Hubbry Logo
National unity governmentNational unity governmentMain
Open search
National unity government
Community hub
National unity government
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
National unity government
National unity government
National unity government
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Part of the Politics series
Basic forms of government
List of forms · List of countries
Source of power
Democracy (rule by many)
Oligarchy (rule by few)
Autocracy (rule by one)
Anarchy (rule by none)
Power ideology
(socio-political ideologies)
(socio-economic ideologies)
  • Religious
  • Secular
(geo-cultural ideologies)
Power structure
Unitarism
Client state
Federalism
International relations
Related
icon Politics portal
Part of the Politics Series
Party politics
Political spectrum
Left-wing
Centre
Right-wing
Syncretic
Major ideologies
Types
Leaders and organization
Internal elections
Party discipline
Party systems
Coalitions between parties
Lists of political parties
icon Politics portal

A national unity government, government of national unity (GNU), or national union government is a broad coalition government consisting of all parties (or all major parties) in the legislature, usually formed during a time of war or other national emergency. A unity government according to the principles of consensus democracy lacks opposition, or opposition parties are too small and negligible.

By country

[edit]

Afghanistan

[edit]

Following the disputed 2014 presidential elections, a National Unity Government (NUG) between both run-off candidates was formed with Ashraf Ghani as President of Afghanistan and Abdullah Abdullah in the new office of Chief Executive of Afghanistan.[1] This power-sharing agreement broke apart after the 2019 Afghan presidential election, after which Ghani abolished the office of Chief Executive while Abdullah again refused to recognize Ghani's presidency and demanded the formation of a new government in northern Afghanistan. Both politicians lost power after the Taliban overthrew the Afghan government in 2021.

Canada

[edit]

During World War I, the Conservative government of Sir Robert Borden invited the Liberal opposition to join the government as a means of dealing with the Conscription crisis of 1917. The Liberals, led by Sir Wilfrid Laurier refused; however, Borden was able to convince many individual Liberals to join what was called a Union Government, which defeated the Laurier Liberals in the fall 1917 election.

During World War II, the opposition Conservative Party ran under the name National Government in the 1940 election as a means of promoting their platform of creating a wartime national government coalition (evocative of the previous war's Union government). The party was not successful in the election, which re-elected the Liberal government of William Lyon Mackenzie King, whose party continued to rule alone for the duration of World War II.

Newfoundland

[edit]

The Dominion of Newfoundland (not to be part of Canada for another three decades) had a National Government during World War I led by Edward Patrick Morris.

China

[edit]

In modern Chinese history, the Republic of China twice saw United Fronts forms to provide national unity in a time of civil conflict. The First United Front (1923–1927) saw the Nationalists (KMT) and Communists (CCP) unite to end warlordism within the country, however since neither party was the centrally recognised Government of China at the time the First United Front cannot be viewed as a true example of a national unity government.

Following the advent of the Second Sino-Japanese War, the KMT, the now solely recognised central party of the country, once again opted to form the Second United Front with the CCP – the two parties at this point had been engaged in an open civil war since the collapse of the First United Front. This new front acted as a national unity government for the extent of the war and represented the solely recognised government for China at the time, though the overall level of cooperation between the two parties – past the cessation of hostility – was mostly nominal.[2]

Croatia

[edit]

Croatia formed a national unity government in 1991 under prime minister Franjo Gregurić in response to the outbreak of the Croatian War of Independence. Even though the cabinet included ministers from minority parties, all heads of ministries were either from the majority Croatian Democratic Union or soon defected to it.

Estonia

[edit]

Estonia had national unity governments during the Estonian War of Independence (Päts I–III Provisional cabinets) and after the 1924 coup d'état attempt by the Communist Party of Estonia (Jaakson cabinet).

Greece

[edit]

A national unity government in Greece is often called ecumenical government:

Hungary

[edit]

There are five periods in Hungary when national unity governments emerged:

Ireland

[edit]

A national unity government, following the failure of government formation after the 2020 general election, was suggested to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic.[3][4][5][6] Instead, a Fianna Fáil–Fine Gael–Green coalition was formed, creating the 32nd government of Ireland.[7]

Israel

[edit]

Israel has had several national unity governments, in which major rival parties formed a ruling coalition. Such coalitions were formed in the days leading up to the Six-Day War in 1967, in the late 1980s and amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The 36th government, formed in 2021, was a national unity government that has been frequently described as the most diverse governments in Israeli history, consisting of right-wing, centrist, left-wing and one Arab Islamist political party. Following the October 7 attack by Hamas, the National Unity party became part of an Israeli war cabinet, joining the 37th government.[8] The National Unity party left the war cabinet in June 2024, leading to the cabinet's dissolution.[9]

Italy

[edit]
Further information: De Gasperi II Cabinet, De Gasperi III Cabinet, Historic Compromise, Ciampi Cabinet, Monti Cabinet, Letta Cabinet, and Grand coalition (Italy)

In the republican era, the first two cabinets, led by Alcide De Gasperi, were supported by all three of the following parties, the pro-American Christian Democrats and the pro-Soviet Italian Communist Party and Italian Socialist Party.

Afterwards, the first government generally recognised as a national unity government was the third Andreotti Cabinet, also known as non-no confidence vote government, as the Italian Communist Party decided to not take part at the confidence vote. The communists voted in favour of the motion of confidence for the following cabinet, still led by Giulio Andreotti.

During the Eurozone crisis, the two main parties, The People of Freedom and the Democratic Party, along with other minor political forces, supported the Monti cabinet, and eventually, after the 2013 general election, formed a grand coalition in support of the Letta Cabinet, which, however, was opposed by a new major political force in parliament, the anti-establishment Five Star Movement.

The Draghi Cabinet, formed during the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic crisis, has been described as a national unity government.[10] It comprises a mixture of independent experts as well as politicians from most of Italy's political parties: the Five Star Movement, Democratic Party, League, Forza Italia, Italia Viva, and Free and Equal.[11]

The following is a list of national unity or grand coalition governments:

Kenya

[edit]

From 2008 to 2013, Kenya was governed by Government of National Unity between the rival Party of National Unity of Mwai Kibaki and the Orange Democratic Movement of Raila Odinga following the 2007 presidential election and subsequent violence. This was due to the ODM winning the majority of seats in the National Assembly, but controversially losing the presidential election by a margin that has since been called into question for its validity.

Lebanon

[edit]

Since Lebanon is a multireligious state and consensus democracy, having a national unity government is more favorable in this country. Unlike other democracies, no group in Lebanon can govern alone.

Libya

[edit]

Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh, selected as Prime Minister of Libya by the Libyan Political Dialogue Forum (LPDF) on 5 February 2021,[12] is required under the agreements made by the LPDF to nominate a cabinet of ministers to the House of Representatives (HoR) by 26 February 2021, establishing the Government of National Unity (Libya).[13]

Luxembourg

[edit]

Luxembourg has had two National Union Governments. The first was formed in 1916, during World War I (in which Luxembourg was neutral, but occupied by Germany nonetheless). It was led by Victor Thorn and included all of the major factions in the Chamber of Deputies, but lasted for only sixteen months.

The second National Union Government was formed in November 1945, in the aftermath of World War II, which had devastated Luxembourg. It was led by Pierre Dupong, who had been prime minister in the government in exile in the war, and included all four parties represented in the Chamber of Deputies. The government lasted until 1947, by which time, a normal coalition between two of the three largest parties had been arranged, thus maintaining the confidence of the legislature.

In addition, Luxembourg had a Liberation Government between November 1944 and November 1945, also under Dupong. It served a similar emergency role to a national government, but included only the two largest parties, the CSV and the LSAP.

Malaysia

[edit]
Main article: 2022 Malaysian general election

For the first time in Malaysian history, a hung parliament occurred when no political party managed to command a simple majority in the Dewan Rakyat from the 15th general election (GE15). Upon the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's call to form a unity government, both Pakatan Harapan and Barisan Nasional agreed to join forces, with Anwar Ibrahim elected as the Prime Minister while Perikatan Nasional decided to be the opposition party.

Myanmar

[edit]
Main article: National Unity Government of Myanmar

After the 2021 Myanmar coup, on 16 April 2021, the exiled Committee Representing Pyidaungsu Hluttaw (CRPH) announced the formation of a National Unity Government (Burmese: အမျိုးသား ညီညွတ်ရေး အစိုးရ), pursuant to the Federal Democracy Charter released on 31 March 2021. The National Unity Government re-introduced the position of Prime Minister, and consists of CRPH members and other ethnic leaders.

Namibia

[edit]
Main article: Transitional Government of National Unity (Namibia)

Nepal

[edit]

Following the devastating April 2015 Nepal earthquake, top political parties in Nepal have decided to form a national unity government in order to handle the crisis and draft a constitution that's been long overdue. The major political parties and unified political fronts have agreed to settle the disputed issues of the constitution drafting process by 3 June and to form a national unity government.[14]

Palestine

[edit]
Main article: Palestinian Unity Government of June 2014

The Palestinian Unity Government of June 2014 was a national unity government of the Palestinian National Authority under Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas formed on 2 June 2014 following the Fatah-Hamas Reconciliation Agreement that had been signed on 23 April 2014. The ministers were nominally independent, but overwhelmingly seen as loyal to President Abbas and his Fatah movement or to smaller leftist factions, none of whom were believed to have close ties to Hamas. However, the Unity Government was not approved by the Palestinian Legislative Council, leading to its legitimacy being questioned. The Unity Government dissolved on 17 June 2015 after President Abbas said it was unable to operate in the Gaza Strip.

Poland

[edit]

In the 1989 Polish parliamentary election, Poland's first semi-free election since World War II, candidates backed by the Solidarity movement won all 161 seats up for free election. The ruling Communist-dominated Patriotic Movement for National Rebirth—comprising the Communist Polish United Workers' Party (PZPR), the United People's Party (ZSL), and the Democratic Party (SD)—broke down soon after, as the ZSL and SD formed an alliance with Solidarity. This forced President Wojciech Jaruzelski to appoint the Cabinet of Tadeusz Mazowiecki on 12 September 1989, Poland's first government since World War II with a non-Communist majority. It was a national unity government of Solidarity-endorsed ministers alongside the PZPR, ZSL, and SD, with the Communists still controlling the Defense and Interior ministries. The PZPR was dissolved on 29 January 1990 and its former ministers resigned on 6 July.

Portugal

[edit]

A national unity government (known as the Sacred Union Government; Port.: Governo da União Sagrada) was in place during the first year of Portuguese participation in World War I, led by the Evolutionist Party president António José de Almeida from 15 March 1916 to 25 April 1917, and with the participation of the Democratic Party of Afonso Costa.

Rwanda

[edit]

After Rwandan genocide in 1994, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), has ruled Rwanda using tactics which have been characterized as authoritarian.[15][16] Elections are manipulated in various ways including banning opposition parties, arresting or assassinating critics, and electoral fraud.[17]

South Africa

[edit]
"Government of National Unity (South Africa)" redirects here. For the government formed in 1994, see Cabinet of Nelson Mandela. For the government formed in 2024, see Third Cabinet of Cyril Ramaphosa.

The interim constitution negotiated by the multi-party negotiations to end apartheid that started in 1990 allowed all parties that gained more than 5% of the vote[18] to participate in a Government of National Unity. The new government that was elected in the 1994 general election therefore had members from many political parties in the cabinet. This government of national unity lasted until the 1999 general election, although it was dominated by the African National Congress (ANC) and a reported lack of shared decision-making prompted the second-largest party, the National Party, to withdraw from the GNU in 1996.

In the 2024 South African general election, support for the ruling ANC party significantly declined. The ANC remained the largest party but lost the parliamentary majority that it had held since the inaugural post-apartheid election in 1994, which required negotiations between parties on the formation of a government. On 14 June 2024, the ANC, the Democratic Alliance (DA), the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) and the Patriotic Alliance (PA), agreed to form a coalition which they referred to as a 'Government of National Unity' (GNU), led by the ANC's Cyril Ramaphosa who was re-elected President of South Africa with the support of the parties who then formed part of the GNU.[19][20] A further six parties subsequently joined the GNU to form a grand coalition of ten parties,[21] with jointly 287 seats in the 400 seat parliament (72%). The additional parties which joined towards the end of June 2024 were the GOOD Party; Rise Mzansi; Al Jama-ah; the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania (PAC), the United Democratic Movement (UDM) and the Freedom Front Plus.[22] These members of the GNU signed a statement of intent with the African National Congress.[23]

Sri Lanka

[edit]

Following the fall of the Mahinda Rajapaksa regime, the United National Party who won the 2015 elections formed a National Unity Government with the main opposition Sri Lanka Freedom Party Under Maithripala Sirisena and Ranil Wickramasinghe.[24]

Sweden

[edit]
Main article: Hansson III Cabinet

Sweden has only had one national unity government; The Hansson III Cabinet during World War II. The government was made up of all parties in the parliament except the Communist party which was considered to be pro-Soviet and hence unreliable. The government consisted of six ministers from the Social Democratic party (including prime minister Per Albin Hansson), three from the Right Wing party, three from the Liberal People's party, three from the Farmer's League and two nonpartisan politicians. The ultimate goal of this government's policy was to keep Sweden out of the war, which they also succeeded with. The Hansson government introduced censorship of press, literature and culture, which was applied to both pro-nazi and pro-communist propaganda. The government also approved departures from the neutrality policy to keep Sweden out of the war.

United Kingdom

[edit]
Main article: National Government (United Kingdom)

First-past-the-post voting, the British electoral system, has long increased the likelihood of a single party gaining a majority of Members of Parliament, who have run most departments and the government legislation of the country since the early 20th century.

After the formation of clear political parties in the Lords and Commons, the first national unity government came in response to the Napoleonic Wars. William Pitt the Younger offered to replace Prime Minister Henry Addington's government with a cabinet including all of the major parliamentary leaders such as himself, Charles James Fox, and Lord Grenville. This proved impossible because of irreconcilable policy differences between the factions (including Fox's opposition to the war in general), Fox's intense animosity towards Pitt the Younger, and King George III's refusal to appoint a government including Fox. After the death of Pitt the Younger in 1806, King George finally acquiesced and allowed Grenville and Fox to form a new "Ministry of All the Talents."[25] This ministry had cross-party support, ranging from very socially conservative Tories, and the broad range of Whigs (among them Charles James Fox and the Foxites as well as Grenvillites), selected for their combined broad political support in both Houses of Parliament and known capabilities in a time of crisis. However, the ministry was frustrated in its attempts to make peace with the First French Empire, and despite one major legislative success (the Slave Trade Act 1807 banning the Atlantic slave trade in the British Empire), it fell apart in 1807 over the question of Catholic Emancipation and was replaced following a general election by a Tory ministry led by the Duke of Portland.

The world wars and the long recovery to the Great Depression would be the only further instances of National Governments. The next major government representing all parties came during World War II after the Norway Debate, in which Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and his cabinet were condemned for their handling of the war and faced a vote of no confidence in which members of his own party voted with the Opposition against him. The debate also revealed that Winston Churchill, an early opponent of Nazi Germany and appeasement, would be the only Conservative minister under which both Labour and Conservative MPs would join a government. Churchill agreed to form a new government after Chamberlain resigned. The subsequent Churchill war ministry included Churchill as prime minister, Labour Party Leader Clement Attlee as deputy prime minister, Conservative Party Leader Chamberlain as Lord President of the Council, and Liberal leader Archibald Sinclair as Secretary of State for Air.[26][27]

Quasi-national governments

[edit]

After 10 years of rule by the Liberal Party, Prime Minister H. H. Asquith agreed to form a new coalition ministry with the Conservative Party in response to World War I in 1915. However, the government remained dominated by the Liberals with few Conservatives in important Cabinet posts. Asquith resigned as Conservatives refused to serve in his government in 1916, and David Lloyd George and Conservative Party Leader Bonar Law formed a new coalition government from Conservatives and a minority of Liberals opposed to Asquith's handling of the war, which was opposed by Asquith's Liberals. In the 1918 general election held after the end of the war, Coalition-endorsed candidates won a large majority. Thereafter a coalition that faced few opposition MPs under David Lloyd George lasted until 1922 when, at the Carlton Club meeting, Conservative backbenchers declared that the party would fight the forthcoming election with its own leader and programme.

During the Great Depression the first of four consecutive National Governments was formed in 1931 by Ramsay MacDonald (Labour/National Labour) succeeded by Stanley Baldwin (Conservative) with their largest opponent and the Liberals. Most members of the Labour and Liberal Parties rejected the government, however, and moved to the opposition benches leaving MacDonald's supporters to rival mainstream party candidates in many cases as National Labour/National Labour Organisation or in the Liberal National Party. Notably candidates styled in this way contested the 1935 election; this long period of quasi-national government took in broader support and widened its selections of ministers in the war years, and its fourth transmutation persisted until the general election of 1945.

In 2019, the idea of a government of National Unity was proposed by politicians including Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and Liberal Democrats leader Jo Swinson to stop a no-deal Brexit spearheaded by Prime Minister Boris Johnson.[28]

Northern Ireland

[edit]

The Belfast Agreement, which sets out the workings of the Northern Ireland Assembly, effectively enforces all-party governments in Northern Ireland.[29][30] All governments formed since the foundation of the Northern Ireland Executive in 1999 have contained ministers from the five main parties (Sinn Féin, Democratic Unionist Party, Ulster Unionist Party, Social Democratic and Labour Party and Alliance), with seats allocated using the d'Hondt method.[31][32][33]

United States

[edit]

In hopes of bridging partisan politics during the American Civil War, Republican Abraham Lincoln ran for his second term under the new National Union Party with Democrat Andrew Johnson as his running mate. The National Union Party allowed members to retain affiliations with other political parties.

Since the Civil War, there has never been a "national unity" government in the United States in the traditional sense. There have been several instances, however, during national disasters or wars, that the two parties have briefly "rallied around the President". Such instances include the attack on Pearl Harbor, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, and the September 11 attacks, all of which not only had a worldwide effect, but preceded a massive spike in the approval rating of the sitting president.[34]

Zimbabwe

[edit]
Main articles: 2008 Zimbabwean political negotiations and Zimbabwe Government of National Unity of 2009

The 2008–2009 Zimbabwean political negotiations between the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (led by Morgan Tsvangirai), its small splinter group, the Movement for Democratic Change – Mutambara (led by Arthur Mutambara), and the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front (led by Robert Mugabe) created a framework for a power-sharing executive government between the two parties. These negotiations followed the 2008 presidential election, in which Mugabe was controversially re-elected, as well as the 2008 parliamentary election, in which the MDC won a majority in the House of Assembly. The new national unity government, including Tsvangirai, was sworn in on 11 February 2009.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

National unity government

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A national unity government is a broad cabinet that incorporates representatives from all or most major within a , typically assembled during acute national crises such as war, severe economic downturns, or existential threats to foster cross-partisan cooperation and governmental stability. These arrangements prioritize national consensus over ideological competition, often requiring parties to negotiate power-sharing formulas that dilute individual agendas in favor of unified policy responses. Historically, national unity governments have emerged in democratic contexts facing existential pressures, as seen in Israel's formation of such a on the eve of the 1967 to mobilize against perceived threats from neighboring states, marking a shift from fragmented rotations to inclusive wartime leadership. Similar structures have addressed post-conflict transitions, such as South Africa's Government of National Unity from 1994 to 1999, which integrated former adversaries to overhaul legal and public service systems amid racial and economic fractures following apartheid. While these governments can achieve short-term stability by broadening legislative support and reducing polarization, they frequently encounter challenges like policy paralysis from veto-prone compromises or incentives for parties to exploit crises for prolonged incumbency rather than resolving underlying divisions. Critics argue that national unity governments risk entrenching elite pacts at the expense of electoral accountability, as evidenced in cases where they delay reforms or mask governance failures under the guise of unity, though empirical outcomes depend on the crisis's severity and parties' pre-existing incentives for cooperation. In non-democratic or hybrid regimes, purported unity governments may serve more as facades for authoritarian consolidation, underscoring the causal link between institutional design and genuine versus performative national cohesion.

Definition and characteristics

Core definition and prerequisites

A national unity government is a cabinet comprising representatives from most or all major parties in a , typically excluding only marginal extremist groups, designed to foster cross-partisan collaboration amid severe national challenges. This structure transcends standard partisan alignments by prioritizing collective governance over ideological competition, often emerging when no single party or narrow alliance can secure a stable majority. Unlike routine , it seeks near-universal parliamentary buy-in to legitimize decisions on existential threats, such as armed conflicts or profound economic downturns, where fragmented governance risks state collapse. Formation prerequisites generally involve an absence of a commanding electoral , compounded by acute stressors like wartime , financial threatening institutional viability, or post-civil strife reconstruction demands that amplify polarization to destabilizing levels. These conditions create game-theoretic pressures for , as rival parties face shared incentives to avert mutually destructive outcomes—such as prolonged deadlock enabling external predation or internal —outweighing short-term partisan gains under high-stakes . Empirical triggers thus hinge on verifiable crises where default non- yields worse payoffs for all actors, necessitating temporary suspension of zero-sum electoral rivalries to preserve systemic functionality. Distinguishing features include proportional allocation of ministerial portfolios reflecting legislative seat shares, ensuring no dominant faction monopolizes executive levers while binding participants to consensus-driven policy. Mandates remain delimited to crisis mitigation, with an implicit or explicit endpoint tied to resolution of precipitating emergencies, rather than indefinite rule. Participants conventionally curtail overt partisan agitation, channeling efforts toward unified national objectives to sustain the coalition's legitimacy and efficacy.

Distinctions from other government forms

A national unity government fundamentally differs from minority or coalitions in its scope of inclusion, requiring participation from nearly all significant parliamentary parties rather than selective alliances sufficient for a working . Whereas minority governments depend on external confidence-and-supply arrangements or legislative support to govern without a , and coalitions aggregate seats from compatible parties to dominate , unity governments prioritize exhaustive representation to simulate national consensus, which inherently dilutes oppositional accountability by folding potential critics into the executive. In contrast to caretaker governments, which operate under constitutional constraints with restricted policy-making authority—typically limited to routine administration until a new executive forms—national unity governments exercise comprehensive governing powers, drawing legitimacy from the inclusion of elected partisans across ideological lines rather than provisional neutrality. Similarly, unity governments diverge from technocratic cabinets, which substitute non-partisan specialists for politicians to insulate decisions from electoral pressures during instability; the former's reliance on sitting legislators from all major factions enables purportedly broader democratic endorsement but introduces risks of veto-prone internal divisions absent in expert-led models. Unlike informal cross-partisan cooperation in federal presidential systems, such as U.S. congressional without cabinet reshuffling, national unity governments in parliamentary unitary states temporarily centralize authority in a single, inclusive executive, with empirical patterns showing potential for institutional path dependency that shifts toward consociational frameworks—featuring entrenched power-sharing and segmental vetoes—rather than reverting to competitive majoritarian alternation. This distinction underscores how unity arrangements, by design, compress pluralism into the government itself, altering the causal dynamics of compared to forms preserving distinct opposition roles.

Historical origins and evolution

Wartime and early 20th-century precedents

In Britain, formed a on 25 May 1915, integrating Conservative and Labour representatives into the Liberal administration to bolster the amid escalating casualties and defeats. By early 1915, British forces had suffered over 100,000 casualties on the Western Front alone, compounded by the Gallipoli campaign's initiation in April, which ultimately resulted in approximately 198,000 British casualties including 31,000 deaths. These losses, alongside munitions shortages and stalled advances, eroded public confidence in partisan governance, compelling cross-party inclusion to avert potential collapse in prosecuting the conflict against . Similarly, France's Union sacrée, declared on 4 August 1914, suspended left-wing opposition to the government as German armies invaded via , capturing significant northeastern territories and threatening within weeks. This truce enabled René Viviani's cabinet to secure parliamentary approval for emergency powers, overriding ideological rifts—including socialist abstention from prior debates—in the face of imminent defeat, with initial yielding over 300,000 French casualties by October 1914. The arrangement prioritized defensive imperatives over domestic divisions, reflecting causal pressures from territorial incursions rather than voluntary consensus. In interwar , economic upheavals evoked wartime-like urgency, prompting the Republic's under from 28 June 1928 to 27 March 1930, uniting Social Democrats, Centre Party, , and to address fiscal strains. Hyperinflation's legacy from 1923 lingered, but the coalition fractured amid the , with 's GDP falling 15.7% from 1929 to 1932 and industrial production dropping over 40%, mirroring invasion-scale disruptions by amplifying unemployment to 30% and eroding reparations capacity under the . These metrics drove pragmatic alliances, though internal disputes over austerity precluded sustained unity, highlighting crises' role in overriding partisanship.

Post-colonial and transitional eras

In the aftermath of , national unity governments emerged in several Asian and African states as provisional coalitions to manage transitions amid ethnic and communal tensions. In , the Interim Government formed on September 2, 1946, under as vice president and de facto head, incorporated representatives from the , Muslim League, and other groups to administer British India pending , but escalating rendered it ineffective in preventing partition. The subsequent partition in triggered mass migrations and riots, with estimates of deaths ranging from 500,000 in alone to over 1 million across the subcontinent, underscoring how unity efforts catalyzed by violence failed to bridge irreconcilable factional demands. Similarly, Lebanon's 1943 , an unwritten accord between Maronite Christian leader and Sunni Muslim Riad al-Solh, allocated the presidency to , premiership to Sunnis, and parliamentary speakership to Shiites, aiming to consolidate from French mandate rule through confessional power-sharing; this structure, while initially stabilizing, entrenched sectarian quotas that prioritized ethnic loyalty over institutional merit. In , transitional unity pacts followed dictatorships, seeking to consolidate democracy via elite consensus. Venezuela's Punto Fijo Pact, signed on October 31, 1958, by the Democratic Action (AD), Social Christian (COPEI), and Democratic Republican Union (URD) parties after the ouster of , committed signatories to alternating power, excluding communists, and fostering electoral competition, which initially yielded four decades of relative stability marked by oil-funded growth and peaceful turnovers. However, the pact's exclusionary framework bred and party dominance, eroding public trust and enabling Hugo Chávez's 1998 electoral rise on appeals, which dismantled pact institutions and ushered in authoritarian . Empirically, these post-colonial unity arrangements often postponed but did not causally resolve underlying ethnic or factional cleavages, as power-sharing incentives reinforced networks that subordinated merit-based administration to group entitlements. In , the National Pact's confessionalism correlated with recurrent crises, culminating in the 1975-1990 that killed over 150,000 and exposed the fragility of quota-driven governance. Across and , prolonged unity phases in fragile states exhibited elevated perceptions, with —fueled by ethnic vote-banks—diverting resources from public goods; for instance, studies link post-independence coalitions to behaviors that perpetuated weak institutions, as leaders traded policy for loyalty amid diverse societies lacking organic national cohesion. This pattern reflects a causal mismatch: unity governments stabilized elites temporarily but incentivized zero-sum competition, yielding higher governance failures than competitive systems that enforce accountability through alternation.

Late 20th to 21st-century adaptations

In the 1990s, the dissolution of Yugoslavia prompted adaptations of national unity frameworks in the , particularly through power-sharing arrangements aimed at post-war stabilization. The Dayton Accords, signed on December 14, 1995, established Bosnia and Herzegovina's structure as a unity government with ethnic quotas in a bicameral and presidency rotating among Bosniak, Croat, and Serb representatives, alongside two entities ( and ) to accommodate divisions. This yielded short-term stability, with UN-monitored ceasefires holding since 1995, over $15 billion in international reconstruction aid by 2000, and a reduction in violence metrics from 100,000+ deaths during the 1992-1995 war to near-zero active combat. However, long-term issues persisted due to ethnic veto powers, resulting in a dysfunctional national government overshadowed by entity-level mono-ethnic institutions, separate armies until 2005 integration efforts, and recurrent secession threats, as evidenced by stalled EU accession reforms and frozen constitutional disputes. From the 2000s to the , national unity governments adapted to acute shocks like pandemics, economic downturns, and security threats, often bridging ideological divides for crisis response. In , a unity coalition formed on April 20, 2020, between Likud's and Blue and White's , sworn in on May 17 amid the outbreak and preceding Gaza escalations, allocated alternating premierships and expanded the to 120 seats for broader inclusion, enabling coordinated lockdowns that limited deaths to under 7,000 by mid-2021 despite regional tensions. Similarly, South Africa's Government of National Unity (GNU), established June 2024 after the (ANC) secured only 40.2% in May 29 elections—its first non-majority since 1994—incorporated the Democratic Alliance and , marking a shift from single-party dominance to multiparty cabinet roles in response to economic stagnation and 32.9% . These cases illustrate empirical pivots toward inclusion under duress, though sustainability hinged on enforceable power-sharing amid ongoing conflicts like Israel's 2021 Gaza operations. In hybrid regimes—blending electoral facades with authoritarian controls—national unity formations increasingly served as symbolic resistance tools by the 2010s-2020s, lacking territorial enforceability absent military backing. Myanmar's National Unity Government (NUG), declared April 16, 2021, by ousted parliamentarians post-February 1 coup, operated in partial exile with a and ethnic alliances, mobilizing international recognition and armed People's Defense Forces that controlled 40% of territory by 2024 per conflict trackers, yet struggled against junta dominance due to fragmented command and no unified military inheritance. This trend reflects broader patterns where such governments in hybrid contexts signal legitimacy claims amid globalization-induced fractures like migration and insurgencies, but empirical outcomes show limited causal impact on without defections from security apparatuses, as hybrid multiparty inclusions rose to nearly 50% of dictatorships by 2020.

Theoretical foundations and empirical outcomes

Purported advantages and supporting evidence

National unity governments are purported to enhance legitimacy by bridging partisan divides, thereby reducing polarization and fostering public trust during . In the United Kingdom's 2010–2015 Conservative-Liberal Democrat , formed amid post-financial crisis needs, the arrangement enabled cross-party consensus on , contributing to economic stabilization as GDP growth resumed from -4.2% in 2009 to 1.9% by 2010 and averaged 1.8% annually through 2014, outperforming several peers in recovery speed. This broad governmental base is credited with mitigating immediate risks of , though success narratives may reflect toward cases where unity was achievable. Efficient crisis response is another claimed advantage, with unity governments enabling coordinated decision-making and resource allocation in existential threats. Israel's national unity governments from 1967 to 1973, encompassing Labor and opposition parties, facilitated rapid mobilization during the , resulting in decisive military victories that expanded territorial control and neutralized immediate Arab coalition threats through superior strategic execution. Similarly, in the 1973 , the unity framework supported sustained defense efforts despite initial losses, correlating with eventual counteroffensives that restored deterrence. Proponents argue this reflects improved operational efficiency via unified command, though empirical metrics on defense spending per victory are sparse and potentially confounded by pre-existing military readiness. Broad policy buy-in under national unity governments can avert escalation to by incorporating diverse stakeholders, yielding measurable stability gains. South Africa's 1994 Government of National Unity, led by and including apartheid-era National Party figures, transitioned the country from apartheid without descending into widespread civil war, with political violence incidents dropping sharply post-election—from over 2,000 deaths in 1993 to under 500 by 1995—as racial tensions eased through inclusive structures. This empirical outcome underscores claims of enhanced social cohesion, evidenced by reduced armed confrontations, though attribution to the unity mechanism must account for concurrent negotiated settlements and international pressures.

Criticisms, risks, and counter-evidence

Power-sharing arrangements in national unity governments can dilute political by obscuring lines of responsibility among coalition partners, allowing incumbents implicated in prior failures to evade electoral consequences. In Zimbabwe's Government of National Unity () from February 2009 to 2013, President Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF retained key and economic portfolios despite the regime's role in that peaked at an annual rate of 89.7 sextillion percent in November 2008, enabling Mugabe to prolong his rule without addressing root causes like electoral violence and networks. The coalition's structure stalled sector reforms essential for fair elections, with Mugabe's resistance blamed for ongoing stalemates that perpetuated manipulation, as opposition struggled to enforce power-sharing stipulations amid ZANU-PF dominance. This contrasts with majoritarian systems, where single-party majorities face direct voter reprisal for economic mismanagement, fostering clearer causal links between policy and outcomes. National unity governments often engender gridlock, as veto points from ideologically opposed parties impede decisive action on structural reforms. Italy's 2011-2013 technocratic government under , backed by a broad unity coalition spanning center-left to center-right, prioritized over comprehensive , resulting in limited progress on labor market flexibility and competition-enhancing measures amid internal paralysis. IMF assessments highlighted persistent bottlenecks in productivity growth, attributing delays to regulatory rigidities unaddressed despite the government's mandate, with fiscal consolidation relying heavily on tax hikes rather than supply-side changes that could have accelerated recovery. Empirical patterns in Italy's history of short-lived coalitions, including unity variants, show lagged structural adjustments compared to peers with stable majorities, as cross-party consensus requirements prolong bargaining and dilute reform momentum. Such governments risk entrenching networks by normalizing veto-driven , which prioritizes sectarian or partisan carve-outs over merit-based administration and voter mandates, often exacerbating and inequality. Lebanon's power-sharing system, embedding proportional sectarian representation since the 1943 , has fostered systemic graft, with Transparency International's scoring the country at 24/100 in 2023, reflecting entrenched in public appointments that suppress competition and widen disparities. This framework sustains veto politics among zu'ama (sectarian leaders), enabling of state resources—evident in the 2019-2020 where bank insolvency and subsidy mismanagement enriched insiders—while countering inclusion narratives with data showing heightened poverty (over 80% by 2022) and rises amid stalled diversification. In contrast, majoritarian alternatives in comparable contexts have demonstrated faster turnover and responsiveness by concentrating on governing majorities rather than diffused coalitions.

Formation processes and operational challenges

Mechanisms in parliamentary vs. presidential systems

In parliamentary systems, national unity governments form through legislative confidence mechanisms, where the head of government negotiates inclusion of diverse parties to secure a majority or supermajority support in parliament. This process exploits the fusion of executive and legislative powers, allowing cabinet positions to be allocated proportionally to party seat shares or bargaining leverage, often via informal quotas or explicit agreements. Such arrangements enable rapid executive reconfiguration during crises, as governments can be installed or adjusted without fixed terms, provided ongoing parliamentary backing is maintained. Presidential systems, by contrast, impose institutional incentives against formal unity governments due to fixed-term elections for both executive and legislature, alongside strict that precludes executive fusion with opposition. Unity emerges quasi-formally through voluntary cross-branch cooperation or temporary pacts, rather than merged cabinets; for instance, post-September 11, 2001, U.S. leaders from both parties displayed public on measures, yet retained independent institutional roles without altering term structures. The causal barrier stems from branch , which discourages dissolution-reformation cycles and fosters hybrid "grand bargains" limited by electoral calendars, rendering comprehensive unity rarer than in parliamentary contexts. Operationally, parliamentary unity governments often adopt modified decision rules emphasizing consensus, such as partner es on key policies to prevent unilateral actions and sustain cohesion, diverging from baseline majoritarian cabinet voting. Presidential variants, lacking fused executives, default to branch-specific majorities with overlaid informal consensus norms for unity initiatives, constrained by overrides or thresholds. These dynamics highlight how parliamentary incentives favor inclusive fusion, while presidential structures prioritize compartmentalized bargaining.

Sustainability and dissolution factors

The longevity of national unity governments hinges primarily on the continuance of acute that initially necessitated their formation, as these compel ideological adversaries to prioritize over partisan rivalry. Persistent threats, such as protracted , sustain cohesion by embedding security imperatives above policy disputes, thereby delaying the resurgence of pre-crisis divisions. Empirical reviews of transitional governments of national unity () underscore this dynamic, noting that external pressures like or often extend durations beyond what domestic consensus alone could achieve, though such arrangements rarely exceed the immediate crisis phase without structural reforms. Data from comparative analyses of grand coalitions—functionally similar to unity governments—reveal average tenures of 1,500 to over 2,000 days for narrower two-party variants, but broader inclusive setups, prone to higher coordination costs, frequently dissolve sooner amid accumulating frictions. Across dozens of cases, durations cluster around 2-3 years when crises wane, reflecting the causal primacy of over formal agreements in maintaining elite pacts. Dissolution triggers emerge when precipitating emergencies resolve, unleashing as parties reposition for electoral gains, evidenced by spikes in defections correlating with economic stabilization that erodes unity's rationale. Ideological fatigue manifests as unaddressed core grievances resurface, fracturing coalitions lacking mechanisms to redistribute equitably, a amplified in clientelist contexts where power-sharing dilutes factional rewards. In African post-conflict GNUs, over 60% fail within a single mandate due to entrenched ethnic and political fissures that coalitions merely paper over, yielding instability rather than resolution absent deeper power-sharing settlements. Such outcomes highlight how superficial inclusion without causal addressing of underlying rivalries precipitates breakdowns, often reverting to prior antagonisms or fragmentation.

Examples by region

Europe

In Europe, national unity governments have historically formed during periods of acute crisis, including world wars, , and post-authoritarian transitions, often in parliamentary systems where broad coalitions enable legislative majorities unattainable through narrow partisan alliances. These arrangements prioritize collective decision-making over ideological purity, though their longevity varies based on the severity of the threat and post-crisis partisan incentives. from interwar and postwar shows they can stabilize temporarily—facilitating wartime or measures—but frequently dissolve amid unresolved structural tensions, as seen in repeated Italian experiments where unity cabinets averaged under two years in duration before fragmentation. The provides classic wartime precedents: David Lloyd George's coalition from December 1916 to 1922 united Liberals, Conservatives, and Labour to prosecute , achieving armistice but yielding to peacetime divisions; Winston Churchill's 1940-1945 administration, encompassing nearly all major parties except pacifist outliers, coordinated Allied efforts and domestic , with Labour's participation ensuring industrial output rose 50% despite bombing campaigns. Earlier, Ramsay MacDonald's 1931 National Government, formed amid the with cross-party support, implemented fiscal austerity including the abandonment of the gold standard on September 21, 1931, which stabilized the pound but eroded Labour's base, leading to Conservative dominance by 1935. Italy has relied on unity governments recurrently due to fragmented parliaments: post-1943 liberation cabinets under and from April 1944 to June 1945 integrated anti-fascist parties including Christian Democrats, Communists, and Socialists to draft the and hold the June 2, 1946 establishing the . In modern times, Mario Draghi's February 2021 to July 2022 executive, backed by a from the Five Star Movement to Lega, disbursed €191.5 billion in EU Recovery Funds and enacted 30+ decrees on pandemic response, though internal rifts over judicial reforms precipitated its collapse. Greece deployed unity governments during debt crises and transitions: Lucas Papademos's November 2011 to May 2012 technocratic cabinet, supported by , New Democracy, and , ratified the second EU-IMF on February 21, 2012, imposing €28 billion in cuts but fueling electoral backlash with unemployment peaking at 27.5% by 2013. Post-junta, Konstantinos Karamanlis's July 1974 national unity administration organized elections on November 17, 1974, securing New Democracy's 54% mandate and averting civil unrest. Poland's 1945 , decreed June 28 by Soviet-backed authorities, nominally merged communist elements with Stanisław Mikołajczyk's to fulfill accords, but non-communist ministers resigned by February 1947 amid rigged elections, enabling full communist control. Ireland lacks formal wartime unity precedents but formed a national unity coalition in June 2020 between historic rivals and , plus Greens, commanding 94 of 160 Dáil seats after a February election deadlock, to address with €30 billion in spending; this broke a 99-year taboo, though critics noted its continuity over transformative reform. Other cases include Belgium's 2010-2011 unity interim under amid fiscal gridlock and Hungary's 1917-1918 wartime cabinets, underscoring Europe's pattern where such governments mitigate immediate perils but rarely resolve underlying polarization without external enforcement or decisive victories.

United Kingdom

In the , national unity governments—broad coalitions spanning major parties—have historically emerged during acute crises, such as world wars and severe economic downturns, to prioritize national survival over partisan competition. These formations reflect the Westminster system's capacity for cross-party collaboration under prime ministerial leadership, often with royal involvement in their inception, but they typically dissolve once the emergency subsides, as the first-past-the-post favors single-party majorities in stable times. A prominent early example occurred during . On 7 December 1916, , then , succeeded as , forming a coalition that included Conservative Party leaders like Andrew Bonar Law and Lloyd George's Liberal supporters, while sidelining Asquith's faction. This government prosecuted the war effort, introduced , and enacted social reforms like the Representation of the People Act 1918, which enfranchised women over 30 and most men over 21; it endured until October 1922, when Conservative discontent over Irish policy and honors scandals prompted its end. The 1931 National Government arose from the Great Depression's financial strains on Britain's commitments. On 24 August 1931, Labour Prime Minister resigned his after most cabinet members rejected spending cuts demanded by international bankers and the Treasury; King George V urged him to form a multi-party administration, which MacDonald led with support from Conservatives under , National Liberals under Sir John Simon, and his own breakaway National Labour group. The coalition won 554 of 615 seats in the 27 October 1931 general election, implementing austerity including a 10% pay cut for public servants and suspending the on 21 September 1931, which stabilized the pound but deepened to 22% by 1932. It transitioned to Conservative dominance under Baldwin (1935–1937) and (1937–1940), focusing on toward until wartime exigencies prompted its replacement. World War II produced another such coalition. Following the Norway campaign's failure and Chamberlain's 8 May 1940 resignation, assumed the premiership on 10 May, assembling an all-party government with Labour's as Lord Privy Seal (later ) and other Labour figures like in key roles, alongside Conservatives and Liberals. This unity administration coordinated mobilization, including rationing, evacuation of 338,000 troops from (26 May–4 June 1940), and the (July–October 1940), sustaining national resolve until Labour withdrew for the July 1945 election, which Churchill lost decisively. Post-1945, no equivalent national unity governments have formed in the UK, despite economic challenges like the 1976 IMF bailout or divisions, as parliamentary arithmetic and ideological polarization have favored minority governments or supply-and-confidence arrangements over full coalitions.

Ireland

In the , national unity governments—as broad, all-party or cross-ideological coalitions formed typically in response to crises—have not been formally established, though proposals emerged during the in 2020. Following the February 2020 general election, where no party secured a and unexpectedly topped the first-preference vote with 24.5%, discussions intensified around forming a "grand coalition" or government of national unity to address the unfolding health crisis and economic uncertainty. advocated for an inclusive emergency administration incorporating all major parties, but this was rejected by and , who cited ideological differences and 's historical ties to the IRA as barriers. Instead, a historic coalition government was formed on 27 June 2020 between the traditional rivals Fine Gael (center-right, 35 seats), Fianna Fáil (center-right, 38 seats), and the Green Party (environmental left, 12 seats), securing 94 of 160 Dáil seats and excluding Sinn Féin (37 seats). This arrangement, often described as Ireland's first "grand coalition" due to the unprecedented partnership between the Civil War-era antagonists Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil, prioritized pandemic response, with Taoiseach Micheál Martin (Fianna Fáil) emphasizing unity against COVID-19 as the administration's initial focus. The coalition's Programme for Government committed to recovery measures, including €30 billion in fiscal stimulus by 2021, and rotated the taoiseach role between Martin and Fine Gael's Leo Varadkar to balance power. Operational challenges included internal tensions over climate policy and housing, leading to the Greens' withdrawal threats, but the government sustained through economic rebound, with GDP growth of 13.6% in 2021. Critics, including opposition voices, argued the exclusion of undermined claims of national unity, potentially prolonging instability during formation talks that overlapped with the pandemic's early phase. The dissolved after the November 2024 , with ongoing negotiations as of early 2025 favoring a renewed Fine Gael-Fianna Fáil partnership, reflecting persistent aversion to broader inclusion amid fragmented politics. This episode highlights Ireland's parliamentary system's preference for minimal winning coalitions over expansive unity models, influenced by deep-seated partisan divides traceable to the 1920s civil war, despite occasional crisis-driven pragmatism. Empirical outcomes showed effective crisis management— Ireland's excess mortality rate during COVID-19 was among Europe's lowest at 0.15%—but also risks of policy gridlock in non-emergency areas, as evidenced by stalled reforms in housing affordability where waiting lists exceeded 250,000 households by 2023.

Italy

In the post-World War II period, established several governments of national unity to facilitate reconstruction and transition from to , drawing support from the major anti-fascist parties in the (CLN), including Christian Democrats (DC), (PCI), Italian Socialist Party of Proletarian Unity (PSIUP), (PLI), and Action Party (PdA). The second Badoglio government, formed on 22 April 1944 under Marshal , represented the initial such coalition, incorporating CLN representatives to administer liberated territories and coordinate the war effort against Nazi-fascist forces. This cabinet lasted until 8 June 1944, emphasizing cross-ideological collaboration amid ongoing conflict. Subsequent unity governments included Ivanoe Bonomi's two cabinets (25 June 1944 – 27 July 1945), which maintained broad CLN backing to stabilize administration and prepare for peace. Ferruccio Parri's government (21 June – 1 December 1945), led by the Action Party amid partisan resistance achievements, explicitly pursued anti-fascist unity objectives, such as purging fascists from institutions and drafting a new , but dissolved due to internal CLN fractures and DC dominance. Alcide De Gasperi's first two governments (1 December 1945 – 28 January 1947) extended this model, incorporating DC, PCI, PSIUP, and Republicans (PRI) to enact the 1946 institutional and initial republican framework, though tensions prompted exclusion of communists and socialists by May 1947. These early coalitions prioritized national stabilization over partisan agendas but highlighted sustainability risks from ideological divergences. During the Years of Lead terrorism crisis, the fourth Andreotti government (16 March 1978 – 20 March 1979), formed under DC Prime Minister amid the ' kidnapping of on 16 March 1978, secured abstention or support from opposition parties including PCI, , and Republicans to maintain parliamentary confidence and combat . This exceptional arrangement, the first broad consensus since the late 1940s, focused on emergency anti-terrorism measures but lasted only a year, underscoring the temporary nature of such pacts in Italy's polarized system. More recently, Mario Draghi's government, appointed on 13 February 2021 by President following the collapse of Giuseppe Conte's coalition, operated as a national unity cabinet to address the , economic recovery, and implementation of the €191.5 billion EU plan. It garnered support from a wide array—from and Democratic Party on the center-left to League and Forza Italia on the center-right—excluding outliers like , enabling passage of key reforms in vaccination campaigns, infrastructure, and . The administration resigned on 14 July 2022 after withdrawal, having navigated Italy's deepest postwar with GDP growth rebounding to 6.6% in 2021, though internal party frictions over energy costs and eroded cohesion. These instances reflect Italy's parliamentary system's reliance on oversized coalitions during exogenous shocks, often yielding short-term efficacy at the cost of deferred electoral accountability.

Greece

In Greece, national unity governments have typically formed during periods of acute political instability or economic crisis to facilitate transitions or implement emergency measures. A prominent example occurred in following the collapse of the that had ruled since 1967; on July 24, , returning from exile, was appointed prime minister of an interim national unity government comprising representatives from multiple parties. This administration prioritized restoring democratic institutions, including legalizing the , organizing free elections on November 17, 1974—which New Democracy won decisively—and drafting a new ratified in 1975. The government's actions stabilized the polity, averting civil unrest and enabling Greece's integration into Western institutions like and the . Another instance arose amid the sovereign debt crisis in 2011, when political deadlock threatened default and eurozone exit. On November 11, , a former vice president of the , was sworn in as of a technocratic unity government backed by the major parties and New Democracy, with initial support from the smaller (LAOS). This coalition passed the EU-IMF bailout agreement on February 12, 2012, incorporating severe austerity measures such as pension cuts and tax hikes, in exchange for €130 billion in loans. However, the government faced internal dissent, with LAOS withdrawing in March 2012 over privatization plans, and public protests intensified due to economic contraction—GDP fell 6.9% that year amid exceeding 24%. It dissolved after elections on May 6, 2012, yielding a fragmented and prolonged instability, as no single party secured a majority, necessitating further coalitions. These cases illustrate Greece's parliamentary system's reliance on broad coalitions during crises, often bridging ideological divides—such as center-left and center-right New Democracy—but with mixed longevity; the 1974 effort endured through institutional reforms, whereas the 2011 version prioritized short-term financial stabilization at the cost of deepened social divisions and electoral volatility. Earlier precedents, like the 1944 government under amid liberation from Axis occupation, similarly aimed at unifying factions post-war but devolved into civil conflict by 1946.

Poland

The (Polish: Tymczasowy Rząd Jedności Narodowej, TRJN) was formed on June 28, 1945, in under the decree of Bolesław Bierut, who acted as provisional president via the Soviet-established State National Council (Krajowa Rada Narodowa). This entity replaced the earlier (PKWN), a communist-dominated administration installed by the in July 1944 in , and aimed to incorporate non-communist elements to comply with Allied demands from the February 1945 for a reorganized Polish government representative of democratic parties. Edward Osóbka-Morawski, affiliated with the (PPS), served as prime minister, while key portfolios like internal affairs and security remained under communist control, primarily the (PPR) and its allies. To project broader legitimacy, the TRJN included figures from pre-war democratic parties, most notably Stanisław Mikołajczyk of the Polish Peasant Party (PSL), who returned from exile and accepted the deputy role on July 5, 1945, after negotiations in . International recognition followed swiftly: the and extended acknowledgment on the same day Mikołajczyk joined, abandoning prior support for the London-based , which dissolved as a result. The cabinet comprised 21 members, with five from Mikołajczyk's PSL, three from the PSL "Wyzwolenie" faction, and the rest dominated by PPR, PPS, and smaller leftist groups, though genuine power resided with Soviet advisors and Polish communists, enabling the suppression of opposition through the newly formed Ministry of Public Security. Operational challenges arose from inherent asymmetries: non-communist ministers faced marginalization, as evidenced by Mikołajczyk's repeated vetoes overridden by the communist majority and Bierut's authority. The government oversaw land reforms redistributing over 6 million hectares to peasants by 1946, but these were leveraged to co-opt rural support for the regime ahead of elections. Tensions culminated in the rigged January 1947 parliamentary elections, where official results claimed a 52.3% plurality for the communist-aligned Democratic Bloc amid documented , including ballot stuffing and voter reported by international observers like U.S. Arthur Bliss Lane. Mikołajczyk resigned and fled into exile in May 1947, prompting the TRJN's replacement on February 6, 1947, by a fully communist government under Józef Cyrankiewicz, marking the end of the unity facade and consolidation of one-party rule. No subsequent Polish governments have formally adopted the "national unity" label in the post-communist era, despite occasional calls for grand coalitions during crises such as the in 2020, when opposition leaders proposed but the ruling (PiS) party rejected cross-party unity cabinets. The 1945 TRJN exemplifies a coerced unity mechanism under foreign occupation, prioritizing regime stabilization over pluralistic governance, with its brief democratic inclusions serving primarily to secure Western acquiescence to Soviet dominance in .

Other European cases

In post-World War II , a government of national unity was formed on December 4, 1945, under Chancellor , comprising the (ÖVP), Social Democratic Party (SPÖ), and (KPÖ), representing nearly all parliamentary forces to oversee reconstruction amid Allied occupation and economic devastation. This lasted until November 20, 1947, facilitating the restoration of via the in 1955, though internal tensions over economic policy and communist influence contributed to its eventual dissolution as KPÖ support waned. France established several provisional governments of national unity between 1944 and 1947 to reestablish republican institutions after liberation from Nazi occupation and collaboration. Key examples include Charles de Gaulle's cabinets from September 10, 1944, to January 20, 1946, involving the (PCF), French Section of the Workers' International (SFIO), (MRP), and Republican Party of the Radical and Radical-Socialist Left (PRRRS), which commanded broad parliamentary support exceeding 90% of seats. These administrations, continuing under and until mid-1946, prioritized purging collaborators, nationalizing key industries like and , and drafting the 1946 constitution, but faced challenges from ideological clashes, particularly PCF demands for deeper socialist reforms, leading to their replacement by narrower coalitions. Finland formed multiple post-war governments of national unity starting September 21, 1944, under Urho Castrén and , uniting the Social Democratic Party (SSDP), Agrarian Union (Maal), (KOK), Swedish People's Party (RKP-SFP), and (SKDL, communist-affiliated), to implement armistice terms with the and stabilize the economy after the . These "rainbow coalitions," extending through 1948 under Mauno Pekkala, encompassed over 90% of parliamentary seats and enabled land reforms, payments totaling 300 million U.S. dollars (equivalent to about 5 billion in 2023 terms), and , though they dissolved amid pressures and SKDL's electoral decline by 1948. A later example, Paavo Lipponen's cabinets from April 13, 1995, to April 17, 2003, revived this model during economic crisis, including five parties to enact austerity, EU accession, and euro adoption, reflecting Finland's tradition of broad consensus in response to external shocks. Switzerland maintains an institutionalized form of national unity through its Federal Council, governed since 1959 by the "magic formula" allocating seven executive seats proportionally among the four major parties— (SVP), Social Democratic Party (SP), FDP.The Liberals (FDP), and The Centre (formerly CVP)—ensuring representation of linguistic and ideological diversity in a . This arrangement, exemplified in councils from 2003–2007 and 2008–2011, covers nearly all parliamentary forces and has sustained stability through referenda-driven policy-making on issues like and , though strains emerged in the as SVP gains challenged the formula's balance, prompting temporary adjustments without full breakdown. Luxembourg briefly adopted national unity governments during crises, such as Victor Thorn's cabinet from February 24, 1916, to June 19, 1917, uniting conservatives, liberals, and socialists amid German occupation pressures in , and Pierre Dupong's post-war administration from November 14, 1945, to February 13, 1947, including the (CSV), Socialist Party (PS), Liberal Group (GPD), and Communist Party (KPL) for recovery and integration. These coalitions facilitated economic revival and constitutional reforms but were short-lived due to partisan realignments post-crisis.

Middle East and North Africa

Israel

Israel has established national unity governments on multiple occasions, typically during periods of existential security threats, economic crises, or prolonged political impasse. The inaugural such coalition formed on 1 June 1967, under Prime Minister , incorporating leader and other opposition figures into the cabinet to present a unified front ahead of the against , , and ; this government lasted until 1969 and is credited with bolstering national resolve during the conflict. In response to hyperinflation exceeding 400% annually and geopolitical tensions, and the Alignment (Labor predecessor) created a in September 1984, with alternating premiership between and over 50 months; this arrangement stabilized the economy through austerity measures, including a 1985 stabilization plan that reduced inflation to 20% by year's end, though it involved painful subsidy cuts and wage freezes. A larger coalition emerged in May 2012 under Netanyahu, encompassing 94 of 120 seats from diverse parties, aimed at addressing stalled peace talks and domestic reforms, but it dissolved amid disputes over military exemptions for ultra-Orthodox Jews. More recently, following the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks that killed over 1,200 and led to hostage-taking, Netanyahu formed an emergency unity government on 11 October 2023, integrating National Unity leader and New Hope's into a narrowed focused on Gaza operations, excluding far-right allies to broaden support; this setup persisted into amid ongoing hostilities, though internal frictions over and judicial reforms strained cohesion.

Lebanon

Lebanon's confessional power-sharing constitution, established by the 1943 and refined in the 1989 , inherently promotes inclusive governments representing Maronite Christians, Sunni and Shia Muslims, , and others, often manifesting as national unity cabinets to avert sectarian deadlock. A notable example occurred in November 2009, when assembled a 30-member unity government post-elections, allocating half the seats to opposition groups including , despite U.S. and Saudi reservations over Iranian influence; this coalition collapsed in January 2011 amid protests tied to indictments implicating in Rafic Hariri's 2005 assassination. After nine months of negotiations following June 2018 parliamentary elections, Hariri announced a new unity government on 31 January 2019, comprising 20 technocrats and politicians from rival factions, including and allies of President ; endorsed by the UN Security Council, it aimed to tackle a ballooning public debt exceeding 150% of GDP and , but stalled on reforms, contributing to the 2019 economic meltdown with currency devaluation over 90% by 2022. Critics argue such unity governments perpetuate patronage networks and powers, particularly Hezbollah's, hindering decisive action; for instance, proposals for reformist alternatives post-2020 Beirut port explosion were rejected in favor of inclusive but ineffective coalitions, exacerbating paralysis amid the 2024 Israel-Hezbollah escalations.

Afghanistan

Afghanistan's National Unity Government (NUG) was established on 29 2014 following a U.S.-mediated agreement between presidential candidates and after a disputed second-round marred by ; Ghani assumed the presidency, while Abdullah was appointed Chief Executive Officer (a new role akin to ), with power-sharing extended to cabinet and provincial appointments to reconcile Pashtun, Tajik, Hazara, and Uzbek factions. Intended to stabilize post-2014 drawdown, the NUG pursued electoral reforms and drives but grappled with internal discord, including delays in constitutional revisions and Abdullah's expanded authority via decree, eroding Ghani's mandate; by , factionalism had intensified patronage rivalries, with over 20 ministerial reshuffles and stalled parliamentary elections contributing to governance fragility amid resurgence. The arrangement endured until the Taliban's 2021 offensive, collapsing with Kabul's fall on 15 August 2021; Ghani's flight and Abdullah's resistance efforts underscored the NUG's inability to forge lasting ethnic consensus, as ethnic-based undermined unified military command and reform implementation.

Other MENA cases

In , a technocratic national unity government was formed in February 2016 under Prime Minister Habib Essid (later ), incorporating ministers from Islamists, secular , and independents to navigate post-Arab Spring deadlock and terrorist threats, including the 2015 Sousse and Bardo attacks; approved by parliament amid economic stagnation with 15% unemployment, it focused on security and IMF-backed austerity but faced no-confidence votes by 2020, reflecting fragile consensus in a polarized assembly. Libya has seen intermittent calls for unity governments amid ; a 2023 proposal for an interim to bridge eastern and western factions gained UN consideration but faltered due to entrenched control and oil revenue disputes, perpetuating division since the 2011 Gaddafi ouster. Iraq's post-2003 governments under Prime Ministers like and often styled as unity s, allocating portfolios across Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish blocs per Muhasasa system, though chronic instability from incursions (2014-2017) exposed veto-prone paralysis rather than effective national cohesion.

Israel

Israel's national unity governments have historically formed in response to acute security threats or prolonged political deadlocks in its fragmented , where often yields multiparty coalitions unable to secure majorities without broad inclusion. These arrangements typically unite rival Zionist parties across the center-left and right, prioritizing national consensus on defense and over domestic ideological divides, though they frequently prove temporary due to underlying tensions. The first such government emerged on June 5, 1967, amid escalating tensions with Arab states preceding the ; Prime Minister expanded his coalition to include leader as a , alongside other opposition figures, to signal unified resolve. This cabinet governed through the war's swift victory and territorial gains, transitioning to in 1969 before dissolving after the 1969 elections, having stabilized leadership during crisis but not resolving long-term partisan rifts. In 1984, following inconclusive elections that left neither Labor nor able to form a majority amid economic turmoil and the War's aftermath, and agreed to a rotation formula: served as for 25 months, then Shamir, with shared ministries emphasizing fiscal restraint and security continuity. This unity lasted until 1990, implementing stabilization policies like the 1985 economic plan but collapsing over disagreements. More recently, after four inconclusive elections from 2019 to 2020 exacerbated by corruption trials and annexation debates, Benjamin Netanyahu's and Benny Gantz's Blue and White formed the thirty-fifth government on May 17, 2020, incorporating rotation and focusing on response; it dissolved in December 2020 over budget disputes. Following Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack killing over 1,200 Israelis, Netanyahu established an emergency unity government on October 11, 2023, integrating and into a war cabinet with Defense Minister to prosecute the Gaza campaign, sidelining smaller coalition partners on military decisions. resigned on June 9, 2024, criticizing the absence of a postwar Gaza vision, effectively ending the unity framework amid judicial probes into the attack's intelligence failures.

Lebanon

In Lebanon, national unity governments are integral to the confessional power-sharing system codified in the 1943 and amended by the 1989 Taif Accord, which ended the 1975–1990 by reinforcing sectarian quotas for executive positions—such as the Maronite Christian presidency, Sunni Muslim premiership, and Shiite Muslim speakership—while mandating inclusive cabinets to avert factional collapse. This structure compels prime ministers-designate to negotiate portfolios among 18 recognized religious communities and major political blocs, including , the Iran-backed Shiite militia with parallel military capabilities that often exercises veto influence through its parliamentary seats and alliances. Such governments form routinely after elections or amid crises like spillover from the , aiming to balance representation but frequently resulting in protracted deadlocks exceeding months due to demands for blocking minorities. Post-2005 and Syrian troop withdrawal, unity cabinets became standard to integrate opposition forces; for instance, after the 2009 elections, assembled a 30-member national unity government on November 9, 2009, granting veto rights to -led opposition after five months of talks, though it collapsed in 2011 amid Syrian unrest. Similarly, following the 2018 elections, Hariri formed another unity cabinet on January 31, 2019—nine months later—encompassing , , , and Sunni rivals, with 30 ministers allocated sectarily to address economic woes but yielding limited reforms. In crisis contexts, unity formations underscore fragility: Tammam Salam's 24-minister cabinet, unveiled February 15, 2014, resolved a 10-month vacuum triggered by 2013 clashes and presidential vacancy, uniting pro- and anti-Hezbollah factions against threats from . After the August 4, 2020, Beirut port explosion—which killed 218, injured over 7,000, and displaced 300,000— forged a 24-member inclusive on , 2021, incorporating all major parties despite Hezbollah's role in port mismanagement allegations, prioritizing IMF-backed reforms amid exceeding 200% annually. These pacts mitigate immediate strife but perpetuate elite entrenchment, as evidenced by 2019 protests decrying and sectarian paralysis, with governments often dissolving into caretaker status without accountability.

Afghanistan

The National Unity Government of Afghanistan was formed on September 21, 2014, through a power-sharing agreement signed by rivals and , resolving a protracted dispute over the results of the June 2014 presidential runoff , which had raised fears of ethnic violence and state collapse. was inaugurated as president on September 29, 2014, while received the newly created position of , effectively functioning as a with authority over cabinet appointments and policy implementation, though subordinate to the president under the agreement. The arrangement, brokered by U.S. Secretary of State and other international actors, included commitments to all 8.1 million votes from the and pursue constitutional reforms to institutionalize the CEO role. Intended as a transitional mechanism lasting until mid-2016, the government faced chronic internal divisions, with Ghani and Abdullah frequently clashing over patronage distribution, ministerial posts, and security appointments, which delayed reforms and weakened executive cohesion amid ongoing . Electoral reforms stalled, leading to extensions of the CEO position without , and the coalition's dysfunction contributed to governance paralysis, as evidenced by incomplete cabinet formations and policy gridlock reported through 2019. Tensions resurfaced after the September 2019 presidential election, resulting in a , 2020, accord where Ghani retained the presidency but Abdullah was granted leadership of the High Council for National Reconciliation to oversee intra-Afghan peace talks with the . The government dissolved on August 15, 2021, when forces entered unopposed, prompting Ghani's flight abroad to avert further bloodshed and marking the collapse of the amid rapid provincial losses since May 2021.

Other MENA cases

In , a Government of National Unity () was established on March 10, 2021, following UN-brokered talks to resolve the civil conflict that had split the country between rival administrations in Tripoli and . Led by , the included ministers nominated to represent diverse factions and was tasked with organizing national elections by December 2021, though delays and competing claims to power, including a rival government proclaimed by the in 2022, undermined its stability. In , governments formed after parliamentary elections in 2005, 2010, and 2018 were explicitly structured as national unity coalitions to bridge sectarian divides among Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish groups amid post-Saddam instability and threats. The 2010-2014 administration under Prime Minister , for instance, incorporated major blocs like the Iraqi National Alliance and Iraqiya, though persistent power-sharing disputes often paralyzed decision-making and fueled perceptions of favoritism toward Shia majorities. Yemen transitioned to a national unity government on December 7, 2011, under a agreement that transferred power from President after months of Arab Spring protests, with Vice President Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi assuming leadership to oversee constitutional reforms and elections. This arrangement collapsed by 2014 amid Houthi advances and renewed , highlighting the fragility of unity efforts in a tribal and factional context. Tunisia's interim unity government was announced on January 17, , days after President fled amid mass protests, with Prime Minister retaining key portfolios while appointing opposition figures from parties like Ettakatol and the to signal inclusivity and avert further chaos. The cabinet resigned shortly after due to strikes and demands for a full break from the old regime, paving the way for elections and a more enduring compared to regional peers. In , following Hosni Mubarak's resignation on February 11, 2011, Prime Minister formed a national unity cabinet incorporating independents and limited opposition voices, such as from the and , to manage the transitional period under Supreme Council of Armed Forces oversight. This government lasted only until March, dissolved amid protests accusing it of continuity with Mubarak-era policies, before elections led to a short-lived civilian administration under .

Sub-Saharan Africa

National unity governments in have typically emerged as mechanisms to mitigate post-election violence, hyperinflation, or stalled democratic transitions, often brokered by regional organizations such as the (SADC). These arrangements prioritize power-sharing among rival parties to foster stability, though their longevity and effectiveness vary, with some enabling constitutional reforms and economic recovery while others entrench elite pacts without addressing underlying governance failures. From the mid-1990s onward, such governments have been invoked in at least a dozen instances across the region, reflecting fragmented party systems and ethnic divisions that prevent outright majorities. In , the inaugural Government of National Unity () operated from April 27, 1994, to February 3, 1997, constitutionally mandated under the interim to include parties securing at least 5% of the vote in the first multiracial elections, such as the (ANC), National Party (NP), and (IFP). This coalition, led by President , facilitated the adoption of a permanent in 1996, restructured the civil service, and integrated former adversaries into governance, averting potential civil war amid apartheid's legacy. A second formed after the May 29, 2024, elections, where the ANC secured 40.18% of votes—its lowest since 1994—prompting alliances with the Democratic Alliance (DA), IFP, and others, totaling 11 parties by June 2024; this arrangement has prioritized anti-corruption measures and fiscal transparency but faces ideological tensions over . Zimbabwe's GNU, established February 13, 2009, following SADC-mediated talks after the disputed 2008 elections, united ZANU-PF under with the two Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) factions led by and . Lasting until 2013, it halted —peaking at 89.7 sextillion percent monthly in 2008—by adopting a multicurrency system and boosting revenue from $90 million monthly by June 2009, alongside partial reforms in media and security sectors. However, persistent ZANU-PF dominance, farm seizures, and unmet electoral reforms led to MDC withdrawals and the coalition's collapse, underscoring power-sharing's limits in authoritarian contexts. Kenya's Grand Coalition Government, formed April 2008 after post-2007 election violence that killed over 1,100 and displaced 600,000, allocated the presidency to Mwai Kibaki's Party of National Unity (PNU) and prime ministership to Raila Odinga's (ODM) via mediation. Operational until 2013, it restored order, enacted in 2010 devolving power to counties, and advanced infrastructure projects, though cabinet overlaps and scandals hampered efficiency. The model emphasized equal partnership but revealed ethnic patronage's persistence, with coalition partners retaining parallel structures. Lesotho exemplifies recurrent unity coalitions amid instability, with a GNU formed after the 2015 elections involving seven parties under Prime Minister Pakalitha Mosisili, followed by another in 2022 comprising 10 of 18 parliamentary parties after no majority emerged. These SADC-facilitated pacts have quelled military interventions—such as the 2014 coup attempt—but struggled with implementation, as seen in stalled judicial reforms and fiscal deficits exceeding 5% of GDP annually. Zambia's 2016 constitutional amendments enabling coalitions have facilitated minority governments but not formal GNUs, highlighting regional variations in institutionalizing unity arrangements.

South Africa

The Government of National Unity (GNU) in was established following the nation's first non-racial democratic elections held from 26 to 29 April 1994, which marked the end of apartheid rule. The (ANC) secured 62.65% of the vote, forming the basis for a power-sharing arrangement mandated by the interim constitution to include parties gaining at least 5% of seats in the . This structure ensured representation from the National Party (NP), which received 20.26%, and the (IFP), with 10.54%, alongside smaller parties. was inaugurated as president on 10 May 1994, with of the NP and of the ANC serving as deputy presidents, while of the IFP took the role of Minister of Home Affairs. The GNU operated from 27 April 1994 until 3 February 1997, functioning as a transitional mechanism to promote reconciliation and stability amid deep ethnic and racial divisions exacerbated by decades of apartheid and pre-election violence. Cabinet positions were allocated proportionally, with the NP holding key portfolios such as foreign affairs (under de Klerk) and finance, while the IFP influenced provincial matters in KwaZulu-Natal. This arrangement facilitated the adoption of a permanent constitution in 1996, but underlying tensions persisted, including clashes over land reform and affirmative action policies. The NP announced its withdrawal on 3 June 1996, citing irreconcilable differences with ANC policies, effectively ending the formal unity structure ahead of the 1999 elections, though the Mbeki administration continued some multi-party elements voluntarily. In June 2024, following national elections where the ANC lost its parliamentary majority for the first time since 1994 (obtaining 40.18%), President formed a second comprising 10 parties, including the Democratic Alliance (DA) with 21.81% of the vote, the IFP, and others. This coalition, approved by parliament on 14 June 2024, aimed to address , exceeding 32%, and infrastructure failures, but faced immediate ideological frictions over issues like expropriation without compensation. Unlike the 1994 model, it lacks constitutional mandates and operates as a voluntary pact, with the DA securing portfolios in , environment, and .

Zimbabwe

The Government of National Unity (GNU) in was established following highly disputed presidential and parliamentary elections in March and June 2008, respectively, which triggered widespread violence and a political crisis. The (SADC), mediated by then-South African President , facilitated negotiations between ZANU-PF, led by , and the two factions of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC): MDC-T under and MDC-M under . These talks culminated in the Global Political Agreement (GPA), signed on 15 September 2008, which outlined power-sharing arrangements to resolve the impasse and avert further conflict. The GNU was formally inaugurated on 13 February 2009, with Mugabe retaining the presidency and control over , Tsvangirai appointed as executive responsible for policy direction, and Mutambara as . The cabinet was allocated proportionally: 15 ministries to ZANU-PF, 13 to MDC-T, and 4 to MDC-M, alongside commitments to draft a new constitution within 18 months, promote economic recovery, and respect . The agreement also called for the lifting of targeted sanctions on to facilitate international re-engagement. However, implementation faced immediate hurdles, including ZANU-PF's resistance to ceding key appointments, such as the Reserve Bank governor and , leading to delays and tensions. During its tenure until July 2013, achieved partial economic stabilization, including the adoption of a multi-currency system in early 2009 that curbed and restored basic services like and health, with donor support resuming conditionally. Yet, political reforms stalled amid ongoing repression: MDC officials faced arrests, farm invasions continued, and security sector command remained firmly under ZANU-PF influence, undermining the power-sharing's intent to build inclusive governance. documented persistent violations, including intimidation of opposition supporters, indicating the GNU's failure to deliver meaningful rights improvements despite its stated goals. The GNU dissolved after the 31 July 2013 elections, in which ZANU-PF secured a two-thirds parliamentary majority and Mugabe won 61% of the presidential vote amid allegations of irregularities, though international observers noted improvements over but persistent flaws in and media access. Tsvangirai withdrew MDC-T candidates days before polling, citing fraud, but the results ended the , reverting full power to ZANU-PF without renewed unity arrangements.

Kenya

The Government of National Unity in Kenya was established in April 2008 as a power-sharing arrangement to resolve the post-election crisis following the disputed December 27, 2007, presidential election between incumbent President of the Party of National Unity (PNU) and opposition leader of the (ODM). The election, marked by allegations of rigging from both sides, triggered ethnic violence that resulted in approximately 1,300 deaths and the displacement of over 600,000 people, primarily along tribal lines pitting Kikuyu supporters of Kibaki against Luo and other groups backing Odinga. International mediation led by former UN Secretary-General culminated in the National Accord and Reconciliation Act, signed on February 28, 2008, which created the position for Odinga while retaining Kibaki as president. The coalition cabinet, finalized on April 13, 2008, allocated 14 positions each to PNU and ODM, alongside additional seats for smaller parties, ensuring broad representation but also embedding dual power centers that often led to policy gridlock. This structure facilitated short-term stability by halting widespread and enabling reforms, including the of a new via on August 4, 2010, which devolved power and strengthened institutions. However, persistent scandals, such as those involving grand corruption in projects, and internal rivalries undermined efficacy, with the government criticized for failing to prosecute perpetrators of the 2007-2008 atrocities despite International Criminal Court indictments against figures from both camps. The unity government dissolved after the March 4, 2013, elections, in which Uhuru Kenyatta of The National Alliance (TNA, successor to PNU elements) defeated Odinga, marking the return to competitive single-party leadership without formal power-sharing. While it averted state collapse, the arrangement highlighted Kenya's reliance on elite pacts over institutional electoral integrity, as ethnic mobilization remained a core driver of politics, with subsequent "handshake" deals between leaders echoing but not replicating the 2008 model's formal coalition. No other formal national unity governments have been formed in Kenya's post-independence history, though ad hoc parliamentary coalitions emerged briefly after the 2005 constitutional referendum rejection.

Other African cases

In , governments of national unity have emerged repeatedly amid chronic political fragmentation and military interventions, often as multi-party coalitions to stabilize governance following inconclusive elections. After the February 2015 snap elections, which resulted from a 2014 involving army mutinies and assassinations, Tom Thabane's All Basotho Convention (ABC) allied with the Lesotho Congress for Democracy (LCD) and other parties to form a emphasizing reform and security sector accountability, though internal disputes led to its collapse by 2017. Subsequent coalitions, including a 10-party arrangement post-2022 elections under Sam Matekane's (RFP), have been labeled governments of national unity to broaden representation and mitigate risks of no-confidence votes in the fragmented , where no single party has secured a since the introduction of in 2002. These arrangements have temporarily quelled instability but faced criticism for prioritizing elite power-sharing over substantive policy delivery, with economic stagnation persisting at an average GDP growth of 1.5% annually from 2015 to 2022. Madagascar experienced a transitional government of national unity during the 2009 political crisis triggered by disputed presidential election results between incumbent and challenger , culminating in military-backed protests and Ravalomanana's resignation on March 17, 2009. Under mediation by the and , a power-sharing accord on , 2009, established a unity government led by Prime Minister Roindefo Monja, incorporating opposition figures and Ravalomanana loyalists to oversee constitutional reforms and elections, though implementation faltered amid factional infighting and . The arrangement facilitated Rajoelina's ascension to power via a 2010 constitutional but was marred by allegations of authoritarian consolidation, with unity eroded by 2013 elections that excluded key rivals. This case highlighted the fragility of unity governments in resource-scarce island states, where elite pacts often substitute for broad reconciliation, contributing to a decade of subdued growth averaging 2.7% GDP annually from 2009 to 2019. In the (DRC), efforts to form a national unity government intensified in early 2025 amid escalating violence in the east from M23 rebel advances and domestic protests against President Félix Tshisekedi's handling of the crisis, which displaced over 7 million people by February. Tshisekedi announced plans on February 22, 2025, for inclusive consultations with opposition leaders to create such a government, aiming to integrate non-state actors and foster consensus on security and governance reforms, though talks launched in March yielded a reshuffled cabinet in that omitted major opposition inclusion, falling short of public demands for comprehensive unity. Prior to this, the 1+4 formula post-2018 elections had formed a between Tshisekedi's and Kabila's Common Front for the Congo, functioning as a unity government until 2023, which stabilized institutions but enabled patronage networks amid persistent conflict killing thousands annually. These initiatives underscore causal challenges in vast, mineral-rich states, where unity pacts risk entrenching corruption—evidenced by DRC's ranking of 162/180 on Transparency International's 2024 —without addressing root ethnic and resource rivalries.

Asia-Pacific

In the Asia-Pacific region, national unity governments have emerged primarily in response to political crises, military coups, ethnic conflicts, or economic instability, often involving broad coalitions to stabilize governance amid fragmented parliaments or existential threats. These arrangements contrast with the region's dominant single-party systems or authoritarian structures, appearing more frequently in parliamentary democracies like and , or as shadow entities in conflict zones like . Historical precedents, such as wartime coalitions in , highlight unity efforts against external aggression, though contemporary examples reveal challenges in sustaining inclusivity across ethnic or ideological divides.

China

During the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945), the Republic of China under the formed a with the , functioning as a de facto national unity coalition to coordinate resistance against Japanese invasion. This , agreed upon in 1937 after the , suspended civil war hostilities and integrated communist forces into national command structures, enabling joint military operations despite underlying tensions. The arrangement collapsed post-war in 1946, resuming conflict leading to the communist victory in 1949. In the era, no multi-party national unity governments have existed due to the Chinese Communist Party's monopoly on power; instead, policies emphasize "national unity" through legal frameworks promoting ethnic integration and Han-centric identity, as seen in 2025 legislation tightening controls on minority regions to foster a "unified ."

Myanmar

Following the February 2021 military coup that ousted the ()-led government, the opposition formed the National Unity Government (NUG) in April 2021 as a shadow administration in exile, comprising elected parliamentarians, ethnic representatives, and civil society figures to counter the junta. The NUG, coordinated through the , claims legitimacy from the 2020 election results and has established parallel institutions, including the People's Defence Force armed wing, which by 2024 controlled significant territory alongside ethnic armed organizations. However, critics argue it falls short of true national unity, as its close ties to the have limited broader ethnic group buy-in, with some factions preferring decentralized alliances over centralized NUG leadership. Public support remains strong, with surveys indicating favorable views among over 70% of respondents in junta-controlled areas as of early 2024, reflecting widespread rejection of military rule. The NUG has raised funds internationally—estimated at tens of millions USD annually through donations and grants—to sustain resistance, though it operates without formal recognition from major powers like , which backs the junta for border stability.

Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka's most prominent national unity government formed in September 2015 after President Maithripala Sirisena's (UNP)-aligned coalition won parliamentary elections, partnering with defectors from the (SLFP) to secure a slim of 122 seats in the 225-member . Led by Ranil Wickremesinghe under Sirisena's presidency, the coalition pursued constitutional reforms, anti-corruption measures, and economic stabilization post-civil war, including a 19th Amendment curtailing presidential powers in 2015. The arrangement endured internal SLFP splits and economic pressures but dissolved by 2018 amid policy gridlock and local election losses, with Sirisena briefly allying with the opposition before judicial intervention restored Wickremesinghe. During the 2022 economic crisis, President proposed a unity government inviting all parties, but the main opposition rejected it on April 4, 2022, citing lack of trust in the administration amid protests.

Other Asian cases

In Malaysia, following the November 19, 2022, where no coalition secured a simple majority in the 222-seat , formed a unity government (Kerajaan Perpaduan) on November 24, 2022, uniting (82 seats), (30 seats), and East Malaysian parties like (23 seats) to achieve 148 seats and royal endorsement. This broad pact, excluding the opposition, focused on economic recovery, anti-corruption drives, and subsidy reforms, but faced criticism for limited structural changes and coalition strains by 2024, with socioeconomic reforms stalled amid internal UMNO-PAS dynamics. has seen calls for national unity governments amid chronic instability; in December 2011, amid a parliamentary deadlock, analysts proposed a to break impasses, though no formal all-party government materialized, with James Marape's administration instead emphasizing unity pledges in 2025 amid regional tensions like Bougainville autonomy disputes.

China

In modern Chinese history, attempts to establish national unity governments have been thwarted by irreconcilable conflicts between the and the , culminating in the CCP's exclusive control after 1949. During the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945), the KMT-led Republic of China government and the CCP maintained a nominal to combat Japanese forces, but this alliance involved minimal power-sharing, with the CCP preserving autonomous military commands and using the period to consolidate rural bases through guerrilla operations. Negotiations in from August to October 1945 between KMT leader and CCP leader produced the , which outlined principles for a including democratic reforms and military reorganization, yet fundamental disputes over CCP armed forces and political representation prevented implementation, resuming full-scale civil war by July 1946. Mao Zedong advocated for a "" in his essay, proposing a provisional democratic body uniting anti-Japanese parties to enact reforms and unify the country, but this vision was abandoned following the CCP's military victory. The (PRC) was proclaimed on October 1, 1949, establishing CCP dominance without rival parties in executive roles. Under the PRC's political framework, the CCP exercises sole leadership, with eight minor "democratic parties" and independents incorporated via the (CPPCC), an advisory body founded in September 1949 that consults on policy but wields no veto or decision-making power. This "multiparty cooperation and political consultation" system, enshrined in the PRC Constitution, subordinates non-CCP entities to CCP directives, differing from national unity governments elsewhere by lacking electoral competition, rotation of power, or equal coalition participation. As of 2021, the CPPCC includes over 2,000 members from these groups, yet all major state organs—, State Council, and military—are CCP-controlled.

Myanmar

The National Unity Government (NUG) of Myanmar was formed on 16 April 2021 by the Committee Representing Pyidaungsu Hluttaw (CRPH), a body of 70 elected members from the National League for Democracy (NLD)-led parliament ousted by the military coup d'état on 1 February 2021. The coup nullified the results of the November 2020 general election, in which the NLD secured 396 of 476 contested seats in the Union Parliament, prompting widespread protests and the NUG's emergence as a parallel administration claiming legitimacy from those electoral mandates. Composed of NLD figures, ethnic minority leaders, and civil society activists, the NUG seeks to unite diverse pro-democracy factions against the junta's State Administration Council, advocating a federal democratic system to address long-standing ethnic conflicts. The NUG operates with a structured executive, including an acting president (Duwa Lashi La, a Kachin leader), a prime minister (Min Ko Naing, a former student activist), and ministers overseeing 12 portfolios such as , defense, and . In May 2021, it established the People's Defence Force (PDF) as its armed wing, comprising civilian volunteers and defectors, with an estimated 65,000 fighters by 2024 organized into battalions across 235 townships. The PDF coordinates with ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) like the and in a "People's Defensive War" declared on 7 September 2021, contributing to resistance gains that control over 50% of Myanmar's territory by mid-2025, including key border areas and urban outskirts. Internationally, the NUG lacks formal state recognition but has secured symbolic endorsements, including from the in 2021 and meetings with U.S. Advisor in 2021, alongside fundraising exceeding $100 million by 2024 for resistance efforts. As of October 2025, it rejects the junta's planned elections starting December 2025—limited to junta-controlled areas and projected to yield over 90% approval for military-aligned parties—as lacking credibility and serving to entrench authoritarian rule amid ongoing atrocities. The NUG administers liberated zones with local governance structures but faces internal strains from ethnic-Burman dominance and coordination challenges with EAOs, potentially undermining long-term unity.

Sri Lanka

In the 2015 Sri Lankan presidential election held on January 8, of the (SLFP) defeated incumbent President , who had sought a third term despite constitutional limits. , campaigning on a platform of and , immediately appointed of the rival (UNP) as on January 9, marking an unprecedented cross-party leadership pairing in 's post-independence history. This arrangement laid the groundwork for a national unity government, driven by Sirisena's pledge to transcend traditional UNP-SLFP rivalries amid public demands for reform following Rajapaksa's authoritarian tendencies and the lingering effects of the 1983–2009 civil war. The unity government was solidified after the August 17, 2015, parliamentary elections, in which the UNP won 106 seats and the SLFP secured 95 in the 225-member legislature, falling short of the 113 needed for a . Sirisena invited SLFP lawmakers to join a cabinet with the UNP, incorporating 26 opposition members by March 22, 2015, to facilitate legislative passage of reforms. The government's stated priorities included drafting a new to devolve power to provinces, abolish the executive presidency, strengthen reconciliation between Sinhalese and Tamil communities, and address economic vulnerabilities exposed by debt accumulation under Rajapaksa. This bipartisan structure represented a departure from Sri Lanka's of alternating single-party dominance by the UNP and SLFP since 1948. Despite initial progress on probes and reorientation toward the West and , the national unity government encountered persistent internal frictions, particularly over constitutional reforms that stalled due to disagreements on electoral systems and . By mid-2017, public confidence eroded amid slow economic recovery and perceived , with the coalition failing to deliver a promised new by its self-imposed 2016–2020 timeline. The arrangement unraveled during the October 2018 constitutional crisis, when Sirisena abruptly dismissed Wickremesinghe and appointed Rajapaksa as , triggering a power struggle resolved by the in favor of the original government; parliament was dissolved in 2019, ending the unity experiment ahead of elections that returned Rajapaksa-aligned forces to power. Assessments highlighted the government's inability to sustain reform momentum or after two years, attributing this to entrenched party loyalties and inadequate institutional safeguards against executive overreach.

Other Asian cases

In Malaysia, the 15th general election held on 19 November 2022 produced a hung parliament, with securing 82 seats, 73, and 30, preventing any single bloc from achieving the 112-seat majority needed in the 222-seat . was sworn in as on 24 November 2022, leading to the formation of a unity government on 3 December 2022 that included , , and other parties such as and Parti Bangsa Dayak Sarawak, encompassing over two-thirds of parliamentary seats to foster stability amid prior frequent leadership changes since 2018. This coalition prioritized economic recovery, anti-corruption measures, and institutional reforms, though internal tensions over policy implementation and power-sharing persisted into 2023. In Nepal, escalating political fragmentation prompted the and Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist), holding 89 and 78 seats respectively in the 275-seat , to dissolve their prior alliance with the Maoist Centre and form a national unity government on 3 July 2024. KP Sharma Oli assumed the premiership on 15 July 2024, replacing , with the stated objectives of enhancing governance efficiency, tackling a 7.98% fiscal deficit as of mid-2024, and countering marked by 3.9% GDP growth in fiscal year 2023/24. The arrangement allocated key portfolios, including to and home affairs to UML, aiming to consolidate legislative support for constitutional amendments and budget passage amid protests and coalition volatility since the 2015 republican transition.

Americas

Canada

In Canada, a notable example of a national unity government occurred during when formed the Union Government in 1917. This coalition united Conservative Party members with pro-conscription Liberals and Independents to secure parliamentary support for military amid wartime strains on voluntary recruitment. The Unionists won the 1917 federal election with 153 seats out of 221, enabling the passage of the Military Service Act on July 1, 1918, though it faced significant opposition, particularly in . The government dissolved the coalition in 1920 after the war, leading to the Conservatives' return as a single party, having governed for three years focused on national mobilization and economic coordination during the crisis.

United States

The , with its , has rarely formed formal national unity governments akin to parliamentary coalitions, but historical precedents include broad partisan alliances during existential threats. In 1864, during the Civil War, ran under the National Union Party banner, a fusion of Republicans and pro-Union Democrats, with as his running mate to appeal to border state voters and symbolize sectional reconciliation. This arrangement secured Lincoln's re-election with 55% of the popular vote and 212 electoral votes, allowing continuity in war efforts against the Confederacy. Post-war, such unity dissolved amid Reconstruction disputes, highlighting the challenges of sustaining cross-party cabinets in a separation-of-powers framework. Modern proposals for unity governments, often invoked rhetorically during polarization, have not materialized into governing coalitions.

Other American cases

In , where presidential systems predominate, national unity governments are infrequent but have been invoked during political instability to foster broad consensus. In , following Pedro Castillo's on December 7, 2022, interim President pledged to form a "national unity government" to stabilize the country amid protests and economic turmoil, calling for a political truce and inclusion of diverse factions. Her administration, which lasted through 2023-2025, emphasized measures and , though it struggled with legitimacy challenges and ongoing unrest, cycling through multiple cabinets without a formalized multi-party coalition. Other instances, such as transitional arrangements in under (2003-2005) following Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada's resignation amid the gas war protests, involved unity appeals but lacked enduring cross-ideological cabinets. These cases underscore how unity governments in the region often serve as temporary responses to crises rather than stable institutions, constrained by strong executive authority and fragmented party systems.

Canada

In 1917, amid declining voluntary enlistments for the Canadian Expeditionary Force during the First World War, Sir Robert Borden sought to form a to implement and bolster the war effort. Borden, leading the Conservative Party, negotiated with pro-conscription elements of the Liberal Party, culminating in the Union Government on October 12, 1917, which united Conservatives and English-speaking Liberals under a non-partisan banner focused on and national mobilization. This arrangement excluded most Quebec Liberals opposed to conscription, reflecting deep linguistic and regional divisions. The Union Government campaigned in the December 17, 1917, federal election on a platform enforcing the Military Service Act of 1917, securing 153 seats against 82 for the anti-conscription Liberals led by Wilfrid Laurier, with nearly all Liberal seats from Quebec. Under Borden's leadership, the government oversaw conscription, which drafted approximately 100,000 men, though enforcement faced resistance, including riots in Quebec in 1918. Post-war, it addressed reconstruction, including tariff policies and veterans' benefits, but internal strains emerged over issues like trade reciprocity and prohibition. Borden resigned in 1920 due to health issues, succeeded by , who rebranded the coalition as the National Liberal and Conservative Party; it lost power in the 1921 election to the Liberals under . No subsequent formal national unity government has formed at the federal level, despite proposals during the Second World War for a "National Government" to unify parties amid debates, which King rejected in favor of maintaining Liberal majorities. Canada's first-past-the-post has generally discouraged enduring coalitions, with rare exceptions like informal wartime support rather than full mergers.

United States

In the , formal national unity governments—characterized by broad coalitions that suspend partisan opposition, as common in parliamentary systems—have not existed since the Civil War era due to the presidential system's fixed terms, , and winner-take-all elections, which preclude dissolving or forming hybrid executives. Instead, unity has manifested through presidents appointing political rivals or opposing-party figures to cabinet positions during crises, aiming to broaden support and mitigate divisions without altering constitutional structures. These "unity cabinets" prioritize expertise and over strict party loyalty, though they remain subordinate to the president's agenda and require confirmation. A prominent early example occurred under President , who in 1861 formed a cabinet dubbed the "" by including former competitors for the Republican presidential nomination, such as as and as Secretary of the Treasury, alongside as . This approach sought to consolidate Republican factions and attract broader Northern support amid the secession crisis and Civil War, fostering debate that refined policies like while maintaining administrative cohesion despite initial tensions. Lincoln's strategy demonstrated how rival inclusion could build trust and policy resilience in existential conflicts, though it did not eliminate intraparty strife or guarantee longevity, as Chase later resigned amid ambitions for higher office. During preparations, President pursued similar bipartisanship by appointing Republicans Henry L. Stimson—former under —as Secretary of War on June 20, 1940, and Frank Knox, the 1936 Republican vice-presidential nominee, as Secretary of the Navy shortly thereafter. These moves, supported by 1940 Republican nominee Wendell Willkie's endorsement of initiatives like aid to Britain and the Selective Service Act, helped overcome isolationist resistance in and unified public mobilization against Axis threats. The appointments bridged partisan gaps on national security, enabling rapid military expansion, though they operated within Democratic majorities and ended with the war's conclusion. In contemporary contexts, proposals for unity cabinets have surfaced amid polarization, such as Unity08's 2006-2008 push for a bipartisan presidential ticket promising cross-party appointments to address gridlock, which garnered initial support but failed to secure or nomination. During the , columnist Thomas Friedman advocated a "national unity cabinet" in April 2020, suggesting opposition figures join the administration for crisis management, but critics noted incompatibility with electoral mandates and party incentives. Extreme partisan entrenchment, evidenced by low cross-party voting (e.g., only 5% of House Republicans supporting Trump's 2021 impeachment) and primary purges of moderates, renders such efforts improbable today, as loyalty to bases outweighs national consensus.

Other American cases

In Argentina, President Fernando de la Rúa formed a national unity government on March 19, 2001, amid a severe economic , high exceeding 15%, and public unrest that included protests and riots. The cabinet incorporated figures from opposition parties, such as leader Carlos "Chacho" Álvarez as deputy leader and Economy Minister Ricardo López Murphy from the center-right Recreate for Growth, aiming to restore investor confidence and stabilize the peso's peg to the U.S. dollar at 1:1, which had been strained by $132 billion in . However, internal disagreements led to López Murphy's after five days over proposed spending cuts, and the government collapsed later that year, culminating in de la Rúa's on December 20, 2001, following the declaration of a and clashes that resulted in over 30 deaths. In Colombia, President led a self-described national unity government from 2010 to 2018, incorporating ministers from multiple parties including the Liberal Party, Conservative Party, and , to address armed conflict with FARC guerrillas, drug trafficking, and economic inequality. This coalition facilitated the 2016 peace accord with FARC, ratified by Congress on November 30, 2016, after an initial plebiscite rejection on October 2, 2016, by 50.2% of voters; the agreement demobilized over 13,000 combatants and addressed land reform for 7 million displaced persons. Critics, including former President , argued the unity framework prioritized leftist elements and concessions, contributing to polarized congressional opposition that blocked some reforms. Haiti attempted to establish a national unity government in May 2021 amid escalating gang violence, political assassinations—including President Jovenel Moïse's killing on July 7, 2021—and a displacing over 19,000 people internally. initiated dialogue among factions to form a consensus-led executive headed by a new premier, but persistent factionalism and interim council disputes delayed implementation, with assuming the role on July 20, 2021, under international pressure from the U.S. and OAS; the effort failed to curb over 1,600 homicides in 2021 or restore stability. In , President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's administration from January 1, 2023, has been characterized as a national unity government, drawing in and conservatives like former President Michel Temer's party alongside Lula's to navigate congressional fragmentation and economic challenges including 8.7% inflation in 2022. This broad coalition secured passage of fiscal responsibility legislation in 2023 but faced criticism for diluting progressive policies amid alliances with parties linked to Bolsonaro-era corruption probes.

References

  1. https://main.knesset.gov.il/EN/About/Lexicon/Pages/unity-government.aspx
  2. https://en.idi.org.il/articles/27116
  3. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/israels-national-unity-governments-retrospective
  4. https://defense360.csis.org/bad-idea-brokering-national-unity-governments-fragile-states/
  5. https://www.aei.org/op-eds/constituting-unity/
  6. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/myanmars-national-unity-government-and-its-prospects-military-victory
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/national-unity
  8. https://filos.lnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Lytvyn_GNU.pdf
  9. https://www.liberalcurrents.com/minority-and-coalition-governments-a-primer/
  10. https://academic.oup.com/pa/article/78/2/379/7780905
  11. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2021.1997498
  12. https://www.academia.edu/38310872/Governments_of_national_unity_in_the_context_of_coalition_majority_governments_conceptualization_cases_political_causes_and_consequences_by_the_example_of_European_democracies
  13. https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/77158/1/21813253_Aziz_thesis.pdf
  14. https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03456037v1/document
  15. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/a-short-guide-to-h-h-asquiths-first-world-war
  16. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/timeline/worldwars_timeline_noflash.shtml
  17. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/governments-parliaments-and-parties-france/
  18. https://shura.shu.ac.uk/30587/1/oxfordhb-9780198845775-e-3.pdf
  19. https://www.statista.com/topics/9521/the-great-depression-worldwide/
  20. https://explaininghistory.org/2025/06/04/was-partition-inevitable-rethinking-the-political-choices-of-1946-47/
  21. https://www.historyjournal.net/article/342/7-1-3-694.pdf
  22. https://in.1947partitionarchive.org/node/702
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41403854
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2503543
  25. https://sites.nd.edu/michael-coppedge/files/2018/01/Venezuela-The-Rise-and-Fall-of-Partyarchy.pdf
  26. https://lebanesestudies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/8b844d712.-The-Communal-Pact-of-National-Identities-The-Making-and-Politics-of-the-1943-National-Pact-Farid-el-Khazen-1991.pdf
  27. https://moodle2.units.it/pluginfile.php/505728/mod_folder/content/0/723213.pdf?forcedownload=1
  28. https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/bitstreams/b91dc390-9a46-4c77-afee-451c28d5f08f/download
  29. https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-848
  30. https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/10/beyond-dayton-accords-resolving-bosnia-herzegovinas-frozen-conflict
  31. https://afsa.org/dayton-accords-25
  32. http://studies.aljazeera.net/en/reports/2015/12/20151216164440261609.html
  33. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-52699156
  34. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/4/20/israeli-coalition-deal-keeps-netanyahu-in-power
  35. https://www.npr.org/2024/06/01/nx-s1-4987616/south-africa-election-results
  36. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/6/1/south-africa-anc-loses-30-year-parliamentary-majority-after-election
  37. https://time.com/7160736/myanmar-coup-civil-war-conflict-timeline-endgame-explainer/
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629823001890
  39. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2024.2338858
  40. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/mar/13/coalition-britain-in-12-charts
  41. https://ifs.org.uk/sites/default/files/output_url_files/coalitioneffect_ch6.pdf
  42. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39960461
  43. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/combat-studies-institute/csi-books/the-1973-arab-israeli-war.pdf
  44. https://www.jns.org/unity-is-israels-most-powerful-weapon/
  45. https://climate-diplomacy.org/case-studies/land-scarcity-and-urban-violence-south-africa-1990-1994
  46. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/files/case-study-competition/20130322-The-Emergence-of-Racial-Politics-in-South-Africa.pdf
  47. https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2018/07/Zimbabwe-Hyperinflates-Again-Hanke-Bostrom-.pdf
  48. https://www.hrw.org/report/2013/06/04/elephant-room/reforming-zimbabwes-security-sector-ahead-elections
  49. https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-2009-09-16-voa3-68793627/411541.html
  50. https://www.sciencespo.fr/en/news/the-monti-government-the-europeanisation-of-italian-politics/
  51. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2011/cr11176.pdf
  52. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/imf-says-italy-on-right-track-must-not-let-up-on-reform-idUSBRE84F0O7/
  53. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2011/cr11173.pdf
  54. https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/lebanon
  55. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/kproducts/Mitigating-corruption-in-the-reconstruction-of-Lebanon_ForPublication.pdf
  56. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/06/breaking-curse-corruption-lebanon/02-context-corruption-lebanon
  57. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/helpdesk/lebanon-overview-of-corruption-and-anti-corruption
  58. https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/government-formation-and-removal-mechanisms
  59. https://constitutionnet.org/sites/default/files/2017-10/government-formation-and-removal-mechanisms-primer.pdf
  60. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/01/15/national-unity-government-partisan-polarization-527156
  61. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/after-911-a-rush-of-national-unity-then-quickly-more-and-new-divisions/2021/09/11/8f6f7d8e-12a9-11ec-bc8a-8d9a5b534194_story.html
  62. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1870&context=auilr
  63. https://tpy.nelsonmandela.org/pages/part-ii-governing/government-of-national-unity/4-1-decision-making-and-discussion-in-the-government-of-national-unity-cabinet
  64. https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/default/files/document/files/2022/07/undppoliticalsystemsandtheirimpactongoverningrelations28presidentialparliamentaryandhybridsystems29.pdf
  65. https://en.idi.org.il/articles/51060
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319140620_Transitional_governments_of_national_unity_GNU_instruments_of_democratization_or_transitional_stabilization
  67. https://asia.nikkei.com/politics/japan-s-new-pm/japan-s-new-coalition-needs-centrist-unity-to-endure-history-shows
  68. https://dlprog.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/B90nyDgrbaA3vc9AamN8Y3K5lMpoG0I90nLSWS79.pdf
  69. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2023.2293316
  70. https://systems.enpress-publisher.com/index.php/jipd/article/viewFile/8874/4694
  71. https://www.governo.it/it/i-governi-dal-1943-ad-oggi/191
  72. https://www.openpolis.it/parole/cose-un-governo-unita-nazionale/
  73. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/pm_and_pol_tl_01.shtml
  74. https://www.findmypast.com/1939register/national-government-1930s-britain
  75. https://www.wsws.org/en/special/library/foundations-uk/08.html
  76. https://www.npr.org/2022/07/20/1112599869/italy-prime-minister-draghi-coalition-unravels
  77. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/greece-reaches-agreement-on-unity-government-papandreou-will-resign/2011/11/06/gIQAaNQ6sM_story.html
  78. https://socialistdemocracy.org/RecentArticles/RecentIrishGeneralElectionCalled.html
  79. https://www.lse.ac.uk/Hellenic-Observatory/Assets/Documents/Publications/GreeSE-Papers/GreeSE-No198.pdf
  80. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04951/SN04951.pdf
  81. https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-prime-ministers/david-lloyd-george
  82. https://history.blog.gov.uk/2017/08/02/asquith-lloyd-george-and-the-struggle-for-the-premiership-in-december-1916/
  83. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/aug/25/national-government-formed-ramsay-macdonald-1931
  84. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/conservative-party-and-the-formation-of-the-national-government-august-1931/E7334C477BCA260994CC3D127BC3F42F
  85. https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-prime-ministers/winston-churchill
  86. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/britain-moves-leftward-labour-party-and-july-1945-election
  87. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-51441410
  88. https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/pat-leahy-five-reasons-a-government-of-national-unity-is-a-bad-idea-1.4213945
  89. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/6/15/ireland-fine-gael-fianna-fail-and-greens-strike-coalition-deal
  90. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53201346
  91. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/01/world/europe/ireland-election-results.html
  92. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/forget-a-grand-coalition-here-is-what-the-next-government-will-most-likely-look-like-1.4175672
  93. https://www.csis.org/blogs/brexit-bits-bobs-and-blogs/would-united-kingdom-or-ireland-embrace-national-unity-government
  94. https://www.dellarepubblica.it/transizione-ii-badoglio
  95. http://www.senato.it/legislature/repubblica/governi-della-repubblica
  96. http://www.storiaxxisecolo.it/larepubblica/repubblica2.htm
  97. https://www.skuola.net/storia-contemporanea/italia-repubblicana-guerra-fredda.html
  98. https://www.governo.it/it/i-governi-dal-1943-ad-oggi/ordinamento-provvisorio-25-luglio-1943-23-maggio-1948-assemblea-2
  99. https://tesi.luiss.it/31422/1/089312_BELLOMO_SIMONE.pdf
  100. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-17435616
  101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23248823.2022.2030895
  102. https://www.openpolis.it/lattivita-del-governo-draghi-in-numeri/
  103. https://www.mfa.gr/usa/en/about-greece/government-and-politics/the-hellenic-government.html
  104. https://www.hellenicparliament.gr/en/vouli-ton-ellinon/to-politevma/syntagmatiki-istoria/
  105. https://www.greekreporter.com/2025/07/24/democracy-restored-greece/
  106. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-15671354
  107. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/11/lucas-papademos-greece-prime-minister
  108. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/11/world/europe/greek-leaders-resume-talks-on-interim-government.html
  109. https://www.cnn.com/2011/11/11/world/europe/greece-main
  110. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1944v05/d142
  111. https://dzieje.pl/wiadomosci/75-lat-temu-powolano-tymczasowy-rzad-jednosci-narodowej
  112. https://histmag.org/Tymczasowy-Rzad-Jednosci-Narodowej-i-miedzynarodowe-uznanie-nowych-porzadkow-w-Polsce-20877
  113. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945v05/d291
  114. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945v05/d270
  115. https://dje.jcpa.org/articles3/isrpolls84-intro.htm
  116. https://www.cfr.org/blog/implications-israels-new-national-unity-government
  117. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/13/israel-unity-government
  118. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un_documents_type/security-council-press-statements/?ctype=Lebanon&cbtype=lebanon
  119. https://www.dw.com/en/lebanon-forms-a-national-unity-government-nine-months-after-elections/a-47318447
  120. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/lebanon-needs-transformation-not-another-corrupt-unity-government
  121. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia-pacific/afghanistan/285-afghanistan-future-national-unity-government
  122. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep20198
  123. https://thediplomat.com/2017/10/a-house-divided-how-afghanistans-national-unity-government-is-crumbling/
  124. https://www.asiamaior.org/the-journal/08-asia-maior-vol-xxvi-2015/afghanistan-2015-the-national-unity-government-at-work-reforms-war-and-the-search-for-stability.html
  125. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/national-unity-government-tunisia
  126. https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/north-africa/libya/forming-unity-government-may-be-libyas-best-bet-healing
  127. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-nears-forming-emergency-government-after-hamas-attack-2023-10-10/
  128. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/11/netanyahu-sets-up-emergency-israeli-unity-government-and-war-cabinet
  129. https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/11/middleeast/israel-gaza-hamas-war-wednesday-intl-hnk
  130. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clkkdymdwlvo
  131. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/22/thirty-years-after-taif-lebanese-seek-end-to-sectarian-politics
  132. https://www.c-r.org/accord/lebanon/taif-agreement
  133. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2016/05/the-unraveling-of-lebanons-taif-agreement-limits-of-sect-based-power-sharing?lang=en
  134. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/1/31/lebanon-announces-government-after-months-of-deadlock
  135. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2014/2/15/lebanese-pm-unveils-national-unity-cabinet
  136. https://carnegieendowment.org/middle-east/diwan/2021/09/najib-mikati-has-formed-a-new-lebanese-government?lang=en
  137. https://iderc.my/great-hope-for-lebanon/
  138. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-29299088
  139. https://www.rferl.org/a/afghanistan-unity-government-abdullah-ghani-kerry/26520747.html
  140. https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/en/reports/political-landscape/when-the-political-agreement-runs-out-on-the-future-of-afghanistans-national-unity-government/
  141. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/5/17/afghanistan-ghani-and-abdullah-sign-power-sharing-deal
  142. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/8/15/afghan-president-ghani-flees-country-as-taliban-surrounds-kabul
  143. https://hdcentre.org/news/libyan-parliament-approves-new-government-of-national-unity/
  144. https://researchcentre.trtworld.com/publications/policy-outlooks/libyas-government-of-national-unity-priorities-and-challenges/
  145. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2011/06/iraq-coalition-under-stress?lang=en
  146. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/analysis/analysis-where-is-government-process-going-in-iraq/2468548
  147. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-16076633
  148. https://press.un.org/en/2011/sgsm14012.doc.htm
  149. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2011/1/17/tunisia-pm-forms-unity-government
  150. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jan/17/tunisia-forms-unity-government
  151. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/after-mubarak-whats-next-for-egypt/
  152. https://www.accord.org.za/conflict-trends/the-efficacy-of-governments-of-national-unity-in-zimbabwe-and-lesotho/
  153. https://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/reconciling-impossible-south-africa-government-national-unity-1994-1996
  154. https://www.ancparliament.org.za/south-african-government-of-national-unity-gnu-1994-1999/
  155. https://blog-iacl-aidc.org/2024-posts/2024/11/14/south-africas-government-of-national-unity-power-sharing-in-a-fractured-democracy
  156. https://www.pindula.co.zw/Government_of_National_Unity
  157. https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/Tendai-Biti-Zimbabwe-Sept-2015.pdf
  158. https://jppg.thebrpi.org/journals/jppg/Vol_2_No_2_June_2014/9.pdf
  159. https://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/kenya-powersharing-cabinet
  160. https://www.prio.org/publications/7315
  161. https://www.accord.org.za/news/lesotho-an-experimental-hub-of-coalition-governments/
  162. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/06/south-africas-new-coalition-government-heralds-change-region-and-its-leaders
  163. https://sahistory.org.za/article/south-african-government-national-unity-gnu-1994-1999
  164. https://sahistory.org.za/article/nelson-mandela-presidency-1994-1999
  165. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/which-parties-make-up-south-africas-unity-government-2024-06-24/
  166. https://www.anc1912.org.za/anc-welcomes-political-parties-to-the-government-of-national-unity/
  167. https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/default/files/document/files/2024/05/zw080915agreement20between20zanu-pf20and20mdc20on20resolving20the20challenges20facing20zimbabwe.pdf
  168. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/zimbabwes-government-national-unity
  169. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/freehou/2013/en/53815
  170. https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/08/31/false-dawn/zimbabwe-power-sharing-governments-failure-deliver-human-rights
  171. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/05/robert-mugabe-zimbabwe-election-zanu-pf
  172. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/online-exclusive/kenyas-shaky-handshake-deals/
  173. https://www.kofiannanfoundation.org/publication/grand-coalition-takes-the-last-lap/
  174. https://www.france24.com/en/20080413-kibaki-announces-coalition-government-kenya
  175. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/kenyan-leader-kibakis-legacy-stained-by-re-election-violence-graft-2022-04-22/
  176. https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/kenya/103115.htm
  177. https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/kenya/90909.htm
  178. https://www.britannica.com/place/Madagascar/Power-struggle
  179. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/congo-president-plans-unity-government-response-eastern-crisis-2025-02-22/
  180. https://english.news.cn/africa/20250808/488369a2f4934bbd85d5bddec6bff310/c.html
  181. https://www.dw.com/en/dr-congo-president-to-hold-talks-to-form-unity-government/a-71720060
  182. https://www.thebrenthurstfoundation.org/news/the-drc-is-a-government-of-national-unity-a-good-idea/
  183. https://thediplomat.com/2025/06/myanmars-national-unity-government-isnt-a-unity-government/
  184. https://www.idsa.in/publisher/occasionalpaper/national-unity-government-in-sri-lanka-an-assessment
  185. https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/07/palestinian-factions-pledge-unity-another-diplomatic-win-china
  186. https://www.nationalia.info/brief/11712/china-tightens-screws-on-minority-repression-with-laws-on-national-unity-standard-chinese
  187. https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/02/myanmar-new-data-show-wide-support-unity-government
  188. https://peacerep.org/2024/12/16/financing-the-anti-military-resistance-unpacking-the-national-unity-governments-role-in-myanmars-political-transition/
  189. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/1/4/qa-leader-of-myanmars-shadow-government-talks-civil-war-strategy-in-2025
  190. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/10/sri-lankan-opposition-parties-plan-unity-government-after-president-quits
  191. https://thediplomat.com/2022/04/sri-lanka-opposition-rejects-proposed-unity-government/
  192. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/all-you-need-to-know-about-a-unity-government
  193. https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/01/28/malaysian-unity-governments-power-was-retained-but-constrained-in-2023/
  194. https://www.afr.com/politics/png-should-try-a-national-unity-government-20111215-j3ors
  195. https://www.pacificatrocities.org/blog/civil-war-of-china-chinese-communist-party-vs-kuomintang
  196. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/chinese-rev
  197. https://www.thinkchina.sg/history/photo-story-failure-double-tenth-agreement-and-beginning-chinese-civil-war
  198. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-3/mswv3_25.htm
  199. https://zw.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zgjj/202112/t20211216_10470539.htm
  200. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2022-8-myanmars-national-unity-government-a-radical-arrangement-to-counteract-the-coup-by-moe-thuzar-and-htet-myet-min-tun/
  201. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/myanmar-history-coup-military-rule-ethnic-conflict-rohingya
  202. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2021/05/11/the-national-unity-government-in-myanmar-role-and-challenges/
  203. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/5/6/myanmars-anti-coup-bloc-to-form-a-defence-force
  204. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/backgrounder-ethnic-armies-in-the-myanmar-civil-war/
  205. https://www.usip.org/publications/2021/10/myanmars-unity-government-meets-nsa-sullivan-gains-further-traction
  206. https://mmpeacemonitor.org/en/cover-story-eng/four-years-on-how-far-has-peoples-defensive-war-come/
  207. https://eng.mizzima.com/2025/10/24/27542
  208. https://fulcrum.sg/myanmars-fake-election-is-a-trap-not-a-transition/
  209. https://hdff.org/the-fragmentation-of-resistance-in-myanmar-implications-and-consequences-for-the-national-unity-government-nug/
  210. https://www.dw.com/en/sri-lanka-sets-up-national-unity-government-to-speed-up-reforms/a-18333225
  211. https://dai-global-developments.com/articles/new-opportunities-emerge-to-support-meaningful-reform-in-sri-lanka/
  212. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09763996221087017
  213. https://online.ucpress.edu/as/article/63/2/291/195812/Malaysia-in-2022Election-Year-Islamization-and
  214. https://fulcrum.sg/why-malaysias-unity-government-will-probably-survive/
  215. https://theannapurnaexpress.com/story/49550/
  216. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/governments-parliaments-and-parties-canada/
  217. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/perus-first-female-president-asks-cabinet-to-take-anti-corruption-pledge
  218. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-19928905
  219. https://www.opb.org/article/2022/12/07/peru-swears-in-a-new-president-amid-constitutional-crisis/
  220. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/union-government
  221. https://www.warmuseum.ca/firstworldwar/history/life-at-home-during-the-war/recruitment-and-conscription/conscription-1917/
  222. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/coalition-government
  223. https://yenniejun.com/books/lincoln/
  224. https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/04/friedmans-foolish-fantasy/
  225. https://www.upi.com/Archives/2001/03/19/Argentina-forms-national-unity-government/4405984978000/
  226. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1228873.stm
  227. https://gadebate.un.org/sites/default/files/gastatements/66/co_es_25.pdf
  228. https://www.dw.com/es/hait%25C3%25AD-abren-di%25C3%25A1logo-para-formar-un-gobierno-de-unidad/a-57430367
  229. https://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article8106
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.