Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Ernst Zündel
View on Wikipedia
Ernst Christof Friedrich Zündel (German: [ˈtsʏndl̩]; 24 April 1939 – 5 August 2017) was a German[2][3] neo-Nazi publisher and pamphleteer of Holocaust denial literature.[4][5] He was jailed several times: in Canada for publishing literature "likely to incite hatred against an identifiable group", and on charges of being a threat to national security; in the United States, for overstaying his visa; and in Germany for charges of "inciting racial hatred".[6][7][8] He lived in Canada from 1958 to 2000.
Key Information
In 1977, Zündel founded a small press publishing house called Samisdat Publishers, which issued neo-Nazi pamphlets such as his co-authored The Hitler We Loved and Why and Richard Verrall's Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth At Last, which were both significant documents to the Holocaust denial movement.[a]
On 5 February 2003, Ernst Zündel was detained by local police in the U.S. and deported to Canada, where he was detained for two years on a security certificate for being a foreign national considered a threat to national security pending a court decision on the validity of the certificate. Once the certificate was upheld, he was deported to Germany and tried in the state court of Mannheim on outstanding charges of incitement of Holocaust denial dating from the early 1990s. On February 15, 2007, he was convicted and sentenced to the maximum term of five years in prison. All these imprisonments and prosecutions were for inciting hatred against an identifiable group.[9] He was released on March 1, 2010.[10]
Background
[edit]Zündel was born in Calmbach (now part of Bad Wildbad) in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, in 1939 and was raised mostly by his mother, Gertrude. His father, Fritz, a lumberjack, was drafted into the German Army shortly after Ernst's birth and served as a medic on the Eastern Front. His father was captured and incarcerated as a prisoner of war and did not return home until 1947, by which time he had become an alcoholic. Ernst was the fourth in a family of six children consisting of a brother, who later became a lawyer in the United States, and four sisters.[11]
He studied graphic art at trade school, graduating in 1957[12] and emigrated to Canada in 1958, when he was 19, to avoid conscription by the German military. In 1960, he married French-Canadian Janick Larouche, whom he met in a language class in Toronto, and with whom he had sons Pierre and Hans.[11][12] The couple moved to Montreal in 1961, where Zündel would eventually come under the tutelage of Canadian fascist politician Adrien Arcand.[13]
Professionally, Zündel worked as a graphic artist, photographer, photo retoucher, and printer.[13] He got his first job in the art department at Simpson-Sears in Toronto before opening his own art studio in Montreal. In 1969, he moved back to Toronto, where he founded Great Ideas Advertising, a commercial art studio.[12] On several occasions in the 1960s he was commissioned to illustrate covers for Maclean's magazine. His controversial views were not well known in the 1960s and 1970s, since he published his opinions under the pseudonym Christof Friedrich. At the time, he was also an organizer among immigrants for the Ralliement des créditistes, Quebec's Social Credit party. In 1968, he joined the Liberal Party of Canada and ran in that year's Liberal leadership convention under the anglicized name Ernest Zundel[14] as a self-described "nuisance candidate", running on an "immigrant rights" platform. He used his candidacy to campaign against anti-German attitudes. He dropped out of the contest prior to the election, but not before delivering his campaign speech to the convention.
Under his Friedrich pseudonym, he wrote a preface to Savitri Devi's esoteric neo-Nazi book The Lightning and the Sun.[15]
Zündel gained prominence during the 1970s as spokesman for Concerned Parents of German Descent, a group that claimed German-Canadians and their children were the target of discrimination due to anti-German stereotyping in the media. In the late 1970s, Zündel, as the group's spokesman, issued press releases protesting the NBC Holocaust miniseries for its depiction of Germans. In the late 1970s, reporter Mark Bonokoski unmasked Zündel and ended his career as a credible media spokesperson by revealing that he was publishing neo-Nazi and antisemitic pamphlets such as The Hitler We Loved and Why under the pseudonym Christof Friedrich.[16]
In 1994, Zündel campaigned in Canada to ban the movie Schindler's List as "hate speech"[17][18] and celebrated the movie being banned in Malaysia and effectively banned in Lebanon and Jordan.[19]
On 8 May 1995, his Toronto residence was the target of an arson attack, resulting in $400,000 in damage.[20] A group calling itself the "Jewish Armed Resistance Movement" claimed responsibility for the arson attack; according to the Toronto Sun, the group had ties to extremist organizations, including the Jewish Defense League and Kahane Chai.[20] The leader of the Toronto wing of the Jewish Defense League, Meir Weinstein (known then as Meir Halevi), denied involvement in the attack; however, five days later, Weinstein and American JDL leader Irv Rubin were caught trying to break into the Zündel property, where they were apprehended by police.[20] No charges were ever filed in the incident.[21] Weeks after the fire, Zündel was targeted with a parcel bomb that was detonated by the Toronto Police bomb squad.[22] The investigation into the parcel bomb attack led to charges being laid against David Barbarash, an animal rights activist based in British Columbia, but they were eventually stayed.[23]
Holocaust denial
[edit]| Part of a series on |
| Neo-Nazism |
|---|
His publishing company, Samisdat Publishers, disseminated neo-Nazi literature, including Zündel's The Hitler We Loved and Why, Richard Verrall's Did Six Million Really Die?, and works by Malcolm Ross.[24][25]
By the early 1980s, Samisdat Publishers had grown into a worldwide distributor of Nazi and neo-Nazi posters, audiotapes, and memorabilia, as well as pamphlets and books devoted to Holocaust denial and what he claimed were Allied and Israeli war crimes. He purportedly had a mailing list of 29,000 in the United States alone. Advertisement space for Samisdat Publishers was purchased in well-known reputable American magazines and even comic books. West Germany became another large market, in violation of West German Volksverhetzung (incitement of the masses) laws preventing Holocaust denial and dissemination of Nazi and neo-Nazi material, with Samisdat going so far as to send mass mailings to every member of the West German Bundestag (parliament).[26]
In December 1980, the West German Federal Ministry of Finance told the Bundestag that between January 1978 and December 1979, "200 shipments of right-wing content, including books, periodicals, symbols, decorations, films, cassettes, and records" had been intercepted entering West Germany; these shipments "came overwhelmingly from Canada." On 23 April 1981, the West German government sent a letter to the Canadian Jewish Congress, confirming that the source of the material was Samisdat Publishers.
From 1981 to 1982, Zündel had his mailing privileges suspended by the Canadian government on the grounds that he had been using the mail to send hate propaganda, a criminal offence in Canada. Zündel then began shipping from a post office box in Niagara Falls, New York, until the ban on his mailing in Canada was lifted in January 1983.[27]
Holocaust denial trials in the 1980s
[edit]
In 1983, Sabina Citron, a Holocaust survivor and founder of the Canadian Holocaust Remembrance Association, filed a private complaint against Zündel before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. In 1984, the Ontario government joined the criminal proceedings against Zündel based on Citron's complaint. Zündel was charged under the Criminal Code, section 181, of spreading false news by publishing Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth At Last.
Zündel underwent two criminal trials in 1985 and 1988. The charge against Zündel alleged that he "did publish a statement or tale, namely, Did Six Million Really Die? that he knows is false and that is likely to cause mischief to the public interest in social and racial tolerance, contrary to the Criminal Code". After a much publicized trial in 1985, Zündel was found guilty. One of the prosecution witnesses, Auschwitz survivor Arnold Friedman, a Holocaust educator in Toronto, testified that "prisoners marched off to the ovens never returned" to which Zündel's lawyer, Doug Christie, replied "if those who disappeared might not have been led out a nearby gate".[28]
His conviction was later overturned in an appeal on a legal technicality, leading to a second trial in 1988, in which he was again convicted. Zündel was originally found guilty by two juries but was finally acquitted upon appeal by the Supreme Court of Canada which held in 1992 that section 181 (formerly known as section 177) was a violation of the guarantee of freedom of expression under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The 1988 trial relied on testimony from Holocaust deniers David Irving and Fred A. Leuchter, a self-taught execution technician.[29] Leuchter's testimony as an expert witness was accepted by the court, but his accompanying Leuchter report was excluded, based on his lack of engineering credentials. In 1985, key expert testimony against Zündel's Holocaust denial was provided at great lengths by Holocaust historian Raul Hilberg, who refused to testify at Zündel's 1988 trial. Zündel was convicted in 1988 and sentenced to 15 months imprisonment by an Ontario court; however, in 1992 in R v Zundel his conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada when the law under which he had been charged, reporting false news, was ruled unconstitutional.[30]
Canadian Human Rights Commission; first departure from Canada
[edit]In 1997, Zündel's marriage with his second wife, Irene Marcarelli, ended after 18 months. She subsequently testified against him in the late 1990s when he was under investigation by the Canadian Human Rights Commission for promoting hatred against Jews via his website. In January 2000, before the commission had completed its hearings, he left Canada for Sevierville, Tennessee, in the US, where he married his third wife, Ingrid Rimland,[8] and vowed never to return to Canada.[31]
Detention, deportation, and imprisonment
[edit]Deportation from the United States
[edit]In 2003, Zündel was arrested by the United States government for violating immigration rules, specifically visa waiver overstay, which he argued was a trumped up charge. After two weeks he was deported to Canada, where he was immediately jailed. A warrant for his arrest for Volksverhetzung (incitement of the masses) had been issued in Germany, where he remained a citizen, in the same year. At his hearing, Zündel described himself as "the Gandhi of the right".[4]
Detention and deportation from Canada
[edit]Although Zündel lived in Canada for more than 40 years prior to moving to the United States, he never gained Canadian citizenship. Applications for citizenship were rejected in 1966 and 1994 for undisclosed reasons.[9] On his return to Canada, he had no status in the country as he was not a citizen and as his landed immigrant status had been forfeited by his prolonged absence from the country. When returning to Canada, Zündel claimed refugee status in hopes of preventing his deportation to Germany. This claim elicited public ridicule; Rex Murphy, a columnist for The Globe and Mail and a well-known commentator on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, wrote, "If Ernst Zündel is a refugee, Daffy Duck is Albert Einstein ... Some propositions are so ludicrous that they are a betrayal of common sense and human dignity if allowed a moment's oxygen."[32]
On May 2, 2003, Canadian Citizenship and Immigration Minister Denis Coderre and Solicitor General Wayne Easter issued a "national security certificate" against Zündel under the provisions of the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, indicating that he was a threat to Canada's national security owing to his alleged links with violent neo-Nazi groups, including Aryan Nations leader Richard Girnt Butler, neo-Nazi Christian Worch, and former Canadian Aryan Nations leader Terry Long, as well as Ewald Althans, convicted in a German court in 1995 of charges that included insulting the memory of the dead and insulting the state.
Zündel moved twice to have Canadian Federal Court justice Pierre Blais recuse himself from the case for "badgering and accusing the witness of lying" and exhibiting "open hostility" towards Zündel, and filed two constitutional challenges, one in the Ontario courts and one in the federal courts, both unsuccessful. During the hearing, Zündel characterized his position as "Sometimes I feel like a black man being convicted on Ku Klux Klan news clippings."[33]
Zündel meanwhile moved to be released from detention on his own recognizance while the legal proceedings were ongoing. His lawyer, Doug Christie, introduced as a "surprise witness" Lorraine Day, a California doctor who practiced alternative cancer treatments, to testify that Zündel's incarceration at Toronto's Toronto West Detention Centre was causing his chest tumor (revealed to the court a few weeks previously) to grow and his blood pressure to rise, that the medication supplied to control his blood pressure was causing side effects such as a slow heart rate and loss of memory, and that he needed "exercise, fresh air, and freedom from stress. The whole point is we need to have his high blood pressure controlled without the drug."[33] On January 21, 2004, after three months of hearings including both public and secret testimony, Justice Blais again ruled against Zündel with a damning statement.[34]
During his imprisonment, Canadian right-wing leader Paul Fromm attempted to hold numerous rallies in support of Zündel, both in Ontario and in Alberta. The rallies were met with formidable opposition, namely by the Anti-Racist Action group, which heightened its opposition to Fromm's pro-Zündel work in the summer of 2004. The anti-racist efforts included participation by numerous Toronto activist groups and individuals, including Shane Ruttle Martinez and Marcell Rodden, and successfully managed to prevent similar future congregations of the neo-Nazis. Fromm eventually ceased his efforts after being advised by Zündel's attorneys that public clashes between supporters and opponents of Zündel were not assisting the image of their client's case.
On February 24, 2005, Justice Blais ruled that Canada could deport Zündel back to Germany at any time, and on February 25, Zündel's lawyer, Peter Lindsay, announced that his client would not attempt to obtain a stay against the deportation and that his fight to remain in Canada was over. In his decision, Justice Blais noted that Zündel had had the opportunity to respond to the allegations of the decision of January 21 by explaining the nature of his contacts with the extremists mentioned and/or providing exonerating witnesses, but had failed to do so. Blais found that "Mr. Zündel's activities are not only a threat to Canada's national security, but also a threat to the international community of nations."[35]
Zündel was deported to Germany on March 1, 2005.[36] Upon his arrival at Frankfurt airport, he was immediately arrested and detained in Mannheim prison awaiting trial for inciting racial hatred.[37] In 2007, Zündel's appeal to the UN Human Rights Committee against deportation was rejected, partly for his failure to exhaust all domestic remedies through a thorough defence as required by its charter, and partly because the committee ruled the case inadmissible as it did not find his rights had been violated.[38]
Trial and imprisonment in Germany
[edit]German prosecutors charged Zündel on July 19, 2005, with 14 counts of inciting racial hatred, which is punishable under German penal code, Section 130, 2.(3) Archived April 26, 2001, at the Wayback Machine (Agitation (sedition) of the People) with up to 5 years in prison. The indictment stated Zündel "denied the fate of destruction for the Jews planned by National Socialist powerholders and justified this by saying that the mass destruction in Auschwitz and Treblinka, among others, were an invention of the Jews and served the repression and extortion of the German people."
His trial was scheduled for five days beginning November 8, 2005, but ran into an early delay when Judge Ulrich Meinerzhagen ruled that lawyer Horst Mahler, whose licence to practise as a lawyer was withdrawn in 2004 and who, in January 2005, was sentenced to nine months in prison for inciting racial hatred, could not be part of the defence team. Mahler had been associated with the violent far-left Red Army Faction in the 1970s, but had since become a supporter of far-right and antisemitic groups. Zündel's public defender Sylvia Stolz was also dismissed on the grounds that her written submissions to the court included Mahler's ideas. On November 15, 2005, Meinerzhagen announced that the trial was to be rescheduled to allow new counsel time to prepare.[39]
The trial resumed on February 9, 2006, for several court sessions but then adjourned on March 9 when the trial judge asked for Sylvia Stolz to be removed as Zündel's defence lawyer after she repeatedly disrupted the trial and had to be dragged out of the court by two bailiffs. Stolz signed "Heil Hitler" on court motions, said the Holocaust was "the biggest lie in world history," and yelled that the judge deserved the death penalty for "offering succour to the enemy". In 2008, Stolz was sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison and stripped of her licence to practice law for five years.[40][41]
The trial again resumed on June 9, 2006, and continued, intermittently, into early 2007. The prosecution concluded its case on January 26, 2007, calling for Zündel to be handed the maximum sentence of five years' imprisonment with state prosecutor Andreas Grossman calling him a "political con man" from whom the German people needed protection. After quoting extensively from Zündel's writings on the Holocaust, Grossman argued "[you] might as well argue that the sun rises in the West ... But you cannot change that the Holocaust has been proven."[9] In its closing arguments the defence called for Zündel to be acquitted.[42][43]
On February 15, 2007, Zündel was sentenced to five years in prison, the maximum sentence possible for violating the Volksverhetzung law in the German penal code which bans incitement of hatred against a minority of the population, which is how his Holocaust denial was interpreted by the Federal German court.[44]
His time in pre-trial confinement in Canada was not taken into account on his sentence, but only the two years he was confined in Germany since 2005. One of his lawyers, Jürgen Rieger, a leading member of Germany's NPD, was forbidden to voice petitions and ruled to put them down in writing; he let another lawyer read them aloud. Another lawyer read parts of Mein Kampf and parts of the NS race legislation aloud in his closing speech. Zündel asked for the inception of an expert's commission to examine the Holocaust. The judge in his emotional closing speech called Zündel a "Brunnenvergifter und Brandstifter, einen Verehrer dieses menschenverachtenden Barbaren Adolf Hitler, von dem er dummdreist daherschwafelt" ("well-poisoner and arsonist, an admirer of this human-despising barbarian Adolf Hitler, of whom he rambles on with brash impertinence"). Holocaust deniers used Zündel trials to claim that freedom of speech was impaired in Germany as that it depended on the ideology of the speaker.[45]
Release from prison
[edit]Zündel was released on March 1, 2010, five years after his deportation to Germany.[46] Following the end of his prison term, Canadian Minister of Public Safety Vic Toews reiterated that Zündel would not be permitted to return to Canada. "In 2005, a Federal Court judge confirmed that Zündel is inadmissible on security grounds for being a danger to the security of Canada", Toews said in a written statement, adding that, "The decision reinforced the government of Canada's position that this country will not be a safe haven for individuals who pose a risk to Canada's national security."[47]
Zündel returned to his childhood home in the Black Forest, which had been vacant since his mother's death in the 1990s, and lived there until his own death.[47]
Barred from entering the United States
[edit]On March 31, 2017, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Administrative Appeals Office ruled Zündel inadmissible to the United States, rejecting his application for an immigrant visa which he had sought in order to be reunited with his wife. He was classified as inadmissible, because he has been convicted of foreign crimes for which the sentence was five years or more and a waiver deemed unwarranted due to Zündel's "history of inciting racial, ethnic, and religious hatred". Legal writer and law professor Eugene Volokh expressed the opinion that while his exclusion from the United States on hate speech grounds was not a violation of the First Amendment, it may be an incorrect application of current immigration law.[48]
UFOlogy
[edit]When Zündel started Samisdat Publishers in the 1970s, he became interested in ufology when the subject was at its peak of worldwide attention. His main offerings were his own books claiming that flying saucers were secret weapons developed by the Third Reich and now based in Antarctica.[49]
Under the pseudonyms Christof Friedrich and Mattern Friedrich, Zündel also wrote several publications promoting the idea that UFOs were craft developed by German scientists who had fled to New Swabia, Antarctica. These titles include "Secret Nazi Polar Expeditions" (1978) and "Hitler at the South Pole" (1979). He promoted the idea of Nazi secret bases in Antarctica, Nazi UFOs, secret polar bases and Hollow Earth theories.
Along with Willibald Mattern, a German émigré living in Santiago, Chile, Zündel also wrote UFOs: Nazi Secret Weapon? on Nazi UFOs in German and translated into English.
It is not clear whether Zündel really believed these theories or whether they were merely speculative fiction.[49][50][51][52]
In the Samisdat Publishers newsletter of 1978, Zündel advertised an expedition to Antarctica to find these bases and UFOs. A ticket would cost $9,999 for a seat on an exploration team to locate the polar entrance to the hollow earth.[51] This expedition never took place.
According to Frank Miele, a member of The Skeptics Society in the United States, Zündel told him that his book UFOs: Nazi Secret Weapon? (which became an underground bestseller, going through several printings) was nothing more than popular fiction to build publicity for Samisdat. Zündel said in a telephone conversation with Miele: "I realized that North Americans were not interested in being educated. They want to be entertained. The book was for fun. With a picture of the Führer on the cover and flying saucers coming out of Antarctica it was a chance to get on radio and TV talk shows. For about 15 minutes of an hour program I'd talk about that esoteric stuff. Then I would start talking about all those Jewish scientists in concentration camps, working on these secret weapons. And that was my chance to talk about what I wanted to talk about." "In that case," I asked him, "do you still stand by what you wrote in the UFO book?" "Look," he replied, "it has a question mark at the end of the title."[53][54][55] Zündel continued to defend these views as late as 2002.[53][56]
Ancestry
[edit]According to Toronto Sun columnist Mark Bonokoski, Zündel's mother was Gertrude Mayer, the daughter of Isadore and Nagal Mayer.[57] Isadore Mayer was a trade union organizer for the garment industry in the Bavarian city of Augsburg.[57]
According to Bonokoski, Ernst's ex-wife, Irene Zündel, claimed that the possibility of being at least partly Jewish bothered Zündel so much that he returned to Germany in the 1960s in search of his family's Ariernachweis, a Third Reich certificate of pure Aryan blood, but was unable to find any such document.[57]
In 1997, Zündel granted an interview to Tsadok Yecheskeli of the Israeli newspaper, Yedioth Ahronoth, that includes the following exchange:
Zundel: If you are fishing for any political information, my father was a Social Democrat, my mother a simple Christian woman. Her father had been a union organizer in Bavaria, and of the garment workers' union. His name got him into trouble because it was Isadore Mayer and, of course, he was called Izzy by his people and the people thought he ...
Yecheskeli: Was Jewish?
Zundel: No, I don't ... don't think so.
Yecheskeli: Are you sure there's no Jewish blood in your family?
Zundel: No.[57]
Death
[edit]Zündel died at his home in Germany, of a heart attack, on August 5, 2017.[58][59][60] He was survived by two children, and his widow Ingrid Rimland, who died on October 12, 2017.[61][62]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Verrall's pamphlet should not be confused with Barbara Kulaszka's book Did Six Million Really Die? Report on the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel, 1988.
References
[edit]- ^ "Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel, deported from Canada in 2005, dies aged 78". Global News. August 7, 2017.
- ^ "Zundel won't appeal deportation, lawyer says", CTV.ca, February 6, 2005 (accessed July 26, 2008): Canadian Justice Pierre Blais denounced Zundel as a Hitler sympathizer determined to propagate the neo-Nazi movement
- ^ Burns, John F. (March 30, 1988). "Canada Puts Neo-Nazi's Ideas on Trial, Again". The New York Times. Retrieved January 26, 2020.
- ^ a b "Ernst Zundel", Anti-Defamation League (accessed July 26, 2008)
- ^ "Ernst Zundel sentenced to 5 years for Holocaust denial". CBC News. February 15, 2007. Retrieved January 26, 2020.
- ^ Connolly, Kate (February 16, 2007). "Holocaust denial writer jailed for five years". The Guardian. London.
- ^ CBC News (March 2, 2005). "Trial could turn Zundel into neo-Nazi martyr: observer".
- ^ a b Irwin, Anna C. (February 8, 2003). "Renowned Neo-Nazi activist held in Blount County jail". The Daily Times. Maryville, Tennessee.
- ^ a b c Associated Press & Canadian Press (February 15, 2007). "Ernst Zundel sentenced to 5 years in prison for Holocaust denial". Winnipeg Free Press. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved February 15, 2007.
- ^ "Zundel released from German prison". CBC News. March 1, 2010. Retrieved January 26, 2020.
- ^ a b Freeman, Alan (March 7, 2003). "Embarrassment and denial in Zundel's hometown". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved September 5, 2017.
- ^ a b c "Ernst Zundel Bio Information". www.soaringeaglesgallery.com. Retrieved September 5, 2017.
- ^ a b Cheney, Peter (March 8, 2003). "The wives, the marriages of chameleon Ernst Zundel". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved September 5, 2017.
- ^ The Zundel Affair Archived November 5, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, Shofar FTP Archives, nizkor.net
- ^ "** RARE ** The Lightning And The Sun by Savitri Devi 1958 ** First Edition ** | #1901503588". /www.worthpoint.com.
- ^ Bonokoski, Mark. "Zundel released from German Jail", Toronto Sun, March 2, 2010.
- ^ "Schindler's List Exposed as Lies and Hate" Archived April 12, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, 1994 leaflet published by Zündel's Samisdat Publishers
- ^ "Ernst Zündel on "Schindler's List"". Archived from the original on December 11, 2014. Retrieved February 7, 2009.
- ^ Censorship offer file Archived May 15, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Shofar FTP Archive, The Nizkor Project
- ^ a b c Shermer, Michael. Why People Believe Weird Things, 1997, p.185.
- ^ Deutsch, Linda. "U.S. Jewish militants charged in bomb plot: Los Angeles mosque, congressman's office were intended targets", Ottawa Citizen, December 13, 2001.
- ^ Stancu, Henry. "Police detonate bomb sent to Zündel's home 'Just another day in life of Ernst Zundel,' he says", Toronto Star, May 21, 1995.
- ^ Hogben, David. "Charges stayed against activists accused of mailing booby-trapped letters", Canadian Press, September 26, 2000.
- ^ "R. v. Zundel - SCC Cases". decisions.scc-csc.ca. Retrieved September 7, 2024.
- ^ Temperman, Jeroen (2016). Religious Hatred and International Law: The Prohibition of Incitement to Violence or Discrimination. Cambridge University Press. p. 102. ISBN 978-1-107-12417-2. Retrieved September 7, 2024.
- ^ Atkins, Stephen E. (April 30, 2009). Holocaust Denial as an International Movement. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. pp. 194–198. ISBN 978-0-313-34539-5. Retrieved September 7, 2024.
- ^ "Annual 6 Chapter 7". www.museumoftolerance.com. Retrieved September 7, 2024.
- ^ The Press, Christchurch, New Zealand, January 15, 1985
- ^ Morris, Errol (2006). "Mr. Death: Transcript". Retrieved March 4, 2007.
- ^ Full text of Supreme Court of Canada decision at LexUM
- ^ Freeze, Colin (February 13, 2003). "Deportation to Germany threatens jailed Zundel". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved January 26, 2020.
- ^ Murphy, Rex (February 22, 2003). "Let's try Zundel denial". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved January 26, 2020.
- ^ a b Glenn Hauser (September 29, 2003). "DX LISTENING DIGEST 3-171". worldofradio.com.
- ^ "Zundel can be deported, Federal Court rules". The Globe and Mail. February 25, 2005. Retrieved April 29, 2024.
- ^ Makin, Kirk (February 25, 2005). "Court finds Zundel can be deported". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved January 26, 2020.
- ^ "Zundel turned over to German authorities". CBC News. March 1, 2005.
- ^ Germany, SPIEGEL ONLINE, Hamburg (March 2005). "Kanada: Holocaust-Leugner Zündel abgeschoben - SPIEGEL ONLINE - Panorama". Der Spiegel.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "University of Minnesota Human Rights Library". hrlibrary.umn.edu.
- ^ "Neo-Nazi Trial Put on Ice After Upset". Deutsche Welle. November 15, 2005. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
- ^ "German Neo-Nazi Lawyer Sentenced for Denying Holocaust". Deutsche Welle. January 14, 2008. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
- ^ "Anwältin aus dem Saal getragen" [Lawyer Dragged Out of Court]. Star. January 14, 2008. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
- ^ "Five years' jail urged for Zundel". Toronto Star. Associated Press. January 26, 2007. Retrieved January 26, 2007.
- ^ "Defense seeks acquittal of far-right activist Ernst Zundel at German trial". International Herald Tribune. Associated Press. February 9, 2007. Retrieved February 13, 2007.
- ^ Canada Press (February 15, 2007). "German court sentences Ernst Zundel to 5 years in prison for Holocaust denial". Canada.com. Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved February 15, 2007.
- ^ Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz Baden-Württemberg (March 2007). "Verteidigung von ZÜNDEL legt Revision ein". Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz Baden-Württemberg. Archived from the original on May 29, 2007. Retrieved May 30, 2007.
- ^ "Holocaust Denier Zündel Released", Associated Press, March 1, 2010
- ^ a b "Zündel free but barred from Canada"[dead link], National Post, March 2, 2010
- ^ "Opinion - Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel barred from moving to the U.S., though his wife is an American citizen". Washington Post. Retrieved September 5, 2017.
- ^ a b Zündel, Ernst (as Christof Friedrich) (1974). UFO's — Nazi Secret Weapon?. Samisdat Publishers.
- ^ Goodricke-Clarke. Black Sun, pp.158, 331.
- ^ a b Zündel, Ernst (as Christof Friedrich) (1979). "Samisdat Hollow Earth Expedition". The Nizkor Project. Archived from the original on August 30, 2008. Retrieved August 27, 2006.
- ^ Zündel, Ernst. "Zündelgram". December 1, 2002. Obtained from The Nizkor Project on August 27, 2006
- ^ a b "Ernst Zündel's Flying Saucers". The Nizkor Project. Archived from the original on October 22, 2019. Retrieved August 27, 2006.
- ^ Miele, Frank. "Giving the Devil His Due", regarding Zündel's "UFOs: Nazi Secret Weapons?"
- ^ Baker, Alan (2000). Invisible Eagle: The History of Nazi Occultism. London: Virgin Books. pp. 268–272. ISBN 978-1-85227-863-2.
- ^ Zündel, Ernst (December 1, 2002). "Zündelgram". archived at The Nizkor Project. Archived from the original on December 15, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2006.
- ^ a b c d Mark Bonokoski (March 2, 2005). "The Jewish card". Toronto Sun. Archived from the original on March 9, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
- ^ Chan, Sewell (August 7, 2017). "Ernst Zündel, Holocaust Denier Tried for Spreading His Message, Dies at 78". The New York Times. Retrieved September 5, 2017.
- ^ "Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel dead at age 78". CTV. August 6, 2017. Archived from the original on August 7, 2017. Retrieved August 7, 2017.
- ^ "Report that Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel dead at 78, but wife says he sounded fine". National Post. August 7, 2017. Retrieved September 5, 2017.
- ^ "Australia's Democracy put to the test". www.adelaideinstitute.org.
- ^ "Home". www.zundelsite.org.
Further reading
[edit]- Wieman, Gabriel and Winn, Conrad (1986) Hate on Trial: The Zundel Case, the Media and Public Opinion in Canada Toronto: Mosaic Press.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Ernst Zündel at Wikimedia Commons
- Anti-Defamation League on Ernst ZundelArchived March 13, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
- Nizkor Project archive criticism of Zündel Archived January 28, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
- Ernst Zündel at IMDb
Ernst Zündel
View on GrokipediaErnst Christof Friedrich Zündel (24 April 1939 – 5 August 2017) was a German-born publisher and historical revisionist who immigrated to Canada in 1958 and became a prominent figure in challenging orthodox narratives of the Second World War, particularly regarding the alleged systematic extermination of European Jews. Through his establishment of Samisdat Publishers in the 1970s, Zündel distributed literature questioning the scale, methods, and intent behind claims of a Holocaust involving gas chambers and mass murder on an industrial scale, including the influential pamphlet Did Six Million Really Die? pseudonymously authored by Richard Verrall.[1][2][3] Zündel's activities led to high-profile legal confrontations in Canada, where he was charged in 1984 with spreading "false news" contrary to the Criminal Code for publishing materials that prosecutors deemed knowingly false statements about historical events. His 1985 and 1988 trials featured testimony from revisionist experts, including forensic engineer Fred Leuchter, whose report analyzed residues in alleged gas chamber ruins at Auschwitz and concluded they were unsuitable for mass homicidal gassings with Zyklon B, as well as historians scrutinizing the absence of direct orders from Adolf Hitler for extermination and inconsistencies in eyewitness accounts and demographic data. Although convicted in both trials and sentenced to prison terms, the Supreme Court of Canada in 1992 unanimously struck down the "false news" provision as violating free expression guarantees under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, effectively vindicating Zündel's right to disseminate his views without criminal penalty under that statute.[4][5][6] Subsequent human rights tribunal findings of hate speech promotion resulted in ongoing restrictions, culminating in a 2003 federal security certificate deeming Zündel a threat to national security, leading to his detention and deportation to the United States in 2003, followed by extradition to Germany in 2005. There, he faced trial under laws prohibiting Volksverhetzung (incitement to ethnic hatred), receiving a five-year sentence in 2007 for prior publications, which he served until 2010; he maintained these proceedings stifled inquiry into wartime history rather than addressing substantive evidence. Zündel's persistence in advocating for open debate on taboo historical topics, drawing on archival documents, engineering analyses, and demographic studies, positioned him as a martyr for free speech among revisionists, while drawing sharp condemnation from establishments committed to the Nuremberg-era framework of events.[7][8][9]
Early Life and Background
Childhood and Education in Germany
Ernst Christof Friedrich Zündel was born on April 24, 1939, in Calmbach, a locality near Bad Wildbad in the Black Forest region of southwestern Germany, on a family farm.[10][11] His birth occurred amid the escalating tensions of World War II, with Germany under Nazi rule until its defeat in May 1945, when Zündel was six years old. Zündel's early childhood unfolded during the war's chaotic end and the ensuing Allied occupation, marked by widespread destruction from bombings and the onset of reconstruction efforts. He later recounted personal memories of the Allied firebombing campaigns that devastated German cities and infrastructure, contributing to the hardships of food shortages, displacement, and societal upheaval in the immediate postwar years.[12] The Black Forest area, while less urbanized, was affected by broader denazification processes, economic ruin, and the reorientation of German society under military governance by Allied forces. Formal education for Zündel was limited; at age 14, around 1953, he entered an apprenticeship at a trade school, training in skills relevant to graphic arts.[13] This vocational path equipped him with practical expertise in drawing, design, and printing techniques, reflecting the emphasis on artisanal trades in postwar West Germany's recovering economy.[14]Immigration to Canada and Initial Settlement
Ernst Zündel immigrated to Canada from Germany in 1958 at the age of 19, initially settling in Montreal.[15] [16] There, he supported himself through entry-level employment while learning English and adapting to North American life, eventually training and working as a graphic artist for advertising firms.[17] [18] By the early 1960s, Zündel had relocated to Toronto, where he built a career as a freelance graphic designer, photo retoucher, and printer, leveraging skills from his apprenticeship in Germany.[17] [19] This professional foundation provided financial stability and access to printing equipment, though his early activities remained focused on commercial work rather than ideological pursuits. During this period, Zündel engaged in minor political involvement, including support for creditist movements such as Quebec's Ralliement créditiste prior to 1968 and later affiliations with Social Credit parties, reflecting an interest in economic reform ideas prevalent in parts of Canada but without evident commitment to extremism.[20] [21] These engagements were peripheral and did not yet indicate the revisionist activism that would emerge later.Publishing and Revisionist Activities
Founding of Samisdat Publishers
Ernst Zündel established Samisdat Publishers Ltd. in 1977 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, as a small independent press dedicated to producing and distributing printed materials that challenged established historical narratives, particularly regarding World War II events. Operating on a modest scale, the company focused on self-publishing pamphlets, booklets, and books that Zündel and his associates viewed as suppressed perspectives, enabling the dissemination of content marginalized by mainstream outlets.[22][23] The publishing house emphasized direct-to-consumer distribution through mail-order catalogs and international shipping, allowing it to reach subscribers and sympathizers across North America, Europe, and beyond without reliance on conventional bookstores or institutional support. This model circumvented barriers faced by such literature, fostering a network of recipients who ordered items via postal correspondence. Operations were supported financially by sales revenue from these transactions, supplemented by voluntary donations from a dedicated but limited base of individuals aligned with Zündel's ideological stance.[24][25] Samisdat's structure reflected a commitment to autonomy in an era when alternative viewpoints on sensitive historical topics encountered significant institutional resistance, including from academic and media establishments prone to left-leaning biases that Zündel argued stifled inquiry. By maintaining low overhead and leveraging print-on-demand techniques, the publisher sustained output over nearly two decades, prioritizing volume and accessibility over commercial viability.[26]Key Publications and Distribution Networks
Zündel established Samisdat Publishers Ltd. in Toronto in 1977 as a small press dedicated to printing and disseminating revisionist materials, including pamphlets, books, and periodicals.[22] The operation began with mail-order sales, producing items such as the pamphlet The West, War, and Islam, authored by Zündel himself in 1981, which critiqued Allied policies and post-war narratives.[27] Samisdat also reprinted earlier works, notably Did Six Million Really Die?—originally issued in Britain in 1974 under the pseudonym Richard Harwood (actual author Richard Verrall)—with Zündel distributing Canadian editions starting around 1975 and formalizing production through his press.[4] These outputs extended beyond core historical topics to include speculative titles like UFOs: Nazi Secret Weapons? (1975, under pseudonym Mattern Friedrich) and endorsements of technical reports such as The Leuchter Report (1988), which analyzed purported execution facilities.[28][29] Distribution relied on a catalog-based mail-order system, shipping thousands of items annually to subscribers via post office boxes, with reported global reach by the early 1980s.[30] Zündel cultivated networks with international contacts, including British author David Irving for shared promotion and European figures like French revisionist Robert Faurisson and Swedish investigator Ditlieb Felderer, facilitating cross-border exchanges and resale arrangements.[31] In the United States, materials circulated through aligned outlets, amplifying reach despite domestic bans, such as West Germany's 1981 prohibition on Zündel's imports.[24] The Samisdat Courier, a monthly newsletter launched in the late 1970s, served as a key vehicle for updates and solicitations, maintaining engagement with an estimated audience of several thousand.[32] Facing escalating scrutiny, including Canadian postal restrictions by the early 1980s, Zündel adapted by leveraging pseudonyms for contributors—such as Harwood and Friedrich—to obscure origins and using multiple addresses for continuity.[33] These tactics, combined with bulk printing and international forwarding, sustained operations amid seizures, with Samisdat reportedly generating revenue through volume sales into the mid-1980s.[30][34]Advocacy for Historical Revisionism
Core Arguments Against Orthodox Holocaust Narrative
Zündel contended that the claimed six million Jewish deaths during World War II were exaggerated, drawing on prewar and postwar demographic data from sources such as the American Jewish Year Book and World Almanac, which he argued showed a global Jewish population decline of no more than 300,000 to 1 million, attributable primarily to emigration, assimilation, and wartime mortality from typhus epidemics and Allied bombings disrupting supply lines rather than systematic extermination.[35] He asserted that the six million figure originated from prewar Zionist fundraising propaganda and lacked corroboration in German records or Allied intelligence, emphasizing that no comprehensive census or forensic accounting supported mass graves or crematoria capacities matching the narrative's scale. Regarding gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau, Zündel promoted the view that structures identified as extermination facilities were actually delousing stations using Zyklon B for hygienic purposes against typhus-carrying lice, citing engineering analyses that highlighted structural flaws such as inadequate ventilation, unsealed doors, and insufficient cyanide residue in wall samples to indicate human gassings on an industrial scale.[5] In the 1988 trial, he sponsored Fred Leuchter's forensic examination, which sampled ruins and found hydrogen cyanide concentrations in alleged gas chambers far below those in confirmed delousing facilities, arguing this proved the rooms' non-homicidal use and that mass executions would have required impossible logistical feats like rapid body disposal without detectable remnants.[5] Zündel further challenged the narrative by questioning the absence of a direct extermination order from Adolf Hitler or top Nazi leadership, positing instead that Jewish policy involved deportation and labor mobilization amid total war, not genocide, and that eyewitness accounts were unreliable due to postwar incentives and inconsistencies.[35] He critiqued the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (1945–1946) as exemplifying "victors' justice," alleging coerced confessions through torture, denial of defense access to documents, ex post facto laws, and reliance on hearsay affidavits without cross-examination, which fabricated the extermination myth to justify Allied conduct and extract reparations.[35] These positions, disseminated through Samisdat Publishers, framed the orthodox history as a product of wartime propaganda amplified by media and academia, urging reliance on archival documents, aerial photographs showing no mass burn pits, and German engineering records over testimonial claims.[5]Promotion of Revisionist Evidence and Witnesses
Zündel commissioned American execution equipment specialist Fred A. Leuchter to examine the ruins of structures alleged to be gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek in February 1988, focusing on engineering feasibility, ventilation systems, and residue analysis for hydrogen cyanide used in Zyklon B.[36] Leuchter's subsequent report concluded that the facilities lacked airtight doors, adequate exhaust mechanisms, and sufficient cyanide traces consistent with mass homicidal gassings, contrasting sharply with delousing chambers where higher residues were detected due to repeated exposure protocols.[36] Zündel promoted the findings through his publishing imprint, distributing copies via Samisdat Publishers and incorporating them into revisionist literature to argue for technical impossibilities in the orthodox account of executions.[5] In parallel, Zündel sought out and publicized testimonies from purported eyewitnesses, including former Auschwitz personnel and inmates, whose accounts contradicted claims of systematic gassings.[37] These included statements from individuals like Swedish researcher Ditlieb Felderer, whose photographs and on-site documentation Zündel cited to highlight discrepancies in crematoria capacities and chamber designs relative to alleged victim numbers.[5] He featured such materials in newsletters and pamphlets, emphasizing their empirical value over what he described as coerced or inconsistent survivor narratives propagated by postwar tribunals.[6] Zündel's approach prioritized forensic and documentary evidence, advocating chemical assays and structural blueprints from German archives to test claims of extermination infrastructure.[37] He argued that wartime records, such as construction plans for Auschwitz facilities labeled for morgues or air-raid shelters rather than gas chambers, supported revisionist interpretations when subjected to engineering scrutiny.[6] Through these efforts, Zündel positioned scientific testing and archival cross-verification as foundational to challenging prevailing historiography, distributing translated excerpts and summaries to international audiences via mail-order catalogs and associate networks.[38]Legal Proceedings in Canada
Criminal Trials for Spreading False News (1985–1988)
In 1984, Ernst Zündel faced two counts under section 181 of the Canadian Criminal Code for wilfully publishing statements known to be false and likely to injure public interest, stemming from his distribution of the pamphlet Did Six Million Really Die? by Richard Verrall, which argued that the Holocaust death toll was exaggerated and lacked evidentiary support.[39][15] The private prosecution was initiated by Sabina Citron, a Holocaust survivor and head of the Canadian Holocaust Remembrance Association.[40] The first trial commenced on January 18, 1985, in Toronto before Judge Ronald Thomas and a jury. The Crown presented thirteen witnesses, including historians and survivors, to establish the pamphlet's falsity regarding Nazi extermination policies and gas chambers at Auschwitz.[15] Zündel's defense, led by counsel Douglas Christie, countered with revisionist experts such as Fred Leuchter, who testified on the alleged technical infeasibility of gas chambers, and emphasized Zündel's good-faith pursuit of historical inquiry rather than deliberate deception or intent to incite harm.[15] On February 28, 1985, Zündel was convicted on both counts and sentenced to fifteen months' imprisonment, though he served only until an appeal bond was granted.[41] The Ontario Court of Appeal quashed the conviction on January 23, 1987, citing the trial judge's erroneous charge to the jury on the element of wilful falsity, which failed to adequately distinguish between objective truth and the publisher's subjective knowledge.[41] A retrial began on January 11, 1988, before Judge McRae, featuring expanded defense testimony from international revisionists challenging orthodox narratives on crematoria capacities and eyewitness accounts. Zündel was again convicted on May 11, 1988, and received a nine-month sentence, highlighting procedural persistence despite evidentiary debates.[14][15] Zündel's appeal reached the Supreme Court of Canada, which on August 27, 1992, unanimously struck down section 181 as unconstitutional under section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, deeming it overbroad for capturing non-malicious false statements in public discourse, including historical debate, without minimal impairment of expression.[39][4] The ruling underscored that truth adjudication belongs to the marketplace of ideas, not prior restraint via archaic criminal law originating in 1892, thereby vacating Zündel's convictions without endorsing the pamphlet's content.[39] This decision reinforced protections for controversial speech, distinguishing it from targeted hate incitement under other provisions.[39]Canadian Human Rights Commission Cases
In July and September 1996, Sabina Citron filed two complaints with the Canadian Human Rights Commission against Ernst Zündel, alleging that content on his website, Zundelsite, violated Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act by communicating, through telecommunications means, messages likely to expose Jews to hatred or contempt.[42] The complaints centered on revisionist materials posted from October 1995 onward, including arguments denying the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and questioning the scale of Jewish deaths during World War II, which the Commission referred to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal for adjudication.[43] Tribunal hearings commenced in the late 1990s, with procedural challenges from Zündel, including applications for judicial review in Federal Court over evidentiary rulings and claims of bias among tribunal members.[44] On January 18, 2002, the Tribunal ruled in Citron et al. v. Zündel that Zündel had engaged in a discriminatory practice under Section 13(1), finding that the website's repeated dissemination of such content constituted telephonic communication—interpreting internet access via phone lines or broadly as telecommunications—likely to foment hatred against an identifiable group.[45] The panel ordered Zündel, along with associates acting in concert, to cease and desist from communicating or causing to be communicated any representation via telecommunications that exposed Jews or persons of Jewish faith or origin to hatred or contempt, effectively requiring the site's shutdown of offending material.[42][15] Zündel appealed the decision, contending that Section 13 imposed unconstitutional censorship on historical revisionism, lacked a requirement for intent or truthfulness, and reversed the burden of proof in a manner incompatible with Charter protections for freedom of expression under Section 2(b).[46] Federal Court and Court of Appeal rulings in 2000 and subsequent reviews dismissed his challenges on jurisdictional and procedural grounds, upholding the Tribunal's authority despite acknowledging free speech tensions, as the provision targeted effects on vulnerable groups rather than mere falsity.[47] Critics of the process, including legal scholars, highlighted the quasi-judicial nature of Tribunal proceedings, which applied a civil standard of proof and did not require demonstration of willful promotion of hatred, raising concerns over overreach in suppressing dissenting interpretations of historical events without full adversarial safeguards.[48] The orders remained in effect until Zündel's detention under a security certificate in 2003, though compliance was contested amid ongoing site operations.[45]Security Certificate and Deportation Efforts (2003–2005)
On May 1, 2003, the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and the Solicitor General of Canada signed a security certificate under section 77 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, declaring Ernst Zündel inadmissible to Canada on grounds of national security.[49] The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) assessed Zündel as a threat due to his leadership role in the white supremacist movement, including his distribution of materials promoting hatred and ideologies that could incite politically motivated violence against Canadians.[49] Specific concerns included his financial support for American white supremacist William Pierce, author of The Turner Diaries, a novel credited with inspiring the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing; associations with international extremist groups such as South Africa's Afrikaner Resistance Movement, Britain's British National Party, and Germany's White Aryan Resistance; and ties to anti-Semitic figures like Swedish revisionist Ahmed Rami, who had connections to radical Islamist networks.[50] Zündel's website was also linked to content, including Radio Islam, advocating "total war against Zionism," positioning him as one of the world's most notorious distributors of hate material.[50] Zündel, a permanent resident in Canada since the 1970s who had never obtained citizenship, was detained immediately following the certificate's issuance and challenged its validity, arguing that his activities constituted protected expression rather than a security risk.[26] In response to deportation proceedings, he filed a refugee claim, asserting a well-founded fear of persecution in Germany for his historical revisionist views, which he claimed would expose him to unfair prosecution or harm.[51] A pre-removal risk assessment conducted on October 28, 2003, rejected this claim, concluding no credible risk of torture, cruel treatment, or danger to life if returned to Germany.[49] The security certificate process rendered him ineligible for refugee status, prioritizing national security over such protections.[26] Hearings before a designated Federal Court judge commenced on May 2, 2003, and extended intermittently until November 23, 2004, involving review of both public and classified CSIS evidence to determine the certificate's reasonableness.[49] Zündel contested the evidence's reliability and the secrecy of portions withheld from him, maintaining that his long-term residency and lack of direct violent acts negated any threat. On February 24, 2005, the Federal Court upheld the certificate as reasonable in Zündel, Re (2005 FC 295), affirming CSIS's conclusions that his influence within extremist networks endangered Canada's security through the promotion of hatred and potential incitement.[49] Appeals, including a denied leave to the Supreme Court of Canada, exhausted Zündel's domestic options, paving the way for removal proceedings.[52]International Detention and Deportation
Brief Detention in the United States
On February 5, 2003, Ernst Zündel was arrested at his home in Sevier County, Tennessee, by the Sevier County Sheriff's Department in coordination with U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) agents.[53] The arrest stemmed from Zündel's failure to attend a scheduled INS interview on June 12, 2001, regarding his application for permanent residency, which resulted in the abandonment of that application.[53] Zündel, a German citizen, had entered the United States on March 12, 2000, under the Visa Waiver Pilot Program (VWPP) based on his marriage to U.S. citizen Ingrid Rimland; under VWPP terms, participants waive the right to contest removal except in asylum claims.[53] He was initially held in Blount County jail pending immigration processing.[53] Zündel filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus on February 13, 2003, seeking emergency relief from detention, which a federal district court denied the same day; his appeal was rejected by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on February 14, 2003.[53] An INS deportation warrant was issued on February 5, 2003, after expedited proceedings that did not involve a full hearing before an immigration judge, given the VWPP waiver and denial of his asylum application on grounds of inadmissibility.[53][54] U.S. authorities cited Zündel's immigration violations and potential security risks, amid ongoing Canadian efforts to revoke his status there via a security certificate for activities deemed a threat to national security.[55] Zündel was deported to Canada on February 17, 2003, transported to Toronto, where he was immediately detained by Canadian authorities under the security certificate process.[53] The U.S. imposed a 20-year bar on his re-entry, consisting of two consecutive 10-year periods under immigration law.[53] This brief U.S. detention highlighted tensions in bilateral immigration enforcement, as Canada had signaled intent to pursue deportation proceedings against him, prompting Zündel's unsuccessful attempt to establish residency in the United States.[55]Final Deportation from Canada to Germany
On February 24, 2005, the Federal Court of Canada dismissed Zündel's final judicial review application challenging the validity of the security certificate issued against him by the Canadian government in May 2003, thereby enabling his removal from the country.[56] The certificate, designated under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, classified Zündel as a threat to national security due to his promotion of ideologies deemed to incite hatred and potentially facilitate terrorist activities, as determined by evidence presented in closed hearings.[57] Zündel's legal team had argued violations of his Charter rights, including freedom of expression, but the court upheld the government's position that his presence posed ongoing risks, including associations with extremist networks.[57] Zündel was physically deported from Canada to Germany on March 1, 2005, via a commercial flight from Toronto, accompanied by Canadian immigration enforcement officers.[7] The removal proceeded despite vocal protests from his supporters, who gathered outside detention facilities and courts, decrying the action as an infringement on free speech and political dissent; these demonstrations included claims that the deportation was politically motivated to suppress revisionist viewpoints.[58] Canadian officials justified the expedited process as necessary to enforce the security certificate following exhaustive legal challenges that had prolonged Zündel's detention since his return from the United States in 2003.[7] [58] Upon landing in Frankfurt Airport, Zündel was immediately transferred into the custody of German federal police authorities, who had issued an outstanding warrant for his arrest related to prior incitement charges.[59] This handover marked the effective end of Canadian jurisdiction over his case, with Zündel remanded pending proceedings in Germany; Canadian sources confirmed the deportation as a successful resolution to years of immigration enforcement efforts against non-citizens promoting prohibited ideologies.[60]Trial and Imprisonment in Germany
Prosecution for Incitement (2005–2007)
Upon his deportation to Germany in March 2005, Ernst Zündel was arrested and held in pretrial detention pending charges under Section 130 of the German Criminal Code, known as Volksverhetzung, which prohibits incitement to hatred against segments of the population, including through denial of atrocities committed under National Socialism.[61] The Baden-Württemberg state prosecutor's office indicted him on multiple counts related to publications from the 1990s, such as pamphlets and books questioning the scale and methods of Jewish deaths during World War II, which remained accessible online and had been distributed internationally via his Samisdat Publishers imprint.[62] Prosecutors argued these materials constituted repeated public endorsement of Nazi ideology and denial of established historical events, with the internet's global reach amplifying their potential to foster ethnic animosity.[8] The trial opened in the Mannheim Regional Court on November 9, 2005, before a panel presided over by Judge Ulrich Meinerzhagen, with proceedings focused on evidentiary review of Zündel's writings rather than a full reexamination of World War II history.[63] Zündel's initial defense counsel, Sylvia Stolz, was ejected from the courtroom and barred from continuing representation by January 2006 after persistently challenging the Holocaust's factual basis during arguments, actions the court classified as obstructing justice and akin to furthering the charged offenses; Stolz was later prosecuted separately for similar statements.[64] Subsequent counsel faced limitations on introducing certain expert witnesses whose testimonies risked veering into prohibited revisionist claims, as German courts under hate speech statutes prioritize preventing the platforming of denied events over unrestricted historical debate.[65] Zündel himself maintained silence throughout much of the trial, submitting written statements asserting his right to question official narratives without intent to incite violence. On February 15, 2007, the Mannheim court convicted Zündel on 14 specific counts of Volksverhetzung, determining that his publications systematically trivialized Nazi crimes against Jews and promoted antisemitic tropes to an international audience, thereby violating Germany's post-1945 legal framework designed to suppress such expressions regardless of borders enabled by digital dissemination.[62][31] The judges emphasized the materials' persistence online as evidence of ongoing provocation, rejecting defenses centered on free speech by referencing the statute's explicit carve-out for protecting democratic order from ideologies linked to genocide.[61] An appeal to the Federal Court of Justice was filed but upheld the conviction later that year, solidifying the ruling's finality on the incitement charges.[66]Prison Sentence and Conditions
On February 15, 2007, the Mannheim Regional Court sentenced Ernst Zündel to five years' imprisonment for 14 counts of incitement to racial hatred under Section 130 of the German Criminal Code.[62][8] The sentence was to be served in Mannheim Prison, where Zündel was transferred following the verdict; he ultimately completed the full term, with credit not explicitly reducing the post-conviction portion in public records.[67] Conditions in Mannheim Prison were described by Zündel and his supporters as restrictive, including the withholding of incoming personal correspondence—over 1,700 letters reportedly delayed or censored for periods up to five years, limiting external communication.[68] While German prison standards provide basic necessities such as bedding and meals, revisionist advocates claimed elements of isolation persisted from pre-trial detention into the sentence, though verifiable evidence primarily documents solitary confinement during his earlier Canadian holding rather than in Germany.[62] No independent reports from penal oversight bodies, such as the German Federal Constitutional Court or international monitors, corroborated exceptional harshness beyond standard security measures for incitement convicts. Zündel reported physical strain from prolonged incarceration, though specific medical diagnoses during the term remain undocumented in primary sources; supporters highlighted this in appeals framing his treatment as politically motivated.[68] International advocacy for early release centered on human rights arguments from revisionist networks, emphasizing freedom of expression violations under Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, but lacked endorsement from mainstream organizations like Amnesty International, which did not intervene citing the nature of the offense.[40] These efforts included petitions and public statements portraying the imprisonment as disproportionate punishment for historical inquiry rather than verified threats.Release and Restrictions (2010–2017)
Ernst Zündel was released from Mannheim-Stammheim prison on March 1, 2010, after serving the full five-year term imposed in 2007 for 14 counts of incitement to racial hatred through the dissemination of Holocaust denial materials.[69] The early announcement of his impending release in February stemmed from crediting time served during pre-trial detention following his 2005 deportation from Canada, though he ultimately completed nearly the entire sentence without additional remission for good behavior.[70] Upon release, Zündel returned to a private residence in the Black Forest region of southwestern Germany, where he resided under ongoing legal constraints derived from his conviction and Germany's strict prohibitions on Volksverhetzung (incitement of the populace).[69] These included a permanent bar on leaving German territory without explicit permission, which authorities denied amid concerns over his potential to propagate prohibited views abroad, and mandates to avoid any public or published expressions that could be construed as denying or trivializing Nazi crimes.[67] Communications were subject to monitoring to ensure compliance, reflecting standard post-conviction oversight for such offenses under Section 130 of the German Criminal Code. From 2010 to 2017, Zündel maintained a deliberately low public profile, eschewing media appearances or organized events to evade re-incarceration, while engaging in private correspondence with a limited network of historical revisionist contacts via traditional mail, as digital channels risked heightened scrutiny.[2] This subdued activity aligned with his stated intent to prioritize personal health recovery over activism, though supporters reported his continued articulation of revisionist perspectives in personal letters, without evidence of organized dissemination that violated probationary norms.[71]Other Interests and Pursuits
Engagement with UFOlogy and Paranormal Theories
Ernst Zündel engaged with ufology through publications asserting that unidentified flying objects represented advanced Nazi-era technology rather than extraterrestrial origins. In 1974, under the pseudonym Christof Friedrich, he released UFOs: Nazi Secret Weapon? via his Samisdat Publishers, compiling claims of German development of disc-shaped craft with anti-gravity propulsion during World War II.[72] The book referenced alleged prototypes like the V-7 and Haunebu series, positing that Nazi scientists, unhindered by conventional physics, engineered flying saucers capable of supersonic speeds and vertical takeoff.[73] Zündel's narrative linked these purported inventions to wartime secrecy, including Viktor Schauberger's vortex engine designs and Hans Kammler's oversight of black projects, suggesting post-1945 UFO sightings stemmed from escaped German personnel or hidden bases, such as those in Antarctica tied to Operation Highjump in 1946–1947.[74] He argued that Allied suppression of such evidence perpetuated a cover-up, paralleling his distrust of official histories in other domains by emphasizing suppressed technological achievements over conventional explanations.[2] These speculations drew from anecdotal reports and unverified engineering diagrams, lacking empirical validation but serving to challenge postwar consensus on Axis capabilities.[72] Beyond print, Zündel incorporated these themes into broader alternative media efforts, including later audiobooks reiterating Nazi UFO primacy and calls for disclosure of suppressed archives.[75] His work overlapped with paranormal circles by framing UFOs within esoteric frameworks like Vril energy and Thule Society influences, though he prioritized human-engineered origins over supernatural or alien hypotheses.[76] This engagement reflected a pattern of interrogating institutional narratives through fringe lenses, funding revisionist endeavors via sales of such material.[77]Connections to Broader Alternative Narratives
Zündel's publications through Samisdat Publishers linked unidentified flying objects to alleged Nazi-engineered disc aircraft, positing these as precursors to post-war sightings suppressed by Allied powers. In UFOs: Nazi Secret Weapon?, co-authored with Willibald Mattern, a German expatriate in Chile, Zündel detailed claims of German prototypes like the V-7 and Haunebu series, developed under engineers such as Viktor Schauberger and tested in 1944–1945, with technologies purportedly evacuated to bases in Antarctica or South America to evade capture.[72][74] These assertions drew on eyewitness accounts from German personnel and critiqued official U.S. and Soviet disclosures as incomplete, implying a coordinated cover-up of Wunderwaffen dispersal to prevent technological proliferation.[72] Such works connected to wider alternative frameworks positing government concealment of advanced propulsion systems across domains, including antigravity research and exotic energy sources derived from wartime innovations. Zündel's materials echoed narratives of elite suppression, where post-1945 operations like Operation Paperclip selectively transferred German expertise while burying anomalous projects, fostering distrust in institutional histories of aviation and aerospace development.[72] This aligned with critiques in paranormal circles of multi-decade obfuscation, extending to claims of ongoing black-budget programs reverse-engineering captured or inherited tech.[78] Through associations with figures like Mattern, who contributed field reports from South America on anomalous aerial phenomena, Zündel integrated UFOlogy with esoteric interpretations of historical engineering feats, influencing niche networks skeptical of mainstream scientific consensus on aerial anomalies.[72] These ties reinforced broader conspiracy motifs of hidden continuities between Axis-era experiments and contemporary unexplained sightings, without empirical validation from declassified records.[79]Personal Life and Heritage
Marriages, Family, and Support Network
Ernst Zündel entered into three marriages during his lifetime. His first marriage occurred in 1959 to Janick Larouche, whom he met in a Toronto language class the previous year; the couple resided in Montreal, where Zündel worked as a commercial artist and later founded Samisdat Publishers, and they had two sons, Pierre and Hans.[80] The marriage lasted 18 years before separating in 1977, amid strains from Zündel's increasing activism and irregular schedule.[80] His second marriage was to Irene Margarelli in March 1996, following her contact with him in 1995 and their meeting in Toronto the next February; the union dissolved less than 1.5 years later when she moved out in March 1997 and subsequently provided information on Zündel's activities to Canadian and U.S. authorities, describing him as "evil incarnate."[80] [81] Zündel's third marriage, in 2001, was to Ingrid Rimland, an American writer he met at a 1994 conference in Los Angeles; the couple, both in their sixties at the time, lived in Tennessee, where Rimland maintained The Zundelsite website to disseminate Zündel's materials and correspondence.[80] [80] Rimland played a central role in sustaining Zündel's publishing and advocacy efforts under legal pressures, handling public relations, website operations, and campaigns on his behalf during his detentions in Canada from 2003 and subsequent imprisonment in Germany from 2005 to 2010.[80] Beyond immediate family, Zündel relied on a network of international contacts who provided financial contributions and logistical assistance to support his legal defenses and publications amid repeated prosecutions; these included donations that funded attorney fees during his Canadian trials in the 1980s and 1990s, as well as ongoing operational costs for Samisdat Publishers.[2]German Ancestry and Cultural Identity
Ernst Zündel was born on April 24, 1939, in Bad Wildbad, a municipality in southwestern Germany within the Black Forest region of Baden-Württemberg, to ethnic German parents immersed in the area's conservative rural traditions.[81] This southwestern locale, historically Swabian-influenced, featured strong emphases on family-centric values, vocational craftsmanship, and community self-reliance, hallmarks of prewar German provincial life. At age 14, shortly after the war's end, Zündel entered a trade apprenticeship, reflecting the enduring German custom of structured professional training that prioritized practical skills and diligence over abstract education.[82] Zündel's formative years coincided with Germany's immediate postwar reconstruction amid national division, economic hardship, and mandatory denazification processes enforced by Allied powers, which emphasized atonement for National Socialist policies and imposed a framework of collective culpability. These conditions, including the psychological burden of defeat and the narrative of German aggression, cultivated in him a perception of systemic injustice toward his ethnic kin, reinforcing a self-conception rooted in unyielding loyalty to German heritage rather than assimilation into supranational or multicultural paradigms. He consistently framed his identity as that of a steadfast ethnic German, prioritizing cultural continuity and sovereignty over pluralistic integration, which he regarded as dilutive to ancestral lineage and folk customs.[26]Death and Posthumous Assessment
Circumstances of Death
Ernst Zündel died on August 5, 2017, at the age of 78, from a heart attack at his home in Bad Wildbad, Germany.[83][84][85] His wife, Ingrid Zündel, confirmed the cause of death and stated that he passed away peacefully in their residence, with no indications of external factors contributing to the event.[85][86] Contemporary reports from local authorities and media outlets documented the death as natural, without any official inquiries into suspicious circumstances.[83]Legacy in Free Speech and Revisionist Circles
Zündel's prosecution under section 181 of the Canadian Criminal Code culminated in the 1992 Supreme Court ruling in R. v. Zündel, which invalidated the "spreading false news" provision as an unjustifiable infringement on freedom of expression guaranteed by section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[4] The decision emphasized that protecting even verifiably false or repugnant statements serves the pursuit of truth through open discourse, absent imminent harm, thereby broadening constitutional safeguards against prior restraint on controversial ideas.[87] This precedent influenced subsequent jurisprudence, distinguishing permissible historical critique from incitement while highlighting limits on legislative overreach in regulating speech. Within revisionist communities, Zündel is commemorated as a foundational figure who advanced evidentiary challenges to orthodox World War II narratives, including forensic analyses of camp structures and demographics, and as a martyr vindicated by legal persecution rather than factual refutation.[5] Adherents credit his trials with exposing reliance on testimonial accounts over physical and documentary proof, framing his decades-long detentions across jurisdictions as proof of systemic suppression of dissent.[88] Such portrayals position his work as a catalyst for prioritizing causal mechanisms and empirical verification in historical assessment over consensus enforcement. Opponents, particularly advocacy groups monitoring extremism, attribute to Zündel a role in normalizing antisemitic tropes through systematic negation of genocide evidence, arguing his output warranted calibrated speech restrictions to mitigate real-world prejudice and violence.[24] His 2007 conviction in Germany under section 130 of the Criminal Code for incitement via denial materials reinforced European models treating such propagation as actionable Volksverhetzung, establishing benchmarks for penalizing discourse deemed to erode social cohesion.[2] These counter-narratives underscore causal links posited between unchecked revisionism and heightened group animosities, informing advocacy for targeted prohibitions over absolute free speech absolutism. Zündel's influence persists in international forums debating historical methodology against hate speech frameworks, with his cases cited in arguments against extraterritorial censorship and for due process in evidence-based inquiry.[15] His publications, including titles like Did Six Million Really Die?, continue circulating via online retailers and digital repositories, evading full eradication and sustaining engagement in fringe scholarship despite bans in nations enforcing denial criminalization.[89] This durability illustrates tensions between digital persistence and regulatory intent, where suppression efforts have arguably amplified perceptions of taboo enforcement over substantive rebuttal.References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zundel%2C_re%2C_February_24%2C_2005
.jpg)
