Hubbry Logo
FreethoughtFreethoughtMain
Open search
Freethought
Community hub
Freethought
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Freethought
Freethought
from Wikipedia

Freethought (sometimes spelled free thought) is an unorthodox attitude or belief.[1]

A freethinker holds beliefs that should not be formed on the basis of authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma,[2] and should instead be reached by other methods such as logic, reason, and empirical observation.[citation needed] According to the Collins English Dictionary, a freethinker is "One who is mentally free from the conventional bonds of tradition or dogma, and thinks independently." In some contemporary thought in particular, free thought is strongly tied with rejection of traditional social or religious belief systems.[3][2][4] The cognitive application of free thought is known as "freethinking", and practitioners of free thought are known as "freethinkers".[2] Modern freethinkers consider free thought to be a natural freedom from all negative and illusive thoughts acquired from society.[5]

The term first came into use in the 17th century in order to refer to people who inquired into the basis of traditional beliefs which were often accepted unquestioningly. Today, freethinking is most closely linked with agnosticism, deism, secularism, humanism, anti-clericalism, and religious critique.[6] The Oxford English Dictionary defines freethinking as, "The free exercise of reason in matters of religious belief, unrestrained by deference to authority; the adoption of the principles of a free-thinker." Freethinkers hold that knowledge should be grounded in facts, scientific inquiry, and logic. The skeptical application of science implies freedom from the intellectually limiting effects of confirmation bias, cognitive bias, conventional wisdom, popular culture, prejudice, or sectarianism.[7]

Definition

[edit]

Atheist author Adam Lee defines free thought as thinking which is independent of revelation, tradition, established belief, and authority,[8] and considers it as a "broader umbrella" than atheism "that embraces a rainbow of unorthodoxy, religious dissent, skepticism, and unconventional thinking."[9][10]

The basic summarizing statement of the essay The Ethics of Belief by the 19th-century British mathematician and philosopher William Kingdon Clifford is: "It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence."[11] The essay became a rallying cry for freethinkers when published in the 1870s, and has been described as a point when freethinkers grabbed the moral high ground.[12] Clifford was himself an organizer of free thought gatherings, the driving force behind the Congress of Liberal Thinkers held in 1878.

Regarding religion, freethinkers typically hold that there is insufficient evidence to support the existence of supernatural phenomena.[13] According to the Freedom from Religion Foundation, "No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth." and "Freethinkers are convinced that religious claims have not withstood the tests of reason. Not only is there nothing to be gained by believing an untruth, but there is everything to lose when we sacrifice the indispensable tool of reason on the altar of superstition. Most freethinkers consider religion to be not only untrue, but harmful."[14]

Bust of Bertrand Russell in London

However, philosopher Bertrand Russell wrote the following in his 1944 essay The Value of Free Thought:[15]

What makes a freethinker is not his beliefs but the way in which he holds them. If he holds them because his elders told him they were true when he was young, or if he holds them because if he did not he would be unhappy, his thought is not free; but if he holds them because, after careful thought he finds a balance of evidence in their favour, then his thought is free, however odd his conclusions may seem.

A freethinker, according to Russell, is not necessarily an atheist or an agnostic, as long as he or she satisfies this definition:

The person who is free in any respect is free from something; what is the free thinker free from? To be worthy of the name, he must be free of two things: the force of tradition, and the tyranny of his own passions. No one is completely free from either, but in the measure of a man's emancipation he deserves to be called a free thinker.

Fred Edwords, former executive of the American Humanist Association, suggests that by Russell's definition, liberal religionists who have challenged established orthodoxies can be considered freethinkers.[16]

On the other hand, according to Bertrand Russell, atheists and/or agnostics are not necessarily freethinkers. As an example, he mentions Stalin, whom he compares to a "pope":

what I am concerned with is the doctrine of the modern Communistic Party, and of the Russian Government to which it owes allegiance. According to this doctrine, the world develops on the lines of a Plan called Dialectical Materialism, first discovered by Karl Marx, embodied in the practice of a great state by Lenin, and now expounded from day to day by a Church of which Stalin is the Pope. […] Free discussion is to be prevented wherever the power to do so exists; […] If this doctrine and this organization prevail, free inquiry will become as impossible as it was in the middle ages, and the world will relapse into bigotry and obscurantism.

In the 18th and 19th century, many thinkers regarded as freethinkers were deists, arguing that the nature of God can only be known from a study of nature rather than from religious revelation. In the 18th century, "deism" was as much of a 'dirty word' as "atheism", and deists were often stigmatized as either atheists or at least as freethinkers by their Christian opponents.[17][18] Deists today regard themselves as freethinkers, but are now arguably less prominent in the free thought movement than atheists.

Characteristics

[edit]
Tombstone detail of a freethinker, late 19th century (Cemetery of Cullera, Spain)

Among freethinkers, for a notion to be considered true it must be testable, verifiable, and logical. Many freethinkers tend to be humanists, who base morality on human needs and would find meaning in human compassion, social progress, art, personal happiness, love, and the furtherance of knowledge. Generally, freethinkers like to think for themselves, tend to be skeptical, respect critical thinking and reason, remain open to new concepts, and are sometimes proud of their own individuality. They would determine truth for themselves – based upon knowledge they gain, answers they receive, experiences they have and the balance they thus acquire. Freethinkers reject conformity for the sake of conformity, whereby they create their own beliefs by considering the way the world around them works and would possess the intellectual integrity and courage to think outside of accepted norms, which may or may not lead them to believe in some higher power.[19]

Symbol

[edit]
Pansy is a symbol of freethought.

The pansy serves as the long-established and enduring symbol of free thought; literature of the American Secular Union inaugurated its usage in the late 1800s. The reasoning behind the pansy as the symbol of free thought lies both in the flower's name and in its appearance. The pansy derives its name from the French word pensée, which means "thought". It allegedly received this name because the flower is perceived by some to bear resemblance to a human face, and in mid-to-late summer it nods forward as if deep in thought.[20] In the 1880s, following examples set by freethinkers in France, Belgium, Spain and Sweden, it was proposed in the United States as "the symbol of religious liberty and freedom of conscience".[20]

History

[edit]

Pre-modern movement

[edit]

Critical thought has flourished in the Hellenistic Mediterranean, in the repositories of knowledge and wisdom in Ireland and in the Iranian civilizations (for example in the era of Khayyam (1048–1131) and his unorthodox Sufi Rubaiyat poems). Later societies made advances on freedom of thought such as the Chinese (note for example the seafaring renaissance of the Southern Song dynasty of 1127–1279),[21] on through heretical thinkers on esoteric alchemy or astrology, to the Renaissance and the Protestant Reformation pioneered by Martin Luther.[22][23]

French physician and writer Rabelais celebrated "rabelaisian" freedom as well as good feasting and drinking (an expression and a symbol of freedom of the mind) in defiance of the hypocrisies of conformist orthodoxy in his utopian Thelema Abbey (from θέλημα: free "will"), the device of which was Do What Thou Wilt:

So had Gargantua established it. In all their rule and strictest tie of their order there was but this one clause to be observed, Do What Thou Wilt; because free people ... act virtuously and avoid vice. They call this honor.

When Rabelais's hero Pantagruel journeys to the "Oracle of The Div(in)e Bottle", he learns the lesson of life in one simple word: "Trinch!", Drink! Enjoy the simple life, learn wisdom and knowledge, as a free human. Beyond puns, irony, and satire, Gargantua's prologue-metaphor instructs the reader to "break the bone and suck out the substance-full marrow" ("la substantifique moëlle"), the core of wisdom.

Modern movements

[edit]

The year 1600 is considered a landmark in the era of modern free thought. It was the year of the execution in Italy of Giordano Bruno, a former Dominican friar, by the Inquisition.[24][25][26]

Australia

[edit]

Prior to World War II, Australia had high rates of Protestantism and Catholicism. Post-war Australia has become a highly secularised country. Donald Horne, one of Australia's well-known public intellectuals, believed rising prosperity in post-war Australia influenced the decline in church-going and general lack of interest in religion. "Churches no longer matter very much to most Australians. If there is a happy eternal life it's for everyone ... For many Australians the pleasures of this life are sufficiently satisfying that religion offers nothing of great appeal", said Horne in his landmark work The Lucky Country (1964).[27]

Belgium

[edit]

The Université Libre de Bruxelles and the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, along with the two Circles of Free Inquiry (Dutch and French speaking), defend the freedom of critical thought, lay philosophy and ethics, while rejecting the argument of authority.

Canada

[edit]

In 1873, a handful of secularists founded the earliest known secular organization in English Canada, the Toronto Freethought Association. Reorganized in 1877 and again in 1881, when it was renamed the Toronto Secular Society, the group formed the nucleus of the Canadian Secular Union, established in 1884 to bring together freethinkers from across the country.[28]

A significant number of the early members appear to have come from the educated labour "aristocracy", including Alfred F. Jury, J. Ick Evans and J. I. Livingstone, all of whom were leading labour activists and secularists. The second president of the Toronto association, T. Phillips Thompson, became a central figure in the city's labour and social-reform movements during the 1880s and 1890s and arguably Canada's foremost late nineteenth-century labour intellectual. By the early 1880s scattered free thought organizations operated throughout southern Ontario and parts of Quebec, eliciting both urban and rural support.

The principal organ of the free thought movement in Canada was Secular Thought (Toronto, 1887–1911). Founded and edited during its first several years by English freethinker Charles Watts (1835–1906), it came under the editorship of Toronto printer and publisher James Spencer Ellis in 1891 when Watts returned to England. In 1968 the Humanist Association of Canada (HAC) formed to serve as an umbrella group for humanists, atheists, and freethinkers, and to champion social justice issues and oppose religious influence on public policy—most notably in the fight to make access to abortion free and legal in Canada.

France

[edit]
Hommage aux morts de la Libre-pensée, 1881

In France, the concept first appeared in publication in 1765 when Denis Diderot, Jean le Rond d'Alembert, and Voltaire included an article on Liberté de penser in their Encyclopédie.[29] The concept of free thought spread so widely that even places as remote as the Jotunheimen, in Norway, had well-known freethinkers such as Jo Gjende by the 19th century.[30]

François-Jean Lefebvre de la Barre (1745–1766) was a young French nobleman, famous for having been tortured and beheaded before his body was burnt on a pyre along with Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary. La Barre is often said to have been executed for not saluting a Roman Catholic religious procession, but the elements of the case were far more complex.[31]

In France, Lefebvre de la Barre is widely regarded a symbol of the victims of Christian religious intolerance; La Barre along with Jean Calas and Pierre-Paul Sirven, was championed by Voltaire. A second replacement statue to de la Barre stands nearby the Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus of Paris at the summit of the butte Montmartre (itself named from the Temple of Mars), the highest point in Paris and an 18th arrondissement street nearby the Sacré-Cœur is also named after Lefebvre de la Barre.

The 19th century saw the emergence of a specific notion of Libre-Pensée ("free thought"), with writer Victor Hugo as one of its major early proponents. French Freethinkers (Libre-Penseurs) associate freedom of thought, political anti-clericalism and socialist leanings. The main organisation referring to this tradition to this day is the Fédération nationale de la libre pensée, created in 1890.

Germany

[edit]
Jugendweihe is a German coming of age ceremony. Photograph from early 20th century.

In Germany, during the period 1815–1848 and before the March Revolution, the resistance of citizens against the dogma of the church increased. In 1844, under the influence of Johannes Ronge and Robert Blum, belief in the rights of man, tolerance among men, and humanism grew, and by 1859 they had established the Bund Freireligiöser Gemeinden Deutschlands (literally Union of Free Religious Communities of Germany), an association of persons who consider themselves to be religious without adhering to any established and institutionalized church or sacerdotal cult. This union still exists today, and is included as a member in the umbrella organization of free humanists. In 1881 in Frankfurt am Main, Ludwig Büchner established the Deutscher Freidenkerbund (German Freethinkers League) as the first German organization for atheists and agnostics. In 1892 the Freidenker-Gesellschaft and in 1906 the Deutscher Monistenbund were formed.[32]

Free thought organizations developed the "Jugendweihe" (literally Youth consecration), a secular "confirmation" ceremony, and atheist funeral rites.[32][33] The Union of Freethinkers for Cremation was founded in 1905, and the Central Union of German Proletariat Freethinker in 1908. The two groups merged in 1927, becoming the German Freethinking Association in 1930.[34]

More "bourgeois" organizations declined after World War I, and "proletarian" free thought groups proliferated, becoming an organization of socialist parties.[32][35] European socialist free thought groups formed the International of Proletarian Freethinkers (IPF) in 1925.[36] Activists agitated for Germans to disaffiliate from their respective Church and for secularization of elementary schools; between 1919–1921 and 1930–1932 more than 2.5 million Germans, for the most part supporters of the Social Democratic and Communist parties, gave up church membership.[37] Conflict developed between radical forces including the Soviet League of the Militant Godless and Social Democratic forces in Western Europe led by Theodor Hartwig and Max Sievers.[36] In 1930 the Soviet and allied delegations, following a walk-out, took over the IPF and excluded the former leaders.[36] Following Hitler's rise to power in 1933, most free thought organizations were banned, though some right-wing groups that worked with so-called Völkische Bünde (literally "ethnic" associations with nationalist, xenophobic and very often racist ideology) were tolerated by the Nazis until the mid-1930s.[32][35]

Ireland

[edit]

In the 19th century, received opinion was scandalized by George Ensor (1769–1843).[38][39] His Review of the Miracles, Prophecies, & Mysteries of the Old and New Testaments (1835) argued that, far from being a source of moral teaching, revealed religion and its divines regarded questions of morality as "incidental"--as a "mundane and merely philosophical" topic.[40]

Netherlands

[edit]
The Dutch magazine De Vrijdenker (The Freethinker) 2015

In the Netherlands, free thought has existed in organized form since the establishment of De Dageraad (now known as De Vrije Gedachte) in 1856. Among its most notable subscribing 19th century individuals were Johannes van Vloten, Multatuli, Adriaan Gerhard and Domela Nieuwenhuis.

In 2009, Frans van Dongen established the Atheist-Secular Party, which takes a considerably restrictive view of religion and public religious expressions.

Since the 19th century, free thought in the Netherlands has become more well known as a political phenomenon through at least three currents: liberal freethinking, conservative freethinking, and classical freethinking. In other words, parties which identify as freethinking tend to favor non-doctrinal, rational approaches to their preferred ideologies, and arose as secular alternatives to both clerically aligned parties as well as labor-aligned parties. Common themes among freethinking political parties are "freedom", "liberty", and "individualism".

Switzerland

[edit]

With the introduction of cantonal church taxes in the 1870s, anti-clericals began to organise themselves. Around 1870, a "freethinkers club" was founded in Zürich. During the debate on the Zürich church law in 1883, professor Friedrich Salomon Vögelin and city council member Kunz proposed to separate church and state.[41]

Turkey

[edit]
Logo of Atheism Association of Turkey

In the last years of the Ottoman Empire, free thought made its voice heard by the works of distinguished people such as Ahmet Rıza, Tevfik Fikret, Abdullah Cevdet, Kılıçzade Hakkı, and Celal Nuri İleri. These intellectuals affected the early period of the Turkish Republic. Mustafa Kemal Atatürkfield marshal, revolutionary statesman, author, and founder of the secular Turkish nation state, serving as its first President from 1923 until his death in 1938– was the practitioner of their ideas. He made many reforms that modernized the country. Sources point out that Atatürk was a religious skeptic and a freethinker. He was a non-doctrinaire deist[42][43] or an atheist,[44][45][46] who was antireligious and anti-Islamic in general.[47][48] According to Atatürk, the Turkish people do not know what Islam really is and do not read the Quran. People are influenced by Arabic sentences that they do not understand, and because of their customs they go to mosques. When the Turks read the Quran and think about it, they will leave Islam.[49] Atatürk described Islam as the religion of the Arabs in his own work titled Vatandaş için Medeni Bilgiler by his own critical and nationalist views.[50]

Association of Atheism (Ateizm Derneği), the first official atheist organisation in Middle East and Caucasus, was founded in 2014.[51] It serves to support irreligious people and freethinkers in Turkey who are discriminated against based on their views. In 2018 it was reported in some media outlets that the Ateizm Derneği would close down because of the pressure on its members and attacks by pro-government media, but the association itself issued a clarification that this was not the case and that it was still active.[52]

United Kingdom

[edit]

The term freethinker emerged towards the end of the 17th century in England to describe those who stood in opposition to the institution of the Church, and the literal belief in the Bible. The beliefs of these individuals were centered on the concept that people could understand the world through consideration of nature. Such positions were formally documented for the first time in 1697 by William Molyneux in a widely publicized letter to John Locke, and more extensively in 1713, when Anthony Collins wrote his Discourse of Free-thinking, which gained substantial popularity. This essay attacks the clergy of all churches and it is a plea for deism.

The Freethinker magazine was first published in Britain in 1881; it continued in print until 2014, and still exists as a web-based publication.

United States

[edit]
Cover of The Truth Seeker from 1921 with picture of Thomas Paine and symbols of the Enlightenment

The freethought movement first organized itself in the United States as the "Free Press Association" in 1827 in defense of George Houston, publisher of The Correspondent, an early journal of Biblical criticism in an era when blasphemy convictions were still possible. Houston had helped found an Owenite community at Haverstraw, New York in 1826–27. The short-lived Correspondent was superseded by the Free Enquirer, the official organ of Robert Owen's New Harmony community in Indiana, edited by Robert Dale Owen and by Fanny Wright between 1828 and 1832 in New York. During this time Robert Dale Owen sought to introduce the philosophic skepticism of the Free Thought movement into the Workingmen's Party in New York City. The Free Enquirer's annual civic celebrations of Paine's birthday after 1825 finally coalesced in 1836 in the first national freethinkers organization, the "United States Moral and Philosophical Society for the General Diffusion of Useful Knowledge". It was founded on August 1, 1836, at a national convention at the Lyceum in Saratoga Springs with Isaac S. Smith of Buffalo, New York, as president. Smith was also the 1836 Equal Rights Party's candidate for Governor of New York and had also been the Workingmen's Party candidate for Lt. Governor of New York in 1830. The Moral and Philosophical Society published The Beacon, edited by Gilbert Vale.[53]

Collected works of Robert G. Ingersoll[54]

Driven by the revolutions of 1848 in the German states, the 19th century saw an immigration of German freethinkers and anti-clericalists to the United States (see Forty-Eighters). In the United States, they hoped to be able to live by their principles, without interference from government and church authorities.[55]

Watson Heston, Two Ways to Go, 1896

Many Freethinkers settled in German immigrant strongholds, including St. Louis, Indianapolis, Wisconsin, and Texas, where they founded the town of Comfort, Texas, as well as others.[55]

These groups of German Freethinkers referred to their organizations as Freie Gemeinden, or "free congregations".[55] The first Freie Gemeinde was established in St. Louis in 1850.[56] Others followed in Pennsylvania, California, Washington, D.C., New York, Illinois, Wisconsin, Texas, and other states.[55][56]

Freethinkers tended to be liberal, espousing ideals such as racial, social, and sexual equality, and the abolition of slavery.[55]

The "Golden Age of Freethought" in the US came in the late 1800s. The dominant organization was the National Liberal League which formed in 1876 in Philadelphia. This group re-formed itself in 1885 as the American Secular Union under the leadership of the eminent agnostic orator Robert G. Ingersoll. Following Ingersoll's death in 1899 the organization declined, in part due to lack of effective leadership.[57]

Freethought in the United States declined in the early twentieth century. By the early twentieth century, most freethought congregations had disbanded or joined other mainstream churches. The longest continuously operating freethought congregation in America is the Free Congregation of Sauk County, Wisconsin, which was founded in 1852 and is still active as of 2020. It affiliated with the American Unitarian Association (now the Unitarian Universalist Association) in 1955.[58] D. M. Bennett was the founder and publisher of The Truth Seeker in 1873, a radical free thought and reform American periodical.

German freethinker settlements were located in:

Anarchism

[edit]
United States tradition
[edit]

Freethought influenced the development of anarchism in the United States.[61] In the U.S.,[when?]

"free thought was a basically anti-Christian, anti-clerical movement, whose purpose was to make the individual politically and spiritually free to decide for himself on religious matters. A number of contributors to Liberty were prominent figures in both free thought and anarchism. The American individualist anarchist George MacDonald [(1857–1944)] was a co-editor of Freethought and, for a time, The Truth Seeker. E. C. Walker was co-editor of the freethought/free love journal Lucifer, the Light-Bearer."[62]

"Many of the anarchists were ardent freethinkers; reprints from free thought papers such as Lucifer, the Light-Bearer, Freethought and The Truth Seeker appeared in Liberty...The church was viewed as a common ally of the state and as a repressive force in and of itself."[62]

European tradition
[edit]
The Boletín de la Escuela Moderna, 1905, edited by Francisco Ferrer

In Europe, a similar development occurred in French and Spanish individualist anarchist circles:

"Anticlericalism, just as in the rest of the libertarian movement, in another of the frequent elements which will gain relevance related to the measure in which the (French) Republic begins to have conflicts with the church...Anti-clerical discourse, frequently called for by the French individualist André Lorulot [(1885–1963)], will have its impacts in Estudios (a Spanish individualist anarchist publication). There will be an attack on institutionalized religion for the responsibility that it had in the past on negative developments, for its irrationality which makes it a counterpoint of philosophical and scientific progress. There will be a criticism of proselytism and ideological manipulation which happens on both believers and agnostics".[63]

These tendencies would continue in French individualist anarchism in the work and activism of Charles-Auguste Bontemps (1893–1981) and others. In the Spanish individualist anarchist magazines Ética and Iniciales

"there is a strong interest in publishing scientific news, usually linked to a certain atheist and anti-theist obsession, philosophy which will also work for pointing out the incompatibility between science and religion, faith, and reason. In this way, there will be a lot of talk on Charles Darwin's theories or on the negation of the existence of the soul".[64]

In 1901, the Catalan anarchist and freethinker Francesc Ferrer i Guàrdia established "modern" or progressive schools in Barcelona in defiance of an educational system controlled by the Catholic Church.[65] The schools had the stated goal to "educate the working class in a rational, secular and non-coercive setting". Fiercely anti-clerical, Ferrer believed in "freedom in education", education free from the authority of church and state.[66][failed verification] Ferrer's ideas, generally, formed the inspiration for a series of Modern Schools in the United States,[65] Cuba, South America, and London. The first of these started in New York City in 1911. Ferrer also inspired the Italian newspaper Università popolare, founded in 1901.[65]

Freethinking in Freemasonry

[edit]

Freemasonry served an important purpose in the spreading of the freethinking movement, Freemason lodges in 18th century Europe served as sites for enlightenment thinking and discussion of new ideas, helping spread freethought philosophies. The informal, secretive nature of the lodges allowed intellectuals and elites to gather and debate radical topics away from the scrutiny of church and state.[67]

Freemasonry attracted many freethinkers and became a hub of the movement, during the Enlightenment era due to its emphasis on inclusive membership, logic, rationalism, and religious tolerance.[68] Freemasonry's origins from stonemason guilds meant its symbolism and rituals drew on concepts from the Trivium and Quadrivium, they include the Mastery of Grammar, Rhetoric, logic then mastery of arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy as well as other arts such as the mechanical arts, reflecting Enlightenment ideals in the goal of making its members Masters of their thoughts and opinions thus making them Freethinkers.[69] This distinguished Freemasonry from other fraternal orders focused on chivalry or Christian morality.[68]

Rationalism and science

[edit]
Voltaire

Due to Freemasonry utilizing extensive symbols and allegories related to mathematics, geometry, and architecture, conveying the importance of reason and science,[69] and the central Masonic symbol of the compass and square represented logic and rigor[70] as well references to the "Great Architect of the Universe", these concepts were interpreted as a deist scientific creator by Enlightenment freethinkers.

Influential early Speculative Masonic writings by James Anderson and Jean-Theophile Desaguliers frequently cited Isaac Newton and promoted Newtonian scientific ideas.[70] Desaguliers was a close friend and student of Newton, further spreading Newton's theories to lodges.[70] Geometry textbooks and lectures were common in early lodges, aligning with Enlightenment interest in mathematics and science.[69]

Freemasonry's multi-tiered system of initiation rituals allegorically used the tools, stages, and concepts of architecture and mechanics to represent enlightenment and self-improvement through education and reason.[69] This resonated with freethinkers' belief in perfecting society through spreading knowledge.

Religious tolerance

[edit]
In 1889, a statue of Giordano Bruno was erected at the site of his execution, by freethinkers from several countries.

Unlike most contemporary fraternal orders, Freemasonry did not require its members to follow a specific religious creed.[68] This openness allowed men of diverse faiths, including deists, to join local lodges throughout Europe and America in the Enlightenment era allowing Free-thought to flourish. While utilizing religious imagery and themes, Freemasonry intentionally avoided dogmatic disputes and focused its moral lessons on shared values of virtue, charity, and righteousness thereby allowing its members to think for themselves.[68]

This religious tolerance attracted Enlightenment thinkers, like Voltaire, who viewed organized religion as upholding oppressive traditional monarchs and hindering free thought.[71] Benjamin Franklin praised Masonic principles of "liberality, tolerance and unity in essentials, leaving each Brother to his own opinions on non-essentials" in his writings.[72]

Political liberalism

[edit]

Many Enlightenment freethinkers perceived established dogmas as oppressing free thought.[71] Consequently, the secrecy and hierarchical Initiatory structure of Freemasonry alarmed some authoritarian states, concerned it could encourage free and revolutionary ideas.[70]

However, most Masonic lodges mainly aimed to promote morality, sociability, freedom and philanthropic causes rather than radical politics.[68] Values of freethinking, liberty, equality, and opposition to tyranny were also celebrated in Masonic rituals and writings, many rituals have for motto "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity".[69] This intellectual spirit likely contributed to many Freemasons supporting independence movements and participating as Founding Fathers of the United States.[73]

In the 19th and 20th centuries, some authoritarian states were against Freemasonry, suspecting it of encouraging freethinking philosophies and suppressed Masonic lodges and members.

Pursuit of mastery

[edit]

A core goal of Freemasonry's initiatory system is to guide men's intellectual and moral development towards mastery and self enlightenment.[69] Masonic rituals and degrees symbolically depict the passage from an Apprentice to Fellowcraft to Master Mason as a metaphor for independent learning and self-improvement to the goal of becoming a Master of himself, thus a full freethinker.[70]

Attaining mastery is presented as freeing a man's mind from blind reliance on authorities and dogmas so he can autonomously reason and have educated opinions.[73] The perfectibility of human nature through education and liberty is a key theme. This aligns with freethinkers' views on thinking for oneself using logic and empiricism.

However, this does not mean that a Freemason cannot follow a dogma rather that as a Free-thinker, the Mason can, if he wants, decide to follow a dogma on his own free will and accord, not because he is told to do so but by his own enlightened choice.

See also

[edit]

Notes and references

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

Freethought is a philosophical stance that prioritizes the formation of beliefs through reason, logic, and , rejecting , , and —particularly in religious contexts—as primary sources of knowledge.
Originating in ancient skeptical traditions and gaining prominence during the Enlightenment, freethought challenged dominance and promoted intellectual independence, with key figures including , , and later American advocates like , whose lectures advanced rational critique of superstition and .
The movement's achievements encompass contributions to secular governance, scientific progress, and social reforms such as moral education and civil rights advocacy, including support for the founding of organizations like the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
Controversies arose from conflicts with religious institutions, leading to prosecutions and social ostracism, as freethinkers were often accused of for questioning divine and scriptural infallibility.

Definition and Core Principles

Definition

Freethought refers to the practice of forming opinions and beliefs through reason, logic, and , independent of , , , or . This approach privileges autonomous inquiry, particularly in evaluating religious claims, where conclusions must withstand scrutiny against observable data rather than defer to scriptural or clerical endorsement. The term "freethinker," originating in the 1690s, describes one who tests propositions by rational standards rather than accepting them on institutional say-so. Distinct from broader "free thought," which encompasses critical reflection free from any authority appeals across domains, freethought historically centers on , challenging assertions and control over . Emerging prominently in 18th-century amid rising challenges to orthodox theology, it embodies a commitment to evidence-based , often resulting in rejection of unverified doctrines like divine . Proponents, such as those in early freethinking circles, emphasized that truth claims require justification through sensory experience and , not inherited belief systems. In practice, freethought demands provisional acceptance of ideas, open to revision upon new evidence, fostering a causal understanding of phenomena grounded in verifiable mechanisms rather than metaphysical assumptions. This stance has roots in pre-modern rationalist traditions but gained traction as a self-conscious movement when thinkers began systematically questioning theistic monopolies on morality and cosmology, as seen in 19th-century manifestos prioritizing over . While not inherently atheistic, it frequently leads to secular conclusions by undermining reliance on untestable propositions.

Key Characteristics

Freethought entails forming conclusions on matters of truth, particularly religious or metaphysical claims, through independent rational rather than submission to , scriptural , or cultural . This approach insists on logic, empirical , and verifiable as the foundations for , rejecting unsubstantiated assertions regardless of their institutional endorsement. Central to this is a commitment to , whereby propositions are scrutinized for coherence and evidential support, often leading freethinkers to prioritize naturalistic explanations over ones. A defining trait is intellectual autonomy, positioning the individual as the primary arbiter of knowledge rather than collective consensus or hierarchical decree. Freethinkers advocate unrestricted inquiry, viewing suppression of dissent—whether through or social —as antithetical to truth-seeking. This manifests in a critical orientation toward power structures that enforce orthodoxy, including religious institutions that historically wielded inquisitorial mechanisms, such as the Roman Catholic Church's , which banned works challenging doctrine from 1559 until 1966. Freethought also emphasizes ethical implications of rationalism, extending beyond epistemology to challenge justifications for social hierarchies rooted in divine sanction, such as absolutist monarchies or caste systems. While not inherently prescriptive, it aligns with reformist impulses by undermining pseudoscientific or faith-based rationales for inequality, as seen in 19th-century freethinkers' advocacy for abolitionism and women's suffrage on evidential grounds rather than moral fiat. This individualistic ethos contrasts with collectivist ideologies that subordinate personal judgment to group ideology, reinforcing freethought's role as a bulwark against ideological conformity in both religious and secular domains.

Symbols and Representations

The pansy flower (Viola spp.) serves as the primary historical symbol of freethought, adopted widely from the late onward due to its etymological link to the French word pensée, meaning "thought." This association underscores the emphasis on independent reasoning and mental freedom, with the flower's face-like appearance evoking contemplation. Freethought organizations, such as the , have incorporated the pansy into pins, publications, and memorials, including tombstone engravings for deceased skeptics in and America as early as the 1870s. In French libre-pensée traditions during the Third Republic (1870–1940), freethinkers drew on revolutionary to represent emancipation from clerical authority, including the (symbolizing liberty), the (denoting equality), the mason's level (for fraternity and rational order), and clasped hands (evoking solidarity). These emblems appeared in Masonic lodges, public ceremonies, and libre-pensée federation banners, blending Enlightenment with republican ideals; for instance, the triangle and level were featured in commemorations of the 1881 Tunis expedition dead as martyrs of secular thought. Visual representations of freethought often include statues of persecuted thinkers, such as the 1889 bronze in Rome's , depicting the philosopher executed in 1600 for heresy against dogmatic cosmology, erected by Italian anticlericals as a testament to defiance of authority. Similarly, busts like that of in London's (unveiled 1980) honor 20th-century advocates of rational inquiry over faith-based claims. Periodical mastheads, such as those of De Vrijdenker (Dutch for "The Freethinker," published since 1856), further propagate these motifs through illustrative covers blending floral symbols with allegorical figures of reason triumphing over . Unlike rigid ideological icons, freethought symbolism prioritizes evocation of intellectual liberty, avoiding centralized mandates in favor of diverse, reason-derived expressions.

Philosophical Foundations

Rationalism and Empiricism

, as a philosophical stance privileging reason as the of , underpins freethought by advocating deduction from first principles and innate ideas to challenge dogmatic assertions, particularly those derived from religious authority rather than logical consistency. Pioneered by figures like in his 1637 , posits that certain truths, such as mathematical axioms or the cogito ("I think, therefore I am"), are accessible through and logical deduction independent of sensory data, enabling freethinkers to dismantle unsubstantiated claims like divine by subjecting them to rational scrutiny. Baruch Spinoza's 1677 , structured geometrically like Euclid's proofs, exemplified this approach by deriving a pantheistic from axioms, rejecting anthropomorphic deities as irrational, though Spinoza's work faced condemnation for its freethinking implications. Empiricism complements in freethought by insisting that knowledge originates from sensory experience and empirical observation, fostering toward untestable propositions and promoting to verify claims against evidence. John Locke's 1690 Essay Concerning Human Understanding argued for the mind as a at birth, filled solely through experience, which supported deistic views over orthodox Christianity by emphasizing observable natural laws over scriptural fiat. David Hume's 1748 Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding extended this to , questioning causation and induction as habits rather than necessities, thereby undermining and theological arguments lacking empirical warrant, as Hume contended that "no is sufficient to establish a , unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact." In freethought's synthesis, and converge to demand both logical coherence and evidential support, rejecting faith-based epistemologies in favor of methodical that prioritizes verifiable truths over . This dual foundation, evident in Enlightenment critiques, informed later movements by equating freethought with rational free from presuppositions, as articulated in J.M. Robertson's 1899 Short History of Freethought, which described as a "critical effort to reach certainties" beyond . While pure risks a priori dogmatism and invites Humean doubt, their interplay—later refined by Immanuel Kant's 1781 —bolstered freethought's commitment to evidence-based reasoning, influencing and scientific methodology without reliance on revealed religion.

Skepticism and Evidence-Based Inquiry


Skepticism in freethought constitutes a commitment to methodical questioning of claims, particularly those derived from religious dogma or unexamined authority, in favor of conclusions supported by reason and empirical scrutiny. This approach rejects credulity, insisting on suspending judgment (epoché) amid uncertainty, as exemplified by ancient Pyrrhonian skeptics who sought tranquility through avoidance of dogmatic assertions. Freethinkers like Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) embodied this by defining freethought as forming opinions through evidence and rational inquiry, independent of tradition.
Evidence-based inquiry operationalizes by applying standards of verifiability, replicability, and to evaluate propositions, drawing from the scientific method's emphasis on data over revelation or anecdote. David Hume's dictum to proportion belief to underscores this , influencing freethought's critique of unsubstantiated claims. In Russell's 1927 lecture "Why I Am Not a Christian," he applied such to , contending that the absence of empirical proof for God's existence and the presence of worldly imperfections preclude acceptance of divine benevolence without compelling . Historically, figures like (c. 470–399 BCE) advanced skeptical by relentlessly interrogating prevailing beliefs, prioritizing dialectical examination over orthodoxy, a practice that cost him his life but inspired freethought's valorization of intellectual independence. Contemporary freethought organizations, such as the Center for Inquiry, promote this synthesis by fostering to counter and promote grounded in testable hypotheses. This framework ensures freethought remains anchored in causal explanations derivable from evidence, guarding against biases inherent in institutional or ideological sources.

First-Principles Reasoning

First-principles reasoning in freethought involves deconstructing complex ideas or doctrines to their most fundamental, irreducible elements—such as logical axioms, self-evident truths, or empirical observations—and rebuilding arguments upward from those basics without reliance on unverified or . This method prioritizes causal chains grounded in verifiable reality over analogical or revelatory claims, ensuring intellectual independence. articulated first principles as foundational propositions, like , that cannot be deduced further and serve as the origin of all , a framework compatible with freethought's demand for reason-derived beliefs. In practice, freethinkers apply this by questioning inherited assumptions, such as religious dogmas, and testing them against basic logical consistency or sensory evidence, rejecting components that fail to hold at the elemental level. This approach fosters causal realism by emphasizing direct, unmediated links between observed fundamentals and conclusions, avoiding distortions from cultural or institutional biases that often embed unexamined in mainstream narratives. For instance, evaluating or scientific claims requires tracing them back to primary data points, like experimental results or definitional clarity, rather than deferring to consensus shaped by potentially skewed academic or media sources.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Roots

The roots of freethought trace to ancient Greek Pre-Socratic philosophers of the 6th and 5th centuries BCE, who pioneered rational inquiry into nature, displacing mythological explanations with naturalistic ones. (c. 624–546 BCE) posited water as the fundamental substance of the universe, attributing cosmic order to observable processes rather than divine whims. (c. 610–546 BCE), his successor, introduced the concept of the —an indefinite boundless principle—as the origin of all things, emphasizing eternal motion and justice in natural cycles without invoking gods. These thinkers prioritized empirical and logical deduction, laying groundwork for questioning dogmatic traditions. Socrates (c. 470–399 BCE) advanced this tradition through his elenchus method, systematically interrogating assumptions about , , and knowledge to reveal contradictions in prevailing beliefs. His persistent questioning of Athenian religious and social norms led to charges of and corrupting youth, culminating in his and execution by hemlock in 399 BCE, an event highlighting tensions between independent reason and orthodox authority. Socrates embodied skeptical freethinking by refusing unexamined opinions, insisting that true wisdom begins with recognizing one's ignorance. In parallel, the (or Lokayata) school in ancient , emerging around the 6th century BCE, represented an early materialist challenge to Vedic orthodoxy. Charvakas rejected entities, the soul's , and scriptural authority, asserting that reality consists solely of perceptible matter and that valid knowledge derives from direct sensory experience alone. Their dismissed and testimony unless corroborated by perception, critiquing ritualism and priestly doctrines as exploitative. Hellenistic developments further entrenched freethought principles. of (c. 360–270 BCE) founded Pyrrhonian , advocating —due to the equipollence of opposing arguments, aiming for ataraxia through avoidance of dogmatic assent. (341–270 BCE) promoted , arguing that the universe operates via mechanistic laws without , encouraging pursuit of modest pleasures grounded in rational understanding over superstitious fears. These strands persisted into Roman antiquity, as in Lucretius's (c. 55 BCE), which popularized Epicurean ideas against religious terror. Pre-modern expressions remained sporadic amid theistic dominance. In the Islamic Golden Age, figures like (854–925 CE) critiqued prophetic revelation and organized religion, favoring reason and philosophy; his works questioned miracles and advocated empirical medicine. (1048–1131 CE) expressed doubt about and in his Rubaiyat, prioritizing earthly experience over eschatological speculation. Such ideas faced suppression, underscoring freethought's vulnerability to institutional power before the Enlightenment.

Enlightenment Era Emergence


Freethought principles crystallized during the Enlightenment, from the late 17th to the late 18th century, as intellectuals shifted emphasis from divine revelation and ecclesiastical authority to individual reason, empirical observation, and critical examination of traditions. This era's rationalist and empiricist advancements enabled systematic challenges to religious , with precursors like (1632–1677) laying foundational critiques; excommunicated from Amsterdam's Jewish community on July 27, 1656, for questioning orthodoxy, Spinoza's (1670) pioneered historical-critical biblical analysis and defended against . Spinoza's pantheistic influenced subsequent thinkers by prioritizing natural explanations over claims.
In France, the philosophes advanced freethought through satire and encyclopedic dissemination of secular knowledge. Voltaire (François-Marie Arouet, 1694–1778) championed freedom of expression and , using works like Lettres philosophiques (1734) to critique Catholic intolerance and while advocating grounded in reason. Imprisoned in the in 1717 and exiled to in 1726, Voltaire's experiences reinforced his opposition to fanaticism, as seen in his defense of , wrongfully executed in 1762 on religious grounds. Denis (1713–1784), co-editor of the (first volume 1751, completed 1772), promoted materialist and irreligious inquiry, compiling contributions that exposed contradictions in and elevated and . The Encyclopédie's 28 volumes, despite royal attempts, reached over 25,000 subscribers by 1772, fostering widespread rational . Across the Channel, Scottish Enlightenment figures emphasized empiricism and doubt. David Hume (1711–1776), in A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–1740) and An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), applied skepticism to causality, miracles, and religious arguments, arguing that beliefs must derive from sensory experience rather than faith; his critique of design arguments undermined providential theology without descending into dogmatism. Hume's irreligious stance, evident in Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (published posthumously 1779), faced professional barriers due to perceived atheism, yet propelled evidence-based inquiry. Thomas Paine's The Age of Reason (Part I, 1794) extended these ideas transatlantically, rejecting biblical revelation as fabrication and endorsing deism via rational observation of nature, selling tens of thousands of copies despite backlash that branded it blasphemous. These works, amid censorship and persecution, established freethought as a viable intellectual stance, prioritizing verifiable truth over inherited creed.

19th-Century Expansion

![Freethinker tombstone detail, late 19th century][float-right] The 19th century marked a period of significant organizational and public expansion for freethought, building on Enlightenment foundations amid rapid scientific and industrial changes. In the United States, this era is often termed the "Golden Age of Freethought," characterized by the proliferation of societies, publications, and lectures challenging religious orthodoxy. Key influences included Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species (1859), which provided empirical evidence undermining literal biblical creation accounts and prompting a crisis of faith among intellectuals. Freethinkers increasingly linked skepticism of dogma to social reforms, including abolitionism, women's suffrage, and labor rights, viewing religious authority as a barrier to progress. In Britain, played a pivotal role by founding the in 1866, uniting disparate secularist groups to advocate for , free speech, and evidence-based ethics. , an outspoken atheist and radical politician, faced repeated legal challenges, including prosecutions and a prolonged parliamentary struggle over his in 1880–1886, which highlighted tensions between freethought and established religion. His efforts, alongside George Holyoake's earlier coinage of "" in 1851, shifted freethought toward organized activism emphasizing moral conduct without supernatural beliefs. Publications like 's National Reformer disseminated these ideas widely. Across the Atlantic, emerged as America's preeminent freethought orator, delivering sold-out lectures from the 1870s onward that critiqued superstition and championed , , and individual liberty. Known as "The Great Agnostic," Ingersoll influenced thousands through speeches like "The Gods" (1872) and "Some Mistakes of Moses" (1879), arguing that reason, not revelation, should guide human affairs; his prominence peaked in the 1880s, with freethought societies numbering in the hundreds by decade's end. The National Liberal League, established in 1876, coordinated these efforts, petitioning against religious tests and for civil rights. European movements paralleled these developments, with French libre-pensée associations commemorating martyrs of freethought, as in the 1881 homage to victims of , and Dutch publications like De Vrijdenker promoting rational inquiry. In the U.S., early precedents included Abner Kneeland's 1838 blasphemy conviction, the last such prosecution, underscoring legal risks that galvanized later organizers. Overall, 19th-century freethought expanded through empirical challenges to —bolstered by , , and —and institutional networks that fostered public discourse on autonomy and evidence.

20th-Century Institutionalization

In , freethought organizations from the late consolidated into enduring national federations and publishing entities during the early , providing platforms for rational inquiry amid rising and political challenges. The Rationalist Press Association (RPA), originating from the publishing efforts of Charles Albert Watts in 1885 and formally organized by 1899, focused on disseminating affordable rationalist literature, including works by and scientific treatises, thereby institutionalizing freethought through mass education and debate. In , the Fédération Nationale de la Libre Pensée, reunified in 1925 after wartime disruptions, advocated for laïcité and free inquiry, drawing on its 19th-century roots to influence educational and social policies with memberships exceeding 25,000 affiliates by the early 1900s in affiliated societies. Germany witnessed a surge in freethought institutionalization before authoritarian suppression, with the Deutscher Freidenkerbund expanding to encompass proletarian and cremationist groups by the 1920s, hosting congresses and promoting secular ceremonies like as alternatives to religious rites. These bodies peaked in influence during the , coordinating with international networks before Nazi bans dismantled them starting in , highlighting freethought's vulnerability to state control. The World Union of Freethinkers (WUFT), established in 1880, sustained trans-European coordination through congresses, such as the 1938 London gathering at Conway Hall, fostering alliances among national groups despite ideological fractures. In the United States, freethought shifted from 19th-century congregations to advocacy-focused entities amid and anti-radical sentiments post-World War I, with publications like The Truth Seeker maintaining continuity from 1873 into the mid-20th century. The American Association for the Advancement of Atheism, founded in 1925 by Charles Lee Smith, emphasized legal challenges to religious influence in public life, though it operated on a smaller scale compared to European counterparts. By mid-century, institutional energies increasingly merged into humanist organizations, such as the formed in 1941, which advanced freethought principles through ethical education and civil rights initiatives, including co-founding the . These institutions faced existential threats from totalitarian regimes—Nazi dissolution of freethinker leagues and Soviet instrumentalization of for state ideology—yet persisted via networks and underground publications, laying groundwork for skeptical and humanist revivals. Journals like The Freethinker, active since 1881, exemplified enduring media infrastructure, critiquing dogma and supporting global freethought amid these pressures.

Regional and Cultural Variations

European Traditions

![Bronze statue of Giordano Bruno by Ettore Ferrari, Campo de' Fiori, Roma.jpg][float-right] (1548–1600), an Italian philosopher and former Dominican friar, exemplified early European resistance to dogmatic authority through his advocacy for , infinite worlds, and hermetic philosophy, leading to his execution by the on February 17, 1600, for . His posthumous symbolism as a defender of was reinforced by the erection of a monument in Rome's in 1889, commemorating opposition to . In France, freethought gained prominence during the Enlightenment with figures like Voltaire (1694–1778), who critiqued superstition and ecclesiastical power in works such as Candide (1759) and advocated for reason and tolerance, influencing the separation of church and state formalized in the 1905 law on laïcité. Jean Meslier (1664–1729), a rural priest whose posthumously published Testament (written circa 1729) rejected Christianity and indicted clerical oppression, represented radical anticlericalism predating the Revolution. French freethinkers, entangled in political battles against Catholicism, pushed for secular education and public sphere neutrality from the Third Republic onward. Britain's tradition emphasized organized secularism, with coining the term in 1851 to promote ethics without religion, leading to the National Secular Society's founding in 1866 under , who became Britain's first openly atheist MP in 1880 after legal battles over oath-taking. The Freethinker magazine, launched in 1881 by G. W. Foote, sustained militant critique of religion amid Victorian blasphemy prosecutions. In , the Deutscher Freidenkerbund, established in 1881 by Ludwig Büchner, grew to approximately 500,000 members by 1930, fostering atheist and rationalist discourse until its dissolution by the Nazis in 1933. This league, rooted in post-1848 revolutionary fervor, paralleled similar associations in from the 1850s, highlighting a continental push for freethought amid industrialization and church influence. European traditions thus intertwined philosophical inquiry with institutional challenges to clerical authority, prioritizing empirical reason over inherited .

North American Movements

Freethought in emerged prominently in the United States during the late 18th century, influenced by Enlightenment and figures such as , whose 1794 publication challenged religious orthodoxy and inspired republican skepticism toward authority. and exemplified early American freethinkers, advocating rational inquiry and amid the founding of the republic. By the 1820s, revivals honoring Paine linked freethought to , as seen in Robert Owen's efforts, setting the stage for broader social reforms including and . The 19th century marked a "Golden Age" of American freethought from 1876 to 1914, characterized by expanded publications, lectures, and organizations demanding church-state separation. Key proponents included orator , dubbed the "Great Agnostic," who delivered thousands of lectures promoting humanism and individual liberty; , who critiqued biblical patriarchy in (1895); and Moncure Daniel Conway, an abolitionist Unitarian who edited freethought journals in the 1860s. Immigrant communities, particularly German "Forty-Eighters" fleeing European autocracy, bolstered the movement in states like starting in the 1850s, establishing halls for rationalist discourse. Women freethinkers such as integrated skepticism with advocacy for , while Black freethinkers critiqued Christianity's alignment with racial oppression. In the 20th century, institutionalization advanced through groups like the American Humanist Association, founded in 1941 to promote civil liberties and secular ethics, influencing Supreme Court cases such as McCollum v. Board of Education (1948), which barred religious instruction in public schools. The Freedom From Religion Foundation, established in 1978, focused on litigation enforcing the First Amendment's establishment clause, achieving victories against public religious displays. Figures like Corliss Lamont defended humanist principles against McCarthy-era probes in the 1950s. The Congressional Freethought Caucus, co-chaired by representatives including Jared Huffman since its formation, advocates for nontheistic constituents in policy debates. Canadian freethought developed more modestly, often intertwined with humanism and international efforts, as evidenced by the 1957 Pugwash Conferences initiated by Canadian industrialist Cyrus Eaton to foster rational dialogue on nuclear disarmament. Modern organizations include the Freethought Association of Canada, promoting secular worldviews through education, and the Centre for Inquiry Canada, which advances skeptical inquiry and secularism via events and advocacy. These groups emphasize evidence-based policy and counter religious influence in public life, though the movement remains smaller than its U.S. counterpart due to cultural and legal differences.

Other Global Contexts

In , freethought traces roots to ancient traditions, including materialist schools like Cārvāka, which emphasized and toward Vedic authority dating back over 2,500 years. Modern organized efforts emerged in the late , with the Hindu Free Thought Union founded in 1878, drawing inspiration from British secularists like to promote rational inquiry and critique religious dogma. In the , figures like E.V. Ramasamy () advanced rationalist movements through the , challenging caste and superstition via public debates and publications, while the Indian Rationalist Association, established in 1949, continues exposing through investigations and . Recent events, such as the 2023 gathering in attracting around 7,000 atheists and freethinkers despite adverse weather, highlight growing visibility amid rising . Australia's freethought developed in the , influenced by British , with early societies like the Secular Club formed in the 1860s advocating reason over religious orthodoxy in colonial debates on education and governance. The Rationalist Society of Australia originated in 1906 from freethinkers, evolving into a network promoting and criticism of clerical influence, including establishment of freethought halls in by 1887 for lectures and libraries. These groups contributed to policy wins, such as state aid removal from religious schools in Victoria by 1910, reflecting freethought's role in fostering evidence-based public discourse. Latin American freethought has gained traction since the early , with rising from 4% in 1996 to 16% by 2020 amid and education gains, fueling organizations challenging Catholic dominance. Annual encounters, such as the Third Latin American Meeting of Freethought in in November 2024, convened rationalists from multiple countries to discuss and , building on prior events in and that drew hundreds for workshops on . Groups in and exemplify grassroots activism, planning expansions like the 2026 international gathering, though participants often face in predominantly religious societies. In , freethought manifests through nascent humanist networks amid strong religious adherence, with the Humanist Association of Ghana promoting non-theistic ethics since the 2010s and unveiling the continent's first atheist billboard in in February 2025 to assert visibility. South Africa's Secular Society advocates separation of religion and state, critiquing policies favoring faith-based initiatives, while Zimbabwean groups offer support to ex-clergy transitioning to secular worldviews. These efforts contend with restrictive laws in over 90% of African nations limiting assembly, underscoring freethought's precarious growth. Across the and broader , freethought faces suppression but persists in underground forms, with ancient atheistic strains in Chinese and Indian texts enduring alongside modern activism like China's resilient skeptic circles post-1989 . is rising among Arab , with surveys showing doubled non-religiosity rates since 2013, yet public expression risks in theocratic states. Turkey's Association represents organized dissent, promoting rational inquiry despite legal hurdles.

Relationships to Other Ideologies

Freethought and Religion

![Bronze statue of Giordano Bruno, Campo de' Fiori, Rome][float-right]
Freethought fundamentally challenges religious doctrines by insisting on reason and evidence as the basis for beliefs about the divine, rather than accepting authority, scripture, or tradition uncritically. This approach often positions freethinkers in opposition to organized religions, which typically demand faith in unprovable tenets as a prerequisite for adherence. For instance, freethinkers reject claims of divine revelation lacking empirical verification, viewing them as products of human invention rather than supernatural truth.
While freethought does not inherently preclude theistic belief—allowing for or non-dogmatic if supported by rational —its practitioners frequently arrive at or upon scrutinizing religious texts and histories for inconsistencies and moral failings. Prominent 19th-century freethinkers like Robert Ingersoll argued that religious stifles independent thought, equating unquestioned with intellectual servitude and advocating derived from human reason over divine command. Historical freethought movements, emerging amid Enlightenment critiques, explicitly contested the role of in and , asserting that faith-based authority undermines social order built on verifiable principles rather than presumed divine sanction. Tensions arise because many religions enforce creeds that deem doubt heretical, directly conflicting with freethought's ethic of perpetual questioning. Freethinkers have historically viewed religion not only as epistemologically flawed but also practically harmful, citing its justification for conflicts, discrimination, and suppression of inquiry. This skepticism extends to modern contexts, where freethought organizations promote strict separation of religion and state to prevent theocratic encroachments on individual liberty and scientific progress. Despite potential for overlap with liberal religious reformers who prioritize reason within faith, empirical observation shows freethought communities predominantly align with secular humanism, prioritizing naturalistic explanations over supernatural ones.

Freethought and Political Philosophies

Freethought's core commitment to independent reasoning and rejection of unexamined has historically intersected with political philosophies emphasizing individual autonomy, often aligning with anti-authoritarian strains rather than collectivist or tradition-bound ideologies. This affinity stems from parallels between skepticism toward religious dogma and critique of state coercion, as seen in Enlightenment thinkers who extended rational inquiry to governance. For instance, freethinkers challenged the , promoting secular bases for political legitimacy that influenced and . In , freethought provided intellectual foundations for doctrines of natural rights and free markets, with figures like advocating republicanism free from ecclesiastical interference. Paine's (1776) exemplified this by urging to foster rational , a echoed in liberal emphasis on consent-based over inherited or divine mandates. Similarly, Adam Smith's , rooted in empirical observation rather than moral fiat, reflected freethought's preference for evidence over tradition. Modern extends this tradition, viewing state intervention as analogous to religious imposition; proponents like integrated freethought's with advocacy for , arguing that coercive redistribution undermines personal rational agency. Anarchist variants, such as , drew directly from freethought networks, as in Benjamin Tucker's synthesis of with opposition to all monopolies, including those enforced by . Tucker's periodical (1881–1908) promoted "," where supplants coercive hierarchies, mirroring freethought's distrust of imposed beliefs. This contrasts with socialist alignments among some freethinkers, like Bertrand Russell's support for , yet reveals tensions: freethought's insistence on critiques Marxism's deterministic as quasi-dogmatic, potentially stifling dissent in pursuit of class ends. No inherent political orthodoxy binds freethought; its practitioners span capitalists like Smith to socialists like Russell, underscoring that or does not dictate economic or statist preferences.

Freethought in Freemasonry and Fraternal Orders

Freemasonry, formalized with the establishment of the Grand Lodge of England in 1717, drew from Enlightenment ideals of reason and moral philosophy, appealing to individuals skeptical of dogmatic authority while emphasizing symbolic rituals and fraternal bonds. Its foundational document, Anderson's Constitutions of 1723, mandates adherence to a moral law and explicitly rejects "stupid Atheist" or "irreligious Libertine," requiring belief in a Supreme Being as a prerequisite for membership in regular jurisdictions. This theistic framework aligned with deistic freethought—rational inquiry into nature's order without sectarian dogma—but excluded strict atheists or materialists, creating inherent tensions with unbridled skepticism toward religious claims. Continental European branches, such as the Grand Orient de France, diverged by prioritizing freedom of conscience over mandatory theism. In 1877, the Grand Orient adopted a motion affirming absolute liberty of belief, effectively admitting atheists and aligning more closely with freethought's rejection of imposed creeds; this shift promoted laïcité () and influenced French republican values, though it led to non-recognition by Anglo-American Grand Lodges. Notable freethinkers like , a deist critic of ecclesiastical power, were initiated into such lodges; on April 4, 1778, at age 83, he joined the Loge des Neuf Sœurs in , symbolizing Masonry's occasional embrace of rationalist elites. Other fraternal orders, including the Independent Order of Odd Fellows and the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, similarly incorporated moral and philosophical teachings but enforced theistic requirements, limiting appeal to freethinkers favoring empirical reasoning over premises. These groups emphasized charity and self-improvement through allegorical lessons, fostering environments for discourse among members who often held deistic or tolerant views, yet their oaths and rituals presupposed divine oversight, constraining purely secular freethought. Variant Masonic obediences in liberal traditions occasionally accommodated broader , but mainstream fraternalism remained anchored in theistic moral orders, reflecting a partial rather than full compatibility with freethought's core tenets of independent judgment unbound by faith-based axioms.

Criticisms and Controversies

Philosophical and Epistemological Critiques

Philosophers have critiqued freethought's epistemological foundations for presupposing the reliability of reason and sensory without adequate justification, potentially leading to . For instance, the commitment to as the arbiter of truth encounters Hume's , where the uniformity of nature cannot be proven inductively without assuming the conclusion, thus questioning the self-consistency of freethought's evidential methodology. Similarly, critiques of rationalism, akin to freethought's emphasis on logic, argue that pure reason alone cannot access synthetic truths about reality, as contended in his (1781), limiting knowledge to phenomena while noumena remain unknowable. A related objection posits that freethought's rejection of and renders it practically unattainable, as most human knowledge derives from accepted testimony rather than independent verification. Alan Cromer, in analyzing the of free thinking, asserts that individuals cannot originate all beliefs anew, relying instead on cultural inheritance and consensus, which freethought dismisses at the cost of epistemic isolation or error. This dependency implies that professed freethinkers inadvertently adopt unexamined dogmas, such as methodological naturalism, which excludes non-empirical possibilities a priori and constrains to material explanations. Further epistemological challenges arise from naturalism's implications for cognition. Alvin Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism (1993) contends that if beliefs arise solely from unguided evolution favoring survival over truth, then the probability of reliable cognitive faculties is low, undermining confidence in freethought's rational conclusions under materialist assumptions. Critics like Jonathan Swift satirized this reductionism in Gulliver's Travels (1726), portraying hyper-rational beings as detached from human realities, highlighting reason's insufficiency for moral and existential knowledge without transcendent anchors. These critiques suggest freethought risks performative contradiction: advocating unfettered inquiry while bounded by unproven priors like naturalism or , potentially fostering that erodes its own propositional commitments. Empirical data on formation supports this, showing cognitive biases and social influences shape even self-described rational judgments, as documented in psychological studies on epistemic dependence.

Societal and Moral Implications

Critics argue that freethought's rejection of religious as a basis for fosters , wherein judgments of right and wrong become subjective and untethered from transcendent standards, potentially justifying actions that undermine . This view posits that without a divine or absolute foundation, moral norms devolve into mere cultural preferences, eroding the consensus necessary for cohesive societies. Empirical experiments support concerns over behavioral impacts, demonstrating that exposure to relativist arguments increases rates among participants compared to those encountering absolutist perspectives. Philosophers such as (1685–1753) condemned freethinking for its cascading effects on , asserting that unchecked not only questions doctrinal truths but also destabilizes moral certainties, leading to increased vice, political unrest, and the breakdown of communal bonds reliant on shared ethical absolutes. In historical s, this critique manifests in observations of secular movements correlating with perceived ethical lapses, as freethought's emphasis on individual challenges traditional restraints on conduct, from familial duties to prohibitions against exploitation. Societal implications extend to broader anomie, where the absence of religious teleology—purpose derived from a higher order—leaves individuals adrift, exacerbating issues like declining birth rates and weakened altruism in increasingly secular populations. Conservative analysts attribute rising individualism and tolerance for moral pluralism to freethought's influence, warning that such shifts prioritize personal liberty over collective welfare, as evidenced in debates over secular policies that accommodate behaviors once universally condemned. While proponents counter with evidence of stable secular ethics grounded in reason and empathy, critics maintain that these substitutes prove fragile under existential pressures, risking nihilism where "if God does not exist, everything is permitted," a sentiment echoed in literary critiques of godless rationalism.

Political Biases and Dogmatism

Freethought's commitment to independent inquiry theoretically transcends political ideologies, yet surveys reveal a consistent left-liberal skew among adherents. A 2012 analysis found that 51% of U.S. atheists and agnostics self-identified as liberal, with only 13% as conservative, a disparity more pronounced than in the general population. By 2025, data indicated 67% of atheists described themselves as ideologically liberal, alongside higher rates of Democratic Party affiliation compared to other religious groups. This pattern holds internationally to varying degrees, with atheists in Western contexts often favoring progressive policies on social issues like and individual rights, though freethought's emphasis on evidence-based reasoning does not inherently prescribe such views. Critics contend that this bias has engendered dogmatism, transforming freethought communities into echo chambers that penalize ideological deviation, akin to the religious orthodoxies they critique. In the era (circa 2006–2010s), leaders like and initially promoted rational discourse but drew accusations of rigid adherence to progressive norms, particularly on and , leading to schisms where dissenters faced . Organizations such as the (FFRF) have been faulted for dogmatic stances on political issues, prioritizing ideological conformity over open debate and alienating potential conservative freethinkers who question left-leaning assumptions on topics like or . Such tendencies reflect broader institutional influences, including academia's documented leftward tilt, which shapes freethought discourse and may suppress empirically grounded conservative critiques of state intervention or . Proponents counter that genuine freethought rejects all forms of , including political, and accommodates conservative —evident in historical figures like , who blended with free-market advocacy. Yet empirical underrepresentation persists; for instance, conservative voices in secular journals argue that humanism's anti-dogmatic should equally challenge left-wing collectivism, but such positions remain marginal amid dominant progressive narratives. This imbalance underscores a tension: while freethought prioritizes evidence over authority, its modern practitioners often exhibit selective , applying rigorous scrutiny to traditional religions but leniency toward politically aligned ideologies, potentially undermining the movement's foundational commitment to unbiased inquiry.

Contemporary Applications and Impact

Modern Organizations and Activism

The (FFRF), incorporated in in 1978, operates as a nonprofit with over 35,000 members dedicated to upholding church-state separation through legal challenges, educational outreach, and public advocacy. The organization has initiated numerous lawsuits targeting religious practices in public institutions, such as eliminating prayers at high school graduations and football games, and removing verses from school displays. The Center for Inquiry (CFI), founded in 1995, advances freethought by promoting reason, , and while countering and claims. Through its global network of branches and CFI On Campus programs, it supports campus-based initiatives to enhance , , and free inquiry among students. CFI also engages in policy advocacy to limit religious influence on governance and education. American Atheists, established in 1963, focuses on protecting atheist and enforcing neutrality toward , with more than 230 local affiliates across the facilitating efforts. The group pursues against religious endorsements in public spaces and supports broader social equality for nonbelievers. Internationally, , originally formed in 1952 as the International Humanist and Ethical Union, coordinates over 100 member organizations to lobby for humanist values at bodies like the , defend individuals facing persecution for nonbelief, and campaign against discrimination based on or laws. Its work emphasizes applying scientific inquiry to ethical and social issues while rejecting supernaturalism. Contemporary activism by these groups includes coordinated legal and public campaigns against religious encroachments, such as FFRF's "Freethought in Action" initiative launched on May 13, 2025, which promotes daily individual actions to reinforce secular principles. In 2025, FFRF and the Secular Student Alliance awarded $1,000 grants to activists combating religious privilege in . The Secular for America, representing multiple freethought entities, lobbies U.S. members on legislation promoting secular governance. These efforts often intersect with challenges to policies perceived as favoring religious viewpoints, including opposition to faith-based initiatives in public funding.

Influence on Science and Policy

Freethought's emphasis on reason and has profoundly shaped contemporary scientific practice by prioritizing toward unverified claims and promoting methodological rigor. Modern freethought organizations, such as the Center for Inquiry (CFI), actively counter through investigative efforts and public education, fostering environments where drives discourse on topics like denial and assertions. CFI's initiatives, including collaborations with experts to debunk , have enhanced skills, turning public into a tool for advancing verifiable knowledge over anecdotal or dogmatic alternatives. In policy realms, freethought advocates push for governance grounded in data rather than faith-based exemptions, influencing outcomes in , , and research funding. The American Humanist Association (AHA), through its legislative arm, defends scientific integrity by lobbying against policies that introduce religious criteria into secular domains, such as opposing faith-healing defenses in child welfare cases or creationist curricula in schools. For example, AHA-supported efforts contributed to legal challenges ensuring evolution education prevails over mandates, as seen in sustained advocacy post-2005 court rulings. Similarly, the Center for Freethought Equality, integrated with AHA in 2025, bolsters secular elected officials who prioritize evidence in lawmaking, with members three times more likely to fund political causes advancing nontheistic, rational policies. This influence extends to broader evidence-based policymaking, where secular skepticism correlates with endorsement of scientific approaches to societal challenges, including mandates and environmental regulations. Freethought groups like the highlight how religious carve-outs erode policy efficacy, as in exemptions allowing unproven treatments over interventions, thereby advocating for uniform standards based on clinical trials and statistical outcomes. Such efforts underscore a causal link: by challenging institutional biases toward , freethought enables policies that adapt to empirical realities, reducing reliance on untestable beliefs in domains from to fiscal planning.

Challenges in the Digital Age

In the digital age, freethinkers face heightened challenges from , where the sheer volume of online content—estimated at 2.5 quintillion bytes generated daily in 2023—overwhelms individuals' capacity for rigorous verification, often leading to reliance on heuristics rather than evidence-based . This deluge complicates the core freethought of independent reasoning, as empirical studies show that limited attention spans exacerbate susceptibility to unvetted claims, with users spending an average of 2.5 hours daily on without proportional . Platforms' algorithmic recommendations, designed to maximize engagement, prioritize sensational or confirmatory content, fostering echo chambers that reinforce biases and limit exposure to counterarguments essential for skeptical . Echo chambers, amplified by these algorithms, pose a direct to freethought by insulating users from dissenting , as modeled in network analyses where homogeneous clusters accelerate virality over factual discourse. A 2021 PNAS study found that online polarization correlates with reduced cross-ideological interaction, diminishing the rational freethinkers advocate, while a 2024 analysis deemed breaking such chambers via algorithmic tweaks "impossible" without unintended suppression of valid . This dynamic is compounded by the spread of , which mimics freethought's critical stance but lacks empirical grounding, eroding public trust in ; for instance, reports from 2013 onward have ranked digital among top global risks, yet responses often conflate genuine inquiry with falsehoods. Content moderation practices further hinder free inquiry, with platforms enacting censorship that disproportionately targets heterodox or skeptical views under the guise of combating harm. A 2023 study revealed prosocial motives among scientists endorsing such measures, but noted resultant loss of trust and cooperation from skeptics, as seen in pandemic-era removals of vaccine-skeptical accounts at rates 2.13 times higher than pro-vaccine ones on . from 2025 Pew surveys indicates growing public skepticism toward federal involvement in online speech restrictions, reflecting concerns that algorithmic and human moderation skews discourse away from open-ended rationalism toward enforced consensus. Freethinkers, particularly those challenging institutional narratives on topics like public health or ideology, encounter deplatforming and shadow-banning, which empirical platform data audits suggest stems from bias toward prevailing academic and media orthodoxies rather than neutral evidence assessment. Online harassment and mob dynamics add personal risks, deterring freethought expression; analyses of social media networks show that dissenting rational critiques often trigger coordinated attacks, amplifying among independent thinkers. While digital tools democratize access to primary sources, these structural barriers—rooted in profit-driven algorithms and uneven —causally undermine the empirical rigor and causal realism central to freethought, necessitating advanced to navigate.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.