Hubbry Logo
Jewish LegionJewish LegionMain
Open search
Jewish Legion
Community hub
Jewish Legion
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Jewish Legion
Jewish Legion
from Wikipedia

Jewish Legion
Jewish Legion soldiers in 1919
Active1917–1921
Country Mandatory Palestine
Allegiance United Kingdom
Branch British Army
Size5,000 Jewish troops
Engagements

The Jewish Legion was a series of battalions of Jewish soldiers who served in the British Army during the First World War. Some participated in the British conquest of Palestine from the Ottomans.

The formation of the battalions had several motives: the expulsion of the Ottomans, the gaining of military experience, and the hope that their contribution would favorably influence the support for a Jewish national home in the land when a new world order was established after the war. The idea for the battalions was proposed by Pinhas Rutenberg, Dov Ber Borochov and Ze'ev Jabotinsky and carried out by Jabotinsky and Joseph Trumpeldor, who aspired for the battalions to become the independent military force of the Yishuv in Palestine.

Their vision did not fully materialize, as the battalions were disbanded shortly after the war. However, their activities significantly contributed to the establishment of paramilitaries such as the Haganah and the Irgun (which later became the foundation for the Israel Defense Forces).

Formation and objectives

[edit]
Jabotinsky (left) and Trumpeldor (right) in uniform.

During the First World War, a debate emerged within the Zionist leadership on whether to support either side, the Entente Powers or the Central Powers, or to maintain neutrality and on the policy that would best ensure the survival of the Jewish community in Palestine during the war and benefit its aspirations for a national home afterward. The debate created a rift between those who supported the Entente Powers and those who supported the Central Powers. The Jews of German origin were patriotic to their country of origin, and the battalions were a British initiative against the Ottoman Empire, which was allied to Germany. Therefore, the "German" Jews opposed the battalions vehemently, and Chaim Weizmann yielded to them by opposing the battalions mainly because the one protecting the Yishuv in Palestine was a German general. There was also the real fear that the Ottomans would carry out a massacre if they decided that the Jews were a fifth column, as had occurred to the Armenians.

Pinhas Rutenberg was a member of the Socialist Revolutionary Party (SR), which, unlike the Bolsheviks, supported the Russians' alliance with Britain. David Ben-Gurion and Yitzhak Ben-Zvi supported the Ottomans and opposed the battalions. What changed their minds completely was the Balfour Declaration, and they later enlisted in the battalion.

First World War and establishment of battalions

[edit]
Ben-Gurion in the uniform of the Jewish Legion, 1918
Lieutenant Colonel John Henry Patterson, commander of the Zion Mule Corps and the 38th Battalion, photographed in 1917.
Soldiers from one of the battalions at the Western Wall after the British capture of Jerusalem, likely in 1918.

During the period leading up to the outbreak of the war in 1914, revolutionaries were waiting for a revolution in Russia. The Okhrana was successful in its activities against the revolutionaries, and SR activists went into exile from Russia. Vladimir Lenin and his colleagues also established the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party, which competed with the SR in exile. When the war broke out, a meeting was held among the SR exiles' leadership, which was divided between the left and the right. Supporters of Ilya Fondaminsky argued that the war would shake the tsarist regime and therefore should enlist and aid the British to hasten the revolution. There was also an opposing trend led by Viktor Chernov, a rival to Rutenberg, who opposed that approach.

Rutenberg went to London, met with Chaim Weizmann and tried to convince him to support the establishment of the Jewish battalions. Rutenberg told Weizmann that the war was an opportunity to advance the idea of a republic in Israel. To convince the Entente Powers, Jewish legions of Jewish exiles needed to be established. According to Professor Matityahu Mintz, Rutenberg preceded Ze'ev Jabotinsky. Rutenberg acted in September 1914, and Jabotinsky began in 1915.

The question arises as to what motivated Rutenberg, who was traveling on behalf of the SR to the British and French capitals to pressure Russia for greater democratisation, engage with the Jewish people and meet Weizmann. Mintz clarifies that for Rutenberg, they were not separate domains. Before his trip, Rutenberg had not spoken about or sought a solution to the Jewish question, but that was a result of Rutenberg's discussions with the SR leadership, who sent him to France. Mintz does not believe that Rutenberg's return to the Jewish people was insincere but emphasises the alignment between his conduct and the interests of the party and of Russia. The evidence for maintaining ties and prioritising the party's interests was Rutenberg's rapid and smooth integration into the government leadership after the February Revolution of 1917, during Alexander Kerensky's Social Revolutionary administration.

The SR, as well as the Constitutional Democrats, thought that the number of Jews in Russia was too large and that it would be better if they left Russia before the revolution, which would be beneficial for the Jews as well. The SR was aware of the Jews' animosity toward the autocratic regime in Russia, alongside the growing Jewish sympathy for Germany, which had granted them freedom and rights. Rutenberg adopted that SR stance. The idea of battalions that would conquer the land from the Ottomans, who were German allies, served the interests of the Russian homeland, allied to France and Britain.

Mintz noted that the Zionist movement decided on neutrality, but in practice, that was not the case, as Zionists in each country supported their homeland. For instance, German Zionists believed that if Germany won the war, the Jews' situation would improve, as their status in Russia was worse than in Germany.

Pinhas Rutenberg's initiative for the establishment of Jewish battalions at the beginning of World War I by Matityahu Mintz, Rutenberg's meeting with Borochov in Milan, Italy.

Rutenberg then went to Italy and established an organization for the Jewish cause. The basic idea was that if Italy joined the war on the side of the Entente Powers, the first Jewish battalions would be formed in Italy. Dov Ber Borochov also arrived in Italy from Vienna after the Austrian police made it clear that it would be better for him to leave Austria-Hungary, an ally of Germany. In Milan, Rutenberg and Borochov met after David Goldstein, a member of Poale Zion, connected them. Borochov joined Rutenberg and was active in leading this organization. He managed to organize not only Jews but also intellectuals, politicians, and Italian ministers like Luigi Luzzatti. In 1915, they joined, but Rutenberg decided to go to the United States. He had travelled to Bari, Italy, and invited Jabotinsky, Ben-Gurion and Ben-Zvi to present the plan. Ben-Gurion and Ben-Zvi refused to come, and only Jabotinsky met with Rutenberg before Jabotinsky's trip to London. Rutenberg and Jabotinsky divided the work. Rutenberg would work in the United States and Jabotinsky in Britain, as Rutenberg aimed to establish a non-Zionist Jewish Congress in the US.

According to Mintz, Rutenberg brought a booklet and manifesto to the US, began participating in conferences, organized a committee and started a newspaper for the Jewish Congress. Borochov was the editor of the newspaper and also wrote the articles. A conflict broke out between Rutenberg and Ben-Gurion, who was also in the US, as Ben-Gurion continued to support a pro-Ottoman orientation. Ben-Zvi joined Ben-Gurion although Mintz notes that their relationship soured in the US because Ben-Gurion published a book in which he attributed all of the work to himself. According to Mintz, there is no doubt that Ben-Gurion downplayed Ben-Zvi's contributions. There was no conflict between Ben-Zvi and Borochov, as Ben-Zvi was from Borochov's hometown, his student, and a close friend, and they respected each other.

Jabotinsky

[edit]

One of the most prominent figures supporting the activist line was Jabotinsky, who knew the Ottoman Empire and so predicted that its days were numbered during the war, which would impact the future governance of Palestine. He argued that the Jews should openly support Britain and help its military efforts to capture the Land of Israel.

Jewish volunteers from Palestine joining the British Army, 1918

In 1915, Jabotinsky arrived at Camp Jabari, near Alexandria, where 1,200 Jews who had been expelled from Palestine by the Ottomans or fled by the harsh living conditions gradually gathered, along with Joseph Trumpeldor. Jabotinsky presented his ideas for establishing a Jewish military unit. On 18 Adar 5675 (February 18, 1915), a document was drafted stating the decision to establish a Jewish battalion and offering its services to the British Army for the conquest of Palestine. The document bore 100 signatures, with the first being those of Ze'ev Gluskin, Jabotinsky, and Trumpeldor. Subsequently, they began negotiations with various elements within the British army and government.

Opposition to establishment of the battalions

[edit]

After numerous negotiations, the British partially agreed to the initiative, and a Jewish unit was formed with volunteers from the exiles in Egypt. Its purpose was set as a transport unit on the Gallipoli front, in Turkey. The means of transport of that time gave the unit its name: the "Zion Mule Corps". However, its activities were not connected to Palestine, as Britain did not yet plan to attack there.

Several bodies and groups opposed the establishment of the battalions, and some actively tried to stop their formation:

  • Anti-Zionist or non-Zionist Jews, particularly assimilated British Jews who feared that emphasizing Jewish nationality through the battalions would harm their status among the British.
  • The leadership of the Zionist Organization, including figures like Nahum Sokolow and others in London, who aimed to maintain neutrality.
  • Ahad Ha'am and others who saw the main role of Zionism in spiritual activity.
  • Part of the labor camp in Palestine, especially members of Hapoel Hatzair, believed that the land should be acquired through labour, not war, and therefore opposed the establishment of the battalions and joining them.

Zion Mule Corps

[edit]

The Zion Mule Corps preceded the combat Jewish battalions formed later. Its recruits were Jews who had been exiled to Egypt by the Ottoman Empire. It was established in the spring of 1915 and was responsible for transporting supplies to the front lines during the Gallipoli campaign, in Turkey. The unit was praised for its performance. After the failed campaign, the British refused to transfer it to another front. The corps was disbanded, and some of its members joined the subsequent Jewish battalions.

Jewish Legion

[edit]
Soldiers of the battalion marching with rifles and bayonets in the streets of London; the first marcher: Lieutenant Jabotinsky
Poster calling for enlistment in the Jewish Battalion: "The brave and faithful man / The Lord his God is with him - and he shall join the Jewish Battalion! Chazak!"
Zion Mule Corps Soldiers trasfered to 3/20 Battalion London Regiment

Unlike Trumpeldor, Jabotinsky was not satisfied with the formation of the Zion Mule Corps, which was not a combat unit and did not participate in the fight against the Ottomans. He traveled to Europe to continue advocating for the battalions. Jabotinsky contacted numerous statesmen but failed to gain genuine support for his initiative in Britain, France and Russia. The resistance stemmed from both a lack of trust in a military unit composed entirely of Jewish volunteers and the times's lack of interest in fighting the Ottomans in Palestine. Also, significant support did not come from most Jewish leaders or communities. However, a few Zionist figures tried to assist Jabotinsky. The most notable was Meir Grossman with whom he founded the newspaper Di Tribune, later known as Unser Tribune, to promote propaganda for the battalions. Rutenberg and Weizmann also supported Jabotinsky's initiative, but the Zionist Organization strongly opposed it, and its executive committee issued an order to all Zionists in Europe to fight against the propaganda supporting the Jewish Legion.

Jabotinsky eventually reached London and focused his efforts there for the next two years. He decided to concentrate on around 30,000 Jews, mostly young men who were refugees from Russia, Poland and Galicia who resided as refugees in London, particularly in Whitechapel and the rest of the East End of London. The efforts to form the battalion were highly determined and carried out against the odds: Horatio Kitchener, the British Secretary of War, believed that Britain did not need "exotic armies" and that the war would not reach Palestine. Most Zionist movement leaders, as mentioned earlier, tried to thwart the initiative, and above all, there was great apathy among young London Jews, most of whom saw no need to enlist in the British Army, did not identify with its war and did not identify with Zionism or the idea of conquering Palestine.

Nevertheless, voices in Britain began to grow in favor of compulsory enlistment. The British people witnessed the heavy losses in the youth on the battlefields compared to the "café dwellers", many of whom were European refugees in London, including young Jews. The British Home Office later ordered compulsory enlistment for British citizens. The foreign Jews initially refused enlistment. Jabotinsky and his supporters clarified to the British authorities and to the young Jews that joining a Jewish battalion was the only way out of the predicament. Two catalysts then appeared: an editorial supporting the idea in the influential newspaper The Times and a group of 120 former members of the Zion Mule Corps, along with Trumpeldor, who joined the 20th Battalion of the Royal Fusiliers and formed a Jewish company within it. After a decisive meeting between Trumpeldor, Jabotinsky and senior officials at the War Office, the formation of a combat Jewish battalion was realized.

Initially, the battalion was called "The Jewish Regiment" (a regiment usually consisting of two battalions), and its symbol was a menorah with the slogan "Kadima," meaning "forward" as both "advance" and "eastward". It recommended John Henry Patterson as its commander, as he had led the Zion Mule Corps throughout its operations in Gallipoli. Trumpeldor, who had served as the deputy commander of the Mule Corps in Gallipoli and succeeded Patterson in its final months, was initially denied an officer's commission by the British and so he returned to Russia to promote his idea of forming a massive Jewish army to fight on the Caucasus front and advance toward Palestine. The Jewish company of the 20th Battalion joined the new Jewish battalion, and its members became the core of the unit.

The 38th Battalion of the Royal Fusiliers

[edit]
Benjamin Smith, a soldier in the 38th Jewish Battalion wearing his uniform. Note the Star of David on the shoulder. This soldier came from Sioux City, Iowa, USA.

The 38th (Service) Battalion, Royal Fusiliers (City of London Regiment), commonly referred to as the "London Battalion", was mainly composed of Jews from London, with a smaller number of Americans. The battalion, led by Patterson because of his success with the Zion Mule Corps, had two thirds of its officers as Jews; other battalions had mostly Christian officers. Recruitment for the battalion took place in England.

In August 1917, two official notices were issued: one obligating Russian citizens residing in England to enlist in the army and the other announcing the establishment of the Jewish battalion. Despite obstacles, the assimilated Jews in London continued to oppose its existence and tried to dissolve it. Although they failed in their efforts, their influence led to the cancellation of the name "The Jewish Regiment" and the menorah symbol. Instead, it was given the name of a regular British battalion—the 38th Battalion of the Royal Fusiliers. The War Minister promised, however, that the battalion would regain its symbols after proving itself in combat. The public and the press still referred to it by its original name, the recruitment office displayed Hebrew signs, and the soldiers and officers wore Star of David insignias on their left arm (the 38th Battalion had a light purple Star of David, the 39th was red and the 40th was blue). The soldiers trained at a camp near Portsmouth.

On 2 February 1918, the Jewish battalion marched through the main streets of Whitechapel and the rest of London. Great excitement was felt among the city's Jews, many shops hung blue and white flags and the proud soldiers of the legion were received with loud cheers in the streets. The next day, the battalion set off for France and then through Italy to Egypt.

The 38th Battalion trained in Egypt and was later sent to Palestine. There were already many volunteers from among the local youths, who would later form the 40th Battalion. In early June, the battalion was stationed on the front lines of the British forces in the hills of Ephraim, an area in which the British forces were engaged in skirmishes against the Ottomans. Malaria was an issue, which afflicted many.

In mid-August, the battalion was sent to the Jordan front, where it served as a link throughout the British front. In September, at the beginning of the Battle of Megiddo, Patterson received orders to capture the Umm al-Shert Bridge in the Jordan Valley, the only bridge in the area (located directly east of Netiv HaGdud, a moshav named after the operation). The first company sent to the location came under fire; its captain, Julian, was barely rescued; the lieutenant was wounded and taken prisoner; and a private was killed. Jabotinsky then led the second company to seize the site, and the mission was successfully completed on the 22nd of the month.

From there, the battalion, already preceded by the 39th Battalion, advanced to the area of As-Salt, east of the Jordan River, and established a garrison there. In Gilead, the British completed their conquest of Palestine, and the battalion returned to its western side and took Ottoman and German prisoners. Subsequently, the battalion was tasked with guarding military facilities.

The 39th Battalion of the Royal Fusiliers

[edit]
Advertisement published in American Jewish newspapers encouraging enlistment in the Jewish Battalions: "Bat Zion", a personification of the Jewish people, or the people dwelling in Zion, emerges from a Star of David, pointing at the viewer in the style of the "Lord Kitchener Wants You" poster and calling, "Your Altneuland needs you! Join the Jewish Regiment!"

The 39th Battalion was known as "the American Battalion," since most of its soldiers coming from the Jewish community in the United States, but had a minority from England. The origins of its formation lie in Rutenberg's 1915 initiative to create a military unit composed of American and Canadian Jews. Initially, American Jews did not agree to his initiative, but when the United States entered the war in April 1917, their stance changed. The battalion was recruited in the United States.

The principal initiators of its establishment were Ben-Zvi and Ben-Gurion, who were exiled from Palestine during the war by Djemal Pasha. They changed their position after the Balfour Declaration. About 5,000 volunteers (though not all managed to arrive in Palestine) formed the battalion, which operated under British command. The battalion's commander was Colonel Eliezer Margolin. It included a core group of members from the "HaHalutz" (The Pioneer) movement and "Poalei Zion," meaning, unlike the 38th British Battalion, most of its members were Zionists. In 1918, the battalion's soldiers were sent to Palestine, where the 38th Battalion had also arrived.

About half of its members participated in the military campaigns in the Jordan Valley and Samaria while the 38th Battalion was also present there. After the capture of the Umm-Shert Bridge, half of the battalion moved to the area of Jericho and then to Gilead to complete the British conquest of Palestine. Some members of the battalion arrived in the land only after the end of the war.

The 40th Battalion of the Royal Fusiliers

[edit]
Choir of the Jewish Legion

The 40th Battalion, known as the "Palestinian Battalion" of the Jewish Legion, had as its primary mission to perform guard and security duties. It was formed after the British forces entered Palestine, and many local youths wanted to participate in the Jewish military effort. Even before the 38th Battalion's arrival, there were already 1,500 youths prepared to volunteer, one third of whom were women, though the women were not enlisted. The desire of the local Palestinian Jewish youth to enlist met the initiative of Major General John Hill, the commander of the 52nd Division, who called on the young men of the Yishuv in areas that had beenconquered by the British to join the army and to assist in further conquests of the land. Most of the volunteers were young "activists" from the labor camp, members of the Jaffa Group and the Small Assembly, as well as secondary school students from Herzliya Hebrew Gymnasium, who campaigned vigorously for recruitment. Their initiative met resistance, and a debate arose within the Jewish Yishuv regarding enlistment.

The decision was made at the First Constituent Assembly on 2 January 1918, following a discussion in which the leadership of Poalei Zion supported enlistment and volunteering. Moshe Smilansky and Eliyahu Golomb argued that joining the Jewish Battalions was a political endeavor that elevated the status of the Yishuv in the eyes of its new rulers and contributed to the strength of the community.

Members of the HaPoel HaTzair, including Yosef Sprinzak and A.D. Gordon, were the main opponents. The party argued that the Yishuv's efforts should focus on settlement and agriculture, alongside its pacifist ideology that opposed participation in imperialist and bloody wars. Another argument was the fear of harm to the settlers of the Galilee, who were still under Ottoman rule. Despite the opposition from the leadership of HaPoel HaTzair, the movement had volunteers who joined the battalion.

In parallel with the enlistment campaign conducted in Tel Aviv, which resulted in one company of volunteers, Baron James de Rothschild led a recruitment campaign in Jerusalem, which produced a second company of recruits. The volunteers from Jerusalem included some students from the teacher's seminary and mostly members of the old Yishuv, who enlisted with the blessing of the rabbis.

Emblem of the Royal Fusiliers ("The King's Men") worn by the soldiers and officers of the Jewish Legion

General Edmund Allenby was initially reluctant to the idea of a unit of Jewish soldiers under his command, but Zionist political activity in London led to its establishment, and 1,000 volunteers were accepted into its ranks. Smilansky, who also enlisted, spearheaded the recruitment campaign. The battalion was formed in Palestine. Among the enlistees were Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, David Ben-Gurion, and Berl Katznelson, who were already public leaders in the Yishuv but served as privates in the battalion. The 40th Battalion completed its initial training near Tel El-Kebir, Egypt, under the command of Colonel Margolin. After Margolin was appointed to command the 39th Battalion, Colonel Frederick Samuel, a member of an assimilated English-Jewish family who had served as a battalion commander on the French front, took command. He expected a promotion to brigadier but upon receiving a letter stating that Jewish officers were needed for the Jewish Legion, he left his unit, forwent the brigadier position and joined the 40th Battalion.

After him, the battalion was commanded by Colonel M.P. Scott, who was a Christian. The battalion did not participate in battles, and its soldiers served in support roles for the British Army and guarded prisoners. In December 1918, the battalion was moved to the Sarafand (now Tzrifin) area, and some of its soldiers, those who found work, were released from service. By the end of 1919, part of the battalion was stationed at Rafah and received an order to send 80 of its soldiers to the Egyptian headquarters. As that was against the "agreement", its soldiers refused to comply. Scott supported their stance and excused them from the order. After his service, Scott remained a supporter of Zionism and was quoted as saying: "England has been honored: We tore a page from the Bible inscribed with the oldest prophecy—adding England's pledge to the promissory note of God. Such a signature cannot be renounced by the nation".

The composition of the three battalions by country of origin was estimated as follows: 1,700 Americans, 1,500 Palestinian Jews, 1,400 British, 300 Canadians, 50 Argentinians and about 50 Jewish prisoners released from Ottoman captivity.

"First Judean"

[edit]
Emblem of the "First Judean" Jewish Battalion
Flag of the "First Judean" Jewish Legion.
The Hashomer flag given to the Jewish Legion reads, "By Blood and Fire Judea Fell; By Blood and Fire Judea shall rise".

In the first year after the conquest of Palestine (1919), the battalions comprised a significant portion of the British forces maintaining order in the land. In the Autumn Offensive of Allenby 1918, only "a battalion and a half" participated, but a year later, the battalions numbered 5,000 soldiers (actually, according to British War Office records, 10,000 men were accepted into the battalions, but half did not reach Palestine because the war had already ended). The presence of the battalions in Palestine moderated the Arab population's attitude toward the Yishuv. For two months, uprisings broke out in Egypt, and the sense of Arab national awakening also reached Palestine, but it did not ignite significant actions.

Hurva Synagogue, Jerusalem 1934. According to the book "O Jerusalem" Flags from the Jewish Legion were kept here

After the war ended, the morale of the soldiers in the legion declined, and most of the British and American soldiers wanted to return to their home countries. The British military administration in Palestine did not align with the pro-Zionist sentiments of London and sought to disband the battalions, which they saw as potentially igniting conflict with the local Arabs.

The Legion's casualties in the First World War[1]
Battalion Fatalities
38th 43
39th 23
40th 12
42nd 3
38th/40th 9
Transferred from
Jewish Legion
1

By spring 1920, the first two battalions were already disbanded, and the remnants of their soldiers joined the Palestinian battalion, now under Margolin's command. The War Minister's promise was fulfilled, and the battalion was renamed the "First Judean". Its symbol was the menorah, and its motto was "Kadima". It was the first military body to have all of its symbols in Hebrew. The Palestinian volunteers attempted to remain despite the demobilisation orders, which were strongly enforced by the military command. Many were torn between military service and labour, but some managed to extend their service by several months. Gradually, only 400 soldiers remained. Herbert Samuel planned to establish a "mixed militia" of Jews and Arabs, and some of the legion's soldiers and veterans joined its Jewish section.

During the 1921 Palestine riots, on Margolin's initiative, several dozen armed soldiers of the battalion arrived in Jaffa and Tel Aviv and participated in defending the area from Arab rioters. Among other actions, they prevented Arabs from breaking into the Jewish compound of Batay Varsha (Jaffa). Their intervention in the pogrom led to the end of their service and closed the chapter on the planned "militia".

After disbandment of "First Judean"

[edit]
Emblem of the battalion on a gravestone at the cemetery on Trumpeldor Street in Tel Aviv

The "First Judean" battalion was disbanded by the British in May 1921. The disbandment of the battalions thwarted Jabotinsky's vision of establishing an official Jewish army and led the Yishuv to establish a clandestine armed force, the Haganah, which, as its name suggested, was primarily defensive. The disbandment of the "First Judean" battalion marked a British policy against an independent Jewish defense force in the Yishuv in response to Arab aggression.

Palestine Defense Force

[edit]

At the time of the disbandment of the Jewish Battalions, a plan was proposed to establish a militia called the "Palestine Defense Force" or "Defense Corps of Palestine" (various translations of the English term). To establish this guard force, a number of officers and about 30 sergeants were retained in the army, intended to be the command staff of the first battalion of the future guard force.

However, after the riots in May 1921 in which the sergeants left their base without permission to assist Jewish defence forces, Margolin, the commander, decided to resign, and the military authorities dismissed all personnel and cancelled the plan to establish the guard. Some of the dismissed soldiers later became instructors and commanders in the newly-formed Haganah.

Legacy

[edit]
The "Beit HaGdudim" Museum in Avihayil
The Jewish Legion Garden in Ramat Gan

Even though the battalions' contribution to the campaign was limited, their existence was significant as the first Jewish military force of the modern era. It was an open non-clandestine force bearing Jewish symbols, and its language was Hebrew. The existence of the battalions provided proof of the possible strength of the Jewish people and gave moral and ethical justification for the demand to establish a Jewish national entity in Palestine. The military experience that was gained within the battalions, as well as the spirit of volunteerism, was later transferred to defensive frameworks like the Tel Aviv Keda Group, most of whose members had been battalion members, and later also into the underground movements operating in the land.

In his book "The Legion Scroll", Jabotinsky wrote:

The moral value of the battalion is clear to anyone capable of honest and fair thinking. War is a terrible thing—a sacrifice of human lives. But today, no one can accuse us: Where were you? Why didn't you demand: Let us, as Jews, give our lives for Eretz Yisrael? – Now we have an answer: Five thousand; and there could have been many more had your leaders not delayed our matter for two and a half years. This moral aspect is invaluable; and this is what the Prime Minister of South Africa—a great lover of peace himself—meant when he said: Letting Jews fight for the land of Israel is one of the most beautiful ideas I have ever heard in my life.

To the members of his battalion who were about to return to their homes overseas, he said:

You will return to your family far across the sea; and there, as you browse the newspaper, you will read good news about the freedom of Jews in a free Jewish land—about workshops and cathedrals, about plowed fields and theaters, and perhaps also about members of parliament and ministers. And you will be lost in thought, and the newspaper will slip from your hand; and you will remember the Jordan Valley, and the desert behind Rafah, and the hills above Aboein. Stand up then, approach the mirror, and look with pride upon yourself, stand tall and salute: This is—your very own handiwork.

The Jewish Legion Memorial Park

The enlistment, service and experience of military life in the battalions are described in the song "Aryeh, Aryeh".

The Menorah Club[2] was a club for veterans of the Jewish Battalions and was established in Jerusalem in 1923. Initially located on Jaffa Street, it moved near the Bezalel Academy in 1929.[3][4] Various gatherings, parties and events were held at the club.[5][6] "Beit HaGdudim" is a museum commemorating their work.[7] It is located in Avihayil, a moshav founded by battalion veterans. It was also decided to move Patterson's ashes there.

The Jewish Legion Memorial Park is near the beginning of the trail in the Shiloh Stream. The Jewish battalions are also commemorated at the Memorial for the Jewish Volunteers in the British Army during the World Wars.

[edit]

Notable members

[edit]
The Volunteer Ribbon

Further reading

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]

See also

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Jewish Legion was a group of volunteer Jewish battalions integrated into the British Army during World War I, formed to combat Ottoman forces in the Palestine campaign as part of broader Zionist efforts to secure a Jewish national homeland. The initiative originated from Zionist activists Ze'ev Jabotinsky and Joseph Trumpeldor, who, building on the experience of the earlier Zion Mule Corps disbanded after the Gallipoli campaign in 1916, successfully advocated for dedicated Jewish combat units despite initial British hesitation and opposition from some Anglo-Jewish leaders wary of antisemitic repercussions. Designated as the 38th, 39th, and 40th Battalions of the Royal Fusiliers—later collectively known as the Judean Regiment—these units drew recruits from Britain, Russia, the United States, Palestine, and other Allied nations, totaling around 5,000 men by 1919 under the command of Lieutenant Colonel John Henry Patterson. Trained in England and Egypt, the battalions deployed to the Middle East in 1918, participating in critical operations including the capture of Umm Shart ford on September 19, 1918, advances in the Jordan Valley, and the Battle of Megiddo, contributing to the British expulsion of Ottoman forces and the subsequent fall of Damascus. Though arriving late to the main Sinai and Palestine offensives, their service demonstrated Jewish martial prowess, earned unit distinctions like the menorah insignia emblazoned with "Kadima," and laid groundwork for post-war Jewish self-defense, as many veterans bolstered early formations such as the Haganah during the 1920-1921 Arab riots in Palestine. The Legion's disbandment between 1919 and 1921 marked the end of its formal role, but its legacy endured in Zionist military tradition and institutions like the Avihayil moshav founded by ex-Legionnaires in 1932.

Historical Context

Pre-War Zionist Military Aspirations

The Zionist movement's pre-World War I military aspirations emerged from the need to secure Jewish settlements in Ottoman against frequent Arab raids and thefts, fostering a doctrine of self-reliance that emphasized armed defense as essential to national revival. Influenced by pogroms in , such as Kishinev in , early Zionists viewed military training and organization as prerequisites for building a sovereign Jewish presence, shifting from reliance on Turkish or Arab guards to and self-protection. These efforts during the Second (1904–1914) prioritized small, elite units capable of deterring attacks and symbolizing the pioneer's resolve. Bar-Giora, the first such organization, was secretly founded on September 28, 1907, in near by and others from the Second Aliyah, establishing initial guard communes in Sejera in the to protect agricultural outposts. Members, including , swore oaths of secrecy and focused on replacing non-Jewish watchmen with trained Jewish fighters, reflecting aspirations for a disciplined force rooted in socialist-Zionist ideals. By 1909, Bar-Giora expanded into ("The Watchman"), a formalized countrywide body that offered paid guarding services to settlements, insisting on exclusive Jewish employment as a condition and structuring itself in a three-tiered hierarchy of founders, active guards, and labor reserves. Never exceeding 100 members, secured villages across , , and , repelled attacks during periods of heightened violence (1911–1913), and founded outposts like Tel Adashim in 1913. Parallel to these initiatives, advanced broader Zionist military concepts from 1908 onward while promoting the cause in , advocating a Jewish fighting force under Zionist auspices to bolster security and territorial claims amid Ottoman decline. Though proposals for integrated units, such as during regional conflicts, faced rejection, they underscored the strategic vision of leveraging armed Jewish participation for political leverage in . Hashomer's affiliation with the Zionist Organization in 1913 formalized these aspirations, positioning the group as the nucleus of a potential national army until disruptions in 1914. These pre-war structures cultivated skills in reconnaissance, combat, and settlement defense, embodying the causal link between vulnerability in exile and the imperative for autonomous force in the land.

World War I Outbreak and Early Jewish Volunteer Efforts

The outbreak of World War I began with Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia on July 28, 1914, escalating rapidly across Europe, and Britain formally entered the conflict on August 4, 1914, following Germany's invasion of Belgium. Jewish communities in Britain responded promptly to the call for volunteers, enlisting in regular British Army units alongside other citizens to defend the empire. This initial wave of enlistment reflected a broader patriotic fervor among British Jews, who viewed service as an affirmation of loyalty amid prevailing societal pressures. The Ottoman Empire's alignment with the , formalized by its entry into the on October 29, 1914, shifted Zionist strategic calculations, as control of offered an opportunity to advance Jewish national aspirations through military contribution. In the ensuing months, Britain declared war on the Ottomans on November 5, 1914, leading to the expulsion or flight of thousands of Jewish residents from Ottoman to , where they sought to volunteer against their former rulers. Zionist leaders, recognizing the potential for organized Jewish participation, began advocating for dedicated units that could symbolize and advance the goal of liberating Eretz Israel. Pioneering proposals emerged in late 1914, with figures like Pinhas Rutenberg outlining initiatives for Jewish battalions to serve under British command in the campaign against Ottoman forces. By December 1914, Ze'ev Jabotinsky and Joseph Trumpeldor formally raised the concept of a Jewish volunteer unit integrated into the British military effort, emphasizing combat roles to reclaim Palestine. Jabotinsky addressed groups of Jewish refugees in Egypt, securing commitments from approximately 180 individuals eager to form such a force, though British authorities initially hesitated due to concerns over separate ethnic units and Ottoman reprisals against Jewish communities. These early endeavors laid the groundwork for subsequent formations, highlighting Zionist determination to leverage the war for national revival despite logistical and political obstacles.

Formation and Precursors

Zion Mule Corps Establishment

The Zion Mule Corps emerged in early 1915 amid , as Jewish refugees displaced by policies sought to contribute to the Allied effort against the . Following the in 1914, thousands of Jews, including pioneers from the early Zionist settlements in , were expelled or fled to , concentrating in refugee camps near . , a Zionist activist, former Russian Imperial Army officer who had lost his left arm in the , and resident of Degania, refused Ottoman conscription and instead volunteered for British service, organizing fellow refugees into a military formation. British authorities, cautious about arming Jewish volunteers for combat due to diplomatic sensitivities with Arab allies and internal debates, approved a non-combat unit rather than a full . Trumpeldor, prioritizing any organized Jewish military participation to advance Zionist goals, accepted the role and recruited primarily Russian Jewish volunteers from the population. The unit was formally established on March 23, 1915, when 650 men took an administered by the Grand of , marking the first distinctively Jewish force in a modern army since antiquity. Lieutenant Colonel John Henry Patterson, an Irish Protestant officer with experience from the Boer War and known sympathy for Zionism, was appointed commander, with Trumpeldor serving as his deputy and handling much of the training in animal handling and logistics. The corps adopted a Star of David emblem and Hebrew-inscribed flag, symbolizing Jewish national aspirations, though its initial role limited it to supplying ammunition and provisions via mules. Of the 650 enlisted, 562 were deployed to the Gallipoli campaign, enduring harsh conditions that tested their resolve despite the unit's auxiliary status.

Jabotinsky's Advocacy for Combat Units

Following the disbandment of the Zion Mule Corps in early 1916 after its service at Gallipoli, , dissatisfied with its non-combat role, intensified his campaign for dedicated Jewish infantry battalions within the to actively participate in liberating from Ottoman control. Collaborating closely with , Jabotinsky argued that such units would not only contribute to the Allied but also establish a trained Jewish presence in the region, serving as a foundation for post-war self-defense and bolstering Zionist claims under . In , Jabotinsky and Trumpeldor formed a committee with surviving Mule Corps members and issued public manifestos calling for Jewish volunteers to form combat units, emphasizing the strategic importance of demonstrating Jewish loyalty to Britain amid the impending conquest of . Despite initial support from some Zionist leaders like , they encountered resistance from the British , which cited concerns over antisemitic backlash among troops and reluctance to create ethnically distinct formations that might complicate imperial relations with Arab populations. Jabotinsky countered these objections through persistent of politicians and military officials, leveraging the shifting political landscape after David Lloyd George's ascension as prime minister in December 1916, who was more amenable to Zionist aspirations. Jabotinsky's advocacy gained traction in mid-1917, coinciding with British military setbacks on the Western Front and growing recognition of the need for additional manpower; on July 3, 1917, the authorized the formation of the 38th Battalion of the Royal Fusiliers as the first Jewish unit, with Jabotinsky commissioned as a to lead recruitment efforts. He organized drives targeting Jewish communities in Britain, , and the , ultimately enlisting around 5,000 volunteers across the subsequent battalions, though not without internal Zionist debates over whether arming might provoke Ottoman reprisals against Palestinian communities. His vision framed the legions as a pragmatic assertion of Jewish agency in a war where Allied victory seemed assured, prioritizing military contribution over diplomatic caution.

Establishment of the Battalions

Overcoming Opposition to Formation

The formation of the Jewish Legion encountered significant resistance from multiple quarters, including the British , assimilated Anglo-Jewish leaders, and segments of the immigrant Jewish community in Britain. The initially rebuffed proposals for distinct Jewish combat units, citing concerns over the loyalty of foreign-born Jews, particularly Russian immigrants, and preferring integrated forces to avoid highlighting ethnic divisions within the army. Assimilated British Jewish elites, such as and Lord Swaythling, opposed the Legion on August 30, 1917, arguing that a separate unit would exacerbate by emphasizing Jewish distinctiveness and doubting the martial reliability of Eastern European Jews, whom they viewed as unfit to represent British Jewry. Official Zionist leadership, adhering to the World Zionist Organization's neutrality policy during the war, also neutralized recruitment efforts, while Russian Jewish immigrants in London's East End often heckled advocates like and at meetings, reflecting anti-militaristic traditions and fears that British service might indirectly aid , their persecutor. Overcoming this required persistent lobbying by Zionist activists. Jabotinsky and Trumpeldor, building on the Zion Mule Corps' demonstrated reliability at Gallipoli, formed a "Committee for the Jewish Future" in to coordinate and appeals, targeting both Jewish communities and British officials. The death of Lord Kitchener in June removed a key obstacle, as his successor facilitated reconsideration amid Britain's manpower crisis following the Somme offensive's 400,000 casualties. In early , a petition to Lloyd George's , backed by pro-Zionist figures like Leopold Amery, secured approval for Jewish battalions, reflecting the new government's sympathy toward Zionist aims in . Colonel John Henry Patterson, appointed to command, played a pivotal role by threatening resignation in August 1917 when authorities considered diluting the units' Jewish character with non-Jewish recruits, compelling a reversal that affirmed the Legion's ethnic composition as official policy. Jabotinsky, granted a recruiting commission, focused on ex-Zion Mule Corps veterans and , swelling enlistments. The in March 1917 further eased restrictions on recruiting Russian subjects, addressing loyalty concerns. By July 1917, the directed Patterson to organize the regiment, with Jabotinsky overseeing recruitment; the on November 2, 1917, then catalyzed broader support, expanding the 38th Battalion to 800 men. These efforts culminated in the raising of the 38th, 39th, and 40th Battalions of the Royal Fusiliers by late 1917, marking the first official Jewish fighting force in over 2,000 years.

Organization of the Royal Fusiliers Battalions

The Jewish Legion's primary combat units were the 38th, 39th, and 40th Service Battalions of the Royal Fusiliers, integrated into the to facilitate Jewish volunteer service while addressing concerns over forming a distinct Jewish force. These battalions adhered to standard British infantry organization, each comprising approximately 800–1,000 men divided into four companies, supported by machine-gun sections and administrative elements, though exact strengths varied due to and . Volunteers underwent basic in locations such as Plymouth, , and Tell al-Kabir, , before deployment, with units distinguished by colored Magen David insignia—red for the 38th, blue for the 39th, and violet for the 40th—worn on uniforms to signify their . The 38th Battalion, the first formed, was established in July 1917 and officially gazetted on August 23, 1917, drawing primarily from British-born or naturalized (about 50% of initial strength), Russian Jewish immigrants, ex-members of the Zion Mule Corps, and volunteers from Allied or neutral countries, reaching around 800 men by February 1918. Commanded by Lieutenant Colonel John Henry Patterson, it included notable volunteers like and , and trained initially in before transfer to . Its effective strength dwindled to about 150 by September 1918 due to outbreaks, yet it maintained operational capacity for frontline duties. The 39th Battalion was raised in late April 1918, predominantly from Jewish volunteers in the United States and , comprising over half of the approximately 1,350 American recruits in the Legion overall. Under Margolin, it trained at Camp Fort Edward in , initially in civilian attire before receiving khaki uniforms with patches, and later joined the 38th in for combined operations. The 40th Battalion, formed in 1918 from over 1,000 Palestinian Jewish volunteers—including 457 from and 350 from , many Ottoman subjects—began training in May 1918 at Tell al-Kabir under M.F. Scott, focusing on local recruits to bolster defenses in the region. By early 1919, the three battalions collectively exceeded 5,000 men, reflecting sustained recruitment efforts despite logistical challenges and disease. British command oversight ensured integration, with Jewish officers and NCOs progressively appointed to foster unit cohesion and morale.

Military Operations

38th Battalion Campaigns

The 38th Battalion of the Royal Fusiliers, comprising the first Jewish Legion unit, departed Plymouth on February 3, 1918, and arrived in , , on March 1, 1918. Under Lieutenant Colonel John Henry Patterson's command, it conducted intensive training at Helmieh Camp near from March to May 1918, emphasizing drill, bayonet practice, musketry, and signaling, earning praise from General Edmund Allenby for its discipline. Deployed to Palestine on June 5, 1918, the battalion reached Ludd on June 9 and advanced to Umm Suffah, establishing forward positions approximately 20 miles north of facing Ottoman forces. From July 3 to 17, 1918, on the Nablus Front between Jiljilia and Abwein, it relieved the 2/101st , constructed sangars and trenches, and executed aggressive night patrols that deterred Turkish incursions, though without direct combat engagements. In the from August 9 to September 22, 1918, stationed at Mellahah 1,300 feet below , the battalion adopted an offensive posture amid severe outbreaks that reduced its effective strength from 800 to 150 men and caused over 30 deaths. On September 22, companies under and others from the 39th Battalion captured Umm esh Shert Ford across the , securing a crossing vital to the Egyptian Expeditionary Force's advance toward ; this action earned Military Medals for soldiers including Privates Sapiashvili and Gordon, despite casualties such as the death of Private Marks on and the presumed loss of Lieutenant Cross and Private Milderner. As part of the Battle of Megiddo commencing September 19, 1918, the 38th Battalion contributed to operations on the sector, encountering intense rifle and machine-gun fire from entrenched Ottoman positions at Mellaha, which delayed but did not halt the broader offensive leading to the capture of 11,000 prisoners and extensive matériel. Overall, operations resulted in more than 20 soldiers killed, wounded, or captured, underscoring the battalion's role in the final push that hastened the Ottoman collapse in .

39th and 40th Battalions Engagements

The 39th Battalion, , arrived in in June 1918, primarily composed of volunteers from the and under Margolin. It was deployed to front-line positions approximately 20 miles north of , where it adopted an aggressive posture against Ottoman forces, conducting patrols and skirmishes to disrupt Turkish encampments. In the during July and August 1918, the battalion endured severe conditions, including a outbreak that afflicted 650 of its roughly 800 men, resulting in over 30 deaths from disease and 20 casualties from combat, wounds, or capture. As part of the broader Battle of Megiddo offensive launched on September 19, 1918, two companies of the 39th crossed the at Umm Shart ford, advancing to capture the town of al-Salt and contributing to the flanking maneuvers that facilitated the British victory at later that month. These actions marked the battalion's primary combat engagements, after which it shifted to occupation duties following the Ottoman armistice on October 31, 1918. The 40th Battalion, known as the Palestinian Battalion and commanded by Colonel M. F. Scott, consisted mainly of local Jewish volunteers, many with prior experience in Ottoman police forces. Formed and trained at Tell al-Kabir in , it remained in reserve throughout the critical phases of the campaign and transferred to only in early December 1918, after the . Its role focused on guard and security duties rather than frontline combat, with no recorded battle engagements during active hostilities. Post-war, the battalion supported occupation forces and later assisted in quelling disturbances during the 1920-1921 riots in .

First Judean Company Role

The First Judean Company, led by Zionist activist as a lieutenant in the 38th Battalion of the Royal Fusiliers, served as a vanguard unit within the Jewish Legion during the . Formed as part of the initial Jewish infantry battalion authorized by British authorities on August 23, 1917, the company consisted primarily of volunteers from and drew on veterans from the earlier Zion Mule Corps. Upon arrival in Palestine in June 1918, it was assigned to defensive positions in the malaria-infested north of , where it endured significant non-combat losses, with over 650 soldiers affected by the disease and more than 30 fatalities recorded by September. Despite these adversities, the company's most notable contribution occurred during the Battle of Megiddo on September 19, 1918. Tasked with an offensive operation, Jabotinsky's approximately 150-man unit advanced under fire to seize the Umm Shart ford across the , the first Jewish force to achieve such a crossing into Transjordan since antiquity. This action disrupted Ottoman supply lines, enabled flanking maneuvers by British forces, and accelerated the collapse of Turkish defenses leading to the capture of Damascus by October 1. Jabotinsky sustained wounds during the assault but received commendations for the company's bravery and tactical success. The company's exploits symbolized Zionist aspirations for Jewish military resurgence in the ancestral , bolstering among volunteers and influencing post-war defense formations. However, high attrition from disease limited its sustained , with the unit suffering around 20 killed, wounded, or captured in direct engagements. Its role underscored the Legion's broader objective of liberating from Ottoman control while demonstrating the feasibility of Jewish units in imperial armies.

Key Figures and Leadership

Ze'ev Jabotinsky's Leadership

demonstrated leadership in the Jewish Legion by enlisting as a private soldier to inspire recruits, despite his prominent status as a Zionist advocate. He underwent a sergeant's training course and was promoted to shortly before the unit's deployment to in 1917. This approach emphasized discipline and commitment, aligning with his vision of a capable Jewish fighting force under British command. As an honorary in the 38th of the Royal Fusiliers, Jabotinsky participated in operations in during 1918, including advances that reached Transjordan. His role involved training and motivating volunteers, many of whom were Russian Jewish immigrants, fostering unit cohesion amid logistical challenges and limited assignments. Jabotinsky's insistence on Hebrew as a command language and cultural symbols like the insignia reinforced Jewish identity within the . Jabotinsky's post-armistice activities extended his influence, as he organized Jewish self-defense units in amid 1920 riots, drawing on Legion veterans and experience to protect communities until British forces intervened. This episode highlighted his strategic foresight in preparing for potential threats, though it led to his brief by British authorities for unauthorized armed activity. His leadership bridged military service and broader Zionist defense efforts, influencing the Legion's transition into informal protective roles before full disbandment in 1921.

Joseph Trumpeldor's Involvement

Joseph , born in 1880 in , , had prior military experience as the most decorated Jewish soldier in the , having lost his left arm during the defense of Port Arthur in the of 1904–1905. In 1914, following the Ottoman Empire's entry into on the side of the , collaborated with to propose the formation of Jewish units within the to fight for the liberation of . Their advocacy emphasized Jewish loyalty and capability, drawing on proven combat record despite his disability. When British authorities, wary of political implications, restricted initial Jewish units to non-combat roles, Trumpeldor took the lead in organizing the Zion Mule Corps in , , on March 23, 1915. Recruiting around 650 volunteers—mostly Russian Jews exiled from , supplemented by Cypriot Jews—he served as a commissioned officer (), second only to British Lieutenant-Colonel John Henry Patterson among Jewish ranks. The corps, comprising 562 rank-and-file deployed to the , handled mule transport of supplies under harsh conditions, with Trumpeldor wounded in the shoulder yet refusing evacuation to maintain unit morale. Disbanded in May 1916 after the Gallipoli evacuation, the Zion Mule Corps provided a foundational demonstration of Jewish organizational and logistical competence, influencing subsequent British approval of combat battalions. Approximately 120 ZMC veterans, including many under Trumpeldor's influence, transferred to and later enlisted in the 38th, 39th, and 40th Battalions of the Royal Fusiliers, forming the core of the Jewish Legion's fighting force. Trumpeldor himself, ineligible for further frontline service due to injuries and age (approaching 36), did not join these infantry units but continued supporting Zionist military aspirations indirectly. Post-war, Trumpeldor returned to in 1917 to organize Jewish units amid revolutionary chaos, before immigrating to in 1919, where his legacy as a Zionist pioneer endured. His leadership in the precursor Mule Corps underscored the feasibility of Jewish military contributions, countering skepticism and facilitating the Legion's establishment as combat-ready battalions in July 1917.

British Commanders and Jewish Officers

![Lt. Col. John Henry Patterson, commander of the 38th Battalion, Royal Fusiliers][float-right] The primary British commander of the Jewish Legion's 38th Battalion, , was John Henry Patterson, an Irish-born officer who had previously led the Zion Mule Corps at Gallipoli. Patterson assumed command in early 1918 and guided the battalion through training in before its deployment to and subsequent operations in under General Edmund Allenby. His pro-Zionist sympathies, influenced by personal experiences and interactions with Jewish leaders, facilitated the unit's cohesion despite initial British hesitations toward exclusively Jewish formations. For the 40th Battalion, comprising largely Palestinian Jewish volunteers, command fell to M.F. Scott, a Christian British officer tasked with integrating local recruits familiar with Ottoman service, including former members of Jewish self-defense groups. Scott's leadership emphasized training at Tell al-Kabir camp in , preparing the battalion for labor and guard duties in the Sinai and theater by mid-1918. Unlike Patterson, Scott's role received less contemporary documentation, reflecting the 40th's more auxiliary functions compared to combat-oriented units. Jewish officers played crucial roles across the battalions, often commissioned to leverage linguistic skills in Hebrew, Yiddish, and Russian for command over immigrant recruits. Eliezer Margolin, a Russian-Jewish Zionist, commanded the 39th Battalion from March 1918, leading American-heavy volunteers in Egypt and Palestine; his prior advocacy for Jewish units underscored Zionist motivations within the Legion. Other notable Jewish officers included Major James Armand de Rothschild in the 39th, who earned the Distinguished Conduct Medal, and medical officer Myer Salaman, who served in both the 38th and 39th, ensuring adherence to kosher provisions and religious observances amid frontline conditions. Edwin Samuel, later Viscount Samuel, also held a commission, bridging British administrative oversight with Jewish volunteer aspirations. These officers, totaling around a dozen per battalion in active service, fostered unit morale through shared Zionist ideals, though British policy limited their autonomy to prevent perceptions of a independent Jewish army.

Controversies and Opposition

Internal Jewish Divisions and Anti-Zionist Critiques

The formation of the Jewish Legion provoked substantial resistance from assimilationist Jewish elites in Britain and the , who contended that a ethnically designated military unit would undermine by fueling perceptions of disloyalty and separatism amid wartime scrutiny. In Britain, the — a joint body of the Board of Deputies of and the Anglo-Jewish Association, spearheaded by Lucien Wolf—vociferously opposed the initiative, issuing public protests in by spring 1917 that framed it as detrimental to Anglo-Jewish integration and likely to incite antisemitic backlash. These leaders prioritized a religious-minority model of over nationalist expressions, viewing the Legion as an unnecessary provocation that risked confirming as perpetual foreigners unwilling to assimilate fully into host societies. American Jewish organizations mirrored this stance, with the initially rejecting the Legion in 1917 due to apprehensions that it could jeopardize domestic by inviting charges of divided allegiance during U.S. involvement in the war. The similarly critiqued the project, emphasizing that separate Jewish forces contradicted the assimilationist strategy of demonstrating undivided patriotism to counter rising nativism, a position rooted in empirical observations of how ethnic military units elsewhere had amplified minority vulnerabilities. Anti-Zionist arguments, articulated by figures like , posited that the Legion's Zionist undertones—seeking to advance Jewish settlement in —clashed with pragmatic , potentially alienating Allied governments and complicating postwar advocacy in . Internal Zionist divisions compounded these critiques, as many leaders, including Russian Zionists during Vladimir Jabotinsky's 1915 advocacy tour, dismissed the Legion as futile or divisive, preferring covert political maneuvering over overt that might alienate supporters. Among Eastern European Jewish immigrants in London's East End, faced apathy and active disruption from socialist, anarchist, and communist circles, who decried it as bourgeois antithetical to , with public meetings often obstructed by hostile crowds. Though less documented for the Legion specifically, traditionalist religious critiqued Zionist-led initiatives like it on theological grounds, arguing that forcible national revival in violated rabbinic prohibitions against preempting messianic redemption through secular means, a view that prioritized divine causality over human agency in Jewish restoration. These fissures revealed a causal divide: proponents saw the Legion as essential for and national awakening, while opponents, drawing from historical precedents of pogroms and expulsions, warned that visible Jewish invited retaliatory isolation without guaranteed security gains.

British Reluctance and Policy Constraints

The British initially rejected proposals for dedicated Jewish battalions in 1915 and 1916, citing a policy against organizing military units based on "sectional religious interests," which they argued would undermine the integration of volunteers into regular forces. This stance persisted amid broader concerns over fostering separatism within the army, particularly as Zionist leaders like pressed for units explicitly tied to the liberation of , a goal viewed skeptically by officials wary of alienating Muslim populations across the empire. Under-Secretary of State for War Lord , despite eventual approval amid manpower shortages, yielded to anti-Zionist pressures by prohibiting overt Jewish insignia and reclassifying the units as standard battalions (38th, 39th, and 40th), thereby diluting their symbolic Zionist purpose. Opposition within the British government was amplified by prominent anti-Zionist figures, including , who argued that distinct Jewish formations promoted dual loyalty and risked exacerbating anti-Semitism by implying Jews prioritized Palestine over British interests. Montagu's influence, as the only Jewish Cabinet member, contributed to caveats in the of November 2, 1917, which supported a Jewish national home but emphasized non-interference with non-Jewish communities' rights—effectively constraining military endorsements of to avoid conflicting with prior commitments to Arab leaders under the McMahon-Hussein correspondence. Even post-approval on July 23, 1917, recruitment was capped at approximately 5,000 men across three battalions, far short of Zionist requests for larger forces, reflecting strategic priorities favoring general over specialized units. Operational constraints further manifested in deployment decisions: while the 38th Battalion participated in the campaign from September 1918, the 39th and 40th were relegated to labor duties in , handling supplies rather than frontline combat against Ottoman forces, ostensibly due to doubts about their and to prevent perceptions of favoritism toward Jewish territorial ambitions. These limitations stemmed from Foreign Office apprehensions about inflaming opposition and Indian Muslim unrest, as a prominent Jewish fighting force in Palestine could be interpreted as imperial endorsement of partition-like outcomes, complicating Britain's post-war mandate plans. The War Office's insistence on British officers for command roles, exemplified by Lt. Col. John Henry Patterson's appointment despite Zionist preferences for Jewish leadership, underscored efforts to maintain oversight and mitigate risks of independent Zionist agendas.

Arab Reactions and Long-Term Geopolitical Ramifications

The deployment of the Jewish Legion in during the final months of heightened Arab apprehensions regarding Zionist intentions, as British authorities expressed concerns that the presence of Jewish battalions could provoke local unrest amid ongoing Arab alliances with Britain against the Ottomans. These fears stemmed from perceptions of the Legion as a mechanism to facilitate Jewish settlement and control, particularly following the of November 2, 1917, which Arabs interpreted as a betrayal of prior assurances of independence under the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence of 1915–1916. Although Palestinian Arabs remained largely quiescent during the war itself, the arrival of approximately 5,000 Jewish troops in the region by mid-1918, including participation in operations like the Battle of Megiddo in September 1918, amplified disquiet over potential demographic and territorial shifts. Post-war demobilization in 1919–1920 exacerbated tensions, as Legion veterans, numbering around 1,000 who settled in , formed the core of early Jewish self-defense groups, which Arabs viewed as a militarized threat to their status. This contributed to outbreaks of violence, such as the in on April 4–7, where Arab crowds attacked Jewish communities amid rumors of intensified Jewish armament and , resulting in five Jewish deaths, over 200 injuries, and British intervention to restore order. Arab leaders, including figures like , framed the Legion's legacy as evidence of British favoritism toward , galvanizing opposition through organizations such as the established in 1919. In the broader geopolitical context, the Jewish Legion's role underscored Britain's dual commitments, eroding trust in the Mandate system formalized in and fostering across the region. The military expertise gained by Legionnaires— including training in and —laid foundational skills for subsequent Jewish formations like the in , enabling the to withstand Arab assaults in the 1929 riots and 1936–1939 revolt, which claimed over 5,000 Arab, 400 Jewish, and 200 British lives. This asymmetry in defensive capabilities intensified Arab perceptions of existential threat, influencing pan-Arab interventions in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, where initial coalitions of five Arab states sought to reverse Mandate-era gains but resulted in Israel's establishment on May 14, 1948, and the displacement of approximately 700,000 . Over decades, the Legion's of Jewish military integration under imperial auspices has been cited in Arab as a catalyst for enduring conflict, complicating peace efforts like the 1947 UN Partition Plan, which Arabs rejected due to fears of precedent-setting territorial concessions.

Disbandment and Post-War Evolution

Demobilization Challenges

The demobilization of the Jewish Legion began after the of November 11, 1918, but faced significant delays as Zionist leaders sought to retain the battalions in for community defense amid escalating Arab-Jewish tensions. Soldiers, many of whom were recent immigrants or volunteers from abroad, exhibited reluctance to return home, viewing continued service as essential for protecting Jewish settlements; this self-imposed factor, combined with advocacy from figures like , prolonged the process beyond standard timelines. By spring 1920, battalion strength had dwindled to approximately 300–400 men from an original peak of several thousand, with units reduced from three full battalions to a single diminished force. British military authorities, influenced by an increasingly anti-Zionist administration, imposed discriminatory measures that exacerbated challenges, including restrictions barring Legion personnel from , frequent reassignments to remote postings, and harassment by . Jabotinsky himself was forcibly demobilized in August 1919 despite his efforts to encourage volunteers to remain, while Palestinian-based units received incremental three-month service extensions to maintain a Jewish presence. Tensions peaked during the Nebi Musa riots of April 1920, when Legionnaires aided Jewish efforts, resulting in clashes with British forces; this led to Jabotinsky's on April 7, 1920, along with sentences of up to seven years for 55 North American volunteers (later amnestied after four months) and similar penalties for 44 members of the 39th Battalion (serving six months). The process culminated in accelerated disbandment following the of May 1, 1921, during which the commander of the remaining 38th Battalion, Eliezer Margolin, led armed intervention without authorization to rescue Jews amid attacks that killed at least 47, prompting British fury and the unit's immediate confinement and dissolution. This event thwarted persistent Zionist demands, including from the Zionist Organization in 1921 and Revisionists in 1925, to reorganize the Legion as a permanent force, reflecting broader British policy shifts toward appeasing Arab opposition over sustaining Jewish military units. Logistical hurdles persisted for demobilized soldiers wishing to settle in , as authorities resisted forming enduring Jewish defense structures, forcing many to transition informally to nascent groups like the .

Transition to Palestine Defense Force

Following the disbandment of the Jewish Legion battalions between July 1919 and June 1921, British authorities in proposed forming a local known as the Palestine Defense Force (PDF), intended to include separate Jewish and units for internal security and defense against potential threats. This initiative aimed to retain experienced personnel from the Legion, with approximately 30 sergeants and several officers from the disbanded units tasked with organizing and training the Jewish contingent, drawing on their combat skills from the campaign. In March 1921, remnants of the 39th Battalion (First Judeans) were reorganized under the PDF, with Eliezer Margolin, a former commander of that Legion battalion, appointed to lead the Jewish unit comprising around 200-300 volunteers, many of whom were demobilized Legionnaires. Margolin, leveraging his prior military experience, focused on equipping the force with arms from British stores and preparing it for garrison duties in key areas like and . Other Legion veterans, such as Ya'akov Dori, also transitioned into the PDF, contributing to early efforts at structured Jewish self-defense amid rising Arab unrest. The PDF's Jewish unit operated briefly until the May 1921 Jaffa riots, during which Margolin independently mobilized armed soldiers to protect Jewish settlements, distributing weapons and coordinating defenses that mitigated casualties in . British officials cited this unauthorized action—viewed as overstepping military protocol—as a pretext for dissolving the PDF in late 1921, alongside the final remnants of Legion-affiliated forces, amid concerns over escalating communal tensions and policy shifts under the . Margolin resigned his commission to avoid court-martial, while surviving personnel dispersed, some integrating into informal groups like that evolved into the . This short-lived transition underscored British ambivalence toward arming Jewish units, prioritizing colonial stability over Zionist aspirations for autonomous defense.

Legacy and Impact

Military Training Foundations for Future Jewish Forces

The Jewish Legion's establishment during World War I provided the first systematic British military training to a significant cadre of Jewish volunteers, numbering around 5,000 across its battalions, equipping them with skills in infantry tactics, discipline, and command structures essential for organized warfare. This training occurred primarily in camps in England and Egypt from 1917 to 1918, where recruits underwent drills, weapons handling, and unit cohesion exercises under British oversight, fostering a professional ethos absent in prior informal Jewish self-defense groups. Veterans returning to Palestine after demobilization in 1919-1921 applied these competencies directly to nascent defense organizations, forming the nucleus of the Haganah, founded in June 1920 to protect Jewish settlements amid rising Arab violence. Key figures from the Legion, such as Ze'ev Jabotinsky and Joseph Trumpeldor, leveraged their experience to institutionalize military practices within the Yishuv, including the translation of British terms into Hebrew—such as "gdud" for battalion—standardizing terminology that persisted into later forces. Jabotinsky, who commanded elements of the 38th Battalion, advocated for the Legion as a deliberate step toward creating a standing Jewish defensive force, using post-war training initiatives to prepare youth through groups like Betar for self-reliance in arms and strategy. Similarly, David Ben-Gurion's service in the 39th Battalion exposed him to frontline logistics and combat readiness, influencing his later role in shaping the Haganah's structure and, ultimately, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in 1948. This foundational training bridged informal pre-war self-defense efforts with modern paramilitary capabilities, enabling the to evolve into an effective underground army by the 1930s, incorporating Legion-honed expertise in scouting, fortification, and rapid mobilization. Legion alumni comprised a disproportionate share of early Haganah officers, providing continuity in doctrine that emphasized proactive defense and territorial security, principles evident in the Palmach's elite units formed in 1941 and integrated into the IDF. By imparting verifiable operational knowledge rather than relying on ad-hoc responses, the Legion mitigated the Yishuv's prior vulnerabilities, laying empirical groundwork for a sovereign Jewish capable of withstanding existential threats.

Zionist Symbolism and National Revival

The Jewish Legion embodied Zionist symbolism through its explicit adoption of Jewish national emblems and revivalist ethos, representing the reawakening of Jewish military autonomy after centuries of diaspora vulnerability. Formed between and 1918 as battalions within the British Army's , the Legion featured Hebrew as its command language, alongside insignia incorporating the and a menorah-emblazoned inscribed with "" (forward), signaling forward momentum in national restoration. This overt display of in a modern army context countered historical stereotypes of passivity, framing participants as contemporary reclaiming agency in the liberation of from Ottoman control. Ze'ev Jabotinsky, a principal architect of the Legion's recruitment, leveraged it as a vehicle for Zionist , portraying enlistment as a sacred duty to forge a disciplined Jewish force capable of defending a future homeland. His efforts mobilized over 5,000 volunteers globally, emphasizing the Legion's role in cultivating martial skills and national consciousness, which he argued were prerequisites for sovereignty. The soldiers' service in campaigns such as the advance on in December 1917 reinforced this symbolism, with their presence at sites like the evoking biblical precedents of Jewish return and resilience. In the broader arc of national revival, the Legion's legacy lay in seeding institutional military expertise among demobilized veterans, who upon return to integrated into nascent defense groups like and later the , applying acquired tactics to safeguard Jewish settlements amid interwar tensions. This transition underscored the Legion's causal contribution to Zionist self-reliance, as its alumni—numbering in the hundreds of trained fighters—provided foundational leadership and doctrine for pre-state Jewish forces, directly linking volunteerism to the 1948 War of Independence. Commemorative practices, including Hebrew anthems and memorials erected post-1918, perpetuated its mythic status as a pivotal step in resurrecting Jewish statehood aspirations.

Modern Reassessments and Achievements vs. Criticisms

Historians reassess the Jewish Legion as a foundational milestone in modern , providing essential training and organizational experience that informed the and later the Israel Defense Forces, with legion veterans forming a core cadre for pre-state Jewish defense efforts. Approximately 5,000 Jewish volunteers served across its battalions, gaining combat skills under British command that proved invaluable during the 1920-1921 Arab riots in , where demobilized legionnaires defended Jewish settlements. This practical expertise shifted Zionist strategy from reliance on British protection to , embodying Jabotinsky's doctrine of armed Jewish presence in Eretz Israel. The Legion's achievements extended symbolically, bolstering Zionist morale and international advocacy by demonstrating Jewish commitment to liberating from Ottoman rule, aligning with the Balfour Declaration's aims and countering stereotypes of Jewish passivity in warfare. Post-war, its legacy influenced military historiography in , where memorials and museums, such as the Bet Hagdudim in Avihayil, preserve artifacts and narratives emphasizing resilience amid adversity. Scholars like Martin Watts highlight how the unit navigated anti-Semitism and bureaucratic hurdles, fostering a cadre of leaders including , whose service underscored the Legion's role in nascent state-building. Criticisms focus on the Legion's limited tactical impact, as its late formation in 1917-1918 restricted participation to minor operations like guarding lines of communication, with no decisive engagements against Ottoman forces in . British policy constraints, including reluctance to arm en masse and post-war disbandment amid Arab unrest, undermined operational effectiveness, leading some analysts to view it as more propagandistic than militarily transformative. Internal Jewish opposition from assimilationist and anti-Zionist groups further hampered , resulting in understrength units plagued by desertions and equipment shortages, which Watts attributes to systemic Anglo-Jewish elite resistance. In broader historiographical debates, post-Zionist critiques occasionally frame the Legion as an early vector for militarized settlement, exacerbating Arab-Jewish tensions, though underscores its defensive rather than expansionist orientation during service.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.