Respect all members: no insults, harassment, or hate speech.
Be tolerant of different viewpoints, cultures, and beliefs. If you do not agree with others, just create separate note, article or collection.
Clearly distinguish between personal opinion and fact.
Verify facts before posting, especially when writing about history, science, or statistics.
Promotional content must be published on the “Related Services and Products” page—no more than one paragraph per service. You can also create subpages under the “Related Services and Products” page and publish longer promotional text there.
Do not post materials that infringe on copyright without permission.
Always credit sources when sharing information, quotes, or media.
Be respectful of the work of others when making changes.
Discuss major edits instead of removing others' contributions without reason.
If you notice rule-breaking, notify community about it in talks.
Do not share personal data of others without their consent.
Phoenix was an uncrewed space probe that landed on the surface of Mars on May 25, 2008, and operated until November 2, 2008.[2]Phoenix was operational on Mars for 157 sols (161 days). Its instruments were used to assess the local habitability and to research the history of water on Mars. The mission was part of the Mars Scout Program; its total cost was $420 million, including the cost of launch.[3]
Phoenix was NASA's sixth successful landing on Mars, from seven attempts, and the first in Mars's polar region. The lander completed its mission in August 2008, and made a last brief communication with Earth on November 2 as available solar power dropped with the Martian winter. The mission was declared concluded on November 10, 2008, after engineers were unable to re-contact the craft.[6] After unsuccessful attempts to contact the lander by the Mars Odyssey orbiter up to and past the Martian summer solstice on May 12, 2010, JPL declared the lander to be dead. The program was considered a success because it completed all planned science experiments and observations.[7]
The mission had two goals. One was to study the geological history of water, the key to unlocking the story of past climate change. The second was to evaluate past or potential planetary habitability in the ice-soil boundary. Phoenix's instruments were suitable for uncovering information on the geological and possibly biological history of the Martian Arctic. Phoenix was the first mission to return data from either of the poles, and contributed to NASA's main strategy for Mars exploration, "Follow the water."
The primary mission was anticipated to last 90 sols (Martian days)—just over 92 Earth days. However, the craft exceeded its expected operational lifetime[8] by a little over two months before succumbing to the increasing cold and dark of an advancing Martian winter.[6] Researchers had hoped that the lander would survive into the Martian winter so that it could witness polar ice developing around it – perhaps up to 1 meter (3 ft) of solid carbon dioxide ice could have appeared. Even had it survived some of the winter, the intense cold would have prevented it from lasting all the way through.[9] The mission was chosen to be a fixed lander rather than a rover because:[10]
costs were reduced through reuse of earlier equipment (though this claim is disputed by some observers[11]);
the area of Mars where Phoenix landed is thought to be relatively uniform, thus traveling on the surface is of less value; and
the weight budget needed for mobility could instead be used for more and better scientific instruments.
The 2003–2004 observations of methane gas on Mars were made remotely by three teams working with separate data. If the methane is truly present in the atmosphere of Mars, then something must be producing it on the planet now, because the gas is broken down by radiation on Mars within 300 years;[12][13][14][15][16] therefore, it was considered important to determine the biological potential or habitability of the Martian arctic's soils.[17] Methane could also be the product of a geochemical process or the result of volcanic or hydrothermal activity.[18]
While the proposal for Phoenix was being written, the Mars Odyssey orbiter used its gamma-ray spectrometer and found the distinctive signature of hydrogen on some areas of the Martian surface, and the only plausible source of hydrogen on Mars would be water in the form of ice, frozen below the surface. The mission was therefore funded on the expectation that Phoenix would find water ice on the arctic plains of Mars.[19] In August 2003 NASA selected the University of Arizona "Phoenix" mission for launch in 2007. It was hoped this would be the first in a new line of smaller, low-cost, Scout missions in the agency's exploration of Mars program.[20] The selection was the result of an intense two-year competition with proposals from other institutions. The $325 million NASA award is more than six times larger than any other single research grant in University of Arizona history.
Side-by-side images of a trench dug by Phoenix's robotic arm, showing the sublimation of material – three whitish clumps in the lower left corner of the trench – presumed to be water ice, over the course of four days (Sol 20 to Sol 24).
Peter H. Smith of the University of Arizona Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, as Principal Investigator, along with 24 Co-Investigators, were selected to lead the mission. The mission was named after the Phoenix, a mythological bird that is repeatedly reborn from its own ashes. The Phoenix spacecraft contains several previously built components. The lander used was the modified Mars Surveyor 2001 Lander (canceled in 2000), along with several of the instruments from both that and the previous unsuccessful Mars Polar Lander mission. Lockheed Martin, who built the lander, had kept the nearly complete lander in an environmentally controlled clean room from 2001 until the mission was funded by the NASA Scout Program.[21]
On June 2, 2005, following a critical review of the project's planning progress and preliminary design, NASA approved the mission to proceed as planned.[24] The purpose of the review was to confirm NASA's confidence in the mission.
Phoenix during testing in September 2006Launched mass
670 kg (1,480 lb) Includes Lander, Aeroshell (backshell and heatshield), parachutes, cruise stage.[1]
Lander Mass
350 kg (770 lb)
Lander Dimensions
About 5.5 m (18 ft) long with the solar panels deployed. The science deck by itself is about 1.5 m (4.9 ft) in diameter. From the ground to the top of the MET mast, the lander measures about 2.2 m (7.2 ft) tall.
Communications
X-band throughout the cruise phase of the mission and for its initial communication after separating from the third stage of the launch vehicle. UHF links, relayed through Mars orbiters during the entry, descent and landing phase and while operating on the surface of Mars. The UHF system on Phoenix is compatible with relay capabilities of NASA's Mars Odyssey, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and with the European Space Agency's Mars Express. The interconnections use the Proximity-1 protocol.[25]
Power
Power for the cruise phase is generated using two decagonalgallium arsenidesolar panels (total area 3.1 m2 (33 sq ft)) mounted to the cruise stage, and for the lander, via two gallium arsenide solar array panels (total area 7.0 m2 (75 sq ft)) deployed from the lander after touchdown on the Martian surface. NiH2 battery with a capacity of 16 A·h.[26]
Lander systems include a RAD6000 based computer system for commanding the spacecraft and handling data.[27] Other parts of the lander are an electrical system containing solar arrays and batteries, a guidance system to land the spacecraft, eight 4.4 N (1.0 lbf) and 22 N (5.0 lbf) monopropellanthydrazine engines built by Aerojet-Redmond Operations for the cruise phase, twelve 302 N (68.0 lbf) Aerojet monopropellant hydrazine thrusters to land the Phoenix, mechanical and structural elements, and a heater system to ensure the spacecraft does not get too cold.
Phoenix Mars Lander being worked on by NASA engineers. The planned operational life of the Phoenix lander was 90 Martian days. Each Martian day is 40 minutes longer than an Earth Day.
Phoenix carried improved versions of University of Arizona panoramic cameras and volatiles-analysis instrument from the ill-fated Mars Polar Lander, as well as experiments that had been built for the canceled Mars Surveyor 2001 Lander, including a JPL trench-digging robotic arm, a set of wet chemistry laboratories, and optical and atomic force microscopes. The science payload also included a descent imager and a suite of meteorological instruments.[28]
During EDL, the Atmospheric Structure Experiment was conducted. This used accelerometer and gyroscope data recorded during the lander's descent through the atmosphere to create a vertical profile of the temperature, pressure, and density of the atmosphere above the landing site, at that point in time.[29]
The robotic digging arm. Left: at landing, with covering in place. Right: the next day, with covering pushed aside.
The robotic arm was designed to extend 2.35 m (7.7 ft) from its base on the lander, and had the ability to dig down to 0.5 m (1.6 ft) below a sandy surface. It took samples of dirt and ice that were analyzed by other instruments on the lander. The arm was designed and built for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory by Alliance Spacesystems, LLC[30] (now Maxar Space Robotics, LLC) in Pasadena, California. A rotating rasp-tool located in the heel of the scoop was used to cut into the strong permafrost. Cuttings from the rasp were ejected into the heel of the scoop and transferred to the front for delivery to the instruments. The rasp tool was conceived of at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The flight version of the rasp was designed and built by HoneyBee Robotics. Commands were sent for the arm to be deployed on May 28, 2008, beginning with the pushing aside of a protective covering intended to serve as a redundant precaution against potential contamination of Martian soil by Earthly life-forms.
The Robotic Arm Camera (RAC) attached to the robotic arm just above the scoop was able to take full-color pictures of the area, as well as verify the samples that the scoop returned, and examined the grains of the area where the robotic arm had just dug. The camera was made by the University of Arizona and Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research,[31] Germany.[32]
Surface Stereo Imager (SSI) built by the University of Arizona.
The Thermal and Evolved Gas Analyzer (TEGA) is a combination of a high-temperature furnace with a mass spectrometer. It was used to bake samples of Martian dust and determine the composition of the resulting vapors. It has eight ovens, each about the size of a large ball-point pen, which were able to analyze one sample each, for a total of eight separate samples. Team members measured how much water vapor and carbon dioxide gas were given off, how much water ice the samples contained, and what minerals are present that may have formed during a wetter, warmer past climate. The instrument also measured organic volatiles, such as methane, down to 10 parts per billion. TEGA was built by the University of Arizona and University of Texas at Dallas.[36]
On May 29, 2008 (sol 4), electrical tests indicated an intermittent short circuit in TEGA,[37] resulting from a glitch in one of the two filaments responsible for ionizing volatiles.[38] NASA worked around the problem by configuring the backup filament as the primary and vice versa.[39]
In early June, first attempts to get soil into TEGA were unsuccessful as it seemed too "cloddy" for the screens.[40][41]
On June 11 the first of the eight ovens was filled with a soil sample after several tries to get the soil sample through the screen of TEGA.[citation needed] On June 17, it was announced that no water was found in this sample; however, since it had been exposed to the atmosphere for several days prior to entering the oven, any initial water ice it might have contained could have been lost via sublimation.[citation needed]
Mars Descent Imager built by Malin Space Science Systems.
The Mars Descent Imager (MARDI) was intended to take pictures of the landing site during the last three minutes of descent. As originally planned, it would have begun taking pictures after the aeroshell departed, about 8 km (5.0 mi) above the Martian soil.[citation needed]
Before launch, testing of the assembled spacecraft uncovered a potential data corruption problem with an interface card that was designed to route MARDI image data as well as data from various other parts of the spacecraft. The potential problem could occur if the interface card were to receive a MARDI picture during a critical phase of the spacecraft's final descent, at which point data from the spacecraft's Inertial Measurement Unit could have been lost; this data was critical to controlling the descent and landing. This was judged to be an unacceptable risk, and it was decided to not use MARDI during the mission.[42] As the flaw was discovered too late for repairs, the camera remained installed on Phoenix but it was not used to take pictures, nor was its built-in microphone used.[43]
MARDI images had been intended to help pinpoint exactly where the lander landed, and possibly help find potential science targets. It was also to be used to learn if the area where the lander lands is typical of the surrounding terrain. MARDI was built by Malin Space Science Systems.[44] It would have used only 3 watts of power during the imaging process, less than most other space cameras. It had originally been designed and built to perform the same function on the Mars Surveyor 2001 Lander mission; after that mission was canceled, MARDI spent several years in storage until it was deployed on the Phoenix lander.
Microscopy, electrochemistry, and conductivity analyzer
Using MECA, researchers examined soil particles as small as 16 μm across; additionally, they attempted to determine the chemical composition of water-soluble ions in the soil. They also measured electrical and thermal conductivity of soil particles using a probe on the robotic arm scoop.[47]
This instrument presents 6 of 69 sample holders to an opening in the MECA instrument to which the robotic arm delivers the samples and then brings the samples to the optical microscope and the atomic force microscope.[48]Imperial College London provided the microscope sample substrates.[49]
The optical microscope, designed by the University of Arizona, is capable of making images of the Martian regolith with a resolution of 256 pixels/mm or 16 micrometers/pixel. The field of view of the microscope is a 2 mm × 2 mm (0.079 in × 0.079 in) sample holder to which the robotic arm delivers the sample. The sample is illuminated either by 9 red, green and blue LEDs or by 3 LEDs emitting ultraviolet light. The electronics for the readout of the CCD chip are shared with the robotic arm camera which has an identical CCD chip.
The atomic force microscope has access to a small area of the sample delivered to the optical microscope. The instrument scans over the sample with one of 8 silicon crystal tips and measures the repulsion of the tip from the sample. The maximum resolution is 0.1 micrometres. A Swiss consortium led by the University of Neuchatel contributed the atomic force microscope.[46]
Illustration of how the wet chemistry lab onboard Phoenix mixes a Martian soil sample with water
The wet chemistry lab (WCL) sensor assembly and leaching solution were designed and built by Thermo Fisher Scientific.[50] The WCL actuator assembly was designed and built by Starsys Research in Boulder, Colorado. Tufts University developed the reagent pellets, barium ISE, and ASV electrodes, and performed the preflight characterization of the sensor array.[51]
The robotic arm scooped up some soil and put it in one of four wet chemistry lab cells, where water was added, and, while stirring, an array of electrochemical sensors measured a dozen dissolved ions such as sodium, magnesium, calcium, and sulfate that leached out from the soil into the water. This provided information on the biological compatibility of the soil, both for possible indigenous microbes and for possible future Earth visitors.[52]
All of the four wet chemistry labs were identical, each containing 26 chemical sensors and a temperature sensor. The polymer Ion Selective Electrodes (ISE) were able to determine the concentration of ions by measuring the change in electric potential across their ion-selective membranes as a function of concentration.[53] Two gas sensing electrodes for oxygen and carbon dioxide worked on the same principle but with gas-permeable membranes. A gold micro-electrode array was used for the cyclic voltammetry and anodic stripping voltammetry. Cyclic voltammetry is a method to study ions by applying a waveform of varying potential and measuring the current–voltage curve. Anodic stripping voltammetry first deposits the metal ions onto the gold electrode with an applied potential. After the potential is reversed, the current is measured while the metals are stripped off the electrode.[citation needed]
Three of the four probes have tiny heating elements and temperature sensors inside them. One probe uses internal heating elements to send out a pulse of heat, recording the time the pulse is sent and monitoring the rate at which the heat is dissipated away from the probe. Adjacent needles sense when the heat pulse arrives. The speed that the heat travels away from the probe as well as the speed that it travels between probes allows scientists to measure thermal conductivity, specific heat (the ability of the regolith to conduct heat relative to its ability to store heat) and thermal diffusivity (the speed at which a thermal disturbance is propagated in the soil).[54]
The probes also measured the dielectric permittivity and electrical conductivity, which can be used to calculate moisture and salinity of the regolith. Needles 1 and 2 work in conjunction to measure salts in the regolith, heat the soil to measure thermal properties (thermal conductivity, specific heat and thermal diffusivity) of the regolith, and measure soil temperature. Needles 3 and 4 measure liquid water in the regolith. Needle 4 is a reference thermometer for needles 1 and 2.[54]
The TECP humidity sensor is a relative humidity sensor, so it must be coupled with a temperature sensor in order to measure absolute humidity. Both the relative humidity sensor and a temperature sensor are attached directly to the circuit board of the TECP and are, therefore, assumed to be at the same temperature.[54]
The Meteorological Station (MET) recorded the daily weather of Mars during the course of the Phoenix mission. It is equipped with a wind indicator and pressure and temperature sensors. The MET also contains a lidar (light detection and ranging) device for sampling the number of dust particles in the air. It was designed in Canada by Optech and MDA, supported by the Canadian Space Agency. A team initially led by York University's Professor Diane Michelangeli[55][56] until her death in 2007, when Professor James Whiteway took over,[57] oversaw the science operations of the station. The York University team includes contributions from the University of Alberta, University of Aarhus (Denmark),[58]Dalhousie University,[59]Finnish Meteorological Institute,[60]Optech, and the Geological Survey of Canada. Canadarm maker MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates (MDA) of Richmond, B.C. built the MET.[61]
Meteorological Station (MET) built by the Canadian Space Agency.Phoenix deployed and then imaged the MET weather mast that holds the wind-strength and direction-measuring tell-tale at a height of 2.3 m. This enhanced image shows wind from the northeast on Sol 3.
The surface wind velocity, pressure, and temperature were also monitored over the mission (from the tell-tale, pressure, and temperature sensors) and show the evolution of the atmosphere with time. To measure dust and ice contribution to the atmosphere, a lidar was employed. The lidar collected information about the time-dependent structure of the planetary boundary layer by investigating the vertical distribution of dust, ice, fog, and clouds in the local atmosphere.[citation needed]
Plot of the minimum daily temperature measured by Phoenix
There are three temperature sensors (thermocouples) on a 1 m (3.3 ft) vertical mast (shown in its stowed position) at heights of approximately 250, 500 and 1,000 mm (9.8, 19.7 and 39.4 in) above the lander deck. The sensors were referenced to a measurement of absolute temperature at the base of the mast. A pressure sensor built by Finnish Meteorological Institute is located in the Payload Electronics Box, which sits on the surface of the deck, and houses the acquisition electronics for the MET payload. The Pressure and Temperature sensors commenced operations on Sol 0 (May 26, 2008) and operated continuously, sampling once every 2 seconds.[citation needed]
The Telltale is a joint Canadian/Danish instrument (right) which provides a coarse estimate of wind speed and direction. The speed is based on the amount of deflection from vertical that is observed, while the wind direction is provided by which way this deflection occurs. A mirror, located under the telltale, and a calibration "cross," above (as observed through the mirror) are employed to increase the accuracy of the measurement. Either camera, SSI or RAC, could make this measurement, though the former was typically used. Periodic observations both day and night aid in understanding the diurnal variability of wind at the Phoenix landing site.[citation needed]
The wind speeds ranged from 11 to 58 km/h (6.8 to 36.0 mph). The usual average speed was 36 km/h (22 mph).[62]
First operation of lidar on Mars; telescope (black tube) and laser window (smaller opening in foreground) can be seen.
The vertical-pointing lidar was capable of detecting multiple types of backscattering (for example Rayleigh scattering and Mie Scattering), with the delay between laser pulse generation and the return of light scattered by atmospheric particles determining the altitude at which scattering occurs. Additional information was obtained from backscattered light at different wavelengths (colors), and the Phoenix system transmitted both 532 nm and 1064 nm. Such wavelength dependence may make it possible to discriminate between ice and dust, and serve as an indicator of the effective particle size.[citation needed]
Contour plot of second lidar operation. The colors show evolution of dust passing overhead with time (red/orange: more dust, blue/green: less dust)
The Phoenix lidar's laser was a passive Q-switchedNd:YAG laser with the dual wavelengths of 1064 nm and 532 nm. It operated at 100 Hz with a pulse width of 10 ns. The scattered light was received by two detectors (green and IR) and the green signal was collected in both analog and photon counting modes.[63][64]
Lidar operating (thin vertical beam at center right).
The lidar was operated for the first time at noon on Sol 3 (May 29, 2008), recording the first surface extraterrestrial atmospheric profile. This first profile indicated well-mixed dust in the first few kilometers of the atmosphere of Mars, where the planetary boundary layer was observed by a marked decrease in scattering signal. The contour plot (right) shows the amount of dust as a function of time and altitude, with warmer colors (red, orange) indicating more dust, and cooler colors (blue, green), indicating less dust. There is also an instrumentation effect of the laser warming up, causing the appearance of dust increasing with time. A layer at 3.5 km (2.2 mi) can be observed in the plot, which could be extra dust, or—less likely, given the time of sol this was acquired—a low altitude ice cloud.[citation needed]
The image on the left shows the lidar laser operating on the surface of Mars, as observed by the SSI looking straight up; the laser beam is the nearly-vertical line just right of center. Overhead dust can be seen both moving in the background, as well as passing through the laser beam in the form of bright sparkles.[65] The fact that the beam appears to terminate is the result of the extremely small angle at which the SSI is observing the laser—it sees farther up along the beam's path than there is dust to reflect the light back down to it.[citation needed]
The laser device discovered snow falling from clouds; this was not known to occur before the mission.[66] It was also determined that cirrus clouds formed in the area.[67]
Phoenix was launched on August 4, 2007, at 5:26:34 a.m. EDT (09:26:34 UTC) on a Delta II 7925 launch vehicle from Pad 17-A of the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. The launch was nominal with no significant anomalies. The Phoenix lander was placed on a trajectory of such precision that its first trajectory course correction burn, performed on August 10, 2007, at 7:30 a.m. EDT (11:30 UTC), was only 18 m/s. The launch took place during a launch window extending from August 3, 2007, to August 24, 2007. Due to the small launch window, the rescheduled launch of the Dawn mission (originally planned for July 7) had to be launched after Phoenix in September. The Delta II rocket was chosen due to its successful launch history, which includes launches of the Spirit and OpportunityMars Exploration Rovers in 2003 and Mars Pathfinder in 1996.[68]
A noctilucent cloud was created by the exhaust gas from the Delta II 7925 rocket used to launch Phoenix.[69] The colors in the cloud formed from the prism-like effect of the ice particles present in the exhaust trail.
Top: Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) imaged Phoenix (lower left corner) in the line of sight to the 10-km-wide Heimdal Crater (the craft is actually 20 km from it). (left) MRO imaged Phoenix suspended from its parachute during descent through the Martian atmosphere. (right)
Bottom: Phoenix landing site near N. polar cap (left); MRO image of Phoenix on the surface of Mars. Also see a larger image showing the parachute / backshell, and heat shield. (right)
The Jet Propulsion Laboratory made adjustments to the orbits of its two active satellites around Mars, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and Mars Odyssey, and the European Space Agency similarly adjusted the orbit of its Mars Express spacecraft to be in the right place on May 25, 2008, to observe Phoenix as it entered the atmosphere and then landed on the surface. This information helps designers to improve future landers.[70] The projected landing area was an ellipse 100 by 20 km (62 by 12 mi) covering terrain which has been informally named "Green Valley"[71] and contains the largest concentration of water ice outside the poles.
Phoenix entered the Martian atmosphere at nearly 21,000 km/h (13,000 mph), and within 7 minutes had decreased its speed to 8 km/h (5.0 mph) before touching down on the surface. Confirmation of atmospheric entry was received at 4:46 p.m. PDT (23:46 UTC). Radio signals received at 4:53:44 p.m. PDT[72] confirmed that Phoenix had survived its difficult descent and landed 15 minutes earlier, thus completing a 680 million km (422 million miles) flight from Earth.[73]
For unknown reasons, the parachute was deployed about 7 seconds later than expected, leading to a landing position some 25–28 km (16–17 mi) east, near the edge of the predicted 99% landing ellipse.
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter'sHigh Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera photographed Phoenix suspended from its parachute during its descent through the Martian atmosphere. This marked the first time ever one spacecraft photographed another in the act of landing on a planet[74][75] (the Moon not being a planet, but a satellite). The same camera also imaged Phoenix on the surface with enough resolution to distinguish the lander and its two solar cell arrays. Ground controllers used Doppler tracking data from Odyssey and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter to determine the lander's precise location as 68°13′08″N234°15′03″E / 68.218830°N 234.250778°E / 68.218830; 234.250778.[76][77]
Phoenix landed in the Green Valley of Vastitas Borealis on May 25, 2008,[78] in the late Martian northern hemisphere spring (Ls=76.73), where the Sun shone on its solar panels the whole Martian day.[79] By the Martian northern Summer solstice (June 25, 2008), the Sun appeared at its maximum elevation of 47.0 degrees. Phoenix experienced its first sunset at the start of September 2008.[79]
The landing was made on a flat surface, with the lander reporting only 0.3 degrees of tilt. Just before landing, the craft used its thrusters to orient its solar panels along an east–west axis to maximize power generation. The lander waited 15 minutes before opening its solar panels, to allow dust to settle. The first images from the lander became available around 7:00 p.m. PDT (2008-05-26 02:00 UTC).[80] The images show a surface strewn with pebbles and incised with small troughs into polygons about 5 m (16 ft) across and 10 cm (3.9 in) high, with the expected absence of large rocks and hills.
Like the 1970s era Viking spacecraft, Phoenix used retrorockets for its final descent.[81] Experiments conducted by Nilton Renno, mission co-investigator from the University of Michigan, and his students have investigated how much surface dust would be kicked up on landing.[82] Researchers at Tufts University, led by co-investigator Sam Kounaves, conducted additional in-depth experiments to identify the extent of the ammonia contamination from the hydrazine propellant and its possible effects on the chemistry experiments. In 2007, a report to the American Astronomical Society by Washington State University professor Dirk Schulze-Makuch, suggested that Mars might harbor peroxide-based life forms which the Viking landers failed to detect because of the unexpected chemistry.[83] The hypothesis was proposed long after any modifications to Phoenix could be made. One of the Phoenix mission investigators, NASA astrobiologist Chris McKay, stated that the report "piqued his interest" and that ways to test the hypothesis with Phoenix's instruments would be sought.
Approximate-color photomosaic of thermal contraction crack polygons in Martian permafrost.
The robotic arm's first movement was delayed by one day when, on May 27, 2008, commands from Earth were not relayed to the Phoenix lander on Mars. The commands went to NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter as planned, but the orbiter's Electra UHF radio system for relaying commands to Phoenix temporarily shut off. Without new commands, the lander instead carried out a set of backup activities. On May 27 the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter relayed images and other information from those activities back to Earth.
The robotic arm was a critical part of the Phoenix Mars mission. On May 28, scientists leading the mission sent commands to unstow its robotic arm and take more images of its landing site. The images revealed that the spacecraft landed where it had access to digging down a polygon across the trough and digging into its center.[84]
The lander's robotic arm touched soil on Mars for the first time on May 31, 2008 (sol 6). It scooped dirt and started sampling the Martian soil for ice after days of testing its systems.[85]
The polygonal cracking at the landing zone had previously been observed from orbit, and is similar to patterns seen in permafrost areas in polar and high altitude regions of Earth.[86]Phoenix's robotic arm camera took an image underneath the lander on sol 5 that shows patches of a smooth bright surface uncovered when thruster exhaust blew off overlying loose soil.[87] It was later shown to be water ice.[88][89]
On June 19, 2008 (sol 24), NASA announced that dice-sized clumps of bright material in the "Dodo-Goldilocks" trench dug by the robotic arm had vaporized over the course of four days, strongly implying that they were composed of water ice which sublimed following exposure. While dry ice also sublimes, under the conditions present it would do so at a rate much faster than observed.[90][91][92]
On July 31, 2008 (sol 65), NASA announced that Phoenix confirmed the presence of water ice on Mars, as predicted in 2002 by the Mars Odyssey orbiter. During the initial heating cycle of a new sample, TEGA's mass spectrometer detected water vapor when the sample temperature reached 0 °C.[93]
Liquid water cannot exist on the surface of Mars with its present low atmospheric pressure, except at the lowest elevations for short periods.[94][95]
With Phoenix in good working order, NASA announced operational funding through September 30, 2008 (sol 125). The science team worked to determine whether the water ice ever thaws enough to be available for life processes and if carbon-containing chemicals and other raw materials for life are present.
Additionally during 2008 and early 2009 a debate emerged within NASA over the presence of 'blobs' which appeared on photos of the vehicle's landing struts, which have been variously described as being either water droplets or 'clumps of frost'.[96] Due to the lack of consensus within the Phoenix science project, the issue had not been raised in any NASA news conferences.[96]
One scientist thought that the lander's thrusters splashed a pocket of brine from just below the Martian surface onto the landing strut during the vehicle's landing. The salts would then have absorbed water vapor from the air, which would have explained how they appeared to grow in size during the first 44 sols (Martian days) before slowly evaporating as Mars temperature dropped.[96]
The first two trenches dug by Phoenix in Martian soil. The trench on the right, informally called "Baby Bear", is the source of the first samples delivered to the onboard TEGA and the optical microscope for analysis.
Clumps of bright material in the enlarged "Dodo-Goldilocks" trench vanished over the course of four days, implying that they were composed of ice which sublimated following exposure.[90]
Color versions of the photos showing ice sublimation, with the lower left corner of the trench enlarged in the insets in the upper right of the images.
On June 24, 2008 (sol 29), NASA's scientists launched a series of scientific tests. The robotic arm scooped up more soil and delivered it to 3 different on-board analyzers: an oven that baked it and tested the emitted gases, a microscopic imager, and a wet chemistry laboratory (WCL).[97] The lander's robotic arm scoop was positioned over the Wet Chemistry Lab delivery funnel on Sol 29 (the 29th Martian day after landing, i.e. June 24, 2008). The soil was transferred to the instrument on sol 30 (June 25, 2008), and Phoenix performed the first wet chemistry tests. On Sol 31 (June 26, 2008) Phoenix returned the wet chemistry test results with information on the salts in the soil, and its acidity. The wet chemistry lab (WCL)[98] was part of the suite of tools called the Microscopy, Electrochemistry and Conductivity Analyzer (MECA).[99]
Phoenix footpad image, taken over 15 minutes after landing to ensure any dust stirred up had settled.
One of the first surface images from Phoenix.
View underneath lander towards south foot pad, showing patchy exposures of a bright surface, possibly ice.[88]
Panorama of rocks near the Phoenix Lander (May 25, 2008).
Panorama of rocks near the Phoenix Lander (August 19, 2008).
A 360-degree panorama assembled from images taken on sols 1 and 3 after landing. The upper portion has been vertically stretched by a factor of 8 to bring out details. Visible near the horizon at full resolution are the backshell and parachute (a bright speck above the right edge of the left solar array, about 300 m (980 ft) distant) and the heat shield and its bounce mark (two end-to-end dark streaks above the center of the left solar array, about 150 m (490 ft) distant); on the horizon, left of the weather mast, is a crater.
Phoenix lander – before/after 10 years (animation; December 21, 2017)[100]
The solar-powered lander operated two months longer than its three-month prime mission. The lander was designed to last 90 days, and had been running on bonus time since the successful end of its primary mission in August 2008.[8][101] On October 28, 2008 (sol 152), the lander went into safe mode due to power constraints based on the insufficient amount of sunlight reaching the lander,[102] as expected at this time of year. It was decided then to shut down the four heaters that keep the equipment warm, and upon bringing the lander back from safe mode, commands were sent to turn off two of the heaters rather than only one as was originally planned for the first step. The heaters involved provide heat to the robotic arm, TEGA instrument and a pyrotechnic unit on the lander that were unused since landing, so these three instruments were also shut down.
On November 10, Phoenix Mission Control reported the loss of contact with the Phoenix lander; the last signal was received on November 2.[103] The demise of the craft occurred as a result of a dust storm that reduced power generation even further.[104] While the spacecraft's work ended, the analysis of data from the instruments was in its earliest stages.
Though it was not designed to survive the frigid Martian winter, the spacecraft's safe mode kept the option open to reestablish communications if the lander could recharge its batteries during the next Martian spring.[105] However, its landing location is in an area that is usually part of the north polar ice cap during the Martian winter, and the lander was seen from orbit to be encased in dry ice.[106] It is estimated that, at its peak, the layer of CO2 ice in the lander's vicinity would total about 30 grams/cm2, which is enough to make a dense slab of dry ice at least 19 cm (7.5 in) thick.[107] It was considered unlikely that the spacecraft could endure these conditions, as its fragile solar panels would likely break off under so much weight.[107][108]
Scientists attempted to make contact with Phoenix starting January 18, 2010 (sol -835), but were unsuccessful. Further attempts in February and April also failed to pick up any signal from the lander.[105][106][109][110] Project manager Barry Goldstein announced on May 24, 2010, that the project was being formally ended. Images from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter showed that its solar panels were apparently irretrievably damaged by freezing during the Martian winter.[111][112]
Unlike some other places visited on Mars with landers (Viking and Pathfinder), nearly all the rocks near Phoenix are small. For about as far as the camera can see, the land is flat, but shaped into polygons between 2–3 m (6.6–9.8 ft) in diameter and are bounded by troughs that are 20 to 50 cm (7.9 to 19.7 in) deep. These shapes are due to ice in the soil expanding and contracting due to major temperature changes. The microscope showed that the soil on top of the polygons is composed of flat particles (probably a type of clay) and rounded particles. Also, unlike other places visited on Mars, the site has no ripples or dunes.[88] Ice is present a few inches below the surface in the middle of the polygons, and along its edges, the ice is at least 20 cm (8 in) deep. When the ice is exposed to the Martian atmosphere it slowly sublimates.[113] Some dust devils were observed.
Snow was observed to fall from cirrus clouds. The clouds formed at a level in the atmosphere that was around −65 °C (−85 °F), so the clouds would have to be composed of water-ice, rather than carbon dioxide-ice (dry ice) because, at the low pressure of the Martian atmosphere, the temperature for forming carbon dioxide ice is much lower—less than −120 °C (−184 °F). It is now thought that water ice (snow) would have accumulated later in the year at this location.[114] This represents a milestone in understanding Martian weather. Wind speeds ranged from 11 to 58 km/h (6.8 to 36.0 mph). The usual average speed was 36 km/h (22 mph). These speeds seem high, but the atmosphere of Mars is very thin—less than 1% of the Earth's—and so did not exert much force on the spacecraft. The highest temperature measured during the mission was −19.6 °C (−3.3 °F), while the coldest was −97.7 °C (−143.9 °F).[62]
Interpretation of the data transmitted from the craft was published in the journal Science. As per the peer-reviewed data the presence of water ice has been confirmed and that the site had a wetter and warmer climate in the recent past. Finding calcium carbonate in the Martian soil leads scientists to think that the site had been wet or damp in the geological past. During seasonal or longer period diurnal cycles water may have been present as thin films. The tilt or obliquity of Mars changes far more than the Earth; hence times of higher humidity are probable.[115]
Chemistry results showed the surface soil to be moderately alkaline, with a pH of 7.7 ±0.5.[53][116] The overall level of salinity is modest. TEGA analysis of its first soil sample indicated the presence of bound water and CO2 that were released during the final (highest-temperature, 1,000 °C) heating cycle.[117]
The elements detected and measured in the samples are chloride, bicarbonate, magnesium, sodium, potassium, calcium, and sulfate.[116] Further data analysis indicated that the soil contains soluble sulfate (SO42-) at a minimum of 1.1% and provided a refined formulation of the soil.[116]
Analysis of the Phoenix WCL also showed that the Ca(ClO4)2 in the soil has not interacted with liquid water of any form, perhaps for as long as 600 million years. If it had, the highly soluble Ca(ClO4)2 in contact with liquid water would have formed only CaSO4. This suggests a severely arid environment, with minimal or no liquid water interaction.[118] The pH and salinity level were viewed as benign from the standpoint of biology.
Perchlorate
On August 1, 2008, Aviation Week reported that "The White House has been alerted by NASA about plans to make an announcement soon on major new Phoenix lander discoveries concerning the "potential for life" on Mars, scientists tell Aviation Week & Space Technology."[119] This led to a subdued media speculation on whether some evidence of past or present life had been discovered.[120][121][122] To quell the speculation, NASA released the preliminary findings stating that Mars soil contains perchlorate (ClO 4) and thus may not be as life-friendly as thought earlier.[123][124] The presence of almost 0.5% perchlorates in the soil was an unexpected finding with broad implications.[98]
Laboratory research published in July 2017 demonstrated that when irradiated with a simulated Martian UV flux, perchlorates become bacteriocidal.[125] Two other compounds of the Martian surface, iron oxides and hydrogen peroxide, act in synergy with irradiated perchlorates to cause a 10.8-fold increase in cell death when compared to cells exposed to UV radiation after 60 seconds of exposure.[125] It was also found that abraded silicates (quartz and basalt) lead to the formation of toxic reactive oxygen species.[126] The results leaves the question of the presence of organic compounds open-ended since heating the samples containing perchlorate would have broken down any organics present.[127] However, in the cold subsurface of Mars, which provides substantial protection against UV radiation, halotolerant organisms might survive enhanced perchlorate concentrations by physiological adaptations similar to those observed in the yeast Debaryomyces hansenii exposed in lab experiments to increasing NaClO4 concentrations.[128]
Perchlorate (ClO4) is a strong oxidizer, so it has the potential of being used for rocket fuel and as a source of oxygen for future missions.[129] Also, when mixed with water, perchlorate can greatly lower freezing point of water, in a manner similar to how salt is applied to roads to melt ice. So, perchlorate may be allowing small amounts of liquid water to form on the surface of Mars today. Gullies, which are common in certain areas of Mars, may have formed from perchlorate melting ice and causing water to erode soil on steep slopes.[130] Perchlorates have also been detected at the landing site of the Curiosity rover, nearer equatorial Mars, and in the martian meteorite EETA79001,[131] suggesting a "global distribution of these salts".[132] Only highly refractory and/or well-protected organic compounds are likely to be preserved in the frozen subsurface.[131] Therefore, the MOMA instrument planned to fly on the 2022 ExoMars rover will employ a method that is unaffected by the presence of perchlorates to detect and measure sub-surface organics.[133]
A 2025 study found 26 new extremophile bacteria species in the cleanrooms that were used to build the Phoenix lander. It is possible that some of these species can survive in space.[134][135]
Attached to the deck of the lander (next to the US flag) is a special DVD compiled by The Planetary Society. The disc contains Visions of Mars, a multimedia collection of literature and art about the Red Planet. Works include the text of H.G. Wells's 1897 novel War of the Worlds (and the 1938 radio broadcast by Orson Welles), Percival Lowell's 1908 book Mars as the Abode of Life with a map of his proposed canals, Ray Bradbury's 1950 novel The Martian Chronicles, and Kim Stanley Robinson's 1993 novel Green Mars. There are also messages directly addressed to future Martian visitors or settlers from, among others, Carl Sagan and Arthur C. Clarke. In 2006, The Planetary Society collected a quarter of a million names submitted through the Internet and placed them on the disc, which claims, on the front, to be "the first library on Mars."[136] This DVD is made of a special silica glass designed to withstand the Martian environment, lasting for hundreds (if not thousands) of years on the surface while it awaits retrieval by future explorers. This is similar in concept to the Voyager Golden Record that was sent on the Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 missions.
The text just below the center of the disk reads:
This archive, provided to the NASA Phoenix mission by The Planetary Society, contains literature and art (Visions of Mars), greetings from Mars visionaries of our day, and names of 21st century Earthlings who wanted to send their names to Mars. This DVD-ROM is designed to be read on personal computers in 2007. Information is stored in a spiral groove on the disc. A laser beam can scan the groove when metallized or a microscope can be used. Very small bumps and holes represent the zeroes and ones of digital information. The groove is about 0.74 micrometres wide. For more information refer to the standards document ECMA-268 (80 mm DVD Read-Only Disk).[137]
A previous CD version was supposed to have been sent with the Russian spacecraft Mars 94, intended to land on Mars in Fall 1995.[138]
^Keller, H. U; Hartwig, H; Kramm, R; Koschny, D; Markiewicz, W. J; Thomas, N; Fernades, M; Smith, P. H; Reynolds, R; Lemmon, M. T; Weinberg, J; Marcialis, R; Tanner, R; Boss, B. J; Oquest, C; Paige, D. A (2001). "The MVACS Robotic Arm Camera". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 106 (E8): 17609–22. Bibcode:2001JGR...10617609K. doi:10.1029/1999JE001123.
^Reynolds, R.O; Smith, P.H; Bell, L.S; Keller, H.U (2001). "The design of Mars lander cameras for Mars Pathfinder, Mars Surveyor '98 and Mars Surveyor '01". IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 50 (1): 63–71. Bibcode:2001ITIM...50...63R. doi:10.1109/19.903879.
^Boynton, William V; Bailey, Samuel H; Hamara, David K; Williams, Michael S; Bode, Rolfe C; Fitzgibbon, Michael R; Ko, Wenjeng; Ward, Michael G; Sridhar, K. R; Blanchard, Jeff A; Lorenz, Ralph D; May, Randy D; Paige, David A; Pathare, Asmin V; Kring, David A; Leshin, Laurie A; Ming, Douglas W; Zent, Aaron P; Golden, D. C; Kerry, Kristopher E; Lauer, H. Vern; Quinn, Richard C (2001). "Thermal and Evolved Gas Analyzer: Part of the Mars Volatile and Climate Surveyor integrated payload". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 106 (E8): 17683–98. Bibcode:2001JGR...10617683B. doi:10.1029/1999JE001153.
^West, S. J; Frant, M. S; Wen, X; Geis, R; Herdan, J; Gillette, T; Hecht, M. H; Schubert, W; Grannan, S; Kounaves, S. P (1999). "Electrochemistry on Mars". American Laboratory. 31 (20): 48–54. PMID11543343.
^ abKounaves, S. P; Hecht, M. H; Kapit, J; Gospodinova, K; Deflores, L; Quinn, R. C; Boynton, W. V; Clark, B. C; Catling, D. C; Hredzak, P; Ming, D. W; Moore, Q; Shusterman, J; Stroble, S; West, S. J; Young, S. M. M (2010). "Wet Chemistry experiments on the 2007 Phoenix Mars Scout Lander mission: Data analysis and results". Journal of Geophysical Research. 115 (E7): E00E10. Bibcode:2010JGRE..115.0E10K. doi:10.1029/2009JE003424.
^Carswell, Allan Ian; et al. (2004). LIDAR for Mars Atmospheric Studies on 2007 Scout Mission "Phoenix". 22nd International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 2004). Vol. 561. p. 973. Bibcode:2004ESASP.561..973C.
^Whiteway, J. A; Komguem, L; Dickinson, C; Cook, C; Illnicki, M; Seabrook, J; Popovici, V; Duck, T. J; Davy, R; Taylor, P. A; Pathak, J; Fisher, D; Carswell, A. I; Daly, M; Hipkin, V; Zent, A. P; Hecht, M. H; Wood, S. E; Tamppari, L. K; Renno, N; Moores, J. E; Lemmon, M. T; Daerden, F; Smith, P. H (2009). "Mars Water-Ice Clouds and Precipitation". Science. 325 (5936): 68–70. Bibcode:2009Sci...325...68W. CiteSeerX10.1.1.1032.6898. doi:10.1126/science.1172344. PMID19574386. S2CID206519222.
^"Mission Involvement". Lunar and Planetary Laboratory & Department of Planetary Sciences | The University of Arizona. Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
^Heldmann, Jennifer L; Toon, Owen B; Pollard, Wayne H; Mellon, Michael T; Pitlick, John; McKay, Christopher P; Andersen, Dale T (2005). "Formation of Martian gullies by the action of liquid water flowing under current Martian environmental conditions". Journal of Geophysical Research. 110 (E5): E05004. Bibcode:2005JGRE..110.5004H. doi:10.1029/2004JE002261. hdl:2060/20050169988. S2CID1578727.
^Witeway, J. et al. 2009. Mars Water-Ice Clouds and Precipitation. Science: 325. p68-70
^Boynton, W. V; Ming, D. W; Kounaves, S. P; Young, S. M. M; Arvidson, R. E; Hecht, M. H; Hoffman, J; Niles, P. B; Hamara, D. K; Quinn, R. C; Smith, P. H; Sutter, B; Catling, D. C; Morris, R. V (2009). "Evidence for Calcium Carbonate at the Mars Phoenix Landing Site". Science. 325 (5936): 61–4. Bibcode:2009Sci...325...61B. doi:10.1126/science.1172768. PMID19574384. S2CID26740165.
^ abcKounaves, Samuel P; Hecht, Michael H; Kapit, Jason; Quinn, Richard C; Catling, David C; Clark, Benton C; Ming, Douglas W; Gospodinova, Kalina; Hredzak, Patricia; McElhoney, Kyle; Shusterman, Jennifer (2010). "Soluble sulfate in the martian soil at the Phoenix landing site". Geophysical Research Letters. 37 (9): L09201. Bibcode:2010GeoRL..37.9201K. doi:10.1029/2010GL042613. S2CID12914422.
^Kounaves, Samuel P; Chaniotakis, Nikos A; Chevrier, Vincent F; Carrier, Brandi L; Folds, Kaitlyn E; Hansen, Victoria M; McElhoney, Kyle M; o'Neil, Glen D; Weber, Andrew W (2014). "Identification of the perchlorate parent salts at the Phoenix Mars landing site and possible implications". Icarus. 232: 226–31. Bibcode:2014Icar..232..226K. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.01.016.
^Hecht, M. H; Kounaves, S. P; Quinn, R. C; West, S. J; Young, S. M. M; Ming, D. W; Catling, D. C; Clark, B. C; Boynton, W. V; Hoffman, J; Deflores, L. P; Gospodinova, K; Kapit, J; Smith, P. H (2009). "Detection of Perchlorate and the Soluble Chemistry of Martian Soil at the Phoenix Lander Site". Science. 325 (5936): 64–7. Bibcode:2009Sci...325...64H. doi:10.1126/science.1172466. PMID19574385. S2CID24299495.
^ abKounaves, Samuel P; Carrier, Brandi L; O'Neil, Glen D; Stroble, Shannon T; Claire, Mark W (2014). "Evidence of martian perchlorate, chlorate, and nitrate in Mars meteorite EETA79001: Implications for oxidants and organics". Icarus. 229: 206–13. Bibcode:2014Icar..229..206K. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.11.012.
Missions are ordered by launch date. Sign † indicates failure en route or before intended mission data returned. ‡ indicates use of the planet as a gravity assist en route to another destination.
Launches are separated by dots ( • ), payloads by commas ( , ), multiple names for the same satellite by slashes ( / ). Crewed flights are underlined. Launch failures are marked with the † sign. Payloads deployed from other spacecraft are (enclosed in parentheses).
Phoenix was a robotic spacecraft developed by NASA as part of the Mars Scout program, launched on August 4, 2007, from Cape Canaveral, Florida, aboard a Delta II rocket, and designed to investigate the Martian arctic's subsurface ice and soil for signs of past water activity and habitability.[1] The lander touched down successfully on May 25, 2008, at 68.22°N, 234.25°E in the Vastitas Borealis plains, marking the first polar landing on Mars and the northernmost site ever reached by a spacecraft, where it operated for 152 sols (Martian days), exceeding its planned 90-sol primary mission until power loss from dust accumulation on solar panels ended communications on November 2, 2008.[2][3]Phoenix's primary objectives included assessing the history of liquid water in the Martian arctic, searching for organic compounds that could indicate past microbial life, and evaluating the soil's chemical and mineralogical properties to determine potential habitability, using a suite of instruments such as the Thermal and Evolved-Gas Analyzer (TEGA) for soil chemistry, the Wet Chemistry Laboratory for detecting soluble salts, an Optical Microscope and Atomic Force Microscope for imaging at microscopic scales, and a robotic arm to excavate up to 0.5 meters deep into the ice-cemented soil.[1][3] The mission confirmed the presence of water ice just below the surface through excavation and sublimation observations, revealed mildly alkaline soil rich in nutrients like magnesium, sodium, potassium, and chloride, and detected perchlorate salts, which, while challenging for some Earth life forms, could serve as an energy source for microbes and provided evidence of past briny water flows.[2][1]Among its notable achievements, Phoenix returned over 25,000 images, including the first color stereo views of Martian trenches and snow-like deposits, and was photographed mid-descent by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, validating entry, descent, and landing technologies not used successfully since the Viking 2 mission in 1976.[2] The spacecraft's contributions advanced understanding of Mars' climate and geochemistry, with its lander design influencing subsequent missions like InSight, its perchlorate findings informing organic detection strategies in missions like Perseverance, and its demonstration of accessible polar water ice highlighting potential for in-situ resource utilization in future human exploration.[1]
Background
Development history
The Phoenix mission emerged from NASA's Mars Scout Program, established to fund innovative, low-cost planetary missions through competitive selection. In August 2003, NASA chose the Phoenix proposal as the program's inaugural Mars mission, with Peter H. Smith of the University of Arizona's Lunar and Planetary Laboratory serving as principal investigator. This marked the first time a public university led a NASA Mars exploration effort, emphasizing cost efficiency by reusing existing technologies rather than developing new ones from scratch.[4][5]Development accelerated post-selection, with Lockheed Martin Space Systems in Denver, Colorado, acting as the prime contractor for spacecraft assembly and testing. The project integrated instruments and structural elements from prior missions, including the canceled Mars Surveyor 2001 Lander and the Mars Polar Lander, which had failed during its 1999 descent. Key milestones included the completion of Phase A studies by late 2003, spacecraft delivery to NASA's Kennedy Space Center in May 2007, and launch aboard a Delta II rocket on August 4, 2007, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. The entire development phase spanned approximately four years, culminating in preparations for the May 2008 landing.[6][7][8]The mission's budget totaled $420 million, encompassing spacecraft development, launch, and initial operations, which allowed for a streamlined approach compared to larger Mars missions. This funding cap, initially estimated at $325 million during proposal reviews, supported the reuse of heritage components to control costs while meeting Scout Program guidelines.[9][10][8]A primary challenge was adapting the Mars Polar Lander's descent and landing system, which had likely failed due to premature engine shutdown triggered by a software misinterpretation of leg deployment signals, to ensure safe touchdown in Mars' volatile northern polar region. Engineers conducted extensive simulations and hardware modifications, including enhanced software safeguards and radar testing, to address risks from thin atmosphere, icy terrain, and potential dust storms at latitudes around 68°N. These efforts prioritized reliability for the untested polar environment, where seasonal changes could affect solar power and operations.[5][11]The development team was led by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, which handled overall mission management and operations. The University of Arizona coordinated science operations, while Lockheed Martin oversaw engineering integration. International collaboration featured prominently, with the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) providing the Meteorological Station instrument through its contributions via MDA and Optech. Additional partners included institutions from Denmark, Germany, and other nations, supporting instrument development and data analysis under a framework of shared expertise.[2][12][5]
Mission objectives
The primary objectives of the Phoenix Mars Lander mission were to investigate the history of water in the Martian arctic, confirm the presence of shallow subsurface water ice, characterize the geochemistry and mineralogy of the ice-soil boundary, study polar meteorology, and assess the biological potential of the northern plains environment.[13] By landing in the Vastitas Borealis region between 65°N and 72°N latitude, the mission aimed to address whether the arctic soil could support microbial life, building on orbital observations from Mars Odyssey that indicated widespread water ice deposits within the top meter of the surface.[14] Specific scientific questions included testing the hypothesis of accessible water ice in the shallow subsurface (within approximately 50 cm), analyzing soil for salts and nutrients that might indicate past aqueous activity, measuring seasonal atmospheric processes such as CO₂ frost sublimation, and searching for organic compounds to evaluate habitability.[3]To achieve these goals, Phoenix was designed to excavate trenches up to 35 cm deep using its robotic arm, collect and deliver surface and subsurface samples to analytical instruments, and monitor local weather patterns including temperature, pressure, and water vapor over the polar summer.[14] The mission sought to determine if the soil chemistry—potentially including chloride and perchlorate salts—revealed evidence of a wetter past or ongoing geochemical cycles that could sustain life.[3]Mission success criteria encompassed a safe landing followed by the acquisition of a 360° panoramic image, excavation to at least 30 cm depth, delivery of at least two subsurface samples (one icy and one soil-only) to both the Thermal and Evolved-Gas Analyzer (TEGA) and the Microscopy, Electrochemistry, and Conductivity Analyzer (MECA), and completion of chemical analyses on a minimum of three samples per instrument, all within a planned operational lifetime of 90 sols (Martian days).[14] Minimum success required power-safe operations, a partial panorama, and analysis of one subsurface sample per instrument.[14]In the context of Mars exploration, Phoenix aimed to bridge the gap between the Viking landers' 1970s surface analyses and future human and sample-return missions by providing the first in-situ data from the polar region, informing site selection and habitability assessments for subsequent endeavors.[13]
Design and systems
Specifications
The Phoenix spacecraft, comprising the cruise stage, entry system, and lander, had a total mass of 670 kg at launch, including the 350 kg lander and entry system (aeroshell, parachute, and propellants).[15] The lander itself had a deck diameter of 1.5 m, a height of 2.2 m to the top of the meteorology mast, and a width of 5.52 m with its twin solar panels fully deployed, providing a compact footprint optimized for the Martian polar environment.[15]Power for surface operations was supplied by twin solar arrays with a total area of approximately 4.2 m², capable of generating up to 100 W under optimal conditions at the landing site's latitude, supplemented by lithium-ion batteries for nighttime and low-insolation periods.[15] These arrays, based on the Ultraflex design, achieved a specific power of about 100 W/kg, enabling reliable energy for the 90-sol primary mission despite the challenges of low solar elevation in the arctic region.[16]Propulsion systems included hydrazine-fueled thrusters: 12 descent thrusters each producing 293 N for controlled landing, and 8 smaller cruise thrusters (15.6 N and 4.4 N) for trajectory adjustments during the interplanetary journey.[15] The lander was stationary, with no mobility mechanisms, relying on its fixed position to conduct in-situ analysis of the regolith.[15]Communication was facilitated by a UHF antenna for high-rate datarelay to the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) and other orbiters, achieving up to 128 kbps, alongside a direct-to-Earth X-band system for low-rate telemetry at 2–256 bps during cruise and critical phases.[15] Thermal control incorporated electrical heaters and multi-layer insulation blanketing to maintain critical components above -40°C in the extreme cold of the polar site, where temperatures could drop to -100°C.[15]The mission targeted the Vastitas Borealis plains at approximately 68°N latitude and 234°E longitude, selected for its ice-cemented soil based on orbital data from Mars Odyssey, ensuring access to subsurface volatiles while avoiding hazards like rocks or dunes.[17]
Parameter
Value
Total mass at launch
670 kg (including 350 kg lander)[15]
Lander dimensions
2.2 m tall (to mast), 5.52 m wide (solar panels deployed), 1.5 m deck diameter[15]
Power generation
Up to 100 W from twin solar arrays; lithium-ion batteries for night operations[15]
Propulsion
Hydrazine thrusters (12 descent at 293 N; no mobility; stationary lander)[15]
The Phoenix spacecraft's entry, descent, and landing (EDL) sequence began with hypersonic atmospheric entry at an altitude of approximately 125 km and an inertial velocity of 5.6 km/s, with a flight path angle of -13 degrees.[18] The entry vehicle, protected by a 2.65 m diameter phenolic-impregnated carbon ablator heat shield, experienced peak deceleration of about 8.5 Earth g's during this phase, with the heat shield ablating to dissipate the intense frictional heat from the thin Martian atmosphere.[19] This ballistic entry relied on aerodynamic stability without active guidance, drawing heritage from the Viking landers' aeroshell design while incorporating refinements from the Mars Pathfinder mission to handle polar entry conditions.[18]Following the hypersonic phase, a supersonic parachute was deployed at roughly 12.6 km altitude and Mach 1.7, reducing velocity to about 80 m/s over the next two minutes of descent.[20] The parachute, a 11.8 m diameter disk-gap-band type inherited from Viking and Pathfinder, was mortar-fired based on inertial measurements of dynamic pressure and velocity.[18] At approximately 940 m above ground level, the lander separated from the backshell and parachute, initiating powered descent using 12 hydrazine monopropellant pulsed thrusters for vertical control and attitude stability.[19]Radar altimetry and velocimetry, activated below 2 km, provided real-time measurements to modulate thruster firings, ensuring a controlled descent without terrain-relative navigation and relying instead on pre-selected site coordinates and inertial navigation.[18]The powered descent covered the final ~940 m in about 50 seconds, with thrusters firing continuously until touchdown sensors triggered cutoff at less than 2.5 m/s vertical velocity—reconstructed at 2.38 m/s for the actual landing.[19] This phase included a backshell avoidance maneuver to maintain separation, informed by lessons from the Mars Polar Lander failure, where premature leg deployment signals had caused erroneous engine shutdown; Phoenix incorporated filters to prevent such false triggers.[18] The entire EDL process lasted approximately 7 minutes (446 seconds) from atmospheric interface to touchdown, marking a successful adaptation of heritage systems for high-latitude operations.[19]
Scientific payload
Robotic arm and surface imager
The robotic arm on the Phoenix spacecraft was a lightweight, 2.4-meter-long manipulator with four degrees of freedom—shoulder yaw, shoulder elevation, elbow flexion, and wrist pitch—designed to excavate and sample the Martian regolith in the planet's north polar region.[21] Its end effector incorporated the Icy Soil Acquisition Device, featuring a backhoe-style scoop equipped with a primary blade for scraping loose soils, a secondary tungsten carbideblade for harder materials, and an integrated rasp for rapidly acquiring compacted icy soils through vibration and abrasion.[21] The arm's design allowed it to extend approximately 2.35 meters from the lander deck, enabling access to a workspace of about 1 square meter around the spacecraft while supporting sample volumes of roughly 2.5 cubic centimeters per operation.[22] A bio-barrier protected the arm to maintain sterility during soil interactions.[23]The Surface Stereo Imager (SSI), mounted on a 1-meter mast atop the lander, served as the primary wide-angle imaging system for surface characterization and operational support.[24] This stereo camera pair, separated by 15 centimeters to enable 3D reconstruction, featured 1024 by 1024 pixel detectors with an instantaneous field of view of 0.24 milliradians per pixel and an overall field of view of about 13.8 degrees, allowing for high-resolution panchromatic and multispectral imaging across 12 bands from 0.4 to 1.0 micrometers.[25] The SSI facilitated site surveys by capturing panoramic mosaics of the landing area, identifying terrain features, and providing color context for geological and atmospheric studies, while its stereo capability generated digital elevation maps essential for safe navigation and planning.[24]During surface operations, the robotic arm relied on visual odometry and stereo imaging from both the SSI and the attached Robotic Arm Camera (RAC) to enable semi-autonomous trenching and sampling, minimizing risks in the uneven polar terrain.[22] The arm excavated multiple trenches, reaching depths of up to 18 centimeters in the "Stone Soup" trench to access subsurface layers, and used its scoop to collect regolith and icy soil samples for delivery to analytical instruments like the Thermal and Evolved-Gas Analyzer and the Microscopy, Electrochemistry, and Conductivity Analyzer suite.[26] Sample transfer was aided by the rasp's vibration mechanism to dislodge material from the scoop, ensuring reliable deposition without clumping.[21] The RAC, positioned on the arm for close-range observation, captured detailed images of trench walls, scoop contents, and surface textures at resolutions down to 23 micrometers per pixel, supporting precise guidance and scientific documentation of sample integrity.[27] These combined imaging systems operated within the lander's power constraints, drawing from solar arrays to sustain extended excavation sequences over the 149-sol mission.[22]
Thermal and Evolved-Gas Analyzer
The Thermal and Evolved-Gas Analyzer (TEGA) instrument on the Phoenix Mars lander consisted of eight single-use ovens integrated with a magnetic-sector mass spectrometer for analyzing soil samples.[28] Each oven had a sample capacity of approximately 0.05 cm³ and could heat samples from ambient temperatures up to 1000°C at a controlled rate of 20°C per minute, using nitrogen carrier gas to transport evolved gases to the mass spectrometer for detection across a mass range of 2–140 daltons.[28] The ovens were sealed to minimize contamination from the Martian atmosphere, and each featured a vibrating sieve with a 150-micrometer mesh to filter fine soil particles delivered by the lander's robotic arm.[29]TEGA's primary functions involved measuring the release of volatile compounds such as water (H₂O), carbon dioxide (CO₂), and sulfur dioxide (SO₂) during heating, which helped identify mineral compositions including perchlorates, carbonates, and hydrated phases in the soil.[28] The mass spectrometer provided isotopic analysis of these gases, enabling detection of decomposition temperatures and endothermic/exothermic transitions to infer mineralogy and potential habitability indicators without direct organic detection.[30] By comparing evolved gas profiles against laboratory simulations, TEGA contributed to understanding volatile release patterns specific to polar regolith.[28]During operations, soil samples were scooped from the surface or subsurface trenches, placed over the sieve of a selected oven, and vibrated to pass fine material into the oven for sealing and heating; the process repeated for multiple ovens to build a dataset of thermal profiles.[29] However, challenges arose from the clumpy, icy nature of the Martian soil, which frequently clogged the sieves despite vibration efforts, requiring repeated delivery attempts and limiting successful analyses to six of the eight ovens before mission end.[31] These issues, including occasional gas over-pressurization, constrained the number of full sample runs but still yielded data on multiple soil types.[30]TEGA's design drew heritage from the Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer (GCMS) on the Viking landers, which also used pyrolysis and mass spectrometry for volatile analysis, but was improved with higher heating temperatures and sensitivity optimized for detecting polar volatiles like water ice in Martian regolith.[32] This evolution addressed limitations in earlier instruments by incorporating differential scanning calorimetry for precise thermal event detection.[28]
Mars Descent Imager
The Mars Descent Imager (MARDI) was a compact color camera integrated into the Phoenix lander's payload to acquire images of the Martian surface during the entry, descent, and landing (EDL) phase. Developed by Malin Space Science Systems, the instrument featured a fisheye lens with a 1.154 mm focal length and 140° field of view, paired with a 1024×1024 pixelcharge-coupled device (CCD) sensor. Mounted on the lander's forward deck and oriented downward, MARDI was designed for low mass and power consumption to minimize impact on the overall mission.[33]MARDI was planned to operate autonomously during the final two minutes of descent, capturing approximately 20 images from an altitude of approximately 12 km down to the surface, with resolutions reaching about 1 cm per pixel near touchdown. These would have provided the first color images of the Martian terrain during descent, documenting the EDL sequence and revealing surface features such as polygons for context in subsequent ground-based analyses. The instrument also included a microphone to record audio elements like parachute deployment and engine firing, enhancing the visual record. However, a late-discovered issue with the interface between MARDI and the lander's data-handling card risked triggering a gyro malfunction during EDL, leading mission managers to power off the instrument entirely; as a result, no images or audio were obtained.[34][6]The primary purpose of MARDI was to characterize the landing site by bridging orbital-scale views from spacecraft like Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter with close-up surface observations, aiding in the interpretation of regional geology and validating the site's habitability potential. Although its non-operation limited direct contributions, the planned data would have offered critical scale and morphological details for Phoenix's in-situ investigations. Post-landing imaging was not feasible due to the lander's power and thermal constraints, which prioritized core scientific instruments.[35]
MECA suite
The Microscopy, Electrochemistry, and Conductivity Analyzer (MECA) suite on NASA's Phoenix Mars lander was a multifaceted instrument package designed to examine the physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties of Martian soil and ice through integrated microscopy, electrochemical analysis, and conductivity probing.[36] Comprising several interconnected components mounted on the lander's deck, MECA enabled detailed in-situ investigations by processing samples delivered via the robotic arm, focusing on particle morphology, soluble ion content, and environmental profiles without relying on thermal volatilization techniques.[37] The suite's sample handling system, including a sample wheel and translation stage (SWTS), facilitated precise delivery of soil and ice grains to the analytical instruments, supporting both dry imaging and wet chemistry experiments.[38]The optical microscope (OM) provided high-resolution visible and ultraviolet imaging of soil particles, operating as a fixed-focus system with 6× magnification and a resolution of approximately 4–8 μm per pixel across a 1 × 2 mm field of view.[38] Illuminated by light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in red, green, blue, and ultraviolet wavelengths, the OM captured color images and fluorescence data of grains ranging from 1 μm to 1 mm in size, allowing characterization of particle shape, texture, and composition on 3-mm substrates positioned by the SWTS.[38] This component, integrated with the atomic force microscope, formed the core of MECA's microscopy station, enabling non-destructive analysis of dry samples sifted from trenches.[39]Complementing the OM, the atomic force microscope (AFM) delivered nanoscale surface topography measurements, marking the first deployment of such technology on another planet.[38] Featuring an array of eight cleavable silicon nitride tips on cantilevers, the AFM scanned areas up to 65 μm² with lateral resolution below 50 nm and vertical resolution under 25 nm, imaging features as small as ~100 nm on fine-grained Martian materials.[38] Operating in contact mode via electromagnetic actuators, it mapped 3D profiles of particles on SWTS substrates after excess material was scraped away, providing insights into grain structure at resolutions unattainable by optical methods.[38]The wet chemistry laboratory (WCL) conducted aqueous extractions to assess soluble components in soil samples, consisting of four identical sealed cells each equipped with multiple sensors and reagent dispensers.[40] Each cell mixed ~1 cm³ of soil with 25 mL of water or calibration solutions, using ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) to measure pH, oxidation-reduction potential, conductivity, and concentrations of key ions including Na⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Cl⁻, Br⁻, I⁻, NO₃⁻, and perchlorate (ClO₄⁻).[40] Additional techniques like anodic stripping voltammetry and chronopotentiometry detected heavy metals and other species, with reagents such as acids and barium chloride added via solenoid-actuated valves to enhance precipitation and calibration; the Teflon-coated titanium beakers ensured contamination-free analysis of wet slurries from delivered samples.[41] This setup allowed for up to eight distinct reagent deployments across the cells, targeting diverse chemical parameters in a compact, autonomous format.[40]The thermal and electrical conductivity probe (TECP) quantified soil physical properties and near-surface atmospheric conditions using a suite of sensors on four protruding needles of varying lengths (15–100 mm).[42] Inserted directly into the soil by the robotic arm, the needles measured vertical profiles of temperature (via thermocouples), relative humidity, thermal conductivity, dielectric constant, and electrical conductivity, providing data on heat flow, moisture mobility, and permittivity to depths of ~10 cm.[42] When positioned above the surface, TECP also monitored atmospheric temperature, pressure, wind speed, and vapor abundance, offering complementary environmental context to the suite's soil analyses.[37]In operations, MECA processed dry samples for microscopy by sieving and positioning them on the SWTS for OM and AFM imaging, while wet samples from arm-dug trenches were funneled into WCL cells for extraction and electrochemical sensing; TECP insertions targeted undisturbed profiles in similar locations.[36] This coordinated workflow enabled comprehensive, multi-scale characterization of regolith properties at the landing site.[37]
Meteorological station
The Meteorological (MET) station on the Phoenix spacecraft was a Canadian-built instrument package designed to monitor the Martian polar atmosphere, mounted on the lander's deck with a 1-meter mast extending approximately 2 meters above the surface.[12][43] Developed by MDA and Optech under the Canadian Space Agency, it incorporated technology adapted from the Mars Pathfinder mission's pressure sensor and incorporated contributions from international partners, including the Finnish Meteorological Institute for the pressure sensor and Aarhus University for the wind monitor.[12][44]Key components included three fast-response thermocouple temperature sensors positioned at heights of 0.25 meters, 0.5 meters, and 1.0 meter on the mast to capture air temperatures at varying levels; a deck-mounted pressure sensor for atmospheric pressure readings; wind telltales at the mast top, imaged by the lander's stereo imager to determine speed and direction; and a vertically pointing lidar system for detecting clouds, fog, and dust in the lower atmosphere.[43][12] The lidar, the first such instrument deployed on a Mars lander, used a dual-wavelength Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm and 532 nm) operating at 100 Hz to measure backscattered light, though its operations were limited to short sessions due to power constraints and later affected by dust accumulation.[45][12]The MET station collected continuous measurements over the mission's 151 sols, exceeding the planned 90 sols, providing data on daily and seasonal pressure cycles that varied from about 7.6 hPa to 8.6 hPa, reflecting CO2 sublimation and condensation in the polar environment.[43][44]Temperature sensors recorded air temperatures ranging from approximately -98°C to -20°C, with diurnal cycles showing lows around -80°C at night and highs near -30°C in the afternoon, while ground surface temperatures were warmer, often between -50°C and -20°C; wind measurements via the telltales indicated typical speeds of 3-5 m/s, with peaks up to 16 m/s (about 58 km/h).[43][12]Lidar sessions, conducted for 15 minutes four times daily, attempted the first surface-based optical measurements of atmospheric opacity and cloud heights on Mars, detecting features up to several kilometers altitude with 10-meter resolution.[12][45]Pre-launch calibration tests simulated the extreme polar conditions expected on Mars, including temperatures down to -100°C and low pressures, using vacuum chambers and computational fluid dynamics to validate sensor accuracy and account for lander-induced heating effects on the lowest thermocouple.[43][44] These efforts ensured reliable performance, with data sampled at 0.5 Hz for temperatures and pressure, enabling real-time monitoring of atmospheric dynamics throughout surface operations.[44]
Mission timeline
Launch and cruise
The Phoenix spacecraft launched on August 4, 2007, at 5:26 a.m. EDT from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida aboard a Delta II 7925 rocket.[1] The launch achieved a precise injection onto a heliocentric trajectory spanning approximately 680 million kilometers to Mars.[46]The subsequent cruise phase lasted 295 days, with the spacecraft arriving at Mars on May 25, 2008.[6] During this period, the mission operations team performed twice-daily health checkouts and activated instruments for functional testing and calibration. Four trajectory correction maneuvers were executed to refine the path, including the first on August 10, 2007, which imparted a delta-V of 18.5 m/s using the spacecraft's mid-sized thrusters; the second on October 24, 2007, firing thrusters for 49.5 seconds; the third on April 10, 2008; and the fourth on May 17, 2008, providing the final adjustment before landing.[47][48][49][50]The spacecraft maintained spin stabilization at 2 rpm throughout cruise for attitude control, powered by solar panels on the cruise stage.[51] Continuous health monitoring confirmed nominal performance, with no major anomalies reported—unlike issues in prior Mars missions such as the Mars Polar Lander—ensuring a smooth interplanetary transit.[52]
Landing
The Phoenix spacecraft entered Mars' atmosphere on May 25, 2008, at 23:37 UTC, descending at hypersonic speeds of approximately 5.7 km/s from an altitude of 125 km.[19] During the entry phase, aerodynamic deceleration peaked at about 8.5 Earth g-forces, guided by the lander's lifting entry trajectory to control its path toward the targeted northern plains.[19] The parachute deployed successfully at 23:42 UTC, at an altitude of around 12.7 km and Mach 1.6, slowing the descent further; the heatshield separated 15 seconds later, exposing the lander for radar lock-on.[19] The lander then separated from the parachute at about 455 m altitude and ignited its 12 hydrazine thrusters for powered descent, achieving touchdown at 23:45 UTC (approximately 4:53 p.m. local Mars solar time) with a vertical velocity of 1.6 m/s.[19]Confirmation of the successful landing arrived at 23:53 UTC via a UHF relay signal from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which detected the lander's transmission almost immediately after touchdown and forwarded it to Earth, accounting for the roughly 15-minute one-way lighttravel time from Mars.[53] This marked NASA's first successful powered landing on Mars since the Viking missions in 1976, with the mission control team at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory erupting in cheers upon receipt of the signal.[1] A subsequent direct-to-Earth signal from the lander was received later that evening, verifying full operational status of the communications systems.Within hours of landing, the first images were relayed via MRO, including a low-resolution "deck view" from the lander's Surface Stereo Imager capturing the pristine solar panels deployed cleanly and one of the footpads resting on the reddish Martian soil, confirming no major structural damage.[1] Higher-resolution images received the following day revealed the surrounding terrain, validating the landing site at 68.22°N latitude, 234.25°E longitude in the Vastitas Borealis plains—a flat, polygonal-patterned region selected for its accessibility and scientific potential, just 18 km from the center of the 65-by-22 km target ellipse.[54]The landing sequence encountered minor anomalies, primarily limited disturbance to the surface soil from the thruster plumes during the final 20 seconds of descent, which displaced fine regolith particles but did not affect spacecraft stability or instrumentation; no thruster misfires or control instabilities were reported, thanks to conservative deadband settings in the guidance system.[19] Overall, the entry, descent, and landing phase lasted about seven minutes and demonstrated robust performance of the heritage Viking-era technologies adapted for Phoenix.[19]
Surface operations
Following a successful landing on May 25, 2008, the Phoenix lander commenced its surface operations with a planned primary mission duration of 90 sols, which was extended to 157 sols thanks to abundant solar power from relatively dust-free panels and the approach of northern summer on Mars, although it entered safe mode on sol 152 due to declining power.[6][55] Daily communications were maintained primarily through UHF relay via the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, supplemented by occasional direct-to-Earth links, enabling the return of approximately 25 gigabytes of data over the mission.[2][56]Surface activities began promptly, with the robotic arm fully deployed on sol 3 to prepare for soil interaction and imaging.[57] The first digging operation occurred on sol 5, creating an initial trench to test soil properties and acquisition techniques.[58] Subsequent efforts focused on excavating multiple trenches, delivering soil and ice samples to onboard instruments such as the Thermal and Evolved-Gas Analyzer (TEGA) and the Wet Chemistry Laboratory (WCL) within the MECA suite, and conducting continuous meteorological observations to track atmospheric conditions like temperature, pressure, wind, and cloud activity. Chemical analyses of three Martian soil samples were performed using the WCL to assess soluble ions, pH, and redox potential.[59][41][60]Operations faced several challenges, including icing on the robotic arm after excavating subsurface water ice, which required careful management to avoid hardware damage; persistent clogs in the TEGA's sieve screens caused by clumpy, cohesive Martian soil that resisted sifting; and progressive dust accumulation on the solar panels, which diminished power output to around 60 watts by the mission's conclusion, limiting activities in the final sols.[61][29][62]Notable achievements included the exposure of a bright, slab-like layer of water ice on sol 20 during initial trenching, confirming the presence of accessible subsurface volatiles.[63] The "Dodo-Goldilocks" trench, enlarged progressively by the arm, provided key samples of layered soil overlying ice, facilitating detailed analyses of potential habitability indicators.[64]
Mission conclusion
As the Martian northern autumn advanced, the Phoenix lander's solar arrays generated progressively less power due to shorter daylight hours, lower solar elevation angles, and increasing dust accumulation on the panels.[65] By sol 152 (October 28, 2008), power levels had fallen critically low, prompting the lander to enter safe mode, with the last signal received on sol 157, November 2, 2008.[6] In its final days, mission operators attempted to recharge the lander's batteries by prioritizing essential systems and shutting down non-critical instruments, while the meteorological station continued collecting data until the end.[66] The robotic arm was repositioned and parked on a patch of Martian soil to conserve energy and avoid interference, ceasing all sample collection activities.[66]Phoenix was not engineered to endure the harsh Martian winter, where temperatures plummet to approximately -120°C and heavy dust storms are expected to bury the solar panels under layers of frost and debris.[67] As power dwindled below sustainable levels, the lander could no longer maintain battery charge or activate heaters, leading to a predictable cessation of operations.[68]In a remote possibility of survival through the winter, NASA planned reactivation efforts in spring 2010 using overflights by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) to detect any signals from Phoenix.[69] Multiple attempts in May 2010 yielded no response, attributed to probable battery degradation from the extreme cold and lack of power.[55] Project managers officially declared the mission concluded on November 10, 2008, after confirming the loss of contact.[65]
Scientific results
Subsurface ice and geology
The Phoenix lander touched down on the flat plains of Vastitas Borealis in Mars' northern lowlands, revealing a landscape characterized by polygonal terrain formed through thermal contraction cracking of subsurface ice. These polygons, ranging from 5 to 18 meters in diameter, feature U-shaped troughs averaging 17 centimeters deep, with surface slopes of about 6.7 degrees, indicative of ice-cemented soil processes in a periglacial environment. The terrain exhibits low relief, with total elevation variation of approximately 80 centimeters over a 60 by 60 meter area, and scattered pebbles and rocks concentrated along polygon troughs due to cryoturbation.[70]Excavation by the lander's robotic arm exposed bright white material in trenches such as "Dodo-Goldilocks" and "Snow White," which sublimated over three to five days, confirming its identity as water ice rather than salt or frost. To verify this, deeper digging isolated similar material from surrounding soil, preventing contamination, and observations showed no recurrence of the white patches, consistent with sublimation behavior unique to water ice under Martian summer conditions. The Surface Stereo Imager (SSI) captured 360-degree panoramas illustrating the polygonal patterns and flat expanse, providing contextual views of the site's geology extending to the horizon.[71][72]The soil profile consists of a thin, loose upper layer approximately 5 centimeters thick, including a duricrust-like cemented crust, overlying hard, ice-cemented material at depths of 5 to 18 centimeters, with pure ice blocks encountered below. No evidence of liquid water was observed, as the ice remained frozen and sublimated directly to vapor. These findings map the ice table across the northern plains, revealing a widespread, stable subsurface reservoir that enhances understanding of regional habitability potential by indicating past and present water availability in accessible forms.
Soil chemistry
The soil analyzed by the Phoenix lander was found to be mildly alkaline, with a pH ranging from 7.7 to 8.7, as measured in aqueous extracts buffered by carbonates under simulated Martian atmospheric conditions.[73] This alkalinity arises from the presence of soluble salts, including magnesium, sodium, and calcium cations, alongside anions such as chloride, bicarbonate, and notably perchlorate at concentrations of 0.4 to 0.6 wt%.[73]Perchlorate, identified as the dominant soluble chlorine species, was present at levels of approximately 2 to 3 mM in solution extracts, far exceeding chloride, which was only sub-millimolar.[73] These findings indicate a soil chemistry conducive to neutral to slightly salty brines if water were available, with total dissolved salts around 10 mM.[73]The Thermal and Evolved Gas Analyzer (TEGA) heated soil samples to release and identify volatiles, revealing water desorption primarily at low temperatures from 0 to 100°C, attributed to adsorbed or bound moisture, followed by higher-temperature releases linked to mineral dehydroxylation.[74] TEGA detected salts such as magnesium perchlorate (Mg(ClO4)2), confirmed by oxygen release (mass 32) between 325 and 625°C, but found no significant carbonates beyond trace amounts of calcite decomposing around 730°C.[74] No organic compounds were detected above a limit of 10 ppb, though perchlorate-induced oxidation during heating may have masked trace levels by converting them to CO2.[74]Complementary data from the Wet Chemistry Laboratory (WCL) involved mixing soil with water to measure ion activities directly, confirming the presence of Na+, K+, Cl-, and perchlorate ions, with magnesium as the most abundant cation at about 3 mM.[73] The solutions showed no elevated levels of heavy metals or other toxics beyond perchlorate, suggesting the soil's soluble chemistry is relatively benign.[73] The Thermal and Electrical Conductivity Probe (TECP) measured soil dielectricpermittivity, yielding values consistent with 1 to 4% bound water content in the regolith, likely as hydrated salts or adsorbed layers, which supports the potential for transient liquidwater interactions.[75]Regarding habitability, the alkaline pH, moderate salinity, and low concentrations of microbial toxins (excluding perchlorate) indicate that the soil conditions could support Earth-like microbes if organic nutrients were present, as the environment falls within tolerances for many terrestrial extremophiles.[76]Perchlorate, while oxidative and potentially inhibitory, does not preclude habitability in this context, as some Earth microbes thrive in perchlorate-rich brines.[76]
Meteorology and climate
The Meteorological Station (MET) on the Phoenix lander provided the first in situ measurements of weather patterns during a full Martian polar summer, revealing a dynamic near-surface atmosphere at 68.22°N latitude. Air temperatures exhibited large diurnal cycles with minimal sol-to-sol variation over the first 90 sols, peaking at approximately 243 K (−30°C) during early afternoon at 2 m height and dropping to about 193 K (−80°C) at night, resulting in swings of around 50 K. Nighttime temperatures frequently fell low enough to form ground frost, observed consistently after sunset due to radiative cooling in the thin atmosphere. Winds predominantly originated from the east during early mission phases (Ls ≈ 77°–123°), rotating clockwise through 360° during midday with average speeds of 4 m/s, before shifting to westerly directions later (Ls ≈ 123°–148°) with speeds increasing to 6–10 m/s and occasional gusts up to 16 m/s. Surface pressure, measured at the lander deck height, averaged around 8–9 hPa during the summer low, decreasing to 7.6 hPa by mission end as CO2 began condensing. A 2020 reanalysis refined the pressure data accuracy to ±3 Pa, improving confidence in these measurements.[43][77][78]Seasonal climate cycles at the site were influenced by the planet's orbital progression, with mean daily air temperatures rising initially before declining by about 20 K toward sol 150 as northern autumn approached. Predictions based on global circulation models indicated substantial CO2 frost buildup during the impending winter, potentially covering the site with up to 30 cm of dry ice and contributing to a 25% exchange of the atmosphere's mass through polar cap sublimation and deposition. The MET's lidar component detected water ice clouds and occasional precipitation (virga) at night within the planetary boundary layer up to 4 km altitude, but no persistent daytime clouds were observed; instead, near-surface humidity measurements from the associated TECP instrument revealed strong vapor diffusion driven by diurnal temperature changes and regolith adsorption, with water vapor pressures varying by two orders of magnitude from 0.005 Pa at night to 1.4 Pa daytime. This indicated intense atmosphere-soil water exchange, with over 25% of the water column concentrated near the surface. A 2024 analysis of lidar data further detailed the diurnal dust aerosol cycle, with dust layers peaking at 4–6 km altitude in the afternoon, driven by wind gusts and convective vortices, highlighting local aeolian activity below the saltation threshold.[43][79][80]These observations provided the inaugural comprehensive dataset for Martian polar meteorology, comprising more than 7,000 MET readings of temperature, pressure, and wind over 151 sols, which correlated well with global climate models like the Mars General Circulation Model in predicting boundary layer depths of 3–5 km and heat fluxes of 3–10 W/m². Compared to Earth's Arctic regions, the site's weather featured analogous diurnal swings and frost formation but in a much thinner atmosphere (surface density ~0.02 kg/m³ versus Earth's ~1.2 kg/m³), with a weaker solar constant (591 W/m²) leading to lower overall energy input and deeper mixing layers. The data underscored the site's stable, low-variability summer conditions, advancing understanding of polar habitability and volatile cycles without evidence of major storms.[43][81][82]
Biological contamination concerns
The Phoenix Mars lander, assembled in controlled cleanroom environments at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, was subject to potential contamination by Earth-origin microbes, particularly extremophiles capable of withstanding harsh conditions like extreme cold and desiccation. Genomic analyses of bacterial isolates from these cleanrooms identified 53 novel strains, including species such as Paenibacillus phoenicis and Tersicoccus phoenicis, which exhibit traits like spore formation and tolerance to low temperatures and nutrient scarcity, raising concerns about their viability during the spacecraft's journey to Mars and potential release upon landing. A 2025 study identified 26 new bacterial species from these cleanrooms, highlighting ongoing microbial diversity and adaptations to decontamination stresses.[83][84][85]Unlike the Viking landers, which underwent rigorous dry-heat sterilization to achieve bioburden levels below detectable limits, Phoenix adhered to COSPAR planetary protection category IVa requirements, limiting the total spore bioburden to no more than 300 per square meter on exposed surfaces without full sterilization.[86] Studies from the Viking era demonstrated that hardy Bacillus spores could survive launch vibrations, radiation exposure, and assembly processes, persisting on spacecraft surfaces for extended periods, which informed assessments that similar contaminants on Phoenix might endure the cruise phase and initial surface exposure.[87][88]Post-mission evaluations found no direct evidence of viable Earth microbes released by Phoenix, but modeling of microbial survival under Martian conditions indicated limited persistence due to the planet's extreme aridity, low temperatures, and ultraviolet radiation. The lander's detection of perchlorates in the soil—comprising 0.4 to 0.6 percent by weight—further mitigated risks, as these salts, when activated by UV light, exhibit strong bactericidal effects, destroying up to 99.9 percent of exposed bacterial cells in simulated Martian environments.[89][90]These concerns highlighted the potential for false positives in astrobiological experiments, where surviving Earth microbes could mimic signs of indigenous life, prompting stricter guidelines for future Mars missions, including enhanced cleanroom monitoring and bioburden reduction techniques. Overall, the assessed forward contamination risk from Phoenix was deemed low, given the controlled bioburden and inhospitable landing site conditions, yet the findings emphasized the ongoing need for advanced planetary protection strategies to preserve scientific integrity.[91]
Legacy
Phoenix DVD
The Phoenix lander featured a durable optical disc mounted on its deck, serving as a cultural time capsule for potential future explorers or extraterrestrial intelligences. This mini-DVD, constructed from archival silica glass approximately 8 cm in diameter, was engineered to endure Martian conditions for hundreds or even thousands of years, far outlasting the lander's operational lifespan. Positioned prominently on the spacecraft's upper deck about 1 meter above the surface, it was oriented to minimize dust accumulation and was captured in images by the lander's Surface Stereo Imager (SSI) camera shortly after landing on May 25, 2008.[92][93][6]The disc's content, totaling around 1.5 GB, encompassed the "Visions of Mars" multimedia collection curated by The Planetary Society under the direction of artist and advisor Jon Lomberg. It included over 80 science fiction stories, essays, and artworks inspired by Mars from authors such as H.G. Wells, Ray Bradbury, Arthur C. Clarke, and Kim Stanley Robinson, representing contributions from nearly 30 nations and diverse cultures in multiple languages. Additional elements comprised summaries of scientific knowledge about Mars, historical photographs, audio recordings like Orson Welles' 1938 "War of the Worlds" broadcast, personal messages from visionaries including Carl Sagan, and the names of approximately 250,000 people who submitted them via an online campaign.[94][93][6]Inspired by the Voyager Golden Record—on which Lomberg had contributed—the Phoenix DVD aimed to convey humanity's fascination with Mars and leave a legacy of our intellectual and artistic heritage. Its label bore the message "Attention Astronauts: Take This with You," instructing readers on playback methods for human or alien audiences. As the first such archival library placed on the Martian surface, it symbolized a bridge between contemporary Earth and future spacefarers, emphasizing exploration's cultural dimensions beyond scientific inquiry.[94][93][92]
Mission significance
The Phoenix Mars Lander represented a pivotal achievement in NASA's Mars exploration program as the first successful spacecraft to land in the planet's polar region, touching down in the Vastitas Borealis on May 25, 2008, and thereby enabling direct study of the arctic subsurface environment.[1][6] Its findings on water ice and soil chemistry, including perchlorates, advanced the "follow the water" strategy central to assessing Mars' past habitability and informed subsequent missions such as Curiosity and Perseverance regarding chemical hazards and potential energy sources for life.[1] The lander's operation for 157 sols—exceeding its planned 90-sol primary mission—demonstrated the feasibility of extended polar surface science.[6]Technologically, Phoenix built on lessons from the failed Mars Polar Lander by incorporating refined entry, descent, and landing (EDL) systems, including improved radar altimetry and parachute deployment, which ensured a precise touchdown in a challenging high-latitude terrain.[18] Its robotic arm, with 2.3 meters of reach and autonomous scraping capabilities, allowed for efficient trenching and sample delivery to onboard instruments, setting precedents for in-situ resource utilization tools in future missions.[22] As the inaugural Mars Scout mission, Phoenix exemplified a cost-effective approach with a total budget of $420 million, including development, launch, and operations, promoting rapid-response, principal-investigator-led projects that balanced innovation with fiscal restraint.[9]The mission's scientific impact extended beyond immediate data collection, enhancing models of Mars' climate dynamics and subsurface ice distribution, which have guided site selection for human exploration by identifying accessible water resources. By evaluating soil pH and chemistry, Phoenix contributed to habitability assessments, suggesting that polar regions could support liquid water under certain conditions and informing strategies for mitigating perchlorate effects in life-detection experiments.[95] These insights have influenced ongoing research into ice mining for propellant production and long-term climate predictions, underscoring Phoenix's role in paving the way for sustainable Mars habitation.[96] As of 2025, Phoenix data continues to support studies, such as analyses of vertical water vapor distribution and extremophile bacteria in mission cleanrooms, advancing planetary protection protocols.[97][85]Phoenix's success earned multiple NASA Group Achievement Awards, including recognitions for the payload team in 2009 and the overall mission development and operations in the same year, highlighting collaborative excellence in planetary science.[98]