Hubbry Logo
Solar flareSolar flareMain
Open search
Solar flare
Community hub
Solar flare
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Solar flare
Solar flare
Solar flare
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Image artifacts (diffraction spikes and vertical streaks) appearing in a CCD image of a major solar flare due to the excess incident radiation
Part of a series of articles about
Heliophysics
Heliospheric current sheet
Heliospheric current sheet
Fundamentals
Interplanetary medium
Magnetospherics
Solar phenomena

A solar flare is a relatively intense, localized emission of electromagnetic radiation in the Sun's atmosphere. Flares occur in active regions and are often, but not always, accompanied by coronal mass ejections, solar particle events, and other eruptive solar phenomena. The occurrence of solar flares varies with the 11-year solar cycle.

Solar flares are thought to occur when stored magnetic energy in the Sun's atmosphere accelerates charged particles in the surrounding plasma. This results in the emission of electromagnetic radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum. The typical time profile of these emissions features three identifiable phases: a precursor phase, an impulsive phase when particle acceleration dominates, a gradual phase in which hot plasma injected into the corona by the flare cools by a combination of radiation and conduction of energy back down to the lower atmosphere, and a currently unexplained EUV late phase [1] that occurs in some flares.

The extreme ultraviolet and X-ray radiation from solar flares is absorbed by the daylight side of Earth's upper atmosphere, in particular the ionosphere, and does not reach the surface. This absorption can temporarily increase the ionization of the ionosphere which may interfere with short-wave radio communication. The prediction of solar flares is an active area of research.

Flares also occur on other stars, where the term stellar flare applies.

Physical description

[edit]
An X3.2-class solar flare observed in different wavelengths. Clockwise from top left: 304, 335, 131, and 193 Å

Solar flares are eruptions of electromagnetic radiation originating in the Sun's atmosphere.[2] They affect all layers of the solar atmosphere (photosphere, chromosphere, and corona).[3] The plasma medium is heated to >107 kelvin, while electrons, protons, and heavier ions are accelerated to near the speed of light.[4][5] Flares emit electromagnetic radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum, from radio waves to gamma rays.[3]

Flares occur in active regions, often around sunspots, where intense magnetic fields penetrate the photosphere to link the corona to the solar interior. Flares are powered by the sudden (timescales of minutes to tens of minutes) release of magnetic energy stored in the corona. The same energy releases may also produce coronal mass ejections (CMEs), although the relationship between CMEs and flares is not well understood.[6]

Associated with solar flares are flare sprays.[7] They involve faster ejections of material than eruptive prominences,[8] and reach velocities of 20 to 2,000 kilometres per second.[9]

Cause

[edit]

Flares occur when accelerated charged particles, mainly electrons, interact with the plasma medium. Evidence suggests that the phenomenon of magnetic reconnection leads to this extreme acceleration of charged particles.[10] On the Sun, magnetic reconnection may happen on solar arcades—a type of prominence consisting of a series of closely occurring loops following magnetic lines of force.[11] These lines of force quickly reconnect into a lower arcade of loops leaving a helix of magnetic field unconnected to the rest of the arcade. The sudden release of energy in this reconnection is the origin of the particle acceleration. The unconnected magnetic helical field and the material that it contains may violently expand outwards forming a coronal mass ejection.[12] This also explains why solar flares typically erupt from active regions on the Sun where magnetic fields are much stronger. [citation needed]

Although there is a general agreement on the source of a flare's energy, the mechanisms involved are not well understood. It is not clear how the magnetic energy is transformed into the kinetic energy of the particles, nor is it known how some particles can be accelerated to the GeV range (109 electron volt) and beyond. There are also some inconsistencies regarding the total number of accelerated particles, which sometimes seems to be greater than the total number in the coronal loop.[13]

Post-eruption loops and arcades

[edit]
See also: Coronal loop
A post-eruption arcade present after an X5.7-class solar flare during the Bastille Day solar storm[14]

After the eruption of a solar flare, post-eruption loops made of hot plasma begin to form across the neutral line separating regions of opposite magnetic polarity near the flare's source. These loops extend from the photosphere up into the corona and form along the neutral line at increasingly greater distances from the source as time progresses.[15] The existence of these hot loops is thought to be continued by prolonged heating present after the eruption and during the flare's decay stage.[16]

In sufficiently powerful flares, typically of C-class or higher, the loops may combine to form an elongated arch-like structure known as a post-eruption arcade. These structures may last anywhere from multiple hours to multiple days after the initial flare.[15] In some cases, dark sunward-traveling plasma voids known as supra-arcade downflows may form above these arcades.[17]

Frequency

[edit]

The frequency of occurrence of solar flares varies with the 11-year solar cycle. It can typically range from several per day during solar maxima to less than one every week during solar minima. Additionally, more powerful flares are less frequent than weaker ones. For example, X10-class (severe) flares occur on average about eight times per cycle, whereas M1-class (minor) flares occur on average about 2,000 times per cycle.[18]

In 1984 Erich Rieger and coworkers discovered an approximately 154-day period in the occurrence of gamma-ray emitting solar flares at least since the solar cycle 19.[19] The period has since been confirmed in most heliophysics data and the interplanetary magnetic field and is commonly known as the Rieger period. The period's resonance harmonics also have been reported from most data types in the heliosphere. [citation needed]

The frequency distributions of various flare phenomena can be characterized by power-law distributions. For example, the peak fluxes of radio, extreme ultraviolet, and hard and soft X-ray emissions; total energies; and flare durations (see § Duration) have been found to follow power-law distributions.[20][21][22][23]: 23–28 

Classification

[edit]

Soft X-ray

[edit]
An M5.8, M2.3, and X2.8 flare were recorded by GOES-16 on 14 December 2023. Their corresponding peak fluxes in the 0.1 to 0.8 nm channel were 5.8×10−5, 2.3×10−5, and 2.8×10−4 W/m2, respectively.

The modern classification system for solar flares uses the letters A, B, C, M, or X, according to the peak flux in watts per square metre (W/m2) of soft X-rays with wavelengths 0.1 to 0.8 nanometres (1 to 8 ångströms), as measured by GOES satellites in geosynchronous orbit. [citation needed]

Classification Peak flux range (W/m2)
A < 10−7
B 10−7 – 10−6
C 10−6 – 10−5
M 10−5 – 10−4
X > 10−4

The strength of an event within a class is noted by a numerical suffix ranging from 1 up to, but excluding, 10, which is also the factor for that event within the class. Hence, an X2 flare is twice the strength of an X1 flare, an X3 flare is three times as powerful as an X1. M-class flares are a tenth the size of X-class flares with the same numeric suffix.[24] An X2 is four times more powerful than an M5 flare.[25] X-class flares with a peak flux that exceeds 10−3 W/m2 may be noted with a numerical suffix equal to or greater than 10.

This system was originally devised in 1970 and included only the letters C, M, and X. These letters were chosen to avoid confusion with other optical classification systems. The A and B classes were added in the 1990s as instruments became more sensitive to weaker flares. Around the same time, the backronym moderate for M-class flares and extreme for X-class flares began to be used.[26]

Importance

[edit]

An earlier classification system, sometimes referred to as the flare importance, was based on H-alpha spectral observations. The scheme uses both the intensity and emitting surface. The classification in intensity is qualitative, referring to the flares as: faint (f), normal (n), or brilliant (b). The emitting surface is measured in terms of millionths of the hemisphere and is described below. (The total hemisphere area AH = 15.5 × 1012 km2.) [citation needed]

Classification Corrected area
(millionths of hemisphere)
S < 100
1 100–250
2 250–600
3 600–1200
4 > 1200

A flare is then classified taking S or a number that represents its size and a letter that represents its peak intensity, v.g.: Sn is a normal sunflare.[27]

Duration

[edit]

A common measure of flare duration is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) time of flux in the soft X-ray bands 0.05 to 0.4 and 0.1 to 0.8 nm measured by GOES. The FWHM time spans from when a flare's flux first reaches halfway between its maximum flux and the background flux and when it again reaches this value as the flare decays. Using this measure, the duration of a flare ranges from approximately tens of seconds to several hours with a median duration of approximately 6 and 11 minutes in the 0.05 to 0.4 and 0.1 to 0.8 nm bands, respectively.[28][29]

Flares can also be classified based on their duration as either impulsive or long duration events (LDE). The time threshold separating the two is not well defined. The SWPC regards events requiring 30 minutes or more to decay to half maximum as LDEs, whereas Belgium's Solar-Terrestrial Centre of Excellence regards events with duration greater than 60 minutes as LDEs.[30][31]

Effects

[edit]
See also: Space weather § Effects

The electromagnetic radiation emitted during a solar flare propagates away from the Sun at the speed of light with intensity inversely proportional to the square of the distance from its source region. The excess ionizing radiation, namely X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (XUV) radiation, is known to affect planetary atmospheres and is of relevance to human space exploration and the search for extraterrestrial life. [citation needed]

Solar flares also affect other objects in the Solar System. Research into these effects has primarily focused on the atmosphere of Mars and, to a lesser extent, that of Venus.[32] The impacts on other planets in the Solar System are little studied in comparison. As of 2024, research on their effects on Mercury have been limited to modeling of the response of ions in the planet's magnetosphere,[33] and their impact on Jupiter and Saturn have only been studied in the context of X-ray radiation back scattering off of the planets' upper atmospheres.[34][35]

Ionosphere

[edit]
Further information: Sudden ionospheric disturbance
Structure of Earth's nightside (left) and dayside (right) ionospheric sub-layers under normal conditions

Enhanced XUV irradiance during solar flares can result in increased ionization, dissociation, and heating in the ionospheres of Earth and Earth-like planets. On Earth, these changes to the upper atmosphere, collectively referred to as sudden ionospheric disturbances, can interfere with short-wave radio communication and global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) such as GPS,[36] and subsequent expansion of the upper atmosphere can increase drag on satellites in low Earth orbit leading to orbital decay over time.[37][38][additional citation(s) needed]

Flare-associated XUV photons interact with and ionize neutral constituents of planetary atmospheres via the process of photoionization. The electrons that are freed in this process, referred to as photoelectrons to distinguish them from the ambient ionospheric electrons, are left with kinetic energies equal to the photon energy in excess of the ionization threshold. In the lower ionosphere where flare impacts are greatest and transport phenomena are less important, the newly liberated photoelectrons lose energy primarily via thermalization with the ambient electrons and neutral species and via secondary ionization due to collisions with the latter, or so-called photoelectron impact ionization. In the process of thermalization, photoelectrons transfer energy to neutral species, resulting in heating and expansion of the neutral atmosphere.[39] The greatest increases in ionization occur in the lower ionosphere where wavelengths with the greatest relative increase in irradiance—the highly penetrative X-ray wavelengths—are absorbed, corresponding to Earth's E and D layers and Mars's M1 layer.[32][36][40][41][42]

Radio blackouts

[edit]
See also: Communications blackout § Space weather

The temporary increase in ionization of the daylight side of Earth's atmosphere, in particular the D layer of the ionosphere, can interfere with short-wave radio communications that rely on its level of ionization for skywave propagation. Skywave, or skip, refers to the propagation of radio waves reflected or refracted off of the ionized ionosphere. When ionization is higher than normal, radio waves get degraded or completely absorbed by losing energy from the more frequent collisions with free electrons.[2][36]

The level of ionization of the atmosphere correlates with the strength of the associated solar flare in soft X-ray radiation. The Space Weather Prediction Center, a part of the United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, classifies radio blackouts by the peak soft X-ray intensity of the associated flare.[2]

Classification Associated
SXR class		 Description[18]
R1 M1 Minor radio blackout
R2 M5 Moderate radio blackout
R3 X1 Strong radio blackout
R4 X10 Severe radio blackout
R5 X20 Extreme radio blackout

Solar flare effect

[edit]
See also: Ionospheric dynamo region
Electric currents in Earth's dayside ionosphere can be strengthened during a large solar flare.

During non-flaring or solar quiet conditions, electric currents flow through the ionosphere's dayside E layer inducing small-amplitude diurnal variations in the geomagnetic field. These ionospheric currents can be strengthened during large solar flares due to increases in electrical conductivity associated with enhanced ionization of the E and D layers. The subsequent increase in the induced geomagnetic field variation is referred to as a solar flare effect (sfe) or historically as a magnetic crochet. The latter term derives from the French word crochet meaning hook reflecting the hook-like disturbances in magnetic field strength observed by ground-based magnetometers. These disturbances are on the order of a few nanoteslas and last for a few minutes, which is relatively minor compared to those induced during geomagnetic storms.[43][44]

Health

[edit]

Low Earth orbit

[edit]

For astronauts in low Earth orbit, an expected radiation dose from the electromagnetic radiation emitted during a solar flare is about 0.05 gray, which is not immediately lethal on its own. Of much more concern for astronauts is the particle radiation associated with solar particle events.[45]

Mars

[edit]

The impacts of solar flare radiation on Mars are relevant to exploration and the search for life on the planet. Models of its atmosphere indicate that the most energetic solar flares previously recorded may have provided acute doses of radiation that would have been harmful or almost lethal to mammals and other higher organisms on Mars's surface. Furthermore, flares energetic enough to provide lethal doses, while not yet observed on the Sun, are thought to occur and have been observed on other Sun-like stars.[46][47][48]

Observational history

[edit]
Further information: Solar observation

Flares produce radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum, although with different intensity. They are not very intense in visible light, but they can be very bright at particular spectral lines. They normally produce bremsstrahlung in X-rays and synchrotron radiation in radio.[49]

Optical observations

[edit]
Richard Carrington's sketch of the first recorded solar flare (A and B mark the initial bright points which moved over the course of five minutes to C and D before disappearing.)[50]

Solar flares were first observed by Richard Carrington and Richard Hodgson independently on 1 September 1859 by projecting the image of the solar disk produced by an optical telescope through a broad-band filter.[51][52] It was an extraordinarily intense white light flare, a flare emitting a high amount of light in the visual spectrum.[51]

Since flares produce copious amounts of radiation at H-alpha,[53] adding a narrow (≈1 Å) passband filter centered at this wavelength to the optical telescope allows the observation of not very bright flares with small telescopes. For years Hα was the main, if not the only, source of information about solar flares. Other passband filters are also used.[citation needed]

Radio observations

[edit]
Further information: Solar radio emission

During World War II, on February 25 and 26, 1942, British radar operators observed radiation that Stanley Hey interpreted as solar emission.[54] Their discovery did not go public until the end of the conflict. The same year, Southworth also observed the Sun in radio, but as with Hey, his observations were only known after 1945. In 1943, Grote Reber was the first to report radioastronomical observations of the Sun at 160 MHz.[55] The fast development of radioastronomy revealed new peculiarities of the solar activity like storms and bursts related to the flares. Today, ground-based radiotelescopes observe the Sun from c. 15 MHz up to 400 GHz.

Space telescopes

[edit]
Observations of a solar flare by different instruments aboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory

Because the Earth's atmosphere absorbs much of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the Sun with wavelengths shorter than 300 nm, space-based telescopes allowed for the observation of solar flares in previously unobserved high-energy spectral lines. Since the 1970s, the GOES series of satellites have been continuously observing the Sun in soft X-rays, and their observations have become the standard measure of flares, diminishing the importance of the H-alpha classification. Additionally, space-based telescopes allow for the observation of extremely long wavelengths—as long as a few kilometres—which cannot propagate through the ionosphere.

Examples of large solar flares

[edit]
See also: List of solar storms § Soft X-ray solar flares
Space weather conditions, including the soft-X-ray flux (top row), during the 2003 Halloween solar storms[56]

The most powerful flare ever observed is thought to be the flare associated with the 1859 Carrington Event.[57] While no soft X-ray measurements were made at the time, the magnetic crochet associated with the flare was recorded by ground-based magnetometers allowing the flare's strength to be estimated after the event. Using these magnetometer readings, its soft X-ray class has been estimated to be greater than X10[58] and around X45 (±5).[59][60]

In modern times, the largest solar flare measured with instruments occurred on 4 November 2003. This event saturated the GOES detectors, and because of this, its classification is only approximate. Initially, extrapolating the GOES curve, it was estimated to be X28.[61] Later analysis of the ionospheric effects suggested increasing this estimate to X45.[62][63] This event produced the first clear evidence of a new spectral component above 100 GHz.[64]

Prediction

[edit]

Current methods of flare prediction are problematic, and there is no certain indication that an active region on the Sun will produce a flare. However, many properties of active regions and their sunspots correlate with flaring. For example, magnetically complex regions (based on line-of-sight magnetic field) referred to as delta spots frequently produce the largest flares. A simple scheme of sunspot classification based on the McIntosh system for sunspot groups, or related to a region's fractal complexity[65] is commonly used as a starting point for flare prediction.[66] Predictions are usually stated in terms of probabilities for occurrence of flares above M- or X-class within 24 or 48 hours. The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) issues forecasts of this kind.[67] MAG4 was developed at the University of Alabama in Huntsville with support from the Space Radiation Analysis Group at Johnson Space Flight Center (NASA/SRAG) for forecasting M- and X-class flares, CMEs, fast CME, and solar energetic particle events.[68] A physics-based method that can predict imminent large solar flares was proposed by Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research (ISEE), Nagoya University.[69]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Solar flare

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A solar flare is a powerful explosion of and energetic particles erupting from the Sun's atmosphere, triggered by the sudden release of stored in twisted and tangled magnetic fields near sunspots. These events, which can last from minutes to hours, propel bursts of X-rays, , and high-speed particles into at near- speeds, often occurring in conjunction with coronal mass ejections (CMEs) during periods of heightened solar activity. Solar flares arise primarily from the process of , where opposing magnetic field lines in the Sun's corona collide, snap, and reform, converting stored magnetic energy into thermal and kinetic energy that heats plasma to tens of millions of degrees and accelerates particles. They are most frequent during the phase of the Sun's approximately 11-year activity cycle, when numbers peak due to intensified magnetic dynamo processes in the solar interior. Flares are classified by their peak flux observed from , using a from A-class (weakest, minor heating) to X-class (most intense, capable of global disruptions), with each class representing a tenfold increase in energy output and subclasses numbered from 1 to 9 (or higher for extreme events). The impacts of solar flares on and environments vary by intensity but primarily affect the and technological systems rather than surface life directly, as the atmosphere shields against harmful . C-class and weaker flares have negligible effects, while M-class events can cause brief high-frequency radio blackouts on the sunlit side of and minor hazards to astronauts beyond low- orbit. X-class flares, the most powerful, may induce widespread radio communication disruptions, degrade , and trigger solar storms that pose risks to and at high latitudes; associated CMEs can cause geomagnetic storms that affect power grids through induced geomagnetic currents. Historical examples include the 2003 X28 flare, the strongest on record, which released energy equivalent to billions of bombs and temporarily blinded instruments. Monitoring by agencies like and NOAA enables forecasts to mitigate these effects on modern infrastructure.

Physical Characteristics

Definition and Overview

A solar flare is a sudden, intense burst of radiation from the Sun's atmosphere, primarily emitting in X-rays, , and radio waves, with durations ranging from minutes to hours. This phenomenon originates in the solar corona and , where it manifests as a rapid release of electromagnetic energy across much of the spectrum, from radio waves to gamma rays. Unlike coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which involve the expulsion of plasma and magnetic fields, solar flares are distinct as primarily events, though they often occur in conjunction with CMEs as part of broader solar eruptive activity. At its core, a solar flare involves the basic physical process of in the solar corona, where built-up is suddenly converted into and . This reconnection accelerates particles and heats plasma to temperatures of 10 to 20 million degrees , producing the observed radiation bursts. The process is triggered by the tangling and reconfiguration of lines near sunspots, releasing stored energy that powers the flare's explosive characteristics. Solar flares play a key role in solar activity, contributing to the dynamic variability of the Sun's output over its 11-year cycle. Their typical output ranges from 102410^{24} to 102910^{29} ergs, equivalent to the of millions of bombs. Visually, flares appear as compact brightenings on the solar disk when observed in H-alpha or (EUV) wavelengths, highlighting the localized regions of intensified emission.

Cause and Trigger Mechanisms

Solar flares are primarily driven by the process of in the Sun's corona, where oppositely directed magnetic field lines in the solar atmosphere come into close proximity, break, and reconnect in a new configuration, thereby converting stored into kinetic, thermal, and radiative energy. Direct evidence for this process includes observations of coronal loop structures, hard X-ray sources at reconnection sites, plasma inflows and outflows, and signatures of particle acceleration, obtained from multi-wavelength observations by missions such as SOHO, SDO, Parker Solar Probe, and RHESSI. This reconnection occurs in magnetically complex regions, allowing the sudden release of energy that powers the flare. The energy available for release is approximated by the magnetic energy content in the reconnection volume, given by the formula E≈B28πV,E \approx \frac{B^2}{8\pi} V, where BB is the magnetic field strength and VV is the volume of the reconnection region; this expression derives from the magnetic energy density in magnetohydrodynamics and highlights how stronger fields or larger volumes can yield greater flare energies. The triggers for initiating magnetic reconnection often involve photospheric motions that build up magnetic stress over time. Shearing motions from convection in the photosphere twist and shear magnetic field lines, increasing the non-potentiality of the field and leading to instability. Flux emergence, where new magnetic flux rises from the solar interior into the atmosphere, can bring opposite-polarity fields into contact, promoting reconnection. Additionally, tether-cutting instabilities occur when internal reconnection within a sheared arcade severs overlying field lines, allowing the core field to erupt and initiate the main reconnection site higher in the corona. The standard model for many solar flares, particularly two-ribbon flares, is the CSHKP model, which integrates these processes into a cohesive framework. Named after contributions from Carmichael (1964), Sturrock (1966), Hirayama (1974), and Kopp and Pneuman (1976), it describes a slow buildup phase where magnetic shear accumulates in active regions, followed by a fast impulsive phase triggered by reconnection that forms a current sheet and ejects plasma, leading to sequential release. Flares predominantly originate in active regions near groups, where concentrated create the necessary complexity for reconnection; sunspots serve as footpoints for these arched field lines, and their relative motions drive the shearing that destabilizes the configuration.

Morphological Features

Solar flares exhibit distinct morphological features that evolve through their lifecycle, revealing the spatial and temporal manifestations of release in the solar atmosphere. During the impulsive phase, compact bright regions known as flare kernels emerge at the footpoints of reconnected lines, appearing as intense emission in chromospheric lines such as H-alpha. These kernels are often clustered within elongated structures called flare ribbons, which trace the polarity inversion line of the underlying photospheric and can span tens of thousands of kilometers. The ribbons typically brighten rapidly as non-thermal electrons precipitate into the , heating the plasma and producing enhanced H-alpha emission. In the post-eruption phase, the flare develops prominent coronal structures, including loops filled with hot plasma reaching temperatures of 10-20 MK, which organize into arcades perpendicular to the ribbons. These loops form as successive magnetic reconnections occur at higher altitudes, creating nested arcades where cooler, inner loops are enveloped by hotter, outer ones. plays a key role here, as energy input from accelerated particles drives upward flows of heated plasma from the into the corona, filling the loops with dense, hot material over minutes. Subsequent cooling leads to , where the plasma density increases and temperatures drop, sometimes forming cooler threads within the arcades. Associated with many flares, particularly those accompanied by coronal mass ejections, are dimming regions—transient areas of reduced coronal density and emission in (EUV) and soft wavelengths, resulting from the evacuation of plasma during mass ejection. These dimmings often appear as expansive, low-intensity patches near the flare site, with density depletions up to 50% or more, recovering over hours to days as plasma refills the volume. The temporal evolution of these features unfolds in distinct phases: a rapid rise phase lasting minutes, marked by the initial brightening of kernels and ribbons alongside the onset of evaporation; a peak phase where emissions in hard X-rays and H-alpha maximize, coinciding with loop filling; and a prolonged decay phase of hours, during which arcade structures cool and dimmings persist. EUV and soft X-ray imaging, such as from the , vividly captures this progression, revealing the nested arcades as layered brightenings that grow outward with time.

Classification and Occurrence

Classification Systems

Solar flares are primarily classified using the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) soft X-ray scale, which measures the peak flux of emissions in the 1–8 Å (0.1–0.8 nm) wavelength band in units of watts per square meter (W/m²). This logarithmic system divides flares into five classes—A, B, C, M, and X—each representing an order-of-magnitude increase in intensity, with further subdivisions from 1 to 9 within each class based on the exact flux value. For instance, an A-class flare has a peak flux of 10−810^{-8} to 10−710^{-7} W/m², while an X-class flare exceeds 10−410^{-4} W/m²; the notation X1.0 specifically denotes a flux of 10−410^{-4} W/m² at the boundary of the X class. An earlier and complementary classification system relies on observations in the H-alpha spectral line, assessing flares by their optical brightness and apparent area on the solar disk as seen from . Flares smaller than the threshold for numbered classes are termed subflares, while larger events are graded by area in millionths of the Sun's visible disk (1, 2, or 3) combined with brightness intensity: N for normal, B for bright, or F for faint. Thus, a 2N flare covers about 2% of the solar disk with normal brightness, and a 3B represents the most intense, covering 3% with bright emission; this system, though subjective, provides morphological context not captured by measurements alone. Flares are also categorized by duration, distinguishing short-lived impulsive events, which typically last minutes and exhibit rapid rise and decay in emissions, from or long-duration events (LDEs) that persist for hours with slower, extended profiles. Impulsive flares are often compact and associated with quick release in lower atmospheric layers, whereas gradual flares involve prolonged heating and complex structures, such as arcades of loops, leading to sustained soft output. For a more comprehensive assessment, classifications often combine soft and H-alpha metrics, as seen in historical catalogs that pair GOES intensity with optical importance to rate overall significance. This integrated approach accounts for multi-wavelength signatures, though no single universal composite index exists. These systems have inherent limitations: the GOES scale reflects only peak , not total radiated , which requires integrating over time for accurate estimation. Moreover, classes do not directly indicate geoeffectiveness, as impacts on depend on factors like the flare's solar location, association with coronal mass ejections, and interplanetary propagation rather than intensity alone.

Frequency and Distribution

Solar flares exhibit a pronounced variation in frequency tied to the 11-year , with activity peaking during when magnetic complexity on the Sun is highest and declining sharply toward . During , the rate of C-class flares can approach 10,000 per year, reflecting the abundance of active regions capable of producing lower-energy events, while near , overall flare occurrences drop to a few hundred C-class events annually or less. This cyclic modulation arises from the evolution of the Sun's global magnetic dynamo, which generates more groups and twisted field lines conducive to reconnection during the cycle's ascending and peak phases. The distribution of flares by intensity class underscores their rarity at higher energies: X-class flares, the most powerful, occur approximately 8 times per 11-year cycle on average for events exceeding X10 intensity, though all X-class events number around 100 in active cycles like Solar Cycle 23. M-class flares are more common, totaling about 100–200 per cycle for moderate intensities, while C-class events number in the thousands across the cycle, comprising the bulk of observed activity. These statistics highlight how flare productivity scales inversely with energy output, with lower-class events dominating due to the prevalence of weaker magnetic instabilities. In Solar Cycle 25, which began in December 2019, activity has exceeded initial predictions, with over 50 X-class flares recorded by mid-2025, indicating a stronger-than-average cycle. Spatially, solar flares are highly concentrated in active regions, which cover only 5–10% of the solar surface even at maximum and serve as hotspots for . These regions, often associated with groups, host the vast majority of flares, with over 90% occurring within 30° of the solar . During the rising phase of the , flare frequency increases near the as active regions migrate equatorward from higher latitudes (Spörer's law), leading to a band-like distribution symmetric about the but with occasional hemispheric preferences. Over longer timescales, flare frequency is modulated by the 11-year Schwabe cycle superimposed on the 22-year Hale cycle, which influences hemispheric asymmetry through the reversal of the Sun's magnetic polarity every cycle. The Hale cycle introduces alternating dominance between hemispheres, with northern-hemisphere flares often outnumbering southern during even cycles and vice versa in odd cycles, resulting in asymmetry indices that oscillate with a ~22-year period. This pattern, evident in radio flux and sunspot data, extends to flare distributions and reflects underlying dynamo asymmetries, including a possible northward-shifted relic field. Recent analyses of Cycles 17–25 confirm this Hale modulation, with Cycle 25 showing reduced overall asymmetry compared to Cycle 24.

Impacts and Effects

Effects on Earth's Atmosphere and Magnetosphere

Solar flares release intense bursts of and (EUV) radiation that propagate to at the , interacting primarily with the sunlit side of the planet's upper atmosphere. This radiation enhances in the lower , particularly the D-layer at altitudes of 60–90 km, by breaking apart neutral molecules and producing additional free electrons. The resulting increase in can be significant, with studies showing enhancements of up to several orders of magnitude during intense events, altering the refractive properties of the for . These ionospheric disturbances manifest as radio blackouts, where high-frequency (HF) radio signals (3–30 MHz) are absorbed due to energy loss from electron collisions in the denser D-layer. Blackouts are more pronounced on the dayside and scale with flare intensity: M-class flares (peak flux ~10^{-5} W/m² in 1–8 Å X-rays) typically cause disruptions lasting 5–20 minutes, while X-class flares (≥10^{-4} W/m²) can extend blackouts to 30 minutes to 2 hours, with examples like the X9.3 event on 6 September 2017 producing fade-outs up to 120 minutes at mid-latitude stations. A related phenomenon is the sudden ionospheric disturbance (SID), characterized by rapid enhancements in D-layer absorption that cause phase anomalies in very low frequency (VLF) signals, often detectable within seconds of the flare onset and lasting 5–20 minutes as the ionization peaks and decays. Direct geomagnetic effects from solar flares are generally subtle and arise from enhanced ionospheric conductivity, which amplifies the solar quiet (Sq) currents and induces small variations (solar flare effects, or Sfes) in , typically on the order of 1–10 nT at mid-latitudes with durations around 16 minutes. These are distinct from stronger indirect geomagnetic storms triggered by coronal mass ejections (CMEs) associated with flares, as direct particle acceleration into the during flares is minimal without . Polar regions may experience more noticeable electrodynamic coupling, including reconfiguration of magnetospheric convection and reduced in the E-region (90–150 km), as observed during the 2017 X-class flare. Navigation systems like GPS are affected through ionospheric scintillation and delays caused by (TEC) fluctuations, where flare-induced ionization can increase vertical TEC by 10–100% or more, leading to signal phase shifts and positioning errors up to several meters. For instance, during large flares, TEC enhancements correlate with EUV peaks, exacerbating range errors on the dayside where the is most disturbed. These effects highlight the flares' role in short-term disruptions to the coupled atmosphere-magnetosphere system, though they typically subside as the radiation subsides.

Technological and Biological Impacts

Solar flares pose significant risks to technological primarily through their associated emissions of s and high-energy particles, which can disrupt operations and communication systems. The intense radiation from flares ionizes the Earth's upper atmosphere, leading to shortwave fadeouts that cause blackouts in high-frequency (HF) radio communications on the sunlit side of the , with durations scaling by intensity: typically 5–20 minutes for M-class and up to 30 minutes to 2 hours for X-class events. These blackouts affect , maritime, and operations in affected regions, with mitigation often involving switching to -based relays or very high-frequency (VHF) alternatives. Additionally, (SEPs) released during flares can penetrate electronics in (LEO), causing single-event upsets (SEUs) that flip bits in memory and lead to temporary malfunctions or data errors in unshielded components. Flares also heat and expand the , increasing atmospheric density and drag on LEO s, which can alter orbits and necessitate fuel-intensive maneuvers to maintain positioning. Power grids experience indirect vulnerabilities from solar flares through their frequent association with coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which trigger s and induce (GICs) in long transmission lines, potentially overheating transformers and causing widespread outages. Flares alone produce minimal direct induction on power systems due to their electromagnetic nature, but the coupled effects with storms amplify risks, as seen in historical events where grid failures led to blackouts affecting millions. Economic impacts from major flare-related disruptions, particularly in operations, are estimated at $10 million to $100 million per event, including costs for corrections, lost from service interruptions, and hardware repairs, with global annual figures exceeding $200 million from effects. For instance, a 2022 linked to solar activity resulted in the loss of 40 satellites due to enhanced drag, costing approximately $20 million. On the biological front, solar flares elevate radiation exposure risks for air travelers and astronauts, primarily via SEPs that partially penetrate Earth's magnetosphere during solar proton events. Polar flights, which traverse regions of weaker magnetic shielding, can see dose rates spike to levels delivering 10 to 20 microsieverts (μSv) per event, comparable to several chest X-rays and contributing to cumulative exposure for frequent flyers. For astronauts in space, NASA models assess cancer risks from chronic and acute radiation, including flare-induced SEPs, with projections indicating a potential 1% increase in lifetime fatal cancer risk per year of exposure in low-Earth orbit environments, though protective measures like storm shelters mitigate acute doses. These models, such as the 2020 NASA Space Cancer Risk Model, incorporate epidemiological data and incorporate uncertainties to limit overall exposure-induced death risk to 3% for career astronauts.

Effects Beyond Earth

Solar flares release (SEPs) that propagate through the , creating enhanced radiation environments in deep space far beyond Earth's influence. These particles, accelerated to energies reaching up to several GeV during major events, pose risks to uncrewed probes operating at great distances from the Sun. For instance, the Voyager spacecraft, launched in 1977, detected SEPs from 22 solar flare events between 1977 and 1982, with composition measurements for elements from Z=3 to Z=30 revealing fluxes that could degrade electronics and scientific instruments over long missions. Such SEP fluxes, often impulsive and lasting hours to days, increase the cumulative radiation dose for deep-space explorers like and 2, which continue to monitor heliospheric boundaries into the 2020s. On Mars, lacking a global , solar flares directly ionize the thin upper atmosphere, precipitating charged particles that produce widespread aurorae visible across the planet. During the X8.2-class flare on 10 September 2017, the orbiter observed global auroral emissions more than 25 times brighter than previous records, resulting from SEP precipitation into the atmosphere and enhanced ionization. Similarly, an X12-class flare on May 20, 2024, generated planet-engulfing aurorae and elevated radiation levels on the surface, as measured by the Curiosity rover's Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD). For surface habitats, these events deliver radiation doses of approximately 0.2 to 2 mSv per X-class flare, depending on event intensity and atmospheric attenuation, comparable to several weeks of galactic background but acutely hazardous without shielding. The , with no or substantial atmosphere, experiences even more direct exposure to SEP fluxes from solar flares, amplifying risks for lunar surface operations like NASA's . During a major solar eruption in August 2023, instruments on the (LRO) detected significant increases in particle fluxes at the lunar surface, highlighting the vulnerability of astronauts to doses potentially exceeding 100 mGy in unshielded scenarios for extreme events. missions must account for this enhanced particle environment, where radiation levels can be an order of magnitude higher than in , necessitating habitat designs with shielding or storm shelters. In the broader , from solar flares propagates at the , arriving nearly instantaneously across interplanetary distances, while SEPs travel at 0.1 to 1 times the , allowing extended exposure windows. These SEPs can interact with tails, as observed during a March 2015 event at 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, where detected SEP fluxes altering plasma densities and ion distributions in the coma. At , SEP influxes from flares contribute to magnetospheric compression and auroral intensification; solar storms associated with flares shift the boundary, injecting particles that enhance aurorae and heat the . Such interactions demonstrate how flare-driven SEPs permeate the , influencing distant magnetospheres and neutral structures over scales of astronomical units. Recent missions have provided in-situ observations of these effects. During its 2022 close approach, ESA/NASA's detected an M-class flare on April 2, 2022, including associated filament eruption and SEP onset, revealing particle acceleration mechanisms at unprecedented proximity. NASA's , from 2018 through 2025, has made multiple in-situ detections of impulsive flares, confirming that low-energy ions (tens to hundreds of keV) observed in interplanetary space originate directly from flare reconnection sites, with over a dozen events analyzed by mid-2025. These observations underscore the heliosphere-wide reach of flare emissions, informing models for deep-space mission planning.

Observation and History

Early Observations

The first documented observation of a solar flare occurred on September 1, 1859, during what is known as the , when British astronomer Richard Carrington visually detected a sudden brightening in white light above a large group using a projected image. This event, independently confirmed by Richard Hodgson, appeared as two patches of intense illumination that intensified and faded over about 17 minutes, marking the initial recognition of solar flares as transient phenomena distinct from the more persistent s. Carrington described the patches as covering an area of about 116 millionths of the solar hemisphere (equivalent to roughly 180 million square kilometers). Advancements in optical observations began in the early with the development of spectroheliographs, enabling imaging in specific wavelengths like (H-alpha). At , pioneered H-alpha spectroheliography in 1908, but the first clear detection of a solar flare in this line occurred in 1917, when Ferdinand Ellerman recorded bright, compact emissions associated with active regions, confirming flares as chromospheric brightenings separate from umbrae and penumbrae. These ground-based H-alpha images from the and , taken with tower telescopes, revealed flares' rapid evolution and association with prominences, though limited resolution often blurred finer details. The discovery of solar radio emissions in the 1940s expanded flare observations beyond visible light, initially as unintended wartime detections. In February 1942, British operators, led by James Hey, recorded intense noise bursts interfering with coastal defense systems at wavelengths around 4-6 meters, later correlated with optical flares during solar active periods. These solar radio bursts, confirmed in 1946 by Hey's analysis, demonstrated that flares produce broadband radio emissions, providing evidence of accelerated electrons in the solar atmosphere. Key milestones in radio studies included the first dynamic radio spectrum of a solar flare in 1947, obtained by J. Paul Wild using a swept-frequency receiver in , which visualized frequency-drifting bursts linked to flare onset. By the 1950s, researchers established a direct connection between major flares and geomagnetic storms on ; for instance, a 1958 study by analyzed 115 class 3+ flares and found 68 associated with subsequent storms, attributing disturbances to flare-ejected plasma impacting the . Theoretically, Ronald G. Giovanelli proposed in 1946 that flares arise from , where oppositely directed fields in penumbrae annihilate, releasing energy to accelerate particles and heat plasma. This hypothesis, building on observations of neutral-line alignments in flares, laid foundational groundwork despite lacking direct field measurements. Pre-space era studies were constrained by ground-based limitations, including atmospheric absorption of and emissions, daytime-only visibility, and seeing distortions that obscured sub-arcsecond structures and coronal extensions.

Modern Detection Methods

Modern detection of solar flares relies on a suite of space-based and ground-based instruments operating across multiple wavelengths, enabling comprehensive monitoring of flare onset, evolution, and impacts. These methods have evolved since the , incorporating advanced , , and in-situ measurements to capture phenomena from (EUV) emissions to high-energy particles. Space-based observatories play a central role in flare detection by providing uninterrupted, high-resolution data above Earth's atmosphere. The (SOHO), launched in 1995, uses the Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT) to observe solar flares in EUV wavelengths, revealing coronal plasma dynamics and pre-flare activity through four spectral filters. Similarly, the (SDO), operational since 2010, employs the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) for multi-wavelength EUV and at 1-arcsecond resolution and 12-second cadence, allowing detailed tracking of flare ribbon formation and loop oscillations. SDO's Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) complements this by providing vector magnetograms of the solar surface, which correlate changes with flare initiation. For hard emissions indicative of particle acceleration, the Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI), active from 2002 to 2018, performed and using germanium detectors, resolving energy spectra from 3 keV to 17 MeV to study non-thermal processes in flares. Ground-based instruments supplement space observations by capturing radio and optical signatures unaffected by atmospheric absorption in those bands. The Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) in New Mexico detects radio bursts from solar flares, producing dynamic spectra that trace gyrosynchrotron emission from accelerated electrons during the impulsive phase. Japan's Nobeyama Radioheliograph, operational since 1992, offers high spatial resolution radio imaging at 17 GHz, enabling mapping of flare-associated microwave sources. For optical observations, the Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG) network of six stations worldwide provides full-disk H-alpha images every minute, capturing chromospheric brightenings and filament eruptions linked to flares. A multi-wavelength approach integrates data from these instruments to reconstruct the full temporal and spatial evolution of solar flares. Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES), operated by NOAA since the 1970s, monitor soft X-ray fluxes (1-8 Å) in real-time to classify flare intensity. Real-time GOES data are disseminated by NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC), with recent measurements (up to 7 days) accessible through JSON endpoints such as . No public JSON endpoint exists for historical archives; these are maintained by NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) in netCDF-4 format for operational observations and text formats for daily summaries. These GOES measurements are cross-referenced with EUV images from SDO/AIA and radio spectra from or Nobeyama for a holistic view of energy release phases. This synergy reveals how flares progress from in the corona (detected in EUV) to particle precipitation (seen in hard X-rays and H-alpha). In-situ measurements detect flare-related effects propagating through the . The (ACE), launched in 1997, and the Wind spacecraft, operational since 1994, use particle detectors to monitor (SEPs) accelerated by flares, measuring fluxes and compositions near Earth. More recently, the , launched in 2018, has provided unprecedented in-situ data on near-Sun magnetic fields and plasma during flybys, capturing flare-driven shocks and turbulence at distances as close as 0.17 AU. Data analysis techniques enhance interpretation of these observations, particularly for inferring physical conditions. Inversion methods applied to multi-filter EUV or data, such as filter-ratio techniques on SDO/AIA images, estimate flare loop temperatures around 10^7 K by comparing intensities in different passbands, assuming optically thin plasma emission.

Notable Solar Flares

One of the most significant historical solar flares is the on September 1, 1859, during 10. British astronomer Richard Carrington observed a brilliant white-light on the Sun's surface through a projected image for about 5 minutes, covering an area equivalent to roughly 116 millionths of the solar hemisphere (about 180 million square kilometers). Modern estimates classify it as an X45 (±5) intensity based on reconstructions of its soft flux and associated geomagnetic effects, far exceeding typical X-class events. The triggered a massive (CME) that arrived at within 17 hours, inducing currents that disrupted telegraph systems worldwide, caused fires in equipment, and produced auroras visible in tropical latitudes. Another impactful event occurred in March 1989 during , when 5395 produced a series of intense X-class flares, including an X15 on March 6. The region culminated in a major X-class flare and high-speed halo CME on March 12, which struck Earth's on March 13, generating severe geomagnetic disturbances. The resulting induced currents overwhelmed the power grid, leading to a cascading blackout that left about 6 million people without electricity for up to 9 hours and caused economic losses estimated in the tens of millions of dollars. Satellite operations were also affected, with temporary loss of control for several U.S. due to enhanced atmospheric drag. In modern times, the of October-November 2003 marked one of the most active periods since the began, featuring multiple X-class flares from 0486 during 23. The strongest was an X17 flare on October 28, peaking at over 17 × 10^{-4} W/m² in soft X-ray flux, followed by an X10 flare on November 2; both were associated with fast CMEs traveling at speeds exceeding 2,000 km/s. These events elevated levels on the , prompting crew alerts and safe haven procedures, while ground-based systems experienced minor power fluctuations and widespread high-frequency radio blackouts lasting several hours. A close call came on July 23, 2012, when an X1.8-class solar flare from 1520 produced a powerful CME during 24. The CME, ejecting material at over 2,200 km/s and spanning more than 1 in width, narrowly missed by passing about 5 days late relative to our orbit, as captured by NASA's STEREO-A . Had it struck, models suggest it could have rivaled the 1989 event in geomagnetic impact, potentially disrupting satellites, power grids, and communications globally. More recently, on May 14, 2024, the Sun produced an X8.7 flare—the strongest of to that point—from 3664. Peaking at 12:51 p.m. ET, it emitted intense soft X-ray radiation and was accompanied by a CME, though the main impacts were ionospheric: severe radio blackouts affected high-frequency communications over and for up to 2 hours, with R3-level disruptions reported. This event underscored ongoing activity, with no major geomagnetic effects on due to the CME's trajectory. In March 2025, during the peak of , an X1.1 erupted on March 28 from 4046 near the solar limb. Observed by NASA's , it was associated with a significant plasma eruption and a solar energetic particle (SEP) event detected by the mission, highlighting interplanetary propagation effects. The caused brief radio blackouts but no widespread terrestrial disruptions. As of November 2025, continues with heightened activity, though no subsequent flares have exceeded X-class intensities reported here.

Forecasting and Research

Prediction Techniques

Solar flare prediction relies on a combination of statistical and physics-based techniques to estimate the likelihood and timing of eruptions from active regions on the Sun. Statistical methods often model flare occurrences using Poisson statistics, assuming that flares in a given active region follow a random process where the rate is constant over short intervals. This approach calculates flare probabilities based on the historical flaring rate of the region, enabling simple Bayesian forecasts that update predictions as new flares are observed. Additionally, flare probabilities are derived from the magnetic complexity of sunspots, such as through the McIntosh classification system, which categorizes s by size, shape, and magnetic structure to assign qualitative flare potential (e.g., simple regions like A-type have low risk, while complex beta-gamma-delta groups indicate higher M- and X-class flare chances). Physics-based methods focus on the underlying magnetic processes driving flares, such as the buildup of free in the corona. Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations model the evolution of coronal , driven by photospheric observations, to track energy accumulation and identify thresholds that precede eruptions. Proxies for this energy, like photospheric —the angle between lines and the neutral line separating opposite polarities—serve as indicators of stress in active regions, with higher shear correlating to increased flare productivity. Short-term forecasting, or nowcasting, typically covers 1-24 hours ahead and uses real-time magnetograms from instruments like the to monitor evolution, applying or rules to detect precursors like emerging flux or shear changes. Long-term predictions, spanning days to the duration, integrate models that extrapolate numbers and emergence patterns to estimate overall activity levels. Current prediction success rates vary by flare class and timeframe. A verification of operational probabilistic forecasts issued by the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) for M-class and X-class solar flares over 1998–2024 shows that these forecasts do not outperform simple baselines such as persistence and climatology across key metrics. They exhibit poor calibration, high false alarm rates (61–71% for X-class flares at a 0.5 probability threshold, depending on lead time), low recall for rare events (e.g., approximately 0.08 for X-class at the same threshold), and misleadingly high accuracy due to severe class imbalance (where a trivial "no flare" baseline can achieve approximately 97.4% accuracy for X-class events). The True Skill Statistic (TSS) for SWPC operational models is approximately 0.4 for M-class flares within 24 hours under standard thresholds but around 0.05–0.08 for rarer X-class events, though advanced or optimized methods can reach up to 0.61. Research models in various studies have achieved TSS scores in the 0.3–0.7 range. Due to the nonlinear and chaotic nature of the solar dynamo, which introduces inherent unpredictability in magnetic field evolution, forecasting remains challenging, and no major improvements or updated performance metrics have been reported for 2025–2026 during the peak of Solar Cycle 25. Operational systems, such as the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) alerts, provide probabilistic forecasts based on these techniques, issuing warnings for radio blackouts from expected . H2020 projects, like FLARECAST, have advanced methods by automating feature extraction from multi-instrument data to improve short-term flare likelihood estimates.

Recent Advances and Missions

The Parker Solar Probe, launched in August 2018, has executed numerous orbits extending through 2025, enabling unprecedented in-situ measurements within the solar corona and heliosphere. These observations have captured switchbacks—abrupt reversals in the solar wind's magnetic field—and direct evidence of magnetic reconnection sites, processes central to solar flare initiation. In August 2025, the probe provided the first direct detection of magnetic reconnection in the Sun's atmosphere, validating long-standing theoretical models and revealing how stored magnetic energy converts into particle acceleration on sub-second timescales, thereby improving forecasts of flare-associated space weather events. Such data from close approaches, as near as 6.1 million kilometers from the solar surface in December 2024, have resolved fine-scale dynamics previously inaccessible from Earth-based or remote observations. Complementing these efforts, the European Space Agency's , launched in February 2020, has utilized its Imager (EUI) for high-resolution imaging and the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (PHI) for vector magnetography, approaching within 0.3 AU of the Sun. Between 2022 and 2025, the mission has gathered critical data on flare precursors, including evolving polar magnetic fields and small-scale magnetic structures that trigger reconnection. In June 2025, delivered the first high-resolution views of the Sun's , illuminating how polar field reversals influence global magnetic activity and flare productivity during . Additionally, September 2025 observations identified solar flares and coronal mass ejections as primary "engines" accelerating superfast electrons to near-light speeds, linking these phenomena to broader heliospheric dynamics observed at varying distances. These multi-instrument datasets, coordinated with encounters, have enhanced stereoscopic views of flare evolution. Advancements in computational modeling have leveraged these mission data to refine flare predictions and mechanisms. Machine learning techniques applied to Space weather HMI Active Region Patches (SHARP) datasets from the Solar Dynamics Observatory have shown promising results; for instance, transformer-based models like SolarFlareNet, trained on vector magnetogram parameters, achieved high true skill scores (outperforming traditional methods) and up to 89% accuracy for predicting M- and X-class flares within 24 hours, by incorporating temporal sequences of magnetic complexity. Similarly, long short-term memory networks using SHARP-derived features have demonstrated accuracies around 75-85% for short-term forecasting, highlighting the role of parameters like total and shear in s. In parallel, three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations have progressed significantly, incorporating data-driven boundary conditions to model nanoflare heating as a contributor to coronal energy balance. Recent 2024-2025 simulations of subsets reproduce observed nanoflare frequencies and energies, estimating that ubiquitous small-scale reconnections release 10^24-10^26 ergs per event, collectively sustaining the corona's million-degree temperatures without large flares. These models integrate multi-wavelength observations to simulate and particle acceleration, addressing gaps in understanding quiet-Sun heating. Interdisciplinary research has connected these advances to forecasting and broader environmental impacts. Intense solar events in 2024-2025, such as the May 2024 storm producing 82 notable flares and the November 2025 G5 , one of the strongest events of , have supplied real-time data to validate and refine global models, improving lead times for disruptions to power grids and satellites. , which reached its predicted maximum of around 115 sunspots in mid-2025, exhibits a double-peaked structure with ongoing high activity as of late 2025. On climate scales, solar flares induce short-term (UV) flux variations that indirectly affect Earth's by enhancing production and altering circulation patterns, though these effects are modulated by the Sun's 11-year cycle and remain secondary to anthropogenic forcings. Looking ahead, synergies with other observatories promise deeper insights, such as potential integration of (JWST) infrared capabilities to probe cooler, optically thick flare components like chromospheric condensations, complementing UV/EUV data from dedicated solar missions. However, challenges persist in resolving nanoscale reconnection processes—occurring on scales below 10 km—from current in-situ measurements, as and instruments are limited to electron-scale resolutions around 10-100 km, necessitating advanced data fusion and higher-cadence sensors for future probes.

References

  1. https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/what-solar-flare/
  2. https://science.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/solar-system/what-is-a-solar-flare/
  3. https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/sftheory/frame1.htm
  4. https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/what-is-a-solar-flare/
  5. https://science.nasa.gov/sun/solar-storms-and-flares/
  6. https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/10109
  7. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena/solar-flares-radio-blackouts
  8. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/impacts/electric-power-transmission
  9. https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/solar-cycle-25/2022/06/10/solar-flares-faqs/
  10. https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/11667/
  11. https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/sftheory/cme.htm
  12. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930066495
  13. https://rscience.gsfc.nasa.gov/keydocs/SolarFlareCampaign.pdf
  14. https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/rhessi3/mission/scientific-objectives/index.html
  15. https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/solar-activity/
  16. https://hinode.msfc.nasa.gov/lc_about_flares.html
  17. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730023147
  18. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19720029280
  19. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040171637
  20. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017EGUGA..19.8464G/abstract
  21. https://parkersolarprobe.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/Show-Article.php?articleID=212
  22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03091929108229123
  23. http://sun.stanford.edu/~sasha/PHYS780/SOLAR_PHYSICS/L17/Lecture_17_PHYS780.pdf
  24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11214-017-0462-5
  25. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad1826
  26. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/501/4/4703/6105733
  27. https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrsp-2011-6
  28. https://www.nature.com/articles/211695a0
  29. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00153671
  30. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00206193
  31. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6dfd
  32. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4134
  33. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aad3c6
  34. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/space-weather/legacy-data/solar-flares-events
  35. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/space-weather/solar-data/solar-features/solar-flares/h-alpha/reports2/documentation/format_h-alpha_reports.pdf
  36. https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/rhessi3/public-outreach/the-solar-faq/index.html
  37. https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/monograph/hudson.pdf
  38. https://www.swsc-journal.org/articles/swsc/full_html/2020/01/swsc190079/swsc190079.html
  39. https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/solar-activity/solar-cycle.html
  40. https://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov/sun/8Page44.pdf
  41. https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/solar-activity/top-50-solar-flares/solar-cycle/25.html
  42. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006JA012205
  43. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2023/06/aa45999-23/aa45999-23.html
  44. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4365/adf105
  45. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2023.1201625/full
  46. https://phys.org/news/2021-04-effects-solar-flares-earth-magnetosphere.html
  47. https://voyager.gsfc.nasa.gov/Library/Breneman_1985-03.pdf
  48. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11214-025-01211-4
  49. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018GL079162
  50. https://science.nasa.gov/missions/mars-2020-perseverance/nasas-curiosity-sees-specks-caused-by-2024-solar-storm-while-recording-a-wind-gust-on-mars
  51. https://wrmiss.org/workshops/twentyseventh/Hassler.pdf
  52. https://mashable.com/article/solar-eruption-space-radiation-danger
  53. https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_weather/Protecting_Artemis_and_lunar_explorers_from_space_radiation
  54. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022JA030398
  55. https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/solar-storms-ignite-x-ray-northern-lights-jupiter/
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103517303615
  57. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2023/09/aa46321-23/aa46321-23.html
  58. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/adcd63
  59. https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/rhessi3/mission/science/overview-of-solar-flares/index.html
  60. https://pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/whcarr.html
  61. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/acd853
  62. https://www2.hao.ucar.edu/education/solar-physics-timeline/1800-1999
  63. https://www.mtwilson.edu/discovering-mount-wilson-chapter-16-hale-nicholson-law/
  64. https://www.spaceacademy.net.au/library/notes/firstsolburst.htm
  65. https://gemelli.spacescience.org/~bpoduval/radiobursts.html
  66. https://csiropedia.csiro.au/radio-astronomy-observing-explosions-on-the-sun/
  67. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/JZ063i001p00077
  68. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AGUSMSP33A..04C/abstract
  69. http://mat.uc.pt/~cspm2015/abstracts/03_Alexei_Pevtsov.html
  70. https://services.swpc.noaa.gov/json/goes/primary/xrays-7-day.json
  71. https://www.spaceweather.gov/content/data-access
  72. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/space-weather/partners/swpc-products-and-data
  73. https://www.swsc-journal.org/articles/swsc/full_html/2013/01/swsc130015/swsc130015.html
  74. https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/about/k-12-education/space-weather/what-was-the-carrington-event
  75. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019sw002278
  76. https://www.noaa.gov/space-weather-and-safety
  77. https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/news/when-solar-storms-attack-space-weather-and-our-infrastructure
  78. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/19648
  79. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/news/great-halloween-solar-storm-2003
  80. https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/3956/
  81. https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/planetary-science/23jul_superstorm/
  82. https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12142/
  83. https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4167/
  84. https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/heliophysics/how-nasa-tracked-the-most-intense-solar-storm-in-decades/
  85. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/news/region-3664-not-done-yet-produces-x87-flarelargest-solar-cycle
  86. https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/14592/
  87. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/news/r3-strong-solar-flare-occurred-28-march-2025
  88. https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5526/
  89. https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/solar-cycle-25/2025/03/28/sun-releases-strong-flare-6/
  90. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2004SW000131
  91. https://www.swsc-journal.org/articles/swsc/full_html/2025/01/swsc240043/swsc240043.html
  92. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad6a54
  93. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20120014198/downloads/20120014198.pdf
  94. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/61687/noaa_61687_DS1.pdf
  95. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/solar-cycle-progression
  96. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025SW004546
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4841181/
  98. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/alerts-watches-and-warnings
  99. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/640216
  100. https://phys.org/news/2025-08-parker-solar-probe-decades-theoretical.html
  101. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/08/250820000747.htm
  102. https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/heliophysics/nasas-parker-solar-probe-makes-history-with-closest-pass-to-sun/
  103. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Solar_Orbiter/Solar_Orbiter_gets_world-first_views_of_the_Sun_s_poles
  104. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/09/250903075244.htm
  105. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-40884-1
  106. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06595
  107. https://science.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/science-research/heliophysics/how-nasa-tracked-the-most-intense-solar-storm-in-decades/
  108. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/news/g3-strong-geomagnetic-storming-continues-g4-severe-still-expected
  109. https://archive.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-7-1-3.html
  110. https://www.europlanet.org/europlanet-magazine/issue-3/jwst-solar-system/
  111. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024cosp...45.1085K/abstract
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.