedimentation, with fine sand shortages emerging in high-demand areas due to overexploitation exceeding natural replenishment rates.[243] These inputs reflect concrete's role as the second-most consumed substance after water, underpinning infrastructure but straining non-renewable deposits without widespread recycling integration.[244]Lifecycle Effects and Comparative Analysis
Concrete's lifecycle environmental impacts are assessed through comprehensive life cycle assessments (LCAs) that account for raw material extraction, manufacturing, transport, installation, operation, maintenance, and end-of-life phases. Production dominates upfront burdens, with cement clinker calcination releasing approximately 0.5-0.8 tons of CO2 per ton of cement due to decarbonation of limestone and fuel combustion, contributing to concrete's embodied carbon of 100-200 kg CO2-equivalent per cubic meter for typical mixes.[245] However, the material's inherent durability—often spanning 50-100 years or more for well-designed structures—amortizes these emissions, as infrequent maintenance and resistance to degradation minimize replacement needs.[246] For instance, extending structural service life by 50% via enhanced durability measures can reduce total CO2 emissions by about 14%, primarily by deferring new production cycles.[247] During the operational phase, concrete's high thermal mass stabilizes indoor temperatures, reducing heating and cooling demands in buildings by up to 10-15% in moderate climates compared to lightweight alternatives, thereby lowering lifecycle energy use.[248] Maintenance impacts remain low, with corrosion-resistant formulations like high-performance concrete further curtailing repairs; LCAs of reinforced concrete pavements show that durability improvements yield net GHG reductions of 20-30% over 50-year spans by avoiding premature reconstruction.[249] At end-of-life, demolition generates minimal emissions if aggregates are recovered, as crushed concrete serves as granular fill or new base material, displacing virgin gravel and cutting extraction-related impacts by 50-70% in road applications.[250] Recycling rates exceed 50% in developed regions, though contamination from reinforcements can limit quality.[251] Comparative LCAs highlight concrete's context-dependent performance against alternatives like steel and timber. In multi-story residential buildings, timber frames demonstrate 25-47% lower global warming potential (GWP) than concrete due to wood's lower processing emissions and carbon sequestration during growth, with one study reporting 43.5% GWP savings for light-frame wood over reinforced concrete.[252][253] Mass timber versus concrete office buildings similarly show 18-25% GWP reductions for wood, though benefits diminish in high-rise or humid environments where wood requires protective treatments increasing its footprint.[254][255] Steel structures incur higher lifecycle electricity demands and emissions from ore reduction and fabrication, often 20-50% above concrete in acidification and eutrophication categories, compounded by corrosion-driven maintenance.[256]| Material | Embodied GWP (kg CO2-eq/m² floor area, cradle-to-gate) | Lifecycle GWP Reduction vs. Concrete (operational + end-of-life factors) | Key Limitations in Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concrete | 400-600 | Baseline | High initial emissions; offset by longevity |
| Timber | 200-400 | 25-45% lower | Susceptible to fire, pests; sourcing deforestation risks |
| Steel | 800-1200 | 10-30% higher overall | Energy-intensive production; frequent corrosion repairs |
